1: %\newcommand{\cn}{\rm{cn} (\it{rt})}
2: %\newcommand{\dn}{\rm{dn} (\it{rt})}
3: %\newcommand{\sn}{\rm{sn} (\it{rt})}
4:
5:
6: \documentstyle[aps,psfig,graphpap,graphics]{revtex}
7: \pagestyle{plain}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{Periodic waves in bimodal optical fibers}
11: \author{K. W. Chow$^1$ \thanks{
12: e-mail: kwchow@hkusua.hku.hk}, K. Nakkeeran$^2$ \thanks{
13: e-mail: ennaks@polyu.edu.hk}, and Boris A. Malomed$^3$ \thanks{
14: e-mail: malomed@post.tau.ac.il}}
15: \address{$^1$Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hong Kong, \\
16: Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong}
17: \address{$^2$Photonics Research Center and Department of Electronic and \\
18: Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, \\
19: Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong}
20: \address{$^3$Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Engineering, \\
21: Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel}
22: \maketitle
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We consider coupled nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations (CNLSE) which govern
26: the propagation of nonlinear waves in bimodal optical fibers. The nonlinear
27: transform of a dual-frequency signal is used to generate an
28: ultra-short-pulse train. To predict the energy and width of pulses in the
29: train, we derive three new types of travelling periodic-wave solutions,
30: using the Hirota bilinear method. We also show that all the previously
31: reported periodic wave solutions of CNLSE can be derived in a systematic
32: way, using the Hirota method.
33:
34: \noindent {\bf Keywords:} Optical fiber, coupled nonlinear Schr\"odinger
35: equations, periodic solutions, Hirota method.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \pacs{42.81.Dp, 42.65.Tg, 05.45.Yv}
39:
40: %\newpage
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43:
44: Steady increase of bit rates provided by fiber-optic telecommunication
45: networks is necessary to support the rapid growth of the data traffic. The
46: development of high-repetition-rate generators of high-quality ultra-short
47: pulses plays a crucial role for the increase of transmission capacity in
48: fiber-optic networks, as well as for optical-signal processing \cite
49: {yamamoto00}. Since available opto-electronic direct-modulation techniques
50: cannot provide for the generation of pulses at a repetition rate higher than
51: 40 GHz, nonlinear transformation of a dual-frequency signal in an optical
52: fiber is an attractive method for applications to ultrahigh-speed
53: telecommunications. Indeed, the repetition rate of the generated pulses can
54: be tuned by adjusting frequencies of the two input waves. A nonlinear
55: technique based on the modulational instability of a pump wave induced by a
56: small periodic signal was first suggested by Hasegawa \cite{hasegawa84} and
57: realized experimentally by Tai et al. \cite{tai86}. Another nonlinear method
58: is based on reshaping of a beat signal which results from superposition of
59: two pump waves of equal power. Nonlinear reshaping of the beat signal into
60: well-separated short pulses was previously demonstrated by several methods,
61: using dispersion decreasing fibers (DDF) \cite{mamyshev91}, intra-pulse
62: stimulated Raman scattering in DDF \cite{chernikov93}, or switching in a
63: nonlinear fiber-loop mirror \cite{chernikov93_2}. Other techniques based on
64: step-like and comb-like dispersion-profiled fibers, composed of segments of
65: conventional uniform fibers with different dispersions, have also been
66: proposed for the generation of picosecond and sub-picosecond pulse trains
67: with high repetition rates \cite
68: {chernikov93_3,chernikov94,chernikov94_2,chernikov96,swanson95}. However,
69: the common feature of these techniques, employed for the reshaping of a beat
70: signal, is that they rely on careful control of dispersion distribution in
71: complex fiber systems. An alternative approach, based on multiple four-wave
72: mixing (FWM) in an optical fiber with {\it constant} anomalous dispersion,
73: has been demonstrated theoretically for the generation of compressed pulse
74: trains from a dual-frequency pump field \cite{trillo94}. In particular, the
75: optimum fiber length (propagation distance at which the pulse width attains
76: a minimum) for given values of input beat-signal parameters, has been
77: accurately predicted by calculating the propagation distance at which the
78: maximum energy conversion from the pumps into the nearest FWM-sidebands
79: occurs \cite{trillo94}. Experimental demonstration of the generation of a
80: transform-limited, pedestal-free pulse train with high repetition rate by
81: means of this technique of the multi-wave-mixing temporal compression in the
82: standard non-zero dispersion-shifted fiber was reported recently \cite
83: {pitois02}.
84:
85: For this kind of ultra-short pulse-train generation from the beating of
86: two-mode signals, one must investigate periodic-wave solutions of nonlinear
87: equations governing the fiber system. The single-mode wave propagation in
88: fibers is governed by the well-known nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger (NLS)
89: equation \cite{HAS-KOD,GPA},
90:
91: \[
92: \psi _{z}-i\beta \psi _{tt}+i|\psi |^{2}\psi =0,
93: \]
94: where $\psi $ is the slowly varying envelope of the axial electrical field
95: and $2\beta $ is the group-velocity-dispersion (GVD) coefficient, while $z$
96: and $t$ are spatial and temporal variables. The normal and anomalous GVD
97: corresponds, respectively, to $\beta >0$ and $\beta <0$.
98:
99: Single-mode fibers actually support co-propagation of two different modes
100: with orthogonal polarizations, which, in the case of anomalous GVD and
101: without birefringence, is described by coupled NLS equations (CNLSE) \cite
102: {MAN,Hiet,men,pka}.
103:
104: \begin{eqnarray}
105: i\psi _{1z}-\beta \psi _{1tt}+\kappa \psi _{2}+\left( |\psi _{1}|^{2}+\sigma
106: |\psi _{2}|^{2}\right) \psi _{1} &=&0, \nonumber \\
107: i\psi _{2z}-\beta \psi _{2tt}+\kappa \psi _{1}+\left( |\psi _{2}|^{2}+\sigma
108: |\psi _{1}|^{2}\right) \psi _{2} &=&0, \label{cnlse}
109: \end{eqnarray}
110:
111: \noindent where $\sigma >0$ is the relative cross-phase modulation (XPM)
112: coefficient, and the linear coupling coefficient $\kappa $ accounts for
113: possible twist of the fiber in the case when $\psi _{1}$ and $\psi _{2}$
114: represent orthogonal linear polarizations, or elliptic deformation of the
115: fiber's cross section if $\psi _{1}$ and $\psi _{2}$ correspond to circular
116: polarizations. In fact, the linear coupling will play a crucially important
117: role in the present work.
118:
119: Complete integrability of the system (\ref{cnlse}) by means of the inverse
120: scattering transform (IST) in the case $\sigma =1,\,\kappa =0$ was shown by
121: Manakov \cite{MAN}. In a completely integrable system, one can use IST to
122: construct not only solitons, but periodic solutions too. However, $\sigma
123: \neq 1$ in real optical fibers, hence Eqs. (\ref{cnlse}) are not integrable.
124: In particular, $\sigma =2$ for two modes with circular polarizations, as
125: well as for a different situation, when two signals carried by different
126: wavelengths co-propagate in the fiber. For two linearly polarized modes, one
127: has $\sigma =2/3$, and in the more general case of elliptically polarized
128: modes, the XPM coefficient may take any value from $2/3<\sigma <2$. All
129: these physical situations come under the umbrella of the non-integrable
130: CNLSE system.
131:
132: The objective of the present paper is to find new periodic-wave solutions of
133: the CNLSE system (\ref{cnlse}) for both anomalous-GVD and normal-GVD
134: regimes. Solutions will be obtained by dint of the Hirota method (HM) \cite
135: {hir} through the Jacobi's elliptic functions. Links to previously found
136: periodic-wave solutions of the same system will be established too.
137:
138: The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we produce
139: three new types of periodic-wave solutions for the anomalous-GVD case, and
140: two new solution types for the normal-GVD\ case. In section 3, we briefly
141: consider the soliton (long-wave) limit of these solutions, concluding that
142: they amount to anti-dark and dark (generally, gray) solitons in the
143: anomalous- and normal-GVD cases, respectively. Conclusions are formulated in
144: section 4, and some technicalities are collected in two Appendices.
145:
146: \section{Periodic waves in the CNLSE system}
147:
148: \subsection{The anomalous-dispersion regime}
149:
150: In this subsection we consider the case $\beta <0$ in Eqs. (\ref{cnlse}),
151: adopting the normalization $\beta =-1$. Some periodic-wave solutions of
152: nonintegrable CNLSE systems have been found earlier for this case in Refs.
153: \cite{flo_trem_pla,kos_uzu_oc,flo_trem_oc}. Here we shall obtain three new
154: kinds of periodic solutions by means of HM, in terms of the theta and Jacobi
155: elliptic functions. We shall also show how previously known periodic
156: solutions of the system (\ref{cnlse}) can be readily found by means of HM.
157:
158: We start with the transformation
159:
160: \begin{equation}
161: \psi _{1}=\frac{1}{2}\left( a+ib\right) ,\,\,\psi _{2}=\frac{1}{2}\left(
162: a-ib\right) , \label{ab}
163: \end{equation}
164:
165: \noindent which casts Eqs. (\ref{cnlse}) with $\beta =-1$ in the form
166:
167: \begin{eqnarray}
168: ia_{z}+a_{tt}+\kappa a+\frac{1}{2}(|a|^{2}+|b|^{2})a+\frac{1}{4}(\sigma
169: -1)(a^{2}+b^{2})a^{\star } &=&0, \nonumber \\
170: ib_{z}+b_{tt}-\kappa b+\frac{1}{2}(|a|^{2}+|b|^{2})b+\frac{1}{4}(\sigma
171: -1)(a^{2}+b^{2})b^{\star } &=&0, \label{cnlsem}
172: \end{eqnarray}
173: where the asterisk stands for the complex conjugation. Stationary solutions
174: to these equations are sought for in the form
175:
176: \begin{eqnarray*}
177: a=\xi (t)\exp (-i\Omega z), \hspace{0.25in} b=\eta (t)\exp (-i\Omega z),
178: \end{eqnarray*}
179:
180: \noindent where the functions $\xi $ and $\eta $ are assumed real. Coupled
181: equations for these functions are tantamount to the stationary version of
182: the Manakov system,
183:
184: \begin{eqnarray}
185: \xi _{xx}+(\Omega +\kappa )\xi +\frac{1}{4}(1+\sigma )(\xi ^{2}+\eta
186: ^{2})\xi &=&0, \nonumber \\
187: \eta _{xx}+(\Omega -\kappa )\eta +\frac{1}{4}(1+\sigma )(\xi ^{2}+\eta
188: ^{2})\eta &=&0. \label{odes}
189: \end{eqnarray}
190: Despite the asymmetry of equations (\ref{odes}), accounted for by the terms
191: proportional to $\pm \kappa $, this system is an integrable one (it has a
192: second dynamical invariant, besides the Hamiltonian) \cite{Hiet}.
193:
194: We now employ the Hirota bilinear operator:
195:
196: \begin{equation}
197: D_{x}^{m}D_{t}^{n}g\cdot f=\left. \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial x}-\frac{
198: \partial }{\partial x^{\prime }}\right) ^{m}\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial
199: t}-\frac{\partial }{\partial t^{\prime }}\right) ^{n}g(x,t)f(x^{\prime
200: },t^{\prime })\right| _{x=x^{\prime },t=t^{\prime }}, \label{hir-der}
201: \end{equation}
202: to rewrite Eqs. (\ref{odes}) in the trilinear form \cite{kwc1}:
203:
204: \[
205: \xi \equiv \frac{g}{f},\,\eta \equiv \frac{G}{f},
206: \]
207:
208: \begin{eqnarray}
209: f(D_{x}^{2}+\Omega +\kappa )g\cdot f+g\left[ -D_{x}^{2}f\cdot f+\frac{1}{4}
210: (1+\sigma )(g^{2}+G^{2})\right] &=&0, \label{trans3} \\
211: f(D_{x}^{2}+\Omega -\kappa )G\cdot f+G\left[ -D_{x}^{2}f\cdot f+\frac{1}{4}
212: (1+\sigma )(g^{2}+G^{2})\right] &=&0. \nonumber
213: \end{eqnarray}
214: Periodic waves are obtained by choosing $g$, $G$, and $f$ as products of
215: theta functions. The Hirota bilinear forms of the theta functions can be
216: simplified by using known properties of these functions. Technical details
217: are omitted in the main text, as the method is very similar to that
218: presented in Refs. \cite{kwc1,kwc2}; a brief sketch of the derivation of the
219: solutions displayed below is given in Appendix \ref{app1}. The results are
220: presented in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions, rather than
221: theta-functions, as the Jacobi functions are more straightforward to handle
222: by means of computer-assisted algebra software. As an independent check we
223: verify that all the solutions given below satisfy Eqs. (\ref{cnlse}) by
224: direct differentiation with the software package Mathematica.
225:
226: An important point is the choice of the theta function for $f$. The
227: functions $\vartheta _{1}(x)$ and $\vartheta _{2}(x)$ have real zeros,
228: therefore choosing them will give rise to singular solutions. The functions
229: $\vartheta _{3}(x)$ and $\vartheta _{4}(x)$ are related by a phase shift of
230: $\pi /2$. Previously known solutions \cite
231: {flo_trem_pla,kos_uzu_oc,flo_trem_oc} employ the choice $f=\vartheta
232: _{4}^{2}(x)$. In this work, we start with $f=\vartheta _{3}(x)\vartheta
233: _{4}(x)$, hence the results are different from the previously known ones.
234: Furthermore, the advantage of HM is that it can be readily generalized for
235: CNLSE with more than two components.
236:
237: By means of this technique (see details in Appendix \ref{app1}), we have
238: obtained three new sets of solutions for the system (\ref{cnlsem}). The
239: first set has the form
240:
241: \begin{eqnarray}
242: \psi _{1} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
243: (rt)}-\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] +\frac{ikB_{1}{\rm {sn}}
244: (rt){\rm cn}(rt)}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}\right\} e^{-i\Omega z}, \nonumber \\
245: \psi _{2} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
246: (rt)}-\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] -\frac{ikB_{1}{\rm {sn}}
247: (rt){\rm cn}(rt)}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}\right\} e^{-i\Omega z}, \label{sol1}
248: \end{eqnarray}
249:
250: \noindent where $k$ is the modulus of the elliptic functions. The amplitude
251: parameters in these expressions are related by
252:
253: \begin{equation}
254: B_{1}^{2}=\frac{k^{2}A_{1}^{2}}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}-\frac{8r^{2}k^{2}}{1+\sigma }
255: \,, \label{AB}
256: \end{equation}
257: the frequency is
258:
259: \begin{equation}
260: \Omega =r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{3}{2}r^{2}(2-k^{2})-\frac{1}{4}
261: A_{1}^{2}(1+\sigma )\left[ \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}-2\right] ,
262: \label{Omega}
263: \end{equation}
264: and the modulus $k$ is related to the linear coupling constant $\kappa $:
265:
266: \begin{equation}
267: \kappa =r^{2}\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}-1+\frac{1}{2}k^{2}\right) .
268: \label{kappa1}
269: \end{equation}
270: Thus, the solution (\ref{sol1}) contains two free parameters, as five
271: constants $A_{1},B_{1},k,r$, and $\Omega $ are subject to three constraints
272: (\ref{AB}), (\ref{Omega}), and (\ref{kappa1}). Each of two other solutions
273: displayed below also contains five constants on which three conditions are
274: imposed. An example of the periodic solution (\ref{sol1}) is shown in Fig.
275: \ref{fig1} (a).
276:
277: The second solution is
278:
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: \psi _{1} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
281: (rt)}+\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] +\frac{ikB_{1}{\rm {sn}}
282: (rt){\rm cn}(rt)}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}\right\} e^{-i\Omega z}, \nonumber \\
283: \psi _{2} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
284: (rt)}+\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] -\frac{ikB_{1}{\rm {sn}}
285: (rt){\rm cn}(rt)}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}\right\} e^{-i\Omega z}. \label{sol2}
286: \end{eqnarray}
287: The relation between the amplitude parameters in this solution is the same
288: as given by Eq. (\ref{AB}), but relations between other parameters are
289: different,
290:
291: \[
292: \Omega =-r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{3}{2}r^{2}(2-k^{2})-\frac{1}{4}
293: A_{1}^{2}(1+\sigma )\left[ \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}+2\right]
294: ,
295: \]
296:
297: \begin{equation}
298: \kappa =-r^{2}\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+1-\frac{1}{2}k^{2}\right) .
299: \label{kappa2}
300: \end{equation}
301: Figure \ref{fig1} (b) shows an example of this solution.
302:
303: \begin{figure}[h]
304: \centerline{\scalebox{0.5}{\includegraphics{oc5fig1.ps}}}
305: \caption{ (a) The intensity $|\protect\psi_1|^2$ versus $t$ for the solution
306: (\ref{sol1}) with the amplitude relation (\ref{AB}) in the case $B_1 = 1$.
307: (b) The solution (\ref{sol2}) in the case $B_1 = 1$. (c) The solution (\ref
308: {sol3}) in the case $A_1 = A_2$. In all the three cases shown, and also
309: below in Fig. 2, $r = 1$ and $k =0.7$. Note the difference in the vertical
310: scale between the three solutions.}
311: \label{fig1}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: The third explicit solution is
315:
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: \psi _{1} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
318: (rt)}-\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] +iA_{2}\left[ \frac{
319: (1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}+\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}
320: \right] \right\} e^{-i\Omega z}, \nonumber \\
321: \psi _{2} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left\{ A_{1}\left[ \frac{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}
322: (rt)}-\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}\right] -iA_{2}\left[ \frac{
323: (1-k^{2})^{1/4}}{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}+\frac{{\rm {dn}}(rt)}{(1-k^{2})^{1/4}}
324: \right] \right\} e^{-i\Omega z}. \label{sol3}
325: \end{eqnarray}
326: This time, the amplitude parameters are related by the equation [cf. the
327: relation (\ref{AB}) for the two previous solutions]
328:
329: \begin{equation}
330: A_{1}^{2}+A_{2}^{2}=\frac{8r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}{1+\sigma }\,, \label{AA}
331: \end{equation}
332: and other constants obey relations
333:
334: \[
335: \Omega =-r^{2}(2-k^{2})-4r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}+(1+\sigma )A_{1}^{2},
336: \]
337: \begin{equation}
338: \kappa =2r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}. \label{kappa3}
339: \end{equation}
340: Figure \ref{fig1} (c) shows an example of this periodic solution.
341:
342: All the above solutions exist only in the presence of the linear coupling:
343: as it follows from Eqs. (\ref{kappa1}), (\ref{kappa2}), and (\ref{kappa3}),
344: no nontrivial solution can be found if $\kappa =0$. On the other hand, the
345: solutions exist at any value of $\sigma $, the Manakov's case, $\sigma =1$,
346: having nothing peculiar.
347:
348: As it was mentioned above, the same HM-based procedure makes it possible to
349: reproduce all the other periodic solutions of the CNLSE system (\ref{cnlse})
350: which were reported earlier in Refs. \cite
351: {flo_trem_pla,kos_uzu_oc,flo_trem_oc}. Those solutions can be obtained on
352: the basis of different combinations of the theta functions, see details in
353: Appendix \ref{app2}.
354:
355: \subsection{The normal-dispersion case}
356:
357: Proceeding to Eqs. (\ref{cnlse}) with $\beta >0$, we adopt the normalization
358: $\beta =1$, thus dealing with the equations
359:
360: \begin{eqnarray}
361: i\psi _{1z}-\psi _{1tt}+\kappa \psi _{2}+\left( |\psi _{1}|^{2}+\sigma |\psi
362: _{2}|^{2}\right) \psi _{1} &=&0, \nonumber \\
363: i\psi _{2z}-\psi _{2tt}+\kappa \psi _{1}+\left( |\psi _{2}|^{2}+\sigma |\psi
364: _{1}|^{2}\right) \psi _{2} &=&0. \label{normal}
365: \end{eqnarray}
366:
367: \noindent As well as in the case of the anomalous GVD considered above, we
368: can repeat the same steps, involving the transformation (\ref{ab}) and HM,
369: to generate periodic-wave solutions for the normal-GVD regime. We have thus
370: obtained two new sets of solutions, using different identities for
371: theta-functions.
372:
373: The form of the first solution is the same as given by Eqs. (\ref{sol1}),
374: but the amplitude parameters are related by
375:
376: \begin{eqnarray} \label{AB1}
377: B_1^2 = \frac{k^2}{\sqrt{1-k^2}} \left(A_1^2 + \frac{8 r^2 \sqrt{1-k^2}}
378: {1+\sigma}\right).
379: \end{eqnarray}
380:
381: \noindent The relations (\ref{Omega}) and (\ref{kappa1}) for the solution
382: (\ref{sol1}) are replaced by
383:
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: \Omega &=&-\frac{3}{2}r^{2}(2-k^{2})-r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}-\frac{1}{4}
386: (1+\sigma )A_{1}^{2}\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}-2\right) ,
387: \label{nor-freq1} \\
388: \kappa &=&r^{2}\left( 1-\frac{1}{2}k^{2}-\sqrt{1-k^{2}}\right) .
389: \label{kappa_dark1}
390: \end{eqnarray}
391:
392: The form of the second solution is the same as given by Eq. (\ref{sol2}),
393: and the amplitude parameters are related by (\ref{AB1}). However, the other
394: parameters are related by
395:
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: \Omega &=&-\frac{3}{2}r^{2}(2-k^{2})+r^{2}\sqrt{1-k^{2}}-\frac{1}{4}
398: (1+\sigma )A_{1}^{2}\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}}}+2\right) ,
399: \label{nor-freq2} \\
400: \kappa &=&r^{2}\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}+1-\frac{1}{2}k^{2}\right)
401: \label{kappa_dark2}
402: \end{eqnarray}
403: [cf. Eq. (\ref{kappa2})]. Figure \ref{fig2} shows an example of the latter
404: periodic solutions.
405:
406: \begin{figure}[h]
407: \centerline{\scalebox{0.5}{\includegraphics{oc5fig2.ps}}}
408: \caption{ The intensity $|\protect\psi_1|^2$ versus $t$ for the solution
409: (\ref{sol1}) of the dark-soliton type, subject to the amplitude relation (\ref
410: {AB}), in the case $B_1= 1$.}
411: \label{fig2}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414: There is no counterpart for the third anomalous dispersion regime solution
415: (\ref{sol3}) in the normal-GVD regime.
416:
417: \section{The soliton limit}
418:
419: A natural question is the soliton (long-wave) limit of the periodic
420: solutions derived above for both the anomalous- and normal-GVD regimes,
421: which corresponds to $k\rightarrow 1$. Note that many expressions in the
422: above solutions seem singular in this limit [for instance, Eq. (\ref{AA})].
423: However, accurate analysis shows that a nonsingular limit exists.
424:
425: In the case of anomalous GVD, both solutions (\ref{sol1}) and (\ref{sol2})
426: give rise to a single long-wave limit,
427:
428: \begin{eqnarray}
429: \psi _{1} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ \sqrt{\beta _{1}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma }}
430: {\rm sech}\left( rt\right) +i\beta _{1}{\rm tanh}\left( rt\right) \right]
431: \exp \left( -i\Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(1)}z\right) , \nonumber \\
432: \psi _{2} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ \sqrt{\beta _{1}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma }}
433: {\rm sech}\left( rt\right) -i\beta _{1}{\rm tanh}\left( rt\right) \right]
434: \exp \left( -i\Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(1)}z\right) , \label{soliton1}
435: \end{eqnarray}
436:
437: \noindent where $\beta _{1}$ is an arbitrary real constant, and
438:
439: \begin{equation}
440: \Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(1)}=-\frac{1}{2}r^{2}-\frac{1}{4}(1+\sigma )\beta
441: _{1}^{2},\hspace{0.5in}\kappa =-\frac{1}{2}r^{2}. \label{kappa}
442: \end{equation}
443:
444: \noindent The solution (\ref{soliton1}) corresponds to a state in the form
445: of a bright soliton placed on top of a continuous-wave background, as it is
446: seen from the expression for the intensity:
447:
448: \[
449: |\psi _{1}|^{2}=\left| \psi _{2}\right| ^{2}=\frac{1}{4}\left[ \beta
450: _{1}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma }{\rm sech}^{2}\left( rt\right) \right] .
451: \]
452: Solutions of this type are often called {\it anti-dark} solitons. \noindent
453:
454: The long-wave limit of the solution (\ref{sol3}) is only possible, as it
455: follows from Eq. (\ref{kappa3}), if the linear coupling $\kappa $ vanishes
456: as $\sqrt{1-k^{2}}$ simultaneously with $\left( 1-k^{2}\right) $ [on the
457: contrary to the above soliton-limit solution, see Eq. (\ref{kappa})]. In the
458: corresponding limit form of the solution, both $\psi _{1}$ and $\psi _{2}$
459: are proportional to ${\rm sech}\left( rt\right) $, which implies an obvious
460: bright vector soliton.
461:
462: In the case of normal GVD, the common long-wave limit of the solutions given
463: by Eqs. (\ref{sol1}), (\ref{AB1}), (\ref{nor-freq1}), (\ref{kappa_dark1})
464: and Eqs. (\ref{sol2}), (\ref{AB1}), (\ref{nor-freq2}), (\ref{kappa_dark2}) is
465:
466: \begin{eqnarray*}
467: \psi _{1} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ -\beta _{2}{\rm sech}\left( rt\right) +i\sqrt{
468: \beta _{2}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma }}{\rm tanh}\left( rt\right) \right]
469: \exp (-i\Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(2)}z), \\
470: \psi _{2} &=&\frac{1}{2}\left[ -\beta _{2}{\rm sech}\left( rt\right) -i\sqrt{
471: \beta _{2}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma }}{\rm tanh}\left( rt\right) \right]
472: \exp (-i\Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(2)}z),
473: \end{eqnarray*}
474:
475: \noindent where $\beta _{2}$ is an arbitrary real constant, and
476: \[
477: \Omega _{{\rm sol}}^{(2)}=-\frac{3}{2}r^{2}-\frac{1}{4}(1+\sigma )\beta
478: _{2}^{2},\hspace{0.5in}\kappa =\frac{1}{2}r^{2}.
479: \]
480:
481: \noindent As expected, this is a dark soliton with the intensity distribution
482:
483: \[
484: |\psi _{1}|^{2}=\frac{1}{4}\left[ \beta _{2}^{2}+\frac{8r^{2}}{1+\sigma}
485: \tanh ^{2}\left( rt\right) \right] .
486: \]
487:
488: \noindent In the general case ($\beta _{2}\neq 0$), this dark soliton is of
489: the {\it gray} type, i.e., with a nonzero minimum value of the intensity at
490: the central point, $t=0$.
491:
492: \section{Conclusions}
493:
494: The periodic solutions obtained in this work for the nonlinear fiber-optic
495: model with both anomalous and normal GVD can be helpful in predicting the
496: energy and width of ultra-short soliton trains using the bi-modal pulse
497: propagation in nonlinear optical fibers (the underlying CNLSE model is
498: definitely relevant for the pulse trains with the temporal width of the
499: pulses up to $\sim 1$ ps, provided that the loss is compensated by
500: appropriate gain). Using these analytical solutions, and knowing fiber
501: parameters, such as GVD, SPM and XPM coefficients, one can calculate the
502: exact shape, width and power of the periodic solution. These results may
503: also help to perform numerical simulations of the beatings of dual-frequency
504: signals.
505:
506: The above consideration was not dealing with stability of the pulse trains.
507: In the case of the anomalous GVD, the trains may be unstable; however, in
508: many cases one may expect that their instability is quite weak (see, e.g.,
509: Ref. \cite{Arnold}), which makes it possible to consider practical
510: applications of these waves, especially in the case of limited propagation
511: distance, which will not give the instability enough room to develop. On the
512: other hand, the pulse train may be completely stable in the case of normal
513: GVD. Moreover, a stable wavetrain with the carrier frequency chosen in the
514: normal-dispersion spectral region can be used to stabilize a co-propagating
515: periodic wave launched in the anomalous-GVD region (on the other side of the
516: zero-dispersion point), provided that group velocities of both waves
517: coincide, as it was proposed in Ref. \cite{Ship}. In fact, it is a
518: challenging issue (which will be considered elsewhere) to find exact
519: solutions for periodic waves in the bimodal system, with the XPM coefficient
520: $\sigma =2$ and without linear coupling ($\kappa =0$), in the case of
521: opposite signs of the dispersion in the two modes.
522:
523: For completeness, we have also presented the long-wave limit of the newly
524: obtained periodic wave solutions, in both the anomalous- and normal-GVD
525: cases. In the former case, it turns out to be an anti-dark soliton, while in
526: the latter situation the long-wave limit amounts to a dark (generally, gray)
527: soliton.
528:
529: To summarize, we have considered the CNLSE model (\ref{cnlse}), which
530: governs the propagation of electromagnetic waves in nonlinear bimodal
531: optical fibers. The model includes both XPM (nonlinear)\ and linear
532: couplings, the latter one accounting for a twist or elliptic deformation of
533: the fiber, in the cases of the linear and circular polarizations,
534: respectively. Using properties of elliptic theta functions and the Hirota
535: bilinear method, we have found three new types of periodic solutions in the
536: case of anomalous GVD, and two new types in the case of normal GVD. The new
537: solutions require the presence of the linear coupling. We have also shown
538: that all the previously reported periodic solutions of the CNLSE model can
539: also be obtained by means of the Hirota bilinear method. Thus, we conclude
540: that this method furnishes a powerful tool to derive different forms of
541: periodic-wave solutions in terms of elliptic functions. Basically the periodic solutions derived using the elliptic functions are in the form of raised sine or cosine functions, as seen from Figs. \ref{fig1} and \ref{fig2}. In most of the return-to-zero (RZ) coding the commonly used optical modulators utilize Mach-Zender interferometric technique. This technique yields raised cosine form of pulses for RZ bits coding. Hence we believe that the periodic solutions derived using Jacobi elliptic functions are of the same type as those generated by the Mach-Zender interferometer modulators. New analytical results obtained in this work may provide for important information in determining properties of pulse trains that are generated by dual-frequency signals in nonlinear optical fibers.
542:
543: \begin{center}
544: {\bf ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS}
545: \end{center}
546:
547: K.N. acknowledges support from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong
548: Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU5132/99E). This
549: author is grateful to P.K.A. Wai for all kinds of help. K.W.C. acknowledges
550: a partial financial support from RGC contracts HKU 7066/00E and HKU
551: 7006/02E. B.A.M. appreciates hospitality of the Optoelectronics Research
552: Centre at the Department of Electronics Engineering, the City University of
553: Hong Kong.
554:
555: \newpage
556:
557: \appendix
558:
559: \section{The theta-functions identities}
560:
561: \label{app1}
562:
563: The theta functions $\theta _{n}(x)$, $n$ = 1,2,3,4, are defined by as
564: follows below, together with auxiliary parameters $q$ and $\tau $:
565: \begin{eqnarray*}
566: \vartheta _{1}(x) &=&2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\sin \left[
567: (2n+1)x\right] \\
568: &\equiv &-\sum_{-\infty }^{\infty }\exp \left[ \pi i\tau \left( m+\frac{1}{2}
569: \right) ^{2}+2i\left( m+\frac{1}{2}\right) \left( x+\frac{\pi }{2}\right)
570: \right] ,
571: \end{eqnarray*}
572:
573: \begin{eqnarray*}
574: \vartheta _{2}(x) &=&2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\cos \left[
575: (2n+1)x\right] \\
576: &\equiv &\sum_{-\infty }^{\infty }\exp \left[ \pi i\tau \left( m+\frac{1}{2}
577: \right) ^{2}+2i\left( m+\frac{1}{2}\right) x\right] ,
578: \end{eqnarray*}
579:
580: \begin{eqnarray*}
581: \vartheta _{3}(x) &=&1+2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\cos \left( 2nx\right)
582: \\
583: &=&\sum_{-\infty }^{\infty }\exp (\pi i\tau m^{2}+2imx),
584: \end{eqnarray*}
585:
586: \begin{eqnarray*}
587: \vartheta _{4}(x) &=&1+2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\cos \left(
588: 2nx\right) \\
589: &=&\sum_{-\infty }^{\infty }\exp \left[ \pi i\tau m^{2}+2im\left( x+\frac{
590: \pi }{2}\right) \right] ,
591: \end{eqnarray*}
592: \begin{equation}
593: q=\exp (\pi i\tau )\,. \label{q}
594: \end{equation}
595: Note that, in the present case, $\tau $ is imaginary, hence the constant $q$
596: defined in Eq. (\ref{q}) belongs to the interval $0<q<1$. It is related to
597: the modulus $k$ of the corresponding Jacobi functions as $q=\exp \left[ -\pi
598: K\left( \sqrt{1-k^{2}}\right) /K(k)\right] $, where $K$ is the complete
599: elliptic integral of the first kind. Zeros of the functions $\theta _{1}$,
600: $\theta _{2}$, $\theta _{3}$, and $\theta _{4}$ are at the points $x=M\pi
601: +N\pi \tau $, $(M+1/2)\pi +N\pi \tau $, $(M+1/2)\pi +(N+1/2)\pi \tau $, and
602: $M\pi +(N+1/2)\pi \tau $, respectively, where $M$ and $N$ are integers.
603:
604: There are many identities involving products of theta functions which are
605: relevant to the Hirota bilinear method. An example is
606:
607: \begin{equation}
608: \vartheta _{4}(x+y)\vartheta _{4}(x-y)\vartheta _{2}^{2}(0)=\vartheta
609: _{4}^{2}(x)\vartheta _{2}^{2}(y)+\vartheta _{3}^{2}(x)\vartheta _{1}^{2}(y).
610: \label{y}
611: \end{equation}
612:
613: \noindent A proof can be found in Ref. \cite{kwc2}. On differentiating Eq.
614: (\ref{y}) with respect to $y$ twice and setting $y=0$, one obtains
615:
616: \[
617: D_{x}^{2}\vartheta _{4}(x)\cdot \vartheta _{4}(x)=2\vartheta
618: _{3}^{2}(0)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(0)\vartheta _{3}^{2}(x)+\frac{2\vartheta
619: _{2}^{\prime \prime }(0)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(x)}{\vartheta _{2}(0)},
620: \]
621: where the Hirota derivative [see Eq. (\ref{hir-der})] is
622:
623: \begin{eqnarray}
624: D_x^2 g \cdot f = f g_{xx} - 2 f_x g_x + g f_{xx}.
625: \end{eqnarray}
626: From these results, one can construct equations of increasing complexity by
627: using Hirota identities like
628:
629: \[
630: D_{x}^{2}ab\cdot cd=bd(D_{x}^{2}a\cdot c)+ac(D_{x}^{2}b\cdot
631: d)+2(D_{x}a\cdot c)(D_{x}b\cdot d).
632: \]
633: The novel choice in the present paper is to set $f=\vartheta
634: _{3}(x)\vartheta _{4}(x)$ as opposed to the selection of $f=\vartheta
635: _{4}^{2}(x)$ used implicitly in earlier works (see Appendix \ref{app2}). The
636: relevant identity is then
637:
638: \begin{eqnarray*}
639: D_{x}^{2}f\cdot f &=&D_{x}^{2}\vartheta _{3}(x)\vartheta _{4}(x)\cdot
640: \vartheta _{3}(x)\vartheta _{4}(x) \\
641: &=&2\vartheta _{3}^{2}(0)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(0)\left[ \vartheta
642: _{3}^{4}(x)+\vartheta _{4}^{4}(x)\right] +\frac{2\vartheta _{2}^{\prime
643: \prime }(0)\vartheta _{3}^{2}(x)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(x)}{\vartheta _{2}(0)}.
644: \end{eqnarray*}
645: The trick is then to select the amplitude parameters such that only the term
646: $\vartheta _{3}^{2}(x)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(x)$ remains in the square bracket
647: of Eq. (\ref{trans3}). The remaining terms of the trilinear equations are
648: then satisfied by adjusting the frequency parameter $\Omega $.
649:
650: %\newpage
651:
652: \section{Comparison with previously known results}
653:
654: \label{app2}
655:
656: Previously known periodic solutions of the CNLSE model (\ref{cnlse}) can be
657: recovered by the present approach via proper choice of theta functions in
658: Eqs. (\ref{trans3}). For instance, selecting
659:
660: \begin{eqnarray*}
661: f &=&\theta _{4}^{2}(\alpha t), \\
662: g &=&A_{0}\theta _{1}(\alpha t)\theta _{2}(\alpha t),\hspace{0.25in}
663: A_{0}^{2}=\frac{24\alpha ^{2}\vartheta _{2}^{4}(0)\vartheta _{4}^{2}(0)}
664: {(1+\sigma )\vartheta _{3}^{2}(0)}, \\
665: G &=&B_{0}\theta _{2}(\alpha t)\theta _{3}(\alpha t),\hspace{0.25in}
666: B_{0}^{2}=\frac{24\alpha ^{2}\vartheta _{2}^{2}(0)\vartheta _{4}^{4}(0)}
667: {(1+\sigma )\vartheta _{3}^{2}(0)},
668: \end{eqnarray*}
669: reproduces a solution reported in Ref. \cite{kos_uzu_oc}, which takes the
670: following form in the present notation:
671:
672: \begin{eqnarray}
673: a &=&2\sqrt{\frac{6}{1+\sigma }}rk^{2}\,{\rm {sn}}(rt)\,{\rm cn}(rt)\exp
674: (-i\Omega z), \label{eq:app_b1} \\
675: b &=&2\sqrt{\frac{6}{1+\sigma }}rk\,{\rm {cn}}(rt)\,{\rm dn}(rt)\exp
676: (-i\Omega z), \label{eq:app_b2}
677: \end{eqnarray}
678:
679: \[
680: \Omega =\frac{5}{2}r^{2}(1-2k^{2}),\,\,\kappa =\frac{3}{2}r^{2}.
681: \]
682: $\alpha$ is the wavenumber in the theta function representation.
683: Since arguments of theta and elliptic functions differ by a scalar
684: (Eq. (B3) below), the wavenumbers in the two formulations
685: are related by $r = \alpha \theta_3^2(0)$. The Jacobi elliptic functions appearing in the expressions (\ref{eq:app_b1})
686: and (\ref{eq:app_b2}) are related to the theta functions as follows:
687:
688: \begin{eqnarray}
689: {\rm {sn}}(rt) &=&\frac{\vartheta _{3}(0)\vartheta _{1}(x)}{\vartheta
690: _{2}(0)\vartheta _{4}(x)},\hspace{0.5in}{\rm {cn}}(rt)=\frac{\vartheta
691: _{4}(0)\vartheta _{2}(x)}{\vartheta _{2}(0)\vartheta _{4}(x)}, \nonumber \\
692: {\rm {dn}}(rt) &=&\frac{\vartheta _{4}(0)\vartheta _{3}(x)}{\vartheta
693: _{3}(0)\vartheta _{4}(x)},\hspace{0.5in}rt\equiv \frac{x}{\vartheta
694: _{3}^{2}(0)}.
695: \end{eqnarray}
696: Note a difference in the scale factors in the arguments of the two types of
697: elliptic functions.
698:
699: \begin{references}
700: \bibitem{yamamoto00} T.\ Yamamoto, E.\ Yoshida, K.\ R.\ Tamura, K.\
701: Yonenaga and N.\ Nakazawa, IEEE\ Photon.\ Technol.\ Lett.\thinspace\
702: {\bf 12}, 353 (2000).
703:
704: \bibitem{hasegawa84} A.\ Hasegawa, Opt.\ Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 9}, 288
705: (1984).
706:
707: \bibitem{tai86} K.\ Tai, A.\ Tomita, J.\ L.\ Jewell and A.\ Hasegawa, Appl.
708: Phys. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 49}, 236 (1986).
709:
710: \bibitem{mamyshev91} P.\ V.\ Mamyshev, S.\ V.\ Chernikov and E.\ M.\
711: Dianov, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.\thinspace\ {\bf 27}, 2347 (1991).
712:
713: \bibitem{chernikov93} S.\ V.\ Chernikov, D.\ J.\ Richardson, R.\ I.\
714: Laming, E.\ M.\ Dianov and D.\ N.\ Payne, Appl. Phys. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf
715: 63}, 293 (1993).
716:
717: \bibitem{chernikov93_2} S.\ V.\ Chernikov and J.\ R.\ Taylor, Electron.
718: Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 29}, 658 (1993).
719:
720: \bibitem{chernikov93_3} S.\ V.\ Chernikov, J.\ R.\ Taylor and R.\ Kashyap,
721: Electron. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 29}, 1788 (1993).
722:
723: \bibitem{chernikov94} S.\ V.\ Chernikov, J.\ R.\ Taylor and R.\ Kashyap,
724: Electron. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 30}, 433 (1994).
725:
726: \bibitem{chernikov94_2} S.\ V.\ Chernikov, J.\ R.\ Taylor and R.\ Kashyap,
727: Opt. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 19}, 539 (1994).
728:
729: \bibitem{chernikov96} S.\ V.\ Chernikov, R.\ Kashyap, M.\ J.\ Guy, D.\ G.\
730: Moodie and J.\ R.\ Taylor, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A\thinspace\
731: {\bf 354}, 719 (1996).
732:
733: \bibitem{swanson95} E.\ A.\ Swanson and S.\ R.\ Chinn, IEEE Photon.
734: Technol. Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 7}, 114 (1995).
735:
736: \bibitem{trillo94} S.\ Trillo, S.\ Wabnitz and T.\ A.\ B.\ Kennedy, Phys.\
737: Rev.\ A\thinspace\ {\bf 50}, 1732 (1994).
738:
739: \bibitem{pitois02} S.\ Pitois, J.\ Fatome and G.\ Millot, Opt.\
740: Lett.\thinspace\ {\bf 27}, 1729 (2002).
741:
742: \bibitem{HAS-KOD} A.\ Hasegawa and Y.\ Kodama, {\em Solitons in Optical
743: Communication} (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
744:
745: \bibitem{GPA} G.\ P. Agrawal, {\em Nonlinear Fiber Optics} (Academic Press,
746: San Diego, 1989).
747:
748: \bibitem{MAN} S.\ V.\ Manakov, Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP\ {\bf 38}, 248 (1974).
749:
750: \bibitem{Hiet} J. Hietarinta, Phys. Lett. A 96, 273 (1983).
751:
752: \bibitem{men} C.\ R.\ Menyuk, IEEE\ J.\ Quant.\ Electron.\ {\bf 25}, 2674
753: (1989).
754:
755: \bibitem{pka} C.\ J.\ Chen, P.\ K.\ A.\ Wai and C.\ R.\ Menyuk, Opt.\ Lett.
756: {\bf 15}, 479 (1990).
757:
758: \bibitem{hir} R.\ Hirota, J.\ Math.\ Phys.\thinspace\ {\bf 14}, 805 (1973).
759:
760: \bibitem{flo_trem_pla} M.\ Florja\'{n}czyk and R.\ Tremblay, Phys.\ Lett.\
761: A\thinspace\ {\bf 141}, 34 (1989).
762:
763: \bibitem{kos_uzu_oc} N.\ A. Kostov and I.\ M.\ Uzunov, Opt.\
764: Commun.\thinspace\ {\bf 89}, 389 (1992).
765:
766: \bibitem{flo_trem_oc} M.\ Florja\'{n}czyk and R.\ Tremblay, Opt.\
767: Commun.\thinspace\ {\bf 109}, 405 (1994).
768:
769: \bibitem{kwc1} K.\ W.\ Chow, J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Japan\thinspace\ {\bf 69},
770: 1313 (2000).
771:
772: \bibitem{kwc2} K.\ W.\ Chow, Phys.\ Lett.\ A\thinspace\ {\bf 179}, 299
773: (1993).
774:
775: \bibitem{Arnold} J.M. Arnold, A.D. Boardman, H.M. Mehta, and R.C.J. Putman,
776: Opt. Commun. {\bf 122}, 48 (1995).
777:
778: \bibitem{Ship} A. Shipulin, G. Onishchukov, and B.A. Malomed, J. Opt. Soc.
779: Am. B {\bf 14}, 3393 (1997).
780: \end{references}
781:
782: \end{document}
783: