hep-th0512340/qnm.tex
1: \documentclass[preprint,pre,eqsecnum,showpacs,amsmath,%
2: amssymb,nofootinbib,showkeys,byrevtex,aps]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
7: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
8: \begin{document}
9: \title{Quasi-normal modes of a dielectric sphere \\ and some their implications}
10: %estimation of the health hazards \\  due to the use of portable
11: %telephones}
12: \author{V.~V.~Nesterenko}
13: \affiliation{Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint
14: Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia}
15: \email{nestr@theor.jinr.ru}
16: \author{A.~Feoli}
17: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Universit\`{a} del
18: Sannio, Corso Garibaldi n.\ 107, Palazzo Bosco Lucarelli,  82100
19: Benevento,  Italy} \affiliation{INFN Sezione di Napoli, Gruppo
20: collegato di Salerno 80126 Napoli, Italy}
21: \email{feoli@unisannio.it}
22:  % ; fax: +39089965275}}
23: \author{G.~Lambiase}
24: %\affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica "E.R.Caianiello" --
25: %Universit\`a di Salerno,
26: %  84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy}
27: %\affiliation{INFN Sezione di Napoli, Gruppo collegato di Salerno
28: %80126 Napoli, Italy}
29: \email{lambiase@sa.infn.it}
30: \author{G.~Scarpetta}
31: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica "E.R.Caianiello" --
32: Universit\`a di Salerno,
33:   84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy
34: and \\ INFN Sezione di Napoli, Gruppo collegato di Salerno
35: 80126 Napoli, Italy}
36: \email{scarpetta@sa.infn.it}
37: 
38: \date{\today}
39: \begin{abstract}
40: It is shown that the quasi-normal modes arise, in a natural way,
41: when considering the oscillations in unbounded regions by imposing
42: the radiation condition at spatial infinity with a complex wave vector $k$.
43: Hence quasi-normal
44: modes are not  peculiarities of gravitation problems only (black
45: holes and relativistic stars).  It is proposed to consider the
46: space form of the quasi-normal modes with allowance for their time
47: dependence. As a result, the problem of their unbounded increase
48: when $r\to \infty$ is not encountered more. The properties of
49: quasi-normal modes of a compact dielectric sphere are discussed in
50: detail. It is argued that the spatial form of these modes
51: (especially so-called surface modes) should be taken into account,
52: for example, when estimating the potential health hazards due to
53: the use of portable telephones.
54: \end{abstract}
55: \pacs{41.20.Jb Electromagnetic wave propagation; radiowave propagation;\\
56:  \phantom{ pacs numberss }
57: 42.60.Da
58: Resonators, cavities, amplifiers, arrays, and rings}
59: 
60: 
61: \keywords{quasi-normal modes, dielectric sphere, portable telephones, estimation
62: of the health hazard}
63:  \maketitle
64:  \section{Introduction}
65: Quasi-normal modes (qnm) are widely used now in black hole physics
66: and in relativistic theory of stellar structure (see, for example,
67: Refs.\ \cite{Nollert,FN,KS}). The corresponding eigenfrequencies
68: are complex numbers, however it is not due to the dissipative
69: processes but it is a consequence of unbounded region occupied by
70: the oscillating system. The latter naturally leads to the energy
71: loss  due to the wave emission (for example, gravity waves).
72: 
73: In this paper we would like to show that the quasi-normal modes are
74: not the peculiarities of the gravitational problems only. Actually
75: they appear, in a natural way, when considering the oscillating
76: systems unbounded in space. The necessary condition for emergence of
77: such modes is imposing the radiation condition at spatial infinity on
78: the field functions. It is this condition that leads to the
79: characteristic  behaviour of the quasi-normal modes, namely, these solutions
80: to the relevant equations exponentially decay in time when $t\to
81: \infty$ and simultaneously they exponentially rise  at spatial infinity $r\to \infty$.
82: An interesting and physically
83: motivated example  is
84: provided here by the oscillations of electromagnetic field
85: connected with a compact dielectric sphere placed in unrestricted
86: homogeneous media with a different refraction index or in vacuum.
87: Taking here  the formal limit $\varepsilon \to \infty$ one passes
88: to a perfectly conducting sphere ($\varepsilon $ is the refraction
89: index of the sphere material). In this case the quasi-normal modes
90: describing the electromagnetic oscillations outside the sphere are
91: tractable  analytically. We propose to consider the spatial form
92: of a quasi-normal modes with allowance for their time dependence.
93: Doing in this way one can escape the  exponential rise of
94: quasi-normal modes at spatial infinity.
95: 
96: The eigenfrequencies of a dielectric sphere are complex $\omega
97: =\omega'-i\, \omega''$, where $\omega '$ is the free oscillation
98: (radian) frequency and $\omega ''$ is its relaxation time. These
99: modes  can be classified as the
100: interior  and exterior ones and, at the same time, as volume modes
101: and surface modes.
102: 
103: In physical applications the surface modes turn out to be
104: important, for example, when estimating the health hazards due to
105: the use of portable telephones. The point is the eigenfrequencies
106: of a dielectric sphere with physical characteristics close to those
107: of a human head  lay in the GSM 400 MHz frequency band which has
108: been used in a first generation of mobile phone systems and now is
109: considered for using again. In this situation one can assume that
110: the surface modes excited by a  cellular phone will lead to  higher
111: heat generation in the tissues close to a head surface as compared
112: with the predictions of routine calculations in this field.
113: 
114: The layout of the paper is as follows. In Sec.\ II we show that
115: the quasi-normal modes are the eigenfunctions of unbounded
116: oscillating regions.  As a simple example the quasi-normal modes
117: of a perfectly conducting sphere are considered. The Sec.\  III is
118: devoted to the consideration of the quasi-normal modes of a
119: dielectric sphere. The main features of these modes are revealed and
120: their classification is presented. The implication of these
121: quasi-normal modes  for estimation of the health hazards of
122: portable telephones is considered in Sec.\ IV. In Conclusion
123: (Sec.\ V) the main results are formulated and their relation to
124: the general theory of open systems is discussed.
125: 
126: \section{Quasi-normal modes as the eigenfunctions of unbounded oscillating regions}
127: 
128: Here we show in the general case in what way complex frequencies
129: and quasi-normal modes appear when considering harmonic
130: oscillations in unbounded regions. Let a closed smooth surface $S$
131: divides the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$ into a
132: compact internal region $D_{\text{ in}}$ and noncompact external
133: region $D_{\text{ex}}$. We consider here a simple scalar wave
134: equation
135: \begin{equation}
136: \label{2-1} \left ( \Delta -\frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial
137: ^2}{\partial t^2} \right )u(t, {\textbf x})=0\,{,}
138: \end{equation}
139: where $c$ is the velocity of oscillation propagation and $\Delta $
140: is the Laplace operator in $\mathbb{R}^d$. For harmonic
141: oscillations
142: \begin{equation} \label{2-2} u(t,{\textbf x})=e^{-i\omega
143: t}u({\textbf x}) \end{equation} the wave equation (\ref{2-1}) is
144: reduced to the Helmholtz equation
145: \begin{equation} \label{2-3}
146: (\Delta +k^2)\,
147:  u(\textbf{x}) =0, \quad
148: k={\omega}/{c}\,{.} \end{equation}
149: 
150:   The oscillations in the internal region $D_{\text{in}}$ are described by
151: an infinite countable set of normal modes
152: \begin{equation}
153:  \label{2-4}
154: u_n(t,\textbf{x})=e^{-i\omega _n t}u_n(\textbf{x}), \quad
155: n=1,2,\ldots .
156:  \end{equation}
157: The spatial form of the normal modes (the functions
158: $u_n(\textbf{x})$) is determined by the boundary conditions which
159: are imposed upon the function $u(\textbf{x})$ on the internal side
160: of the surface $S$. These conditions should fit the physical
161: content of the problem under study. The set of normal modes is a
162: complete one. Hence any solution of  (\ref{2-3}) obeying relevant
163: boundary conditions can be expanded in terms of the normal
164: modes~$u_n(\textbf{x})$.
165: 
166: When considering the oscillations in the external domain $D_{\rm
167: ex }$ one imposes, in addition to the conditions on the compact
168: surface $S$, a special requirement concerning the behavior of the
169: function $u(\textbf{x})$ at large $r\equiv |\textbf{x}|$. In the
170: classical mathematical physics~\cite{RR} the radiation conditions,
171: proposed by Sommerfeld~\cite{Sommerfeld,FM}, are used here
172: \begin{equation}
173: \label{2-5} \lim_{r\to \infty} r^{\frac{d-1}{2}}u(r)=
174: \textrm{const}\,{,}\qquad  \lim_{r\to\infty}r^{\frac{d-1}{2}}\left
175: ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} -i ku\right )= 0\,{.}
176: \end{equation}
177: For real values of the wave vector $k$ (for real frequencies
178: $\omega$) the solution to Eq.\ (\ref{2-3}), which obeys the radiation
179: conditions (\ref{2-5}) and reasonable boundary condition on a
180: compact surface $S$, identically vanishes. In this case the Laplace operator
181: entering the Helmholtz equation (\ref{2-3}) has no eigenfunctions with
182: real eigenvalues.
183: 
184:     The physical content of the radiation conditions is very clear.
185: They select only the oscillations with real frequencies driven by
186: external sources which are situated in a compact spatial area. From
187: the mathematical standpoint, these conditions ensure the {\it
188: uniqueness} of the solutions to {\it inhomogeneous} wave or
189: Helmholtz equations with external sources on the right-hand side,
190: when these solutions are considered in the external region $D_{\text{ex}}$ or in
191: the whole space $D_{\text{in}}+D_{\text{ex}}$  in the case of
192: compound media.
193: 
194: Here the question arises, how to change minimally the conditions in
195: the {\it homogeneous} problem at hand in order to get nonzero
196: solutions, i.e., eigenfunctions in unbounded regions. The energy
197: conservation law prompts a simple way to construct nonzero solutions
198: to the homogeneous wave equation (\ref{2-1})  or to the Helmholtz equation
199: (\ref{2-3}) describing the outgoing waves at spatial infinity, namely,
200: one has to introduce {\it complex} frequencies $\omega =
201: \omega'- i\,\omega '',\quad \omega ''>0$. We may hope that in this case
202: the factor $e^{-\omega ''t}$ will describe the decay of the initial
203: solutions in time accounting the fact that outgoing waves take away
204: the energy. In other words, we are dealing here with the radiation
205: of the energy with the amplitude decaying in time.
206: 
207:   Indeed, if we remove the requirement of reality of the wave vector $k$,
208: then  the homogeneous wave equation (2.1) and the Helmholtz equation
209: (2.3) will have nonzero solutions with {\it complex frequencies},
210: these solutions obeying  the radiation conditions (\ref{2-5}) and a common
211: boundary condition on a compact surface $S$ (for instance, Dirichlet
212: or Neumann conditions). In quantum mechanics the radiation condition
213: with a complex wave number $k$ is known as the Gamov condition which
214: singles out the resonance states in the spectrum of the Hamiltonian~\cite{Gamov,G1,G2}.
215: 
216:     When introducing the radiation conditions and proving the
217: respective uniqueness theorem in the text books \cite{RR} only the real
218: wave vector $k$ is considered. The possibility of existence of
219: quasi-normal modes with complex frequencies satisfying the radiation
220: conditions at spatial infinity with a complex $k$ is not mentioned
221: usually. We are aware only of alone textbook where the
222: eigenfunctions with complex frequencies are noted in this context.
223: It is the article written by Sommerfeld in the book~\cite{FM}, where it is
224: emphasized that the uniqueness in this problem is only up to the
225: eigenfunctions with complex frequencies, i.e., up to the quasi-normal
226: modes.
227: 
228:     Thus imposing the radiation conditions  with real $k$ we remove the
229: quasi-normal modes from our consideration only. However this cannot
230: prevent the excitation of these modes in the real physical problem.
231: Hence, when dealing with systems unbounded in space (open systems)
232: one has always to investigate the consequences of qnm excitation. An
233: example of such a problem will be considered in Sec.~III.
234: 
235: As a very simple and physically motivated example of quasi-normal modes we
236: consider here the oscillations of electromagnetic field outside a
237: perfectly conducting sphere of radius $a$. In this case the
238: electric and magnetic fields are expressed in terms of two scalar
239: functions $f_{kl}^{\rm{TE}}(r)$ and $f_{kl}^{\rm{TM}}(r)$ (Debye
240: potentials \cite{Stratton}) which are the radial parts of the
241: solutions to the scalar wave equation (\ref{2-1}). Outside the
242: perfectly conducting sphere placed in vacuum the solution to the
243: Helmholtz equation (\ref{2-3}) obeying the radiation conditions
244: (\ref{2-5}) has the form $(d=3)$
245: \begin{equation}
246: \label{2-6} f_{kl}(r)=C\, h^{(1)}_l\left ( \frac{\omega}{c}\,r
247: \right ){,}\quad r>a\,{,}
248: \end{equation}
249: where $ h^{(1)}_l(z)$ is the spherical Hankel function of the
250: first kind \cite{AS}. At the surface of perfectly conducting
251: sphere the tangential component of the electric field should
252: vanish. This leads to the following frequency equation for
253: TE-modes
254: \begin{equation}
255: \label{2-7} h^{(1)}_l\left ( \frac{\omega}{c}\,a \right
256: )=0{,}\quad l\geq 1
257: \end{equation}
258: and for TM-modes
259: \begin{equation}
260: \label{2-8} \frac{d}{d r}\left ( r \,h^{(1)}_l\left (
261: \frac{\omega}{c}\,r \right ) \right )=0, \quad r=a,\quad l\geq
262: 1\,{.}
263: \end{equation}
264: The spherical Hankel function $h^{(1)}_l(z)$ is $e ^{i z}$
265: multiplied by the polynomial in $1/z$  of a finite order
266: \cite{AS}. Hence frequency equations (\ref{2-7}) and (\ref{2-8})
267: have a finite number of roots which are in the general case
268: complex numbers. For $l=1$ (the lowest oscillations) Eqs.\
269: (\ref{2-7}) and (\ref{2-8}) assume  the form $(z=a\,\omega/c)$
270: \begin{eqnarray}
271: h^{(1)}_l(z)&=&-\frac{1}{z}\,e^{i z}\left ( 1+\frac{i}{z} \right
272: )=0\quad (\text{TE modes}),
273:  \label{2-8a} \\
274: \frac{d }{d z}\left (z\, h^{(1)}_l(z)\right
275: )&=&-\frac{i}{z^2}\,e^{i z}\left ( z^2+i z-1 \right )=0\quad
276: (\text{TM modes})\,{.}
277:  \label{2-9}
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: Thus the lowest eigenfrequencies are
280: \begin{eqnarray}
281: \frac{\omega}{c}&=&-\frac{i}{a}\quad (\mbox{TE modes})\,{,}
282: \label{2-10}
283: \\
284: \frac{\omega}{c}&=&-\frac{1}{2a}(i\pm\sqrt 3)\quad (\text{TM
285: modes})\,{.} \label{2-11}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: 
288: The complex eigenfrequencies lead to a specific time and spatial
289: dependence of the  respective natural modes and ultimately of the
290: electromagnetic fields. So, with allowance of (\ref{2-10}), we
291: obtain
292: \begin{equation}
293: \label{2-12} e^{-i \omega t}f_{k1}^{\text{TE}}(r)=-i
294: \,C\,\frac{a}{r}\,e^{(r-ct)/a}\left ( 1-\frac{a}{r} \right ),
295: \quad r\geq a\,{.}
296: \end{equation}
297: Thus, the eigenfunctions are exponentially going down in time and
298: exponentially going up when $r$ increases. Such a time and spatial
299: behaviour is a direct consequence of radiation conditions (\ref{2-5}) and it is
300: typical for eigenfunctions describing oscillations in
301: external unbounded regions, the physical content and details of
302: oscillation process  being irrelevant. The eigenfunctions
303: corresponding to complex eigenvalues are called {\it quasi-normal
304: modes} keeping in mind their unusual properties~\cite{Nollert}.
305: The physical origin of such features is obvious, in fact  we are
306: dealing here with {\it open systems} in which the energy  can be
307: radiated to infinity. Therefore in open systems field cannot
308: acquire a stationary state.
309: 
310:  Quasi-normal modes do not obey the standard completeness condition
311: and the notion of norm cannot be defined for them~\cite{Nollert}.
312: Therefore these eigenfunctions cannot be used for expansion of the
313: classical field with the aim to quantize it and to introduce the
314: relevant Fock operators. The treatment of these problems can be found,
315: for example, in~\cite{Ching,Leung,Chang}.
316: 
317: It is worthy to investigate the spatial form of the of quasi-normal
318: modes with allowance for their time dependence. Indeed, these
319: solutions have the character of propagating waves that are
320: eventually going to spatial infinity. Let us take the point which
321: is sufficiently far from  the region with nontrivial dynamics in
322: the system under study. Obviously, it has sense to say about the
323: value of the quasi-normal mode at a given point only after arrival
324: at this point of the wave described by this  mode. The maximal
325: value of the quasi-normal mode  is observed just at the moment of
326: its arrival at this point. At the later moments the quasi-normal
327: mode is dumping due to its characteristic time dependence. Indeed,
328: taking into account all this we obtain for the maximal observed
329: value of the quasi-normal mode (\ref{2-12}) the following
330: physically acceptable expression
331: \begin{equation}
332: \label{2-13}\left ( e^{-i \omega t}f_{k1}^{\text{TE}}(r)\right
333: )_{\text{max-obs}}=-i \,C\,\frac{a}{r}\left ( 1-\frac{a}{r} \right
334: ), \quad r\geq a\,{.}
335: \end{equation}
336: Thus, in our consideration the problem of unbounded
337: (exponential) rising of quasi-normal modes, when $r\to \infty$, does
338: not arise.
339: 
340: In order to associate with resonance phenomenon a single square
341: integrable eigenfunction, rather sophisticated methods are used, for
342: example, complex scaling~\cite{scaling} (known also as the
343: complex-coordinate method or as the complex-rotational method).
344: 
345: 
346:  The necessary condition for
347: appearing the quasi-normal modes is imposing the radiation
348: conditions at spatial infinity on the field functions. When other
349: conditions are used at spatial infinity, the quasi-normal modes do
350: not arise. For example, if we demand that the solution to the wave
351: equation (\ref{2-1}) becomes the sum of incoming and outgoing
352: waves when $r\to \infty$ then the spectrum of the variable $k^2$
353: in the Helmholtz equation (\ref{2-3}) will be positive and
354: continuous.
355: 
356: \section{Quasi-normal modes  of a dielectric sphere}
357: 
358:  The same situation, with regard to quasi-normal modes, takes
359: place when we consider the oscillations of compound unbounded
360: media. In this case in both the regions $D_{\text{in}}$ and
361: $D_{\text{ex}}$ the wave equations are defined
362: \begin{eqnarray}
363: \left ( \Delta -\frac{1}{c_{\text{in}}^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial
364: t^2} \right ) u_{\text{in}}(t,\mathbf{x}) &=& 0, \quad
365: \mathbf{x}\in D_{\text{in}}\,{,} \label{2-14}\\ \left ( \Delta
366: -\frac{1}{c_{\text{ex}}^2}\frac{\partial }{\partial t^2} \right )
367: u_{\text{ex} }(t,\mathbf{x}) &=& 0, \quad \mathbf{x}\in D_{\text{
368: ex}} \label{2-15}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370: with the matching conditions at the interface $S$, for example, of
371: the following kind
372: \begin{eqnarray}  u_{\text{ in}}(t,\mathbf{x})&=&u_{\text{ex}}(t,
373: \mathbf{x}){,} \label{2-16}
374: \\
375: \lambda_{\text{ in}}\frac{\partial u_{\text{in
376: }}(t,\mathbf{x})}{\partial n_{\text{in
377: }}(\mathbf{x})}&=&\lambda_{\text{ ex}}\frac{\partial u_{\rm
378: ex}(t,\mathbf{x})}{\partial n_{\text{ ex }}(\mathbf{x})}, \quad
379: \mathbf{x}\in S\,{,} \label{2-17}
380: \end{eqnarray}
381: where $n_{\text{in}}(\textbf{x})$ and $n_{\text{ ex}}(\textbf{x})$
382: are the normals to the surface $S$ at the point $\textbf{x}$ for
383: the regions $D_{\text{in}}$ and $D_{\text{ex}}$, respectively. The
384: parameters $c_{\text{in}}$, $c_{\text{ex}}$, $\lambda
385: _{\text{in}}$, and $\lambda _{\text{ex}}$ specify the material
386: characteristics of the media. At the spatial infinity the solution
387: $u_{\text{ex}}(t, \mathbf{x})$ should satisfy the radiation
388: conditions (\ref{2-5}). For real $k$ we again have only zero
389: solution in this problem, both functions $u_{\text{in}}(t,
390: \mathbf{x})$ and $u_{\text{ex}}(t, \mathbf{x})$ vanishing.
391: However, the wave equations (\ref{2-14}) and (\ref{2-15}) have
392: nonzero solutions with complex frequencies, i.e.\ quasi-normal
393: modes, which satisfy the matching conditions (\ref{2-16}) and
394: (\ref{2-17}) at the interface $S$ and radiation conditions
395: (\ref{2-5}) at  spatial infinity. It is important, that the
396: frequencies  of oscillations in internal ($D_{\text{in}}$) and
397: external ($D_{\text{ex}}$) regions are the same. A typical example
398: here is the complex eigenfrequencies of a dielectric sphere. This
399: problem has been investigated by Debye in his PhD thesis concerned
400: with the light pressure on a material particles~\cite{Debye}.
401: 
402: Let us consider a sphere of radius $a$, consisting of a
403: material which is characterized by permittivity $\varepsilon_1 $
404: and permeability $\mu_1$. The sphere is assumed to be placed in an
405: infinite medium with permittivity $\varepsilon_2 $ and
406: permeability $\mu_2$. In the case of spherical symmetry the
407: solutions to Maxwell equations are expressed in terms of two
408: scalar Debye potentials $\psi$ (see, for example, textbooks
409: \cite{Stratton,Jackson}):
410: \begin{eqnarray}
411: \mathbf{E}^{\text{TM}}_{lm}&=&\bm{\nabla} \times
412: \bm{\nabla}\times(\mathbf{r}\psi^{\text{TM}}_{lm}),\quad
413: \mathbf{H}^{\text{TM}}_{lm}=-i\,\omega \,\bm{\nabla} \times
414: (\mathbf{r}\psi^{\text{TM}}_{lm})\quad (\text{E-modes}), \nonumber
415: \\ \mathbf{E}^{\text{TE}}_{lm}&=&i\,\omega \,\bm{\nabla} \times
416: (\mathbf{r}\psi^{\text{TE}}_{lm}),\quad
417: \mathbf{H}^{\text{TE}}_{lm}=\bm{\nabla} \times
418: \bm{\nabla}\times(\mathbf{r}\psi^{\text{TE}}_{lm})\quad
419: (\text{H-modes})\,{.} \label{3-1}
420: \end{eqnarray}
421: These potentials obey the Helmholtz equation and have the
422: indicated angular dependence
423: \begin{equation}
424: \label{3-2} \left ( \mathbf{\nabla}^2+k^2_i\right
425: )\psi_{lm}=0,\quad
426: k_i^2=\varepsilon_i\,\mu_i\,\frac{\omega^2}{c^2}, \quad i=1,2\quad
427: (r\neq a); \quad \psi_{lm}(\mathbf{r})=f_l(r)Y_{lm}(\Omega)\,{.}
428: \end{equation}
429: 
430: Equations  (\ref{3-2}) should be supplemented by the boundary conditions at
431: the origin, at the sphere surface, and at infinity. In order for the
432: fields to be finite at $r=0$ the Debye potentials should be regular
433: here. At the spatial infinity we impose the radiation conditions with
434: the goal to find the spectrum of eigenfunctions with complex frequencies
435: (quasi-normal modes in the problem at hand). At the sphere surface
436: the standard matching conditions for electric and magnetic fields
437: should be satisfied~\cite{Stratton}.
438: 
439: In view of all this the Helmholtz equation (\ref{3-2}) becomes now
440: the spectral problem for the Laplace operator
441: multiplied by the discontinuous factor $-1/(\varepsilon
442: (r)\,\mu(r))$
443: \begin{equation}
444: \label{3-2a}-\, \frac{1}{\varepsilon (r)\,\mu(r)}\Delta
445: \,\psi_{\omega l m}(r)=\frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\,\psi_{\omega l m}(r),
446: \quad r\neq a\,{,}
447: \end{equation}
448: where
449: \[
450: \varepsilon (r)\,\mu(r)=
451: \begin{cases}
452: \varepsilon_1\,\mu_1\,{,}&r<a \,{,}\\
453: \varepsilon_2\,\mu_2\,{,}&r>a \,{.}
454: \end{cases}
455: \]
456: In this problem the spectral parameter is $\omega^2/c^2$.
457: 
458: In order to obey the boundary conditions at the origin and at
459: spatial infinity formulated above, the solution to the spectral
460: problem (\ref{3-2a}) should have the form
461: \begin{equation}
462: \label{3-2b} f_{\omega l}(r)=C_1\,j_l(k_1r)\,{,} \quad r<a,\quad
463: f_{\omega l}(r)=C_2\,h^{(1)}_l(k_2r)\,{,} \quad r>a\,{,}
464: \end{equation}
465: where $j_l(z)$ is the spherical Bessel function and $h_l^{(1)}(z)$
466: is the spherical Hankel function of the first kind \cite{AS}, the
467: latter obeys the radiation conditions (\ref{2-5}).
468: 
469: Now we address the matching conditions at the sphere surface.
470: By making use of Eqs.\ (\ref{3-1}) we can write, in an explicit
471: form, the radial (r) and tangential (t) components of electric and
472: magnetic fields in the case of spherical symmetry. For TE-modes
473: these equations read
474: \begin{eqnarray}
475: E^{\text{TE}}_{klm,\text{r}}&=&0\,{,} \label{a-20}\\
476: E^{\text{TE}}_{klm,\text{t}}&=&a_{lm}(k)\,f_{kl}^{\text{TE}}(r)\,\mathbf{X}_{lm}\,{,}
477: \label{a-21}\\ H^{\text{TE}}_{klm,\text{r}}&=&\frac{1}{kr}\left (
478: \frac{\varepsilon}{\mu} \right
479: )^{1/2}\sqrt{l(l+1)}\,a_{lm}(k)f_{kl}^{\text{TE}}(r)\,Y_{lm} \,{,}
480: \label{a-22}\\ H^{\text{TE}}_{klm,\text{t}}&=&\frac{i}{kr}\left (
481: \frac{\varepsilon}{\mu} \right
482: )^{1/2}a_{lm}(k)\,\frac{d}{dr}\left( rf_{kl}^{\text{TE}}(r)
483: \right)\,\mathbf{X}_{lm}^\perp\,{,} \label{a-23}
484: \end{eqnarray} and the same for the TM-modes
485: \begin{eqnarray}
486: E^{\text{TM}}_{klm,\text{r}}&=&-\frac{1}{kr}\left (
487: \frac{\mu}{\varepsilon} \right
488: )^{1/2}\sqrt{l(l+1)}\,b_{lm}(k)f_{kl}^{\text{TM}}(r)\,Y_{lm} \,{,}
489: \\ E^{\text{TM}}_{klm,\text{t}}&=&-\frac{i}{kr}\left (
490: \frac{\mu}{\varepsilon} \right
491: )^{1/2}b_{lm}(k)\,\frac{d}{dr}\left( rf_{kl}^{\text{TM}}(r)
492: \right)\,\mathbf{X}_{lm}^\perp\,{,} \label{a-25}\\
493: H^{\text{TM}}_{klm,\text{r}}&=&0\,{,} \label{a-26}\\
494: H^{\text{TM}}_{klm,\text{t}}&=&b_{lm}(k)\,f_{kl}^{\text{TM}}(r)\,\mathbf{X}_{lm}\,{.}
495: \label{a-27}
496: \end{eqnarray}
497: Here $\mathbf{X}_{lm}$ are the vector spherical
498: harmonics~\cite{Jackson}
499: \begin{equation}
500: \label{vsh}
501: \mathbf{X}_{lm}(\theta,\phi)=\frac{\mathbf{L}\,Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)}{\sqrt{l(l+1)}}\,{,}\quad
502: l\geq1\,{,}
503: \end{equation}
504: where $\mathbf{L}$ is the angular momentum operator
505: \[
506: \mathbf{L}=-i\,(\mathbf{r}\times \bm{\nabla})\,{.}
507: \]
508: The vector spherical harmonic  $\mathbf{X}_{lm}^{\perp}$ is
509: obtained from $\mathbf{X}_{lm}$ after rotation  by the angle
510: $\pi/2$ around the normal $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{r}/r$. From Eqs.\
511: (\ref{a-20}) -- (\ref{a-27}) it follows, in particular, that the
512: tangential components of electric field in TE- and TM-modes are
513: orthogonal each other and the same holds for the magnetic field.
514: It implies that the matching conditions on the sphere surface do not
515: couple TE- and TM-modes.
516: 
517: At the sphere surface the tangential components of electric and
518: magnetic fields are continuous (see Eqs.\ (\ref{a-20}) -- (\ref{a-27})).
519: As a result, the eigenfrequencies
520: of electromagnetic field for this configuration are determined
521: \cite{Stratton} by the frequency equation for the TE-modes
522: \begin{equation}
523: \label{3-3} \Delta^{\text{TE}}_l(a\omega)\equiv
524: \sqrt{\varepsilon_1\mu_2}\,\hat j_l'(k_1a)\,\hat h_l(k_2a)-
525: \sqrt{\varepsilon_2\mu_1}\,\hat j_l(k_1a)\,{\hat h_l}'(k_2a)=0\,{}
526: \end{equation}
527: and by the analogous equation for the TM-modes
528: \begin{equation}
529: \label{3-4} \Delta^{\text{TE}}_l(a\omega)\equiv
530: \sqrt{\varepsilon_2\mu_1}\,\hat j_l'(k_1a)\,\hat h_l(k_2a)-
531: \sqrt{\varepsilon_1\mu_2}\,\hat j_l(k_1a)\,{\hat
532: h_l}'(k_2a)=0\,{,}
533: \end{equation}
534: where $k_i=\sqrt{\varepsilon_i\mu_i}\,\omega/c,\quad i=1,2$ are
535: the wave numbers inside and outside the sphere, respectively, and
536: $\hat j_l(z)$ and $\hat h_l(z)$ are the Riccati-Bessel
537: functions~\cite{AS}
538: \begin{equation}
539: \label{3-5} \hat j_l(z)=z\,j_l(z)=\sqrt{\frac{\pi
540: z}{2}}\,J_{l+1/2}(z)\,{,}\quad \hat
541: h_l(z)=z\,h_l^{(1)}(z)=\sqrt{\frac{\pi
542: z}{2}}\,H^{(1)}_{l+1/2}(z)\,{.}
543: \end{equation}
544: In Eqs.\ (\ref{3-3}) and (\ref{3-4}) the orbital momentum $l$
545: assumes the values $1,2,\ldots $, and prime stands for the
546: differentiation with respect of the arguments $k_1a$ and $k_2a$ of
547: the Riccati-Bessel functions.
548: 
549: The frequency equations for a dielectric sphere of permittivity
550: $\varepsilon $ placed in vacuum follow from Eqs.\ (\ref{3-3}) and
551: (\ref{3-4}) after putting there
552: \begin{equation}
553: \label{3-12} \varepsilon_1=\varepsilon, \quad
554: \varepsilon_2=\mu_1=\mu_2=1\,{.}
555: \end{equation}
556: The roots of these equations have been studied in the Debye paper
557: \cite{Debye} by making use of an approximate  method. As the
558: starting solution the eigenfrequencies of a perfectly conducting
559: sphere were used. These frequencies are different for
560: electromagnetic oscillations inside and outside  sphere. Namely,
561: inside  sphere they are given by the roots of the following
562: equations $(l\geq 1)$
563: \begin{eqnarray}
564: j_l\left ( \frac{\omega}{c}\,a \right)&=&0 \quad
565: (\text{TE-modes})\,{,} \label{3-13}\\ \frac{d}{dr}
566: \left(r\,j_l\left ( \frac{\omega}{c}\,a \right)\right)&=&0\,{,}
567: \quad r=a \quad (\text{TM-modes})\,{,} \label{3-14}
568: \end{eqnarray}
569: while outside sphere they are determined by Eqs.\ (\ref{2-7}) and
570: (\ref{2-8}). The frequency equations for perfectly conducting
571: sphere (\ref{2-7}), (\ref{2-8}) and  (\ref{3-13}), (\ref{3-14})
572: can be formally derived  by substituting (\ref{3-12}) into
573: frequency equations (\ref{3-3}) and (\ref{3-4}) and taking there
574: the limit $\varepsilon \to \infty$.
575: 
576:  Approximate calculation of the eigenfrequencies of a dielectric
577: sphere without using computer \cite{Debye} didn't allow one to reveal
578: the characteristic features of the respective eigenfunctions
579: (quasi-normal modes). The computer analysis of this spectral problem
580: was accomplished in the work~\cite{Gastine} where the experimental
581: verification of the calculated frequencies was accomplished also by
582: making use of radio engineering measurements.
583: 
584: These studies enable one to separate all the dielectric sphere modes into the
585: {\it interior}  and {\it exterior} modes and, at the same time, into
586: the {\it volume} and {\it surface} modes. It is worth noting that all
587: the eigenfrequencies are complex
588: \begin{equation}
589: \label{3-15} \omega=\omega '-i\,\omega''\,{.}
590: \end{equation}
591: Thus we are dealing with "leaky modes".
592: 
593: The classification of the modes as the interior and exterior  ones
594: relies on the investigation of the behaviour of a given
595: eigenfrequency in the limit $\varepsilon \to \infty$. The modes are
596: called ''interior'' when the product $k\,a= \sqrt
597: {\varepsilon}\,\omega \,a/c$ remains finite in the limit
598: $\varepsilon \to \infty$, provided the imaginary part of the
599: frequency ($\omega ''$) tends to zero. The modes are referred to
600: as ''exterior'' when the product $k\,a/\sqrt{\varepsilon}=
601: \omega\,a/c$ remains finite with growing $\omega''$. In the first
602: case the frequency equations for a dielectric sphere (\ref{3-3}) and
603: (\ref{3-4}) tend to Eqs.\ (\ref{3-13}) and (\ref{3-14}) and in the
604: second case they tend to Eqs.\ (\ref{2-7}) and  (\ref{2-8}). The
605: order of the root obtained will be denoted by the index $r$ for
606: interior modes and by $r'$ for exterior modes. Thus
607: $\text{TE}_{\,lr}$ and $\text{TM}_{\,lr}$  denote the interior TE-
608: and TM-modes, respectively,  while $\text{TE}_{\,lr'}$ and
609: $\text{TM}_{\,lr'}$ stand for the exterior TE- and TM-modes.
610: 
611: For fixed $l$ the number of the modes of exterior type is limited
612: because the frequency equations for exterior oscillations of a
613: perfectly conducting sphere (\ref{2-7}) and  (\ref{2-8}) have
614: finite number of solutions (see the preceding Section). In view of
615: this, the number of exterior TE- and TM-modes is given by the
616: following rule. For even $l$ there are $l/2$ exterior TE-modes and
617: $l/2$  exterior TM-modes, for odd $l$ the number of the modes
618: $\text{TE}_{\,l\,r'}$ is $(l+1)/2$ and the number of the modes
619: $\text{TM}_{\,l\,r'}$ equals $(l-1)/2$.
620: 
621: An important parameter is the $Q$ factor
622: \begin{equation}
623: \label{3-16} Q_{\text{rad}}=\frac{\omega'}{2\omega''}=
624: 2\,\pi\,\frac{\text{stored energy}}{\text{radiated energy per
625: cycle}}\,{.}
626: \end{equation}
627: For exterior modes the value of $Q_{\text{rad}}$ is always less than 1, hence
628: these modes can never be observed as sharp resonances. At the same time for
629: $\varepsilon $ greater than 5, the $Q_{\text{rad}}$ for interior modes is
630: greater than 10 and it can reach very high values when
631: $\varepsilon \to \infty$.
632: 
633: For physical implications  more important is the classification in
634: terms of {\it volume} or {\it surface} modes according to whether
635: $r> l$ or $l> r$.  For volume modes the electromagnetic energy
636: is distributed in the whole volume of the sphere while in the case
637: of surface modes the energy is concentrated in the proximity of
638: the sphere surface. The exterior modes are the first roots of the
639: characteristic equations and it can be shown that they are always
640: surface modes.
641: \noindent
642: \begin{figure}[th]
643: \noindent \centerline{
644: \includegraphics[width=75mm]{pic1.eps}
645: \hspace{10mm}
646: \includegraphics[width=75mm]{pic2.eps}}
647: \caption{Electric energy density $r^2\,E_{\text{t}}^2$ for the
648: surface (A) and volume (B) TE-modes of a dielectric sphere with
649: $\varepsilon =40$ placed in vacuum.} \label{Plot:s-v-modes}
650: \end{figure}
651: 
652: Figure 1 shows a typical spatial behaviour of the surface and
653: volume modes of a dielectric sphere.
654: 
655: Thus a substantial part of the sphere modes (about one half) belong to the interior
656: surface modes. It is
657: important that respective frequencies are the {\it first} roots of
658: the characteristic equations.
659: 
660: In order to escape the confusion, it is worth noting here that the
661: surface modes in the problem in question obey the same boundary
662: conditions at the sphere surface  and when $r\to \infty$ as the
663: volume modes do. Hence,  these surface modes cannot be classified as the
664: evanescent surface waves propagating along the interface  between
665: two media (propagating waves along dielectric waveguides~\cite{Jackson}, surface
666: plasmon waves on the interface between metal bulk and adjacent
667: vacuum~\cite{Raether,BPN} and so on).  When describing the evanescent waves one imposes
668: the requirement of their exponential decaying away from interface
669: between two media. In this respect the evanescent surface wave
670: differ from the modes in the bulk.
671: 
672: 
673: \section{Implication of QNM of a dielectric sphere
674: for estimation of the health hazard of portable telephones}
675: 
676: Here we shall argue that the features of the quasi-normal modes of a
677: dielectric sphere (namely, existence of surface and volume modes)
678: should be taken into account, in
679: particular, when estimating the potential  health hazards due to
680: the use of the cellular phones. The safety guidelines in this
681: field~\cite{Health} are based on the findings from animal
682: experiments that the biological hazards due to radio waves result
683: mainly from the temperature rise in tissues\footnote{In principle,
684: non-ionizing radiation can lead also to other effects in
685: biological tissues~\cite{Sernelius}.} and a whole-body-averaged
686: specific absorption rate (SAR) below 0.4~W/kg is not hazardous to
687: human health. This corresponds to a limits on the output from the
688: cellular phones (0.6~W at 900~MHz frequency band and 0.27~W at
689: 1.5~GHz frequency band). Obviously, the {\it local} absorption
690: rate should be also considered especially in a human
691: head~\cite{WF}.
692: 
693: In such studies the following point should be
694: taken into account. The parts of human body (for example, head)
695: posse the  eigenfrequencies of electromagnetic oscillations like
696: any compact body. In particular, one can anticipate that the
697: eigenfrequencies of human head are close to those of a dielectric
698: sphere with radius $a\approx 8$~cm and permittivity $\varepsilon
699: \approx 40$ (for human brain $\varepsilon =44.1$ for  900~MHz and
700: $\varepsilon =42.8$ for  1.5~GHz \cite{WF}).
701: Certainly, our model is very rough, however for the evaluation of the order of
702: the effect anticipated (see below)
703: it is sufficient.
704: By making use of the
705: results of calculations conducted in the work \cite{Gastine} one
706: can easily obtain the eigenfrequencies of a dialectic sphere with
707: the parameters  mentioned above. For $\text{TE}_{l1}$ modes with
708: $l=1,2,3$ we have, respectively, the following frequencies:
709: 280~MHz, 420~MHz, and 545~MHz. For $\text{TM}_{l1}$ modes
710: with $l=1,2,3$ the resonance frequencies are 425~MHz, 540~MHz, and
711: 665~MHz. The imaginary parts of these eigenfrequencies are very
712: small so the $Q$ factor in Eq.\ (\ref{3-16}) responsible for radiation
713: is greater than 100.
714: 
715: These eigenfrequencies belong to a new GSM 400 MHz frequency band
716: which is now being standardized by the European Telecommunications
717: Standards Institute.  This band was primarily used in Nordic
718: countries, Eastern Europe, and Russia in a first generation of
719: mobile phone system prior to the introduction of GSM.
720: 
721:     Due to the Ohmic losses the resonances of a dielectric sphere
722:  in question are in fact broad, overlapping and,
723: as the result, they cannot be manifested separately.
724: Indeed, the electric conductance $\sigma$ of the human brain is rather substantial.
725: According to the data  presented in Ref.~\cite{WF} $\sigma\simeq 1.0$~S/m.
726: The eigenfrequencies  of a dielectric dissipative sphere with allowance for
727: a finite conductance $\sigma $ can be found in the following way. As known \cite{LL}
728: the effects of $\sigma $ on electromagnetic processes in a media possessing
729: a common real dielectric constant $\varepsilon$ are described by a complex
730: dielectric constant $\varepsilon_{\text{diss}}$ depending on frequency
731: \begin{equation}
732: \label{4-1}
733: \varepsilon_{\text{diss}} =\varepsilon +i\frac{4\pi \sigma}{\omega}\,{.}
734: \end{equation}
735: The eigenfrequencies $\omega$,  calculated for a real $\varepsilon $,
736: are related to eigenfrequencies $\omega_{\text{diss}}$ for $\varepsilon_{\text{diss}}$
737: by the formula~\cite{LL}
738: \begin{equation}
739: \label{4-2}
740: \omega_{\text{diss}} =\frac{\omega}{\sqrt{\varepsilon_{\text{diss}} }}\simeq \omega
741: -2\pi\, i \,\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon}\,{.}
742: \end{equation}
743: The corresponding factor $Q_{\text{diss}}$ is
744: \begin{equation} \label{4-3} Q_{\text{diss}}=\frac{\omega'_{\text{diss}}}{2
745: \omega''_{\text{diss}}}\simeq
746: \frac{\varepsilon \, \omega}{4\pi\, \sigma}\,{.}
747: \end{equation}
748: Substituting in this equation the values
749: $\omega /2\pi =0.5\cdot 10^9\;\text{Hz}, \quad \varepsilon =40,
750: \quad \sigma = 1\,\text{S/m}=9\cdot 10^9\; \text{s}^{-1}$ one finds
751: \begin{equation}
752: \label{4-4}
753: Q_{\text{diss}}\simeq\frac{20}{18}\simeq 1\,{.}
754: \end{equation}
755: 
756: Thus the real
757: spectrum of electromagnetic oscillations in the problem under study
758: is practically a continuous band around the frequency 400 MHz. The
759: radiation of the cellular telephone with frequency laying in this
760: band, will excite (practically with the same amplitudes) all the
761: neighbouring modes of a dissipative dielectric sphere. In order to
762: get the upper bound for the anticipated effect (see below) we assume
763: that the number of excited modes is sufficiently large so that
764: the half of these modes are surface modes.\footnote{As it was
765: shown in preceding Section this relation between the number of the
766: surface and volume modes holds only for the spectra as a whole.}
767: Thus one can expect that the resulting spatial configuration of
768: electric and magnetic fields inside a dielectric sphere with Ohm
769: losses will follow, to some extent, the spatial behaviour of the
770: relevant natural modes of the sphere, volume and surface ones. It is
771: obvious that due to excitation of surface modes the maximum values
772: of electric and magnetic fields inside dissipative sphere will be
773: shifted to its outer part $r> a/2$.
774: 
775: When assuming the total number of the surface modes to be the same
776: as those for the  volume modes and consequently it is equal to a half
777: of all the dielectric sphere modes, then one can anticipate that the
778: temperature rise in the head tissues close to head surface may be by
779: a factor 1.5 higher  in comparison with the standard calculations
780: using the  numerical methods without  special allowance for the spatial
781: behaviour  of the relevant natural modes.
782: 
783: However the numerical methods used for estimation of the
784: temperature rise in human tissues due to the radio frequency
785: irradiation  do not take into account this effect. Indeed, such
786: calculations (see, for example,  paper~\cite{WF}) are carried out
787: in two steps. First the electric and magnetic fields inside the
788: human body are calculated by solving the Maxwell equations with a
789: given source (antenna of a portable telephone). The electric field
790: gives rise to conduction currents with the energy dissipation
791: rate $\sigma \,E^2/2$, where $\sigma $ is a conduction constant.
792: In turn it leads to the temperature rising. The second step is the
793: solution of the respective heat conduction equation (or more
794: precisely, bioheat equation~\cite{WF}) with found local heat
795: sources $\sigma \,E^2/2$ and with allowance for all the possible
796: heat currents. Hence, for this method the  distribution of
797: electric field inside the head is of primary importance.
798: The spatial behaviour of the
799: eigenfunctions characterize the system as a whole, and  these
800: properties cannot be taken into account by local methods for
801: calculating the solution to partial differential equations (in
802: our case, to the Maxwell equations).
803: 
804: \section{Conclusion}
805: We have shown that such different, at first glance, notions as
806: quasi-normal modes in black hole physics, Gamov states in quantum
807: mechanics, and quasi-bound states in the theory of open
808: electromagnetic resonators~\cite{Vaynstayn} have the same origin, namely, all these
809: are the eigenmodes of oscillating unbounded domains. By making use of
810: a simple but physically motivated example of electromagnetic
811: oscillations outside a perfectly conducting sphere, which admits
812: analytical treatment, we have easily shown the main features  of such
813: oscillations, namely, their exponential decaying in time and,
814: simultaneously, their exponential grows at spatial infinity. These
815: properties are a direct consequence of the radiation condition which
816: is met by qnm at spatial infinity. It is shown also that the
817: exponential rising of qnm at infinity is not observable because the
818: time dependence of qnm should be taken into account here. In the
819: considered example the qnm are the outgoing spherical waves for
820: $r>a$. This point is disregarded in all the attempts to treat qnm
821: mathematically, in particular, to formulate the completeness
822: condition and the relevant expansions in terms of qnm. We have
823: considered the qnm modes in the problem without inhomogeneous
824: potential (instead of the potential the boundary conditions at the
825: surface of the sphere are introduced). It enables us to infer
826: the conclusion stated above clear and easy.
827: 
828:  It is argued also that imposing the standard radiation conditions with
829: a real wave vector $k=\omega /c$ does not prevent us from the
830: necessity to investigate the eigenmodes with complex $\omega'$s,
831: i.e., qnm in a given problem.
832: 
833:  The importance of this is demonstrated by
834: investigating the role of the qnm in the problem of estimating the
835: potential health hazards due to the use of portable telephones. The
836: general analysis of the qnm spectra of a dielectric sphere with
837: allowance for the dissipative processes enables us to estimate
838: quantitatively the expected effect, namely, a possible temperature
839: rise in the tissues laying in the outer part of the human head may
840: be 1.5 times greater as compared with the inner part of the brain.
841: 
842:     The predicted effect is, in some sense, analogous to the usual (but
843: weakly manifested here) skin-effect. It is not surprising because
844: the substantial conductivity of the sphere material plays a
845: principal part in our consideration. Due to this conductivity the
846: individual resonances of a sphere become very overlapping and, being
847: not observed separately, many of them (volume and surface ones) are
848: excited by the cellular telephone irradiation with the frequency in
849: this band. In view of different spatial behaviour, the surface and
850: volume modes will lead to different spatial distributions of the net
851: heat inside the sphere (and also inside a human head).
852: 
853: 
854: When  we have the quasi-normal modes instead the usual normal
855: modes it implies that we are dealing with the open
856: systems~\cite{Open}. Open systems admit a dual description: on
857: the one hand, they can be considered from the ``inside'' point of
858: view, treating the coupling to the environment as a -- not
859: necessarily small -- perturbation. From this point of view, one
860: can study the (discreet) eigenvalues of the system, the width of
861: resonances and the resulting decay properties~\cite{Ching,Leung}. On the other hand,
862: open systems allow to take the ``outside'' point of view,
863: considering the system as a perturbation of the environment. The
864: typical quantity to be investigated from this point of view is the
865: {\it scattering matrix} ($S$-matrix), i.e.\ the amplitude for
866: passing from a given incoming field configuration  to a certain outgoing
867: configuration as a function of energy~\cite{Vaynstayn}.
868: 
869: The registration of the quasi-normal modes of a black hole is
870: considered now as a possible way to detect this object
871: \cite{Nollert,KS}. In this connection it is surpassing that till
872: now the quasi-normal modes have not been used in an analogous
873: acoustic problem, i.e., for description of sound generation by ringing
874: body~\cite{Raylaygh,Lamb,Morse}. At the same time one
875: can find in literature the statement (without proving)
876: that we hear ringing quasi-normal modes of a bell when we hear the
877: bell sound~\cite{Moss}.
878: 
879: 
880: \begin{acknowledgments}
881:  This paper was completed during the visit of on of the authors
882: (VVN) to Salerno University. It is his pleasant duty to thank G.\
883: Scarpetta and G.\ Lambiase for the kind hospitality extended to
884: him. VVN was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic
885: Research (Grant No.\ 03-01-00025). The financial support of INFN
886: is acknowledged. The authors are indebted to A.V.~Nesterenko for
887: preparing the figure.
888: \end{acknowledgments}
889: 
890: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
891: \bibitem{Nollert} H.-P.\ Nollert, Class.\ Quantum Grav.\ {\bf 16},
892: R159 (1999).
893: \bibitem{FN} V.~P.~Frolov and I.~D.~Novikov, {\it Black Hole Physics} (Kluwer
894: Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998).
895: \bibitem{KS} K.~D.~Kokkotas and B.~G.~Schmidt, Living Rev.\
896: Relativity, {\bf 2}, 1 (1999); arXiv:gr-qc/9909058.
897: %\eprint{gr-qc/9909058}.
898: \bibitem{RR} I.\ Rubinstein, L.\ Rubinstein, {\it Partial Differential Equations in Classical
899: Mathematical Physics} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
900: \bibitem{Sommerfeld} A.\ Sommerfeld, {\it Partial Differential Equations of
901: Physics} (Academic Press, New York, 1949).
902: \bibitem{FM} P.~Frank and R.~Mises, {\it Die Differential- und Integralgleihungen
903: der Mechanik und Physik}, II Physikalischer Teil (Dover
904: Publications, New York, 1961).
905: \bibitem{Gamov} G.~Gamov, Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf 51}, 2004 (1928).
906: \bibitem{G1} E.~U.~Condon and R.~W.~Gurney, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 33}, 127 (1929).
907: \bibitem{G2} R. de la Madrid,
908: Lect.\ Notes Phys.\ {\bf 622}, 327 (2003);
909: arXiv:\eprint{quant-ph/0302184}.
910: \bibitem{Stratton} J.\ A.\ Stratton, {\it Electromagnetic Theory} (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).
911: \bibitem{AS} M.~Abramowitz and I.~Stegun, eds., {\it Handbook of Mathematical Functions}
912: (Dover Publications, New York, 1972).
913: \bibitem{Ching}E.~S.~C.~Ching, P.~T.~Leung, W.~M.~Suen,, and K.~Young,
914: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 4588 (1995).
915: \bibitem{Leung} P.~T.~Leung, S.~Y.~Liu, S.~S.~Tong, and K.~Young,
916: Phys.\ Rev.\ A {\bf 49}, 3068 (1994).
917: \bibitem{Chang} R.~K.~Chang and A.~J.~Campillo, {\it Optical
918: Processes in Microcavities} (1996).
919: \bibitem{scaling} Y.~K.~Ho, Phys. Reports  {\bf 99}, 1 (1983).
920: \bibitem{Debye} P.\ Debye,  {\it Ann.\ Phys.\ (Leipzig)} {\bf 30},
921: 57 (1909); G.~Mie, {\it Ann.\ Phys.\ (Leipzig)} {\bf 25},  377 (1908).
922: \bibitem{Jackson} J.~D.~Jackson, {\it Classical Electrodynamics},
923: 3rd ed. (J.~Wiley \& Sons, New York, 1999).
924: \bibitem{Gastine} M.~Gastine, L.~Courtois, and
925: J.~L.~Dormann, IEEE Trans.\ Microwave Theory and Techniques,\
926: vol.\ MTT-15, No.\ 12, pp.\ 694--700, December 1967.
927: \bibitem{Raether} H.~Raether, {\it Surface Plasmons} (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
928: \bibitem{BPN}  M.~Bordag, I.~G.~Pirozhenko, V.~V.~Nesterenko,  J~Phys.\ A {\bf 38}, 11027 (2005).
929: \bibitem{Health} International Commission on Non-Ionizing
930: Radiation Protection, ''IC-NIRP statement --- Health issues
931: related to the use of hand-held radiotelephones and base
932: transmitters,'' {\it Health Phys.} {\bf 70}, No.\ 4, pp.\
933: 587--593, Apr.\ 1996.
934: \bibitem{Sernelius} B.~E.~Sernelius, {\it Europhys.\ Lett.} {\bf
935: 60}, 643 (2002).
936: \bibitem{WF} J.~Wang and O.~Fujiwara,  IEEE Transactions on
937: Microwave Theory and Techniques, {\bf 47}, No.\ 8,  1528 (1999).
938: \bibitem{LL} L.~D.~Landau and E.~M.~Lifshitz, {\it Electrodynamics of Continuouis Media}, Vol.\ 8
939: of {\it  Course of Theoretical Physics} (Pergamon, New York, london, 1960).
940: \bibitem{Vaynstayn} L.~A.~Vaynstayn, {\it Theory of open resonators and open waveguides}
941:  (Sovetskoe Radio, Moscow, 1966; English transaltion 1969).
942: \bibitem{Open} K.-H.~Li, Phys.\ Reports, {\bf 134}, 1--85 (1986).
943: \bibitem{Raylaygh} J.~W.~Strutt, Baron Rayleigh, {\it The theory of sound}, vols.\
944:  I, II (Macmillan, London,1926).
945: \bibitem{Lamb} H.~Lamb, {\it The dynamical theory of sound}, 2nd ed.\ (Adward Arnold, London,
946:  1931).
947: \bibitem{Morse} F.~Morse, {\it Vibraions and sound} (Gostechizdat, Moscow, Leningrad, 1949).
948: \bibitem{Moss} I.~G.~Moss, {\it Can you hear the shape of a bell?: Asymptotics
949: of quasinormal modes,} Nucl.\ Phys.\ B (Proc.\ Suppl.) {\bf 104}, 181 -- 184 (2002).
950: \end{thebibliography}
951: \end{document}
952: 
953: The frequency equations will be investigated in two limiting
954: cases: 1) permittivity of the ball material $\varepsilon$ is much
955: greater than 1 and 2) a dilute dielectric ball when permittivity
956: $\varepsilon $ is close to 1. The first case is relevant, for
957: example, when considering the eigenoscillations of electromagnetic
958: field in human head. Proceeding from this, we argue that
959: quasi-normal modes should be taken into account in estimation of
960: the health hazards due to the use of the portable telephones. The
961: second limiting case has relation to the calculation of the
962: Casimir energy of a dilute dielectric ball. Recently, the latter
963: problem has been investigated actively.
964: 
965: \bibitem{Watson}  G.N.~Watson, Proc.\ R.\ Soc.\ London, A {\bf
966: 100}, 83 (1918).
967: \bibitem{Wigner} E.P.~Wigner, Lower limit for the energy derivative of the
968: scattering phase shift, Phys.\ Rev.\  98 (1955) 145.
969: \bibitem{Smith} F.T.~Smith, Lifetime matrix in collision theory, Phys.\ Rev.\
970: 118 (1960) 349. %\bibitem{FM}F.\ Frank, R.\ Mises, {\it
971: %Differential Gleihungen der Physik}, Band II (Braunschweig,
972: %1935).
973: 
974: Certainly, one cannot anticipate that an exact resonance  with
975: only one specific frequency will be excited by a portable
976: telephone in a human head. The probability of such a coincidence
977: is very low. Furthermore the dissipation of the energy due to a
978: finite connectivity of  tissues in human head would make this
979: resonance very broad. However, one can expect that  the spatial
980: configuration of electric and magnetic fields inside the human
981: head will be, to some extent, analogous to the spatial behaviour
982: of the relevant natural modes.
983: