1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,epsfig,graphicx}

3: %\usepackage[dvipdfm]{graphicx}

4: %\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.jpg}

5: %\DecalareGraphicsRule{.jpg}{eps}{.bb}{}

6: %\usepackage{refcheck}

7: %\documentstyle[12pt,epsfig,showkeys]{article}

8: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

9: %

10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  NEWCOMMANDS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

11: %\newlength{\dinwidth}

12: %\newlength{\dinmargin}

13: %\setlength{\dinwidth}{21.0cm}

14: %\textheight23.2cm \textwidth17.0cm

15: %\setlength{\dinmargin}{\dinwidth}

16: %\addtolength{\dinmargin}{-\textwidth}

17: %\setlength{\dinmargin}{0.5\dinmargin}

18: %\oddsidemargin -1.0in

19: %\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{\dinmargin}

20: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}

21: %\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.9\dinmargin}

22: %\marginparsep 8pt \marginparpush 5pt

23: %\topmargin -42pt

24: %\headheight 12pt

25: %\headsep 30pt \footheight 12pt \footskip  24pt

26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

27: % to make the paper format is more like harvac's

28: %%%%% number equations by section %%%%%%%%

29: \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother

30: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

32: \addtolength{\textwidth}{3cm}

33: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-1.5cm}

34: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-1.5cm}

35: \addtolength{\textheight}{3.0cm}

36: \addtolength{\topmargin}{-1.5cm}

37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

38: % end dina4 format from DESY

39: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

40: \newcommand{\epsl}{\varepsilon \hspace{-5pt} / }

41: \newcommand{\rsl}{r \hspace{-5pt} / }

42: \newcommand{\qsl}{q \hspace{-5pt} / }

43: \newcommand{\pbsl}{p \hspace{-5pt} / }

44: \newcommand{\pssl}{p' \hspace{-7pt} / }

45: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

46: %\def\Kop{\mathop{K}^{\!\circ}{}}

47: %\def\Gop{\mathop{g}^{\!\circ}{}}

48: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}

49: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}

50: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

51: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

52: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

53: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

54: % Bra-Kets:

55: \def\bra{\langle}

56: \def\ket{\rangle}

57: % Greek letters:

58: %\def\a{\alpha}

59: %\def\g{\gamma}

60: %\def\d{\delta}

61: %\def\e{\epsilon}

62: %\def\p{\pi}

63: %\def\ve{\varepsilon}

64: %\def\ep{\varepsilon}

65: %\def\et{\eta}

66: %\def\l{\lambda}

67: \def\m{\mu}

68: \def\n{\nu}

69: %\def\G{\Gamma}

70: %\def\D{\Delta}

71: %\def\L{\Lambda}

72: \def\parallel{| \hskip-0.03cm |}

73: %\def\S{{\bf S}}

74: \def\C{{\bf C}}

75: \def\bce{\begin{center}}

76: \def\ece{\end{center}}

77: \def\nn{\noindent}

78: \def\nonu{\nonumber}

79: \def\pbx{\partial_x}

80: \def\pa{\partial}

81: \def\al{\alpha}

82: \def\be{\beta}

83: \def\ga{\gamma}

84: \def\Ga{\Gamma}

85: \def\de{\delta}

86: \def\De{\Delta}

87: \def\ep{\epsilon}

88: \def\vep{\varepsilon}

89: \def\ze{\zeta}

90: \def\et{\eta}

91: \def\th{\theta}

92: \def\Th{\Theta}

93: \def\vth{\vartheta}

94: \def\io{\iota}

95: \def\ka{\kappa}

96: \def\la{\lambda}

97: \def\La{\Lambda}

98: \def\rh{\rho}

99: \def\si{\sigma} \def\Si{\Sigma}

100: \def\ta{\tau}

101: \def\up{\upsilon}

102: \def\Up{\Upsilon}

103: \def\ph{\phi}

104: \def\Ph{\Phi}

105: \def\vph{\varphi}

106: \def\ch{\chi}

107: \def\ps{\psi}

108: \def\Ps{\Psi}

109: \def\om{\omega}

110: \def\Om{\Omega}

111: \def\lbr{\left(}

112: \def\rbr{\right)}

113: \def\half{\frac{1}{2}}

114: \def\vol#1{{\bf #1}}

115: \def\R{{\bf R}}

116: \def\Z{{\bf Z}}

117: \def\RP{{\bf RP}}

118: \def\S{{\bf S}}

119: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

120: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{Tr}}

121: \newcommand{\p}{\hat{p}}

122: \newcommand{\q}{\hat{q}}

123: %\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

124: %\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

125: %\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

126: %\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

127: \newcommand{\vD}{{\bf D}}

128: \newcommand{\vW}{{\bf W}}

129: \newcommand{\vWp}{{\bf W}_{\perp}}

130: \newcommand{\ce}{\widehat{e}}

131: \newcommand{\te}{\widetilde{e}}

132: \newcommand{\tf}{\widetilde{f}}

133: \newcommand{\tW}{\widetilde{W}}

134: \newcommand{\tD}{\widetilde{D}}

135: %\newcommand{\dfrac}[2]{\displaystyle\frac

136: %{\mathstrut #1}{\mathstrut #2}}

137: \newcommand{\dsqrt}[1]{\sqrt{\mathstrut #1}}

138: \def\Kop{{\displaystyle \mathop{K}^{\circ}}{}}

139: \def\Gop{{\displaystyle \mathop{g}^{\circ}}{}}

140: \def\eop{{\displaystyle \mathop{e}^{\circ}}{}}

141: \def\epsop{{\displaystyle \mathop{\epsilon}^{\circ}}{}}

142: \def\eps6{{\displaystyle \mathop{\epsilon}^{6}}{}}

143: \def\nabop{{\displaystyle \mathop{\nabla}^{\circ}}{}}

144: \def\nab6{{\displaystyle \mathop{\nabla}^{6}}{}}

145: % Specials:

146: \def\to{\rightarrow}

147: 

148: 

149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%JustinNotation%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

150: 

151: \def\ft#1#2{{\textstyle{\frac{\scriptstyle #1}{\scriptstyle #2}}}}

152: \def\fft#1#2{\frac{#1}{#2}}

153: \def\0{{\sst{(0)}}}

154: \def\1{{\sst{(1)}}}

155: \def\2{{\sst{(2)}}}

156: \def\3{{\sst{(3)}}}

157: \def\4{{\sst{(4)}}}

158: \def\5{{\sst{(5)}}}

159: \def\6{{\sst{(6)}}}

160: \def\7{{\sst{(7)}}}

161: \def\8{{\sst{(8)}}}

162: \def\n{{\sst{(n)}}}

163: \def\td{\tilde}

164: \def\nnn{\nonumber}

165: \def\CP{{{\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}}}

166: 

167: 

168: 

169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FengNotation%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

170: 

171: 

172: 

173: \def\Pf{\mathop{\rm Pf}}

174: \def\Im{\mathop{\rm Im}}

175: \def\IZ{\mathbb{Z}}

176: \def\IR{\mathbb{R}}

177: \def\IQ{\mathbb{Q}}

178: \def\IC{\mathbb{C}}

179: \def\IP{\mathbb{P}}

180: 

181: 

182: \def\p{\partial}

183: \def\O #1{\overline{#1}}

184: \def\W #1{\widetilde{#1}}

185: \def\D #1{\dot{#1}}

186: \def\rightaction#1{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\partial

187: \over \partial #1}}

188: \def\leftaction#1{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\partial \over \partial #1}}

189: 

190: \def\func#1{\mathop{\rm #1}\nolimits}

191: \def\abs#1{\left| #1\right|}

192: \def\ba{\begin{array}}

193: \def\ea{\end{array}}

194: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

195: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

196: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

197: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

198: \def\braket#1{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

199: \def\bra#1{\left\langle #1\right|}

200: \def\ket#1{\left| #1\right\rangle}

201: \def\bbar#1{ \overline #1}

202: 

203: \def\Tr{\mathop{\rm Tr}}

204: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}

205: \def\det{\mathop{\rm det}}

206: \def\sign{\mathop{\rm sign}}

207: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

208: 

209: %\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}

210: \def\eref#1{(\ref{#1})}

211: \def\bit#1{\begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \hspace{#1 cm}}

212: \def\to{\rightarrow}

213: \def\d{\partial}

214: \def\la{\lambda}

215: \def\eps{\epsilon}

216: \def\lblb{({\bar\la}{\bar\la})}

217: \def\ald{{\dot\alpha}}

218: \def\bed{{\dot\beta}}

219: \def\gad{{\dot\gamma}}

220: \def\sid{{\dot\rho}}

221: 

222: \def\a{{\alpha}}

223: \def\b{{\beta}}

224: \def\c{{\gamma}}

225: \def\d{{\rm d}}

226: \def\da{{\dot{\alpha}}}

227: \def\db{{\dot{\beta}}}

228: \def\dc{{\dot{\gamma}}}

229: \def\th{{\theta}}

230: \def\bth{{\overline{\theta}}}

231: \def\tp{{(2 \pi)}}

232: \def\half{{1 \over 2}}

233: \def\Th{{\Theta}}

234: \def\IZ{\mathbb{Z}}

235: \def\IR{\mathbb{R}}

236: \def\IQ{\mathbb{Q}}

237: \def\IC{\mathbb{C}}

238: \def\IP{\mathbb{P}}

239: 

240: 

241: \def\p{\partial}

242: \def\O #1{\overline{#1}}

243: \def\W #1{\widetilde{#1}}

244: \def\D #1{\dot{#1}}

245: \def\rightaction#1{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\partial

246: \over \partial #1}}

247: \def\leftaction#1{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\partial \over \partial #1}}

248: 

249: \def\func#1{\mathop{\rm #1}\nolimits}

250: \def\abs#1{\left| #1\right|}

251: \def\ba{\begin{array}}

252: \def\ea{\end{array}}

253: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

254: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

255: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

256: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

257: \def\braket#1{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

258: \def\bra#1{\left\langle #1\right|}

259: \def\ket#1{\left| #1\right\rangle}

260: \def\bbar#1{ \overline #1}

261: 

262: \def\Tr{\mathop{\rm Tr}}

263: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}

264: \def\det{\mathop{\rm det}}

265: \def\sign{\mathop{\rm sign}}

266: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}}

267: %\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Figure~\ref{#1}}

268: \def\eref#1{(\ref{#1})}

269: \def\bit#1{\begin{array}{c} \\ \\ \end{array} \hspace{#1 cm}}

270: \def\to{\rightarrow}

271: \def\d{\partial}

272: \def\la{\lambda}

273: \def\eps{\epsilon}

274: \def\lblb{({\bar\la}{\bar\la})}

275: \def\ald{{\dot\alpha}}

276: \def\bed{{\dot\beta}}

277: \def\gad{{\dot\gamma}}

278: \def\sid{{\dot\rho}}

279: 

280: \def\a{{\alpha}}

281: \def\b{{\beta}}

282: \def\c{{\gamma}}

283: \def\d{{\rm d}}

284: \def\da{{\dot{\alpha}}}

285: \def\db{{\dot{\beta}}}

286: \def\dc{{\dot{\gamma}}}

287: \def\th{{\theta}}

288: \def\bth{{\overline{\theta}}}

289: \def\tp{{(2 \pi)}}

290: \def\half{{1 \over 2}}

291: \def\Th{{\Theta}}

292: 

293: \newcommand{\bean}{\begin{eqnarray*}}

294: \newcommand{\eean}{\end{eqnarray*}}

295: 

296: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

297: \begin{document}

298: \thispagestyle{empty} \addtocounter{page}{-1}

299: \begin{flushright}

300: KIAS-P06039 \\

301: %CALT-68-nnnn \\

302: {\tt hep-th/0608160}\\

303: \end{flushright}

304: 

305: \vspace*{1.3cm}

306: 

307: \centerline{ \Large \bf Brane Configurations for}

308: \vspace{.3cm} 

309: \centerline{ \Large \bf Nonsupersymmetric Meta-Stable Vacua}

310: \vspace{.3cm} 

311: \centerline{ \Large \bf  in SQCD with Adjoint Matter} 

312: \vspace*{1.5cm}

313: \centerline{{\bf Changhyun Ahn}} 

314: %and {\bf Yutaka Ookouchi $^{2}$}} 

315: \vspace*{1.0cm} 

316: \centerline{\it 

317: Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Taegu

318: 702-701, Korea} 

319: %\centerline{\it $^{2}$ California Institute of 

320: %Technology, Pasadena, CA91125, USA }

321: \vspace*{0.8cm} 

322: \centerline{\tt ahn@knu.ac.kr} 

323: %\qquad

324: %yutaka@caltech.edu} 

325: \vskip2cm

326: 

327: \centerline{\bf Abstract}

328: \vspace*{0.5cm}

329: 

330: We present the configurations of intersecting branes

331: in type IIA string theory corresponding to 

332: the meta-stable supersymmetry breaking 

333: vacua(hep-th/0608063) in the four-dimensional 

334: ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory coupled massive 

335: flavors with adjoint matter where the superpotential has three deformed

336: terms. 

337: 

338: \baselineskip=18pt

339: \newpage

340: \renewcommand{\theequation}

341: {\arabic{section}\mbox{.}\arabic{equation}}

342: 

343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

344: \section{Introduction}

345: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

346: 

347: The dynamical supersymmetry breaking occurs at local long-lived 

348: meta-stable minima 

349: separated from supersymmetric vacua by potential barrier \cite{ISS}.

350: Those nonsupersymmetric meta-stable vacua exist in ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD

351: with massive fundamental matter(with masses much smaller than the dynamical

352: scale of the gauge sector).

353: The supersymmetry is 

354: broken by the rank condition(not all the F-term conditions

355: can be satisfied). Typically classical flat directions exist and can be 

356: lifted by quantum corrections which generate positive mass terms for the 

357: pseudomoduli leading to long-lived meta-stable vacua.   

358: 

359: A simple generalization of \cite{ISS} doesn't  always guarantee the existence

360: of local meta-stable minima at one-loop \cite{FU}. Somehow the direction 

361: which was not properly lifted by the one-loop potential should be removed.

362: In \cite{FU}, this can be accomplished by adding a set of singlets in the 

363: quiver gauge theory on fractional branes at the simplest example of an 

364: obstructed geometry. 

365: Other possible embedding is given by brane probes wrapping cycles of

366: local Calabi-Yau and corresponding ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric quiver 

367: gauge theories have a landscape of inequivalent meta-stable vacua and 

368: all the moduli are stabilized \cite{OO}. Although these theories have two

369: gauge singlet fields, one of the F-term conditions enables us to remove 

370: one of the degrees of freedom due to the coupling of bi-fundamentals and 

371: adjoint field of second gauge group in the superpotential. 

372: 

373: Geometrical approach for these meta-stable vacua using the brane 

374: configuration in type IIA string theory 

375: have many interesting aspects \cite{OO1,FGU,BGHSS}. 

376: For the example of \cite{ISS}, turning on the quark masses in the 

377: electric theory corresponds to deform the superpotential by adding 

378: a term in linear in a singlet field in the dual magnetic theory. 

379: In the brane configuration, 

380: this is equivalent to move D6-branes(with worldvolume 0123789 directions) 

381: in particular

382: directions. The misalignment of D4-branes(with worldvolume 01236 directions) 

383: connecting NS5'-brane(with worldvolume 012389 directions) can be 

384: interpreted as a nontrivial F-term conditions in the field theory side.

385: Some of these D4-branes can join and recombine 

386: the same number of D4-branes connecting 

387: NS5-brane(with worldvolume 012345 directions) 

388: which is equivalent to give nonzero vacuum expectation values of

389: dual quarks. The remaining D4-branes connecting NS5'-brane can move 

390: in other two directions freely and this is exactly the classical moduli 

391: space of nonsupersymmetric vacua of the field theory. 

392: 

393: For the application of \cite{ISS}, it is natural to ask what happens 

394: if we add an adjoint field into ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD with fundamental matter.

395: It turns out that  a local meta-stable minimum 

396: at one-loop doesn't exist without

397: adding any deformations.

398: In \cite{AGM}, by deforming the electric description of this theory

399: with an addition of gauge singlet terms, they found a meta-stable 

400: nonsupersymmetric long-lived vacuum.

401: It was crucial to consider the extra large massive adjoint field as well as

402: the mass term for quarks and the coupling term 

403: between an adjoint and quarks.   

404: 

405: In this paper,  

406: after the review of standard supersymmetric brane configuration

407: in electric and magnetic theories for ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric 

408: gauge theory with fundamental matter and an adjoint field, we would like to

409: construct the brane configuration  for nonsupersymmetric 

410: meta-stable vacua \cite{AGM}

411: by realizing the three deformation terms in the magnetic dual theory

412: geometrically. 

413: 

414: Some of the relevant works with \cite{ISS} in different context are present

415: \cite{BBO}-\cite{Forste}. For the standard description for the brane

416: construction with gauge theory, see the reference \cite{GK}.

417: We follow the notations of \cite{GK}.

418: 

419: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

420: \section{Brane configurations for the meta-stable vacua}

421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

422: 

423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

424: \subsection{Electric theory for supersymmetric brane configuration}

425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

426: 

427: Before we are considering brane configuration for the

428: nonsupersymmetric meta-stable vacua in type IIA string theory, 

429: let us  

430: review the supersymmetric brane configuration for the 

431: ${\cal N}=1$ $U(N_c)$ super Yang-Mills theory coupled 

432: $N_f$ massive chiral multiplets $Q, \widetilde{Q}$  

433: and a single adjoint field $X$ with a cubic superpotential 

434: $W_{ele}= \frac{1}{3} g_X \tr X^3$.

435: 

436: In the electric description, let us describe the 

437: configuration of $N_c$ D4-branes stretched 

438: between NS5-branes and an NS5'-brane along the 

439: $x^6$ direction, with $N_f$ D6-branes at values of $x^6$

440: that are between those corresponding to the positions of

441: the NS5-branes and NS5'-brane \cite{EGK,EGKRS,GK}. 

442: The power of a superpotential is related to the number of 

443: NS5-branes. For the cubic case, the number of NS5-branes is given by 2.

444: 

445: $\bullet$

446: Two NS5-branes  with worldvolume $(012345)$ living at a point 

447: in the $(6789)$ directions.

448: 

449: $\bullet$ 

450: One NS5'-brane with worldvolume $(012389)$ living at a point 

451: in the $(4567)$ directions.

452: 

453: $\bullet$

454: $N_f$ D6-branes with worldvolume $(0123789)$ living at a point 

455: in the $(456)$ directions.

456: 

457: $\bullet$

458: $N_c$ D4-branes with worldvolume $(01236)$ living at a point 

459: in the $(45789)$ directions.

460: 

461: The 4-6 strings describe $N_f$ chiral multiplets in the fundamental 

462: representation of $U(N_c)$ and the only massless mode arising from

463: 4-4 strings  is the $U(N_c)$ worldvolume gauge field.

464: Here we define two complex coordinates

465: \bea

466: v \equiv x^4 + i x^5, \qquad w \equiv x^{8} + i x^9.

467: \nonu

468: \eea 

469: 

470: Initially, the two NS5-branes live at the same point in the $w$-plane.

471: Displacing them to 2 different points $w_1$ and $w_2$ provides

472: different possible configurations labelled by a set of non-negative 

473: integers $(r_1,r_2)$ where $r_1+r_2=N_c$. 

474: One can think of the locations $w_1$ and $w_2$ as determining

475: the vacuum expectation values of the adjoint field $X$

476: describing fluctuations of the D4-branes in the $w$-direction. 

477: There is a superpotential for the adjoint field $X$ of the form by resolving 

478: the cubic superpotential:

479: $W_{ele}=\frac{1}{3} g_X 

480: \tr X^3 + \frac{1}{2} m_X \tr X^2 +\la_X \tr X$. This superpotential

481: has 2 distinct minima in general. 

482: The integers $r_1$ and $r_2$ are the numbers of eigenvalues of the 

483: matrix $X$ residing in the different minima of the potential.

484: When $w_1$ and $w_2$ are distinct, $X$ is massive and the gauge group is 

485: broken $U(N_c) \rightarrow U(r_1) \times U(r_2)$.

486: 

487: The brane configuration for this theory is present in Figure 39 (a) of

488: \cite{GK}. Instead of drawing this in this paper, we will present 

489: the more important brane configuration for the magnetic theory 

490: in next subsection.  

491: 

492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

493: \subsection{Magnetic  theory for supersymmetric brane configuration

494: \label{magnetic}}

495: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

496: 

497: The Seiberg dual, magnetic theory, 

498: can be obtained by moving NS5-brane to the other side of

499: NS5'-brane. For the present case, we do this procedure twice because

500: there exist two NS5-branes for our problem(coming from 

501: the cubic superpotential).

502: The brane configuration for the magnetic dual was identified in 

503: \cite{EGK,EGKRS,GK} and corresponding figure was presented in Figure 39 (b) 

504: of \cite{GK} or we redraw it in Figure 1 below.

505: 

506: $\bullet$ Two NS5-branes with worldvolume (012345)(denoted by red color) 

507: 

508: $\bullet$ One NS5'-brane with worldvolume (012389)(denoted by blue color)

509: 

510: $\bullet$ $N_f$ D6-branes with worldvolume (0123789)(denoted by dotted lines)

511: 

512: $\bullet$ $(2N_f-N_c)$ D4-branes between the 

513: NS5'-brane and NS5-branes: first kind of D4-branes

514: 

515: $\bullet$  $2N_f$ D4-branes between D6-branes and NS5'-brane: 

516: second kind of D4-branes.

517: Two D4-branes are connected to each of $N_f$ D6-branes \footnote{There is no

518: analog of the s-rule \cite{HW} 

519: for these D4-branes because two such D4-branes can be

520: separated in the $w$-direction \cite{EGK,EGKRS}.}.

521: 

522: The low energy theory on the D4-branes stretched between 

523: NS5'-brane and NS5-branes  is

524: a $U(\widetilde{N} =2N_f -N_c)$ gauge theory

525: with an adjoint superfield $Y$ coming from 4-4 strings

526: connecting D4-branes of the first kind, $N_f$ fundamental flavors

527: of quarks $q, \widetilde{q}$ coming from 

528: 4-4 strings connecting D4-branes of the first kind to those of 

529: the second kind, and 2 magnetic meson fields $M_1$(which is equal to

530: $Q \widetilde{Q}$) and $M_2$(which is equal to $Q X \widetilde{Q}$)

531: each of which is an $N_f \times N_f$ matrix, coming from 

532: 4-4 strings connecting D4-branes of the second kind. 

533: The extra meson degrees of freedom correspond to the motion of the 

534: $2N_f$ D4-branes in the $w$-direction along the D6-branes and 

535: NS5'-brane \footnote{In the gauge theory, this corresponds to putting 

536: $q=\widetilde{q} =Y=0$ and turning on arbitrary vacuum expectation 

537: values for the singlets $M_1$ and $M_2$ \cite{EGKRS}. The classical 

538: moduli space is $2N_f^2$ dimensional, not $4N_f^2$. 

539: One simply gets two copies of the 

540: moduli space of the magnetic theory for ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD with 

541: fundamentals \cite{ISS}. The explicit counting of $N_f^2$ 

542: massless modes was given in \cite{GK}: Figure 29 of \cite{GK}. }. 

543: The magnetic superpotential corresponding to 

544: the resolved electric superpotential \footnote{Although the electric 

545: superpotential has  extra adjoint $Z$-dependent terms \cite{EGKRS,GK}, 

546: if there exists 

547: a single NS5'-brane(i.e., quadratic superpotential in $Z$), then $Z$ is

548: massive and can be integrated out. This amounts to putting $Z=0$ in the 

549: superpotential. Therefore, there is no dual adjoint field in the 

550: magnetic superpotential. We will come to the finite massive case 

551: which will lead to quartic superpotential $(Q \widetilde{Q})^2$ 

552: in next subsection.} 

553: is given by \cite{Kutasov,KS,KSS}

554: \bea

555: W_{mag}  = 

556: \frac{1}{3} \widetilde{g}_Y \tr Y^3 + \frac{1}{2} \widetilde{m}_Y 

557: \tr Y^2 + \widetilde{\la}_Y \tr Y +

558: \tr \left( \frac{1}{2} \widetilde{m}_Y \widetilde{q} M_1 q + 

559: \widetilde{g}_Y \widetilde{q} M_2 q +

560: \widetilde{g}_Y M_1 q Y \widetilde{q}    \right).

561: \nonu

562: \eea

563: Also one can put the intermediate scale in the meson terms above 

564: by taking into account the mass dimension of meson and this scale 

565: relates the strong coupling scale of electric gauge group to  the 

566: strong scale coupling of its magnetic dual gauge group. 

567: The coefficient of beta function implies 

568: that $2\widetilde{N}-N_f$ is negative

569: when $N_f < \frac{2}{3} N_c$ and in the dual magnetic theory

570: we should have $\widetilde{N} > 0$. Therefore, for the region 

571: where the magnetic theory is IR free, 

572: \bea

573: \frac{1}{2} N_c < N_f < \frac{2}{3} N_c 

574: \nonu

575: \eea

576: the stable vacuum is present \cite{AGM} and we will study these vacua

577: in the brane configuration in next subsection.

578: 

579: For convenience, we present the supersymmetric 

580: brane configuration in magnetic theory in 

581: Figure 1 which will be our starting point.

582: 

583: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

584: \begin{figure}[ht]

585:    \epsfxsize=5in 

586: \centerline{\epsffile{brane1.eps}}

587:    \caption[FIG. \arabic{figure}.]{ 

588: The standard 

589: supersymmetric brane configuration for the magnetic 

590: $U(\widetilde{N}=2N_f-N_c)$ 

591: theory with $N_f$ flavors with an adjoint. 

592: There are also two gauge singlet fields.  This is  from a 

593: Figure 39 (b) of \cite{GK}. We emphasize here that the number of 

594: NS5-branes is two and the total D4-branes connecting to D6-branes is 

595: $2N_f$, not $N_f$. Two D4-branes are connected to each of 

596: $N_f$ D6-branes. }

597: \label{fig1}

598: \end{figure}

599: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

600: 

601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

602: \subsection{Nonsupersymmetric brane configuration 

603: for the meta-stable vacua}

604: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

605: 

606: In \cite{AGM}, 

607: the dangerous extra flat directions which cannot be 

608: stabilized at one-loop

609: can be removed by deforming the original electric theory

610: where deformed mesonic terms are given by three terms

611: \bea

612: \Delta W_{ele} = \la_Q \tr Q X \widetilde{Q} + m_Q \tr Q \widetilde{Q} +

613: h \tr (Q \widetilde{Q})^2.

614: \nonu

615: \eea

616: The first term can be seen from ${\cal N}=2$ supersymmetric QCD where

617: when we give a vacuum expectation value to the adjoint field $X$, the 

618: hypermultiplets receive a mass. 

619: Rotating both NS5-branes relative to the D6-branes in ${\cal N}=2$ brane

620: configuration \cite{Barbon,GK} 

621: keeping the two NS5-branes and all the D6-branes parallel 

622: among themselves provides the change of the value for the coupling

623: $\la_Q$ between $X$ and quarks $Q$ and $\widetilde{Q}$. 

624: The second term is a mass deformation 

625: by turning on the mass matrix for the quarks that is an arbitrary

626: $N_f \times N_f$ complex matrix.

627: The last term can be obtained by integrating out an extra 

628: massive adjoint field $Z$

629: and as we take the limit $h \rightarrow 0$, we 

630: recover the usual ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD with an adjoint field $X$.

631: Rotating one NS5-brane by keeping other NS5-brane and all the D6-branes

632: fixed corresponds to the changing the mass of this extra adjoint chiral 

633: superfield $Z$. 

634: 

635: Let us describe the above deformations in the magnetic theory as follows:

636: 1) Turning on the quark masses in the electric description 

637: corresponds to 

638: deforming the superpotential by adding a term in linear in $M_1$ since

639: the meson field $M_1$ is identified with 

640: $Q\widetilde{Q}$ in the electric description.

641: 2) Changing the value of the Yukawa coupling between $X$ and the quarks

642: $Q$, $\widetilde{Q}$ 

643: corresponds to deforming the superpotential by adding 

644: a term in linear in $M_2$ because 

645: the meson field $M_2$ is identified with 

646: $Q X \widetilde{Q}$ in the electric description.

647: 3) Finally, changing the mass of adjoint chiral superfield $Z$ 

648: corresponds to deforming the superpotential by adding 

649: a quadratic term in $M_1$.

650: Therefore, the full magnetic 

651: superpotential $W_{tot}$ 

652: with rescales can be written as  \cite{AGM} 

653: \bea

654: W_{mag}+ \Delta W_{mag} & = & 

655: \frac{1}{3} g_Y \tr Y^3 + \frac{1}{2} m_Y \tr Y^2 +\la_Y \tr Y +

656: \tr \left( h_1 \widetilde{q} M_1 q + h_2 \widetilde{q} M_2 q +

657: h_3 M_1 q Y \widetilde{q}    \right) \nonu \\

658: &-& 

659: h_1 m_1^2 \tr M_1 -h_2 m_2^2 \tr M_2 + m_3 \tr M_1^2. 

660: \label{superpotential}

661: \eea

662: 

663: Therefore, our main work is to find out the brane configuration 

664: by starting with the supersymmetric brane configuration in subsection  

665: \ref{magnetic} where the relevant superpotential is given by the first line

666: of (\ref{superpotential})

667: and adding the effects coming from the last three terms

668: in (\ref{superpotential}) and to see how it differs from the supersymmetric 

669: brane configuration.

670: 

671: One of the F-term conditions(a derivative of $W_{mag} + \Delta W_{mag}\equiv

672: W_{tot}$ 

673: with respect to

674: $M_2$), $F_{M_2}$, gives \cite{AGM}

675: \bea

676: q \widetilde{q} - m_2^2 {\bf 1}_{N_f} =0.

677: \label{Fterm}

678: \eea

679: Since the ranks of $q$ and $\widetilde{q}$ are at most 

680: $\widetilde{N}$, this equation cannot be satisfied if

681: the rank of the $N_f \times N_f$ matrix exceeds 

682: $\widetilde{N}$.

683: Turning on 

684: the value of the Yukawa coupling between $X$ and the quarks

685: $Q, \widetilde{Q}$ 

686: breaks the supersymmetry in the magnetic description.

687: This is the rank condition of \cite{ISS}. 

688: 

689: 

690: The local minima of the tree-level $F$ and $D$-term potential 

691: from the field theory analysis

692: can be parametrized as \cite{AGM}

693: \bea

694: <q> &= & \left(

695: \begin{array}{c}

696: m_2 e^{\theta} {\bf 1}_{\widetilde{N}} \nonu \\

697: 0

698: \end{array}

699: \right), \qquad 

700: <\widetilde{q}> =

701:  \left(

702: \begin{array}{cc}

703: m_2 e^{-\theta}  {\bf 1}_{\widetilde{N}}   &

704: 0

705: \end{array}

706: \right), \qquad <Y>=0

707: \nonu \\

708: <M_1> &=& \frac{h_1}{2m_3}

709:  \left(

710: \begin{array}{cc}

711: (m_1^2-m_2^2)  {\bf 1}_{\widetilde{N}} & 0 \nonu \\

712: 0 & m_1^2  {\bf 1}_{N_f-\widetilde{N}} 

713: \end{array}

714: \right), \nonu \\

715: <M_2>  &=&

716:  \left(

717: \begin{array}{cc}

718: - \frac{h_1^2}{2 h_2 m_3}(m_1^2-m_2^2)  {\bf 1}_{\widetilde{N}}  & 0 

719:  \\

720: 0 & M_0  {\bf 1}_{N_f-\widetilde{N}} 

721: \end{array}

722: \right).

723: \label{solution}

724: \eea

725: 

726: Now we are ready to describe the brane configuration for the meta-stable

727: supersymmetry breaking vacuum characterized by (\ref{solution}).

728: Our starting point is the supersymmetric brane configuration in subsection 

729: \ref{magnetic} and describe brane dynamics for each deformation term in the 

730: superpotential (\ref{superpotential}). We will end up with the 

731: intermediate 

732: brane configuration  in Figure 2 after the following four steps.  

733: 

734: $\bullet$ Step 1. The $N_f$ D4-branes of second kind can move   

735: $w$-direction(since these D4-branes connecting 

736: D6-branes to the NS5'-brane are {\it not} rigid

737: and they can fluctuate in $w$-direction)  and arrive at $w=0$.

738: 

739: This is a reverse process when we are doing  Seiberg dual \cite{EGK,GK}. 

740: At this initial Step 1, we consider the vacuum structure where

741: the magnetic gauge group $U(\widetilde{N})$ is not broken by adjoint 

742: field $Y$. In brane language, remember that 

743: two nonnegative integers $r_1, r_2$ corresponding to 

744: the degeneracies of the eigenvalues of $Y$

745: where $r_1 + r_2 = \widetilde{N}$ and the locations $w_1$ and $w_2$ for

746: two NS5-branes in $w$-direction  corresponding to 

747: the eigenvalues for $Y$ determine the vacuum expectation value

748: for $Y$. When $r_1=0$, then we have $w_2=0$ implying that the 

749: $r_2=\widetilde{N}$ entries of $Y$ have zeros.

750: In other words, the two NS5-branes are located at $w=0$: {\it coincident } 

751: two NS5-branes (012345) at the origin $w=0$(denoted by two dotted red 

752: lines) in Figure 2.  

753: Other choices for the vacuum

754: expectation values of $Y$ don't change the tree-level

755: potential energy of the vacua \cite{AGM}.  

756: 

757: $\bullet$ Step 2. The NS5'-brane rotates in the $(v,w)$-plane freely since

758: all the D4-branes of first and second kinds

759: connecting to it are sitting at $w=0$. 

760: 

761: The {\it counterclockwise } 

762: rotation angle $\phi'$ when we 

763: look at from the right hand side of NS5'-brane is given by 

764: $\frac{1}{m_3(\phi')} = \tan \phi'$ \cite{Barbon,GK}.

765: This situation is in the intermediate status between NS5'-brane (012389)(the blue dotted line)

766: and tilted NS5'-brane(the blue solid line) of Figure 2. 

767: The relative angle $\phi'$ between the NS5'-brane and NS5-branes

768: encodes the mass of the adjoint chiral superfield 

769: $Z$ in the electric theory. In general, there is also a phase factor 

770: $e^{i \theta_{w}}$ in front of $\tan \phi'$ above

771: where $\theta_w$ is a rotation angle

772: in $w$-plane \cite{GK}.

773: In magnetic description, this rotation

774: induces the mass term for $M_1$.

775: Recall that one of the F-term conditions(a derivative of the 

776: superpotential $W_{tot}$ with respect to $M_1$), $F_{M_1}$,  

777: contains $m_3 M_1$ term.  

778: 

779: $\bullet$ Step 3. The $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes move $v$-direction.

780: 

781: Among $N_f$ D4-branes of second kind, 

782: $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes can combine with those D4-branes of first kind

783: and these combined D4-branes can leave NS5'-brane like as \cite{OO1,FGU}. 

784: In the electric 

785: brane description, the mass of quarks corresponds to the relative 

786: displacement between D6-branes and D4-branes in the 

787: $v$-direction(in the vertical direction of Figure 2).

788: The locations of D6-branes in the $v$-plane are the eigenvalues of

789: mass matrix. For equal masses \cite{AGM}, the $\widetilde{N}$ 

790: D4-branes are located at positive 

791: $v_{m_1}=-h_1 m_1^2$ which is a distance to the location for them 

792: from the origin in Figure 2. 

793: This contribution together with 

794: the contribution coming from  step 4 below will give us 

795: the final $\widetilde{N}$ entries for the meson $M_1$.

796: In magnetic description, this deformation

797: induces a linear term in $M_1$.

798: Note, in corresponding field theory side, 

799: that the expression of $-h_1 m_1^2 {\bf 1}_{N_f}$

800: is present in the F-term equation $F_{M_1}$.  

801: What happens for the remaining $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ D4-branes of

802: second kind? The one end of these D4-branes is fixed at $(v,w)=(0,0)$ and the

803: other end is located at positive $v_{m_1}=-h_1 m_1^2$.

804: Remember that the D6-branes and NS5'-brane are { \it not }

805: parallel to each other and at an 

806: angle $\phi'$ at this stage. Therefore, those D4-branes connecting both

807: D6-branes and NS5'-brane

808: are rigid and cannot

809: move any directions freely.

810: Therefore, the $(N_f -\widetilde{N})$ entries of the 

811: vacuum expectation value of the meson $M_1$ correspond to 

812: the $v$ coordinate of D4-branes:$-\frac{v_{m_1}}{2m_3} {\bf 1}_{N_f -

813: \widetilde{N}}$. The overall coefficient $1/m_3$ is related to the rotation 

814: at Step 2.  

815: 

816: $\bullet$ Step 4. Both NS5 and NS5'-branes with same rotation angle

817: rotate in the $(v,w)$-plane.

818: 

819: The {\it counterclockwise} 

820: rotation angle $\phi$ when we 

821: look at from the right hand side of NS5-brane is given by 

822: $-h_2 m_2^2 = \cos \phi$ \cite{Barbon,GK}.

823: After this rotation, the final brane configuration 

824: is depicted in Figure 2.

825: In magnetic description, this 

826: induces a linear term in $M_2$.

827: In this process, $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ D4-branes of second kind are not 

828: affected too much if $v_{m_1}$ is small 

829: because they cannot move unless the combined rotation of

830: $\phi'$ and $\phi$ give rise to the parallel between D6-branes and NS5'-brane. 

831: For general $v_{m_1}$, the $w$ coordinate of  end point 

832: of these D4-branes is not zero.

833: The NS5'-brane rotates in the $(v,w)$-plane with counterclockwise 

834: rotation angle $(\phi' + \phi)$ denoted by an angle between 

835:  NS5'-brane (012389)(the blue dotted line) and  tilted NS5'-brane(the

836:  blue solid line) 

837: in Figure 2

838: during the whole process.

839: In the field theory side, the F-term (\ref{Fterm}) can be partially

840: cancelled by a recombination of D4-branes in Step 3 above. In other words, 

841: this recombination corresponds to the fact that $\widetilde{N}$ entries

842: of the dual quarks $q, \widetilde{q}$ 

843: acquire nonzero vacuum expectation values  to minimize

844: the F-term.  

845: Therefore, the $\widetilde{N}$ entries of the 

846: vacuum expectation value of the meson $M_1$ coming from Step 3 above 

847: and Step 4 here

848: correspond to 

849: the $(v,w)$ coordinates of D4-branes:$-\frac{1}{2m_3} \left(v_{m_1}-

850: \frac{h_1}{h_2} 

851: \cos \phi \right) {\bf 1}_{

852: \widetilde{N}}$.  From the relation (\ref{Fterm}), 

853: one can write down 

854: $h_1 q \widetilde{q}$ arising from F-term equation $F_{M_1}$ as 

855: $\left(\frac{h_1}{h_2}\right) h_2 q 

856: \widetilde{q}=\left(\frac{h_1}{h_2} \right) 

857: h_2 m_2^2 {\bf 1}_{\widetilde{N}}$ and

858: the dimensions of $h_1 \cos\phi$ and $h_2 v_{m_1}$ are the same. 

859: 

860: Let us draw the intermediate brane configuration I in Figure 2 which shows the 

861: exact field theory results (\ref{solution}) except the information on the

862: vacuum expectation value for other gauge singlet $M_2$ that will be described

863: in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

864: 

865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

866: \begin{figure}[ht]

867:    \epsfxsize=5in 

868: \centerline{\epsffile{brane2-1.eps}}

869:    \caption[FIG. \arabic{figure}.]{ 

870: The intermediate brane configuration I.

871: This brane configuration consists of tilted NS5'-brane(solid blue), 

872: tilted NS5-brane(solid red), D6-branes (0123789)(dotted black), and 

873: D4-branes connecting between D6-branes and NS5-brane or connecting

874: between D6-branes and NS5'-brane(solid black).

875: The three deformations are characterized by 

876: a rotation angle $\phi'$, a distance in $v$-direction $v_{m_1}$ and a

877: rotation angle $\phi$.

878: The vacuum expectation value for $M_1$ is fixed completely through  

879: this brane configuration. }

880: \label{fig2}

881: \end{figure}

882: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

883: 

884: So far, we have discussed about the moduli space of the magnetic theory 

885: coming from half of the $2N_f$ D4-branes of the second kind in the brane 

886: configuration. Now we describe the moduli space of the magnetic theory

887: coming from the remaining half of the $2N_f$ D4-branes of the second kind.

888: The process for this is as follows: 

889: The Step 1 and Step 3 are the same as before. The new feature appears 

890: in Step 2 and Step 4 denoted by Step 2' and Step 4' respectively below.

891: 

892: $\bullet$ Step 1. The {\it other} $N_f$ D4-branes of second kind can move   

893: $w$-direction and arrive at $w=0$.

894: 

895: $\bullet$ Step 2'. The NS5'-brane rotates in the $(v,w)$-plane freely since

896: all the D4-branes of first and second kinds

897: are sitting at $w=0$.

898: 

899: The {\it clockwise } 

900: rotation angle which is opposite to the previous rotation angle in Step 2

901: is denoted by $\phi''$ when we 

902: look at from the right hand side of NS5'-brane. This can be seen 

903: from the rotation from NS5'-brane (012389)(solid blue line) to tilted

904: NS5-brane(dotted blue line) in Figure 3. 

905: This rotation angle $\phi''$ will be fixed at the final stage.

906: 

907: $\bullet$ Step 3. The $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes move $v$-direction.

908: 

909: For equal masses, the $\widetilde{N}$ 

910: D4-branes are located at positive 

911: $v_{m_1}=-h_1 m_1^2$ as before.

912: 

913: $\bullet$ Step 4'. Both NS5 and NS5'-branes rotate in the $(v,w)$-plane.

914:  

915: The {\it counterclockwise } 

916: rotation angle $\phi$ when we 

917: look at from the right hand side of NS5-brane is given by 

918: $-h_2 m_2^2 = \cos \phi = \cos \phi''$. In other words, 

919: the rotation of NS5'-brane st Step 2' is not independent but

920: depends on the rotation of NS5-branes.

921: Then the location of NS5'-brane doesn't change by the 

922: rotation from tilted NS5-brane(dotted blue line) to NS5'-brane(solid blue line) in Figure 3.

923: In this process, $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ D4-branes of second kind

924: can move because

925: NS5'-brane is oriented into $w$ direction(the location of NS5'-brane does not

926: change during four steps) and therefore these D4-branes are

927: not rigid due to the parallel between D6-branes and NS5'-brane. 

928: In field theory analysis, the two equations of motion on $F_{q}$ and 

929: $F_{\widetilde{q}}$ do not fix the vacuum expectation value of $M_2$

930: completely. 

931: Therefore, the $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ entries of the 

932: vacuum expectation value of the meson $M_2$ are not fixed and are parametrized

933: by pseudomoduli encoded in an arbitrary $(N_f-\widetilde{N}) \times 

934: (N_f-\widetilde{N})$ mesonic matrix $M_0$.

935: Moreover, 

936: the $\widetilde{N}$ entries of the 

937: vacuum expectation value of the meson $M_2$ correspond to 

938: the $(v,w)$ coordinates of D4-branes:$\frac{h_1}{2h_2 m_3} 

939: \left(v_{m_1}-\frac{h_1}{h_2} 

940: \cos \phi \right) {\bf 1}_{

941: \widetilde{N}}$ which is equal to minus $\widetilde{N}$ entries of 

942: the vacuum expectation value of $M_1$ multiplied by $h_1/h_2$.   

943: Note that the overall coefficient for this expression is 

944: different from the one in previous brane configuration where the 

945: corresponding rotation angle was $\phi'$.

946: According to the field theory analysis \cite{AGM}, 

947: the vacuum expectation value of $M_0$ in the quantum minimum

948: is nonzero \footnote{One of the pseudomoduli 

949: $\theta$ in the vacuum expectation

950: values $q$ and $\widetilde{q}$ is not manifest in the 

951: geometry we have considered.}.

952: 

953: We end up with the 

954: intermediate brane configuration II  in Figure 3 after above four steps.  

955: 

956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

957: \begin{figure}[ht]

958:    \epsfxsize=5in 

959: \centerline{\epsffile{brane3-1.eps}}

960:    \caption[FIG. \arabic{figure}.]{ 

961: The intermediate brane configuration II.

962: This brane configuration consists of NS5'-brane(solid blue), 

963: tilted NS5-brane(solid red), D6-branes (0123789)(dotted black), 

964: and D4-branes  connecting between D6-branes and NS5-brane or connecting

965: between D6-branes and NS5'-brane(solid black).

966: The vacuum expectation value for $M_2$ is partially fixed through  

967: this brane configuration.}

968: \label{fig3}

969: \end{figure}

970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

971: 

972: 

973: Now let us combine the two different brane configurations I and II or describe

974: them simultaneously for the meta-stable vacua. 

975: Let us begin with Step 1 in brane configurations I and 

976: II at the same time. 

977: Then we continue Step 2 of brane configuration I while keeping the 

978: $N_f$ D4-branes appearing at the stage of Step 1 in brane configuration II intact. Next 

979: we do the Step 3 of both brane configurations I and II(i.e., turning on the mass term). 

980: Then, we end up with 

981: Step 4 of brane configuration I while 

982: remaining the 

983: above $N_f$ D4-branes intact in this case also.

984: At this stage, the only Step 1 and 3 of brane 

985: configuration II are done; splitting of $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ D4-branes and 

986: $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes.  

987: So one can imagine 

988: that there exists a brane configuration of Figure 2 together 

989: with these ``extra'' D4-branes.

990:  

991: We want to execute the remaining process of brane configuration II on these 

992: D4-branes.

993: Now we rotate NS5'-brane with an clockwise angle 

994: $(\phi'+\phi)$ in Figure 2 

995: and put it in its original position of Figure 3 without touching any other 

996: branes. This procedure can be interpreted as the relative magnitude 

997: of vacuum expectation values $M_1$ and $M_2$, in the field theory side. 

998: Then we perform the Step 2'

999: of brane configuration II with tilted $(N_f-\widetilde{N})$ D4-branes 

1000: connecting to NS5'-brane and 

1001: $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes connecting to NS5-brane of 

1002: Figure 2.  

1003: Then the final procedure of Step 4' of brane configuration II can be 

1004: done similarly. Note that  

1005: although the positions of D4-branes connecting to NS5'-brane 

1006: in Figure 2 are changed during the 

1007: process of Step 2' of brane configuration II, after 

1008: Step 4' of brane configuration II is done, they 

1009: are located at the previous positions. Effectively they don't change in

1010: this process. 

1011: The Step 1 and 3 of brane configuration II were done already in

1012: previous paragraph above.

1013: 

1014: So we can draw the final brane configuration corresponding to 

1015: meta-stable vacua in Figure 4 which is a combination of brane

1016: configurations I and II.

1017: From this brane configuration, the classical moduli space for two

1018: singlet fields without any deformations with dimension $2N_f^2$ 

1019: is distributed to 

1020: the vacuum expectation values for $M_1$ which is fixed 

1021: completely(through 

1022: the brane configuration I) and $M_2$ which is fixed 

1023: partially(through the brane configuration II). 

1024: 

1025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1026: \begin{figure}[ht]

1027:    \epsfxsize=5in 

1028: \centerline{\epsffile{brane4.eps}}

1029:    \caption[FIG. \arabic{figure}.]{ 

1030: The final brane configuration  corresponding to the field theory 

1031: configuration (\ref{solution}).

1032: This brane configuration consists of NS5'-brane (012389)(solid blue), 

1033: tilted NS5-branes(solid red), D6-branes (0123789)(dotted black), 

1034: and various D4-branes

1035:  connecting between D6-branes and NS5-brane or connecting

1036: between D6-branes and NS5'-brane(solid black). 

1037: Half of D4-branes connecting to NS5'-brane 

1038: can move in $w$ direction 

1039: freely(corresponding to the vacuum expectation value $M_0$ of $M_2$

1040: in (\ref{solution})). The other half of D4-branes connecting to NS5'-brane 

1041: cannot move in $w$ direction and their $w$ coordinates intersecting NS5'-brane which are not

1042: equal to zero depend on the rotation angles $\phi$ and $\phi'$. Their

1043: $v$ coordinates intersecting D6-branes are specified by $v_{m_1}$. In

1044: field theory side, this is equivalent to the fact that the vacuum

1045: expectation value for $M_1$ is fixed completely. The

1046: angle $\phi'$ is not seen explicitly in this figure.   The

1047: three

1048: deformation parameters are characterized by $\phi, \phi'$ and $v_{m_1}$. }

1049: \label{fig4}

1050: \end{figure}

1051: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1052: 

1053: As in the same spirit of \cite{OO1,FGU},

1054: one can understand how the decay 

1055: of the meta-stable vacuum into the 

1056: supersymmetric vacua in this brane configuration. 

1057: Let us move the upper $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes toward to 

1058: the NS5'-brane

1059: such that there exist $\widetilde{N}$ D4-branes connecting NS5'-brane

1060: and NS5-branes and $N_f$ D4-branes connecting the 

1061: NS5'-branes and D6-branes in Figure 4. The final configuration for 

1062: NS5-branes(dotted red lines) 

1063: is  perpendicular to NS5'-brane(solid blue line). 

1064: In this process, there exists an energy cost

1065: which is equivalent to the height of potential barrier

1066: between the nonsupersymmetric vacua and supersymmetric ones.

1067: Now there exist $N_f$ D4-branes connecting the NS5'-brane and 

1068: D6-branes and they can move in the $w$-direction.

1069: The locations of these D4-branes in the $w$-direction

1070: can be encoded by the vacuum expectation value of $M_2$.

1071: The field theory result implies that 

1072: there are supersymmetric configuration at \cite{AGM}

1073: \bea

1074: h_2 <M_2> ={m_2} 

1075: \left( \frac{\widetilde{\Lambda}}{m_2}\right)^{\frac{N_f-2\widetilde{N}}{N_f-

1076: \widetilde{N}}} \left( \frac{m_2}{m_Y} 

1077: \right)^{\frac{\widetilde{N}}{N_f-\widetilde{N}}} {\bf 1}_{N_f}.

1078: \nonu

1079: \eea

1080: This was obtained by taking the minmization of low energy effective 

1081: superpotential which was obtained by integrating out 

1082: the massive fields $M_1$ and $Y$ in (\ref{superpotential}) and using 

1083: their equations of motion.

1084: In the small $\frac{m_2}{\widetilde{\Lambda}}$ limit,

1085: the vacuum expectation values above are much smaller than the scale 

1086: $\widetilde{\Lambda}$ and much larger than mass scale $m_2$ of the 

1087: magnetic theory.

1088: %: $m_2 << h_2 <M_2> << \widetilde{\Lambda}$.

1089: 

1090: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1091: \section{Comments}

1092: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1093: 

1094: Let us make some comments on the future directions.

1095: 

1096: $\bullet$ The magnetic configuration for the case where 

1097: $k'$ NS5'-branes are connected by $\widetilde{N}(=N_f-N_c)$ D4-branes to

1098: an NS5-brane on their right and by a single D4-brane to each of 

1099: $N_f$ D6-branes on their left was given in \cite{EGKRS}.  

1100: The low energy theory on the D4-branes of first kind 

1101: has a gauge group $U(\widetilde{N})$ and an adjoint $Y'$ coming from 

1102: 4-4 strings connecting D4-branes of first kind, and $N_f$ fundamentals

1103: $q$ and $\widetilde{q}$ coming from 4-4 strings connecting D4-branes of the 

1104: first kind to those of the second kind. Finally, a single meson field

1105: coming from 4-4 strings connecting D4-branes of the second kind

1106: is coupled to the adjoint field and the quarks. 

1107: For $k'=2$ case, the gauge theory analysis was given in \cite{ASY}.

1108: It would be interesting to study whether there exist nonsupersymmetric 

1109: meta-stable vacua by following the method of \cite{ISS}

1110: and if not, how one can think of the possible 

1111: deformations in the superpotential to make them stabilize 

1112: at one-loop?

1113: 

1114: $\bullet$ As pointed out in \cite{FGU}, 

1115: it might be possible to do 

1116: a similar analysis for the nonsupersymmetric minima in orthogonal and 

1117: symplectic gauge groups. 

1118: The ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD with fundamentals and an adjoint field for these

1119: gauge groups should have orientifold 4 plane, O4-plane with either 

1120: plus D4-brane

1121: charge or minus D4-brane charge. 

1122: Similarly, the ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD with fundamentals 

1123: and a symmetric(antisymmetric) tensor field for orthogonal(symplectic)

1124: gauge group should have orientifold 6 plane.

1125: We expect that for the former case with O4-plane, one should add

1126: possible mesonic deformations in electric theory or magnetic theory because

1127: the number of  magnetic meson fields is the same as the case of 

1128: $U(\widetilde{N})$ gauge group. Also this is clear from the brane 

1129: configuration we described in this paper.     

1130: 

1131: $\bullet$ Although there exist many field theory results \cite{ILS} 

1132: where their Seiberg 

1133: duals are known, it would be interesting to study meta-stable vacua for

1134: some field theory 

1135: results where D-brane descriptions are allowed. Some of the examples are 

1136: presented in \cite{FGU} for unitary gauge groups.   Due to the presence of

1137: many mesonic fields in the dual magnetic theory, a systematic analysis of the 

1138: effect of deforming the theory by 

1139: the addition of gauge invariant superpotential terms is needed. 

1140: 

1141: $\bullet$ As presented in \cite{Ooguri}, it might be possible to 

1142: apply the method of \cite{ISS} to the more general quiver gauge theories.

1143: The lesson from \cite{OO} implies that 

1144: the coupling between dual quarks in the first gauge group factor and 

1145: adjoint field of second gauge group factor gives rise to fix the direction of 

1146: one of the mesonic fields. The immediate application in this direction is 

1147: to take the product gauge group of orthogonal and symplectic gauge group with

1148: appropriate matter contents and

1149: this gauge theory appears in the brane configuration also. Or the 

1150: orientifolded version of quiver gauge theory in \cite{OO} 

1151: by taking the appropriate projections

1152: correctly is possible.    

1153:   

1154: 

1155: $\bullet$ According to the observation of \cite{OV}, parallel to the standard

1156: construction of \cite{EGK}, the geometry of ${\cal N}=1$ Seiberg duality

1157: arises from wrapping D6-branes around 3-cycles of Calabi-Yau threefolds 

1158: in type IIA string theory. In this process, the T-duality between 

1159: the BPS states of ${\cal N}=2$ string theory  and ${\cal N}=1$ field theory

1160: in four dimensions was crucial. So it is natural to ask how this geometric 

1161: point of view in the meta-stable vacua brane configuration appears in various 

1162: field theory results \cite{OV,Ahn}. In order to

1163: do this, one needs to understand how T-duality works at the intersecting 

1164: branes.

1165:  

1166: $\bullet$ There is also quantum effects in both electric 

1167: and magnetic ${\cal N}=1$ SQCD theories. According to \cite{Witten},

1168: the NS5-branes and NS5'-branes are deformed by the D4-branes 

1169: ending on them. This bending is a quantum effect in the type IIA string 

1170: description. For the problem we discussed in this paper, the careful analysis 

1171: leads to the fact that 

1172: only one combination of two $U(1)$ R-symmetries survives in the

1173: quantum theory. The bending of the NS5-branes and NS5'-branes were given 

1174: explicitly in \cite{EGKRS}.   

1175: Although there exist some partial results in \cite{FGU}, the quantitative 

1176: analysis remains open problem in the lifting the brane configuration of

1177: M-theory. The recent paper \cite{BGHSS} might be helpful.

1178: 

1179: 

1180: \vspace{.7cm}

1181: 

1182: 

1183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1184: \centerline{\bf Acknowledgments}

1185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1186: 

1187: I would like to thank Freddy Cachazo, Sebastian Franco, Ryuichiro Kitano, 

1188: David Kutasov, Kimyeong Lee, 

1189: Yutaka Ookouchi, Chang Soon Park, Jaemo Park, 

1190: Masaki Shigemori, Kyungsung Woo,

1191: Ho-Ung Yee, 

1192: and Piljin Yi for discussions.

1193: In particular, I thank Yutaka Ookouchi for intensive discussions on 

1194: ISS model \cite{ISS} and some comments on this paper.

1195: This work was supported by grant No.

1196: R01-2006-000-10965-0 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea

1197: Science \& Engineering Foundation. 

1198: I thank Hirosi Ooguri for my visit at 

1199: Caltech Particle Theory Group  where

1200: this work was undertaken and I thank KIAS(Korea Institute for 

1201: Advanced Study) for hospitality. 

1202: 

1203: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1204: 

1205: %\cite{Intriligator:2006dd}

1206: \bibitem{ISS}

1207:   K.~Intriligator, N.~Seiberg and D.~Shih,

1208:   ``Dynamical SUSY breaking in meta-stable vacua,''

1209:   JHEP {\bf 0604}, 021 (2006)

1210:   [arXiv:hep-th/0602239].

1211:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0602239;%%

1212: 

1213: %\cite{Franco:2006es}

1214: \bibitem{FU}

1215:   S.~Franco and A.~M.~Uranga,

1216:   ``Dynamical SUSY breaking at meta-stable minima from D-branes at obstructed

1217:   geometries,''

1218:   JHEP {\bf 0606}, 031 (2006)

1219:   [arXiv:hep-th/0604136].

1220:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0604136;%%

1221: 

1222: %\cite{Ooguri:2006pj}

1223: \bibitem{OO}

1224:   H.~Ooguri and Y.~Ookouchi,

1225:   ``Landscape of supersymmetry breaking vacua in geometrically realized gauge

1226:   theories,''

1227:   [arXiv:hep-th/0606061].

1228:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0606061;%%

1229: 

1230: %\cite{Ooguri:2006bg}

1231: \bibitem{OO1}

1232:   H.~Ooguri and Y.~Ookouchi,

1233:   ``Meta-Stable Supersymmetry Breaking Vacua on Intersecting Branes,''

1234:   [arXiv:hep-th/0607183].

1235:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0607183;%%

1236: 

1237: %\cite{Franco:2006ht}

1238: \bibitem{FGU}

1239:   S.~Franco, I.~Garcia-Etxebarria and A.~M.~Uranga,

1240:   ``Non-supersymmetric meta-stable vacua from brane configurations,''

1241:   [arXiv:hep-th/0607218].

1242:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0607218;%%

1243: 

1244: %\cite{Bena:2006rg}

1245: \bibitem{BGHSS}

1246:   I.~Bena, E.~Gorbatov, S.~Hellerman, N.~Seiberg and D.~Shih,

1247:   ``A Note on (Meta)stable Brane Configurations in MQCD,''

1248:   [arXiv:hep-th/0608157].

1249:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0608157;%%

1250: 

1251: %\cite{Amariti:2006vk}

1252: \bibitem{AGM}

1253:   A.~Amariti, L.~Girardello and A.~Mariotti,

1254:   ``Non-supersymmetric meta-stable vacua in SU(N) SQCD with adjoint matter,''

1255:   [arXiv:hep-th/0608063].

1256:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0608063;%%

1257: 

1258: %\cite{Braun:2006em}

1259: \bibitem{BBO}

1260:   V.~Braun, E.~I.~Buchbinder and B.~A.~Ovrut,

1261:   ``Dynamical SUSY breaking in heterotic M-theory,''

1262:   [arXiv:hep-th/0606166].

1263:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0606166;%%

1264: 

1265: %\cite{Argurio:2006ew}

1266: \bibitem{Argurio:2006ew}

1267:   R.~Argurio, M.~Bertolini, C.~Closset and S.~Cremonesi,

1268:   ``On stable non-supersymmetric vacua at the bottom of cascading theories,''

1269:   [arXiv:hep-th/0606175].

1270:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0606175;%%

1271: 

1272: %\cite{Braun:2006da}

1273: \bibitem{Braun:2006da}

1274:   V.~Braun, E.~I.~Buchbinder and B.~A.~Ovrut,

1275:   ``Towards realizing dynamical SUSY breaking in heterotic model building,''

1276:   [arXiv:hep-th/0606241].

1277:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0606241;%%

1278: 

1279: %\cite{Ray:2006wk}

1280: \bibitem{Ray:2006wk}

1281:   S.~Ray,

1282:   ``Some properties of meta-stable supersymmetry-breaking vacua in Wess-Zumino

1283:   models,''

1284:   [arXiv:hep-th/0607172].

1285:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0607172;%%

1286: 

1287: %\cite{Forste:2006zc}

1288: \bibitem{Forste}

1289:   S.~Forste,

1290:   ``Gauging flavour in meta-stable SUSY breaking models,''

1291:   [arXiv:hep-th/0608036].

1292:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0608036;%%

1293: 

1294: %\cite{Giveon:1998sr}

1295: \bibitem{GK}

1296:   A.~Giveon and D.~Kutasov,

1297:   ``Brane dynamics and gauge theory,''

1298:   Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\  {\bf 71}, 983 (1999)

1299:   [arXiv:hep-th/9802067].

1300:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9802067;%%

1301: 

1302: %\cite{Elitzur:1997fh}

1303: \bibitem{EGK}

1304:   S.~Elitzur, A.~Giveon and D.~Kutasov,

1305:   ``Branes and N = 1 duality in string theory,''

1306:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 400}, 269 (1997)

1307:   [arXiv:hep-th/9702014].

1308:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9702014;%%

1309: 

1310: %\cite{Elitzur:1997hc}

1311: \bibitem{EGKRS}

1312:   S.~Elitzur, A.~Giveon, D.~Kutasov, E.~Rabinovici and A.~Schwimmer,

1313:   ``Brane dynamics and N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory,''

1314:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 505}, 202 (1997)

1315:   [arXiv:hep-th/9704104].

1316:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9704104;%%

1317: 

1318: %\cite{Hanany:1996ie}

1319: \bibitem{HW}

1320:   A.~Hanany and E.~Witten,

1321:    ``Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge

1322:   dynamics,''

1323:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 492}, 152 (1997)

1324:   [arXiv:hep-th/9611230].

1325:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9611230;%%

1326: 

1327: %\cite{Kutasov:1995ve}

1328: \bibitem{Kutasov}

1329:   D.~Kutasov,

1330:   ``A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,''

1331:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 351}, 230 (1995)

1332:   [arXiv:hep-th/9503086].

1333:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9503086;%%

1334: 

1335: %\cite{Kutasov:1995np}

1336: \bibitem{KS}

1337:   D.~Kutasov and A.~Schwimmer,

1338:   ``On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,''

1339:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 354}, 315 (1995)

1340:   [arXiv:hep-th/9505004].

1341:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9505004;%%

1342: 

1343: %\cite{Kutasov:1995ss}

1344: \bibitem{KSS}

1345:   D.~Kutasov, A.~Schwimmer and N.~Seiberg,

1346:   ``Chiral Rings, Singularity Theory and Electric-Magnetic Duality,''

1347:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 459}, 455 (1996)

1348:   [arXiv:hep-th/9510222].

1349:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9510222;%%

1350: 

1351: %\cite{Barbon:1997zu}

1352: \bibitem{Barbon}

1353:   J.~L.~F.~Barbon,

1354:   ``Rotated branes and N = 1 duality,''

1355:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 402}, 59 (1997)

1356:   [arXiv:hep-th/9703051].

1357:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9703051;%%

1358: 

1359: %\cite{Aharony:1995ne}

1360: \bibitem{ASY}

1361:   O.~Aharony, J.~Sonnenschein and S.~Yankielowicz,

1362:   ``Flows and duality symmetries in N=1 supersymmetric gauge theories,''

1363:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 449}, 509 (1995)

1364:   [arXiv:hep-th/9504113].

1365:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9504113;%%

1366: 

1367: %\cite{Intriligator:1995ax}

1368: \bibitem{ILS}

1369:   K.~A.~Intriligator, R.~G.~Leigh and M.~J.~Strassler,

1370:    ``New examples of duality in chiral and nonchiral supersymmetric gauge

1371:   theories,''

1372:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 456}, 567 (1995)

1373:   [arXiv:hep-th/9506148].

1374:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9506148;%%

1375: 

1376: \bibitem{Ooguri}

1377: H.~Ooguri, announced at the conference, Strings '06,

1378: http://strings06.itp.ac.cn/talk-files/hooguri.pdf.

1379: 

1380: %\cite{Ooguri:1997ih}

1381: \bibitem{OV}

1382:   H.~Ooguri and C.~Vafa,

1383:   ``Geometry of N = 1 dualities in four dimensions,''

1384:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 500}, 62 (1997)

1385:   [arXiv:hep-th/9702180].

1386:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9702180;%%

1387: 

1388: %\cite{Ahn:1997ww}

1389: \bibitem{Ahn}

1390:   C.~Ahn and K.~Oh,

1391:   ``Geometry, D-branes and N = 1 duality in four dimensions. I,''

1392:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 412}, 274 (1997)

1393:   [arXiv:hep-th/9704061];

1394:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9704061;%%

1395: %\cite{Ahn:1997db}

1396: %\bibitem{Ahn:1997db}

1397:   C.~Ahn,

1398:   ``Geometry, D-branes and N = 1 duality in four dimensions. II,''

1399:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 419}, 91 (1998)

1400:   [arXiv:hep-th/9705004];

1401:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705004;%%

1402: %\cite{Ahn:1997yc}

1403: %\bibitem{Ahn:1997yc}

1404:   C.~Ahn and R.~Tatar,

1405:    ``Geometry, 

1406: D-branes and N = 1 duality in four dimensions with product  gauge

1407:   groups,''

1408:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 413}, 293 (1997)

1409:   [arXiv:hep-th/9705106];

1410:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705106;%%

1411: %\cite{Ahn:1997gs}

1412: %\bibitem{Ahn:1997gs}

1413:   C.~Ahn, K.~Oh and R.~Tatar,

1414:    ``Branes, 

1415: geometry and N = 1 duality with product gauge groups of SO and

1416:   Sp,''

1417:   J.\ Geom.\ Phys.\  {\bf 31}, 301 (1999)

1418:   [arXiv:hep-th/9707027].

1419:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9707027;%%

1420: 

1421: %\cite{Witten:1997sc}

1422: \bibitem{Witten}

1423:   E.~Witten,

1424:   ``Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M-theory,''

1425:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 500}, 3 (1997)

1426:   [arXiv:hep-th/9703166].

1427:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9703166;%%

1428: 

1429: \end{thebibliography}

1430: 

1431: \end{document}

1432: 

1433: