1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{putex, epsfig}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{placeins}
5: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
6:
7: \newcommand{\beq}[1]{\begin{eqnarray}\label{#1}}
8: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{eqnarray}}
9:
10:
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \institution{ITP-CAS}{Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese
16: Academy of Science}
17:
18: \title{Jet quenching parameter of Sakai-Sugimoto model}
19: \authors{Yi-hong Gao, Wei-shui Xu and Ding-fang Zeng\footnote{gaoyh@itp.ac.cn, wsxu@itp.ac.cn and dfzeng@itp.ac.cn}}
20:
21: \abstract{
22: Using gauge theory/string duality, we calculated the jet
23: quenching parameter $\hat{q}$ of the Sakai-Sugimoto model in various phases.
24: Being different from the $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM
25: theory where $\hat{q}\propto T^3$,
26: we find that $\hat{q}\propto T^4/T_d$, where
27: $T_d$ is the critical temperature of the confined/deconfined
28: phase transition. By analyzing the $\hat{q}$ in different phases of
29: this theory, we get better understanding about some statements in
30: previous works, such as the non-universality
31: and the explanation of discrepancies between the theory
32: predictions and experiments.
33: }
34:
35:
36: \date{June 2007}
37:
38: \maketitle
39:
40:
41: \section{Introduction}\label{introductionSection}
42:
43: Experimental relativistic heavy ion collisions produced many
44: evidences signalling the quark gluon plasma's formation
45: \cite{ex-Adms05, ex-Adcox04} at RHIC.
46: One of the characteristic features discovered from data is the
47: suppression of heavy quark's spectrum in high-$p_T$
48: region \cite{ex-Adler05, ex-Bielcik05}. This is the jet quenching
49: phenomenon. Its cause is the medium induced
50: heavy quarks' energy loss when they move through QGP.
51: So successful models explaining this phenomenon
52: usually involve a medium sensitive ``jet quenching parameter''
53: $\hat{q}$. While in \cite{jetquench-LRW}, the authors
54: proposed a first principle, non-perturbative quantum field
55: theoretic definition for it.
56: Using their new definition and AdS/CFT correspondence
57: \cite{ads-Maldacena,ads-Witten9803,ads-AGMOOreview}, these
58: authors calculated the jet quenching parameter of
59: the thermal $\mathcal{N}=4$ suppersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.
60: After some reasonable parameters's choice adapted to the Au-Au
61: collisions at RHIC and the universality assumption
62: $\hat{q}_{QCD}\approx\hat{q}_{\mathcal{N}=4}$, they
63: find that the theoretically predicted $\hat{q}$ is less
64: than that suggested by experiments.
65: And the author of \cite{jetquench-Buchel} generalizes the proposal
66: of \cite{jetquench-LRW} to the strongly coupled non-conformal
67: gauge theory plasma and find that instead of universal, the jet
68: quenching parameter is gauge theory specific. They explicitly
69: show that the jet quenching parameter increases as one goes
70: from a confining gauge theory to a conformal theory. So they
71: concluded that the reasons about the jet quenching parameter predicted by \cite{jetquench-LRW}
72: being less than the experimental measures is probably due to the existence of some extra energy loss mechanisms of
73: the heavy quarks besides gluon radiation.
74:
75: In order to investigate whether the jet quenching parameter is universal or not,
76: the calculations
77: of this parameter in some different gauge theories are meaningful and will help us
78: to understand discrepancies between theory and experiments more deeply.
79: So after \cite{jetquench-LRW} and
80: \cite{jetquench-Buchel}, many other works related to the jet quenching
81: parameter appear, see e.g. \cite{jetquench-Portiz},
82: \cite{jetquench-CaceresGuijosa},
83: \cite{jetquench-LinMatsuo},
84: \cite{jetquench-AvarmisSfetsos},
85: \cite{jetquench-ArmestoEdelsteinMas} and \cite{jetquench-NTW}\footnote{For more references, one can
86: see the paper \cite{Liu:2006he}}.
87: One common feature of these works is that, in the dual gravity
88: description of the corresponding gauge field theory,
89: the background metric usually involves
90: an asymptotically $AdS_5$ component.
91:
92: An interesting question is,
93: how will the jet quenching parameter behave in a gauge theory
94: whose dual gravity descriptions involves no $AdS_5$ component?
95: In this paper, we will investigate this problem by using the Sakai-Sugimoto
96: model \cite{SSmodel}. It is a holographic model of
97: the low energy QCD constructed from the intersecting branes. whose
98: most striking feature is its phase structure \cite{SSmodel-phase}: (i) the zero and low temperature
99: phase or confining phase in which all fundamental field
100: degrees of freedom is confined; (ii) in the deconfined phase, there exists the
101: chiral symmetry breaking phase and the chiral symmetry restoration phase.
102:
103: We will follow the same routine as in \cite{jetquench-LRW}, and calculate the jet quenching parameter.
104: After doing some analysis this parameter in the different phase of this model, we
105: can get more deep understanding about the jet quenching
106: phenomenon in the thermal QCD-like theory\footnote{In \cite{drag-Talavera, SSmodel-meson},
107: the authors have studied the
108: drag force and screening length problems in this holographic
109: model.}.
110:
111: The organization of this paper is as follows,
112: we will briefly review the Sakai-Sugimoto model in the next section,
113: then calculate the jet-quenching parameter of
114: this model in different phases in the section 3, while
115: the last section contains the main conclusions of the paper.
116:
117: \section{Brief review of Sakai-Sugimoto model}\label{braneConstructSection}
118:
119: In the \cite{SSmodel}, Sakai and Sugimoto constructed a holograhic QCD-like model from the
120: brane components D4, D8 and $\overline{D8}$ in type
121: IIA string theory. In this brane construction, the low
122: energy effective theory in the intersecting dimension is a $U(N_c)$
123: gauge theory with $N_f$ flavors. And there also exists a global $U(N_f)_L\times
124: U(N_f)_R$ chiral symmetry.
125:
126: In the strong coupling region, we can use the supergravity
127: approximation to analyze the
128: underlying physics. Thus, in the zero-temperature phase, we can use the D8 brane to probe
129: the following background
130: \beq{}
131: &&\hspace{-5mm}ds^2_c=H^{-\frac{1}{2}}(-dt^2+d\vec{x}\cdot
132: d\vec{x}+fdx_4^2)+H^{\frac{1}{2}}(f^{-1}du^2+u^2d\Omega_4^2),\nonumber\\
133: &&\hspace{-5mm}H=\frac{R_{D4}^3}{u^3},\ f=1-\frac{u_\Lambda^3}{u^3}, ~R_{D4}^3=N_c \pi g_s l_s^3,\nonumber\\
134: &&\hspace{-5mm}e^\phi=g_s\left[\frac{u^3}{R_4^3}\right]^{1/4},\
135: F_{(4)}=\frac{2\pi N_c}{V_4}\epsilon_4,
136: \label{zeroTempBGRND}
137: \eeq
138: where $t$, $\vec{x}$ are four uncompactified world-volume
139: coordinates of the D4 branes, and $x_4$ denotes the compactified
140: world-volume coordinate. The sub-manifold spanned by $x_4$
141: and $u$ is singular as $u\rightarrow u_\Lambda$, to avoid this
142: singularity, the periodical identification of $x_4$ should be
143: \beq{}
144: x_4\sim x_4+2\pi R,\ 2\pi
145: R=\frac{4\pi}{3}\left[\frac{R_{D4}^3}{u_\Lambda}\right]^{1/2}.
146: \eeq
147:
148: While to the high temperature phase of the gauge theory i.e $T>(2\pi R)^{-1}\equiv
149: T_d$ (where $T_d$ is the critical temperature of the Hawking-Page phase
150: transition),
151: the dual gravity system's background becomes
152: \beq{}
153: &&\hspace{-5mm}ds^2_d=H^{-\frac{1}{2}}(-fdt^2+d\vec{x}\cdot
154: d\vec{x}+dx_4^2)
155: +H^{\frac{1}{2}}(f^{-1}du^2+u^2d\Omega_4^2)\nonumber\\
156: &&\hspace{-5mm}H=\frac{R_{D4}^3}{u^3},\ f=1-\frac{u_T^3}{u^3}.
157: \label{highTempBGRND}
158: \eeq
159: The others are same as in (\ref{zeroTempBGRND}), and here the Hawking temperature
160: is $T=\frac{3}{4\pi}\left[\frac{u_T}{R_{D4}^3}\right]^{1/2}$.
161:
162: As investigated in \cite{SSmodel-phase}, there exists two phases in this deconfined phase.
163: We can use the $D8$- and
164: $\overline{D8}$-branes to probe the background (\ref{highTempBGRND}).
165: The world-volume coordinates of the $D8$- and $\overline{D8}$-branes
166: consists of $t$, $\vec{x}$, $u$ and $\Omega_4$.
167: Assuming that as $u\rightarrow\infty$ the D8 branes
168: sit at $x_4=0$ while the $\overline{D8}$-branes
169: at $x_4=D$, then the induced metric
170: on the probe $D8$- or $\overline{D8}$-branes reads
171: \beq{}
172: ds^2_8=H^{-\frac{1}{2}}(-fdt^2+d\vec{x}\cdot
173: d\vec{x})+(H^{-\frac{1}{2}}x_4^{\prime2}
174: +H^{\frac{1}{2}}f^{-1})du^2+H^{\frac{1}{2}}u^2d\Omega_4^2.
175: \label{highTempInduceBGRND}
176: \eeq
177: The DBI action of the probe D8-branes gives equation of motion,
178: \beq{}
179: &&\hspace{-5mm}\frac{u^4f}{\sqrt{f+H/[\frac{dx_4}{du}]^2}}=
180: u_0^4\sqrt{f(u_0)}\nonumber\\
181: &&\hspace{-5mm}\Rightarrow\frac{dx_4}{du}=
182: \pm\left[\frac{H}{f([u^8f]/[u_0^8f_0]-1)}\right]^{1/2}
183: \label{D8profile}\eeq
184: where $u_0$ is the $u$-coordinate of a point at which
185: the $x_4^\prime(u)=0$. As the result,
186: \beq{}
187: x_4(u)=\frac{D}{2}\pm\left[\frac{R_4^3}{u_0}\right]^{1/2}\int_1^{\frac{u}{u_T}} dx
188: \left[\frac{x^{-3}}{(1-y_T^3x^{-3})[x^8(1-y_T^3x^{-3})/(1-y_T^3)-1]}\right]^{1/2}
189: \label{chisbD8branes}
190: \eeq
191: where $y_T=\frac{u_T}{u_0}$. In this case, the $D8$- and
192: $\overline{D8}$ are connected smoothly at $x_4=D/2$ point.
193:
194: However, the configuration constrained by
195: \beq{}
196: \partial_ux_4\equiv0
197: \eeq
198: also satisfy eq(\ref{D8profile}). This means that the $D8$ and $\overline{D8}$
199: are located at fixed positions
200: \beq{}
201: x_4(u)\equiv0~
202: \textrm{\ or\ }~
203: x_4(u)\equiv D.
204: \label{chisrD8branes}
205: \eeq
206: Between the phases (\ref{chisbD8branes}) and (\ref{chisrD8branes}), as pointed out by \cite{SSmodel-phase},
207: there exists a first order chiral phase
208: transition. Under a critical temperature
209: $T_{\chi SB}\simeq 0.154/D$, the chiral symmetry is broken. However, above
210: this temperature, the symmetry will be restored.
211: We depict the relevant profile in the left hand side of Figure \ref{DDbarProfile}.
212: \begin{figure}[ht]
213: \begin{center}
214: \centering\includegraphics[]{DDbarprofile.eps}
215: \end{center}
216: \caption{
217: The chiral symmetry is broken in the left one, however, it is
218: restored in the right one.
219: }
220: \label{DDbarProfile}
221: \end{figure}
222:
223:
224: \section{The jet quenching parameter}\label{eomSection}
225:
226: \subsection{General definitions}\label{gRoutineSection}
227:
228: By the definition of \cite{jetquench-LRW}, the jet quenching
229: parameter $\hat{q}$ is related to the expectation value of a
230: light-like wilson loop $<W^A(\mathcal{C})>$ in the adjoint
231: representation whose contour $\mathcal{C}$ composed of
232: a rectangle of length $L^-$ and width $L$ with $L<<L^-$ and
233: $L<<T^{-1}$. Motivated by
234: dipole approximation \cite{dipoleApprox}
235: \beq{}
236: <W^A(\mathcal{C})>\approx\exp\left[-\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}}\hat{q}L^-L^2\right].
237: \label{jetQuenchPDef}
238: \eeq
239: The author of \cite{jetquench-LRW} defined $\hat{q}$ as the
240: coefficient of the $L^-L^2/(4\sqrt{2})$ term in
241: $\ln<W^A(\mathcal{C})>$. So
242: \beq{}
243: \hat{q}=\frac{-4\sqrt{2}}{L_-L^2}\ln<W^A(\mathcal{C})>.
244: \label{jetQuenchFinalDefinition}
245: \eeq
246: The factor of $\sqrt{2}$ in the above equations comes from the
247: light-cone coordinate definition $x^{\pm}=(t\pm x^1)/\sqrt{2}$. If
248: a different definition $x^{\pm}=t\pm x^1$ are used,
249: the factor of $\sqrt{2}$ in the equation (\ref{jetQuenchPDef}) will not
250: appear, see for e.g. \cite{jetquench-Buchel}.
251:
252: So, let us consider such a Wilson loop following the same routine
253: of \cite{jetquench-LRW}. In the planar limit, wilson loops
254: in the adjoint representation is related
255: to that in the fundamental representation through
256: \beq{}
257: \ln<W^A(\mathcal{C})>=2\ln<W^F(\mathcal{C})>.
258: \eeq
259: According to the gauge theory/string duality, see for e.g.
260: \cite{wilson-Maldacena}, \cite{wilson-ReyYee},
261: \cite{wilson-ReyTheisenYee} and \cite{wilson-BISY},
262: $<W^F(\mathcal{C})>$ can be given by
263: \beq{}
264: <W^F(\mathcal{C})>=\exp[i\hat{S}(\mathcal{C})]
265: \eeq
266: where $\hat{S}$ is related to the
267: extremal action $S$ of a fundamental string whose
268: world-sheet on the boundary of the background space-time have
269: $\mathcal{C}$ as the boundary, i.e.
270: \beq{}
271: &&\hspace{-5mm}S=-\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\int d^2\sigma\sqrt{-\gamma},\nonumber\\
272: &&\hspace{5mm}\gamma=\textrm{det}\gamma_{ab},
273: \ \gamma_{ab}=\partial_aX^\mu\partial_bX^\nu G_{\mu\nu}
274: \label{Sdefinition}
275: \eeq
276: which is just the Nambu-Goto action of the string.
277: In the above equations, $X^\mu$ is the embedding of the
278: fundamental string in the background space-time with metric
279: $G_{\mu\nu}$. From gauge theory, since the action $S$ contains the
280: self-energy $S_{sef}$
281: of quarks attached on the
282: two ends of the string, it is usually divergent. In order to describe the interactions
283: between the two quarks, we need subtract the self-energy part. The
284: final part $\hat{S}$ will be
285: \beq{}
286: \hat{S}=S-S_{sef}
287: \eeq
288:
289: \subsection{String configuration}\label{strConfigSection}
290:
291: According to the general routines in the last section,
292: in order to calculate the jet quenching parameters of the Sakai-Sugimoto
293: model in different phases, we can write the background space-time (\ref{zeroTempBGRND}) and
294: (\ref{highTempBGRND}) in the light-cone
295: coordinates. The zero temperature background becomes
296: \beq{}
297: ds^2=
298: H^{-\frac{1}{2}}(-2dx^+dx^- +dx_\bot^2+fdx_4^2)+H^{\frac{1}{2}}(f^{-1}du^2+u^2d\Omega_4^2)
299: \label{lightConeMetric1}
300: \eeq and the high temperature one is\beq{}
301: ds^2&=&H^{-\frac{1}{2}}(-\frac{1+f}{2}dx^+dx^- +
302: \frac{1-f}{4}[dx^{+2}+dx^{-2}]+dx_\bot^2+dx_4^2)\nonumber\\
303: &&~~~~~+H^{\frac{1}{2}}(f^{-1}du^2+u^2d\Omega_4^2).\label{lightConeMetric}\eeq{}
304:
305: To find the embedding of strings into the above backgrounds, we give the following ansatz for the string
306: configuration,
307: \beq{}
308: X^-=\tau, ~X^2=\sigma, \nonumber \\ u(\sigma),~~~ X^4(\sigma)
309: \eeq
310: Under this ansatz, the Nambu-Goto action
311: of the string vanishes in the zero temperature metric (\ref{lightConeMetric1}),
312: and in the high temperature background (\ref{lightConeMetric}) reads
313: \beq{}
314: S=-\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha^\prime}\int d^2\sigma
315: \sqrt{\frac{f-1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{H}
316: +\frac{u^{\prime2}}{f}
317: +\frac{u^{\prime2}}{H}\left[\frac{dx_4}{du}\right]^2\right)}
318: \label{NambuGotoAction}
319: \eeq{}
320: where $u^\prime$ denotes $\frac{du}{d\sigma}$.
321:
322: By minimizing the Nambu-Goto action, we can find the equation of motion and then the
323: solution of the required string configuration. Obviously, since the action
324: equals to zero identically in the zero-temperature phase, the
325: corresponding string configuration satisfying required boundary
326: conditions cannot be determined uniquely. Notice that it
327: is $\hat{S}$ instead of $S$ that determines the jet quenching
328: parameter. Hence this means the jet quenching parameter $\hat{q}$ will be equal to zero.
329: Since the jet quenching parameter
330: is designed to describe the property of medium through which
331: the test heavy quark moves. The vanishing jet quenching parameter $\hat{q}$ means that
332: the medium will look transparent to the test heavy quarks in the confining phase.
333:
334: For the high temperature phase, we can get the equation of motion from the action (\ref{NambuGotoAction}) which reads
335: \beq{}
336: u^{\prime2}=\frac{c^2f}{H+(dx_4/du)^2f}
337: \hspace{5mm} \label{eomFirstCHISB}
338: \eeq
339: In deriving these equations, we used the fact that
340: Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}\equiv\sqrt{-\gamma}$ in
341: the equation (\ref{NambuGotoAction}) does not contain $\sigma$ explicitly.
342: So the effective ``hamiltonian''
343: $\mathcal{H}\equiv u^\prime\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial
344: u^\prime}-\mathcal{L}$ is a conserved quantity.
345: The integral constant $c $ characterizes the profile of string. If
346: the $dx_4/du=0$, then the equation (\ref{eomFirstCHISB}) will
347: reduce to \beq{}
348: u^{\prime2}=\frac{c^2f}{H}
349: \hspace{5mm} \label{eomFirstCHISBR}
350: \eeq
351: due to the fact that $dx_4/du=0$. In this case, the test string
352: lies in the quark gluon plasma with chiral symmetry restored.
353:
354: We require the string has the profile depicted in figure
355: \ref{stringConfig} intuitively. \begin{figure}[ht]
356: \begin{center}
357: \centering\includegraphics[]{stringConfig.eps}
358: \end{center}
359: \caption{
360: The configuration of strings with light-like boundaries on the
361: $D8$-branes world-volume.
362: }
363: \label{stringConfig}
364: \end{figure}
365: The end points of this string are
366: located on the $D8$-branes world-volume. And its projection on this worldvolume will form a
367: light-like Wilson loop. It goes from the world volume of
368: the $D8$-branes at $u=\infty$, towards the black hole horizon
369: then turn around at some lowest point and come back to the $D8$-branes
370: world-volume again, i.e. the string has a U-shape in
371: the $x_2-u$ plane.
372:
373:
374: From equation (\ref{eomFirstCHISBR}), we find that in the chiral symmetry restored phase the only zero point
375: occurs at the black hole horizon. It means the turning point of the string will exactly reach the
376: horizon. And in this phase, the length of the string is
377: \beq{}&&\hspace{-5mm}L=2\int du\frac{1}{u^\prime}=
378: \frac{u_T}{c}\left[\frac{R_{D4}^3}{u_T^3}\right]^{1/2}\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}\eeq{}
379: where we have used the integral \beq{}
380: \int_1^\infty\frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^3-1}}
381: =\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}.
382: \eeq
383:
384: While in the broken chiral symmetry phase, equation (\ref{eomFirstCHISB}) has
385: two zero points, one at the black hole horizon $u=u_T$,
386: the other at $u=u_0>u_T$. To assure the positivity of
387: $u^{\prime2}$, the lowest point of the string can only reach
388: $u=u_0$. Then, the length $L'$ of string is
389: \beq{}
390: L'&=&\frac{2}{c}\int\left[\frac{H+(dx_4/du)^2f}{f}\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\
391: &=&\frac{u_T}{c}\left[\frac{R_{D4}^3}{u_T^3}\right]^{1/2}
392: \frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}\cdot A[y_T]
393: \label{Lvsc}
394: \eeq
395: with the definition
396: \beq{}
397: \int_{u_0/u_T}^\infty\frac{dx}{\left[x^3-1-u_0^8f_0/u_T^8x^{-5}\right]^{1/2}}
398: =A[y_T]\cdot\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}
399: \label{Adefinition}
400: \eeq
401: where the $y_T=u_T/u_0$. Obviously, if $A[y_T]=1$, then the length $L'$ of the string in the broken chiral
402: symmetry phase will reduce to the corresponding one in the symmetry restored phase. The numerical
403: behavior of $A[y_T]$ is displayed in the left hand side of Figure \ref{AD-yT-numerics}.
404: \begin{figure}[ht]
405: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{A-yT.eps}
406: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{D-yT.eps}
407: \caption{
408: The left panel, the numerical behavior of $A[y_T]$ defined in
409: the equation (\ref{Adefinition}). The right panel, the distance $D$ between
410: the $D8$- and $\overline{D8}$-branes v.s. $y_T$. The distance $D$
411: is measured by the temperature inverse, $T^{-1}$. When $y_T<<1$,
412: $D\propto y_T^{1/2}$ which can be looked out from
413: the equation (\ref{chisbD8branes}).
414: }
415: \label{AD-yT-numerics}
416: \end{figure}
417: From the figure we can see the behavior of the function $A[y_T]$
418: with the variable $y_T$. When $y_T=1$, $A[y_T]$ will reach the
419: maximal value $1$. This means that at this point the chiral symmetry
420: broken phase will turn into the chiral symmetry restored phase.
421:
422: \subsection{The jet quenching parameter in various
423: phases}\label{jetQuenchSection}
424:
425: Now we can use the routines of subsection \ref{gRoutineSection}
426: to calculate the jet quenching parameters of the Sakai-Sugimoto model.
427: We start with the Nambu-Goto action,
428: \beq{}
429: \hspace{-5mm}S=\frac{L_-\cdot L'}{2\sqrt{2}\pi\alpha^\prime}
430: \left[\frac{u_T^3}{R_{D4}^3}\right]^{1/2}\cdot\sqrt{1+c^2}
431: \label{NambuGotoActionIntegrated}
432: \eeq
433: and the self-energy
434: of the string is
435: \beq{}
436: \hspace{-5mm}S_{sef}=\frac{2}{2\pi\alpha^\prime}\int d\tau
437: du\sqrt{-G_{--}G_{uu}}
438: \nonumber\\
439: \hspace{6mm}=\frac{L_-u_T}{\sqrt{2}\pi\alpha^\prime}
440: \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}\cdot A[y_T]
441: \eeq
442: Then according to the equation (\ref{jetQuenchFinalDefinition}),
443: the jet quenching parameter can be expressed as
444: \beq{}
445: \hat{q}=2(S-S_{sef})\cdot\frac{4\sqrt{2}}{L_-L'^2}
446: =\frac{4}{\pi\alpha^\prime}
447: \left(\left[\frac{u_T^3}{R_{D4}^3}\right]^{1/2}\frac{(1+c^2)^\frac{1}{2}}{L'}-
448: \frac{u_T}{L'^2}\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{3}\frac{\Gamma[1/6]}{\Gamma[2/3]}\cdot
449: A[y_T]\right)
450: \label{jetQuenchPrimary}
451: \eeq
452: The right hand side of this equation involves the undetermined
453: integration constant $c$. But it can be
454: eliminated by the relations expressed in the equation (\ref{Lvsc}). And since the wilson loop satisfies the condition
455: $L' T\rightarrow 0$, we find
456: \beq{}
457: &&\hspace{-5mm}\hat{q}=
458: \frac{64\sqrt{\pi^3}}{27}\frac{\Gamma[2/3]}{\Gamma[1/6]}\frac{\lambda}{A[y_T]}T^4/T_d
459: \label{jetQuenchAnaResults}
460: \eeq
461: where we have used the relation $\lambda=g_{YM}^2N_c$, $g^2_{YM}=2\pi g_sl_s/R$,
462: and the critical temperature $T_{d}=1/(2\pi R)$. If choosing the
463: parameter $A[y_T]=1$, then the above results will reduce to the
464: corresponding ones in the chiral symmetry restoration phase.
465: However, if $A[y_T]\neq1$, all the results in the above are in the
466: chiral symmetry broken phase.
467:
468: Let us make some comments on these results in the following.
469: First, we compare the jet quenching parameters in the chiral
470: symmetry broken phase and that in the chiral symmetry restored
471: one. Since $A[y_T]<1$, we know that the jet quenching parameter $\hat{q}$ in the chiral
472: symmetry broken phase is larger than the one in the chiral symmetry restored phase. As is
473: known, in the chiral symmetry broken phase, the gauge system is a mixture of quark-gluon plasma
474: and hadrons; while in the chiral symmetry restored phase, the gauge system
475: is a pure quark-gluon plasma with all hadrons resolved. So
476: if the dominant mechanism of heavy quarks energy loss is due to
477: gluon radiation induced by the medium, we expect the jet quenching
478: parameter in the chiral
479: symmetry broken phase be less than that in the chiral symmetry
480: restored one, since the gluons density in the former is less
481: than that in the latter. So we think
482: that our result about the parameter $\hat{q}$ being more large in the chiral symmetry broken phase
483: may be looked as an evidence supporting the viewpoint of
484: \cite{jetquench-Buchel} which states that, the reasons of the jet
485: quenching parameter found in \cite{jetquench-LRW} being less than the experimental measures are
486: due to existence of some extra
487: energy loss mechanisms(such as binary collisions) of the heavy quarks
488: as they move through the mediums. \cite{energyLoss:dominantMechanism}
489: even suggest that the dominant mechanism is not gluon radiation
490: but binary collisions.
491:
492: Second, let us make a comparison between the jet quenching
493: parameter of Sakai-Sugimoto model plasmas with the $N=4$ SYM theory
494: plasmas. The most striking difference is their
495: temperature dependence. The former, $\hat{q}_{SS}\propto T^4$ at a
496: fixed $T_d$
497: while the latter, $\hat{q}_{\mathcal{N}=4SYM}\propto T^3$. This
498: is an evidence that the jet quenching parameter in the
499: different gauge theories is not universal. If experiments can
500: measure the jet quenching parameter v.s. temperature relation
501: explicitly, this may be a good starting point for further exploration of the meaning of
502: the jet quenching parameter.
503:
504: Finally, we make a little numerics to see whether the
505: Sakai-Sugimoto theory plasma fit experiments more better or
506: even worse than $N=4$ SYM plasmas.
507: For this purpose, we rewrite the equation (\ref{jetQuenchAnaResults}) as
508: \beq{}
509: \hat{q}=\frac{3.21}{A[y_T]}{\lambda T^4/T_d}
510: \label{jetQuenchNumResults}
511: \eeq{} If letting $A[y_T]=1$, it reduces to
512: \beq{} \hat{q}=3.21\lambda T^4/T_d
513: \eeq{} in the chiral symmetry restoration phase.
514:
515: Taking $N_c=3$, $g_{YM}^2=0.5$ and $T_d=300$
516: Mev,
517: we find, in order to obtain $\hat{q}=5 \textrm{Gev}^2/\textrm{fm}$,
518: the corresponding temperature of the quark gluon plasma in the chiral symmetry restoration phase is
519: $280$ Mev, which is smaller than expected \cite{ex-KolbHeinzreview}.
520: Equivalently, the jet
521: quenching parameter on the basis of these parameters
522: are less than that suggested by RHIC data, note that,
523: $T\sim\left[\frac{\hat{q}T_d}{N_cg_{YM}^2\hat{q}}\right]^{1/4}$.
524: However, in the
525: chiral symmetry broken phase, the corresponding temperature is
526: $280\cdot A^{\frac{1}{4}}[y_T]$ Mev. As long
527: as we choose a appropriate $A[y_T]$, as a result, the jet
528: quenching parameter can be equal to the one suggested by RHIC
529: data.
530:
531: To understand what the smallness
532: of $A[y_T]$ means. Let us turn back to the Sakai-Sugimoto model
533: for a while. From figure \ref{AD-yT-numerics} we know that smaller $A[y_T]$
534: corresponds to smaller $y_T$. From the equation (\ref{chisbD8branes}) we know that $y_T$ is
535: related with the distance $D$ between the $D8$- and
536: $\overline{D8}$-branes. We numerically integrated this equation
537: and plot the $D$ v.s. $y_T$ relation in the right panel of Figure
538: \ref{AD-yT-numerics}. From the figure we see that in the small
539: $y_T$ region, $D$ is an increasing function of $y_T$. So the
540: smallness of $y_T$ means the small distance between the $D8$- and
541: $\overline{D8}$-branes. Hence from aspects of the microscopic
542: construction of Sakai-Sugimoto model, to enhancing the jet
543: quenching parameter, we only need to make the $D8$- and
544: $\overline{D8}$-branes sit as near as possible.
545:
546: \section{Summary}\label{summarySection}
547:
548: In this paper, we calculated the jet quenching parameters of the Sakai-Sugimoto
549: model in various phases. In this holographic model, the gravity metric is different from the
550: asymptotic $AdS_5$ spacetimes. After some analysis, we find that the jet quenching parameter
551: $\hat{q}$ in this
552: holographic model is proportional to the fourth power of the
553: temperature at a fixed confining/deconfining temperature $T_d$, $\hat{q}\propto T^4/T_d$.
554: By comparing the jet quenching parameter of this
555: model in different phases with that of the $N=4$ SYM plasmas,
556: we get more deep understanding about the
557: following statements in previous works, (i) the jet
558: quenching parameters in different gauge theories are not
559: universal, bur are specific for a given gauge theory; (ii) the discrepancies about the jet quenching
560: parameter between
561: theoretically calculating
562: and experimental data is probably due to some extra energy
563: loss mechanisms except gluon radiations of the heavy quarks
564: when they move through the quark gluon plasmas.
565:
566:
567: \begin{thebibliography}{50}
568:
569: \bibitem{ex-Adms05}
570: J.~Adams(Star Collaboration) {\em et.~al.},
571: ``Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search
572: for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR collaboration's
573: critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions'',
574: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A757} (2005) 102--183, nucl-ex/0501009.
575:
576: \bibitem{ex-Adcox04}
577: K.~Adcox {\em et.~al.},
578: ``Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic
579: nucleus nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental
580: evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration'',
581: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A757} (2005) 184--283, nucl-ex/0410003.
582:
583: \bibitem{ex-Adler05}
584: S.~S. Adler {\em et.~al.},
585: ``Modifications to di-jet hadron pair correlations
586: in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV'',
587: {\em Phys. Rev. Lett} {\bf 96} (2006) 032301, nucl-ex/0510047.
588:
589: \bibitem{ex-Bielcik05}
590: J. Bielcik(Star Collaboration) {\em et.~al.},
591: ``Centrality dependence of heavy flavor production from
592: single electron measurement in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au + Au collisions'',
593: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A774} (2006) 697, nucl-ex/0511005.
594:
595: \bibitem{jetquench-LRW}
596: H.~Liu, K.~Rajagopal, and U.~A. Wiedemann,
597: ``Calculating the jet quenching parameter from AdS/CFT'',
598: hep-ph/0605178;
599:
600: \bibitem{ads-Maldacena}
601: J. Maldacena,
602: ``The Large N Limit Of Superconformal Field Theories
603: And Supergravity'',
604: hep-th/9711200;
605: \bibitem{ads-Witten9803}
606: E. Witten, ``Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition
607: and confinement in gauge theories'',
608: Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.2(1998)505, hep-th/9803131;
609: \bibitem{ads-AGMOOreview}
610: O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,
611: ``Large-N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity'',
612: Phys. Rep. 323(2000)183, hep-th/9905111.
613:
614: \bibitem{jetquench-Buchel}
615: A.~Buchel,
616: ``On jet quenching parameters in strongly coupled
617: non-conformal gauge theories'',
618: Phys. Rev. D74(2006)046006, hep-th/0605178.
619:
620: \bibitem{jetquench-Portiz}
621: J.~F.~Vazquez-Poritz, ``Enhancing the jet quenching parameter from marginal
622: deformations'',
623: hep-th/0605296.
624:
625: \bibitem{jetquench-CaceresGuijosa}
626: E.~C\'{a}ceres and A. G\"{u}ijosa, ``On Drag Forces and Jet Quenching Strong-Coupled
627: Plasmas'',
628: hep-th/0606134.
629:
630: \bibitem{jetquench-LinMatsuo}
631: F. L. Lin, T. Matsuo, ``Jet Quenching Parameter in Medium with Chemical Potential from
632: AdS/CFT'',
633: hep-th/0606136.
634:
635: \bibitem{jetquench-AvarmisSfetsos}
636: S.~D.~Avramis and K.~Sfetsos,
637: ``Supergravity and the jet quenching parameter in the
638: presence of R-charge densities'',
639: hep-th/0606190.
640:
641: \bibitem{jetquench-ArmestoEdelsteinMas}
642: N.~Armesto, J.~D.~Edelstein and J.~Mas,
643: ``Jet quenching at finite 't Hooft coupling and chemical
644: potential from AdS/CFT'',
645: JHEP 0609:039,2006, hep-ph/0606245.
646:
647: \bibitem{jetquench-NTW}
648: E. Nakano, S. Teraguchi and Wen-Yu Wen,
649: ``Drag force, jet quenching, and AdS/QCD'',
650: hep-ph/0608274
651:
652: \bibitem{Liu:2006he}
653: H.~Liu, K.~Rajagopal and U.~A.~Wiedemann,
654: ``Wilson loops in heavy ion collisions and their calculation in AdS/CFT,''
655: JHEP {\bf 0703}, 066 (2007)
656: [arXiv:hep-ph/0612168].
657:
658: \bibitem{SSmodel}
659: T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,
660: ``Low Energy Hadron Physics in Holographic QCD'',
661: Prog. Theor. phys. 113(2005)843-882, hep-th/0412141.
662:
663: \bibitem{SSmodel-phase}
664: O. Aharony, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,
665: ``A Holographic Model of Deconfinement and Chiral
666: Symmetry Restoration'',
667: , hep-th/0604161.
668: A.~Parnachev and D.~A.~Sahakyan,
669: ``Chiral phase transition from string theory,''
670: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97}, 111601 (2006)
671: [arXiv:hep-th/0604173].
672:
673: \bibitem{SSmodel-meson}
674: K. Peeters, J. Sonnenschein and M. Zamakar,
675: ``Holographic melting and related properties of mesons in
676: a quark gluon plasma'',
677: hep-th/0606195.
678:
679: \bibitem{dipoleApprox}
680: B. G. Zakaharov,
681: ``Radiative energy loss of high-energy quarks in finite size
682: nuclear matter and quark - gluon plasma''.
683: {\em JETP Lett} {\bf 65} (1997) 615, hep-ph/9704255.
684:
685: \bibitem{wilson-Maldacena}
686: J.~M. Maldacena,
687: ``Wilson loops in large N field theories,''
688: {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 80} (1998) 4859--4862, hep-th/9803002.
689:
690: \bibitem{wilson-ReyYee}
691: S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee,
692: ``Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large
693: N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity'',
694: {\em Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C22}(2001) 379--394, hep-th/9803001.
695:
696: \bibitem{wilson-ReyTheisenYee}
697: S.-J. Rey, S.~Theisen and J.-T. Yee,
698: ``Wilson-Polyakov loop at finite temperature in
699: large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity'',
700: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B527} (1998) 171--186, hep-th/9803135.
701:
702: \bibitem{wilson-BISY}
703: A.~Brandhuber, N.~Itzhaki, J.~Sonnenschein, and S.~Yankielowicz,
704: ``Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature'',
705: {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B434}(1998) 36--40, hep-th/9803137.
706:
707: \bibitem{ex-KolbHeinzreview}
708: P. F. Kolb and U. Heinz,
709: ``Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion
710: collisions'',
711: nucl-th/0305084.
712:
713: \bibitem{drag-Talavera}
714: P. Talavera, ``Drag force in a string model dual to large-N QCD'',
715: hep-th/0610179.
716:
717: \bibitem{stability-AEV}
718: P. C. Argyres, M. Edalati, J. F. Vazquez-Poritz,
719: ``No-Drag String Configurations for Steadily Moving Quark-Antiquark
720: Pairs in a Thermal Bath'',
721: hep-th/0608118.
722:
723: \bibitem{energyLoss:dominantMechanism}
724: H. van Hees, V. Greco and R. Rapp,
725: ``Heavy-Quark Probes of the Quark-Gluon Plasma at RHIC'',
726: Phys.Rev. C73 (2006) 034913, nucl-th/0508055.
727:
728: \end{thebibliography}
729:
730:
731: \end{document}
732: