1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3:
4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
6: \parskip 0.2 cm
7:
8: %\input{psfig}
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{A simple theory for the Raman spike}
12: \author{J.-G.~Caputo$^{1~2~*)}$ and A.~Maimistov$^3$}
13: \date{ \ }
14: \maketitle
15:
16: {\footnotesize
17: \hangindent=4mm \noindent
18: 1) Laboratoire de Math\'ematiques, INSA de Rouen,\\
19: B.P. 8, 76131 Mont-Saint-Aignan cedex, France. \\
20: \phantom{1)} E-mail: caputo@insa-rouen.fr \\
21: 2) Laboratoire de Physique th\'eorique et modelisation,\\
22: Universit\'e de Cergy-Pontoise and C.N.R.S.\\
23: 3) Department of Solid State Physics, \\
24: Moscow Engineering Physics Institute,\\
25: Kashirskoe sh. 31, Moscow, 115409 Russia\\
26: \phantom{1)} E-mail: maimistov@pico.mephi.ru \\
27: }
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30:
31: The classical stimulated Raman scattering system
32: describing resonant interaction between two electromagnetic waves
33: and a fast relaxing medium wave is studied by introducting a systematic
34: perturbation approach in powers of the relaxation time. We separate
35: amplitude and phase effects for these complex fields.
36: The analysis of the former shows the existence of a stagnation distance
37: after which monotonous energy transfer begins from one
38: electromagnetic wave to the other and this quantity is calculated.
39: Concerning phase effects we give the conditions for the formation of
40: a Raman spike from an initial fast and large phase jump in one of the
41: waves. The spike evolution and width estimated from the reduced
42: model agree with the results from numerical simulations of the
43: original system.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: PACS: 42.65.Dr Stimulated Raman scattering,
48: 42.55.-f Lasers, 42.65.-k Nonlinear optics
49:
50: \section{Introduction}
51:
52: The investigation of the transient effects in stimulated
53: Raman scattering (SRS) has a long history. The initial
54: interest came from the study of Druhl et al \cite{drulh}
55: who examined the interaction of a strong laser pump pulse
56: with a high pressure gas. They found that pulses of long
57: duration get completely depleted except in some cases
58: where a very rapid and short lived restoration occurs.
59: Numerical simulations then showed that this
60: "spike" of pump radiation was connected to a rapid
61: $\pi$ phase shift or phase flip introduced in the
62: initial Stokes wave \cite{wenzel}.
63:
64: The theory of SRS is based on a very simple system of equations resulting
65: from the Pluczek model of interaction of electromagnetic waves with
66: molecular vibrations \cite{yariv,pantel}
67: This is essentially
68: the wave equation coupled to an oscillator equation. Using a slowly
69: varying envelope approximation for the fields and assuming
70: the Brillouin resonance conditions
71: on energy and momentum, one can obtain the system of three wave interaction
72: between two electromagnetic waves and a medium wave (See, for example
73: \cite{cgl95}).
74: This system is interesting for its mathematical properties and can be
75: found in many fields. First, in the limit of zero damping Chu et al
76: \cite{chu} showed that it can be written as zero-curvature conditions for
77: two differential operators, so that an inverse scattering
78: transform (IST) method \cite{ablowitz} could be used to solve it. However
79: IST methods are generally used to solve Cauchy problems where one is given
80: all the field data for all space coordinates at an initial time $t_0$.
81: The theory of SRS leads to a boundary value problem where the fields
82: are given for all times at a fixed location $x_0$. As illustrated in
83: \cite{leon,lm99} the IST method can be developed in this case as
84: well but one needs to check independently that the potential decays
85: sufficiently fast at infinity. This approach was recently validated
86: for the model with group velocity dispersion by
87: direct comparison with the numerical solution of the problem \cite{bclp00}.
88:
89: From another point of view the SRS is an example in optics of the very
90: important phenomenon of three wave interaction. A second well known
91: example is the Mandelshctam-Brillouin scattering, where an optical wave
92: interacts with acoustic phonons. As well as SRS this interaction is
93: used to amplify directly laser pulses propagating in an optical fiber
94: \cite{Agrawal95}, \cite{Boyd}.
95: The second harmonic generation in non
96: collinear beams is another example of three wave interaction.
97: Overall this phenomenon is present in much of condensed matter physics, from
98: the scattering of spin waves on phonons to the nonlinear optics of
99: Bose-Einstein condensates \cite{BEC}. Therefore the results obtained for SRS
100: could be transposed to these other contexts.
101:
102:
103: Here we are interested in the limit
104: where the damping of the medium vibrations is large, so that a
105: perturbation theory derived from the IST method is not applicable. This
106: is precisely when one observes the Raman spike, where the pump radiation
107: after being depleted displays a sharp burst of energy, which lasts a
108: small fraction of its initial duration. This phenomenon first observed
109: in gases can be studied via numerical simulations of the full equations
110: \cite{wenzel,tashkent}. These show that the Raman spike can be seen only for
111: large dissipation, that it appears with some delay and that its amplitude
112: decays for increasing propagation distances in the medium. Our aim is
113: to understand how this occurs, more precisely
114: \begin{enumerate}
115: \item understand quantitatively the energy transfer from one component of
116: the field (the pump) to the other (Stokes wave), in particular estimate
117: the distance necessary for a given transfer.
118: \item explain the time delay of the Raman spike (stagnation effect)
119: \item explain the position, the width and the amplitude of the
120: Raman spike as a function of the initial phase flip in the Stokes wave
121: \item understand the evolution of the fronts of the pump pulse
122: \end{enumerate}
123:
124:
125: We consider a simplified situation where the pump and Stokes pulse are
126: not gaussian but almost rectangular. In this case we will see that the
127: effects of phase and amplitude can be separated so that the magnitude of
128: the wave intensities can be assumed to be independent of time in the
129: spike region, located in the middle of the pulses. The medium variable can be
130: expressed as an integral of the product of the amplitudes of the interacting
131: waves. This can be expanded using as a small parameter $1 /\Gamma$ where
132: $\Gamma$ is the damping of the medium variable. If we limit ourselves to the
133: leading term in this series, we obtain the well-known equations describing
134: SRS for continuous waves and within this approximation we find the
135: Raman transfer coefficient. At the next order we obtain a system of equations
136: where the evolution of the pump amplitude is independent from the one of
137: the phase. Though it cannot take into account the phase flip effects
138: causing the Raman spike, it should be adequate for the transient
139: phenomena occurring on the fronts
140: of the interacting pulses. To get coupling between
141: the phase and amplitudes of the pulses we need to consider
142: the third order term in the expansion of the medium variable.
143: In this approximation the dispersion of the response is taken into account and
144: this causes phase variations to influence the amplitudes.
145: Thus, we have the simplest approximate theory to describe the Raman
146: spike phenomenon. We will show that nevertheless our analytical
147: description of the Raman spike formation reproduces the stagnation effect
148: and yields an approximate formula for the spike width. The comparison
149: of our analytical results with
150: the results of the numerical simulation shows qualitative and
151: in some cases quantitative agreement.
152:
153:
154: The paper is organized as follows. After introducing the original
155: model in section 2, we describe the approximation used and obtain
156: the zero order (standard Raman model) in section 3, the front effects
157: corresponding to the first order are described in section 4. Dispersion
158: effects corresponding to the third order are given in section 5 and
159: analyzed in section 6. We present numerical results confirming this
160: approach in section 7 and conclude in section 8.
161:
162: \section{The original model }
163:
164: The system of equations describing the non-stationary stimulated Raman
165: scattering can be written as \cite{newell}
166: \begin{equation}
167: \frac{\partial a}{\partial x}=qb,\quad \frac{\partial b}{\partial x}%
168: =-q^{\ast }a, \label{eq11}
169: \end{equation}
170:
171: \begin{equation}
172: \frac{\partial q}{\partial t}+\Gamma q=-gab^{\ast }, \label{eq12}
173: \end{equation}
174:
175: \noindent where $a,b$ are the amplitudes of the electromagnetic field and
176: $q$ is the amplitude of the medium.
177: $\Gamma $\ is the damping coefficient and $g$ is the amplification
178: coefficient. This system of equations may be presented in a dimensionless
179: form by rescaling $a,b$ and taking as unit of time the
180: dissipation time $1/\Gamma$,
181: $ a = \tilde{a}/g^{1/2}$, $b = \tilde{b}/g^{1/2}$ and $t =\tilde{t}/\Gamma$.
182:
183: \noindent One gets, omitting the tildes
184: \begin{equation}
185: \frac{\partial a}{\partial x}=qb,\quad \frac{\partial b}{\partial x}%
186: =-q^{\ast }a, \label{ab}
187: \end{equation}
188: \begin{equation}
189: \frac{\partial q}{\partial t}+q=-\varepsilon ab^{\ast } \label{qq}
190: \end{equation}
191: where $\varepsilon =1/\Gamma$ is a small parameter because we consider the
192: case of a large dissipation.
193:
194: The initial conditions for the system are
195: $$x=0, a= a_0(t), b=a_0(t) \rho \exp{i\phi(t)}, $$
196: $$t=0, q= 0$$
197: where the last equation indicates that the medium is
198: initially in the ground state.
199: The quantity $\rho = e^{-\gamma}$ is the initial amplitude difference
200: between $a$ and $b$, in most cases we will assume $ \rho << 1$ and
201: $|a|_{x=0}$ to be of order 1 so that $|a|_{x=0} >> |b|_{x=0}$.
202: The term $\phi(t)$ is a time dependent initial phase.
203: In the following we will assume that $a_0, \gamma$ and $\phi$ are real.
204:
205:
206: Equations (\ref{ab}) and (\ref{qq}) are such that $D^2(t)\equiv |a|^2 +|b|^2$ is
207: independent of $x$ and therefore $D^2(t)=|a|^2 +|b|^2=a_0^2(t) (1+\rho^2)$.
208: There is no symmetry in exchanging $a$ and $b$. In fact
209: the evolution of the field variable $q$ can be written
210: $$ q_{xt} + q_x =\epsilon q (|a|^2 -|b|^2).$$
211: Even if $|a|^2 -|b|^2|_{x=0} <0$ there will be no flow of energy from
212: $b$ to $a$. Note also that an initial homogeneous phase in $b$ plays
213: no role in the dynamics.
214:
215:
216: We discretized (\ref{eq11},\ref{eq12}) in both $x$ and $t$ using Heun's
217: order 2 Runge-Kutta method and advance via the following algorithm
218: \begin{enumerate}
219: \item given $a(x,t)$ and $b(x,t)$ for a given $x$ compute $q(x,t) $
220: by integrating (\ref{eq12}) in $t$ for the initial datum $q(x,t=0)=0$.
221: \item advance to $a(x+dx,t)$ and $b(x+dx,t)$ for all $t$ by
222: integrating (\ref{eq11}) in $x$.
223: \item go to step 1 with $x=x+dx$.
224: \end{enumerate}
225: The scheme is started at step 1 for $x=0$ and the quality of the
226: computation is monitored by evaluating the relative error in $|a|^2 +|b|^2$.
227: In all the runs presented it remained smaller than $10^{-5}$.
228:
229:
230:
231: \section{A systematic approximation: the zero order}
232:
233: The equation describing the evolution of the variable $q$ contains the product
234: of the amplitudes of the interacting fields. This suggests
235: to use the variables $\sigma =ab^{\ast }$ and $ n=a^{\ast }a-b^{\ast }b$,
236: so that the principal equations take the form
237: \begin{equation}
238: \frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}=-qn,\quad \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}%
239: =2(q\sigma ^{\ast }+q^{\ast }\sigma ), \label{eq21}
240: \end{equation}
241: \begin{equation}
242: \frac{\partial q}{\partial t}+q=-\varepsilon \sigma \label{eq22}
243: \end{equation}
244: The formal integration in (\ref{eq22}) leads to
245: \begin{equation}
246: q=-\varepsilon \left( \sigma -\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial t}+\frac{%
247: \partial ^{2}\sigma }{\partial t^{2}}-\frac{\partial ^{3}\sigma }{\partial
248: t^{3}}+...\right), \label{eq23}
249: \end{equation}
250: \noindent which written as an infinite expansion is an
251: exact solution of (\ref{qq}) that can be obtained by integration
252: by parts.
253:
254: \noindent To see this consider the formal solution of (\ref{qq})
255: $$q(t)=-\epsilon \int_{-\infty }^{t}
256: \exp [-(t-t^{\prime })]\sigma (t^{\prime })dt^{\prime } . $$
257: Integrating by parts, this expression can be rewritten as
258: $$q(t)=-\epsilon \left( \sigma (t)-\int_{-\infty }^{t}
259: \exp [-(t-t^{\prime})]
260: {\partial \sigma (t^{\prime }) \over \partial t^{\prime}}dt^{\prime }
261: \right) , $$
262: or, after a second step,
263: $$q(t)=-\epsilon \left( \sigma (t)-{\partial \sigma (t)\over \partial t}
264: +\int_{-\infty}^t \exp [-(t-t^{\prime })]
265: {\partial^{2}\sigma (t^{\prime }) \over \partial t^{\prime 2}}dt^{\prime }
266: \right) , $$
267: and so on.
268:
269: \noindent For $t=\Gamma $ we have
270: $\partial \sigma (t)/\partial t=O(\sigma /\Gamma )$
271: Thus this expansion becomes a better approximation to the solution
272: when the dissipation parameter gets large.
273:
274:
275: In the zero order approximation, the medium variable follows
276: instantaneously the field variables
277: $$q = - \epsilon \sigma .$$
278: This is a well known approximation \cite{Agrawal95} where the intensities
279: $|a|,|b|$ can be calculated exactly.
280: We get
281: \begin{equation}\label{a20}
282: |a|^2 (x,t)= D^2(t) {1 \over 1+\rho^2 e^{2 \epsilon D^2 x} },
283: \end{equation}
284: \begin{equation}\label{b20}
285: |b|^2 (x,t)= D^2(t) {\rho^2 e^{2 \epsilon D^2 x} \over
286: 1+\rho^2 e^{2 \epsilon D^2 x} } ~~~.
287: \end{equation}
288: Here we introduce $\rho = e^{-\gamma}$ so that the
289: key quantity in (\ref{a20},\ref{b20})
290: $$\rho^2 e^{2 \epsilon D^2 x} = e^{2(\epsilon D^2 x -\gamma)}.$$
291: We immediately see that the distance $x_c$
292: past which a significant transfer of energy occurs is
293: \be\label{stag}
294: x_c= {\gamma \over \epsilon D^2 } , \ee
295: which we will refer to as the stagnation distance.
296: We will find this quantity throughout this work.
297:
298:
299: To measure energy transfer between modes $a$ and $b$, it is convenient
300: to introduce the Raman transfer coefficient
301: \be \label{transfer}
302: R(x) = 1 - {\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |a|^2 dt
303: \over \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |a_0|^2 dt} ,
304: \ee
305: such that $0 < R(x) <1$.
306: Initially $a= a_0$ so that $R(x=0)=0$. As $x$ increases $a$
307: decreases so that $R$ increases towards 1.
308: Assuming $a_0$ to be a rectangular initial pulse
309: $|a_0|^2 (t) = H(t-t_1) -H(t-t_2)$ where H is the usual
310: Heaviside function, we get $\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |a_0|^2 dt= t_2 - t_1$
311: and
312: $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |a|^2 dt= (t_2 - t_1)
313: {1+\rho^2 \over \rho^2 e^{2 (1 + \rho^2)\epsilon x} +1}$$
314: so that
315: \be \label{trans}
316: R(x) = \rho^2 {e^{2 (1 + \rho^2)\epsilon x} -1 \over
317: \rho^2 e^{2 (1 + \rho^2)\epsilon x} +1}
318: \ee
319:
320: \begin{figure}[t]
321: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f1.ps,height=15 cm,width=8 cm,angle=-90}}
322: \caption{Plot of $|a(x,t)|^2$ as a function of $t$ for different
323: values of $x$ for the numerical solution (full line) and the
324: zero order approximation (\ref{a20}). The parameter
325: $\gamma =5$.}
326: \label{f1} \end{figure}
327:
328: In Fig. \ref{f1} we plot $|a(x,t)|^2$ as a function of time $t$
329: for $x=3,4,5,6$ and $7$ for both the solution of the partial
330: differential equation system (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}) shown in
331: full line and the
332: zero order approximation (\ref{a20}) shown in dashed line.
333: The initial pulse is given by
334: \be\label{a0}
335: a_0(t) = 0.5 (\tanh((t-t_i)/w_t)-\tanh((t-t_e)/w_t) ) ,\ee
336: \noindent where $t_i=20$ and $t_e=80$ are respectively the front and back ends
337: of the pulse and the front width $w_t=2$. The
338: left (resp. right) panel of Fig. \ref{f1} corresponds to $20<t<35$
339: (resp. $70<t<85$).
340: The zero-order approximation predicts correctly the field depletion
341: in the center of the pulse but fails for the values of $t$ corresponding
342: to the incoming or outgoing fronts.
343:
344: \begin{figure}[h]
345: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f2.ps,height=15cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
346: \caption{Computation of the Raman transfer coefficient vs. the position
347: $x$ for the numerical
348: solution of (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}), shown as points and the analytical
349: expression (\ref{trans}) assuming a Heaviside distribution $a_0(t)$,
350: shown in full line. The parameter $\gamma=5$.}
351: \label{f2} \end{figure}
352:
353: Despite this disagreement on the fronts, the estimation (\ref{trans}) of the
354: Raman transfer coefficient shown in Fig. \ref{f2} matches fairly well
355: the one obtained from the full numerical solution. Since the pulse
356: is long compared with the typical time $1/\Gamma$ (=1 here)
357: the errors made at the front ends are compensated and the
358: approximation is good. This would not be the case for a short
359: pulse.
360:
361:
362: It seems clear that the transient effects occurring near an incoming
363: or outgoing pulse cannot be captured by the zero order approximation
364: and that higher order terms are needed. In the next section we
365: include these higher order terms limiting ourselves to the
366: first order time derivative.
367:
368: \section{The first order: front effects}
369:
370: We substitute the corresponding approximation for $q$\ in
371: the initial system of equation to obtain
372: \begin{equation}
373: \frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}=n\left( \sigma -\frac{\partial \sigma
374: }{%
375: \partial t}\right) , \label{eq24}
376: \end{equation}
377: \begin{equation}
378: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}=-2\left( 2\left| \sigma \right| ^{2}-\frac{%
379: \partial \left| \sigma \right| ^{2}}{\partial t}\right) . \label{eq25}
380: \end{equation}
381: We introduce the real variable $p$ according to the definition
382: $p=2\sigma \exp (-i\phi )$
383: so that we now only have real variables which satisfy the system
384: of equations
385: \begin{equation}
386: \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}=np,
387: \label{eq26}
388: \end{equation}
389: \begin{equation}
390: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial p^{2}}{\partial t}%
391: =-p^{2}, \label{eq27}
392: \end{equation}
393: \begin{equation}
394: \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}=0.
395: \label{eq28}
396: \end{equation}
397: If we remember that $\sigma =ab^{\ast }$, one finds that $\phi =\arg a-\arg
398: b$, and for $x=0$, $\phi $\ is the function which determines the
399: phase flip process. The system of equations given above admits the
400: conserved quantity with respect to $x:$%
401: \begin{equation}\label{p2pn2}
402: p^{2}+n^{2}=D^{4}(t)=\left[ a_{0}^{2}(t)+b_{0}^{2}(t)\right] ^{2}
403: \label{eq29}
404: \end{equation}
405: This relation allows us consider only two equations, one for the difference of
406: the squares of the interacting waves and another for the
407: phase difference $\phi $.
408: \begin{equation}\label{fren}
409: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}=2D^{3}\frac{%
410: \partial D}{\partial t}+(n^{2}-D^{4}),
411: \end{equation}
412: \begin{equation}\label{frep}
413: \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}=0.
414: \end{equation}
415:
416: \section{Analysis of the characteristic equations for an incoming front}
417:
418: We now proceed to study the effect of an incoming front using
419: equations (\ref{fren},\ref{frep}). We first simplify the right
420: hand side of the equation for $n$ by writing it $n^2 - f(t)$ where
421: $f(t)\equiv D^3(D - 2 {\partial D \over \partial t})$.
422: Then we write the equations in characteristic form
423: \be \label{frcar}
424: {dn \over dx}=n^2- f(t) ~~~~~~~~; ~~~~~~~~ {d t \over dx}=n ~~.
425: \ee
426: The equation for $n$ can be integrated using separation of variables
427: and we obtain
428: \be \label{frn} n = - \sqrt{f(t)} \tanh [\sqrt{f(t)} (x-x_0) ] , \ee
429: and
430: \be \label{frt}
431: t=t_{0}+\int\limits_{0}^{x}n(\xi )d\xi = t_{0}
432: -\log[{\cosh(\sqrt{f(t)} (x-x_0)) \over \cosh(\sqrt{f(t)} x_0)}] ,
433: \ee
434: \noindent where the square root can be imaginary so that the
435: $i \tanh$ becomes a $\tan$.
436: The integration constant $x_0$ can be computed from the
437: initial condition and the relation $ n_0/D^2 = \tanh(\gamma)$
438: obtained from the definition of $D$.
439: We get
440: $$x_0 = {1 \over f}{\rm atanh}[{D^2 \over f}\tanh(\gamma)] ~~.$$
441: The expressions (\ref{frn},\ref{frt}) give $n$ and $t$ in implicit form
442: and therefore need to be solved numerically.
443:
444:
445: We have integrated numerically the characteristic ordinary differential
446: equations (\ref{frcar}) in $x$ and obtained the solution in the form
447: of characteristics $t(t_0,x),n(t_0,x)$. In Fig. \ref{f3} this
448: estimation is
449: compared to the full numerical solution of (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}) for the incoming
450: front of Fig. \ref{f1}. The results are shown in
451: the form of 3D plots $|a(x,t)|^2$, on the left panel is the solution
452: given by the characteristics while the full numerical solution is
453: given in the right panel. For large $x$ the plots on the left panel
454: are curved because the wave breaks i.e. it becomes multivalued. The
455: approximate model (\ref{frcar}) is therefore not sufficient to
456: describe an incoming front. Second derivative terms should be included
457: to yield a dynamics similar to the one of Burgers equation.
458:
459: \begin{figure}[t]
460: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f3.ps,height=15cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
461: \caption{3D plot of the incoming front of Fig. \ref{f1}. The left
462: panel shows the solution obtained from the characteristics of the
463: approximate model (\ref{frcar}) while the right panel gives the full
464: numerical solution of (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}).}
465: \label{f3} \end{figure}
466:
467:
468: \section{Dispersion effects: second order approximation}
469:
470: Lets now consider the terms of (\ref{eq23}) up to the second order with respect
471: to the time derivative and rescale the independent variable $x$ into
472: $ x^{\prime }=\varepsilon x$. The substitution
473: of expression
474: \begin{equation}
475: q=-\varepsilon \left( \sigma -\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial t}+\frac{%
476: \partial ^{2}\sigma }{\partial t^{2}}\right) \label{eq31}
477: \end{equation}
478: into the equations (\ref{eq21}) results in the following system of equations:
479: \begin{equation}
480: \frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}=n\left( \sigma -\frac{\partial \sigma
481: }{%
482: \partial t}+\frac{\partial ^{2}\sigma }{\partial t^{2}}\right) ,
483: \end{equation}
484: \begin{equation}
485: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}=-2\left( 2\left| \sigma \right| ^{2}-\frac{%
486: \partial \left| \sigma \right| ^{2}}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial ^{2}\left|
487: \sigma \right| ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}-2\left| \frac{\partial \sigma }{%
488: \partial t}\right| ^{2}\right) , \label{eq32}
489: \end{equation}
490: where the primes have been dropped for simplicity.
491: Both these equations and the original system of equations (\ref{eq21})
492: and (\ref{eq22}) have the first integral with respect to $x$
493: $n^{2}+4\sigma ^{\ast }\sigma =const(t)$.
494:
495:
496: \noindent Once again we introduce the real variable $p$ according to the
497: definition
498: $2\sigma =p\exp (i\phi )$. Using the system of equation (\ref{eq31}) and
499: (\ref{eq32}) one gets the following system of equations for the real variables
500: $p,n$ and$\phi$
501: \begin{equation}
502: \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}-n\frac{\partial
503: ^{2}p}{\partial t^{2}}=np[1-\left( \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}\right)
504: ^{2}], \label{eq33}
505: \end{equation}
506: \begin{equation}
507: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}-p\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}=
508: -p^2 [1- \left( \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t }\right)^{2}]
509: - p \frac{\partial^{2}p}{\partial t^{2}}
510: , \label{eq34}
511: \end{equation}
512: \begin{equation}
513: \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial
514: t}-n\frac{%
515: \partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial t^{2}}=2\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}\left(
516: \frac{\partial \log p}{\partial t}\right)n , \label{eq35}
517: \end{equation}
518: where again the conservation law (\ref{p2pn2}) holds.
519:
520:
521: Since we want to take into account only effects resulting from the phase flip
522: process, we will neglect the terms ${\partial \log(p) \over \partial t} $ and
523: ${\partial^2 p \over \partial t^2} $.
524: Furthermore, we will assume that $D$ does not vary with time, i.e. we place
525: ourselves in the central part of the rectangular-like initial pulse.
526: Using these approximations the system of equations
527: (\ref{eq33}) -- (\ref{eq35}) takes the form:
528: \begin{equation}
529: \frac{\partial n}{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}%
530: =(n^{2}-D^{4})\left[ 1-( \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t})^{2}
531: \right ], \label{eq37}
532: \end{equation}
533: \begin{equation}
534: \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x}+n\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}=0.
535: \label{eq38}
536: \end{equation}
537: These equations can be written in the characteristic form \cite{w74}:
538: \begin{equation}
539: \frac{dt}{dx}=n,\quad \frac{d\phi }{dx}=0, \label{eq39}
540: \end{equation}
541: \begin{equation}
542: \frac{dn}{dx}=(n^{2}-D^{4})\left[ 1-\left( \frac{\partial
543: \phi }{\partial t}\right) ^{2}\right ] \label{eq310}
544: \end{equation}
545: From equations (\ref{eq39}) it follows that $\phi =\phi (t_{0})$\ and the
546: expression to find characteristics
547: \begin{equation}
548: t=t_{0}+\int\limits_{0}^{x}n(\xi )d\xi , \label{eq311}
549: \end{equation}
550: where $\xi $ is the variable of the characteristic. From (\ref{eq310})
551: we can compute $n(\xi )$\ as
552: \begin{equation}
553: n(x,t_{0})=-D^{2}\tanh \left\{ D^{2}f(t_{0})\left[ x-x_{0}(t_{0})\right]
554: \right\} , \label{eq312}
555: \end{equation}
556: where $x_{0}(t_{0})$ is a constant of integration and the function
557: $f(t_{0})$ is defined by
558: \[
559: f(t_{0})=1-\left( \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial t}\right) ^{2}
560: \]
561: where the derivative with respect to $t$ is calculated at $t=t_{0}$, and
562: as $\phi =\phi (t_{0})=\phi (x=0,t_{0})$,
563: its value can be calculated at $x=0$. Thus the function $f(t_{0})$
564: reflects the phase flip on the initial pulse $b$ of the interacting
565: waves. The constant of integration $x_{0}(t_{0})$\ is defined by the
566: initial condition
567: \begin{equation}
568: n(x=0,t_{0})=n_{0}=D^{2}\tanh \left\{ D^{2}f(t_{0})x_{0}(t_{0})\right\} .
569: \label{eq313}
570: \end{equation}
571: If we use equation (\ref{eq313}) and the definitions of $n$\ and $D$ we obtain:
572: \[
573: n_{0}=a_{0}^{2}\left( 1-\exp (-2\gamma )\right) ,\quad D^{2}=a_{0}^{2}\left(
574: 1+\exp (-2\gamma )\right) ,
575: \]
576: then the constant of integration $x_{0}(t_{0})$ can be rewritten as $%
577: x_{0}(t_{0})=\gamma \left[ D^{2}f(t_{0})\right] ^{-1}$. Substituting this
578: expression into equation (\ref{eq312}) leads to
579: \begin{equation}
580: n(x,t_{0})=-D^{2}\tanh \left\{ D^{2}f(t_{0})x-\gamma \right\} .
581: \label{eq314}
582: \end{equation}
583:
584:
585: So equations (\ref{eq311}) and (\ref{eq314}) allow
586: us to write the expression defining the characteristics
587: \begin{equation}
588: t=t_{0}-\frac{1}{f(t_{0})}\log \left\{ \frac{\cosh \left[ \gamma
589: -D^{2}f(t_{0})x\right] }{\cosh \gamma }\right\} . \label{eq315}
590: \end{equation}
591: From this equation one can extract $t_{0}$ as a function of
592: $t$ and $x$ and substitute it into
593: (\ref{eq314}) to yield the solution of the problem
594: under consideration:
595: \begin{equation}
596: n(x,t)=-D^{2}\tanh \left\{ D^{2}f(t_{0}(t,x))x-\gamma \right\} ,
597: \label{eq316}
598: \end{equation}
599: \begin{equation}
600: a^{2}(x,t)=0.5D^{2}\left[ 1-\tanh \left\{ D^{2}f(t_{0}(t,x))x-\gamma
601: \right\} \right] . \label{eq317}
602: \end{equation}
603: There is an intrinsic difficulty in this procedure due to the fact that
604: the characteristics can cross so that there might not be a unique $t_{0}$
605: for a given $t$ and $x$. In particular we will see that around the spike
606: region characteristics will cross. Nevertheless it is possible to understand
607: what is going on by using asympotics in the regions away from where the
608: characteristics cross. We do this in the next section.
609:
610: \begin{figure}[t]
611: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f4.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
612: \caption{3D plot of the pump amplitude $|a| (x,t)$ obtained
613: by direct integration of the original equations (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}).
614: The initial phase flip is for $t=t_f=40$ and the
615: parameters are $\gamma=5$ and $\delta=0.011$.}
616: \label{f4} \end{figure}
617:
618: \section{Analysis of the characteristic equations for the Raman spike}
619:
620: As shown by expressions (\ref{eq315}) and (\ref{eq317}) the principal
621: problem is to determine the auxiliary function $t_{0}(t,x)$, from
622: the equation of characteristics (\ref{eq315}).
623: To do it we will use the numerical solution of this equation.
624: However, it is possible to obtain some information for small or
625: large $x$ using asymptotic expansions of the function $t_{0}(t,x)$.
626: We write
627: \be\label{tt0} t = t_0 + {1\over f}\log[\cosh(D^{2}~f~x)]
628: +{1\over f}\log [1-\tanh(D^{2}~f~x)~\tanh(\gamma)]\ee
629: For $x$ small the above expression can be expanded to yield
630: at first order
631: \be\label{txsmall}
632: t \approx t_0 + D^{2}~x \tanh(\gamma)= t_0 + n_0 x~.~\ee
633: This expression can be immediately deduced from the characteristic
634: equation giving $dt /dx$ (\ref{eq311}).
635: It is correct even in the spike region as long as
636: $D^{2}~f~x<<1$.
637: For larger values of $x$ it is necessary to distinguish the
638: region where $f<<0$ leading to a spike from the rest of the
639: domain where $f\approx 1$.
640:
641:
642: Let us consider this case first. Then one can approximate the
643: expression (\ref{tt0}) for large $x\approx 2 {\gamma \over D^{2}}$ by
644: \be\label{txlarge}
645: t = t_0 +2 \gamma \tanh(\gamma) - D^{2}~x \tanh(\gamma)~.~\ee
646: Notice how the slope of the $t(x)$ curve, i.e. the
647: direction of the characteristic changes as one crosses the stagnation
648: distance $x_c= {\gamma \over D^{2}}$.
649:
650:
651: The situation in the spike region can be analyzed using the expression
652: for $n$ (\ref{eq316}). Inside the spike region the argument of the
653: tanh in $n$, $D^{2}~f~x -\gamma <0$ even for large values of $x$
654: so that there is no depletion. In this region the characteristics follow
655: $t = t_0 + D^{2}~x \approx t_0 + n_0 x~$ which is very close to (\ref{txsmall})
656: for large $\gamma$. On the sides of the spike $0<f<1$ so that the argument of
657: the tanh can go through 0 but for a larger stagnation distance than
658: $x_c$. To summarize, outside the spike region we expect the characteristic
659: curves to bend smoothly from the behavior (\ref{txsmall})
660: to (\ref{txlarge}) as $x$ increases while inside the spike region they will
661: follow (\ref{txsmall}). There is also an intermediate region around the
662: spike where the characteristic curves will shift to (\ref{txlarge}) but
663: for $x>x_c$. These sets of characteristic curves will cross as we will
664: show in the next section, leading to shock formation.
665:
666:
667:
668: To understand things quantitatively let us now give a precise form of the
669: phase flip function. We chose
670: \[
671: \phi (x=0,t)=-\frac{a_f }{2}\left[ 1+\tanh \left(
672: \frac{t-t_{f}}{%
673: \delta }\right) \right] .
674: \]
675: \noindent where $t_f$ is the location of the phase jump and $a_f$
676: its amplitude. When $a_f=\pi$ we speak of phase flip.
677: With this choice the function $f(t_{0})$ takes the form
678: \begin{equation}
679: f(t_0)=1-\frac{a_f^2}{4\delta^2} {\rm sech}^{4} \left(
680: \frac{t_0-t_f}{\delta }\right) . \label{eq44}
681: \end{equation}
682: The region where the function $f(t_{0})$ has a minimum will be named
683: \emph{Raman spike} (RS) \emph{region}. If the parameter $\delta $ is
684: chosen to be small, the RS-region is very narrow. Outside this region
685: $f(t_{0})$ is equal to one. Hence we can write
686: \begin{equation}
687: a^{2}(x,t)=0.5D^{2}\left[ 1-\tanh (D^{2}x-\gamma) \right]
688: \label{eq45}
689: \end{equation}
690: It shows that up to $x\approx (\gamma -1)/D^{2}$ the value of
691: the intensity of the pump wave is $a^{2}(x,t)=D^{2}$ and that for
692: $x=x_{c}\approx \gamma /D^{2}$ this value decreases down to
693: $0.5D^{2}$. Only inside the RS-region the intensity of the
694: pump wave does not vary. This results in the formation of a
695: Raman spike.
696: Fig. \ref{f4} shows a 3D plot of the pump field $|a(x,t)|$
697: solution of the original equations (\ref{ab},\ref{qq}) where we chose
698: the Heaviside-like initial pump and Stokes distribution (\ref{a0})
699: In this case the middle of the pulse is such that $D = 1$. We took
700: $\gamma=5$ and clearly see in Fig. 2 that the pump field starts getting
701: depleted only past $x_c= 5$. Thus our estimation of the stagnation distance
702: is a good one.
703:
704:
705: Let $\Delta _{RS}$ be the width of the RS-pulse given by
706: half of the amplitude, i.e.
707: $ \Delta _{RS}=2(t_{1}-t_{m})$, where the instant $t_{1}$ is
708: defined by the condition $a^{2}(x,t_{1})=0.5D^{2}$ and $t_m$ is the
709: position of the minimum of the function $f(t_0)$.
710: Using (\ref{eq317}) and (\ref{eq44}) we can obtain the following equation
711: \begin{equation}
712: \frac{a_f^{2}}{4\delta ^{2}}{\rm sech}^4\left( \frac{%
713: t_{0}(t_{1},x)-t_{f}}{\delta }\right) =1-\frac{\gamma
714: }{D^{2}x}=1-\frac{x_{c}%
715: }{x}. \label{eq46}
716: \end{equation}
717: Note how \emph{the stagnation distance} $x_c$ appears again.
718: Furthermore if $x\leq x_{c}$ the right hand side is negative
719: so that no value of $t_0$ can be found and there is not
720: Raman spike formation. Hence we obtain the stunted
721: growth (stagnation) of Raman transformation once again.
722: From the definition of the stagnation distance $x_{c}$
723: one can see that in dimensional variables $x_{c}$
724: is proportional to the damping coefficient $ \Gamma $ and
725: to the initial depletion coefficient $\gamma $.
726:
727:
728: Let us now proceed to further analyze (\ref{eq46}) in order
729: to estimate the width of the Raman spike. For that denote
730: \[
731: \epsilon ^{4}=\frac{4\delta ^{2}}{a_f^{2}}
732: \left( 1-\frac{x_{c}}{x}\right) ,
733: \]
734: so that equation (\ref{eq46}) can be written as
735: \begin{equation}
736: \cosh \left( \frac{t_{0}(t_{1},x)-t_{f}}{\delta }\right) =
737: \epsilon ^{-1} .
738: \label{eq47}
739: \end{equation}
740: Since the parameter $\epsilon $ is very small because of the
741: smallness of $\delta$, the argument of the $\cosh$ function
742: in (\ref{eq47}) is large so that the function can be approximated
743: by an exponential. We obtain
744: \[
745: \exp \left( \frac{t_{0}(t_{1},x)-t_{f}}{\delta }\right) =
746: \frac{2}{\epsilon } ,
747: \]
748: so that $t_{0}(t_{1},x)=t_{f}+\delta \log (2/\epsilon )$. If
749: the function $t_{0}(t,x)$ can be approximated by
750: $t_{0}\approx t-n_{0}x.$, then $t_{1}=t_{f}+n_{0}x+\delta
751: \log (2/\epsilon )$. But in the framework of the
752: approximation under consideration $t_{m}=t_{f}+n_{0}x$, hence $\Delta
753: _{RS}\approx 2\delta \log (2/\epsilon )$. From this expression and the
754: definition of the parameter $\epsilon $\ one gets
755: \begin{equation}\label{wrs}
756: \Delta _{RS}\approx -\frac{\delta }{2}\log \left[
757: \frac{\delta ^{2}}{4 a_f^{2}}\left( 1-\frac{x_{c}}{x}\right) \right ]
758: \label{eq48}
759: \end{equation}
760: where it was assumed that $\delta ^{2}(x-x_{c})<<x_{c}$,
761: i.e.,. the distance away from $x_c$ is small large
762: enough. It is interesting that for
763: $ x\longrightarrow \infty $\ the width of RS-pulse approaches
764: the limiting value
765: \[
766: \Delta _{RS}\approx \delta \log \left( 2 a_f /\delta \right) .
767: \]
768: For $\delta =0.5$ this limit is equal to $1.27$. When
769: the distance $x$\ approaches the stagnation distance
770: $x_{c}$, the width of the RS-pulse increases. Hence the Raman
771: spike forms only if $x>x_{c}$, a feature that we can clearly see
772: in Fig. \ref{f4}.
773:
774: \begin{figure}[t]
775: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f5.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
776: \caption{Influence of flip time on the formation of the Raman spike.
777: $|a|^2 (x,t)$ for $x =2,4,6$ and $8$ as a function of $t$ for
778: three different flip times $\delta = 0.1$ (full line), $1$ (long dash)
779: and $3$ (short dash). The amplitude of the flip is $\pi$ and the other
780: parameters are as in Fig. \ref{f4}.}
781: \label{f5} \end{figure}
782:
783: \section{Numerical results and discussion}
784:
785: \begin{figure}[t]
786: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f6.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
787: \caption{Influence of the amplitude of the phase change on the formation of the Raman spike.
788: $|a|^2 (x,t)$ for $x =2,4,6$ and $8$ as a function of $t$ for
789: three different phase changes of $\pi$ (full line), $\pi/2$
790: (long dash) and $\pi/4$ (short dash) occurring during a time $\delta = 1$.}
791: \label{f6} \end{figure}
792:
793: We present here numerical solutions of the full SRS equations
794: for the spike which confirm the analysis done previously.
795: The equations (\ref{eq11},\ref{eq12}) have been integrated using the
796: method indicated in section 2.
797: We first examine the influence of the flip time
798: and amplitude on the formation of the spike.
799:
800:
801: Fig. \ref{f5} shows $|a(x,t)|^2$ as a function of $t$
802: for $x=2,4,6$ and 8 with a Raman spike. The calculation
803: has been done for a flip amplitude $a_f=\pi$ and
804: three values of flip time $\delta=0.1$ (full line)
805: 1 (long dash) and 3 (short dash). As expected from the
806: previous section, no manifestation of the phase flip
807: can be seen for
808: $x<x_c={\gamma \over D^2}\approx 4$, where
809: $x_c$ is the stagnation distance.
810: Notice how the amplitude of
811: the spike remains of order 1 for the fast flip $\delta=0.1$.
812: On the contrary for $\delta=1$ the amplitude decays as $x$
813: increases to 4 and 6. The decay is even stronger for
814: $\delta=3$ for which the spike is barely noticeable.
815:
816:
817: The influence of the phase change on the Raman spike can be seen in
818: Fig. \ref{f6}. There we computed $|a (x,t)|^2$ as previously
819: but took $\delta=1$ fixed and took three values of the
820: phase jump $a_f=\pi,{\pi \over 2}$ and ${\pi \over 4}$.
821: The results are similar to the ones shown in Fig. \ref{f5}.
822: No spike can be seen for $x< x_c$ and the spike dies off for
823: $\delta={\pi \over 4}$ whereas it is still weakly present
824: for $\delta={\pi \over 2}$.
825:
826:
827: These two figures show the importance of the ratio $a_f/\delta$. If
828: $a_f/\delta > \pi$ a Raman spike is created and subsists for a few stagnation
829: distances. On the contrary if $a_f/\delta < \pi$ the spike is weak and
830: short lived.
831:
832: \begin{figure}[t]
833: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f7.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
834: \caption{Characteristic curves $t(x)$ for different values of $t_0$.
835: The parameters are the same as for Fig. \ref{f4}. The curve in dashed line
836: indicates the position of the maximum of the spike in the
837: numerical solution of the full system.}
838: \label{f7} \end{figure}
839:
840: \begin{figure}[t]
841: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f8.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
842: \caption{t position of the maximum of the Raman spike corresponding
843: to Fig. \ref{f4} as a function of $x$ (full line).
844: The $t$ position where the phase of $q$ is equal to $- \pi/2$ is
845: in small dashed line. The line $t = t_f + x$ is marked in big dash.}
846: \label{f8} \end{figure}
847:
848: We now compare the position and half width of the Raman spike obtained
849: from the direct solution of equations (\ref{eq11},\ref{eq12}) and the estimates
850: given by the characteristic equations. Fig. \ref{f7} shows the characteristic
851: curves $t(x)$ for different values of $t_0$ around the spike instant
852: $t_0=t_f$. As expected from the analysis of the previous section, one
853: sees the characteristic curves away from the spike region shift smoothly
854: from the behavior (\ref{txsmall}) to (\ref{txlarge}) as $x>x_c$. In
855: the spike region
856: the characteristics are straight and around the spike one can see the
857: transition from (\ref{txsmall}) to (\ref{txlarge}) for a stagnation distance
858: larger than $x_c$.
859: Observe how the characteristics cross for $x>x_c$ indicating
860: a shock. In fact there are multiple shocks as shown by the
861: crossings seen for the curves such that $t_0 \le t_f$ in
862: the right top part of the graph. For $t_0 > t_f$ all
863: the curves seem to accumulate along a line parallel to
864: (\ref{txlarge}). This set of curves shows the limitation of the
865: our approach which can predict the kinematics of the Raman spike
866: as it is created
867: \be\label{kinespike}
868: n = -D^2 \tanh[D^2~f(t-D^2~x~\tanh(\gamma))~x -\gamma]~, \ee
869: but breaks down after shocks are formed.
870: In Fig. \ref{f7} we plot the maximum of the spike observed in the
871: numerical solution of (\ref{eq11},\ref{eq12}) and one can see that
872: this position agrees well with the one given by the accumulation
873: point of the characteristics for $t_0>t_f$.
874: The result is clearly seen in Fig. \ref{f8} where we
875: plot the position of the maximum of the spike as a function of $x$.
876: On the same picture we give the $t^*$ value such that $q(x,t^*)=\pi/2$
877: and this follows the position of the spike.
878: In Fig. \ref{f9} we compare the width of the Raman spike with expression
879: (\ref{wrs}) for a range of values of $\delta$ and see that there is
880: a fairly good agreement.
881:
882: \begin{figure}[t]
883: \centerline{\psfig{figure=f9.ps,height=15 cm,width=6 cm,angle=-90}}
884: \caption{Half-width of Raman spike as a function of $\delta$ the
885: flip time for the numerical solution of the full system (full line) for
886: a distance $x=2. x_c = 2 \gamma/D^2 =10 $. The analytical
887: expression (\ref{eq48}) is in dashed line. The other parameters are
888: the same as for Fig. \ref{f4}}
889: \label{f9} \end{figure}
890:
891: \section{Conclusion}
892:
893: We have introduced a systematic approximation procedure to simplify
894: the stimulated Raman scattering equations where the small parameter is
895: the inverse of the damping of the field variable. Since the equations describe
896: complex fields, we have studied separately the influence of the
897: amplitude and phase of the waves. This provided a better understanding of
898: the phenomenon.
899:
900:
901: Concerning the amplitude, the zero order of the approximation
902: yields the well-known theory for continuous waves. At the first order we
903: obtain
904: a hyperbolic system of equations which exhibits wave breaking. At this stage
905: it does not give the accurate front dynamics but it could probably be
906: refined to do so.
907: The simple model we introduce allows to understand how energy transfer
908: occurs between the different components $a$ and $b$ of the field. In
909: particular we show that this transfer is monotonous and occurs
910: after a stagnation distance $x_c$ which we specifically compute from
911: the parameters of the model.
912:
913:
914: For the phase effects we provide a good description of
915: the Raman spike phenomenon in the case of waves of constant
916: amplitude through a simple system of hyperbolic partial differential
917: equations for the population difference $n= |a|^2-|b|^2$ and
918: the relative phase of the fields. We show that a spike is formed
919: from an initial phase jump of amplitude $a_f$
920: and duration $\delta$ in one of the fields if the ratio $a_f / \delta$
921: is large enough. From the characteristic curves of the system we obtain
922: the time instant and duration of the Raman spike as a function
923: of the propagation distance in the medium. These estimations
924: are confirmed numerically.
925:
926:
927: \section{Acknowledgements}
928:
929: A. Maimistov is grateful to the INSA de Rouen for an invited
930: professorship in May 2002. J G Caputo thanks Jerome Leon for
931: useful discussions.
932:
933: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
934: \bibitem{w74} G. B. Whitham, \textit{Linear and nonlinear waves},
935: J. Wiley, (1974).
936:
937: \bibitem{tashkent} J.\ G. Caputo, in \textit{Nonlinearity and disorder:
938: theory and applications}, F.Kh. Abdullaev, M.P. Soerensen and
939: O. Bang Eds. , Kluwer, (2001).
940:
941: \bibitem{leon} J. Leon, Phys. Lett. A 170, 283 (1992);
942: Phys.Rev. A 47, 3264 (1993).
943:
944: \bibitem{lm99} J. Leon and A. Mikhailov, Phys. letters A. 1999.
945:
946: \bibitem{bclp00} M. Boiti, J.G. Caputo, J. Leon et F. Pempinelli,
947: Inverse Problems, vol. 16, nb. 2, 303-315, (2000).
948:
949: \bibitem{drulh} K. Dr\"uhl, R.G. Wenzel, J.L. Carlsten, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
950: {\bf51} (1983) 1171;
951:
952: \bibitem{wenzel} R.G. Wenzel, J.L. Carlsten, K. Dr\"uhl,
953: J. Stat. Phys., {\bf 39} (1985) 621.
954:
955: \bibitem{yariv} A. Yariv, \textit{Quantum Electronics}
956: John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1967).
957:
958: \bibitem{pantel} R.H. Pantel and H.E. Putkhof, \textit{Fundamentals of
959: quantum electronics}, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1969).
960:
961: \bibitem{chu} F. Y. F. Chu and A. C. Scott, Phys. Rev. A 12, 2060, (1975).
962:
963: \bibitem{cgl95} C.Claude, F. Ginovart and J. Leon, Phys.Rev. A 52, 767 (1995)
964:
965: \bibitem{ablowitz} M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, \textit{Solitons and
966: the Inverse Scattering Transform}, SIAM, Philadelphia, (1981).
967:
968: \bibitem{newell} A.C. Newell and J.V. Moloney, \textit{Nonlinear Optics},
969: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood City, (1992).
970:
971: \bibitem{Agrawal95}
972: G.P. Agrawal, \textit{Nonlinear Fiber Optics}, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego,
973: Boston, (1995).
974:
975: \bibitem{Boyd} R. F. Boyd, Nonlinear optics, Academic Press, (1992).
976:
977: \bibitem{BEC} G. Lenz, P.Meystre and E.W. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71,
978: 3271 (1993).
979:
980:
981: \end{thebibliography}
982:
983: \end{document}
984:
985: