1: \documentclass[fleqn]{vch-book}
2: \usepackage{amsmath}
3: \usepackage{amssymb}
4: \usepackage{makeidx}
5: \makeindex
6: \usepackage{times}
7: \usepackage{tabularx}
8: \usepackage{booktabs}
9: \setlength{\heavyrulewidth}{0.4pt}
10: \setlength{\lightrulewidth}{0.4pt}
11: \setlength{\cmidrulewidth}{0.4pt}
12:
13: \usepackage{epsfig}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16: \chapter{ Nonlinear Vibration in Gear Systems
17: \tocauthor{G. Litak and M.I.
18: Friswell}}\label{chap:editbooks}
19: \authorafterheading{Grzegorz Litak$^1$ and Michael I. Friswell$^2$}
20: %Name\footnote{You may use the footnote for
21: %your current address, expression of thanks etc.}}
22:
23: \affil{ $^1$ Department of Applied Mechanics, \\ Technical University of
24: Lublin,
25: Nadbystrzycka 36, PL-20-618 Lublin, \\ Poland \\ \\
26: $^2$ Department of Areospace Engineering, \\
27: University of Bristol,
28: Queens Building, Bristol BS8 1TR,\\ United Kingdom}
29:
30:
31: Gear box dynamics is characterised by a periodically
32: changing
33: stiffness and a backlash which can lead to a
34: loss of the contact between the teeth. Due to backlash, the gear system
35: has piecewise linear stiffness characteristics and, in consequence,
36: can vibrate
37: regularly or chaoticaly depending on the system parameters and the initial conditions.
38: We examine the possibility of a nonfeedback system control by introducing a weak
39: resonant excitation term and through
40: adding an additional degree
41: of freedom to account for shaft flexibility on one side of the gearbox.
42: We shall show that by correctly choosing
43: the coupling values the system vibrations may be controlled.
44:
45:
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49: Gear box dynamics is based on a periodically changing
50: meshing stiffness complemented by a nonlinear effect of backlash
51: between the teeth.
52: Recently, their
53: regular and chaotic vibrations have been predicted theoretically and examined
54: experimentally
55: \cite{Kah90,Sat91,Bla95,Kah97,Rag99,War00,Lit03}.
56: The theoretical description of this phenomenon
57: has been based mainly on single degree of freedom models
58: \cite{Kah90,Sat91,Bla95,Kah97,Rag99,War00,Sza96}
59: or multi degree models neglecting
60: backlash \cite{Sch86,War00b}. This paper examines the possibility of
61: taming chaotic vibrations and reducing the amplitude by nonfeedback
62: control methods. Firstly, we will introduce a weak resonant excitation
63: through an additional small external excitation term (torque) with a different
64: phase \cite{Cha01,Cao03}.
65: Secondly, we will examine the effect of an
66: additional degree of freedom to account for
67: shaft flexibility on one side of the gearbox \cite{Lit03}.
68: This may also be regarded as a single mode approximation to the
69: torsional system dynamics, or alternatively as a
70: simple model for a vibration neutraliser or absorber
71: installed in one of the gears.
72:
73:
74:
75: \section{One Stage Gear Model}
76: We start our analysis with modelling the relative vibrations of a single stage transmission
77: gear \cite{War00}.
78: Figure \ref{GLf1} shows a schematic picture of the physical system.
79: The gear wheels are shown with
80: moments of inertia $I_1$ and $I_2$ and are coupled by the stiffness and damping of the teeth
81: mesh, represented by $k_Z$ and $c_Z$.
82:
83: \begin{figure}
84: \vspace{1cm} \begin{center}
85: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig1.eps}
86: \vspace{-1cm}
87: \caption{ \label{GLf1}
88: The physical model of a one stage transmission gear system.}
89: %\vspace{1cm}
90: \end{center}
91: \end{figure}
92:
93:
94:
95:
96: The equations of motion of the system may be written in terms of the
97: two degrees of freedom, $\psi_1$, $\psi_2$ that represent the rotational angles
98: of the gear wheels. These angles are those that remain
99: after the steady rotation of the system is removed \cite{War00}.
100: Thus, if the backlash is initially neglected, we have
101:
102: \begin{eqnarray}
103: I_1 \ddot{\psi}_1 + \left[ k_Z(r_1\psi_1-r_2\psi_2)+
104: c_Z(r_1\dot{\psi}_1-r_2 \dot{\psi}_2) \right] r_1 & = & M_1,
105: \nonumber \\
106: I_2 \ddot{\psi}_2 - \left[ k_Z(r_1\psi_1-r_2\psi_2)+
107: c_Z(r_1\dot{\psi}_1-r_2 \dot{\psi}_2) \right] r_2 & = & -M_2, \label{GLe1}
108: \end{eqnarray}
109: where $r_1$ and $r_2$ are the radii of the gear wheels and the overdot represents
110: differentiation with respect to time $t$.
111:
112:
113:
114: \begin{figure}
115: \vspace{1cm} \begin{center}
116: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig2.ps}
117: \caption{\label{GLf2} The meshing stiffness $k(\tau)$.}
118: \end{center}
119: \vspace{0cm}
120: \end{figure}
121:
122:
123: \begin{figure}
124: \vspace{1cm} \begin{center}
125: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig3a.ps}
126: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig3b.ps}
127: \caption{ \label{GLf3} The amplitude of vibration (a) and the maximal Lyapunov exponent $\lambda_1$ (b) versus frequency
128: $\omega$
129: obtained by simulation. The initial conditions were assumed to be $x_0=-2.0$ and $v_0=\dot{x}_0=-0.5$
130: for small $\omega$ ($\omega_0=0.1$) and for each new $\omega$ ($\omega_{i+1}$) calculations were
131: performed for
132: $400$
133: excitation cycles. Each time
134: new initial conditions $(x_0,v_0)$ were chosen as the last pair of values of $(x,v)$ for previous
135: $\omega_{i}$ ($(x_0,v_0)|_{new}=(x,v)|_{old}$). Curves '1' and '2' correspond to cases with $D=0$ and $D=2$, respectively.}
136: \end{center}
137: \vspace{0cm}
138: \end{figure}
139:
140:
141: \begin{figure}
142: \vspace{1cm}
143: \hspace{-0.7cm}
144: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig4a.ps} \hspace{-1.2cm}
145: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig4b.ps}
146: \caption{\label{GLf4} The Poincare maps calculated for ten randomly chosen initial conditions for $\omega=1.5$ (a) and
147: $\omega=1.6$ the gray colour corresponds to simulations with respect to (Eq. \ref{GLe2}) while the black
148: one to (Eq. \ref{GLe6}), respectively.}
149: \vspace{0cm}
150: \end{figure}
151:
152:
153:
154:
155: In fact, it is possible to reduce the above two equations to one using the new relative
156: displacement coordinate $x=r_1\psi_1 - r_2 \psi_2$. That coordinate
157: represents the relative displacement of the gear wheels at the teeth.
158: The equation of motion for $x$ is obtained
159: by subtracting $r_2/I_2$ times first equation from $r_1/I_1$
160: times the second one (Eqs. \ref{GLe1}). Thus, in non-dimensional form, the
161: equation of motion can be rewritten as
162: \begin{equation}
163: \frac{{\rm d}^2}{{\rm d} \tau^2}x + \frac{2 \zeta}{\omega} \frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} \tau}x+ \frac{k(\tau)
164: g(x,\eta)}{\omega^2} = \frac{\bar{B}(\tau)}{\omega^2}
165: = \frac{B_0 + B_1 cos (\tau+ \Theta )}{\omega^2},
166: \label{GLe2}
167: \end{equation}
168: where the parameters are easily derived from Eqs. (\ref{GLe1}-\ref{GLe2}), as
169: \begin{eqnarray}
170: \tau &=& \omega t, \nonumber \\
171: 2 \zeta & = & c_Z \left[ r_1^2 /I_1 + r_2^2 / I_2 \right],
172: \label{GLe3}
173: \\
174: \bar{B}(\tau) & = & r_1M_1/I_1 + r_2M_2/I_2. \nonumber
175: \end{eqnarray}
176: $\zeta$, $k(\tau)$, $g(x,\eta)$ and $\bar{B}(\tau)$ are defined as in reference \cite{War00}.
177: Note that the backlash and time dependent meshing stiffness have been included by
178: rewriting the meshing force as \cite{War00}
179: \begin{equation}
180: k_Z \left[ r_1^2 /I_1 + r_2^2 / I_2 \right] x = k(\tau) g(x,\eta).
181: \label{GLe4}
182: \end{equation}
183: Equations (\ref{GLe3}) and (\ref{GLe4}) have assumed that the moments on the gear system are
184: composed of a sinusoidal moment at frequency $\omega$ with a constant offset.
185:
186:
187: The meshing stiffness is periodic and the backlash is described by a piecewise
188: linear function. Figure \ref{GLf2} shows a typical time dependent mesh stiffness
189: variation $k(\tau)$ \cite{War00} and the backlash
190: is modelled for a clearance $\eta$ as
191:
192: \begin{equation}
193: g\left( {x,\eta } \right) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
194: x & \hspace{8mm} & {x \ge 0} \\
195: 0 & & { - \eta < x < 0} \\
196: {x + \eta } & & {x \le \eta }. \\
197: \end{array}} \right.
198: \label{GLe5}
199: \end{equation}
200:
201:
202:
203:
204:
205:
206: \section{Vibrations of a Gear System in Presence of a Weak Resonance Term}
207: Now we are going to examine the gear system described by Eqs. (\ref{GLe1}-\ref{GLe5}) subjected to
208: to an additional external periodic excitation with a relatively small value $D$
209: \begin{equation}
210: \frac{{\rm d}^2}{{\rm d} \tau^2}x + \frac{2 \zeta}{\omega} \frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} \tau}x+ \frac{k(\tau)
211: g(x,\eta)}{\omega^2} =
212: \frac{B_0 + B_1 cos (\tau+ \Theta ) + D cos (\tau+ \Theta' )}{\omega^2},
213: \label{GLe6}
214: \end{equation}
215: where the phase angle $\Theta' \neq \Theta$. Such inclusion has been discussed earlier in the literature
216: as a suitable method of
217: chaos control for Josephson junction circuits \cite{Cha01} and Froude pendulum motion
218: \cite{Cao03}. In those papers the authors claimed that the resonant term, if used adequately, can tame or
219: include chaotic motion.
220: We have performed numerical simulations of Eqs. (\ref{GLe2}) and (\ref{GLe6}) to highlight the effect of
221: the addition of resonant term $D$ on the basic equation of motion (Eq. \ref{GLe2}). In particular we were
222: interested in changes in vibration amplitude. The type of
223: motion was analysed using Lyapunov exponents obtained by the algorithm of Wolf {\em et al.}
224: \cite{Wol88}.
225: System parameters have been used as in \cite{War00}:
226: $\omega=1.5$, $B_0=1$, $B_1=4$, $\Theta=0$, $\zeta = 0.08$, $\eta = 10$
227: while the additional excitation term \ref{GLe6} was
228: introduced as $D=2$,
229: $\Theta'=0.1$.
230:
231: Figure \ref{GLf3}a shows
232: the calculated vibration amplitude of the relative motions of the gear wheels, $A$, defined as
233: \begin{equation}
234: A=\left| \frac{x_{max}-x_{min}}{2} \right|.
235: \label{GLe7}
236: \end{equation}
237: The maximal Lyapunov exponent
238: $\lambda_1$ versus frequency
239: $\omega$,
240: obtained by simulation, is plotted in Fig. \ref{GLf3}b. Note, the initial conditions were assumed to be
241: $x_0=-2.0$ and
242: $v_0=\dot{x}_0=-0.5$
243: for small starting $\omega$ ($\omega=0.1$) and for each new $\omega_{i+1}$ calculations were performed
244: for
245: $400$
246: excitation cycles with
247: where new initial conditions were the last pair of values of $(x,v)$ for the previous frequency $\omega_{i}$.
248: Curves marked by '1' correspond to solutions of Eq. \ref{GLe2} while those marked by '2' correspond to
249: Eq. \ref{GLe6}.
250: One can easily note that the amplitude of the modified system is slightly larger but simultaneously the
251: system behaves
252: more regularly. In most of cases where the original system was in a chaotic state ($\lambda_1 > 1$ for the
253: curve '1', Fig. \ref{GLf3}b) it vibrates regularly in the presence resonant term ($\lambda_1 < 1$ for the
254: curve
255: '2' in Fig. \ref{GLf3}b). Unfortunately the taming of the chaotic motion was accompanied by
256: additional features
257: visible in Fig. \ref{GLf3}a. Clearly, the curve '2' describing the amplitude of motion shows a number of
258: jumps, i.e. for $\omega \approx 1.36$ and 1.70. These jumps may be associated with transitions to other
259: solutions (attractors)
260: with changing $\omega$. This effect is typical for many nonlinear systems but it seems to be more
261: transparent for $D \neq 0$.
262: To explore further this effect we have also calculated Poincare
263: maps for many initial conditions chosen randomly. The results for frequencies $\omega=1.5$ and
264: 1.6 are shown in Fig. \ref{GLf4}. In this figure, one can see that for $\omega=1.5$ attractors
265: (in gray colour) for $D=0$ and (in black colour) for $D \neq 0$ are similar. Here, numbers '1' and '2'
266: denote the regular and
267: chaotic attractors, respectively.
268: But if we move $\omega$ to a larger value ($\omega$= 1.6) the regular attractor for $D=0$
269: disappears. The attractor remains for $D \neq 0$, but interestingly another chaotic
270: attractor emerges. For some other
271: frequencies additional attractors also exist, which supports the proposed explanation of the jumping
272: phenomenon.
273:
274:
275:
276:
277:
278:
279:
280:
281: \section{Vibrations of a Gear System with a Flexible Shaft}
282:
283:
284: \begin{figure}
285: \vspace{0.5cm} \begin{center}
286: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig5.eps}
287: \vspace{1cm}
288: \caption{\label{GLf5}
289: The physical model of the gear model with an additional degree of freedom
290: introduced by a disk fixed by a flexible shaft to one of gear wheels.
291: }
292: \end{center}
293: \end{figure}
294:
295:
296: Here we examine the effect of adding an
297: additional degree of freedom to the gear system (Fig. \ref{GLf5}) by using
298: a flexible shaft on one side of the gearbox \cite{Lit03}.
299:
300: Now the equations of motion of the system may be written in terms of the
301: three degrees of freedom, $\psi_1$, $\psi_2$ and $\psi_3$, related to the rotational angles
302: of the gear wheels and disk, and have the following form
303:
304: \begin{eqnarray}
305: I_1 \ddot{\psi}_1 &+& \left[ k_Z(r_1\psi_1-r_2\psi_2)+
306: c_Z(r_1\dot{\psi}_1-r_2 \dot{\psi}_2) \right] r_1 = M_1,
307: \nonumber \\
308: I_2 \ddot{\psi}_2 &-& \left[ k_Z(r_1\psi_1-r_2\psi_2)+
309: c_Z(r_1\dot{\psi}_1-r_2 \dot{\psi}_2) \right] r_2 - k_S ( \psi_3-\psi_2 ) = -M_2, \nonumber
310: \\
311: I_3 \ddot{\psi}_3 &+& k_S ( \psi_3-\psi_2 ) = -M_3.
312: \label{GLe8}
313: \end{eqnarray}
314:
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \vspace{1cm} \begin{center}
318: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig6a.ps}
319: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig6b.ps}
320: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig6c.ps}
321: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90]{fig6d.ps}
322: \caption{\label{GLf6}
323: The amplitude of vibration (a) and the maximal Lyapunov exponent $\lambda_1$ (b) versus frequency
324: $\omega$
325: obtained by simulations. The initial conditions were assumed to be $x_{10}=-2.0$,
326: $v_{10}=\dot{x}_{10}=-0.5$ and $x_{20}=0$ $v_{20}=\dot{x}_{20}=0$
327: for small $\omega$ ($\omega=0.1$) and for each new $\omega_{i+1}$ calculations were performed for $400$
328: excitation cycles
329: where the new initial conditions were the last pair of values of $(x_1,v_1,x_2,v_2)$ for the previous
330: $\omega_{i}$.
331: Curves '1','2','3' were obtained for $k_S=0$, 0.1 and 1.0, respectively.
332: Four nonzero Lyapunov exponents $\lambda_i$ ($i=1,2,3,4$) versus frequency $\omega$ are shown
333: for $k_S=0.1$ (c) and $k_S=1.0$ (d).
334: }
335: \end{center}
336: \vspace{0cm}
337: \end{figure}
338:
339:
340:
341:
342: As in the previous case (Eqs. \ref{GLe1}, \ref{GLe2}) the above set of equations may be decoupled
343: by using the new relative
344: displacement coordinates $x_1=r_1\psi_1 - r_2 \psi_2$ and $x_2=r_2(\psi_3 -
345: \psi_2)$. Thus we
346: reduce the number of equations from three to two
347:
348:
349: \begin{eqnarray}
350: \frac{{\rm d}^2}{{\rm d} \tau^2}x_1 &+& \frac{2 \zeta}{\omega} \frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} \tau}x_1 +
351: \frac{k(\tau)
352: g(x_1,\eta)}{\omega^2} + \frac{\beta_1 k_S x_2}{\omega^2} \nonumber \\ &=& \frac{B_0 + B_1 cos ( \omega t+ \Theta
353: )}{\omega^2},
354: \label{GLe9} \\
355: \frac{{\rm d}^2}{{\rm d} \tau^2}x_2 &+& \frac{\beta_2 k_S x_2}{\omega^2} + \frac{2 \beta_3
356: \zeta}{\omega}
357: \frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d} \tau}x_1+ \frac{\beta_3 k(\tau) g(x_1,\eta)}{\omega^2}
358: = 0, \nonumber
359: \end{eqnarray}
360: where most of parameters have already been defined in Eqs. \ref{GLe3} and \ref{GLe4}.
361: The rest of them are easily
362: derived from Eqs.
363: (\ref{GLe8}-\ref{GLe9}), as
364: \begin{eqnarray}
365: \beta_1 & = & 1 / I_2, \nonumber \\
366: \beta_2 & = & 1/I_2 + 1/I_3, \nonumber \\
367: \beta_3 & = & (r_2^2/I_2) / \left[ r_1^2/I_1 + r_2^2/I_2 \right], \label{GLe10} \\
368: 0 & = & r_2M_2/I_2 - r_2M_3/I_3. \nonumber
369: \end{eqnarray}
370:
371: \begin{figure}
372: \vspace{1cm}
373: \hspace{-0.7cm}
374: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig7a.ps} \hspace{-0.8cm}
375: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig7b.ps}
376:
377: \hspace{-0.7cm}
378: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig7c.ps} \hspace{-0.8cm}
379: \includegraphics[scale=0.4,angle=-90]{fig7d.ps}
380: \caption{\label{GLf7}
381: Phase portraits (gray lines) and Poincare maps (black points) for $\omega=1.5$ and $k_S=0$ (a),
382: $k_S=1.0$ (b) and $k_S=0.1$ (c-d). The initial conditions:
383: $x_{10}=-2.0$,
384: $v_{10}=\dot{x}_{10}=-0.5$ and $x_{20}=0$ $v_{20}=\dot{x}_{20}=0$.}
385: \vspace{0cm}
386: \end{figure}
387:
388: The simulation results of the above system (Eq. \ref{GLe9}, Fig. \ref{GLf5}) are presented
389: in Fig. \ref{GLf6} and \ref{GLf7}. First of all we have repeated the calculations of the amplitude and
390: Lyapunov exponents. The results for the amplitude $A$ with various couplings ($k_S$) are
391: summarized in Fig. \ref{GLf6}a. Curves '1','2','3' correspond to for $k_S=0$, 0.1 and 1.0, respectively.
392: One can see that a suitable change to $k_S$ may lead to the lowering of the amplitude.
393: This effect is more efficient
394: in the case of $k_S=1.0$. Comparing the corresponding values of the maximal Lyapunov exponents one can
395: investigate the chaotic nature of the vibrations (Fig. \ref{GLf6}b). Namely, the case
396: $k_S=0.1$ (the curve '2') does not reduce the original chaoticity in region
397: around $\omega \approx 1.0$ and $\omega \in
398: [1.24,1.62]$ (the curve '1') while $k_S=1.0$ is large enough to tame the chaos in these regions as well
399: as to make the vibration amplitude smaller.
400:
401: It should be noted that for $k_S \neq 0$ there are four nonzero exponents to be examined. The
402: positive value of the
403: largest one $\lambda_1$, is presented in Fig.
404: \ref{GLf6}b. It detects frequency regions of chaotic vibrations. But it is also interesting to see what has
405: happened to the other
406: exponents, especially for our multidimensional system. They were also calculated and are plotted for comparison in Figs.
407: \ref{GLf6}c-d. For a small coupling stiffness, $k_S=0.1$, we have the surprising result that
408: most of the chaotic
409: regions are characterized by two positive exponents (Fig. \ref{GLf6}c), which is a signal that the system
410: is truly hyperchaotic \cite{Kap94,War99,War00b}. In this case two initially close trajectories escape
411: exponentially in two different
412: directions. The results of calculations with larger $k_S$ ($k_S=1.0$) are different (Fig. \ref{GLf6}),
413: where regions of chaotic motion with only one positive Lyapunov exponent were found, which signals
414: typical chaotic behaviour. To clarify this point we plot the phase portrait and Poincare maps for the chosen
415: frequency $\omega=1.5$. Figure \ref{GLf7}a shows the portrait plane and the Poincare map of chaotic
416: attractor
417: for $k_S=0$
418: while in Fig. \ref{GLf7}b, for $k_S=1.0$,
419: the corresponding attractor is regular, synchronized with the excitation frequency $\omega$. Figures
420: \ref{GLf7}c and d show the phase portrait and the Poincare map of the hyperchaotic attractor.
421:
422:
423:
424: \section{Conclusions}
425: This paper has examined the effect of adding an additional small resonance excitation term or an
426: additional degree of freedom to a simple
427: model of gear vibration (Figs. \ref{GLf1} and \ref{GLf2}). We have shown that the resonance term
428: can successively reduce chaoticity in the dynamical system (Fig. \ref{GLf3}b), although
429: the vibration
430: amplitude increases to a larger value than that for the basic system. We also noted several
431: sudden jumps in
432: the vibration amplitude value (Fig. \ref{GLf3}a) which could destroy a real gearbox. The jumps
433: are presumably caused by the
434: creation of a larger number of attractors in the presence of the resonance
435: term (Fig. \ref{GLf4}). The extra
436: degree of freedom (Fig. \ref{GLf5}), which may represent a flexible shaft or
437: a vibration neutraliser, also has a considerable effect on the dynamics.
438: We noted that the suitable use of the coupling value, shaft stiffness $k_S$, can lead to regular
439: attractors ($k_S=1.0$) and, simultaneously, to a reduction in the vibration amplitude (Fig.
440: \ref{GLf6}a-b). Interestingly we have found that for a small value of the coupling stiffness,
441: $k_S=0.1$, two
442: of the four Lyapunov exponents were positive, leading to hyperchaos phenomenon. The study of
443: the hyperchaotic
444: attactor will be reported in a separate article.
445: Thus the coupling $k_S$ is a proper bifurcation parameter giving a wide
446: range of system behaviour. The correct choice of this stiffness value can also be used to control the system vibrations.
447:
448:
449:
450: \renewcommand\bibname{References}
451:
452: \begin{thebibliography}[1]{99}\label{sect:labib}
453:
454:
455: \bibitem{Kah90} A.~Kahraman and R.~Singh,
456: \emph{ Non--linear dynamics of a spur gear pair},
457: Journal of Sound and Vibration \textbf{142} (1990), 49--75.
458:
459: \bibitem{Sat91} K.~Sato, S.~Yammamoto, T.~Kawakami, \emph{Bifurcation sets and
460: chaotic states of a gear system subjected to harmonic excitation},
461: Computational Mechanics \textbf{7} (1991), 171--182.
462:
463: \bibitem{Bla95} G.W.~Blankenship and A.~Kahraman,
464: \emph{Steady state forced response of a mechanical oscillator with combined
465: parametric excitation and clearance type non--linearity},
466: Journal of Sound and Vibration \textbf{185} (1995), 743--765.
467:
468: \bibitem{Kah97} A.~Kahraman and G.W.~Blankenship, \emph{Experiments on nonlinear
469: dynamic behavior of an oscillator with clearance and periodically
470: time--varying parameters}, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics \textbf{64} (1997), 217--226.
471:
472: \bibitem{Rag99} A.~Raghothama and S.~Narayanan,
473: \emph{Bifurcation and chaos in geared rotor bearing system by incremental
474: harmonic
475: balance method},
476: Journal of Sound and Vibration \textbf{226} (1999), 469--492.
477:
478: \bibitem{War00}
479: J.~Warmi\'nski, G.~Litak, K.~Szabelski, \emph{Dynamic phenomena in gear boxes},
480: in M.~Wiercogroch and B.~De
481: Kraker, editors. \emph{Applied nonlinear dynamics and chaos of mechanical systems with
482: discontinuities}, Series on Nonlinear Science Series A vol. 28, World Scientific,
483: Singapore 2000, 177--205.
484:
485:
486: \bibitem{Lit03} G.~Litak and M.I.~Friswell, \emph{Vibrations in gear
487: systems},
488: Chaos, Solitons \&
489: Fractals \textbf{16} (2003), 145--150.
490:
491:
492:
493: \bibitem{Sza96} K.~Szabelski, G.~Litak, J.~Warmi\'nski and
494: G.~Spuz--Szpos, \emph{Chaotic vibrations of the parametric system with baclash and
495: non--linear elasticity}, in
496: Proc. of EUROMECH -- 2nd European Nonlinear Oscillation
497: Conference, vol. 1, Prague, September 1996, 431--435.
498:
499: \bibitem{Sch86} G.~Schmidt, A.~Tondl, \emph{Non-linear vibrations},
500: Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1986.
501:
502: \bibitem{War00b} J.~Warmi\'nski, G.~Litak and K.~Szabelski,
503: \emph{Synchronisation and chaos in a parametrically and
504: self--excited system with two degrees of freedom},
505: Nonlinear Dynamics \textbf{22} (2000), 135--153.
506:
507:
508: \bibitem{Cha01} R.~Chakon, F.~Palmero and F.~Balibrea, \emph{Taming chaos
509: in a driven Josephson
510: junction},
511: International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos \textbf{11} (2001), 1897--1909.
512:
513:
514: \bibitem{Cao03} H.~Cao, X.~Chi and G.~Chen, \emph{Suppresing or including chaos by weak resonant
515: excitations in an externally-forced Froude pendulum}, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
516: (2003), in press.
517:
518: \bibitem{Wol88} A.~Wolf, J.B.~Swift, H.L.~Swinney and J.A.~Vastano, \emph{Determining Lyapunov exponents
519: from a time series}, Physica D \textbf{16} (1988) 285--317.
520:
521: \bibitem{Kap94} T.~Kapitaniak and L.O.~Chua, \emph{Hyperchaotic attractors of undirectionally coupled
522: Chua's circuits}, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos \textbf{4} (1994) 477--482.
523:
524: \bibitem{War99} J.~Warmi\'nski, G.~Litak and K.~Szabelski, \emph{Vibrations of a
525: parametrically
526: and self--excited system with two degrees of freedom}, in Proc. of Second
527: International Conference on Identification in Engineering Systems,
528: Swansea, March 1999, (Eds. M.I.~Friswell, J.M.~Mottershead and A.W.~Lees,
529: University of Wales, Swansea 1999), 285--294.
530:
531:
532:
533: \end{thebibliography}
534:
535:
536:
537:
538:
539:
540: \end{document}
541: