1: \documentclass{elsart}
2: %\documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}
3: %\usepackage{natbib}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}
6: \usepackage{bm}
7: \begin{document}
8: \begin{frontmatter}
9: %\preprint{CCOC-03-04 (Last Update:\today)}
10: \title{Synchronization of delayed systems in the presence of delay time modulation}
11: \author{Won-Ho Kye},
12: \ead{whkyes@empal.com}
13: \author{Muhan Choi},
14: \ead{ihshope@naver.com}
15: \author{Myung-Woon Kim},
16: \author{Soo-Young Lee},
17: \author{Sunghwan Rim}, and
18: \ead{rim@phys.paichai.ac.kr}
19: \author{Chil-Min Kim}
20: \ead{chmkim@mail.paichai.ac.kr}
21: \address{National Creative Research Initiative Center for Controlling Optical Chaos,
22: Pai-Chai University, Daejeon 302-735, Korea}
23: \author{Young-Jai Park}
24: \ead{yjpark@ccs.sogang.ac.kr}
25: \address{Department of Physics, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea}
26: \begin{abstract}
27: We investigate synchronization in the presence of delay time
28: modulation for application to communication.
29: We have observed that the robust synchronization is established by a common delay signal
30: and its threshold is presented using Lyapunov exponents analysis.
31: The influence of the delay time modulation in chaotic oscillators is also discussed.
32: \end{abstract}
33: \begin{keyword}
34: synchronization, time-delayed system
35: \PACS 05.45.Xt, 05.40.Pq
36: \end{keyword}
37: \end{frontmatter}
38:
39: Synchronization phenomenon was discovered by Huygens in two coupled pendulum clocks\cite{Huy}.
40: The first description of synchronization in chaotic systems by Fujisaka and Yamada \cite{SyncOrg0}
41: gave new rise to scientific attention to the phenomenon
42: and, over the past decade,
43: synchronization in chaotic oscillators has been rigorously investigated
44: not only for understanding of its role in nonlinear systems
45: but for its potential applications in various fields \cite{SyncTut,SyncBook}.
46: Synchronization in chaotic oscillators
47: % $\dot{\bf x}_1={\bf F}_1({\bf x}_1, {\bf x}_2)$
48: % $\dot{\bf x}_2={\bf F}_2({\bf x}_2, {\bf x}_1)$
49: is characterized by the fact that transverse variable ${\bf X}={\bf x}_1-{\bf x}_2$ converges
50: to zero in the limit of $t \rightarrow \infty$,
51: while longitudinal variable ${\bf x} = {\bf x}_1+{\bf x}_2$ is still in a chaotic state.
52: Up to now the kinds of synchronization \cite{SyncTut,SyncBook,GPS} that
53: have been observed include complete synchronization in identical systems
54: and phase synchronization (PS), lag synchronization,
55: and frequency synchronization in slightly detuned systems,
56: while generalized synchronization and
57: generalized phase synchronization
58: have been described in systems with different dynamics.
59: %So far, complete synchronization (CS) \cite{SyncOrg0,SyncOrg1} have been observed in identical systems, and
60: %phase synchronization (PS) \cite{PhaseSync}, lag synchronization (LS) \cite{Lag},
61: %and frequency synchronization (FS) \cite{FS} in slightly detuned systems.
62: %Generalized synchronization (GS) \cite{GenSync} and generalized phase synchronization (GPS) \cite{GPS}
63: %have been described between systems with different dynamics.
64:
65: One of the most important fields where chaos has been practically applied is in communication.
66: The major concern in this field was that an encoded message is vulnerable to extraction
67: by nonlinear dynamic forecasting \cite{NLDF},
68: when it is masked by the signal from the low-dimensional chaotic system.
69: Then it becomes essential to develop high-dimensional chaotic systems
70: having a multiple number of positive Lyapunov exponents
71: to implement a communication system.
72: In this regard, one time-delayed system received a lot of attention:
73: that is,
74: \begin{equation}
75: \dot{x}=f(x(t), x(t-\tau_0)),
76: \end{equation}
77: where $\tau_0$ is a delay time \cite{TD_Sync,TD_Laser,TD_Circuit,TD_Cont,TD_Comm}.
78: The time-delayed system exhibits intriguing characteristics with increasing $\tau_0$.
79: Despite a small number of physical variables,
80: the embedding dimension and number of positive Lyapunov exponents increases
81: as the delay time increases,
82: and the system eventually transits to hyperchaos\cite{Hyperchaos}.
83: For this reason, a time-delayed system was considered to be the most suitable
84: candidate for implementing communication systems.
85: %the embedding dimension and the number of positive
86: %Lyapunov exponents of time-delayed system almost linearly increase as the delay time.
87: %The system transits to hyperchaos \cite{Hyperchaos}.
88: %been considered to be the best candidate for secure communication.
89: %It is observed in various fields, e.g., biological system \cite{TD_Bio}, laser \cite{TD_Laser},
90: %electronic circuit \cite{TD_Circuit}, and controls \cite{TD_Cont} is given by
91: %\begin{equation}
92: %\dot{x}={f}({x}(t), {x}(t-\tau_0)),
93: %\end{equation}
94: %where $\tau_0$ is a delay time.
95: %The system exhibits intriguing characteristics with increasing delay time $\tau_0$.
96: %To improve the security in communication, the synchronization of high-dimensional
97: %systems having multiple positive Lyapunov exponents is preferable.
98: %Thus the time-delayed system is considered to be the
99: %most suitable candidate for implementing communication systems \cite{TD_Comm}.
100: %time-delay system have been intensively investigated
101: %for applications in communication \cite{TD_Comm} and
102:
103: However, it was newly discussed the communication based on a time-delayed system
104: is still vulnerable because the delay time $\tau_0$ can be exposed
105: by several measures, e.g., autocorrelation \cite{AutoCorr}, filling factor\cite{Bunner},
106: and one step prediction error, etc \cite{Bunner,TD_ATT}.
107: %The possibility of the exposure of delay time $\tau$ in a time-delayed
108: %system comes from the feedback mechanism with constant delay time $\tau_0$.
109: %The system fed by $x(t-\tau_0)$ delayed feedback indispensably exhibits the
110: %similar dynamical behavior at $t+\tau_0$ depending on the strength of coupling.
111: %Eventually, that leads to the peaks in autocorrelation function.
112: If the delay time is known, the time-delayed system collapses
113: to the simple manifold
114: in the $(\dot{x}, x(t), x(t-\tau_0))$ space \cite{Bunner,TD_ATT}.
115: So the time-delayed system becomes quite a simple one to someone who knows the delay time $\tau_0$,
116: and that message encoded by the chaotic signal
117: can be extracted by the common attack methods \cite{NLDF}.
118:
119: Accordingly, the most crucial questions to address regarding to the application
120: of time-delayed system to communications come to be
121: {\it "Is there any scheme which hides the delay time from an eavesdropper"},
122: and {\it "Is it possible to find out a robust synchronization regime under the scheme"}.
123: In this paper, we consider a generalization of time-delayed systems in which
124: the delay time is not constant but modulated in time, which was introduced
125: to study the general property of the delay differential system \cite{Madruga}.
126: Applying the generalization to two coupled chaotic systems,
127: we focus our discussion on answering the two questions above.
128: Thus, we would show that there exists
129: a robust synchronization regime even if the delay time is modulated and
130: that the imprints of delay time in time series are completely
131: wiped out by the modulation of delay time.
132:
133: \begin{figure}
134: \begin{center}
135: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{./corr.eps}}
136: \caption{Autocorrelation functions and filling factors at $\lambda=4.0, \beta=0.7$:
137: (a) and (c) constant delay time $\tau_0=30$;
138: (b) and (d) delay time modulation with $g(t, \tau_0)= (0.95\tau_0/2)\sin(t)+\tau_0/2$ and $\tau_0=60$.
139: The primary peaks in (a) and (c)
140: show the constant delay time $\tau_0$.}
141: \end{center}
142: \end{figure}
143: First, to explain the delay time modulation (DTM),
144: we consider a single logistic map with time-delayed feedback,
145: and observe what an effect the modulated delay time $\tau$
146: has on the characteristics of the time series:
147: $x(t+1)=\lambda \tilde{x}(t)(1-\tilde{x}(t))$,
148: where $\tilde{x}(t)= (1-\beta) x(t) +\beta x(t-\tau)$ with
149: $\tau(t)=g(t, \tau_0)$.
150: The modulation function of the delay time is given by:
151: \begin{equation}
152: \tau=g(t, \tau_0).
153: \end{equation}
154: If we take $g(t,\tau_0)$ as a constant,
155: the system returns to the usual time-delayed system.
156: As we shall see, the nontrivial choice of the modulation function
157: not only has a crucial effect on the characteristics of synchronization,
158: but also remarkably transforms the characteristics of the time series.
159: Figure 1 shows autocorrelations and filling factors \cite{FF}
160: for two different modulations.
161: In the case of the constant delay time (Fig. 1 (a) and (c)),
162: one can easily notice that the peaks indicated
163: by arrows exactly correspond to the multiples of the delay time $\tau_0$.
164: On the contrary, when the modulation is
165: sinusoidal (Fig. 1(b) and (d)) the imprints of delay time are completely
166: wiped out, and the detection of delay time seems
167: to be impossible.
168: We emphasize that the disappearance of the
169: imprints of delay time is caused by the fact that the delay time is
170: changing in time.
171: Accordingly, Figure 1 clearly shows that the results
172: do not depend on the method of the detection.
173:
174: %Even if one detects a delay time $\tau_1$ at a particular time $t_1$,
175: %the delay time is no longer valid at the time $t_2$ because the delay time is
176: %already shifted by $\delta \tau = (d g(t, \tau_0)/dt) \delta t$.
177: %The two systems embedded in topology changing network
178: %This type of modulation can be observed in the network
179: %whose topology is changed in time.
180: %It should be noted that DTS can be easily found in real network systems.
181: %Since the networks in nature continue to change their topology through
182: %'deaths' and 'birth' of the vertices, the time needed to get feedback
183: %might be dynamically modulated.
184:
185: To analyze synchronous behaviors,
186: we consider a system of two coupled Lorenz oscillators
187: with common time-delayed feedback:
188:
189: \begin{equation}
190: \left .
191: \begin{array}{lll}
192: \dot{x}_1&=& \sigma (y_1-\tilde{x}_1), \\
193: \dot{y}_1&=& -\tilde{x}_1z_1 + r\tilde{x}_1-y_1, \\
194: \dot{z}_1&=& \tilde{x}_1 y_1 - b z_1, \\
195: & & \\
196: {\tau} &=& g(t, \tau_0),
197: \end{array}
198: \right \} \mbox{Transmitter}
199: \end{equation}
200: \begin{equation}
201: \left .
202: \begin{array}{lll}
203: \dot{x}_2&=& \sigma (y_2-\tilde{x}_2), \\
204: \dot{y}_2&=& -\tilde{x}_2 z_2 + r\tilde{x}_2-y_2, \\
205: \dot{z}_2&=& \tilde{x}_2 y_2 - b z_2,
206: \end{array}
207: \right \} \mbox{Receiver~~~}
208: \end{equation}
209: where $\sigma=10.0$, $r=28.0$, and $b=8/3$ and
210: $\tilde{x}_1=(1-\beta) x_1(t) + \beta y_1(t-\tau)$
211: and $\tilde{x}_2=(1-\beta) x_2(t) + \beta y_1(t-\tau)$.
212: Here we take the modulation function as
213: $g(t, \tau_0)= \frac{0.95\tau_0}{2} \sin(\omega t) + \frac{\tau_0}{2}$ and $\tau_0=60$.
214: We note that the systems are coupled by common signal $\beta y_1(t-\tau)$.
215: Figure 2 shows the trajectories in the phase space with
216: time-delayed feedback. One can see that the shape of the attractor
217: is so seriously deformed that it is impossible to identify
218: the original shape of the Lorenz attractor.
219: This deformation of the attractor is the typical characteristic of
220: the time-delayed system which stems from the transition
221: to hyperchaos by time-delayed feedbacks \cite{TD_Sync,Bunner}.
222:
223: \begin{figure}
224: \begin{center}
225: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{./l_port.eps}}
226: \caption{Projective trajectories of Eq. (3) when $\beta=0.93$ and $\omega=0.005$.
227: (a) in $(x,y)$ space (b) in $(y,z)$ space.}
228: \end{center}
229: \end{figure}
230:
231: The synchronization transition can be easily detected by observing the
232: relative motion of the two oscillators.
233: The equation of motion describing the relative
234: motion is obtained from Eqs. (3)-(4):
235: \begin{eqnarray}
236: \dot{X} &=& \sigma (Y - (1-\beta) X), \nonumber \\
237: & & \nonumber\\
238: \dot{Y} &=& -(1-\beta) (x_1Z +X z_1- X Z) \nonumber\\
239: & &-\beta y_1(t-\tau) Z -r (1-\beta)X -Y, \\
240: & & \nonumber\\
241: \dot{Z} &=& (1-\beta) (x_1Y + X y_1-X Y) \nonumber\\
242: & & +\beta y_1(t-\tau) Z -b Z, \nonumber
243: \end{eqnarray}
244: where $X=x_1-x_2$, $Y=y_1-y_2$, and $Z=z_1-z_2$.
245: %one can understand the synchronization phenomenon.
246: The above equations are nonautonomous in themselves and, so,
247: by iterating the above equation with Eqs. (3)-(4), we obtain the
248: transverse Lyapunov exponents (TLEs) \cite{TLE} which enable us
249: to determine the synchronization threshold.
250:
251: \begin{figure*}
252: \begin{center}
253: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=14.0cm]{./l_lyap_2d.eps}}
254: \caption{Two largest TLEs as a function of
255: the coupling $\beta$ and the modulation frequency $\omega$.
256: We have added the uniform random noise of amplitude $ |\xi| \sim 10^{-8}$ only to
257: $x$ variable of Eq. (3)
258: in order to remove abrupt synchronization regime:
259: (a) the largest exponent, where the border line between gray and dark gray region on $(\beta, \omega)$
260: plane corresponds to
261: the transition threshold to CS; (b) the second largest exponent,
262: where the border line corresponds to the transition threshold to PS.}
263: \end{center}
264: \end{figure*}
265:
266: \begin{figure}
267: \begin{center}
268: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=7.3cm]{./l_cri_ad.eps}}
269: \caption{Contour plot of synchronization regimes in $(\omega, \beta)$ space.
270: A and B are the reference points to show the time series.
271: CS: Complete Synchronization, PS: Phase Synchronization, AD: Amplitude Death.}
272: \end{center}
273: \end{figure}
274:
275: Figure 3 shows two largest TLEs as a function of $\beta$ and $\omega$.
276: One can clearly see the threshold to CS on $(\beta, \omega)$ plane of Fig. 3 (a)
277: where the largest TLE becomes negative.
278: Also the threshold to PS, where the vanishing TLE becomes negative,
279: is plotted on $(\beta, \omega)$ plane of Fig. 3 (b).
280: The synchronization regimes are presented in Fig. 4 as a contour plot.
281: Contrary to a common intuition, the CS regime becomes wider as the
282: modulation frequency $\omega$ increases, even though the regime
283: is smeared with an amplitude death (AD) \cite{AD,Death}.
284: The amplitude death phenomenon due to DTM in our study is similar to
285: the transition to periodic orbit in Ref. \cite{Madruga} in the sence that
286: in both cases the systems lose their exponential instability by the interaction.
287: However different apect is that our system converges to the fixed point
288: without oscillation instead of the periodic orbit.
289: %These effects show that DTM can be applied to stabilizing systems such as chaos control\cite{TD_Cont}.
290: These effects show that DTM can play a role of stabilizing scheme such as chaos control\cite{TD_Cont}.
291: The appearance of the wider synchronization regime in Fig. 4 implies that the scheme
292: will be effective to implement real communication systems,
293: since the higher modulation frequency widens the synchronization regime
294: and it would enable us to construct more of communication channels.
295: \begin{figure}
296: \begin{center}
297: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=8.3cm]{./l_sync.eps}}
298: \caption{Time series of $x_1-x_2$ and the delay time $\tau$ as a function of time:
299: (a) point A in Fig. 4 ($\beta=0.87, \omega=0.005$).
300: (c) point B in Fig. 4 ($\beta=0.93, \omega=0.005$).
301: (c) modulated delay time when $\omega=0.005$.}
302: \end{center}
303: \end{figure}
304:
305: Figure 5 shows the temporal behaviors of the difference between $x_1$ and $x_2$
306: and the modulated delay time $\tau$.
307: The temporal behaviors below (point A in Fig. 4) and above (point B in Fig. 4)
308: the threshold are presented in Fig. 5 (a) and Fig. 5 (b), respectively.
309: They clearly show the threshold behaviors of CS at two points.
310: The delay time $\tau$ is modulated as shown in Fig. 5 (c).
311: It is interesting to see the autocorrelations and filling factor for different modulations.
312: %when the delay time is constant (Fig. 6 (a)) and
313: %the delay time is modulated (Fig. 6 (b)).
314: For the constant delay time,
315: the delay time is exactly indicated by the position of
316: the dips pointed by arrows in Fig. 6 (a) and (c).
317: In the case of DTM (Fig. 6 (b) and (d)),
318: the dips disappear.
319:
320: In general introducing a $d$-dimensional chaotic oscillator,
321: we can consider a chaotic modulation of delay time:
322: $\tau = g({\bf x}, \tau_0)$
323: where
324: $\dot{\bf x} = \frac{1}{\epsilon}{\bf F}({\bf x})$ and
325: $\epsilon$ is a time scaling parameter to control
326: the rate of modulation like $\omega$ in sinusoidal modulation.
327: We can expect that the chaotic modulation
328: will not work a fundamental change in contrast with the sinusoidal modulation,
329: because the delayed feedback $x(t-\tau)$ hardly correlated with $x(t)$ already
330: even in the sinusoidal modulation as shown in Fig. 6 (b).
331: However, in the application to communication, the chaotic modulation
332: would enhance the security of the system
333: because it may increase the complexity of the attractor.
334: \begin{figure}
335: \begin{center}
336: \rotatebox[origin=c]{0}{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{./l_corr.eps}}
337: \caption{Disappearance of the dips in autocorrelations and filling factors at $\beta=0.93$:
338: (a) and (c) constant delay time, $\tau_0=30$; (b) and (d) modulated delay time ($\omega=0.005$).}
339: \end{center}
340: \end{figure}
341: %On the basis of present results,
342: %we can confirm that DTM will protect the systems against attacks
343: %by the time delay embedding method, e.g., NLDF \cite{NLDF}.
344: It is worth discussing the physical implementation of the systems described by
345: Eq. (3)-(4). We think that such a situation can be observed in optical systems.
346: For example, one can consider two laser systems coupled by reflected laser beam from a vibrating mirror.
347: In that case, Lorenz equation describes a laser system and
348: the vibrating mirror plays a role of modulation function.
349:
350: In conclusion, we have studied the effects of DTM in chaotic oscillators.
351: We have observed that the imprints due to the constant time delay
352: are completely wiped out by the modulation in the chaotic map and flow.
353: We have also demonstrated that the robust synchronization can be established
354: in the presence of DTM.
355: We expect this effects to be useful in constructing real communication systems.
356:
357: We thank M. S. Kurdoglyan for helpful discussions.
358: This work is supported by Creative Research Initiatives
359: of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.
360:
361: \begin{thebibliography}{150}
362: \bibitem{Huy} Ch. Huygens, {\it Horologium Oscillatiorium} Apud F. Muguet, Paris, France, 1673 English
363: translation: {\it The Pendulum Clock} Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1986.
364: \bibitem{SyncOrg0} H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 69}, 32 (1983);
365: V.S. Afraimovich, N.N. Verichev, and M.I. Rabinovich, Radiophys.
366: Quantum Electron. {\bf 29}, 747 (1986);
367: L.M. Pecora and T.L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 64}, 821 (1990).
368: \bibitem{SyncTut} S. Boccaletti, J. Kurth, G. Osipov, D.L. Valladares and C. Zhou, Physics Reports {\bf 366}, 1 (2002) and references therein.
369: \bibitem{SyncBook} A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, {\it Synchronization A universal concept in nonlinear
370: science}, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2001.
371: %\bibitem{PhaseSync}M. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76}, 1804 (1996);
372: % K.J. Lee, Y. Kwak, and T.K. Lim, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 321 (1998).
373: %\bibitem{Lag}M. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 4193 (1997);
374: % M. Zhan, G.W. Wei, and C.-H. Lai, Phys. Rev. E{\bf 65}, 036202 (2002).
375: %\bibitem{FS} V.S. Anishchenko, T.E. Vadivasova, D.E. Postnov, and M.A. Safonova,
376: % Int. J. Bif. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 2, 633 (1992).
377: %\bibitem{GenSync} L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76}, 1816 (1996);
378: % R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 4835 (1998).
379: \bibitem{GPS} D.-S. Lee, W.-H. Kye, S. Rim, T.-Y. Kwon, and C.-M. Kim,
380: Phys. Rev. E{\bf 67}, 045201(R)(2003).
381: \bibitem{NLDF}K.M. Short and A.T. Parker, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 58}, 1159 (1998) and references therein.
382: \bibitem{TD_Sync} K. Pyragas, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 58}, 3067 (1998);
383: R. He and P.G. Vaidya, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 59}, 4048 (1999);
384: L. Yaowen, G, Gguangming, Z. Hong, and W. Yinghai, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 62}, 7898 (2000).
385: %\bibitem{TD_Bio}J. Fort and V. M\'endez, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 178101 (2002).
386: \bibitem{TD_Laser} T. Heil, I. Fischer, W. Els\"asser, J. Mulet, and C. R. Mirasso, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 2001 (795).
387: \bibitem{TD_Circuit} D. V. Ramana Reddy, A. Sen, and G.L. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 3381 (2000).
388: \bibitem{TD_Cont} K. Pyragass, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 2265 (2001);
389: O. L\"uthje, S. Wolf, and G. Pfister, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 1745 (2001).
390: \bibitem{TD_Comm} V.S. Udaltsov, J.-P. Goedgebuer, L. Larger, and W.T. Rhodes, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 1892 (2001).
391: \bibitem{Hyperchaos} J.D. Farmer, Physica D {\bf 4}, 366 (1982).
392: K.M. Short and A.T. Parker, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 58}, 1159 (1998).
393: \bibitem{AutoCorr} F.T. Arecchi, R. Meucci, E. Allaria, A. Di Garbo, and L.S. Tsimring, Phys. Rev. E{\bf 65}, 046237 (2002).
394: \bibitem{Bunner} M.J. B\"unner, Th. Meyer, A. Kittel, and J. Parisi, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 56}, 5083 (1997);
395: R. Hegger, M.J. B\"unner, H. Kantz, and A. Giaquinta, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 558 (1998);
396: M.J. Buenner, M. Ciofini, A. Giaquinta, R. Hegger, H. Kantz, R. Meucci and A. Politi,
397: Eur. Phys. J. D {\bf 10}, 165 (2000);
398: M.J. Buenner, M. Ciofini, A. Giaquinta, R. Hegger, H. Kantz, R. Meucci and A. Politi,
399: Eur. Phys. J. D {\bf 10}, 177 (2000); {\it ibid} {\bf 10}, 177 (2000).
400: \bibitem{TD_ATT} V.I. Ponomarenko and M.D. Prokhorov, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 66}, 026215 (2002);
401: C. Zhou and C.-H. Lai, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 60}, 320 (1999);
402: B.P. Bezruchko, A.S. Karavaev, V.I. Ponomarenko, and M.D. Prokhorov,
403: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 64}, 056216 (2001).
404: \bibitem{Madruga} S. Madruga and S. Boccaletti, and M.A. Matias, International Journal of Bifurcation
405: and Chaos {\bf 11}, 2875 (2001).
406: \bibitem{FF}
407: Consider the $({ \bf x}(t), {\bf x}(t-\tau), \dot{\bf x})$ space
408: with $P^{3N}$ equally sized hypercubes.
409: The filling factor is the number of hypercubes, which are visited by
410: the projected trajectory, normalized to the total number of hypercubes, $P^{3N}$ (see the
411: first reference in Ref \cite{Bunner}).
412: We have used $(x(t), x(t-\tau), \dot{x})$ space for filling factors in Fig. 1 (c) and (d)
413: and $(x_1, y_1(t-\tau), \dot{x}_1)$ space for filling factors in Fig. 6 (c) and (d).
414: \bibitem{TLE} J.F. Heagy, T.L. Carroll, and L.M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. E{\bf 50}, 1874(1994).
415: \bibitem{AD}
416: In the amplitude death regime, the amplitudes of oscillation of state vectors ${\bf x}_1$ and ${\bf x}_2$
417: are strongly damped and eventually converge to fixed points.
418: Thus, in this regime, the transverse variables $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ converges to zero.
419: This is the first observation of amplitude death due to DTM in chaotic oscillator, as far as we know.
420: We will report the phenomenon with detail analyses elsewhere; for understanding of amplitude
421: death in coupled limit cycles, see, for example, Ref. \cite{Death}.
422: \bibitem{Death} D.V. Ramana Reddy, A. Sen, and G.L. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 5109 (1998).
423: %\bibitem{Sequen} C.-M. Kim, S. Rim, and W.-H. Kye, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 014103 (2002);
424: % S. Rim, D.U. Hwang, I. Kim, and C.M. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 2304 (2000).
425: %\bibitem{TopologyChange}
426: %The network whose topology is changing in time is ubiquitous in nature, e.g.,
427: %neural networks, human relationships, and Internet etc \cite{CascadeNet,TD_Net,ScaleFree}.
428: %The change of topology could produce DTM in propagating signals.
429: %\bibitem{CascadeNet} A.E. Motter and Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 66}, 065102 (2002).
430: %\bibitem{TD_Net}S. H. Park, S. Kim, H.-B. Pyo, and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4962 (1999).
431: %\bibitem{ScaleFree} R. Albert and A.-L. Barab\'asi, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 74}, 47(2002).
432: \end{thebibliography}
433: \end{document}
434: