1: \def\G1915{GRS $1915$+$105$}
2: \def\X1550{XTE J$1550$--$564$}
3: \def\J1655{GRO J$1655$--$40$}
4: \def\GX{GX $339$--$4$}
5: \def\eg{{\it e.g.} }
6: \def\etal{et al. }
7: \def\ie{{\em i.e. } }
8: \def\ergcms{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ }
9: \documentclass[]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
12: \usepackage{epsfig}
13: \usepackage{epsf}
14: \usepackage{color}
15: \definecolor{red}{rgb}{0.7,0,0}
16: \definecolor{blue}{rgb}{0,0,0.7}
17: \def\correc#1{{\bf\textcolor{red}{#1}}}
18:
19:
20: \shorttitle{LFQPO Spectra of \G1915}
21: \shortauthors{Rodriguez \etal}
22: %\received{}
23: \begin{document}
24: \title{Spectral Properties of Low Frequency Quasi-Periodic
25: Oscillations in GRS~1915+105}
26:
27:
28: \author{J. Rodriguez\altaffilmark{1,2}, S. Corbel\altaffilmark{3,1}, D.C Hannikainen\altaffilmark{4}, T. Belloni\altaffilmark{5}, A. Paizis\altaffilmark{2}, O. Vilhu\altaffilmark{4}}
29:
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique (CNRS FRE 2591), CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{ISDC, Chemin d'Ecogia, 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland}
33: \altaffiltext{3}{Universit\'e Paris 7 Denis Diderot, 2 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France}
34: \altaffiltext{4}{Observatory, PO Box 14, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland}
35: \altaffiltext{5}{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera via E. Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy}
36:
37:
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We report on the timing analysis of {\emph{RXTE}} observations
41: of the Galactic micro-quasar \G1915 performed in 2003.
42: Out of a total of six times $\sim 20$~ks, we focus here
43: only on the three observations during which \G1915 is found in
44: a steady C-state (referred to as class $\chi$) resulting
45: in a total of $\sim 50$~ks. During these observations, we detect
46: low frequency quasi-periodic oscillations
47: with high ($\sim 14\%$) rms amplitude in the 2--40
48: keV energy range. Contrary to what is usually observed in GRS~1915+105, in most
49: of our observations the QPO frequency present no correlation with the {\emph{RXTE/PCA}}
50: count rate, nor with the {\emph{RXTE/ASM}} count rate. We present, for the first time,
51: high resolution (22 spectral channels)
52: 2-40 keV spectral fits of the energy dependence of the QPO amplitude (``QPO spectra'').
53: The QPO spectra are well modeled with a cut-off power law except on one occasion
54: where a single power law gives a satisfactory fit (with no cut-off at least up to $\sim 40$ keV).
55: The cut-off energy evolves significantly from one observation to the other, from a value
56: of $\sim21.8$ keV to $\sim30$ keV in the other observations where it is detected.
57: We discuss the possible origin of this behavior and suggest that the compact jet
58: detected in the radio contributes to the hard X-ray ($\geq 20$ keV) mostly through synchrotron
59: emission, whereas the X-ray emitted below 20 keV would originate through inverse Compton scattering.
60: The dependence of the QPO amplitude on the energy can be understood if the modulation of
61: the X-ray flux is contained in the Comptonized photons and not in the synchrotron ones.
62: \end{abstract}
63: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- black hole physics --- stars: individual (GRS~1915+105) --- X-rays: stars}
64:
65:
66: %\keywords{accretion -- black hole physics -- stars: individual (\X1550) --
67: %X-rays: stars}
68:
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71: \G1915 was discovered by the {\emph{WATCH}} instrument on-board
72: {\emph{GRANAT}}
73: in 1992 (Castro-Tirado et al. 1992). It is the first
74: Galactic source observed to have apparent superluminal
75: motion in radio (Mirabel \& Rodr{\'\i}guez, 1994),
76: corresponding to the ejection of plasma at a speed of
77: $\sim 92-98\%$ of the speed of light. It distance is
78: estimated to $9\pm3$ kpc (Chapuis \& Corbel 2004), and the mass of the
79: compact object
80: in \G1915 is estimated to be 14.0 $\pm 4.4$ M$_{\odot}$
81: (Harlaftis \& Greiner 2004).\\
82: \indent Systematic monitoring in the X-rays (mainly with
83: the {\emph{Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, RXTE}}), revealed a rich
84: pattern of variability on all time scales.
85: \G1915 is a source of Low and High Frequency QPOs (LFQPO,
86: HFQPO, Morgan, Remillard \& Greiner 1997), whose properties
87: (frequency, rms amplitude) are tightly correlated to the
88: spectral parameters (Morgan et al. 1997,
89: Muno et al. 1999, Markwardt et al.
90: 1999, Rodriguez et al. 2002a,b, Vignarca et al. 2002).
91: When analyzing data of black hole binaries, the frequency of LFQPOs
92: have been shown to be best correlated with
93: the slope of the high energy tail of the energy spectra
94: (Vignarca et al. 2002). It should be noted that the
95: LFQPO frequency is usually correlated with the soft X-ray flux, thought
96: to originate from the accretion disk.\\
97: \indent Belloni et al. (2000, hereafter B00) analyzing 163
98: {\emph{RXTE}} observations, have shown that,
99: though complex, the behavior of \G1915 could be understood
100: as spectral transitions between 3 basic states A, B, C.
101: They identified 12 recurrent classes of variability
102: on a timescale of $\sim$ 3000 s. \G1915 spends most of the time
103: in the so-called $\chi$ class of variability that corresponds to a
104: steady state in the X-rays, lying in a rather hard part
105: of the color-color diagram (state C or hard
106: state).
107: Based on the X-ray (spectral end temporal) and radio
108: properties of \G1915, 4 subclasses ($\chi_1$, $\chi_2$,
109: $\chi_3$, $\chi_4$) can be distinguished.
110: Two of them have a high level of radio emission with a flat
111: spectrum, LFQPOs, and a high energy tail (B00,
112: Trudolyubov 2001, Muno et al. 2001, Klein-Wolt et al.
113: 2002).\\
114: \indent We monitored \G1915 with the {\emph{INTErnational
115: Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL)}} during its
116: first AO, for a total of 6$\times$100 ks (Hannikainen et
117: al. 2003, 2004), and obtained 120 ks divided in 6 sequences of
118: simultaneous observations with {\emph{RXTE}}.
119: One of our {\emph{RXTE}} observations was planned during an {\emph{INTEGRAL}}
120: target of opportunity on \G1915, and allowed a wide band
121: simultaneous spectral and temporal coverage to be
122: performed (Fuchs et al. 2003, hereafter F03). The global analysis of the
123: whole campaign is dedicated to a future publication. Here we
124: focus on the timing analysis of the 3 steady
125: C-state {\emph{RXTE}} observations. The data reduction methods are
126: described in Sec. 2, while the results are presented in Sec. 3
127: and discussed in Sec. 4
128:
129: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
130: The log of the observations analyzed in this paper can
131: be found in Table \ref{tab:log}. Each observation
132: covers several satellite orbits.
133: The analysis was first performed on each single revolution,
134: and when no noticeable (spectral or temporal) evolution
135: was found, the different orbits were further averaged to
136: increase the statistics.
137: %here table1
138:
139: We extracted light curves from the
140: {\emph{Proportional Counter Array (PCA)}} following the standard
141: way described in the Cook Book and ABC of {\emph{RXTE}}, with the
142: {\emph{LHEASOFT V5.3}} package.
143: Good time intervals (gti) are defined as follows:
144: satellite elevation over the Earth limb $>10^{\circ}$,
145: offset pointing $<0.02^{\circ}$, and PCU 0 and 2 turned
146: on. Light curves were extracted from Binned and Event data.
147: We first accumulated a broad band 2--40~keV (absolute channels 0-94,
148: epoch 5) light curve with the highest time resolution allowed by
149: the (Binned) data format ($\sim 4$~ms). We then extracted light curves
150: in small energy bins, with the highest spectral resolution
151: allowed by the (Binned) data (16 energy bins from 2 to 14.8 keV), and over
152: 7 additional spectral bins for the Event data (from 15 to $\sim$40~keV).
153: Power density spectra (PDS) were produced using
154: {\itshape{Powspec V1.0}}, and corrected for white noise.
155: In the case of the 2--40 keV light curves, PDS were produced on
156: interval length of 64~s between
157: 15.625~mHz and 64~Hz. All intervals were averaged together.
158: The energy dependent PDSs were produced on interval of 160~s length,
159: between 6.25~mHz and 12.8~Hz. Fig. \ref{fig:pds} shows, as an example,
160: the PDS's extracted in three energy bands, for Obs.1
161: We extracted background light curves in all these energy ranges,
162: and used their count rate to obtain the true
163: rms amplitude following Berger and van der Klis (1994). In addition,
164: to check for short term evolution of the QPO frequency, we produced dynamical
165: power spectra with $\sim 16$~s resolution between absolute channels 0-35
166: ($\sim2-14.8$~keV). \\
167:
168: \section{Results}
169: The preliminary spectral analysis (in a multi-wavelength context)
170: of the first observation is presented in F03.
171: The 8 other sequences presented here show similar steady light
172: curves (see Hannikainen et al. 2004, hereafter H04, for details on the
173: {\emph{INTEGRAL/RXTE}} campaign). The {\emph{RXTE/ASM}} light curve, showing
174: the dates of our pointed {\emph{INTEGRAL/RXTE}} observations is represented in
175: Fig. {\ref{fig:asm}}. While the long term evolution shows a slow decay, a double flare
176: occurs between Obs.~1 and Obs.~2-7. This X-ray flare is associated with a radio flare
177: (F03), probably indicative of a discrete ejection.
178: We identify the class of variability of our observations as class $\chi$ of B00.
179: The high level of radio
180: emission detected during each of these observations (F03, H04) allows us to further
181: classify the observations as class $\chi_1-\chi_3$ also known as
182: the radio loud hard state (Muno et al. 2001) or type II hard state (Trudolyubov 2001).
183: It should be noted, however, such a long term decay with the source mostly in class $\chi$
184: is rather peculiar, and had never been seen previously.
185: A preliminary spectral analysis (F03; H04) shows that the common model
186: of black hole X-ray binaries, i.e. a multicolor disk black body and
187: a power-law, represents the data well. As mentioned for such classes
188: (Muno et al. 2001), however, the disk temperature returned from the fit
189: is too high (3-4 keV), and the inner radius far too small. Alternative models
190: of broken power-law or broken power-law plus
191: disk component fit the data well and lead to parameters closer to what
192: is seen in other systems (H04). We also successfully fitted the {\emph{RXTE/PCA}} 3-25 keV
193: spectra with a cut off power-law with a high energy cut-off of about 20-25 keV
194: (Rodriguez et al. 2004, Fig \ref{fig:spec}). When adding higher energy spectra,
195: such as those extracted with {\emph{RXTE/HEXTE}}, a large deviation to the spectrum is
196: seen at high energy, indicating the need of an additional spectral component to the model,
197: e.g. an extra power law (Zdziarski et al. 2001; Hannikainen et al. in prep.).
198: This is illustrated in
199: Fig. \ref{fig:spec} (left panel) with the particular example of Obs. 1\footnote{Note
200: that the details of the RXTE and INTEGRAL spectral analysis will
201: be given in a forthcoming paper, dedicated to the spectral analysis of the whole campaign.
202: However, the RXTE (PCA, and HEXTE) spectra have been extracted in the same way as in, e.g.,
203: Rodriguez et al. 2003.}. Furthermore, Rodriguez et al. (2004) have shown that the 20-400 keV
204: combined {\emph{RXTE/HEXTE}} and {\emph{INTEGRAL/IBIS}} and {\emph{SPI}} spectra could be
205: fitted with a power law of photon index $\sim 3.5$. Note that similar results were found from the
206: OSSE spectral analysis of Zdziarski et al. (2001).
207:
208: % Here Fig.1
209: For all sequences, the 2--40~keV PDS were fitted between $\sim$15~mHz
210: and 10~Hz with a sum of 2 or 3 Lorentzians (depending on the energy range),
211: to account for the wide band variability (Belloni, Psaltis \& van der Klis 2002).
212: A strong LFQPO is detected in all the
213: PDSs, and is modeled with an additional Lorentzian (harmonics are also detected,
214: especially during intervals with the longest exposures). A first analysis of Obs. 8
215: showed a rather broad QPO, with parameters poorly constrained.
216: As the dynamical power spectrum showed two distinct features, we separated this
217: observation in sub-intervals
218: and averaged those showing the QPO at the same frequency. This resulted in two
219: distinct sets of data, for which we identified two different QPOs.
220: The LFQPO parameters are reported in Table \ref{tab:qpos}. \\
221: %here fig.2
222: \indent At first glance, there is apparently no obvious correlation between the
223: QPO frequency and the PCA 2--60 keV count rate (Tables \ref{tab:log} \&
224: \ref{tab:qpos}). To further verify this, we fitted each of the $\sim2-15$~keV 16~s PDS
225: used to construct our dynamical power spectra with a Lorentzian around the average QPO frequency
226: (Table \ref{tab:qpos}), and could therefore obtain the variations of the QPO frequency
227: with a time resolution of 16~s. No correlation is found between the QPO frequency and
228: the PCA $2-15$~keV count rate from Obs. 1 through 7, whereas we do find
229: a correlation in Obs. 8.\\
230: \indent We further averaged sequences showing the QPO at a similar
231: frequency (Obs. 7, showing the QPO at 1.06 Hz is averaged with Obs. 2
232: and Obs. 4, whereas Obs. 3, 5 and 6 are averaged together), and produced PDS in
233: the 22 energy bins described in Sec. 2.
234: These energy dependent PDSs were fitted
235: between 6.25~mHz and 10~Hz. The energy dependences of the amplitude
236: of the four distinct features are reported in Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec}.\\
237: %here fig2
238: \indent A clear difference in the shape of the energy dependence of the amplitude
239: of the QPO appears in Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec}. A clear turn-over in the amplitude
240: vs. energy relation is visible for the $\sim2.48$~Hz QPO
241: detected on MJD 52731, and another one is visible for the $\sim1.09$~Hz QPO
242: from the observation of MJDs 52738-52739, although it is not as clear as for the first
243: QPO. For the three other features we do not see any clear turn-over
244: (Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec}), although a flattening is obvious at energies above 10 keV.
245: This may suggest that the turn-over energy evolves from one observation to the other,
246: and is above the upper energy limit of our QPO ''spectra''. To further test this hypothesis,
247: we fitted the QPO spectra in {\emph{XSPEC V11.3.0}}. For all QPOs but the 1.04 Hz one, the
248: spectra are well fitted by a cut-off power-law ({\rm{cutoffpl}} in {\emph{XSPEC}}). The fit
249: parameters are reported in Table \ref{tab:fit}, while the right panel of Fig.
250: \ref{fig:spec} shows the QPO spectrum of Obs. 1 with the best fit model superimposed.
251: It should be added here that a single power law
252: gives a rather good representation of the 1.878~Hz QPO detected in Obs. 8, with a
253: reduced chi square of 1.89 (20 dof). A cut-off power law model improve the fit (Table
254: \ref{tab:fit}), although the cut-off energy is poorly constrained (4.7-$\sigma$ significance
255: on this parameter). It is interesting to note that the break energy seems anti-correlated with
256: the QPO frequency, i.e. the lowest break energy is observed for the highest QPO frequency
257: (Table \ref{tab:fit}). Caution has to be expressed, however, since the statistical uncertainties
258: on the break energies does not allow us to draw firm conclusion.
259:
260: %here table3
261:
262:
263: \section{Discussion}
264: The presence of LFQPO in GRS~1915+105 during class $\chi$ (as well as during other
265: classes) is a known fact (e.g. Muno et al. 1999, Rodriguez et al. 2002a,b).
266: It is also known that QPO parameters depend
267: on spectral parameters in black hole binaries (BHB) in general.
268: Here we present observations taken during the same state, with
269: few differences between the spectral parameters returned from the spectral fits.
270: The parameters of the QPO change dramatically from one observation to another.
271: Except in Obs. 8, the frequency of the QPO does not seem to correlate to the {\emph{PCA}}
272: 2--15 keV flux or the {\emph{ASM}} 1.2--12 keV flux either (although the highest frequency
273: is observed when the {\emph{ASM}} flux is the highest, Fig. \ref{fig:asm}, and Table \ref{tab:qpos}),
274: contrary to what is usually claimed/observed. This could indicate some definite
275: peculiarities in Obs. 1-7 that are taken just before and after the X-ray/radio flare
276: (Fig. \ref{fig:asm}, F03). On the other hand, Obs. 8 occurs later, after GRS~1915+105
277: apparently went off the linear decay phase, after the {\emph{ASM}} light curve
278: showed some variability again.\\
279: \indent The most striking behavior appears when studying the energy dependence
280: of the QPO amplitude. It is expected and a known fact that it presents
281: a turn-over at some point (e.g. Tomsick \& Kaaret 2001, Rodriguez et al. 2002a).
282: We report here, for the first time, a clear evolution of the turn-over energy
283: between states that are spectrally similar, and have similar {\emph{PCA}} fluxes. This ``cut-off''
284: energy has an origin that is unclear. It could represent, for example, some specific
285: temperature at which the QPO is produced, either through oscillations of a shocked
286: boundary layer between the accretion disk, and a hot inner flow (e.g. Chakrabarti
287: \& Titarchuk 1995), or by a hot spot orbiting at some specific radius in the disk
288: (e.g. Rodriguez et al. 2002a; Tagger et al. 2004). In these two cases, however,
289: we would expect the frequency of the QPO to scale with the inner radius
290: of the accretion disk, and thus the soft X-ray flux (Molteni, Sponholz \&
291: Chakrabarti 1996; Tagger \& Pellat 1999), unless the soft X-rays are not uniquely produced
292: by the accretion disk, but by another physical medium, as e.g. a
293: compact jet (see Markoff \& Nowak 2004).
294: The variations of the soft X-rays flux could be due to variations of the compact jet flux
295: (with a steady thermal flux from the accretion disk), as we discuss below. \\
296: \indent The spectral approach presented in H04, and
297: Rodriguez et al. (2004), the systematic analysis of type II states
298: (Trudolyubov 2001), and the detection of a hard tail up to (at least)
299: 600 keV with OSSE (Zdziarski et al. 2001) raise the challenging question of the origin of the
300: third spectral component needed to fit the high energy spectra well. Models
301: of jet emission (e.g. Markoff et al. 2003, Markoff \& Nowak 2004)
302: propose a jet model in which the X-ray spectrum of an XRB would represent the sum of
303: thermal emission from the accretion disk, direct synchrotron from the jet,
304: inverse Comptonization (either through synchrotron self-Compton from the jet, or
305: Comptonization on the basis of the jet, the ``corona''), reflection of these radiations on
306: the accretion disk. It should be noted
307: This proposition has found an echo with
308: the radio flux/X-ray flux correlation found in several BHBs when in the
309: low hard state (when the compact jet is present, e.g. Corbel et al. 2003, Gallo et al. 2003),
310: but also in the case of radio loud AGN (e.g. Merloni, Heinz \& di Matteo, 2003;
311: Falcke, K\"ording \& Markoff, 2004).
312: Our RXTE observation of MJD 52731 occurred at a time when the radio flux
313: was high and indicative of the presence of the compact jet (F03).
314: The level of radio emission as measured by the Ryle telescope at 15~GHz is about
315: 130-150 mJy during this observation, with a spectrum extending up to the near
316: infra-red range (F03). Unfortunately we do not have such a nice
317: coverage for the following observations, but the observation of MJDs 52738-52739
318: indicates a
319: level of 15 GHz emission higher ($\sim 250$~mJy, F03), that is
320: dropping rapidly. We remark that this observation occurred just after a radio flare
321: indicative of a discrete ejection. It is thus very likely that the radio emission
322: this day partly originates from the discrete ejection (with a different spectrum).
323: During the last observation, the radio
324: flux is very low compared to the two previous dates, with a level dropping from
325: 107 mJy on MJD 52767 to 44 mJy on MJD 52769 (H04). Both our spectral analysis
326: (H04, Rodriguez et al. 2004) and the properties of the
327: QPOs (present work) can be understood easily, if the X-ray emission in GRS~1915+105 during
328: radio loud/type II/class $\chi_1-\chi_3$ observations originate (as proposed
329: by Markoff \& Nowak 2004) from two different physical processes (beside the thermal emission of the
330: accretion disk): Comptonization and synchrotron radiation. The high energy spectrum of a
331: source with a compact jet represents thus the sum of these different emission processes.
332: As a result the spectrum will therefore strongly depend on the relative contribution of each
333: of these emission processes.
334: The break in the energy spectrum could be representative of the energy at which the relative
335: contributions of these components cross each other. Above the break the
336: contribution of the synchrotron radiation would be the dominant process to the spectrum.
337: Then the higher the relative contribution of the
338: synchrotron component (to the overall spectrum) the lower the break energy is.
339: In this case, to understand the energy dependence
340: of the QPO amplitude, one has to assume that the QPO is contained in the Comptonized
341: flux, and not in the synchrotron flux. Then the position of the cut-off in the energy
342: dependence of the QPO amplitude would be linked to the synchrotron flux emitted by
343: the jet.
344: We find this interpretation at least qualitatively in good agreement with several
345: observational facts:
346: \begin{itemize}
347: \item the compact jet model has successfully been used in the fitting of
348: different BHBs (e.g. Markoff et al. 2001).
349: \item type II states show a 2--30 keV level of variability lower than that of
350: type I (radio quiet) states (Trudolyubov 2001).
351: \item a compact jet is detected during the observation showing the clear and well constrained
352: cut-off in the energy dependence of the QPO amplitude (Obs. 1, Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec})
353: \item a high level of radio emission is detected during the observation taken on MJDs
354: 52738-52739, a turn-over in the energy dependence of the $\sim 1.09$~Hz QPO is detected
355: (Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec}, Table \ref{tab:fit}, although it is absent in the spectrum of
356: the $\sim1.04$~Hz QPO), while for the last observation (MJD 52768)
357: the radio flux is much lower, a single power law can fit the first QPO spectrum, and
358: the turn over is poorly constrained (Fig. \ref{fig:qpospec}, Table \ref{tab:fit}).
359: \end{itemize}
360: We should add that the Optical/UV/X-ray variability (and presence of LFQPO
361: in those bands) seen in XTE J1118+480 (Hynes et al. 2003), a Black Hole X-ray transient in which the compact jet model
362: has been shown to fit the broad band spectra well (Markoff et al. 2001), is also
363: compatible with our interpretation. Hynes et al. (2003) pointed out that the
364: variability could not originate from the disk itself, but involved another non-thermal
365: source of photons.\\
366: \indent The lack of complete simultaneity, between the radio and X-ray observations,
367: prevents
368: us from drawing any firmer conclusions. In addition, a cut-off in the spectrum of the
369: compact jet is expected in the near infra-red domain. Knowing its exact position
370: would allow us to estimate the flux expected from the jet in the hard
371: X-rays accurately, and thus test our hypothesis. We hope to obtain such simultaneous
372: coverages in the near future, with {\emph{INTEGRAL}}, {\emph{RXTE}} for the high energies, but also
373: the Ryle telescope and the VLA, in the radio domain, and {\emph{Spitzer}},
374: and ground based telescopes in the infra red domain.
375:
376: \begin{acknowledgements}
377: The authors would like to thank G. Henri for useful discussions and G. Pooley
378: for kindly providing the Ryle data to our group. J.R. acknowledges financial support
379: from the French Space Agency (CNES). DCH acknowledges the Finnish Academy.
380: \end{acknowledgements}
381: \begin{thebibliography}{}
382: \bibitem{tomaso00} Belloni T., Klein-Wolt M., M\'endez M., et al. 2000, A\&A, 355, 271, {\bf{B00}}.
383: \bibitem{tomaso02} Belloni T., Psaltis D., van der Klis M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 392.
384: \bibitem{ber94} Berger M. \& van der Klis M., 1994, A\&A, 292, 175.
385: \bibitem{castro92} Castro-Tirado A.J., Brandt S., Lund N. 1992, IAUC 5590.
386: \bibitem{claude04} Chapuis C. \& Corbel S. 2004, A\&A, 414, 659.
387: \bibitem{Chakrabarti95} Chakrabarti S.K., Titarchuk L. G., 1995, ApJ, 455, 623.
388: \bibitem{stephane03} Corbel S., Nowak M., Fender R.P., Tzioumis A. K., Markoff S. 2003, A\&A, 400, 1007.
389: \bibitem{fal03} Falcke H., K\"ording E., Markoff S., 2004, A\&A, in press, astro-ph/0305335
390: \bibitem{yael1} Fuchs Y., Rodriguez J., Mirabel I.F., et al. 2003, A\&A, 409, L35, {\bf{F03}}.
391: \bibitem{gallo03} Gallo E., Fender R.P., Pooley G.G. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 60.
392: \bibitem{diana1} Hannikainen D.C., Vilhu O., Rodriguez J., et al. 2003, A\&A 411, L415.
393: \bibitem{diana2} Hannikainen D.C., Vilhu O., Rodriguez J., et al. 2004, Proceedings of the 5$^{th}$ INTEGRAL workshop, {\bf{H04}}.
394: \bibitem{harlaftis04} Harlaftis E. T.\& Greiner J. 2004, A\&A, 414, L13.
395: \bibitem{hyn03}Hynes R. I., Haswell C. A., Cui W., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 292
396: \bibitem{klein02} Klein-Wolt M., Fender R.P. Pooley G.G. et al. 2001, MNRAS, 331, 745.
397: \bibitem{markoff01} Markoff S., Falcke H., Fender R.P. 2001, A\&A, 372, L25.
398: \bibitem{markoff03} Markoff S., Nowak M., Corbel S., Fender R., Falcke H. 2003, A\&A, 397, 645.
399: \bibitem{Markoff04} Markoff S. \& Nowak M. 2004, ApJ in press, astro-ph 0403468.
400: \bibitem{Markwardt99} Markwardt C.B., Swank J.H., Taam R.E., 1999, ApJ, 513, 37.
401: \bibitem{mer03}Merloni A., Heinz S., di Matteo T., 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057
402: \bibitem{Mirabel94} Mirabel I.F., Rodr{\`{\i}}guez L.F. 1994, Nature, 371, 46.
403: \bibitem{Molteni96} Molteni D., Sponholz H., Chakrabarti S.K., 1996, ApJ, 457,
404: 805.
405: \bibitem{Morgan97} Morgan E.H., Remillard R.A., Greiner J. 1997, ApJ, 482, 993.
406: \bibitem{MMR99} Muno M. P., Morgan E. H., and Remillard R. A. 1999, ApJ, 527, 321.
407: \bibitem{muno01} Muno M.P., Remillard, R.A., Morgan, E.H., et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 515.
408: \bibitem{Rodriguez02b} Rodriguez J., Durouchoux P., Mirabel F., Ueda Y., Tagger M., Yamaoka K. 2002a, A\&A, 386, 271.
409: \bibitem{Rodriguez02} Rodriguez J., Varni\`ere P., Tagger M., Durouchoux P. 2002b, A\&A 387, 487.
410: \bibitem{rodriguez03} Rodriguez J., Corbel S., Tomsick J.A. 2003, ApJ 595, 1032.
411: \bibitem{Rodriguez04} Rodriguez J., Fuchs Y., Hannikainen et al. 2004, Proceedings of the 5$^ {th}$ INTEGRAL workshop, astro-ph 0403030.
412: \bibitem{tagger99} Tagger M. \& Pellat R. , 1999, A\& A, 349, 1003.
413: \bibitem{tagger04} Tagger M. Varni\`ere P., Rodriguez J., Pellat R., 2004, ApJ, in press, astro-ph 0401539.
414: \bibitem{tom01a} Tomsick J.A., Kaaret P., 2001, ApJ, 548, 401.
415: \bibitem{trudo01} Trudolyubov S. 2001, ApJ, 558, 276
416: \bibitem{vign} Vignarca F., Migliari S., Belloni T., Psaltis D., van der Klis M. 2003, A\&A, 397, 729.
417: \bibitem{zdziarski01} Zdziarski A.A., Grove E.J., Poutanen J., Rao A.R., Vadawale S.V. 2001, ApJ, 554, L45.
418: \end{thebibliography}
419:
420: \clearpage
421: \begin{table}
422: \centering
423: \caption{Log of the RXTE observations used in the present analysis. The first of these observations was performed simultaneously with the
424: multi-wavelength campaign discussed in Fuchs et al. (2003). Observations are time ordered. $^\star$
425: cts/s in the top layer of PCU \#2, both anodes.}
426: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
427: \hline
428: Observation \# & Obs. Date & Obs. Id. & Good Time & Number of & Net Count Rate \\
429: & (MJD) & (P80127-)& (s) & PCU & /PCU$^\star$\\
430: \hline
431: 1 & 52731& 01-03-00 & 9,300 s & 4 & 1737.5 cts/s\\
432: 2 & 52738 & 02-01-00 & 5,400 s & 3 & 1700.8 cts/s\\
433: 3 & 52739 & 02-02-02 & 1,800 s & 3 & 1675.8 cts/s\\
434: 4 & & 02-02-01 & 1,800 s & 4 & 1666.9 cts/s\\
435: 5 & & 02-02-00 & 2,060 s & 3 & 1660.4 cts/s\\
436: 6 & & 02-03-00 & 11,100 s & 3-4 & 1674.7 cts/s\\
437: 7 & & 02-01-01 & 3,200 s & 3 & 1677.0 cts/s\\
438: 8 & 52768 & 03-01-00 & 14,000 & 3-4 & 1460.2 cts/s \\
439:
440: \hline
441: \end{tabular}
442: \label{tab:log}
443: \end{table}
444:
445: \begin{table}
446: \caption{Parameters of the LFQPO detected in each of
447: the 8 sequences. $^\star$
448: $Q=\frac{\mathrm{Centroid frequency}}{FWHM}$}
449: \centering
450: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
451: \hline
452: Obs. sequence & QPO frequency & Q$^\star$ & rms amplitude\\
453: & (Hz) & & \% \\
454: \hline
455: 1 &2.498$\pm 0.005$ & 5.0 & 12.6$\pm0.3$ \\
456: 2 &1.040$\pm0.004$ & 3.8 & 13.5 $\pm0.6$\\
457: 3 & 1.081$\pm0.004$ & 7.2 & 13.2$^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$\\
458: 4 & 1.039$\pm0.004$ & 7.2 & 12.7 $^{+1.2}_{-1.3}$\\
459: 5 & 1.097$\pm0.005$ & 10.0 & 11.5$\pm1.0$ \\
460: 6 & 1.096$\pm0.002$ & 6.4 & 13.4$\pm0.4$ \\
461: 7 &1.060$\pm0.003$ & 6.4 & 13.0$\pm 0.9$\\
462: 8\_QPO1 & 1.878$_{-0.003}^{+0.005}$ & 6.8 & 12.9$\pm0.5$ \\
463: 8\_QPO2 &2.332$\pm0.005$ & 5.3 & 14.9$\pm0.5$\\
464: \hline
465: \end{tabular}
466: \label{tab:qpos}
467: \end{table}
468:
469: \begin{table}
470: \caption{Parameters of the fits to the energy dependence of the
471: QPO amplitude, also refer to as QPO spectra in the text. The errors are given at the
472: one-$\sigma$ level. $^\star$ No cut-off is detected in this observation at least up to $\sim40$ keV.}
473: \centering
474: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
475: \hline
476: QPO freq. & Power-law slope & Cut-off energy & reduced $\chi^2$ (dof)\\
477: (Hz) & ($\Gamma$) & (keV) & \\
478: \hline
479: 2.498 & $-0.77\pm0.04$ & $21.9_{-2.2}^{+2.7}$ & 1.0 (19) \\
480: 1.04 & $-0.26\pm 0.02$ & No cut-off$^\star$ & 0.92 (21)\\
481: 1.09 & $-0.59\pm 0.05$ & $29.5_{-3.9}^{+5.2}$ & 0.37 (20)\\
482: 1.878 & $-0.70\pm0.07$ & $25.6_{-4.4}^{+6.5}$ & 0.5 (19) \\
483: 2.332 & $-0.71\pm0.05$ & $26.7_{-3.3}^{+4.4}$ & 0.28 (20)\\
484: \hline
485: \end{tabular}
486: \label{tab:fit}
487: \end{table}
488:
489: \clearpage
490:
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: \plotone{f1.eps}
494: \caption{Example of PDS's extracted in three energy bands (1--3.7 keV, 8.2--9 keV, and 20.6-23.1 keV),
495: as described in the text. These PDS's are from Obs. 1. The $2.498$ Hz LFQPO is obvious in each
496: panel. The same vertical scale is used for each PDS and allows for a direct comparison of the
497: source behavior in those energy bands.}
498: \label{fig:pds}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501: \begin{figure}
502: \plotone{f2.eps}
503: \caption{RXTE/All Sky Monitor 1.2--12 keV light curve of GRS~1915+105. The vertical dashed lines show
504: the days our observations took place. The 1.2--12 keV $\sim$1 Crab flare is obvious here. A radio flare
505: is detected at the same time, with its maximum occurring 2 days later (F03).}
506: \label{fig:asm}
507: \end{figure}
508:
509: \begin{figure}
510: \plotone{f3.eps}
511: \caption{{\it Left panel}: PCA+HEXTE 3-150 keV $\nu-f_\nu$ spectra from Obs. 1. A model consisting
512: of an absorbed power law with a high energy cut-off of about 25 keV (plus a Gaussian at 6.4 keV) is
513: superimposed. The deviation to this model at high energy is obvious here. This likely reflects
514: the need of an additional component to account for the high energy emission from GRS 1915+105.
515: {\it Right panel}: Energy dependence of the QPO amplitude observed during the same observation.
516: The best fit model a power law with a high energy cut-off of $\sim 22$~keV is superimposed.}
517: \label{fig:spec}
518: \end{figure}
519:
520: \begin{figure}
521: \plotone{f4.eps}
522: \caption{Energy dependence of the LFQPO amplitude. The frequency (or mean frequency) of the feature
523: and the observation numbers are written in each panel.}
524: \label{fig:qpospec}
525: \end{figure}
526: \end{document}
527: