1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % example compuscript proc3.tex from editor proceedings macro package:
3: % http://www.worldscientific.com/style/ws-procs975x65_2e_master.zip
4: % svailable at
5: % http://www.worldscientific.com/style/proceedings_style.shtml
6: % ** modified for MG11 contributors **
7: % ** by bob jantzen 19-sep-2006 **
8: % since the current proceedings macros assume all contributions are to be
9: % joined into a single master latex document, requiring a TableOfContents
10: % entry and chaptebib.sty for treating the contributions as chapters in
11: % the document. They also forgot the standard cite.sty file to deal with
12: % their citations intelligently. This example contains no figure.
13: % One must consult the example file: ws-procs975x65.tex for this.
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: %% For technical support please email: ykoh@wspc.com.sg (or) rajesh@wspc.com.sg
18: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
19: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
20: %% Copyright 2005 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
21: %% All rights are reserved.
22: %%
23: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in
24: %% Text Area: 8in (include runningheads) x 5in
25: %% Main Text is 10/13pt
26: %% Last Modified: 7-7-05
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: %
29: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs975x65}
30: \documentclass{ws-procs975x65}
31: \usepackage{psfrag}
32: %\usepackage{showlabels}
33: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
34: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
35: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
36: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
37: \newcommand{\T}{{\rm T}}
38: \newcommand{\n}{n}
39: \newcommand{\N}{N}
40: \newcommand{\Z}{Z}
41: \newcommand{\W}{W}
42: \newcommand{\kap}{{\kappa}}
43: \newcommand{\f}{f_1}
44: \newcommand{\p}{f_2}
45: \newcommand{\R}{{\rm R}}
46:
47: \newcommand{\Y}{Y}
48: \newcommand{\YY}{\Lambda}
49: \newcommand{\OOmega}{\Lambda}
50: \newcommand{\WW}{{\rm W}}
51: \newcommand{\V}{(\Omega_1(1+\W_3)-\W_1(1+\Omega_3))}
52: \begin{document}
53:
54: %to switch ON running title
55: %\markboth{L. Hatcher}{Quantum States from Tangent Vectors}
56:
57: %\wstoc{Quantum States from Tangent Vectors}{L. Hatcher}
58:
59: \title{GRAVITATING NON-ABELIAN SOLITONS AND HAIRY
60: BLACK HOLES IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS}
61:
62:
63:
64:
65: \author{MIKHAIL S. VOLKOV}
66:
67: \address{Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques et Physique Th\'eorique,
68: Universit\'e Fran\c{c}ois-Rabelais Tours,
69: F\'ed\'eration Denis Poisson - CNRS,
70: Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, FRANCE\\
71: \email{volkov@lmpt.univ-tours.fr}
72: }
73:
74:
75: % WARNING. in standard latex cls file formatting, at this point
76: % \maketitle would typeset the above titlepage information
77: % but WS has chosen to be nonstandard and have each line typeset
78: % as it is digested.
79: % no abstract is necessary.
80: % \bodymatter below resets the footnote counter and symbols after
81: % possible use in the title matter.
82:
83: \begin{abstract}
84: This is a short review of classical
85: solutions with gravitating Yang-Mills fields
86: in $D>4$ spacetime dimensions. The simplest
87: SO(4) symmetric particlelike and SO(3) symmetric vortex type solutions
88: in the Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in $D=5$ are considered, and their
89: various generalizations with or without an event horizon,
90: for other symmetries, in more general theories, and also in $D>5$ are described.
91: In addition, supersymmetric solutions with gravitating Yang-Mills fields
92: in string theory are discussed.
93:
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \bodymatter
97:
98: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
99: In this mini-review the following two questions will be addressed:
100: \begin{itemize}
101:
102: \item
103: What is known about solutions with gravity-coupled non-Abelian gauge fields in $D>4$
104: spacetime dimensions ?
105:
106: \item
107: Why should one study such solutions ?
108:
109:
110: \end{itemize}
111: In answering these questions we shall briefly consider
112: the simplest gravitating non-Abelian solutions in $D=5$
113: and shall then discuss their known generalizations.
114:
115: \section{Einstein-Yang-Mills theory in D=4}
116:
117: Before going to higher dimensions, it is worth reminding the situation in
118: $D=4$. It is well known that neither pure gravity nor pure
119: Yang-Mills theory in $D=4$
120: admit solitons, by which we mean stationary and globally regular
121: (but not necessarily stable)
122: solutions with finite total energy.
123:
124: In the case of pure Einstein gravity
125: with the action
126: %Pure gravity /pure attraction/
127: \be
128: S_{\rm E}=\frac{1}{16\pi G}\int R\,\sqrt{-g}\,d^4 x
129: \ee
130: the statement is the content of the theorem \cite{Lich} of
131: Lichenrowitcz. The vacuum gravity admits however
132: solutions describing localized
133: stationary objects with finite mass, but these are not globally regular:
134: black holes.
135:
136: The action for the pure Yang-Mills (YM) theory with a compact and simple gauge group
137: ${\cal G}$
138: is given by
139: %/purely repulsion/
140: \be
141: S_{\rm YM}=-\frac{1}{4Ke^2}\,\int {\rm tr}\, F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\sqrt{-g}\,d^4 x\,,
142: \ee
143: where $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu
144: -i[A_\mu,A_\nu]$. Here $A_\mu=A^a_\mu \T_a$ and $\T_a$ are the gauge group
145: generators normalized such that ${\rm tr}(\T_a\T_b)=K\delta_{ab}$. If
146: ${\cal G}$=SU(2)
147: then $a=1,2,3$ and $\T_a=\frac12\,\tau_a$ where $\tau_a$ are the Pauli matrices.
148: The gauge coupling constant is denoted by $e$.
149: Since this theory is scale invariant, the non-existence of stationary solitons,
150: expressed by the statement ``there are no classical glueballs'',
151: essentially follows \cite{Deser,Coleman,Coleman1} from the scaling arguments.
152:
153: The physical reason for the non-existence of solitons in the above two cases
154: is clear: one cannot have equilibrium objects
155: in systems with only attractive (gravity) or only repulsive (Yang-Mills)
156: interactions. However, in systems with both gravity and Yang-Mills
157: fields described by the Einstein-Yang-Mills (EYM) action
158: \be \label{EYM}
159: S_{\rm EYM}=S_{\rm E}+S_{\rm YM}
160: \ee
161: both attractive and repulsive forces are present, and so the
162: existence of solitons is not excluded. At the same time, the
163: existence of solitons in this case is not guaranteed either,
164: and so it was a big surprise when
165: such solutions were constructed \cite{BK}
166: by Bartnik and McKinnon. As this was actually
167: the first known example of solitons in self-gravitating systems,
168: a lot of interest towards the
169: Einstein-Yang-Mills system \eqref{EYM} has been triggered. This interest was
170: further increased by the discovery in the same system of the first known example
171: \cite{MV89,Kunzle,Bizon}
172: of hairy black holes which are not uniquely characterized by their
173: conserved charges and so violate manifestly the no-hair conjecture \cite{Wheeler}.
174: Further surprising discoveries followed when
175: these static EYM solitons and black holes were generalized \cite{Kunz,Kunz1,Kunz2}
176: to the non-spherically symmetric and
177: non-static cases.
178: This has revealed that the EYM solutions provide manifest counter-examples also
179: to a number of classical theorems originally proven
180: for the Einstein-Maxwell system but believed to be generally true, as for example
181: the theorems of staticity, circularity,
182: the uniqueness theorem, Israel's theorem an so on (see \cite{MV98} for a review).
183: As a result, the EYM theory has become an interesting topic of studies.
184:
185:
186:
187:
188:
189:
190: \section{Pure gravity and pure Yang-Mills in D=5}
191:
192: Going to higher dimensions, let us first consider separately
193: some simplest solutions for pure gravity and pure
194: Yang-Mills theory in $D=5$.
195: We shall denote the spacetime coordinates by $x^M$ where
196: $M=0,1,2,3,4$.
197:
198:
199: \subsection{Pure gravity}
200: Vacuum gravity in $D>4$ has been much studied and many interesting solutions have
201: been obtained (see \cite{Reall} for a recent review), but we shall just mention a couple
202: of the simplest ones.
203: If $g^E_{\mu\nu}(x^\sigma)$, where $\mu,\nu,\sigma=1,2,3,4$, is a
204: {Euclidean} Ricci flat metric
205: (gravitational instanton), then the 5D geometry
206: $$
207: ds^2=-dt^2+g^E_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu
208: $$
209: will also be Ricci flat. One obtains in this way
210: static and globally regular vacuum solutions in $D=5$. However,
211: since there are no \cite{eguchi} asymptotically Euclidean gravitational instantons,
212: these 5D solutions will not be asymptotically flat (although they can be
213: asymptotically locally flat).
214: There exist also
215: localized and asymptotically flat solutions -- black holes -- but these are
216: not globally regular.
217: In the simplest case with the SO(4) spatial symmetry this is the Schwarzschild
218: black hole,
219: $$
220: ds^2=-Ndt^2+\frac{dr^2}{N}+r^2d\Omega_3^2,~~~~
221: N=1-\left(\frac{r_g}{r}\right)^2.
222: $$
223: If $\partial/\partial x^4$ is a symmetry
224: and $g_{\mu\nu}$ is a Ricci flat Lorentzian metric /$\mu=0,1,2,3$/ then
225: the 5D metric
226: $$
227: ds^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+(dx^4)^2
228: $$
229: will also be Ricci flat. Choosing $g_{\mu\nu}$ to be a 4D black hole metric
230: gives then a one-dimensional linear mass distribution in $D=5$ -- black string.
231:
232:
233: \subsection{Pure Yang-Mills theory: particles and vortices}
234: Since the Yang-Mills theory in $D=5$ is not scale invariant,
235: one can have localized and globally regular object made of pure gauge field.
236: We shall call them `Yang-Mills particles', these are
237: essentially the 4D YM instantons uplifted to D=5.
238: Specifically,
239: if $A^a_\mu(x^\nu)$ is a solution of the 4D Euclidean
240: YM equations then
241: $$
242: A^a_M=(0,A^a_\mu(x^\nu))~~~~~~~~/\mu=1,2,3,4/
243: $$
244: will be a solution of the 5D YM equations describing a static object
245: whose 5D energy coincides with the 4D instanton action \cite{inst}
246: $$
247: E=\frac{1}{4e^2}\int (F^a_{\mu\nu})^2 d^4x\geq \frac{8\pi^2 |n|}{e^2}.
248: $$
249: The equality here is attained for self-dual configurations, with
250: $F_{\mu\nu}=\ast F_{\mu\nu}$,
251: in which case
252: $n\in\mathbb{Z}$
253: is the number of the `YM particles'.
254: Their mutual interaction forces being exactly zero,
255: the particles can be located anywhere in the 4-space.
256:
257: If
258: $\partial/\partial x^4$ is a symmetry, then choosing
259: $$
260: A^a_M=(0,A^a_i(x^k),H^a(x^k)),~~~~~~/i,k=1,2,3/
261: $$
262: the YM energy per unit $x^4$,
263: $$E=\frac{1}{2e^2}\int(
264: (\partial_iH^a+\varepsilon_{abc}A^b_i H^c)^2+\frac12 (F^a_{ik})^2)d^3 x
265: \geq \frac{4\pi|n|}{e^2}\,,
266: $$
267: coincides with
268: the energy \cite{mon} of the D=3 YM-Higgs system. Its absolute minima for a given $n$
269: are the BPS monopoles, and
270: when lifted back to D=5 they become one-dimensional objects --
271: {`YM vortices'}. The number of vortices, $n$, can be arbitrary, and they
272: can be located anywhere in the 3-space of $x^k$.
273:
274: We shall now describe the self-gravitating analogs \cite{MV01}
275: for the YM particles and also for the YM vortices. Practically all other known solutions with
276: gravitating gauge fields in higher dimensions are generalizations of these two simplest
277: types.
278:
279:
280:
281: \section{Gravitating YM particles \cite{MV01} }
282: The EYM theory with gauge group SU(2) in D=5 is defined by the action
283: \be \label{0}
284: S=\int{\cal L}_5\sqrt{^{(5)} g}\,d^5 x=
285: \int\left(\frac{1}{16\pi G}\,^{(5)}R
286: -\frac{1}{4 e^2}\,F^a_{MN}F^{aMN}\right)\sqrt{^{(5)}g}\,d^5 x\, ,
287: \ee
288: where
289: $F^a_{MN}=\partial_M A^a_N-\partial_N A^a_M
290: +\varepsilon_{abc}A^b_M A^c_N$ $(a=1,2,3)$. The Newton constant $G$
291: and gauge coupling $e$ being both dimensionful,
292: $[G^{1/3}]=[{ e^2}]=[{\rm length}]$, one can define the
293: dimensionless coupling parameter as
294: $$
295: {\kappa}=\frac{8\pi G}{ e^6}.
296: $$
297: Let us try to construct the 5D counterparts of the 4D solitons \cite{BK}
298: of Bartnik and McKinnon: particle-like objects localized in 4 spatial
299: dimensions. In the simplest case they are static and purely magnetic
300: and have the SO(4)
301: spatial symmetry. The fields are then given by
302: \be \label{e0}
303: ds^2=e^2\left\{-\sigma(r)^2 N(r)dt^2
304: +\frac{d r^2}{N(r)}+
305: r^2\,d\Omega_3^2\right\}\, ,~~~A^a=(1+w(r))\,\theta^a\, ,
306: \ee
307: where $\theta^a$ are the
308: invariant forms on $S^3$.
309: With $N\equiv 1-{ \kappa} m(r)/r^2$,
310: the EYM field equations for the action \eqref{0} reduce to
311: \bea
312: &&r^2 Nw''+r\,w'
313: +{ \kappa}\,(m-(w^2-1)^2)\frac{w'}{r}=2\,(w^2-1)w\, , \label{e1} \\
314: &&rm'=r^2Nw'^2+(w^2-1)^2\, ,~~ \label{e2} \\
315: &&\sigma'=\kap\,\frac{w'^2}{r}\,\sigma\,~~ \Rightarrow~~
316: \sigma(r)=\exp\left(-{ \kappa}\int_r^\infty\frac{w'^2}{r}\,dr\right).
317: \label{e3}
318: \eea
319: If ${\kappa=0}$ then $\sigma=N=1$ and the geometry is flat.
320: The solution of
321: Eq.\eqref{e1} is
322: the 5D { YM particle}, which is the same as the 4D one-instanton solution:
323: \be
324: w=\frac{1-{ b}\,r^2}{1+{ b}\,r^2}.
325: \ee
326: Here ${ b}>0$ is an integration constant that determines the
327: size of the particle.
328: This solution is everywhere regular and its
329: energy is the ADM mass: $E=M_{\rm ADM}=m(\infty)=\frac{8}{3}$.
330:
331: The next question is what happens if ${\kappa\neq 0}$ ?
332: %The answer to this question is given by the following assertion: \\
333: %{\it For ${\kappa\neq 0}$ Eqs.\eqref{e1})--\eqref{e3}) do not admit
334: %globally regular or black hole solutions with finite ADM mass}\\
335: %The proof goes as follows.
336: Let us consider asymptotically flat solutions with finite ADM mass.
337: If they are globally regular, then they will have a regular origin at $r=0$,
338: and for small $r$ the local solution of Eqs.\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} will be given by
339: %They can have the two following types of boundary conditions at small $r$.
340: %$M_{\rm ADM}<\infty$ $\Rightarrow$ $w(\infty)=\pm 1$. Either
341: %\begin{itemize}
342: %\item
343: \be \label{reg}
344: w=1-2br^2+O(r^4),~~~~~m=O(r^3).
345: \ee
346: One can also consider black hole solutions, in which case
347: \be \label{bh}
348: \exists r_h>0:~~~~~N(r_h)=0,~~~~~N'(r_h)>0,~~~~~w(r_h)<\infty\,.
349: \ee
350: In both cases, using the boundary condition \eqref{reg} if $r_h=0$ and
351: \eqref{bh} for $r_h>0$ and
352: integrating \eqref{e2} gives the ADM mass functional
353: \be \label{mass}
354: M_{\rm ADM}[w(r)]=m(\infty)
355: =\frac{r_h^2}{\kappa}+
356: \int_{r_h}^\infty\frac{dr}{r}\,(r^2w'^2+(w^2-1)^2)
357: \sigma(r).
358: \ee
359: This shows that one should have $w(\infty)=\pm 1$ for the
360: mass to be finite. Let us suppose that there is a solutions with $M_{\rm ADM}<\infty$
361: and let $w(r)$ be the corresponding gauge field amplitude.
362: The first variation
363: of the mass functional \eqref{mass} should then vanish under all variations
364: $w(r)\to w(r)+\delta w(r)$
365: respecting the boundary conditions.
366: In particular, if we consider special variations $w(r)\to w(\lambda r)$ then
367: one should have
368: $\frac{d}{d\lambda}M[w(\lambda r)]=0$ for $\lambda=1$.
369: However, \eqref{mass} implies that
370: $\frac{d}{d\lambda}M[w(\lambda r)]<0$ for any $\lambda$. As a result,
371: there are no solutions with finite ADM mass.
372:
373:
374: We therefore conclude that
375: {\sl the flat space YM particles do not admit self-gravitating generalizations
376: with finite energy}. One can say that they
377: { get completely destroyed by gravity}, as in some sense they
378: resemble dust, since their energy momentum tensor is
379: $$
380: T_{MN}=\epsilon(r)\delta^0_M\delta^0_N
381: $$
382: and in addition
383: they can be scaled to an arbitrary size. As a result, when gravity is on,
384: the repulsion and attraction are not balanced and so equilibrium states
385: are not possible.
386: If one nevertheless tries
387: integrating Eqs.\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3} starting from the
388: regular origin, say, to see what happens, one finds a
389: peculiar quasi-periodic behavior shown in Fig.1.
390: %
391: \begin{figure}[h]
392: \hbox to\linewidth{\hss%
393: % \psfrag{x}{$\ln(1+\rho)$}
394: % \psfrag{1}{$\delta\p$}
395: % \psfrag{3}{$\delta W_1$}
396: % \psfrag{2}{$\delta\Omega_1$}
397: % \psfrag{4}{$\nu=1$}
398: \resizebox{8cm}{6cm}{\includegraphics{FIG0.eps}}%
399: \hss}
400: \caption{Globally regular solution to Eqs.\eqref{e1}--\eqref{e3},\eqref{reg}
401: with $b=1$, $\kappa=10^{-8}$. }
402: \end{figure}
403: %
404: This can be explained qualitatively:
405: integrating Eq.\eqref{e1} with the regular boundary condition \eqref{reg}
406: gives
407: \be \label{11}
408: w^{\prime 2}-(w^2-1)^2=
409: -\int_{-\infty}^\tau(\ln(\sigma^2 N))'w'^2 d\tau\, ,
410: \ee
411: with $^\prime \equiv\frac{d}{d\tau}\equiv r\sqrt{N}\frac{d}{dr}$.
412: This describes a particle moving with friction
413: in the inverted double-well potential $U=-(w^2-1)^2$.
414: At $\tau=-\infty$ the particle
415: starts at the local maximum of the potential
416: at $w=1$, but then it looses energy
417: due to the dissipation and
418: cannot reach the second maximum at $w=-1$.
419: Hence it bounces back.
420: For large $\tau$
421: the dissipative term tends to zero,
422: and the particle ends up oscillating in the
423: potential well with a constant energy. After each oscillation the mass
424: function $m$ increases in a step-like fashion, and for large $r$
425: one has $m(r)\sim \tau\sim\ln r$. As a result,
426: there emerges an infinite sequence of static spherical shells of the
427: YM energy in the D=5 spacetime. These arguments easily generalize to the black hole case.
428:
429:
430:
431: \subsection{Other particlelike solutions \cite{Maeda,
432: BCT-High,BCHT-High,RT-High,
433: RST-High,BRT-High,BMT,RST
434: }}
435:
436: A number of generalizations
437: of the above results have been considered. It
438: turns out that the divergence of the mass is the generic property
439: of the static EYM solutions with the spherical symmetry in $D>4$.
440: In particular, it has been shown that for all static
441: EYM solutions with gauge group ${\cal G}=$SO(d) and with the spatial SO(d) symmetry
442: in $D>4$ dimensions,
443: where $d=D$ if $D$ is even and $d=D-1$ if $D$ is odd, the ADM mass diverges.
444: This concerns both globally regular and black hole solutions, and also
445: solutions with a $\Lambda$-term.
446:
447: It turns out, however, that one can nevertheless have finite mass particlelike
448: solutions in $D>4$ at the expense of adding
449: the higher order curvature corrections to the EYM Lagrangian.
450: The gravitational term of the action, $R$, is then `corrected' by adding all possible
451: Gauss-Bonnet invariants, while the Yang-Mills term, ${\rm tr}(F\wedge \ast F)$,
452: is augmented by adding terms of the type ${\rm tr}({\cal F}\wedge \ast {\cal F})$,
453: where ${\cal F}=F\wedge\ldots\wedge F$.
454: It is important that after taking these corrections into account the field equations remain
455: the second order. These equations admit localized solutions with a finite mass which have
456: been studied \cite{
457: BCT-High,BCHT-High,RT-High,
458: RST-High,BRT-High,BMT,RST
459: }
460: quite extensively.
461:
462:
463:
464:
465:
466:
467: \subsection{Gravitating Yang monopoles \cite{GT}}
468: Flat space 4D YM instantons with ${\cal G}$=SU(2)
469: can also be used to construct self-gravitating solutions
470: in $D=6$. The YM instanton lives in this case on the $S^4$ angular part of
471: the SO(5)-invariant 5-space,
472: the ansatz for the metric and gauge field being
473: $$
474: ds^2=-\sigma(r)^2 N(r)dt^2
475: +\frac{d r^2}{N(r)}+
476: r^2(d\xi^2+\sin^2\chi\,d\Omega_3^2)\, ,~~~A^a=(1+w(\chi))\,\theta^a\, .
477: $$
478: YM equations decouple and admit a solution $w(\chi)=\cos\chi$,
479: whose energy momentum tensor does not depend on $r$ and
480: determines the source for the Einstein equations.
481: The latter give
482: $$
483: \sigma=1,~~~~N=1-\frac{2Gm(r)}{r^3},~~~~~m'={ 8\pi},~~~~~m(r)=8\pi r+m_0,
484: $$
485: and so the mass is linearly divergent for large $r$.
486: This solution can be generalized \cite{GT} also to
487: $D=2k+2$ dimensions, choosing SO($2k$) as the gauge group.
488: In this case one finds $m(r)\sim r^{2k-3}$.
489:
490:
491:
492:
493:
494: \section{Gravitating YM vortices \cite{MV01}}
495: Let us return to the 5D EYM model defined by Eq.\eqref{0} and assume the
496: existence of a
497: hypersurface orthogonal Killing vector $\partial/\partial x^4$,
498: such that the metric is
499: $$
500: g_{MN}dx^M dx^N=e^{-\zeta}g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+e^{2\zeta}(dx^4)^2\,,
501: $$
502: \be \label{hyper}
503: A^a_M dx^M=A^a_\mu dx^\mu+H^a dx^4\, ,~~~/\mu,\nu=0,1,2,3/.
504: \ee
505: Inserting this to \eqref{0} reduces the 5D EYM model to
506: the 4D EYM-Higgs-dilaton theory,
507: \bea \label{hyper1}
508: \sqrt{^{(5)}g}\,{\cal L}_5&=&
509: \left(\frac{^{(4)}R}{2{\kappa}{ e^6}}\,-
510: \frac{3}{{\kappa}{ e^6}}(\partial_\mu\zeta)^2\right.\nonumber \\
511: &-&\left.\frac{1}{2 e^2}e^{-2\zeta}(D_\mu H^a)^2
512: -\frac{1}{4 e^2}e^\zeta (F^a_{\mu\nu})^2\right)\sqrt{-^{(4)}g},\nonumber
513: \eea
514: Let us assume the {SO(3) symmetry} for the 4D fields,
515: $$
516: e^{-\zeta(r)}ds^2=-{\rm e}^{2\nu(r)}dt^2
517: +dr^2+
518: \R^2(r)\,d\Omega_2^2,
519: $$
520: \be \label{vort}
521: A^a_k dx^k=(w(r)-1)\epsilon_{aik}n^idn^k,~~~~
522: H^a=n^a e^{\zeta(r)}h(r),
523: \ee
524: where $n^k$ is the unit normal to the 2-sphere, $d\Omega_2^2=dn^kdn^k$.
525: The independent EYM equations can be rewritten \cite{MV01} in the form of a seven-dimensional
526: dynamical system
527: \be \label{dynam}
528: \frac{d}{dr}\,y_k=F_k(y_s,{\kappa})
529: \ee
530: with $y_k=\{w,w',h,h',Z=\zeta',\R,\R'\}$. Solutions of these equations
531: show interesting features which can be qualitatively understood
532: by studying the fixed points of the system.
533: The system has the following fixed points.
534:
535: {I. The origin:} $(w,h,Z,\R)=(1,0,0,0)$. Assuming that this fixed point is
536: attained for $r=0$, the local behavior of the solution for small $r$
537: is
538: \bea \label{zero}
539: w=1-br^2+O(r^2),~~~ h=ar+O(r^3),~~~
540: Z=O(r^2),~~~ \R=r+O(r^3).
541: \eea
542:
543: II. { Infinity:} $(w,h,Z,1/\R)=(0,1,0,0)$. This fixed point can be reached
544: for $r\to \infty$, in which case
545: \bea \label{inf}
546: &&w=A\,r^{C}{\rm e}^{-r}+o({\rm e}^{-r}),
547: \ Z={\kappa}{Q}{r^{-2}}+O(r^{-3}\ln r),\ \nonumber \\
548: &&h=1-{C}{r^{-1}}+O(r^{-2}\ln r), \\
549: &&\R=r-m\ln r+m^2r^{-1}\ln r-r_0+{\gamma}{r^{-1}}
550: +O(r^{-2}\ln r)\, . \nonumber
551: \eea
552: In these expressions
553: $a$, $b$, $A$, $v$, $C$, $Q$, $r_\infty$, $\gamma$
554: are eight free parameters.
555: The ADM mass is
556: $
557: M_{\rm ADM}=3(C+(2+{\kappa} )Q).
558: $
559:
560:
561: III. { ``Warped'' $AdS_3\times S^2$.} The fixed point values of the
562: functions are expressed in this case in terms of roots of the cubic
563: equation
564: {$4q^3+7q^2+11q=1$} as
565: \be \label{III}
566: w^2=q,~~
567: \R^2=\kap\frac{(11q-1)(1-q)}{(4q^2-13q+1)},~~
568: h^2=\frac{1-q}{R^2},~~Z^2=-\frac{4q^2-13q+1}{(4q+1)R^2}.
569: \ee
570: Evaluating,
571: \be \label{333}
572: w=0.29,~ h=\frac{1.27}{\sqrt{\kap}},~
573: Z=\pm\frac{0.31}{\sqrt{\kap}} ,~
574: \R=0.75\sqrt{\kap}\, ,
575: \ee
576: which gives an exact non-Abelian solution with
577: the geometry
578: \be \label{warped}
579: ds^2={\rm e}^{2(1+\kappa h^2) Zr}dt^2-d r^2-{\rm e}^{2Zr}\,(dx^4)^2
580: -\R^2\,d\Omega_2^2.
581: \ee
582: Linearizing Eqs.\eqref{dynam} around this fixed point gives
583: the characteristic eigenvalues
584: \be\left( -\frac{2.77}{\sqrt{\kap}},-\frac{2.47}{\sqrt{\kap}},
585: -\frac{2.12}{\sqrt{\kap}},
586: { -\frac{0.61}{\sqrt{\kap}}\pm i\frac{1.24}{\sqrt{\kap}}} ,
587: +\frac{0.88}{\sqrt{\kap}},
588: +\frac{1.54}{\sqrt{\kap}}\right) . \label{eig}
589: \ee
590:
591: \begin{figure}[ht]
592: \hbox to\linewidth{\hss%
593: \resizebox{9cm}{4.5cm}{\includegraphics{DYN.eps}}%
594: \hss}
595: \caption{Schematic behavior of solutions of Eqs.\ref{dynam} interpolating
596: between fixed points I and II.}
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: {Global solutions} of Eqs.\eqref{dynam} can then be viewed as
600: trajectories in the phase space interpolating between
601: fixed point I (origin) and fixed point II (infinity). Their behavior is schematically
602: sketched in Fig.2. For $\kap=0$ the 4D solution is the flat space BPS
603: monopole and its 5D analog is the flat space YM vortex. For
604: $\kap\ll 1$ the solution is a weakly gravitating 5D vortex whose
605: field configuration is only slightly deformed as compared to the $\kap=0$ case.
606: The YM vortices therefore do generalize to curved space, unlike the YM particles.
607:
608: \subsection{Strong gravity limit}
609: Further increasing the gravitational coupling
610: $\kap$ deforms the YM vortex more and more and
611: the phase space trajectory approaches closer and closer
612: the third fixed point.
613: \begin{figure}[h]
614: \hbox to\linewidth{\hss%
615: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{FIG1.eps}}%
616: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{FIG3.eps}}%
617: \hss}
618: \caption{Left: For strongly gravitating solutions the field amplitudes oscillate around
619: the values \eqref{333} corresponding to the third fixed point.
620: Right: The spiraling behavior of the solution parameters in the
621: strong gravity limit. One sees that
622: for a given value of $\kappa\in[0.11,3.22]$ there exist several
623: (at least two) different solutions.
624: }
625: \end{figure}
626: Since the latter has complex eigenvalues with negative real part,
627: the phase trajectory gets attracted by this fixed point
628: and oscillates around it for a while before going to infinity.
629: These oscillations manifest themselves in the solution profiles; see Fig.3.
630: A further increase of the gravitational force is not accompanied
631: by an increase of the value of $\kappa$ but can rather be achieved
632: by increasing the value of $\xi=\kap h'(0)$. The parameters
633: $\kap(\xi)$, $M_{\rm ADM}(\xi)$, etc. then
634: start developing spiraling oscillations around some limiting values; see Fig.3.
635:
636:
637:
638:
639: Such strongly gravitating solutions have a regular core connected to
640: the asymptotic region by a long throat -- the region where the radius of the
641: two-sphere, $\R$, is approximately constant and all other field amplitudes
642: oscillate around the constant values \eqref{333}. Increasing the value of
643: $\xi=\kap h'(0)$ this throat becomes longer and longer, and finally the solution
644: splits up into the two independent solutions: interior and exterior, schematically
645: shown in Fig.4.
646: \begin{figure}[h]
647: \hbox to\linewidth{\hss%
648: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{gravity.eps}}%
649: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{FIG2.eps}}%
650: \hss}
651: \caption{Left: Schematic behavior of solutions in the strong gravity limit.
652: Right: The profiles of the exterior part of the limiting solution.
653: }
654: \end{figure}
655:
656: {The interior solution} has a regular central core and approaches asymptotically
657: the `warped ADS' geometry \eqref{warped}.
658: In Fig.2 this solution corresponds to the phase trajectory that starts at the
659: fixed point I and after infinitely many oscillations around the fixed point III
660: ends up there. {The exterior solution}, shown in Fig.4, interpolates between
661: the `warped ADS' and infinity. In Fig.2 this solution corresponds to the
662: phase trajectory that interpolates between the
663: fixed points III and II. It does not oscillate,
664: since all `repelling' eigenvalues \eqref{eig} with positive real part are real.
665: This solution is somewhat similar to an extreme non-Abelian black string,
666: since passing to the Schwarzschild gauge where $r=\R$ one has
667: $$
668: g_{rr}\sim (r-r_h)^{-2},~~~
669: g_{tt}\sim
670: g_{44}=e^{2\zeta}\sim (r-r_h)^{2.02}
671: $$
672: where the event horizon radius is $r_h=0.42$.
673:
674:
675:
676:
677: \subsection{Conclusions}
678: Summarizing the above discussion, although the static and SO(4) symmetric YM particles
679: in D=5 get destroyed by gravity, in view of their scaling behavior,
680: the static and SO(3) symmetric solutions
681: -- YM vortices -- do admit
682: non-trivial curved space generalizations, since their scale invariance is broken
683: by the asymptotic value of the `Higgs field' $H^a=A^a_4$.
684: These gravitating YM vortices comprise a one-parameter family of globally
685: regular solutions -- the fundamental branch -- that interpolates
686: between the flat space BPS monopole and the extreme non-Abelian black
687: string. For all these solutions the YM field amplitude $w$ is positive definite.
688: In addition, there exist also excitations over the fundamental branch. These are
689: solutions for which the YM field amplitude $w$ oscillates around { zero value}, these
690: solutions do not have the flat space limit.
691:
692:
693:
694: \section{Generalized YM vortices}
695:
696: The gravitating YM vortex solutions of the fundamental branch (but not the excited ones)
697: have been generalized in a number of ways.
698:
699:
700: \subsection{YM black strings \cite{Hartmann04}}
701: From the 4D viewpoint the YM vortices are regular
702: gravitating solitons. It has been known for quite a long time \cite{Kastor92}
703: that gravitating solitons can often be generalized to include a small black hole
704: in the center. Technically this requires replacing
705: the boundary conditions at the regular origin (conditions of the type \eqref{reg})
706: by the boundary conditions at the regular event horizon
707: (conditions of the type \eqref{bh}). Such a procedure has been used \cite{Hartmann04} to
708: promote the regular YM vortices to black strings.
709:
710: For a given $\kap$ there can be several YM vortex solutions corresponding
711: to different parts of the spiraling curves in Fig.3. This property generalizes also
712: to the black string case, where one also finds several black string solutions
713: for a given $\kap$, provided that their even horizon radius $r_h$ is
714: small enough.
715: As $r_h$ increases, these
716: solutions approach each other and finally merge for some maximal
717: value $r_h^{\rm max}(\kap)$. There are no black strings with
718: $r_h>r_h^{\rm max}(\kap)$, and so black strings exist
719: only in a finite domain of the $(\kap,r_h)$ parameter plane.
720: Black strings and regular vortex solutions with a $\Lambda$-term \cite{TB,BD}
721: have also been considered.
722:
723:
724:
725:
726:
727: \subsection{`Twisted' solutions \cite{BR-twist,BR-twist1}}
728: When performing the dimensional reduction from D=5 to D=4 in Eqs.\eqref{hyper}
729: and \eqref{hyper1} it was assumed that the Killing vector $\partial/\partial x^4$
730: is hypersurface orthogonal. Relaxing this condition,
731: Eq.\eqref{hyper} generalizes to
732: \be
733: g_{MN}dx^M dx^N=e^{-\zeta}g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+e^{2\zeta}
734: (dx^4+{ W_\mu} dx^\mu)^2\,, \nonumber
735: \ee
736: \be
737: A^a_M dx^M=A^a_\mu dx^\mu+H^a (dx^4+{ W_\mu} dx^\mu)\,,\nonumber
738: \ee
739: where the twist $W_\mu$ can be viewed as a 4D
740: vector field.
741: Inserting this to the action \eqref{0} gives instead of \eqref{hyper1}
742: a four dimensional EYM-Higgs-dilaton+U(1) model. The solutions of this
743: `twisted' model carry an
744: additional U(1) charge under the vector field $\W_\mu$.
745: This charge can be of electric \cite{BR-twist} or magnetic \cite{BR-twist1} type.
746: When this
747: charge vanishes, the solutions reduce to the YM vortices/black strings.
748:
749:
750:
751:
752: \subsection{Deformed and stationary solutions \cite{BH02a,BHR05def,BHR05}}
753: The 5D YM vortices/black strings, with or without twist, have been also generalized
754: \cite{BH02a,BHR05def,BHR05} to the case where, after the dimensional reduction to D=4, the
755: fields are chosen to be static and axially symmetric, rather than spherically symmetric.
756: %The 4D metric then reads
757: %$$
758: %ds^2=F(r,\theta)dt^2
759: %-M(r,\theta)(dr^2+r^2\sin^2\theta)-L(r,\theta)d\varphi^2\,.
760: %$$
761: The ansatz for the gauge field $A_\mu^a$ and $H^a$
762: contains in this case two integer winding numbers, $n,m$.
763: If ${ n=1},{ m=0}$ then the solutions are spherically symmetric monopoles.
764: For ${ n>1}$, ${ m=0}$
765: one obtains axially symmetric solutions of the multimonopole type.
766: Solutions with ${ m=1}$ describe monopole-antimonopole pairs.
767: Both regular solutions \cite{BHR05def} and black strings \cite{BHR05} have been considered within this approach. In all cases the existence
768: of several solutions for a given value of $\kappa$ has been detected.
769:
770: A further generalization is achieved \cite{BHR05def,BHR05}
771: by returning back to D=5 an performing
772: a Lorentz boost along the $x^4$ direction. This operation has a non-trivial effect
773: on the 4D configurations: it produces
774: stationary spinning solutions.
775:
776:
777:
778:
779: \subsection{Non-Abelian braneworlds \cite{Shap03,BBez,BCH,BH04,BBB03}}
780:
781:
782: Solutions with gravitating gauge fields can also be considered
783: in the context of the braneworld models.
784: As was discussed above, the non-Abelian monopole describes a one-dimensional object
785: (vortex) in D=5. It will therefore describe a two-dimensional object (domain wall) in D=6
786: and a three-dimensional object (3-brane) in D=7. In all cases
787: the SU(2) Yang-Mills field and the triplet Higgs fields can be chosen to be
788: static and spherically symmetric,
789: \be \label{ans1}
790: A^a_kdx^k=\epsilon_{akj}\frac{x^j}{r^2}\,
791: (1-w(r))dx^k,~~~~H^a=\frac{x^a}{r}\,h(r)~~~~/r^2=x^k x^k/,
792: \ee
793: with $r^2=x^k x^k$. For the 3-brane in D=7 one chooses
794: $x^k$ $/k=1,2,3/$
795: to be coordinates orthogonal to the brane, the 7D metric being
796: \be \label{ans2}
797: ds^2=A(r)\eta_{\mu\nu}dy^\mu dy^\nu+B(r)\delta_{ik}dx^i dx^k\,,
798: \ee
799: where $y^\mu$ $/\mu=0,1,2,3/$ are coordinates on the brane.
800: Integrating the coupled
801: EYM-Higgs-$\Lambda$ equations reveals \cite{Shap03}
802: that there are solutions satisfying the regularity condition at the brane,
803: $A(0)=B(0)=w(0)=1$, $h(0)=0$, for which
804: $A(r)\to 0$ for $r\to\infty$. Such solutions describe globally regular braneworlds confined
805: in the monopole core with gravity localized on it.
806: Solitonic braneworlds have also been studied in systems with a
807: gravitating global monopole
808: \cite{Shap00} and also for
809: the local and global monopoles \cite{BBez} coupled to each other and to gravity
810: in D=7.
811:
812: More general solutions of the $n$-brane type have been obtained \cite{BCH,BH04,BBB03}
813: by oxidizing the
814: $D=5$ YM vortices to $D=4+n$ dimensions.
815: The metric is then chosen to be
816: \be \label{ans3}
817: ds^2=-e^{\xi_{0}(r)}(dy^0)^2+\sum_{k=1}^{n}e^{\xi_{k}(r)}(dy^k)^2+B(r)\delta_{ik}dx^i dx^k
818: \ee
819: with the gauge field given by
820: \be \label{ans4}
821: A^a_M dx^M=\epsilon_{akj}\frac{x^j}{r^2}\,(1-w(r))dx^k+\frac{x^a}{r}\sum_{k=1}^{n}h_k(r)dy^k\,.
822: \ee
823: What is interesting, the analog of the fixed point \eqref{III} can be obtained \cite{BCH}
824: within this approach
825: for any $n$, also expressed in terms of roots of a cubic polynomial.
826:
827:
828: \section{Non-Abelian solitons in string theory}
829:
830: Coming to the question of why one should study gravitating Yang-Mills fields in
831: higher dimensions, one can say that (apart form pure curiosity) the motivation
832: for this is provided by string theory. Gravitating Yang-Mills fields enter
833: supersymmetry multiplets of the supergravity (SUGRA) theories to which string theory
834: reduces at low energies. The knowledge of the basic solutions
835: for gravitating gauge fields can therefore be useful for constructing
836: solutions in low energy string theory. However, unlike solutions of the pure vacuum gravity,
837: solutions of the EYM theory will not directly solve equations of SUGRA, since the
838: latter generically contain additional fields, as for example the dilaton field.
839: Constructing supergravity solutions with Yang-Mills fields is
840: thus more complicated. However, imposing
841: the supersymmetry conditions one can sometimes reduce the problem to solving first order
842: Bogomol'nyi equations and not the second order field equations.
843:
844: \subsection{Heterotic solitons \cite{Strom90,Duff}}
845: The first example of supersymmetric solutions with gravitating Yang-Mills fields
846: was obtained by Strominger \cite{Strom90} in the heterotic string theory. The low energy
847: limit of the latter is a supergravity whose bosonic sector contains a Yang-Mills field
848: already in D=10. Strominger considers a 5-brane in D=10 and makes the 6+4
849: split of the metric,
850: $$
851: ds^2=A(x^\mu)\eta_{MN}dy^M dy^N+B(x^\nu)\delta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu\,,
852: $$
853: where $y^M$ /$M,M=0,1,2,3,4,5$/ are coordinates on the brane while the coordinated of the
854: 4-space orthogonal to the brane are $x^\mu$ $/\mu=1,2,3,4$/. He puts
855: the Yang-Mills field to the orthogonal Euclidean 4-space,
856: $$
857: A^a_M=0,~~~~~A^a_\mu(x^\nu).
858: $$
859: Since the Yang-Mills field in D=4 is conformally invariant and the relevant 4D part
860: of the metric is conformally flat, the scale factor $B(x^\nu)$ drops out from the
861: Yang-Mills equations. As a result, any flat space self-dual Yang-Mills instanton
862: in D=4,
863: \be \label{self}
864: F_{\mu\nu}=\tilde{F}_{\mu\nu},
865: \ee
866: will solve the Yang-Mills part of the SUGRA equations. The metric functions $A,B$ as well as
867: the axion and dilaton will then satisfy the Poisson equation on $\mathbb{E}^4$ with the source
868: determined by $F_{\mu\nu}$, and so the solution can be expressed in quadratures.
869: As there are many solutions of Eqs.\eqref{self}, this gives a large family
870: of heterotic 5-branes in D=10.
871: Performing then dimensional reductions, one can construct \cite{Duff} yet many more
872: different solutions living in $D<10$.
873: All these are called heterotic solitons.
874:
875:
876:
877:
878: \subsection{Non-Abelian vacua in gauged SUGRAs \cite{CV04,CV97,CV98,CV01,Radu,Radu1}}
879:
880: Type I and type II string theories and also M theory reduce at low energies to
881: supergravities in D=10 and D=11 whose multiplets do not contain Yang-Mills fields.
882: However, the latter appear when one performs dimensional reductions on internal
883: manifolds with non-Abelian isometries. This gives gauged SUGRAs in lower
884: dimensions whose gauge group is related to the isometry group of the
885: internal manifold. For example, the reduction of type II string theory on $S^5$ gives
886: the gauged SUGRA in D=5 whose solutions are used in the AdS/CFT correspondence.
887: Another example is the reduction of M theory on $S^7$, which
888: gives \cite{deWit} the N=8 gauged SUGRA in D=4 with the local
889: SO(8)$\times$SU(8) invariance. One can then study solutions
890: in these SUGRAs, and lifting them back to $D=10,11$ will give vacua
891: of string or M theory.
892:
893: The field content of a gauged SUGRA model can be quite complicated, which is why
894: the gauge fields are often set to zero to find solutions. This gives,
895: for example, black holes with scalar hair \cite{Duff-Liu,Hertog-Maeda} in N=8 SUGRA.
896: However, in some cases one can construct solutions also
897: with gravitating gauge fields. Let us consider a SUGRA model \cite{CV04} in D=4 which is a
898: consistent truncation of the maximal N=8 SUGRA,
899: \be \label{so4}
900: {\cal L}_4 =\frac{1}{4}R
901: -\frac12\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi
902: -\frac{1}{4}\,e^{2\phi}F^{a}_{\mu\nu}F^{a\mu\nu}
903: +\frac{1}{8}\, (e^{-2\phi}+{\xi^2}e^{2\phi}+4{\xi}).
904: \ee
905: This theory contains a gravity-coupled Yang-Mills field with gauge group SU(2)
906: and the dilaton, whose potential depends on a real parameter $\xi$.
907: In the static and spherically symmetric case the fields are given by
908: \bea
909: ds^2_{(4)}&=&-e^{2V(\rho)}dt^2+e^{2\lambda(\rho)}d\rho^2+r^2(\rho)d\Omega^2, \nonumber \\
910: A^a_k dx^k&=&(w(\rho)-1)\epsilon_{aik}n^idn^k,~~ ~\phi=\phi(\rho).~~\nonumber
911: \eea
912: For one-shell configurations the amplitudes $V,\lambda,r,w,\phi$ satisfy
913: a system of second order ODEs whose solutions can be studied \cite{Mann} numerically.
914: Instead of solving these equations, one can also consider the
915: conditions for the fields to have unbroken supersymmetries.
916: These conditions require the existence of a non-trivial spinor
917: $\epsilon$ satisfying the linear equations
918: \bea \label{SUSY}
919: 0&=&
920: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\,\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu\phi\,\epsilon+
921: \frac{1}{2}\,e^{\phi}{\cal F}\epsilon
922: +\frac{1}{4}\,(e^{-\phi}-{\xi} e^{\phi})\epsilon, \nonumber \\
923: 0&=&
924: {\cal D}_\mu\epsilon +
925: \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\,e^{\phi}{\cal F}\gamma_\mu \epsilon
926: +\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}}\,(e^{-\phi}+{\xi} e^{\phi})\gamma_\mu\epsilon, \label{susy}
927: \eea
928: where ${\cal F}=\frac{i}{2}\tau^aF^a_{\alpha\beta}\gamma^\alpha\gamma^\beta$.
929: In general these equations are inconsistent, since there are 80 equations for
930: 16 components of $\epsilon$, and so the only solution is $\epsilon=0$.
931: However, one can show \cite{CV04} that if the background fields are such that the following
932: conditions are fulfilled,
933: %
934: \bea \label{bog}
935: &&V'-\phi'={ \xi}\,\frac{P}{\sqrt{2}N}e^{\phi+\lambda},~~~~~
936: Q=e^{V+\phi}\frac{w}{N}, ~~~~~ \phi'=\sqrt{2}\,\frac{BP}{N}\, e^{\lambda},\nonumber \\
937: w'&=&-\frac{rwB}{N} e^{-\phi+\lambda},~~~~~
938: N\equiv\rho\lambda'+1=\sqrt{w^2+P^2},~~~~~~
939: r'=Ne^\lambda,
940: \eea
941: %
942: where $Q$ is a constant and
943: $$
944: P=e^\phi\frac{1-w^2}{\sqrt{2}r}+\frac{r}{2\sqrt{2}}(e^{-\phi}+{\xi} e^\phi),~~~~
945: B=-\frac{P}{\sqrt{2}r}+\frac12e^{-\phi},
946: $$
947: then there exist four independent solutions of Eqs.\eqref{susy},
948: which corresponds to the N=1 supersymmetry.
949: \begin{figure}[h]
950: \hbox to\linewidth{\hss%
951: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{ads.eps}}%
952: \resizebox{6.5cm}{5.5cm}{\includegraphics{comp.eps}}%
953: \hss}
954: \caption{The asymptotically AdS and compact solutions of the Bogomol'nyi equations \eqref{bog}.
955: }
956: \end{figure}
957: %
958: Solutions \cite{CV04}
959: of the Bogomol'nyi equations \eqref{bog} with the regular boundary condition
960: at the origin, $\rho=r=0$, comprise a continuous family labeled by $\xi$ and
961: show three completely different types of behavior,
962: depending on the sign on $\xi$. For $\xi>0$ the dilaton is everywhere bounded
963: and the solutions approach the AdS metric in the asymptotic region.
964: For $\xi<0$ the solutions are of the `bag of gold' type, since they have compact spatial
965: sections with the topology of $S^3$. The geometry is generically singular at one pole
966: of the $S^3$. However, for $\xi=-2$ the solution is globally regular, the dilaton is
967: constant, the geometry is that of $\mathbb{R}^1\times {S}^3$, and the gauge field potential
968: coincides with the invariant forms on $S^3$. All these solutions can be uplifted \cite{CV04}
969: to $D=11$ to become vacua of M theory.
970:
971:
972: For $\xi=0$ the solution is given by \cite{CV97}
973: \bea \label{4.7}
974: d{ s}^{2}&=&\left.\left.
975: 2\, e^{2\phi}\,
976: \right\{
977: -dt^{2}+d\rho^{2}+
978: \left.\left.\R^{2}(\rho)\right(d\vartheta ^{2}+\sin ^{2}\vartheta d\varphi
979: ^{2}\right)\right\} , \nonumber \\
980: w&=&\pm \frac{\rho}{\sinh \rho},\ \ \ \
981: e^{2(\phi-\phi_0) }=\frac{\sinh \rho}{2\,R(\rho)},~~~
982: \R(\rho)=\sqrt{2\rho\coth\rho-w^2-1}. \label{sol}
983: \eea
984: This solution can be uplifted \cite{CV98} to D=10, the string frame metric
985: and the three-form in D=10 then being given by
986: \bea
987: d{s}^2 &=&
988: -{ dt^{2}+dy_1^2+dy_2^2+dy_3^2}+d\rho^{2}
989: +\R^{2}(\rho)\, d\Omega^{2}_2
990: +\Theta^a\Theta^a\, , \nonumber \\
991: H&=& \label{sol1}
992: \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\, e^{-\frac{3}{4}\phi}(F^{a}\wedge\Theta^a
993: +
994: \epsilon_{abc}\Theta^a\wedge\Theta^b\wedge\Theta^c),
995: \eea
996: where $F^a$ is the gauge field 2-form and
997: $\Theta^a=A^a-\theta^a$ with $\theta^a$ being the invariant forms on $S^3$.
998: This solution describes a 3-brane in D=10.
999:
1000: This solution was originally obtained \cite{CV97,CV98} by
1001: Chamseddine and Volkov, both in D=4 and D=10. A very interesting holographic
1002: interpretation
1003: for this solution was then proposed \cite{MN} by Maldacena and Nunez,
1004: according to which this solution describes the NS-NS 5-brane wrapped on $S^2$,
1005: in which case it effectively becomes a 3-brane.
1006: As a result, the solution provides a dual SUGRA description for the
1007: wrapped brane worldvolume theory, which is the (deformed) N=1 Super Yang-Mills
1008: in D=4.
1009: Since this
1010: theory is confining, one can say that the solution \eqref{sol},\eqref{sol1}
1011: provides the dual SUGRA description for the phenomenon of confinement.
1012: For example, the value of the Wilson loop, the beta-function and other parameters
1013: of the confining
1014: gauge field theory can be obtained by simply computing some purely geometrical
1015: parameters of the solution, like areas of spheres and the values of the $H$-fluxes
1016: through them. As a result, this solution with self-gravitating
1017: Yang-Mills field has found quite interesting and serious applications.
1018: Generally known as solution of Maldacena and Nunez
1019: (the names of Chamseddine and Volkov seem now to be completely forgotten)
1020: it plays an important role in the analysis of string theory
1021: (see \cite{Grana,Edelstein} for recent reviews).
1022:
1023:
1024: Non Abelian vacua have also been studied \cite{CV01} in the context of a gauged SUGRA
1025: in D=5.
1026: The gravitational and gauge fields in this case are given by the same SO(4) invariant
1027: expressions \eqref{e0} as for the YM particle, and there are also the dilaton and axion.
1028: The solutions are not asymptotically flat, they have two supercharges, and they can be
1029: used \cite{MN1}
1030: for a dual SUGRA description of the confining N=1 Super-Yang-Mills theory in D=3.
1031:
1032: The discussed above supersymmetric solutions \cite{CV97,CV01} have also been generalized
1033: \cite{Radu,Radu1} to the case
1034: where the spatial part of the metric is $\mathbb{R}^1\times \Sigma$, where $\Sigma$ is a maximal
1035: symmetry space, that is sphere, hyperboloid or Euclidean space.
1036: Their black hole generalizations \cite{GTV,Bertoldi} have been used
1037: for a holographic description of the confinement/deconfinement phase transition
1038: in the dual gauge theory.
1039:
1040:
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047:
1048:
1049:
1050: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
1051:
1052: %1.
1053:
1054:
1055:
1056:
1057: \bibitem{Lich} A. Lichenrowitcz, {\it Th\'eories Relativistes de la Gravitation
1058: et de l'Electromagn\'etisme} (Masson, Paris, 1955).
1059:
1060: \bibitem{Deser} S. Deser,
1061: {\it Absence of static solutions in source-free Yang-Mills theory.}
1062: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 64}, 463 (1976).
1063:
1064: \bibitem{Coleman} S. Coleman,
1065: {\it There are no classical glueballs.}
1066: {\it Comm.Math.Phys.} {\bf 55}, 113 (1977).
1067:
1068: \bibitem{Coleman1} S. Coleman and L. Smarr,
1069: {\it Are there geon analogs in sourceless gauge field theories ?}
1070: {\it Comm.Math.Phys.} {\bf 56}, 1 (1977).
1071:
1072: \bibitem{BK} R. Bartnik and J. McKinnon,
1073: {\it Particlelike solutions of the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations.}
1074: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 61}, 141 (1988).
1075:
1076: \bibitem{MV89} M.S. Volkov and D.V. Gal'tsov,
1077: {\it Non-Abelian Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes.}
1078: {\it JETP Lett.} {\bf 50}, 346 (1989).
1079:
1080: \bibitem{Kunzle} H. Kunzle and A.K.M. Masood ul Alam,
1081: {\it Spherically symmetric static SU(2) Einstein-Yang-Mills fields.}
1082: {\it J.Math.Phys.} {\bf 31}, 928 (1990).
1083:
1084: \bibitem{Bizon} P. Bizon,
1085: {\it Colored black holes.}
1086: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 64}, 2844 (1990).
1087:
1088: \bibitem{Wheeler} R. Ruffini and J.A. Wheeler,
1089: {\it Introducing the black hole.}
1090: {\it Phys. Today} {\bf 24}, 30 (1971).
1091:
1092: \bibitem{Kunz} B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz,
1093: {\it Static axially symmetric solutions of Einstein Yang-Mills dilaton theory.}
1094: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 78}, 2527 (1997);
1095: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9612101}].
1096:
1097:
1098: \bibitem{Kunz1} B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz,
1099: {\it Static black hole solutions with axial symmetry.}
1100: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 79}, 1595 (1997);
1101: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/9704060}].
1102:
1103: \bibitem{Kunz2} B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz,
1104: {\it Rotating hairy black holes.}
1105: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 86}, 3704 (2001);
1106: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0012081}].
1107:
1108:
1109: \bibitem{MV98} M.S. Volkov and D.V. Gal'tsov,
1110: {\it Gravitating non-Abelian solitons and black holes with Yang-Mills fields.}
1111: {\it Phys.Rep.} {\bf 319}, 1 (1999);
1112: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9810070}].
1113:
1114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BLACk RINGS
1115:
1116: \bibitem{Reall} R. Emparan and H.S. Reall,
1117: {\it Black rings.}
1118: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 23},
1119: R169 (2006); {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0608012}].
1120:
1121:
1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1123:
1124:
1125: \bibitem{eguchi} T. Eguchi, P.B. Gilkey and A.J. Hanson,
1126: {\it Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry.}
1127: {\it Phys.Rep.} {\bf 66}, 213 (1980).
1128:
1129: \bibitem{inst} A.A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A.S. Shvarts, Yu.S. Tyupkin,
1130: {\it Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations.}
1131: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B59}, 85 (1975).
1132:
1133: \bibitem{mon} E.B. Bogomol'nyi,
1134: {\it Stability of classical solutions.}
1135: {\it Sov.J.Nucl.Phys.} {\bf 24}, 676 (1976).
1136:
1137:
1138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BASIC REFERENCE
1139:
1140: \bibitem{MV01} M.S. Volkov,
1141: {\it Gravitating Yang-Mills vortices in 4+1 spacetime dimensions.}
1142: {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B524},
1143: 369 (2002); {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0103038}].
1144:
1145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Higher F and R solutions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1146:
1147:
1148:
1149: \bibitem{BCT-High} Y. Brihaye, A.Chakrabarti and D.H. Tchrakian,
1150: {\it Particle-like solutions to higher order curvature
1151: Einstein-Yang-Mills systems in d-dimensions.}
1152: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 20},
1153: 2765 (2003); {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0202141}].
1154:
1155: \bibitem{Maeda} N. Okuyama and Kei-ichi-Maeda,
1156: {\it Five-dimensional black hole and particle solution with non-Abelian gauge field.}
1157: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 67},
1158: 104012 (2003); {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0212022}].
1159:
1160: \bibitem{BCHT-High} Y. Brihaye, A.Chakrabarti, B. Hartmann and D.H. Tchrakian,
1161: {\it Higher order curvature generalizations of Bartnick-McKinnon and colored black hole solutions in D = 5.}
1162: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 561},
1163: 161 (2003);{\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0212288}].
1164:
1165: \bibitem{RT-High} E. Radu and D.H. Tchrakian,
1166: {\it No hair conjecture, non-Abelian hierarchies and Anti-de Sitter spacetime.}
1167: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 73},
1168: 024006 (2006);
1169: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0508033}].
1170:
1171: \bibitem{RST-High} E. Radu, C. Stelea and D.H. Tchrakian,
1172: {\it Features of gravity-Yang-Mills hierarchies in d-dimensions.}
1173: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 73},
1174: 084015 (2006);
1175: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0601098}].
1176:
1177: \bibitem{BRT-High} Y. Brihaye, E. Radu and D.H. Tchrakian,
1178: {\it Einstein-Yang-Mills solutions in higher dimensional de Sitter spacetime.}
1179: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0610087}].
1180:
1181: \bibitem{BMT} P. Breitenlihner, D. Maison and D.H. Tchrakian,
1182: {\it Regular solutions to higher order curvature Einstein-Yang-Mills systems in higher dimensions.}
1183: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 22},
1184: 5201 (2005);
1185: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0508027}].
1186:
1187: \bibitem{RST} E. Radu, Ya. Shnir and D.H. Tchrakian,
1188: {\it Particle-like solutions to the Yang-Mills-dilaton system in d=4+1 dimensions.}
1189: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0611270}].
1190:
1191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% YANG MONOPOLE
1192:
1193: \bibitem{GT} G.W. Gibbons and P. Townsend,
1194: {\it Self-gravitating Yang monopoles in all dimensions.}
1195: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 23},
1196: 4873 (2006);
1197: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0604024}].
1198:
1199: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% black strings
1200:
1201: \bibitem{Kastor92} D. Kastor, J.H. Traschen,
1202: {\it Horizon inside classical lumps.}
1203: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 46}, 5399 (1992);
1204: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9207070}].
1205:
1206:
1207: \bibitem{Hartmann04} B. Hartmann,
1208: {\it Non-Abelian black strings.}
1209: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 602}, 231 (2004); {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0409006}].
1210:
1211:
1212: \bibitem{TB} F. Bakkalo Taheri and Y. Brihaye,
1213: {\it Non-Abelian black strings and cosmological constant.}
1214: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0605040}].
1215:
1216: \bibitem{BD} Y. Brihaye and T. Delsate,
1217: {\it Black strings and solitons in five dimensional
1218: space-time with positive cosmological constant.}
1219: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0611195}].
1220:
1221:
1222:
1223:
1224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TWISTED SOLUTIONS
1225: \bibitem{BR-twist} Y. Brihaye and E. Radu,
1226: {\it Gravitating Yang-Mills dyon vortices in 4+1 spacetime dimensions.}
1227: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 605}, 190 (2005);
1228: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0409065}].
1229:
1230: \bibitem{BR-twist1} Y. Brihaye and E. Radu,
1231: {\it Kaluza-Klein black holes with squashed horizons and d=4 superposed monopoles.}
1232: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 641}, 212 (2006);
1233: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0606228}].
1234:
1235: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% DEFORMED SOLUTIONS
1236:
1237: \bibitem{BH02a} Y. Brihaye, B. Hartmann,
1238: {\it Dilatonic monopoles from (4+1)-dimensional vortices.}
1239: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 534}, 137 (2002);
1240: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0202054}].
1241:
1242: \bibitem{BHR05def} Y. Brihaye, B. Hartmann and E. Radu,
1243: {\it Deformed vortices in (4+1)-dimensional Einstein - Yang - Mills theory.}
1244: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 71}, 085002 (2005).
1245: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0502131}].
1246:
1247: \bibitem{BHR05} Y. Brihaye, B. Hartmann and E. Radu,
1248: {\it Black strings in (4+1)-dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.}
1249: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 72}, 104008 (2005);
1250: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0508028}].
1251:
1252:
1253:
1254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BRANEWORLD
1255:
1256: \bibitem{Shap03} E. Roessl and M. Shaposhnikov,
1257: {\it Localizing gravity on a 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole in seven-dimensions.}
1258: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 66}, 084008 (2002);
1259: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0205320}].
1260:
1261: \bibitem{Shap00} T. Gherghetta, E. Roessl and M. Shaposhnikov,
1262: {\it Living inside a hedgehog: Higher dimensional solutions that localize gravity.}
1263: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 491}, 353 (2000);
1264: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0006251}].
1265:
1266:
1267: \bibitem{BBez} E. R. Bezerra de Mello and B. Hartmann,
1268: {\it Localizing gravity in composite monopole brane worlds without bulk cosmological constant.}
1269: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 639}, 546 (2006);
1270: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0603077}].
1271:
1272: \bibitem{BCH} Y. Brihaye, F. Clement, B. Hartmann,
1273: {\it Spherically symmetric Yang-Mills solutions in a (4+n)-dimensional space-time.}
1274: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 70}, 084003 (2004);
1275: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0403041}].
1276:
1277: \bibitem{BH04} Y. Brihaye, B. Hartmann,
1278: {\it Spherically symmetric solutions of a (4+n) - dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills model with cosmological constant.}
1279: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 22}, 183 (2005);
1280: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0403296}].
1281:
1282: \bibitem{BBB03} B. Hartmann, Y. Brihaye, B. Bertrand,
1283: {\it Spherically symmetric Yang-Mills solutions in a
1284: five-dimensional anti-de Sitter space-time.}
1285: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 570}, 137 (2003);
1286: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0307065}].
1287:
1288:
1289: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1290:
1291:
1292:
1293:
1294:
1295: \bibitem{Strom90} A. Strominger,
1296: {\it Heterotic solitons.}
1297: {\it Nucl.Phys.} {\bf B 343}, 167 (1990).
1298:
1299: \bibitem{Duff} M.J. Duff, R.R. Khuri and J.X. Lu,
1300: {\it String solitons.}
1301: {\it Phys.Rep.} {\bf 259}, 213 (1995);
1302: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9412184}].
1303:
1304: \bibitem{deWit} B. de Wit and H. Nicolai,
1305: {\it N=8 Supergravity.}
1306: {\it Nucl.Phys.} {\bf B 208}, 323 (1982).
1307:
1308: \bibitem{Duff-Liu} M.J. Duff and J.T. Liu,
1309: {\it Anti-de Sitter black holes in gauged N = 8 supergravity.}
1310: {\it Nucl.Phys.} {\bf B 554}, 237 (1999);
1311: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9901149}].
1312:
1313: \bibitem{Hertog-Maeda}
1314: T. Hertog and K. Maeda,
1315: {\it Black holes with scalar hair and asymptotics in N = 8 supergravity.}
1316: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0407:} 051 (2004);
1317: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0404261}].
1318:
1319:
1320: \bibitem{CV04} A. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,
1321: {\it Non-Abelian solitons in N=4 gauged supergravity and leading order string theory.}
1322: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 70}, 086007 (2004);
1323: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0404171}].
1324:
1325: \bibitem{Mann} R.B. Mann, E. Radu and D.H. Tchrakian,
1326: {\it Non-Abelian solutions in AdS(4) and d=11 supergravity.}
1327: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 74}, 064015 (2006);
1328: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0606004}].
1329:
1330: \bibitem{CV97} A. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,
1331: {\it Regular non-Abelian vacua in N = 4, SO(4) gauged supergravity.}
1332: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 79}, 3343 (1997);
1333: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9711181}].
1334:
1335: \bibitem{CV98} A. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,
1336: {\it Non-Abelian BPS monopoles in N=4 gauged supergravity.}
1337: {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D 57}, 6242 (1998);
1338: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/9707176}].
1339:
1340: \bibitem{MN} J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,
1341: {\it Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 super-Yang-Mills.}
1342: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 86}, 588 (2001);
1343: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0008001}].
1344:
1345:
1346:
1347:
1348:
1349: \bibitem{Grana} M. Grana,
1350: {\it Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review.}
1351: {\it Phys.Rep.} {\bf 423}, 91 (2006);
1352: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0509003}].
1353:
1354: \bibitem{Edelstein} J.D. Edelstein, R. Portugues,
1355: {\it Gauge/string duality in confining theories.}
1356: {\it Fortsch.Phys.} {\bf 54}, 525 (2006);
1357: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0602021}].
1358:
1359:
1360:
1361:
1362: \bibitem{CV01} A. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,
1363: {\it Non-Abelian vacua in D = 5, N=4 gauged supergravity.}
1364: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0104}, 023 (2001);
1365: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0101202}].
1366:
1367: \bibitem{MN1} J.M. Maldacena and H. Nastase,
1368: {\it The Supergravity dual of a theory with dynamical supersymmetry breaking.}
1369: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0109}, 024 (2001);
1370: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0105049}].
1371:
1372: \bibitem{Radu} E. Radu,
1373: {\it New non-Abelian solutions in D = 4, N=4 gauged supergravity.}
1374: {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 542}, 275 (2002);
1375: {\tt [arXiv: gr-qc/0202103}].
1376:
1377: \bibitem{Radu1} E. Radu,
1378: {\it Non-Abelian solutions in N=4, D=5 gauged supergravity.}
1379: {\it Class.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 23}, 4369 (2006);
1380: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0601135}].
1381:
1382:
1383: \bibitem{GTV} S.S. Gubser, A.A. Tseytlin and M.S. Volkov,
1384: {\it Non-Abelian 4-d black holes, wrapped five-branes, and their dual descriptions.}
1385: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0109}, 017 (2001);
1386: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0108205}].
1387:
1388: \bibitem{Bertoldi} G. Bertoldi,
1389: {\it 5-D black holes, wrapped fivebranes and 3-D Chern-Simons super Yang-Mills.}
1390: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0210}, 042 (2002);
1391: {\tt [arXiv: hep-th/0210048}].
1392:
1393:
1394:
1395:
1396:
1397:
1398: \end{thebibliography}
1399: \end{document}
1400:
1401:
1402:
1403:
1404:
1405:
1406:
1407:
1408:
1409:
1410:
1411:
1412:
1413:
1414: % LocalWords: dyon Kaluza Dilatonic Hooft Gherghetta
1415: