1:
2:
3: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4: \documentclass[12pt]{JHEP3}
5: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6:
7: \title{On Entropy Function for Supersymmetric Black Rings}
8: \author{Rong-Gen Cai \\
9: Institute of Theoretical Physics\\
10: Chinese Academy of Sciences\\
11: P.O.Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China\\
12: \email{cairg@itp.ac.cn}}
13: \author{Da-Wei Pang\\
14: Institute of Theoretical Physics\\
15: Chinese Academy of Sciences\\
16: P.O.Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China\\
17: {\rm and}\\
18: Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences\\
19: YuQuan Road 19A, Beijing 100049, China\\
20: \email{pangdw@itp.ac.cn}}
21:
22:
23: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24:
25: \abstract{The entropy function for five-dimensional supersymmetric
26: black rings, which are solutions of $U(1)^{3}$ minimal supergravity,
27: is calculated via both on-shell and off-shell formalism. We find
28: that at the tree level, the entropy function obtained from both
29: perspectives can reproduce the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. We also
30: compute the higher order corrections to the entropy arising form
31: five-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet term as well as supersymmetric $R^{2}$
32: completion respectively and compare the results with previous
33: microscopic calculations.
34: }
35:
36: \keywords{Black Holes in String Theory; Black Holes}
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40: \section{Introduction}
41: \label{Introduction}
42: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
43: The attractor mechanism has played an important role in
44: understanding black hole physics in string theory and has been
45: studied extensively in the past decade. It was initiated in the
46: context of $N=2$ extremal black holes~\cite{classic} and
47: generalized to more general cases, such as supersymmetric black
48: holes with higher order corrections~\cite{cardoso} and
49: non-supersymmetric attractors~\cite{fgk},~\cite{non},~\cite{dst}.
50:
51: Recently, based on Wald's entropy formula~\cite{wald}, A.Sen
52: proposed an effective method for calculating the entropy of
53: D-dimensional black holes with near horizon geometry $AdS_{2}\times
54: S^{D-2}$, which is named as ``entropy function'' method~\cite{sen}.
55: It states that the entropy of such kind of black holes can be
56: obtained by extremizing the ``entropy function'' with respect to
57: various moduli, where the entropy function is defined as integrating
58: the Lagrangian over the horizon coordinates and taking the Legendre
59: transformation with respect to the electric charges. This method has
60: been applied to many specific examples, such as extremal black holes
61: in higher dimensions, rotating black holes and non-supersymmetric
62: black holes. For recent developments, see~\cite{relate}. It is also
63: an useful way to calculate the higher order corrections to the
64: entropy. In particular, more recently we have shown that for some
65: nonextremal black holes in string theory, the entropy function
66: method also works quite well~\cite{CaiPang}. Similar arguments that
67: concerning entropy function for non-extremal black holes/branes
68: appeared very recently~\cite{gagh}.
69:
70: It is well known that for black holes in four-dimensional
71: asymptotically flat spacetime, there exists only one horizon
72: topology $S^{2}$. But for black holes in five-dimensional
73: spacetime, the horizon topology is not unique. A black hole
74: solution with horizon topology $S^{1}\times S^{2}$, named as black
75: ring, was presented firstly in~\cite{er}. Several important
76: developments are listed
77: in~\cite{eemr1},~\cite{eemr2},~\cite{gg},~\cite{bena},~\cite{cgms},
78: where various solutions, the microscopic entropy and relations to
79: other topics are discussed. For reviews, see~\cite{rev}.
80:
81: The near horizon geometry of certain black holes and black rings
82: turns out to be $AdS_{3}\times S^{2}$. It becomes $AdS_{2}\times
83: S^{2}$ after dimensional reduction so that one expects the entropy
84: function formalism also works. Such attempts have been discussed
85: in~\cite{diiss,cop} and an interesting paper appeared very
86: recently~\cite{gj}, where the entropy function for five-dimensional
87: extremal black holes and black rings is constructed in the context
88: of two-derivative gravity coupled to abelian gauge fields and
89: neutral scalar fields, which shows the validity of the entropy
90: function in a general way.
91:
92: Since the entropy function method can give the higher order
93: corrections to the entropy conveniently, it is interesting to study
94: the corrections via the entropy function and compare the results
95: with microscopic calculations. In order to study the higher order
96: corrections to the entropy, we take supersymmetric black rings in
97: $U(1)^{3}$ supergravity as a concrete example. Firstly we carry out
98: the analysis using the two-derivative on-shell and off-shell
99: supergravity, where we make a dimensional reduction so that the
100: resulting action is gauge and coordinate invariant. We find that the
101: entropy function can reproduce both the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
102: and the near horizon geometry, while the correct attractor values of
103: the moduli fields can also be obtained by extremizing the entropy
104: function. Then we calculate the $R^{2}$ corrections to black ring
105: entropy by adding the five-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet term which
106: originates from $R^{4}$ terms in M-theory compactified on a
107: Calabi-Yau manifold as well as supersymmetric $R^{2}$ completion and
108: compare our results with previous microscopic considerations.
109:
110: The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In
111: section~\ref{SBR} we review the supersymmetric black ring
112: solutions in the $U(1)^{N}$ theory and specialize to the case of
113: $N=3$. After dimensional reduction to four-dimensional spacetime,
114: the entropy function for $U(1)^{3}$ black rings is carried out in
115: section~\ref{Four-dim}. The higher order corrections to the
116: entropy are discussed in section~\ref{HOC}. We summarize the
117: results and discuss some related topics in section~\ref{Summary}.
118:
119: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
120: \section{Supersymmetric Black Rings in $U(1)^{3}$ Theory}
121: \label{SBR}
122: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123: In this section, we review some salient properties of
124: supersymmetric black ring in the $U(1)^{3}$ theory, which are
125: needed in the following calculations. For more details, see Sec.
126: II and Appendix B of~\cite{eemr2}.
127:
128: Consider the case of minimal supergravity coupled to $N-1$ Abelian
129: vector multiplets with scalars taking values in a symmetric space.
130: The action for such a theory is
131: \begin{eqnarray}
132: \label{2eq1}
133: S&=&\frac{1}{16\pi
134: G_{5}}\int(R\star1-G_{IJ}dX^{I}\wedge\star
135: dX^{J}-G_{IJ}F^{I}\wedge\star F^{J}\nonumber\\
136: & &-\frac{1}{6}C_{IJK}A^{I}\wedge F^{J}\wedge F^{K}),
137: \end{eqnarray}
138: where $I,J,K=1,\cdots,N$ and the constants $C_{IJK}$ are symmetric
139: in $(IJK)$. The $N-1$ dimensional scalar manifold is conveniently
140: parameterized by the $N$ scalars $X^{I}$, which obey the constraint
141: \begin{equation}
142: \frac{1}{6}C_{IJK}X^{I}X^{J}X^{K}=1.
143: \end{equation}
144: The matrix $G_{IJ}$ is defined by
145: \begin{equation}
146: G_{IJ}\equiv\frac{9}{2}X_{I}X_{J}-\frac{1}{2}C_{IJK}X^{K},
147: \end{equation}
148: where $X_{I}\equiv\frac{1}{6}C_{IJK}X^{J}X^{K}$ such that
149: $X_{I}X^{I}=1$.
150:
151: The supersymmetric black ring in $U(1)^{3}$ theory can be viewed
152: as an eleven-dimensional supertube carrying three charges and
153: three dipoles after dimensional reduction down to $D=5$ on
154: $T^{6}$. The configuration can be summarized as follows:
155: \begin{eqnarray}
156: Q_{1}~~~M2:&1~2~-~-~-~-~-,\nonumber\\
157: Q_{2}~~~M2:&-~-~3~4~-~-~-,\nonumber\\
158: Q_{3}~~~M2:&-~-~-~-~5~6~-,\nonumber\\
159: p_{1}~~~m5:&-~-~3~4~5~6~\psi,\nonumber\\
160: p_{2}~~~m5:&1~2~-~-~5~6~\psi,\nonumber\\
161: p_{3}~~~m5:&1~2~3~4~-~-~\psi.
162: \end{eqnarray}
163: Such a configuration can be taken as a solution of $D=11$
164: supergravity with the effective action
165: \begin{eqnarray}
166: S_{11}&=&\frac{1}{16\pi
167: G_{11}}\int(R_{11}\star_{11}1-\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{F}\wedge\star_{11}\mathcal{F}\nonumber\\
168: & &-\frac{1}{6}\mathcal{F}\wedge\mathcal{F}\wedge\mathcal{A}).
169: \end{eqnarray}
170: The eleven-dimensional solution describing this system takes the
171: form
172: \begin{eqnarray}
173: \label{2eq6}
174: ds_{11}^{2}&=&ds_{5}^{2}+X^{1}(dz_{1}^{2}+dz_{2}^{2})+X^{2}(dz_{3}^{2}+dz_{4}^{2})\nonumber\\
175: & &+X^{3}(dz_{5}^{2}+dz_{6}^{2}),\nonumber\\
176: \mathcal{A}&=&A^{1}\wedge dz_{1}\wedge dz_{2}+A^{2}\wedge
177: dz_{3}\wedge dz_{4}\nonumber\\
178: & &+A^{3}\wedge dz_{5}\wedge dz_{6},
179: \end{eqnarray}
180: where $z_{i}$ denote the coordinates along the 123456-directions
181: and $\mathcal{A}$ is the three-form potential.
182:
183: Note that if we reduce the eleven-dimensional action to
184: five-dimensional spacetime on $T^{6}$ using the ansatz~(\ref{2eq6}),
185: we will obtain precisely the action~(\ref{2eq1}) with $N=3$,
186: $C_{IJK}=1$ if $(IJK)$ is a permutation of $(123)$ and $C_{IJK}=0$
187: otherwise, and
188: \begin{equation}
189: G_{IJ}=\frac{1}{2}{\rm diag}[(X^{1})^{-2}, (X^{2})^{-2},
190: (X^{3})^{-2}].
191: \end{equation}
192: The resulting five-dimensional black ring solution is
193: characterized by the metric $ds_{5}^{2}$, three scalars $X^{i}$,
194: and three one-forms $A^{i}$, with field strengths $F^{i}=dA^{i}$,
195: which are given by
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: ds_{5}^{2}&=&-(H_{1}H_{2}H_{3})^{-2/3}(dt+\omega)^{2}+(H_{1}H_{2}H_{3})^{1/3}d{\bf
198: x}_{4}^{2},\nonumber\\
199: A^{i}&=&H_{i}^{-1}(dt+\omega)-\frac{p_{i}}{2}[(1+y)d\psi+(1+x)d\phi],\nonumber\\
200: X^{i}&=&H_{i}^{-1}(H_{1}H_{2}H_{3})^{1/3},
201: \end{eqnarray}
202: where
203: \begin{eqnarray}
204: d{\bf
205: x}_{4}^{2}&=&\frac{R^{2}}{(x-y)^{2}}[\frac{dy^{2}}{y^{2}-1}+(y^{2}-1)d\psi^{2}\nonumber\\
206: &
207: &+\frac{dx^{2}}{1-x^{2}}+(1-x^{2})d\phi^{2}],\\
208: H_{1}&=&1+\frac{Q_{1}-p_{2}p_{3}}{2R^{2}}(x-y)-\frac{p_{2}p_{3}}{4R^{2}}(x^{2}-y^{2}),\nonumber\\
209: H_{2}&=&1+\frac{Q_{2}-p_{1}p_{3}}{2R^{2}}(x-y)-\frac{p_{1}p_{3}}{4R^{2}}(x^{2}-y^{2}),\\
210: H_{3}&=&1+\frac{Q_{3}-p_{1}p_{2}}{2R^{2}}(x-y)-\frac{p_{1}p_{2}}{4R^{2}}(x^{2}-y^{2}),\nonumber\\\nonumber
211: \end{eqnarray}
212: and $\omega=\omega_{\phi}d\phi+\omega_{\psi}d\psi$ with
213: \begin{eqnarray}
214: \omega_{\phi}&=&-\frac{1}{8R^{2}}(1-x^{2})[p_{1}Q_{1}+p_{2}Q_{2}+p_{3}Q_{3}\nonumber\\
215: & &-p_{1}p_{2}p_{3}(3+x+y)],\nonumber\\
216: \omega_{\psi}&=&\frac{1}{2}(p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})(1+y)-\frac{1}{8R^{2}}(y^{2}-1)\nonumber\\
217: &
218: &\times[p_{1}Q_{1}+p_{2}Q_{2}+p_{3}Q_{3}-p_{1}p_{2}p_{3}(3+x+y)].
219: \end{eqnarray}
220: Note that the six-torus $T^{6}$ has constant volume because
221: $X^{1}X^{2}X^{3}=1$.
222:
223: The horizon locates at $y=-\infty$ and in order to obtain the near
224: horizon geometry, we have to take rather complicated coordinate
225: transformations, which are discussed extensively in Appendix D
226: of~\cite{eemr2} and here we will not repeat any more. The
227: resulting near horizon metric is
228: \begin{eqnarray}
229: \label{2eq12}
230: ds^{2}&=&\frac{4L}{p}\tilde{r}d\tilde{t}d\tilde{\psi}+L^{2}d\tilde{\psi}^{2}+
231: \frac{p^{2}}{4}\frac{d\tilde{r}^{2}}{\tilde{r}^{2}}\nonumber\\
232: & &+\frac{p^{2}}{4}(d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}),
233: \end{eqnarray}
234: where
235: \begin{eqnarray}
236: L&\equiv&\frac{1}{2p^{2}}[2\sum\limits_{i<j}\mathcal{Q}_{i}p_{i}\mathcal{Q}_{j}p_{j}-
237: \sum\limits_{i}\mathcal{Q}_{i}^{2}p_{i}^{2}-4R^{2}p^{3}\sum\limits_{i}p_{i}],\nonumber\\
238: \mathcal{Q}_{1}&=&Q_{1}-p_{2}p_{3},~~~\mathcal{Q}_{2}=Q_{2}-p_{1}p_{3},~~~\mathcal{Q}_{3}=Q_{3}-p_{1}p_{2},\nonumber\\
239: p&\equiv&(p_{1}p_{2}p_{3})^{1/3}.
240: \end{eqnarray}
241: Finally, let $\tilde{t}=p^{2}\tau/4$ and $e^{0}=p/2L$, the near
242: horizon metric~(\ref{2eq12}) becomes
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: ds^{2}&=&\frac{p^{2}}{4}(-\tilde{r}^{2}d\tau^{2}+\frac{d\tilde{r}^{2}}{\tilde{r}^{2}})+L^{2}(d\tilde{\psi}
245: +e^{0}\tilde{r}d\tau)^{2}\nonumber\\
246: & &+\frac{p^{2}}{4}(d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}),
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: which is the product of a locally $AdS_{3}$ with radius $p$ and a
249: two-sphere of radius $p/2$. The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is
250: \begin{equation}
251: \label{2eq15}
252: S_{BH}=\frac{\mathcal{A}_{5}}{4G_{5}}=\frac{2\pi^2Lp^{2}}{4G_{5}}.
253: \end{equation}
254: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
255: \section{The Entropy Function Analysis in Four-dimensional Spacetime}
256: \label{Four-dim}
257: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
258: In this section, we will carry out the analysis of entropy function
259: for supersymmetric black rings in detail, using both the on-shell
260: and off-shell Lagrangian at two-derivative level.
261: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
262: \subsection{On-Shell Analysis}
263: \label{on}
264: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
265: In this subsection, we calculate the entropy of supersymmetric black
266: rings in $U(1)^{3}$ supergravity via the entropy function formalism,
267: which can be seen as a concrete example of~\cite{gj}. According
268: to~\cite{sen}, in order to carry out entropy function analysis, the
269: Lagrangian must be gauge and coordinate invariant. Since the
270: five-dimensional effective action contains a Chern-Simons term, the
271: Lagrangian is not gauge invariant and we have to reduce it to four
272: dimensions so that the entropy function can be applied. Such
273: analysis was initiated in~\cite{ss1} and has been followed
274: in~\cite{ss2},~\cite{cop} and~\cite{gj}.
275:
276: We take the near horizon field configuration as follows:
277: \begin{eqnarray}
278: \label{3eq1} &
279: &ds_{5}^{2}=w^{-1}[v_{1}(-r^{2}dt^{2}+dr^{2}/r^{2})+v_{2}(d\theta^{2}
280: +\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2})]+w^{2}(d\psi+e^{0}rdt)^{2},\nonumber\\
281: & &A^{I}_{5}=A^{I}_{4}+a^{I}(d\psi+e^{0}rdt), \nonumber\\
282: &
283: &F^{I}_{5rt}=e^{I}+a^{I}e^{0},~~~F^{I}_{4rt}=e^{I},~~~F^{0}_{4rt}=e^{0},
284: ~~~F^{I}_{5\theta\phi}=F^{I}_{4\theta\phi}=\frac{1}{2}p^{I}\sin\theta,\nonumber\\
285: & &X^{I}=x^{I},~~~I=1,2,3.
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: Note that the $\psi$ components of the gauge potential become axions
288: in four-dimensional spacetime. The entropy function analysis will be
289: processed in four-dimensional spacetime after dimensional reduction
290: on $\psi$ coordinate. Define
291: \begin{equation}
292: \label{3eq2} f_{0}\equiv\frac{1}{16\pi}\int d\theta
293: d\phi\sqrt{-g}(\mathcal{L}^{'}_{0}+\mathcal{L}_{0CS})=f^{'}_{0}+f_{0CS},
294: \end{equation}
295: where $\mathcal{L}_{0CS}$ is the Chern-Simons term down to four
296: dimensions and $\mathcal{L}^{'}_{0}$ denotes the resulting
297: Lagrangian coming from the gauge and coordinate invariant terms in
298: the original five-dimensional supergravity. Throughout the work, the
299: four-dimensional Newton constant is set to be $G_{4}\equiv1$ so that
300: $G_{5}=2\pi$.
301:
302: Note that for a consistent dimensional reduction, the first term
303: in~(\ref{3eq2}) can be evaluated in the original five-dimensional
304: background without writing out the expression for the reduced action
305: explicitly, what we should pay attention to is the second
306: Chern-Simons term. In four-dimensional spacetime such a term becomes
307: \begin{eqnarray}
308: \frac{1}{6}A_{5}\wedge F_{5}\wedge
309: F_{5}=e^{-1}(\frac{1}{6}C_{IJK}a^{I}a^{J}a^{K}F^{0}_{4\mu\nu}F^{0}_{4\lambda\sigma}
310: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}+
311: \frac{1}{4}C_{IJK}a^{J}a^{K}F^{I}_{4\mu\nu}F^{0}_{4\lambda\sigma}
312: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}\nonumber\\+\frac{1}{4}C_{IJK}a^{J}a^{K}F^{0}_{4\mu\nu}F^{I}_{4\lambda\sigma}
313: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}+\frac{1}{2}C_{IJK}a^{K}F^{I}_{4\mu\nu}F^{J}_{4\lambda\sigma}
314: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}),\nonumber\\
315: \mu,\nu,\lambda,\sigma=t,r,\theta,\phi,~~~I=1,2,3.
316: \end{eqnarray}
317:
318: Next, define
319: \begin{equation}
320: F_{0}\equiv e^{0}\frac{\partial f_{0}}{\partial
321: e^{0}}+e^{I}\frac{\partial f_{0}}{\partial e^{I}}-f_{0},
322: \end{equation}
323: where $F_{0}$ is a function of $v_{1}$, $v_{2}$, $w$, $a^{I}$ and
324: $x^{I}$. Finally, the entropy is given by
325: \begin{equation}
326: S_{BR}=2\pi F_{0}
327: \end{equation}
328: after extremizing $F_{0}$ with respect to various moduli and
329: substituting their values back into $F_{0}$.
330:
331: We can obtain the explicit results of $\mathcal{L}^{'}_{0}$ and
332: $\mathcal{L}_{0CS}$ directly by putting the near horizon field
333: configuration~(\ref{3eq1}) into~(\ref{3eq2}),
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \mathcal{L}^{'}_{0}&=&(-\frac{2w}{v_{1}}+\frac{2w}{v_{2}}+\frac{(e^{0})^{2}w^{4}}{2v_{1}^{2}})\nonumber\\
336: & &+\frac{1}{2}(x^{I})^{-2}\frac{w^{2}}{v_{1}^{2}}
337: (e^{I}+a^{I}e^{0})^{2}-\frac{1}{8}(x^{I})^{-2}\frac{w^{2}}
338: {v_{2}^{2}}(p^{I})^{2},\nonumber\\
339: \mathcal{L}_{0CS}&=&2e^{-1}\sin\theta
340: C_{IJK}(e^{0}p^{I}a^{J}a^{K}+e^{I}p^{J}a^{K}).
341: \end{eqnarray}
342: One subtle is that the definition of electric charges will receive
343: modifications in the presence of Chern-Simons terms. In the usual
344: analysis of entropy function, the electric charges are defined by
345: $q_{I}\equiv\partial f/\partial e^{I}$. However, when Chern-Simons
346: terms are taken into account, the corresponding expression gives the
347: so-called ``Page charge'' introduced in~\cite{page}, whose
348: definition is given by
349: \begin{equation}
350: Q_{Page}\sim\int\ast F+A\wedge F.
351: \end{equation}
352:
353: The subsequent calculations are straightforward and the expression
354: for $F_{0}$ is
355: \begin{eqnarray}
356: F_{0}&=&\frac{v_{2}}{2}-\frac{v_{1}}{2}+\frac{p^{2}L^{4}v_{1}}{32v_{2}w^{3}}
357: +\frac{1}{8}(x^{I})^{-2}\frac{w^{2}}{v_{1}^{2}}
358: (e^{I}+a^{I}e^{0})^{2}\nonumber\\&
359: &+\frac{1}{32}(x^{I})^{-2}\frac{w^{2}} {v_{2}^{2}}(p^{I})^{2},
360: \end{eqnarray}
361: where we have replaced $e^{0}$ by the ``true'' electric charge
362: $q_{0}\equiv\partial f^{'}_{0}/\partial
363: e^{0}=\frac{1}{4}v_{1}^{-1}v_{2}w^{3}e^{0}$. We can obtain the
364: correct values of the various moduli fields by solving the following
365: equations
366: \begin{equation}
367: \frac{\partial F_{0}}{\partial v_{1}}=\frac{\partial F_{0}}{\partial
368: v_{2}}=\frac{\partial F_{0}}{\partial w}=0,~~~\frac{\partial
369: F_{0}}{\partial x^{I}}=\frac{\partial F_{0}}{\partial a^{I}}=0.
370: \end{equation}
371: The solutions to the above equations are given as follows
372: \begin{equation}
373: \label{3eq9}
374: v_{1}=v_{2}=\frac{Lp^{2}}{4},~~~w=L,~~~x^{I}=\frac{p^{I}}{p},~~~a^{I}=-\frac{e^{I}}{e^{0}},
375: \end{equation}
376: note that the $x^{I}$s are not independent, subject to the
377: constraint $x^{1}x^{2}x^{3}=1$. Thus we have obtained the correct
378: near horizon geometry and attractor values of the scalar fields.
379: Furthermore, we can obtain the entropy by putting all the values
380: back into $F$,
381: \begin{equation}
382: S_{BR}=2\pi F_{0}=\frac{\pi Lp^{2}}{4},
383: \end{equation}
384: which reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
385: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
386: \subsection{Off-Shell Analysis}
387: \label{off}
388: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
389: We will calculate the entropy function using the off-shell
390: formalism. One advantage of the off-shell formalism is that the
391: supersymmetric completion of an $R^{2}$ term can be realized more
392: conveniently. For simplicity, we just list the basic ingredients of
393: the relevant supermultiplets briefly. Details for the
394: five-dimensional off-shell supergravity can be found in~\cite{hot}
395: and references therein. Similar work has been done in~\cite{fla},
396: where both the entropy function formalism and the so-called
397: ``c-extremization''~\cite{pkfl} are discussed.
398:
399:
400: The irreducible Weyl multiplet, which consists of 32 bosonic plus 32
401: fermonic component fields, contains the following fields
402: \begin{equation}
403: e_{\mu}^{a},~~~\psi^{i}_{\mu},~~~V^{ij}_{\mu},~~~b_{\mu},~~~v^{ab},~~~
404: \chi^{i},~~~D,
405: \end{equation}
406: where $e_{\mu}^{a}$ are the vielbein, $V^{ij}_{\mu}$ and $b_{\mu}$
407: denote gauge fields associated with the $SU(2)$ generator and
408: dilatation generator respectively. $\psi^{i}_{\mu}$ and $\chi^{i}$
409: are $SU(2)$-Majorana spinors. Note that $v^{ab}$, $\chi^{i}$ and $D$
410: are auxiliary fields, where $v^{ab}$ is antisymmetric in $a$ and $b$
411: and $D$ is a scalar. The vector multiplet consists of gauge fields
412: $A^{I}_{\mu}$, scalar fields $M^{I}$, $SU(2)$-Majorana gaugini
413: $\Omega^{I}$ and $SU(2)$-triplet auxiliary fields $Y^{IJ}$, which
414: can be gauged away.
415:
416: After gauge fixing, the bosonic terms in the two-derivative
417: Lagrangian of $\mathcal{N}=2$ supergravity with the Weyl multiplet
418: and $n_{v}$ vector multiplets can be expressed as
419: \begin{eqnarray}
420: \mathcal{L}_{0}&=&-\frac{1}{2}D+\frac{3}{4}R+v^{2}+\mathcal{N}(\frac{1}{2}D
421: +\frac{1}{4}R+3v^{2})+2\mathcal{N}_{I}v^{ab}F^{I}_{ab}\nonumber\\
422: & &+\mathcal{N}_{IJ}(\frac{1}{4}F^{I}_{ab}F^{Jab}+\frac{1}{2}
423: \partial_{a}M^{I}\partial^{a}M^{J})+\frac{1}{24}e^{-1}C_{IJK}
424: A^{I}_{a}F^{J}_{bc}F^{K}_{de}\epsilon^{abcde},
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: where the functions characterizing the scalar manifold are defined
427: as
428: \begin{equation}
429: \mathcal{N}=\frac{1}{6}C_{IJK}M^{I}M^{J}M^{K},~~~
430: \mathcal{N}_{I}=\partial_{I}\mathcal{N}=\frac{1}{2}C_{IJK}M^{J}M^{K},~~~
431: \mathcal{N}_{IJ}=C_{IJK}M^{K},
432: \end{equation}
433: with $I,J,K=1,\cdots,n_{v}$. Note that the equation of motion for
434: the auxiliary field $D$ fixes $\mathcal{N}=1$, that is, the scalars
435: parametrize the ``very special geometry''. The auxiliary fields
436: $v^{ab}$ and $D$ can be eliminated via their equations of motion and
437: the resulting Lagrangian is the familiar one arising from the
438: compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity on a Calabi-Yau
439: manifold with intersection numbers $C_{IJK}$.
440:
441: The near horizon field configuration can be taken as follows
442: \begin{eqnarray}
443: \label{3eq14} &
444: &ds^{2}=w^{-1}[v_{1}(-r^{2}dt^{2}+dr^{2}/r^{2})+v_{2}(d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta
445: d\phi^{2})]+w^{2}(d\psi+e^{0}rdt)^{2},\nonumber\\
446: &
447: &F^{I}_{5rt}=e^{I}+e^{0}a^{I},~~~F^{I}_{4rt}=e^{I},~~~F^{0}_{4rt}=e^{0}=\frac{p}{2L},~~~
448: F^{I}_{5\theta\phi}=F^{I}_{4\theta\phi}=\frac{1}{2}p^{I}\sin\theta,\nonumber\\
449: & &M^{I}=mp^{I},~~~v_{\theta\phi}=V\sin\theta.
450: \end{eqnarray}
451: The auxiliary fields can be eliminated by solving the equations
452: \begin{equation}
453: \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial
454: D}=0,~~~\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial
455: V}=0,~~~\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial m}=0,
456: \end{equation}
457: which gives
458: \begin{equation}
459: \label{3eq16}
460: D=12p^{-2},~~~m=p^{-1},~~~V=-\frac{3}{8}p.
461: \end{equation}
462: After substituting~(\ref{3eq16}) back in to $\mathcal{L}_{0}$, which
463: gives
464: \begin{eqnarray}
465: \mathcal{L}_{0}&=&(-\frac{2w}{v_{1}}+\frac{2w}{v_{2}}+\frac{(e^{0})^{2}w^{4}}{2v_{1}^{2}})-
466: \frac{3w^{2}}{8v_{2}^{2}}p^{2}-\frac{1}{2}c_{IJK}(e^{I}+e^{0}a^{I})(e^{J}+e^{0}a^{J})
467: \frac{p^{K}}{p}\frac{w^{2}}{v_{1}^{2}}\nonumber\\&
468: &-2e^{-1}\sin\theta C_{IJK}(e^{0}p^{I}a^{J}a^{K}+e^{I}p^{J}a^{K}).
469: \end{eqnarray} Then the subsequent analysis is similar to
470: the on-shell case discussed in the previous subsection and the same
471: result will be obtained, which would not be repeated here.
472: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
473: \section{Higher Order Corrections}
474: \label{HOC}
475: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
476: In this section we would like to discuss higher order corrections to
477: black ring entropy, which can be obtained in a similar way by
478: incorporating the higher order corrections into the effective
479: action. We will use two different actions, one of which is the
480: five-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet term coming from the compactification
481: of M-theory on a Calabi-Yau three fold $CY_{3}$~\cite{cor}, while
482: the other is a supersymmetric completion of $R^{2}$ terms in
483: five-dimensional supergravity proposed recently~\cite{hot}. We also
484: compare our results with the one obtained from microscopic
485: considerations.
486: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
487: \subsection{5D Gauss-Bonnet Corrections}
488: \label{5dgb}
489: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
490: The higher order corrections to the low energy effective action for
491: the compactification of M-theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold
492: $CY_{3}$(here is $T^{6}$) down to five dimensions takes the
493: following form
494: \begin{equation}
495: I_{GB}=\frac{1}{2^{9}3\pi^{2}}\int d^{5}x\sqrt{-g}c\cdot X
496: (R_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}R^{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}-4R_{\alpha\beta}R^{\alpha\beta}+R^{2}),
497: \end{equation}
498: where $c\cdot X=c_{2I}X^{I}$ with $c_{2I}$ denoting the components
499: of the second class of $CY_{3}$. In principle, we should do
500: dimensional reduction on $\mathcal{L}_{GB}$ down to four-dimensional
501: spacetime. However, as pointed in previous section, such a term can
502: be evaluated in the original five-dimensional background without the
503: explicit resulting four-dimensional action, for this term is gauge
504: and coordinate invariant.
505:
506: Define
507: \begin{equation}
508: f_{1}\equiv\frac{1}{16\pi}\int d\theta
509: d\phi\sqrt{-g}\mathcal{L}_{GB}
510: \end{equation}
511: and substitute the five-dimensional near horizon metric
512: in~(\ref{3eq1}) into the above expression, we can arrive at the
513: following result
514: \begin{equation}
515: f_{1}=\frac{1}{3\cdot2^{6}}\frac{c_{2I}p^{I}}{p}(-8w+\frac{2(e^{0})^{2}w^{4}}{v_{1}})
516: \end{equation}
517: where the scalar fields $X^{I}$ have been taken their attractor
518: values $X^{I}=p^{I}/p$. Then we can redefine $F\equiv F_{0}-f_{1}$
519: in a straightforward way and obtain the corrections to the entropy.
520: However, it seems that such equations can not give explicit
521: solutions for the moduli fields.
522:
523: As pointed out in~\cite{ss2}, since the entropy is related to the
524: value of $F$ at its extremum, a first order error in the
525: determination of the near horizon background will give a second
526: order error in the value of the entropy. Thus if we want to obtain
527: the first order correction to the entropy, we can find the near
528: horizon background just by extremizing $F_{0}$ and then evaluate $F$
529: in this background. Finally, the entropy is given by
530: \begin{equation}
531: S_{BH}=2\pi F,
532: \end{equation}
533: after substituting the values of various moduli fields obtained by
534: extremizing $F_{0}$. Thus we can obtain the first order corrections
535: to black ring entropy
536: \begin{equation}
537: \label{4eq5}
538: \Delta S_{BR}=-2\pi f_{1}=\frac{\pi}{16}c\cdot
539: p\frac{L}{p}.
540: \end{equation}
541:
542: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
543: \subsection{Supersymmetric $R^{2}$ Corrections}
544: \label{src}
545: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
546: One shortcoming of the five-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet Lagrangian is
547: that it is not supersymmetric, so several terms relevant to the
548: entropy might be omitted. Fortunately, a supersymmetric completion
549: of $R^{2}$ terms in five-dimensional supergravity has been realized
550: recently in~\cite{hot} and several relevant applications have been
551: listed in~\cite{fla}. Thus one can revisit the higher order
552: corrections by making use of the supersymmetric $R^{2}$ action.
553:
554: A particular higher order term has been taken into account
555: in~\cite{hot} and the supersymmetric completion has been realized
556: there. The particular term is the so-called mixed
557: gauge-gravitational Chern-Simons term
558: \begin{equation}
559: e\mathcal{L}_{CS}=-\frac{c_{2I}}{6\cdot2}A^{I}\wedge\textrm{Tr}(R\wedge
560: R)=\frac{c_{2I}}{3\cdot16}\epsilon_{abcde}A^{Ia}R^{bcfg}{R^{de}}_{fg},
561: \end{equation}
562: with $c_{2I}$ being the expansion coefficients of the second Chern
563: class, which comes from the anomaly arguments. The four derivative
564: supersymmetric completion of the Chern-Simons term has been given
565: in~\cite{hot} and the relevant terms for the calculation
566: are\footnote{The difference in the overall coefficients is due to
567: the different conventions of the five-dimensional Newton constant.}
568: \begin{eqnarray}
569: \label{2eq5}
570: \mathcal{L}_{1}&=&\frac{c_{2I}}{3}(\frac{1}{16}e^{-1}\epsilon_{abcde}
571: A^{Ia}C^{bcfg}{C^{de}}_{fg}+\frac{1}{8}M^{I}C^{abcd}C_{abcd}+\frac{1}{12}M^{I}D^{2}
572: +\frac{1}{6}F^{Iab}v_{ab}D\nonumber\\&
573: &-\frac{1}{3}M^{I}C_{abcd}v^{ab}v^{cd}-\frac{1}{2}F^{Iab}C_{abcd}v^{cd}
574: +\frac{8}{3}M^{I}v_{ab}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}^{b}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{c}v^{ac}\nonumber\\
575: & &+\frac{4}{3}M^{I}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}^{a}v^{bc}
576: {\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{a}v_{bc}+\frac{4}{3}M^{I}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}^{a}v^{bc}
577: {\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{b}v_{ca}-\frac{2}{3}e^{-1}M^{I}\epsilon_{abcde}v^{ab}v^{cd}
578: {\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{f}v^{ef}\nonumber\\
579: & &+\frac{2}{3}e^{-1}F^{Iab}\epsilon_{abcde}v^{cd}
580: {\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{f}v^{ef}+e^{-1}F^{Iab}\epsilon_{abcde}{v^{c}}_{f}
581: {\hat{\mathcal{D}}}^{d}v^{ef}\nonumber\\
582: & &-\frac{4}{3}F^{Iab}v_{ac}v^{cd}v_{db}-\frac{1}{3}
583: F^{Iab}v_{ab}v^{2}+4M^{I}v_{ab}v^{bc}v_{cd}v^{da}-M^{I}(v_{ab}v^{ab})^{2}),
584: \end{eqnarray}
585: with $C_{abcd}$ the Weyl tensor defined as
586: \begin{equation}
587: C_{abcd}=R_{abcd}-\frac{2}{3}(g_{a[c}R_{d]b}-g_{b[c}R_{d]a})+\frac{1}{6}Rg_{a[c}g_{d]b}.
588: \end{equation}
589: The double covariant derivative of $v_{ab}$ is given by
590: \begin{equation}
591: v_{ab}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}^{b}{\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{c}v^{ac}=v_{ab}\mathcal{D}^{b}
592: \mathcal{D}_{c}v^{ac}+\frac{2}{3}v^{ac}v_{cb}{R_{a}}^{b}+\frac{1}{12}v_{ab}v^{ab}R,
593: \end{equation}
594: where the superconformal derivative is related to the usual
595: derivative as ${\hat{\mathcal{D}}}_{\mu}=\mathcal{D}_{\mu}-b_{\mu}$.
596:
597: For our background which satisfies $\hat{\mathcal{D}}_{a}v_{bc}=0$,
598: following~\cite{ss2}, the first order corrections to the black ring
599: entropy can be obtained by substituting~(\ref{3eq9})
600: and~(\ref{3eq16}) into
601: \begin{equation}
602: \Delta^{'}S_{BR}=2\pi F^{'}_{1}=-2\pi f^{'}_{1},
603: \end{equation}
604: where
605: \begin{equation}
606: f^{'}_{1}\equiv\frac{1}{16\pi}\int d\theta
607: d\phi\sqrt{-g}\mathcal{L}_{1}.
608: \end{equation}
609: The result is
610: \begin{equation}
611: \label{4eq12} \Delta^{'}S_{BR}=\frac{\pi}{8}\frac{c\cdot p}{p}L,
612: \end{equation}
613: which shows similar behavior as the Gauss-Bonnet corrections but
614: with different numerical coefficients.
615: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
616: \subsection{Comparison with the Microscopic Corrections}
617: \label{com}
618: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
619: Now we would like to compare our results with the microscopic
620: entropy obtained in previous papers~\cite{ghls, bk}. The microscopic
621: corrections reads
622: \begin{equation}
623: \Delta S_{BRmic}=\frac{\pi}{6}c_{2}\cdot
624: p\sqrt{\frac{\hat{q_{0}}}{C}},
625: \end{equation}
626: where\footnote{Note that $q_{Ithere}=\frac{1}{4}q_{Ihere}$,
627: $p^{I}_{there}=\frac{1}{2}p^{I}_{here}$}$\hat{q_{0}}$ denotes the
628: left-moving oscillator number and $C$ is related to the left-moving
629: central charge $c_{L}$ by $c_{L}=6C$. The expressions for the
630: quantities are given as follows
631: \begin{eqnarray}
632: \hat{q_{0}}&=&-J_{\psi}+\frac{1}{12}C^{AB}q_{A}q_{B}+\frac{c_{L}}{24},\nonumber\\
633: &=&-J_{\psi}+\frac{D}{4}+\frac{1}{16}(\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{p^{3}}+\frac{q_{2}q_{3}}{p^{1}}
634: +\frac{q_{1}q_{3}}{p^{2}})-\frac{1}{256D}((p^{1}q_{1})^{2}+(p^{2}q_{2})^{2}+(p^{3}q_{3})^{2}),\nonumber\\
635: C^{AB}&=&(C_{AB})^{-1}=(C_{ABC}p^{A}p^{B}p^{C})^{-1},\nonumber\\
636: c_{L}&=&6C=6C_{ABC}p^{A}p^{B}p^{C}=\frac{3}{4}p^{1}p^{2}p^{3}.
637: \end{eqnarray}
638: One can see that
639: \begin{equation}
640: \hat{q_{0}}=\frac{1}{8}L^{2}p,~~~C=\frac{1}{8}p^{3},
641: \end{equation}
642: then
643: \begin{equation}
644: \Delta S_{BRmic}=\frac{\pi}{6}c\cdot p\frac{L}{p},
645: \end{equation}
646:
647: Comparing~(\ref{4eq5}) and~(\ref{4eq12}) with the above microscopic
648: correction, we can find that all of them behave similarly up to a
649: numerical constant. Furthermore, the correction obtained from the
650: supersymmetric completion is more accurate than the Gauss-Bonnet
651: correction, which means that the former action contains more terms
652: that are necessary in considering the higher order corrections to
653: black ring solutions.
654: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
655: \section{Summary and Discussion}
656: \label{Summary}
657: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
658: In this paper, we have constructed the entropy function for
659: supersymmetric black rings in $U(1)^{3}$ theory from both on-shell
660: and off-shell perspectives, which can be seen as a concrete
661: realization of~\cite{gj}. We have found that after dimensional
662: reduction down to four-dimensional spacetime, the effective action
663: is gauge invariant and we can carry out the entropy function
664: analysis. We have reproduced the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
665: precisely and have obtained the correct attractor values of the
666: scalar fields via the entropy function using both formalisms. Note
667: that when we set $Q_{1}=Q_{2}=Q_{3}$, $q_{1}=q_{2}=q_{3}$, the black
668: ring becomes the solution presented in~\cite{eemr1}, which implies
669: that the entropy function formalism can also be applied to those
670: cases.
671:
672: The higher order corrections to the entropy have also been discussed
673: and two kinds of corrections have been considered. One is due to the
674: five-dimensional Gauss-Bonnet term which comes from $R^{4}$
675: corrections in eleven-dimensional M-theory compactified on $CY_{3}$
676: but is not supersymmetric itself, while the other arises from a
677: supersymmetric $R^{2}$ completion of the five-dimensional
678: supergravity. Unfortunately, we have found that although both of
679: them can give similar behavior as the microscopic result, the
680: numerical coefficients can not be reproduced successfully. However,
681: the result obtained via the supersymmetric $R^{2}$ completion is
682: more accurate than that obtained via the five-dimensional
683: Gauss-Bonnet term, which means that the former contains more
684: information about the corrections and there might still be some
685: relevant terms ignored.
686:
687:
688:
689: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
690: \acknowledgments DWP would like to thank Hua Bai, Li-Ming Cao and
691: Hui Li for useful discussions and kind help. The work was supported
692: in part by a grant from Chinese Academy of Sciences, by NSFC under
693: grants No. 10325525 and No. 90403029.
694: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
695: {\small\begin{thebibliography}{100}
696:
697: \bibitem{classic}
698: S.~Ferrara, R.~Kallosh and A.~Strominger,
699: ``N=2 extremal black holes,''
700: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 5412 (1995)
701: [arXiv:hep-th/9508072].\\
702: A.~Strominger,
703: ``Macroscopic Entropy of $N=2$ Extremal Black Holes,''
704: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 383}, 39 (1996)
705: [arXiv:hep-th/9602111].\\
706: S.~Ferrara and R.~Kallosh,
707: ``Supersymmetry and Attractors,''
708: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 1514 (1996)
709: [arXiv:hep-th/9602136].\\
710: S.~Ferrara and R.~Kallosh,
711: ``Universality of Supersymmetric Attractors,''
712: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 1525 (1996)
713: [arXiv:hep-th/9603090].
714:
715: \bibitem{cardoso}
716: G.~Lopes Cardoso, B.~de Wit and T.~Mohaupt,
717: ``Corrections to macroscopic supersymmetric black-hole entropy,''
718: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 451}, 309 (1999)
719: [arXiv:hep-th/9812082].\\
720: G.~Lopes Cardoso, B.~de Wit and T.~Mohaupt,
721: ``Deviations from the area law for supersymmetric black holes,''
722: Fortsch.\ Phys.\ {\bf 48}, 49 (2000)
723: [arXiv:hep-th/9904005].\\
724: G.~Lopes Cardoso, B.~de Wit and T.~Mohaupt,
725: ``Macroscopic entropy formulae and non-holomorphic corrections for
726: supersymmetric black holes,''
727: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 567}, 87 (2000)
728: [arXiv:hep-th/9906094].\\
729: G.~Lopes Cardoso, B.~de Wit, J.~Kappeli and T.~Mohaupt,
730: ``Stationary BPS solutions in N = 2 supergravity with R**2 interactions,''
731: JHEP {\bf 0012}, 019 (2000)
732: [arXiv:hep-th/0009234].
733:
734: \bibitem{fgk}
735: S.~Ferrara, G.~W.~Gibbons and R.~Kallosh,
736: ``Black holes and critical points in moduli space,''
737: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 500}, 75 (1997)
738: [arXiv:hep-th/9702103].
739:
740: \bibitem{non}
741: K.~Goldstein, N.~Iizuka, R.~P.~Jena and S.~P.~Trivedi,
742: ``Non-supersymmetric attractors,''
743: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 124021 (2005)
744: [arXiv:hep-th/0507096].\\
745: P.~K.~Tripathy and S.~P.~Trivedi,
746: ``Non-supersymmetric attractors in string theory,''
747: JHEP {\bf 0603}, 022 (2006)
748: [arXiv:hep-th/0511117].\\
749: K.~Goldstein, R.~P.~Jena, G.~Mandal and S.~P.~Trivedi,
750: ``A C-function for non-supersymmetric attractors,''
751: JHEP {\bf 0602}, 053 (2006)
752: [arXiv:hep-th/0512138].\\
753:
754:
755: \bibitem{dst}
756: A.~Dabholkar, A.~Sen and S.~P.~Trivedi,
757: ``Black hole microstates and attractor without supersymmetry,''
758: arXiv:hep-th/0611143.
759:
760: \bibitem{wald}
761: R.~M.~Wald,
762: ``Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,''
763: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 48}, R3427 (1993)
764: [arXiv:gr-qc/9307038].\\
765: T.~Jacobson, G.~Kang and R.~C.~Myers,
766: ``On Black Hole Entropy,''
767: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 6587 (1994)
768: [arXiv:gr-qc/9312023].\\
769: V.~Iyer and R.~M.~Wald,
770: ``Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole
771: entropy,''
772: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 846 (1994)
773: [arXiv:gr-qc/9403028].\\
774: T.~Jacobson, G.~Kang and R.~C.~Myers,
775: ``Black hole entropy in higher curvature gravity,''
776: arXiv:gr-qc/9502009.
777:
778: \bibitem{sen}
779: A.~Sen,
780: ``How does a fundamental string stretch its horizon?,''
781: JHEP {\bf 0505}, 059 (2005)
782: [arXiv:hep-th/0411255].\\
783: A.~Sen,
784: ``Stretching the horizon of a higher dimensional small black hole,''
785: JHEP {\bf 0507}, 073 (2005)
786: [arXiv:hep-th/0505122].\\
787: A.~Sen,
788: ``Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher
789: derivative gravity,''
790: JHEP {\bf 0509}, 038 (2005)
791: [arXiv:hep-th/0506177].\\
792: A.~Sen,
793: ``Entropy function for heterotic black holes,''
794: JHEP {\bf 0603}, 008 (2006)
795: [arXiv:hep-th/0508042].\\
796:
797: \bibitem{relate}
798: P.~Prester,
799: ``Lovelock type gravity and small black holes in heterotic string theory,''
800: JHEP {\bf 0602}, 039 (2006)
801: [arXiv:hep-th/0511306].\\
802: M.~Alishahiha and H.~Ebrahim,
803: ``Non-supersymmetric attractors and entropy function,''
804: JHEP {\bf 0603}, 003 (2006)
805: [arXiv:hep-th/0601016].\\
806: A.~Sinha and N.~V.~Suryanarayana,
807: ``Extremal single-charge small black holes: Entropy function analysis,''
808: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 23}, 3305 (2006)
809: [arXiv:hep-th/0601183].\\
810: B.~Chandrasekhar, S.~Parvizi, A.~Tavanfar and H.~Yavartanoo,
811: ``Non-supersymmetric attractors in R**2 gravities,''
812: JHEP {\bf 0608}, 004 (2006)
813: [arXiv:hep-th/0602022].\\
814: B.~Sahoo and A.~Sen,
815: ``Higher derivative corrections to non-supersymmetric extremal black holes in
816: N = 2 supergravity,''
817: JHEP {\bf 0609}, 029 (2006)
818: [arXiv:hep-th/0603149].\\
819: G.~Exirifard,
820: ``The alpha' stretched horizon in heterotic string,''
821: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 070 (2006)
822: [arXiv:hep-th/0604021].\\
823: B.~Chandrasekhar,
824: ``Born-Infeld corrections to the entropy function of heterotic black holes,''
825: arXiv:hep-th/0604028.\\
826: A.~Ghodsi,
827: ``R**4 corrections to D1D5p black hole entropy from entropy function
828: formalism,''
829: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 124026 (2006)
830: [arXiv:hep-th/0604106].\\
831: J.~R.~David and A.~Sen,
832: ``CHL dyons and statistical entropy function from D1-D5 system,''
833: JHEP {\bf 0611}, 072 (2006)
834: [arXiv:hep-th/0605210].\\
835: M.~Alishahiha and H.~Ebrahim,
836: ``New attractor, entropy function and black hole partition function,''
837: JHEP {\bf 0611}, 017 (2006)
838: [arXiv:hep-th/0605279].\\
839: R.~G.~Cai and D.~W.~Pang,
840: ``Entropy function for 4-charge extremal black holes in type IIA superstring
841: theory,''
842: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 064031 (2006)
843: [arXiv:hep-th/0606098].\\
844: A.~Sinha and N.~V.~Suryanarayana,
845: ``Two-charge small black hole entropy: String-loops and multi-strings,''
846: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 034 (2006)
847: [arXiv:hep-th/0606218].\\
848: D.~Astefanesei, K.~Goldstein, R.~P.~Jena, A.~Sen and S.~P.~Trivedi,
849: ``Rotating attractors,''
850: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 058 (2006)
851: [arXiv:hep-th/0606244].\\
852: G.~L.~Cardoso, V.~Grass, D.~Lust and J.~Perz,
853: ``Extremal non-BPS black holes and entropy extremization,''
854: JHEP {\bf 0609}, 078 (2006)
855: [arXiv:hep-th/0607202].\\
856: P.~Kaura and A.~Misra,
857: ``On the existence of non-supersymmetric black hole attractors for
858: two-parameter Calabi-Yau's and attractor equations,''
859: arXiv:hep-th/0607132.\\
860: J.~F.~Morales and H.~Samtleben,
861: ``Entropy function and attractors for AdS black holes,''
862: JHEP {\bf 0610}, 074 (2006)
863: [arXiv:hep-th/0608044].\\
864: D.~Astefanesei, K.~Goldstein and S.~Mahapatra,
865: ``Moduli and (un)attractor black hole thermodynamics,''
866: arXiv:hep-th/0611140.\\
867: B.~Chandrasekhar, H.~Yavartanoo and S.~Yun,
868: ``Non-Supersymmetric attractors in BI black holes,''
869: arXiv:hep-th/0611240.\\
870: G.~L.~Cardoso, B.~de Wit and S.~Mahapatra,
871: ``Black hole entropy functions and attractor equations,''
872: arXiv:hep-th/0612225.\\
873: R.~D'Auria, S.~Ferrara and M.~Trigiante,
874: ``Critical points of the black-hole potential for homogeneous special
875: geometries,''
876: arXiv:hep-th/0701090.\\
877:
878: \bibitem{CaiPang}R.~G.~Cai and D.~W.~Pang,
879: ``Entropy function for non-extremal black holes in string theory,''
880: arXiv:hep-th/0701158.
881:
882: \bibitem{gagh}
883: M.~R.~Garousi and A.~Ghodsi,
884: ``On Attractor Mechanism and Entropy Function for Non-extremal Black
885: Holes/Branes,''
886: arXiv:hep-th/0703260.
887:
888: \bibitem{er}
889: R.~Emparan and H.~S.~Reall,
890: ``A rotating black ring in five dimensions,''
891: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 101101 (2002)
892: [arXiv:hep-th/0110260].
893:
894: \bibitem{eemr1}
895: H.~Elvang, R.~Emparan, D.~Mateos and H.~S.~Reall,
896: ``A supersymmetric black ring,''
897: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93}, 211302 (2004)
898: [arXiv:hep-th/0407065].
899:
900: \bibitem{eemr2}
901: H.~Elvang, R.~Emparan, D.~Mateos and H.~S.~Reall,
902: ``Supersymmetric black rings and three-charge supertubes,''
903: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 024033 (2005)
904: [arXiv:hep-th/0408120].
905:
906: \bibitem{gg}
907: J.~P.~Gauntlett and J.~B.~Gutowski,
908: ``Concentric black rings,''
909: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 025013 (2005)
910: [arXiv:hep-th/0408010].\\
911: J.~P.~Gauntlett and J.~B.~Gutowski,
912: ``General concentric black rings,''
913: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 045002 (2005)
914: [arXiv:hep-th/0408122].
915:
916: \bibitem{bena}
917: I.~Bena and N.~P.~Warner,
918: ``One ring to rule them all ... and in the darkness bind them?,''
919: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 9}, 667 (2005)
920: [arXiv:hep-th/0408106].\\
921: I.~Bena and P.~Kraus,
922: ``Microscopic description of black rings in AdS/CFT,''
923: JHEP {\bf 0412}, 070 (2004)
924: [arXiv:hep-th/0408186].\\
925: I.~Bena, P.~Kraus and N.~P.~Warner,
926: ``Black rings in Taub-NUT,''
927: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 084019 (2005)
928: [arXiv:hep-th/0504142].
929:
930: \bibitem{cgms}
931: M.~Cyrier, M.~Guica, D.~Mateos and A.~Strominger,
932: ``Microscopic entropy of the black ring,''
933: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 191601 (2005)
934: [arXiv:hep-th/0411187].
935:
936: \bibitem{rev}
937: R.~Emparan and H.~S.~Reall,
938: ``Black rings,''
939: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 23}, R169 (2006)
940: [arXiv:hep-th/0608012].\\
941: I.~Bena and N.~P.~Warner,
942: ``Black holes, black rings and their microstates,''
943: arXiv:hep-th/0701216.
944:
945: \bibitem{diiss}
946: A.~Dabholkar, N.~Iizuka, A.~Iqubal, A.~Sen and M.~Shigemori,
947: ``Spinning strings as small black rings,''
948: arXiv:hep-th/0611166.
949:
950: \bibitem{ss1}
951: B.~Sahoo and A.~Sen,
952: ``BTZ black hole with Chern-Simons and higher derivative terms,''
953: JHEP {\bf 0607}, 008 (2006)
954: [arXiv:hep-th/0601228].
955:
956: \bibitem{ss2}
957: B.~Sahoo and A.~Sen,
958: ``alpha' corrections to extremal dyonic black holes in heterotic string
959: theory,''
960: JHEP {\bf 0701}, 010 (2007)
961: [arXiv:hep-th/0608182].
962:
963: \bibitem{cop}
964: G.~L.~Cardoso, J.~M.~Oberreuter and J.~Perz,
965: ``Entropy function for rotating extremal black holes in very special
966: geometry,''
967: arXiv:hep-th/0701176.
968:
969: \bibitem{gj}
970: K.~Goldstein and R.~P.~Jena,
971: ``One entropy function to rule them all,''
972: arXiv:hep-th/0701221.
973:
974: \bibitem{page}
975: D.~N.~Page,
976: ``Classical Stability Of Round And Squashed Seven Spheres In
977: Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity,''
978: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 28}, 2976 (1983).
979:
980: \bibitem{kl}
981: P.~Kraus and F.~Larsen,
982: ``Attractors and black rings'',
983: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 024010 (2005)
984: [arXiv:hep-th/0503219].
985:
986: \bibitem{cor}
987: I.~Antoniadis, S.~Ferrara, R.~Minasian, K.~S.~Narain,
988: ``$R^{4}$ couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau
989: spaces'',
990: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 507}, 571-588 (1997)
991: [arXiv:hep-th/9707013];\\
992: S.~Ferrara, R.~Khuri, R.~Minasian,
993: ``M-theory on a Calabi-Yau manifold'',
994: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 375}, 81-88 (1996)
995: [arXiv:hep-th/9602102].
996:
997: \bibitem{hot}
998: K.~Hanaki, K.~Ohashi and Y.~Tachikawa,
999: ``Supersymmetric completion of an R**2 term in five-dimensional
1000: supergravity,''
1001: arXiv:hep-th/0611329.
1002:
1003: \bibitem{ghls}
1004: M.~Guica, L.~Huang, W.~Li, A.~Strominger, ``$R^{2}$ corrections for
1005: 5D black holes and rings'' JHEP {\bf 0610}, 036 (2006)
1006: [arXiv:hep-th/0505188]
1007:
1008: \bibitem{bk}
1009: I.~Bena, P.~Kraus, ``$R^{2}$ corrections to black ring entropy'',
1010: arXiv:hep-th/0506015.
1011:
1012: \bibitem{fla}
1013: A.~Castro, J.~L.~Davis, P.~Kraus and F.~Larsen,
1014: ``5D attractors with higher derivatives,''
1015: arXiv:hep-th/0702072.\\
1016: A.~Castro, J.~L.~Davis, P.~Kraus and F.~Larsen,
1017: ``5D Black Holes and Strings with Higher Derivatives,''
1018: arXiv:hep-th/0703087.\\
1019: M.~Alishahiha,
1020: ``On R**2 Corrections for 5D Black Holes,''
1021: arXiv:hep-th/0703099.
1022:
1023: \bibitem{pkfl}
1024: P.~Kraus and F.~Larsen,
1025: ``Microscopic black hole entropy in theories with higher derivatives,''
1026: JHEP {\bf 0509}, 034 (2005)
1027: [arXiv:hep-th/0506176].
1028: P.~Kraus and F.~Larsen,
1029: ``Holographic gravitational anomalies,''
1030: JHEP {\bf 0601}, 022 (2006)
1031: [arXiv:hep-th/0508218].
1032:
1033:
1034:
1035:
1036:
1037:
1038:
1039:
1040:
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047:
1048:
1049:
1050:
1051:
1052:
1053:
1054:
1055:
1056:
1057:
1058:
1059:
1060:
1061:
1062:
1063:
1064:
1065:
1066:
1067:
1068:
1069:
1070:
1071:
1072:
1073:
1074:
1075:
1076:
1077:
1078:
1079:
1080:
1081:
1082:
1083:
1084:
1085:
1086:
1087:
1088:
1089: \end{thebibliography}}
1090: \end{document}
1091: