1: \label{sec:c3pos}
2:
3: This section presents the main results we've determined from
4: numerical integration of the equations of motion: a map of the
5: fundamental periodic orbits of the three-spin system for and
6: \Poincare\ sections depicting the global dynamics of the system
7: for $\sigma=0.5$.
8: Like any chaotic system, the three spin system has an
9: infinite number of periodic orbits. However, a few short period
10: orbits form the skeleton of the system's
11: dynamics. Four of these are known; the {\it
12: stationary-spin} orbit, the {\it counterbalanced} orbit, the {\it
13: three-phase} and the {\it unbalanced} orbit. Fig. \ref{fig:poet} plots
14: the energy-time curves of the four orbits for $\sigma=0.5.$
15: (Spin trajectories for the four orbit types
16: are visualized in Fig. 1 of \cite{Houle98b})
17:
18: Sections \ref{sec:ssorbit} - \ref{sec:3porbit} discuss the
19: stationary-spin, counterbalanced, three-phase and unbalanced orbits
20: respectively.
21: Section \ref{sec:c3fmend} and \ref{sec:c3afmend} discuss global dynamics
22: near the ferromagnetic ($E \rightarrow 3$) and antiferromagnetic ($E
23: \rightarrow -1.5$) ends. Section \ref{sec:symdyn} points out
24: how symmetries of the Hamiltonian manifest in its
25: classical dynamics.
26:
27:
28: \subsection{Stationary spin orbits}
29: \label{sec:ssorbit}
30:
31: The stationary spin orbits are simple to study because any point on a
32: stationary spin invariant manifold (see Section \ref{sec:manifolds}) lies
33: on a stationary spin orbit. As there are three stationary spin
34: manifolds, there are three families of stationary spin orbits related by symmetry.
35:
36: For a stationary spin orbit, one spin (say, spin 1) is stationary in the
37: equatorial plane, while the other two spins move in distorted circles, $180^\circ$
38: out of phase. Fig. \ref{fig:sphere} is a plot of the trajectories of one
39: of the moving spins, based on the single-spin Hamiltonian
40: \eqn{\ref{eq:ssSingle}}. In the range
41: $-1<E<3,$ each family of stationary spin orbits has a single branch;
42: trajectories on the single-spin sphere are concentric
43: distorted circles centered around the FM fixed point. Between $E=-1$
44: and $E=E_c$, two branches of periodic orbits exist: the {\it outer branch}, still
45: centered around the $FM$ fixed point, and the {\it inner branch}, centered around
46: the $A$ fixed point. Below the
47: coalescence energy $E_c(\sigma)$, the orbits reorganize into a different
48: pair of branches (left and right), one centered around each antiferromagnetic ground state.
49:
50: The stationary spin orbit runs
51: along the $Z_A=0$ seam on the slice of the energy surface visualized in
52: Fig. \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}. Fig.
53: \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}d and c represent the case where $E>-1$ and
54: only one branch of the orbit exists. In Fig. \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}b,
55: the outer branch runs along the outside of the surface while the inner branch
56: rungs along the inside of the hole in the
57: surface. Finally in Fig. \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}a, left and right branches of the the
58: stationary spin orbit exist on two separate lobes of the energy surface.
59:
60: The energy-time curve for the stationary spin orbits is seen in
61: Fig. \ref{fig:poet}. Although one would expect that the periods of the left
62: and right
63: branches in the $E<E_c$ regime are the same (because they are related by reflection
64: symmetry,) it's a bit surprising that the period $T(E)$ of
65: the inner and outer branches in the $E_c<E<-1$ is also the same. Since the coalescence
66: separatrix intersects the stationary-spin manifold, the period of the
67: stationary spin orbits goes to infinity as $E \rightarrow E_c$ from either
68: side, with an observable effect on the quantum mechanical orbit spectrum.\cite{Houle98b}
69:
70: In the case of $\sigma=0.5,$ the stationary spin orbit is unstable for $E>-1.$
71: For $-1<E<E_c,$ the inner branch of the stationary
72: spin orbit is stable and the outer branch is unstable. The left and right branches
73: are stable as $E \rightarrow -1.5$ but become unstable as the energy increases
74: and chaos becomes widespread (the orbit does momentarily regain its stability
75: near $E=-1.22.$)
76: Fig. \ref{fig:ssStab} is a plot of the stability parameter $\rho=\lambda+\lambda^{-1}$ versus
77: energy for $E<-1,$ where $\lambda$ and $\lambda^{-1}$ are
78: eigenvalues of the transverse stability matrix; $|\rho|<2$ for a stable orbit and
79: and $|\rho|>2$ an unstable orbit. \cite{Lichtenberg92}
80:
81: \subsection{Counterbalanced orbits}
82: \label{sec:ccorbit}
83:
84: The counterbalanced orbit family is also easy to study because, like the
85: stationary spin family, it lives on an invariant manifold.
86: Counterbalanced orbits
87: exist only in the range $E>-1,$ and at least for $0<\sigma<2,$ the
88: counterbalanced orbit is always stable. As is the case for counterbalanced
89: manifolds, there are three counterbalanced orbits related by
90: the symmetry $\transop.$
91:
92: The spin wave analysis of Section
93: \ref{sec:spinWaves} can be applied to the stability properties of the
94: inner branch stationary spin and counterbalanced orbits in
95: the limit $E \rightarrow 1$.
96: A counterbalanced orbit (approaching from $E>-1$) and
97: the inner branch of a stationary spin orbit touch at each
98: antiparallel fixed point. Using the linearization around the
99: antiparallel fixed point \eqn{\ref{eq:mockEx}}, we can establish
100: that both orbits are stable, and compute the limiting value of
101: the stability exponent $\rho$ at $E \rightarrow -1$ for both
102: orbits.
103:
104: Because there are two distinct frequencies in the linearized
105: dynamics around the antiparallel fixed point, \eqn{\ref{eq:mockEx}},
106: dynamics in the vicinity of the antiparallel fixed point are
107: structurally stable and, for close enough energies, should be similar
108: to the linearized behavior. Focusing attention on the
109: counterbalanced orbit, the degree of freedom orthogonal to the
110: counterbalanced orbit is the stationary spin orbit -- therefore the
111: counterbalanced orbit is stable as $E \rightarrow -1.$ In one circuit
112: of the counterbalanced spin orbit, a slightly displaced trajectory winds
113: around the orbit at the frequency of the stationary spin spin wave. The winding
114: number is the ratio of the periods of the two orbits, or
115:
116: %
117: \begin{equation}
118: \theta = 2 \pi {T_c \over T_{ss}} = \sqrt{{1 - \sigma} \over {1+3 \sigma}}.
119: \end{equation}
120: %
121: For $\sigma={1 \over 2}, \theta={2 \pi \over \sqrt{5}}.$ The stability
122: parameter $\rho=2 \cos \theta$ equals $-1.891,$ and agrees
123: with the result obtained by numerical integration
124: (see Fig. \ref{fig:cbStab}). Repeating this analysis
125: for the stationary spin orbit, we obtain $\rho \rightarrow 0.175$ in
126: agreement with Fig. \ref{fig:ssStab}.
127:
128: \subsection{Three phase orbits}
129: \label{sec:3porbit}
130:
131: The three phase orbits do not lie on an invariant manifold and thus
132: have richer behavior than the previous two families of orbits.
133: Unlike the stationary spin and counterbalanced orbits for which
134: $\avgdotphi=0,$
135: three phase orbits can exhibit {\it precession},
136: a secular trend in $\Phi_0$ and
137: therefore can be periodic orbits of the reduced system but not the full system.
138: The three phase orbit undergoes a pitchfork birfucation at transition
139: energy $E_b$ ($E_b \approx -0.75$ for $\sigma=0.5$.) Above $E_b,$ a
140: single branch of non-precessing orbits exists, but below the bifurcation
141: three branches of three phase orbits exist: a non-precessing unstable orbit
142: and two stable orbits for which
143: $\avgdotphi \neq 0$ with opposite signs. This transition is visible
144: on curve (c) of Fig. \ref{fig:poet}. The unstable orbit exists for a
145: small energy below $E_b$ but soon disappears when the spin trajectory
146: intercepts the poles of the spin spheres.
147:
148: The three-phase orbits are so called because, in three-phase orbits, the
149: spins each execute an identical circuit around a distorted
150: circle, each $120^\circ$ out of phase -- much like the
151: currents used in three-phase AC power transmission. The
152: multiplicity of the three-phase orbit is different from the previous two:
153: Above $E_b$
154: there are two three-phase orbits, one in which the spins rotate clockwise
155: and another with counterclockwise rotation. Below $E_b$ and the demise
156: of the nonprecessing orbit, there are a total of four: each AFM ground state
157: has it's own pair, one member of which has $\avgdotphi$ positive and
158: the other $\avgdotphi$ negative. Fig. \ref{fig:precSq} is a plot of
159: the per-orbit precession rate of the three-phase orbit below the pitchfork
160: bifurcation; note that the precession rate converges on $2 \pi$
161: (effectively zero) as $E \rightarrow -1.5.$
162:
163: The three phase family is more difficult to study than the previous two,
164: because we must search the energy surface for it. It's still quite
165: straightforward, for as seen in Sections
166: \ref{sec:c3fmend} and \ref{sec:c3afmend} the three spin
167: orbit lies on the $Z_B=0$ line of the $\Phi_A=0$ surface of section and
168: can be found by a one-dimensional search. The stability exponent $\rho$ of
169: the three-spin orbit can be seen in Fig. \ref{fig:tpStab}.
170:
171: \subsection{Unbalanced Orbits}
172:
173: The {\it unbalanced} orbits, a family of unstable periodic orbits,
174: exist between $E=-1.5$ and $E=E_p.$ Unbalanced orbits do not lie on
175: a symmetric manifold and do not precess. The unbalanced family
176: corresponds with the unstable fundamental periodic orbit of the \Henon-Heiles
177: problem near its ground state -- in the $(\Phi_A,\Phi_B)$ plane the projection
178: of an unbalanced orbits is roughly a parabola that does not pass through the
179: projection of the AFM fixed point. Like the first two orbit
180: families, the behavior of one spin in the unbalanced orbit is different
181: from the other two; therefore there are three unbalanced orbits for each
182: of the two AFM fixed points, for a total of six unbalanced orbits.
183: At low energies, the odd spin moves along a closed curve in $(\phi,\theta)$ space while the
184: other two spins move along open curves which are dented on one corner and are
185: mirror images of one another. One unbalanced orbit lies on the line $Z_B=0$ line of
186: the $Z_A=0$ surface of section.
187:
188: The unbalanced orbit disappears at the polar transition, at which point
189: the trajectory of the odd spin grazes the poles, touching the holes
190: that appear between Fig. \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}c and
191: \ref{fig:scenarioTwo}d.
192:
193:
194: %%% Local Variables:
195: %%% mode: latex
196: %%% TeX-master: "document"
197: %%% End:
198: