1: \documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{karticle}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \setlength{\topmargin}{0cm}
5: \setlength{\headheight}{0cm}
6: \setlength{\headsep}{0cm}
7: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.55cm}
8: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.55cm}
9: \setlength{\textwidth}{17cm}
10: \setlength{\textheight}{23.5cm}
11: \setlength{\parindent}{2.25ex}
12: %\setlength{\footskip}{1.7cm}
13: %\setlength{\footheight}{12pt}
14:
15:
16: \pagestyle{plain}
17: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\S\arabic{section}}
18: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
19: %%%%%% TEXT START %%%%%%
20:
21: \title
22: {
23: Generalized Amplitude Truncation of Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise}
24:
25: \author
26: {
27: Donghak {\sc Choi}
28: %\footnote{Present address: Department of Physics,
29: %Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-03.}
30: and Nobuko {\sc Fuchikami}
31: }
32:
33: %\inst
34: %{
35: %Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397\\
36: %$^1$Department of Information Science, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa 259-1293
37: %}
38:
39: \date
40: {(\today)
41: }
42:
43: %\kword
44: %{
45: %dripping faucet dynamics,
46: %%Leaky Faucet Dynamics,
47: %computer simulation,
48: %drop formation,
49: %stability of hanging drops,
50: %chaos, bifurcation
51: %}
52:
53: \begin{document}
54: \sloppy
55: \maketitle
56: \begin{center}
57: \textit{
58: Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University,
59: Minami-Ohsawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan }
60: \end{center}
61:
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: \setlength{\baselineskip}{15pt}
65: We study a kind of filtering,
66: an amplitude truncation with
67: upper and lower truncation levels $x_{\rm{max}}$ and
68: $x_{\rm{\min}}$. This is a generalization of
69: the simple transformation
70: $y(t)=\rm{sgn}[\it{x(t)}]$, for which a rigorous
71: result was obtained recently. So far numerical experiments
72: have shown that a power law spectrum $1/f^{\alpha}$ seems to be
73: transformed again into a power law spectrum $1/f^{\beta}$ under
74: rather general condition for the truncation levels.
75: We examine the above numerical results analytically.
76: When $1<\alpha<2$ and
77: $x_{\rm{max}}=-x_{\rm{min}}=a$,
78: the transformed spectrum is shown to be
79: characterized by
80: a certain corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$
81: which divides the spectrum into two parts with different exponents.
82: We derive $f_{\rm c}$ depending on $a$ as $f_{\rm c} \sim a^{-2/(\alpha-1)}$.
83: It turns out that the output signal should deviate
84: from the power law spectrum when the truncation is asymmetrical.
85: We present a numerical example such that
86: $1/f^2$ noise converges to $1/f$ noise
87: by applying the transformation $y(t)=\rm{sgn}[\it{x(t)}]$ repeatedly.
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: {\footnotesize
91: \hspace{0.3cm}\textsf{KEYWORDS:}~\textsf{1/f fluctuation, nonlinear transformation, filtering, power law}
92: }
93:
94: \newcommand{\lsim}{\begin{minipage}{12pt}
95: \vspace{0pt}$
96: \,\stackrel{\textstyle <}{\sim}$\end{minipage}}
97: \newcommand{\gsim}{\begin{minipage}{12pt}
98: %\newcommand{\quote}{ ` '}
99: %\newcommand{\dquote}{`` ''}
100: \vspace{0pt}$
101: \,\stackrel{\textstyle >}{\sim}$\end{minipage}}
102: \baselineskip 4.5mm
103:
104: \section{Introduction}
105: \setlength{\baselineskip}{17pt}
106: $1/f$ noise whose power spectrum is inversely proportional to
107: the frequency $f$ has been observed in a variety of systems,
108: since it was first discovered in current fluctuations of a vacuum
109: tube (see ref. 1 and references therein).
110: Sometimes $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise with the exponent $\alpha$ not close
111: to $1$ but between $0$ and $2$ is also referred to as
112: `$1/f$ noise'\cite{bak97,frieden94}.
113: When this extended definition is applied, `$1/f$ noise' is more
114: widely observed\cite{rf:mandel}.
115:
116: It should be noted that the integral $\int_0^{\infty}f^{-\alpha}df$
117: diverges for all $\alpha$. Therefore, if the process is stationary,
118: which is usually a reasonable assumption, a low or high frequency
119: cut off should exist corresponding to $\alpha \geq 1$ or
120: $0 \leq \alpha \leq1$, respectively. Or equivalently, the value of
121: $\alpha$ cannot be constant: $\alpha$ should become smaller
122: (larger) than unity in a low (high) frequency range.
123: The power law behavior involves several difficulties.
124: The autocorrelation function of $1/f^{\alpha}$
125: noise with $\alpha < 1$ decays very slowly (power law decay,
126: see eq. (\ref{eqn:incor1b}) and Fig. \ref{fig:1}(a))
127: especially when $\alpha$ is close to unity, unless there is another low
128: frequency cut off $f_0$ so that the spectrum becomes white ($\alpha=0$)
129: in a range $f\ll f_0$. It often happens that the cut off frequency
130: $f_0$ is extremely low or not observed during the practical observation
131: time.\cite{rf:mandel,musha90} One of the difficulties is
132: to explain a long time scale $\sim 1/f_0$
133: from any realistic model. Another problem is the value of the exponent which
134: largely deviates from $2$. The exponent $\alpha=2$ is most naturally
135: expected in nonstationary processes. Random walk in
136: $n$-dimensional space yields $1/f^2$ spectrum.
137: Also, a Lorentzian spectrum
138: $(f^2+f_0^2)^{-1}$ looks as $1/f^2$ when the observation time is not long
139: enough: $f\gg f_0$. Lorentzian spectrums are obtained from Debye-type
140: relaxation processes, which occur most commonly. A randomly amplified
141: Langevin system which has a power law distribution function also leads
142: to a Lorentzian spectrum,\cite{fuchi99}
143: even though the process is nonstationary so that
144: the Wiener-Khintchine theorem does not hold.
145: Then what mechanism could exist that would reduce the value of
146: $\alpha$ from $2$? The present work relates to this second problem.
147: We shall investigate, by generalizing a previous
148: theory\cite{ishioka00}, how Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise is affected by a
149: kind of filtering, an amplitude truncation.
150:
151: In the previous paper, a simple dichotomous transformation defined by
152: $y(t)=\rm{sgn}[\it{x(t)}]$
153: for Gaussian
154: $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise
155: was studied in detail and a rigorous
156: result for transformation properties
157: was obtained\cite{ishioka00}.
158: When a Gaussian noise $x(t)$ with a power law spectrum $1/f^{\alpha}$
159: is filtered by this transformation, power spectral density
160: (PSD) of the output noise $y(t)$ obeys
161: again a power law $1/f^{\beta}$.
162: The exponent $\beta$ is derived as $\beta=\alpha$ for
163: $0<\alpha\leq1$, and $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$ for $1\leq \alpha<2$.
164:
165: The present paper deals with a more general amplitude truncation
166: \begin{equation}
167: y(t)=\left\{
168: \begin{array}{ll}
169: x_{\rm{min}} &\mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) \leq x_{\rm{min}}\mbox{, } \\
170: x_{\rm{max}} &\mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) \geq x_{\rm{max}}\mbox{, } \\
171: x(t) & \mbox{ otherwise, }
172: % x(t) & \mbox{ if }\;\;\; x_{\rm{min}} < x(t) < x_{\rm{max}} \mbox{ , }
173: \end{array}
174: \right.
175: \label{eqn:truncation}
176: \end{equation}
177: for Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise.
178: %$1/f^{\alpha}$ noise $x(t)$.
179: The transformation $y(t)=\rm{sgn}[\it{x(t)}]$
180: is equivalent to the situation $x_{\rm{max}}=-x_{\rm{min}}\ll1$
181: in eq. (\ref{eqn:truncation}), namely, the dichotomous
182: transformation is a special case of
183: eq. (\ref{eqn:truncation}).
184: So far numerical experiments have shown\cite{gingl96,gingl99}
185: that a power law spectrum $1/f^{\alpha}$ seems to be
186: transformed again into a power law spectrum $1/f^{\beta}$ under
187: rather general condition for the truncation levels
188: $x_{\rm{min}}$ and $x_{\rm{max}}$.
189: However, the numerical results are not always clear, so that
190: we will investigate analytically the above amplitude truncation to
191: know how $\beta$ depends on the levels as well as $\alpha$
192: and when the output signal deviates from the power law spectrum.
193:
194: The rest of the present paper is organized as follows. In the next
195: section, we briefly review and reinterpret
196: the recent result for the dichotomous transformation.
197: In \S 3, we extend our study for the
198: symmetrical truncation with finite levels
199: : $x_{\rm{max}}=-x_{\rm{min}}=a$
200: in (\ref{eqn:truncation}).
201: We consider the asymmetrical truncation in \S 4.
202: It will be shown how PSD of the output signal deviates from the
203: power law.
204: In \S 5, we present a numerical example such that
205: $1/f^2$ noise converges to $1/f$ noise
206: by applying the dichotomous
207: transformation repeatedly.
208: The last section is devoted to summary and discussions.
209:
210: \section{Dichotomous Transformation}
211: \setcounter{equation}{0}
212: The dichotomous
213: transformation is defined by
214: \begin{eqnarray}
215: y(t)= \rm{ sgn }
216: [\mit x(t)]= \left\{
217: \begin{array}{ll}
218: -1 &\mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) \leq 0 \mbox{ , } \\
219: +1 &\mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) > 0 \mbox{ , } \\
220: \end{array}
221: \right.
222: \label{eqn:dichotomous}
223: \end{eqnarray}
224: where $x(t)$ is an input noise with zero mean and
225: $y(t)$ is an output noise. This is a special case of
226: the amplitude truncation (\ref{eqn:truncation})
227: and was investigated in detail in ref. 1.
228: It turned out that when the transformation (\ref{eqn:dichotomous})
229: is applied to a Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$
230: noise $x(t)$, then the output noise $y(t)$ exhibits a power law spectrum
231: $1/f^{\beta}$.
232: The exponent $\beta$ was derived as
233: $\beta=\alpha$ for $0<\alpha\leq 1$,
234: and $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$ for $1\leq \alpha <2$.
235: As will be shown below, a key to understand this result is a
236: transformation property of the correlation function
237: $R(t)$ (eq. (\ref{eqn:relation})).
238: %which also obeys a power law
239: %$t^{\alpha-1}$ when PSD obeys the power law $f^{-\alpha}$.
240:
241: The correlation function of the
242: output signal $y(t)$ is obtained from eq. (\ref{eqn:dichotomous}) as
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: R_{y}(t)& \equiv & \langle y(t_0)y(t_0+t) \rangle \nonumber \\
245: & = &1 \cdot P\left( y(0)y(t)=1 \right)+(-1)
246: \cdot P\left(y(0)y(t)=-1\right) \nonumber \\
247: & = &P\left(x(0)x(t)>0\right)-P\left(x(0)x(t)<0\right) \nonumber \\
248: & = &2 \cdot P\left(x(0)x(t)>0\right)-1 \mbox{ , }
249: \label{eqn:outcorre}
250: \end{eqnarray}
251: where $P(.)$ stands for the probability that the condition of the
252: argument is satisfied.
253: In the above, we have assumed a stationary process for the input noise,
254: which leads to a stationary process for the output one.
255: We can therefore apply the Wiener-Khintchine theorem to both input and
256: output noises.
257: We also assume that the process for the input noise is correlated
258: Gaussian\cite{rf:note}.
259: That is, the joint probability is given by
260: \begin{eqnarray}
261: P(x(t_{0}),x(t_{0}+t))& = &P(x(0),x(t)) \nonumber \\
262: & = &\frac{1}{A_{0}}\exp[-(x^{2}-2cxy+y^{2})/B]
263: \nonumber \\
264: & \equiv &f(x,y,c) \mbox{ , }
265: \label{eqn:joint}
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: where,
268: %$x \equiv x(0)$, $ y \equiv x(t_{1}-t_{2})$, $c \equiv R_{x}(t_{1}-t_{2})$,
269: % $A_{0} \equiv 2\pi R_{x}(0)\sqrt{1-c^{2}}$, $B \equiv 2R_{x}(0)(1-c^{2})$,
270: %$R_{x}(t)$ being the correlation function of $x(t)$.
271: \begin{equation}
272: \left\{
273: \begin{array}{ll}
274: x \equiv x(0)\mbox{ , } \\
275: y \equiv x(t)\mbox{ , } \\
276: c \equiv R_{x}(t)\mbox{ , } \\
277: A_{0} \equiv 2\pi R_{x}(0)\sqrt{1-c^{2}}\mbox{ , } \\
278: B \equiv 2R_{x}(0)(1-c^{2})\mbox{ , } \\
279: \end{array}
280: \right.
281: \label{eqn:definjoint}
282: \end{equation}
283: and
284: \begin{eqnarray}
285: R_{x}(t) \equiv \langle x(t_0)x(t_0+t) \rangle
286: \label{eqn:definjoint2}
287: \end{eqnarray}
288: is the correlation function of $x(t)$.
289:
290:
291:
292: The probability $P(xy>0)$ is calculated from eq. (\ref{eqn:joint}) as
293: \begin{eqnarray}
294: P(xy>0)&=&\int_{0}^{\infty}dx\int_{0}^{\infty}dy f(x,y,c) \nonumber \\
295: &&+\int_{-\infty}^{0}dx\int_{-\infty}^{0}dy f(x,y,c) \nonumber \\
296: &=&\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{\pi}\arcsin[R_{x}(t)] \mbox{ . }
297: \end{eqnarray}
298:
299: Thus we obtain the relation between the input and output
300: correlation functions as
301: \begin{eqnarray}
302: R_{y}(t)=\frac{2}{\pi}\arcsin[R_{x}(t)] \label{eqn:relation} \mbox{ . }
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: %The relation is correct if input noise is Gaussian.
305: %The relation (\ref{eqn:relation})
306: %leads to the relation between PSD
307: %by using the Winer-Khinchin theorem.
308:
309: The previous result for the exponent $\beta$ can easily be understood
310: qualitatively if we note the approximated expression for
311: (\ref{eqn:relation}):
312: %\begin{equation}
313: %\left\{
314: %\begin{array}{ll}
315: %\mbox{ when } |R_x(t)| \ll 1 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
316: %R_y(t)\propto R_x(t) \label{eqn:sssss1}\\
317: %\mbox{ when } |1-R_x(t)| \ll 1 \;\; R_y(t)\propto \mbox{const}
318: %-(1-R_x(t))^{\frac{1}{2}}
319: %\label{eqn:sssss2}
320: %\end{array}
321: %\right.
322: %\end{equation}
323: \begin{eqnarray}
324: &&\mbox{ when } |R_x(t)| \ll 1 \mbox { , }\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
325: R_y(t)\propto R_x(t); \label{eqn:sssss1}\\
326: &&\mbox{ when } |1-R_x(t)| \ll 1 \mbox{ , } \;\; R_y(t)\propto \mbox{const.}
327: -(1-R_x(t))^{\frac{1}{2}} \mbox{ . }
328: \label{eqn:sssss2}
329: \end{eqnarray}
330:
331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fig. 1
332: \begin{figure}[htbp]
333: \vspace{0.4cm}
334: \begin{center}
335: \includegraphics[width=0.82\linewidth]{fig1.eps}
336: \end{center}
337: \caption{Correlation function $R_x(t)$ of a $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise.
338: %yielding power law spectrum $1/f^{\alpha}$.
339: (a) $0< \alpha <1$: eqs. (\ref{eqn:incor1}).
340: (b) $1< \alpha <2$: eqs. (\ref{eqn:incor222}).}
341: \label{fig:1}
342: \end{figure}
343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
344:
345: First we explain $\beta=\alpha$ for $0<\alpha<1$.
346: When PSD for low frequencies obeys the power law as $\sim f^{-\alpha}$
347: with $0< \alpha <1$, the corresponding correlation function $R_x(t)$
348: should be $R_x(t)\sim t^{\alpha-1}$ for large $t$ values\cite{ishioka00,stanly94}.
349: Let us consider a system whose characteristic time scale is $\tau_1$.
350: Then, by assuming $R_x(t)$ as
351: %\begin{equation}
352: %R_x(t)=\left\{
353: %\begin{array}{ll}
354: % 1 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \leq 1 \mbox{ , } \\
355: % (t/\tau_1)^{\alpha-1}\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \geq 1\mbox{ , }
356: %\end{array}
357: %\right.
358: %\label{eqn:incor1}
359: %\end{equation}
360: \begin{subeqnarray}
361: \label{eqn:incor1}
362: R_x(t)&=& 1 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
363: \mbox{ for }\;\;\;t/\tau_1 \leq 1 \mbox{ , }\\
364: \slabel{eqn:incor1b}
365: R_x(t)&=& (t/\tau_1)^{\alpha-1} \;\;\;
366: \mbox{ for }\;\;\;t/\tau_1 \geq 1 \mbox{ , }
367: %R_x(t)&=& 1 \mbox{ , }\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \leq 1
368: %\mbox{ , } \\
369: %\slabel{eqn:incor1b}
370: %R_x(t)&=& (t/\tau_1)^{\alpha-1}\mbox{ , }\;\;\; t/\tau_1 > 1\mbox{ , }
371: \end{subeqnarray}
372: the PSD is $\sim (\tau_1 f)^{-\alpha}$ for low frequencies:
373: $0<f \ll 1/\tau_1$.
374: The relation (\ref{eqn:sssss1}) can be used to obtain $R_y(t)$ for
375: large $t$: $t/\tau_1\gg1$, because $R_x(t)$ is small. This is why the same
376: exponent $\beta=\alpha$ is obtained for $0<\alpha<1$.
377:
378: The case $1<\alpha<2$ can also be understood qualitatively. Let us
379: assume the correlation function as
380: %\begin{equation}
381: %R_x(t)=\left\{
382: %\begin{array}{ll}
383: % 1-(t/\tau)^{\alpha-1} \;\;\; t/\tau_1 \leq 1 \mbox{ , } \\
384: % 0 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \geq 1\mbox{ . }
385: %\end{array}
386: %\right.
387: %\label{eqn:incor2}
388: %\end{equation}
389: \begin{subeqnarray}
390: \label{eqn:incor222}
391: \slabel{eqn:incor2}
392: R_x(t)&=& 1-(t/\tau_1)^{\alpha-1} \;\;\;
393: \mbox{ for }\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \leq 1 \mbox{ , } \\
394: \slabel{eqn:incorb}
395: R_x(t)&=& 0 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
396: \mbox{ for }\;\;\; t/\tau_1 \geq 1\mbox{ . }
397: \end{subeqnarray}
398: The above correlation function yields a white spectrum if the observation
399: time $t$ is long enough: $t\gg\tau_1$, i.e., $f\ll1/\tau_1$.
400: Naturally we are interested in the situation in which the characteristic
401: time scale $\tau_1$ is very long. The power law, eq.
402: (\ref{eqn:incor2}) again leads to the power law spectrum
403: $S_x(f)\propto(\tau_1f)^{-\alpha}$ for a wide range: $f\gg1/\tau_1$\cite{ishioka00}.
404: Note that if $\tau_1$ is very long, the lower limit $1/\tau_1$ can be
405: small and the power law $\sim f^{-\alpha}$ holds practically in a wide
406: range of low frequencies.
407: When time $t$ is long enough but satisfies $t\ll\tau_1$, the
408: approximation (\ref{eqn:sssss2}) can be used for $R_y(t)$:
409: \begin{eqnarray}
410: R_y(t) &\propto& \mbox{ const.}-(t/\tau_1)^{\frac{\alpha-1}{2}} \nonumber \\
411: &\equiv& \mbox{ const.}-(t/\tau_1)^{\beta-1}\mbox{ . }
412: \label{eqn:sec2las}
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: Corresponding to the above $R_y(t)$, the PSD is obtained as $\sim f^{-\beta}$,
415: where $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$.
416:
417:
418:
419:
420:
421:
422: \section{Symmetrical Truncation with Finite Levels}
423: \setcounter{equation}{0}
424:
425: In this section we generalize the results obtained
426: in the above.
427: Suppose that a Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise with zero mean is
428: transformed by a symmetrical truncation with finite levels
429: $x_{\rm{max}}=-x_{\rm{min}}\equiv a$.
430: Let us define a typical time scale $\tau_{\rm c}$ in which the noise signal
431: passes between the two truncation levels.
432: In a high frequency range $f\gg f_{\rm c}\equiv 1/\tau_{\rm c}$, PSD of
433: the truncated noise is mainly determined by the behavior of the noise
434: between the two levels.
435: On the other hand, in a low frequency range
436: $f \stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$
437: (corresponding
438: to a long-term observation), PSD of the output signal should have a
439: similar PSD to that obtained by the dichotomous transformation.
440: Therefore, for $0<\alpha<1$, the same exponent $\beta=\alpha$ is
441: expected both in high
442: ($f_{\rm c}\stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f \ll 1/\tau_1$)
443: and low ($f\stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$)
444: frequency ranges.
445:
446: In contrast, when $1<\alpha<2$, PSD is divided into two parts by a
447: corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$: $\beta=\alpha$ for a high frequency range
448: ($f\stackrel{\displaystyle >}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$)
449: and $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$ for a low frequency range
450: ($1/\tau_1\ll f \stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$).
451: A typical PSD of a truncated signal for $\alpha=2$
452: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:2}.
453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fig. 2
454: \begin{figure}[htbp]
455: \vspace{0.4cm}
456: \begin{center}
457: \includegraphics[width=0.38\linewidth]{fig2.eps}
458: \end{center}
459: \caption{PSD of the truncated signal for $\alpha=2$.
460: The PSD is obtained by averaging over $40$ samples. PSDs in three
461: frequency ranges are composed. Straight lines are $S(f) \propto f^{-2}$
462: and $\propto f^{-1.5}$}
463: \label{fig:2}
464: \end{figure}
465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
466:
467: The aim in this section is
468: to derive the dependence of $f_{\rm c}$ upon the truncation level $a$.
469: The transformation is expressed as
470: \begin{equation}
471: y(t)=\left\{
472: \begin{array}{ll}
473: x(t) &\mbox{ if }
474: \;-a \leq x(t) \leq a \mbox{, } \\
475: a \cdot \rm{ sgn } [\mit x(t)] &\mbox{ otherwise, }
476: \end{array}
477: \right.
478: \label{eqn:astranin}
479: \end{equation}
480: where $x(t)$ is a correlated Gaussian noise with zero mean.
481:
482: As in the previous section, the joint probability (\ref{eqn:joint}) yields
483: the correlation function
484: of the output signal as
485: \begin{eqnarray}
486: R_{y}(t)& = & 2 \cdot a^2 (I(c)-I(-c))+
487: 2 \cdot (J(c)-J(-c)) \nonumber \\
488: && + 4 \cdot a (K(c)-K(-c)) \mbox{ , }
489: \label{eqn:tranlevco}
490: \end{eqnarray}
491: where
492: \begin{eqnarray}
493: I(c)\equiv\int_{a}^{\infty} dx\int_{a}^{\infty} dy
494: f(x,y,c)\mbox{ , } \nonumber \\
495: J(c)\equiv\int_{0}^{a}dx\int_{0}^{a}dy\;xyf(x,y,c) \mbox{ , } \nonumber \\
496: K(c)\equiv\int_{a}^{\infty}dx \int_{0}^{a}dy\; yf(x,y,c)\mbox{ . } \nonumber
497: %f(x,y,c)\equiv\frac{1}{A_0}\exp [-(x^2-2cxy+y^2)/B]. \nonumber
498: \end{eqnarray}
499: If we assume $a\ll 1$,
500: $I(c)$, $J(c)$ and $K(c)$ can be expanded with respect to $a$ as
501: \begin{eqnarray}
502: I(c)&=&\frac{1}{4}[1+\frac{2}{\pi}\arcsin (c)]
503: -a\frac{\sqrt{B\pi}}{A_0}
504: -a^2\frac{c-1}{A_0}+O(a^3) \mbox{ , } \nonumber \\
505: J(c)&=&a^4\frac{6}{4!A_0}+O(a^5) \mbox{ , }\nonumber \\
506: K(c)&=&a^2\frac{\sqrt{B\pi}}{2!2A_0}+a^3\frac{2c-3}{3!A_0}
507: +O(a^4) \mbox{ . }
508: \label{eqn:ijk}
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: Substitution of Eq. (\ref{eqn:ijk}) into (\ref{eqn:tranlevco})
511: leads to the correlation function of the output signal as
512: \begin{eqnarray}
513: R_y(t)
514: &=&2a^2\{\frac{1}{\pi}\arcsin(c)
515: -2\cdot\frac{ca^2}{2\pi \sqrt{1-c^2}}+\cdots\} \nonumber \\
516: && +4a\{\frac{ca^3}{3\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}+\cdots\} \nonumber \\
517: & = & a^2\{\frac{2}{\pi}\arcsin(c)-\frac{2ca^2}{\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}
518: +\frac{4ca^2}{3\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}+\cdots \} \mbox{ . }\nonumber
519: %4a^2\frac{c}{\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}} \nonumber \\
520: % && \; \; \; \; \; \; \; +a\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}-a^2\frac{2}
521: %{\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}\cdots\} \nonumber
522: \label{eqn:perturbation}
523: \end{eqnarray}
524: Since we are considering the case of $1<\alpha<2$ , we substitute
525: $c\equiv R_x(t)=1-t^{\alpha-1}$ (eq. (\ref{eqn:incor2}))
526: into the above. The correlation
527: function is thus obtained as
528: \begin{eqnarray}
529: R_y(t)
530: &\simeq& a^2\{1-\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{\pi}
531: t^{(\alpha-1)/2}\nonumber \\
532: &&-a^2\frac{\sqrt{2}}
533: {3\pi}t^{-\frac{\alpha-1}{2}}+\cdots \},
534: \label{eqn:pertur_ts}
535: \end{eqnarray}
536: for $t\ll 1 $.
537: Here and hereafter, the dimensionless time $t/\tau_1$ is replaced
538: by $t$ for simplicity. Thus $t\ll1$ actually means $t\ll\tau_1$.
539: If $a$ is small enough and/or $t$ is not so small so that
540: the third term in the braces in (\ref{eqn:pertur_ts}) can be neglected,
541: $R_y(t)$ reduces to eq. (\ref{eqn:sec2las}).
542: As $t$ decreases, the third term grows and becomes comparable to the
543: second term. In other words, the perturbative expansion
544: (\ref{eqn:pertur_ts}) breaks down when
545: $t^{(\alpha-1)/2}\sim a^2 t^{-(\alpha-1)/2}$ i.e. $t\sim a^{2/(\alpha-1)}$.
546: This means that the corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$ depends on the truncation
547: level $a$ as
548: \begin{eqnarray}
549: f_{\rm c} \sim a^{-2/(\alpha-1)}.
550: \label{eqn:dependence}
551: \end{eqnarray}
552: For a long-term observation, i.e.,
553: $1 \gg t\stackrel{\displaystyle >}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}}
554: a^{2/(\alpha-1)}$
555: (which corresponds to
556: $1 \ll f\stackrel{\displaystyle <}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$),
557: the exponent $\beta$ of the PSD becomes
558: $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$ because (\ref{eqn:pertur_ts}) reduces to
559: (\ref{eqn:sec2las}).
560: For a high frequency range:
561: $f\stackrel{\displaystyle >}{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\sim$}} f_{\rm c}$,
562: the same exponent
563: $\beta=\alpha$ as the input signal
564: is expected by the reason mentioned already,
565: although the correlation function of the form
566: $R_y(t)\sim \mbox{const.}-t^{\alpha -1}$ (which corresponds to
567: the PSD$\sim f^{-\alpha}$) cannot be obtained from any correction
568: terms added to (\ref{eqn:pertur_ts}) because the perturbative expansion
569: has broken down. One can see in
570: Fig.~\ref{fig:2} that the PSD obtained from the
571: numerical
572: simulation is really composed of two power law spectra separated by
573: the corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$.
574:
575: The scaling property of eq. (\ref{eqn:dependence}) can also be suggested
576: from the following self-affine character of the signal from the fractional
577: Brownian motion:\cite{vicsek92}
578: \begin{eqnarray}
579: \langle x(t)^2 \rangle \sim t^{2H} .
580: \label{eqn:selfaffin}
581: \end{eqnarray}
582: It is well known that if a signal satisfies
583: the scaling relation
584: (\ref{eqn:selfaffin}),
585: then its PSD is $1/f^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha=2H+1$ where
586: $\alpha\geq 0$\cite{vicsek92}.
587: The above self-affine character yields
588: \begin{eqnarray}
589: \sqrt{\langle x(t)^2 \rangle}
590: &=&
591: \sqrt{\langle x(a^{-\frac{1}{H}}a^{\frac{1}{H}}t)^2 \rangle} \nonumber \\
592: &\propto& \frac{1}{a}\sqrt{\langle x(a^{\frac{1}{H}}t)^2 \rangle}.
593: \end{eqnarray}
594: This means that if the truncation levels are changed
595: from $ \pm U$ to $ \pm aU$ and the time
596: %scale
597: is changed from $t$ to $a^{1/H}t$ simultaneously, the structure
598: of the noise is invariant. Then the corner
599: frequency changes from $f_{\rm c}$ to $a^{-(1/H)}f_{\rm c}=a^{-2/(\alpha-1)}f_{\rm c}$.
600: This coincides with the result obtained from the
601: perturbation method; the present
602: argument can be applicable even for large $a$ values.
603:
604: To confirm $a$-dependence of $f_{\rm c}$,
605: eq. (\ref{eqn:dependence}), we performed a numerical simulation
606: for $\alpha=2$ by varying the truncation level $a$ in eq. (\ref{eqn:astranin}).
607: For each $a$ value, a PSD $S(f)$ was obtained by averaging over $40$ samples.
608: Then $\log S(f)$ was fitted to the line
609: %$F(f)=A(f_{\rm c}^{0.5}f^{-2}\Theta (f-f_{\rm c})+f^{-1.5}\Theta (f_{\rm c}-f)$ so as to
610: $F(f)=(-1.5\log f+1.5\log f_{\rm c}+A)\Theta(\log f_{\rm c}-\log f)
611: +(-2.0\log f+2.0\log f_{\rm c}+A)\Theta(\log f-\log f_{\rm c})$
612: where
613: $\Theta(x)$ is a Heaviside function with $\Theta(0)=1/2$.
614: The result is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:3}.
615: Agreement between the theoretical line: $f_{\rm c}\propto a^{-2}$ and the numerical
616: result is tolerable.
617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fig. 3
618: \begin{figure}[htbp]
619: \vspace{0.4cm}
620: \begin{center}
621: \includegraphics[width=0.55\linewidth]{fig3.eps}
622: \end{center}
623: \caption{Log-log plot of the corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$ vs the truncation level $a$
624: for $\alpha=2$. The straight line is $f_{\rm c}\propto a^{-2}$.}
625: \label{fig:3}
626: \end{figure}
627: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
628:
629: \section{Asymmetrical Truncation}
630: \setcounter{equation}{0}
631:
632: We consider the simplest case, i.e., the following asymmetrical
633: dichotomous transformation:
634: \begin{equation}
635: y(t)=\rm{ sgn } [\mit x(t)-a]=\left\{
636: \begin{array}{ll}
637: +1 & \mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) \geq a \mbox{, } \\
638: -1 & \mbox{ if }\;\;\; x(t) < a \mbox{. }
639: \end{array}
640: \right.
641: \label{eqn:asymtrans}
642: \end{equation}
643: The input signal is a Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise with
644: zero mean, and the condition
645: $0<\alpha<1$ is assumed here.
646:
647: Figure ~\ref{fig:4} illustrates the PSD of the output signal obtained
648: by eq. (\ref{eqn:asymtrans}) for $\alpha =0.8$ and
649: $a=0, \sigma, 2\sigma$, where $\sigma$ is the
650: standard deviation of the input signal.
651: It is unclear from these numerical results
652: whether the PSD obeys the power law or not.
653: %To make certain the question we investigate the transformation
654: %(\ref{eqn:asymtrans}) analytically.
655: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fig. 4
656: \begin{figure}[htbp]
657: \vspace{0.4cm}
658: \begin{center}
659: \includegraphics[width=0.50\linewidth]{fig4.eps}
660: \end{center}
661: \caption{Output PSDs obtained from the asymmetric transformation
662: (\ref{eqn:asymtrans}) where the exponent of the input noise is $\alpha=0.8$.
663: Each PSD was obtained by averaging over 40 samples.
664: (a), (b), and (c) correspond to the truncation level
665: $a=0$, $\sigma$ and 2$\sigma$,
666: respectively, where $\sigma$ is the standard deviation of the input signal.
667: }
668: \label{fig:4}
669: \end{figure}
670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
671:
672: Note that the mean value of the output signal is finite:
673: \begin{eqnarray}
674: \langle y(t) \rangle &=& \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\mbox{sgn}[x-a]f(x)dx \nonumber \\
675: &=&-2\int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx \equiv \bar{y} \mbox{ , }
676: \label{eqn:secfortw}
677: \end{eqnarray}
678: where $f(x)$ is the Gaussian distribution function for the input signal:
679: \begin{eqnarray}
680: f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi R_x(0)}}\exp\left[-\frac{x^2}{2R_x(0)}\right] \mbox{ . }
681: \end{eqnarray}
682: The correlation function of $y(t)$ is thus given by
683: \begin{eqnarray}
684: R_y(t)&=&\langle (y(t_0)-\bar{y})(y(t_0+t)-\bar{y} \rangle \nonumber \\
685: &=&\langle y(t_0)y(t_0+t)\rangle-(\bar{y})^2 \\
686: &=&2P((x(0)-a)(x(t)-a)>0)-1-(\bar{y})^2 \mbox{ . }
687: \label{eqn:realascor}
688: \end{eqnarray}
689: The probability $P((x(0)-a)(x(t)-a)>0)$ is expressed as
690: \begin{eqnarray}
691: &&P((x(0)-a)(x(t)-a)>0) \nonumber \\
692: &=&\bigm[2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\int_{0}^{a}dy
693: +2\int_{a}^{\infty}dx\int_{a}^{\infty}dy\bigm]
694: f(x,y,c) \mbox{ , }
695: \label{eqn:asymcorr}
696: \end{eqnarray}
697: where $f(x,y,c)$ is the joint probability defined by
698: (\ref{eqn:joint}) $\sim$ (\ref{eqn:definjoint2}).
699: The first term in (\ref{eqn:asymcorr}) depends on $a$ but not on $t$:
700: \begin{eqnarray}
701: 2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\int_{0}^{a}dyf(x,y,c)
702: =2\int_{0}^{a}dxf(x)dx=-\bar{y} \mbox{ , }
703: \end{eqnarray}
704: which yields
705: \begin{eqnarray}
706: P((x(0)-a)(x(t)-a)>0)=-\bar{y}+T \mbox { , }\label{eqn:pasy}\\
707: T\equiv 2\int_{a}^{\infty}dx\int_{a}^{\infty}dyf(x,y,c) \mbox{ . }
708: \end{eqnarray}
709: We calculate $R_y(t)$ in two cases $a\ll 1$ and $a\gg1$.
710: Since $R_x(t)$ is assumed as eqs. (\ref{eqn:incor1}),
711: we set $R_x(0)=1$ hereafter.
712:
713: When $a\ll 1$, $\bar{y}$ is expanded with respect to $a$:
714: \begin{eqnarray}
715: \bar{y}=-\frac{2a}{\sqrt{2\pi}}+O(a^3) \mbox{ . }
716: \label{eqn:outmean}
717: \end{eqnarray}
718: The second term $T$ in (\ref{eqn:pasy}) is similarly expanded as
719: \begin{eqnarray}
720: T\equiv \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{\pi}\arcsin[c]-\frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}a
721: +\frac{1-c}{\pi\sqrt{1-c^2}}a^2+\cdots \mbox{ . }
722: \end{eqnarray}
723: For $t\gg1$ the correlation function becomes $c\equiv R_x(t)=t^{\alpha-1}\ll 1$.
724: Then $T$ can be approximated as
725: \begin{eqnarray}
726: T=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}a+\frac{1}{\pi}c
727: +\frac{1}{\pi}(1-c+\frac{1}{2}{c^2})a^2+O(c^3) \mbox{ . }
728: \label{eqn:therdterm}
729: \end{eqnarray}
730: Substituting (\ref{eqn:pasy}), (\ref{eqn:outmean}),
731: (\ref{eqn:therdterm}) and $c\equiv
732: t^{\alpha-1}$ into (\ref{eqn:realascor}), we obtain
733: \begin{eqnarray}
734: \label{eqn:asasco1}
735: R_y(t)
736: &=&2(-\bar{y}+T)-1-\bar{y}^2 \\
737: &\sim& \frac{2}{\pi}(1-a^2)c+\frac{a^2}{\pi}c^2 \nonumber \\
738: &=& \frac{2}{\pi}(1-a^2)t^{\alpha-1}+\frac{a^2}{\pi}t^{2(\alpha-1)}
739: \;\;\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{for}\; t\gg 1 \mbox{ and } \; a\ll 1 \mbox{. }
740: \label{eqn:asasco}
741: \end{eqnarray}
742: Equation (\ref{eqn:asasco}) implies that the correlation function
743: of the output signal obeys a power law $\sim t^{\alpha-1}$ with a small
744: correction term. When the first term in (\ref{eqn:asasco}) is dominant, i.e.
745: $a^2t^{\alpha-1}\ll 1$, the PSD of the output signal turns $f^{-\alpha}$.
746: The condition $a^2t^{\alpha-1}\ll 1$ corresponds to $f \ll f_1$, where
747: \begin{eqnarray}
748: f_1 \equiv (1/a^2)^{1/(1-\alpha)} \mbox{ . }
749: \label{eqn:condi_f1}
750: \end{eqnarray}
751: The frequency $f_1$ can be very large
752: for small $a$ values because $1-\alpha>0$.
753: The power law spectrum $f^{-\alpha}$ is then observed
754: in a wide range of frequencies.
755:
756:
757:
758: For $a\gg 1$, an asymptotic expansion of (\ref{eqn:secfortw}) yields
759: \begin{eqnarray}
760: \bar{y}=-1+\frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left[-\frac{a^2}{2}\right]
761: \cdot\bigm\{\frac{1}{a}+O(\frac{1}{a^3})\bigm\} \mbox{ . }
762: \label{eqn:ylargea}
763: \end{eqnarray}
764: We can calculate $T$ as follows.
765: \begin{eqnarray}
766: T&=&2\int_{a}^{\infty}\!\!\!\int_{a}^{\infty}
767: \frac{dxdy}{A_{0}}
768: \exp\left[-\frac{x^{2}-2cxy+y^{2}}{B}\right] \nonumber \\
769: %&=&2\int_{a}^{\infty}dy\int_{a-cy}^{\infty}
770: %\frac{dX}{A_{0}} \exp[-\frac{X^{2}+(1-c^2)y^{2}}{B}] \nonumber \\
771: &=&2\frac{1}{A_0}\int_{a^2}^{\infty}dY
772: \frac{1}{2Y^{\frac{1}{2}}}\exp\left[-\frac{1-c^2}{B}Y\right]
773: \int_{a-c\sqrt{Y}}^{\infty}dX\exp\left[-\frac{X^2}{B}\right]
774: \mbox{ . }
775: \end{eqnarray}
776: Integrating by parts with respect to the variable $Y$,
777: we obtain
778: \begin{eqnarray}
779: \label{eqn:asggat}
780: T&=&E+F+G \mbox{ , } \\
781: E&\equiv&\frac{B}{A_0(1-c^2)}\frac{1}{a}
782: \exp\left[-\frac{1-c^2}{B}a^2\right]
783: \int_{(1-c)a}^{\infty}dX
784: \exp\left[-\frac{X^2}{B}\right] \mbox{ , } \nonumber \\
785: F&\equiv&\frac{B}{A_0(1-c^2)}\int_{a^2}^{\infty}dY
786: \frac{-1}{2Y^{\frac{3}{2}}}\exp\left[-\frac{1-c^2}{B}Y\right]
787: \int_{a-c\sqrt{Y}}^{\infty}dX\exp\left[-\frac{X^2}{B}\right]
788: \mbox{ , } \nonumber \\
789: G&\equiv&\frac{B}{A_0(1-c^2)}\int_{a^2}^{\infty}dY
790: \frac{c}{2Y}\exp\left[-\frac{1-c^2}{B}Y\right]
791: \exp\left[-\frac{(a-c\sqrt{Y})^2}{B}\right] \mbox{ . } \nonumber
792: \end{eqnarray}
793: The second term $F$ in (\ref{eqn:asggat}) can be neglected because
794: $a \gg 1$.
795: The asymptotic expansion of $E$ is obtained by substituting
796: $X^2=x$ and
797: integrating by parts as
798: \begin{eqnarray}
799: E=\frac{B^2}{2A_0(1-c^2)(1-c)a^2}
800: \exp\left[-\frac{2a^2(1-c)}{B}\right]
801: +O\left(\frac{1}{a^4}\exp\left[-\frac{2a^2(1-c)}{B}\right]\right) \mbox{ . }
802: \label{eqn:tfirst}
803: \end{eqnarray}
804: In a similar manner
805: G is calculated,
806: by substituting $y=(\sqrt{Y}-ca)^2$ and
807: integrating by parts, as
808: \begin{eqnarray}
809: G=\frac{cB^2}{2A_0(1-c^2)(1-c)a^2}
810: \exp\left[-\frac{2a^2(1-c)}{B}\right]
811: +O\left(\frac{1}{a^4}\exp\left[-\frac{2a^2(1-c)}{B}\right]\right) \mbox{ . }
812: \label{eqn:tthird}
813: \end{eqnarray}
814: Equations (\ref{eqn:tfirst}) and (\ref{eqn:tthird}) yield
815: \begin{eqnarray}
816: T=\frac{(1+c)^2}{\pi a^2 \sqrt{1-c^2}}\exp\left[-\frac{a^2}{1+c}\right]
817: +O\left(\frac{1}{a^4}\exp\left[-\frac{a^2}{1+c}\right]\right) \mbox{ . }
818: \label{eqn:tlarga}
819: \end{eqnarray}
820: Substituting
821: (\ref{eqn:pasy}), (\ref{eqn:ylargea}), (\ref{eqn:tlarga}) and
822: $c\equiv t^{\alpha-1}$
823: into (\ref{eqn:realascor}), we obtain
824: \begin{eqnarray}
825: R_y(t)&\sim&\frac{2}{\pi a^2}\left[\frac{(1+c)^2}{\sqrt{1-c^2}}
826: \exp\bigm[-\frac{a^2}{1+c}\bigm]-\exp[-a^2]\right]
827: \;\;\mbox{ (for $a^2\gg1$)} \nonumber \\
828: &\sim& \frac{2}{\pi a^2}\left[(1+2t^{\alpha-1}+\frac{3}{2}
829: t^{2(\alpha-1)})\exp[-a^2(1-t^{\alpha-1}+t^{2(\alpha-1)}]
830: -\exp[-a^2]\right]\;\;\mbox{ (for $c\ll 1$).} \nonumber \\
831: &&
832: \label{eqn:asabco}
833: \end{eqnarray}
834: When $a^2t^{\alpha-1} \ll 1$, eq. (\ref{eqn:asabco}) reduces to
835: \begin{eqnarray}
836: R_y(t)\sim \frac{2}{\pi}t^{\alpha-1}\exp[-a^2] \mbox{ . }
837: \end{eqnarray}
838: %Equation (\ref{eqn:asabco}) represents that the correlation function
839: %of the output signal is $\sim t^{\alpha-1}e^{a^2}$ for
840: %$a^2t^{\alpha-1} \ll 1$ i.e. $f\ll (1/a^2)^{1/(1-\alpha)}$.
841: The above result leads to a $1/f^{\alpha}$ spectrum for the output signal
842: in a low frequency range: $f\ll f_1$, where $f_1$ is defined by
843: (\ref{eqn:condi_f1}).
844: In contrast to the case $a\ll 1$, however, $f_1$ is small for $a\gg1$.
845: This means that the power law spectrum $1/f^{\alpha}$
846: cannot be observed unless the
847: observation time $t$ is large enough to satisfy $a^2t^{\alpha-1}\ll 1$. When
848: this condition is not satisfied, $R_y(t)$ includes correction terms which
849: are $t^{2(\alpha-1)}+\cdots$.
850: Therefore PSD of the output
851: signal deviates from the power law as
852: $A/f^{\alpha}+B/f^{2\alpha-1}+\cdots$.
853: Since $\alpha > 2\alpha -1$, the second term makes the exponent of the PSD
854: decrease. As the value of $a$ or $f$ increases, the higher order terms
855: become more important, namely, the exponent tends to decrease.
856: Figure.~\ref{fig:4} indicates this trend: The slope of the PSD turns
857: flatter as $a$ or $f$ increases.
858:
859: \section{Construction of $1/f$ Noise from $1/f^2$ Noise}
860: \setcounter{equation}{0}
861:
862: We present a numerical example to generate a $1/f$ noise
863: from $1/f^2$ noises using the dichotomous transformation
864: introduced in \S 2. The procedure is as follows:
865: %The idea is illustrated in Fig. 1:
866: 1) Prepare an ensemble of independent Gaussian $1/f^{\alpha}$ noises.
867: 2) Transform these noises to dichotomous ones via
868: eq. (\ref{eqn:dichotomous}). As described in \S 2,
869: PSDs of the transformed noises are proportional to
870: $1/f^{(\alpha+1)/2}$.
871: 3) Average over a bunch of these dichotomous noises to re-Gaussianize,
872: and prepare a number of such Gaussian $1/f^{(\alpha+1)/2}$ noises.
873: 4) Go back to 2).
874:
875: We applied the above method to Lorentzian noises with a long
876: relaxation time $\tau_1$, whose spectrum is
877: $\sim [f^2+(1/\tau_1)^2]^{-1}$. The spectrum looks like $1/f^2$
878: when the observation time $t$ is not long enough:
879: $t \ll \tau_1$ so that $f \gg 1/\tau_1$. The Lorentzian noises were
880: generated by the following first order Markovian process
881: \begin{eqnarray}
882: x(t+1)=\rho x(t)+n(t) \mbox{ ; }\;\;\;
883: \rho=\exp\left[-\frac{1}{\tau_1}\right] \mbox{ , }
884: \label{eqn:lorentzian}
885: \end{eqnarray}
886: where $n(t)$ is white noise with zero mean.
887: As $\rho$ approaches unity, the time series tends to a $1/f^2$ noise.
888: A typical spectrum obtained from (\ref{eqn:lorentzian}) is shown in
889: Fig.~\ref{fig:6}(a), where $\rho=1-0.001$, i.e. $\tau_1\sim 1000$ and
890: $n(t)$ is a uniform random number in $[-0.5, 0.5]$. Starting with
891: such Lorentzian noises, we obtained the first and the second
892: transformations as Fig.~\ref{fig:6}(b) and Fig.~\ref{fig:6}(c),
893: which are very close to $1/f^{1.5}$ and $1/f^{1.25}$ as was expected.
894: It is rather amazing that only five independent output signals
895: were averaged to obtain each {\it approximately} Gaussian noise.
896: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fig. 5
897: \begin{figure}[htbp]
898: \vspace{0.4cm}
899: \begin{center}
900: \includegraphics[width=0.92\linewidth]{fig5.eps}
901: \end{center}
902: \caption{PSD of the signal in each step in the procedure to achieve a
903: $1/f$ noise. PSD is obtained by averaging over $10$ samples.
904: The straight
905: lines represent $f^{-2}$ in (a), $f^{-1.5}$ in (b) and $f^{-1.25}$ in (c).
906: (a) PSD of a Lorentzian noise. (b) PSD of the noise transformed once.
907: (c) PSD of the noise transformed twice. To obtain a Gaussian input
908: noise, five output noises by the previous transformation were averaged.
909: }
910: \label{fig:6}
911: \end{figure}
912: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
913:
914:
915: There are several methods to generate $1/f^{\alpha}$
916: noise\cite{frieden94,dutta81,furukawa86,sano90} ; among them, McWhoter's
917: model for $1/f$ noise is well known because
918: the model corresponds to real physical systems, for
919: example, noise due to
920: surface traps of carriers in a semiconductor.\cite{dutta81}
921: McWhoter's theory tells that if a large number of Lorentzian
922: noises with various relaxation time $\tau$ are superposed with
923: an appropriate weight: $w(\tau) \propto 1/\tau$ in a range
924: $\tau_2 \leq \tau \leq \tau_1$, the spectrum
925: becomes $1/f$ in the frequency range $1/\tau_1 \ll f \ll 1/\tau_2$.
926: In contrast to McWhoter's theory, the present method requires
927: only one kinds of Lorentzian noises specified by a single relaxation
928: time $\tau_1$: $w(\tau)=\delta(\tau-\tau_1)$. Then the
929: dichotomous transformation, if applied repeatedly, can lead to
930: nearly $1/f$ noise in the range $f \gg 1/\tau_1$.
931:
932: In many cases, model systems exhibit $1/f$ noise only when the system
933: parameters are tuned to some special values. For example, simulations
934: of phonon number fluctuations based on a Fermi-Pasta-Ulam lattice
935: resulted in a $1/f$ spectrum when the lattice size is $N=8$.\cite{fukamachi94,kawamura96}
936: For larger $N$, however, the spectrum tended to Lorentzian
937: $\sim (f^2+f_0^2)^{-1}$, although the time scale $\tau_1 \equiv 1/f_0$
938: became larger as $N$ increases.\cite{kawamura96}
939: In contrast, tuning is unnecessary in the
940: present method of generating $1/f$ noise, which is an essential point
941: of the method.
942:
943: \section{Summary and Discussions}
944: \setcounter{equation}{0}
945:
946: We have analyzed the amplitude truncation of $1/f^{\alpha}$ noises
947: (eq. (1.1)). Although $1/f^{\alpha}$ noises with
948: $\alpha$ between $0$ and $2$ are commonly called
949: `$1/f$ noise', the transformation property is different
950: depending on whether $\alpha$ is larger than unity or not.
951:
952: For $\alpha > 1$, the output PSD under the symmetrical truncation
953: obeys the power law with a smaller exponent $\beta=(\alpha+1)/2$
954: (which is still larger than unity) in a low frequency range
955: ($f_1 \ll $)$f\ll f_{\rm c}$. The corner frequency $f_{\rm c}$ depends on $\alpha$
956: and the truncation level $a$ as $f_{\rm c} \propto a^{-2/(\alpha -1)}$.
957: Let us assume that the time scale of the system, $\tau_1=1/f_1$, is
958: long enough so that the interval $[f_1$, $f_{\rm c}]$ is sufficiently wide.
959: Then the filtering effect in the measurement makes it possible to
960: observe a power law spectrum with the exponent much smaller than $2$,
961: even if the original signal is close to Lorentzian: $\alpha \sim 2$.
962: As was shown by the numerical simulation, if we start from an ensemble
963: of Gaussian $1/f^2$ or Lorentzian signals and apply the symmetrical
964: truncation and re-Gaussianization procedure repeatedly, the output
965: signal converges to $1/f$ noise.
966:
967: When $\alpha\leq 1$, in contrast, the symmetrical truncation
968: leads to a power law spectrum with the same exponent $\alpha$.
969: (A proof for $\alpha=1$ has been given
970: only for the dichotomous transformation.\cite{ishioka00}) This means that
971: the exponent less than unity can never be reached by the symmetrical
972: truncation as far as we start from the exponent larger than unity.
973: On the other hand, when the asymmetrical amplitude truncation is
974: applied to $1/f^{\alpha}$ signal with $\alpha$ less than unity,
975: the output PSD deviates from the power law. The correction terms
976: make the slope of the spectrum flatter as $f$ increases. However,
977: as far as the results of the numerical experiments
978: ($\alpha=0.8$ in the present paper and $\alpha=1$ in ref. 5) are
979: observed, the output PSD looks approximately as $1/f^{\alpha}$-like
980: with an exponent smaller than that of the input signal.
981:
982: Amplitude truncation may generally occurs in systems composed of
983: threshold elements, for example neural networks. It also occurs in
984: the flow of packets in Internet systems
985: where the overflow of the packets
986: is deleted.
987: Furthermore, measurement or analysis of signals often involves
988: amplitude truncation. For example, a dichotomous transformation is
989: used to analyze the (spatial) long-range correlation in DNA.\cite{stanly94}
990: If a Lorentzian or $1/f^2$ noise is superposed on the original
991: signal, filtering with such a truncation may easily leads to
992: the observation of a $1/f^{\alpha}$ noise.
993:
994: Throughout the present paper, we have assumed that the time
995: scale of the system is long enough so that the original data
996: exhibits the power law spectrum in a wide range of frequencies.
997: As mentioned already, to derive an extremely long time scale
998: from any realistic model is a difficult problem.
999: Once a long time scale has been assumed, however, the present
1000: study suggests a possible mechanism to generate $1/f^{\alpha}$
1001: noises with the exponent smaller than that of the original signal.
1002:
1003: \vspace{0.8cm}
1004:
1005: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1006:
1007: %1
1008: \bibitem{ishioka00}
1009: S. Ishioka, Z. Gingl, D. Choi and N. Fuchikami:
1010: Phys. Lett. A {\bf269} (2000) 7.
1011: %2
1012: \bibitem{bak97}
1013: P.Bak: {\it How Nature Works} (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
1014: %3
1015: \bibitem{frieden94}
1016: B. R. Frieden and R. J. Hughes:
1017: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 49} (1994) 2644.
1018: %4
1019: \bibitem{rf:mandel}
1020: B. B. Mandelbrot and J. R. Wallis:
1021: Water. Resour. Res. {\bf 5} (1969) 321.
1022: %5
1023: \bibitem{musha90}
1024: T. Musha, G. Borbery and M. Shoji:
1025: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf64} (1990) 2394.
1026: %6
1027: \bibitem{fuchi99}
1028: N. Fuchikami:
1029: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 60} (1999) 1060.
1030: %7
1031: \bibitem{gingl96}
1032: Z. Gingl and L.B. Kiss: {\it Proc. First Int. Conf. on Unsolved
1033: Problems of Noise} edited by Ch.R. Doering, L.B. Kiss and
1034: M.F. Schlesinger (World Scientific, 1996) p.337.
1035: %8
1036: \bibitem{gingl99}
1037: Z. Gingl, S. Ishioka, D. Choi and N. Fuchikami:
1038: {\it Proc. Int. Conf. on Unsolved
1039: Problems of Noise and Fluctuation} edited by D. Abbott and L.B. Kish
1040: (AIP. press, 1999) p.136.
1041: %9
1042: \bibitem{rf:note}
1043: Note that the output signal is generally non-Gaussian.
1044: %10
1045: \bibitem{stanly94}
1046: H.E.Stanly, S.V.Buldyrev, A.L.Goldberger, Z.D.Goldberger,
1047: S.Hvlin, R.N.Mantegna, S.M.Oddadnik, C.-K.Peng and M.Dimons:
1048: Physica A {\bf 205} (1994) 214.
1049: %11
1050: \bibitem{vicsek92}
1051: T. Vicsek: {\it Fractal Growth Phenomena}
1052: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992) 2nd ed.
1053: %12
1054: \bibitem{dutta81}
1055: P. Dutta and P. M. Horn: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 53} (1981) 497
1056: %A.L.McWhorter: {\it Proc. conf. Semiconductor Surface Physics}
1057: %edited by R.H.kingston (1955).
1058: %13
1059: \bibitem{furukawa86}
1060: H. Furukawa: Phys .Rev. A {\bf 34} (1986) 2315.
1061: %14
1062: \bibitem{sano90}
1063: M. Sano, H. Nakauchi, H. Akabane and T. Musha:
1064: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 29} (1990) 2186.
1065: %15
1066: \bibitem{fukamachi94}
1067: K. Fukamachi: Europys. Lett. {\bf26} (1994) 449.
1068: %16
1069: \bibitem{kawamura96}
1070: H. Kawamura, N. Fuchikami, D. Choi and S. Ishioka:
1071: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 35} (1996) 2387.
1072:
1073:
1074: %1
1075: %\bibitem{rf:1}
1076: %J. B. Jhonson, Phys. Rev. {\bf 26}, 71 (1925).
1077: %2
1078: %\bibitem{rf:2}
1079: %H.E. Maes and S.H. Usmani, J.Appl.Phys. {\bf54}, 1937 (1983).
1080: %3
1081: %\bibitem{rf:3}
1082: %H.E. Maes S.H. Usmani and G. Groeseneken,
1083: %J.Appl.Phys., {\bf57}, 4811 (1985).
1084: %4
1085: %\bibitem{rf:4}
1086: %G.A. Garfunkel and M.B. Weissman, J.Appl.Phys. {\bf57}, 634 (1985).
1087: %5
1088: %\bibitem{rf:5}
1089: %N.B. Lukyanchikova, {\sl Noise Research in Semiconductor Physics},
1090: %edited by B. K. Jones, (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1996).
1091: %6
1092: %\bibitem{rf:6}
1093: %J.R. Clem, Phys. Rep. {\bf75}, 1 (1981).
1094: %7
1095: %\bibitem{rf:7}
1096: %B. O. Nilsson, IEEE Trans. Electron. Device {\bf 41}, 2139 (1994).
1097: %8
1098: %\bibitem{rf:8}
1099: %A. M. Yurek, H. E. Taylor, L. Goldberg, J. F. Weller and A. Dandridge,
1100: %IEEE J. Quantum Electron., {\bf QE-22}, 522 (1986).
1101: %9
1102: %\bibitem{rf:9}
1103: %R.J. Fronen and L.K.J. Vandamme,
1104: %IEEE J. Quantum Electron., {\bf24}, 724 (1988).
1105: %10
1106: %\bibitem{rf:10}
1107: %R.J. Fronen, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., {\bf25}, 1653 (1989).
1108: %11
1109: %\bibitem{rf:11}
1110: %R.J. Fronen, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., {\bf26}, 1742 (1990).
1111: %12
1112: %P.L. Nolan et al., Astrophys.J., {\bf246}, 494 (1981).
1113: %\bibitem{rf:12}
1114: %13
1115: %\bibitem{rf:13}
1116: %T. Musha, H. Takeuchi and T. Inoue, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
1117: %{\bf BME-30}, 194 (1983).
1118: %14
1119: %\bibitem{rf:14}
1120: %T. Musha and H. Higchi, Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. {\bf15}, 1271 (1976).
1121: %15
1122: %\bibitem{rf:15}
1123: %R.F. Voss and J.Clarke, J.Acoust.Soc. Am {\bf 68}, 258 (1978).
1124: %16
1125: %\bibitem{rf:16}
1126: %R.F. Voss and J.Clarke, Nature, {\bf 258}, 317 (1975).
1127: %17
1128: %\bibitem{rf:17}
1129: %Z. Gingl and L.B. Kiss, in {\sl Proc. First Int. Conf. on Unsolved
1130: %Problems of Noise}, edited by Ch.R. Doering, L.B. Kiss and
1131: %M.F. Schlesinger, (World Scientific, 1996) p.337
1132: %18
1133: %\bibitem{rf:18}
1134: %L.B. Kiss, Z. Gingl, Zs. Marton, J. Kertesz, F. Moss, G. Schmera
1135: %and A. Bulsara, J.Stat.Phys. {\bf 70}, 451 (1993)
1136: %19
1137: %\bibitem{rf:19}
1138: %S. Ishioka, Z. Gingl, D. Choi and N. Fuchikami,
1139: %submitted to Phys. Lett. A269, (2000) 7.
1140: %20
1141: %\bibitem{rf:20}
1142: %H. Hayakawa and K. Nakanishi,
1143: %Prog.Theor.Phys.Suppl.{\bf 130}, 57 (1998)
1144: %21
1145: %\bibitem{rf:21}
1146: %Z. Gingl, S. Ishioka, D. Choi and N. Fuchikami,
1147: %{\sl Proc. ... Int. Conf. on Unsolved
1148: %Problems of Noise 99}, edited by...
1149: %22
1150: %\bibitem{rf:22}
1151: %O.Moriyama, N.Kuroiwa, M.Matsushita and H.Hayakawa,
1152: %Phys.Rev.Lett. {\sl 80}, 2833 (1998)
1153: %23
1154: %\bibitem{rf:23}
1155: %H.Hayakawa and K Nakanishi,
1156: %Prog. Theor. Suppl. {\sl 130}, 57 (1998)
1157: %24
1158: %\bibitem{rf:24}
1159: %H.E.Stanly, S.V.Buldyrev, A.L.Goldberger, Z.D.Goldberger,
1160: %S.Hvlin, R.N.Mantegna, S.M.Oddadnik, C.-K.Peng and M.Dimons,
1161: %Physica A {\bf 205}, 214 (1994)
1162: %25
1163: %\bibitem{rf:25}
1164: %T.Vicsek, Fractal Growth Phenomena, Second Edition
1165: %(World Scientific, Singapore, 1992)
1166: %26
1167: %\bibitem{rf:26}
1168: %The output noise is not necsessarily correlated Gaussian.
1169: %27
1170: %\bibitem{rf:27}
1171: %M.Sano, H.Nakauchi, H.Akabane and T.Musha:
1172: %Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 29}(1990)2186.
1173: %28
1174: %\bibitem{rf:28}
1175: %H.Furukawa:Phys.Rev.{\bf 34}(1986)2315
1176: %29
1177: %\bibitem{rf:29}
1178: %A.L.McWhorter, in {\sl Semiconductor Surface Physics}
1179: %(1955 Conf.Proc.), edited by R.H.kingston
1180: \end{thebibliography}
1181:
1182: \end{document}
1183:
1184: