1:
2: %\documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[draft,twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
5: %\documentclass[draft,twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
6:
7: \usepackage[final]{graphicx} % to include figures
8: %\usepackage[draft]{graphicx} % includes only space for figures
9:
10: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} %faktor 1.5 fuer tabellenzeilenabstand
11:
12: \newcommand{\Nabla}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\nabla$}}
13: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{\stackrel{\rightharpoonup}{#1}}
14: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
15: \newcommand{\Vxi}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\xi$}}
16: \newcommand{\Vphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}}
17: \newcommand{\Vzeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
18: \newcommand{\VPsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\psi$}}
19: \newcommand{\Overrightarrow}[1]{\stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{#1}}
20:
21: % info und seite in kopfzeile
22: \pagestyle{myheadings}
23: % datum in kopfzeile. falls 'twoside': {leftside}{rightside}
24: \markboth{\today}{\today}
25:
26: \bibliographystyle{prsty}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{\bf
31: Traveling Wave Fronts and Localized Traveling Wave Convection in Binary Fluid
32: Mixtures}
33:
34: \author{D.~Jung and M.~L\"ucke}
35: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at des Saarlandes,
36: Postfach 151150, \\ D-66041 Saarbr\"ucken, Germany}
37:
38: \date{\today}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: Nonlinear fronts between spatially extended traveling wave convection (TW)
42: and quiescent fluid and spatially localized traveling waves (LTWs) are
43: investigated in quantitative detail in the bistable regime of binary fluid
44: mixtures heated from below.
45: A finite-difference method is used to solve the full hydrodynamic field
46: equations in a vertical cross section of the layer perpendicular
47: to the convection roll axes. Results are presented for ethanol-water
48: parameters with several strongly negative separation ratios where TW solutions
49: bifurcate subcritically. Fronts and LTWs
50: are compared with each other and similarities and differences are elucidated.
51: Phase propagation out of the
52: quiescent fluid into the convective structure entails a unique selection of
53: the latter while fronts and interfaces where the phase moves into the
54: quiescent state behave differently. Interpretations of various experimental
55: observations are suggested.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58:
59: %\pacs{PACS number(s): 47.20.-k, 47.10.+g, 47.27.Te, 47.54.+r}
60: \pacs{47.20.-k, 47.54.+r, 44.27.+g, 47.20.Ky}
61: %****************************************************************
62: % 47.20.-k : Hydrodynamic stability
63: % 47.10.+g : General theory (of fluid dynamics)
64: % 47.27.Te Convection and heat transfer
65: % 47.54.+r Pattern selection; pattern formation
66: % 44.27.+g Forced convection
67: % 47.20.Ky Nonlinearity (including bifurcation theory)
68: % 05.45.-a Nonlinear dynamics and nonlinear dynamical systems
69: % 05.65.+b Self-organized systems
70: %****************************************************************
71: \maketitle
72: %\tableofcontents
73: %\newpage
74: % skip 2/6inch
75: \vskip2pc
76:
77: %im gegenstz zu \widetext (z.b. bei formeln)
78: %halbe zeitenbreite f"ur spaltentext
79: %\narrowtext
80:
81: %---------------------Sec. I ------------------------------------------
82: \section{INTRODUCTION}
83: %----------------------------------------------------------
84:
85: Many nonlinear dissipative systems that are driven sufficiently far away from
86: thermal equilibrium show selforganization out of an unstructured state: A
87: structured one can appear that is characterized by a (spatially extended)
88: pattern which retains some of the symmetries of the system \cite{CH93}.
89: Convection in binary miscible fluids like ethanol-water, $^3$He
90: $-^4$He, or various gas mixtures is an example of such systems. It shows rich
91: and interesting pattern formation behavior and it is paradigmatic for problems
92: related to instabilities, bifurcations, and
93: selforganization with complex spatiotemporal behavior.
94:
95: Compared to convection in one-component
96: fluids like, e.g., pure water the spatiotemporal properties are far more
97: complex. The reason is that concentration variations
98: which are generated via thermodiffusion, i.e., the Soret effect by
99: externally imposed and by internal temperature gradients influence the buoyancy,
100: i.e., the driving force for convective flow. The latter in turn mixes by
101: advectively redistributing concentration. This nonlinear advection
102: gets in developed convective flow typically much larger than the smoothening
103: by linear diffusion --- P\'eclet numbers measuring the strength
104: of advective concentration transport relative to diffusion are easily
105: $\cal O$(1000). Thus, the concentration balance is strongly nonlinear
106: giving rise to strong variations of the concentration field and to
107: boundary layer behavior. In contrast to that, momentum and
108: heat balances remain weakly nonlinear close to onset as in pure fluids implying
109: only smooth and basically harmonic variations of velocity and temperature fields
110: as of the critical modes.
111:
112: Without the thermodiffusive Soret coupling between temperature and
113: concentration any initial concentration deviation from the mean diffuses away
114: and influences no longer the balances of the other fields.
115: Hence, the feedback interplay between ({\em i}) the Soret generated
116: concentration variations, ({\em ii}) the resulting modified buoyancy, and
117: ({\em iii}) the
118: strongly nonlinear advective transport and mixing causes binary mixture
119: convection to be rather complex with respect to its spatiotemporal
120: properties and its bifurcation behavior.
121: Take for example the case of negative Soret coupling, $\psi < 0$,
122: between temperature and concentration fields \cite{coupling} when the lighter
123: component migrates to the colder regions thereby stabilizing the density
124: stratification in the quiescent, laterally homogeneous conductive fluid state.
125: Then the above
126: described feedback interplay generates oscillations. In fact the buoyancy
127: difference in regions
128: with different concentrations was identified already in \cite{WKPS85} as the
129: cause for traveling wave convection.
130:
131: Oscillatory convection appears in the form of the
132: transient growth of convection at supercritical heating, in spatially
133: extended
134: nonlinear traveling wave (TW) and standing wave solutions that branch
135: in general subcritically
136: out of the conductive state via a common Hopf bifurcation, in spatially
137: localized traveling wave (LTW) states, and in various types of fronts. TW and LTW convection
138: has been studied experimentally and theoretically for some time
139: \cite{CH93,Moses87Heinrichs87,Behringer9091,Winkler92,Kolodner94,Platten96,Kaplan94,Surko91,
140: Aegert01,Ning97b,Batiste01,Jung02}.
141: The transient oscillatory growth of convection was investigated by
142: numerical simulations \cite{FL}. Nonlinear standing wave solutions were obtained
143: only recently \cite{MJL04,JML04}. Freely propagating convection fronts that
144: connect subcritically bifurcating nonlinear TW convection with the {\em stable}
145: quiescent fluid do not seem to have been investigated in detail beyond some
146: first preliminary results \cite{Bensimon90,Kolodner92Fronts,Bu99}. Here we determine such fronts in
147: quantitative detail and compare their properties with those of LTWs.
148:
149: In narrow rectangular and annular channels convection occurs in
150: the form of rolls with axes oriented perpendicular to the long sidewalls
151: \cite{Surko87,CH93}. These stuctures can efficiently be described in the two
152: dimensional vertical $x-z$ cross section in the middle of the channel
153: perpendicular to the roll axes ignoring variations in axis direction.
154: Furthermore, these convection structures have relevant phase gradients only in
155: $x$-direction thus causing effectively one dimensional patterns \cite{AlBa04}.
156:
157: When comparing
158: experiments with analytical calculations or numerical simulations
159: performed under the above described conditions it is useful to do that on the
160: basis of reduced Rayleigh numbers, $r=R/R^0_c$, with $R^0_c$ being the critical
161: one for onset of pure fluid convection for the respective experiment, analytical
162: method, or numerical method. This significantly reduces the dependence
163: of, say, the bifurcation diagrams of convective states on the specific
164: geometry of the respective set-up. In laterally unbounded systems the analytical
165: value for $R^0_c$ is 1707.762.
166:
167: %---------------------------------------------------------
168: {\em Localized traveling waves.} \hspace{0.3cm}
169: %---------------------------------------------------------
170: For weak negative Soret coupling one has observed in experiments a competition
171: between homogeneous laterally extended TW convection and so-called dispersive
172: chaos with an irregular repetitive formation and collapse of spatially localized
173: TW pulses \cite{Kolodner90Glazier91,Kaplan94}. During the pulse formation their
174: drift velocities can drop abruptly
175: to about a tenth of the initial group velocity \cite{Kolodner90Glazier91}.
176: We consider this to be a characteristic signal that the lateral redistribution
177: of concentration over the pulse \cite{Jung02} becomes important and that the
178: strongly nonlinear dynamics sets in. For more negative $\psi \lesssim -0.06$ the
179: collapse is in general less dramatic. There, convection is dominated
180: by isolated strongly peaked localized states. Eventually, at $\psi\simeq -0.07$
181: a regime is reached where stable LTWs coexist near onset with extended
182: TWs \cite{Barten95I,Barten95II,Luecke98,Moses87Heinrichs87,Kolodner88,
183: Kolodner91a,Kolodner94}.
184: Increasing the Soret coupling strength further to more negative $\psi$
185: the band ($r^{LTW}_{min},r^{LTW}_{max}$) of Rayleigh numbers in which stable
186: LTWs exist increases monotonically while shifting upwards as a whole ---
187: $r^{LTW}_{max}(\psi)$ grows stronger than $r^{LTW}_{min}(\psi)$. Simultaneosly,
188: the lower band limit for the existence of extended TW states
189: $r^{TW}_{min}(\psi)$, i.e., the lowest saddle-node of TWs increases even steeper
190: so that eventually for $\psi \lesssim -0.4$ the complete LTW band comes to lie
191: below the existence range of TWs, $r^{LTW}_{max} \leq r^{TW}_{min}$
192: \cite{Jung02}.
193:
194: LTWs consist of slowly drifting, spatially confined convective regions that are
195: embedded in the quiescent fluid.
196: These intriguing structures have been investigated in experiments
197: \cite{Moses87Heinrichs87,Kolodner88,Bensimon90,Niemela90,Behringer9091,
198: Kolodner9091,Steinberg91,Kolodner91a,
199: Surko91,Kolodner91c,Kolodner91d,Kolodner93II,Kolodner94} and numerical simulations
200: \cite{Barten91,Barten95II,Luecke98,Jung02}. A discussion of
201: various theoretical models aiming at their explanation is contained in
202: Sec.~\ref{SEC:LTWmodels}. Roll vortices grow in a LTW structure out
203: of the quiescent fluid at one end, travel with spatially varying phase velocity
204: $v_p(x)$ to the other end, and decay there back into the basic state. The two
205: interfaces to conduction and with it the whole convective region move with
206: constant, uniquely selected drift velocity $v_d$. The latter is a
207: function of $r, \psi$ with magnitude much smaller than the phase velocities.
208: Also the oscillation frequency of the LTW is uniquely selected; it is constant
209: in space and time in the frame that is comoving with its drift velocity.
210: And finally, the length $l(r,\psi)$ of the convective region of stable LTWs and
211: their spatial stucture are uniquely selected. This length grows with increasing
212: heating $r$.
213:
214: A central role for the stable existence of LTWs plays a large-scale
215: mean concentration current. Extending over the whole LTW it redistributes
216: concentration and thereby changes the buoyancy in a decisive way \cite{Luecke98}.
217: This effect
218: can sustain LTWs even at low $r$ where no extended TWs exist \cite{Jung02}.
219:
220: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
221: {\em Blinking states in rectangular channels.} \hspace{0.3cm}
222: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
223: The LTW confinement of convection occurring in translationally invariant annular
224: channels is obviously an inherent process of the hydrodynamic balances.
225: But one has also observed end-wall-assisted or at least end-wall-modified
226: confinement of convection close to the ends of rectangular channels.
227: The weakly nonlinear varieties of such a confinement can largely be understood
228: in terms of the convective behavior
229: of TW packets, their reflection properties at the end walls, and the
230: destructive interaction
231: between left and right traveling patterns \cite{Cross868889,Brand86,Fineberg90}.
232: These effects give rise near onset to a wide range of weakly nonlinear and
233: effectively low dimensional spatiotemporal behavior that depends sensitively
234: on the specific experimental set-up like, e.g., the end-wall boundary
235: conditions and the system length
236: \cite{Kolodner8889,Fineberg88Steinberg89,Bestehorn89,Kolodner93,Batiste01}.
237: While the linear eigenmodes of such sytems ('linear counterpropagating
238: waves' or 'chevrons') \cite{Kolodner86,Surko87,Kolodner87,Batiste01}
239: are laterally symmetric or antisymmetric
240: localization sets in via a temporal amplitude modulation. Thereby
241: convection is alternatingly weakened and enhanced in the left and the right part
242: of the system part giving rise to a 'blinking' state
243: \cite{Surko87,Kolodner8889,Fineberg88Steinberg89,Steinberg91,Kolodner93}.
244: The so-called 'chaotic blinking' states \cite{Kolodner8889,
245: Fineberg88Steinberg89,Steinberg91,Kolodner93} seem to be the
246: analogue of the 'chaotic dispersive' pulse formation in annular containers
247: \cite{Steinberg91,Kaplan94}. Also 'blinking' modes with different
248: frequencies at
249: both ends of the channel were observed \cite{Fineberg88Steinberg89,Steinberg91}.
250: But their possible relation to a large-scale mean concentration variation
251: \cite{Moses86} produced by nonlinear propagating waves in a finite cell has not
252: been discussed.
253:
254: %--------------------------------------------------------
255: {\em Wall-attached structures.} \hspace{0.3cm}
256: %--------------------------------------------------------
257: At larger $r$ one has observed wall-attached TW structures with amplitudes
258: confined to the vicinity of one or both end walls. These wall-attached
259: convective patches
260: \cite{Moses87Heinrichs87,Kolodner8889,Fineberg88Steinberg89,Kolodner90,Kolodner91b,Yahata91,
261: Ning96,Ning97a} are closely related to free LTWs \cite{Niemela90}.
262: They are strongly nonlinear as indicated by their low frequency
263: \cite{Kolodner8889,Fineberg88Steinberg89}.
264: Moreover, their spatial structure and their region of existence is largely
265: unaffected by the details
266: of the lateral boundaries or by the container length in contrast to the linear
267: and weakly nonlinear behavior described above \cite{Fineberg88Steinberg89}. The
268: more extensive wall-attached structures show some similarities with front-like
269: states. Note, however, that here the source or the sink of the propagating rolls
270: is pinned near a wall and the interface to the quiescent fluid in the bulk of the
271: channel does not move \cite{Kolodner90}.
272:
273: %--------------------------------------------------------
274: {\em Our numerical simulations.} \hspace{0.3cm}
275: %--------------------------------------------------------
276: Our numerical simulations have been performed in order to elucidate in
277: quantitative detail the properties of relaxed nonlinear TW convection structures
278: that contain an interface (or two of them) to the
279: quiescent fluid as an integrated structural element. We compare
280: for a wide range of Soret coupling strengths front states and LTW states
281: showing what they have in common and how they differ. We
282: focus our interest to those parameters where the quiescent conductive state of
283: the fluid is stable and where the solutions describing spatially extended,
284: laterally periodic TW convection bifurcate subcritically out of it.
285:
286: The system we have in mind is a binary fluid layer of thickness $d$
287: which is bounded by two solid horizontal plates perpendicular to
288: the gravitational acceleration $\vec{g}$.
289: The fluid might be a mixture of water with the lighter component ethanol at a
290: mean concentration $\overline{C}$.
291: It is heated from below. The temperatures at the plates are
292: $\overline{T} \pm \Delta T/2$.
293: The variation of the fluid density $\rho$ due to temperature and
294: concentration variations is governed by the linear thermal and solutal
295: expansion coefficients
296: $ \alpha = - \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial {T}} $ and
297: $ \beta = - \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial {C}} $, respectively.
298: Both are positive for ethanol-water. The solutal diffusivity
299: of the binary mixture is $D$, its thermal diffusivity is $\kappa$, and its
300: viscosity is $\nu$.
301: Length and time is scaled by $d$ and $d^2/\kappa$, respectively, so that
302: velocity is measured in units of $\kappa/d$.
303: Temperatures are reduced by the vertical temperature
304: difference $\Delta T$ across the layer and concentrations
305: by $\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\Delta T$.
306: The scale for the pressure is given by $\frac{\rho\kappa^2}{d^2}$.
307:
308: Then, the balance equations for mass, momentum, heat, and concentration
309: \cite{LL66,Platten84} read in Oberbeck--Boussinesq approximation \cite{Barten95I}
310: \begin{subequations}
311: \label{eq:baleqs}
312: \begin{eqnarray}
313: \Nabla \cdot \vec{u} = 0 \label{eq:baleqmass}\\
314: \partial_t\, {\bf u} = - {\bf \mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$} }\,
315: ({\bf u : u} + p
316: - \sigma \, {\bf \mbox{\boldmath $\nabla : $}\,\, u }) +
317: {\bf B} \,\,\,;\,\,\,
318: {\bf B} = \sigma\, R\, (\delta T + \delta C) {\bf e}_z \label{eq:baleqveloc}\\
319: \partial_t\delta T =
320: - \Nabla \cdot \left[ \vec{u}\delta T - \Nabla \delta T\right]\label{eq:baleqheat}\\
321: \partial_t \delta C =
322: - \Nabla \cdot \left[ \vec{u} \delta C - L\Nabla\left(\delta C -\psi \delta T\right) \right]\ .
323: \label{eq:baleqconc}
324: \end{eqnarray}
325: \end{subequations}
326: Here, $\delta T$ and $\delta C$ denote deviations of
327: the temperature and concentration fields, respectively, from their
328: mean $\overline{T}$ and $\overline{C}$ and $\bf B$ is the buoyancy.
329: The Dufour effect \cite{HLL92,HL95}
330: that provides a coupling of concentration gradients into
331: the heat current and a change of the thermal diffusivity
332: is discarded in (\ref{eq:baleqheat}) since it is relevant
333: only in few binary gas mixtures \cite{LA96} and possibly in
334: liquids near the liquid--vapor critical point \cite{LLT83}.
335:
336: Besides the Rayleigh number $R=\frac{\alpha g d^3}{\nu \kappa}\Delta T$
337: measuring the thermal driving of the fluid three additional
338: numbers enter into the field equations: the Prandtl number
339: $\sigma=\nu/\kappa$, the Lewis number $L=D/\kappa$, and the separation ratio
340: $\psi=-\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\frac{k_T}{\overline{T}}=
341: - S_T\overline{C}(1-\overline{C})\frac{\beta}{\alpha}$.
342: Here $k_T = \overline{T}\,\overline{C}(1-\overline{C})S_T$ is the thermodiffusion coefficient
343: \cite{LL66} and $S_T$ the Soret coefficient. They measure changes
344: of concentration fluctuations due to temperature gradients in the fluid.
345: $\psi$ characterizes the sign and the strength of the Soret effect.
346: Negative Soret coupling $\psi$ (i.e., positive $S_T$ for mixtures like ethanol
347: water with positive $\alpha$ and $\beta$) induces concentration gradients of
348: the lighter component that are antiparallel to temperature gradients.
349: In this situation, the buoyancy induced by solutal changes in density is opposed
350: to the thermal buoyancy.
351:
352: When the gradient of the total buoyancy exceeds a threshold, convection sets in
353: --- typically
354: in the form of straight rolls. For sufficiently negative $\psi$ the primary
355: instability is oscillatory. Ignoring field
356: variations along the roll axes we describe here 2D convection in an
357: $x$--$z$ plane perpendicular to the roll axes with a velocity field
358: \begin{equation}
359: \vec{u}(x,z,t) = u(x,z,t)\,\vec{e}_x + w(x,z,t)\,\vec{e}_z \, .
360: \end{equation}
361:
362: To find the time-dependent solutions of the above partial differential equations
363: subject to realistic horizontal boundary conditions \cite{Barten95I}
364: we performed numerical simulations with a modification of
365: the SOLA code that is based on the MAC method \cite{MAC-SOLA,PT83}.
366: This is a finite-difference method of second order in space formulated on
367: staggered grids for the different fields. The Poisson equation for the pressure
368: field that results from taking the divergence of (\ref{eq:baleqveloc}) was solved
369: iteratively with the artificial compressibility
370: method \cite{PT83} by incorporating a multi-grid technique.
371:
372: Throughout this paper we consider mixtures with $L=0.01$, $\sigma=10$,
373: and various negative values of $\psi$ that are easily accessible with
374: ethanol-water experiments. The paper is organized as follows: In
375: Sec.~\ref{Sec:Fronts} we first describe our methods for characterizing the
376: various convective states. Then we present results for the two different types of
377: TW front states that can arise in laterally homogeneous mirror symmetric systems
378: with either the phase propagating out of the quiescent fluid or into it. Also
379: transient two-front structures are discussed. Sec.~\ref{SEC:LTW} deals with LTW
380: states and their relation to fronts. The transient dynamics towards the selected
381: LTW, the stabilization via front repulsion, the difference between long and short
382: LTWs, and a critical appraisal of LTW models are topics covered here. In
383: Sec.~\ref{SEC:Compare-exp} we present a comparison with experiments and a
384: discussion. The last section contains a conclusion.
385:
386: %\clearpage
387: %-------------- Sec. II --------------------------------
388: \section{Fronts} \label{Sec:Fronts}
389: %-------------------------------------------------------
390:
391: Here we discuss front solutions where part of the system is occupied by the
392: quiescent fluid while the other one shows fully developed, saturated, strongly
393: nonlinear TW convection with laterally homogeneous amplitude.
394: Strictly speaking these two states are realized only in the two opposing limits
395: of $x\to \pm \infty$.
396: We focus our investigation of fronts on parameters where the quiescent fluid
397: state is stable and where the TW solutions bifurcate subcritically out of the
398: conductive state. Then, any {\it linear} growing and spreading of
399: infinitesimal, localized convective perturbations in the
400: quiescent fluid which could possibly dominate the low amplitude behavior
401: of fronts as in the case of an unstable zero amplitude state
402: \cite{vSaarloos9092,vSaarloos03} is absent.
403:
404: Little general is known about pattern forming fronts in real bistable systems
405: \cite{CH93}. Most of the research activities were centered on fronts in the
406: quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation \cite{vSaarloos9092,vHvSHo93,CoWaSMi99,CoCh01,
407: SzLu03,Rabaud03}.
408: One can expect that the front properties are fixed by a strongly
409: nonlinear eigenvalue problem
410: describing a heteroclinic orbit between the two involved states.
411: Some of these front solutions will be unstable. There might be also
412: multistable coexistence of fronts so that depending on initial conditions and
413: on the history of the (control) parameters different fronts could finally be
414: realized. We call a front uniquely selected when our numerical simulations
415: indicated that different formation processes ended in the same front for a fixed
416: parameter combination.
417:
418: Fronts can be classified into coherent and incoherent ones \cite{vSaarloos03}.
419: We focus here on the first kind which in our system are characterized as
420: strictly time periodic
421: states in a frame that is comoving with the front's velocity $v_F$.
422: Such a front state being monochromatic is a global nonlinear mode. Its
423: frequency is an eigenvalue, i.e., a global constant in space and time so that
424: the convection oscillations have everywhere the same period.
425:
426: Thus, we do not consider here, e.g., complex large scale or chaotic
427: spatiotemporal interface behavior. The coherent
428: fronts of the various hydrodynamic fields and quantities in this paper have
429: a smooth and basically monotonous profile which connects
430: the quiescent fluid with the nonlinear saturated extended TW. The transition
431: region between conduction and convection that is characterized by large
432: amplitude variations is quite short and consists typically
433: only of about 3 -4 convection rolls. We call this transition region also
434: the interface between conduction and convection.
435:
436: If the selected front pattern is incompatible with any stable bulk structure
437: there are two possibilities:
438: ({\it i}) A perturbation in the unstable convection bulk grows and expands
439: towards
440: the interface. This would destroy front coherence and could lead to more
441: complex large scale variations, perhaps chaotic spatiotemporal behavior.
442: ({\it ii}) The interface region is only convectively unstable against
443: perturbations of the bulk nonlinear TW. Then initially localized
444: perturbations would be advected out of every finite system and could not
445: reach the unperturbed interface region of the front.
446:
447: %-------------- Sec. II A ----------------------------
448: \subsection{Methods of characterization} \label{SEC:FRONT-charact}
449: %---------------------------------------------------
450:
451: %-------------- Sec. II A1 ----------------------------
452: \subsubsection{Definitions} \label{SEC:FRONT-def}
453: %---------------------------------------------------
454:
455: We call a front to be of type $+$ when its envelope grows at $x=-\infty$ out
456: of the basic quiescent state.
457: Otherwise it is a $-$front. Then the amplitude falls to zero at $x=+\infty$
458: \cite{Buechel00}. The phase of the convection pattern in a front state of type
459: $+$ can either propagate to the left or to the right and similarly for the
460: $-$front state. Hence, one would have
461: to discuss four front states separately. However, because of the invariance
462: of the system under $x \to -x$
463: a $+$front state with positive (negative) phase velocity $v_p$ is the mirror
464: image of the $-$front state with negative (positive) $v_p$. Therefore, it
465: suffices to consider only the front states that consist of roll vortices
466: traveling, say, in positive $x$-direction and to use the superscript $+$ or
467: $-$ to identify the properties of the front in question in a unique way. So,
468: the phase velocities of all oscillatory convective structures investigated in
469: this paper are positive. We call the direction of positive $x$ into which
470: the phase propagates also 'downstream' and the opposite one 'upstream'.
471:
472: So, to sum up our notation: In a $+$front state the quiescent fluid is located
473: 'upstream' and a source of phase with the latter propagating out of the
474: conductive state into convection. In a $-$front the quiescent fluid is located
475: in 'downstream' direction and a sink since phase moves out of convection
476: into conduction.
477:
478: Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics} shows fronts of each type. Under the $+$front (left
479: half of Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}) convection rolls grow out of the
480: quiescent fluid and saturate in a 'downstream' bulk TW. On the other hand,
481: a $-$front (right half of Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}) annihilates
482: roll vortices. In this process their phase velocity is accelerated [cf. the
483: increase in the lateral profile of $v_p(x)$ in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(f)]
484: and they are stretched horizontally.
485:
486: It is clear from Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics} that the quiescent (convecting) region
487: expands into the convecting (quiescent) one when the velocity $v^+_F$ of the
488: $+$front is positive (negative) and vice versa for the $-$front.
489:
490: %-------------- Sec. II A2 ----------------------------
491: \subsubsection{Mixing number} \label{SEC:FRONT-mix}
492: %---------------------------------------------------
493:
494: In order to monitor how well the fluid is mixed along the front we always
495: determined for the relaxed front states the mixing number
496: \begin{equation} \label{Eq:M(x)}
497: M(x)=
498: \left[< \overline{(\delta C)^2} > / \overline{ (\delta C_{cond})^2}\right]^{1/2}
499: \end{equation}
500: as a function of lateral position $x$. It basically
501: measures the mean square of the deviations $\delta C(x,z,t)$ of the concentration
502: field from its global mean: the overbars imply a vertical average and the
503: brackets a temporal average at the specific horizontal location $x$ in the
504: frame comoving with the front velocity $v_F$.
505: The subscript {\it cond} denotes the reference quiescent
506: conductive state with its linear vertical concentation variation. The mixing
507: number is defined such that $M=0$
508: in a perfectly mixed fluid and $M=1$ in the quiescent state.
509:
510: In laterally extended TWs $\omega$ and with it $v_p$ increase when the
511: concentration variations become larger \cite{Barten95I,Luecke98}. In fact, there
512: is a
513: universal scaling relation between $M$ and $\omega$ \cite{HoBuLu97} which shows
514: that $M$ and $v_p$ are linearly related to each other.
515: This relation also holds for the bulk part of front states far away from the
516: interface where the convection is TW-like with only slow spatial amplitude
517: variation (Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}).
518:
519: %-------------- Sec. II A3 ----------------------------
520: \subsubsection{Concentration current} \label{SEC:FRONT-current}
521: %---------------------------------------------------
522:
523: The phase shift between the concentration and velocity waves in the TW-like
524: bulk of the front states sustains as in extended TW states a mean lateral
525: concentration current $<\vec{J}>(x,z)$ \cite{Linz88,Barten89,Barten95I,Luecke98}:
526: \begin{equation} \label{Eq:J}
527: <\vec{J}>= < \vec{u} \delta C - L \Nabla (\delta C - \psi \delta T) >
528: \end{equation}
529: where $\vec{u}$ is the velocity field and $\delta T$ the temperature deviation
530: from the global mean. Again, the brackets imply a temporal average in the
531: frame that is comoving with the front velocity. The Lewis number $L=0.01$
532: being rather small in our simulations
533: implies that $<\vec{J}>$ is dominated by the advective contribution except in
534: those boundary regions in which $\vec{u}$ becomes small.
535:
536: The vertical variation of $<\vec{J}>$ is such that positive (negative)
537: $\delta C$ is transported in phase direction in the upper (lower) half of the
538: layer. This transport causes a large-scale concentration redistribution in a
539: front state between its TW bulk and its interface to the quiescent fluid and it
540: is responsible for the different characteristic structures of the interfaces in
541: a $+$ and a $-$front as we will see further below.
542:
543: %-------------- Sec. II A4 ----------------------------
544: \subsubsection{Preparation and lateral boundary conditions}
545: \label{SEC:FRONT-prep}
546: %---------------------------------------------------
547:
548: We simulated systems containing up to 160 rolls.
549: The initial state was prepared by filling one half of the sytem with a nonlinear
550: TW that was previously generated with periodic boundaries to have some fixed
551: wavelength $\lambda$. The other half contained the stable temperature and
552: concentration distribution of the pure quiescent basic state.
553:
554: To simulate $+$fronts in infinite systems that connect to developed TW convection
555: with some wavelength $\lambda$ far away from the interface
556: between conduction and convection we imposed at the 'downstream' boundary $x=L$
557: of our computation domain the periodicity condition $f(L)=f(L-\lambda)$.
558: For the case of $-$fronts we found that imposing the analogous condition at the
559: 'upstream' boundary of the developed TW part at $x=-L$ typically will introduce
560: perturbations that can grow in 'downstream'
561: direction for example when the TW region is Eckhaus unstable.
562: The different aspects of the stability of $+$ and $-$fronts are discussed
563: further below in the paper.
564:
565: After a relaxation time of typically 100 to 200
566: vertical thermal diffusion times
567: we then could observe under certain conditions a coherent front state connecting
568: a quiescent region of the system to a TW with asymptotic wavelength $\lambda$.
569: Here the fact that the frequency $\omega$ of such a coherent front state is
570: constant in space and time in the
571: frame that is comoving with the front velocity $v_F$ proved to be a good
572: relaxation criterion to effectively determine whether such a state had been
573: obtained.
574:
575:
576: %-------------- Sec. II B ----------------------------
577: \subsection{$+$Fronts} \label{SEC:+front}
578: %---------------------------------------------------
579:
580: %-------------- Sec. II B1 ----------------------------
581: \subsubsection{Structure and dynamics}
582: %---------------------------------------------------
583:
584: As soon as the growing convection rolls in a $+$front have become sufficiently
585: nonlinear, i.e., when their lateral flow velocity $u$ has grown up to about
586: their phase
587: velocity $v_p$ [e.g., close to the vertical arrow in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(c)]
588: they start to alternatingly suck in positive ('blue') and negative ('red')
589: $\delta C$ from the top and bottom concentration boundary layers, respectively.
590: It is transported away into the well mixing convection bulk and replaced at the
591: interface location by neutral ('yellow/green') $\delta C$. Note that increasing
592: $u$ beyond $v_p$ causes the appearence of closed streamlines of the velocity
593: field in the frame comoving with the phase velocity of a traveling roll
594: \cite{Linz88,Luecke98,JML04}. These closed streamlines regions
595: are responsible for the characteristic roll
596: structure of the $C$ field in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(a): Positive (negative)
597: $\delta C$ is collected from the top (bottom) boundary
598: layers and transported within the homogeneously mixed closed streamline
599: regions in phase direction while mean concentration, $\delta C \simeq 0$, is
600: advected along the meandering "green-yellow stripe" in
601: Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(a) to the left \cite{Jung02}. The mean concentration
602: current $<\vec{J}>$ resulting from this complicated concentration
603: redistribution is shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(i). All in all, mean
604: concentration is accumulated (depleted) at the $+$ ($-$) front interface.
605:
606: The concentration redistribution reduces at the interface of the $+$front the
607: Soret-induced solutal
608: stabilization that occurs to the left of it
609: as a result of the large conductive vertical concentration gradient: at the
610: interface one can observe a minimal mixing number [Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(e)]
611: and with it a buoyancy overshoot [Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(g)] which is
612: sufficiently large to sustain local convection
613: growth there and cause even invasion of convection into the quiescent region whenever
614: $v_F^+<0$. With the fluid being well mixed there, i.e., with $M$ being small
615: the local phase velocity is also small there -- in fact the minimum of $v_p(x)$
616: in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(e) lies close to the one in $M$.
617:
618: Since the strongly stable quiescent fluid to the left of the $+$front
619: prohibits a well developed advectively mixing
620: front tail the reduction of $\delta C$ variations there is driven primarily by
621: diffusion.
622: The latter having a characteristic time scale given by $L=0.01$ explains why
623: the front velocities are much smaller than the fast phase velocity.
624:
625: When $r$ is increased $v_F^+$ tends to become (more) negative:
626: convection to the right of the $+$interface can now, with increased heating,
627: better invade the quiescent fluid to the left of it and thus
628: $\partial_r v_F^+(r,\psi) < 0$. Similarly, when $\psi$ is increased, i.e.,
629: when the convection suppressing Soret effect is diminished the expansion of
630: TW convection is favoured and thus $\partial_{\psi} v_F^+(r,\psi) < 0$.
631:
632: Moving along the $+$front in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics} to the right
633: from the interface towards the asymptotic TW state at large $x$ there develops
634: an equilibrium
635: between the $\delta C$ feed-in from the boundary layers at the plates and the
636: amount of advective mixing: The concentration contrast between two
637: neighboring rolls increases on the way towards the TW bulk.
638: With it the phase speed $v_p(x)$, the wavelength
639: $\lambda(x)=2\pi v_p(x)/\omega$, and the lateral concentration
640: current $<\vec{J}>$ grow monotonously up to their asymptotic TW values. This
641: growth extends laterally over
642: a wide interval which itself increases when the Soret coupling becomes stronger.
643:
644: We found that the minimal wavelength in a $+$front state is located at the
645: interface and -- more remarkably -- that it is about $\lambda_{min}\sim 1.4$
646: for {\it all $r$ and $\psi$} that we have simulated. We have no real
647: quantitative explanation for this strong universal selection of the local
648: wavelength at the interface.
649: Intuitively the growing rolls are squeezed in the region with the negative
650: lateral gradient of $M$. The squeezing is relaxed when the rolls begin to
651: absorb high concentration contrasts from the plate layers which increases
652: $v_p$ again [arrow in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(c)].
653:
654: It is interesting to note that the mean concentration current $<\vec{J}>$ of TWs
655: becomes maximal close to the TW saddle node, i.e., where the asymptotic TW
656: parts of our front states are located.
657: Finally we mention that the front states do not sustain a measurable lateral
658: meanflow; the quiescent fluid prohibits that.
659: On the other hand, extended TWs in laterally periodic systems show in general a
660: Reynolds stress-induced meanflow of the order $10^{-3}$
661: \cite{Linz88,Barten95I,Luecke98}. But it goes through zero just
662: near the TW saddle node.
663:
664: %-------------- Sec. II B2 ----------------------------
665: \subsubsection{Bifurcation properties} \label{SEC:bifprop}
666: %---------------------------------------------------
667:
668: In Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r} - \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r} we show the
669: bifurcation properties of fronts in comparison with LTWs and laterally periodic
670: TW states. We use front velocities and frequencies being temporally and
671: spatially constant as order parameters to characterize all of the aforementioned
672: oscillatory states. In addition we also consider the local wave numbers of
673: front states and of LTWs in the bulk spatial regions where $\lambda(x)$ has
674: reached a plateau, i.e., sufficiently away from any interface to conduction.
675:
676: Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r} and \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r} show that the front
677: velocities of $+$ and $-$fronts vary quite differently as a function of $r$.
678: The former decrease linearly with growing $r$ and the latter increase, albeit
679: not linearly. Thus, there is a crossing at $r^F_{eq}$ where $v_F^+$ becomes
680: equal to $v_F^-$, so that both fronts move with the same velocity. At this
681: Rayleigh number the length $l$ of the LTWs diverges, i.e.,
682: $r^{LTW}_\infty = r^F_{eq}$. There, and strictly speaking only there, this
683: limiting LTW can be seen as a state consisting of two fronts.
684:
685: The frequency and bulk wave number selected by a $+$front and of a very long
686: LTW are close to those of the respective, laterally extended saddle-node
687: TW (Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}, \ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}, \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}).
688: A somewhat hand-waving explanation for the selection of the saddle-node
689: frequency is as follows: With ({\it i}) convection growing out of conduction in a $+$
690: front, with ({\it ii}) small-amplitude extended TW perturbations of the latter
691: oscillating according to a purely linear balance with the large Hopf frequency, and
692: with ({\it iii}) the tendency to decrease
693: $\omega$ with
694: growing convection amplitude the saddle-node frequency is the first, i.e., the
695: largest possible eigenfrequency of the full nonlinear front problem to allow
696: for a stable TW region away from the interface.
697:
698: A stable front state that has a TW bulk part extending laterally to infinity
699: with frequency $\omega$ and wave number $k$ cannot be realized at $r$-values
700: that lie below the saddle-node curve of laterally
701: extended TWs, cf. the curve marked $r_s^{TW}$ in the $k-r$ plane of
702: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}. Thus, the lowest Rayleigh number $r^F_{min}$ for
703: the existence of fronts is $r_{min}^{TW} = r_s^{TW}(k \simeq \pi)$, i.e., the
704: location of the
705: tip of the nose-shaped TW bifurcation surface like the grey surface in
706: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}. Ahead of this nose one
707: cannot realize front states because at such locations there are no
708: TWs to which the interface from conduction could connect.
709:
710: The TW bulk parts of our $+$fronts are practically saddle-node TWs that have
711: bulk wave numbers on the saddle-node curve $r_s^{TW}(k)$.
712: Furthermore, it is interesting to note that they are on the {\em large}-$k$
713: branch of
714: $r_s^{TW}(k)$ --- the big plusses in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r} marking the
715: bulk values of the front states lie all above $k \simeq \pi$. In fact, in all
716: our simulations we did not find front states with bulk wave numbers smaller than
717: $\pi$. This value marks for all $\psi$ that we investigated the tip of the
718: nose-shaped TW bifurcation surface like the grey surface in
719: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}.
720:
721: In contrast to fronts, however, LTWs of
722: {\em finite} length $l$ can coexist bistably
723: together with the conductive state at $r$-values well below $r_s^{TW}(k)$: They
724: can sustain over a finite lateral length convection with frequencies and bulk
725: wave numbers (big bullets in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}) ''ahead'' of the
726: grey TW surface for reasons that are explained in Ref.~\cite{Jung02}.
727: This also shows that fronts and LTWs are quite different states. In the
728: limit $l \to \infty$ the LTW states merge at $r^{LTW}_\infty=r^F_{eq}$ with a
729: TW whose wave number and frequency is close to the TW saddle-node as shown in
730: Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}, \ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}, \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}.
731: Therefore, $\omega(r^{LTW}_\infty)$ increases when the Soret coupling becomes
732: more negative but $k(r^{LTW}_\infty)$ decreases. For $\psi \lesssim -0.4$ it
733: moves towards the tip of the TW nose at $k\simeq \pi$.
734:
735: %-------------- Sec. II B3 ----------------------------
736: \subsubsection{Front selection and stability}
737: %---------------------------------------------------
738:
739: Simulations of $+$fronts that were done at fixed control parameters
740: $r, \psi$ with different initial conditions, e.g., different
741: wave numbers of an initial TW part produced in general a uniquely
742: selected final front state with the same frequency and the same
743: asymptotic bulk TW part.
744: During the formation process initial wave structures with the 'wrong' wave
745: patterns propagated out of
746: the system in the direction of the phase velocity and
747: were substituted by convection that was selected by the front. That also
748: explains why our TW boundary condition $f(L)=f(L-\lambda)$ at the 'downstream'
749: end has no measurable influence on the $+$front state even
750: when $\lambda$ differs from the front-selected value.
751:
752: The substitution dynamics is documented in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontrelaxation}.
753: There a TW bulk part was prepared initially at $x>8$ with a wavelength of
754: $\lambda=1.85$ and phase velocity $v_p=1.032$. The spatial region to the right
755: of the interface to conduction is then invaded by the front-selected TW pattern
756: that has a smaller bulk wavelength of $\lambda=1.80$ and that propagates with a
757: faster phase velocity of $v_p=1.258$. The wave number is increased via several
758: phase annihilating defects.
759:
760: All our $+$interfaces selected bulk TW wave numbers close to the large-$k$
761: branch of the TW saddle-node curve; cf. Figs.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}(b) and
762: \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r} for $r^{TW}_s(k)$ and Fig.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(c)
763: for $k^{TW}_s(r)$. Thus, these wave numbers are too large
764: to be Eckhaus stable \cite{Baxter92,Kolodner92,Bu99,MeAlBa04}.
765: However, these fully developed TWs were only convectively unstable
766: \cite{Bu99}: Perturbations could grow but while doing so they
767: were advected sufficiently fast downstream in the direction of the TW phase
768: propagation so that they could not influence the upstream part of the $+$front
769: state in a persistent way. In systems with sufficiently long
770: downstream section of the front state the growing fluctuations have sufficient
771: time --- or are sufficiently fast growing, respectively --- to reach a critical
772: amplitude at which
773: two neighboring rolls are annihilated \cite{Baxter92,Kolodner92} as, e.g., for
774: the parameters of Fig.~\ref{Fig:irregularfront}.
775:
776: Because noise cannot be prevented in general one observes then
777: such phase defects as in Fig.~\ref{Fig:irregularfront} at irregular points in
778: time and space beyond a certain downstream growth length that is related to
779: size of the noise and the growth rate. The associated roll-annihilation events
780: can lead to an effectively reduced mean wave number in the very far downstream
781: region of the convection bulk. Thus, the coherent part of the $+$front
782: close to the interface to conduction is followed by a second
783: incoherent, chaotic phase front consisting of the erratically occurring
784: phase defects. This phase front connects the smooth primary Eckhaus unstable
785: section to a smooth
786: Eckhaus stable TW with smaller wave number that is realized at larger downstream
787: distances.
788: For parameters for which the growth rate of perturbations of the primary
789: front-selected TW is lower than the one of Fig.~\ref{Fig:irregularfront}
790: one does not observe in short systems the erratically occurring phase defects
791: --- and even less so the Eckhaus stable final downstream TW state. Indeed,
792: that was the situation for most of our front states.
793:
794: We finally mention that we could also generate front states with frequencies
795: larger than those of the laterally extended saddle node TWs [dotted lines in
796: Fig.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(b) and Fig.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}(a)], i.e., with
797: frequencies that lie above the respective dotted line in the
798: respective 3D plot similar to the one of Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}. However,
799: we suppose that in sufficient long systems and after long enough times
800: these unstable TW realizations develop a $-$front in the downstream bulk
801: possibly induced by roll annihilating defects \cite{Kolodner92}.
802:
803: %-------------- Sec. II C ----------------------------
804: \subsection{$-$Fronts}
805: %---------------------------------------------------
806:
807: The right half of Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(b) shows a typical $-$front. The
808: mean lateral concentration current in the TW bulk part to the left of the
809: $-$interface to conduction shuffles positive (negative) $\delta C$ in the upper
810: (lower) part of the layer towards the $-$interface. Thus, a large vertical
811: concentration gradient is maintained slightly ahead of it that strongly
812: stabilizes the conduction regime to the right of the $-$interface:
813: there the mixing number $M$ is even larger than 1. In this way the TW
814: oscillations are damped and the conduction regime is shielded against a rapid
815: invasion of convection.
816:
817: The increase of $M(x)$ upon approaching the interface from the convection side
818: causes --- and is related to --- a similar increase of $v_p(x)$ and $\lambda(x)$.
819: The rolls disperse with growing phase velocity $v_p(x)$ over a short lateral
820: distance at the interface. The decreasing convection amplitude lowers the mean
821: concentration current and causes $M(x)$ to grow further. This in turn enhances
822: $v_p(x)$ and $\lambda(x)$ leading to
823: smaller convection amplitude and so on. It is therefore the strongly nonlinear
824: lateral concentration current $<\vec{J}>$ which is responsible for the
825: rapid self amplified decay process of convection at the $-$interface.
826:
827: With increasing $r$ the front velocity $v_F^-$ changes sign, becomes positive
828: and continues to grow [Fig.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(a) and
829: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a)] because the quiescent state becomes
830: less stable when increasing $r$.
831: The slope of $v_F^-(r)$, i.e., the increase of the front velocity is
832: considerably steeper for negative $v_F^-$ than for positive ones:
833: The strongly stabilizing solutal stratification ahead of the interface hinders
834: convection to intrude
835: into the quiescent fluid region but favours the latter to replace the TW
836: part.
837:
838: The 'upstream' lateral distance over which the $-$interface to conduction
839: influences the TW to the left of it is definitely smaller than the 'downstream'
840: influence length of the $+$interface on the convective bulk. In the former case
841: one cannot observe
842: a difference to an extended TW state at an 'upstream' distance of, say, 10-15
843: rolls while in the latter case the 'downstream' convection properties
844: approach the asymptotic bulk TW behavior only over a significantly longer
845: distance. So, in particular the phase dilatation at a $-$interface does not
846: propagate 'upstream' into the TW bulk against the fast phase flow.
847:
848: This also explains why in the formation process of a $-$front TW
849: properties that were initially present in a developed form are conserved. In
850: fact, we could
851: produce coherent $-$fronts for a fixed $r$ with different wave numbers of the
852: bulk TW part out of a whole band near the saddle node wave numbers
853: $k_s^{TW}(r)$. Only for higher $r$ and initial wave numbers away from
854: $k_s^{TW}$ we observed long-time transient incoherent front behavior.
855: Here this transition to incoherence may correspond to a transition from
856: a convectively to an absolutely unstable regime concerning the propagation of
857: phase dilatations in 'upstream' direction.
858:
859: We should like to stress again that in contrast to $-$fronts which depend on
860: the preparation process the asymptotic
861: 'downstream' TW part of a $+$front is uniquely selected as discussed in the
862: previous section. Thus, for a particular $r$ we have found only a single
863: coherent $+$front.
864:
865: For definiteness and for the sake of comparison with $+$fronts we show in the
866: Figs. of this paper the properties of $-$front states that have a bulk TW part
867: which itself was selected by a $+$front.
868: This, however, has a slight numerical drawback stemming from the convective
869: Eckhaus instability of this TW part: ever present phase noise (in particular
870: at the boundary of the 'upstream' TW region) is enhanced on the 'downstream'
871: way towards the $-$interface. We think that this effect is
872: responsible for fluctuations in our frequency measurements of $-$fronts. These
873: data are therefore not shown in Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(b) and
874: Fig.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}. However, in our simulations the 'upstream' part of
875: the $-$fronts were too short to allow for the full development of phase slip
876: defects.
877:
878: %-------------- Sec. II D ----------------------------
879: \subsection{Transient two-front structures}
880: %---------------------------------------------------
881:
882: Consider a set-up where a $+$front generates a very long TW part that develops
883: back into the quiescent fluid via a coherent $-$front. If the convective
884: part is laterally sufficiently long then this structure appears as a two-front
885: structure with the TW part being spatially confined between a $+$ and a
886: $-$interface to conduction. This structure will in general either expand or
887: shrink laterally. Only when the two front velocities $v_F^+$ and $v_F^-$ are
888: equal, i.e., at the
889: crossing points $r^F_{eq}$ of the curves in Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(a) and
890: \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a) one can have a stationary state, namely,
891: a LTW with diverging length $l$.
892:
893: We have simulated such structures at $\psi=-0.25$ and $-0.30$ for Rayleigh
894: numbers for which $v_F^+<v_F^-$, i.e., to the right of the crossing in
895: Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(a) and \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a) so that these
896: two-front structures expand. Their properties are practically identical
897: to those of the respective single-front states. The two-front structures
898: have a technical advantage over the simulation of single fronts:
899: we could use a periodic boundary condition that was located in the quiescent
900: region of the former. This avoids the noise that is induced at the upstream TW
901: boundary of a single $-$front state. With this noise source being absent in our
902: two-front structures the frequency fluctuations at the $-$
903: interfaces of single $-$front states did not occur.
904:
905: When we reduced $r$ then the velocities of the two
906: fronts approached each other along the lines in
907: Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(a) and \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a) that were
908: obtained from velocity measurements of single-front states. In that way we could
909: reproduce the unique crossing point at $r^F_{eq}$ where $v_F^+=v_F^-$ and
910: where LTWs with diverging $l$ exist with a drift velocity $v_d$ given by the
911: crossing velocity.
912:
913: In addition to expanding two-front structures we simulated also shrinking ones
914: for a particular parameter combination ($\psi=-0.35, r=1.3586$, for which
915: $v_F^+=-0.022 > v_F^-=-0.067$) that is located in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a)
916: at $r<r^F_{eq}$. As an example consider the
917: large two-front structure as in Fig.~\ref{Fig:LTWapproach}.
918: The $+$front selects in the bulk of this initial two-front structure a saddle
919: node TW with wavelength $\lambda_{plateau}\sim 1.905$. In the course of time
920: the velocity $v_F^-$ of the $-$front
921: approaches that of the $+$front and a stationary LTW forms with length
922: $l \simeq 47$ that drifts with the velocity $v_d=v_F^+=-0.022$ and oscillates
923: with the frequency of the $+$front. These values of the $+$front remain
924: practically unchanged in the whole process.
925:
926: %\clearpage
927: %-------------- Sec. III ----------------------------
928: \section{Localized traveling wave states} \label{SEC:LTW}
929: %----------------------------------------------------
930:
931: We produced LTW states with very large length $l$ immediately below the
932: Rayleigh number $r^{LTW}_\infty = r^F_{eq}$. There, $l$ diverges thus marking
933: the upper existence boundary of LTW states. And there, the
934: velocities $v_F^+$ and $v_F^-$ of the $+$ and $-$front states, respectively,
935: become equal. See Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r} and \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r} for
936: the corresponding results in the range of $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.25$ that we
937: have investigated in this paper. Upon decreasing $r$ below the threshold
938: $r^{LTW}_\infty(\psi)$ one finds uniquely selected
939: LTW states. Depending on parameters they can coexist stably with front states,
940: extended TW states, and the quiescent basic state.
941:
942: For completeness we include here in Fig.~\ref{Fig:phasediagram} a phase
943: diagram of the $\psi -r$ plane where
944: all the LTWs that we have numerically obtained in the range
945: $-0.65 \leq \psi \leq - 0.08$ are shown by vertical bars together
946: with the saddle-node location $r_s^{TW} (k = \pi)$ of extended TWs (full line)
947: and the oscillatory Hopf bifurcation threshold $r_{osc}(k = \pi)$ for TWs
948: (dashed line). But in this work we focus on the range
949: $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.25$.
950:
951: We should like to emphasize again that we found LTWs for
952: $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.25$ only in the parameter regime below
953: $r^{LTW}_\infty(\psi)$, i.e.,
954: to the left of the crossing points in Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(a) and
955: \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a) where the velocities of independent single fronts
956: become equal. Thus, LTWs exist at these $\psi$ only for parameters for which
957: $v_F^+ > v_F^-$,
958: i.e., for which independent fronts would approach each other: eventually any
959: convective region between them would shrink to zero and the quiescent conductive
960: state would result if this interface motion would continue without change.
961: However,
962: the stabilization effects that allow in such a situation a uniquely selected
963: stable and robust LTW are easily understood with the help of the investigations
964: in the following subsections. On the other hand, for $r>r^F_{eq}$ the front
965: velocities are such that a two-front structure expands.
966:
967: %-------------- Sec. III A ----------------------------
968: \subsection{Transient dynamics towards the selected LTW}
969: %----------------------------------------------------
970:
971: A typical transient dynamics towards the uniquely selected LTW is shown in
972: Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontrelaxation} for $\psi=-0.35$. Here the initial condition was a
973: very broad two-front structure that was prepared at
974: $r=1.3586$ where it shrinks with $v_F^+ > v_F^-$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a)].
975: In fact, the $-$front moves to the left with a speed that is about three times
976: higher than that of the $+$front.
977:
978: In the following shrinking process
979: where the $-$front closes up to the $+$front the latter does not change its
980: velocity at all and the former keeps its velocity as long as
981: the bulk TW part between the two fronts is effectively asymptotic, i.e., without
982: lateral variation. This behavior reflects the fact that in such broad two-front
983: structures there is practically no interaction between the fronts when
984: their distance is so large that an asymptotic TW part is realized between the
985: interfaces to conduction.
986: However, the situation changes when the convective region between the interfaces
987: becomes less extended since
988: it requires a finite 'downstream' growth length behind a $+$interface over
989: which the
990: convection properties still vary with small gradients before the asymptotic TW
991: is reached. The slow lateral variation is best seen in the mixing
992: number $M(x)$ in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(e) reflecting the slow variation of
993: the concentration distribution and in the related convective contribution
994: $\langle b \rangle$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(g)] to the local buoyancy.
995:
996: When the front separation comes to the order of this length
997: one cannot speak any more of a two-front structure with two independent
998: fronts: For the parameters of Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontrelaxation} the velocity
999: of the formerly independent $-$front changes continuously from $v_F^-=-0.067$
1000: to $-0.022$, i.e, to the velocity of the preceeding $+$front and a coherent and
1001: robust LTW
1002: forms which moves with a drift velocity that is determined by the $+$front,
1003: $v_d = v_F^+=-0.022$. During this slowing-down process of the $-$interface
1004: its structure changes to that of the characteristic decay
1005: interface to conduction of a LTW. Therein the two interfaces, i.e., the former
1006: $+$ and $-$fronts, respectively, are in a robust
1007: equilibrium with each other at a uniquely selected fixed distance $l$ that
1008: depends on $r,\psi$ as shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(b).
1009:
1010: So the $-$interfaces of LTWs and front states do not influence significantly the
1011: upstream part of these stuctures. Hence, the local concentration 'barrier'
1012: ahead of the $-$interface does not select the drift velocity of LTWs as
1013: speculated previously \cite{Barten95II}. It is rather the $+$interface that is
1014: the more important one.
1015:
1016: %-------------- Sec. III B ----------------------------
1017: \subsection{Stabilization via front repulsion}
1018: %----------------------------------------------------
1019:
1020: Note that it is the 'downstream wake' in the concentration field of the
1021: preceeding $+$front that
1022: effectively slows down the $-$front: When the latter reaches the region where
1023: the mixing number $M(x)$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(e)] starts to decrease towards
1024: the preceeding $+$front, i.e., when the convective contribution
1025: $\langle b \rangle$ [Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(g)] to the local buoyancy starts to
1026: increase then the speed of the approaching
1027: $-$interface has to slow down. This distance over which the $+$front influences
1028: the $-$front in a two-front structure grows when the Soret
1029: coupling becomes stronger. For example at $\psi>-0.3$ a separation of about
1030: 160 rolls between the two interfaces is not sufficient to ensure independence.
1031:
1032: The sensitive dependence of the velocity of the $-$interface on
1033: the concentration-induced buoyancy variation in the 'wake' behind the $+$front
1034: is the main reason for the robust localization mechanism of (long) LTWs. The
1035: invasion of conduction into the convective region via the trailing $-$interface
1036: is stopped at just that well defined distance from the $+$front where the
1037: concentration-induced convective buoyancy $\langle b \rangle$
1038: has become sufficiently large. The latter increases monotonously towards the
1039: well mixed region under the $+$interface since this degree of advective mixing
1040: decreases gradually in the 'wake' behind the $+$interface. See, e.g.,
1041: ref.~\cite{Jung02} for an explanation of the associated interplay of diffusion
1042: and advection which both reduce concentration gradients and the Soret effect
1043: which generates them. Of course, the effect of stopping the approaching
1044: $-$interface at a particular distance from the $+$interface can be interpreted
1045: as an effective repulsive interaction between them.
1046:
1047: %-------------- Sec. III C ----------------------------
1048: \subsection{Long LTWs}
1049: %----------------------------------------------------
1050:
1051: The structural similarity
1052: between long LTWs and fronts is documented in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}.
1053: Differences between the full lines (fronts) and the dashed ones (LTW)
1054: are visible only in the case of the $-$front in
1055: Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(d,f,h). Here the bulk asymptotic TW that is realized
1056: to the left of the $-$front differs slightly from the plateau TW in the LTW.
1057:
1058: The above mentioned $\delta C$ redistribution via $<\vec{J}>$ enhances the
1059: buoyancy at the $+$interface and leads there to a self-consistent
1060: stabilization of convection against invasion of conduction at the $+$front.
1061: This mixing effect makes stable LTWs possible even for low heating rates $r$
1062: where neither extended TW convection nor fronts exist.
1063:
1064: Long LTWs are characterized by a wide TW part with a well developed
1065: plateau with almost no lateral variation in the convection properties like,
1066: e.g., $v_p(x)$ or $M(x)$ \cite{Jung02}. The TW plateau separates the growth and
1067: the decay part of convection at the $+$ and $-$interface, respectively
1068: and it provides a communication mechanism favoring one direction: The first
1069: region is shielded from the second one by the fast 'downstream' phase
1070: propagation. Like in a single $-$front state the $-$interface of the LTW does
1071: not influence the 'upstream' TW; it only manages the decay transition of the
1072: TW vortices into the quiesent fluid. Thus, the
1073: $+$front character at the $+$interface is also present in the LTW. And the
1074: properties of long LTWs are dominated by and similar to those of the single
1075: $+$front at the same $r$ if the latter exists. For example,
1076: the drift velocities of long LTWs agree with the values
1077: of the corresponding $+$fronts in Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r},
1078: \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}, \ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k}, \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r},
1079: \ref{Fig:LTWapproach}, \ref{Fig:4Psisom-r}. Furthermore, they
1080: continue to show the same linear variation with $r$ as the $+$fronts even where
1081: the latter cease to exist at smaller $r$, cf., the open
1082: circles in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(a) for the cases of $\psi=-0.35$ and
1083: $\psi=-0.4$. Similarly, the variation $\omega(r)$ of long LTWs follows the
1084: corresponding one of $+$fronts, cf., open circles and filled triangles in
1085: Fig.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom-r}.
1086:
1087: A comparison of LTW plateau values with extended TWs and front TWs
1088: is presented in Fig.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}(b,c) for $\psi=-0.25$, in
1089: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r} for $\psi=-0.4$, and in
1090: Fig.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k} for for all examined $\psi$. At
1091: $r^{LTW}_\infty=r^F_{eq}$ (arrows)
1092: there is no difference between the fronts, the diverging LTWs, and the extended
1093: saddle TWs.
1094:
1095: For decreasing $r$ convection is less stable, the disintegration of the
1096: traveling rolls sets in earlier, and the LTW length $l$ is therefore reduced,
1097: cf., the inset of Fig.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r} and
1098: Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(b). The smallest plateau wave numbers of LTWs are
1099: realized for diverging lengths at $r^{LTW}_\infty(\psi)$. With decreasing $r$
1100: one
1101: finds a slight increase of $k_{plateau}$ while the wave number selected by a
1102: single $+$front remains close to that of the saddle TW.
1103:
1104: So this is the LTW bifurcation scenario that we found in the range
1105: $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.25$ (for a discussion of the scenario at smaller Soret
1106: coupling strength cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC:small-soret}): Approaching
1107: $r^{LTW}_\infty$ from below LTWs become
1108: indistinguishable from front states when $l \to \infty$. But further
1109: below $r^{LTW}_\infty$ LTWs
1110: differ more and more in particular with respect to the bulk
1111: wave numbers as can be seen in
1112: Figs.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom+r-k} and \ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}.
1113: However, for long enough LTWs with a well developed spatial bulk plateau
1114: behavior the frequencies $\omega (r, \psi)$ and drift velocities $v_d(r, \psi)$
1115: vary like the corresponding quantities of $+$fronts. This confirms the fact
1116: \cite{Jung02} that it is the $+$front-like growth
1117: interface that selects the properties of a long LTW. Shorter LTWs behave
1118: also with respect to the variation of $\omega (r, \psi)$ and $v_d(r, \psi)$
1119: somewhat differently.
1120:
1121: %-------------- Sec. III D ----------------------------
1122: \subsection{Short LTWs}
1123: %----------------------------------------------------
1124:
1125: Reducing $r$ one eventually arrives for any $\psi$ at the regime of short LTWs
1126: that are marked in Figs~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}, \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}, and
1127: \ref{Fig:4Psisom-r} by shaded circles and that are located close to the dotted
1128: line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:phasediagram}. Here, the dominant influence of the $+$front
1129: vanishes eventually in the regime of short LTW pulses.
1130: No convection plateau can be identified any more in these structures, cf. the
1131: dotted curves in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontrelaxation}.
1132: The prototype of a short LTW consists of a growth interface which is followed
1133: directly by the decay of convection so that the whole pulse has to be seen now
1134: as one integrated structure that no longer contains front-like independent $+$
1135: and $-$interfaces. Hence, short LTWs show a strong lateral
1136: variation of their properties. The shape of their amplitudes superficially
1137: resemble the pulse solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation
1138: \cite{Niemela90,Steinberg91,Kolodner91c,Thual8890,Malomed90,Hakim90,vSaarloos9092}.
1139:
1140: Like for long LTWs the stable existence of short pulses below any heating that
1141: is necessary to sustain
1142: extended TWs is caused by a lateral $\delta C$ redistribution over the pulse.
1143: Also its frequency $\omega$ is constant in the frame that comoves with the drift
1144: velocity $v_d$ of the pulse like for a long LTW. However, compared to long LTWs
1145: short LTWs provide a qualitatively new convection structure.
1146: They are independent of and cannot even be compared with extended TWs because
1147: there is no characteristic wavelength or phase velocity. The special
1148: character of short pulses compared with long LTWs or fronts is
1149: reflected in the change of the $r$-variation of $v_d, l, w_{max}, \omega$ that
1150: can be seen in Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}, \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}, and
1151: \ref{Fig:4Psisom-r} by comparing the dashed circles with the open ones and the
1152: filled triangles.
1153:
1154: We observed the shortest possible LTWs at the lower end, $r^{LTW}_{min}$, of
1155: the $r$ band of LTWs. There they seem to end via a saddle
1156: node bifurcation for pulses \cite{Hakim90}. These minimal pulses always
1157: contained about 5 convection rolls
1158: for all Soret couplings $-0.65 \leq \psi \leq -0.08$ that we have
1159: investigated. This surprising universality of
1160: $l_{min} \simeq 5$, i.e., its insensitivity to the values of the actual heating
1161: rate $r^{LTW}_{min}$ and the Soret coupling $\psi$ is still unexplained.
1162:
1163: Approaching the lower band limit of
1164: LTWs their flow intensity steeply drops [Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(c)]
1165: and consequently their frequency increases [Fig.~\ref{Fig:4Psisom-r}] as the
1166: degree of advective mixing of the fluid decreases.
1167:
1168: %-------------- Sec. III E ----------------------------
1169: \subsection{Comparison with LTW models} \label{SEC:LTWmodels}
1170: %----------------------------------------------------
1171:
1172: Several attempts have been made to describe LTWs by simple model equations.
1173: Stable pulse solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGLE) were
1174: proposed
1175: as a model for confined binary mixture convection \cite{Thual8890}.
1176: The nonlinear interaction between the local amplitude and frequency seems to be
1177: the essential localization mechanism in this approximation.
1178: Indeed, one could find localized solutions of increasing length up to
1179: the limit of an infinitely long two-front state
1180: \cite{Malomed90,Hakim90,vSaarloos9092}.
1181: But some basical problems remained:
1182: Within the CGLE all pulses drift with the same velocity. This is
1183: the critical linear group velocity $v_g$ if the coefficients are derived from an
1184: asymptotic
1185: reduction of the full hydrodynamic field equations. But $v_g$ is too
1186: fast by a
1187: factor of about 20-40 compared with the LTW drift velocity in experiments or
1188: simulations
1189: \cite{Cross88Knobloch88,Zimmermann8993,Surko87,Barten91,Luecke92,Barten95II,Jung02,Kolodner91a,Kolodner94}.
1190: Brand and Deissler \cite{Brand8990} introduced asymmetry in the pulse properties
1191: by adding nonlinear gradient terms to the CGLE.
1192: %???(In fact, already the ordinary CGLE showed asymmetric pulse solutions that
1193: %do not drift with $v_g$ \cite{Hakim90}). ???
1194: A similar extension was given by Bestehorn {\it et al.} \cite{Bestehorn89,Bestehorn888991}
1195: within their framework of order parameter equations. Both could produce a very
1196: slow drift, even opposite to the phase direction \cite{Bestehorn90}.
1197: But this kind of nonlinear modification of the linear group velocity involves a
1198: balance which seems to be
1199: too fragile to explain the occurrence of small pulse velocities over
1200: a whole range of $\psi$ and $r$ \cite{RieckeL92}.
1201:
1202: Another problem was mentioned by van Saarloos and Hohenberg \cite{vSaarloos9092}.
1203: According to their model of a quintic CGLE nonlinear wide pulses
1204: are expected by counting arguments to exist only in a codimension-2
1205: submanifold of
1206: the parameter space. Provided there are no hidden symmetries this seems to be
1207: incompatible
1208: with the robust occurrence of LTWs in experiments.
1209: Furthermore, stable pulse solutions seem to exist only in the bistable regime
1210: whereas LTWs are known to
1211: persist well above the linear onset of extended convection for weakly negative
1212: $\psi$
1213: \cite{Niemela90,Behringer9091,Kolodner9091,Kolodner91a,Kolodner91c,Kolodner91d,Barten91,Barten95II,Luecke98}.
1214: Furthermore, coexisting small stable and wide unstable LTWs were never seen in
1215: the CGLE but found in experiments by Kolodner \cite{Kolodner94}. Instead,
1216: stable broad pulse solutions
1217: are found in the model to arise in a saddle node bifurcation together with an
1218: unstable branch
1219: of smaller 'critical droplets' near the basic state \cite{Hakim90}.
1220: Finally, numerical solutions of the field equations show the
1221: existence
1222: of stable LTWs even below the lowest TW saddle node \cite{Jung02}. This makes
1223: clear that LTWs are
1224: influenced by a localization mechanism that is not contained in the CGLE.
1225:
1226: Inspired by simulation results of Barten {\it et al.} \cite{Barten91,Luecke92}
1227: which showed the important role of the concentration field for a LTW Riecke
1228: \cite{RieckeL92,RieckeD92}
1229: proposed an extension of the Ginzburg-Landau equations. Within a weakly
1230: nonlinear expansion he coupled into the standard CGLE as an additional slow
1231: variable the amplitude ${\mathcal C}$ of an advected mean large-scale
1232: concentration mode that influences the growth of the critical modes.
1233: A similar idea was advanced already by Glazier {\it et al.} \cite{Kolodner9091}.
1234: The extension can induce an additional amplitude-intability of phase winding
1235: solutions
1236: to modulated waves. It may be considered as the origin for pulse formation in
1237: this ansatz \cite{Riecke01}.
1238: Riecke showed that the influence of the real ${\mathcal C}$-mode alone on
1239: the local growth rate (without dispersion) suffices
1240: to generate slowly drifting stable pulse solutions even below a supercritical
1241: TW-bifurcation \cite{RieckeD92}.
1242: In this way he modelled a new localization mechanism to explain the
1243: robust occurrence of LTWs in binary mixture convection.
1244: The amplitude ${\mathcal C}$ can be interpreted as a measure for the local
1245: mixing state or the mean convection-induced deviation of the vertical
1246: concentration gradient from the conductive one.
1247: In this way his extended complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (ECGLE) contains in a
1248: sketchy way physical effects like the mixing influence on the growth rate and
1249: the large-scale concentration redistribution.
1250:
1251: Riecke characterized within his model short and long LTWs
1252: as dispersion-dominated pulses \cite{Riecke96} and states of two fronts
1253: that are bounded by the ${\mathcal C}$ dynamics \cite{RieckeD95}, respectively.
1254: He proposed an explanation for their coexistence in stable and unstable form,
1255: respectively,
1256: by the competition between dispersion-dominated and ${\mathcal C}$-dominated
1257: localization \cite{RieckeD95,RieckeL95}.
1258:
1259: Note, however, that
1260: in contrast to the model used by Riecke our results show
1261: % no correlation between drift direction of long LTWs and their stability.
1262: stable long LTWs that drift either in or opposite to
1263: the direction of phase propagation depending on paramters.
1264: It would be interesting to check whether adding a term of the form
1265: $v |{\mathcal A}|^2 \partial_x {\mathcal C}$ to the ${\mathcal C}$-equation
1266: can stabilize forward drifting long pulses within the model since it
1267: models the concentration 'wake', i.e., the transport of the local mixing state
1268: in phase direction by the traveling rolls of amplitude ${\mathcal A}$.
1269:
1270: Numerical and analytical investigations of the ECGLE predict a hysteretic
1271: transition from
1272: slow to fast drifting pulses or the existence of oscillatory moving ones
1273: \cite{Riecke96}. But both were never seen in experiments or simulations.
1274: Thus, despite their capability in elucidating some essential mechanisms
1275: CGLE type models have the drawback so far that they reproduce only
1276: single aspects of LTWs in a qualitative manner.
1277: Their range of validity and their predictive power is not well known.
1278: And since a satisfactory relation with the
1279: full field equations has not been established these models remain somewhat
1280: arbitrary.
1281: %???Moreover, our simulations show that the strongly nonlinear
1282: %TW front behavior should be described by a model that can also
1283: %cover the dynamics of long LTWs.???
1284:
1285: It appears questionable that weakly nonlinear expansions with spatially
1286: slowly varying mode amplitudes are approriate at all in view of the very
1287: large P\'eclet numbers, $\cal O$(1000), measuring the strength of the nonlinearity
1288: in the concentration balance. Thus, so far numerical simulations of the full
1289: field equations seem
1290: to be the appropriate tool besides careful experiments to gather insight into
1291: the specific physical mechanisms for LTW formation in binary mixture convection.
1292:
1293: %\clearpage
1294: %-------------- Sec. IV ----------------------------
1295: \section{Comparison with experiments and discussion} \label{SEC:Compare-exp}
1296: %----------------------------------------------------
1297: %-------------- Sec. I V A----------------------------
1298: \subsection{Small Soret coupling strength} \label{SEC:small-soret}
1299: %----------------------------------------------------
1300:
1301: An inspection of Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}, \ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}, and
1302: \ref{Fig:phasediagram}
1303: shows that the lower band limit $r^{LTW}_{min}$ for the existence of short
1304: LTWs and the crossing value, $r^F_{eq}=r^{LTW}_{\infty}$, where the velocities
1305: of free fronts become equal approach each other when $|\psi|$ decreases. Thus,
1306: one can foresee an interval of moderately negative $\psi$ where
1307: short and long LTWs can be found close to $r^{LTW}_\infty$.
1308: In this case the upper band limit for the existence of stable LTWs should be
1309: defined by a
1310: backward saddle-node bifurcation at $r_s^{LTW}$ where the branches of stable
1311: short and unstable
1312: long LTWs annihilate each other.
1313:
1314: Hence, we expect that the upper parts of the
1315: bifurcation diagrams of $l$ versus $r$ in the inset of
1316: Figs.~\ref{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r} and in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}(b) curve
1317: backwards towards smaller $r$ when $|\psi|$ decreases further below the values
1318: of the two figures. In this way the shape of the curve $l(r)$ would change
1319: continuously from the form shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig:l-r-scheme}(b) to the one in
1320: Fig.~\ref{Fig:l-r-scheme}(a). The former shows schematically the bifurcation
1321: behavior of $l(r)$ that we have determined numerically for $\psi \lesssim -0.25$.
1322: In fact, at $\psi$ slightly larger than -0.25 we expect the appearence of the
1323: saddle-node in the curves $l(r)$. Fig.~\ref{Fig:l-r-scheme}(a) is a schematic
1324: representation of experimental results of Kolodner \cite{Kolodner94} for
1325: $\psi=-0.127$ as presented in his Fig.~5. He stabilized by an adaptive
1326: heating mechanism long unstable LTWs in coexistence with short stable ones.
1327: Thus, the unstable LTW solution branch [dashed line in
1328: Fig.~\ref{Fig:l-r-scheme}(a)] forms for $r^{LTW}_\infty \leq r \leq r_s^{LTW}$ a
1329: separatrix between the domains of attraction of expanding two-front structures
1330: to the right of the dashed line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:l-r-scheme}(a) and the domain
1331: to the left of the dashed line leading to stable narrow pulses or the basic
1332: state. Furthermore, small LTWs that are prepared at $r < r_s^{LTW}$ will
1333: evolve into expanding two-front structures when $r$ is increased above
1334: $r_s^{LTW}$.
1335:
1336: Note that in Kolodner's experiment \cite{Kolodner94} done at $\psi=-0.127$ the
1337: upper band limit $r_s^{LTW}$ of LTWs lies {\it above} the Hopf bifurcation
1338: threshold $r_{osc}$ for extended TWs where perturbations of the quiescent fluid
1339: can grow. Therefore, one has to address there questions related to linear
1340: and nonlinear
1341: convective versus absolute instability \cite{Chomaz92,Bu99}, to linearly selected
1342: so-called pulled fronts versus nonlinearly selected so-called pushed fronts
1343: \cite{vSaarloos9092,vSaarloos03}, and to the robustness and stability of
1344: nonlinear fronts under emission or absorption of TW perturbations that can
1345: grow in the region occupied by the quiescent fluid.
1346:
1347: %-------------- Sec. IV B----------------------------
1348: \subsection{Strong Soret coupling strength}
1349: %----------------------------------------------------
1350:
1351: For stronger negative $\psi$ the measured LTW properties agree qualitatively
1352: well with our results. For example, the 'arbitrary-width confined states'
1353: found in experiments \cite{Kolodner93II} for $\psi=-0.253$
1354: at a single Rayleigh number are to be identified as two-front structures.
1355: A quantitative comparison is difficult due to the difference in the boundary
1356: conditions:
1357: % whose implications for the spatiotemporal behavior of LTWs can hardly be assessed:
1358: We simulated two-dimensional convection assuming translational symmetry in
1359: $y$-direction while the narrow experimental convection channels
1360: impose no-slip conditions at the walls perpendicular to the roll axes.
1361: There are three effects that account for the difference beteen experiments and
1362: simulations.
1363:
1364: First, the characteristic Rayleigh numbers
1365: in the experiments are higher. This is already known from the
1366: suppression of oscillatory or steady convection instabilities in narrow channels
1367: \cite{Platten84,CJT97,AlBa04}.
1368: The no-slip conditions at the side-walls generate a nontrivial $y$-variation
1369: of the velocity
1370: field that introduces additional internal friction and that has to be
1371: compensated by a higher heating rate \cite{Catton72,Ohlsen90,Bensimon90}.
1372:
1373: Second, the LTW drift velocities in the experiment have the global tendency to
1374: lie below those of the simulations. For example, for $\psi=-0.253$ the
1375: experimental LTWs \cite{Kolodner93II,Kolodner94} move opposite to the phase
1376: velocity whereas according to our calculations $v_d$ should be around $0.05$.
1377: Again, we attribute this difference to the fact that we neglect gradients
1378: in $y$-direction. They change the concentration redistribution dynamics in
1379: particular at the $+$interface of the LTW which determines the drift velocity.
1380: In this context one has to note that already weak
1381: inhomogeneities in a convection cell can slow down and even pin the LTW
1382: movement \cite{Kolodner91a,Kolodner91c,Kolodner93II}.
1383: Finally, the influence of the different boundaries on the frequencies, phase
1384: velocities, and wave numbers of confined states are totally unknown.
1385:
1386: Also when comparing quantitatively our results for fronts with experiments one
1387: should take into account the above discussed points.
1388:
1389: Extrapolating our results for the front velocities to more negative $\psi$
1390: beyond $\psi=-0.4$ we see that already at the lowest TW saddle location
1391: $r_{min}^{TW}$ two-front stuctures
1392: would expand with $v_F^- > v_F^+$. In other words, the velocity crossing
1393: point $r^F_{eq}$ is no longer above $r_{min}^{TW}$ but has virtually moved
1394: below
1395: the lowest TW saddle location where in fact no fronts exist. On the other hand,
1396: LTWs still exist in this $r$-range with length increasing with $r$. However,
1397: $l(r)$ does not seem to diverge anymore as for $-0.4 \lesssim \psi$ which is
1398: compatible with the absence of fronts moving with the same velocity.
1399:
1400: %-------------- Sec. IV C----------------------------
1401: \subsection{Wall-attached confined structures}
1402: %----------------------------------------------------
1403:
1404: Laterally confined convection patches of traveling rolls were found in the
1405: early experiments
1406: \cite{Moses87Heinrichs87,Fineberg88Steinberg89,Niemela90,Kolodner91b}
1407: that were done in narrow rectangular convection channels in the form of
1408: so-called
1409: wall-attached confined structures (WACS). They were localized near one of the
1410: short end walls closing the channel.
1411:
1412: These WACS can be understood with our
1413: knowledge of fronts and free LTWs. For example, for the weakly negative $\psi$
1414: used in the early experiments the phase velocity of the WACS was directed
1415: towards the wall to which they were attached. Indeed, for such parameters
1416: mainly short LTWs occur
1417: with drift velocities in phase direction so that they would end as WACS of
1418: the above described type in finite length channels.
1419: Furthermore, the measured WACS profiles of phase velocity $v_p(x)$, of
1420: wavelength $\lambda(x)$, and their decrease of frequency
1421: with increasing $r$ \cite{Fineberg88Steinberg89,Steinberg91,Kolodner91b}
1422: agree qualitatively with the typical behavior of free short LTWs.
1423:
1424: The connection between WACS and free LTWs was more explicitly demonstrated
1425: by Kolodner \cite{Kolodner90} for more negative separation ratios
1426: $\psi=-0.24$ and $-0.408$:
1427: He prepared a free LTW pulse with large phase velocity (a 'fast confined state'
1428: in his terminology) which drifted slowly opposite to the direction of
1429: phase propagation towards an end wall of the convection channel and became
1430: there a WACS (a 'slow confined state' in his terminology) with lower phase
1431: velocity being directed away from the wall.
1432: % ((According to our results LTWs at $\psi=-0.24$ should drift in phase direction.
1433: % We adress this discrepancy to the two dimensionality of our simulations. Therefore we neglect
1434: % the strong inhomogenities in the lateral $y$-direction.))
1435: In this WACS the phase generating 'trailing front', i.e., the analogue of
1436: the $+$interface is pinned at the wall and
1437: therefore without solutal gradients to the quiescent fluid as in a free LTW.
1438: The absence of these concentration variations at the $+$interface implies and
1439: allows a lateral concentration redistribution over the whole state at lower
1440: levels of the mixing number $M$ in WACS as compared to free LTWs. Consequently,
1441: the phase velocities and frequencies of WACS are smaller than those
1442: of the respective free LTWs. A less dramatic drop of frequency was observed
1443: also between forward drifting LTWs and short WACS at $\psi=-0.047$
1444: \cite{Steinberg91}.
1445:
1446: Due to their better mixing capability, i.e., smaller $M$ it is
1447: very probable that short WACS
1448: % with the growth part attached to a wall
1449: can exist for heating rates below the lower band limit $r^{LTW}_{min}$ of
1450: stable LTW
1451: pulses --- at least in the case where the phase velocity is directed away
1452: from the wall. It would be very interesting to test this conjecture
1453: experimentally, in
1454: particular for strongly negative $\psi$. There $r^{LTW}_{min}$ itself lies
1455: already
1456: well below the range of stable TWs \cite{Jung02} and so the WACS would lie even
1457: lower.
1458: An inportant hint that this conjecture is right is given by Ning {\it et al.}
1459: \cite{Ning96}. They have performed two-dimensional simulations
1460: of a finite-length convection channel
1461: with realistic boundary conditions for $\psi=-0.47, \sigma=13.8$, and $L=0.01$.
1462: Neglecting the slight difference
1463: in $\sigma$ their results should be comparable with our work.
1464: They found short WACS at $r=1.35$ which is according to our results far below
1465: the TW saddle nodes for this
1466: separation ratio and also below the lower band limit $r^{LTW}_{min}$ of free
1467: LTWs
1468: for $\psi=-0.40$. However, these authors claim --- we think, incorrectly ---
1469: that their WACS lie above the saddle-node location $r_s^{TW}$ of extended TWs.
1470:
1471: %-------------- Sec. IV D----------------------------
1472: \subsection{LTW and front stability}
1473: %----------------------------------------------------
1474: In the previous section we have shown that the $+$interface where the
1475: convection rolls grow in 'downstream' direction out of the quiescent fluid
1476: plays the dominant role for the stability of LTWs. While the $-$interface
1477: where the decaying rolls are advected into the quiescent fluid does
1478: not play a decisive role. This is clearly confirmed in
1479: pulse collision experiments \cite{Kolodner9091}.
1480:
1481: Fast TW pulses --- linear ones with small amplitude as well as nonlinear
1482: ones with larger amplitude --- were completely absorbed by a LTW when the
1483: pulses hit the
1484: $-$interface of the LTW, i.e., when the pulse velocity is directed opposite to
1485: and towards
1486: the phase velocity of the LTW. Then the collision with the pulse affects only
1487: the $-$interface
1488: itself and perturbations are quickly advected out of the LTW and do not propagate
1489: upstream towards the $+$interface. For the same reason double-LTW states of
1490: two counter propagating waves can persist over a
1491: long time \cite{Kolodner9091} or even be stable \cite{Kolodner91d}.
1492: Moreover, a pair of LTWs that have their phase propagation directed towards
1493: each other and that interact with each other via their decay interfaces is seen
1494: to be stable over a substantially wider $r$-range than two LTW pulses which
1495: are connected at their growth interfaces \cite{Kolodner91d}. Obviously the
1496: latter case is more critical for the structural integrity of the involved LTWs.
1497:
1498: A LTW is most likely destroyed when another wave with the same direction
1499: of phase propagation infiltrates its phaseflow at the growth region.
1500: Then, while growing the perturbations can be transmitted into the
1501: strongly nonlinear bulk part of the LTW and can destroy its coherence.
1502:
1503: The different selection and stability properties of the $+$ and $-$interfaces
1504: were already observed
1505: in transient convection behavior in various experiments (see for example
1506: \cite{Kolodner88,Bensimon90}), however without further investigation.
1507:
1508: %-------------- Sec. IV E ----------------------------
1509: \subsection{Defected confined states}
1510: %----------------------------------------------------
1511:
1512: The fact that ($i$) different $-$fronts with different bulk
1513: TW parts are possible as stable coexisting states
1514: and that ($ii$) a $+$front interface is in general stable against
1515: downflow perturbations opens
1516: the possibility for another kind of stable long
1517: confined TWs: Therein rolls with low wavelength grow out of the quiescent
1518: fluid in a 'normal' growth part. In the bulk an incoherent phase front
1519: connects this fast wave that is coming from the $+$interface with a slow wave
1520: of higher wavelength and larger amplitude
1521: via spatiotemporal dislocations as, e.g., in Fig.~\ref{Fig:irregularfront}.
1522: The transition could take place via one or more intermediate convection
1523: states. Eventually this slow TW convection undergoes a decay transition
1524: into the basic state via a coherent $-$interface. Such 'defected
1525: confined states' are indeed observed in annular containers \cite{Bensimon90,
1526: Behringer9091} and were studied by Kolodner \cite{Kolodner94}.
1527: He found such structures only for $\psi\le -0.21$.
1528: One may speculate that for these separation ratios the bulk TW that is selected
1529: by and behind the $+$interface is absolutely unstable against the slow wave
1530: in the further 'downstream' part.
1531: This could explain the existence of persistent roll pair annihilations without
1532: the need of fluctuations.
1533:
1534: We finally mention that the occurrence of phase annihilating dislocations
1535: between a growth part and the downstream convection was observed for moderately
1536: negative $\psi$ already in narrow rectangular containers \cite{Kolodner91b}.
1537: Furthermore, end-wall induced Eckhaus instabilities of downstream TW states
1538: have been seen in simulations \cite{BuLu99}.
1539:
1540: %\clearpage
1541: %-------------- Sec. V ----------------------------
1542: \section{Conclusion}
1543: %----------------------------------------------------
1544:
1545: %1---I---10----I---20----I---30----I---40----I---50----I---60----I---70----I---80
1546: For parameters where the conductive quiescent fluid is stable and where
1547: spatially extended TW solutions bifurcate subcritically out of it we have
1548: investigated in quantitative detail relaxed, strongly nonlinear oscillatory
1549: convection
1550: structures with one or two interfaces to the quiescent fluid, i.e, fronts and
1551: LTWs, respectively. They are time-periodic global
1552: nonlinear modes: in the frame that is comoving
1553: with the respective front velocity $v_F$ or with the LTW drift velocity $v_d$
1554: the oscillations have everywhere the same period.
1555:
1556: Fronts come in two varieties.
1557: In a $+$front state the quiescent fluid is located
1558: 'upstream', i.e., phase propagates out of it into convection.
1559: In a $-$front the quiescent fluid is located
1560: in 'downstream' direction and phase moves out of convection
1561: into conduction.
1562:
1563: The lowest Rayleigh number for the existence of fronts is
1564: the lowest saddle-node location of extended
1565: TWs, $r^F_{min} = r^{TW}_{min}$: below it there are no TWs to which the
1566: interface from conduction can
1567: connect. However, LTWs of {\em finite} length $l$ can coexist bistably
1568: together with the conductive state well below the lowest TW saddle when the
1569: Soret coupling is sufficiently negative, $r^{LTW}_{min} < r^{TW}_{min}$.
1570: Furthermore, we have arguments
1571: that WACS at end walls of rectangular channels can exist even at smaller $r$
1572: than LTWs.
1573:
1574: Central for understanding fronts and LTWs is a large-scale concentration
1575: redistribution that influences the buoyancy at the interfaces to conduction in
1576: different ways than in the bulk TW parts. For example, at the $+$interfaces of
1577: fronts and LTWs alike there is a buoyancy overshoot which is sufficiently
1578: large to sustain local convection growth there and that can cause even
1579: invasion of convection into the stable quiescent fluid. At the $-$interface
1580: the lateral buoyancy variation is such as to induce the decay of the approaching
1581: convection rolls into the conductive state.
1582:
1583: Front velocities as well as LTW drift velocities are much smaller than the phase
1584: velocities of the carrier waves for reasons that are related to the
1585: concentration redistribution dynamics. The velocities of $+$fronts decrease
1586: with growing $r$ while those of $-$fronts increase. At some
1587: $r^F_{eq}$ they become equal so that both fronts move with the same velocity.
1588: At this Rayleigh number the length $l$ of the LTWs diverges and there, and
1589: strictly speaking only there, the limiting LTW can be seen as a state
1590: consisting of two fronts. However, $+$fronts and long LTWs have almost
1591: identical propagation velocities and frequencies. Furthermore, they select a
1592: similar bulk wave number. The selected frequencies and bulk wave numbers are
1593: close to those of a saddle-node TW. In fact, it is the $+$front-like growth
1594: interface that selects the properties of long LTWs.
1595:
1596: Small amplitude extended TW perturbations of the conductive state oscillate
1597: with the large Hopf frequency. But the global-mode oscillation
1598: is restrained by the requirement that its frequency has to allow stable
1599: developed bulk TW convection. It is interesting to note that the $+$interface
1600: connecting conduction with
1601: convection selects the largest possible frequency eigenvalue that meets this
1602: requirement, namely the TW saddle-node frequency.
1603: All our $+$fronts select bulk TW wave numbers close to the large-$k$
1604: branch of the TW saddle-node curve, i.e., wave numbers that are too large
1605: to be Eckhaus stable. However, these TWs are only convectively unstable:
1606: perturbations can grow but while doing so they
1607: are advected sufficiently fast downstream in the direction of the TW phase
1608: propagation so that they cannot influence the upstream part of the $+$front
1609: state in a persistent way.
1610:
1611: While $+$front states seem to be uniquely selected we could produce for a
1612: fixed $r$
1613: different coherent $-$fronts that were characterized in the bulk part
1614: by different wave numbers and frequencies close to the TW saddles.
1615: The decay interface adjusts itself to the respective bulk TW part but does not
1616: exert an influence in 'upstream' direction on the bulk convection within a coherent
1617: $-$front. In contrast, the growth under a $+$interface
1618: induces in downstream direction a long concentration 'wake' that is
1619: characteristic
1620: for $+$fronts and long LTWs and of special importance for the latter.
1621:
1622: Here it is interesting to notice that all the interfaces of fronts and LTWs
1623: consist typically only of about 3-4 convection rolls. We furthermore should
1624: like to mention that $+$interfaces of fronts and LTWs always locate a minimal
1625: wavelength. Its value, $\lambda_{min}\sim 1.4$, is remarkably universal for
1626: {\it all $r$ and $\psi$} that we have simulated. This is unexplained so far.
1627:
1628: We have also prepared initial two-front stuctures by connecting a $+$front and
1629: a $-$front with a common long bulk TW. When $r>r^F_{eq}$ they expand. But at
1630: $r<r^F_{eq}$ they shrink towards a uniquely selected LTW of fixed length $l$.
1631: Here the 'downstream wake' in the concentration field of the
1632: preceeding $+$front exerts an effective repulsion on the approaching $-$interface:
1633: the invasion of conduction via the latter is stopped at a well
1634: defined distance $l$ that is determined by the concentration-induced buoyancy
1635: levels in the 'wake' of the $+$front.
1636:
1637: LTWs shortly below $r^F_{eq}$ (where LTW with diverging $l$ are possible) are
1638: very long. Their drift velocities, frequencies, and many stuctural properties
1639: are similar to those of $+$fronts. Decreasing $r$ the LTW length decreases
1640: and one eventually arrives for any $\psi$ at the regime of short LTWs that lies
1641: for strongly negative $\psi$ well below the TW saddle-nodes. These short LTWs
1642: without a convection plateau are qualitatively different structures.
1643: This is also reflected by their drift velocities and frequencies
1644: showing a variation with $r$ that differs from those of long LTWs.
1645: The shortest possible LTWs are realized at the lower end of
1646: the $r$ band of LTWs. These minimal pulses always
1647: contained about 5 convection rolls for all Soret couplings that we have
1648: investigated. This surprising universality of $l_{min} \simeq 5$ remains to be
1649: explained.
1650:
1651: \clearpage
1652: %----------------------------------------------
1653: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
1654: %----------------------------------------------
1655:
1656: \bibitem{CH93}
1657: M.~C.~Cross and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
1658: % {\it Pattern Formation Outside of Equilibrium}
1659: Rev.~Mod.~Phys. {\bf 65}, 851 (1993).
1660: %---------------------------
1661: \bibitem{coupling}
1662: For 5 weight percent of ethanol mixed into water at $T=20^{\circ} C$ the separation
1663: ratio measuring the Soret coupling strength \cite{CH93} is
1664: $\psi \simeq -0.3$;
1665: %\cite{KWM88}.
1666: %---------------------------
1667: %\bibitem{KWM88}
1668: see P.~Kolodner, H.~L.~Williams, and C.~Moe,
1669: %{\it Optical Measurement of the Soret Coefficient of Ethanol-Water Solutions},
1670: J.~Chem.\ Phys.~{\bf 88}, 6512 (1988).
1671: %-----------------------------------------
1672: \bibitem{WKPS85}
1673: R.~W.~Walden, P.~Kolodner, A.~Passner, and C.~M.~Surko,
1674: % {\it Traveling Waves and Chaos in Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures}
1675: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 55}, 496 (1985).
1676: %-----------------------------------------
1677: \bibitem{Moses87Heinrichs87}
1678: E.~Moses, J.~Fineberg, and V.~Steinberg,
1679: % {\it Multistability and confined traveling-wave patterns in a convecting binary mixture}
1680: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 35}, R2757 (1987);
1681: R.~Heinrichs, G.~Ahlers, D.~S.~Cannell,
1682: % {\it Traveling waves and spatial variation in the convection of a binary mixture}
1683: {\it ibid.} {\bf 35}, R2761 (1987).
1684: %------------------------------------------
1685: \bibitem{Behringer9091}
1686: K.~E.~Anderson and R.~P.~Behringer,
1687: % {\it Long time scales in traveling wave convection patterns}
1688: Phys.~Lett.~A {\bf 145}, 323 (1990);
1689: K.~E.~Anderson and R.~P.~Behringer,
1690: % {\it Traveling Wave Convection Patterns in an Annular Cell}
1691: Physica~D {\bf 51}, 444 (1991).
1692: %------------------------------------------
1693: \bibitem{Winkler92}
1694: B.~I.~Winkler and P.~Kolodner,
1695: % {\it Measurements of the concentration field in nonlinear travelling-wave convection}
1696: J.~Fluid Mech. {\bf 240}, 31 (1992).
1697: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1698: \bibitem{Kolodner94}
1699: P.~Kolodner,
1700: % {\it Stable, unstable, and defected confined states of traveling-wave convection}
1701: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 2731 (1994).
1702: %------------------------------------------
1703: \bibitem{Platten96}
1704: H.~Touiri, J.~K.~Platten, and G.~Chavepeyer,
1705: % {\it Effect of the separation ratio on the transition between travelling waves and steady
1706: % convection in the two-component Rayleigh-B\'enard problem}
1707: Eur.~J.~Mech.~B {\bf 15}, 241 (1996).
1708: %------------------------------------------
1709: \bibitem{Kaplan94}
1710: E.~Kaplan, E.~Kuznetsov, and V.~Steinberg,
1711: % {\it Burst and collapse in traveling-wave convection of a binary fluid}
1712: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 3712 (1994).
1713: %-----------------------------------------
1714: \bibitem{Surko91}
1715: C.~M.~Surko, D.~R.~Ohlsen, S.~Y.~Yamamoto, and P.~Kolodner,
1716: % {\it Confined states of traveling-wave convection}
1717: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 43}, R7101 (1991).
1718: %------------------------------------------
1719: \bibitem{Aegert01}
1720: C.~M.~Aegerter and C.~M.~Surko,
1721: % {\it Effects of lateral boundaries on traveling-wave dynamics in binary fluid convection}
1722: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 63}, 46301 (2001).
1723: %-----------------------------------------*******13
1724: \bibitem{Ning97b}
1725: L.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1726: % {\it Formation Process of the Traveling-Wave State with a Defect in Binary Fluid Convection}
1727: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 98}, 551 (1997).
1728: %-----------------------------------------
1729: \bibitem{Batiste01}
1730: O.~Batiste, E.~Knobloch, I.~Mercader, and M.~Net,
1731: % {\it Simulations of Oscillatory Binary Fluid Convection in Large Aspect Ratio Containers}
1732: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 65}, 016303 (2001).
1733: %------------------------------------------
1734: \bibitem{Jung02}
1735: D.~Jung and M.~L\"ucke,
1736: % {\it Localized Waves without the Extended Waves: Oscillatory Convection
1737: % of Binary Mixtures with Strong Soret Effect}
1738: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 89}, 054502 (2002).
1739: %-----------------------------------------
1740: \bibitem{FL}
1741: C. F\"utterer and M. L\"ucke,
1742: % {\it Growth of binary fluid convection: the role of the concentration field},
1743: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 65}, 036315 (2002).
1744: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1745: \bibitem{JML04}
1746: D.~Jung, P.~Matura, and M.~L\"ucke,
1747: % {\it Oscillatory convection in binary mixtures: Thermodiffusion, solutal
1748: % buoyancy, and advection},
1749: Eur.~Phys.~J.~E.~{\bf15}, 293 (2004).
1750: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1751: \bibitem{MJL04}
1752: P.~Matura, D.~Jung, and M. L\"ucke,
1753: % {\it Standing wave oscillations in binary mixture convection: from the onset via
1754: % symmetry breaking to period doubling into chaos},
1755: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 92}, 254501 (2004).
1756: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1757: \bibitem{Bensimon90}
1758: D.~Bensimon, P.~Kolodner, C.~M.~Surko, H.~Williams, and V.~Croquette,
1759: % {\it Competing and coexisting dynamical states of travelling-wave convection
1760: % in an annulus}
1761: J.~Fluid Mech. {\bf 217}, 441 (1990).
1762: %------------------------------------------
1763: \bibitem{Kolodner92Fronts}
1764: P.~Kolodner,
1765: % {\it Extended states of nonlinear traveling-wave convection.
1766: % II. Fronts and spatiotemporal defects}
1767: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 46}, 6452 (1992).
1768: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1769: \bibitem{Bu99}
1770: P.~B\"uchel,
1771: % {\it Konvektion in zweikomponentigen Fl\"ussigkeiten: Einflu{\ss}
1772: % von Scherstr\"omung und seitlicher Berandung auf die Strukturbildung},
1773: Ph.D.\ thesis, Universit\"at des Saarlandes, 1999.
1774: %------------------------------------------------
1775: \bibitem{Surko87}
1776: C.~M.~Surko and P.~Kolodner,
1777: % {\it Oscillatory Traveling-Wave Convection in a Finite Container}
1778: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 58}, 2055 (1987).
1779: %------------------------------------------
1780: \bibitem{AlBa04}
1781: A.~Alonso and O.~Batiste,
1782: % {\it Onset of oscillatory binary fluid convection in three-dimensional cells},
1783: Theoret.~Comput.~Fluid~Dynamics~{\bf 18}, 239 (2004).
1784: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1785: \bibitem{Kolodner90Glazier91}
1786: P.~Kolodner, J.~A.~Glazier, and H.~Williams,
1787: % {\it Dispersive Chaos in One-Dimensional Traveling-Wave Convection}
1788: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 65}, 1579 (1990);
1789: J.~A.~Glazier, P.~Kolodner, and H.~Williams,
1790: % {\it Dispersive Chaos}
1791: J.~Stat.~Phys. {\bf 64}, 945 (1991).
1792: %-----------------------------------------
1793: \bibitem{Luecke98}
1794: M.~L\"ucke, W.~Barten, P.~B\"uchel, C.~F\"utterer, St.~Hollinger, and Ch.~Jung,
1795: % {\it Pattern Formation in Binary Fluid Convection and in Systems with Throughflow}
1796: in {\it Evolution of Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems},
1797: % Lecture Notes in Physics, {\bf m55},
1798: edited by F. H. Busse and S. C. M\"uller, % Lecture Notes in Physics, {\bf m55}
1799: (Springer, Berlin, 1998), p. 127.
1800: %-----------------------------------------
1801: \bibitem{Barten95I}
1802: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, M.~Kamps, and R.~Schmitz,
1803: % {\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures. I. Extended Traveling-Wave and Stationary States},
1804: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 51}, 5636 (1995).
1805: %-----------------------------------------****27
1806: \bibitem{Barten95II}
1807: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, M.~Kamps, and R.~Schmitz,
1808: % {\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures: II. Localized Traveling Waves},
1809: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 51}, 5662 (1995).
1810: %-----------------------------------------
1811: \bibitem{Kolodner88}
1812: P.~Kolodner, D.~Bensimon, and C.~M.~Surko,
1813: % {\it Traveling-Wave Convection in an Annulus}
1814: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 60}, 1723 (1988).
1815: %------------------------------------------
1816: \bibitem{Kolodner91a}
1817: P.~Kolodner,
1818: % {\it Drifting Pulses of Traveling-Wave Convection}
1819: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 66}, 1165 (1991)
1820: %-----------------------------------------
1821: \bibitem{Steinberg91}
1822: V.~Steinberg and E.~Kaplan,
1823: in {\it Spontaneous Formation of Space-Time Structures and Criticallit},
1824: edited by T.~Riste and D.~Sherrington (Kluwer, Boston, 1991), p. 207.
1825: %-----------------------------------------
1826: \bibitem{Niemela90}
1827: J.~J.~Niemela, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
1828: % {\it Localized Traveling-Wave States in Binary-Fluid Convection}
1829: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 64}, 1365 (1990).
1830: %-----------------------------------------
1831: \bibitem{Kolodner9091}
1832: P.~Kolodner and J.~A.~Glazier,
1833: % {\it Interaction of localized pulses of traveling-wave convection with propagating disturbance}
1834: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 42}, R7504 (1990);
1835: J.~A.~Glazier and P.~Kolodner,
1836: % {\it Interaction of nonlinear pulses in convection in binary mixture}
1837: {\it ibid.} {\bf 43}, 4269 (1991).
1838: %------------------------------------------
1839: \bibitem{Kolodner91c}
1840: P.~Kolodner,
1841: % {\it Drift, shape, and intrinsic destabilization of pulses of traveling-wave convection}
1842: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 44}, 6448 (1991).
1843: %------------------------------------------
1844: \bibitem{Kolodner91d}
1845: P.~Kolodner,
1846: % {\it Collision between pulses of traveling-wave convection}
1847: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 44}, 6466 (1991).
1848: %------------------------------------------
1849: \bibitem{Kolodner93II}
1850: P.~Kolodner,
1851: % {\it Arbitrary-width confined states of traveling-wave convection: Pinning, locking,
1852: % drift, and stability}
1853: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 48}, R4187 (1993).
1854: %------------------------------------------
1855: \bibitem{Barten91}
1856: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, and M.~Kamps,
1857: % {\it Localized Traveling-Wave Convection in Binary-Fluid Mixtures}
1858: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 66}, 2621 (1991).
1859: %-----------------------------------------
1860: \bibitem{Cross868889}
1861: M.~C.~Cross,
1862: % {\it Traveling and Standing Waves in Binary-Fluid Convection in Finite Geometries}
1863: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 57}, 2935 (1986);
1864: % M.~C.~Cross,
1865: % {\it Structure of nonlinear traveling-wave state in finite geometries}
1866: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 38}, 3593 (1988);
1867: % M.~C.~Cross,
1868: % {\it Non-linear traveling wave states in finite geometries}
1869: Physica D {\bf 37}, 315 (1989).
1870: %-----------------------------------------
1871: \bibitem{Brand86}
1872: H.~R.~Brand, P.~S.~Lomdahl, and A.~C.~Newell,
1873: % {\it Evolution of the order parameter in situations with broken rotational symmetry}
1874: Phys.~Lett. A {\bf 118}, 67 (1986);
1875: % {\it Benjamin-Feir turbulence in convective binary fluid mixtures}
1876: Physica D {\bf 23}, 345 (1986).
1877: %-----------------------------------------
1878: \bibitem{Fineberg90}
1879: J.~Fineberg, V.~Steinberg, and P.~Kolodner,
1880: % {\it Weakly nonlinear states as propagating fronts in convecting binary mixtures}
1881: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 41}, R5743 (1990).
1882: %----------------------------------------- ******40
1883: \bibitem{Kolodner8889}
1884: P.~Kolodner and C.~M.~Surko,
1885: % {\it Weakly Nonlinear Traveling-Wave Convection}
1886: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 61}, 842 (1988);
1887: P.~Kolodner, C.~M.~Surko, and H.~L.~Williams,
1888: % {\it Dynamics of Traveling Waves near the Onset of Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures}
1889: Physica D {\bf 37}, 319 (1989).
1890: %-----------------------------------------
1891: \bibitem{Fineberg88Steinberg89}
1892: J.~Fineberg, E.~Moses, and V.~Steinberg,
1893: % {\it Spatially and Temporally Modulated Traveling-Wave Pattern in Convecting Binary Mixtures}
1894: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 61}, 838 (1988);
1895: % J.~Fineberg, E.~Moses, and V.~Steinberg,
1896: % {\it Nonlinear pattern and wave-number selection in convecting binary mixtures}
1897: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 38}, R4939 (1988);
1898: V.~Steinberg, J.~Fineberg, E.~Moses, and I.~Rehberg,
1899: % {\it Pattern Selection and Transition to Turbulence in Propagating Waves}
1900: Physica D {\bf 37}, 359 (1989).
1901: %-----------------------------------------
1902: \bibitem{Bestehorn89}
1903: M.~Bestehorn, R.~Friedrich, and H.~Haken,
1904: % {\it Modulated traveling waves in nonequilibrium systems: the 'blinking state'}
1905: Z.~Phys.~B {\bf 77}, 151 (1989).
1906: %-----------------------------------------
1907: \bibitem{Kolodner93}
1908: P.~Kolodner,
1909: % {\it Repeated transients of weakly nonlinear traveling-wave convection}
1910: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 47}, 1038 (1993).
1911: %-----------------------------------------
1912: \bibitem{Kolodner86}
1913: P.~Kolodner, A.~Passner, C.~M.~Surko, and R.~W.~Walden,
1914: % {\it Onset of Oszillatory Convection in a Binary Fluid Mixture}
1915: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 56}, 2621 (1986).
1916: %-----------------------------------------
1917: \bibitem{Kolodner87}
1918: P.~Kolodner, C.~M.~Surko, A.~Passner, and H.~L.~Williams,
1919: % {\it Pulses of oscillatory convection}
1920: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 36}, R2499 (1987).
1921: %-----------------------------------------
1922: \bibitem{Moses86}
1923: E.~Moses and V.~Steinberg,
1924: % {\it Flow patterns and nonlinear behavior of traveling waves in a convective binary fluid}
1925: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 34}, R693 (1986).
1926: %-----------------------------------------
1927: \bibitem{Kolodner90}
1928: P.~Kolodner,
1929: % {\it Neutrally stable fronts of slow convective traveling waves}
1930: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 42}, R2475 (1990).
1931: %-----------------------------------------******48
1932: \bibitem{Kolodner91b}
1933: P.~Kolodner,
1934: % {\it Stable and unstable pulses of traveling-wave convection}
1935: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 43}, 2827 (1991).
1936: %-----------------------------------------
1937: \bibitem{Yahata91}
1938: H.~Yahata,
1939: % {\it Travelling convection rolls in a binary fluid mixture}
1940: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 85}, 933 (1991).
1941: %-----------------------------------------
1942: \bibitem{Ning96}
1943: L.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1944: % {\it Localized Traveling Waves in Binary Fluid Convection}
1945: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 96}, 669 (1996).
1946: %-----------------------------------------
1947: \bibitem{Ning97a}
1948: L.~Ning, Y.~Harada, and H.~Yahata,
1949: % {\it Modulated Traveling Waves in Binary Fluid Convection in an
1950: % Intermediate-Aspect-Ratio Rectangular Cell}
1951: Prog.~Theor.~Phys. {\bf 97}, 831 (1997).
1952: %-----------------------------------------
1953: \bibitem{LL66}
1954: L.~D.~Landau and E.~M.~Lifschitz,
1955: {\it Course of Theoretical Physics},
1956: % {\it Hydrodynamik}
1957: % Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1966.
1958: (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1993), Vol.~6.
1959: %---------------------------
1960: \bibitem{Platten84}
1961: J.~K.~Platten and J.~C.~Legros,
1962: {\it Convection in Liquids},
1963: (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
1964: %---------------------------
1965: \bibitem{HLL92}
1966: W.~Hort, S.~J.~Linz, and M.~L\"ucke,
1967: % {\it Onset of Convection in Binary Gas Mixtures: The Role of the Dufour Effect}
1968: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 45}, 3737 (1992).
1969: %---------------------------
1970: \bibitem{HL95}
1971: St.~Hollinger and M.~L\"ucke,
1972: % {\it Influence of the Dufour effect on convection in binary gas mixtures}
1973: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 52}, 642 (1995).
1974: %---------------------------
1975: \bibitem{LA96}
1976: J.~L.~Liu and G.~Ahlers,
1977: % {\it Spiral--Defect Chaos in Rayleigh--B\'enard Convection with Small Prandtl Numbers}
1978: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 77}, 3126 (1996).
1979: %---------------------------
1980: \bibitem{LLT83}
1981: G. W. T. Lee, P. Lucas, and A. Tyler,
1982: % {\it Onset of Rayleigh-B\'enard Convection in Binary Liquid Mixtures of $^{3}$He in $^{4}$He}
1983: J.~Fluid~Mech. {\bf 135}, 235 (1983).
1984: %---------------------------
1985: \bibitem{MAC-SOLA}
1986: F.~H.~Harlow and J.~E.~Welch,
1987: % {\it Numerical Calculation of Time Dependent Viscous Flow or
1988: % Fluid with Free Surfaces},
1989: Phys.\ Fluids~{\bf 8}, 2183 (1965);
1990: J.~E.~Welch, F.~H.~Harlow, J.~P.~Shannon, and B.~J.~Daly,
1991: % {\it The MAC-Method: A Computing Technique for Solving Viscous,
1992: % Incompressible, Transient Fluid-Flow Problems Involving
1993: % Free Surfaces}
1994: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University
1995: of California, Report No. LA-3425, 1966 (unpublished);
1996: C.~W.~Hirt, B.~D.~Nichols, and N.~C.~Romero,
1997: % {\it SOLA --- A Numerical Solution Algorithm for
1998: % Transient Fluid Flow},
1999: % Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University
2000: % of California,
2001: {\it ibid.} Report No. LA-5852, 1975 (unpublished).
2002: %---------------------------
2003: \bibitem{PT83}
2004: R.~Peyret and T.~D.~Taylor,
2005: {\it Computational Methods in Fluid Flow}
2006: (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
2007: %-------------********60
2008: \bibitem{vSaarloos9092}
2009: W.~van Saarloos and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
2010: % {\it Pulses and Fronts in the Complex Ginzburg-Landau Equation near a
2011: % Subcritical Bifurcation}
2012: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 64}, 749 (1990);
2013: % W.~van Saarloos and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
2014: % {\it Fronts, pulses, sources and sinks in generalized complex Ginzburg-Landau equation}
2015: Physica D {\bf 56}, 303 (1992).
2016: %------------------------------------------
2017: \bibitem{vSaarloos03}
2018: W.~van Saarloos,
2019: % {\it Front propagation into unstable states}
2020: Phys.~Rep. {\bf 386}, 29 (2003); and references therein.
2021: %------------------------------------------
2022: \bibitem{vHvSHo93}
2023: M.~van Hecke, W.~van Saarloos, and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
2024: % {\it Comment on "Absolute and convective instabilities in nonlinear systems"},
2025: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 71}, 2162 (1993).
2026: %------------------------------------------
2027: \bibitem{CoWaSMi99}
2028: P.~Colet, D.~Walgraef, and M.~San~Miguel,
2029: % {\it Convective and absolute instabilities in the subcritical Ginzburg-Landau
2030: % equation},
2031: Eur.~Phys.~J.~B {\bf 11}, 517 (1999).
2032: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
2033: \bibitem{CoCh01}
2034: A.~Couairon and J.~M.~Chomaz,
2035: % {\it Pushed global modes in weakly inhomogeneos subcritical flows},
2036: Physica (Amsterdam) {\bf 158D}, 129 (2001).
2037: %------------------------------------------
2038: \bibitem{SzLu03}
2039: A. Szprynger and M.~L\"ucke,
2040: % {\it Noise sensitivity of sub- and supercritically bifurcating patterns with
2041: % group velocities close to the convective-absolute instability},
2042: Phys.~Rev.~E~{\bf67}, 046301 (2003).
2043: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
2044: \bibitem{Rabaud03}
2045: L. Meignin, P. Gondret, C. Ruyer-Quil, and M. Rabaud,
2046: % {\it Subcritical Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability in a Hele-Shaw Cell},
2047: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 234502 (2003).
2048: %------------------------------------------------*****66
2049: \bibitem{Buechel00}
2050: P.~B\"uchel and M.~L\"ucke,
2051: % {\it Localized perturbations in binary fluid convection with and without throughflow}
2052: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 63}, 016307 (2000).
2053: %------------------------------------------
2054: \bibitem{HoBuLu97}
2055: St.~Hollinger, P.~B\"uchel, and M.~L\"ucke,
2056: % {\it Bistability of slow and fast traveling waves in fluid mixtures},
2057: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf78}, 235 (1997).
2058: %------------------------------------------------
2059: \bibitem{Linz88}
2060: S.~J.~Linz, M.~L\"ucke, H.~W.~M\"uller, and J.~Niederl\"ander,
2061: % {\it Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures: Traveling Waves and Lateral Currents},
2062: Phys.~Rev. {\bf A38}, 5727 (1988).
2063: %------------------------------------------
2064: \bibitem{Barten89}
2065: W.~Barten, M.~L\"ucke, W.~Hort, and M.~Kamps,
2066: % {\it Fully Developed Traveling Wave Convection in Binary Fluid Mixtures},
2067: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 63}, 376 (1989).
2068: %------------------------------------------
2069: \bibitem{Baxter92}
2070: G.~W.~Baxter, K.~D.~Eaton, and C.~M.~Surko,
2071: % {\it Eckhaus instability for traveling waves}
2072: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 46}, R1735 (1992).
2073: %-----------------------------------------
2074: \bibitem{Kolodner92}
2075: P.~Kolodner,
2076: % {\it Observations of the Eckhaus instability in one-dimensional traveling-wave convection}
2077: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 46}, R1739 (1992);
2078: % P.~Kolodner,
2079: % {\it Extended states of nonlinear traveling-wave convection. I. The Eckhaus instability}
2080: {\it ibid.} {\bf 46}, 6431 (1992).
2081: %-----------------------------------------********73
2082: \bibitem{MeAlBa04}
2083: I.~Mercader, A.~Alonso, and O.~Batiste,
2084: % {\it Numerical analysis of the Eckhaus instability in travelling-wave
2085: % convection in binary mixtures},
2086: Eur.~Phys.~J.~E.~{\bf15}, 311 (2004).
2087: %------------------------------------------------
2088: \bibitem{Thual8890}
2089: O.~Thual and S.~Fauve,
2090: % {\it Localized structures generated by subcritical instabilities}
2091: J.~Phys.~France {\bf 49}, 1829 (1988);
2092: %\bibitem{Fauve90}
2093: S.~Fauve and O.~Thual,
2094: % {\it Solitary Waves Generated by Subcritical Instabilities in Dissipative Systems}
2095: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 64}, 282 (1990).
2096: %------------------------------------------
2097: \bibitem{Hakim90}
2098: V.~Hakim, P.~Jakobsen, and Y.~Pomeau,
2099: % {\it Fronts vs Solitary Waves in non Equilibrium Systems}
2100: Europhys.~Lett. {\bf 11}, 19 (1990).
2101: %------------------------------------------
2102: \bibitem{Malomed90}
2103: B.~A.~Malomed and A.~A.~Nepomnyashchy,
2104: % {\it Kinks and solitons in the generalized Ginzburg-Landau equation}
2105: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 42}, 6009 (1990).
2106: %------------------------------------------
2107: \bibitem{Luecke92}
2108: M.~L\"ucke, W.~Barten, and M.~Kamps,
2109: % {\it Convection in binary mixtures: the role of the concentration field}
2110: Physica D {\bf 61}, 183 (1992).
2111: %-----------------------------------------
2112: \bibitem{Cross88Knobloch88}
2113: M.~C.~Cross and K.~Kim,
2114: % {\it Linear instability and the codimension-2 region in binary fluid convection
2115: % between rigid impermeable boundaries}
2116: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 37}, 3909 (1988);
2117: E.~Knobloch and D.~R.~Moore,
2118: % {\it Linear stability of experimental Soret convection}
2119: {\it ibid.} {\bf 37}, 860 (1988).
2120: %------------------------------------------
2121: \bibitem{Zimmermann8993}
2122: W.~Sch\"opf and W.~Zimmermann,
2123: % {\it Multicritical behaviour in binary fluid convection}
2124: Europhys.~Lett. {\bf 8}, 41 (1989);
2125: % W.~Sch\"opf and W.~Zimmermann,
2126: % {\it Convection in binary fluids: Amplitude equations, codimension-2 bifurcation, and thermal fluctuations}
2127: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 47}, 1739 (1993).
2128: %------------------------------------------
2129: \bibitem{Brand8990}
2130: H.~R.~Brand and R.~J.~Deissler,
2131: % {\it Interaction of Localized Solutions for Subcritical Bifurcations}
2132: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 63}, 2801 (1989);
2133: R.~J.~Deissler and H.~R.~Brand,
2134: % {\it The Effect of Nonlinear Gradient Terms on Localized States near a Weakly
2135: % Inverted Bifurcation}
2136: Phys.~Lett.~A {\bf 146}, 252 (1990).
2137: %------------------------------------------
2138: \bibitem{Bestehorn888991}
2139: M.~Bestehorn, R.~Friedrich, and H.~Haken,
2140: % {\it The oscillatory instability of a spatially homogeneous state in large aspect ratio
2141: % systems of fluid dynamics}
2142: Z.~Phys.~B {\bf 72}, 265 (1988);
2143: % {\it Two-dimensional traveling wave patterns in nonequilibrium systems}
2144: % Z.~Phys.~B
2145: {\bf 75}, 265 (1989);
2146: % {\it Traveling waves in nonequilibrium systems}
2147: Physica D {\bf 37}, 295 (1989);
2148: M.~Bestehorn,
2149: % {\it Stationary and Travelling Pulses of the 2D Complex Ginzburg-Landau Equation}
2150: Europhys.~Lett. {\bf 15}, 473 (1991).
2151: %------------------------------------------
2152: \bibitem{Bestehorn90}
2153: M.~Bestehorn and H.~Haken,
2154: % {\it Traveling waves and pulses in a two-dimensional large-aspect-ratio system}
2155: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 42}, 7195 (1990).
2156: %------------------------------------------
2157: \bibitem{RieckeL92}
2158: H.~Riecke,
2159: % {\it Self-Trapping of Traveling-Wave Pulses in Binary Mixture Convection}
2160: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 68}, 301 (1992).
2161: %------------------------------------------
2162: \bibitem{RieckeD92}
2163: H.~Riecke,
2164: % {\it Ginzburg-Landau equation coupled to a concentration field in binary-mixture convection}
2165: Physica D {\bf 61}, 253 (1992).
2166: %------------------------------------------
2167: \bibitem{Riecke01}
2168: A.~Roxin and H.~Riecke,
2169: % {\it Destabilization and localization of traveling waves by an advected field}
2170: Physica D {\bf 156}, 19 (2001).
2171: %------------------------------------------
2172: \bibitem{Riecke96}
2173: H.~Riecke,
2174: % {\it Solitary waves under the influence of a long-wave mode}
2175: Physica D {\bf 92}, 69 (1996).
2176: %------------------------------------------
2177: \bibitem{RieckeD95}
2178: H.~Herrero and H.~Riecke,
2179: % {\it Bound pairs of fronts in a real Ginzburg-Landau equation coupled to a mean field}
2180: Physica D {\bf 85}, 79 (1995).
2181: %------------------------------------------
2182: \bibitem{RieckeL95}
2183: H.~Riecke and W.~J.~Rappel,
2184: % {\it Coexisting Pulses in a Model for Binary-Mixture Convection}
2185: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 75}, 4035 (1995).
2186: %------------------------------------------
2187: \bibitem{Chomaz92}
2188: J.~M.~Chomaz,
2189: % {\it Absolute and Convective Instabilities in Nonlinear Systems},
2190: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 69}, 1931 (1992).
2191: %------------------------------------------------*****90
2192: \bibitem{CJT97}
2193: Ch.~Jung,
2194: {\it Numerische Simulationen dreidimensionaler Konvektionsstrukturen in
2195: bin\"aren Fluiden mit positiver Soretkopplung},
2196: Ph.D.~thesis, Universit\"at des Saarlandes, 1997.
2197: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
2198: \bibitem{Catton72}
2199: I.~Catton,
2200: % {\it The effect of insulating vertical walls on the onset of motion in a fluid heated from below}
2201: J.~Heat Mass Transfer {\bf 15}, 665 (1972).
2202: %------------------------------------------
2203: \bibitem{Ohlsen90}
2204: D.~R.~Ohlsen, S.~Y.~Yamamoto, C.~M.~Surko, and P.~Kolodner,
2205: % {\it Transition from Traveling-Wave to Stationary Convection in Fluid Mixtures}
2206: Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 65}, 1431 (1990).
2207: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
2208: \bibitem{BuLu99}
2209: P.~B\"uchel and M.~L\"ucke,
2210: % {\it Sidewall induced Eckhaus instability of propagating wave convection
2211: % in binary fluid mixtures},
2212: Entropie~{\bf 218}, 22 (1999).
2213: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
2214: \end{thebibliography}
2215:
2216: \clearpage
2217:
2218: %-----------------FIG 1 --------------------------------------------------
2219: \begin{figure}
2220: \includegraphics[clip=true,angle=0,width=14cm]{./FIG1.eps}
2221: \caption{Typical structures of a coherent $+$front (left) and of a $-$front
2222: (right) with nearly the same asymptotic wavelength $\lambda= 1.90$.
2223: Only the vicinity of the respective interfaces between
2224: convection and conduction is shown.
2225: Both fronts propagate to the left ($v^+_F=-0.022, v_F^-=-0.067$), i.e.,
2226: opposite to the direction of the phase velocity $v_p$.
2227: (a, b) Color coded snapshot of concentration deviation $\delta C$ from its
2228: global
2229: mean in a vertical cross section of the layer. The color code is shown at the
2230: right end of (b).
2231: (c, d) Instantaneous lateral wave profile at midheight, $z=0$, of $\delta C$
2232: (green), vertical velocity $w$ (blue), and its envelope.
2233: Arrows mark the positions where $w$ has grown up to $v_p$.
2234: (e, f) Mixing number $M$ (green), Eq.~(\ref{Eq:M(x)}), and phase velocity
2235: $v_p$ (black) of the nodes
2236: of $w$ in the comoving frames. The variation of $\lambda(x)=2\pi v_p(x)/\omega$
2237: is the
2238: same since the frequency $\omega$ is a {\it global} constant.
2239: (g, h) Time averaged deviations from the conductive state at $z=-0.25$ for
2240: concentration
2241: (green), temperature (red), and their sum ($<b>$) measuring the convective
2242: contribution to the buoyancy.
2243: (i, j) Streamlines of the averaged concentration current $<\vec{J}>$ (green) and
2244: velocity field $<\vec{u}>$ (blue). The latter results from $<b>$ and documents
2245: roll shaped
2246: contributions of $<\vec{u}><\delta C>$ to $<\vec{J}>$ at the interfaces.
2247: Thick blue and green arrows indicate $<\vec{u}>$ and transport of positive
2248: $\delta C$ (alcohol surplus), respectively.
2249: Temporal averaging is always performed in the frame comoving with the
2250: respective front velocity. Dashed lines show the decay
2251: part of the long LTW that coexists at the same parameters
2252: ($r=1.3586, \psi=-0.35, L=0.01$) with the fronts.
2253: Differences between the interfaces of the $+$front and the corresponding LTW
2254: interface are not visible on the scale of the above plots.
2255: \label{Fig:frontpics}}
2256: \end{figure}
2257: %\clearpage
2258: %-----------------FIG 2 --------------------------------------------------
2259: \begin{figure}
2260: %
2261: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=8.0cm,angle=0]{./FIG2.eps}
2262: \caption{ Front and LTW bifurcation properties versus reduced Rayleigh number
2263: $r=R/R^0_c$ for $\psi=-0.25$.
2264: Left and right pointing triangles with triangles denote $+$ and $-$fronts,
2265: respectively. Open and shaded circles refer to long and short LTWs,
2266: respectively.
2267: (a) Front velocities of relaxed single-front states (thick dashed lines with
2268: filled triangles), of
2269: expanding two-front states (thin dashed lines with open triangles), and drift
2270: velocities of LTWs (circles).
2271: The inset shows the drastic increase of LTW length $l$ at
2272: $r^{LTW}_\infty=r^F_{eq}$ where the
2273: front velocities of the $+$ and $-$ single-front states become equal.
2274: (b) Frequencies of front states and of long LTWs in comparison with the rest
2275: frame frequencies of laterally periodic TWs. The saddle-node
2276: vicinities of the latter are shown by full lines for several wave numbers
2277: $k=2\pi/\lambda$. TW states with frequencies above the dotted line of
2278: saddle-node TWs are unstable.
2279: (c) Wave numbers selected by front states in the bulk part far away from the
2280: interface (triangles) and in the central part of long LTWs (open circles).
2281: Horizontal lines indicate the laterally periodic TWs that are shown in (b) by
2282: full lines. The continuum of these TW states is bounded in the $r-k$ plane by
2283: the dotted line of TW saddle nodes,
2284: $k_s^{TW}(r)$. Here we show only the large-$k$ branch of it (cf. the dotted
2285: line marked $r_s^{TW}$ in Fig.~\ref{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r} for another
2286: perspective).
2287: %\label{Fig:Psi25fronts}
2288: \label{Fig:Psi25v+om+k-r}}
2289: \end{figure}
2290: %\clearpage
2291: %-----------------FIG 3-----------------------------------------------------------
2292: \begin{figure}
2293: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0,width=8.5cm]{./FIG3.eps}
2294: \caption{ Front states and LTWs for different $\psi$.
2295: (a) Front velocities, $v_F$, of $+$fronts (left pointing triangles), of $-$
2296: fronts (right pointing triangles), and drift velocities, $v_d$, of LTWs
2297: (circles) versus $r$. Note that short LTWs (shaded circles) and long LTWs
2298: (open circles) show different $v_d(r)$-behavior.
2299: The latter varying linearly with $r$ is nearly indistinguishable from $v^+_F(r)$.
2300: Arrows mark the low-$r$ existence boundary $r_{min}^{TW}$ of laterally
2301: periodic TWs
2302: and with it of front states. LTWs exist below this threshold \cite{Jung02} with
2303: drift velocities that show the above mentioned linear variation
2304: with $r$ as long as the LTWs are long enough. To identify an LTW as a long one
2305: we required a clearly visible plateau in the spatial properties.
2306: (b) Length $l$ of the LTWs of (a) measured as the distance between
2307: the half maximum values of the envelope of the vertical velocity field $w$
2308: [cf., blue line in Fig.~\ref{Fig:frontpics}(c,d)].
2309: (c) Maximal vertical flow velocities $w_{max}$ of LTWs.
2310: \label{Fig:3Psisv+l+w-r}}
2311: \end{figure}
2312: %\clearpage
2313: %-------------Fig 4 ---------------------------------------------------
2314: \begin{figure}
2315: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0,width=8.5cm]{./FIG4.eps}
2316: \caption{ Wave properties of $+$fronts (dashed lines with triangles),
2317: long LTWs (circles), and laterally extended saddle-node TWs (dotted
2318: lines) for different $\psi$. The wave numbers of the two former refer to
2319: plateau values in the bulk part away from the interface.
2320: (a) Frequency $\omega$ (for TWs in the rest frame and for LTWs and fronts in
2321: the comoving frame) versus wave number $k$.
2322: (b) The same convection structures in the $k-r$ plane.
2323: The wave numbers and frequencies of LTWs with
2324: $l \to \infty$ (arrows) coincide at $r^{LTW}_\infty=r^F_{eq}$ with those of
2325: the respective $+$ fronts.
2326: \label{Fig:4Psisom+r-k} }
2327: \end{figure}
2328: %\clearpage
2329: %------------Fig 5------------ ----------------------------------------------------
2330: \begin{figure}
2331: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=-90,width=8.5cm]{./FIG5.eps}
2332: \caption{ Laterally periodic TWs, $+$fronts, and LTWs
2333: in the three dimensional $k-r-\omega$ parameter space.
2334: Grey, nose-shaped surface \cite{Jung02} denotes TWs. They are unstable when
2335: $\omega$ is above the dotted line of saddle nodes. Its projection onto the
2336: $k-r$ is marked by $r^{TW}_s(k)$. A particular bifurcation branch for a given
2337: $k$ (e.g., the long-dashed line for $k\sim \pi$) starts backwards with a large
2338: Hopf frequency (not shown) and becomes stable by a saddle-node bifurcation at
2339: the dotted line.
2340: The big plus signs on the TW surface mark asymptotic $+$fronts. The small
2341: plusses at large $k$ denote the
2342: highest wave numbers occurring at the $+$front interface. Long LTWs are
2343: represented with their plateau values by big bullets.
2344: They coexist with fronts (big plusses) in a very narrow $r$ interval at
2345: $r^{LTW}_\infty$ close to the tip of the TW nose. The small bullets at large $k$
2346: denote the largest local wave numbers occurring at the interface of convection
2347: growth. Each horizontal line indicates at fixed $r$ and $\omega$ the spatial
2348: variation
2349: of the local wave number $k$ within a $+$front or a long LTW from the growth
2350: interface to the asymptotic plateau value. The $k$ variation of LTWs from
2351: plateau to the decay interface into conduction is not shown.
2352: \label{Fig:3DPsi40om-k-r}}
2353: \end{figure}
2354: %\clearpage
2355: %----------Fig 6---------- ----------------------------------------------------
2356: \begin{figure}
2357: \includegraphics[clip=true, width=15cm]{./FIG6.eps}
2358: \caption{ Typical spatio-temporal evolution of a $+$front. Shown are the
2359: extrema positions of the vertical velocity field $w$.
2360: The initial condition at time $t=-5$ (not visible) consisted of an extended TW
2361: for $x>8$ with wavelength $\lambda=1.85$ and phase velocity $v_p=1.032$
2362: and quiescent fluid for $x<8$.
2363: Boundary conditions are conduction at $x=0$ and $f(x=160)= f(x=160-1.85)$
2364: that imposes at $x=160$ a wavelength of $\lambda=1.85$.
2365: First, a pulse that causes a quite regular sequence of roll-pair annihilation
2366: events (lower line of defects) propagates to the right with velocity greater
2367: than
2368: $v_p$. The intermediate wave pattern resulting from this primary sequence of
2369: defects is then transformed via further, somewhat erratically occurring
2370: phase defects into the fast asymptotic TW with $\lambda=1.80,v_p=1.258$ that is
2371: favoured by the $+$front. The boundary condition
2372: at $x=160$ that imposes a 'wrong' wavelength there does not influence the
2373: bulk behavior which is selected by the front.
2374: Parameters are $r=1.237, \psi=-0.25$.
2375: \label{Fig:frontrelaxation}}
2376: \end{figure}
2377: %\clearpage
2378: %--------Fig 7------------ ----------------------------------------------------
2379: \begin{figure}
2380: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=15cm]{./FIG7.eps}
2381: \caption{ Spatio-temporal dynamics of a front-selected TW pattern that is
2382: convectively Eckhaus unstable. Shown are the extrema positions of the
2383: vertical velocity field $w$. The front selects a bulk TW
2384: with wavelength $\lambda \sim 1.72$ that is strongly Eckhaus unstable:
2385: While beeing advected 'downstream' phase deformations (that are caused, e.g.,
2386: by computer 'noise') grow sufficiently fast to reach a critical amplitude
2387: within the system length. Then two neighboring rolls are annihilated. That
2388: increases the wavelength and decreases the phase velocity towards Eckhaus
2389: stable values. Parameters are $r=1.26, \psi=-0.25$.
2390: \label{Fig:irregularfront}}
2391: \end{figure}
2392: %\clearpage
2393: %-----------Fig 8--- --------------------------------------------------
2394: \begin{figure}
2395: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0, width=8.5cm]{./FIG8.eps}
2396: \caption{ Evolution of the lateral profiles of the wavelength (top) and of
2397: the vertical flow amplitude $w_{max}/10$ (bottom) after
2398: starting with a very long two-front structure at $r=1.3586, \psi=-0.35$.
2399: The $+$front selects in the bulk of the initial two-front structure a
2400: saddle-node TW with wavelength $\lambda_{plateau}\sim 1.905$. With
2401: $v^-_F<v^+_F<0$
2402: the $-$front approaches the $+$front and doing so the velocity of the former
2403: goes monotonously towards $v_F^+$. This transient process ends in a long LTW
2404: (dashed line) of constant length $l \simeq 47$ with a plateau wavelength of $1.873$.
2405: Its drift and frequency is effectively the same as the respective values of
2406: the $+$front which remain unchanged all the time.
2407: For comparison the profiles of a short LTW at the same $\psi$ but smaller
2408: $r=1.3220$ are shown with dotted lines.
2409: \label{Fig:LTWapproach}}
2410: \end{figure}
2411: %\clearpage
2412: %----------Fig 9 ------------------------------------------
2413: \begin{figure}
2414: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0, width=8.5cm]{./FIG9.eps}
2415: \caption{Phase diagram in the $\psi -r$ plane. The vertical bars indicate
2416: the range of stable existence of those LTWs that we
2417: have numerically simulated. Full and dashed lines refer to the saddle node
2418: location $r_s^{TW}$ of extended TWs and to their
2419: oscillatory Hopf bifurcation threshold $r_{osc}$, respectively; both for a
2420: wave number $k = \pi$ . For $\psi \leq -0.25$ the upper existence boundary of
2421: LTWs was determined by the requirement that $l$ remained below about 120 in
2422: our numerical set-up. The dotted line guides the eye along the lower
2423: band limit $r^{LTW}_{min}$ of LTWs. Parameters are $L = 0.01, \sigma = 10$.
2424: \label{Fig:phasediagram}}
2425: \end{figure}
2426: %\clearpage
2427: %----------Fig 10------ ----------------------------------------------------
2428: \begin{figure}
2429: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0,width=8.5cm]{./FIG10.eps}
2430: \caption{ Frequency $\omega$ of $+$fronts (dashed lines with triangles) and
2431: of LTWs (full lines with circles) in the respective comoving frame versus
2432: $r$ for different $\psi$. Open and shaded circles refer to long and short LTWs,
2433: respectively. The frequencies of the former are the same as those of the
2434: fronts while short LTWs differ. Arrows indicate the lower limit of existence
2435: of the fronts at $r^F_{min}=r^{TW}_s(k \simeq \pi)$.
2436: %\label{Fig:fandLvaluesB}
2437: \label{Fig:4Psisom-r}}
2438: \end{figure}
2439: %\clearpage
2440: %----------Fig 11----------------------------------------------------------
2441: \begin{figure}
2442: \includegraphics[clip=true, angle=0,width=8.5cm]{./FIG11.eps}
2443: \caption{ Schematic bifurcation diagrams of LTW length $l$ versus $r$. (a)
2444: experimental results \cite{Kolodner94} obtained for $\psi=-0.127$ with dashed
2445: line denoting unstable states (cf., text for further explanation); (b)
2446: numerically obtained bifurcation behavior for $-0.4 \leq \psi \leq -0.25$.
2447: \label{Fig:l-r-scheme}}
2448: \end{figure}
2449: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
2450:
2451:
2452:
2453:
2454: \end{document}
2455:
2456: