1: \documentclass{rcdj}
2:
3: \usepackage{hhline}
4: \setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
5: \setcounter{tocdepth}{5}
6: \makeatletter
7: \renewcommand*\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{1.0em}{2.1em}}
8: \@addtoreset{paragraph}{section}
9: \makeatother
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \setcounter{page}{201}
14: \journal{REGULAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS, V.\,7, \No2, 2002}
15: \title{THE ROLLING MOTION OF A BALL ON A SURFACE.\\
16: NEW INTEGRALS AND HIERARCHY OF DYNAMICS}
17: \runningtitle{THE ROLLING MOTION OF A BALL ON A SURFACE}
18: \runningauthor{A.\,V.\,BORISOV, I.\,S.\,MAMAEV, A.\,A.\,KILIN}
19: \authors{A.\,V.\,BORISOV}
20: {Department of Theoretical Mechanics\\
21: Moscow State University,
22: Vorob'ievy Gory\\
23: 119899, Moscow, Russia\\
24: E-mail: borisov@rcd.ru}
25: \authors{I.\,S.\,MAMAEV}
26: {Laboratory of Dynamical Chaos and Nonlinearity\\
27: Udmurt State University, Universitetskaya, 1\\
28: 426034, Izhevsk, Russia\\
29: E-mail: mamaev@rcd.ru}
30: \authors{A.\,A.\,KILIN}
31: {Laboratory of Dynamical Chaos and Nonlinearity\\
32: Udmurt State University, Universitetskaya, 1\\
33: 426034, Izhevsk, Russia\\
34: E-mail: aka@rcd.ru} \amsmsc{37J60, 37J55} \received 10.02.2002.
35: \doi{10.1070/RD2002v007n02ABEH000205} \abstract{The paper is concerned
36: with the problem on rolling of a homogeneous ball on an arbitrary surface.
37: New cases when the problem is solved by quadratures are presented. The
38: paper also indicates a special case when an additional integral and
39: invariant measure exist. Using this case, we obtain a nonholonomic
40: generalization of the Jacobi problem for the inertial motion of a point on
41: an ellipsoid. For a ball rolling, it is also shown that on an arbitrary
42: cylinder in the gravity field the ball's motion is bounded and, on the
43: average, it does not move downwards. All the results of the paper
44: considerably expand the results obtained by E.\,Routh in XIX century.}
45:
46: \maketitle
47:
48: \section*{Contents}
49:
50: \makeatletter
51: \@starttoc{toc}
52: \makeatother
53:
54: \vspace{1cm}
55:
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57: \section{Introduction}
58:
59: In this paper we consider the problem of sliding-free rolling of a
60: dynamically symmetrical ball (the central tensor of inertia is
61: spherical~${\bf I}=\mu{\bf E}$) on an arbitrary surface. As it was
62: indicated by E.\,Routh in his famous treatise~\cite{Raus}, if the surface
63: is a surface of revolution the problem is integrable even in the presence
64: of axisymmetric potential fields. Here we give a more complete analysis of
65: the Routh solution for the body of revolution, and present new integrals
66: for the case of ball rolling on non-symmetrical surfaces of the second
67: order.
68:
69:
70: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71: \section{The equations for a ball moving on a surface}
72:
73: In rigid body dynamics it is customary to introduce a body-fixed frame of
74: reference. However, while studying motion of a homogeneous ball, it is
75: more convenient to write the equations of motion with respect to a certain
76: fixed in space frame of reference. In such a frame a balance of linear
77: momentum and of angular momentum with respect to the ball's center of
78: mass, involving the reaction and the external forces, may be written as
79: \eq[eq1-1]{ m\dot \bv=\bN+\bF,\qquad ({\bf I}\bs\om)^{\ds.}=\ba\x
80: \bN+\bM_{\bF}. }
81:
82: \wfig<bb=0 0 45.3mm 33.7mm>[15]{ris3.eps}[The rolling of a ball on a
83: surface ($G$ is the center of mass, $Q$ is a point of contact with the
84: surface)]
85:
86:
87: \noindent The sliding-free condition reads (the contact point velocity
88: vanishes) \eq[eq1-2]{ \bv+{\bs\om}\x \ba=0. } Here~$m$ is the mass of the
89: ball, $\bv$ isthe velocity of its center of mass, $\bs\om$ is the angular
90: velocity, ${\bf I}=\mu {\bf E}$ is the (spherical) central tensor of
91: inertia, $\ba$ is the vector from the center of mass to the point of
92: contact, $R$ is the ball's radius, $\bN$ is the reaction at the contact
93: point (see Fig.~\ref{ris3.eps}), $\bF$ and~$\bM_F$ are the external force
94: and the moment of forces with respect to the point of contact
95: respectively.
96:
97:
98: Eliminating from these equations the reaction $\bN$ and making use of the
99: fact that the contact point velocities on the surface and on the ball
100: coincide, we obtain the system of six equations:
101: \begin{equation}
102: \label{eq1-3} \dot{\bM} = D\dot{\bs\gam}\x ({\bs\om}\x{\bs\gam})+\bM_F,
103: \quad \dot{\br}+R\dot{\bs\gamma}=\bs\omega\x R\bs\gamma.
104: \end{equation}
105: Here $D=mR^2$. These equations govern the behaviour of the vector of the
106: angular momentum (with respect to the contact point $\bM$), and of the
107: vector $\bs\gamma=-R^{-1}\ba$ normal to the surface (Fig.~\ref{ris3.eps}).
108: The vectors $\bs\omega$ and $\br$ (the position vector of the contact
109: point) are obtained from the relations
110: \begin{equation}
111: \label{eq1-4}
112: \bM=\mu \bs\omega+D\bs\gamma\x (\bs\omega\x\bs\gamma),\quad
113: \bs\gamma=\frac{\nabla F(\br)}{|\nabla F(\br)|},
114: \end{equation}
115: $F(\br)=0$ is the equation of the surface on which the ball rolls. The
116: last equation in~\eqref{eq1-4} defines the Gaussian map. Further on,
117: following Routh, we will use the explicit form of the surface on which
118: \emph{the ball's center of mass} is moving. This surface, defined by the
119: position vector $\br'=\br+R\bs\gamma$, is equidistant relative to the
120: surface on which the contact point is moving.
121:
122: In the case of potential forces, the moment $\bM_F$ is expressed in terms
123: of the potential $U(\br')=U(\br+R\bs\gamma)$. This potential depends on
124: the position of the ball's center of mass as
125: follows~$\bM_F=R\bs\gamma\times \pt{U}{\br'}$.
126:
127: \begin{rem}
128: In his treatise~\cite{Raus} Routh obtained the equations of motion of the
129: ball in semifixed axes and presented the cases when these equations can be
130: analytically solved. Actually, in the majority of the subsequent
131: publications~\cite{Appell,Neimark} Routh's results were just restated
132: without any essential expansion. It should be noted that Routh was
133: especially interested in the stability of particular solutions (e.\,g. a
134: ball rotating around the vertical axis at the top of a surface of
135: revolution). Here we are not giving the original form of Routh's
136: equations. Equations~(\ref{eq1-3}) are, in many respects, similar to the
137: equations describing an arbitrary body motion on a plane and a
138: sphere~\cite{Bormam-new}. This allows us to consider many problems (e.\,g.
139: those of integrability) from the single point of view.
140: \end{rem}
141:
142:
143: \paragraph{The integrals of motion.}
144: In the case of potential field with potential~$U(\br+R\bs\gamma)$,
145: equations~(\ref{eq1-3}) possess the integral of energy and the geometric
146: integral
147: \begin{equation}
148: \label{eq1-5}
149: H=\frac12(\bM,\bs\om)+U(\br+R\bs\gamma), \qq F_1=\bs\gam^2=1.
150: \end{equation}
151: In the case of an arbitrary surface $F(\br)=0$, apart from these
152: integrals, the system~\eqref{eq1-3} has neither measure, nor two
153: additional integrals, which are necessary for the integrability according
154: to the last multiplier theory (the Euler\f Jacobi theory). The system's
155: behavior is chaotic. As it is shown later, in some cases there exists a
156: measure and only one additional integral. In such a case chaos becomes
157: ``weaker''. As it was noted by Routh, for a surface of revolution there
158: exist two additional integrals, the system is integrable, and its behavior
159: is regular. The reduced system becomes a Hamiltonian one after an
160: appropriate change of time.
161:
162: \paragraph{Rolling on a surface of the second order.}
163: We are going now to revisit equations\eqref{eq1-3} for the case when the
164: ball's center of mass is moving on a surface of the second order. The
165: surface is defined by the equation
166: \begin{equation}
167: \label{eq1-6}
168: \bigl(\br+R\bs\gamma,{\bf B}^{-1}(\br+R\bs\gamma)\bigr)=1,\qquad
169: {\bf B}=\diag (b_1,b_2,b_3)
170: \end{equation}
171: (for an ellipsoid, $b_i>0$ and are equal to the squares of the main
172: semi-axes). Solving \eqref{eq1-6} for the position vector~$\br$ gives
173: \begin{equation}
174: \label{eq1-7} \br+R\bs\gamma= \frac{{\bf
175: B}\bs\gamma}{\sqrt{(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)}}.
176: \end{equation}
177: We obtain the equations of motion in terms of the variables
178: $\bM,\bs\gamma$:
179: \begin{equation}
180: \label{eq1-8}
181: \dot{\bM}=-\frac{D}{\mu+D}(\bM,\dot{\bs\gamma})\bs\gamma,\qquad
182: \dot{\bs\gamma}=\frac{R\sqrt{(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)}}
183: {\mu+D}\bs\gamma\x\bigl(\bs\gamma\x{\bf B}^{-1}(\bs\gamma\x\bM)\bigr)
184: \end{equation}
185:
186: \paragraph{A ball on a rotating surface.}
187: Let us also consider the motion a ball on a surface rotating with constant
188: angular velocity~$\bs\Om$. One particular case of this problem (a plane
189: and a sphere) was also investigated by Routh~\cite{Raus}. By analogy with
190: the previous case, replacing the nonholonomic relation~\eqref{eq1-2} by
191: \begin{equation}
192: \label{eq1-9}
193: \bv+\bs\om\x \ba=\bs\Om\x \br,
194: \end{equation}
195: we get
196: \begin{equation}
197: \label{eq1-10}
198: \begin{gathered}
199: \dot {\bM} = m\bigl(\dot {\ba}\x(\bs\om\x \ba)+\ba\x(\bs\Om\x \dot {\br})\bigr)+ \bM_F\\
200: \dot {\br}+R\dot{\bs\gamma} = \bs\omega \x R\dot{\bs\gamma}+ \bs\Om\x
201: \br.
202: \end{gathered}
203: \end{equation}
204: Here~$\ba=-R\bs\gam$.\goodbreak
205:
206:
207: It should be noted that in the case of an arbitrary surface the system of
208: six equations~\eqref{eq1-10} is not closed because the position vector of
209: the point on the surface, $\br$, is not expressed in terms of $\bs\gamma$
210: only; one should also introduce the equation for the angle of rotation of
211: the surface around the fixed axis. Nevertheless, if the surface is
212: axisymmetric, and the symmetry axis coincides with the axis of rotation,
213: equations~\eqref{eq1-10} get closed. We assume this to be fulfilled in
214: further text.
215:
216: Equations \eqref{eq1-2}, \eqref{eq1-10} are in many respects similar to
217: the equations, defining the rigid body rolling on a plane or a sphere,
218: which we thoroughly investigated in the paper~\cite{Bormam-new}. We shall
219: use this fact while transferring the corresponding results onto
220: systems~\eqref{eq1-2}, \eqref{eq1-10}.
221:
222:
223: \section{Ball's motion on a surface of revolution}
224:
225: First of all, let us consider the cases of integrability of
226: equations~\eqref{eq1-3}, \eqref{eq1-10}, associated with the rotational
227: symmetry of the surface on which the ball rolls. Here we are using the
228: technique introduced in~\cite{Bormam-new} and concerned with the analysis
229: of a certain reduced system in terms of new variables~$K_1$, $K_2$, $K_3$,
230: $\gamma_3$. We shall also assume the surface to be rotating around the
231: axis of symmetry with constant angular velocity $\bs\Om=(0,0,\Om)$,
232: $\Omega\ne 0$. The particular case, $\Omega=0$, was discussed by Routh,
233: who obtained the majority of the following results (although he missed
234: some cases of equal interest).
235:
236: The equation of a surface of revolution with respect to an immovable
237: reference frame may be written as
238: \begin{equation}
239: \label{eq1-11}
240: \begin{gathered}
241: r_1=(f(\gam_3)-R)\gam_1, \q r_2=(f(\gam_3)-R)\gam_2, \\
242: r_3=\int \Bigl(f(\gam_3)-\frac{1-\gamma_3^2}{\gamma_3}f'(\gamma_3)
243: \Bigr)d\gamma_3
244: -R\gamma_3,
245: \end{gathered}
246: \end{equation}
247: where $f(\gamma_3)$ is a certain function specifying the surface
248: parametrization. The parametrization \eqref{eq1-11} is to be so chosen as
249: to make the form of the reduced system as simple as possible.
250:
251: In the case being considered equations \eqref{eq1-3}, \eqref{eq1-10} allow
252: an invariant measure with density
253: \begin{equation}
254: \label{eq1-12}
255: \rho = \bigl(f(\gamma_3)\bigr)^3g(\gamma_3), \quad \text{where}
256: \quad g(\gamma_3)=f(\gamma_3)-\frac{1-\gamma_3^2}{\gamma_3}f'(\gamma_3).
257: \end{equation}
258: Apart from the invariant measure, the equations also have a simple
259: symmetry field
260: \begin{equation}
261: \label{eq1-13}
262: \hat{\bv}=M_1\pt{}{M_2}-M_2\pt{}{M_1}+\gamma_1\pt{}{\gamma_2}-\gamma_2
263: \pt{}{\gamma_1},
264: \end{equation}
265: which is caused by the rotational symmetry.
266:
267: In our book \cite{BorisovMamaev1} we make a frequent use of the fact that
268: to obtain the simplest form of the reduced system in the presence of
269: symmetries, one needs to choose the most relevant {\em integrals of the
270: field of symmetries} which, in this case, may be written as
271: \begin{equation}
272: \label{eq1-14}
273: K_1=(\bM,\bs\gamma)f(\gamma_3),\quad K_2=\mu\omega_3=
274: \frac{\mu M_3+D(\bM,\bs\gamma)\gamma_3}{\mu+D},\quad
275: K_3=\frac{M_1\gamma_2-M_2\gamma_1}{\sqrt{1-\gamma_3}},\quad \gamma_3.
276: \end{equation}
277: In terms of the chosen variables, the reduced system takes the form
278: \begin{equation}
279: \label{eq1-15}
280: \begin{gathered}
281: \dot\gamma_3=k K_3,\\
282: \dot K_1=kK_3\Bigl(\frac{f'}{\gamma_3}K_2+\Bigl(1-\frac{f}{R}\Bigr)
283: g\mu\Omega\Bigr),\\
284: \dot K_2=kK_3\frac{D}{\mu +D}\Bigl(\frac{1}{f}
285: K_1-\gamma_3\Bigl(1-\frac{g}{R}\Bigr)\mu\Omega\Bigr),\\
286: \dot K_3=-k\frac{(\mu+D)g}{\mu^2(1-\gamma_3^2)f^2}
287: \Bigl(\frac{\gamma_3K_1-fK_2}{f(1-\gamma_3^2)}\bigl(
288: (\mu+D\gamma_3^2)K_1-\gamma_3 f(\mu+D)K_2\bigr)+\\
289: +\Bigl(1-\frac{g}{R}\Bigr)\bigl((\mu+2D\gamma_3^2)K_1-\gamma_3f
290: (\mu+2D)K_2\bigr)\Bigr)\mu\Omega,
291: \end{gathered}
292: \end{equation}
293: where $k=\frac{R\sqrt{1-\gamma_3^2}}{(\mu+D)g(\gamma_3)}$. It is easy to
294: show that this system of equations possesses an invariant measure with
295: density $\rho=k^{-1}$. The system~\eqref{eq1-15} can be explicitly
296: integrated in the following way.
297:
298: Let us divide the second and the third equation of system~\eqref{eq1-15}
299: by~$\dot\gamma_3$. Then we obtain the nonautonomous system of two linear
300: equations with the independent variable~$\gamma_3$
301: \begin{equation}
302: \label{eq1-16}
303: \frac{dK_1}{d\gamma_3}=\frac{f'}{\gamma_3}K_2+
304: \Bigl(1-\frac{f}{R}\Bigr)g\mu\Omega,\quad
305: \frac{dK_2}{d\gamma_3}=\frac{D}{\mu+D}
306: \Bigl(\frac{1}{f}K_1-\gamma_3\Bigl(1-\frac{g}{R}\Bigr)\mu\Omega\Bigr).
307: \end{equation}
308: This system of linear equations always possesses two integrals which are
309: linear in~$K_1$, $K_2$. The coefficients in the integrals are functions
310: of~$\gamma_3$, and in the general case cannot be obtained in the explicit
311: (algebraic) form. Having divided the last equation of the
312: system~\eqref{eq1-15} by~$\gamma_3$ and substituting into this equation
313: the known solution of the system~\eqref{eq1-16}, we obtain the explicit
314: quadrature for~$K_3(\gamma_3)$. Using the first equation
315: from~\eqref{eq1-15} we can obtain the expression for~$\gamma_3(t)$.
316:
317: In the case $\Omega=0$, the system~\eqref{eq1-15} has the integral of
318: energy
319: \begin{equation}
320: \label{eq1-18} H=(\bM,\bs\omega)=\frac12\biggl(\frac{K_1^2}{\Lambda f^2}+
321: \frac{(\mu+D)(\gamma_3K_1-fK_2)^2}{\mu^2f^2(1-\gamma_3^2)}
322: +\frac{K_3^2}{\mu+D}\biggr).
323: \end{equation}
324: The quadrature for $\gamma_3(t)$ may be obtained upon substitution of
325: $K_3=k^{-1}\dot\gamma_3$ into ~\eqref{eq1-18}.
326:
327: For the reduced system~\eqref{eq1-15} the following theorem is valid:
328:
329: \begin{teo}
330: For $\Omega=0$ by the change of time $k\,dt=d\tau$, the
331: system~\eqref{eq1-15} can be represented in the Hamiltonian form
332: \begin{equation}
333: \label{eq3-8} \frac{dx_i}{d\tau}=\{x_i,H\},\quad
334: \bx=(\gamma_3,K_1,K_2,K_3).
335: \end{equation}
336: The bracket is degenerate and specified by the relations
337: \begin{equation}
338: \label{eq3-9}
339: \{\gamma_3,K_3\}=\mu+D,\quad
340: \{K_1,K_3\}=(\mu+D)\frac{f'}{\gamma_3}K_2,\quad \{K_2,K_3\}=\frac{D}{f}K_1
341: \end{equation}
342: {\rm(}for the other pairs of variables the brackets are zero\/{\rm)}.
343: \end{teo}
344:
345:
346: \proof*() is a straightforward exercise consisting in derivation
347: of~~\eqref{eq1-15} ($\Omega =0$) from~\eqref{eq3-8} and verification of
348: the Jacobi identity for the bracket~\eqref{eq3-9}.\qed
349:
350: One can assert that the equations for the linear integrals of the
351: system~\eqref{eq1-16} exactly coincide with the equations for the Casimir
352: function of the bracket~\eqref{eq3-9}.
353:
354: It should also be noted that for $\Omega =0$ the system~\eqref{eq1-15} has
355: ``skew-symmetrical notation'', similar to the Hamiltonian
356: form~\eqref{eq3-8}, \eqref{eq3-9}
357: \begin{equation}
358: \label{eq3-*1} \frac{dx_i}{d\tau}=J_{\lambda ij}(x)\pt{H}{x_j};\quad
359: J_{ij}=-J_{ji}.
360: \end{equation}
361: The matrix ${\bf J}_\lambda$ is of a somewhat more general form than that
362: of the corresponding bracket~\eqref{eq3-9}
363: \begin{equation}
364: \label{eq3-*2}
365: \begin{gathered}
366: {\bf J}_\lambda = \begin{pmatrix}
367: 0 & 0 & 0 & \mu +D\\
368: 0 & 0 & \lambda & (\mu+D)\frac{f'}{\gamma_3}K_2+\lambda u\\
369: 0 & -\lambda & 0 & \frac {D}{f}K_1+\lambda v\\
370: -(\mu+D) & -(\mu+D)\frac{f'}{\gamma_3}K_2-\lambda u &
371: \frac{D}{f}K_1+\lambda v & 0
372: \end{pmatrix},\\
373: u=\frac{(\mu+D)^2(\gamma_3K_1-fK_2)}{\mu^2f(1-\gamma_3^2)K_3},\quad
374: v=\frac{(\mu+D)\bigl((\mu+D\gamma_3^2)K_1-f\gamma_3(\mu+D)K_2\bigr)}
375: {\mu^2f^2(1-\gamma_3^2)K_3}.
376: \end{gathered}
377: \end{equation}
378: Here $\lambda$ is an arbitrary function of $\gamma_3$, $K_i$. For
379: $\lambda=0$, one again gets bracket~\eqref{eq3-9}, and the tensor ${\bf
380: J}_\lambda$ satisfies the Jacobi identity. However, in the general case,
381: ${\bf J}_\lambda$ does not satisfy the Jacobi identity (it is not of the
382: Poisson type). Nevertheless, if we assume
383: \begin{equation}
384: \label{eq3-*3}
385: \lambda=w(\gamma_3)K_3,
386: \end{equation}
387: then the tensor $\lambda^{-1}{\bf J}_\lambda$ is a Poisson one, and the
388: quantity $\lambda$ is a reducing multiplier (according to Chaplygin).
389:
390: Thus, we obtain the following Hamiltonian vector field
391: $$
392: \bv_\lambda=(\lambda^{-1}{\bf J}_\lambda)\nabla H,
393: $$
394: for which $\div\bv_\lambda\ne 0$ ($\div\lambda\bv_\lambda=0$). The
395: examples of Hamiltonian fields with nonzero divergency were almost not
396: discussed earlier. One particular case of the Poisson tensor
397: $\lambda^{-1}{\bf J}_\lambda$ was found by J.\,Hermans in~\cite{hermans}.
398: Hermans used his own system of reduced variables which slightly differs
399: from ours.
400:
401: To clarify the behavior of a ball on a surface of revolution, we will
402: discuss the cases, when this surface is a paraboloid, a sphere, a cone,
403: and a cylinder. These problems were investigated by Routh in~\cite{Raus}
404: for~$\Om=0$. Here we will expand the results for~$\Om\ne0$.
405:
406:
407: \paragraph{A paraboloid of revolution.}
408: Suppose the ball's center of mass is moving on the paraboloid of
409: revolution~$z=c(x^2+y^2)$. In equations~\eqref{eq1-11} we, therefore, put
410: \begin{equation}
411: \label{eq3-10}
412: f(\gamma_3)=-\frac{1}{2c\gamma_3}.
413: \end{equation}
414: The density of the invariant measure~\eqref{eq1-12} (up to an unessential
415: factor) can be written as
416: \begin{equation}
417: \label{eq3-11}
418: \rho=\frac{1}{\gamma_3^6}.
419: \end{equation}
420: In this case, the two-dimensional system~\eqref{eq1-16} reads
421: \begin{equation}
422: \label{eq3-12}
423: \frac{dK_1}{d\gamma_3}=\frac{1}{2c\gamma_3^3}\Bigl(
424: K_2-\frac{1+2cR\gamma_3}{2cR\gamma_3}\mu\Omega\Bigr),\quad
425: \frac{dK_2}{d\gamma_3}=-\frac{D}{\mu+D}\Bigl(2c\gamma_3K_1+
426: \frac{(1+2cR\gamma_3^3)}{2cR\gamma_3^2}\mu\Omega\Bigr).
427: \end{equation}
428: For the variable $K_2$ we obtain a {\em homogeneous} second-order linear
429: equation whose coefficients are homogeneous functions of $\gamma_3$ (at
430: $\Omega\ne 0$)
431: $$
432: K_2''-\frac{1}{\gamma_3}K_2'+\frac{D}{\mu+D}\frac{1}{\gamma_3^2}K_2=
433: \frac{D(2+cR\gamma_3)}{(\mu+D)cR\gamma_3^3}\mu\Omega.
434: $$
435: Its general solution may be represented as~$\gamma_3^\alpha$,
436: $\alpha=\const$
437: \begin{equation}
438: \label{eq3-13}
439: K_2=c_1\gamma_3^{1-\nu}-c_2\gamma_3^{1+\nu}+\mu\Omega\Bigl(
440: 1+\frac{2D}{cR(\mu+4D)}\frac{1}{\gamma_3}\Bigr), \quad \nu^2=\frac{\mu}
441: {\mu+D}.
442: \end{equation}
443: For the variable $K_1$ from~\eqref{eq3-12} we, similarly, obtain
444: \begin{equation}
445: \label{eq3-14}
446: K_1=\frac{\mu+D}{2cD}\Bigl(-(1-\nu)\gamma_3^{-1-\nu}c_1+
447: (1+\nu)\gamma_3^{-1+\nu}c_2\Bigr)-\frac{\mu\Omega}{2c}
448: \Bigl(1-\frac{\mu}{2cR(3\mu+4D)}\frac{1}{\gamma_3^3}\Bigr).
449: \end{equation}
450: Solving for the constants~$c_1$, $c_2$ from~\eqref{eq3-13},
451: \eqref{eq3-14}, we obtain the integrals of the system~\eqref{eq1-16}.
452: These integrals are linear in to~$K_1$, $K_2$ and have form
453: \begin{equation}
454: \label{eq3-15}
455: \begin{aligned}
456: F_2&=\frac{D}{2\sqrt{\mu(\mu+D)}}\gamma_3^\nu\biggl(
457: 2c\gamma_3K_1+\frac{\mu+D}{D\gamma_3}K_2+\mu\Omega\Bigl(
458: \gamma_3-\frac{(\mu+D)(1+\nu)}{D\gamma_3}-\frac{2+\nu}{2cR(2-\nu)
459: \gamma_3^2}\Bigr)\biggr)\\
460: F_3&=\frac{D}{2\sqrt{\mu(\mu+D)}}\gamma_3^{-\nu}\biggl(
461: 2c\gamma_3K_1+\frac{\mu+D}{D\gamma_3}K_2+\mu\Omega\Bigl(
462: \gamma_3-\frac{(\mu+D)(1-\nu)}{D\gamma_3}-\frac{2-\nu}{2cR(2+\nu)
463: \gamma_3^2}\Bigr)\biggr)
464: \end{aligned}
465: \end{equation}
466: The product $F_2 F_3$ gives {\em an algebraic quadratic integral}.
467:
468: For~$\Omega=0$ the equations also have the integral of energy
469: \begin{equation}
470: \label{eq3-16}
471: H=\frac{2c^2\gamma_3^2}{\mu}K_1^2+\frac12\frac{\mu+D}{\mu^2(1-\gamma_3^2)}
472: \bigl(2c\gamma_3^2K_1+K_2\bigr)^2+\frac12\frac{K_3^2}{\mu+D}.
473: \end{equation}
474:
475: \begin{rem}
476: \label{rem2} Some forms of surfaces (on which a ball is rolling) are
477: investigated in the paper~\cite{Bychkov} (details are given below). In
478: this paper it is shown that if a ball is rolling on a paraboloid of
479: revolution, then the system~(\ref{eq1-3}) is reduced to a particular class
480: of Fuchsian equations. Routh himself considered the case when not the
481: contact point, but the center of mass is moving on a paraboloid. We should
482: note again that in this case equations~(\ref{eq1-3}) have algebraic
483: integrals. The motion of a homogeneous ball on a surface of revolution was
484: also studied by F.\,Noether~\cite{neter}.
485: \end{rem}
486:
487:
488: \paragraph{An axisymmetric ellipsoid.}
489: Consider the motion of a dynamically symmetrical ball when its center of
490: mass is moving on a fixed ellipsoid ($\Om=0$). In this case
491: \begin{equation}
492: \label{eq3-29}
493: f(\gamma_3)=\frac{b_1}{\sqrt{b_1(1-\gamma_3^2)+b_3\gamma_3^2}},
494: \end{equation}
495: where $b_1,b_2$ are the squares of the ellipsoid principal semi-axes. The
496: density of the invariant measure~\eqref{eq1-12} (up to a constant factor)
497: is
498: \begin{equation}
499: \label{eq3-29a}
500: \rho=\bigl(b_1(1-\gamma_3^2)+b_3\gamma_3^2\bigr)^{-3}.
501: \end{equation}
502:
503: In this case the variables $N_1,N_2,K_3$ are more convenient than the
504: variables~\eqref{eq1-14}. Here
505: \begin{equation}
506: \label{eq3-30}
507: N_1=(\bM,\bs\gamma),\quad N_2=\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}f(\gamma_3)\bigl(
508: \gamma_3(\bM,\bs\gamma)-M_3\bigr),
509: \end{equation}
510: which satisfy the system, similar to \eqref{eq1-15} for $\Omega=0$
511: \begin{equation}
512: \label{eq3-31}
513: \begin{gathered}
514: \dot N_1=-kK_3\frac{f'}{\gamma_3f^2}N_2,\quad \dot N_2=kK_3\frac{\mu}
515: {\mu+D}fN_1,\\
516: \dot K_3=-k\frac{(\mu+D)g}{\mu^2\gamma_3(1-\gamma_3^2)^2f^3}N_2
517: \bigl(\mu f(1-\gamma_3^2)N_1+(\mu+D)\gamma_3N_2\bigr),
518: \end{gathered}
519: \end{equation}
520: where $k=\frac{R\sqrt{1-\gamma_3^2}}{(\mu+D)g}$.\goodbreak
521:
522: Using~\eqref{eq3-29}, we obtain two linear equations with independent
523: variable~$\gamma_3$
524: \begin{equation}
525: \label{eq3-32}
526: \frac{dN_1}{d\gamma_3}=-\frac{(b_1-b_3)}{b_1\sqrt{b_1(1-\gamma_3^2)+
527: b_3\gamma_3^2}}N_2,\quad \frac{dN_2}{d\gamma_3}=\frac{\mu b_1}
528: {(\mu+D)\sqrt{b_1(1-\gamma_3^2)+b_3\gamma_3^2}}N_1.
529: \end{equation}
530: It is easy to show that system~\eqref{eq3-32} has a quadratic integral
531: with constant coefficients
532: \begin{equation}
533: \label{eq3-33} F_2=b_1^2\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}N_1^2+(b_1-b_3)N_2^2.
534: \end{equation}
535: Below we will show that this integral may be generalized to the case of a
536: three-axial ellipsoid.
537:
538: The system~\eqref{eq3-32} can be solved in terms of elementary functions.
539: Depending on the sign of the difference~$b_1-b_3$, the solution may be
540: written as:
541: \begin{itemize}
542: \item[1.] {\boldmath $b_1>b_3$, $a^2=\frac{b_1}{b_1-b_3}>1$.}
543: \begin{equation}
544: \label{eq3-34}
545: \begin{gathered}
546: N_1=c_1\sin\vfi(\gamma_3)+c_2\cos\vfi(\gamma_3),\quad N_2=
547: a\sqrt{\frac{\mu b_1}{\mu+D}}\bigl(-c_1\cos\vfi(\gamma_3)+
548: c_2\sin\vfi(\gamma_3)\bigr),\\
549: \vfi(\gamma_3)=\nu\arctg\frac{\gamma_3}{\sqrt{a^2-\gamma_3^2}},\qq
550: \nu=\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}}.
551: \end{gathered}
552: \end{equation}
553: \item[2.] {\boldmath $b_1<b_3$,} {\boldmath $a^2=\frac{b_1}{b_3-b_1}>0$.}
554: \begin{equation}
555: \label{eq3-35}
556: \begin{gathered}
557: N_1=c_1\tau^{-\nu}+c_2\tau^{\nu},\quad N_2=a\sqrt{\frac{\mu
558: b_1}{\mu+D}}\Bigl(-c_1\tau^{-\nu}
559: +c_2\tau^{\nu}\Bigr),\\
560: \tau(\gamma_3)=\gamma_3+\sqrt{a^2+\gamma_3^2},\qq
561: \nu=\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}}.
562: \end{gathered}
563: \end{equation}
564: \end{itemize}
565: Here $c_1, c_2=\const$. Solving for these constants, we can obtain linear
566: integrals of motion.
567:
568: {\small
569: \paragraph{Historical comments.}
570: It is an interesting fact that neither Routh, nor his followers succeeded
571: in obtaining the simplest reduced equations (like~\eqref{eq3-32}) and
572: solving the problem of a ball rolling on an ellipsoid of revolution in
573: terms of elementary functions. To integrate the equations one must
574: appropriately choose the reduced variables such as~\eqref{eq3-30}.
575:
576: }
577:
578: \wfig<bb=0 0 50.7mm 30.9mm>[8]{ris4.eps}
579:
580: \paragraph{A circular cone.}
581: In this case, due to the fact that the Gaussian map $\bs\gamma=
582: \frac{\nabla F}{|\nabla F|}$ is degenerate, one should use the components
583: of the vector~$\br$ (the position vector of the ball center) as the
584: positional variables in equations~\eqref{eq1-10}. For the cone~$\ta$
585: (Fig.~\ref{ris4.eps}) we have
586: \begin{equation}
587: \label{eq3-17}
588: \begin{gathered}
589: \gam_3=\cos\ta=\const, \q \gam_1=\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{1+k^2}} \frac{r_1}{r_3},
590: \q \gam_2=\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{1+k^2}} \frac{r_2}{r_3}, \\
591: r_3=k\sqrt{r_1^2+r_2^2},\qquad k=\tg\ta.
592: \end{gathered}
593: \end{equation}
594:
595:
596:
597: \noindent The measure of equations~\eqref{eq1-3}, \eqref{eq1-10} in which
598: $\bs\gamma$ is expressed in terms of~$\br$ in accordance
599: with~\eqref{eq3-17}, can be written in explicit form: \eq[eq3-18]{
600: \rho=\frac{\left(\frac{k^2}{1-k^2}R_0+r_3\right)^3}{r_3^2}, }
601:
602: \noindent
603: For the reduced system let us choose the variables
604: \begin{equation}
605: \label{eq3-19}
606: \begin{aligned}
607: \sg_1 & =\omega_3 +\frac{D\Omega}
608: {\sqrt{1+k^2}\sqrt{\mu+D}} \frac{r_3}{R},\\
609: \sg_2 & =\Bigl(r_3+\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{1+k^2}} R\Bigr)
610: \Bigl(\Bigl(\bM-\frac{k^2\mu^2}
611: {\mu+D}\bs\Omega\Bigr),\bs\gamma\Bigr).
612: \end{aligned}
613: \end{equation}
614: In terms of these variables we obtain the equations \eq*{
615: \frac{d\sg_1}{dr_3}=0, \q
616: \frac{d\sg_2}{dr_3}=\sqrt{1+k^2}\sg_1+\frac{\mu\Om}{\mu+D}\Bigl(\frac{r_3}{R}-k^2\Bigr).
617: } From these equations the following integrals can be easily obtained:
618: \begin{equation}
619: \label{eq3-20}
620: F_2=\sigma _1,\q
621: F_3=\sqrt{1+k^2}r_3\sigma_1-\sigma_2+\frac{\mu\Omega}{\mu+D}
622: \Bigl(\frac{r_3^2}{2R}-k^2r_3\Bigr).
623: \end{equation}
624:
625:
626: \paragraph{A circular cylinder.}
627: {\it The motion of a ball within a cylinder} is a well-known problem which
628: is usually used to illustrate some unrealistic conclusions, derived by
629: means of nonholonomic mechanics. It can be shown that a homogeneous ball,
630: moving within a vertical cylinder, on the average, is not rolling
631: downwards due to the gravity force. Nevertheless, this physical fact may
632: be observed while playing basketball, when the ball has almost hit the
633: basket, but then rapidly jumps out of it, suddenly lifting upwards. The
634: addition of a viscous friction to this nonholonomic system, which leads to
635: a vertical drift, is analyzed in~\cite{disskoleskinov}, where the explicit
636: solution of this problem has also been obtained.
637:
638: \wfig<bb=0 0 23.7mm 37.1mm>{ris1.eps}
639:
640: For a
641: cylinder,~$\bs\gam=\left(-\frac{r_1}{R_c},\,-\frac{r_2}{R_c},\,0\right)$,
642: where $R_c$ is the cylinder radius (Fig.~\ref{ris1.eps}), in terms of the
643: variables~$(\bM,\,\br)$ or~$(\bs\om,\,\br)$, the invariant measure's
644: density is constant. The kinetic energy looks like
645: \begin{multline*}
646: H=\frac12(\bM,\,\bs\om)=\frac{1}{2(\mu+D)} \left\{ (M_1^2+M_2^2)+
647: \frac{D}{\mu}(\bM,\,\bs\gam)^2+M_3^2 \right\} = \\
648: =\frac12(\mu(\bs\om,\bs\gam)^2 + (\mu+D)
649: (\om_3^2+(\om_1\gam_2-\om_2\gam_1)^2)).
650: \end{multline*}
651: The reduced system in terms of the variables~$\sg_1=\om_3$,
652: $\sg_2=(\bs\om,\,\bs\gam)$ looks like \eq[67]{ \sg_1'=\om_3'=0, \qq
653: \sg_2'=\frac{R\om_3-R_c\Om}{(R_c-R)R}. }
654:
655:
656: \noindent Thus, we have two integrals \eq[68z]{ \om_3=\const, \qq
657: (\bs\om,\bs\gam)-\frac{R\om_3-R_c\Om}{R_c-R} \frac{r_3}{R} = \const. } On
658: writing~$\wt{\bs\om}= (\om_1,\,\om_2,\,\frac{R\om_3-R_c\Om}{R_c-R})$, the
659: second integral takes the form \eq*{ (\wt{\bs\om},\br)=\const, } and the
660: kinetic energy becomes \eq*{
661: 2H=\mu\left((\wt{\bs\om},\bs\gam)+\wt\om_3\frac{r_3}{R} \right)^2
662: +(\mu+mR^2){\wt\om}_3^2+(\mu+mR^2) \frac{\dot r_3^2}{R^2}. } Hence, the
663: variable~$r_3$ (responsible for the vertical displacement of the ball) can
664: be easily found to be \eq*{ r_3=-\frac{(\wt{\bs\om},\bs\gam)}{\wt\om_3}\pm
665: \sqrt{\vphantom{\frac{\mu}{\mu+mR^2}} \raise
666: -3pt\hbox{$\ds\smash{\frac{2H-(\mu+mR^2){\wt\om}^2_3}{\mu{\wt\om}^2_3}}$}}
667: \sin\Bigl({\wt\om}_3\sqrt{\frac{\mu}{\mu+mR^2}}(t-t_0)\Bigr), }
668:
669: \wfig<bb=0 0 41.1mm 45.6mm>{ris2.eps}
670:
671: \noindent where $t_0$ is a constant depending on the initial conditions.
672: It is clear that the average displacement of the ball equals zero even in
673: the presence of the gravity field (see formula~\eqref{eq-a7}).
674:
675:
676: Let us now consider two different variants of problem concerning the
677: rolling of a ball on a sphere. These problems were integrated and analyzed
678: by Routh~\cite{Raus}.
679:
680:
681: \paragraph{A ball on a rotating sphere.}
682: Consider a sphere of radius $R_s$ rotating around a certain axis with a
683: constant angular velocity~$\bs\Om$. Let $R$ be the ball radius,
684: $\ba=-R\bs\gam$, $\br=R_s\bs\gam$ (Fig.~\ref{ris2.eps}). The equations of
685: motion in the potential field with potential~$V(\bs\gam)$ may be
686: represented as \eqc[68]{
687: D_1\dot{\bs\om}=\frac{DR}{R_s+R}(\bs\om,\bs\gam)\bs\om\x\bs\gam+
688: \frac{R_sR}{R_s+R}
689: (\bs\Om,\bs\gam) (R\bs\om+R_s\bs\Om)\x\bs\gam+\bs\gam\x\pt{V}{\bs\gam}, \\
690: \dot{\bs\gam}=\frac{(R\bs\om+R_s\bs\Om)\x\bs\gam}{R_s+R} } where~$D=m
691: R^2$, $D_1=\mu+D$, and $\mu$ is the moment of inertia of the ball. Whether
692: the ball rolls outside or inside the sphere is determined by the sign
693: of~$R$. Using the angular momentum
694: vector~$\bM=D_1\bs\om-D\bs\gam(\bs\om,\bs\gam)$, the first equation
695: of~\eqref{68} may be written as
696: \begin{equation}
697: \label{69}
698: \dot \bM=\frac{R_sR}{R_s+R} \Bigl( R((\bs\om\x\bs\gam)(\bs\Om,\bs\gam)+
699: \bs\gam(\bs\Om,\bs\om\x\bs\gam))
700: -R_s(\bs\Om,\bs\gam)(\bs\gam\x\bs\Om) \Bigr) + \bs\gam\x\pt{V}{\bs\gam}.
701: \end{equation}
702: Using~$\wt{\bs\om}=\bs\om+\frac{R_s}{R}\bs\Om$ in~(\ref{68}), we get
703: \eq[70]{ \left\{
704: \begin{aligned}
705: D_1\dot{\wt{\bs\om}} & =\frac{DR}{R_s+R} (\wt{\bs\om},\bs\gam)
706: (\wt{\bs\om}\x\bs\gam)+\bs\gam\x\pt{V}{\bs\gam} \\
707: \dot{\bs\gam} & = \frac{R}{R_s+R}\wt{\bs\om}\x\bs\gam.
708: \end{aligned}
709: \right. } This coincides with the original system~\eqref{68}
710: for~$\bs\Om=0$. Thus, it will be enough to consider only the case
711: when~$\bs\Om=0$. In terms of the variables~$(\bM,\bs\gam)$
712: equations~(\ref{68}) for $\bs\Omega=0$ are written as \eq[71]{ \left\{
713: \begin{aligned}
714: \dot \bM & = \bs\gam\x\pt{V}{\bs\gam} \\
715: \dot{\bs\gam} & = \frac{R}{R_s+R}\bs\om\x\bs\gam.
716: \end{aligned}
717: \right. } They possess the integrals \eq[72]{
718: H=\frac12(\bM,\bs\om)+V(\bs\gam), \q F_1=(\bM,\bs\gam)=c, \q
719: F_2=\bs\gam^2=1. } The change of time~$t\to-\frac{R}{R_s+R}\tau$
720: transforms the second equation of~(\ref{71}) into an ordinary Poisson
721: equation~$\dot{\bs\gam}=\bs\gam\x\bs\om$, and the potential is multiplied
722: by some nonessential factor. Thus we set a system~(\ref{68}) for which we
723: know the cases when it is integrable. For example,
724: if~$V=\frac12(\bs\gam,{\bf C}\bs\gam)$, ${\bf C}=\diag(c_1,\,c_2,\,c_3)$,
725: one gets famous Neumann problem of the motion of a point on a sphere in
726: the quadratic potential (equations~(\ref{68}) incorporate even more
727: general situation, when~$(\bM,\bs\gamma)=c\ne0$, which corresponds to the
728: Clebsch case~\cite{BorisovMamaev2}).
729:
730: The equations~\eqref{70}, \eqref{71}for the motion of a ball on a sphere
731: also manifests an analogy (discussed in~\cite{Neimark,Raus}) of problems,
732: concerning the rolling of a homogeneous ball on a sphere in the gravity
733: field, and the Lagrange case in the Euler\f Poisson equations (the motion
734: of a heavy dynamically symmetrical top). Indeed, for a potential of the
735: type~$V=V(\gam_3)$, the systems~\eqref{70}, \eqref{71}, because of the
736: axial symmetry, have ``Lagrangian integrals''~$M_3=\const$
737: or~$\om_3=\const$.
738:
739:
740: \paragraph{The rolling of a ball on a rotating sphere.}
741: Now suppose that the sphere on which a ball rolls rotates freely about its
742: center. The dynamical equations can be written as: \eqc*{ m\dot\bv =
743: \bN,\quad \mu\dot{\bs\om} = \ba\x \bN,\quad
744: \mu_s\dot{\bs\Omega}=-\br\x \bN, \\
745: \bv+\bs\om\x \ba = \bs\Om\x \br. } Here~$\bs\om,\,\bs\Om,\,\mu,\,\mu_s$
746: are the angular velocities and the moments of inertia of the ball and the
747: sphere, respectively. Using the relations~$\br=R_s\bs\gam$,
748: $\ba=-R\bs\gam$, for the
749: quantities~$\wt{\bs\om}=\frac{R\bs\om+R_s\bs\Om}{R+R_s}$, $\bs\gam$, we
750: can write \eqc[73]{
751: \begin{gathered}
752: (1+D)\dot{\wt{\bs\om}} = D\bs\gam\x(\dot{\bs\gam}\x\wt{\bs\om}),\quad
753: \dot {\bs\gamma}=\wt{\bs\omega}\x\bs\gamma, \\
754: D=\frac{mR^2}{\mu}+\frac{mR^2_s}{\mu_s}.
755: \end{gathered} \\
756: } By the change of time $dt\to\alpha\,dt$, $\alpha=\const$, this system
757: can be reduced to equations~\eqref{70} and, for this reason, is
758: integrable.
759:
760:
761:
762: \section{Rolling of a ball on surfaces of the second order}
763:
764: Consider the dynamics of a ball in greater detail for the case when its
765: center of mass is moving on a surface of the second order
766: \begin{equation}
767: \label{eq4-1}
768: \bigl(\br+R\bs\gamma,{\bf B}^{-1}(\br+R\bs\gamma)\bigr)=1,\quad
769: {\bf B}=\diag(b_1,b_2,b_3).
770: \end{equation}
771: In this case the equations of motion are identical in form
772: to~\eqref{eq1-8}.
773:
774: It can be shown that these equations possess an invariant measure and a
775: quadratic integral of the form
776: \begin{equation}
777: \label{eq4-2}
778: \begin{gathered}
779: \rho=(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)^{-2},\\
780: F_2=\frac{(\bs\gamma\times \bM,{\bf B}^{-1}(\bs\gamma\times\bM))}
781: {(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)}.
782: \end{gathered}
783: \end{equation}
784: Here $\bf B$ is an arbitrary (nondegenerate) matrix.
785:
786: {\small
787: \paragraph{Comment I.}
788: The invariant measure's density was found rather easily, after the authors
789: had obtained equations~\eqref{eq1-8} for rolling of a homogeneous ball on
790: an ellipsoid. These equations describe the {\em Jacobi nonholonomic
791: problem}. The problem's name stems from the following fact. When the
792: ball's radius is tending to zero it seems that we get the holonomic
793: classical problem concerning the geodesic lines on an ellipsoid (solved by
794: Jacobi in terms of elliptic functions). Apparently, one should get
795: convinced in the correctness of such a limiting transition, which,
796: however, does not prevent us from using the given terminology. One can
797: treat the integral~\eqref{eq4-2} as a generalization of the Ioachimstal
798: quadratic integral in the Jacobi problem. Originally, the authors found
799: this integral by numerical experiments, using the Poincar\'{e}
800: three-dimensional map in terms of the Andoyae\f Deprit variables
801: $(L,G,H,l,g,h)$. These variables for nonholonomic mechanics were
802: introduced in~\cite{Bormam-new} (see also earlier paper~\cite{BE}).
803:
804: Fig.~\ref{map.eps} illustrates three-dimensional sections of a phase
805: flow in the phase space $(l,L/G,H,g)$ at a level of energy~$E=\const$. The
806: secant plane is $g=\pi/2$. It is seen that the levels~$F_2=\const$ make
807: the three-dimensional chaos ``foliated'' into two-dimensional chaotic
808: surfaces. The fact that the motion on the two-dimensional surfaces
809: $F_2=\const$ ensures that no additional integrals (necessary for
810: integrability of the problem) exist.
811:
812: }
813:
814: Let us consider various particular (may be degenerate) surfaces of the
815: second order for which an integral of the type~\eqref{eq4-2} exists.
816:
817: \fig<width=15.8cm>{map.eps} [\label{fig1}Examples of three-dimensional
818: mappings (on the left) and the corresponding level surfaces of the
819: integral $F_2$ (on the right). All the mappings are constructed at a level
820: of energy $E=1$ for ${\bf B}=\diag(1,\,4,\,9)$. To the frames on the left
821: correspond the values $F_2=1.7,\,2,\,4,\,8,\,10$ (from top to
822: bottom).\vspace{-16mm}]
823:
824:
825: \paragraph{An elliptic (hyperbolic) paraboloid.}
826: Let the ball's center of mass move on an elliptic paraboloid defined by
827: the equation
828: \begin{equation}
829: \label{eq4-3}
830: \frac{x^2}{b_1}+\frac{y^2}{b_2}=2z.
831: \end{equation}
832: Although in this case all the results may be obtained from the previous
833: ones by means of a passage to the limit, we will derive them ``of
834: scratch''.
835:
836: The Gaussian map~\eqref{eq1-7} looks like:
837: \begin{equation}
838: \label{eq4-4}
839: r_1+R\gamma_1=-b_1\frac{\gamma_1}{\gamma_3},\quad r_2+R\gamma_2=
840: -b_2\frac{\gamma_2}{\gamma_3},\quad r_3+R\gamma_3=
841: \frac{b_1\gamma_1^2+b_2\gamma_2^2}{2\gamma_3^2},
842: \end{equation}
843: and the equations motion~\eqref{eq1-8} take the form
844: $$
845: \dot\bM=-\frac{D}{\mu+D}(\bM,\dot{\bs\gamma})\bs\gamma,\quad
846: \dot{\bs\gamma}=\frac{R\gamma_3}{\mu+D}\bs\gamma\times\bigl(
847: \bs\gamma\times{\bf B}^{i}(\bs\gamma\times\bM)\bigr),
848: $$
849: where ${\bf B}^{i}=\diag(b_1^{-1},b_2^{-1},0)$ is a degenerate
850: matrix.\goodbreak
851:
852: The invariant measure density depends on~$\gamma_3$ only
853: \begin{equation}
854: \label{eq4-5}
855: \rho=\frac{1}{\gamma_3^4},
856: \end{equation}
857: and the quadratic integral~\eqref{eq4-2} can be written as
858: \begin{equation}
859: \label{eq4-6}
860: F_2=\frac{\bigl(\bs\gamma\times\bM,{\bf B}^{i}(\bs\gamma\times\bM)\bigr)}
861: {\gamma_3^2}.
862: \end{equation}
863:
864: {\small
865: \paragraph{Comment II.}
866: The integrals~\eqref{eq4-2}, \eqref{eq4-6}, being quadratic with respect
867: to the velocities ($\bM$ or $\bs\omega$), depend on the positional
868: variables in a rather complex way. Maybe for this reason the classics (in
869: particular, Routh and F.\,Noether who obtained only particular results)
870: did not find these integrals. As it has been already noted, the
871: integrals~\eqref{eq4-2}, \eqref{eq4-6} were originally found through
872: numerical experiments. Their analytic form was obtained by means of the
873: following considerations.
874:
875: As we have shown above, the problem concerning the rolling of a ball on a
876: paraboloid of revolution such that $b_1=b_2$ is integrable and has two
877: additional linear integrals. This integrals (in the absence of rotation
878: $\Om=0$) may be written as follows \eqa[eq4-7]{
879: I_1=\gam_3^{\sqrt{1-k}-1}(\sg_1-\sg_2\gam_3+\sg_2\gam_3\sqrt{1-k}),\\
880: I_2=\gam_3^{-\sqrt{1-k}-1}(\sg_1-\sg_2\gam_3-\sg_2\gam_3\sqrt{1-k}),\quad
881: k=\frac{D}{\mu+D} } where $\sg_1=\om_3$, $\sg_2=(\bs \omega,\,\bs\gam)$.
882: The product of these integrals is also an integral which is quadratic with
883: respect to $\sigma_i$, and a rational function of $\sg_1,\,\sg_2$ and
884: $\gam_3$ \eq[eq4-8]{
885: J=\frac{(\sg_2\gam_3-\sg_1)^2}{\gam_3^2}-\sg_2^2(1-k)=\frac{\sg_1^2}{\gam_3^2}-
886: 2\sg_2\frac{\sg_1}{\gam_3}+k\sg_2^2. } Let us eliminate, using the
887: expression for energy~(\ref{eq1-18}), the term $k\sg_2^2$ from the
888: integral~(\ref{eq4-8}), and consider the integral \eq[eq4-9]{
889: F_2=J+2E=\frac{\om_3^2}{\gam_3^2}-2\sg_2\frac{\om_3}{\gam_3}+\bs\om^2. }
890: Substituting the expressions for $\sg_2$ into~(\ref{eq4-9}) and isolating
891: perfect squares, we obtain \eq[eq4-10]{
892: F_2=\frac{(\gam_2\om_3-\gam_3\om_2)^2+(\gam_3\om_1-\gam_1\om_3)^2}{\gam_3^2}.
893: } The integral $F_2$, written in such a form, is easily generalized to the
894: case of an arbitrary paraboloid ($b_1\ne b_2$) \eq[eq4-11]{
895: F_2=\frac{\frac{1}{b_1}(\gam_2\om_3-\gam_3\om_2)^2+\frac{1}{b_2}
896: (\gam_3\om_1-\gam_1\om_3)^2}{\gam_3^2}= \frac{(\bs\gam\x\bs\om,{\bf
897: B}^{i}(\bs\gam\x\bs\om))}{\gam_3^2},\quad {\bf
898: B}^{i}=\diag(b_1^{-1},b_2^{-1},0) } and any surface of the second
899: order~\eqref{eq4-2}. The integrals~\eqref{eq4-2}, \eqref{eq4-6} may be
900: used for stability analysis of stationary motions of a ball near the
901: points of intersection of the surface with the principal axes. The
902: symmetrical case of this problem was considered by Routh~\cite{Raus}.
903:
904: }
905:
906:
907: \paragraph{Motion of a ball on an elliptic cone.}
908: Suppose that the ball's center of mass is moving on the surface of an
909: elliptic cone, defined by the equation \eqc[con1]{ (\br_c,\,{\bf
910: B}^{-1}\br_c)=0,\qq {\bf B}=\diag(b_1,b_2,-1), } where
911: $\br_c=\br+R\bs\gam$ are the coordinates of the center of mass, and
912: $b_1,\,b_2$ are positive quantities such that $\sqrt{b_1}$ and
913: $\sqrt{b_2}$ determine the slope of the generatrices with respect to the
914: coordinate axes. Given the coordinates of the center of mass, we can
915: calculate the normal to the surface $\bs\gam$ at this point as follows:
916: \eqc[con2]{ {\bs\gam}=\frac{{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c}{\sqrt{({\bf
917: B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)}}. } In our case $\br$ (or $\br_c$) is
918: not uniquely defined by $\bs\gam$ (because $\bs\gam$ is constant on a
919: generatrix). Therefore, as phase variables, we will use not
920: $(\bM,\,\bs\gam)$ (as we did earlier), but $(\bM,\,\br_c)$. Upon
921: substitution of~(\ref{con2}) into the equations of motion~(\ref{eq1-3}),
922: we get the equations of motion in terms of the variables $\bM,\,\br_c$:
923: \eq[con3]{
924: \begin{cases}
925: \dot\br_c=\frac{R}{(\mu+D)\sqrt{({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)}}
926: ({\bM}\x{{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c}),\\
927: \dot{\bM}=\frac{DR}{(\mu+D)^2({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)^{5/2}}
928: ({\bf B}^{-1}(\bM\x{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c),\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c\x({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c\x\bM))
929: {\bf B}^{-1}\br_c.
930: \end{cases}
931: } Equations~(\ref{con3}) possess an energy integral
932: $$
933: H=\frac{1}{2(\mu+D)}(\bM^2+\frac{D(\bM,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)^2}
934: {\mu({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)})
935: $$
936: and an invariant measure
937: $$
938: \rho=\sqrt{({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)}.
939: $$
940:
941: Let us now make one more change of variables and time \eqc*{ \by={\bf
942: B}^{-1}\br_c,\qq d\,\tau=\frac{R}{(\mu+D)\sqrt{({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf
943: B}^{-1}\br_c)}}d\,t. } This results in \eq[con4]{
944: \begin{cases}
945: \by'={\bf B}^{-1}({\bM}\x\by),\\
946: {\bM}'=\frac{D}{(\mu+D)(\by,\,\by)^2}({\bf B}^{-1}(\bM\x\by),\,\by\x(\by\x\bM))\by
947: \end{cases}
948: } which possesses two ``natural'' integrals: the energy integral \eqc*{
949: H=\frac{1}{2(\mu+D)}({\bM}^2+\frac{D}{\mu}\frac{(\bM,\,\by)^2}{(\by,\,\by)}),
950: } and the geometrical integral \eqc*{ (\by,\,B\by)=0. } The latter defines
951: the surface in terms of the new variables along which the ball's center of
952: mass is moving. Moreover, equations~(\ref{con4}) possess invariant measure
953: with constant density. The generalization of the nontrivial
954: integral~(\ref{eq4-2}) to the case of equations~(\ref{con4}) looks like
955: \eq[con5]{ F_2=(({\bM}\x\by),\,{\bf B}^{-1}({\bM}\x\by)), } or, in terms
956: of the original physical variables, we set \eq*{ F_2=(({\bM}\x{\bf
957: B}^{-1}\br_c),\,{\bf B}^{-1}({\bM}\x{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)). }
958:
959: The question of existence of one more additional integral for
960: equations~\eqref{con4} remains open. Apparently, in the general case, when
961: $b_1\ne b_2$, it does not exist.
962:
963: \section{Motion of a ball on a cylindrical surface}
964:
965: Let us consider the rolling of a ball whose center of mass is moving on a
966: cylindrical surface. It can be shown that, in the absence of external
967: fields, this system may be integrated by quadratures; but when an external
968: force is directed along the cylinder generatrix, the equations are reduced
969: to a Hamiltonian system with one and a half degree of freedom .
970:
971: \wfig<bb=0 0 25.9mm 37.8mm>{ris5.eps}
972:
973: Let us choose a fixed frame of reference with one axis~$(Oz)$ directed
974: along the cylinder generatrix (see Fig.~\ref{ris5.eps}). In this case, a
975: normal vector is expressed as
976: \begin{equation}
977: \label{eq-5-1}
978: \bs\gamma=(\gamma_1,\gamma_2,0),\quad \gamma_1^2+\gamma_2^2=1.
979: \end{equation}
980: Denote the projections of the normal to the center of mass and the
981: position vector of the center of mass of the ball onto the normal
982: cross-section by~$\wt{\br}=(r_1+R\gamma_1,r_2+R\gamma_2)$,
983: $\wt{\bs\gamma}= (\gamma_1,\gamma_2)$. For these projections we have
984: evident geometrical relations
985: $$
986: (\dot{\wt{\br}},\wt{\bs\gamma})=(\dot{\wt{\bs\gamma}},\wt{\bs\gamma})=0.
987: $$
988: Hence, we conclude that $\dot{\wt{\bs\gamma}}$ is parallel to
989: $\dot{\wt{\br}}$,
990: $$\dot{\wt{\bs\gamma}}=\lambda({\bs\gamma})\dot{\wt{\br}}.$$
991: The factor $\lambda({\bs\gamma})$ is completely determined by the geometry
992: of the cylinder cross-section and does not depend on angular velocity.
993:
994: Using equations~\eqref{eq1-3}, we get the equations of motion for the ball
995: on the cylindrical surface with the assumption that the cylinder is
996: subject to a force (with potential~$U(z)$) directed along a cylinder's
997: generatrix ($z=\frac{r_3}{R}$):
998: \begin{equation}
999: \label{eq-a3}
1000: \begin{gathered}
1001: \dot\bM=\frac{M_3}{\mu+D}\lambda(\bs\gamma)\frac{D}{\mu+D}(\bM\times\bs\gamma,\be_z)\bs\gamma+
1002: \pt{U}{z}\be_z\times\bs\gamma,\\
1003: \dot{\bs\gamma}=\frac{M_3}{\mu+D}\lambda(\bs\gamma)\be_z\times\bs\gamma,\quad
1004: \dot z=\frac{1}{\mu+D} (\bM\times\bs\gamma,\be_z).
1005: \end{gathered}
1006: \end{equation}
1007:
1008: Here not only the energy is conserved but also the projection of the
1009: (angular velocity) moment on the cylinder axis:
1010: \begin{equation}
1011: \label{eq-a4}
1012: \begin{gathered}
1013: H=\frac12(\bM,\bs\omega)+U(z),\\
1014: F_2=M_3=(\mu+D)\omega_3=\const.
1015: \end{gathered}
1016: \end{equation}
1017:
1018: Moreover, the system~\eqref{eq-a4} possesses an invariant measure with
1019: density
1020: \begin{equation}
1021: \label{eq-a5} \rho({\bs\gamma})=\lambda^{-1}(\bs\gamma).
1022: \end{equation}
1023: It follows from~\eqref{eq-a3} that the equations for the
1024: vector~$\bs\gamma$ get uncoupled. Let us use parametrization
1025: $$
1026: \gamma_1=\cos\vfi,\quad \gamma_2=\sin\vfi.
1027: $$
1028: For the angle $\vfi(t)$ we obtain the equation
1029: \begin{equation}
1030: \label{eq-a6}
1031: \dot\vfi=\frac{M_3}{\mu+D}\lambda(\cos\vfi,\sin\vfi)=Q^{-1}(\vfi),
1032: \end{equation}
1033: where $Q(\vfi)$ is, in the general case, a $2\pi$-periodic function
1034: of~$\vfi$, determined by the shape of a cylinder cross-section.
1035:
1036: In the remaining equations of the system \eqref{eq-a3} we put
1037: $$
1038: K_1=M_1\gamma_1+M_2\gamma_1,\quad K_2=M_1\gamma_2-M_2\gamma_1,
1039: $$
1040: and replace the time (as an independent variable) by the angle~$\vfi$, and
1041: thereby obtain the nonautonomous system with~$2\pi$-periodic coefficients
1042: \begin{equation}
1043: \label{eq-a7}
1044: \begin{gathered}
1045: \frac{dK_1}{d\vfi}=-\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}K_2,\quad \frac{dK_2}{d\vfi}=
1046: K_1-Q(\vfi)U'(z),\\
1047: \frac{dz}{d\vfi}=\frac{Q(\vfi)}{\mu+D}K_2.
1048: \end{gathered}
1049: \end{equation}
1050: This system has an integral of energy
1051: \begin{equation}
1052: \label{eq-a8}
1053: \wt{H}= \frac12\Bigl(\frac{K_1^2}{\mu}+\frac{K_2^2}{\mu+D}\Bigr)
1054: +U(z).
1055: \end{equation}
1056: In the case of the gravity field, $U(z)=mgz$ and equation~\eqref{eq-a7}
1057: are integrated by quadratures:
1058: \begin{equation}
1059: \label{eq-a9}
1060: \begin{aligned}
1061: K_1(\vfi)&=-\nu mg\intl_{\vfi_0}^{\vfi}\sin\nu(\tau-\vfi)Q(\tau)d\tau+
1062: \nu A\cos\nu\vfi+\nu B\sin\nu\vfi,\\
1063: K_2(\vfi)&=-mg\intl_{\vfi_0}^{\vfi}\cos\nu(\tau-\vfi)Q(\tau)d\tau+
1064: A\sin\nu\vfi-B\cos\nu\vfi,
1065: \end{aligned}
1066: \end{equation}
1067: where $A,B$ are constants and $\nu^2=\frac{\mu}{\mu+D}$.\goodbreak
1068:
1069: Let us show that the integrals in~\eqref{eq-a9} are bounded functions. We
1070: expand the function $Q(\tau)$ in a Fourier series \eq[eq-a9a]{
1071: Q(\tau)=\sum\limits_{n\in\mZ}Q_ne^{in\tau}. } The integrals in the
1072: expressions for $K_1(\varphi)$ and $K_2(\varphi)$ in~\eqref{eq-a9} may be
1073: considered as the real and imaginary parts of the integral \eq[eq-a9b]{
1074: \int e^{i\nu\tau}Q(\tau)\,d\tau=\int\sum\limits_n
1075: Q_ne^{i(n+\nu)\tau}\,d\tau. } Using the well known theorems of the Fourier
1076: analysis and the fact that $n+\nu\ne0$ (as far as $0<\nu<1$) we put the
1077: integral under the sum sign and integrate the series term-by-term:
1078: \eq[eq-a9c]{
1079: \int\sum\limits_nQ_ne^{i(n+\nu)\tau}\,d\tau=\sum\limits_n\frac{Q_n}{i(n+\nu)}e^{i(n+\nu)\tau}.
1080: } It is evident that the series obtained converges to a certain
1081: quasiperiodic function, hence, $K_1(\varphi)$ and $K_2(\varphi)$ are
1082: bounded. This fact and also the conservation of energy in the reduced
1083: system~\eqref{eq-a8} ensure that $z(\vfi)$ is bounded.
1084:
1085: {\it Thus, when the ball is rolling on an absolutely rough cylindrical
1086: surface of an arbitrary cross-section in the gravity field, the vertical
1087: secular drift is not observed.}
1088:
1089: The time dependence of the angle (and, hence, of all the other functions)
1090: is described by~\eqref{eq-a6}.
1091:
1092:
1093: \paragraph{An elliptic (hyperbolic) cylinder.}
1094: Let us consider in greater detail a particular case, i.\,e., the ball's
1095: center of mass is moving on an elliptic cylinder with cross-section is
1096: defined by the equation
1097: \begin{equation}
1098: \label{eq-**1}
1099: \frac{x^2}{b_1}+\frac{y^2}{b_2}=1.
1100: \end{equation}
1101: We have
1102: $$
1103: r_1+R\gamma_1=\frac{b_1\gamma_1}{\sqrt{b_1\gamma_1^2+b_2\gamma_2^2}},\quad
1104: r_2+R\gamma_2=\frac{b_2\gamma_2}{\sqrt{b_1\gamma_1^2+b_2\gamma_2^2}},\quad
1105: r_3=Rz,
1106: $$
1107: therefore,
1108: $$
1109: \begin{gathered}
1110: \lambda(\bs\gamma)=\frac{R(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)^{3/2}}{b_1b_2},\quad
1111: {\bf B}=\diag(b_1,b_2,0),\\
1112: Q^{-1}(\vfi)=\frac{M_3R}{(\mu+D)b_1b_2}(b_1\cos^2\vfi+b_2\sin^2\vfi)^{3/2}.
1113: \end{gathered}
1114: $$
1115:
1116:
1117: We should mention an important distinction existing between an elliptic
1118: and a circular cylinder (see above): in the case of an elliptic cylinder
1119: the dependency of dynamical variables~$K_1,K_2,z$ is defined by two
1120: frequencies~$\omega_1=1$, $\omega_2=\nu$, instead of a single frequency,
1121: as it happens in case of a circular cylinder. Thus, the integrals
1122: in~\eqref{eq-a9} contain quasiperiodic functions; the integrals have very
1123: complicated nature, their analytical properties are thoroughly discussed
1124: in~\cite{KozlovMKA}. Graphs $z(\varphi)$ for various initial values of
1125: $K_1$ and $K_2$ are shown in Fig.~\ref{picuhod}. The main result is that
1126: whatever the ratio of the frequencies, the quantities $K_1$ and $K_2$,
1127: and, therefore, the displacement~$z$ execute bounded, quasiperiodic
1128: oscillations. It is the main result of this construction.
1129:
1130: The authors express are deeply thankful to V.\,V.\,Kozlov for useful
1131: remarks and discussions.
1132:
1133: \fig<width=110mm>{zphi.eps}[\label{picuhod} The $\varphi$-dependence of
1134: the vertical coordinate of the point of contact $z$ for various initial
1135: values $K_1,\,K_2,\,z$. For this figure the other parameters are:
1136: $E=1,\,\mu=1,\,D=1(\nu=2^{-1/2}),\,b_1=1,\,b_2=2,\,R=1$.]
1137:
1138:
1139: \pagebreak
1140:
1141: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1142:
1143: \bibitem{Appell}
1144: \author{P.\,Appell}
1145: \title{Trait\'e de m\'ecanique rationnelle}
1146: \publisher{Paris, Gauthier\f Villars}
1147:
1148: \bibitem{BE}
1149: \author{A.\,V.\,Borisov, K.\,V.\,Emel'yanov}
1150: \title{Nonintegrability and stochasticity in rigid body dynamics.}
1151: \publisher*{Izhevsk, Izd. Udm. Univer.}
1152: \year{1995}
1153:
1154: \bibitem{BorisovMamaev1}
1155: \author{A.\,V.\,Borisov, I.\,S.\,Mamayev}
1156: \title{Poisson Structures and Lie Algebras in Hamiltonian Mechanics}
1157: \publisher{Izhevsk:~RCD}
1158: \year{1999}
1159: \page{464}
1160:
1161: \bibitem{BorisovMamaev2}
1162: \author{A.\,V.\,Borisov, I.\,S.\,Mamaev}
1163: \title{Rigid Body Dynamics}
1164: \publisher{Izhevsk:~RCD}
1165: \year{2001}
1166: \page{384}
1167:
1168: \bibitem{Bormam-new}
1169: \author{A.\,V.\,Borisov, I.\,S.\,Mamaev}
1170: \title{Rigid body rolling on a plane and a sphere. Dynamical hierarchy}
1171: \journal*{Reg \& Chaot. Dyn.}
1172: \year{2002 (in print)}
1173:
1174: \bibitem{Bychkov}
1175: \author{Yu.\,P.\,Bychkov}
1176: \title{On rolling rigid body on a stationary surface}
1177: \journal{PMM}
1178: \year{1965}
1179: \volume{29}
1180: \no{3}
1181: \page{573--583}
1182:
1183: \bibitem{KozlovMKA}
1184: \author{V.\,V.\,Kozlov}
1185: \title{Qualitative Analysis Methods in Rigid Body Dynamics}
1186: \publisher{Izhevsk: RCD}
1187: \year{2000}
1188:
1189: \bibitem{disskoleskinov}
1190: \author{S.\,N.\,Kolesnikov}
1191: \title{Some Mechanics' Problems on Rolling of Rigid Bodies}
1192: \journal{Candidate Thesis}
1193: \publisher{Moscow, Lomonosov's MSU}
1194: \year{1988}
1195: \page{88}
1196:
1197:
1198: \bibitem{Neimark}
1199: \author{Yu.\,I.\,Neumark, N.\,A.\,Fufayev}
1200: \title{Nonholonomic System Dynamics}
1201: \publisher{M.: Nauka}
1202: \year{1967}
1203: \page{519}
1204:
1205: \bibitem{Raus}
1206: \author{E.\,Routh}
1207: \title{Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies}
1208: \publisher{Dover Publications, New York}
1209:
1210:
1211: \bibitem{neter}
1212: \author{F.\,Noeter}
1213: \title{\"Uber rollende Bewegung einer Kugel auf Rotationsfl\"ache}
1214: \publisher{Leipzig, Teubner}
1215: \year{1909. 56~S}
1216:
1217: \bibitem{hermans}
1218: \author{J.\,Hermans}
1219: \title{A symmetric ball rolling on a surface}
1220: \journal{Nonlinearity}
1221: \year{1995}
1222: \volume{8(4)}
1223: \page{493--515}
1224:
1225: \end{thebibliography}
1226:
1227:
1228:
1229: %%% таблица
1230:
1231: \begin{table}[!p]
1232: \begin{center}
1233: \unitlength=1mm
1234: \begin{picture}(0,0)
1235: \put(19.5,129.5){\cfig{tabl.eps}}
1236: \end{picture}
1237: \resizebox{!}{\textheight}{%
1238: \rotatebox{90}{\parbox{27.5cm}{%
1239: \begin{center}
1240: \mbox{}\hfill{\small Table 1. The rolling of a ball on a surface}\\\medskip
1241: \footnotesize\tabcolsep=1pt
1242: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
1243: \hline
1244: & & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{surface of the second order}
1245: & \multicolumn{6}{|c|}{surface of revolution}\\
1246: \hhline{|~|~|--|------|}
1247: \parbox{22mm}{\centering surface type}
1248: & \parbox{30mm}{\centering \hspace{0pt}cylindrical surface}
1249: & \parbox{40mm}{\centering ellipsoid, hyperboloid,\\ paraboloid}
1250: & \parbox{40mm}{\centering cone of the second order}
1251: & \parbox{25mm}{\centering arbitrary\\ surface}
1252: & \parbox{22mm}{\centering ellipsoid,\\ hyperboloid}
1253: & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\parbox{40mm}{\centering paraboloid, cone, cylinder}}
1254: & sphere\\
1255: \hline
1256: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{}\\[-3.5mm]
1257: \hline
1258: \parbox{23mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering measure}& measure exists &
1259: % \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\parbox{50mm}{measure exists, the most common
1260: % expression is $\rho = (\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)^{-2}$}} &
1261: \parbox{40mm}{\centering $\rho = (\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)^{-2}$} &
1262: \parbox{35mm}{\centering $\rho=\sqrt{({\bf B}^{-1}\br_c,\,{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c)}$}&
1263: \multicolumn{6}{|c|}{\parbox{70mm}{\centering $\rho = (f(\gamma_3))^3\Bigl(f(\gamma_3)-
1264: \frac{1-\gamma_3^2}{\gamma_3}f'(\gamma_3)\Bigr)$}}\\
1265: \hline
1266: \parbox{23mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering additional integrals}
1267: & \parbox{28mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering system is integrable by quadratures}
1268: & \parbox{48mm}{\centering$ \frac{(\bs\gamma{\times}\bM,{\bf B}^{-1}
1269: (\bs\gamma{\times}\bM))}{(\bs\gamma,{\bf B}\bs\gamma)}=\const$\\ (one integral)}
1270: &\parbox{55mm}{\centering$((\bM\x{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c),{\bf B}^{-1}(\bM\x{\bf B}^{-1}\br_c))=\const$\\
1271: (one integral)}
1272: & \parbox{25mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering
1273: two linear integrals, defined by the system of linear equations} &
1274: \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{\parbox{80mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering
1275: there exist two linear integrals that can be
1276: expressed in terms of elementary functions}} \\
1277: \hline
1278: \parbox{23mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering Hamiltonianity} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}
1279: {\parbox{70mm}{\centering nothing is known about
1280: the Hamiltonianity of these systems}} & \multicolumn{6}{|c|}
1281: {\parbox{90mm}{\centering
1282: upon change of time (prescribed by the reducing multiplier)
1283: the reduced system becomes Hamiltonian}}\\
1284: \hline
1285: \parbox{23mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering authors}& \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{A.V.Borisov, I.S.Mamaev, A.A.Kilin (2001)}
1286: & E.Routh (1884) & \parbox{20mm}{\centering A.V.Borisov, I.S.Mamaev, A.A.Kilin (2001)} &
1287: \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{E.Routh (1884)} \\
1288: \hline
1289: \parbox{22mm}{\hspace{0pt}\centering generalizations\\ and remarks} &
1290: \parbox{30mm}{\centering
1291: integrable addition of the gravity field
1292: along a cylinder generatrix is possible} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{}&
1293: \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{\parbox{85mm}{\centering
1294: A.V.Borisov, I.S.Mamaev, and A.A.Kilin have shown
1295: the integrability in terms of elementary functions
1296: of the case of the ball rolling on the ellipsoid of revolution;
1297: have found an invariant measure for an arbitrary surface of revolution;
1298: for a paraboloid, a cone, and a cylinder they have shown the integrability of
1299: the case, when the ball is rolling on a surface rotating around its
1300: axis of symmetry}}
1301: & \parbox{28mm}{\centering
1302: the problems of the rolling of a ball on an
1303: unconstrained and rotating sphere are also solved.
1304: System also allows integrable additions of potentials.} \\
1305: \hline
1306: \end{tabular}
1307: \end{center}
1308: Remark. The cases when the tensor invariants exist are indicated by gray
1309: color in the table. The partial filling corresponds to the uncomplete set
1310: of integrals. }}}
1311: \end{center}
1312: \end{table}
1313:
1314: \end{document}
1315: