1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsf}
3: \newcommand{\beq }{\begin{eqnarray}}
4: \newcommand{\eeq }{\end{eqnarray}}
5: \newcommand{\lr }{\left(}
6: \newcommand{\rl }{\right)}
7: \newcommand{\lan }{\langle}
8: \newcommand{\ran }{\rangle}
9: \newcommand{\SRa}{
10: \put(0,6) { \vector(1,0){10} }
11: \put(10,0){ \vector(-1,0){10} }
12: \qquad}
13: \newcommand{\SRb}{
14: \put(0,10) { \vector(1,-1){10} }
15: \put(10,10){ \vector(-1,-1){10} }
16: \qquad}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{Spectral Form Factor for Chaotic Dynamics \\
21: in a Weak Magnetic Field}
22:
23: \author{Keiji Saito {\footnote {\tt email:
24: saitoh@spin.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}}~~and
25: Taro Nagao {\footnote {\tt email:
26: nagao@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp}}
27: }
28: \date{}
29: \maketitle
30:
31: \begin{center}
32: \it
33: $^*$ Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science,
34: University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
35: \end{center}
36: \begin{center}
37: \it
38: $^\dag$ Graduate School of Mathematics,
39: Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, \\ Nagoya 464-8602, Japan
40: \end{center}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: Using semiclassical periodic orbit theory for a chaotic system in a
44: weak magnetic field, we obtain the form factor predicted
45: by Pandey and Mehta's two matrix model up to the third order. The third
46: order contribution has a peculiar term which exists only in the
47: intermediate crossover domain between the GOE (Gaussian Orthogonal
48: Ensemble) and the GUE (Gaussian Unitary Ensemble) universality classes.
49: The exact expression is obtained by taking account of the contribution
50: from encounter regions where orbit loops are connected.
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: PACS: 05.45.+b; 05.40.+j
54:
55: \medskip
56:
57: KEYWORDS: quantum chaos; periodic orbit theory; random matrices
58:
59: \newpage
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: Universal level statistics of classically chaotic systems
64: in agreement with the RMT (Random Matrix Theory) prediction
65: has been intensively studied since it was conjectured two
66: decades ago\cite{BGS84}.
67:
68: Berry\cite{B85} first evaluated the first order term of the
69: spectral form factor using the semiclassical periodic orbit
70: theory\cite{GW}. His method is called the diagonal approximation.
71: It is applicable to both of the GOE (Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble)
72: and GUE (Gaussian Unitary Ensemble) universality classes.
73: In the absence of time reversal invariance, the first order
74: term is evaluated as a sum over the periodic orbits and agrees
75: with the prediction derived from the GUE of random matrices.
76: If the system is time reversal invariant, we additionally need
77: to sum up over the pairs of the periodic orbits mutually
78: time reverse. The result is also in agreement with the RMT
79: prediction derived from the GOE.
80:
81: Recently Sieber and Richter (SR) showed that a family of orbit pairs
82: with an encounter gave the first correction to the diagonal approximation
83: \cite{SR01}. Their idea clarifies what corresponds to the {\em order}
84: of each term in the context of the periodic orbit theory. Heusler et al.
85: \cite{HMBH04} further generalized SR's idea by using a combinatorial
86: analysis and M\"uller et al.\cite{MHBHA04,MHBHA05} obtained the
87: full expansion which yields the RMT form factor.
88:
89: In this paper, we investigate the form factor of chaotic
90: systems in a weak magnetic field, extending the method
91: of Ref.\cite{HMBH04}. Our aim is to reproduce
92: the universal level statistics in the crossover domain
93: between the GOE and GUE universality classes. The corresponding
94: RMT formula is derived from Pandey and Mehta's two matrix
95: model\cite{PM83}. This formula interpolates the form
96: factors of GOE and GUE, which correspond
97: to chaotic systems without and with a magnetic field, respectively.
98: Using a quantum graph, the authors previously obtained the second order
99: term by employing Sieber and Richter's periodic orbit pairs and
100: showed that it agreed with the RMT prediction\cite{NS03}.
101: Here we consider the third order term of the
102: form factor and clarify a mechanism to yield the RMT
103: expression. We show that the RMT expression is obtained
104: by taking account of the interference of the gauge
105: potential in the encounters of periodic orbits.
106:
107: Let us explicitly present the RMT prediction of the form factor.
108: It is derived from Pandey and Mehta's two matrix
109: model, as explained in\cite{NS03}. For small $\tau
110: (0\le \tau \le {1\over 2})$, the RMT form factor $K_{\rm RM}(\tau)$
111: with a parameter $\mu$ is written as
112: \beq
113: K_{\rm RM} (\tau ) &=& \tau + {1\over 2}
114: \int_{1-2\tau }^{1} dk \, {k \over k + 2\tau }
115: e^{-\mu(k + \tau)}
116: \nonumber \\
117: &=& \tau + \tau e^{-\mu} - 2\tau^2 e^{-\mu}
118: + \tau^3 \left(
119: {\mu^2 \over 6} e^{-\mu} +
120: 2 e^{-\mu} \right) + \cdots . \label{pd}
121: \eeq
122:
123: The GOE and GUE limits correspond to $\mu\to0$ and
124: $\mu\to\infty$, respectively. Up to the second order of
125: $\tau$, each term is a monotonic function of the parameter
126: $\mu$. However, the third order term in (\ref{pd})
127: includes a peculiar nonmonotonic term $\tau^3
128: {\mu^2 \over 6} e^{-\mu}$, which vanishes in both of the GOE
129: and GUE limits. Such terms generally appear in higher order
130: contributions. We can thus expect that a semiclassical
131: analysis of the third order term will offer a basis to
132: reproduce the full expansion of $K_{\rm RM}(\tau)$.
133:
134: \section{Chaotic System in a Magnetic Field and Periodic Orbit Theory}
135:
136: We consider a quantum system in a magnetic field and
137: assume that the corresponding classical dynamics is chaotic.
138: In the semiclassical limit $\hbar \rightarrow 0$, the form factor
139: of such a system can be
140: formally written in terms of the classical periodic
141: orbits\cite{GW};
142: \beq
143: K_{\rm po}(\tau ) =
144: \left\langle
145: \sum_{\gamma , \gamma'} A_{\gamma}A_{\gamma'}^{\ast} e^{i( S_{\gamma}
146: + \theta_{\gamma})/\hbar }
147: e^{ -i( S_{\gamma'} + \theta_{\gamma'} )/\hbar }
148: \delta \left( \tau - {T_{\gamma} + T_{\gamma'} \over 2T_{\rm H}}\right)
149: \right\rangle ,
150: \label{fmr}
151: \eeq
152: where $S_{\gamma}$, $T_{\gamma}$ and $A_{\gamma}$ are
153: the action without gauge potential
154: (including the Maslov phase), period and
155: dimensionless stability amplitude of the
156: periodic orbit $\gamma$. The phase $\theta_{\gamma}$ is
157: an effect of the gauge potential in the action along
158: the orbit $\gamma$, i.e.,
159: $\theta_{\gamma}=
160: \int_{\gamma} d{\bf x}_{\gamma} \cdot {\bf a}({\bf x}_{\gamma})
161: = \int_{\gamma} dt \, d{\bf x}_{\gamma}/dt \cdot {\bf a}({\bf x}_{\gamma})$,
162: using the gauge potential ${\bf a}({\bf x}_{\gamma})$ at the
163: position ${\bf x}_{\gamma}$.
164: The angular bracket stands for an average over
165: the mean energy $(E+E')/2$ and over a time interval much smaller than
166: the Heisenberg time $T_{\rm H}$. Since the classical dynamics
167: is chaotic, each periodic orbit shows a diffusive
168: behavior\cite{TR03,R_text}; successive changes of the velocity
169: can be regarded as independent events. Hence, if the time $T$
170: elapsed on an orbit $\gamma$ is sufficiently large, we assume
171: that the term $g_{\gamma} (t) \equiv d{\bf x}_{\gamma}/dt
172: \cdot {\bf a}({\bf x}_{\gamma}) $ can be replaced by the
173: Gaussian white noise satisfying the correlation
174: $\lan \lan g_{\gamma} (t) g_{\gamma }(t') \ran \ran
175: = 2D \delta (t-t')$. Here a Gaussian average $\lan\lan
176: \cdots\ran\ran$ is computed as a functional integral
177: \beq
178: \label{gaussian}
179: \lan \lan \ F[g_{\gamma}] \ \ran \ran = \frac{\displaystyle
180: \int {\cal D}g_{\gamma} \ {\rm exp}\left[
181: -\frac{1}{4 D} \int_0^T dt (g_{\gamma}(t))^2
182: \right] F[g_{\gamma}]}
183: {\displaystyle \int {\cal D}g_{\gamma} \
184: {\rm exp}\left[ -\frac{1}{4 D} \int_0^T dt (g_{\gamma}(t))^2
185: \right]}.
186: \eeq
187: Incorporating such a Gaussian average, we obtain a formula
188: \beq
189: K_{\rm po} (\tau ) =
190: \left\langle
191: \sum_{\gamma , \gamma'} A_{\gamma}A_{\gamma'}^{\ast}
192: e^{i( S_{\gamma} -S_{\gamma'} )/\hbar }
193: \lan\lan e^{ i( \theta_{\gamma} - \theta_{\gamma'} )/\hbar} \ran\ran
194: \delta \left( \tau - {T_{\gamma} + T_{\gamma'} \over 2T_{\rm H}}\right)
195: \right\rangle . \label{pobs}
196: \eeq
197: We start from Berry's diagonal approximation, which yields
198: the first order term\cite{B85}. This term is obtained from
199: two types of periodic orbit pairs
200: $({\gamma,\gamma})$ and $({\gamma, \overline{\gamma}})$. Here
201: a periodic orbit $\overline{\gamma}$ is the time reverse of $\gamma$.
202: For the pairs of identical orbits $({\gamma,\gamma})$, the dependence
203: on the gauge potential is canceled, so that the result does not
204: depend on the magnetic field. The estimate for the form
205: factor is given by the Hannay and Ozorio de Almeida (HOdA)'s
206: sum rule\cite{HODA84};
207: \beq
208: \sum_{\gamma}\left| A_{\gamma}\right|^2
209: \delta \lr \tau - {T_{\gamma}\over T_{H}}\rl
210: = \tau.
211: \eeq
212: For the pairs of mutually time reverse orbits $({\gamma,\overline{\gamma}})$,
213: on the other hand, the result depends on the magnetic field.
214: It is estimated as
215: \beq
216: \sum_{\gamma}\left| A_{\gamma}\right|^2
217: \delta \lr \tau - {T_{\gamma}\over T_{H}}\rl
218: \lan\lan e^{ i( \theta_{\gamma} - \theta_{\overline{\gamma}})/\hbar} \ran\ran
219: =\tau \lan\lan e^{2i \theta_{\gamma} /\hbar } \ran\ran
220: = \tau e^{-bT},
221: \eeq
222: where the last equality results from the
223: Gaussian average (\ref{gaussian}).
224: Here $T$ is the period $T(=\tau T_{H})$ and $b$
225: is defined in terms of the diffusion constant $D$
226: as $b = 4D/\hbar^2$, which depends on the magnetic field.
227: Putting the above results together, we reproduce the
228: first order term of the form factor
229: \cite{BGOS95} as
230: \beq
231: K_{\rm po}^{(1)} &=& \tau + \tau e^{-bT},
232: \eeq
233: which reproduces the first two terms of the
234: RMT prediction (\ref{pd}). The RMT parameter
235: $\mu$ is identified with $b T$.
236:
237: We next consider the second order term.
238: As shown by Sieber and Richter (SR) \cite{SR01}, a family of orbit pairs
239: with one encounter plays a crucial role\cite{NS03,TR03}.
240: We can symbolically write SR pairs as $\gamma=E L_1 \overline{E} L_2$ and
241: $\gamma'=E \overline{L}_1 \overline{E} L_2$ (see Figure 1). Here $E$ and its almost
242: time reverse $\overline{E}$ are the orbit segments in the encounter where two
243: loops are connected. The loops are denoted as $L_1$ and $L_2$,
244: respectively, and $\overline{L}_1$ is the time reverse of $L_1$.
245: Let us see the behavior of the periodic orbits $\gamma$ and
246: $\gamma'$ in the encounter region. The directions of encounter
247: orbits are depicted as $\SRa$ for
248: $\gamma$ and $\SRb$ for $\gamma'$. For a system with two
249: degrees of freedom, it is convenient to use the
250: Poincar\'e section ${\cal P}$ in the phase space
251: \cite{HMBH04}. The orbit $\gamma$ pierces through
252: $\cal P$ at two phase space points denoted by vectors
253: $x_a$ and $x_b$. Let us express
254: ${\cal T}x_b - x_a$ (${\cal T}$ is the time reversal
255: operator) in terms of the pairwise normalized
256: vectors $\hat{e}_{s}$ and $\hat{e}_{u}$ as $
257: {\cal T}x_b - x_a = u \hat{e}_{u} + s \hat{e}_{s}$.
258: To demand that the orbits in the encounter are mutually
259: close, we introduce a bound $c$ and assume that $|u|,|s|
260: < c$. Then the partner orbit $\gamma'$ (or the
261: time reverse of $\gamma'$) pierces at $x_a^p =
262: x_a + u \hat{e}_{u}$ and at $x_b^p= {\cal T}(x_a
263: + s\hat{e}_{s})$. We can consequently estimate
264: the duration $t_{\rm enc}$ of the encounter
265: and the action difference $\Delta S$ for the
266: two orbits as
267: \beq
268: t_{\rm enc} =
269: {1\over \lambda} \ln {c^{2}\over |us|}
270: \qquad {\rm and}\qquad
271: \Delta S = us,
272: \eeq
273: where $\lambda$ is the Liapunov exponent.
274:
275: We need to estimate the number of encounters
276: in one periodic orbit of a period $T$.
277: This can be computed as
278: \beq
279: \int_{-c}^c du ds
280: \int_{0}^{T -2t_{\rm enc}} d T_1
281: {T \over {\cal N} t_{\rm enc} \Omega},
282: \label{enb}
283: \eeq
284: where $\Omega^{-1} (={1\over 2\pi\hbar T_H})$
285: is the ergodic return probability per a unit action.
286: The factor $T \int_{0}^{T - 2 t_{\rm enc}} {\rm d}T_1$
287: indicates that one of the two piercings occurs in the
288: time interval $[0,T]$ and that the time $T_1$ elapsed
289: on the loop $L_1$ or $\overline{L}_1$ lies in $[0,T-2 t_{\rm enc}]$.
290: The combinatorial factor ${\cal N} = 2$ is
291: necessary to avoid a double counting due to
292: the equivalence of $E$ and $\overline{E}$ in
293: $\gamma$.
294:
295: Let us now evaluate the contribution of the gauge potential
296: to the second order term. The Gaussian average (\ref{gaussian})
297: yields a factor $e^{-b T_1}$ as a contribution from the
298: the pair of the loops $L_1$ and $\overline{L}_1$. In the region of the encounter,
299: the gauge potential destructively interferes with itself
300: and yields no contribution. That is, since mutually
301: almost time reversed orbits are combined in the encounter,
302: a product of the phase factors $e^{i \theta_{\gamma}}$
303: and $e^{-i \theta_{\gamma^{\prime}}}$
304: gives a factor $1$. Incorporating the factor $2$ due to the
305: time reversal of the orbit $\gamma^{\prime}$, we
306: obtain the second order term as
307: \beq
308: K_{\rm po}^{(2)}(\tau) &=& 2 \sum_{\gamma}\left| A_{\gamma}\right|^2
309: \delta \lr \tau - {T_{\gamma}\over T_{H}}\rl
310: \int_{-c}^{c} du ds
311: \int_{0}^{T -2t_{\rm enc}} d T_1
312: {T \over {\cal N} t_{\rm enc} \Omega}
313: e^{-b T_{1}}
314: e^{i us/\hbar}
315: \nonumber \\
316: &\rightarrow&-2\tau^2 e^{-b T},
317: \eeq
318: again in agreement with (\ref{pd}). Here we calculated only the
319: term independent of $t_{\rm enc}$, as the other terms vanish
320: due to appearances of extra factors $\hbar$ or rapid
321: oscillations\cite{MHBHA05}.
322:
323: \section{Third Order Term}
324: We now calculate the third order contribution, following
325: the recipe explained in previous section. We will find
326: that the calculation is somewhat different from the second
327: order term because the interference of the gauge
328: potential in the encounter regions gives a
329: significant contribution. For the
330: periodic orbit pairs which contribute
331: to the third order term, Heusler
332: et al.\cite{HMBH04} introduced several
333: notations (aas, api, ppi, ac and pc).
334: In order to take account of the time
335: reversal of the orbit $\gamma^{\prime}$,
336: we modify their notations by putting
337: suffixes (-a and -b) as drawn in
338: Figures 2 and 3.
339:
340: Let us first consider a general orbit pair
341: $\alpha$ with $L$ loops and $V$ encounters.
342: Extending the result (\ref{enb}) for
343: the second order term, we can compute
344: the number of encounters in one periodic
345: orbit of a period $T$ as
346: \beq
347: \int d{\bf u}d{\bf s}
348: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}} dT_1
349: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}-T_1} dT_2 \cdots
350: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}-T_1-T_2-\cdots-T_{L-2}} dT_{L-1}
351: \ Q_{\alpha},
352: \eeq
353: where
354: \beq
355: Q_{\alpha} = \frac{ T}{{\cal N}_{\alpha} \
356: \prod_{v=1}^V t_{{\rm enc},v} \ \Omega^{L-V}}.
357: \eeq
358: The integration measures are $d{\bf u} = \prod_{j=1}^{L-V}
359: du_j$ and $d{\bf s} = \prod_{j=1}^{L-V} ds_j$ in terms of
360: appropriate phase space coordinates $(u_j,s_j)$. The times elapsed
361: on the $L$ loops are depicted as $T_1,T_2,\cdots,T_L$.
362: The duration of the $v$-th encounter is written as $t_{{\rm enc},v}$.
363: The total duration of the encounters in one periodic orbit
364: is $t_{\alpha} = \sum_{v=1}^V l_v t_{{\rm enc},v}$ ($l_v$
365: is the number of the orbit segments contained in the $v$-th
366: encounter). A combinatorial factor ${\cal N}_{\alpha}$
367: depends on the structure of the orbit pair.
368: \par
369: We then consider the contribution of the gauge potential.
370: The Gaussian average (\ref{gaussian}) on the loops yields
371: a factor $e^{-b T_1} e^{-b T_2} \cdots e^{-b T_K}$,
372: where $K$ is the number of the pairs of mutually
373: time reversed loops. In Figures, the encounter orbits
374: are schematically drawn along with the passing
375: directions through the encounter regions. For the $v$-th
376: encounter, we introduce the number $n_{{\rm enc},v}$ of
377: the orbit segment pairs which cause the
378: significant gauge potential contribution.
379: Let us fix an arbitrary direction $(+)$
380: of the orbit passing and call the opposite
381: direction $(-)$. Then the number
382: $n_{{\rm enc},v}$ can be computed as
383: \beq
384: n_{{\rm enc},v} = \frac{1}{2}
385: \left| \left\{ \#^{(+)}(\gamma)-\#^{(-)}(\gamma) \right\} -
386: \left\{ \#^{(+)}(\gamma') - \#^{(-)}(\gamma') \right\} \right|.
387: \eeq
388: Here $\#^{(+)}(\gamma)$ and $\#^{(-)}(\gamma)$ mean the
389: numbers of passings of $\gamma$ through the encounter
390: in $(+)$ and $(-)$ directions, respectively. We again compute
391: the Gaussian average (\ref{gaussian}) to evaluate the effect
392: of the gauge potential. The contribution from an encounter
393: is then estimated as $\lan \lan e^{2 i n_{{\rm enc},v}
394: \theta_{\gamma}/\hbar} \ran \ran
395: = e^{- b n_{{\rm enc},v}^2 t_{{\rm enc},v}}$.
396:
397: Putting the above results together, we find the
398: contribution to the form factor from the orbit
399: pair $\alpha$ as
400: \beq
401: & & K_{\rm po,\alpha}(\tau)
402: = \tau \int d{\bf u}d{\bf s}
403: \nonumber \\ & \times &
404: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}} dT_1
405: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}-T_1} dT_2 \cdots
406: \int_0^{T-t_{\alpha}-T_1-T_2-\cdots-T_{L-2}} dT_{L-1}
407: Q_{\alpha} R_{\alpha} e^{i \Delta S/\hbar} \nonumber \\
408: \label{kpo}
409: \eeq
410: with
411: \beq
412: R_{\alpha} = e^{-b(T_1 + T_2 + \cdots + T_K)}
413: e^{-b(n_{{\rm enc},1}^2 t_{{\rm enc},1}
414: + n_{{\rm enc},2}^2 t_{{\rm enc},2} + \cdots +
415: n_{{\rm enc},V}^2 t_{{\rm enc},V})}.
416: \eeq
417: This contributes to the terms of order $L-V+1$.
418: Here $\tau$ appears due to the HOdA sum rule
419: and the action difference is estimated as
420: $\Delta S = \sum_{j=1}^{L-V} u_j s_j$.
421:
422: Let us go back to the calculation of the third order
423: term with $L-V+1=3$. From Figures 2 and 3,
424: we can readily see the followings. For $\alpha=$ aas,api
425: and ppi, $L=4$, $V=2$ and $t_{\alpha}=2\lr
426: t_{\rm enc, 1} + t_{\rm enc, 2}\rl$. On the other hand,
427: for $\alpha=$ ac and pc, $L=3$, $V=1$ and
428: $t_{\alpha}=3 t_{\rm enc}$. Thus we can
429: calculate $R_{\alpha}$ as
430: \beq
431: R_{\rm aas-a}
432: &=& R_{\rm aas-b} = e^{-b\lr T_1 + T_2 \rl} , \\
433: R_{\rm api-a} &=& R_{\rm api-b} = e^{-b\lr T_1 + T_2
434: + t_{\rm enc, 1}+ t_{\rm enc , 2} \rl} , \\
435: R_{\rm ppi-a} &=& 1 , \\
436: R_{\rm ppi-b} &=&
437: e^{-b\lr T -t_{\rm ppi}\rl
438: -4b\lr t_{\rm enc , 1}+ t_{\rm enc ,2}\rl } , \\
439: R_{\rm ac-a} &=& e^{-b\lr T_1 + T_2 \rl} , \\
440: R_{\rm ac-b} &=& e^{-b\lr T_1 + t_{\rm enc} \rl} , \\
441: R_{\rm pc-a} &=& 1 , \\
442: R_{\rm pc-b} &=& e^{-b\lr T -t_{pc} \rl - 9 b t_{\rm enc}} .
443: \eeq
444: Moreover the combinatorial factor ${\cal N}_{\alpha}$
445: is evaluated in \cite{HMBH04} as
446: \beq
447: ({\cal N}_{\rm aas}, {\cal N}_{\rm api}, {\cal N}_{\rm ppi},
448: {\cal N}_{\rm ac}, {\cal N}_{\rm pc})=(2,2,4,1,3).
449: \eeq
450:
451: We substitute these formulas into (\ref{kpo}) and
452: again extract the terms independent of the encounter
453: durations $t_{{\rm enc} ,1}$, $t_{{\rm enc} ,2}$ and
454: $t_{\rm enc}$. After a straightforward calculation,
455: we obtain contributions from the orbit pairs
456: \beq
457: K_{\rm po,aas-a}(\tau ) &=& K_{\rm po, aas-b}(\tau ) = 2 \tau^3 e^{-bT} , \\
458: K_{\rm po,api-a}(\tau ) &=& K_{\rm po, api-b} (\tau ) =
459: \tau^3 \left[
460: -{e^{-bT} -1 \over bT} + {1 + e^{-bT} \over 2}
461: \right] , \\
462: K_{\rm po,ppi-a}(\tau ) &=& \tau^3 ,\\
463: K_{\rm po,ppi-b}(\tau ) &=& \tau^3 e^{-bT} \left[
464: {(bT)^2 \over 6} + bT + 1 \right] ,\\
465: K_{\rm po,ac-a}(\tau ) &=& -3\tau^3 e^{-bT} ,\\
466: K_{\rm po,ac-b}(\tau ) &=& \tau^3 \left[
467: -1 + {2\lr e^{-bT} - 1 \rl \over bT}
468: \right] ,\\
469: K_{\rm po,pc-a}(\tau ) &=& -\tau^3 , \\
470: K_{\rm po,pc-b}(\tau ) &=& -\tau^3 e^{-bT} \lr 1 + bT\rl .
471: \eeq
472: Summing up these values, we arrive at the third order term of
473: the form factor
474: \beq
475: K_{po}^{(3)}(\tau ) = \sum_{\alpha} K_{\rm po, \alpha}(\tau ) =
476: \tau^3 \left(
477: {(bT)^2 \over 6} e^{-bT} +
478: 2 e^{-bT} \right),
479: \eeq
480: which agrees with the RMT prediction (\ref{pd}). One might think that
481: $K_{\rm po,api}$ and $K_{\rm po,ac}$ should disappear in the
482: limit $b\to\infty$, because a pair of mutually time reversed
483: loops exists. However, as these contributions come from the
484: limiting situations that the times elapsed on those loops are
485: short, there is no inconsistency.
486:
487: In summary, we investigate the level statistics of
488: a classically chaotic system in the crossover domain
489: between GUE and GOE universality classes. Summing up
490: the contributions from the relevant periodic orbit pairs
491: of a chaotic system, we find an agreement between the
492: semiclassical form factor and the RMT result up
493: to the third order. We expect that this agreement
494: holds up to any arbitrary order. The periodic orbit pairs
495: consist of loops and encounters. The durations of
496: the encounters are logarithmically divergent
497: in the limit $\hbar \rightarrow 0$ but
498: infinitesimally small compared to the orbit
499: periods, which are of the order of the
500: Heisenberg time $T_H$ ($\sim O(1/\hbar)$
501: for a system with two degrees
502: of freedom)\cite{HMBH04}. Nevertheless,
503: the contribution from the encounter regions
504: is crucial. This mechanism should also be
505: a key factor in the derivation of higher
506: order terms. It might moreover shed light
507: on a similar counting problem\cite{BSW03}
508: for a quantum graph.
509:
510: \section*{Acknowledgement}
511:
512: One of the authors (T.N.) is grateful to Dr. Gregory Berkolaiko,
513: Dr. Petr Braun, Dr. Sebastian M\"uller and Dr. Holger Schanz
514: for valuable discussions.
515:
516: \begin{thebibliography}{notitle}
517:
518: \bibitem{BGS84}
519: O. Bohigas, M.J. Giannoni and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 52} (1984) 1.
520: \bibitem{B85}
521: M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London {\bf A400} (1985) 229.
522: \bibitem{GW}
523: M. Gutzwiller, {\em Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics}
524: (Springer, 1990).
525: \bibitem{SR01}
526: M. Sieber and K. Richter, Physica Scripta {\bf T90} (2001) 128.
527: \bibitem{HMBH04}
528: S. Heusler, S. M\"{u}ller, P. Braun and F. Haake,
529: J. Phys. {\bf A37} (2004) L31.
530: \bibitem{MHBHA04}
531: S. M\"{u}ller, S. Heusler, P. Braun, F. Haake and A. Altland,
532: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93} (2004) 014103-1.
533: \bibitem{MHBHA05}
534: S. M\"{u}ller, S. Heusler, P. Braun, F. Haake and A. Altland,
535: nlin.CD/0503052.
536: \bibitem{PM83}
537: A. Pandey and M.L. Mehta, Commun. Math. Phys. {\bf 87} (1983) 449.
538: \bibitem{NS03}
539: T. Nagao and K. Saito, Phys. Lett. {\bf A311} (2003) 353.
540: \bibitem{TR03}
541: M. Turek and K. Richter, J. Phys. {\bf A36} (2003) L455.
542: \bibitem{R_text}
543: K. Richter, {\em Semiclassical Theory of Mesoscopic Quantum Systems}
544: (Springer, 2000).
545: \bibitem{HODA84}
546: J.H. Hannay and A.M. Ozorio de Almeida, J. Phys. {\bf A17}
547: (1984) 3429.
548: \bibitem{BGOS95}
549: O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni, A.M. Ozorio de Almeida and C. Schmit,
550: Nonlinearity {\bf 8} (1995) 203.
551: \bibitem{BSW03}
552: G. Berkolaiko, H. Schanz and R.S. Whitney, J. Phys. {\bf A36}
553: (2003) 8373.
554:
555: \end{thebibliography}
556:
557: \newpage
558:
559: \begin{figure}[!t]
560: \epsfxsize=14cm
561: \centerline{\epsfbox{sr.eps}}
562: \caption{The Sieber-Richter (SR) pair of periodic orbits}
563: \end{figure}
564:
565: \begin{figure}[!t]
566: \epsfxsize=14cm
567: \centerline{\epsfbox{two.eps}}
568: \caption{The periodic orbit pairs with two encounters.}
569: \end{figure}
570:
571: \begin{figure}[!t]
572: \epsfxsize=14cm
573: \centerline{\epsfbox{one.eps}}
574: \caption{The periodic orbit pairs with one encounter.}
575: \end{figure}
576:
577:
578: \end{document}
579:
580:
581: