math-ph0509026/y.tex
1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.1} 
3: \topmargin -27pt
4: \textwidth 6.6in
5: \textheight 8.9in 
6: \oddsidemargin=-0.5cm
7: \def\be{\begin{equation}} 
8: \def\ee{\end{equation}} 
9: 
10: \def\ch{\mbox{ch}}
11: \def\sh{\mbox{sh}}
12: \def\sign{\mbox{sign}}
13: \def\tg{\mbox{tg}}         
14: \def\s{\sigma} 
15: \def\g{\gamma}
16: \def\a{\alpha}
17: \def\b{\beta} 
18: \def\l{\lambda}
19: \def\la{\langle}
20: \def\ra{\rangle}
21: 
22: 
23: 
24: \begin{document}
25: 
26: \begin{center}
27: {\large Fisher-Hartwig conjecture and the correlators in 
28: XY spin chain.}
29: \end{center}
30: 
31: \begin{center}
32: {\large A.A.Ovchinnikov}
33: \end{center}
34: 
35: \begin{center}
36: {\it Institute for Nuclear Research, RAS, Moscow, 117312, Russia}  
37: \end{center}
38: 
39: 
40: \begin{abstract}
41: 
42: We apply the theorems from the theory of Toeplitz determinants 
43: to calculate the asymptotics of the correlators in the XY spin chain 
44: in the transverse magnetic field. 
45: The asymptotics of the correlators for the XX spin chain 
46: in the magnetic field are obtained.  
47: 
48: \end{abstract} 
49: 
50: 
51: 
52: 
53: \vspace{0.2in}
54: 
55: {\bf 1. Introduction} 
56: \vspace{0.1in}
57: 
58: 
59: 
60:   The calculation of correlators in the one-dimensional exactly 
61: solvable models remains an interesting and important problem. 
62: An important exact results on the correlators for the XY 
63: quantum spin chain and the Ising model were obtained 
64: \cite{LSM}-\cite{MC}. 
65:     The goal of the present letter is twofold. 
66:   First, we present the calculations of the correlators in 
67: the limit of the XX spin chain in a non-zero magnetic field 
68: which was not considered previously. 
69: In particular, the asymptotics of the exponential correlator 
70: for the XX spin chain is found.  
71:   Second, we use the generalized Fisher-Hartwig conjecture 
72: (for example, see \cite{BM}) and the method to calculate 
73: the asymptotics of Toeplitz determinants \cite{F} to 
74: derive the known results \cite{MC} for the correlators 
75: in the XY spin chain in a non-zero magnetic field 
76: in a simple way. 
77: 
78: 
79: 
80: In the present letter to calculate the asymptotics of the 
81: determinants we use the conjecture from the theory of Toeplitz 
82: matrices, \cite{BM}, the generalized Fisher-Hartwig conjecture,   
83: which is based on the proofs of the original 
84: Fisher-Hartwig conjecture \cite{FH} including the constant in 
85: front of the asymptotics, in a number of the particular cases 
86: \cite{Basor}, \cite{ES} (see also \cite{BM} and references 
87: therein). 
88:     One finds the representation of the generating function 
89: $f(x)$ of the Toeplitz matrix 
90: $M_{ij}=M(i-j)=\int_{0}^{2\pi}(dx/2\pi)e^{i(i-j)x}f(x)$ 
91: of the following form: 
92: \be
93: f(x)=f_0(x)\prod_{r}e^{ib_r(x-x_r-\pi\sign(x-x_r))}
94: (2-2\cos(x-x_r))^{a_r},  
95: \label{f}
96: \ee
97: where $x\in(0,2\pi)$ is implied, the discontinuities (jumps and zeroes 
98: or the power-law singularities) are at finite number of the points $x_r$,  
99: and $f_0(x)$ is the smooth non-vanishing function 
100: with the continuously defined argument at the interval $(0,2\pi)$.  
101: The function (\ref{f}) is 
102: characterized by the parameters $a_r$, $b_r$ at each point of  
103: discontinuity $x_r$. 
104: In general there are several representations of the form (\ref{f}) 
105: for a given functions $f(x)$. 
106: To obtain the asymptotics of the determinant one should take the sum 
107: over the representations (\ref{f}) corresponding to the minimal exponent 
108: $\sum_r(b_r^2-a_r^2)$: 
109: \be
110: D(N)=\sum_{Repr.}e^{l_0 N}N^{\sum_r(a_r^2-b_r^2)} E
111: \label{DN}
112: \ee
113: where $E$ is the constant independent of $N$, 
114: \be
115: E=\exp\left( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}k l_k l_{-k}\right) 
116: \prod_{r}(f_{+}(x_r))^{-a_r+b_r}(f_{-}(x_r))^{-a_r-b_r}~~~~~~~~~~~~
117: \label{E}
118: \ee
119: \[
120: ~~~~~~~~~\prod_{r\neq s}\left(1-e^{i(x_s-x_r)}\right)^{-(a_r+b_r)(a_s-b_s)}  
121: \prod_{r}\frac{G(1+a_r+b_r)G(1+a_r-b_r)}{G(1+2a_r)},  
122: \]
123: $l_k=\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}(dx/2\pi)e^{ikx}\ln(f_0(x))$, and 
124: the functions $f_{\pm}(x)$ are given by the equations  
125: \[
126: \ln f_{+}(x)=\sum_{k>0}l_{-k}e^{ikx}, ~~~
127: \ln f_{-}(x)=\sum_{k>0}l_{k}e^{-ikx},   
128: \]
129: where $G$ is the Barnes $G$-function \cite{Barnes}, 
130: $G(z+1)=G(z)\Gamma(z)$, $G(1)=1$. 
131: 
132: 
133: 
134: For the piecewise continuous generation function $f(x)$ 
135: with the finite number of discontinuities which is not equal 
136: to zero ($a_r=0$) the equation (\ref{DN}) can be represented in 
137: a more convenient form \cite{Basor}. 
138: Suppose the function $f(x)$ has 
139: the finite number of discontinuities at the points $x_r$, 
140: \[
141: \l_r=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left(\ln f(x_r+0)-\ln f(x_r-0)\right), 
142: \]
143: and assume that the function $f(x)$ has the continuously defined 
144: argument and not equal to zero at the interval $(-\pi,\pi)$. 
145: Then the asymptotic of the determinant is given by the formula 
146: \cite{Basor} 
147: \be
148: D(N)=\sum_{Repr.}e^{l_0 N}N^{(\sum_r\l_r^{2})}E,~~~~E=\exp\left(  
149: \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(k l_k l_{-k}-\frac{1}{k} 
150: \sum_{r}\l_r^{2}\right)\right)\prod_r \tilde{g}(\l_r),
151: \label{det}
152: \ee
153: where we denote 
154: $l_k=\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}(dx/2\pi)e^{ikx}\ln(f(x))$ 
155: and the function $\tilde{g}(\l)$ equals 
156: \be
157: \tilde{g}(\l)=e^{(1+\g)\l^2}\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}
158: \left(1+\frac{\l^2}{k^2}\right)e^{-\l^2/k}, 
159: \label{gl}
160: \ee
161: where $\g=0.577..$ is Euler's constant. 
162: The constant $E$ (\ref{gl}) in eq.(\ref{det}) is a consequence of 
163: the formula for the Barnes $G$- function: 
164: \[
165: G(1+z)=(2\pi)^{z/2}\exp\left(-\frac{z(z+1)}{2}-\g\frac{z^2}{2}\right) 
166: \prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(1+\frac{z}{k}\right)^k 
167: \exp(-z+z^2/2k), 
168: \]
169: in such a way that $\tilde{g}(\l_r)=G(1+z)G(1-z)$ for $\l_r=iz$. 
170: 
171: 
172: In ref.\cite{Basor} the theorem was proved for an arbitrary 
173: number of the discontinuities of the imaginary part of the magnitude 
174: less than $1/2$, $|\l_r|<1/2$, however, there are many reasons 
175: to believe it to be true also in the case $|\l_r|=1/2$ \cite{BM}.  
176: For the case of an arbitrary single Fisher-Hartwig singularity 
177: the conjecture (\ref{DN}) was recently proved in ref.\cite{ES}.  
178: See ref.\cite{BM} for the complete list of the cases for which 
179: the rigorous proof of the conjecture (\ref{DN}) is available. 
180:       Schematically the rigorous proofs in the particular 
181: cases \cite{Basor} \cite{ES} go as follows.  
182: Suppose that equation (\ref{det}) is fulfilled for some functions 
183: $f_1(x)$ and $f_2(x)$ of the class of piecewise continuous 
184: functions with continuously defined argument. 
185: Then the equation (\ref{det}) is fulfilled for the function 
186: $f(x)=f_1(x)f_2(x)$. 
187: Thus it is sufficient to prove eq.(\ref{det}) for the 
188: smooth function with the continuously defined argument, 
189: in which case it is reduces to the well known 
190: strong Szego theorem and for the singular function of the 
191: form (\ref{f}) $f(x)=(1-z)^{\a}(1-1/z)^{\b}$, 
192: $z=e^{ix}$, in which case the asymptotics is known exactly. 
193: 
194: 
195: 
196: 
197: 
198: \vspace{0.2in}
199: 
200: {\bf 2. General form of the correlators for XY spin chain.} 
201: 
202: 
203: \vspace{0.1in}
204: 
205: 
206: Let us review the known calculations \cite{LSM}-\cite{MC} 
207: of the equal-time correlators of the operators $S^{\pm}$ 
208: for the XY spin chain at non-zero transverse magnetic field. 
209: The Hamiltonian of the XY spin chain has the form 
210: \be
211: H=-\sum_{i=1}^{L}\left((1+\g)S_i^{x}S_{i+1}^{x}+ 
212: (1-\g)S_i^{y}S_{i+1}^{y} - h S^{z}_{i}\right),
213: \label{H}
214: \ee
215: where $S^a=\frac{1}{2}\s^a$, $a=x,y,z$, $0<\g<1$   
216: and the periodic boundary conditions are implied. 
217: Performing the well-known Jordan-Wigner transformation
218: ($S^{\pm}=S^{x}\pm iS^{y}$): 
219: \be
220: S_{x}^{+}=e^{i\pi N(x)}a_x^{+}=\exp(\sum_{l<x}n_{l})a_x^{+}, 
221: \label{J}
222: \ee
223: we obtain the following Hamiltonian written down in terms 
224: of the fermionic operators: 
225: \be 
226: H=-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{L}\left(a_i^{+}a_{i+1}+
227: \g a_i^{+}a_{i+1}^{+} +h.c.\right)+ 
228: h\sum_{i=1}^{L}a_i^{+}a_i, 
229: \label{HF}
230: \ee
231: where the boundary terms which are not important in the 
232: thermodynamic limit are omitted. 
233: The Hamiltonian is diagonalized with the help of the 
234: following Fourier transform in the sectors with an odd number 
235: of particles: 
236: \[
237: a_k^{+}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}\sum_{x}e^{ikx}a_x^{+}, ~~~
238: k=\frac{2\pi n}{L}, ~~n\in Z, ~~~ -\pi<k<\pi. 
239: \]
240: The Hamiltonian (\ref{HF}) is easily diagonalized in the 
241: momentum space. Introducing the column 
242: $\psi_k^{+}=(a_k^{+}, a_{-k})$ for $k\in(0,\pi)$ the Hamiltonian 
243: is represented as 
244: \[
245: H=-\sum_{k>0}\psi_k^{+}\hat{M}_{k}\psi_k, ~~~~
246: \hat{M}_k=\left(
247: \begin{array}{cc}
248: \epsilon_k & i\Delta_k \\
249: -i\Delta_k & -\epsilon_k 
250: \end{array} \right), ~~~~\psi_k=\left( 
251: \begin{array}{c}
252: a_k \\
253: a^{+}_{-k}
254: \end{array}\right), ~~~~k>0, 
255: \]
256: where the notations $\epsilon_k=\cos(k)-h$, $\Delta_k=\g\sin(k)$ 
257: are used and the additional constant term $\epsilon_k$ is implied. 
258: It is convenient to redefine the operator $a_{-k}^{+}\to ia_{-k}^{+}$. 
259: In this case the Hamiltonian is diagonalized by means of the 
260: canonical transformation 
261: \be
262: a_{k}^{+}=c_{k}\a_{1k}^{+}+s_{k}\a_{2k}, ~~~
263: a_{-k}= c_{k}\a_{2k}-s_{k}\a_{1k}^{+}, 
264: \label{can}
265: \ee
266: where $k>0$, $c_k^2+s_k^2=1$, $c_k=\cos(\phi_k)$, $s_k=\sin(\phi_k)$, 
267: and the angle $\phi_k$ and the Hamiltonian are: 
268: \[
269: \tg(2\phi_k)=-\frac{\Delta_k}{\epsilon_k}, ~~~
270: H=-\sum_{k>0}\left(\a_{1k}^{+}\a_{1k}-\a_{2k}^{+}\a_{2k}+1\right), ~~~
271: E_k=\sqrt{(\cos(k)-h)^2+\g^2\sin^2(k)}. 
272: \]
273: Consider the equal-time correlators for the XY spin chain: 
274: \[
275: G(x)=\la0|S^{+}_{i+x}S^{-}_{i}|0\ra. ~~~~~
276: \tilde{G}(x)=\la0|S^{+}_{i+x}S^{+}_{i}|0\ra.
277: \]
278: Using the Jordan-Wigner transformation 
279: $S_{x}^{+}=\exp(i\pi\sum_{l<x}n_l)a_x^{+}$,  
280: the correlation functions $G(x)$, $\tilde{G}(x)$ can be represented 
281: as the following averages over the ground state of the Hamiltonian 
282: (\ref{HF}), 
283: \be
284: G(x)=\la0|a_x^{+}e^{i\pi N(x)}a_0|0\ra, ~~~~~
285: \tilde{G}(x)=-\la0|a_x^{+}e^{i\pi N(x)}a_{0}^{+}|0\ra, 
286: \label{corr}
287: \ee 
288: where $\hat{N}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{x-1}n_{i}$. 
289: Introducing the operators, anticommuting at different sites, 
290: \[
291: A_i=a_i^{+}+a_i, ~~~~ B_i=a_i^{+}-a_i, ~~~~A_i B_i=e^{i\pi n_i},   
292: \]
293: where $n_{i}=a_i^{+}a_i$ - is the fermion occupation number, with the 
294: following correlators with respect to the vacuum, 
295: \[
296: \la B_i A_j\ra=BA(i-j),~~~~\la A_i A_j \ra=0,~~~\la B_i B_j\ra=0
297: \]
298: one obtains the following expression for the bosonic correlator: 
299: \be 
300: G(x)=\frac{1}{4}\la0|B_x\prod_{i=1}^{x-1}(A_i B_i)A_0|0\ra+ 
301: \frac{1}{4}\la0|B_0\prod_{i=1}^{x-1}(A_i B_i)A_0|0\ra = 
302: \la S^{y}_x S^{y}_0\ra + \la S^{x}_x S^{x}_0\ra, 
303: \label{G}
304: \ee
305: where the terms $\la S^{y}_x S^{y}_0\ra$, $\la S^{x}_x S^{x}_0\ra$
306: correspond respectively to the two terms at the 
307: left-hand side of this equation. At zero magnetic field 
308: each term in this expression is represented as a product of the two 
309: Toeplitz determinants \cite{LSM}. The asymptotic behaviour of $G(x)$ is 
310: determined by the form of the average $BA(x)$. To calculate this  
311: function one should use the expressions for the averages of two 
312: operators $a_i^{+}$, $a_i$, which follow from the canonical 
313: transformation (\ref{can}): 
314: \be
315: \la a_{x}^{+}a_0 \ra= \int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{dk}{2\pi}
316: \left( e^{ikx}+e^{-ikx}\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}
317: \frac{\cos(k)-h}{\sqrt{(\cos(k)-h)^2+\g^2\sin^2(k)}}\right), 
318: \label{av}
319: \ee
320: \[
321: \la a_x^{+} a_0^{+}\ra=\int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\left( 
322: e^{ikx}-e^{-ikx}\right)
323: \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{i\g\sin(k)}{\sqrt{(\cos(k)-h)^2+\g^2\sin^2(k)}}     
324: \right)
325: \]
326: where the sums have been replaced by the integrals in the 
327: continuum limit. From the expressions (\ref{av}) 
328: the following expression can be obtained:  
329: \[
330: BA(x)=\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\frac{dk}{2\pi}e^{ikx}
331: \frac{\cos(k)-h+i\g\sin(k)}{\sqrt{(\cos(k)-h)^2+\g^2\sin^2(k)}},  
332: \]
333: which gives the following generation functions $f_1(x)$, $f_2(x)$ 
334: for the correlators $\la S^{x}_x S^{x}_0\ra$, $\la S^{y}_x S^{y}_0\ra$ 
335: respectively for the XY spin chain in the magnetic field: 
336: \be
337: f_{1,2}(x)= e^{\mp ix}\sign_{\g}(x)= e^{\mp ix}
338: \left(\frac{\cos(k)-h+i\g\sin(k)}{\cos(k)-h-i\g\sin(k)}\right)^{1/2}. 
339: \label{f12}
340: \ee
341: Finally, let us obtain the determinant representation for the 
342: exponential correlator 
343: \be
344: G_{\a}(x)=\la e^{i\a N(x)}\ra ,
345: \label{a}
346: \ee
347: where $\a$ is an arbitrary parameter and $N(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{x}n_i$, 
348: introducing the operators 
349: \[
350: A_i=e^{i\a/2}a_i^{+}+a_i, ~~~B_i=a_{i}^{+}+e^{i\a/2}a_i, ~~~
351: A_i B_i=e^{i\a n_i}, 
352: \]
353: for an arbitrary $\a$ we represent the correlator (\ref{a}) as the 
354: average $\la\prod_{i=1}^{x}(a_i B_i)\ra$. 
355: Since for $\a\neq\pi$ the averages $\la A_i A_j\ra$ and 
356: $\la B_i B_j\ra$ are not equal to zero at $\g\neq0$, 
357: we obtain the correlator 
358: (\ref{a}) as a Pfaffian, which can be expressed through 
359: the Toeplitz determinants. 
360: For the case $\a=\pi$ we have $\la A_i A_j\ra=\la B_i B_j\ra=0$ 
361: and the average can be represented as the Toeplitz determinant 
362: $\det_{ij}\left(\la A_i B_j\ra\right)$, $i,j=1, \ldots x$, 
363: At $\g=0$ the generating function for this determinant equals 
364: $f(x)=\sign(|x|-p_F)$.  
365: 
366: 
367: 
368: For the practical calculations one should represent the functions 
369: (\ref{f12}) in the following form: 
370: \be 
371: f_{1,2}(x)=\left(e^{i2x}\right)
372: \left(\frac{1-\l_{1}e^{-ix}}{1-\l_{1}e^{ix}}\right)^{1/2} 
373: \left(\frac{1-\l_{2}e^{-ix}}{1-\l_{2}e^{ix}}\right)^{1/2}, 
374: \label{ff12} 
375: \ee
376: where the factor $e^{i2x}$ in the parenthesis corresponds to 
377: the correlator $\la S^{y}_{x}S^{y}_0\ra$ 
378: (to the function $f_2(x)$) and the parameters $\l_{1,2}$ are 
379: given by the expression: 
380: \be
381: \l_{1,2}=\frac{1}{1+\g}\left(h\mp\sqrt{h^2+\g^2-1}\right). 
382: \label{l12}
383: \ee
384: The behaviour of the correlators is determined by the values of 
385: the parameters $\l_{1,2}$, which obey the relation 
386: $\l_1\l_2=a$, where the parameter $a<1$ equals 
387: $a=(1-\g)/(1+\g)$. 
388: In general, for $\g>0$ one should distinguish four different cases. 
389: 1) $h^2+\g^2<1$. In this case the parameters 
390: $\l_{1,2}=\sqrt{a}e^{\pm i\phi}$ are the complex numbers. 
391: 2) $h^2+\g^2>1$ but $h<1$. In this case the parameters 
392: $\l_{1,2}$ are real and obey $\l_{1}<\l_{2}<1$. 
393: 3) The line $h=1$ at arbitrary $\g$: $\l_{1}=a<1$, $\l_{2}=1$. 
394: 4) The region $h>1$ where the real parameters $\l_{1,2}$ 
395: are $\l_{1}<1<\l_{2}$. The asymptotic behaviour of the 
396: correlators is different in this four regions.  
397: 
398: 
399: 
400: 
401: 
402: \vspace{0.2in}
403:  
404: 
405: {\bf 3. Correlators for the XX spin chain.}
406: 
407: \vspace{0.1in}
408: 
409: 
410: In this section we calculate the correlators for the isotropic 
411: XX spin chain ($\g=0$) at non-zero magnetic field. For this purpose 
412: it is sufficient to use the equation (\ref{det}). 
413: Let us present the generating functions $f(x)$ for the initial determinants 
414: of the $x\times x$ matrices obtained for different correlators. 
415: We construct the functions with the continuously defined argument 
416: at the interval $(-\pi,\pi)$ which is important for the application of the 
417: equation (\ref{det}) (see \cite{Basor}). 
418: One can use the following functions.  
419: First for the correlator (\ref{a}) at $\a<\pi$ one should use the function 
420: \be
421: f(x)=(1,e^{i\a},1)
422: \label{f1}
423: \ee
424: where the three number in parenthesis denote the values of the function 
425: at the intervals $(-\pi,-p_F)$, $(-p_F,p_F)$ and $(p_F,\pi)$ 
426: respectively and the unity in eq.(\ref{f1}) denotes the phase equal to zero, 
427: the function 
428: \be
429: f(x)= (1,-1,1)
430: \label{f2}
431: \ee
432: for the same correlator at $\a=\pi$ and the functions of the form 
433: \be 
434: f_1(x)=e^{-ix}(e^{-i\pi},1,e^{i\pi}),~~~~ 
435: f_2(x)=e^{ix}(e^{i\pi},1,e^{-i\pi}), 
436: \label{f3}
437: \ee
438: with the continuously defined argument for the two terms in 
439: eq.(\ref{G}) respectively. 
440: Let us note that for the case $\a>\pi$ in eq.(\ref{a}) 
441: the function can be chosen in the form $(e^{i2\pi},e^{i\a},e^{i2\pi})$, 
442: which shows that the correlator (\ref{a}) is in fact the 
443: $2\pi$ - periodic function of the real parameter $\a$.  
444: 
445: 
446: 
447: The function $f(x)$ (\ref{f1}) has the continuously defined argument 
448: and the two jumps of the size $i\a$ and $-i\a$ at the points 
449: $x_1=-\pi/2$ and $x_2=\pi/2$.
450: Substituting this functions into the equation (\ref{det}) we  
451: obtain at the half-filling the asymptotics: 
452: \be
453: G_{\a}(x)=\la e^{i\a N(x)}\ra =e^{i\a x/2}\frac{1}{x^{\a^2/2\pi^2}}
454: \frac{1}{2^{\a^2/2\pi^2}}\left(g(\l)\right)^2, 
455: \label{ga}
456: \ee
457: where  $\l=\a/2\pi$. 
458: Evaluating the product in $g(\l)$  for the function given by 
459: the equation (\ref{gl}) we obtain the expression: 
460: \be
461: \ln(g(\l))=\l^2\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{dt}{t}\left(e^{-t}- 
462: \frac{1}{\l^2}\frac{(\sh(\l t/2)^2}{(\sh(t/2))^2} 
463: \right), ~~~~\l^2=\frac{\a^2}{4\pi^2}. 
464: \label{lgl}
465: \ee
466: For the correlator $G_{\a}(x)$ at $\a=\pi$ one should use 
467: the conjecture (\ref{DN}). 
468: The function $f(x)=(1,-1,1)$ (\ref{f2}) allows for two different 
469: representations in the form (\ref{f}) with two equal 
470: exponents $\sim 1/x^{1/2}$: 1) $b_1=1/2$, $b_2=-1/2$, $f_0(x)=e^{i\pi/2}$ 
471: and $b_1=-1/2$, $b_2=1/2$, $f_0(x)=e^{-i\pi/2}$, with 
472: $x_1=-\pi/2$, $x_2=\pi/2$. 
473: Thus for the asymptotics one should take the sum of the two terms 
474: which gives the following result: 
475: \be
476: G_{\pi}(x)=\left(e^{ip_F x}+e^{-ip_F x}\right)G_0(x)=
477: \cos(p_{F}x)2G_0(x), 
478: \label{pi}
479: \ee
480: where $p_F=\pi/2$ and 
481: \[
482: G_0(x)=\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(g(1/2))^2. 
483: \]
484: The correlator $G_{\pi}(x)$ equal to zero for $x$ - odd and 
485: to $\pm 2G_0(x)$ for $x$- even in accordance with the general 
486: properties of the average $G_{\pi}(x)=\la\prod_{i=1}^{x}(1-2n_i)\ra$ 
487: (real function).  
488:  The same result for $G_{\pi}$ can be obtained using the reduction 
489: of the determinant to the square of the half-size determinant. 
490: At $\a\neq\pi$ the first term $e^{ip_F x}$ in eq.(\ref{pi}) 
491: corresponds to the expression (\ref{ga}) while the second term gives 
492: the subleading asymptotics. 
493: One can also obtain the asymptotics of the correlator (\ref{pi}) 
494: at the arbitrary $p_F\neq\pi/2$: 
495: \be
496: G_{\pi}(x)=(e^{ip_F x}+e^{-ip_F x})\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}
497: \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sin(p_F)}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(g(1/2))^2, 
498: \label{pf}
499: \ee
500: which also have two different exponents and at arbitrary $p_F$ is the 
501: real function of $x$. 
502: Note that the same results could be obtained from equation (\ref{det}) 
503: by taking the sum of the two terms corresponding to the functions 
504: $(1,e^{i\pi},1)$, and $(1,e^{-i\pi},1)$. 
505: 
506: 
507: 
508: 
509: The spin-spin correlator (\ref{corr}) using the 
510: functions (\ref{f3}) for the two terms we obtain from eq.(\ref{det}) 
511: the asymptotics 
512: \be
513: G(x)=\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(g(1/2))^2, 
514: \label{asg}
515: \ee
516: where the constant $g(1/2)=\sqrt{\pi}(G(1/2))^2$, 
517: can be represented in the form:
518: \[
519: \ln(g(1/2))=\frac{1}{4}\int^{\infty}_{0}\frac{dt}{t}\left( 
520: e^{-4t}-\frac{1}{(\ch(t))^2}\right). 
521: \]
522: Note that for the functions (\ref{f3}) there is only one representation 
523: (\ref{f}), $b_1=b_2=1/2$ and $b_1=b_2=-1/2$ respectively 
524: so the conjecture (\ref{DN}) leads to the same results. 
525: 
526: Finally, one can use equation (\ref{G}) and the functions (\ref{f3}) 
527: and the discontinuities at the points $x_{1,2}=\pm p_F$ to obtain 
528: the asymptotics of the correlator $G(x)$ for the XX spin chain in the 
529: magnetic field in the form: 
530: \be
531: G(x)=\frac{1}{x^{1/2}} \frac{\sqrt{\sin(p_F)}}{\sqrt{2}} 
532: (g(1/2))^{2}, 
533: \label{PF}  
534: \ee
535: which differs from the well known asymptotics (\ref{asg}) 
536: by the simple factor $(\sin(p_F))^{1/2}=(1-h^2)^{1/4}$. 
537: Note that both eq.(\ref{DN}) and (\ref{det}) predict the 
538: real positive function $G(x)$ without the oscillating factors 
539: in agreement with the observation that the ground-state 
540: wave function of the Hamiltonian (\ref{H}) at $\g=0$ 
541: is the positive function of the coordinates.   
542: 
543: 
544: 
545: 
546: 
547: 
548: \vspace{0.2in}
549: 
550: {\bf 4. Correlators for the XY spin chain.}
551: 
552: \vspace{0.1in}
553: 
554: Let us start with the calculations of the asymptotics of the 
555: $xx$-correlator $G^{xx}(x)=\la S^{x}_{x}S^{x}_0\ra$ for the 
556: different values of the parameters $\g$, $h$ ($\l_{1,2}$). 
557: In Section 2 this correlator was represented by the 
558: determinant corresponding to the function $f_1(x)$ (\ref{ff12}). 
559: At $h<1$ we have for the parameters $\l_{1,2}$ the condition 
560: $|\l_{1,2}|<1$, and this function is the smooth function with 
561: zero winding number, so the strong Szego theorem can be applied. 
562: Thus in the whole region $h<1$ the correlator has the long-range 
563: order which can be easily calculated: 
564: \[
565: G^{xx}(x)={1\over4}(1-a^2)^{1/2}(1-h^2)^{1/4}, ~~~~~
566: a=\frac{1-\g}{1+\g}, ~~~~~~h<1. 
567: \]
568: Next, let us consider the correlator at the line $h=1$. 
569: At this value of $h$ the parameter $\l_2=1$ and the function 
570: $f_1(x)$ takes the form: 
571: \[
572: f_1(z)=
573: \left(\frac{1-a/z}{1-az}\right)^{1/2} 
574: \left(\frac{1-1/z}{1-z}\right)^{1/2}, ~~~~~z=e^{ix}. 
575: \]
576: One can see that this function has the form (\ref{f}) 
577: with the function $f_0(x)$ given by the first factor in the last 
578: equation and the single jump discontinuity at $z=1$ with the 
579: parameter $b=-1/2$. The calculations according to the formulas 
580: (\ref{DN}), (\ref{E}) yield the result  
581: \[
582: G^{xx}(x)=\frac{1}{x^{1/4}}\frac{\g^{3/4}}{2(1+\g)}
583: \sqrt{\pi}(G(1/2))^2, ~~~~~~h=1, 
584: \]
585: in agreement with the result of ref.\cite{MC}. 
586: Let us turn to the case $h>1$. In this case $\l_2>1$ and the 
587: function takes the following form: 
588: \be
589: f_1(z)=z^{-1}
590: \left(\frac{1-\l_1/z}{1-\l_1 z}\right)^{1/2}
591: \left(\frac{1-\l z}{1-\l/z}\right)^{1/2}, 
592: ~~~~~~\l=1/\l_2<1. 
593: \label{fun}
594: \ee
595: To calculate the determinant we use the method proposed in 
596: ref.\cite{F}, which allows one to use the general 
597: Fisher-Hartwig conjecture (\ref{DN}), (\ref{E}). 
598: Representing the matrix elements as an integrals 
599: in the complex plane over the unit circle, 
600: we deform the contour of integration to the circle $|z|=1/\l$ 
601: which is the {\it outer} boundary of the annulus $\l<|z|<1/\l$. 
602: This procedure is correct since the function (\ref{fun}) 
603: is an analytic function inside this annulus and reduces 
604: to the substitution $z\to z/\l$ in eq.(\ref{fun}). 
605: As a result we obtain the function of the form (\ref{f}): 
606: \[
607: f_0(z)=\l\left(\frac{1-\l_1\l/z}{1-(\l_1/\l)z}\right)^{1/2}
608: \frac{1}{(1-\l^2/z)^{1/2}},~~~~~a=\frac{1}{4},~~~~b=-\frac{3}{4} 
609: \]
610: with the singularity at the point $z=1$.  
611: Applying the conjecture (\ref{DN}) we obtain the result 
612: for the case $h>1$: 
613: \[
614: G^{xx}(x)=\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}\left(\frac{1}{\l_2}\right)^{x}
615: \frac{1}{4\sqrt{\pi}}(1-\l_{1}^2)^{1/4} (1-\l_{2}^{-2})^{-1/4} 
616: (1-\l_1\l_2)^{1/2}, ~~~~~~h>1,  
617: \]
618: in agreement with the corresponding formula in ref.\cite{MC}. 
619: 
620: 
621: Let us proceed with the calculations of the $yy$-correlator 
622: $G^{yy}(x)=\la S^{y}_{x}S^{y}_0\ra$. 
623: The behaviour of this correlator in the four regions  
624: in the space of parameters is completely different.  
625: We begin with the basic region in the space of parameters 
626: where both $\g$ and $h$ are sufficiently small: 
627: $h^2+\g^2<1$. In this case the parameters $\l_{1,2}$ are 
628: inside the unit circle at the complex plane: 
629: \[
630: \l_{1,2}=(1+\g)^{-1}\left(h\pm i\sqrt{1-h^2-\g^2}\right)=  
631: e^{\pm i\phi}\sqrt{a}. 
632: \]
633: In order to obtain an appropriate representation (\ref{f}) 
634: we deform the contour of integration from the unit circle 
635: to the circle of the radius $\sqrt{a}$, which amounts to 
636: the substitution $z\to\sqrt{a}z$ in the function $f_2(z)$ 
637: (\ref{ff12}). One can see that the resulting function $f(z)$ 
638: has the two singularities at the points $z=e^{\pm i\phi}$. 
639: One can prove that the only possible way to represent this 
640: function in the form (\ref{f}) is as follows. Namely, 
641: we single out the two equivalent Fisher-Hartwig singularities 
642: at the points $x=\pm\phi$. Thus we have the representation: 
643: \[
644: f_0(z)=a(1-e^{i\phi}az)^{-1/2}(1-e^{-i\phi}az)^{-1/2}, 
645: ~~~~~a_1=a_2=\frac{1}{4}, ~~~~~ b_1=b_2=\frac{3}{4}. 
646: \]
647: Substituting this function into the equations (\ref{DN}), 
648: (\ref{E}) we obtain the correlator: 
649: \[
650: G^{yy}(x)=a^{x}\frac{1}{x}\left(\frac{1}{2\pi} 
651: \sin(\phi)(1-a)^{-1/2}(1+a^2-2a\cos(2\phi))^{-1/4}\right). 
652: \]
653:  Next, let us consider the case $h^2+\g^2>1$, but $h<1$, 
654: when the parameters $\l_1$ and $\l_2$ are real and both are 
655: inside the unit circle, $\l_1<\l_2<1$. 
656: Taking the contour to be the inner boundary of the region 
657: $\l_2<|z|<1/\l_2$, where the function $f_2(z)$ (\ref{ff12}) 
658: is an analytic function, we obtain the representation: 
659: \[
660: f_0(z)=\l_{2}^{2} 
661: \left(\frac{1-(\l_1/\l_2)/z}{1-(\l_1\l_2)z}\right)^{1/2}
662: \frac{1}{(1-\l_2^2 z)^{1/2}}, 
663: ~~~~~a=\frac{1}{4},~~~~b=\frac{7}{4},  
664: \]
665: which gives the following correlation function: 
666: \[
667: G^{yy}(x)=-\frac{1}{x^{3}}\left(\l_2^2\right)^{x}
668: \frac{1}{8\pi}(1-\l_{1}^2)^{1/4}(1-\l_{2}^{2})^{-3/4} 
669: (1-\l_1\l_2)^{-1/2}(1-\l_1/\l_2)^{-1},  ~~~~~h<1.   
670: \]
671: This expression is identical with that given in ref.\cite{MC}  
672: which can be easily established using the following 
673: useful relations: $1-\l_{1}\l_2=1-a=2\g/(1+\g)$ and  
674: $(1-\l_1^2)(1-\l_2^2)=4(1-h^2)/(1+\g)^{2}$. 
675: 
676: 
677: As in the case of the $xx$-correlator, at the line $h=1$ 
678: no special deformation of the integration contour is 
679: required. The parameters $\l_{1,2}$ are $\l_1=a$, $\l_2=1$ 
680: and from the function $f_2(x)$ (\ref{ff12}) 
681: one can easily obtain the representation: 
682: \[
683: f_0(z)=\left(\frac{1-a/z}{1-az}\right)^{1/2},  
684: ~~~~~a=0,~~~~b=\frac{3}{2},  
685: \]
686: Calculating the constant (\ref{E}) we get: 
687: \[
688: G^{yy}(x)=-\frac{1}{x^{9/4}}\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{32} 
689: \g^{-5/4}(1+\g)(G(1/2))^2.  
690: \]
691: Finally, let us consider the region $h>1$ ($\l_2>1$). 
692: In this case the calculations are analogous to the 
693: corresponding case for the $xx$-correlator. 
694: Introducing the parameter $\l=1/\l_2<1$, we  
695: observe that the function is an analytic function 
696: in the annulus $\l<|z|<1/\l$. Deformation of the integration 
697: contour to the {\it inner} boundary of the annulus, 
698: $z\to\l z$, gives the representation (\ref{f}) 
699: in the form: 
700: \[
701: f_0(z)=\l\left(\frac{1-(\l_1/\l)/z}{1-\l_1\l z}\right)^{1/2}
702: (1-\l^{2}z)^{1/2},~~~~~a=-\frac{1}{4},~~~~b=\frac{5}{4}. 
703: \]  
704: Applying the conjecture (\ref{DN}) we obtain the result:  
705: \[
706: G^{yy}(x)=-\frac{1}{x^{3/2}}\left(\frac{1}{\l_2}\right)^{x}
707: \frac{1}{8\sqrt{\pi}}(1-\l_{1}^2)^{1/4}(1-\l_{2}^{-2})^{3/4} 
708: (1-(\l_1/\l_2))^{-1}(1-\l_1\l_2)^{-1/2}, 
709: ~~~~h>1,  
710: \]
711: in agreement with the corresponding formula in ref.\cite{MC}. 
712: Let us note that in all the cases considered in this section 
713: (except the $yy$- correlator at $h^2+\g^2<1$) we have 
714: obtained the functions with the single Fisher-Hartwig 
715: singularity. In the case of the single singularity 
716: the asymptotics (\ref{DN}), (\ref{E}) was proved 
717: in ref.\cite{ES}. 
718: In conclusion, it is easy to verify that in all the cases 
719: considered, there is only one possible way to choose the contour 
720: of integration (inner or outer boundary of the annulus). 
721: In fact, in all the cases at the opposite boundary the 
722: condition $a_r\pm b_r\in Z^{-}$ is fulfilled. 
723: Formally, in this case we have the constant $E=0$, 
724: which suggests, that these special cases should be excluded from 
725: the general statement of the conjecture (\ref{DN}), (\ref{E}) 
726: since in this case the matrix elements corresponding to the 
727: pure Fisher-Hartwig singularity does not exist. 
728: 
729:  
730: 
731: 
732: 
733: 
734: \begin{thebibliography}{99} 
735: 
736: \bibitem{LSM}
737: E.Lieb, T.Schultz, D.Mattis, Ann.Phys. 16 (1961) 407. 
738: 
739: \bibitem{M}
740: B.M.McCoy, Phys.Rev.B 173 (1968) 531; \\
741: T.T.Wu, Phys.Rev. 149 (1966) 380. 
742: 
743: \bibitem{MC} 
744: E.Barouch, B.M.McCoy, Phys.Rev.A 3 (1971) 786. 
745: 
746: \bibitem{BM}
747: E.L.Basor, K.E.Morrison, Lin.Alg.Appl. 202 (1994) 129. \\
748: E.L.Basor, C.A.Tracy, Physica A 177 (1991) 167. 
749: 
750: \bibitem{F}
751: P.J.Forrester, N.E.Frankel, math-ph/0401011. 
752: 
753: \bibitem{FH}
754: M.E.Fisher, R.E.Hartwig, Adv.Chem.Phys. 15 (1968) 333.  
755: 
756: \bibitem{Basor}
757: E.Basor, Indiana U.Math.J. 28 (1979) 975; \\
758: E.Basor, H.Widom, Journ.Funct.Analysis 50 (1983) 387. 
759: 
760: \bibitem{ES}
761: T.Ehrhardt, B.Silbermann, Journ.Funct.Analysis 148 (1997) 229.    
762: 
763: \bibitem{Barnes}
764: E.W.Barnes, Quart.J.Math. 31 (1900) 264. 
765: 
766: 
767: 
768: \end{thebibliography}
769: 
770: \end{document}
771: 
772: