1: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2: % Beginning of article.tex
3: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4: %
5: % AMS-LaTeX 1.2 sample file for book proceedings, based on amsproc.cls.
6: %
7: % Replace amsproc by the documentclass for the target series, e.g. pspum-l.
8: %
9: \documentclass{amsproc}
10: \usepackage{amssymb,amsthm}
11: \usepackage{amsmath}
12: \usepackage{amscd}
13: \usepackage{subfigure}
14: \usepackage{epsf,graphicx}
15: \usepackage[all]{xy}
16:
17: \newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}%[section] (If you want theorem numbered
18: \newtheorem{lema}[thm]{Lemma}% with section number. Same
19: \newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}% goes for lemmas, etc.)
20: \newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition} %--> \begin\end{theorem,lemma,...}
21: \newtheorem{rem}[thm]{Remark}
22: \newtheorem{conj}[thm]{Conjecture}
23: \newtheorem{defi}[thm]{Definition}
24: \newtheorem{exa}[thm]{Example}
25: \newtheorem{defiteo}[thm]{Definition-theoren}
26:
27:
28: \DeclareFontFamily{OMS}{rsfs}{\skewchar\font'60}
29: \DeclareFontShape{OMS}{rsfs}{m}{n}{<-5>rsfs5 <5-7>rsfs7 <7->rsfs10
30: }{} \DeclareSymbolFont{rsfs}{OMS}{rsfs}{m}{n}
31: \DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\scr}{rsfs}
32:
33:
34: \newcommand{\cqd}{\rule{2mm}{2mm}}
35: \newcommand{\des}{\displaystyle}
36: %Si lo vuelas enumera con numeros%
37: \renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
38: \newcommand{\im}{{\rm{im}}}
39: \renewcommand{\ker}{{\rm{Ker}}}
40: \newcommand{\en}{{{\rm End}}}
41: \newcommand{\ma}{{\rm Map}}
42: \newcommand{\Co}{{\rm Cob}}
43: \newcommand{\de}{{\rm dg\mbox{-}vect}}
44: \newcommand{\fu}{{\rm Funct}}
45: \newcommand{\Mfu}{{\rm MFunc}}
46: \newcommand{\mat}{{\rm Mat}}
47: \newcommand{\Ho}{{\rm H}}
48: \newcommand{\hg}{{\rm HG}}
49: \newcommand{\My}{{\rm M}}
50: \newcommand{\Si}{{\rm S}}
51: \newcommand{\Ca}{{\rm C}}
52: \newcommand{\sC}{\scr{C}}
53: \newcommand{\Mor}{{\rm Mor}}
54: \renewcommand{\mod}{{\rm mod}}
55: \newcommand{\alg}{{\rm alg}}
56: \newcommand{\ob}{{\rm Ob}}
57: \newcommand{\er}{{\rm E}}
58: \newcommand{\al}{{\rm A}}
59: \newcommand{\pe}{{\rm P}}
60: \newcommand{\OB}{{\rm ob}}
61: \newcommand{\Sc}{{\rm Schur}}
62: \newcommand{\ve}{{\rm vect}}
63: \newcommand{\HL}{{\rm HLQFT}}
64: \newcommand{\om}{{\rm Oman}}
65: \newcommand{\ca}{{\rm Cat}}
66: \newcommand{\op}{{\rm op}}
67: \newcommand{\I}{{\rm I}}
68: \newcommand{\id}{{\rm id}}
69: \newcommand{\ho}{{\rm Hom}}
70: \renewcommand{\des}{\displaystyle}
71: \def\N{{\Bbb N}}
72: \def\Q{{\Bbb Q}}
73: \def\R{{\Bbb R}}
74: \def\Z{{\Bbb Z}}
75: \def\V{\mathbb{R}^{n}}
76: \def\S{{\mathbb S}}
77: \def\K{{\mathbb K}}
78: \def\R{{\mathbb R}}
79: \def\P{{\mathcal{P}}}
80: \def\O{{\mathcal{O}}}
81: \def\E{{\mathcal{E}}}
82: \def\s{{\mathcal{S}}}
83: \def\C{{\mathcal{C}}}
84: \def\B{{\mathcal{B}}}
85: \def\d{{\mathcal{D}}}
86: \def\f{{\mathcal{F}}}
87: \def\g{{\mathcal{G}}}
88: \def\h{{\mathcal{H}}}
89: \newcommand{\A}{A_{\infty}}
90:
91:
92: \numberwithin{equation}{section}
93:
94: % Absolute value notation
95: \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\lvert#1\rvert}
96:
97: % Blank box placeholder for figures (to avoid requiring any
98: % particular graphics capabilities for printing this document).
99: \newcommand{\blankbox}[2]{%
100: \parbox{\columnwidth}{\centering
101: % Set fboxsep to 0 so that the actual size of the box will match the
102: % given measurements more closely.
103: \setlength{\fboxsep}{0pt}%
104: \fbox{\raisebox{0pt}[#2]{\hspace{#1}}}%
105: }%
106: }
107:
108: \begin{document}
109:
110: \title{Homological matrices}
111:
112: % Information for first author
113: \author{Edmundo Castillo}
114: % Address of record for the research reported here
115: \address{Departamento de Matem\'aticas, Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV).}
116: % Current address
117: \curraddr{Universidad Central de Venezuela,
118: Av. Los Ilustres, Los Chaguaramos,
119: Caracas-Venezuela
120: }
121: \email{ecastill@euler.ciens.ucv.ve}
122: % \thanks will become a 1st page footnote.
123:
124:
125: % Information for second author
126: \author{Rafael D\'\i az}
127: \address{Departamento de Matem\'aticas, Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV)} \email{rdiaz@euler.ciens.ucv.ve}
128:
129: \curraddr{Universidad Central de Venezuela, Av. Los Ilustres, Los
130: Chaguaramos, Caracas-Venezuela }
131: % General info
132: \subjclass{Primary 18D20, 18G60; Secondary 55N25, 81T99}
133: \date{September 2005}
134:
135:
136:
137: \keywords{Homological quantum field theory, String}
138:
139: \begin{abstract}
140: We define homological matrices, construct examples of
141: one-dimen\-sion restricted homological quantum field theories,
142: and show a relationship between the two theories.
143: \end{abstract}
144:
145: \maketitle
146: \section{Introduction}
147:
148: The purpose of this paper is to introduce examples of
149: one-dimensional homological quantum field theories $\HL,$ and to
150: define a higher dimensional homological analogue of matrices.
151: First we review the notion of $\HL$ introduced in \cite{Cas} which
152: is based on the concept of cobordisms dotted with homology classes
153: of maps into a fixed compact oriented smooth manifold. We demand
154: that the maps from cobordisms to the fixed manifold be constant on
155: each boundary component. This restriction is necessary in order to
156: define composition of morphisms using transversal intersection on
157: finite dimensional manifolds. We define a HLQFT as a monoidal
158: functor from that category of extended cobordisms into the
159: category of vector spaces.
160:
161:
162: {\noindent}Throughout this paper we work at the chain level. To do
163: so we introduced in Section \ref{sec1} transversal $1$-categories
164: following ideas by May and Kriz \cite{KM}, and homology with
165: corners for oriented smooth manifolds. In Section \ref{sec2} we
166: defined homological quantum field theory in arbitrary dimensions.
167: Section \ref{sec3} contains our main example of one-dimensional
168: $\HL$ which is based on the notion of parallel transportation
169: along chains of paths.
170:
171: {\noindent}In Section \ref{sec4} we introduce a higher dimensional
172: homological analogue of matrices using the graphical
173: representation of matrices introduced in \cite{RE}. We describe
174: the relation between $1$-dimensional restricted $\HL$ and higher
175: dimensional matrices.
176:
177:
178:
179: \section{Transversal $1$-categories}\label{sec1}
180:
181: Fix a field $k$ of characteristic zero. We denote by $\de$ the
182: category of differential $\mathbb{Z}$-graded $k$-vector spaces.
183: Objects in dg-vect are pairs $(V,d),$ where $V=\bigoplus_{i\in
184: \mathbb{Z}}V_{i}$ is $\mathbb{Z}$-graded $k$-vector space and
185: $d=\bigoplus _{i\in \mathbb{Z}}d_{i}\colon V \to V$ is such that
186: $d_{i}\colon V_{i}\to V_{i-1}$ and $d^{2}=0.$ If $V$ is $\de$ then
187: $V[n]$ is the $\de$ such that $V[n]^{i}=V^{i+n}.$ We say that $V[n]$
188: is equal to $V$ with degrees shifted down by $n.$ If $v\in V^{i}$
189: the are write $|v|=i.$ If $V$ is a dg-vect $\Ho(V)$ denotes the
190: homology of $V.$ A {\it dg-precategory} $\C$ consist of a collection
191: of objects $\ob(\C)$ and for any $x,y \in \ob(\C),$ a dg-vect
192: $\C(x,y)$ called the space of morphisms from $x$ to $y.$ A
193: dg-category $\C$ is a dg-precategory together with complex
194: morphisms $\circ \colon \C(x,y) \bigotimes \C(y,z) \longrightarrow
195: \C(x,z)$ and $\id_x \colon k \rightarrow \C(x,x)$ turning $\C$ into
196: a category. We think of $k$ as the complex with zero differential
197: concentrated in degree zero. For a dg-precategory $\C,$ we define
198: the precategory $\Ho(\C)$ as follows: $\ob(\Ho(\C))=\ob(\C),$ and
199: for any $x,y \in \ob(\Ho(\C)), \ \Ho(\C)(x,y)=\Ho(\C(x,y)).$ One
200: checks easily that if $\C$ is a dg-category, then $\Ho(\C)$ is also
201: a category.
202:
203: \vspace{0.3cm} {\noindent} A {\it transversality structure}
204: $\C^{\star}$ in a dg-precategory $\C$ consist of the following data:
205: \begin{itemize}
206: \item{For $x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n} \in \ob(\C)$ a $\de$ $\C(x_{0},\cdots
207: ,x_{n}).$ }
208: \item{ inclusions $i_{n}\colon \C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n}) \hookrightarrow
209: \displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{n}\C(x_{i-1},x_{i}).$ }
210: \end{itemize}
211:
212: This data should satisfy the following properties:
213:
214: \begin{itemize}
215: \item{$i_{n}\colon \C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n}) \to\des
216: \bigotimes_{i=1}^{n}\C(x_{i-1},x_{i})$ is a quasi-isomorphism,
217: i.e., the induced map \\ $\Ho({i}_{n})\colon\Ho(\C( x_{0},\cdots
218: ,x_{n})) \to \displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{n} \Ho(\C(x_{i-1},
219: x_{i}))$ is an isomorphism.}
220: \item{ For each partition $n=n_{1}+ \cdots + n_{k},$ the map $i_{n}$
221: factors through \\
222: $\displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k}\C(x_{n_{i-1}},\cdots
223: ,x_{n_{i}}).$ }
224: \end{itemize}
225:
226: Details are explained in \cite{Cas}. In \cite{Kar} the reader will
227: find examples of transversal structures with applications to
228: algebraic topology.
229:
230:
231: {\noindent}We think of $\C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n}) $ as the
232: differential graded subspace of
233: $\des\bigotimes_{i=1}^{n}\C(x_{i-1},x_{i})$ consisting of
234: transversal $n$-tuples $\C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n}).$ Thus any $0$ or
235: $1$-tuple is automatically transversal. For $n\geq 2$ any closed
236: $n$-tuple in $\displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{n}\C(x_{i-1},x_{i})$
237: is homologous to a closed transversal $n$-tuple, and any
238: subsequence of a transversal sequence is transversal.
239:
240:
241: {\noindent}Let $D^{1}=\{y\in\mathbb{R}\mid |y|\leq1\}.$ The operad
242: of little intervals $\I=\{\I(n)\}_{n\geq1}$ is defined as follows:
243: for each $n\geq1,$ $\I(n)$ is the topological space
244: \[\I(n)= \Big\{(T_{y_{1},r_{1}}, \ldots ,T_{y_{n},r_{n}}) \ \Big |
245: \begin{array}{c}
246: y_{i}, y_{j}\in D^{1},\ 0\leq r_{i} < 1 \ \mbox{such that if }\
247: i\neq j\
248: \\
249: \overline{\im(T_{y_{i},r_{i}})}\cap \overline{\im(T_{y_{j},r_{j}})}=
250: \emptyset \ \mbox{ for all} \ 1\leq
251: i,j \leq n \\
252: \end{array} \Big \} ,\]
253: where $T_{a,r}\colon D^{1}\to D^{1}$ is the affine transformation
254: $T_{a,r}(y)=ry+a,$ for $x\in D^{1}$ and $r\geq0$ small
255: enough.
256:
257: {\noindent} We regard $\I$ as a non-symmetric operad for the
258: purposes of this
259: note. Notice that a configuration of little intervals is
260: naturally numbered using the order in $D^{1}.$ Compositions in
261: $\I=\{\I(n)\}_{n\geq1}$
262: are illustrated by Figure \ref{figu1}
263: \begin{figure}[h]
264: \begin{center}
265: \includegraphics[height=1.6cm]{in.eps}
266: \caption{\ Example of a composition $\gamma_{2}\colon \I(2)\otimes
267: \I(3)\otimes \I(2)\to \I(5) $. \label{figu1}}
268: \end{center}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271:
272: {\noindent}We shall use the dg-vect operad of singular chains
273: $\Ca_{s}(\I)=\{\Ca_{s}(\I(n))\}_{n\geq 1}$ with compositions induced
274: by those on $\I.$
275: A dg-precategory $\C$ is said to be a {\it
276: transversal $1$-category} if a domain $\C^{\star}$ in
277: $\C$ is given together with maps $\theta_{n}\colon
278: \Ca_{s}(\I(n))\otimes \C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n}) \to \C(x_{0},x_{n})$
279: for any $x_{0}, \cdots ,x_{n} \in \ob( \C).$ This data should
280: satisfy the following axioms:
281: 1) $\theta_{1}(1\otimes(\ ))=\id\colon \C(x_{0},x_{1}))\to\C(x_{0},x_{1}),$
282: where $1$ denotes the identity in $\Ca(\I(1)).$ 2) For each
283: partition $n=n_{1}+ \cdots + n_{k},$ the map
284: $\displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k}\Ca_{s}(\I(n_{i}))\otimes
285: (\displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{n} \C(x_{n_{i-1}},\cdots
286: ,x_{n_{i}}))\to \displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k} \C(x_{n_{i-1}}
287: ,x_{n_{i}})$ obtained by including $\C(x_{0},\cdots ,x_{n})$ in
288: $\displaystyle\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k} \C(x_{n_{i-1}},\cdots
289: ,x_{n_{i}}),$ shuffling, and applying $\theta ^{\otimes k}$ factors
290: through $\C(x_{n_{0}},x_{n_{1}},\cdots,x_{n_{k}}),$ see \cite{Cas}.
291: Using that $\Ho(\I(n))=k$ for all $n\geq1,$ it is shown in
292: \cite{Cas} that
293:
294:
295: \begin{thm}\label{Teo4}
296: {\em If $\C$ is a transversal $1$-category then $\Ho(\C)$ is a
297: category.}
298: \end{thm}
299:
300:
301: {\noindent}The concept of transversal $1$-algebra may be deduced
302: from that of a transversal category as follows: a dg-vect $A$ is a
303: transversal $1$-algebra if and only if the precategory $\C_{A}$
304: with only one object $p,$ such that $\C_{A}(p,p)=A$ is a
305: $1$-category.
306:
307:
308: \begin{cor}\label{cor5}
309: {\em If $A$ is a transversal $1$-algebra then
310: $\Ho(A)$ is an associative algebra.}
311: \end{cor}
312:
313:
314: {\noindent} Smooth manifolds with corners are defined in \cite{Mel}.
315: Given a smooth manifold $M$ we define the graded vector space
316: \[\Ca(M)=\bigoplus_{i\in \N} \Ca_{i}(M),\]
317: with $i\in \N,$ where $\Ca_{\it i}(M)$ denotes the complex
318: vector space
319: \[ \frac{\Big\langle (K_{x},x)\colon \begin{array}{c}
320: K_{x}\ \mbox{is a compact connected oriented}\ i \mbox{-manifold with } \\
321: \mbox{corners and} \ x\colon K_{x} \to M \
322: \mbox{is a smoth map} \\
323: \end{array}
324: \Big\rangle}{\langle (K_{x},x)-(-K_{x},x) \rangle}.\]
325:
326: {\noindent}For $K$ an oriented manifold, $-K$ denotes the same
327: manifold provided with the opposite orientation. We let $\partial
328: \colon \Ca_{i}(M) \to \Ca_{{i}-\rm {1}}(M)$ be the map given by
329: $\partial(K_{x},x)=\sum_{c}(\overline{c},x_{\overline{c}}),$ where
330: the sum ranges over the connected components of $\partial_{1}
331: K_{x}$ provided with the induced boundary orientation and
332: $x_{\overline{c}}$ denotes the restriction of $x$ to the closure of
333: $c.$ In \cite{Cas} is proven that
334:
335:
336: \begin{thm}
337: {\em $(\Ca(M),\partial)$ is a differential $\mathbb{Z}$-graded
338: $k$-vector space. Moreover}
339: \[\Ho(\Ca(M),\partial)=\Ho(M):=\mbox{\em singular homology of } \
340: M.\]
341: \end{thm}
342:
343:
344:
345:
346:
347:
348:
349:
350:
351:
352: \section{Homological quantum field theory}\label{sec2}
353:
354: This work was motivated by our desired to understand and
355: generalized string topology introduce by M.Chas and D. Sullivan
356: \cite{SCh}, see also \cite{CJ} and \cite{S}. Indeed the category
357: $\Co^{M}_{1,r}$ of homological one dimensional restricted cobordisms
358: enriched over a manifold $M$ constructed in Section \ref{sec3}
359: includes open string topology on $M$ as a particular case when one
360: considers objects of the form $c \colon [1] \longrightarrow D(M).$
361:
362:
363: The theory of cobordisms was introduced by Rene Thom \cite{RT}.
364: Using cobordisms Michael F. Atiyah \cite{MA} and G. B. Segal
365: \cite{Se} introduced the axioms for topological quantum field
366: theories TQFT and conformal field theories CFT, respectively. V.
367: Turaev \cite{TU1} introduced the axioms for homotopical quantum
368: field theories. Essentially the axioms of Atiyah may be summarized
369: as follows: 1) Consider the monoidal category $\Co_{n}$ of
370: $n$-dimensional cobordism. 2) Define the category of TQFT as the
371: category $\Mfu(\Co_{n},\ve)$ of monoidal functors $\f\colon
372: \Co_{n}\to \ve.$ The category of Segal's CFT may also be recast as
373: a category of monoidal functors.
374:
375:
376: {\noindent}We shall define the category $\HL$ of homological
377: quantum field theories as follows
378:
379: {\noindent}1) Construct a $1$-category $\sC \OB_{n}^{M}$ for each
380: $n\geq1$ and compact oriented smooth manifold $M.$
381:
382: {\noindent}2) Consider the associated category
383: $\Co_{n}^{M}=\Ho(\sC\OB_{n}^{M}).$
384:
385: {\noindent}3) Define the category $\HL(M,n)$ to be the category of
386: monoidal functors $\Mfu(\Co_{n},\ve).$
387:
388:
389: {\noindent}Let us first define the transversal $1$-category $\sC
390: \OB_{n}^{M}.$ By we denote $D(M)$ the set of all embedded
391: connected oriented submanifolds of $M.$ $\pi_{0}(M)$ denotes the
392: set of connected components of $M.$ We define the completion of a
393: manifold $M$ to be $\overline{M}=\des\prod_{c\in \pi_{0}(N)}c.$
394: Figure \ref{fieti} gives an example of a manifold and its
395: completion.
396: \begin{figure}[ht]
397: \begin{center}
398: \includegraphics[height=2.1cm]{Eti.eps}
399: \caption{ \ Manifold $N$ and its completion
400: $\overline{N}.$\label{fieti}}
401: \end{center}
402: \end{figure}
403:
404:
405: {\noindent}Objects in $\sC \OB_{n}^{M}$ are triples $(N,f,<)$ where
406: $N$ is a compact oriented manifold of dimension $n-1,$
407: $f\colon \pi_{0}(N) \to D(M)$ is any map, and $<$ is a linear ordering on
408: $\pi_{0}(N).$ By convention the empty
409: set is assumed to be a $n$-dimensional manifold for all $n\in
410: \mathbb{N}.$
411:
412: {\noindent}Let $(N_{i},f_{i},<_{i})$ and $(N_{o}, \ f_{o},<_{o})$
413: be objects in $\sC \OB_{n}^{M}.$ We set
414: \[ \sC \OB_{n}^{M}((N_{i},f_{i},<_{i}), \ (N_{o},f_{o},<_{o}))=\overline{\sC
415: \OB_{n}^{M}}\diagup \backsim\] where $\overline{\sC \OB_{n}^{M}}$
416: is the set of triples $(P,\alpha,\xi)$ such that
417:
418: {\noindent}1) $P$ is a compact oriented smooth manifold with
419: corners of dimension $n.$
420:
421: {\noindent}2) $\alpha \colon N_{i}\bigsqcup N_{o}\times [0,1]\to
422: \im (\alpha)\subseteq P$ is a diffeomorphism and $\alpha \mid_{
423: N_{i}\bigsqcup N_{o}}\to
424: \partial P$ is a diffeomorphism such that $\alpha|_{N_{i}}$
425: reverses orientation and $\alpha|_{N_{o}}$ preserves orientation.
426:
427: {\noindent}3) $\xi \in \Ca(\ma (P,M)_{f_{i}, f_{o}}),$ where
428: $\ma(P,M)_{f_{i}, f_{o}}$ is the set of all smooth maps $g\colon
429: P\to M$ such that for $c\in \pi_{0}(N_{j}), \ \xi(a, )$ is a
430: constant map with value in $f_{j}(c)$ on an open neighborhood of
431: $c,$ for $j=i,o.$ We considered $\Ca(\ma (P,M)_{f_{i}, f_{o}})$
432: with degrees shifted down by
433: $\dim N_{0}.$ Thus $\xi$ is a smooth map $\xi\colon
434: K_{\xi}\times P\to M$ for some compact oriented manifold with
435: corners $K_{\xi}.$
436:
437:
438: {\noindent}If $\alpha\in \ma(PM)_{f_{i},f_{o}}$ we define
439: $e_{i}(\alpha)\in\des \prod_{c\in\pi_{0}(N_{i})}f_{i}(c)$ by
440: $e_{i}(\alpha)(c)=e_{i}(x)$ for $x\in c;$ similarly
441: $e_{o}(\alpha)\in\des \prod_{c\in\pi_{0}(N_{o})}f_{o}(c)$ is given
442: by $e_{o}(\alpha)(c)=e_{o}(x)$ for $x\in c.$ Triples
443: $(P_{1},\alpha_{1}, \xi_{1} )\sim (P_{2},\alpha_{2}, \xi_{2} )$ in
444: $\overline{\sC \OB_{n}^{M}}((N_{i},f_{i},<_{i}), \
445: (N_{o},f_{o},<_{o}))$ if and only if there is an orientation
446: preserving diffeomorphism $\varphi\colon P_{1} \to P_{2}$ such
447: that $\varphi \circ \alpha_{1}=\alpha_{2},$ and
448: $\varphi_{\star}(\xi_{1})=\xi_{2}.$
449:
450: {\noindent}$\sC \OB_{n}^{M} ((N_{0},f_{0},<_{0}),\cdots ,
451: (N_{k},f_{k},<_{k}))$ is the set of all $k$-tuples
452: $\{(P_{i},\alpha_{i}, \xi_{i})\}_{i=1}^{k}$ such that
453: $(P_{i},\alpha_{i},\xi_{i})\in \sC \OB_{n}^{M}
454: ((N_{i-1},f_{i-1},<_{i-1}), (N_{i},f_{i},<_{i}))$ and for all
455: $1\leq i \leq j \leq k$ the map
456: \[
457: \begin{array}{c}
458: \txt \footnotesize {$\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
459: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!e (\xi_{1},
460: \ldots , \xi_{n})\colon
461: \des\prod_{i=1}^{k}K_{\xi_{i}}
462: \rightarrow
463: \des \prod_{i=1}^{k-1}\overline{N}_{i}\times\overline{ N}_{i}$}\\
464: \txt \footnotesize {$e (\xi_{1}, \ldots , \xi_{k}) (c_{1},\ldots ,
465: c_{k}) = (e_{o}(\xi_{1}(c_{1}))
466: ,e_{i}(\xi_{2}(c_{2})),e_{o}(\xi_{2}(c_{2})),
467: \ldots ,e_{i}(\xi_{k}(c_{k}))) $}\\
468: \end{array}\]
469: is transversal to $\txt \footnotesize
470: {$\Omega_{k}=\des\prod_{i=1}^{k}
471: \Delta^{N_{i}}_{2}\subset\des\prod_{i=1}^{k-1}\overline{N}_{i}\times
472: \overline{N}_{i}$}$ where $\Delta^{N_{i}}_{2}=\{(a,a)\in
473: \overline{N}_{i}\times \overline{N}_{i} \}$ for $1\leq i \leq
474: k-1.$ Clearly
475: \begin{equation}\label{eva2}
476: \!\!\!\txt \footnotesize {$e^{-1}(\Omega_{k})= $}\Big\{\txt
477: \footnotesize {$(c_{1}, \ldots ,c_{k}) \in
478: \des\prod_{i=1}^{k}K_{\xi_{i}}$} \Big |
479: \begin{array}{c}
480: \txt \footnotesize
481: {$e_{o}(\xi_{i}(c_{i}))=e_{i}(\xi_{i+1}(c_{i+1}))$}
482: \\
483: \txt \footnotesize {$1\leq i \leq k-1$}\\
484: \end{array}\Big \}
485: \end{equation}
486:
487: {\noindent}Since $e$ is a smooth map and $e(\xi_{1},
488: \ldots , \xi_{k})\pitchfork\Omega_{k}$ then
489: \[K_{\xi_{1}}\times_{\overline{N}_{1}}K_{\xi_{1}}\times_{\overline{N}_{2}} \cdots
490: \times_{\overline{N}_{k-1}} K_{x_{k}}=e^{-1}(\Omega_{k})\] is a
491: manifold with corners.
492:
493:
494: {\noindent}Given $a\in \Ca_{s}(\I(k)),$
495: $(P_{i},\alpha_{i},\xi_{i})\in
496: \sC \OB_{n}^{M}
497: ((N_{i-1},f_{i-1},<_{i-1}), (N_{i}, f_{i}, <_{i}))$ for $1\leq
498: i\leq k,$ the composition morphism
499: $a((P_{1},\alpha_{1},\xi_{1}),\cdots
500: ,(P_{k},\alpha_{k},\xi_{k}))\in \sC \OB_{n}^{M} ((N_{0},
501: f_{0},<_{0}), (N_{k},f_{k},<_{k})))$ is the triple
502: $(a(P_{1},\cdots , P_{k}),a(\alpha_{1},\cdots ,
503: \alpha_{k}),a(\xi_{1},\cdots , \xi_{k}))$ where
504: \[\begin{array}{c}
505: a(P_{1},\cdots , P_{k})=P_{1}\des\bigsqcup_{N_{1}}
506: \cdots \des\bigsqcup_{N_{k-1}}P_{k} \\
507: a(\alpha_{1},\cdots ,
508: \alpha_{k})=\alpha_{1}\mid_{N_{0}}\bigsqcup
509: \alpha_{k}\mid_{N_{k}} \\
510: \\
511: K_{a}(\xi_{1},\cdots , \xi_{k})=K_{a}\times
512: K_{\xi_{1}}\des\times_{\overline{N}_{1}}K_{\xi_{2}}\times
513: \cdots \des\times_{\overline{N}_{k-1}}K_{\xi_{k}} \\
514: \end{array}\]
515: The map $a(\xi_{1},\cdots , \xi_{k})\colon K_{a}(\xi_{1},\cdots ,
516: \xi_{k})\times P_{1}\des\bigsqcup_{N_{1}}\cdots
517: \des\bigsqcup_{N_{k-1}}P_{k}\to M$ is given by $a(\xi_{1},\cdots ,
518: \newline \xi_{k})((s, t_{1}\cdots ,t_{k}),u)=\xi_{i}(t_{i})(u)$ for any
519: tuple $(s, t_{1}\cdots ,t_{k})$ in $K_{a}\times
520: K_{\xi_{1}}\times_{\overline{N}_{1}} \cdots
521: \times_{\overline{N}_{k-1}} K_{\xi_{k}}$ and $u\in P_{i}.$
522: Figure $\ref{Bor3}$ represents a $n$-cobordism
523: enriched over $M$ and Figure $\ref{Bor4}$ shows a composition of
524: $n$-cobordism enriches over $M.$
525:
526:
527: \begin{figure}[h]
528: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\linewidth}
529: \begin{center}
530: \includegraphics[height=2.7cm]{sig3.eps}\!\!\!\!\!\!\caption{A
531: $n$-cobordism enriched over $M.$}\label{Bor3}
532: \end{center}
533: \end{minipage}
534: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\linewidth}
535: \begin{center}
536: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{Comp3.eps}\!\!\!\!\!\! \!\!\!\!\!\!\ \caption{Composition of
537: $n$-cobordisms enriched over $M.$}\label{Bor4}
538: \end{center}
539: \end{minipage}
540: \end{figure}
541:
542: {\noindent}$\Co^{M}_{n,r}$ is the full subcategory of
543: $\Co^{M}_{n},$ such that the empty set is not included as an object.
544:
545: \begin{prop}
546: {\em $(\Co_{n}^{M}, \ \sqcup, \ \emptyset)$ is a monoidal category
547: with disjoint union $\sqcup$ as product and empty set as unit.
548: $ \ \Co^{M}_{n,r}$
549: is a monoidal category without unit. }
550: \end{prop}
551:
552:
553:
554: {\noindent}Given monoidal categories $\C$ and $\d$ we denote by
555: $\Mfu(\C,\d)$ the category of monoidal functors from $\C$ to $\d.$
556:
557: \begin{defi}
558: {\em $\HL (M,d)=\Mfu(\Co_{n}^{M},\ve)$ and $\HL_{r} (M,d)=
559: \Mfu(\Co_{n.r}^{M},\ve).$ $\HL_{d}(M,d)$ is the category of}
560: homological quantum field theories of dimension $d.$ $\HL_{r}
561: (M,d)$ {\em is the category of} restricted homological quantum
562: field theories of
563: dimension $d.$
564: \end{defi}
565:
566:
567:
568: \vspace{0.3cm}
569:
570:
571: \section{One-dimensional \HL}\label{sec3}
572:
573: For $n\in \mathbb{N}$ we set $[n]=\{1,\cdots ,n\}.$ Let $M$ be a
574: compact oriented smooth manifold and $\pi\colon P\to M$ be a
575: principal fiber $G$-bundle for $G$ a compact Lie group. Let
576: $\scr{A}_{P}$ denote the space of planar connections on $P,$ and let
577: $\Lambda \in \scr{A}_{P}$ be a connection. If $\gamma \colon I \to
578: M$ is a smooth curve on $M$ and $x\in P$ is such that
579: $\pi(x)=\gamma(0),$ then we let $P_{\Lambda}(\gamma,x)$ be
580: $\widehat{\gamma}(1)$ where $\widehat{\gamma}$ is the horizontal
581: lift of $\gamma$ with respect to $A$ such that
582: $\widehat{\gamma}(0)=x.$ The goal of this section is to construct a
583: map $\Ho\colon \scr{A}_{P} \to \HL_{r}(M,1).$ For each connection
584: $\Lambda \in \scr{A}_{P}$ we construct a one-dimension restricted
585: homological quantum field theory $\Ho_{\Lambda}\colon
586: \Co_{1,r}^{M}\to \ve.$ For $c\in \ob(\Co^{M}_{1,r})$ we let
587: $\overline{c}$ be $\des \prod_{i\in[n]}c(i).$ Notice that an object
588: in $\Co^{M}_{1,r}$ is a map $c\colon [n]\to D(M)$ for some $n\in
589: \mathbb{N}^{+}.$ On objects $\Ho_{\Lambda}\colon
590: \ob(\Co_{1,r}^{M})\to \ob(\ve)$ is the map given by
591: \[\Ho_{\Lambda}(c)=\Ho(\des\prod_{i\in[n]} P\mid_{c(i)})\]
592: where $P\mid_{c(i)}$ denotes the restriction of $P$ to
593: $c(i)\subseteq M.$ Notice that a morphism in $\Co_{1}$ from $c$ to
594: $d$ consists of a pair $(\alpha, t)$ where $\alpha$ is a permutation
595: $\alpha \colon [n]\to [n],$ and $t=\{t_{1}\cdots t_{n}\}$ is such
596: that $t_{i}\in\Ho(\ma(\I_{c},M)_{c_{i},d(\alpha(i))})$ where $I_{c}$
597: is a $1$-dimensional compact manifold with boundary (a closed
598: interval). Figure \ref{strin} shows a picture of a morphism in
599: $\Co_{1}$.
600: \begin{figure}[ht]
601: \begin{center}
602: \includegraphics[height=4cm]{string1.eps}
603: \caption{ \ A morphism in $\Co_{1}$. \label{strin}}
604: \end{center}
605: \end{figure}
606:
607: {\noindent}The map
608: \[\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha, t)\colon \Ho(\des\prod_{i\in[n]} P\mid_{c(i)})\to
609: \Ho(\des\prod_{i\in[n]} P\mid_{d(i)}) \] is defined as follows:
610: consider the natural projection $\pi\colon\des\prod_{i\in[n]}
611: P\mid_{c(i)}\to \des\prod _{i\in[n]} c(i),$ and let $x$ be a chain
612: $x\colon K_{x}\to\des\prod_{i\in[n]} P\mid_{c(i)},$ where
613: $x=(x_{1},\dots ,x_{n}).$ The domain of $\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,
614: t)(x)$ is given by
615: \[K_{\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha, t)(x)}=K_{x}\times_{\overline{c}}
616: \des\prod _{i\in[n]}K_{t_{i}}\] The map
617: $\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,t)(x)\colon K_{\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,t)(x)}\to
618: \des\prod_{i\in[n]} P\mid_{d(i)}$ is given by
619: \[[\Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha, t)(x)](y;y_{1},\cdots
620: y_{n})=\des\prod_{i\in[n]} P(t_{i}(y_{i}),x_{i})\] where $y\in
621: K_{x}, \ y_{i}\in K_{t_{i}}.$
622:
623: \begin{thm}\label{t6}
624: {\em For any $\Lambda \in \scr{A}_{P}$ the map $\Ho_{\Lambda}$ defines on
625: $1$-dimensional homological quantum field theory.}
626: \end{thm}
627: \begin{proof}
628: We need to show that $\Ho_{\Lambda}((\beta,s)\circ (\alpha,
629: t))=\Ho_{\Lambda}(\beta,s)\circ \Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,t).$ Since
630: \[K_{\Ho_{\Lambda}((\beta,s)\circ (\alpha, t))}(x)=
631: K_{x}\times_{\overline{N}_{i}}(\des\prod_{c\in\pi_{0}(N_{i})}K_{t(c)}\times_{\overline{N}_{m}}
632: \des\prod_{d\in\pi_{0}(N_{m})}K_{s(d)})
633: \]
634: and
635: \[K_{\Ho_{\Lambda}(\beta,s)\circ \Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,t)}=(K_{x}\times_{\overline{N}_{i}}
636: \des\prod_{c\in\pi_{0}(N_{i})}K_{t(c)})\times_{\overline{N}_{m}}\des\prod_{d\in\pi_{0}(N_{m})}K_{s(d)}\]
637: the domains $\Ho_{\Lambda}((\beta,s)\circ (\alpha, t))$ and
638: $\Ho_{\Lambda}(\beta,s)\circ \Ho_{\Lambda}(\alpha,t)$ agree. The
639: corresponding maps also agree since $P(\gamma \circ \beta,
640: x)=P(\alpha, P(\beta,x)).$
641: \end{proof}
642:
643:
644: \section{Homological matrices}\label{sec4}
645:
646: In this section we develop a higher dimensional analogue of matrices
647: and matrix multiplication. D\'iaz and Pariguan in \cite{RE} used the
648: following graphical representation of matrices. Let
649: $\textrm{Digraph}(m,n)$ be the $\mathbb{C}$-vector space generated
650: by the set of directed bipartite graphs $\Gamma$ with one edge
651: starting in $[m]$ and ending in $[n],$ so $\Gamma$ is given by an
652: element $\Gamma \in [m]\times [n].$ $\textrm{Digraph}(m,n)$ and the
653: vector space $M_{m\times n}(\mathbb{C})$ of complex matrices of
654: format $m\times n$ are naturally isomorphic via the correspondence
655: shown in Figure \ref{mat1}.
656:
657:
658: \begin{figure}[ht]
659: \begin{center}
660: \includegraphics[height=2.3cm]{matana1.eps} \caption{ \ Graphical representation
661: of matrices \label{mat1}}
662: \end{center}
663: \end{figure}
664:
665: {\noindent}Fix a compact oriented manifold $M.$ We proceed to
666: construct a higher dimensional homological analogue of matrices by
667: generalizing the spaces $\textrm{Digraph}(m,n)$ as follows: 1) We
668: replace each point of the set $[m]$ by oriented embedded
669: submanifold of $M.$ So the indices of a generalized matrix are maps
670: $c\colon [m]\to D(M).$ 2) The vector space $\textrm{Digraph}(m,n)$
671: is replaced by the space $\hg(c,d)$ of homological bipartite graphs
672: with one packet of edges, where $c\colon [m]\to D(M)$ and $d\colon
673: [n]\to D(M).$ The space $\hg(c,d)$ is given by
674: \[\hg(c,d)=\des\bigoplus_{j\in[m] i\in[n]}\Ho(\ma(I,M)_{c(j),d(i)})\]
675: with degrees in $\Ho(\ma(I,M)_{c(j),d(i)})$ shifted by
676: $\dim(d(i)).$ 3) Given $A\in \hg(d,e)$ and $B\in \hg(c,d)$ then we
677: define the product $AB\in \hg(c,e)$ of $A$ and $B$ by the rule
678: \[(AB)_{ki}=\des\sum_{j\in[m]}A_{kj}\circ B_{ji}\]
679: for all $i\in[n], j\in[m] \mbox{ and } k \in [p]$ where $B_{ji}\in
680: \Ho(\ma(I,M)_{c(i),d(j))}, \ A_{kj}\in \Ho(\ma(I,M)_{d(j),e(k))}$
681: and the composition maps
682: \[\circ\colon \Ho (\ma(I,M)_{d(j),e(k)})\otimes \Ho (\ma(I,M)_{c(i),d(j)})\to
683: \Ho (\ma(I,M)_{c(i),e(k)})\] are defined as for $1$-dimensional
684: homological quantum field theories.
685:
686: \begin{figure}[ht]
687: \begin{center}
688: \includegraphics[height=2.3cm]{matana3.eps} \caption{ \ Example of an element in $ \hg(c,d).$
689: \label{mat2}}
690: \end{center}
691: \end{figure}
692:
693: {\noindent}For a map $c\colon[n]\to D(M),$ the space $\hg(c,c)$ is
694: an algebra which may be regarded as higher dimensional homological
695: analogue of $M_{n}(\mathbb{C}).$ A representation of $\hg(c,c)$ on
696: a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space $V$ is a linear map $\rho \colon
697: \hg(c,c)\to \en(V)$ such that $\rho(AB)=\rho(A)\rho(B).$ Figure
698: \ref{mat3} shows an example of product of homological matrix in
699: $\hg(d,e)$ with a homological matrix $\hg(c,d).$
700: \begin{figure}[ht]
701: \begin{center}
702: \includegraphics[angle=90, height=2.7cm]{matana2.eps} \caption{ \
703: Homological analog of matrix products \label{mat3}}
704: \end{center}
705: \end{figure}
706:
707: \begin{thm}
708: {\em $\des\bigoplus_{i \in [n]}\Ho(c(i)),$ where $\Ho(c(i))$ is shifted down by $\dim(c(i)),$
709: is a representation of $\hg(c,c)$.}
710: \end{thm}
711: \begin{proof}
712: Let $A\in \des \bigoplus_{i,j\in [n]} \Ho (\ma(I,M)_{c(i),c(j)})$
713: and $e\in \des\bigotimes_{i \in[n]} \Ho (c(i))$ then we set
714: $(Ae)_{i}=\des\sum_{j\in[n]} A_{ij}\circ e_{j},$ where $A_{i,j}\in
715: \hg(c(j),c(i))$ and $e_{j}\in \Ho(c(j))$ and the composition maps
716: \[\circ \colon \Ho
717: (\ma(I,M)_{c(i),c(j)})\otimes\Ho(c(j))\to \Ho(c(i))\] are define
718: as in Theorem \ref{t6}.
719: \end{proof}
720:
721: {\noindent}In \cite{RE1} the $m$-symmetric power $\Si^{m}\al$ of
722: an algebra $\al$ is defined as follows: as a vector space
723: $\Si^{m}\al=(\al^{\otimes m})_{S_{m}},$ ($S_{m}$-coinvariants.)
724: The product in $\Si^{m}\al$ is that as if $\overline{a_{1}\otimes
725: \cdots \otimes a_{m}}\in\Si^{m}\al$ and $\overline{b_{1}\otimes
726: \cdots \otimes b_{m}}\in\Si^{m}\al$ then
727: \[(\overline{a_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes
728: a_{m}}) \cdot (\overline{b_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes b_{m}})=
729: \frac{1}{m !} \des\sum_{\sigma \in S_{m}}
730: {\rm
731: sgn}(a,b,\sigma)\overline{(a_{1}b_{\sigma^{-1}(1)})\otimes \cdots
732: \otimes (a_{m}b_{\sigma^{-1}(m)})}\] where ${\rm
733: sgn}(a,b,\sigma)=(-1)^{e}$ and $e=e(a,b,\sigma)= \sum_{i>j}|a_{i}
734: b_{\sigma^{-1}(j)}| + \sum_{\sigma(i)>\sigma(j)}|b_{i} b{_j}|.$
735:
736:
737: {\noindent}As shown in \cite{RE1} if $\al$ is the algebra
738: $\en(\R^{p\mid q})$ of supermatrices of dimension $(p\mid q)\times
739: (p\mid q)$ then $\Si^{m}(\en)(\R^{p\mid q})$ is the Schur
740: superalgebra (see \cite{Gre}) which controls the polynomial
741: representations of $\en(\R^{p\mid q}).$ We proceed to define Schur
742: algebras in the homological context.
743:
744:
745: \begin{defi}
746: {\em For $c\colon [n]\to D(M)$ we set
747: $\Sc_{m}(c,c)=\Si^{m}(\hg(c,c)).$ }
748: \end{defi}
749:
750: {\noindent}Figure \ref{mat4} shows an element of $\Sc_{4}(c,c)=
751: \Si^{4}(\Ho(c,c)).$ Figure \ref{matt3} shows a product in
752: $\Sc_{2}(c,c).$
753: \begin{figure}[ht]
754: \begin{center}
755: \includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{matana4.eps} \caption{ \ Higher
756: dimensional analog of Schur algebras. \label{mat4}}
757: \end{center}
758: \end{figure}
759:
760: \begin{thm}
761: {\em If $V$ is a representation of $\Ho(c,c)$ then $\Si^{m}V$ is a
762: representation of
763: $\Sc_{m}(c,c)$.}
764: \end{thm}
765: \begin{proof}
766: $\overline{a_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes a_{m}}\in\Sc_{m}(c,c)$ and
767: $\overline{v_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes v_{m}}\in\Si^{m} V$ then
768: \[\overline{a_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes
769: a_{m}} \cdot \Big(\overline{v_{1}\otimes \cdots \otimes
770: v_{m}}\Big)= \frac{1}{m !} \des\sum_{\sigma \in S_{m}}
771: {\rm
772: sgn}(a,v,\sigma)\overline{a_{1}(v_{\sigma^{-1}(1)})\otimes \cdots
773: \otimes a_{m}(v_{\sigma^{-1}(m)})}\] where ${\rm
774: sgn}(a,v,\sigma)=(-1)^{e}$ and $e=e(a,v,\sigma)= \sum_{i>j}|a_{i}(
775: v_{\sigma^{-1}(j)})| + \sum_{\sigma(i)>\sigma(j)}|v_{i} v{_j}|.$
776: \end{proof}
777:
778:
779: For the rest of the paper we work with \emph{even} dimensional
780: homology groups. Also we assume that the map $c\colon [n]\to D(M)$
781: is such that $\dim{(c(i))}$ is even for all $i\in[n].$
782:
783:
784: \begin{thm}
785: {\em Let $c\colon [n]\to D(N)$ and $C=\des\bigsqcup_{i\in[n]}c(i).$ There is an algebra inclusion
786: $i\colon \Co_{1,r}^{M}(C,C)\to \Sc_{m}(c,c).$ Thus any representation
787: of $\Sc_{m}(c,c)$ induces a representation of $\Co_{1,r}^{M}(C,C)$.}
788: \end{thm}
789: \begin{proof}
790: Al element of $\Co_{1,r}^{M}(C,C)$ is a sequence
791: $a=(a_{i})_{i=1}^{n}$ where $a_{i}\in \Ho(\ma(I,
792: M)_{c(i),c(\alpha(i))})$ for some $\alpha\colon [n]\to[n]$
793: biyective. The map $i$ is such that $i(a)=\overline{a_{1}\otimes
794: \cdots a_{m}}.$
795: \end{proof}
796:
797: \begin{cor}
798: {\em $\Si^{m}(\des \bigoplus_{i=1}^{n}\Ho(c(i)))$ is a
799: representation of $\Co_{1,r}^{M}(C,C).$ }
800: \end{cor}
801:
802:
803:
804: \begin{figure}[ht]
805: \begin{center}
806: \includegraphics[height=3.6cm]{matpro.eps} \caption{ \ Example of a product in
807: $\Si^{2}(\hg(1,1)).$ \label{matt3}}
808: \end{center}
809: \end{figure}
810:
811:
812: \vspace{0.3cm}
813: \subsection*{Acknowledgment} We thank Delia Flores de Chela, Raymundo Popper, Eddy Pariguan, Sylvie
814: Paycha and Bernardo Uribe.
815:
816:
817: \bibliographystyle{amsalpha}
818: \begin{thebibliography}{A}
819:
820: \bibitem{MA} M. F. Atiyah, \textit{Topological quantum
821: field theory} I, Ann. Inst. Fourier
822: (Grenoble) Publications math\'ematiques de
823: l'Institut des Hautes \'Etudes Scientifiques, 17 (4), 1982, 661-692.
824:
825: \bibitem{Cas} E. Castillo and R. D\'{\i}az,
826: \textit{Homological quantum field theory }, math.KT/0509532.
827:
828: \bibitem{SCh} M. Chas and D. Sullivan,\textit{String
829: Topology}, Math.GT/9911159.
830:
831: \bibitem{CJ} R. L.Cohen, and J. D. S. Jones, \textit{A
832: homotopy theoretic realization of string topology}, Math. Ann.
833: \textbf{324 (4)}, 2002, 773-798.
834:
835: \bibitem{RE1} R. D\'iaz and E. Pariguan. \textit{Quantum symmetric
836: functions}. Communications in Algebra. Vol 33, Issue 6, 2005,
837: 1947-1978.
838:
839: \bibitem{RE} R. Diaz, and E. Pariguan, \textit{Graphical introduction to classical
840: Lie algebras}, math.RT/0504602. To appear in Boletin de la Asociacion
841: Matem\'atica Venezolana.
842:
843: \bibitem{Gre} J.~A. Green, \emph{Polynomial representations of
844: {$GL_{n}$}}, no. 830, Lecture
845: notes in mathematics. Springer-Velarg, New York, 1980.
846:
847: \bibitem{Kar} M. Karoubi, \textit{Cochaines quasi-commutatives en topologie algebrique},
848: http://arxiv.org/ftp/math/papers/0509/0509268.pdf.
849:
850:
851: \bibitem{KM} I. Kriz and J. P. May, \textit{Operads,
852: Algebras, Modules, and Motives}, \textbf{233},
853: Ast\'erisque, 1995.
854:
855: \bibitem{Mel} R. Melrose, \textit{Differential
856: analysis on manifolds with corners},
857: http://www-math.mit.edu/~rbm/book.html.
858:
859: \bibitem{Se}G. B. Segal, \textit{The definition
860: of conformal field theory}, 1988.
861:
862: \bibitem{S} D. Sullivan,\textit{Open and Closed String field theory interpreted
863: in classical Algebraic Topology}, Topology, Geometry and Quantum
864: Field Theory. London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes vol. \textbf{308},
865: (2004), 344-357.
866:
867: \bibitem{RT} R. Thom, \textit{Sur les vari\'et\'es
868: cobordantes.}, Colloque de topologie et g\'eom\'etrie
869: diff\'erentielle, Strasbourg, 7, 1952, La Biblioth�ue Nationale
870: et Universitaire de Strasbourg.
871:
872: \bibitem{TU1} V.
873: Turaev, \textit{Homotopy field theory in dimension {2} and
874: group-algebras}, QA/9910010.
875:
876:
877: \end{thebibliography}
878:
879:
880:
881: \end{document}
882:
883: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
884: % End of article.tex
885: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
886: