1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{lscape}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4:
5: \newcommand{\MF}{{\large{\manual META}\-{\manual FONT}}}
6: \newcommand{\manual}{rm}
7: \newcommand\bs{\char '134}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{ Vortex solitons in dispersive nonlinear Kerr type media}
12:
13:
14: \author{L. M. Kovachev, L. M. Ivanov, \\
15: D. Y. Dakova$^\dag$, L.I. Pavlov$^{\dag\dag}$, K. L. Kovachev, \\
16: Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,\\
17: Tsarigradcko chaussee 72,1784 Sofia, Bulgaria,\\
18: $^\dag$ Plovdiv Univetsity, 24 Tsar Asen, 400, Plovdiv, Bulgaria\\
19: $^{\dag\dag}$ Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy,\\
20: 72 Tsarigradsko chaussee,1784, Bulgaria,} \maketitle
21: \date{}
22: \begin{abstract}
23:
24:
25: We have investigated the nonlinear amplitude vector equation
26: governing the evolution of optical pulses in optical and UV region.
27: We are normalizing this equation for the cases of different and
28: equal transverse and longitudinal size of optical pulses or
29: modulated optical waves, of week and strong dispersion. This gives
30: us the possibility to reduce the amplitude equation to different
31: nonlinear evolution equations in the partial cases. For some of
32: these nonlinear equations exact vortex solutions are found.
33: Conditions for experimental observations of these vortices are
34: determined. We have found large spectral zones on the 'wings' of
35: the electron resonances of metal vapors and also near to the plasma
36: frequency where the amplitude equation can be reduced to 3D+1
37: vector nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation.
38:
39: PACS 42.81.Dp;05.45.Yv;42.65.Tg
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44: The investigation of optical pulses and of modulated periodical
45: waves in wave guide structures as fibers and planar waveguides is
46: connected with the additional requirements to the optical property
47: of the materials. One standard way for confinement the optical beams
48: and pulses is by variation of the linear or nonlinear refractive
49: index in plane, which is transverse to the propagation direction. In
50: an isotropic dispersive media the refractive index depends only on
51: the frequency, the group velocity depends on the chromatic
52: dispersion and the wave guide modes can not be introduced in linear
53: regime of propagation. To provide one correct analysis in this case
54: we need to get in mind also the different spatial size of the
55: optical pulses. The longitudinal spatial size is determined from the
56: time duration by the relations $z_0=v_gt_0=ct_0/n_g$, where a
57: typical value of the group index $n_g$ in transparency region of
58: pure silica is ($n_g\cong 1.5$). For example, the typical transverse
59: size of laser pulses is evaluated from $r_{\perp}=1-5 $ $mm$ to
60: $r_{\perp} =100$ $\mu m$. While for the longitudinal size of pulses
61: or spatial period of modulated waves, there are mainly two
62: possibilities: a. Pulses from nanoseconds up to $40-100$
63: picoseconds. For such pulses $z_0>>r_{\perp}$ and their shape is
64: more close to optical filaments. b. Pulses from few picoseconds to
65: $100$ femtoseconds. In this case $z_0\sim r_{\perp}$ and the pulses
66: look like as optical bullets. When the transverse and longitudinal
67: part are approximately equal (case b), the ignoring of the second
68: derivative in $z$ direction in amplitude equation is not possible.
69: The propagation of such type of short optical pulses in nonlinear
70: media must be characterized, not only with the equal dimensions in
71: $x$, $y$ and $z$ direction, but also with non-stationary optical
72: linear and nonlinear response of the media. That is why we can
73: expect, that the equations governing the propagation of such type of
74: pulses, like optical bullets, are different from the well known
75: paraxial approximated equations, which describe evolution of
76: nanosecond and picosecond pulses \cite{CHIAO,TAL,KEL}. Another basic
77: characteristic of the pulses is their polarization. As it is well
78: known, in the case of plane monochromatic wave, the electromagnetic
79: field is polarized in the plane perpendicular to the direction of
80: propagation. In this case four Stokes parameters, two amplitudes and
81: two phases, connected with the transverse components of the
82: electromagnetic field can be introduced \cite{BORN}. This
83: corresponds to SU(2) symmetry of propagation of the monochromatic
84: field. The nanosecond and hundred picosecond optical pulses admit
85: very little spectral bandwidth, and the polarization component in
86: the propagation direction is small in respect to the transverse
87: components. With good approximation these pulses or modulated waves
88: also can be investigated as polarized in $x,y$ plane. Their spatial
89: form also is more close to the cw wave, as the longitudinal size is
90: hundred times greater, than the transverse size. In contrast to
91: the case of long pulses, the few ps and femtosecond optical waves
92: are with relatively equal size in $x,y,z$ direction and admit large
93: spectral width. For them such coherent SU(2) tensor can not be
94: introduced. The experimental results show, that the electric field
95: of sub-picosecond and femtosecond pulses, always contains also third
96: longitudinal component. With the enlargement of the spectral width
97: of the vector field also the longitudinal component grows (the
98: component normal to the standard Stokes coherent polarization
99: plane). Recently Carozzi et al. have shown that for the wave packets
100: higher class of symmetry - SU(3) exists \cite{BERG}. Using the
101: presentation of Gell-Mann of SU(3), they prove that five independent
102: parameters, three amplitudes and two phases, define the dynamics of
103: propagation of the vector field. This corresponds to a
104: three-component vector field. The above made analysis and the
105: experimental results show that in the investigation of
106: sub-picosecond and femtosecond pulses we must always have in mind
107: the three-component vector character of the electromagnetic field.
108: An initial investigation of the propagation of the optical pulses
109: was provided in the frame of spatiotemporal scalar evolution
110: equation \cite{SIL,DRA}. We found that vector generalization of such
111: spatiotemporal model can be applied to optical pulses or to
112: modulated periodical waves in UV region for dielectrics with strong
113: dispersion.
114:
115: \section{Nonlinear amplitude vector equation}
116:
117: Starting from the Maxwell equation for an isotropic, dispersive,
118: nonlinear Kerr-type media with no stationary response, we derive
119: the next slowly varying vector amplitude equation \cite{KOV}:
120:
121: \begin{eqnarray}
122: \label{a11} i\left(\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial t} +
123: v\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+\left(n_2+\frac {
124: k_0v}{2}\frac{\partial n_2}{\partial\omega}\right)\frac{\partial
125: \left(\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec
126: A\right)}{\partial t} \right) =\nonumber\\
127: \\
128: \frac{v}{2k_0}\Delta\vec A -
129: \frac{v}{2}\left(k_0^{"}+\frac{1}{k_0v^2}\right)
130: \frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t^2} + \frac{n_2 k_0
131: v}{2}\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A,\nonumber
132: \end{eqnarray}
133: where $k_0$, $v$, $k_0^{"}$ and $n_2$ are the carrying wave number,
134: group velocity, dispersion of the group velocity, and the nonlinear
135: refractive index respectively. With $\vec A $ we denote the slowly
136: varying vector amplitude of the electrical field. The equation
137: (\ref{a11}) is written in second approximation to the linear
138: dispersion and in first approximation to the nonlinear dispersion.
139: The kind of nonlinearity is connected with the fact, that in this
140: paper, as in the previous one \cite{KOV}, we investigate only
141: linearly polarized electrical field. The dependance of the nonlinear
142: polarization from different kinds of polarizations of the
143: electrical field is discussed in the Appendix 1. We will apply to
144: the basic amplitude equation (\ref{a11}) the method of different and
145: equal transverse and longitudinal spatial scales, as it is connected
146: with the natural initial shape of the optical pulses. This
147: application is one simplification of the multi-scale method,
148: introduced in the nonlinear optics in \cite{ACX, ASC, NEW} and also
149: in the hydrodynamics \cite{NL}.
150:
151:
152: \section{Case of different transverse and longitudinal size}
153: Applying a "moving in time" ($t' = t-z/v; z' = z $) transformation
154: to the vector amplitude equation (\ref{a11}), we obtain:
155:
156: \begin{eqnarray}
157: \label {mt} -i\left(\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z'}+
158: \frac{1}{v}\left(n_2+\frac { k_0v}{2}\frac{\partial
159: n_2}{\partial\omega}\right)\frac{\partial \left(\left|\vec
160: A\right|^2\vec A\right)}{\partial t'} \right)+
161: \frac{1}{2k_0}\Delta_{\bot}\vec A -
162: \frac{k_0^{"}}{2}\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t'^2}
163: -\nonumber\\
164: \\
165: \frac{1}{2k_0}
166: \left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial
167: z'^2}-\frac{2}{v}\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t'\partial
168: z'}\right)+ \frac{n_2 k_0 v}{2}\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec
169: A=0,\nonumber
170: \end{eqnarray}
171: where $\Delta_{\bot}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} +
172: \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial y^2}$.
173: The estimation of the influence of different terms in equation (\ref{mt})
174: can be reached by writing it in dimensionless variables. To make one assessment of
175: the difference between transverse and longitudinal dimension of the pulses we are introducing separately
176: transverse $r_\perp$ and longitudinal $z_0$ constants. Defining the rescaled
177: variables:
178:
179: \begin{eqnarray}
180: \label{eq12} \vec A=A_0\vec A';\ x=r_{\perp}x';\ y=r_{\perp}y';\
181: z'=z_0z";\ t'=t_0t",
182: \end{eqnarray}
183: and constants:
184:
185: \begin{eqnarray}
186: \label{norm}
187: z_0/t_0=v;\ \alpha=k_0z_0;\ \delta=r_{\perp}/z_0;\ z_{dis}=t_0^2/k";\ \nonumber\\
188: \\
189: \beta_1=k_0r_{\perp}^2/z_{dis};\
190: \gamma=k_0^2r_{\perp}^2n_2\left|A_0\right|^2/2;
191: \gamma_1=n_2\left|A_0\right|^2/2, \nonumber
192: \end{eqnarray}
193: equation (\ref{mt}) can be transformed in the following (the
194: primes and the seconds are not written for clarity):
195:
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: \label{tp}
198: -i\alpha\delta^2\left(\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+
199: \gamma_1\frac{\partial \left(\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec
200: A\right)}{\partial t} \right)+\frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot}\vec A
201: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t^2}
202: -\nonumber\\
203: \\
204: \frac{1}{2}\delta^2\left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial
205: z^2}-2\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t\partial z}\right) +
206: \gamma\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0, \nonumber
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: where $z_{dis}=t_0^2/k"$ and in the transparency region we use the
209: approximation \\ $\partial n_2/\partial\omega\simeq 0$.
210:
211:
212: \subsection{Pulse propagation in optical region: week dispersion}
213: In the optical region the wave vector is valued from $k_0\sim 10^4$
214: to $k_0\sim 10^5$ $cm^{-1}$. The typical value of the dispersion
215: parameter in the transparency optical region of dielectrics is from
216: $k"\sim 10^{-28}$ $s^2/cm$ up to $k"\sim 10^{-24}$ $s^2/cm$ in UV
217: region \cite{AXM}. The transfer sizes $r_{\perp}$ of laser generated
218: optical pulses or modulated periodical in time waves are valued from
219: $r_{\perp}< 1 $ to $r_{\perp}\sim10^{-2}$ $cm$. We will investigate
220: laser pulses or modulated periodical waves with time duration or
221: modulation period from few nanoseconds ($t_0\sim 10^{-9}$ $s$) up to
222: $40-100$ picoseconds ($t_0\sim 4-10 \times 10^{-11}$ $s$) in the
223: transparency region of a nonlinear Kerr type media. The group
224: velocity index in this case is about $n_g\simeq1.5$ and using the
225: relations $z_0=v_gt_0=ct_0/n_g\sim 10^{1}-10^{2}$ $cm$, we find that
226: the dimensionless parameter in front of second derivative in $z$
227: direction and cross-term is very small
228: $\delta^2=r_{\perp}^2/z_0^2\simeq 10^{-2}-10^{-4}$. Another
229: important relation is that if slowly-varying amplitudes are used
230: $\alpha=k_0z_0\simeq 10^{3}-10^{4}$. For such typical values of the
231: dispersion $k"$, wave vector $k_0$, time duration $t_0$ and
232: transverse dimension $r_{\perp}$ of the optical wave, the
233: dimensionless parameter $\beta_1$ in front of the dispersion term in
234: equation (\ref{tp}) is very small $\beta=k_0r_{\perp}^2/z_{dis}\sim
235: 10^{-3}-10^{-4}$ . Here we study the cases with power near the
236: critical for self-focusing $\gamma \cong 1$. These valuations give
237: us possibility to estimate dimensionless constant in front of the
238: different terms of normalized amplitude equation (\ref{tp}) for the
239: transparency optical region of a dispersive nonlinear Kerr type
240: media:
241:
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: \label{norm1}
244: \alpha=k_0z_0\simeq 10^{3}-10^{4};\
245: \delta^2=r_{\perp}^2/z_0^2\simeq 10^{-2}-10^{-4};\
246: \nonumber\\ \beta_1=k_0r_{\perp}^2/z_{dis}\simeq 10^{-3}-10^{-4};\ \\
247: \gamma=k_0^2r_{\perp}^2n_2\left|A_0\right|^2\simeq 1;\
248: \gamma_1=n_2\left|A_0\right|^2\ll 1. \nonumber
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: Neglecting the small terms in (\ref{tp}) we obtain the next amplitude equation:
251:
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: \label{parax}
254: -i\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+
255: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot}\vec A +
256: \left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0.
257: \end{eqnarray}
258: As it can be expected, the dynamics of such kind of long optical
259: pulses is governed by the well known paraxial approximation. This
260: equation was introduced initially for optical beam
261: \cite{CHIAO,TAL,KEL}. The fact, that with such type of nonlinear
262: paraxial equation it is possible to investigate non-stationary
263: processes is well known also \cite{CHIR,LIT,ASC}. It seems natural
264: the dynamics of propagation of long pulses to be governed by the
265: equation which describes dynamics of optical beam. The paraxial
266: approximation is applicable even when the relation between the
267: longitudinal and the transverse part is of the order of ten
268: ($\delta=r_{\perp}/z_0\sim 1/10$). The dimensionless coefficient in
269: front of the term with second derivative in z direction and
270: cross-term is of the order of square of $\delta$ ( $\delta^2\sim
271: 1/100<<1$), the term can be neglected and this leads again to the
272: paraxial equation (\ref{parax}). Effects of self-steepening due to
273: the first order of the nonlinear dispersion (second term in equation
274: (\ref{tp})) is not possible as always $\gamma_1\approx
275: n_2|A|^2<<1$. Different kind of generalization of equation
276: (\ref{parax}) in respect to nonlinearities \cite{SIL,KIV,DESM,TOR}
277: and multi-component vector fields \cite{MAN,DES} was performed. It
278: is important to point here that the second derivative in $z$
279: direction and the crossed term are neglected from the difference
280: between transverse and longitudinal size
281: ($\delta^2=r_{\perp}^2/z_0^2\simeq 10^{-2}-10^{-4}<<1$), and not
282: because the slowly varying amplitude is used. When we investigate
283: the optical pulses with equal transverse and longitudinal size
284: $\delta^2=r_{\perp}^2/z_0^2\simeq 1$, the second derivative in $z$
285: direction and cross term of the amplitude function are of the same
286: order that the transverse Laplassian, and these terms influence
287: considerably on the dynamics of propagation. This important case we
288: will investigate in the next section. When the power of the pulse is
289: less than the critical for self-focusing $\gamma << 1$ the
290: diffraction term dominates and the propagation of the optical
291: pulses is governed by the next linear paraxial equation:
292:
293: \begin{eqnarray}
294: \label{paraxl}
295: -i\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+
296: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot}\vec A=0.
297: \end{eqnarray}
298:
299:
300: \subsection{Optical pulses in UV region: strong dispersion. Vortex solutions}
301:
302: In UV region of media with high density as liquids and dielectrics
303: the dispersion $k"$ increases considerably and can reach the values
304: from $k"\sim 10^{-24}-10^{-25}$ $s^2/cm$. The carrying wavenumber
305: is valued from $k_0\sim 10^5$ $cm^{-1}$ to $k_0\sim 10^6$ $cm^{-1}$
306: and in this spectral region we can reach value with equal
307: diffraction and dispersion length, which corresponds to $
308: \beta_1=k_0r_{\perp}^2/z_{dis}\sim 1$. We use for example bulk
309: fused silica and calculate the linear refractive index from the
310: Sellmeier relations \cite{MAL}:
311:
312: \begin{eqnarray}
313: \label{Sel}
314: n^2=1+\sum_{j=1}^{3}{\frac{B_j\omega_j}{\omega_j-\omega}},
315: \end{eqnarray}
316: with coefficients $B_1=0.6961663,\ B_2=0.4079426,\ B_3=0.897479$,
317: wavelengths $\lambda_1=0.0684043$ $\mu m$ $\lambda_2=0.1162414$ $\mu
318: m$ $\lambda_3=9.896161$ $\mu m$ where $\lambda_j=2\pi c/\omega_j$.
319: The choice of carrying wavelength for the optical packet at
320: $\lambda=0.264$ $\mu m$, ($\omega=0.7131606. 10^{16}$ $Hz$) is
321: connected with the facts, that fused silica is still transparent on
322: this wavelength and it can be reached easy way by fourth harmonics
323: from Nd YAG laser on $\lambda=1.064$ $\mu m$. Considering the case
324: of pulses or modulated waves with intensity near the critical for
325: self-focusing $\gamma\sim1$, time duration $t_0\simeq 30-40$ $ps$
326: and using the relations $k(\omega)=\sqrt{\omega^2n^2(\omega)/c^2},\
327: k"=\frac{\partial^2 k}{\partial \omega^2} $, the next values for
328: laser characteristics and material constants are obtained:
329: \begin{center}
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: \label{norm2}
332: k_0=2.378\times 10^5\ cm^{-1};\ k"=1.99\times 10^{-25}\ s^2/cm;\ n_g\sim 1.65;\ \nonumber\\
333: r_\perp\simeq (1.4-1.6)\times 10^{-1}\ cm;\
334: z_{dis}\simeq (0.45-0.8)\times 10^{4}\ cm;\ \\
335: z_0\sim (6-8)\times 10^{-1}\ cm;\ k_0^2r_\perp^2\simeq
336: (1.1-1.5)\times 10^{9};\ \nonumber\\
337: n_2|A_0|^2\simeq (1.1-1.5)\times 10^{-9}. \nonumber
338: \end{eqnarray}
339: \end{center}
340: These parameters correspond to the next dimensionless constant:
341:
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \label{norm3}
344: \beta_1=k_0r_{\perp}^2/z_{dis}\simeq 1;\
345: \alpha\cong 10^{4};\ \nonumber\\
346: \delta^2=r_{\perp}^2/z_0^2\simeq 10^{-2};
347: \gamma=k_0^2r_{\perp}^2n_2\left|A_0\right|^2\simeq 1; \\
348: \alpha\delta^2\gamma_1=\alpha \delta^2n_2\left|A_0\right|^2\simeq
349: 10^{-6}\ll 1. \nonumber
350: \end{eqnarray}
351: Neglecting the small terms from the amplitude equation (\ref{tp}) we
352: obtain the next equation governing the propagation of optical pulses
353: with different transfer and longitudinal size in UV region of
354: dielectrics:
355:
356: \begin{eqnarray}
357: \label{UV}
358: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+
359: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot}\vec A
360: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t^2}
361: +\gamma\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0.
362: \end{eqnarray}
363: The scalar variant of this spatiotemporal equation (\ref{UV}) was
364: introduced for first time by Silberberg \cite{SIL} and attracts a
365: growing interest. In the beginning this equation was suggested to
366: discover the dynamics of so-called "light bullets" (LB), i.e.
367: optical pulses with relatively equal transfer and longitudinal size.
368: Our investigation corrects this idea and finds that the equation
369: (\ref{UV}) governed the propagation of optical pulses with
370: longitudinal size hundred times greater than the transfer one in UV
371: region of dielectrics and liquids. In the case of optical waves with
372: very small intensity the nonlinear term can be neglected
373: $\gamma<<1$, and we obtain the linear version of the equation
374: (\ref{UV}):
375:
376: \begin{eqnarray}
377: \label{UVL}
378: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial z}+
379: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot}\vec A
380: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t^2}
381: =0.
382: \end{eqnarray}
383: Let investigate the two component vector field polarizable in
384: transverse $x,y$ plane. For long pulses, as they are more close to
385: the cw regime, the longitudinal vector component is small and such
386: approximation is possible. We represent the optical vector field by
387: two orthogonal components $A_1\vec{x}+ A_2\vec{y}$ and the equation
388: (\ref{UV}) is transformed to the next nonlinear system of equations:
389:
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: \label{SYSUV}
392: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_1}{\partial z}+
393: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot} A_1
394: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_1}{\partial t^2}
395: +\gamma \left(| A_1|^2+ | A_2|^2\right)A_1=0, \nonumber\\
396: \\
397: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_2}{\partial z}+
398: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot} A_2
399: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_2}{\partial t^2}
400: +\gamma \left(| A_2|^2+ | A_1|^2\right)A_2=0. \nonumber
401: \end{eqnarray}
402: In the linear case the (\ref{SYSUV}) is reduced to two equal scalar equations for $A_1$ and $A_2$:
403:
404: \begin{eqnarray}
405: \label{LSUV}
406: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_i}{\partial z}+
407: \frac{1}{2} \Delta_{\bot} A_i
408: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_i}{\partial t^2}=0,
409: \end{eqnarray}
410: where $i=1,2$.
411: We rewrite the linear scalar equation (\ref{LSUV}) in cylindrical coordinates:
412:
413: \begin{eqnarray}
414: \label{LC}
415: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_i}{\partial z}+
416: \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial A_i}{\partial r}+
417: \frac{\partial^2 A_i}{\partial r^2}+
418: \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2 A_i}{\partial \theta^2} \right)
419: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_i}{\partial t^2}=0,
420: \end{eqnarray}
421: where $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $\theta=\arctan(x/y)$.
422: The linear equation (\ref{LC}) admits infinite number of exact analytical solutions of kind of:
423:
424: \begin{eqnarray}
425: \label{LSOL}
426: A_i=r^{n}\left[a_n\cos(n\theta)+a_n\sin(n\theta)\right]\exp\left(i(\beta_1
427: z+\sqrt{2\alpha\delta^2}t)\right),
428: \end{eqnarray}
429: \begin{eqnarray}
430: \label{LSOL1}
431: A_i=r^{-n}\left[a_n\cos(n\theta)+a_n\sin(n\theta)\right]\exp\left(i(\beta_1
432: z+\sqrt{2\alpha\delta^2}t)\right),
433: \end{eqnarray}
434: where $n=0,1,2...\infty$ is one infinite number. The solutions
435: (\ref{LSOL}), (\ref{LSOL1}) admit modulation frequency
436: $\Omega=\sqrt{2\alpha\delta^2}$ and modulation wave vector
437: $K=\beta_1$ in z direction. The existence of such kind solutions for
438: monochromatic light was observed for first time by Nye and Berry
439: \cite{NB}. The solutions of kind (\ref{LSOL}),(\ref{LSOL1}) admit
440: amplitude and phase singularities. One elegant way to remove the
441: amplitude singularities by using the combination of Gaussian
442: envelope and the solution (\ref{LSOL1}) with $n=1$ was suggested for
443: first time in \cite{SOS} for paraxial beam. This method is
444: applicable also to the linear equation (\ref{LC}) and optical
445: vortices in combined pulses with finite amplitudes can be found.
446: Usually the localized solutions of the linear equations are not
447: stable. Now we will turn to most interesting case; exact solutions
448: of the nonlinear system of equation (\ref{SYSUV}). Again we rewrite
449: the system (\ref{SYSUV}) in cylindrical variables:
450:
451: \begin{eqnarray}
452: \label{NLC}
453: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_1}{\partial z}+
454: \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial A_1}{\partial r}+
455: \frac{\partial^2 A_1}{\partial r^2}+ \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2
456: A_1}{\partial \theta^2} \right)
457: \nonumber\\-\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_1}{\partial t^2}
458: +\gamma \left(| A_1|^2+ | A_2|^2\right)A_1=0, \nonumber\\
459: \\
460: -i\alpha\delta^2\frac{\partial A_2}{\partial z}+
461: \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial A_2}{\partial r}+
462: \frac{\partial^2 A_2}{\partial r^2}+ \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2
463: A_2}{\partial \theta^2} \right)
464: \nonumber\\
465: -\frac{1}{2}\beta_1\frac{\partial^2 A_2}{\partial t^2}
466: +\gamma \left(| A_2|^2+ | A_1|^2\right)A_2=0. \nonumber
467: \end{eqnarray}
468: The nonlinear system of equations (\ref{NLC}) admits another infinite number of exact vortex solutions of kind of:
469:
470: \begin{eqnarray}
471: \label{NSOL}
472: A_1=\sqrt{((n+1)^2-1)/\gamma}(r^{-1})\cos((n+1)\theta)\exp\left(i(\beta_1 z+\sqrt{2\alpha\delta^2}t)\right),\\
473: A_2=\sqrt{((n+1)^2-1)/\gamma}(r^{-1})\sin((n+1)\theta)\exp\left(i(\beta_1 z+\sqrt{2\alpha\delta^2}t)\right),
474: \end{eqnarray}
475: where $n=1,2...\infty$ is one infinite number. One important
476: consequence of these solutions is, that they are obtained as a
477: balance not only between the diffraction and the nonlinearity, but
478: mostly by the nonlinearity and the angular distribution. That is
479: why, we can expect one stable propagation of such vortices in z
480: direction. Right away we can point here, that conditions for
481: finiteness of the energy of the above solutions have been not found
482: up to now.
483:
484:
485: \section{ Pulses with equal transverse and longitudinal size $r_\perp\sim z_0$}
486:
487: The investigation of the propagation of optical pulses or modulated
488: waves with equal transverse and longitudinal size $r_{\perp}\sim
489: z_0$ is more convenient to provide in coordinate system moving with
490: group velocity. That is why we apply a Galilean transformation to
491: the basic vector amplitude equation ($t'=t$, $z'=z-vt$), as
492: difference from the case of long pulses, where the "moving in time"
493: transformation is more natural. The equation (\ref{a11}) in this
494: case is transformed to:
495:
496: \begin{eqnarray}
497: \label {a13} -i\left(\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial t'}+
498: \left(n_2+\frac {k_0v}{2}\frac{\partial
499: n_2}{\partial\omega}\right)\left(\frac{\partial \left(\left|\vec
500: A\right|^2\vec A\right)}{\partial t'} -v\frac{\partial
501: \left(\left|\vec
502: A\right|^2\vec A\right)}{\partial z'}\right)\right)+\nonumber\\
503: \frac{v}{2k_0}\Delta_{\bot}\vec A -
504: \frac{v^3k_0^{"}}{2}\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial z'^2} -
505: \frac{v}{2}\left(k_0^{"}+\frac{1}{k_0v^2}\right)
506: \left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t'^2}-2v\frac{\partial^2\vec
507: A}{\partial t'\partial z'}\right)+ \\
508: \frac{n_2 k_0 v}{2}\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0, \nonumber
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: where $\Delta_{\bot}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} +
511: \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial y^2}$. We use again the approximation
512: $\partial n_2/\partial\omega\simeq 0$. To estimate the influence of
513: the different terms on the propagation dynamics we rewrite the
514: equation (\ref{a13}) in dimensionless form. Defining the rescaled
515: variables:
516:
517: \begin{eqnarray}
518: \label{rescal} \vec A=A_0\vec A';\ x=r_0x';\ y=r_oy';\ z"=r_0z';\
519: t"=t_0t',
520: \end{eqnarray}
521: and constants:
522:
523: \begin{eqnarray}
524: \label{norm5}
525: \alpha=2k_0r_0^2/t_0v=2k_0r_0;\ \beta=v^2k"k_0;\
526: \gamma=k_0^2r_0^2n_2\left|A_0\right|^2;\nonumber\\
527: \\
528: r_0/t_0=v;\ \gamma_1=2k_0r_0n_2\left|A_0\right|^2, \nonumber
529: \end{eqnarray}
530: equation (\ref{a13}) can be transformed in the following (the primes
531: and the seconds are not written for clarity again):
532:
533: \begin{eqnarray}
534: \label {eq13}
535: -i\left(\alpha\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial t}+
536: \gamma_1\left(\frac{\partial \left(\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec
537: A\right)}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial \left(\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec
538: A\right)}{\partial z} \right)\right)+ \Delta_{\bot}\vec A
539: -\beta\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial z^2}
540: -\nonumber\\
541: \\
542: \left(\beta +1\right)\left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial
543: t^2}-2\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t\partial z}\right) +
544: \gamma\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0. \nonumber
545: \end{eqnarray}
546: We point out, that the normalizing is with equal longitudinal and
547: transverse dimensions $r_0$. As it was pointed above, it is fulfilled usually for
548: few picosecond and femtosecond pulses of a pulse with
549: transverse size of $1-5$ millimeters to hundred micrometers.
550:
551: \subsection{Equation in optical region of media with week dispersion $\beta<<1$}
552:
553: Dimensionless dispersion parameter $\beta$ in transparency region of
554: dielectrics and gases usually is of the order of $10^{-2}-10^{-3}$.
555: For example we calculate $\beta$ in the transparency region of pure
556: silica on $\lambda=1,55 \mu m $ using the standard Sellmeier
557: expression for dependence of the dielectric constant from frequency,
558: and the value really is of this order $ \beta=-0,0069 $. The
559: constant $\alpha$ has a value of $\alpha\approx 10^2$ ($\alpha
560: \approx 2r_0 k_0 $) if the slowly varying approximation is used. In
561: this case, when we investigate the optical pulses with power near to
562: the critical for self-focusing $\gamma\approx 1$, $\gamma_1\ll 1$,
563: our vector amplitude equation (\ref{eq13}) can be transformed to
564: the next evolution equation:
565:
566: \begin{eqnarray}
567: \label {eq14} -i\alpha\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial t}+
568: \Delta_{\bot}\vec A - \left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial
569: t^2}-2\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t\partial z}\right) +
570: \gamma\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0.
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: The equation (\ref{eq14}) is one generalization of the well known
573: paraxial equation (\ref{parax}) in optical region for pulses with
574: equal transverse and longitudinal size.
575:
576: \subsection{Equation in UV transparency region. Strong dispersion ($\beta\approx 1$)}
577:
578: The critical dimensionless parameter $\beta$, which determines the
579: relation between dispersion and diffraction in the normalized
580: amplitude equation (\ref{eq13}), as it was established in the
581: previous paragraph, is very little in the optical region. In spite
582: of this, the temporal effects are presented in the corresponding
583: equation (\ref{eq14}) and for pulses with equal transverse and
584: longitudinal size can not be neglected. The situation in UV region
585: is quite different. In this region we can reach $\beta\simeq 1$.
586: When we investigate optical pulses with power, near to the critical
587: for self-focusing, the corresponding nonlinear dimensionless
588: parameters admit values $\gamma\approx 1$, $\gamma_1<<1$. Than the
589: equation (\ref{eq13}) is transformed to:
590:
591: \begin{eqnarray}
592: \label {UV1} -i\alpha\frac{\partial\vec A}{\partial t}+
593: \Delta_{\bot}\vec A-\beta\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial z^2}
594: -\left(\beta +1\right)\left(\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial
595: t^2}-2\frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial t\partial z}\right) +
596: \gamma\left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A=0.
597: \end{eqnarray}
598: If we compare the equations in optical (\ref{eq14}) and UV region
599: (\ref{UV1}), it is seen that in UV region we can take in mind in
600: addition a negative second derivative in z direction of amplitude
601: function and we multiply the temporal effects of second order by
602: factor $\beta+1$. We use for example again bulk fused silica and
603: calculate the linear refractive index $n^2 (\omega) $ from the
604: Sellmeier relations. The investigation is provided for the spectral
605: region from wavelength $\lambda=0.264$ $\mu m$ to wavelength
606: $\lambda=0.164$ $\mu m$. The group velocity $v_g$, dispersion
607: $k^"(\omega)$ and the dimensionless parameter $\beta(\omega)$ are
608: calculated. The typical characteristic of the laser pulse are
609: $t_0=5\times 10^{-12}$ $s$, group velocity $v_g\simeq1.8\times
610: 10^{10}$ $cm/s$ and $r_{\perp}=z_0\simeq 1\times 10^{-1}$ $cm$. On
611: Figure \ref{Fig1}, Figure \ref{Fig2} are presented correspondingly
612: the graphics of dispersion of the group velocity $k^"(\lambda)$ and
613: dimensionless parameter $\beta(\lambda)$. As it is seen from Fig.2,
614: the dimensionless parameter $\beta$, really can reach values equal
615: to one in UV region for some dielectrics.
616:
617:
618:
619: \begin{figure}[t]
620: \begin{center}
621: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{FF1.eps}
622: \caption{Plot of the dispersion of the group velocity $k^"(\omega)$
623: in the UV region from $\lambda=264$ nm to $\lambda=164$ nm for bulk
624: fused silica.}\label{Fig1}
625: \end{center}
626: \end{figure}
627: \vspace{3mm}
628:
629: \begin{figure}[t]
630: \begin{center}
631: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{FF2.eps}
632: \caption{ Plot of the dimensionless parameter $\beta=k_0v^2k^{"}$
633: within wavelengths from $\lambda=264$ nm to $\lambda=164$ nm for
634: bulk fused silica. The dispersion parameter reach a value $\beta\sim
635: 1$ in UV region.}\label{Fig2}
636: \end{center}
637: \end{figure}
638:
639: \subsection{Equation in media with strong negative dispersion \\ $\beta\approx -1$}
640:
641: Now we come to the most interesting case in this investigation: the
642: possibility that the temporal effects of second order can be
643: neglected. As it can be traced out from basic amplitude equation
644: (\ref{a11}), and to see in the normalized equation (\ref{eq13}),
645: when $k_0v_g^2k"=\beta\cong-1$, the dispersion effects of second
646: order do not present in the corresponding amplitude equations and do
647: not influence on the propagation dynamics. Recently in \cite{KOV} it
648: was found that near the electronic resonances of gases and
649: dielectrics and also near the Langmuir frequency in cold plasma the
650: dispersion is negative, the dispersion parameter arises rapidly and
651: is of the order of $\beta\approx -1$. Again we investigate the
652: propagation of optical pulses with power near the critical for
653: self-focusing ($\gamma\approx 1$, $\gamma_1<<1$). The amplitude
654: equation (\ref{eq13}) in this case can be written in the next simple
655: form of 3D+1 Vector Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (VNSE):
656:
657: \begin{eqnarray}
658: \label{eq15}
659: -i\alpha\frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t} +
660: \Delta_{\bot}\vec A + \frac{\partial^2\vec A}{\partial z^2} +
661: \left|\vec A\right|^2\vec A = 0.
662: \end{eqnarray}
663: Here we will study the possibility to obtain $\beta=-1$ in the next
664: three cases: 1. Near the isolated resonance of mercury vapor on
665: $\lambda=0.3653 \mu m $. 2. Near the Langmuir frequency in cold
666: electron plasma. 3. In deep UV and R\"o region for dielectrics,
667: gazes and metals.
668:
669: \subsubsection{Dispersion parameter $\beta$ near the isolated electron
670: resonance}
671:
672: When $\varepsilon(\omega)\sim
673: 1/\omega$ the wave vector can be written as:
674:
675: \begin{eqnarray}
676: \label{eps}
677: k(\omega)=\frac{\sqrt{\omega}}{c}.
678: \end{eqnarray}
679: Calculating $\beta=v^2k"k$ for dispersion relation of kind of
680: (\ref{eps}), right away we obtain $\beta=-1$. This gives us a
681: confidence to look for such zones near the electronic resonances
682: where $\varepsilon(\omega)\sim 1/\omega$. Near to some of the
683: isolated electron resonances of metal vapors the dielectric constant
684: can be expressed by \cite{BOYD}:
685:
686: \begin{eqnarray}
687: \label{res} \varepsilon(\omega)=1+\frac{f4\pi Ne^2}{m\omega_0}
688: \frac{\omega_0-\omega}{\left(\omega_0-\omega\right)^2+\gamma^2}.
689: \end{eqnarray}
690: The investigation are provided for resonance frequency of mercury
691: vapor on $\omega_0=2\pi c/\lambda_0=0.515568.10^{16}$ Hz, oscillator
692: strength $f=0.3$, and natural (i.e. radiative) linewidth
693: $\gamma=1/4,53\lambda_0^2=1,654.10^8$ Hz. We use Lorenz shape of the
694: line, as we investigate the rarefied vapor and looking in zones
695: outlying from resonance on distance more than $4\gamma$, where the
696: natural shape of the line dominated. In Figure 3 it is shown the
697: form of the dielectric constant for number density $N=1,2.10^{15}$.
698: In the Figure 4 it is presented the dimensionless dispersion
699: parameter $\beta$. As it is well seen on the wing on the resonance
700: on distance about $4\gamma$ we have spectral zone where $\beta\simeq
701: -1$. Right away it must be pointed that $\beta$ depends strongly on
702: the number density N. The number density of the order of $N\approx
703: 1.10^{13}-1.10^{15}$ appears to be most suitable for large zones
704: with $\beta\sim-1$. Seems, for such number density the wing of the
705: resonance in best way can be approximated with
706: $\varepsilon(\omega)\sim 1/\omega$.
707:
708: \begin{figure}[t]
709: \begin{center}
710: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{FF3.eps}
711: \caption{ Frequency dependence of the dielectric constant for
712: resonance frequency of mercury vapor of $\omega_0=2\pi
713: c/\lambda_0=0.515568.10^{16}$ Hz ($\lambda=365$ nm), and natural
714: linewidth $\gamma=1/4,53\lambda_0^2=1,654.10^8$ Hz.}\label{Fig3}
715: \end{center}
716: \end{figure}
717: \vspace{3mm}
718:
719: \begin{figure}[t]
720: \begin{center}
721: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{FF4.eps}
722: \caption{ Plot of the dimensionless parameter $\beta=k_0v^2k^{"}$
723: near to resonance frequency of mercury vapor on $\omega_0=2\pi
724: c/\lambda_0=0.515568.10^{16}$ Hz. On distance $4\gamma$ we find the
725: spectral zone where $\beta\simeq -1$.}\label{Fig4}
726: \end{center}
727: \end{figure}
728:
729:
730: \subsubsection{Dispersion parameter $\beta$ near to Langmuir
731: frequency in cold plasma}
732:
733: Dielectric constant in the case of cold electron plasma is given by the expression \cite{KARP}:
734:
735: \begin{eqnarray}
736: \label{plazma}\varepsilon(\omega)=1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2},
737: \end{eqnarray}
738: where $\omega_p=\sqrt{4\pi N_1e^2/m}$ is the plasma frequency and
739: $N_1$ is the number of free electron particles per $cm^{-3}$. Here
740: we investigate a typical number which characterized the plasma
741: density in generators used for nuclear fusion. In Figure 5 is
742: presented $\varepsilon(\omega)$ for frequencies higher and close to
743: plasma frequency and number density $N_1\cong 1.10^{17}$ $cm^{-3}$.
744: The frequency is normalizing on spectral width of optical pulse
745: $\delta\omega=1.10^{10}$ Hz, which corresponds to pulse with time
746: duration $\Delta t\simeq 2.10^{-10}$ seconds. The corresponding to
747: this dielectric constant dispersion parameter $\beta(\omega)$ is
748: presented in Figure 6. As it is seen from the graphics, the large
749: spectral zone exists, more than twenty spectral widths from plasma
750: frequency, where $\beta\cong -1$. The transverse and longitudinal
751: size such optical pulse valued from $0.5-1$ $cm$. An important
752: relation is pointed out with investigation of dependence of $\beta$
753: from time duration of the pulses and number density. With decreasing
754: the time and spatial duration of the pulses (fs pulses) and
755: increasing the number density, this large spectral zone with
756: $\beta\cong -1$ keeps on.
757:
758: \begin{figure}[t]
759: \begin{center}
760: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{nucle.eps}
761: \caption{Frequency dependence of the dielectric constant near to
762: Langmuir frequency in cold plasma for number density $N_1\sim
763: 1.10^{17}$. The frequency is normalizing on spectral width of the
764: optical pulse $\delta\omega=1.10^{10}$ Hz.}
765: \end{center}
766: \end{figure}
767:
768: \begin{figure}[t]
769: \begin{center}
770: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=85mm]{nuclb.eps}
771: \caption{ The corresponding dimensionless dispersion parameter
772: $\beta$ near the plasma frequency. Large spectral sone with
773: $\beta\simeq -1$ is established.}\label{Fig6}
774: \end{center}
775: \end{figure}
776:
777:
778: \subsubsection{Dielectric constant $\varepsilon(\omega)$ and dispersion parameter $\beta$ from deep UV to
779: R\"o region}
780:
781: As it was established in \cite{LAN}, it is possible to find equal
782: dispersion relation of the dielectric constant $\varepsilon(\omega)$
783: for different kind of materials, as dielectrics, gases,
784: semiconductors, metals, when the carrying frequency of optical wave
785: is much higher than the resonances of this media. In these cases the
786: localized energy of optical wave is much higher than the critical
787: for ionization of the materials and the linear and nonlinear
788: response is the same as in cold plasma. Practically the electrons
789: interact as free electrons on these frequencies. It is not hard to
790: find that in this region again we have the dispersion relation of
791: dielectric constant of the kind of:
792:
793: \begin{eqnarray}
794: \label{plazma1}\varepsilon(\omega)=1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}.
795: \end{eqnarray}
796:
797: The critical parameter which characterized the plasma frequency in
798: these materials is the number density $N_1$ of the free electrons.
799: The typical number for semiconductors is $N_1\cong 1.10^{18}$ and
800: for metals is $N_1\cong 1.10^{22}$. That is why, the application of
801: this formula started from deep UV for light elements as H, Li, e.c.
802: and from R\"o frequencies in heavy elements. For optical waves when
803: $\omega>\omega_{p}$, there are no difference between metals,
804: semi-conductors, dielectrics and metals. All of them are transparent
805: for optical waves with carrying frequency $\omega_0>\omega_{p}$.
806: Again we can obtain, that near the corresponding plasma frequency of
807: these materials, large frequency zone with negative dispersion
808: parameter of order of $\beta\sim -1$ exists, if the picosecond and
809: femtosecond pulses are used. For all of these three important cases
810: the propagation of localized optical pulses is governed by the
811: vector 3D+1 Nonlinear Schr\"odinger Equation (\ref{eq15}). The
812: numerical experiment provided in \cite{KOV} show a stable
813: propagation of the vortex solutions. The intensity picture of these
814: multi-component solutions is truly symmetric and look like as stable
815: Fraunhofer distribution. The internal structure of these vortices is
816: presented by the spherical harmonics with integer number.
817:
818: \section{Exact vortex solutions on VNSE}
819:
820: The solutions of the 3D+1 Vector Nonlinear Schr\"odinger amplitude
821: equation (\ref{eq15}) in a fixed basis are \cite{KOV}:
822:
823: \begin{eqnarray}
824: \label{c1}
825: A_x = \sqrt 2\frac{\exp\left({i\sqrt{\alpha\Omega}
826: r}\right)}{r} \sin \theta \cos \varphi \exp \left(i\Omega t
827: \right),
828: \end{eqnarray}
829:
830: \begin{eqnarray}
831: \label{c2} A_y = \sqrt 2\frac{\exp\left({i\sqrt{\alpha\Omega}
832: r}\right)}{r} \sin \theta \sin \varphi \exp \left(i\Omega t
833: \right),
834: \end{eqnarray}
835:
836: \begin{eqnarray}
837: \label{c3} A_z = \sqrt 2\frac{\exp\left({i\sqrt{\alpha\Omega}
838: r}\right)}{r} \cos \theta \exp \left(i\Omega t \right),
839: \end{eqnarray}
840: where $r=\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}$, $\theta= \arccos\frac zr$ and $\varphi=arctan\frac xy $
841: are the moving spherical variables of the independent variables
842: $x, y, z$. The corresponding real solutions $\Re(\vec
843: {A})$, are:
844:
845: \begin{eqnarray}
846: \label{eq30} \Re(A_x)=\frac{1}{2i}\left( A_x-A_x^{*}\right)=
847: \sqrt{2}\frac{\sin\left(\sqrt{\alpha\Omega}r+\Omega t\right)}{r}\sin
848: \theta \cos \varphi ,
849: \end{eqnarray}
850:
851: \begin{eqnarray}
852: \label{eq31} \Re(A_y)=\frac{1}{2i}\left( A_y-A_y^*\right)= \sqrt {2}
853: \frac{\sin\left({\sqrt{\alpha\Omega} r+\Omega t}\right)}{r}\sin
854: \theta \sin \varphi ,
855: \end{eqnarray}
856:
857: \begin{eqnarray}
858: \label{eq32} \Re(A_z)=\frac{1}{2i}\left( A_z-A_z^*\right)= \sqrt {2}
859: \frac{\sin\left({\sqrt{\alpha\Omega} r+\Omega t}\right)}{r}\cos
860: \theta.
861: \end{eqnarray}
862: It is important to point, that in \cite{KOV} conditions for
863: finiteness of the energy of the solutions (\ref{eq30})-(\ref{eq32})
864: was found. As it can be established, the averaged with one time
865: period intensity field of these solutions admits total radial
866: symmetry:
867:
868: \begin{eqnarray}
869: \label{int} \langle A_x\rangle^2+\langle A_y\rangle^2+\langle
870: A_z\rangle^2= 2\frac{\sin^2\left(\sqrt{\alpha\Omega}r\right)}{r^2}.
871: \end{eqnarray}
872: Thus, in one experiment the solution will look like as Fraunhofer
873: distribution. Figure 7 presents the surface $\langle\vec
874: A\rangle^2_{z=0}$ of the solutions (\ref{eq30})-(\ref{eq32}).
875:
876: \begin{figure}[t]
877: \begin{center}
878: \includegraphics[width=65mm,height=55mm]{FF7.eps}
879: \caption{ Fraunhofer distribution for the averaged with one time
880: period intensity of the solutions (\ref{int}) of 3D+1 Vector
881: Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (\ref{eq15}).}\label{Fig7}
882: \end{center}
883: \end{figure}
884: We can recognize the vortex structures of these solutions only if we
885: see the field distribution and the intensity of one of the
886: component, for example $\langle A_x\rangle$. On Figure 8 we present
887: the surface of one of the components $\langle A_{x,|z=0}\rangle$,
888: rewritten in Cartesian coordinates:
889:
890: \begin{eqnarray}
891: \label{komp} \langle
892: A_x\rangle=\sqrt{2}\frac{x\sin\left(\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}\right)}
893: {x^2+y^2+z^2}.
894: \end{eqnarray}
895: It is clearly seen, that the surface of our three dimensional
896: solutions possess linear phase dislocations in space, which
897: characterizes the vortex structures \cite{NB}.
898:
899: \begin{figure}[t]
900: \begin{center}
901: \includegraphics[width=65mm,height=55mm]{FF8.eps}
902: \caption{Surface of the one of the component $\langle
903: A_{x,|z=0}\rangle$ of the averaged with one time period vortex
904: solutions (\ref{komp}). It is clearly seen linear phase dislocation
905: for these solutions.}\label{Fig8}
906: \end{center}
907: \end{figure}
908: The intensity of this component $\langle A_x^2\rangle$, which is one
909: $l=1, m=1$ distribution, is presented in Figure 9. This picture is
910: possible to see in one experiment, when an optical vortex of kind
911: (\ref{eq30})-(\ref{eq32}) is passed trough the linear polarizer.
912: Then the internal structure of these vortex solutions composed by
913: spherical harmonics with $l=1, m=\pm1, 0$ distribution, will be
914: seen. Our solutions (\ref{eq30})-(\ref{eq32}) admits total angular
915: momentum $l=1$ and line phase singularities for the different
916: components. That is why, in spite of the fact that the intensity
917: field is total symmetric, we recognize the internal vortex
918: structures of these solutions.
919:
920: \begin{figure}[t]
921: \begin{center}
922: \includegraphics[width=65mm,height=55mm]{FF9.eps}
923: \caption{The intensity profile of one of the components $\langle
924: A_{x,|z=0}\rangle^2$, which corresponds to $l=1,m=1$
925: distribution.}\label{Fig9}
926: \end{center}
927: \end{figure}
928:
929:
930: \section {Conclusion}
931:
932: In conclusion, we investigated the application of the nonlinear
933: amplitude equation (\ref{a11}), in different spectral zones,
934: starting from the optical region, and extending up to the R\"o
935: region of dielectrics. Different generalizations of the paraxial
936: equation are obtained, depending from the spectral zones, the
937: material constants, and the initial shape of the pulses (long pulses
938: or optical bullets). We find large spectral region near the plasma
939: frequency in cold plasma for fs and few picosecond optical pulses,
940: where the temporal effects of second order in the amplitude
941: equations (\ref{a11}) can be neglected. The same result is obtained
942: also for spectral regions on the 'wings' of the electron resonances
943: in metal vapors. In the last case the conditions to obtain such
944: effects depend strongly on the number density of the gases. In these
945: spectral zones the propagation of optical pulses is governed by the
946: amplitude vector nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (\ref{eq15}) and,
947: as it was predicted in \cite{KOV}, stable 3D optical vortices can be
948: observed. They look like as Fraunhofer distribution in the space.
949: After passing trough the linear polarizer the vortex structures will
950: be seen. The vector theory presented in this paper can be extended
951: also in respect to different kind of nonlinearities and
952: polarizations of the optical field.
953:
954: \section {Appendix 1. Nonlinear polarization of two and three components of the same frequency}
955:
956: The electric field associated with linear or elliptically polarized
957: optical wave can be written in the form
958:
959: \begin{eqnarray}
960: \vec{E}(x,y,z,t)=\frac{1}{2i}\left(\left(\vec{x}A_x+\vec{y}A_y\right)\exp(i\omega_0t)
961: -c.c.\right),
962: \end{eqnarray}
963: where $A_x$ and $A_y$ are the complex amplitudes of the polarization
964: components of a wave with the frequency $\omega_0$.
965:
966: \subsection{Linearly polarized components}
967: Let investigate the polarization dynamics of two initially linearly
968: polarized components of the electrical field. Then, there is no
969: initial phase different between the components, and the complex
970: amplitudes can be expressed as a product of two real amplitude
971: functions with equal phases: $ \Re(\hat{A}_x)\exp(i\phi)$, $
972: \Re(\hat{A}_y)\exp(i\phi) $. Calculating the relation between the
973: linear polarized components in the same manner, as it was performed
974: for plane wave \cite{YR}, we obtain the same kind relation for the
975: components of the electrical field:
976:
977: \begin{eqnarray}
978: \label{YAR}
979: \frac{E_y}{E_x}=\frac{\Re(\hat{A}_y)}{\Re(\hat{A}_x)},
980: \end{eqnarray}
981: where $\Re(\hat{A}_y)$ and $\Re(\hat{A}_x)$ are real functions, not
982: real constants as in the case of plane wave. We investigate the
983: propagation dynamics of optical pulses with arbitrary localized
984: amplitudes. The soliton case appear as partial case, when equal
985: amount of nonlinear and linear phase shift are compensated, the
986: initial phase different do not changed, and the linear polarization
987: keeps on. For optical pulses with arbitrary amplitudes, as the media
988: is isotropic, the diffraction and the dispersion add equal phases to
989: the two components and they can be written generally in the form:
990:
991: \begin{eqnarray}
992: \label{DIFDIS1}
993: A_x=\Re(A_x)\exp(i(K_{diff}z+\Omega_{disp}t)+\phi)=\Re(A_x)\exp(i\Phi(z,t)),
994: \end{eqnarray}
995: \begin{eqnarray}
996: \label{DIFDIS2}
997: A_y=\Re(A_y)\exp(i(K_{diff}z+\Omega_{disp}t)+\phi)=\Re(A_y)\exp(i\Phi(z,t)),
998: \end{eqnarray}
999: where $K_{diff}$ is the phase shift due to diffraction,
1000: $\Omega_{disp}$ is the phase shift due to dispersion, $\Phi(z,t)$ is
1001: the equal phase components for the both amplitudes, and $\Re(A_y)$,
1002: $\Re(A_y)$ are the real part of solutions for the amplitudes on
1003: distance z in isotropic media. For arbitrary solutions of kind
1004: (\ref{DIFDIS1}), (\ref{DIFDIS2}) the relation (\ref{YAR}) keeps on
1005: for the real part of the amplitudes. It is following from the fact,
1006: that the diffraction and the dispersion effects do not change the
1007: initial linear polarization of the pulses (do not yield linear
1008: birefringence in isotropic materials) . The nonlinear polarization
1009: $\vec{P}_{nl}$ in the case of isotropic medium is well known and can
1010: be written in the form \cite{MT,LAN}:
1011:
1012:
1013: \begin{eqnarray}
1014: \label{PNL}
1015: \vec{P}_{nl}=A(\omega)\left(\vec{E}\cdot\vec{E^*}\right)\vec{E}+
1016: \frac{B(\omega)}{2}\left(\vec{E}\cdot\vec{E}\right)\vec{E^*}.
1017: \end{eqnarray}
1018: Substituting the expression for the two linearly polarized component
1019: (\ref{DIFDIS1}) and (\ref{DIFDIS2}) in (\ref{PNL}), right way we
1020: obtain for the nonlinear polarization of the different components
1021: \cite{LAN}:
1022:
1023: \begin{eqnarray}
1024: \label{PNL1}
1025: P^x_{nl}=\left(A(\omega)+\frac{B(\omega)}{2}\right)\left(|A_x|^2+|A_y|^2\right)A_x,
1026: \end{eqnarray}
1027: \begin{eqnarray}
1028: \label{PNL2}
1029: P^y_{nl}=\left(A(\omega)+\frac{B(\omega)}{2}\right)\left(|A_x|^2+|A_y|^2\right)A_y.
1030: \end{eqnarray}
1031: We point here, that the expression is valid not only for nonlinear
1032: nonresonant optical response, when $A=B=const$, but also for
1033: nonlinearity near to some of the resonances, when $A(\omega)\neq
1034: B(\omega)$. In the same way we can obtain, that the components of
1035: the nonlinear polarization for one linear polarized vector in 3D
1036: space take forms:
1037:
1038: \begin{eqnarray}
1039: \label{PNL3}
1040: P^x_{nl}=\left(A(\omega)+\frac{B(\omega)}{2}\right)\left(|A_x|^2+|A_y|^2+|A_z|^2\right)A_x,\\
1041: P^y_{nl}=\left(A(\omega)+\frac{B(\omega)}{2}\right)\left(|A_x|^2+|A_y|^2+|A_z|^2\right)A_y,\\
1042: P^z_{nl}=\left(A(\omega)+\frac{B(\omega)}{2}\right)\left(|A_x|^2+|A_y|^2+|A_z|^2\right)A_z.
1043: \end{eqnarray}
1044:
1045: \subsection{Elliptically polarized components}
1046:
1047: In the case of elliptically polarized light the relation (\ref{YAR})
1048: take form:
1049: \begin{eqnarray}
1050: \label{YAR1}
1051: \frac{E_y}{E_x}=\frac{\Re(A_y)}{\Re(A_x)}\exp(i(\delta_y-\delta_x)),
1052: \end{eqnarray}
1053: where $\delta_y-\delta_x\neq 0,\ n\pi,\ \pi/2, $ is the different of
1054: the phase functions for the components of the vector field. Since
1055: the diffraction and the dispersion add equal amount of phase shift
1056: to the different components in isotropic media, the phase different
1057: keeps on again. If we substitute $E_x$ and $E_y$ with such phase
1058: difference in the expression for nonlinear polarization (\ref{PNL}),
1059: and take in mind that $A=B=const$ for case of nonresonant electronic
1060: nonlinearities, the next expression for the components can be found
1061: \cite{AGR}:
1062:
1063: \begin{eqnarray}
1064: \label{PNLX}
1065: P^x_{nl}=const\left[\left(|A_x|^2+\frac{2}{3}|A_y|^2\right)A_x+\frac{1}{3}(A^*_xA_y)A_y\exp(2i(\delta_x-\delta_y))\right],
1066: \end{eqnarray}
1067:
1068: \begin{eqnarray}
1069: \label{PNLY}
1070: P^y_{nl}=const\left[\left(|A_y|^2+\frac{2}{3}|A_x|^2\right)A_y+\frac{1}{3}(A^*_yA_x)A_x\exp(-2i(\delta_x-\delta_y))\right].
1071: \end{eqnarray}
1072: The last terms in equations (\ref{PNLX}) and (\ref{PNLY}) present
1073: degenerate four wave mixing process ($\omega_1=\omega_2=\omega_0$).
1074: Since $\delta_x-\delta_y\neq 0$, this leads to periodically exchange
1075: of energy between the elliptically polarized components. Thus, such
1076: one exchange of energy can be observed in isotropic material as
1077: gases, metal vapors and crystals. When the phase different vanish
1078: ($\delta_x-\delta_y= 0$) in the case of linearly polarized
1079: components, the amplitude functions admit again equal phases, and
1080: the nonlinear polarization (\ref{PNLX}) and (\ref{PNLY}) can be
1081: transformed to the nonlinear polarization of linearly polarized
1082: components (\ref{PNL1}) and (\ref{PNL2}). This is one generalization
1083: of the results obtained for parametric solitons in $\chi^{(3)}$
1084: media \cite{PARKOV}. When there is no phase different between the
1085: components, the parametric therm appear as usual cross-phase term in
1086: the dispersion relations, and can be take in mind to determinate the
1087: right amplitude constants. The polarization dynamics in materials
1088: which admit modal birefringece is more complicate. In single-mode
1089: fiber, where the linear birefgingent effect appear \cite{KAM},
1090: additional polarization mode dispersion exists \cite{MEN}. This lead
1091: to random birefringence in optical fibers and random phase different
1092: in the last parametric terms in (\ref{PNLX}) and (\ref{PNLY}). Our
1093: numerical experiment show that the parametric effects with random
1094: phases are not effective, and can be neglected. One transitions to
1095: the Manakov system with coefficients equal to one in front of the
1096: cross-terms \cite{MAN} is possible again for birefringent materials
1097: at elliptically angle $35^\circ$ between the main axes \cite{MEN1}.
1098:
1099:
1100:
1101: \newpage
1102: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
1103: \bibitem {CHIAO}
1104: R.Y.Chiao, E.Garmire and C.H.Townes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 479 (1964).
1105: \bibitem {TAL}
1106: V.I.Talanov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 2, 222 (1965).
1107: \bibitem {KEL}
1108: P.L.Kelley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 1005 (1965).
1109: \bibitem {BORN}
1110: M. Born and E. Wolf, \textit{Principes of Optics}, 6th (corr) ed.,
1111: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998).
1112: \bibitem {BERG}
1113: T. Carozzi, R. Karlsson, and J. Bergman, Phys. Rev. E, 61, 2024 (2000).
1114: \bibitem {ACX}
1115: S.A.Akhmanov, A.P.Sukhorukov, R.V. Khokhlov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 50, 474 (1966).
1116: \bibitem {ASC}
1117: S.A.Akhmanov, A.P.Sukhorukov, A.S.Chirkin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 1430 (1968).
1118: \bibitem{NEW} A.C.Newell, and J.V. Moloney, \textit{Nonlinear Optics},
1119: (Advanced Topics in the Interdisciplinary, Mathematical Sciences,
1120: Addison-Wesley, California, 1992).
1121: \bibitem{NL}
1122: A.C.Newell, J.A.Whitehead, J. Fluid. Mech., 36, 309 (1969).
1123: \bibitem{CHIR}
1124: A.S. Chirkin, Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow University, 1967.
1125: \bibitem{LIT}
1126: A.G.Litvak, V.I.Talanov, Izv. Vuzov, Radiophysics, 10, 539 (1967).
1127: \bibitem {SIL}
1128: Y.Silberberg, Opt.Lett. 15, 1282 (1990).
1129: \bibitem {DRA} A.B.Blagoeva, S.G.Dinev, A.A.Dreisehuh, A.Naidenov,\\
1130: IEEE J. Quant. Electronic, QE-27, 2060 (1991).
1131: \bibitem{NB}
1132: J.F.Nye, M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci 336, 165 (1974).
1133: \bibitem {SOS} M. S. Soskin, V. N. Gorshkov, M. V. Vasnetsov, J. T. Malos,
1134: N. R. Heckenberg, Phys.Rev. A, 56, 4064 (1997).
1135: \bibitem {KOV}
1136: L.M.Kovachev, Int. J. of Math. and Math. Sc., 18, 949 (2004).
1137: \bibitem {AXM} C.A.Akhmanov, V.A.Vysloukh, A.C.Chirkin, \textit{
1138: Optics of femtosecond laser pulses}, (Nayka, Moscow, 1988).
1139: \bibitem {KIV}
1140: Yu.S.Kivshar, and G.P.Agrawal, \textit{Optical solitons: From fiber to Photonic Cristals},
1141: (Academic Press, San Diego, 2003).
1142: \bibitem {DESM}
1143: A.Desyatnikov, A.Maimistov and B.Malomed, Phys. Rev. E, 61, 3107 (2000).
1144: \bibitem {TOR}
1145: L.Torner,D.V.Petrov, Electron. Lett., 33, 7, 608 (1997).
1146: \bibitem {MAN}
1147: S.V. Manakov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 38, 248, (1974).
1148: \bibitem {DES}
1149: A.S.Desyatnikov, D.Neshev, E.A.Ostrovskaya, Yu.S.Kivshar, \\
1150: G. McCarthy, W.Krolikowski, and
1151: B.Luther-Davies, JOSA-B, 19, 586 (2002).
1152: \bibitem {MAL}
1153: I.H. Malitson, JOSA-B, 55, 1205 (1965).
1154: \bibitem {BOYD}
1155: R.W.Boyd,\textit{ Nonlinear Optics}, (Acad.Press Inc., 1992).
1156: \bibitem {KARP}
1157: V.I.Karpman, \textit{Nonlinear Waves in Dispersive Media},
1158: (Nauka, Moscow, 1973).
1159: \bibitem {LAN}
1160: L.D.Landau and E.M.Lifshitz, \textit{Electrodynamics of Continious Media},
1161: (Nayka, Moscow, 1978).
1162: \bibitem{YR}
1163: A.Yariv,\textit{Optical Waves in Crystals}, (John Wiley and Sons,
1164: Inc, 1984).
1165: \bibitem{MT}
1166: P.D.Maker and R.W.Terhune, Physical Review, 137, 801 (1965).
1167: \bibitem{AGR} G.P.Agrawal, \textit{Nonliner Fiber Optics}, (Academic
1168: Press Inc., 2003).
1169: \bibitem{PARKOV} L.M.Kovachev and V.N.Serkin, Izv. Acad.
1170: Nayk, Physics, 53, 1599, (1989).
1171: \bibitem {KAM} I.P.Kaminow, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, QE-17,
1172: 15 (1981).
1173: \bibitem{MEN} J.Yang, W.L.Kath, C.R.Menyuk, Optics Letters, 26, 1472 (2001).
1174: \bibitem{MEN1} C.R.Menyuk,IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, QE22,
1175: 2674 (1989).
1176: \end{thebibliography}
1177: \end{document}
1178: