1: \documentclass[preprint,prd,aps,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{amsmath}

3: %\usepackage{graphics}

4: \usepackage{psfig}

5: %\includegraphycs

6: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{10}

7: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

8: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

9: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}

10: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

11: \newcommand{\bc}{\begin{center}}

12: \newcommand{\ec}{\end{center}}

13: \def\om{\Omega_{\rm M}}

14: \def\oa{\Omega_{\Lambda}}

15: \def\ot{\Omega_{\rm tot}}

16: \def\luv{\lambda_\ast^{\rm UV}}

17: \def\guv{g_\ast^{\rm UV}}

18: \def\lir{\lambda_\ast^{\rm IR}}

19: \def\gir{g_\ast^{\rm IR}}

20: \def\lira{\lambda_\ast}

21: \def\gira{g_\ast}

22: \def\ngf{g_\ast\lambda_\ast}

23: \def\mt{{\cal M}}

24: %\def\gu{g^{(1)}}

25: \def\gu{{h_1}}

26: %\def\lu{\lambda^{(1)}}

27: \def\lu{h_{2}}

28: \def\cchi{\sqrt{8\pi}g_\ast}

29: \begin{document}

30: \begin{center}

31: \bibliographystyle{article}

32: 

33: {\Large \textsc{Gravitational amplitudes in black-hole evaporation:

34: the effect of non-commutative geometry}}

35: 

36: \end{center}

37: \vspace{0.4cm}

38: 

39: %\vspace*{0.6cm}

40: 

41: \date{\today}

42: 

43: 

44: \author{Elisabetta Di Grezia,$^{1}$

45: \thanks{Electronic address: digrezia@na.infn.it}

46: Giampiero Esposito,$^{1,2}$ \thanks{

47: Electronic address: giampiero.esposito@na.infn.it}

48: Gennaro Miele,$^{2,1}$

49: \thanks{Electronic address: gennaro.miele@na.infn.it}}

50: 

51: \affiliation{${\ }^{1}$Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare,

52: Sezione di Napoli,\\

53: Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia, Edificio N', 80126

54: Napoli, Italy\\

55: ${\ }^{2}$Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Complesso Universitario di Monte

56: S. Angelo,\\

57: Via Cintia, Edificio N', 80126 Napoli, Italy}

58: 

59: 

60: \begin{abstract}

61: Recent work in the literature has studied the quantum-mechanical decay of

62: a Schwarzschild-like black hole, formed by gravitational collapse, into

63: almost-flat space-time and weak radiation at a very late time. The relevant

64: quantum amplitudes have been evaluated for bosonic and fermionic fields,

65: showing that no information is lost in collapse to a black hole. On the

66: other hand, recent developments in noncommutative geometry have shown

67: that, in general relativity, the effects of noncommutativity can be taken

68: into account by keeping the standard form of the Einstein tensor on the

69: left-hand side of the field equations and introducing a modified

70: energy-momentum tensor as a source on the right-hand side. The present

71: paper, relying on the recently obtained noncommutativity effect on a

72: static, spherically symmetric metric, considers from a new perspective the

73: quantum amplitudes in black hole evaporation. The general relativity

74: analysis of spin-2 amplitudes is shown to be modified by a multiplicative

75: factor $F$ depending on a constant non-commutativity parameter and on the

76: upper limit $R$ of the radial coordinate. Limiting forms of $F$ are

77: derived which are compatible with the adiabatic approximation here

78: exploited. Approximate formulae for the particle emission rate are also

79: obtained within this framework.

80: \end{abstract}

81: 

82: \maketitle

83: \bigskip

84: \vspace{2cm}

85: 

86: \section{Introduction}

87: 

88: Theoretical research in black hole physics has witnessed,

89: over the last few years, an impressive

90: amount of new ideas and results on at least four main areas:

91: \vskip 0.3cm

92: \noindent

93: (i) The problem of information loss in black holes, after the suggestion

94: in Ref. \cite{Hawk05} that quantum gravity is unitary and information is

95: preserved in black hole formation and evaporation.

96: \vskip 0.3cm

97: \noindent

98: (ii) The related series of papers in Refs. \cite{Farl1, Farl2, Farl3, Farl4,

99: Farl5, Farl6, Farl7, Farl8, Farl9}, concerned with evaluating quantum

100: amplitudes for transitions from initial to final states, in agreement with

101: a picture where information is not lost, and the end state of black hole

102: evaporation is a combination of outgoing radiation states.

103: \vskip 0.3cm

104: \noindent

105: (iii) The approach in Refs. \cite{Vilk1, Vilk2, Vilk3}, according to which

106: black holes create instead a vacuum matter charge to protect themselves

107: from the quantum evaporation.

108: \vskip 0.3cm

109: \noindent

110: (iv) The work in Ref. \cite{Nico06} where the authors, relying upon the

111: previous findings in Ref. \cite{Smai04}, consider a noncommutative radiating

112: Schwarzschild black hole, and find that non-commutativity cures usual problems

113: encountered in trying to describe the latest stage of black hole evaporation.

114: 

115: We have been therefore led to study how non-commutativity would affect the

116: analysis of quantum amplitudes in black hole evaporation performed in

117: Refs. \cite{Farl1, Farl2, Farl3, Farl4, Farl5, Farl6, Farl7, Farl8, Farl9}.

118: Following Ref. \cite{Nico06}, we assume that non-commutativity of space-time

119: can be encoded in the commutator of operators corresponding to space-time

120: coordinates, i.e. (the integer $D$ below is even)

121: \begin{equation}

122: \Bigr[x^{\mu},x^{\nu}\Bigr]=i \theta^{\mu \nu}, \;

123: \mu,\nu=1,2,...,D,

124: \label{(1)}

125: \end{equation}

126: where the antisymmetric matrix $\theta^{\mu \nu}$ is taken to have

127: block-diagonal form

128: \begin{equation}

129: \theta^{\mu \nu}={\rm diag}\Bigr(\theta_{1},...,\theta_{D/2}\Bigr),

130: \label{(2)}

131: \end{equation}

132: with

133: \begin{equation}

134: \theta_{i}=\theta

135: \left(

136: \begin{array}{cc}

137: 0 & 1 \\

138: -1 & 0 \\

139: \end{array}

140: \right), \;

141: \forall i =1,2,...,D/2,

142: \label{(3)}

143: \end{equation}

144: the parameter $\theta$ having dimension of length squared and being

145: constant. As shown in Ref. \cite{Smai04}, the constancy of $\theta$ leads

146: to a consistent treatment of Lorentz invariance and unitarity.

147: The authors of Ref. \cite{Nico06} solve the Einstein equations with mass

148: density of a static, spherically symmetric, smeared particle-like

149: gravitational source as (hereafter we work in $G=c={\hbar}=1$ units)

150: \begin{equation}

151: \rho_{\theta}(r)={M\over (4\pi \theta)^{3\over 2}}e^{-{r^{2}\over 4\theta}},

152: \label{(4)}

153: \end{equation}

154: which therefore plays the role of matter source. Their resulting

155: spherically symmetric metric is

156: \begin{eqnarray}

157: ds^{2}&=&-\left[1-{4M\over r \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma

158: \left({3\over 2},{r^{2}\over 4\theta}\right)\right]dt^{2}

159: +\left[1-{4M\over r \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma \left({3\over 2},

160: {r^{2}\over 4 \theta}\right)\right]^{-1}dr^{2} \nonumber \\

161: &+& r^{2}(d\Theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\Theta d\phi^{2}),

162: \label{(5)}

163: \end{eqnarray}

164: where we use the lower incomplete gamma function \cite{Nico06}

165: \begin{equation}

166: \gamma \left({3\over 2},{r^{2}\over 4\theta}\right) \equiv

167: \int_{0}^{{r^{2}\over 4\theta}}\sqrt{t}e^{-t}dt.

168: \label{(6)}

169: \end{equation}

170: In this picture, we deal with a mass distribution

171: \begin{equation}

172: m(r) \equiv {2M \over \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma \left({3\over 2},

173: {r^{2}\over 4\theta}\right),

174: \label{(7)}

175: \end{equation}

176: while $M$ is the total mass of the source \cite{Nico06}. This mass

177: function satisfies the equation

178: $$

179: m'(r)=4\pi r^{2} \rho_{\theta}(r),

180: $$

181: formally analogous to the general relativity case \cite{Farl9}.

182: 

183: The work in Refs. \cite{Farl1, Farl2, Farl3, Farl4, Farl5, Farl6, Farl7,

184: Farl8, Farl9} studies instead the quantum-mechanical decay of a

185: Schwarzschild-like black hole, formed by gravitational collapse, into

186: almost-flat space-time and weak radiation at a very late time.

187: The spin-2 gravitational perturbations split into parts with odd and

188: even parity, and one can isolate suitable variables which can be taken

189: as boundary data on a final spacelike hypersurface $\Sigma_{F}$. The main

190: idea is then to consider a complexified classical boundary-value problem

191: where $T$ is rotated into the complex: $T \rightarrow |T| e^{-i \alpha}$,

192: for $\alpha \in ]0,\pi/2]$, and evaluate the corresponding classical

193: Lorentzian action $S_{\rm class}^{(2)}$

194: to quadratic order in metric perturbations. The

195: genuinely Lorentzian quantum amplitude is recovered by taking the limit

196: as $\alpha \rightarrow 0^{+}$ of the semiclassical amplitude

197: $e^{iS_{\rm class}^{(2)}}$ \cite{Farl1, Farl5, Farl9}.

198: 

199: Section II studies the differential equations obeyed by radial modes

200: within the framework of the adiabatic approximation, and Sec. III obtains

201: the resulting orthogonality relation in the presence of a non-vanishing

202: non-commutativity parameter $\theta$. Section IV derives the effect of

203: $\theta$ on the expansion of the pure-gravity action functional, which

204: can be used in the evaluation of quantum amplitudes along the lines of

205: Refs. \cite{Farl1}-\cite{Farl9}. Absorption and emission spectra of a

206: non-commutative Schwarzschild-like black hole are studied in Sec. V, while

207: concluding remarks are presented in Sec. VI, and relevant details are

208: given in the Appendix.

209: 

210: \section{Equations for radial modes}

211: 

212: The analysis in Ref. \cite{Farl9} holds for any

213: spherically symmetric Lorentzian background metric

214: \begin{equation}

215: ds^{2}=-e^{b(r,t)}dt^{2}+e^{a(r,t)}dr^{2}

216: +r^{2}(d\Theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\Theta d\phi^{2}),

217: \label{(8)}

218: \end{equation}

219: the even modes $\xi_{2lm}^{(+)}(r,t)$ and odd modes $\xi_{2lm}^{(-)}(r,t)$

220: being built from a Fourier-type decomposition, i.e. \cite{Farl9}

221: \begin{equation}

222: \xi_{2lm}^{(+)}(r,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk \; a_{2klm}^{(+)}

223: \xi_{2kl}^{(+)}(r){\sin kt \over \sin kT},

224: \label{(9)}

225: \end{equation}

226: and

227: \begin{equation}

228: \xi_{2lm}^{(-)}(r,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk \;

229: a_{2klm}^{(-)}\xi_{2kl}^{(-)}(r){\cos kt \over \sin kT},

230: \label{(10)}

231: \end{equation}

232: where the radial functions $\xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)}$ obey the following

233: second-order differential equation:

234: \begin{equation}

235: e^{-a}{d\over dr}\left(e^{-a}{d\xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)}\over dr}\right)

236: +\Bigr(k^{2}-V_{l}^{\pm}(r)\Bigr)\xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)}=0,

237: \label{(11)}

238: \end{equation}

239: where, on defining $\lambda \equiv {(l+2)(l-1)\over 2}$, the potential

240: terms are given by \cite{Farl9}

241: \begin{equation}

242: V_{l}^{+}(r)=e^{-a(r,t)}

243: {2[\lambda^{2}(\lambda+1)r^{3}+3\lambda^{2}mr^{2}+9]m^{2}r+9m^{3}

244: \over r^{3}(\lambda r+3m)^{2}},

245: \label{(12)}

246: \end{equation}

247: and

248: \begin{equation}

249: V_{l}^{-}(r)=e^{-a(r,t)}\left({l(l+1)\over r^{2}}

250: -{6m\over r^{3}}\right),

251: \label{(13)}

252: \end{equation}

253: respectively. In the expansion of the gravitational action to quadratic

254: order, it is of crucial importance to evaluate the integral

255: \begin{equation}

256: I(k,k',l,R) \equiv \int_{0}^{R}

257: e^{a(r,t)}\xi_{2kl}^{(+)}(r)\xi_{2k'l}^{(+)}(r)dr,

258: \label{(14)}

259: \end{equation}

260: since \cite{Farl9} (see Appendix)

261: \begin{equation}

262: S_{\rm class}^{(2)}[(h_{ij}^{(\pm)})_{lm}]

263: ={\pm 1 \over 32 \pi} \sum_{l=2}^{\infty}\sum_{m=-l}^{l}

264: {(l-2)! \over (l+2)!}\int_{0}^{R}e^{a}\xi_{2lm}^{(\pm)}

265: \left({\partial \over \partial t}\xi_{2lm}^{(\pm)*}\right)_{t=T}dr.

266: \label{(15)}

267: \end{equation}

268: For this purpose, we bear in mind the limiting behaviours \cite{Farl9}

269: \begin{equation}

270: \xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)} \sim {\rm const} \times (kr)^{l+1}

271: +{\rm O}((kr)^{l+3}) \; {\rm as} \; r \rightarrow 0,

272: \label{(16)}

273: \end{equation}

274: \begin{equation}

275: \xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)}(r) \sim z_{2kl}^{(\pm)}e^{ik r_{s}}

276: +z_{2kl}^{(\pm)*}e^{-ikr_{s}} \; {\rm as} \; r \rightarrow \infty,

277: \label{(17)}

278: \end{equation}

279: where Eq. (16) results from imposing regularity at the origin,

280: $r_{s}$ is the Regge--Wheeler tortoise coordinate \cite{Farl9, Regg57}

281: \begin{equation}

282: r_{s}(r) \equiv r +2M \log(r-2M),

283: \label{(18)}

284: \end{equation}

285: while $z_{2kl}^{(\pm)}$ are complex constants. Indeed, it should be

286: stressed that non-commutativity can smear plane waves into Gaussian wave

287: packets. Thus, in a fully self-consistent analysis, the Fourier modes in

288: Eq. (9), (10), and their asymptotic form in Eq. (16), (17), should be

289: modified accordingly. However, this task goes beyond the aims of the

290: present paper, and we hope to be able to perform these calculations in

291: a future publication.

292: 

293: With this understanding, we can now exploit Eq. (11)

294: to write the equations (hereafter, we write for simplicity of notation

295: $\xi_{kl}$ rather than $\xi_{2kl}^{(\pm)}$, and similarly for $V_{l}$

296: rather than $V_{l}^{\pm}$)

297: \begin{equation}

298: e^{a}\xi_{k'l}\left[e^{-a}{d\over dr}\left(e^{-a}{d\over dr}\xi_{kl}\right)

299: +(k^{2}-V_{l})\xi_{kl}\right]=0,

300: \label{(19)}

301: \end{equation}

302: \begin{equation}

303: e^{a}\xi_{kl}\left[e^{-a}{d\over dr}\left(e^{-a}{d\over dr}\xi_{k'l}\right)

304: +({k'}^{2}-V_{l})\xi_{k'l}\right]=0.

305: \label{(20)}

306: \end{equation}

307: According to a standard procedure, if we subtract Eq. (20) from Eq. (19),

308: and integrate the resulting equation from $r=0$ to $r=R$, we obtain

309: \begin{equation}

310: (k^{2}-{k'}^{2})\int_{0}^{R}e^{a}\xi_{kl}\xi_{k'l}dr

311: = \int_{0}^{R}\left[\xi_{kl}{d\over dr}\left(e^{-a}{d\over dr}

312: \xi_{k'l}\right)-\xi_{k'l}{d\over dr}\left(e^{-a}{d\over dr}\xi_{kl}

313: \right)\right]dr.

314: \label{(21)}

315: \end{equation}

316: The desired integral (14) is therefore obtained from Eq. (21),

317: whose right-hand side is then

318: completely determined from the limiting behaviours in

319: Eqs. (16) and (17), i.e.

320: \begin{equation}

321: \int_{0}^{R}e^{a}\xi_{kl}\xi_{k'l}dr=

322: \left \{ {1\over (k^{2}-{k'}^{2})}\left[\xi_{kl}e^{-a}

323: \left({d\over dr}\xi_{k'l}\right)-\xi_{k'l}e^{-a}

324: \left({d\over dr}\xi_{kl}\right)\right]_{r=0}^{r=R}

325: \right \},

326: \label{(22)}

327: \end{equation}

328: where, on going from Eq. (21) to Eq. (22), we have exploited the

329: vanishing coefficient that weights the integral

330: $$

331: \int_{0}^{R}e^{-a}\left({d\over dr}\xi_{kl}\right)

332: \left({d\over dr}\xi_{k'l}\right)dr,

333: $$

334: resulting from two contributions of equal magnitude and opposite sign.

335: By virtue of Eq. (16), $r=0$ gives vanishing contribution to the right-hand

336: side of Eq. (22), while the contribution of first derivatives of radial

337: functions involves also

338: \begin{equation}

339: \left . {dr_{s}\over dr} \right |_{r=R}

340: ={R\over (R-2M)}.

341: \label{(23)}

342: \end{equation}

343: 

344: \section{Generalized orthogonality relation}

345: 

346: Note now that our metric (5) is a particular case of the spherically

347: symmetric metric (8), since our $a$ and $b$ functions are independent

348: of time. More precisely, unlike the full Vaidya space-time, where in the

349: region containing outgoing radiation the mass function varies extremely

350: slowly with respect both to $t$ and to $r$

351: \cite{Farl8}, we consider a ``hybrid''

352: scheme where the mass function depends on $r$ only for any fixed value of

353: the non-commutativity parameter $\theta$. We can therefore write

354: \begin{equation}

355: e^{-a}=1-{4M\over r \sqrt{\pi}}

356: \gamma \left({3\over 2},{r^{2}\over 4\theta}\right)

357: \label{(24)}

358: \end{equation}

359: in our non-commutative spherically symmetric model,

360: where the function in curly brackets in Eq. (22) reads as

361: $$

362: \left(1-{4M \over R \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma \left({3\over 2},

363: {R^{2}\over 4\theta}\right)\right){R \over (R-2M)}

364: {1\over (k^{2}-{k'}^{2})}

365: \times i \Bigr[(k'-k)z_{kl}z_{k'l}e^{i(k+k')r_{s}(R)}

366: $$

367: $$

368: +(k-k')z_{kl}^{*}z_{k'l}^{*}e^{-i(k+k')r_{s}(R)}

369: -(k+k')z_{kl}z_{k'l}^{*}e^{i(k-k')r_{s}(R)}

370: +(k+k')z_{kl}^{*}z_{k'l}e^{i(k'-k)r_{s}(R)}\Bigr].

371: $$

372: At this stage, we exploit one of the familiar limits that can be used

373: to express the Dirac $\delta$, i.e. \cite{Farl9}

374: \begin{equation}

375: \lim_{r_{s}\to \infty}{e^{i(k \pm k')r_{s}}\over (k \pm k')}

376: =i \pi \delta(k \pm k'),

377: \label{(25)}

378: \end{equation}

379: to find

380: \begin{equation}

381: \int_{0}^{R}e^{a}\xi_{kl}\xi_{k'l}dr=2\pi |z_{kl}|^{2}

382: F(R,\theta) \Bigr(\delta(k+k')+\delta(k-k')\Bigr),

383: \label{(26)}

384: \end{equation}

385: having defined

386: \begin{equation}

387: F(R,\theta) \equiv {R \over (R-2M)} \left[1-

388: {4M \over R \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma \left({3\over 2},{R^{2}\over 4\theta}\right)

389: \right].

390: \label{(27)}

391: \end{equation}

392: 

393: \section{Effect of $\theta$ and expansion of the action functional}

394: 

395: Since $\theta$ has dimension length squared as we said after Eq. (3),

396: we can define the noncommutativity-induced length scale

397: \begin{equation}

398: L \equiv 2 \sqrt{\theta}.

399: \label{(28)}

400: \end{equation}

401: Moreover, we know that

402: our results only hold in the adiabatic approximation, i.e. when both

403: $m'$ and ${\dot m}$ are very small. The latter condition is obviously

404: satisfied because our mass function in Eq. (7) is independent of time.

405: The former amounts to requiring that (hereafter we set

406: $w \equiv R/L$, while $R_{s} \equiv 2M$)

407: \begin{equation}

408: m'(R)={2\over \sqrt{\pi}}{R_{s}\over L}e^{-w^{2}}w^{2} <<1.

409: \label{(29)}

410: \end{equation}

411: The condition (29) is satisfied provided that either

412: \vskip 0.3cm

413: \noindent

414: (i) $w \rightarrow \infty$ or $w \rightarrow 0$, i.e. $R >>L$ or

415: $R << L$;

416: \vskip 0.3cm

417: \noindent

418: (ii) or at $R=L$ such that

419: \begin{equation}

420: m'(R=L)=m'(w=1)={2\over \sqrt{\pi}}{R_{s}\over L}e^{-1} <<1,

421: \label{(30)}

422: \end{equation}

423: and hence for ${R_{s}\over L} << {e \sqrt{\pi} \over 2}$.

424: 

425: Furthermore, at finite values of the non-commutativity parameter $\theta$,

426: our $w \equiv {R\over L}$ is always much larger than $1$ in Eq. (27)

427: if $R$ is very large, and hence

428: we can exploit the asymptotic expansion of the lower incomplete

429: $\gamma$-function in this limit \cite{Abra64, Spal06}, i.e.

430: \begin{equation}

431: \gamma \left({3\over 2},w^{2}\right)=

432: \Gamma \left ({3\over 2} \right)

433: -\Gamma \left({3\over 2},w^{2}\right)

434: \sim {1\over 2}\sqrt{\pi}\left[1-e^{-w^{2}}

435: \sum_{p=0}^{\infty}{w^{1-2p}

436: \over \Gamma \left({3\over 2}-p \right)}\right].

437: \label{(31)}

438: \end{equation}

439: By virtue of Eqs. (27) and (31), we find

440: \begin{equation}

441: F(R,\theta) \equiv F(R,L) \sim 1+{R_{s} \over (R-R_{s})}

442: e^{-w^{2}}

443: \sum_{p=0}^{\infty}{w^{1-2p}\over

444: \Gamma \left({3\over 2}-p \right)}.

445: \label{(32)}

446: \end{equation}

447: Equation (32) describes the asymptotic expansion

448: of the correction factor $F$ when $R >> L$.

449: 

450: In the opposite regime, i.e. for $\theta$ so large that

451: $(R/L)<<1$ despite that $R$ tends to $\infty$, one has

452: \cite{Spal06}

453: \begin{equation}

454: F(R,L) \sim {R \over (R-R_{s})}\left[

455: 1-{4 \over 3 \sqrt{\pi}}{R_{s}\over R}w^{3}

456: \left(1-{7\over 5}w^{2}\right)\right].

457: \label{(33)}

458: \end{equation}

459: 

460: Last, but not least, if $R$ and $L$ are comparable, the lower-incomplete

461: $\gamma$-function in Eq. (27) cannot be expanded, and we find,

462: bearing in mind that $R_{s}/L <<1$ from Eq. (30), the limiting form

463: \begin{equation}

464: F(R,L) \sim 1+ {R_{s}\over L} \left(1-{2\over \sqrt{\pi}}

465: \gamma \left({3\over 2},1 \right)\right)

466: +{\rm O}((R_{s}/L)^{2}).

467: \label{(34)}

468: \end{equation}

469: 

470: We therefore conclude that a $\theta$-dependent correction to the

471: general relativity analysis in Ref. \cite{Farl9} does indeed arise from

472: non-commutative geometry. In particular, the expansion of the

473: action to quadratic order in perturbative modes takes the form

474: (cf. Ref. \cite{Farl9})

475: \begin{equation}

476: S_{\rm class}^{(2)}={F(R,L)\over 16} \sum_{l=2}^{\infty}

477: \sum_{m=-l}^{l}\sum_{P=\pm 1}{(l-2)!\over (l+2)!}\int_{0}^{\infty}dk \;

478: k |z_{2klP}|^{2} \left | a_{2klmP}+P a_{2,-klmP} \right |^{2}

479: \cot kT,

480: \label{(35)}

481: \end{equation}

482: where the function $F(R,L)$ (see Eq. (27)) takes the

483: limiting forms (32) and (33), respectively, depending on whether

484: $w>>1$ or $w<<1$, while

485: $P = \pm 1$ for even (respectively odd) metric perturbations. Our

486: ``correction'' $F(R,L)$ to the general relativity analysis is

487: non-vanishing provided that one works at very large but finite values

488: of $R$. In the limit as $R \rightarrow \infty$, one has instead

489: \begin{equation}

490: \lim_{R \to \infty} F(R,L)=1,

491: \label{(36)}

492: \end{equation}

493: which means that, at infinite distance from the Lorentzian singularity

494: of Schwarzschild geometry, one cannot detect the effect of a

495: non-commutativity parameter.

496: 

497: \section{Absorption and emission spectra of a non-commutative

498: Schwarzschild black hole}

499: 

500: If general relativity is taken as the fundamental description of

501: gravitational phenomena, particle emission by a black hole follows

502: a Planck-type spectrum \cite{Hawk75} while wave absorption by a black

503: hole shows an oscillatory behaviour as a function of frequency

504: \cite{Sanc78}. For a Schwarzschild black hole, the two spectra are

505: related by

506: \begin{equation}

507: H(\omega)={\sigma (\omega)\over e^{\omega/T_H}-1}, 

508: \label{(37)}

509: \end{equation}

510: where $\omega$ is the frequency of the wave and $T_H$ is the

511: temperature for a body emitting thermal radiation, i.e. for the

512: black hole. With this notation, $H(\omega)$ and $\sigma(\omega)$

513: are the emission and absorption rates, respectively. In Ref.

514: \cite{Sanc78} the author has found the following expression for

515: the total absorption cross-section $\sigma(\omega)$ in the Hawking

516: formula (37):

517: \begin{equation}

518: \sigma(\omega)=27 \pi M^{2}-2 \sqrt{2}M

519: {\sin(2 \sqrt{27} \pi \omega M)\over \omega},

520: \label{(38)}

521: \end{equation}

522: where $\sigma(\omega)$ oscillates about the value $27 \pi M^{2}$ with

523: decreasing amplitude ${2 \sqrt{2} M \over \omega}$ and an approximately

524: constant oscillation period.

525: 

526: We can `import' the above result in our case by virtue of the

527: adiabatic approximation exploited in Refs.

528: \cite{Farl1}-\cite{Farl9}, and we hence replace $T_H$ in

529: Eq. (\ref{(37)}) by the noncommutative black hole temperature

530: $T_{HNC}$ defined as

531: \begin{equation}

532: T_{HNC}\equiv

533: - \left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\frac{dg_{00}}{dr}\right)_{r=r_+}=

534: \frac{1}{4\pi

535: r_+}\left[1-\frac{r_+^3}{4\theta^{3/2}}

536: \frac{e^{-r_+^2/4\theta}}{\gamma(3/2;r_+^2/4\theta)}\right],

537: \label{(39)}

538: \end{equation}

539: where $r_+$ solves the horizon equation

540: \begin{equation}

541: r_+=2m(r_+,\theta) \equiv {4M \over \sqrt{\pi}}\gamma

542: \left({3\over 2}, {r_+^{2}\over 4\theta}\right). 

543: \label{(40)}

544: \end{equation}

545: Equation (38) yields therefore

546: \begin{equation}

547: \sigma(\omega)=\frac{27 \pi}{4} r_+^{2}- \sqrt{2}r_+ {\sin(

548: \sqrt{27} \pi \omega r_+)\over \omega}, 

549: \label{(41)}

550: \end{equation}

551: where $\sigma(\omega)$ oscillates about ${27\over 4} \pi r_+^{2}$ with

552: decreasing amplitude ${ \sqrt{2}r_+\over \omega}$ and a smaller

553: oscillation period depending on $\theta$ (note that

554: the $\theta$-dependence in the horizon radius

555: dominates at small $\theta$). Moreover, the emission spectrum of

556: the black hole takes the form

557: \begin{equation}

558: H(\omega)={\sigma(\omega) \over e^{ \omega/T_{HNC}}-1 }.

559: \label{(42)}

560: \end{equation}

561: In the `large radius' regime $r_+^{2}/4\theta >> 1$, i.e. $R>>L$,

562: Eq. (\ref{(40)}) can be solved by iteration \cite{Nico06}. To

563: first order in $M/\sqrt{\theta}$, one finds

564: \begin{equation}

565: r_+=2M\left(1-{M \over \sqrt{\pi\theta}}e^{-M^2/\theta}\right) .

566: \label{(43)}

567: \end{equation}

568: The resulting plot of emission spectrum of the black hole

569: (\ref{(42)}) in the `large radius' regime, i.e. if $R

570: >>L$ ($M >>L$) is shown in Fig. 1. 

571: In Fig. 1 the non-commutativity parameter in

572: Eq. (28) is unable to modify the general relativity shape, although

573: the maximum value attained is smaller than in general relativity.

574: 

575: \begin{figure}[!h]

576: \centerline{\hbox{\psfig{figure=theta1.eps,width=0.6\textwidth}}}

577: \caption{Total emission spectrum for a black hole in units $y

578: \equiv H(x)/4M^{2}$, where $x \equiv 2M \omega$ and $R=10L$.

579: \label{fig1}}

580: \end{figure}

581: 

582: \section{Concluding remarks}

583: 

584: Our paper has investigated the effect of non-commutative geometry on the

585: recent theoretical analysis of quantum amplitudes in black hole

586: evaporation, following the work in Refs. \cite{Hawk05},

587: \cite{Farl1}-\cite{Farl9} (for other developments, see for example the

588: recent work in Refs. \cite{Kar05, Kar06a, Kar06b, Albe06}).

589: For this purpose, we have considered an

590: approximate scheme where the background space-time is static and

591: spherically symmetric, with mass function depending on the radial

592: coordinate only for any fixed value of the non-commutativity parameter

593: $\theta$.

594: 

595: Within this framework, we find that the general relativity analysis

596: of spin-2 amplitudes is modified by a multiplicative factor $F$ defined

597: in Eq. (27). Its limiting forms for $R >>L$ or $R <<L$ or

598: $R \cong L$ are given by Eqs. (32), (33) and (34), respectively.

599: Within this framework, unitarity is preserved, and the end state of

600: black hole evaporation is a combination of outgoing radiation states

601: (see section 1).

602: 

603: When the adiabatic approximation here assumed holds, we have also

604: considered approximate formulae for the absorption and emission

605: spectra of a ``non-commutative Schwarzschild'' black hole. The

606: resulting plot shows that for the total emission spectrum the

607: General Relativity shape is essentially recovered at finite values

608: of $\theta$ such that $R >> L$. Within such a scheme, Hawking

609: emission is only important in a certain frequency range

610: \cite{Sanc78}, but nothing can be said about the end-state of

611: black hole evaporation.

612: 

613: An outstanding open problem is

614: whether one can derive a time-dependent spherically

615: symmetric background metric which incorporates the effects of

616: non-commutative geometry. This would make it possible to improve the

617: present comparison with the results in Refs. \cite{Farl1}-\cite{Farl9},

618: where the Vaidya space-time was taken as the background geometry.

619: A closer inspection of the effect of a variable surface gravity is also

620: in order, jointly with an assessment of the whole subject of black hole

621: thermodynamics, when ``corrected'' by non-commutative geometry.

622: 

623: \acknowledgments

624: The work of G. Esposito and G. Miele has been partially supported by

625: PRIN {\it SINTESI} and PRIN {\it FISICA ASTROPARTICELLARE},

626: respectively.

627: 

628: \appendix

629: \section{From Regge--Wheeler to asymptotically flat gauge}

630: 

631: Although we refer the reader to Ref. \cite{Farl9} for the large amount

632: of detailed calculations, we should stress a few important points about

633: the derivation of Eq. (15). The metric perturbations of linearized theory

634: are subject to infinitesimal diffeomorphisms, which are the

635: `gauge transformations' of general relativity \cite{Dewi03} (since the

636: infinite-dimensional invariance group of the Einstein theory is indeed

637: the diffeomorphism group).

638: 

639: The Regge--Wheeler (hereafter RW) gauge is not a supplementary condition,

640: but rather an infinitesimal diffeomorphism according to which the odd-parity

641: metric perturbations are modified as follows:

642: \begin{equation}

643: h_{0lm}^{(-)RW}=h_{0lm}^{(-)'}=h_{0lm}^{(-)}-\partial_{t}

644: \Lambda_{lm},

645: \label{(A1)}

646: \end{equation}

647: \begin{equation}

648: h_{1lm}^{(-)RW}=h_{1lm}^{(-)'}=h_{1lm}^{(-)}

649: -\partial_{r}\Lambda_{lm}+{2\Lambda_{lm}\over r},

650: \label{(A2)}

651: \end{equation}

652: \begin{equation}

653: h_{2lm}^{(-)RW}=0=h_{2lm}^{(-)'}=h_{2lm}^{(-)}+2\Lambda_{lm},

654: \label{(A3)}

655: \end{equation}

656: where $h_{0lm}^{(-)}$ occurs in the expansion of the shift vector, while

657: $h_{1lm}^{(-)}$ and $h_{2lm}^{(-)}$ occur in the expansion of the

658: odd-parity three-metric perturbations \cite{Farl9}.

659: 

660: In our spherically symmetric model of non-commutative gravity, since we

661: rely upon the work in Ref. \cite{Nico06}, where the left-hand side of the

662: Einstein equations retains the same functional form as in general

663: relativity, it remains possible to consider infinitesimal diffeomorphisms

664: formally analogous to Eqs. (A1)--(A3). For a more general framework, that

665: we do not strictly need here, one should instead build a deformation of

666: the algebra of diffeomorphisms, e.g. along the lines of the work in

667: Refs. \cite{Asch05, Asch06}.

668: 

669: In the RW gauge, one of the coupled partial differential equations relating

670: $h_{1lm}$ and $h_{0lm}$ is \cite{Farl9}

671: \begin{equation}

672: \partial_{t}^{2} h_{1lm}^{RW}=\partial_{r}\partial_{t}

673: h_{0lm}^{RW}-{2\over r}\partial_{t}h_{0lm}^{RW}

674: +\left[-{2\lambda e^{b}\over r^{2}}-{2e^{b}\over r}

675: \left(m''+{2m'e^{a}\over r^{2}}(m'+rm)\right) \right]h_{1lm}^{RW}.

676: \label{(A4)}

677: \end{equation}

678: To recover the expected fall-off behaviour of metric perturbations, one

679: later performs the asymptotically flat (hereafter AF) gauge transformation,

680: according to which \cite{Farl9}

681: \begin{equation}

682: h_{0lm}^{(-)AF}=0=h_{0lm}^{(-)RW}-\partial_{t}\Lambda_{lm},

683: \label{(A5)}

684: \end{equation}

685: \begin{equation}

686: h_{1lm}^{(-)AF}=h_{1lm}^{(-)RW}-\partial_{r}\Lambda_{lm}

687: +{2\Lambda_{lm}\over r},

688: \label{(A6)}

689: \end{equation}

690: \begin{equation}

691: h_{2lm}^{(-)AF}=h_{2lm}^{(-)RW}+2\Lambda_{lm}=2\Lambda_{lm}.

692: \label{(A7)}

693: \end{equation}

694: By virtue of Eqs. (A6) and (A4), and neglecting all derivatives of the

695: mass function (this remains legitimate for our mass function in

696: Eq. (7), as is clear from Fig. 2 below),

697: one finds

698: \begin{equation}

699: \partial_{t}^{2}h_{1lm}^{(-)AF}=-{2\lambda e^{b}\over r^{2}}

700: h_{1lm}^{(-)RW},

701: \label{(A8)}

702: \end{equation}

703: since exact cancellations occur of the coefficients of

704: $\partial_{r}\partial_{t}^{2}\Lambda_{lm}$ and

705: $\partial_{t}^{2}\Lambda_{lm}$. Moreover, since $h_{2lm}^{(-)}$

706: vanishes in the RW gauge (see Eq. (A3)), one finds, for the Zerilli

707: function \cite{Farl9, Zeri70},

708: \begin{equation}

709: Q_{lm}^{(-)RW} \equiv {e^{-a}\over r}\left(h_{1lm}^{(-)RW}

710: +{r^{2}\over 2}\partial_{r}{h_{2lm}^{(-)RW}\over r}\right)

711: ={e^{-a}\over r}h_{1lm}^{(-)RW}.

712: \label{(A9)}

713: \end{equation}

714: With our metric (5), one has $e^{b}=e^{-a}$, and hence

715: \begin{equation}

716: \partial_{t}^{2}h_{1lm}^{(-)AF}=-{2\lambda \over r}Q_{lm}^{(-)RW},

717: \label{(A10)}

718: \end{equation}

719: in complete analogy with the general relativity analysis in Ref.

720: \cite{Farl9}. Equation (A10) is in turn used to prove the desired

721: fall-off property

722: \begin{equation}

723: h_{1lm}^{(-)AF}(r,t)={2\lambda \over r}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}

724: dk \; {a_{klm}^{(-)}\over k^{2}}Q_{kl}^{(-)RW}

725: {\sin kt \over \sin kT},

726: \label{(A11)}

727: \end{equation}

728: after writing \cite{Farl9}

729: \begin{equation}

730: Q_{lm}^{(-)RW}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk \; a_{klm}^{(-)}

731: Q_{kl}^{(-)RW}{\sin kt \over \sin kT}.

732: \label{(A12)}

733: \end{equation}

734: 

735: \begin{figure}[!h]

736: \centerline{\hbox{\psfig{figure=theta2.eps,width=0.6\textwidth}}}

737: \caption{Plot of the function $y \equiv m''+2m'e^{a}(m'+rm)r^{-2}$,

738: with $m$ defined as in Eq. (7) and $\theta=1$ (hence much smaller

739: than $R^{2}$).

740: \label{fig2}}

741: \end{figure}

742: 

743: \begin{references}

744: \bibitem{Hawk05}

745: Hawking S W 2005 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 72} 084013

746: \bibitem{Farl1}

747: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2004 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 601} 184

748: \bibitem{Farl2}

749: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2005 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 613} 181

750: \bibitem{Farl3}

751: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2005 {\it Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf 22}

752: 2765

753: \bibitem{Farl4}

754: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2005 {\it Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf 22}

755: 3001

756: \bibitem{Farl5}

757: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2005 `Quantum amplitudes in black-hole

758: evaporation. I. Complex approach' (gr-qc/0510028)

759: \bibitem{Farl6}

760: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2005 `Quantum amplitudes in black-hole

761: evaporation. II. Spin-0 amplitude' (gr-qc/0510029)

762: \bibitem{Farl7}

763: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2006 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 634} 419

764: \bibitem{Farl8}

765: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2006 {\it Gen. Rel. Grav.} {\bf 38} 425

766: \bibitem{Farl9}

767: Farley A N St J and D'Eath P D 2006 {\it Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)} {\bf 321}

768: 1334

769: \bibitem{Vilk1}

770: Vilkovisky G A 2005 `Kinematics of evaporating black holes' (hep-th/0511182).

771: \bibitem{Vilk2}

772: Vilkovisky G A 2006 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 634} 456

773: \bibitem{Vilk3}

774: Vilkovisky G A 2006 Phys. Lett. B {\bf 638} 523

775: \bibitem{Nico06}

776: Nicolini P, Smailagic A, and Spallucci E 2006 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 632}

777: 547

778: \bibitem{Smai04}

779: Smailagic A and Spallucci E 2004 {\it J. Phys.} A {\bf 37} 7169

780: \bibitem{Regg57}

781: Regge T and Wheeler J A 1957 {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 108} 1063

782: \bibitem{Abra64}

783: Abramowitz M and Stegun I A 1964 {\it Handbook of Mathematical Functions}

784: (New York: Dover)

785: \bibitem{Spal06}

786: Spallucci E, Smailagic A and Nicolini P 2006 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 73}

787: 084004

788: \bibitem{Hawk75}

789: Hawking S W 1975 {\it Commun. Math. Phys.} {\bf 43} 199

790: \bibitem{Sanc78}

791: Sanchez N G 1978 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 18} 1030;

792: {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 18} 1798

793: \bibitem{Kar05}

794: Kar S and Majumdar S 2005 `Black hole geometries in a non-commutative

795: string theory' (hep-th/0510043).

796: \bibitem{Kar06a}

797: Kar S and Majumdar S 2006 `Non-commutative D3-brane, black holes

798: and attractor mechanism' (hep-th/0606026).

799: \bibitem{Kar06b}

800: Kar S 2006 `Tunneling between de Sitter and Anti de Sitter black holes

801: in non-commutative D3-brane formalism' (hep-th/0607029).

802: \bibitem{Albe06}

803: Alberghi G L, Casadio R, Galli D, Gregori D, Tronconi A, and Vignoni V

804: 2006 `Probing quantum gravity effects in black holes at LHC'

805: (hep-ph/0601243).

806: \bibitem{Dewi03}

807: DeWitt B S 2003 {\it The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory}, Int. Ser.

808: Mon. Phys. {\bf 114} (Oxford: Clarendon Press)

809: \bibitem{Asch05}

810: Aschieri P, Blohmann C, Dimitrijevi\'c M, Meyer F, Schupp P, and

811: Wess J 2005 {\it Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf 22} 3511

812: \bibitem{Asch06}

813: Aschieri P, Dimitrijevi\'c M, Meyer F, and Wess W 2006 {\it Class. Quantum

814: Grav.} {\bf 23} 1883

815: \bibitem{Zeri70}

816: Zerilli F J 1970 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 2} 2141

817: \end{references}

818: 

819: \end{document}

820: