1: %\documentstyle[aps,prl,psfig,preprint]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[aps,aps10,psfig,prl,multicol]{revtex}
3:
4:
5:
6: \documentstyle[multicol,aps,psfig,prl]{revtex}
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}
9: %TCIDATA{Created=Sat Dec 18 18:15:56 1999}
10: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Mon Nov 20 23:47:59 2000}
11: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
12: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
13: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex.cst}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16: \title{Pulse confinement in optical fibers with random
17: dispersion}
18: \author{M. Chertkov, I. Gabitov, J. Moeser}
19: \address{Theoretical Division, LANL, Los Alamos, NM
20: 87545}
21: \date{\today}
22:
23: \maketitle
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: Short range correlated uniform noise in the dispersion coefficient,
27: inherent in many types of optical fibers, broadens and eventually
28: destroys all initially ultra-short pulses. However, under the
29: constraint that the integral of the random component of the dispersion
30: coefficient is set to zero, or pinned, periodically or
31: quasi-periodically along the fiber, the nature of the pulse
32: propagation changes dramatically. For the case that randomness is
33: added to constant positive dispersion, the pinning restriction
34: significantly reduces pulse broadening. If the randomness is added to
35: piecewise constant periodic dispersion, the pinning may even provide
36: probability distributions of pulse parameters that are numerically
37: indistinguishable from the statistically steady case. The pinning
38: method can be used to both manufacture better fibers and upgrade
39: existing fiber links.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \pacs{42.81.Dp, 05.45.-a, 46.65.+g}
43:
44: %\footnote{
45: %Theoretical Division, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545 .
46: %$^\#$To whom correspondence should be addressed.E-mail:
47: %chertkov@lanl.gov .
48: %$^1$Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics,
49: %117334 Moscow, Russia. $^2$Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown
50: %University, Providence, RI 02806.}$^{,\#}$,
51:
52: \begin{multicols}{2}
53:
54:
55: \bigskip The effect of random perturbations in optical fibers
56: increasingly attracts attention as the demand for the quality of
57: transmission grows daily~ \cite{Recent reviews}. The impact of
58: randomness on signal transmission in a single mode fiber is negative;
59: it causes degradation of the signal and lowers transition
60: capabilities~\cite{Multimode}. In particular, amplifier
61: noise~\cite{Gordon-Hauss}, and noise in the fiber birefringence
62: (double refraction)~\cite{PMD} lead to random shifts in the pulse
63: position (timing jitter) and to pulse broadening, respectively. Both
64: effects eventually cause a destruction of bit-patterns and eventual
65: increase of the Bit-Error-Rate (BER), the most important parameter
66: describing performance in fiber communications systems~\cite{97A}.
67:
68: In the present paper, we consider the effect of random dispersion,
69: which is, for ultrashort pulses, potentially as dangerous as the
70: aforementioned effects. We, however, propose a way to significantly
71: reduce the pulse deterioration and eventually reduce the BER caused by
72: the noise in dispersion by using passive (independent of pulse
73: properties) periodic control of the accumulated dispersion of the
74: fiber link. Furthermore, the method may even provide statistically
75: steady propagation of the pulse along the fiber.
76:
77: Chromatic dispersion is an important characteristic of a medium and
78: can significantly degrade the integrity of wave packets. In practice,
79: chromatic dispersion is not uniformly distributed and often exhibits
80: random variations in space and time. On the other hand, wave
81: propagation through the medium is usually much faster than temporal
82: variations of the chromatic dispersion. Therefore, these random
83: variations can be treated as ``spatial'' multiplicative noise that
84: does not change in time. This multiplicative noise is conservative and
85: the wave energy remains constant during propagation through the
86: medium. Recently, high precision measurements of fiber chromatic
87: dispersion as function of a fiber length experimentally demonstrated
88: the significance of the dispersion randomness ~\cite{96MMN,98GM}.
89:
90: The overall chromatic dispersion in an optical fiber comes from two
91: sources. The first source is the medium itself. The second source is
92: the specific geometry of the waveguide profile. Material dispersion in
93: the optical fiber is a relatively stable parameter, uniformly
94: distributed along the fiber. However, waveguide dispersion is not
95: nearly as stable. Existing technology does not yet provide accurate
96: control of the waveguide geometry of modern fibers, where dependence
97: of dispersion on wavelength is complex. As a result, the magnitudes of
98: random variations of fiber chromatic dispersion are typically the same
99: as, or in some cases even greater than that of the mean
100: dispersion~\cite{96MMN,98GM}.
101:
102: In the short-wavelength regime, a universal description of the signal
103: envelope in the reference frame moving with the packet group velocity
104: is given by the nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation (NLS) for the
105: complex scalar field, $\psi (z;t)$, see for example \cite{97A},
106: \begin{equation}
107: -i\partial _{z}\psi =d(z)\partial _{t}^{2}\psi +2\psi ^{2}\bar{\psi}.
108: \label{disp}
109: \end{equation}
110: The equation is written in the dimensionless form
111: \cite{Param}. Variations in the medium enter this description through
112: the
113: dispersion coefficient $%
114: d(z)=d_{\det }(z)+\xi (z)$, which is decomposed into its deterministic
115: part, $d_{\det }(z)$, and a random part, $\xi (z)$. Here $z$ is the
116: position along the fiber and $t$ is the retarded time. The initial
117: profile $\psi (0;t)$ is localized in $t$. We consider two different
118: models of deterministic dispersion, both of which are standard in
119: fiber optic communications. Model (A) is the case of constant
120: dispersion, $d_{\det }=d_{0}$. In the absence of noise ($\xi (z)=0$),
121: $\psi _{0}(z;t)=a\exp \left[
122: izd_{0}/b^{2}\right] sech%
123: \left[ t/b\right] $, where $a^{2}b^{2}=d_{0}$ ($a$ is the peak
124: amplitude, $b$ is the pulse width), is an exact soliton solution of
125: (\ref{disp}). The existence of the soliton \cite{72ZS} is the result
126: of a dynamic equilibrium between dispersion and nonlinearity: the two
127: spatial
128: scales, nonlinearity $%
129: z_{NL}=1/a^{2}$, and dispersion $z_{d}=b^{2}/d_{0}$, coincide. Model
130: (B) is the case of dispersion management (DM), $d_{\det }=d_{0}\pm
131: d_{DM}$ \cite {80LKC}. Here dispersion is piecewise constant: positive
132: and negative spans alternate with period $z_{DM}$, and
133: $0<d_{0}<d_{DM}$. There is no exact solution for the pure (no noise)
134: Model (B), but theoretical evidence, confirmed by extensive numerical
135: studies and experimental results, indicates the existence of a
136: breathing solution (DM soliton) with a nearly Gaussian shape
137: \cite{96GT,96SKDBB,99TSSM,99GGDBMGHFG}. The localized solution here is
138: again due to the interplay of dispersion and nonlinearity. In the
139: presence of a periodic dispersion map, however, the (DM) soliton
140: acquires an important characteristic, quadratic phase (chirp). In
141: contrast to conventional soliton solutions, DM solitons can exist for
142: zero (or even negative) values of average dispersion.
143: %~\cite{Kodama,Doran}.
144:
145: Approximate scale characteristics of the dispersion noise present in
146: real fibers can be extracted from experimental
147: results~\cite{96MMN,98GM}. These results show that the smallest scale
148: of noticeable change in the dispersion value is approximately $\sim
149: 1-2 km$. For constant dispersion fibers (model A), the amplifier
150: spacing is $\sim 50-60 km$, and for dispersion managed fibers (model
151: B), the period of a typical dispersion map is also $\sim 50-60 km$.
152: These scales are much longer than that of the dispersion variation,
153: justifying the idealized consideration of delta-correlated noise for
154: both models. Previously, the stability of initial pulses in the
155: presence of the short-range-correlated Gaussian uniform noise $\xi
156: _{u}$ with zero mean,
157: %\begin{equation}
158: $\left\langle \xi _{u}(z_{1})\xi _{u}(z_{2})\right\rangle =D\delta
159: \left(
160: z_{1}-z_{2}\right)$, %\label{delta}\end{equation}
161: was studied for both models (A) and (B). For model (A), adiabatic
162: theory, valid if the noise is weak, shows dynamical broadening of the
163: pulse and its eventual destruction~\cite{98ACS}. The pulse-broadening
164: effects of $\xi _{u}$ on model (B) were studied numerically and by
165: means of a variational approach~\cite{98ACS,00AB}.
166:
167: The problem can also be addressed in the limit of strong noise. On
168: short scales the nonlinearity is weak and propagation is essentially
169: linear : only the phase of the pulse is changed by a rapidly varying
170: dispersion, while its frequency spectrum is not. In this weakly
171: nonlinear case the following change of variables is suggested, $\psi
172: \left( z;t\right) =\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }d\omega \exp \left[ -
173: i\left(
174: \omega t+\omega ^{2} %
175: \left[ \int_{0}^{z}\left( d(z^{\prime })-d_{0}\right) dz^{\prime
176: }\right] \right) \right] \psi _{\omega }(z),$ where $\psi_\omega (z)$
177: describes the pulse evolution on longer scales. The equation for the
178: noise average of the slow filed $ \varphi _{\omega}=\left\langle \psi
179: _{\omega }(z)\right\rangle $ derived from (\ref{disp}) is
180: \begin{eqnarray} & &
181: \left( -i\partial _{z}\!+\!id_{0}\omega ^{2}\right)\varphi _{\omega
182: }\!=\!2\int d\omega_{1,2,3} \delta \left( \omega _{1}\!+\!\omega
183: _{2}\!-\!\omega _{3}\!-\!\omega \right) \nonumber \\ && \times
184: \exp\left[ -i\Delta \int\limits_{0}^{z}dz^{\prime }\left( d_{\det
185: }-d_{0}\right)\right]\ e^{-\Delta ^{2}Dz_{\ast }/2}\ \varphi
186: _{1}\varphi _{2}\bar{\varphi}_{3}. \label{kernel}
187: \end{eqnarray}
188: Here, $\Delta \equiv \omega _{1}^{2}+\omega _{2}^{2}-\omega
189: _{3}^{2}-\omega ^{2}$, and the second exponential on the right of
190: (\ref{kernel}), which we will call the kernel, is the average of $\exp
191: \left[ -i\Delta \int_{0}^{z}\xi \left( z^{\prime }\right) dz^{\prime
192: }\right] $. $z_{\ast}=z$%
193: , thereby setting the correlation scale, $z_{\xi }=[\Delta
194: ^{2}D]^{-1}\sim \lbrack \omega ^{4}D]^{-1}\sim b^{4}/D$. The
195: approximation is justified, i.e. the nonlinearity is weak if
196: $z_{\xi}\ll z_{NL}$. The exponential decay of the kernel with $z$
197: disrupts the balance between nonlinearity and dispersion necessary for
198: steady pulse propagation.
199:
200: The grim analytical conclusion is that the natural noise in dispersion
201: leads to destruction of initially localized signal in the extremes of
202: both weak
203: %($z_{\xi}\gg z_{NL}$)
204: and strong
205: %($z_{\xi}\ll z_{NL}$)
206: noise. Numerical study of the intermediate range shows the same
207: effect.
208:
209: The natural question is that of the existence of {\em an artificial
210: constraint} which may reduce or completely prevent this pulse
211: broadening. We demonstrate that such a constraint does indeed exist,
212: and can be readily implemented in real fibers. All that is required is
213: that {\em the accumulated dispersion, $\int_{0}^{z}dy\xi (y)$, is set
214: to zero, or pinned, either periodically or quasi-periodically} with a
215: period of the order or less than $z_{\xi }$. The resulting Gaussian
216: nonuniform noise, $\xi _{n}$
217: with zero mean is described by %\begin{equation}
218: $\left\langle \xi _{n}(y)\xi _{n}(z)\right\rangle
219: =D\left( \delta (z-y)-%
220: \frac{1}{l_{j+1}-l_{j}}\right) $ if
221: %\label{deltazeroInt}\end{equation}
222: $y$ and $z$ belong to the same segment bounded by an adjacent pair of
223: pinning points.
224: %i.e.,
225: %$l_{j}<y,z<l_{j+1}$, where $j$ is the
226: %pinning points label.
227: Otherwise there are no correlations.
228: %, i.e. $\left\langle \xi _{n}(y)\xi _{n}(z)\right\rangle =0$.
229:
230:
231: Consider the effect of nonuniform noise, $\xi=\xi_n$, in the weakly
232: nonlinear case. $z_\ast$ in (\ref{kernel}) is $z\left(
233: l_{j+1}-z\right) /\left( l_{j+1}-l_{j}\right) $ with $z\in \lbrack
234: l_{j};l_{j+1}]$. Thus the decay of the kernel in (\ref{kernel}) is
235: replaced by oscillatory (or quasi-oscillatory, when the period is
236: fluctuating) behavior. In the nonuniform case, additional averaging
237: over a single pinning leg reduces the $z$-dependent kernel of
238: (\ref{kernel}) to $\exp \left[ -\Delta ^{2}Dl/4\right] \sqrt{\pi
239: /\left[ \Delta ^{2}Dl\right] }\mbox{Erfi}\left[ \sqrt{\Delta
240: ^{2}Dl}/4\right] $. In Model (B), independent averaging of the first
241: exponential on the right-hand side of (\ref{kernel}) over $z_{DM}$
242: (see
243: also~\cite{96GT,96SKDBB}%
244: ) replaces it by $2\sin \left[ \Delta z_{DM}/4\right]
245: /\left[ \Delta z_{DM}%
246: \right] $. The overall result of the averaging procedure in the case
247: of $\xi =\xi _{n}$ is the emergence of a nonlinear term which
248: does not vanish as $%
249: z\rightarrow \infty $, in contrast to the case $\xi =\xi _{u}$, where
250: the nonlinearity dies away with $z\rightarrow \infty $.
251: One also concludes that $%
252: z_\xi$ sets the critical pinning period: the pinning
253: is efficient only if $%
254: l=l_{i+1}-l_i\lesssim z_\xi$. It is possible to show that the averaged
255: equation for $\xi =\xi _{n}$ has a steady solution~\cite{00CGMb}.
256: Notice also that the averaged kernel decays exponentially as $\Delta
257: ^{2}\rightarrow \infty $. This is much faster than the algebraic decay
258: obtained from averaging over the dispersion map period in pure
259: dispersion management. Therefore, the model of~\cite{99ZM}
260: corresponding to a very narrow type of nonlinear kernel (in $\omega
261: $-space) is better suited for the case considered here than for the
262: case of pure DM for which it was originally proposed. The averaged
263: equation approach is {\it \'{a} priori} applicable for a large but
264: finite $z$, so the emergence of a steady localized solution for the
265: averaged equation does not mean that the original problem possesses a
266: steady state. In the direct numerical simulation of (\ref{disp}), to
267: which we now switch our attention, the effect is seen as essentially
268: limiting the pulse broadening.
269:
270: We perform numerical investigations of both models (A) and (B) with
271: $\xi =\xi _{u}$ and $\xi=\xi_{n}$ in intermediate case, $z_{NL}\sim
272: z_\xi$.
273: %The initial ($z=0$) pulse is the exact soliton for model (A) and it is
274: %a Gaussian pulse close to the respective DM soliton for model (B).
275: Fourier split-step scheme with
276: %to solve models (A) and (B)
277: %numerically for the two cases, $\xi =\xi _{u}$ and $\xi =\xi _{n}$.
278: $2^{13}$ temporal Fourier modes and periodic conditions imposed on the
279: boundaries of the domain $t\in [-180,180]$ is implemented.
280: The spatial step is $%
281: z_{step}=0.01$ and the numerical convergence was checked by varying
282: the size of the periodic box and number of the Fourier harmonics.
283: Parameters for the initial signal were chosen to be $d_{0}=1$, $a=1$
284: in
285: model (A), and $%
286: d_{0}=0.15$, $d_{DM}=0.1$, $z_{DM}=1$,
287: $|\psi(0;t)|=0.79\exp(-t^2/2.6)$ in model (B). The setup in model (B)
288: is borrowed from~\cite{99TSSM} and corresponds to experimentally
289: available DM fibers. Gaussian zero-mean noise correlated at
290: $z_{n}=0.1$ with amplitude $d_{n}=1$
291: models the $\delta $%
292: -correlated uniform noise with $D=d_{n}^{2}z_{n}=0.1$. The nonuniform
293: noise is constructed from the uniform noise by the following
294: subtraction at every pinning leg: $\xi _{n}(z)=\xi
295: _{u}(z)-\frac{1}{l_{j+1}-l_{j}}%
296: \int_{l_{j}}^{l_{j+1}}dy\xi (y)$. Pinning strategies of two types are
297: considered: strictly periodic, $l_{j+1}-l_{j}=l$, where $l$ is fixed;
298: and quasi-periodic, $l_{j+1}-l_{j}=l(1+\eta )$, where $\eta $ is a
299: random number uniformly distributed between $\pm 1/2$. The averaged
300: (or otherwise strict) pinning period for the nonuniform case is taken
301: to be $1 $, $5$ or $10$. The simulation runs until the pulse arrives
302: at $z=95$. Statistics were collected for $10^2-10^{3}$, and in a
303: special case $10^{4}$, realizations.
304:
305:
306: \begin{figure}[tbp]
307: \psfig{file=figa.eps,width=8cm,height=5.5cm}
308: %\hskip1cm
309: \psfig{file=figb.eps,width=8cm,height=5.5cm}
310: %\caption{Averaged pulse-width as a function of $z$ measured at the
311: %half-of-the-peak-amplitude position. Fig1A and
312: %Fig1B correspond to the model A and B respectively. }
313: %\label{Fig1}
314: \end{figure}
315:
316: The averaged pulse-width (full width at half maximum amplitude) as a
317: function of $z$ is shown in Figure 1, see also \cite{Movie}. The
318: capital letter subscript of the figures corresponds to the type of
319: model, (A) or (B). Solid black, red, green, and blue represent uniform
320: noise, and nonuniform noise with pinning period $l=1,5,10$
321: respectively. The quasi-periodic curves are dashed and of the same
322: color as the respective periodic ones.
323:
324: For Model(A), all types of nonuniform noise demonstrate a significant
325: reduction in the rate of pulse broadening when compared with the
326: uniform case. The individual configurations that degrade (through
327: pulse splitting, etc.) in the uniform case maintain pulse integrity
328: when each type of nonuniform compensation is applied. The dependence
329: on the pinning period is monotonic: the peak amplitude of the pulse
330: decays faster as the pinning period increases. The difference between
331: periodic and respective quasi-periodic cases is minor, with a slightly
332: better confinement observed for the quasi-periodic case. The
333: destruction of the pulse is also accompanied by emission of continuous
334: radiation by the soliton. The radiation is clearly seen in the movie
335: made for individual runs~\cite{Movie}. Once the radiation reaches the
336: boundaries of the box, it reflects and starts to interfere with the
337: still localized solution. The latter shows up in the change of the
338: averaged-width behavior at larger distances, $z\sim 20$. In
339: principle, one could introduce absorbing boundary conditions to enable
340: longer-time simulations. However, these conditions are artificial, as
341: in real data streams pulses are not isolated. Each pulse emits
342: continuous radiation which eventually interacts with neighboring
343: pulses. In this paper we purposefully study self-interaction of a
344: pulse and its radiation via reflecting boundary conditions, which is a
345: simple model for the behavior of a real bit stream. Our results reveal
346: that after $z\sim 20$, the rate of pulse disintegration is reduced,
347: suggesting that in a real bit pattern, pulse disintegration might be
348: prevented by radiation absorption from neighboring pulses.
349:
350: The effect of nonuniform noise is more dramatic in the case of
351: Model(B). For nonuniform compensation with the averaged period $l=1$
352: (and also less) one observes a tendency toward statistically steady
353: behavior: the average pulse width does not decay (in contrast to a
354: decay in the uniform case), and the PDF of the pulse width (and of
355: other variables characterizing the pulse propagation, such as
356: amplitude) does not change shape with $z$~\cite{D5}. There is no
357: visible emission of radiation by the localized solution for any case
358: of Model (B). We have also checked that temporal and spatial averages
359: (for example for the PDF of the pulse width) coincide. The dependence
360: on the type of compensation (for $l>1$) is monotonic, and the
361: difference between the random and quasi-random cases is minor, as in
362: the case of Model(A).
363:
364: Notice that the tremendous reduction in the pulse decay is achieved by
365: very minor changes in dispersion (see \cite{Movie}, for the comparable
366: plots of the dispersion profiles).
367:
368: Our analysis gives practical recommendations for improving fiber
369: system performance that is limited by randomness in chromatic
370: dispersion. The limitation originates from accumulation of the
371: integral dispersion. The distance between naturally occurring nearest
372: zeros of the accumulated dispersion grows with the fiber length ($\sim
373: \sqrt{z}$ as it is shown in \cite{00CGMb}). This growth causes
374: asymptotic decay of the nonlinearity with $z$ and, therefore, pulse
375: degradation. We have shown that the signal can be stabilized by
376: periodic or quasi-periodic pinning of the accumulated random
377: dispersion \cite{different}. This can be achieved by first measuring
378: the mismatch between the nominal dispersion of the fiber line and the
379: actual accumulated dispersion, and second, inserting a small fiber to
380: compensate this mismatch \cite{00MMGNMGV}.
381:
382:
383: We are grateful to G.D. Doolen, G. Falkovich, I.
384: Fatkullin, J. Hesthaven, I.
385: Kolokolov, P. Lushnikov, P. Mamyshev, F.G. Omenetto,
386: H. Rose, T. Schaefer,
387: Z. Toroczkai, and S. Tretiak for constructive
388: comments. M.C. wishes to
389: acknowledge the support of J.R. Oppenheimer
390: fellowship and the hospitality
391: of ITP Santa Barbara, where part of this work has
392: been done. This work was
393: supported in part (I.G.) by DOE Contract
394: W-7-405-ENG-36 and by the DOE
395: Program in Applied Mathematical Sciences, KJ-01-01.
396:
397: \begin{references}
398: \bibitem{Recent reviews} G. Steinmeyer, D.H. Sutter,
399: L. Gallmannn, N.
400: Matuschek, U. Keller, Science {\bf 286}, 1507 (1999);
401: G.A. Thomas, A.A.
402: Ackerman, P.R. Prunchal, S.L. Cooper, Physics Today
403: {\bf 53, 9}, 30 (2000);
404: %;G.A. Thomas, B.I. Shraiman, P.F. Glodis, M. Stephen,
405: %Nature {\bf 404}, 262 (2000).
406:
407: \bibitem{Multimode} Notice, however, that in the
408: multi-channel situation
409: (which will not be discussed here) the opposite to the
410: standard expectation
411: is also possible : namely the presence of random inter-modes
412: (channels) scattering
413: can be used here to improve the total information
414: capacity of a multi-mode
415: optical fiber. See, A.F. Garito, J. Wang, R. Gao,
416: Science {\bf 281}, 962
417: (1998); H. Stuart, Science {\bf 289}, 281 (2000), and
418: also discussion of
419: similar ideas in the field of wireless
420: communications: G. J. Foschini, M.J.
421: Gans, Wireless Personal Commun. {\bf 6}, 311 (1998);
422: A.L. Mousstakas, H.U.
423: Baranger, L. Balents, A.M. Sengupta, S.H. Simon,
424: Science {\bf \ 287}, 287
425: (2000).
426:
427: \bibitem{Gordon-Hauss} J.N. Elgin, Phys. Lett. {\bf
428: 110A}, 441 (1985);
429: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 47}, 4331 (1993);J.P. Gordon, H.A.
430: Haus, Opt. Lett. {\bf %
431: 11}, 665 (1986); G. Falkovich, I. Kolokolov, V.
432: Lebedev, S. Turitsyn,
433: preprint 04/2000,
434: http://xyz.lanl.gov/abs/nlin.CD/0004001.
435:
436: \bibitem{PMD} C.D. Poole, Opt. Lett. {\bf 13}, 687
437: (1988); {\bf 14}, 523
438: (1989); C.D. Poole, J.H. Winters, and J.A. Nagel, Opt.
439: Lett. {\bf 16}, 372
440: (1991); N. Gisin, Opt. Comm. {\bf 86}, 371-373 (1991);
441: P.K. Wai,
442: C.R.Menyak, H.H. Chen, Opt. Lett. {\bf 16}, 1231
443: (1991).
444:
445: \bibitem{97A} G.P. Agrawal, Fiber-optic communication
446: systems, New York,
447: Wiley, 1997.
448:
449: \bibitem{96MMN} L.F. Mollenauer, P.V. Mamyshev, M.J.
450: Neubelt,
451: %''Method for
452: %facile and accurate measurement of optical fiber dispersion maps'',
453: Opt. Lett. {\bf 21}, 1724 (1996).
454:
455: \bibitem{98GM} J. Gripp, L.F. Mollenauer,
456: %Enhanced range far OTDR-like dispersion map measurements.
457: Opt. Lett. {\bf 23}, 1603 (1998).
458:
459: \bibitem{Param} All parameters are presented here in
460: dimensionless units
461: which transform to real-world fiber units according to
462: the following rules.
463: The envelope of the electric field is in the form
464: $\psi =E/\sqrt{P_{0}}$,
465: where $P_{0}$ is the peak pulse power. The propagation
466: variable is $%
467: z=x(\alpha P_{0}/2)$, where $x$ is distance along the
468: fiber and $\alpha $ is
469: the Kerr nonlinearity coefficient. The Kerr
470: coefficient can be expressed in
471: terms of other fiber parameters, $\alpha =2\pi
472: n_{2}/(\lambda S_{eff})$,
473: where $n_{2}$ is the nonlinear component of fiber
474: refractive index, $\lambda
475: $ is operating wavelength, and $S_{eff}$ is an
476: effective core area of the
477: fiber. The spatial coordinate is $t=\tau /\tau _{0}$,
478: where $\tau $ is in
479: the reference frame of the group velocity and $\tau
480: _{0}$ is the
481: characteristic pulse width. The dispersion coefficient
482: is $d=2\beta
483: _{2}/(\alpha P_{0}\tau _{0}^{2})$, where $\beta _{2}$
484: is the second order
485: dispersion parameter. The typical parameters for
486: dispersion shifted fiber
487: are: $\lambda =1550$nm , $\tau _{0}=7.01$ps, $x=50$km,
488: $P_{0}=$ $4$mW, $%
489: \beta _{2}$ $=2$ ps$^{2}/$km, $\alpha =10$
490: Wt$^{-1}$km$^{-1}$.
491:
492: \bibitem{72ZS} V. E. Zakharov, A.B. Shabat, Sov.
493: Phys. JETP {\bf 34}, 62
494: (1972).
495:
496: \bibitem{80LKC} C. Lin, H. Kogelnik, L.G. Cohen, Opt.
497: Lett. {\bf 5}, 476
498: (1980).
499:
500:
501:
502: %\bibitem{00MMGNMGHV} L.F. Mollenauer, P.V. Mamyshev,
503: %J. Gripp, M.J.
504: %Neubelt, N. Mamysheva, L. Gruner-Nielsen, T. Veng,
505: % Demonstration of massive wavelength-division
506: %multiplexing over
507: % transoceanic distances by use of dispersion-managed
508: %solitons,
509: %Opt. Lett.,{\bf 25}, 704, (2000).
510:
511: \bibitem{96GT} I. Gabitov, S.K. Turitsyn, Opt. Lett.
512: {\bf 21}, 327 (1996);
513: JETP Lett. {\bf 63}, 861 (1996).
514:
515: \bibitem{96SKDBB} N. Smith, F. M. Knox, N.J. Doran,
516: K.J. Blow, I. Bennion,
517: %''Enhanced power solitons in optical fiber transmission line'',
518: Electron. Lett. {\bf 32}, 54 (1996).
519:
520: \bibitem{99TSSM} S.K. Turitsyn, T. Schafer, K.H.
521: Spatschek, V.K.
522: Mezentsev,
523: %''Path-averaged chirped optical soliton in dispersion-managed fiber
524: %communication lines'',
525: Opt. Comm. {\bf 163}, 122 (1999).
526:
527: \bibitem{99GGDBMGHFG} D.Le. Guen, et al.,
528: Post Deadline Paper, OFC/IOOC'99, San
529: Diego, CA, USA.
530:
531: \bibitem{98ACS} F. Kh. Abdullaev, J.G. Caputo, M.P.
532: Sorensen, in New
533: trends in Optical Soliton Transmission Systems, A.
534: Hasegawa, Eds. (Kluwer,
535: Dordrecht, 1998); F.Kh. Abdullaev, J. C. Bronski and
536: G. Papanicolaou,
537: Physica {\bf D}135, 369 (2000).
538:
539: \bibitem{00AB} F. Kh. Abdullaev, B. B. Baizakov,
540: %'' Disintegration of asoliton in a disperion-managed
541: %optical
542: % communication line with random parameters'',
543: Opt. Lett. {\bf 25}, 93 (2000).
544:
545: \bibitem{00CGMb} M. Chertkov, I. Gabitov, J. Moeser,
546: Z. Toroczkai,
547: unpublished.
548:
549: \bibitem{99ZM} V.E. Zakharov, S.V. Manakov, JETP
550: Lett. {\bf 70}, 578
551: (1999).
552:
553: \bibitem{Movie} Movies of single realization
554: dynamics in $z$, comparative
555: plot of the dispersion profile with and without
556: compensation, and more
557: figures characterizing statistics of the pulse
558: propagation (in the various
559: cases considered) are available at
560: http:/cnls.lanl.gov/\symbol{126}chertkov/Fiber.
561:
562: \bibitem{D5} Notice that for the case with the same
563: pinning period $l=1$
564: but greater $D=2.5$, a minor, but still observable
565: degradation of pulse
566: occurred. This is consistent with the statement
567: concerning the efficiency
568: of the pinning made in the text: the greater $D$, the
569: lower the critical
570: pinning period.
571:
572: \bibitem{different} Real fiber spans, usually each of
573: length $0.5-2$ $z_{NL}
574: $, are not homogeneous, as they are often produced at
575: different times by
576: different companies.
577:
578: \bibitem{00MMGNMGV} After the work was completed we
579: learned about the
580: paper of L.F.Mollenauer, et al. [ Opt. Lett. {\bf 25},
581: 704 (2000)], where
582: long haul transmission experiments on fibers
583: built from spans of
584: different types are described. It was shown there that
585: periodic
586: compensation of the overall dispersion to the fixed
587: residual value
588: (achieved via insertion of an extra span) optimizes
589: propagation of pulses.
590: These results are consistent with, and also give an
591: experimental support
592: to, the present proposed pinning method.
593: \end{references}
594:
595: \end{multicols}
596: \end{document}
597:
598: