1: \documentclass{article}
2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx,psfrag}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{
6: Exact Phase Solutions of
7: Nonlinear Oscillators on Two-dimensional Lattice
8: }
9: \author{
10: Tsunehiro Yokoi, Hiroyasu Yamada, and Kazuhiro Nozaki
11: }
12: \date{}
13: \maketitle
14:
15: \begin{abstract}
16: We present various exact solutions of a discrete
17: complex Ginzburg-Landau (CGL) equation on a
18: plane lattice, which describe target patterns
19: and spiral patterns and derive their stability criteria.
20: We also obtain similar solutions to a system of
21: van der Pol's oscillators.
22: \end{abstract}
23:
24: \section{Introduction}
25: Near the onset of the Hopf bifurcation in continuous media, a complex
26: amplitude of
27: distributed oscillators is described by a normal form equation called
28: the complex Ginzburg-Landau (CGL) equation. Some exact solutions of the 1+1
29: dimensional
30: CGL equation are known as hole, solitary-wave and shock solutions
31: \cite{nozaki-bekki}. In the 2+1 dimensional space, numerical studies
32: showed existence of interesting solutions describing target patterns
33: and spiral patterns \cite{kramer1,kramer2}.
34: However, explicit
35: and exact solutions representing target patterns or spiral patterns
36: have not been constructed yet.
37:
38: Here we consider a system of oscillators which undergo the Hopf
39: bifurcation on a two dimensional lattice instead of continuous media.
40: Each oscillator is governed by the normal form equation of the Hopf
41: bifurcation \cite{gholms} and couples diffusively and dispersively with
42: its nearest-neighbor oscillators so that the system becomes a
43: spatially discretized version of the 2+1 dimensional CGL (discrete
44: CGL) equation\cite{mori}.
45: Such a discrete CGL equation has also been studied on
46: a network in connection with \cite{strogatz,yamada}. In this paper,
47: we show that the discrete CGL equation has exact solutions
48: describing various
49: phase patterns consisting of target patterns and spiral patterns. Each
50: spiral pattern solution needs a defect in its origin of spiral, where
51: oscillators are absent.
52: This defect may corresponds to the singularity of the origin in a
53: spiral solution
54: in continuous media. In the other hand, target pattern solutions do
55: not have any defects.
56: We derive the stability condition of the exact solutions to
57: modulational perturbations
58: and conduct some numerical simulations to confirm the stability
59: criterion. Similar phase pattern solutions are constructed to a system
60: of van der Pol's oscillators.
61:
62: %%%%%%%
63: \section{Nonlinear Oscillators on Two-dimensional Lattice }
64: %%%%%%%%
65: Let us consider the following system of normal form oscillators to the
66: Hopf bifurcation
67: on a two-dimensional lattice.
68: \begin{equation}
69: \frac{dW_n}{dt} = -(\mu_r +i \mu_i)|W_n|^2 W_n
70: +(\nu_r+ i \nu_i)W_n
71: +(\lambda_r +i \lambda_i)\sum_{j \sim n} ^4 (W_j - W_n) \label{eq:1}
72: \end{equation}
73: where
74: $W_n $ are complex amplitudes of oscillators and
75: $ \mu _r,\ \mu_i,\ \nu_r,\ \nu_i,\ \lambda_r,\ \lambda _i $
76: are real constants; $ \mu _r$
77: and $ \nu _r$ are assumed to be positive (the subcritical bifurcation) and
78: % $W_n \in {\it C}, \mu _r,\mu _i,\nu_r,\nu_i,\lambda_r ,\lambda _i \in {\it R}$
79: $\sum^4 _{j \sim n}$ denotes summation over nearest-neighbor
80: oscillators
81: at site $n$. Through this summation term, each oscillator has
82: diffusive ($\lambda _r$) and dispersive ($\lambda _i$) interactions
83: with its nearest-neighbors. Here, we call
84: Eq.(\ref{eq:1})
85: a discrete CGL equation.
86:
87: By changing variables
88: $W_n \rightarrow W_n \exp[-i \nu _i t]$ and $t \rightarrow \mu_r t$,
89: and replacing coefficients as
90: $p_1 = \mu _i /\mu_r $, $ p_2 = \nu_r/\mu_r $,
91: $p_3 = \lambda_r/ \mu_r$ and $p_4 = \lambda_i/\mu_r$,
92: Eq.(\ref{eq:1}) is transformed into
93: \begin{equation}
94: \frac{dW_n}{dt} = -(1 +i p_1)|W_n|^2 W_n
95: +p_2 W_n+(p_3 +i p_4)\sum^4_{j \sim n}(W_j - W_n) ,\label{eq:2}
96: \end{equation}
97: or
98: \begin{equation}
99: \frac{dW_n}{dt} = -(1 +i p_1)|W_n|^2 W_n
100: +(p_2 -4(p_3 +i p_4))W_n+(p_3 +i p_4)\sum^4_{j \sim n}W_j
101: ,\label{eq:3}
102: \end{equation}
103: where $p_2>0$.
104: We use Eq.(\ref{eq:2}) or Eq.(\ref{eq:3}) as a basic system in this
105: paper.
106:
107: %%%%%%%%%
108: \section{Exact Solutions}
109: %%%%%%%%%%
110: In this section, we derive some exact solutions of the discrete CGL
111: equation (\ref{eq:3}),
112: which represent a target pattern, a spiral pattern and various mixtures
113: of those patterns.
114: A crucial step to find exact solutions is to assume
115: \begin{equation}
116: \sum^4_{j \sim n} W_j =0
117: \ \mbox{(for all sites}\ n \mbox{)}.\label{eq:4}
118: \end{equation}
119: Then, Eq. (\ref{eq:3}) takes the same equation for all $n$:
120: \begin{equation}
121: \frac{dW_n}{dt}=-(1 +i p_1)|W_n|^2 W_n +(p_2-4 (p_3 +i p_4)) W_n
122: .\label{eq:5}
123: \end{equation}
124: We choose an equilibrium solution of Eq.(\ref {eq:5}).
125: \begin{equation}
126: W_n =A e^{i(\omega t +\phi(n))} ,\label{eq:6}
127: \end{equation}
128: where $A ,\ \omega $ are real constants satisfying
129: \begin{eqnarray}
130: A^2 &=& p_2-4p_3 , \\
131: \omega &=& -p_1 (p_2 -4 p_3)-4 p_4 ,
132: \end{eqnarray}
133: and a functional form of the phase $\phi(n)$ with respect to $n$ is
134: determined later.
135: Because of $A^2 >0$, we need
136: \begin{equation}
137: p_2-4p_3>0. \label{cond1}
138: \end{equation}
139: Since $p_2>0$, the condition (\ref {cond1}) is automatically satisfied
140: for
141: $p_3 \le 0$ (negative diffusion or diffusionless case).
142: The solution (\ref {eq:6}) has the same amplitude $A$ at all cites but
143: its phase could vary from site to site. The variation of the phase must
144: be determined
145: so that Eq.(\ref {eq:4}) is satisfied.
146: \begin{equation}
147: \sum^4_{j \sim n} e^{i \phi(j)}=0
148: \ \mbox{(for all sites}\ n \mbox{)}.\label{eq:7}
149: \end{equation}
150: We consider a case that there are only two values for $\phi (n)$,
151: that is, $\phi(n)=0$ or $\pi$. At every site, we set phase values of two oscillators
152: among four nearest-neighbor oscillators as $\phi(n)=0$, while the
153: other two phases are chosen to be $\pi$.
154: Then, the condition (\ref {eq:7}) is fulfilled at all sites, that is,
155: \begin {eqnarray}
156: \sum^4_{j \sim n} e^{i \phi(j)} &=&
157: e^{i \cdot 0} +e^{i \cdot 0} +e^{i \cdot \pi} +e^{i \cdot
158: \pi}\nonumber \\
159: &=&0 \ \mbox{(for all sites}\ n \mbox{)} .\label {exact1}
160: \end{eqnarray}
161: This choice of phase values is quite simple but produces a variety of
162: phase patterns
163: such as stripe patterns and target patterns as exact solutions.
164: We can construct not only a single target pattern but also a combined
165: pattern of
166: some target patterns as shown in Fig.1. Although we present only a
167: combined pattern of
168: four target patterns, combined patterns of more or less target
169: patterns are also
170: possible. We can construct various combined patterns of target
171: patterns indefinitely if the system size becomes larger.
172:
173: When the lattice has a defect, that is, an oscillator is absent at a
174: site, we should modify the above discussion for four oscillators
175: around a defect.
176: To four oscillators around a defect, the coupling terms in
177: Eq.(\ref{eq:2}) are changed to
178: \begin{eqnarray}
179: (p_3 +i p_4) \sum_{j \sim n} ^3 ( W_j - W_n )
180: &=& (p_3 +i p_4)( \sum_{j \sim n} ^3 W_j -3 W_n) \nonumber \\
181: &=& (p_3 +i p_4)\left\{ (W_n + \sum_{j \sim n} ^3 W_j)-4 W_n
182: \right\},
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: where $n$ indicates one of the four oscillators and the summation term
185: in Eq.(\ref{eq:3}) becomes
186: \begin{equation}
187: (p_3 +i p_4)(W_n + \sum_{j \sim n} ^3 W_j ) .
188: \end{equation}
189: Thus, Eq.(\ref{eq:7}) is modified for each $n$-th oscillator around a
190: defect as
191: \begin{equation}
192: e^{i \phi(n)}+\sum_{j \sim n} ^3 e^{i \phi(j)}=0 .\label{eq:7m}
193: \end{equation}
194: Comparing Eq.(\ref{eq:7m}) to Eq.(\ref{eq:7}), the term
195: $\exp (i \phi(n))$ in (\ref{eq:7m})
196: appears replacing the term which comes from an oscillator at a defect
197: site.
198: Therefore, for the $n$-th oscillator around a defect, the defect
199: behaves as a mirror,
200: that is, the defect acts as if it is an oscillator with the same
201: phase as the $n$-th phase.
202: Owing to this flexible property of a defect, we can construct spiral
203: patterns with $2^k$ arms around $k \times k$ combined defects. For
204: example, we obtain a spiral pattern with two arms around a single
205: defect ($k=1$) and a spiral pattern with four arms around four combined
206: defects ($k=2$) as shown in Fig.2 and Fig.4, respectively. Two separated defects produce
207: two spiral patterns with the same or opposite rotation directions as
208: shown in Fig.3.
209: We can also construct various patterns in which spirals and targets
210: are concurrent and show one of the simplest examples in Fig.2. On a
211: large enough lattice, we could construct virtually an indefinite number
212: of such spiral and target patterns.
213:
214:
215: \begin{figure}[htbp]
216: \begin{tabular}{cc}
217: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
218: \begin{center}
219: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic1-1.eps}
220:
221: \end{center}
222: \end{minipage}
223: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
224: \begin{center}
225: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic1-2.eps}
226: \end{center}
227: \end{minipage}
228: \end{tabular}
229: \caption{A target pattern.
230: Black points denote $\phi (n) =0$, while
231: gray points denote $\phi (n) =\pi$.}
232: \label{fig:1}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235: \begin{figure}[htbp]
236: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
237: \begin{center}
238: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic2-1.eps}
239:
240: \end{center}
241: \end{minipage}
242: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
243: \begin{center}
244: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic2-2.eps}
245:
246: \end{center}
247: \end{minipage}
248: \caption{A spiral pattern with a defect and
249: a combined pattern of a spiral and a target.}
250: \label{fig:2}
251: \end{figure}
252:
253: \begin{figure}[htbp]
254: \begin{tabular}{cc}
255: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
256: \begin{center}
257: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic3-1.eps}
258: \end{center}
259: \end{minipage}
260: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
261: \begin{center}
262: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic3-2.eps}
263: \end{center}
264: \end{minipage}
265: \end{tabular}
266: \caption{ Two spiral patterns with the opposite and the same
267: spiral rotations, respectively.}
268: \label{fig:3}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271: \begin{figure}[htbp]
272: \begin{tabular}{cc}
273: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
274: \begin{center}
275: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pic4.eps}
276: \end{center}
277: \caption{A four-arm spiral pattern and a two-arm spiral pattern}
278: \label{fig:3.5}
279: \end{minipage}
280: \end{tabular}
281:
282: \end{figure}
283:
284:
285:
286:
287: %%%%%%%%%
288: \section{Stability of Solutions}
289: %%%%%%%%%%
290: Let us investigate a linear stability of the exact solution:
291: \begin{eqnarray}
292: && W_n ^0 (t) =
293: A e^{ i(\omega t +\phi(n))}\ (\phi(n)=0\ \mbox{or}\ \pi), \nonumber\\
294: && \sum^4_{j \sim n} e^{i \phi(j)}=0
295: \ \mbox{(for all site}\ n \mbox{)}.\nonumber
296: \end{eqnarray}
297: Substituting a perturbed solution $W_n =W_n ^0 +\delta W_n$
298: into Eq.(\ref{eq:3}), we have
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: \frac{d}{dt}\delta W_n&=& i \omega \delta W_n-(1+i p_1)A^2 \delta W_n
301: \nonumber\\
302: && -(1+i p_1)A^2 e^{2 i(\omega t+\phi(n))} \delta W_n ^*
303: +(p_3 +i p_4) \sum^4_{j \sim n}\delta W_j. \label{eq:8}
304: \end{eqnarray}
305: As $\phi (n)=0$ or $\pi$, the coefficient of the third term in the
306: RHS of Eq.(\ref {eq:8}) becomes
307: $-(1+i p_1)A^2 \exp[i 2 \omega t]$, which does not depend on
308: a site number $n$. Therefore, all coefficients of the linearized
309: equation
310: (\ref {eq:8}) are independent of $n$, which greatly simplifies
311: stability analysis.
312: Changing the variable as
313: $\delta W_n \rightarrow \delta W_n \exp[-i \omega t]$,
314: Eq.(\ref{eq:8}) is transformed into
315: \begin{equation}
316: \frac{d}{dt}\delta W_n= -(1+i p_1)A^2(\delta W_n + \delta W_n ^*)
317: +(p_3 +i p_4) \sum^4_{j \sim n}\delta W_j. \label{eq:9}
318: \end{equation}
319: We consider plane-wave perturbations
320: \begin{equation}
321: \delta W_n=a(t)e^{i \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}
322: =a(t) e^{i (k_x x+k_y y)} ,\label{eq:10}
323: \end{equation}
324: where $\vec{x}=(x,y)$ indicates a lattice point and $\vec{k}=(k_x,k_y)$
325: is a wave-number vector.
326: Then, the summation term of Eq.(\ref{eq:9}) reads
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: \sum^4_{j \sim n} \delta W_j &=&
329: a e^{\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}
330: (e^{i k_x}+e^{i k_y}+e^{-i k_x}+e^{-i k_y}) \nonumber \\
331: &=& a e^{\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}(2 \cos k_x + 2 \cos k_y) \nonumber \\
332: &=&2 \delta W_n K, \nonumber
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: where $K = \cos k_x +\cos k_y$.
335: Hence, Eq.(\ref{eq:9}) reduces to
336: \begin{eqnarray}
337: \frac{d}{dt}\delta W_n &=& -(1+i p_1)A^2(\delta W_n + \delta W_n ^*)
338: +2 (p_3 +i p_4) K \delta W_n \nonumber \\
339: &=& (2 (p_3 +i p_4) K-(1+i p_1)A^2)\delta W_n
340: -(1+i p_1)A^2 \delta W_n ^* ,
341: \end{eqnarray}
342: or in terms of the real and imaginary parts of $\delta W_n$
343: \begin{eqnarray}
344: \frac{d}{dt} \left(
345: \begin{array}{c} \Re [\delta W_n]\\
346: \Im [\delta W_n]\end{array}
347: \right)=2
348: \left(
349: \begin{array}{cc} p_3 K-A^2 & - p_4 K \\
350: p_4 K -p_1 A^2 & p_3 K\end{array}
351: \right)
352: \left(
353: \begin{array}{c} \Re [\delta W_n]\\
354: \Im [\delta W_n]\end{array}
355: \right).\label{eq:11}
356: \end{eqnarray}
357: Eigenvalues of Eq.(\ref {eq:11}) are
358: \begin{equation}
359: 2 p_3 K-A^2 \pm \sqrt{-4 p_4 ^2 K^2
360: +4 p_1 p_4 A^2 K+A^4}.
361: \end{equation}
362: We denote an eigenvalue as $\alpha_+$ which has a larger real part
363: than the other.
364: \begin{equation}
365: \alpha_+ =2 p_3 K-A^2 +
366: \Re \left[p
367: \sqrt{-4 p_4 ^2 K^2
368: +4 p_1 p_4 A^2 K+A^4}
369: \right]. \label{eq:14}
370: \end{equation}
371: If $\alpha_+ \leq 0$ for any $K$ in $|K|\leq 2$,
372: the various phase solutions are stable to a perturbation (\ref{eq:10}).
373: For stability, $\alpha_+$ must take local maximum at K=0 since
374: $\alpha_+ =0$ at $K=0$
375: (see Fig.\ref{fig:5}, Fig.\ref{fig:6}).
376: The derivative of $\alpha_+$ at $K=0$ is given as
377: \begin{eqnarray}
378: \left.\frac{\partial \alpha_+}{\partial K} \right| _{K=0}
379: &=& 2 \left[
380: p_3 -p_4 \frac{2 p_4 K- p_1 A^2}{
381: \sqrt{-4 p_4 ^2 K^2 +4 p_1 p_4 K+A^4 }
382: }
383: \right]_{K=0} \nonumber \\
384: &=& 2 (p_3+ p_1 p_4). \nonumber
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: A condition $p_3+p_1 p_4=0$ is necessary for stability.
387: When $p_3+p_1 p_4=0$, we have
388: \begin{eqnarray}
389: \left.\alpha _+ \right| _{K= \frac{A^2}{2 p_3}}
390: &=& \Re \left[
391: \sqrt{- \left(\frac{p_4}{p_3} \right)^2
392: + 2 \frac{p_1 p_4}{p_3} +1} \right] A^2\nonumber \\
393: &=& \Re \left[ \sqrt{- \left(\frac{p_4}{p_3} \right)^2 -1} \right] A^2 \nonumber\\
394: &=&0,\nonumber
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: which shows that $K=A^2 /2 p_3 $ is also a vanishing point of $\alpha _+$, where its derivative with respect to $K$ is finite.
397: For stability, we need $$ |A^2 /2 p_3|\geq 2$$ or
398: \begin{equation}
399: A^2=p_2 -4 p_3 \geq 4 |p_3|, \label{cond-sta}
400: \end{equation}
401: Since $p_2>0$ is supposed, the condition (\ref {cond-sta})
402: reads
403: $ p_3 <0$ or $p_2>8p_3>0$.
404:
405:
406: Thus, we obtain
407: the following conditions for our solutions to be stable.
408: \begin{eqnarray}
409: && p_3+p_1 p_4=0 \label{eq:15} \\
410: &&p_3 <0\ \mbox{or}\ p_2\geq 8p_3>0.\nonumber
411: % A^2=p_2 -4 p_3 & \geq & 4 |p_3| \nonumber
412: \end{eqnarray}
413:
414: \begin{figure}[htbp]
415: \begin{tabular}{cc}
416: \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize}
417: \begin{center}
418: \psfrag{a}[][][0.6]{$ \alpha _+$}
419: \psfrag{K}[][][0.6]{K}
420: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic5-1.eps}
421: \caption{$\alpha_+ (K)$ vs. $K$ for stable parameters
422: ($p_1 =-0.5$, $p_2 =4.0$, $p_3=0.5$, $p_4 =1.0$).}
423: \label{fig:5}
424: \end{center}
425: \end{minipage}
426: \begin{minipage}{0.1\hsize}
427: \end{minipage}
428: \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize}
429: \begin{center}
430: \psfrag{a}[][][0.6]{$ \alpha _+$}
431: \psfrag{K}[][][0.6]{K}
432: \includegraphics[width=5cm]{pic5.eps}
433: \caption{$\alpha_+ (K)$ vs. $K$ for unstable parameters
434: ($p_1 =1.3$, $p_2 =3.0$, $p_3=0.25$, $p_4 =0.8$).}
435: \label{fig:6}
436: \end{center}
437: \end{minipage}
438: \end{tabular}
439: \end{figure}
440:
441:
442: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
443: \section{Numerical analysis of the system}
444: %%%%%%%%%%
445: First, we we conduct numerical analysis of the system with random
446: initial perturbations in order to confirm validity of the stability
447: condition (\ref{eq:15}).
448: We set a boundary condition which enables
449: our exact solutions to persist. It is supposed
450: that, outside a boundary, there are oscillators whose phases are
451: different from those just inside the boundary by $\pi$. This boundary
452: condition is called a vanishing boundary condition in this paper.
453: For values of parameters satisfying the stability condition
454: (\ref{eq:15}),
455: both target patterns and spiral patterns are found to be
456: stable even for random perturbations.
457: For example, in a stable case that $p_1 =-0.5$, $p_2 =4.0$, $p_3=0.5$
458: and $p_4 =1.0$, a single target pattern and the pattern with two
459: spirals are stable even for max $20 \%$ random perturbations
460: as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:7}.
461:
462: \begin{figure}[htbp]
463: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
464: \begin{center}
465: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic7-1.eps}
466: \end{center}
467: \end{minipage}
468: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
469: \begin{center}
470: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic7-2.eps}
471: \end{center}
472: \end{minipage}
473: \caption{Initial 20\% random perturbations
474: are added to exact solutions in a
475: stable case that $p_1 =-0.5,p_2 =4.0,p_3=0.5,p_4 =1.0$.
476: Length of an arrow indicates $|W_n |$
477: and its direction means $\arg W_n$ .}
478: \label{fig:7}
479: \end{figure}
480:
481: \begin{figure}[htbp]
482: \begin{tabular}{cc}
483: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
484: \begin{center}
485: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic8-1.eps}
486: \end{center}
487: \end{minipage}
488: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
489: \begin{center}
490: \psfrag{amp}[][][0.6]{$|W|^2$}
491: \psfrag{time}[][][0.6]{time}
492: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic8-2.eps}
493: \end{center}
494: \end{minipage}
495: \end{tabular}
496: \caption{ A target pattern of the numerical solution at time $t=50$ for the
497: initial condition given in Fig.\ref{fig:7} and $|W_n| ^2$ vs. $t$ for all
498: $n$, which shows stability of the target pattern. }
499: \label{fig:8}
500: \end{figure}
501:
502: \begin{figure}[htbp]
503: \begin{tabular}{cc}
504: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
505: \begin{center}
506: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic9-1.eps}
507: \end{center}
508: \end{minipage}
509: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
510: \begin{center}
511: \psfrag{amp}[][][0.6]{$|W|^2$}
512: \psfrag{time}[][][0.6]{time}
513: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic9-2.eps}
514: \end{center}
515: \end{minipage}
516: \end{tabular}
517: \caption{A combined spiral pattern of the numerical solution at time $t=50$ for the
518: initial condition given in Fig.\ref{fig:7} and $|W_n| ^2$ vs. $t$ for all
519: $n$, which shows stability of the combined spiral pattern.
520: }
521: \label{fig:9}
522: \end{figure}
523:
524:
525: Next, we show that a single target pattern can be reached
526: from some initial conditions far from the exact solution.
527: For example, setting initial values as $W_n=1/2,\ \phi(n)=\pi/4$ for
528: all $n$ in the case $p_1 =0.5$, $p_2 =3.0$, $p_3 =0.25$ and $p_4
529: =-0.5$, we eventually have a target pattern, where $|W_n|=2$, shown in
530: Fig.\ref{fig:13}. We also find
531: other initial conditions far from the exact solution that lead to
532: the single target pattern but those do not give enough informations
533: for a basin structure of the target patterns.
534: \begin{figure}[htbp]
535: \begin{tabular}{cc}
536: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
537: \begin{center}
538: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic10-1.eps}
539: \end{center}
540: \end{minipage}
541: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
542: \begin{center}
543: \includegraphics[width=5.0cm]{pic10-2.eps}
544: \end{center}
545: \end{minipage}
546: \end{tabular}
547: \caption{An initial condition $|W|=0.5$
548: and phase$= \pi /4$ for all oscillators and
549: a target pattern at time $t=150$ developed from
550: the initial condition.
551: }
552: \label{fig:13}
553: \end{figure}
554:
555: %%%%%%%%%
556: \section{Van der Pol's Oscillators}
557: %%%%%%%%%%
558: Similar exact target and/or spiral solutions can be also constructed for
559: other diffusively and dispersively coupled systems of oscillators
560: which undergo the subcritical Hopf bifurcation.
561: For example, we consider a system of van der Pol's oscillators
562: which are coupled with each other diffusively and dispersively on a
563: plane lattice.
564: \begin{eqnarray}
565: \frac{d}{dt}x_n &=&y_n+ax_n- \frac{a}{3}x_n^3+
566: D_x \sum^4_{j \sim n}(x_j-x_n) \nonumber \\
567: \frac{d}{dt}y_n &=&-x_n+
568: D_y \sum^4_{j \sim n}(x_j-x_n), \label{van-der}
569: \end{eqnarray}
570: where $a$ is a positive constant and $D_x, D_y$ are diffusive
571: and dispersive constants respectively.
572: Let us seek phase solutions of Eq.(\ref {van-der})
573: similar to those discussed earlier.
574: Assuming
575: \begin{equation}
576: \sum^4_{j \sim n}x_j =0, \label{van-rel}
577: \end{equation}
578: Eqs.(\ref {van-der}) are reduced to a single van der Pol's equation
579: \begin{equation}
580: \frac{d^2}{dt^2}X_n+(X_n^2-1)\frac{d}{dt}X_n+X_n=0, \label{svan-der}
581: \end{equation}
582: where $\sqrt{1+4D_y}t \rightarrow t $, $x_n=(1-4D_x/a)^{1/2} X_n$
583: and
584: \begin{equation}
585: (1+4D_y)>0, \quad (1-4D_x/a)>0 \label{van-cond}
586: \end{equation}
587: are assumed.
588: If the van der Pol's attractor of Eq.(\ref {svan-der}) is written as
589: $x_n(t)=A(t)$, its opposite-phase function $x_n(t)=-A(t)$ is also
590: the attractor of Eq.(\ref {svan-der}).
591: By choosing $x_n(t)$ as $A(t)$ or $-A(t)$ for all $n$ so that
592: $x_n(t)$ are satisfy the relation (\ref {van-rel}),
593: we can construct various exact solutions whose phase patterns
594: are exactly the same as those in the discrete CGL equation.
595: However, the stability analysis will be much more difficult than
596: the previous case.
597: %%%%%%%%%
598: \section{Conclusions}
599: %%%%%%%%%%
600: We present various exact solutions of a discrete CGL equation on a
601: plane lattice, which describe target patterns
602: and spiral patterns and derive their stability criteria.
603: Exact solutions obtained here represent not only a single target pattern and a
604: single spiral pattern but also patterns consisting
605: of targets and spirals. In the center of a spiral pattern, at least one
606: defect is necessary and a number of spiral's arms depends on a
607: number of defects. For example, a defect produces a two-arm spiral
608: and four defects in the center generate a four-arm spiral and so on.
609: For a system of the van der Pol's oscillators, we can also
610: construct various exact solutions whose phase patterns
611: are exactly the same as those in the discrete CGL equation.
612: pp
613: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
614: \section* {Acknowledgement}
615: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
616: One of the authors (K.N.) has been, in part, supported by a
617: Grant-in-Aid for
618: Scientific Research
619: (C) 13640402 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
621:
622:
623:
624: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
625: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
627: \bibitem{nozaki-bekki} K.Nozaki and N.Bekki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
628: {\bf 53}
629: 53 (1984), 1581.
630: \bibitem{kramer1}
631: I.S. Aranson, L. Aranson, L. Kramer, and A. Weber,
632: Phys. Rev. A 46, R2992 (1992)
633:
634: \bibitem{kramer2}
635: Igor S. Aranson and Lorenz Kramer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 99 (2002)
636:
637: \bibitem{gholms} J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes,
638: {\it Nonlinear Oscillations,Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of
639: Vector Fields}, Springer-Verlag (1983).
640:
641: \bibitem{mori}
642: S. Mori: M. Thesis, Faculty of Science,
643: Ochanomizu University, Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1996.
644:
645: \bibitem{yamada}
646: H. Yamada and T. Nakagaki,
647: talk at Traffic and Granular Flow '01, October 15-71, 2001, Nagoya University, Japan.
648:
649:
650: \bibitem{strogatz}
651: S. H. Strogatz, Nature 410 (2001), 268.
652:
653:
654:
655:
656:
657:
658:
659: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
660: \end{thebibliography}
661: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
662:
663: \end{document}
664:
665: