1: \section{Introduction}
2: \label{sec:intro}
3: Billiards have played a prominent role in the understanding of classical and
4: quantum mechanics.
5: In such a system, a particle moves freely in a domain with specular reflections
6: at the boundary (the angle of reflection equals the angle of
7: incidence); see, e.g.,~\cite{Berry81}.
8: %
9: Billiards of a different kind are realized in ballistic mesoscopic
10: samples connected to a superconductor~\cite{Andreev64,Andreev66}. The boundary
11: of such an {\it Andreev billiard}~\cite{KMG95} consists of normal-conducting
12: regions with specular reflections and superconducting regions with Andreev
13: reflections, whereby electronlike quasiparticles with charge $-q$, mass
14: $m$, and energy $\varepsilon$ above the Fermi energy in the normal
15: metal are retroreflected as holelike quasiparticles with charge $q$, mass
16: $-m$, and energy $-\varepsilon$. In the absence of a magnetic
17: field, retroreflected orbits are self-retracing and therefore periodic. The
18: presence of a magnetic field allows for a richer spectrum of dynamical
19: behavior~\cite{KMG95}.
20:
21: In this paper, we study an interesting Andreev billiard, the
22: circular Andreev billiard in a uniform magnetic field. Our analysis will
23: lead one to the conclusion that boundary points separating normal
24: and superconducting regions, henceforth called {\it critical points}, have
25: the same consequences on the classical dynamics as {\it critical corners}
26: in rational polygonal billiards.
27: %
28: In such a polygon, all angles $\alpha_j = m_j\pi/n_j$ between sides are
29: rationally related to $\pi$, where $m_j, n_j > 0$ are relatively prime
30: integers.
31: %
32: The free motion inside a rational polygon is characterized as
33: {\it pseudointegrable}~\cite{RichensBerry81} since it shares some properties
34: of integrable systems:
35: (i) the phase space is foliated by two-dimensional invariant
36: surfaces~\cite{Hobson75,ZemlyakovKatok75};
37: (ii) the flow on these surfaces is ergodic and not mixing~\cite{Gutkin96}, and,
38: in particular, not chaotic (see, e.g.,~\cite{AA68} for the definition of ergodic properties).
39: Yet, in the presence of critical corners with $m_j > 1$ the dynamics is more
40: complex:
41: (i) the genus of the surfaces is greater than one~\cite{RichensBerry81};
42: (ii) the dynamics is not quasiperiodic; and (iii) presumably weak mixing,
43: but this is proven only for a special subclass; see,
44: e.g.,~\cite{Gutkin96}. Numerical evidence for weak
45: mixing has been reported in~\cite{ACG97,AGR00}.
46:
47: The paper is organized as follows. In Sec.~\ref{sec:andreev}, we
48: introduce the circular Andreev billiard and derive its Poincar\'e map,
49: which describes the collision-to-collision discrete dynamics.
50: We show that the dynamics is pseudointegrable, in the same sense as for
51: rational polygons.
52: The relation to the asymmetric barrier billiard is discussed in
53: Sec.~\ref{sec:barrier}.
54: Section~\ref{sec:dynamics} presents numerical evidence that the Poincar\'e
55: map is typically weak mixing on the invariant sets.
56: In Sec.~\ref{sec:con}, we draw conclusions and give an outlook.
57:
58:
59:
60: