1: %\documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[preprint, twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[twocolumn, aps, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
5:
6: \usepackage[final]{graphicx}
7:
8: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} %faktor 1.5 fuer tabellenzeilenabstand
9: \newcommand{\Nabla}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\nabla$}}
10: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{\stackrel{\rightharpoonup}{#1}}
11: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
12: \newcommand{\Vxi}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\xi$}}
13: \newcommand{\Vphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}}
14: \newcommand{\Vzeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
15: \newcommand{\VPsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Psi$}}
16: \newcommand{\Overrightarrow}[1]{\stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{#1}}
17: \newcommand{\ra}{\right\rangle}
18: \newcommand{\la}{\left\langle}
19: \newcommand{\bean}{\begin{eqnarray}}
20: \newcommand{\eean}{\end{eqnarray}}
21: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
22: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray*}}
23: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\D}{\displaystyle}
26: \newcommand{\quer}{\overline}
27: \newcommand{\ul}{\underline}
28: \newcommand{\ob}{\overbrace}
29: \newcommand{\ub}{\underbrace}
30: \newcommand{\greeksym}[1]{{\usefont{U}{psy}{m}{n}#1}}
31: \newcommand{\umu}{\mbox{\greeksym{m}}}
32: \newcommand{\udelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{d}}}
33: \newcommand{\uDelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{D}}}
34: \newcommand{\uPi}{\mbox{\greeksym{P}}}
35: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\vereq<}}
36: \def\vereq#1#2{\lower3pt\vbox{\baselineskip1.5pt \lineskip1.5pt
37: \ialign{$\hfill##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
38: \def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\vereq>}}
39:
40: \pagestyle{myheadings}
41: \markboth{\today}{\today}
42: \bibliographystyle{prsty}
43:
44:
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: \title{Standing wave oscillations in binary mixture convection: from onset via
50: symmetry breaking to period doubling into chaos}
51:
52: \author{P.~Matura, D.~Jung, and M.~L\"{u}cke}
53: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Theoretische Physik, Universit\"{a}t
54: des Saarlandes, D-66041~Saarbr\"{u}cken, Germany\\}
55:
56: \date{\today}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: Oscillatory solution branches of the hydrodynamic field equations describing
60: convection in the form of a standing wave (SW) in binary fluid mixtures
61: heated from below are determined completely for several negative Soret
62: coefficients $\psi$. Galerkin as well as finite-difference simulations were
63: used. They were augmented by simple control methods to
64: obtain also unstable SW states. For sufficiently negative $\psi$ unstable SWs
65: bifurcate subcritically out of the quiescent conductive state. They become
66: stable via a saddle-node bifurcation when
67: lateral phase pinning is exerted. Eventually their invariance under time-shift
68: by half a period combined with reflexion at midheight of the fluid layer gets
69: broken. Thereafter they terminate by undergoing a period-doubling cascade into
70: chaos.
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73:
74: \pacs{47.20.-k, 47.20.Ky, 47.54.+r, 05.45.-a}
75: %****************************************************************
76: % 47.20.-k : Hydrodynamic stability
77: % 47.20.Ky Nonlinearity (including bifurcation theory)
78: % 05.45.-a Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear dynamical systems
79: % 47.52.+j Chaos (see also 05.45.-a Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear
80: % dynamical systems; 83.60.Wc Flow instabilities)
81: % 47.54.+r Pattern selection; pattern formation
82: % 44.27.+g Forced convection
83: % 47.27.Te Convection and heat transfer
84: %****************************************************************
85:
86: \maketitle
87: %\tableofcontents
88: \clearpage
89: Convection in one-component fluids like pure water occurs in Rayleigh-B\'enard
90: setups of narrow channels heated from below in the form of stationary
91: rolls. However, adding, say, 5\% of ethanol to the water the
92: spatiotemporal behavior of the possible convective structures
93: becomes much richer \cite{review}. The reason is that concentration variations
94: which are generated via the Soret effect by
95: externally imposed and by internal temperature gradients influence the buoyancy,
96: i.e., the driving force for convective flow. The latter in turn mixes by
97: advectively redistributing concentration. This nonlinear advection
98: gets in developed convective flow typically much larger than the smoothening
99: by linear diffusion --- P\'eclet numbers measuring the strength
100: of advective concentration transport relative to diffusion are easily of the
101: order thousand. Thus, the concentration balance is strongly nonlinear
102: giving rise to strong variations of the concentration field and to
103: boundary layer behavior as in Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics}. In contrast to that,
104: momentum and
105: heat balances remain weakly nonlinear close to onset as in pure fluids implying
106: only smooth and basically harmonic variations of velocity and temperature fields
107: as of the critical modes, c.f. Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics}.
108: Hence, the feedback interplay between ({\em i}) the Soret generated
109: concentration variations, ({\em ii}) the resulting modified buoyancy, and
110: ({\em iii}) the
111: strongly nonlinear advective transport and mixing causes binary mixture
112: convection to be rather complex not only with respect to its spatiotemporal
113: properties but 12 concerning its bifurcation behavior.
114:
115: Take for example the case of negative Soret coupling, $\psi < 0$,
116: between deviations $\delta T$ and $\delta C$ of temperature and concentration,
117: respectively, from their means \cite{coupling}. Then the above described cross
118: coupling between solutal buoyancy and
119: advection of Soret induced concentration variations generates oscillations.
120: They show up in transient growth of convection \cite{FL}
121: at supercritical heating, in relaxed nonlinear
122: traveling wave (TW) and standing wave (SW) solutions that branch subcritically
123: out of the conductive state via a common Hopf bifurcation, and in spatially
124: localized traveling wave (LTW) states. TW and LTW convection has been studied
125: experimentally and theoretically in detail
126: \cite{review,Ahlers,Behringer,Kolodner,Platten,Steinberg,Surko,Yahata,Knobloch,JL02}.
127: But little is known about
128: nonlinear SW states beyond a weakly nonlinear amplitude equation analysis
129: \cite{SZ93} that is restricted to the immediate vicinity of
130: the oscillatory threshold. It showed that SWs are unstable there, typically
131: bifurcating backwards.
132:
133: Here we determine for the first time structure, dynamics, and bifurcation
134: behavior of SWs for several $\psi$. We stabilize the unstable SWs by
135: control methods which can similarly also be applied in experiments. We found
136: that they
137: undergo a period-doubling cascade into chaos after a mirror-timeshift symmetry
138: (c.f. further below) has been broken
139: that relates up- and downflow at a fixed lateral location, $x$, to each other.
140:
141: Calculations were done for mixtures such as ethanol-water for Lewis number
142: $L=0.01$ and Prandtl number $\sigma=10$. The field equations for convection
143: were solved in a
144: vertical cross section through the convection rolls perpendicular to their
145: axes. A multi-mode Galerkin method as well as a finite-difference method was
146: used showing agreement with each other.
147: Horizontal boundaries at top and bottom, $z=\pm1/2$, were no-slip, perfectly
148: heat conducting, and impermeable. Laterally we impose periodic boundary
149: conditions with wave number $k=\pi$. In addition we suppress phase
150: propagation. We stabilize the SW states by
151: exerting control via the field amplitudes (or the heat current injected into
152: the fluid) and the Rayleigh number $R$ in response to the
153: instantaneous frequency and its temporal derivative, respectively
154: \cite{control}. In this way we
155: trace out the SW solution branch all the way from close to onset with large
156: frequency to slowly oscillating SWs that eventually period-double into
157: chaos. The procedure starts from a supercritically
158: growing transient SW with subsequent reduction of the heating below threshold.
159:
160: We use $r=R/R_{c}^{0}$ to measure the thermal driving in terms of the
161: Rayleigh number reduced by the critical one $R_{c}^{0}=1707.762$ for
162: onset of convection in a pure fluid. The flow induced mixing is measured
163: by the mixing number $M(t)$ that is defined in terms of the mean square
164: concentration deviation, $M^2 = <(\delta C)^2>/<(\delta C_{cond})^2>$.
165: Here the brackets denote spatial averaging. In a perfectly mixed fluid
166: $M$ vanishes while $M=1$ in the
167: conductive state (denoted by the subscript $cond$) with its large
168: Soret-induced vertical concentration gradient.
169:
170: In Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics} we show snapshots of SW convection covering half an
171: oscillation period in order to display characteristic symmetry and
172: structural properties. SWs are laterally mirror symmetric around positions
173: of maximal up- and downflow, e.g., $x$=0 and the node locations of the fields
174: are fixed in time. Furthermore, all fields have at every
175: instant definite parity under the mirror-glide operation $(x,z)\to
176: (x+\lambda/2,-z)$ of vertical reflection at mid-height, $z$=0, combined with
177: lateral translation by half a wavelength. We did not observe SWs without
178: this symmetry -- perturbations breaking it that we introduced for test
179: purposes always decayed rapidly to zero. Finally, the fields of
180: Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics} have a
181: definite mirror-timeshift symmetry (MTS), e.g., $f(x,z,t)=-f(x,-z,t+\tau/2)$
182: for $f=\delta C,\delta T$, and the vertical velocity field $w$ with
183: $\tau=2\pi/\omega$ being the SW oscillation period. At mid-height the
184: condition $f(t)=-f(t+\tau/2)$ implies in particular that positive and negative
185: field extrema of an oscillation cycle have equal magnitudes.
186: SWs with smaller frequency break this symmetry which is a prerequisite for
187: period doubling \cite{SW84}.
188:
189: Since the concentration balance is dominated by nonlinear advection the
190: distribution of $\delta C$ (color coded plots in Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics}) shows
191: plume-like structures and narrow boundary layers. Consequently, the field
192: profiles of $\delta C$ which are shown in Fig.~\ref{FIG:swpics} at $z$=0 are
193: anharmonic. Also the temporal oscillation of $\delta C$ at a fixed location is
194: anharmonic. On the other hand, temporal and spatial variations of $w$ and
195: $\delta T$ are much smoother and almost harmonic. The oscillation of $w$ is
196: temporally delayed relative to that of $\delta C$: the latter being
197: advected almost passively by the former changes the buoyancy driving force
198: for $w$. At midheight this phase
199: shift increases from about 0.52$\pi$ at onset to about 0.73$\pi$ before the MTS
200: breaks.
201:
202: Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall} shows how the bifurcation behavior of SWs changes
203: with Soret coupling strength $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.03$. The solution branch
204: for stationary overturning convection (SOC), which has the same spatial
205: symmetries as SWs, is included for comparison only for $\psi=-0.03$.
206: The heating range in which SWs exist increases when $\psi$ becomes more
207: negative since the oscillatory bifurcation threshold $r_{osc}$ is shifted
208: stronger to higher $r$ than the SW saddle-node at $r_s^{SW}$ which marks the
209: lower end of the $r$-interval containing SWs. All these SWs bifurcate
210: subcritically out of the conductive state as unstable solutions. They
211: become stable via saddle-node bifurcations. However, when the
212: phase-pinning condition is lifted completely then SWs decay by developing TW
213: transients since
214: %that, depending on $r$, either end in a nonlinear TW or SOC or the
215: %conductive state.
216: any spatial phase difference between $\delta C$ and $w$ causes the extrema of
217: the latter to be "pulled" towards the solutally shifted buoyancy extrema.
218: Depending on $r$ these transients either end in a nonlinear TW or SOC or the
219: conductive state.
220:
221: Moving along an SW branch the maximal
222: vertical upflow velocity $w_{max}$ [Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(a)] does not
223: increase monotonically as in TWs and SOCs but rather has a maximum somewhat
224: below the respective SOC value before it drops again. On the other
225: hand, $\omega$ and $M$ decrease monotonically starting with the Hopf
226: frequency $\omega_{H}$ and $M=1$, respectively, at onset at the upper ends
227: of the curves in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(b),(d). $M$ and $\omega$ are related to
228: each other almost linearly as in TWs \cite{LBBFHJ98}.
229:
230: The blow-up of the lower
231: part of Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(b) in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(c) shows how stability
232: and shape of the solution branches change with $\psi$; to that end they are
233: shifted such as to fit into Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(c).
234: While the SW at $\psi$=-0.03 has only one saddle-node the curvature of the
235: branches changes with decreasing $\psi$ such that two additional saddle-nodes
236: arise (for $\psi=-0.25,-0.3,-0.35$) with associated stability changes.
237: For $\psi=-0.4$ we have only one saddle-node again. While the saddle-node
238: positions slightly depend on the number of Galerkin modes retained the
239: $r$-range with stable SWs [solid lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}(c)] definitely
240: increases with decreasing $|\psi|$.
241:
242: The bifurcation behavior of the leftmost curves of Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall} is
243: displayed in more detail in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bif003}. For the sake of completeness
244: the TW solution (dotted curves) is shown as well. It bifurcates subcritically
245: as an unstable solution out of the conductive state at the common SW-TW Hopf
246: threshold. The TW solution ends by merging with zero frequency with the SOC
247: branch. However, when phase propagation is suppressed as in our case then the
248: TW does not exist and the upper SOC solution branch [full line in
249: Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bif003}(a)] is stable down to its saddle-node.
250:
251: Also the SW becomes stable via a saddle-node bifurcation. With increasing
252: heating
253: $r$ the flow amplitude of the stable SW (full lines) slightly decreases. At
254: $r=1.04831$ the MTS breaks and the solution branch splits into two. Thereafter
255: the downflow (upflow) extrema occurring in the SW oscillations, say, at $x$=0
256: ($\pm \lambda/2)$ are more intense than the upflow (downflow) extrema.
257: Consequently, the time averaged fields have now a net SOC-like structure
258: with non zero mean downflow (upflow), say, at $x$=0 ($\pm\lambda/2)$.
259:
260: Fig.~\ref{FIG:wCMt} shows the local dynamics of $w$ and $\delta C$ at $x=0=z$
261: and the global mixing number $M$ before (left column) and after (right column)
262: MTS breaking. By definition $M$ oscillates with twice the SW frequency as
263: long as MTS holds. Note that in particular $\delta C$ displays the
264: characteristics of a relaxational oscillator. In the MTS-broken SW of
265: Fig.~\ref{FIG:wCMt} the extrema of upflow and downflow at $x$=0 differ. Also
266: the up- and downflow times between the respective zero crossings of $w$ differ.
267: %As an aside we mention that MTS breaking can be suppressed by controlling,
268: %e.g., $w$ via its dominant mode. In this way the MTS-enforced
269: %SW solution branch can be continued [dashed line in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bif003}(a)
270: %beyond the MTS-breaking threshold] without experiencing a period-doubling
271: %bifurcation.
272:
273: In Fig.~\ref{FIG:phaseplane} we show how MTS breaking and period-doubling
274: changes the SW phase dynamics using $w,\dot w$, and $M$ as characteristic
275: local and global quantities, respectively. The curves in
276: Fig.~\ref{FIG:phaseplane}(a)-(c) refer to those of Fig.~\ref{FIG:wCMt}(a)-(c).
277: The upwards and downwards pointing triangles denote the two symmetry
278: degenerate unstable SOC fixed points with either upflow or downflow (of
279: equal magnitude) located at $x=0$. The particular MTS-broken SW orbits of
280: Fig.~\ref{FIG:phaseplane} move closer to the SOC with downflow at $x=0$. Here
281: it would be interesting to see whether and how the heteroclinic orbits
282: connecting these two unstable symmetry degenerate SOC fixed points organize
283: and restrain in phase space the dynamics of the SWs that periodically switch
284: between up- and downflow.
285:
286: For the $\psi$-range considered here we found that slightly after the MTS
287: breaking a period-doubling scenario into chaos starts
288: that is compatible within our numerical resolution with the Feigenbaum
289: constant. For stronger Soret coupling, e.g. $\psi=-0.25$, we could resolve also
290: a $r$-window with period-3 SW states and subsequent period doubling. However,
291: we did not observe SWs beyond the chaotic window(s) seen, e.g., in the inset of
292: Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bif003}(a). After increasing the heating beyond this threshold
293: the SWs developed transients into a stable SOC state
294: with large convection amplitude [full line in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bif003}(a)].
295:
296: In summary, we have determined SW states in mixtures for several Soret coupling
297: strengths. Close to onset of convection the subcritical solutions are unstable.
298: Under phase-pinning conditions they become stable via saddle-node bifurcations.
299: After the occurrence of a MTS breaking they undergo a period-doubling cascade
300: into chaos thereby terminating.
301:
302: \clearpage
303: %----------------------------------------------
304: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
305: %------------------------------------------------------------
306: \bibitem{review}
307: For a review see M.~C.~Cross and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
308: %{\it Pattern Formation Outside of Equilibrium},
309: Rev.~Mod.~Phys.~{\bf 65}, 851 (1993) and references cited therein and, e.g., in
310: \cite{LBBFHJ98,FL}.
311: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
312: \bibitem{LBBFHJ98}
313: M. L\"ucke, W. Barten, P. B\"uchel, C. F\"utterer, St. Hollinger, and Ch. Jung,
314: %{\it Pattern Formation in Binary Fluid Convection and in Systems with Throughflow}
315: in {\it Evolution of Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems},
316: edited by F. H. Busse and S. C. M\"uller, Lecture Notes in Physics, {\bf m55}
317: (Springer, Berlin,1998), p. 127.
318: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
319: \bibitem{FL}
320: C. F\"utterer and M. L\"ucke,
321: %{\it Growth of binary fluid convection: the role of the concentration field}
322: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 65}, 036315 (2002).
323: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
324: \bibitem{coupling}
325: For 5 weight \% of ethanol mixed into water at $T=20^{\circ} C$ the separation
326: ratio measuring the Soret coupling strength between concentration and
327: temperature gradients is $\psi \simeq -0.3$.
328: %----------------------------------------------------------------
329: \bibitem{Ahlers}
330: R.~Heinrichs, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
331: %{\it Traveling Waves and Spatial Variation in the Convection of a Binary Mixture},
332: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf A} 35, 2761 (1987);
333: J.~J.~Niemela, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
334: % Localized Traveling-Wave States in Binary Fluid Convection
335: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~ {\bf 64}, 1365 (1990),
336: K.~Lerman, D.~S.~Cannell, and G.~Ahlers,
337: % Analysis of transients for binary mixture convection in cylindrical geometry
338: Phys.~Rev.~E~{\bf 59}, 2975 (1999).
339: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
340: \bibitem{Behringer}
341: K.~E.~Anderson and R.~P.~Behringer,
342: % Traveling Wave Convection Patterns in an Annular Cell
343: Physica~D {\bf 51}, 444 (1991).
344: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
345: \bibitem{Kolodner}
346: D.~Bensimon, P.~Kolodner, C.~M.~Surko, H.~L.~Williams, and V.~Croquette,
347: % Competing and Coexisting Dynamical States of Traveling-Wave Convection in an Annulus
348: J.~Fluid~Mech.~ {\bf 217}, 441 (1990);
349: B.~L.~Winkler and P.~Kolodner,
350: % Measurements of the Concentration Field in Nonlinear Traveling-Wave Convection
351: {\it ibid}~ {\bf 240}, 31 (1992);
352: P.~Kolodner,
353: % Stable, Unstable, and Defected Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection
354: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 2731 (1994).
355: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
356: \bibitem{Platten}
357: H.~Touiri, J.~K.~Platten, and G.~Chavepeyer,
358: %{\it Effect of the separation ratio on the transition between travelling waves and steady
359: %convection in the two-component Rayleigh-B\'enard problem},
360: Eur.~J.~Mech.~B {\bf15}, 241 (1996).
361: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
362: \bibitem{Steinberg}
363: E.~Moses, J.~Fineberg, and V.~Steinberg,
364: %{\it Multistability and Confined Traveling-Wave Patterns in a Convecting Binary Mixture},
365: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf A}35, 2757 (1987);
366: E.~Kaplan, E.~Kuznetsov, and V.~Steinberg,
367: %{\it Burst and collapse in traveling-wave convection of a binary fluid},
368: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 3712 (1994).
369: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
370: \bibitem{Surko}
371: C.~M.~Surko, D.~R.~Ohlsen, S.~Y.~Yamamoto, and P.~Kolodner,
372: % Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection
373: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 43}, 7101 (1991);
374: C.~M.~Aegerter and C.~M.~Surko
375: %{\it Effects of lateral boundaries on traveling-wave dynamics in binary fluid
376: %convection}
377: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 63}, 46301 (2001).
378: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
379: \bibitem{Yahata}
380: L.~Z.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
381: %{\it Formation Process of the Traveling-Wave State with a Defect in Binary Fluid Convection}
382: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 98}, 551 (1997).
383: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
384: \bibitem{Knobloch}
385: O.~Batiste, E.~Knobloch, I.~Mercader, and M.~Net,
386: %{\it Simulations of Oscillatory Binary Fluid Convection in Large Aspect-Ratio Containers}
387: Phys.~Rev.~E.~{\bf 65}, 016303 (2001).
388: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
389: \bibitem{JL02}
390: D.~Jung and M.~L\"ucke,
391: %{\it Localized waves without the existence of extended waves:
392: % Oscillatory convection of binary mixtures with a strong Soret effect}
393: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 89}, 054502 (2002).
394: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
395: \bibitem{SZ93}
396: W.~Sch\"opf and W.~Zimmermann,
397: Phys.\ Rev.~E {\bf 47}, 1739 (1993).
398: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
399: \bibitem{control}
400: We drive the system towards the unstable limit cycle (ULC) with frequency
401: $\omega_\ast$ that is located on the subcritical SW solution branch as follows:
402: To reduce deviations with growing (decreasing) convection
403: amplitude $A$ that decrease (increase) $\omega$ at fixed $R$ we set
404: $A_{n+1}=A_n [1 + W_A(\omega - \omega_\ast)]$. Furthermore, when
405: $\Delta \omega / \Delta t$ is negative (positive) we move towards
406: the SW solution branch by decreasing (increasing) $R$ according to
407: $R_{n+1}=R_n (1 + W_R \Delta \omega / \Delta t)$. The control depends on the
408: actual values of $\omega - \omega_\ast$ and $\Delta \omega / \Delta t$ and
409: vanishes only at the ULC with the preselected frequency $\omega_\ast$. The
410: optimal weight factors $W_A$ and $W_R$ depend on $\omega_\ast$.
411: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
412: \bibitem{SW84}
413: J.~W.~Swift and K.~Wiesenfeld,
414: %{\it Suppression of period doubling in symmetric systems}
415: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 52}, 705 (1984).
416: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
417:
418: \end{thebibliography}
419:
420:
421: \clearpage
422: %--------------------------FIG. 1 -----------------------------------------
423: \begin{figure}
424: \centerline{\includegraphics[height=12cm,width=8cm]{fig01.ps}}
425: \caption{Snapshots of SW convection for $r=1.15,\,\psi= -0.25$ during
426: half of its oscillation period $\tau=2\pi/\omega=1.4$. The
427: concentration distribution in the vertical cross-section through the layer
428: is color coded with blue and red denoting high and low
429: concentration, respectively. Lateral wave profiles of vertical velocity
430: $w$, temperature $\delta T$, and concentration $\delta C$ at midheight, $z=0$,
431: are shown by colored lines: $w$ - blue, 40\,$\delta T/R$ - red, and
432: 80\,$\delta C/R$ - green, respectively.
433: At the snapshot times $t=0$ (a), $0.265\,\tau$ (b), and $\tau/2$ (c)
434: $\delta C(x=0,z=0,t)$ has a minimum, a zero crossing, and a
435: maximum, respectively. This SW shows the MTS explained in the text.}
436: \label{FIG:swpics}
437: \end{figure}
438:
439: %--------------------------FIG. 2 -----------------------------------------
440: \begin{figure}
441: \centerline{\includegraphics[height=12.5cm,width=8cm]{fig02.eps}}
442: \caption{Bifurcation properties of SWs for $\psi$= -0.03, -0.05, -0.1, -0.15,
443: -0.2, -0.25, -0.3, -0.35, -0.4 (from left to right) : (a) Maximal
444: vertical velocity $w_{max}$. (b) Frequency $\omega$. (d) Time average of
445: the mixing number $M$. The inset (c) shows a blow up of the lower
446: part of (b), however, with shifted solution branches to better display their
447: structural evolution with $\psi$. Full (dashed) lines in (c) identify stable
448: (unstable) SWs. Unstable SWs bifurcate subcritically out of the
449: quiescent conductive state [lower ends of the curves in (a); upper
450: ends in (b) and (c)] and undergo stability changes via saddle-node
451: bifurcations .
452: The SOC solution branch is shown for the sake of clarity only for $\psi$= -0.03.
453: SOC curves for the other $\psi$ are shifted slightly to the right.}
454: \label{FIG:Bifall}
455: \end{figure}
456:
457: %--------------------------FIG. 3 -----------------------------------------
458: \begin{figure}
459: \centerline{\includegraphics[height=12.5cm,width=8cm]{fig03.ps}}
460: \caption{Details of the bifurcation behavior for $\psi=-0.03$
461: (leftmost curves in Fig.~\ref{FIG:Bifall}): (a) Magnitude
462: $|w_{extr}|$ of the extrema in the vertical flow. (b) Frequency $\omega$.
463: For the sake of completeness we include also the TW solution for laterally
464: periodic boundary conditions allowing free phase propagation.
465: SW and TW bifurcate subcritically at $r_{osc}=1.0418$ with Hopf frequency
466: $\omega_H=3.426$. The TW branch ends by merging with zero
467: frequency with the SOC solution branch. The SW solution becomes
468: stable (solid lines) at the saddle-node position $r_s^{SW}=1.0373$.
469: At $r=1.04831$ the MTS is broken and the solid SW line in (a)
470: splits into two when the magnitudes of the vertical flow extrema
471: occurring during one oscillation cycle become different [see, e.g.,
472: Fig.~\ref{FIG:wCMt}(b) where the downflow at $x=0=z$ is more intense than the
473: upflow]. This MTS-broken SW starts to undergo at $r = 1.04883$
474: (marked by arrows) a period-doubling route to chaos that is shown in more
475: detail in the inset of (a).}
476: \label{FIG:Bif003}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: %--------------------------FIG. 4 -----------------------------------------
480: \begin{figure}
481: \centerline{\includegraphics[height=12.5cm,width=8cm]{fig04.eps}}
482: \caption{Effect of MTS-breaking on temporal oscillation profiles. Right (left)
483: column shows a
484: period-1 SW for $\psi=-0.03$ at $r=1.0488$ (1.0483) where the MTS is (not yet)
485: broken. Here $w$ and $\delta C$ are evaluated at midheight between two
486: rolls, $x=0=z$. The mixing number $M$ oscillates with twice the SW frequency
487: as long as the MTS holds (c).}
488: \label{FIG:wCMt}
489: \end{figure}
490: %--------------------------FIG. 5 -----------------------------------------
491: \begin{figure}
492: \centerline{\includegraphics[height=12.5cm,width=8cm]{fig05.eps}}
493: \caption{MTS-breaking and period doubling in the phase space dynamics of SWs.
494: Shown are the mixing number $M$ and $\dot w$ versus the vertical velocity $w$
495: at $x=0=z$.
496: In (a)-(d) the dash-dotted (full) lines
497: refer to the period-1 SW in the right (left) column of
498: Fig.~\ref{FIG:wCMt} for which the MTS is (not yet)
499: broken. Period doubling is displayed in (d) - (f). Upwards and downwards
500: pointing triangles indicate symmetry degenerate unstable SOC fixed
501: points (dashed SOC branches in Figs.~\ref{FIG:Bifall} and
502: \ref{FIG:Bif003}) with upflow or downflow, respectively, at $x=0$.}
503: \label{FIG:phaseplane}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: \end{document}
507: