1: %\documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[preprint, twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[twocolumn, aps, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
5:
6: \usepackage[final]{graphicx}
7:
8: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} %faktor 1.5 fuer tabellenzeilenabstand
9: \newcommand{\Nabla}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\nabla$}}
10: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{\stackrel{\rightharpoonup}{#1}}
11: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
12: \newcommand{\Vxi}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\xi$}}
13: \newcommand{\Vphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}}
14: \newcommand{\Vzeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
15: \newcommand{\VPsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Psi$}}
16: \newcommand{\Overrightarrow}[1]{\stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{#1}}
17: \newcommand{\ra}{\right\rangle}
18: \newcommand{\la}{\left\langle}
19: \newcommand{\bean}{\begin{eqnarray}}
20: \newcommand{\eean}{\end{eqnarray}}
21: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
22: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray*}}
23: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\D}{\displaystyle}
26: \newcommand{\quer}{\overline}
27: \newcommand{\ul}{\underline}
28: \newcommand{\ob}{\overbrace}
29: \newcommand{\ub}{\underbrace}
30: \newcommand{\greeksym}[1]{{\usefont{U}{psy}{m}{n}#1}}
31: \newcommand{\umu}{\mbox{\greeksym{m}}}
32: \newcommand{\udelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{d}}}
33: \newcommand{\uDelta}{\mbox{\greeksym{D}}}
34: \newcommand{\uPi}{\mbox{\greeksym{P}}}
35: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\vereq<}}
36: \def\vereq#1#2{\lower3pt\vbox{\baselineskip1.5pt \lineskip1.5pt
37: \ialign{$\hfill##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
38: \def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\mathpalette\vereq>}}
39:
40: \pagestyle{myheadings}
41: \markboth{\today}{\today}
42: \bibliographystyle{prsty}
43:
44:
45: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: \title{Oscillatory convection in binary mixtures: thermodiffusion,
50: solutal buoyancy, and advection}
51:
52: \author{D.~Jung, P.~Matura, and M.~L\"{u}cke}
53: \affiliation{Institut f\"{u}r Theoretische Physik, Universit\"{a}t
54: des Saarlandes, D-66041~Saarbr\"{u}cken, Germany\\}
55:
56: \date{\today}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59:
60: The role of thermodiffusive generation of concentration fluctuations via the Soret
61: effect, their contribution to the buoyancy forces that drive convection, the
62: advective mixing effect of the latter, and the diffusive homogenisation are
63: compared and elucidated for oscillatory convection. Numerically obtained solutions
64: of the field equations in the form of spatially extended
65: relaxed traveling waves, of standing waves, and of the transient growth of standing
66: waves and their transition to traveling waves are discussed as well as spatially
67: localized convective states of traveling waves that are surrounded by the quiescent
68: fluid.
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \pacs{47.20.-k, 47.20.Ky, 47.54.+r, 47.27.Te }
72: %****************************************************************
73: % 47.20.-k : Hydrodynamic stability
74: % 47.20.Ky Nonlinearity (including bifurcation theory)
75: % 05.45.-a Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear dynamical systems
76: % 47.52.+j Chaos (see also 05.45.-a Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear
77: % dynamical systems; 83.60.Wc Flow instabilities)
78: % 47.54.+r Pattern selection; pattern formation
79: % 44.27.+g Forced convection
80: % 47.27.Te Convection and heat transfer
81: %****************************************************************
82:
83: \maketitle
84: %\tableofcontents
85:
86: %***************Sec. I **********************************************
87: \section{Introduction}
88: \label{Sec:Intro}
89: %****************************************************************
90: Convection in binary miscible fluids like ethanol-water, $^3$He
91: $-^4$He, or various gas mixtures is an example of systems that show rich
92: and interesting pattern formation behavior when driven away from
93: equilibrium. It is paradigmatic for problems related to
94: instabilities, bifurcations,
95: selforganisation, complex spatiotemporal behavior, and turbulence.
96: Compared to convection in one-component
97: fluids the spatiotemporal properties are far more
98: complex. The reason is that concentration variations
99: which are generated via thermodiffusion, i.e., the Soret effect by
100: externally imposed and by internal temperature gradients influence the buoyancy,
101: i.e., the driving force for convective flow. The latter in turn mixes by
102: advectively redistributing concentration. This nonlinear advection
103: gets in developed convective flow typically much larger than the smoothening
104: by linear diffusion --- P\'eclet numbers measuring the strength
105: of advective concentration transport relative to diffusion are easily of the
106: order thousand. Thus, the concentration balance is strongly nonlinear
107: giving rise to strong variations of the concentration field and to
108: boundary layer behavior. In contrast to that, momentum and
109: heat balances remain weakly nonlinear close to onset as in pure fluids implying
110: only smooth and basically harmonic variations of velocity and temperature fields
111: as of the critical modes. Without the thermodiffusive Soret coupling between
112: temperature and
113: concentration field initial concentration deviations from the mean diffuse away and
114: influence no longer the balances of the other fields [such a system displays
115: close to onset only the familiar stationary Benard rolls that are called
116: for historical reasons states of stationary overturning convection (SOC)].
117:
118: Hence, the feedback interplay between ({\em i}) the Soret generated
119: concentration variations, ({\em ii}) the resulting modified buoyancy, and
120: ({\em iii}) the
121: strongly nonlinear advective transport and mixing causes binary mixture
122: convection to be rather complex with respect to its spatiotemporal
123: properties and its bifurcation behavior.
124:
125: Take for example the case of negative Soret coupling, $\psi < 0$,
126: between temperature and concentration fields \cite{coupling}. Then the above
127: described feedback interplay generates oscillations. In fact the buoyancy
128: difference in regions
129: with different concentrations was identified already in \cite{WKPS85} as the
130: cause for traveling wave convection.
131:
132: Oscillatory convection appears in the form of the
133: transient growth of convection at supercritical heating, in spatially
134: extended relaxed
135: nonlinear traveling wave (TW) and standing wave (SW) solutions that branch
136: subcritically
137: out of the conductive state via a common Hopf bifurcation, and in spatially
138: localized traveling wave (LTW) states. TW and LTW convection has been studied
139: experimentally and theoretically in detail
140: \cite{review,Ahlers,Behringer,Kolodner,Platten,Steinberg,Surko,Yahata,Knobloch,JL02}.
141: The transient oscillatory growth of convection was investigated by
142: numerical simulations \cite{FL}. Nonlinear SW solutions were obtained only
143: recently \cite{MDL}.
144:
145: Here we compare these different oscillatory solutions and elucidate
146: common features and differences.
147:
148: In Sec.~\ref{Sec:System} we describe the system
149: and our numerical methods for investigating it. Sec.~\ref{Sec:extended} deals with
150: extended states of TWs, transient growth of SWs, with SW $\to$ TW transitions, and
151: with relaxed SWs. Then in Sec.~\ref{Sec:LTW} LTWs are discussed.
152: Sec.~\ref{Sec:conclusion} contains a short conclusion.
153:
154:
155: %\newpage
156: %***************Sec. II **********************************************
157: \section{System}
158: \label{Sec:System}
159: %****************************************************************
160:
161: We consider a binary fluid layer of thickness $d$ at a mean temperature
162: $\bar{T}$
163: and with a mean concentration $\bar{C}$ of the lighter component (e.g. ethanol
164: in water).
165: It is confined between two solid horizontal plates perpendicular to
166: the gravitational acceleration $g$.
167: The layer is heated from below with a temperature difference $\Delta T$
168: to the upper plate.
169: The variation of the fluid density $\rho$ due to temperature and
170: concentration variations is governed by the linear thermal and solutal
171: expansion coefficients
172: $ \alpha = - \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial \bar{T}} $ and
173: $ \beta = - \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial \bar{C}} $,
174: respectively. Both are positive for ethanol-water. The solutal diffusivity
175: of the binary mixture is $D$, its thermal diffusivity is $\kappa$, and its
176: viscosity is $\nu$.
177:
178: The vertical thermal diffusion time $d^2/\kappa$ is used as
179: the time scale of the system and all velocities are
180: scaled by $\kappa/d$.
181: Temperatures are reduced by the vertical temperature
182: difference $\Delta T$ across the layer and concentration deviations from
183: the mean concentration by $\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\Delta T$.
184: The scale for the pressure is given by $\frac{\rho\kappa^2}{d^2}$.
185: Then, the balance equations for mass, momentum, heat, and concentration
186: \cite{LL66,PL84} read in Oberbeck--Boussinesq approximation \cite{BLKS95I}
187: \begin{mathletters}
188: \label{eq:baleqs}
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: \Nabla \cdot \vec{u} = 0 \label{eq:baleqmass}\\
191: \partial_t\, {\bf u} = - {\bf \mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$} }\,
192: ({\bf u : u} + p
193: - \sigma \, {\bf \mbox{\boldmath $\nabla : $}\,\, u }) +
194: {\bf B} \,\,\,;\,\,\,
195: {\bf B} = \sigma\, R\, (\delta T + \delta C) {\bf e}_z \label{eq:baleqveloc}\\
196: \partial_t\delta T = - \Nabla \cdot \vec{Q}\ =\
197: - \Nabla \cdot \left[ \vec{u}\delta T - \Nabla \delta T\right]\label{eq:baleqheat}\\
198: \partial_t \delta C = - \Nabla \cdot \vec{J}\ =\
199: - \Nabla \cdot \left[ \vec{u} \delta C - L\Nabla\left(\delta C -\psi \delta T\right) \right]\ .
200: \label{eq:baleqconc}
201: \end{eqnarray}
202: \end{mathletters}
203: Here, $\delta T$ and $\delta C$ denote deviations of
204: the temperature and concentration fields, respectively, from their global
205: mean values $\bar{T}$ and $\bar{C}$; $\vec{Q}$ and
206: $\vec{J}$ are the associated currents. $\bf B$ is the buoyancy.
207: The Dufour effect \cite{HLL92,HL95}
208: that provides a coupling of concentration gradients into
209: the heat current $\vec{Q}$ and a change of the thermal diffusivity
210: is discarded in (\ref{eq:baleqheat}) since it is relevant
211: only in few binary gas mixtures \cite{LA96} and possibly in
212: liquids near the liquid--vapor critical point \cite{LLT83}.
213:
214: Besides the Rayleigh number $R=\frac{\alpha g d^3}{\nu \kappa}\Delta T$
215: measuring the thermal driving of the fluid three additional
216: numbers enter into the field equations: the Prandtl number
217: $\sigma=\nu/\kappa$, the Lewis number $L=D/\kappa$, and the separation ratio
218: $\psi=-\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\frac{k_T}{\bar{T}}=
219: - S_T\bar{C}(1-\bar{C})\frac{\beta}{\alpha}$.
220: Here $k_T = \bar{T}\bar{C}(1-\bar{C})S_T$ is
221: the thermodiffusion coefficient \cite{LL66} and $S_T$ the Soret coefficient. They
222: measure changes
223: of concentration fluctuations due to temperature gradients in the fluid.
224: $\psi$ characterizes the sign and the strength of the Soret effect.
225: Negative Soret coupling $\psi$ (i.e., positive $S_T$ for mixture like ethanol
226: water with positive $\alpha$ and $\beta$)
227: induces concentration gradients of the lighter component
228: that are antiparallel to temperature gradients.
229: In this situation, the buoyancy
230: induced by solutal changes in density is opposed to the thermal buoyancy.
231: Throughout this paper we consider mixtures with $L=0.01$, $\sigma=10$,
232: and various negative values of $\psi$ that are easily accessible with
233: ethanol-water experiments.
234:
235: When the total buoyancy exceeds a threshold, convection sets in --- typically
236: in the form of straight rolls. For sufficiently negative $\psi$ the primary
237: instability is oscillatory \cite{osc-inst}.
238: Ignoring field
239: variations along the roll axes we describe here 2D convection in an
240: $x$--$z$ plane perpendicular to the roll axes with a velocity field
241: \begin{equation}
242: \vec{u}(x,z,t) = u(x,z,t)\,\vec{e}_x + w(x,z,t)\,\vec{e}_z \, .
243: \end{equation}
244: This 2D type of convection is
245: commonly enforced experimentally in convection channels of small extension in
246: $y$-direction since the rolls are oriented preferentially perpendicular
247: to the channel walls \cite{CH93}.
248:
249: To find the time-dependent solutions of the partial differential equations
250: describing convection we performed
251: numerical simulations with a modification of the SOLA code that is based on
252: the MAC method \cite{MAC-SOLA,PT83}.
253: This is a finite-difference method
254: of second order in space formulated on staggered grids for the different
255: fields. The Poisson equation for the pressure field that results from taking the
256: divergence of (\ref{eq:baleqveloc}) was solved iteratively using the
257: artificial viscosity method \cite{PT83}. In addition we used multi-mode
258: Galerkin expansion methods \cite{HL02}.
259:
260: The boundary conditions for the fields were as follows:
261: we used realistic no slip conditions
262: for the top and bottom plates at $z=\pm 1/2$
263: and we assumed perfect heat conducting plates.
264: Furthermore, impermeability of the horizontal boundaries for the
265: concentration was guaranteed by enforcing
266: the vertical concentration current $\vec{e}_z\cdot\vec{J}$ to vanish at
267: both plates
268: \begin{equation}
269: \label{eq:Cbound}
270: \vec{e}_z\cdot\vec{J} =
271: - L\partial_z\left(\delta C-\psi \delta T\right)(x,z=\pm 1/2;t) = 0\ \ \ .
272: \end{equation}
273: Laterally periodic extended convection
274: structures were simulated by imposing lateral perodicity in
275: $x$-direction with periodicity length $\lambda=2\pi/k$. Spatially localized
276: convection states were obtained in domains of size up to 160.
277: To measure the strength of the thermal driving
278: we use the reduced Rayleigh number $r = R/R_c^0$
279: that is scaled by the critical Rayleigh number $R_c^0$ for onset
280: of pure-fluid convection with the critical wave number $k_c^0$\,.
281: The analytical values are $R_c^0 = 1707.762$ and $k_c^0 = 3.11632$.
282: However, to enable comparison
283: with experimental, analytical, or numerical results we scale $R$ by the
284: threshold $R_c^0$ in question, e.g., of the finite differences numerical code
285: \cite{CJT97}.
286:
287: To characterize convection
288: we monitored among others the evolution of the spatial
289: maximum of the vertical velocity field $w_{\rm max}$, of the oscillation
290: frequency, and of the reduced variance
291: \begin{equation}
292: \label{eq:Mdef}
293: M = \sqrt{\langle \delta C^2\rangle/\langle \delta C^2_{\rm cond}\rangle}
294: \end{equation}
295: of the concentration field.
296: Note that $0\leq M \leq 1$ measures to which extent the binary fluid is mixed.
297: The better it is mixed the smaller is the spatial mean
298: $\langle \delta C^2\rangle$ of the square of the concentration deviation
299: from its mean -- for spatially localized convection states $M$ is defined
300: slightly differently, cf. Sec.~\ref{Sec:LTW}.
301: The boundary conditions, however, sustain always small Soret-induced
302: concentration gradients against the action of advection and diffusion and
303: prevents $M$ from vanishing completely.
304: On the other hand, in the conductive state (denoted by the subscript
305: ``cond'') with a Soret-induced vertical concentration
306: stratification given by $\delta C_{\rm cond}(z) = -\psi z$, there is no
307: advective mixing. Its concentration variance,
308: $\langle \delta C^2_{\rm cond}\rangle = \psi^2/12$, is largest yielding
309: $M_{\rm cond}=1$.
310:
311: %\newpage
312: %***************Sec. III **********************************************
313: \section{Spatially extended oscillatory convection}
314: \label{Sec:extended}
315: %****************************************************************
316:
317: The complexity of (oscillatory) convection in binary mixtures has been the
318: subject of many studies \cite{reviewCF} that are too numerous to be discussed
319: here. A recent survey on papers adressing the role of the concentration
320: field may be found in the introduction of \cite{FL}.
321:
322: In this section we compare characteristic properties of spatially extended
323: oscillatory convection in the form of relaxed TWs \cite{BLKS95I,LBBFHJ98,HL98},
324: SWs \cite{MDL} and of
325: oscillatory transients \cite{FL} into, say, a nonlinear TW.
326: In Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht} we show the bifurcation diagrams
327: of maximal vertical flow velocity
328: $w_{max}$ and oscillation frequency $\omega$ versus reduced
329: Rayleigh number $r$ for the representative Soret coupling $\psi=-0.25.$
330:
331:
332:
333: At $r_{osc}=1.335$ a SW solution
334: as well as a pair of symmetry degenerate left and right
335: traveling wave solutions bifurcate out
336: of the conductive state with wave number $k=\pi$. At this Rayleigh number
337: the system shows a subcritical Hopf bifurcation with a Hopf
338: frequency $\omega_H(k=\pi, r_{osc})=11.23$. Here two facts are worth
339: mentioning: (i) the bifurcation threshold and the frequency
340: are practically the same as for the critical waves with the critical wave number
341: $k_c=3.135$ and
342: (ii) TWs with wavelength $\lambda \simeq 2$ are often
343: observed in large-scale experimental setups.
344: This value corresponds to the minimum of $r_{osc}(k)$.
345: Fig.~\ref{Fig:TWonsetsaddles} shows $r_{osc}(k)$ for different $\psi$.
346: The respective onset values for the phase velocities $v_p^H(k)=\omega_H(k)/k$
347: depend only
348: weakly on the wave number $k$. The curves $v_p^H(k)$ are shifted to higher
349: values with increasing
350: negative $\psi$ due to the higher Soret-induced concentration contrast in the
351: conductive state.
352: The saddle node lines $r_s^{TW}(k)$ are more or less downwards shifted versions of
353: $r_{osc}(k)$.
354: The size of the interval, $r_{osc}(k) - r_s^{TW}(k)$, of subcritical TWs
355: increases when $\psi$ becomes more negative.
356: For the parameters of Fig.~\ref{Fig:TWonsetsaddles}
357: the TW branches end at large amplitudes in a well mixed state of vanishing frequency
358: by merging with the stationary SOC solution branch of the same wavelength.
359: For the parameters of Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht} this happens at $r^{\ast}=1.65$
360: where the SOC solution branch is included for convenience as well.
361:
362: In contrast to the TW solutions,
363: the SWs remain unstable at least against a transition into a (transient) TW.
364: Their solution branches (cf. Sec.~\ref{Sec:SW}) end in period dubling cascades
365: \cite{MDL}.
366:
367: %----------------Sec. IIIA -----------------------------------------------------
368: \subsection{Advective mixing and diffusion of concentration
369: fluctuations}
370: \label{Sec:Mixdiff}
371: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
372:
373: When moving along the
374: TW and SW solution branches in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht} the frequency
375: $\omega$ and the
376: TW phase velocity $v_p=\omega/k$ decrease monotonically starting from the large
377: Hopf value at the bifurcation threshold. This is related to the advective
378: reduction of the Soret generated concentration gradients.
379: In fact there is a universal linear relation between the
380: degree of mixing and the frequency $\omega$ which holds for weakly nonlinear as
381: well as for strongly nonlinear states and for transients alike.
382: See for example \cite{HBL97,LBBFHJ98} for TWs, \cite{JL02} for LTWs, and \cite{FL}
383: for transients. This scaling relation $\omega/\omega_H \simeq M$ holds also for
384: SWs as one can infer from Fig.~\ref{Fig:Mvsom}. Also TWs with wavelength
385: different from 2 show roughly this scaling.
386:
387: In particular on the stable, strongly nonlinear
388: TW solution branch the binary fluid gets
389: with increasing $w_{max}$ and thermal
390: driving $r$ more and more mixed and $M$ reduces almost to zero -- only
391: concentration gradients in the narrow boundary layers survive. This holds even
392: more so for the well
393: mixed SOC states (see e.g. the SOC2 in Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct} which is
394: marked in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht} by the filled
395: triangle) that resemble closely the corresponding stationary
396: state in the pure fluid with the same $\sigma$ and $r$.
397:
398: The transition to convection at
399: $r_{osc}$ is hysteretic, i.e., of first order because the Soret coupling
400: coefficient $\psi=-0.25$ is sufficiently negative.
401: The associated precipitous growth of
402: convection is caused by an interplay
403: between the solutal contribution to the buoyancy
404: \cite{BLKS95I,LBBFHJ98} that tends to stabilize the conductive state and the
405: effect of advective mixing. The latter enhances convection by reducing the
406: adverse effect of the Soret generated concentration variations.
407:
408: There occurs an ``S''-shaped deformation of the unstable part
409: of the TW bifurcation branch [dashed (blue) line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}]
410: when the advection velocity $w_{max}$ has grown to become equal
411: to the TW phase velocity $v_p$. Then the first
412: closed streamlines appear \cite{HL98} in the frame of reference
413: that is comoving with the TW phase velocity and where
414: the TW solution is time independent.
415: This is indeed a characteristic feature of strongly nonlinear TW convection, cf.
416: further below.
417:
418: For $w_{max}<|v_p|$, i.e.,
419: closer to the threshold $r_{osc}$ all streamlines are open and the field structures
420: look almost harmonic -- see the TW1 plot in Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct}.
421: This weakly nonlinear TW, marked by an open circle in
422: Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}, is just at the border $w_{max} \simeq |v_p|$.
423: This condition marks also the border line beyond which a straightforward
424: small-amplitude expansion around the convective onset breaks down \cite{HBL97}.
425: In addition the generic {\em transient growth} dynamics of
426: oscillatory convection (consisting initially of oppositely traveling waves of
427: roughly equal velocity amplitudes $|A_R| \simeq |A_L|$)
428: undergoes a dramatic change that cannot be described at all with
429: amplitude equation models when the flow amplitudes $|A_{R,L}|$ approach
430: the border line value of $\omega/k$ \cite{FL}.
431:
432: The qualitative change in the flow topology between weakly and strongly nonlinear
433: TWs causes a different mixing behavior with increasing amplitude. This is the
434: reason for the
435: ``S''-shaped deformation of the unstable part
436: of the TW bifurcation branch [dashed (blue) line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}].
437: It becomes more pronounced with $\psi$ becoming more negative (see e.g.
438: Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW}). Eventually the strongly nonlinear TW solution branch
439: develops a
440: bistable part there on which fast TWs are located \cite{HBL97,LBBFHJ98}.
441:
442: For relaxed TWs with $0<|v_p|<w_{max}$ the remaining open streamlines are
443: spatially correlated
444: with inner boundary layers of the concentration field.
445: As indicated in the TW2 of Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct} they meander along the
446: (green) regions of mean concentration,
447: $\delta C = 0$, between and around the roll-like regions of closed streamlines.
448: In a right-propagating TW the regions of
449: closed streamlines for the right (left) turning fluid domains are
450: rich (poor) in the lighter component - here ethanol - and they are
451: displaced towards the upper cold (lower
452: warm) plate, where the Soret effect maintains a boundary layer with
453: alcohol surplus (deficiency). In addition the meandering open streamlines lie
454: between the upper (lower) closed streamline regions and the opposite bottom (top)
455: concentration boundary layer. This structure of closed and open streamlines causes
456: the top (bottom) boundary layer to feed high (low) concentration
457: only into the right (left) turning roll domain at the location of
458: downflow (upflow). Then the fluid becomes
459: diffusively homogenized in the closed streamline regions of the rolls
460: leading to anharmonic concentration
461: profiles of trapezoidal shape shown in the top plot of the left column of
462: Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct}.
463: The motion of the rolls with their specific concentration distribution implies
464: a mean concentration current
465: which is directed to the right in the upper and to the left in the lower half of
466: the layer. See refs. \cite{BLHK89,BLK92,BLKS95I} for a more detailed discussion
467: of this current.
468:
469: With increasing $w_{max}$ and decreasing $|v_p|$
470: the regions of closed streamlines grow at the expense of the open ones. Thereby,
471: the former also come closer to the respective opposing boundary layer. This
472: decreases the asymmetry of the boundary layer
473: feeding into oppositely turning rolls. As a consequence the
474: concentration contrast between adjacent TW rolls decreases until in the SOC
475: state with $v_p=0$ the rolls are fed symmetrically by both boundary layers and
476: mirror symmetry between the rolls is established.
477:
478: %----------------Sec. IIIB -----------------------------------------------------
479: \subsection{Symmetries}
480: \label{Sec:Symmetries}
481: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
482:
483: SOCs and SWs are laterally mirror symmetric around positions
484: of maximal up- and downflow, e.g. $x$=0 in Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct},
485: and the node locations of the fields
486: are fixed in time. This symmetry is broken in TWs -- see, e.g., the
487: concentration
488: contrast between left and right turning rolls in Fig.~\ref{Fig:comparestruct}.
489: But all fields of SOCs, SWs, and TWs have at every
490: instant definite parity under the mirror-glide (MG) operation $(x,z)\to
491: (x+\lambda/2,-z)$ of vertical reflection at mid-height, $z$=0, combined with
492: lateral translation by half a wavelength. We did not observe SWs without
493: this symmetry -- perturbations breaking it that we introduced for test
494: purposes always decayed rapidly to zero.
495:
496: Furthermore, all transients investigated in \cite{FL} obeyed the MG symmetry
497: with the exception of the very early stage in cases where the imposed initial
498: conditions were not MG symmetric. But even then
499: the MG symmetry was rapidly restored by a fast decay of MG symmetry-breaking
500: modes. Also the transient growth seen in the experiments in an annular
501: geometry by Winkler and Kolodner \cite{WK92} was locally MG symmetric.
502: A time dependent generalization
503: of this symmetry was found to be realized in LTW
504: states \cite{LTW} and an extension to 3D patterns was observed in
505: \cite{JHL98}. Furthermore, MG symmetric convective structures
506: were not only observed in Soret
507: driven convection with only temperature gradients imposed but also in
508: thermosolutal convection \cite{STK98}.
509:
510: Thus, the MG symmetry that is displayed by the basic conductive state
511: and by the linear critical convective modes seems to
512: be quite robust and also persistent in non-linear
513: convective structures of pure fluids and of mixtures.
514: The robustness of this symmetry is remarkable
515: given that the nonlinearity in the concentration balance, i.e.,
516: the Peclet number $w/L$ is quite large -- of the order of 1000.
517: However, the concentration field is ``tamed'' by being coupled to
518: the velocity and temperature fields. Their shape
519: remains mostly harmonic for small
520: supercritical thermal driving like in pure fluid convection. And thus the
521: increase in structural
522: complexity associated with a MG symmetry breaking does not occur.
523:
524: Finally, the SW fields start at onset to have in addition a
525: definite mirror-timeshift symmetry (MTS), e.g., $f(x,z,t)=-f(x,-z,t+\tau/2)$
526: for $f=\delta C,\delta T$, and the vertical velocity field $w$ with
527: $\tau=2\pi/\omega$ being the SW oscillation period. At mid-height the
528: condition $f(t)=-f(t+\tau/2)$ implies in particular that positive and negative
529: field extrema of an oscillation cycle have equal magnitudes.
530: SWs with smaller frequency that are located in the end region of the SW solution
531: branches break this symmetry (cf. Sec.~\ref{Sec:SW}). This is a prerequisite for
532: period doubling \cite{SW84}.
533:
534:
535: %*****************Transient ***********************************************
536: \subsection{Supercritical growth and SW$\to$TW transition}
537: \label{Sec:transient}
538: %****************************************************************
539: Here we review the supercritical spatiotemporal behavior of SW transients.
540: We start from the quiescent conductive state at $r<r_{osc}$, disturb it
541: slightly by adding small random numbers in the range of
542: $\left[ -10^{-4}, 10^{-4}\right]$, and
543: simultaneously increase the control
544: parameter $r$ slightly above threshold as indicated in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}.
545: Then one observes a
546: generic transition scenario that occurs similarly also in analogous
547: experiments. It consists of three evolution phases that we have found to be
548: generic for convective growth out of small unspecific perturbations:
549: ({\it i}) an exponentially growing SW of high frequency over a time interval
550: the length of which depends on the size of the initial perturbations of the
551: conductive state, ({\it ii}) an intermediate phase that is always very short
552: with a spatiotemporally
553: complicated transformation from SW into a high-frequency TW and finally
554: ({\it iii}) a long-term TW transient to a low-frequency,
555: strongly nonlinear, relaxed TW or SOC state depending on $r$ \cite{FL}.
556:
557: In generic, i.e., non specific initial perturbations that break the
558: mirror symmetry
559: $x \to - x$ only weakly the two critical oscillatory modes of right and left
560: traveling waves that can grow above the Hopf
561: threshold are contained with roughly equal
562: amplitudes, i.e., $|A_R| \simeq |A_L|$.
563: Thus, initially, i.e., as long as linear theory applies, the two critical TW modes
564: that started with $|A_R| \simeq |A_L|$ grow
565: exponentially and independently of each other with the same growth rate; and their
566: superposition causes SW-like oscillations with
567: the large critical frequency as in Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} a. Hence, ``almost''
568: mirror symmetric experimental
569: setups that do not favor a particular TW propagation direction cause an initial
570: growth phase with SW characteristics \cite{WK92}.
571:
572: But then a competition between the two TW constituents sets in
573: when the advective nonlinearities have become sufficiently strong. They amplify
574: the mirror-symmetry breaking differences between $|A_R|$ and $|A_L|$ and cause
575: the decay of the minority TW. Thus, the SW, which still has a large
576: frequency, is transformed into a fast TW (Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} b -h). This
577: SW $\to$ TW transformation being
578: advection driven is spatiotemporally complicated, in particular for the
579: concentration field and it implies a dramatic redistribution of concentration by
580: advective ``rolling in'' of concentration (Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} c -g).
581: It takes place within less than one vertical thermal diffusion time and it
582: starts roughly when the flow amplitudes of
583: the two constituent TWs have grown to about the phase velocity $v_p$:
584: First, concentration is advected up- and downwards in the form of plumes by the
585: growing SW-like
586: flow that reverts periodically its direction; the vertical concentration
587: gradient being still as large as that of the quiescent conductive state.
588: The SW $\to$ TW transformation is triggered by an advective wave breaking
589: and wave toppling process of the crests and troughs of the concentration wave
590: (Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} c -d),
591: whereas the waves of $w$ and $\delta T$ do not undergo substantial structural
592: changes. Advective nonlinearities have by now
593: become sufficiently strong to make the mirror-symmetry-breaking
594: differences between the original, left and right propagating TW constituents of
595: the SW clearly visible. When the concentration wave crests (troughs) with a
596: high (low) alcohol content bend and topple, they
597: are advectively ``rolled in''.
598:
599: The flow induced sequence of first deforming,
600: then bending, and finally rolling in the plume-like wave crests and troughs is
601: associated with and driven by a growth of the spatial phase shift between
602: velocity and concentration field from zero
603: to about $\lambda/4$ during the SW $\to$ TW transformation: In the SW
604: the spatial location of the nodes of $\delta C$ and $w$ coincide while their
605: oscillations
606: are shifted in time by about a quarter of an oscillation period. The value
607: of this phase difference, $\varphi_C - \varphi_w \simeq \pi/2$, does not change
608: during the whole transition sequence
609: but in the TW, it also implies a spatial shift of $\delta C$ and $w$ of $\lambda/4$.
610:
611: In the early TW phase (Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} h)
612: the lateral concentration difference between adjacent roll like regions is still almost as large as the initial
613: vertical concentration contrast in the conductive state. Thus, the frequency and
614: the phase velocity of this emerging TW are still very large, i.e.,
615: not much smaller than the critical values. But then for the parameters
616: of Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} a long-term TW transient to a
617: low-frequency, strongly nonlinear and strongly anharmonic relaxed TW state
618: (Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient} i) sets in:
619: slow diffusion degrades and homogenizes the concentration striations,
620: the spatial extension over which $\delta C$ is
621: constant at the two alternating high and low levels increases, the plateau height
622: decreases, the width of boundary layers between these plateaus shrinks, the
623: $\delta C$-wave profile becomes more and more trapezoidal, and the
624: alcohol surplus (deficiency) in the cold top (warm bottom) part of the fluid layer
625: decreases, thereby reducing the overall vertical concentration difference between
626: top and bottom. This longtime degradation of concentration gradients is reflected
627: by a dramatic decrease of the mixing number $M$ and with it of
628: the frequency $\omega$ relative to the initial values --- the better the fluid
629: becomes mixed the smaller is $\omega$.
630:
631: %***************** SWs ******************************************
632: \subsection{Standing waves}
633: \label{Sec:SW}
634: %****************************************************************
635:
636: TW and LTW convection has been studied
637: experimentally and theoretically in detail
638: \cite{review,Ahlers,Behringer,Kolodner,Platten,Steinberg,Surko,Yahata,Knobloch,JL02}.
639: But little is known about
640: nonlinear SW states beyond a weakly nonlinear analysis
641: \cite{SZ93} that is restricted to the immediate vicinity of
642: the oscillatory threshold. It showed that SWs are unstable there, typically
643: bifurcating backwards.
644:
645: In order to obtain the solution branch, we stabilize the SW states by suppressing
646: phase propagation
647: (so TWs can not compete against SWs) and, if necessary, by
648: exerting a control procedure. The latter operates via the field amplitudes or the
649: heat current injected into the fluid and the Rayleigh number in response to the
650: instantaneous frequency $\omega$ and its temporal derivative $\Delta \omega /
651: \Delta t$ , respectively \cite{control}. In this way we
652: trace out the SW solution branch all the way from close to onset with large
653: frequency to slowly oscillating SWs that eventually period-double into chaos.
654:
655: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWBifprops} shows the bifurcation behavior of SWs and how it changes
656: with varying Soret coupling strength. The solution branch
657: for the SOC is included for comparison only for $\psi=-0.03$.
658: The heating range in which SWs exist increases when $\psi$ becomes more
659: negative since the oscillatory bifurcation threshold $r_{osc}$ is shifted
660: stronger to higher $r$ than the SW saddle-node positions at $r_s^{SW}$ which marks the
661: lower end of the $r$-interval containing SWs. All these SWs bifurcate
662: subcritically out of the conductive state as unstable solutions. They
663: become stable via saddle-node bifurcations when the phase-pinning condition is
664: imposed. However, when
665: this condition is lifted completely then SWs decay by developing TW
666: transients since any spatial phase difference between $\delta C$ and $w$ causes the extrema of
667: the latter to be "pulled" towards the solutally shifted buoyancy extrema.
668: Depending on $r$ these transients either end in a nonlinear TW or SOC or the
669: conductive state.
670:
671: Moving along an SW branch the maximal
672: vertical upflow velocity $w_{max}$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWBifprops}(a)] does not
673: increase monotonically as in TWs and SOCs but rather has a maximum somewhat
674: below the respective SOC value before it drops again. On the other
675: hand, $\omega$ and $M$ decrease monotonically starting with the Hopf
676: frequency $\omega_{H}$ [upper end of the curves in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWBifprops}(b)]
677: and $M=1$, respectively, at onset. This variation follows
678: the universal scaling law $\omega/\omega_H \simeq M$, cf. Fig.~\ref{Fig:Mvsom}.
679:
680: The typical bifurcation behaviour of two representative SWs of
681: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWBifprops} with $\psi$=-0.03 and -0.25 is
682: displayed in more detail in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}. Full (dashed) lines refer
683: to stable (unstable)
684: branches. Note that the large-amplitude upper SOC solution branches
685: [the one for $\psi$=-0.03 is shown
686: explicitly in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(a)] are stable down to their respective
687: saddle-nodes when phase propagation is
688: suppressed so that TW solutions do not exist.
689: Then, the SW solutions, too, change their stability at saddle-node bifurcation(s),
690: one for $\psi$=-0.03
691: at $r^{SW}_{s}\approx1.0373$ and three for $\psi$=-0.25 [two of them can be seen in
692: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(b) at $r^{SW}_{s}\approx1.1238$].
693: With increasing $r$ the flow amplitude of the stable SW slightly decreases. Then
694: the MTS breaks. Thereafter, for example, the downflow (upflow) extrema occurring
695: in the SW oscillations, say, at $x$=0
696: ($\pm \lambda/2)$ are more intense than the upflow (downflow) extrema. This is
697: reflected by the first splitting of the SW solution branches in
698: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}.
699: Consequently, the time averaged fields have now a net SOC-like structure
700: with non zero mean downflow (upflow), say, at $x$=0 ($\pm\lambda/2)$.
701:
702: In Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace} we show for $\psi=-0.03$ how MTS breaking
703: changes the SW phase dynamics using $w,\dot w$ at the mid position $x=0=z$ and
704: $M$ as characteristic local and global quantities, respectively.
705: By definition $M$ oscillates with twice the SW frequency as
706: long as MTS holds (dash-dotted lines in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace}).
707: The particular MTS-broken SW orbits of
708: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace} move closer to the low-amplitude fixed point
709: on the lower SOC solution branch of Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(a) with downflow at
710: $x=0$, so the SW spends more time in the downflow phase at $x=0$ than in the upflow
711: phase. This can be seen more clearly in the temporal
712: oscillation profile of $w$ (Fig.~4 in \cite{MDL}) ; it develops a plateau close to
713: the value of the corresponding SOC fixed point.
714:
715: Then, at a certain $r$ depending on $\psi$, the first period-doubling
716: occurs followed by further subsequent period-doublings that lead
717: to chaos (Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling} and Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace}).
718: For stronger Soret coupling, i.e. $\psi=-0.25$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(b)], we
719: could also resolve
720: a $r$-window with period-3 SW states and subsequent period doublings.
721:
722: Beyond the last chaotic windows, we did not observe any stable SWs: heating
723: above this threshold leads to the development of transients into a stable,
724: large-amplitude SOC on the {\em upper} solution branch [e.g., with amplitude
725: $w_{SOC} \simeq 2.51$ in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(a), i.e., well outside the plot
726: range of Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace}].
727:
728: Thus, here the question arises whether -- and if so -- how and how long the
729: heteroclinic orbits
730: connecting the two unstable symmetry degenerate SOC fixed points on the lower
731: solution branch with small convection amplitudes ($w_{SOC} \simeq 0.71$ in
732: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace}) organize
733: and restrain the dynamics of the periodic and chaotic SWs that switch
734: between up- and downflow.
735:
736: %\newpage
737: %*****************LTWs***********************************************
738: \section{Localized traveling waves}
739: \label{Sec:LTW}
740: %****************************************************************
741:
742: LTWs consist of wave trains of traveling convection rolls which are surrounded
743: by quiescent fluid \cite{exp,LTW,Y91_NHY96,JL02}. There exist several attemps to
744: model LTWs by weakly nonlinear small-amplitude expansions
745: around the convective onset \cite{vSH92,FT90} and modifications thereof
746: \cite{DB90,BH90,Riecke92}.
747: But due to the strongly nonlinear characteristics of LTWs these models
748: are aimed at some qualitative aspects of LTW states.
749:
750: Here we investigate stable LTWs at subcritical driving,
751: $r<r_{osc}$, where the quiescent conductive surrounding is stable as well.
752:
753: The rolls grow out of this environment at the tail end of the
754: wave train, travel through the convective bulk of the LTW with increasing phase
755: velocity $v_p(x)$ and wavelength $\lambda(x)$,
756: and decay at the head of the wave train (cf. Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW}). These stable
757: LTW states are uniquely selected. Their width $l$ (or number of rolls) is
758: stationary and depends in an unique way on
759: the control parameters (cf. Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW}).
760: The whole convective region drifts through the motionless state
761: with a drift velocity $v_d$ that can be positive or negative but that is small
762: compared to the phase velocity \cite{JL02}.
763: Therefore, the frequency of a LTW is constant in a frame of reference that is
764: comoving with the LTW's drift.
765:
766: To characterize the concentration variations in a LTW we use a
767: local mixing number $M(x)$ that is defined similarly to the
768: case of extended states as the mean variance of $\delta C$.
769: But here the lateral average is
770: replaced by a time average at a fixed lateral position $x$,
771: \begin{equation}
772: \label{Eq:Mxdef}
773: M(x) = \sqrt{\langle \delta C^2\rangle / \langle \delta C^2_{\rm cond}\rangle} \,.
774: \end{equation}
775: So brackets denote here an average over $z$ and $t$ instead of $z$ and $x$ as in
776: Eq.~(\ref{eq:Mdef}).
777: Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW} (c) shows the variation of $M(x)$ over the convective region of a
778: typical long LTW. The relation between $M(x)$ and the local phase velocity $v_p(x)$
779: in the bulk of the LTW is the same as the relation between $M$ and $v_p=\omega/k$
780: for TWs.
781:
782: The smallest stable localized pulses have for each $\psi$ a minimal width of
783: about 5 rolls.
784: With increasing $r$ LTWs grow in width and amplitude and
785: $l$ diverges at a maximal driving $r_{max}$. Beyond this value,
786: LTWs of stationary width seem to be no longer possible. Thereafter, only transient
787: localized
788: convective regions can occur which keep expanding between two fronts.
789:
790: As one can see in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW}
791: the existence interval of LTWs at fixed $\psi$ can be divided into two regimes:
792: In the regime of short pulses the frequency decreases with increasing $r$ and the amplitude
793: grows fast whereas in the regime of long LTWs the frequency increases with $r$ and
794: the amplitude grows only moderately.
795:
796: Short LTWs are dominated by a direct interaction between the growth part
797: and the decay part of the convection rolls.
798: Long LTWs are characterized by an extended bulk part where rolls travel with
799: phase velocity $v_p(x)$ that increases from tail to head. This corresponds to an
800: increasing local wavelength $\lambda(x)=2\pi v_p(x)/\omega$ since
801: the frequency $\omega$ is constant in the frame that is comoving
802: with $v_d$. The speeding up of $v_p(x)$ reflects
803: the growing concentration contrast between adjacent rolls along the $x$-direction:
804: The minimal mixing number is located in the growth region of the tail where
805: $v_p(x)$ and $\lambda(x)$ are minimal as well.
806: On their way from tail to head the rolls do not reach a stationary balance between
807: $\delta C$ injection from the different boundary layers
808: and advective mixing and diffusive homogenisation
809: of concentration differences on a constant level of small $M$.
810: Rather LTW rolls collapse at the head when $v_p$ has grown up to $w_{max}$
811: [right arrow in Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW} (b)]. Thereafter concentration is discharged and
812: sustains a barrier of $\langle \delta C \rangle$ ahead of the decay part which
813: stabilizes the conductive state there against invasion of convection.
814:
815: Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW} (b) and (c) compare the maximal flow velocities and the
816: frequencies of LTWs for several $\psi$ with the respective TW branch of
817: $\lambda\simeq 2$ for which the saddle location $r_s^{TW}$ is the lowest one.
818: Note that the LTW values for $w_{max}$ and $\omega$ always lie near the saddle
819: values of TWs.
820: Although there exist no extended TWs below the shown TW saddle positions
821: there exist stable LTWs ahead of these global TW saddles when $\psi$ is
822: sufficiently negative.
823: For example, for $\psi=-0.4$ almost all LTWs of finite width appear {\it below} the
824: existence region for TWs as can be observed in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW}.
825:
826: The intriguing existence of stable LTWs without coexisting TWs is ensured by a
827: flow-induced
828: lateral concentration redistribution over its convective bulk.
829: Positive ``blue'' (negative ``red'') concentration deviation from the global mean
830: is sucked from
831: the top (bottom) boundary layer into right (left) turning rolls as soon as they
832: become
833: nonlinear during their growth [left arrow in Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW} (b)].
834: Convection in the bulk of a (long) LTW shows all the characteristics of a
835: strongly nonlinear extended TW. Thus, as discussed in Sec.~\ref{Sec:Mixdiff},
836: positive (negative)
837: concentration is transported within the closed streamline regions predominantly
838: in the upper (lower) half away from the tail towards the head.
839: This lateral concentration transport is reflected in the time averaged
840: current
841: of $\delta C$ [cf. its streamlines in Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW}(e)].
842: At the same time, mean concentration, $\delta C \simeq 0$, migrates mostly to the
843: left along open velocity field streamlines
844: that meander between the closed roll regions [green regions in
845: Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW}(a)].
846: In this way a region with well mixed fluid, i.e., almost vanishing $\delta C$
847: is created and sustained under the tail.
848: This strongly nonlinear large scale concentration redistribution that maintains
849: the concentration locally at a homogeneous mean level under the trailing front
850: makes there the growth of convection possible: By reducing the stabilizing
851: concentration gradients the driving buoyancy force is
852: locally increased there to levels which suffice to cause convection
853: in a well-mixed fluid.
854:
855: Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW} (d)
856: shows that this effect causes the mean convectively generated $C$ profile
857: to extend
858: significantly further into the conductive region than the mean convective
859: temperature field.
860: Thus, the buoyancy $\langle b \rangle$ [cf. Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW} (d)] is determined
861: in the front regions predominantly
862: by the concentration field. This explains (i) the decrease of buoyancy below
863: conduction levels
864: ahead of the decay part with the associated restabilization of conduction there
865: and
866: (ii) the increase of $\langle b \rangle$ out of the conductive state at the tail
867: and
868: its strong overshoot over the bulk enabling convection growth even for heating $r$
869: where no stable extended TWs are possible.
870:
871:
872: %*****************LTWs***********************************************
873: \section{Conclusion}
874: \label{Sec:conclusion}
875: %****************************************************************
876:
877: Three oscillatory steady states of convection in binary fluid
878: mixtures like ethanol-water were investigated and compared numerically in a cross section
879: perpendicular to the roll axes:
880: Traveling waves, standing waves, and localized traveling waves.
881: In addition the supercritical growth of SWs out of perturbations and the
882: SW $\to$ TW transformation was elucidated.
883:
884: The full bifurcation behavior of TWs and SWs has been presented and their typical
885: concentration field structures are shown in detail.
886: Both extended oscillatory periodic patterns bifurcate subcritically out of the conductive
887: state in a common Hopf bifurcation. The decrease of the phase velocity or the frequency along the solution
888: branches is connected to the decrease of the mean $\delta C$ contrasts in the system
889: due to advective mixing.
890: Thereby, the different symmetries and flow topologies of TWs and SWs cause a different
891: behavior in the strongly nonlinear regime.
892: However frequencies and mixing numbers are always related to each other via the universal
893: scale relation $\omega/\omega_H \simeq M$.
894:
895: TWs are mirror-glide symmetric under $(x,z) \to (x+\lambda/2, -z)$.
896: At high amplitudes they are characterized
897: by the occurrence of closed streamlines in the frame comoving with the TW's phase
898: velocity. The regions of closed streamlines are displaced alternately towards the
899: upper and lower plates with their respective concentration boundary layers.
900: The latter feed selectively concentration only into the nearby closed streamline
901: domains
902: where it is homogenized. This leads to the characteristic
903: concentration distribution with homogeneous rolls of alternating signs in $\delta C$.
904: They are separated by meandering inner boundary layers of $\delta C \sim 0$ which are spatially
905: correlated with open streamlines of the velocity field.
906: With increasing amplitude the concentration contrasts between the rolls decrease, the
907: phase velocity slows down, and the TW ends at large amplitudes in a mirror symmetric
908: SOC state.
909:
910: SWs are always laterally mirror symmetric. The solution branch turns around at a saddle node
911: and becomes stable there under phase pinning conditions.
912: For strongly negative $\psi$ the stable part of the SW branch is directed towards lower amplitudes
913: -- in contrast to the TW case -- and develops further saddle nodes.
914: The complicated bifurcation behavior at low frequencies seems to be due to an interaction
915: with the unstable low amplitude SOC solutions. There is a breaking of the mirror-timeshift
916: symmetry which is a prerequisite for the following period doubling cascade into chaos.
917: Without phase pinning the SWs develop TW transients which end either in a nonlinear TW or a SOC state
918: depending on the parameters.
919: This mechanism is similar to the symmetry breaking of a weakly nonlinear SW during
920: its transient growth at supercritical heating towards a nonlinear TW.
921: The transition is characterized by a dramatic advective reorganization of the $\delta C$ field and therefore
922: of the buoyancy field within a short time interval.
923:
924: The only global symmetry operation for a LTW is the mirror-timeshift [$(x,z,t) \to (x,-z,t+\tau/2)$]
925: in the frame
926: which is comoving with its small drift velocity $v_d$. The structual properties of a generic
927: long LTW were presented as well as the global bifurcation behavior with $r$ for different
928: $\psi$.
929: For strongly negative separation ratios LTWs exist monostably at low heatings $r$ where no
930: extended TWs are possible.
931: This is ensured by a flow-induced lateral large scale redistribution of concentration
932: over its TW dominated convective bulk:
933: Thereby, concentration is maintained under the tail of the wave train at a homogeneous mean level.
934: This increases the driving buoyancy forces there locally to levels which suffice to cause convection.
935:
936:
937:
938: %---------------------------%---------------------------%---------------------------
939: %---------------------------%---------------------------%---------------------------
940:
941: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
942: %---------------------------
943: \bibitem{coupling}
944: For 5 weight percent of ethanol mixed into water at $T=20^{\circ} C$ the separation
945: ratio measuring the Soret coupling strength \cite{CH93} is
946: $\psi \simeq -0.3$ \cite{KWM88}.
947: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
948: \bibitem{CH93}
949: M.~C.~Cross and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
950: %{\it Pattern Formation Outside of Equilibrium},
951: Rev.~Mod.~Phys.~{\bf 65}, 851 (1993) and references cited therein.
952: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
953: \bibitem{KWM88}
954: P.~Kolodner, H.~L.~Williams, and C.~Moe,
955: %{\it Optical Measurement of the Soret Coefficient of Ethanol-Water Solutions},
956: J.~Chem.\ Phys.~{\bf 88}, 6512 (1988).
957: %---------------------------62
958: \bibitem{WKPS85}
959: R.~W.~Walden, P.~Kolodner, A.~Passner, and C.~M.~Surko,
960: %{\it Traveling waves and chaos in convection in binary mistures}
961: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 55}, 496 (1985).
962: %---------------------------
963: \bibitem{review}
964: See ref.~\cite{CH93} and references, e.g., in \cite{LBBFHJ98,FL}.
965: %---------------------------
966: \bibitem{Ahlers}
967: R.~Heinrichs, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
968: %{\it Traveling Waves and Spatial Variation in the Convection of a Binary Mixture},
969: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf A} 35, 2761 (1987);
970: K.~Lerman, D.~S.~Cannell, and G.~Ahlers,
971: % Analysis of transients for binary mixture convection in cylindrical geometry
972: Phys.~Rev.~E~{\bf 59}, 2975 (1999).
973: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
974: \bibitem{Behringer}
975: K.~E.~Anderson and R.~P.~Behringer,
976: % Traveling Wave Convection Patterns in an Annular Cell
977: Physica~D {\bf 51}, 444 (1991).
978: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
979: \bibitem{Kolodner}
980: B.~L.~Winkler and P.~Kolodner,
981: % Measurements of the Concentration Field in Nonlinear Traveling-Wave Convection
982: J.~Fluid~Mech.~{\bf 240}, 31 (1992);
983: P.~Kolodner,
984: % Stable, Unstable, and Defected Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection
985: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 2731 (1994).
986: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
987: \bibitem{Platten}
988: H.~Touiri, J.~K.~Platten, and G.~Chavepeyer,
989: %{\it Effect of the separation ratio on the transition between travelling waves and steady
990: %convection in the two-component Rayleigh-B\'enard problem},
991: Eur.~J.~Mech.~B {\bf15}, 241 (1996).
992: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
993: \bibitem{Steinberg}
994: E.~Moses, J.~Fineberg, and V.~Steinberg,
995: %{\it Multistability and Confined Traveling-Wave Patterns in a Convecting Binary Mixture},
996: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf A}35, 2757 (1987);
997: E.~Kaplan, E.~Kuznetsov, and V.~Steinberg,
998: %{\it Burst and collapse in traveling-wave convection of a binary fluid},
999: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 3712 (1994).
1000: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1001: \bibitem{Surko}
1002: C.~M.~Surko, D.~R.~Ohlsen, S.~Y.~Yamamoto, and P.~Kolodner,
1003: % Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection
1004: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 43}, 7101 (1991);
1005: C.~M.~Aegerter and C.~M.~Surko
1006: %{\it Effects of lateral boundaries on traveling-wave dynamics in binary fluid
1007: %convection}
1008: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 63}, 46301 (2001).
1009: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1010: \bibitem{Yahata}
1011: L.~Z.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1012: %{\it Formation Process of the Traveling-Wave State with a Defect in Binary Fluid Convection}
1013: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 98}, 551 (1997).
1014: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1015: \bibitem{Knobloch}
1016: O.~Batiste, E.~Knobloch, I.~Mercader, and M.~Net,
1017: %{\it Simulations of Oscillatory Binary Fluid Convection in Large Aspect-Ratio Containers}
1018: Phys.~Rev.~E.~{\bf 65}, 016303 (2001).
1019: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1020: \bibitem{JL02}
1021: D.~Jung and M.~L\"ucke,
1022: %{\it Localized waves without the existence of extended waves:
1023: % Oscillatory convection of binary mixtures with a strong Soret effect}
1024: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 89}, 054502 (2002).
1025: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1026: \bibitem{FL}
1027: C. F\"utterer and M. L\"ucke,
1028: %{\it Growth of binary fluid convection: the role of the concentration field}
1029: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 65}, 036315 (2002).
1030: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1031: \bibitem{MDL}
1032: P.~Matura, D.~Jung, and M. L\"ucke,
1033: %{\it Standing wave oscillations in binary mixture convection: from the onset via
1034: %symmetry breaking to period doubling into chaos}
1035: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 92}, 254501 (2004).
1036: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1037: \bibitem{LL66}
1038: L.~D.~Landau and E.~M.~Lifschitz,
1039: {\it Hydrodynamik},
1040: (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1966).
1041: %---------------------------
1042: \bibitem{PL84}
1043: J.~K.~Platten and J.~C.~Legros,
1044: {\it Convection in Liquids},
1045: (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
1046: %---------------------------
1047: \bibitem{BLKS95I}
1048: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, M.~Kamps, and R.~Schmitz,
1049: %{\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures. I. Extended Traveling-Wave and Stationary States},
1050: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 51}, 5636 (1995).
1051: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1052: \bibitem{HLL92}
1053: W.~Hort, S.~J.~Linz, and M.~L\"ucke,
1054: % Onset of Convection in Binary Gas Mixtures: The Role of the Dufour Effect
1055: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 45}, 3737 (1992).
1056: %---------------------------
1057: \bibitem{HL95}
1058: St.~Hollinger and M.~L\"ucke,
1059: %{\it Influence of the Dufour effect on convection in inary gas mixtures}
1060: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 52}, 642 (1995).
1061: %---------------------------
1062: \bibitem{LA96}
1063: J. L. Liu and G. Ahlers,
1064: % Spiral--Defect Chaos in Rayleigh--B\'enard Convection with Small Prandtl Numbers
1065: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 77}, 3126 (1996).
1066: %---------------------------4334
1067: \bibitem{LLT83}
1068: G. W. T. Lee, P. Lucas, and A. Tyler,
1069: % Onset of Rayleigh-B\'enard Convection in Binary Liquid Mixtures of $^{3}$He in $^{4}$He
1070: J.~Fluid~Mech. {\bf 135}, 235 (1983).
1071: %---------------------------44
1072: \bibitem{osc-inst}
1073: The oscillatory instability is not primarily due to concentration
1074: diffusion being small: even if the diffusive time scales for momentum, heat,
1075: and concentration are the same ($L = \sigma = 1$) there are oscillations.
1076: They are caused by a
1077: sufficiently strong "off diagonal" Soret coupling between the degrees of
1078: freedom of concentration and temperature and their feedback into the
1079: buoyancy.
1080: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
1081: \bibitem{MAC-SOLA}
1082: %F.~H.~Harlow and J.~E.~Welch,
1083: %{\it Numerical Calculation of Time Dependent Viscous Flow or
1084: %Fluid with Free Surfaces},
1085: %Phys.\ Fluids~{\bf 8}, 2183 (1965);
1086: J.~E.~Welch, F.~H.~Harlow, J.~P.~Shannon, and B.~J.~Daly,
1087: %{\it The MAC-Method: A Computing Technique for Solving Viscous,
1088: %Incompressible, Transient Fluid-Flow Problems Involving
1089: %Free Surfaces},
1090: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University
1091: of California, Report No. LA-3425, 1966 (unpublished);
1092: C.~W.~Hirt, B.~D.~Nichols, and N.~C.~Romero,
1093: %{\it SOLA --- A Numerical Solution Algorithm for
1094: %Transient Fluid Flow},
1095: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University
1096: of California, Report No. LA-5852, 1975 (unpublished).
1097: %---------------------------4536
1098: \bibitem{PT83}
1099: R.~Peyret and T.~D.~Taylor,
1100: {\it Computational Methods in Fluid Flow}
1101: (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
1102: %-------------------------------------------------------------
1103: \bibitem{HL02}
1104: B.~Huke and M. L\"ucke,
1105: %{\it Convective patterns in binary fluid mixtures with positive separation ratio}
1106: in {\it Thermal nonequilibrium phenomena in fluid mixtures},
1107: edited by W.~K\"ohler and S.~Wiegand, Lecture Notes in Physics,
1108: {\bf 584} (Springer, Berlin, 2002), p. 334.
1109: %---------------------------46
1110: \bibitem{CJT97}
1111: For a discretization of dx=1/20 (dx=1/40) the
1112: threshold for a one-component fluid is $R_c^0$ = 1686 ($R_c^0$ = 1702);
1113: Ch.~Jung,
1114: %{\it Numerische Simulationen dreidimensionaler Konvektionsstrukturen in bin\"aren Fluiden mit positiver Soretkopplung},
1115: Ph.~D.~thesis, Universit\"at des Saarlandes, Saarbr\"ucken, 1997.
1116: %---------------------------47
1117: \bibitem{reviewCF}
1118: For a review see \cite{PL84,CH93}. Further references may be found,
1119: e.g., in \cite{BLKS95I,LBBFHJ98}. See also the more recent publications
1120: \cite{KKS94a,KGW90-KFK99,TPC96,NHY97b,LCA99,AS01,BNMK01} of some of the many
1121: groups that have investigated convection in binary mixtures.
1122: %---------------------------5
1123: \bibitem{LBBFHJ98}
1124: M. L\"ucke, W. Barten, P. B\"uchel, C. F\"utterer, St. Hollinger, and Ch. Jung,
1125: %{\it Pattern Formation in Binary Fluid Convection and in Systems with Throughflow}
1126: in {\it Evolution of Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems},
1127: edited by F. H. Busse and S. C. M\"uller, Lecture Notes in Physics, {\bf m55}
1128: (Springer, Berlin,1998), p. 127.
1129: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1130: \bibitem{HL98}
1131: St.~Hollinger and M.~L\"ucke,
1132: % Influence of the Soret effect on convection of binary fluids,
1133: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 57}, 4238 (1998).
1134: %---------------------------48
1135: \bibitem{KKS94a}
1136: E.~Kaplan, E.~Kuznetsov, and V.~Steinberg,
1137: %{\it Burst and collapse in traveling-wave convection of a binary fluid},
1138: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 3712 (1994).
1139: %---------------------------63
1140: \bibitem{KGW90-KFK99}
1141: P.~Kolodner, J.~A.~Glazier, and H.~Williams,
1142: %{\it Dispersive Chaos in One-Dimensional Traveling-Wave Convection}
1143: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 65}, 1579 (1990);
1144: P.~Kolodner, G.~Fl\"atgen, and I.~G.~Kevrekidis,
1145: %{\it Controlling dispersive chaos in binary-fluid convection},
1146: {\it ibid} {\bf 83}, 730 (1999).
1147: %---------------------------25
1148: \bibitem{TPC96}
1149: H.~Touiri, J.~K.~Platten, and G.~Chavepeyer,
1150: %{\it Effect of the separation ratio on the transition between travelling waves and steady
1151: %convection in the two-component Rayleigh-B\'enard problem},
1152: Eur.~J.~Mech.~B {\bf15}, 241 (1996).
1153: %---------------------------7
1154: \bibitem{NHY97b}
1155: L.~Z.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1156: %{\it Formation Process of the Traveling-Wave State with a Defect in Binary Fluid Convection}
1157: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 98}, 551 (1997).
1158: %---------------------------29
1159: \bibitem{LCA99}
1160: K.~Lerman, E.~Bodenschatz, D.~S.~Cannell, and G.~Ahlers,
1161: %{\it Transient Localized States in 2D Binary Liquid Convection},
1162: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 70}, 3572 (1993);
1163: K.~Lerman, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
1164: %{\it Different convection dynamics in mixtures with the same separation ratio}
1165: Phys.~Rev.~E~{\bf 53}, R2041 (1996);
1166: K.~Lerman, D.~S.~Cannell, and G.~Ahlers,
1167: % Analysis of transients for binary mixture convection in cylindrical geometry
1168: {\it ibid} {\bf 59}, 2975 (1999).
1169: %---------------------------26
1170: \bibitem{AS01}
1171: C.~M.~Aegerter and C.~M.~Surko
1172: %{\it Effects of lateral boundaries on traveling-wave dynamics in binary fluid
1173: %convection}
1174: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 63}, 46301 (2001).
1175: %---------------------------27
1176: \bibitem{BNMK01}
1177: O.~Batiste, M.~Net, I.~Mercader, and E.~Knobloch,
1178: %{\it Oscillatory Binary Fluid Convection in Large Aspect-Ratio Containers}
1179: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 86}, 2309 (2001).
1180: %---------------------------32
1181: \bibitem{HBL97}
1182: St.~Hollinger, P.~B\"uchel, and M.~L\"ucke,
1183: % Bistability of Slow and Fast Traveling Waves in Fluid Mixtures
1184: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~ {\bf 78}, 235 (1997).
1185: %---------------------------49
1186: \bibitem{BLHK89}
1187: W.~Barten, M.~L\"{u}cke, W.~Hort, and M.~Kamps,
1188: %! {\it Fully Developed Traveling Wave Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures},
1189: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.~{\bf 63}, 373 (1989).
1190: %---------------------------8
1191: \bibitem{BLK92}
1192: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, and M.~Kamps,
1193: %{\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures. I.~ Extended Traveling-Wave and Stationary States},
1194: Physica~D {\bf 61}, 183 (1992).
1195: %---------------------------12
1196: \bibitem{WK92}
1197: B.~L.~Winkler and P.~Kolodner,
1198: % Measurements of the Concentration Field in Nonlinear Traveling-Wave Convection
1199: J.~Fluid~Mech.~ {\bf 240}, 31 (1992).
1200: %---------------------------16
1201: \bibitem{LTW}
1202: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, and M.~Kamps,
1203: %{\it Localized Traveling-Wave Convection in Binary-Fluid Mixtures}
1204: Phys.~Rev.~Lett {\bf 66}, 2621 (1991);
1205: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, M.~Kamps, and R.~Schmitz,
1206: %{\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures: II. Localized Traveling Waves},
1207: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 51}, 5662 (1995).
1208: %---------------------------5042
1209: \bibitem{JHL98}
1210: Ch.~Jung, B.~Huke, and M.~L\"ucke,
1211: %{\it Subharmonic bifurcation cascade of pattern oscillations caused by winding
1212: % number increasing entrainment}
1213: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.~{\bf 81}, 3651 (1998).
1214: %---------------------------5143
1215: \bibitem{STK98}
1216: A.~Spina, J.~Toomre, and E.~Knobloch,
1217: %{\it Confined states in large-aspect-ratio thermosolutal convection}
1218: Phys.~Rev.~E~{\bf 57}, 524 (1998).
1219: %---------------------------52
1220: \bibitem{SW84}
1221: J.~W.~Swift and K.~Wiesenfeld,
1222: %{\it Suppression of period doubling in symmetric systems}
1223: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 52}, 705 (1984).
1224: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1225: \bibitem{SZ93}
1226: W.~Sch\"opf and W.~Zimmermann,
1227: Phys.\ Rev.~E {\bf 47}, 1739 (1993).
1228: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1229: \bibitem{control}
1230: We drive the system towards the unstable limit cycle (ULC) with frequency
1231: $\omega_\ast$ that is located on the subcritical SW solution branch as follows:
1232: To reduce deviations with growing (decreasing) convection
1233: amplitude $A$ that decrease (increase) $\omega$ at fixed $r$ we set
1234: $A_{n+1}=A_n [1 + W_A(\omega - \omega_\ast)]$. Furthermore, when
1235: $\Delta \omega / \Delta t$ is negative (positive) we move towards
1236: the SW solution branch by decreasing (increasing) $r$ according to
1237: $r_{n+1}=r_n (1 + W_r \Delta \omega / \Delta t)$. The control depends on the
1238: actual values of $\omega - \omega_\ast$ and $\Delta \omega / \Delta t$ and
1239: vanishes only at the ULC with the preselected frequency $\omega_\ast$. The
1240: optimal weight factors $W_A$ and $W_r$ depend on $\omega_\ast$.
1241: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1242: \bibitem{exp}
1243: E.~Moses, J.~Fineberg, and V.~Steinberg,
1244: %{\it Multistability and Confined Traveling-Wave Patterns in a Convecting Binary Mixture},
1245: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf A35}, 2757 (1987);
1246: R.~Heinrichs, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
1247: %{\it Traveling Waves and Spatial Variation in the Convection of a Binary Mixture},
1248: {\it ibid.} 2761 (1987);
1249: P.~Kolodner, D.~Bensimon, and C.~M.~Surko,
1250: %{\it Traveling-Wave Convection in an Annulus},
1251: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.~{\bf 60}, 1723 (1988);
1252: J.~J.~Niemela, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
1253: %{\it Localized Traveling-Wave States in Binary Fluid Convection},
1254: {\it ibid.}~{\bf 64}, 1365 (1990).
1255:
1256: %D.~Bensimon, P.~Kolodner, C.~M.~Surko, H.~L.~Williams, and V.~Croquette,
1257: %{\it Competing and Coexisting Dynamical States of Traveling-Wave Convection in an Annulus},
1258: %J.~Fluid Mech.~{\bf 217}, 441 (1990);
1259: %C.~M.~Surko, D.~R.~Ohlsen, S.~Y.~Yamamoto, and P.~Kolodner,
1260: %{\it Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection},
1261: %Phys.\ Rev.\ A{\bf43}, 7101 (1991);
1262: %P.~Kolodner,
1263: %{\it Stable, Unstable, and Defected Confined States of Traveling-Wave Convection},
1264: %Phys.\ Rev.~E{\bf 50}, 2731 (1994).
1265: %----------------------------------------------
1266: \bibitem{Y91_NHY96}
1267: H.~Yahata,
1268: %{\it Traveling Convection Rolls in a Binary Fluid Mixture},
1269: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.~{\bf 85}, 933 (1991);
1270: L.~Z.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1271: %{\it Localized Traveling Waves in Binary Fluid Convection}
1272: {\it ibid.} {\bf 96}, 669 (1996).
1273: %----------------------------------------------
1274: \bibitem{vSH92}
1275: W.~van~Saarloos and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
1276: %{\it Fronts, Pulses Sources and Sinks in Generalized Complex Ginzburg-Landau Equations},
1277: Physica~D{\bf 56}, 303 (1992);
1278: %----------------------------------------------
1279: \bibitem{FT90}
1280: % O.~Thual and S.~Fauve,
1281: % %{\it Localized Structures Generated by Subcritical Instabilities: Counterpropagating Waves},
1282: % J.~Phys.\ (France)~{\bf 49}, 1829 (1988);
1283: S.~Fauve and O.~Thual,
1284: %{\it Solitary Waves Generated by Subcritical Instabilities in Dissipative Systems},
1285: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.~{\bf 64}, 282 (1990);
1286: %----------------------------------------------
1287: \bibitem{DB90}
1288: R.~J.~Deissler and H.~R.~Brand,
1289: %{\it The Effect of Nonlinear Gradient Terms on Localized States near
1290: % a Weakly Inverted Bifurcation},
1291: Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 146}, 252 (1990);
1292: %----------------------------------------------
1293: \bibitem{BH90}
1294: M.~Bestehorn, R.~Friedrich, and H.~Haken,
1295: %{\it Traveling Waves and Pulses in a Two-Dimensional Large Aspect Ratio System},
1296: Phys.\ Rev.\ A{\bf 42}, 7195 (1990);
1297: %----------------------------------------------
1298: \bibitem{Riecke92}
1299: H.~Riecke,
1300: %{\it Self Trapping of Traveling-Wave Pulses in Binary Mixture Convection},
1301: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.~{\bf 68}, 301 (1992);
1302: %{\it Ginzburg-Landau Equation Coupled to a Concentration Field in Binary Mixture Convection},
1303: Physica~D{\bf 61}, 253 (1992).
1304: %----------------------------------------------
1305:
1306: \end{thebibliography}
1307:
1308: %----------------------------------------------%----------------------------------------------
1309: %----------------------------------------------%----------------------------------------------
1310:
1311: \clearpage
1312:
1313:
1314: %----------------- FIG1: Bif Uebersicht--------------------------------------------------
1315: \begin{figure}
1316: \includegraphics[clip=true,angle=0,width=12cm]{./FIG1.eps}
1317: \caption{Bifurcation properties of maximal vertical flow velocity $w_{max}$
1318: (a) and frequency $\omega$ (b) versus $r$ for representative relaxed nonlinear
1319: convective SOC, TW, SW, and LTW states. Full (dashed) lines refer to
1320: stable (unstable) states. Symbols identify the states that are discussed in
1321: more detail. TW and SW solutions bifurcate subcritically out of the conductive
1322: state at the oscillatory threshold $r_{osc}$ with common Hopf frequency.
1323: Vertical arrows indicate the supercritical transient of
1324: Fig.~\ref{Fig:transient}
1325: from a growing SW perturbation of the quiescent conductive state into a
1326: nonlinear TW. The wavelength of SOC, TW, and SW is $\lambda = 2$.
1327: Parameters are $L = 0.01, \sigma = 10, \psi = -0.25$.}
1328: \label{Fig:BifUebersicht}
1329: \end{figure}
1330: %----------------- FIG2: TWonsetsaddles --------------------------------------------------
1331: \begin{figure*}
1332: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=12cm,angle=0]{./FIG2.eps}
1333: \caption{Wave number dependence of TWs at onset and at their saddle-nodes
1334: for different $\psi$.
1335: (a) Phase velocities $v_p(k)$ at the onset (straight lines) and at the
1336: saddle (dashed lines).
1337: (b) Location of the onset $r_{osc}(k)$ (straight lines) and of the saddle-nodes
1338: $r_{s}^{TW}(k)$ (dashed lines) for TW branches in the $k-r$-plane.
1339: The dotted line marks the onset of SOCs in pure fluids.
1340: Parameters are $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$.
1341: \label{Fig:TWonsetsaddles}}
1342: \end{figure*}
1343: %----------------- FIG3: M vs omega--------------------------------------------------
1344: \begin{figure}
1345: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=15cm,angle=0]{./FIG3.eps}
1346: \caption{Mixing number $M$ versus reduced oscillation frequencies of TWs and SWs
1347: for various Soret coupling $\psi$. For SWs the time averaged mixing number is
1348: plotted. Here $\omega_H$ is the respective Hopf
1349: frequency at onset. Parameters are $ \lambda = 2, L = 0.01, \sigma = 10$.
1350: \label{Fig:Mvsom}}
1351: \end{figure}
1352: %----------------- FIG4: TW SW SOC comparison stuctures --------------------------------------------------
1353: \begin{figure}
1354: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=8.5cm,angle=-90]{./FIG4.eps}
1355: \caption{Concentration distribution of selected extended states in vertical
1356: cross-sections through the rolls. TW1(2) and SOC1(2) are
1357: states marked by open (filled) circles and triangles, respectively,
1358: in Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}. The SW refers to the lozenge in
1359: Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifUebersicht}. The top figure in the left column shows the
1360: lateral wave profiles of $\delta C,\delta T$, and $w$ at midheight, $z=0$, of
1361: the fluid layer in the TW2.
1362: Parameters are $ \psi = -0.25, L = 0.01, \sigma = 10, \lambda = 2$.
1363: \label{Fig:comparestruct}}
1364: \end{figure}
1365: %-----------------FIG5: SW - TW transient --------------------------------------------------
1366: \begin{figure}
1367: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=15cm,angle=0]{./FIG5.eps}
1368: \caption{Time ordered snapshots of the concentration redistribution in the SW$\to$TW
1369: transformation. The concentration distribution in a vertical cross section
1370: of the fluid layer is displayed for one wavelength.
1371: Full isoconcentration lines are shown for $\delta C>0$. Dashed lines are
1372: streamlines, i.e., tangents to
1373: the instantaneous velocity field. The final TW (j) propagates to the left.
1374: Parameters are
1375: $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$, $\psi = -0.25$, $r = 1.42$, and $\lambda = 2$.}
1376: \label{Fig:transient}
1377: \end{figure}
1378: %-----------------FIG6: SW Bifurcation properties --------------------------------------------------
1379: \begin{figure}
1380: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./FIG6.eps}
1381: \caption{Bifurcation properties of SWs for $\psi$= -0.03, -0.05, -0.1, -0.15,
1382: -0.2, -0.25, -0.3, -0.35, -0.4 (from left to right) : (a) Maximal
1383: vertical velocity $w_{max}$. (b) Frequency $\omega$. Unstable SWs bifurcate subcritically out of the
1384: quiescent conductive state [lower ends of the curves in (a); upper
1385: ends in (b)] and undergo stability changes via saddle-node
1386: bifurcations.
1387: The SOC solution branch is shown for the sake of clarity only for $\psi$= -0.03.
1388: SOC curves for the other $\psi$ are shifted slightly to the right.
1389: Parameters are
1390: $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$, and $\lambda = 2$.}
1391: \label{Fig:SWBifprops}
1392: \end{figure}
1393: %-----------------FIG7: SW Period-doubling --------------------------------------------------
1394: \begin{figure}
1395: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{./FIG7.eps}
1396: \caption{Details of the SW bifurcation behavior for $\psi=-0.03$ (a) and
1397: $\psi=-0.25$ (b).
1398: The magnitude $|w_{extr}|$ of the extrema in the vertical flow is shown
1399: versus the reduced Rayleigh number $r$.
1400: The SWs bifurcate subcritically out of the quiescent conductive state at
1401: $r_{osc}$. When phase-pinning conditions are applied they become stable
1402: (solid lines) at saddle-nodes positions [lying outside the plot range of (b)].
1403: When the MTS is broken, the solid SW line
1404: splits into two since the magnitudes of the vertical flow extrema
1405: occurring during one oscillation cycle become different [see, e.g.,
1406: Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPhasespace} (b) where the downflow at $x=0=z$ is more intense
1407: than the upflow].
1408: This MTS-broken SW starts at the arrows to undergo a period-doubling scenario
1409: (cf. insets) leading to chaos.
1410: Parameters are $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$, and $\lambda = 2$.}
1411: \label{Fig:SWPdoubling}
1412: \end{figure}
1413: %-----------------FIG8: SW Phasespace --------------------------------------------------
1414: \begin{figure}
1415: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./FIG8.eps}
1416: \caption{MTS-breaking and period doubling in the phase space dynamics of SWs.
1417: Shown are $\dot w$ and the mixing number $M$ versus the vertical velocity $w$
1418: at $x=0=z$ for $\psi$=-0.03.
1419: In (a)-(g) the full (dash-dotted) lines refer to asymmetric (symmetric) SWs for which the MTS is (not yet)
1420: broken. Period doubling is displayed in (b)-(d) and in (f)-(g). A chaotic trajectory is shown in (h).
1421: Upwards and downwards
1422: pointing triangles indicate symmetry degenerate unstable SOC fixed
1423: points with upflow and downflow, respectively, at $x=0$ that lie on the low-amplitude
1424: SOC solution branch [dashed line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(a)]. The flow velocity
1425: on the stable large-amplitude
1426: SOC solution branch [full line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:SWPdoubling}(a)] is $w \simeq 2.51$ for
1427: the $r$-values displayed here.
1428: Parameters are $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$, and $\lambda = 2$.}
1429: \label{Fig:SWPhasespace}
1430: \end{figure}
1431: %----------------- FIG9: Bif LTW - TW --------------------------------------------------
1432: \begin{figure}
1433: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=15cm,angle=0]{./FIG9.eps}
1434: \caption{Bifurcation properties of LTWs (symbols) and TWs (lines) for different
1435: separation ratios $\psi$: (a) Full width $l$ of LTWs at half maximum of the
1436: envelope of the vertical velocity field $w$. (b) Maximal vertical flow
1437: velocity $w_{max}$. (c) Frequency (for LTWs in the frame comoving with the
1438: drift velocity $v_d$ of the respective LTW). Filled circles identify the LTW
1439: whose structure is shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTW}.
1440: Lines in (b, c) denote TWs with
1441: saddle-node wave number $k_s^{TW} \simeq \pi$.
1442: Unstable TWs (dashed lines; determined with a control
1443: method) bifurcate subcritically with large Hopf frequency $\omega_H$ at
1444: $r_{osc}$ out of the conductive state and become stable (solid lines) at
1445: the saddle-node $r_s^{TW}$ when lateral periodicity is imposed with
1446: $\lambda=2\pi/k$. Parameters are $L = 0.01, \sigma = 10$.
1447: \label{Fig:BifTW_LTW}}
1448: \end{figure}
1449: %-----------------FIG10: LTW --------------------------------------------------
1450: \begin{figure*}
1451: \includegraphics[width=12.0cm]{./FIG10.eps}
1452: \caption{Broad LTW of $l$=17.4 identified by filled circles in
1453: Fig.~\ref{Fig:BifTW_LTW}: (a) Snapshot of
1454: concentration deviation $\delta C$ from the global mean value in
1455: a vertical cross section of the layer. (b) Snapshots of lateral wave
1456: profiles at midheight, $z$=0, of $\delta C$, vertical
1457: velocity $w$, and its envelope. At the arrows $w_{max}=v_p$.
1458: (b) Mixing number $M(x)$,
1459: [Eq.~(\ref{Eq:Mxdef})] and phase velocity
1460: $v_p$ of nodes of $w(z=0)$ in the frame comoving with the small drift velocity $v_d$ of
1461: the LTW. The variation of
1462: $\lambda(x)=2\pi\;v_p(x)/\omega$ is the same
1463: since the LTW frequency $\omega$ is a {\em global} constant.
1464: (d) Time averaged deviations from the conductive state at $z$=-0.25 for
1465: concentration, temperature, and their sum, $ b= T-T_{cond} + C-C_{cond} $,
1466: measuring the convective contribution to the buoyancy.
1467: (e) Streamlines of time averaged velocity field $\langle \vec{u} \rangle$
1468: and concentration current $\langle \vec{J}\rangle =
1469: \langle \vec{u}\delta C - L\Nabla (\delta C -\psi \delta T)\rangle$.
1470: $\langle \vec{u} \rangle$ results from $\langle b \rangle$ and
1471: affects $\langle \vec{J}\rangle$ via the contribution
1472: $\langle \vec{u} \rangle \langle \delta C \rangle$.
1473: In the upper half of the layer positive $\delta C$ (alcohol surplus) is
1474: transported to the right. In the lower half of the layer negative
1475: $\delta C$ (water surplus) is also transported to the right -- positive
1476: $\delta C$ is transported there to the left as indicated by the arrow.
1477: Parameters are $L =0.01$, $\sigma = 10$, $\psi$=-0.35, and $r$=1.346.
1478: \label{Fig:LTW}}
1479: \end{figure*}
1480: \end{document}
1481:
1482:
1483: