1: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,aps,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx,eucal,bm}
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{Conformal invariance in two-dimensional turbulence}
6: \author{D. Bernard$^{\dagger}$, G. Boffetta$^{\star}$, A. Celani$^{\bullet}$
7: and G. Falkovich$^{\&}$}
8: \affiliation{$^{\dagger}$ Service de Physique Th\'eorique de Saclay,
9: CEA/CNRS, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
10: \\$^{\star}$
11: Dipartimento di Fisica Generale and INFN, Universit\`a di Torino,
12: via Pietro Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
13: \\$^{\bullet}$ CNRS, INLN, 1361 Route des Lucioles,
14: 06560 Valbonne Sophia Antipolis, France\\$^{\&}$ Physics of
15: Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science,\\ Rehovot 76100,
16: Israel }
17: %\date{\today}
18: \maketitle
19:
20: {\bf Simplicity of fundamental physical laws manifests itself in
21: fundamental symmetries. While systems with an infinity of strongly
22: interacting degrees of freedom (in particle physics and critical
23: phenomena) are hard to describe, they often demonstrate
24: symmetries, in particular scale invariance. In two dimensions (2d)
25: locality often promotes scale invariance to a wider class of
26: conformal transformations which allow for nonuniform re-scaling.
27: Conformal invariance allows a thorough classification of
28: universality classes of critical phenomena in 2d. Is there
29: conformal invariance in 2d turbulence, a paradigmatic example of
30: strongly-interacting non-equilibrium system? Here, using numerical
31: experiment, we show that some features of 2d inverse turbulent
32: cascade display conformal invariance. We observe that the
33: statistics of vorticity clusters is remarkably close to that of
34: critical percolation, one of the simplest universality classes of
35: critical phenomena. These results represent a new step in the
36: unification of 2d physics within the framework of conformal
37: symmetry.}
38:
39: %Even more remarkably, often (but not always \cite{RC}) scale
40: %invariance is local so that the statistical properties are actually
41: %invariant with respect to a much wider class of transformations: this
42: %is the conformal invariance \cite{Polyakov}.
43:
44:
45: We consider here 2d incompressible turbulent motion of a fluid,
46: which represents an appropriate description of large-scale motions
47: of the atmosphere and can be realized in different laboratory
48: settings as well$^{1-5}$. As predicted by Kraichnan$^1$, stirring
49: at some scale $L_f$ results in two turbulence cascades, with the
50: formation of fine-scale vortical structures and large-scale
51: velocity structures. In two dimensions, squared vorticity
52: $\omega^2=({\bm \nabla} \times {\bm v})^2$ performs a direct
53: cascade to small scales while kinetic energy $\frac{1}{2}{\bm
54: v}^2$ flows from the injection length $L_f$ to large scales,
55: opposite to the three-dimensional case.
56: %Note that the kinetic energy and all powers of vorticity are inviscid
57: %invariants of incompressible hydrodynamics.
58: We focus here on the inverse cascade of energy for which, not
59: surprisingly in view of the presence of a strong interaction,
60: there is no exact analytic theory. Phenomenological dimensional
61: arguments give consistent predictions, though in two seemingly
62: unrelated ways. Consider the velocity difference $v_r$ at the
63: distance $r$. On the one hand, one may require that the kinetic
64: energy $v_r^2$ divided by the typical time $r/v_r$ must be
65: constant and equal to the energy flux, $\epsilon$: $v_r^3\sim
66: \epsilon r$. On the other hand, it can be argued that vorticity,
67: which cascades to small scales, must be in equipartition in the
68: inverse cascade range$^6$. If this is the case, the enstrophy
69: $r^d\omega_r^2$ accumulated in a volume of size $r$ is
70: proportional to the typical time $r/v_r$ at such scale, i.e.
71: $r^d\omega_r^2\sim r/v_r$.
72: %If this is the case, the pair correlation function at
73: %scale $r$ is proportional to the typical time $r/v_r$ spent
74: %at such scale, i.e.$\omega_r^2\sim r^{1-d}/v_r$ \cite{FGV}.
75: Using $\omega_r\sim v_r/r$ we derive $v_r^3\sim r^{3-d}$ which for
76: $d=2$ is exactly the requirement of constant energy flux.
77: Amazingly, the requirements of vorticity equipartition (i.e.
78: equilibrium) and energy flux (i.e. turbulence) give the same
79: Kolmogorov-Kraichnan scaling in 2d. Experiments$^{4,5,7}$ and
80: numerical simulations$^{8}$ indeed demonstrate scale-invariant
81: statistics with the vorticity having scaling dimension $2/3$:
82: $\omega_r\propto r^{-2/3}$.
83:
84: Our goal here is to find out whether scale invariance can be
85: extended to conformal invariance at least for some properties of
86: 2d turbulence. Under conformal transformations the
87: lengths are re-scaled non-uniformly yet the angles between vectors
88: are left unchanged (a useful property in navigation cartography
89: where it is often more important to aim in the right direction than
90: to know the distance)$^{9,10}$. The novelty of our approach is that we analyze the
91: inverse cascade by describing the large-scale statistics of the
92: boundaries of vorticity clusters, i.e. large-scale zero-vorticity
93: lines. In equilibrium critical phenomena, cluster boundaries in
94: the continuous limit of vanishingly small
95: lattice size %and at criticality
96: were recently found to belong to a remarkable class of curves
97: that can be mapped into Brownian walk (called Stochastic Loewner
98: Evolution or SLE curves)$^{11-19}$. Namely, consider a curve
99: $\gamma(t)$ that starts at a point on the boundary of the
100: half-plane $H$ (by conformal invariance any planar domain is
101: equivalent to the upper half plane). One can map the half-plane
102: $H$ minus the curve $\gamma(t)$ back onto $H$ by an analytic
103: function $g_t(z)$ which is unique upon imposing the condition
104: $g_t(z)\sim z+2t/z+{\rm O}(1/z^2)$ at infinity. The growing tip of
105: the curve is mapped into a real point $\xi(t)$.
106: Loewner$^{20}$ found in 1923 %\cite{Loew}
107: that %this family of conformal maps satisfies a simple evolution equation so that
108: the conformal map $g_t(z)$ and the curve $\gamma(t)$ are fully
109: parametrized by the driving function $\xi(t)$.
110: %One defines the hull $K(t)$ which is the union
111: %of the curve with the set of points that cannot be reached from
112: %infinity without crossing it. Since the complement of $K(t)$ in
113: %$H$ is simply connected it can be mapped
114: %Loewner found that the evolution of the curve $\gamma(t)$, also called
115: %the ``trace'' of the process, can be univocally linked to the
116: %evolution of the mapping upon imposing the condition $g_t(z)\sim
117: %z+2t/z+{\rm o}(1/z)$ at $z\to\infty$. The family of conformal maps
118: %$g_t(z)$ satisfies the Loewner equation
119: %$dg_t(z)/dt=2[g_t(z)-\xi(t)]^{-1}$ \cite{Loew}.
120: Almost eighty
121: years later, Schramm$^{11}$ considered random curves in planar
122: domains and showed that their statistics is conformal invariant if
123: $\xi(t)$ is a Brownian walk, i.e. its increments are identically
124: and independently distributed and
125: $\langle(\xi(t)-\xi(0))^2\rangle=\kappa t$.
126: %then the statistics of $\gamma(t)$ is conformally invariant \cite{Schramm}.
127: In simple words, the locality in time of the Brownian walk
128: translates into the local scale-invariance of SLE curves, i.e.
129: conformal invariance. SLE$_\kappa$ provide a natural
130: classification (by the value of the diffusivity $\kappa$) of
131: boundaries of clusters of 2d critical phenomena$^{16}$ described
132: by conformal field theories (CFT)$^{10}$ and allow to establish
133: many new results (see \cite{Lbook,GK,Cardy,BB1} for a review).
134:
135: The fractal dimension of SLE$_\kappa$ curves is known to
136: be$^{22,23}$ $D_\kappa=1+\kappa/8$ for $\kappa<8$. To establish
137: possible link, let us try to relate the Kolmogorov-Kraichnan
138: phenomenology to the fractal dimension of the boundaries of
139: vorticity clusters. Note that one ought to distinguish between the
140: dimensionality $2$ of the full vorticity level set (which is
141: space-filling) and a single zero-vorticity line that encloses a
142: large-scale cluster$^{24}$. Consider the vorticity cluster of
143: gyration radius $L$ which has the ``outer boundary'' of perimeter
144: $P$ (that boundary is the part of the zero-vorticity line
145: accessible from outside, see Fig.~\ref{fig:1} for an
146: illustration). The vorticity flux through the cluster, $\int
147: \omega dS \sim \omega_L L^2$, must be equal to the velocity
148: circulation along the boundary, $\Gamma=\oint {\bm v}\cdot d{\bm
149: \ell}$. The Kolmogorov-Kraichnan scaling is
150: $\omega_L\sim\epsilon^{1/3}L^{-2/3}$ (coarse-grained vorticity
151: decreases with scale because contributions with opposite signs
152: partially cancel) so that the flux is $\propto L^{4/3}$. As for
153: circulation, since the boundary turns every time it meets a
154: vortex, such a contour is irregular on scales larger than the
155: pumping scale. Therefore, only the velocity at the pumping scale
156: $L_f$ is expected to contribute to the circulation, such velocity
157: can be estimated as $(\epsilon L_f)^{1/3} $ and it is independent
158: of $L$. Hence, circulation should be proportional to the
159: perimeter, $\Gamma\propto P$, which gives $P\propto L^{4/3}$, i.e.
160: the fractal dimension of the exterior of the vorticity cluster is
161: expected to be $4/3$.
162:
163: Let us check this hypothesis by data analysis. A powerful tool for
164: the study of 2d turbulence is the numerical integration of the
165: incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in a planar domain. By this
166: method it is possible to achieve a range of dynamical lengthscales
167: of about four decades, whereas current laboratory experiments are
168: limited to a scale separation of about a hundred. We present here
169: the analysis of very high resolution numerical simulations (with
170: up to 16384$^2$ grid points) of two-dimensional
171: inverse cascade. (See Table~\ref{table} %and Ref.~\cite{BC}
172: for the details). Vorticity clusters are shown on
173: Figure~\ref{fig:0}. The fractal dimension of their exterior
174: boundary (without self-intersections) shown in the left panel of
175: Figure~\ref{fig:4} as indeed close to $D_*=4/3$. Moreover, the
176: fractal dimension of the boundary itself is close to $D=7/4$. Of
177: course, having some particular dimension does not by itself imply
178: that the curve belong
179: to SLE. Note, however, that the exterior perimeter of SLE$_\kappa$ %hulls
180: with $\kappa>4$ is conjectured$^{25}$ to look locally as
181: SLE$_{\kappa_*}$ curve with $\kappa_*=16/\kappa < 4$ resulting in
182: the duality relation, $(D-1)(D_*-1)=1/4$, as observed in our
183: turbulence data. Moreover, $D_*=4/3$ corresponds to a SLE$_{8/3}$
184: curve which represents the continuum limit of a self-avoiding
185: random walk while the dual SLE$_6$ curve corresponds to a cluster
186: boundary in critical percolation. That prompts us to compare the
187: probability distributions of sizes and boundary lengths between
188: vorticity and percolation clusters. The size $s$ of a cluster is
189: the number of connected sites with the same sign of vorticity, the
190: boundary length $b$ is the number of sites that belong to the
191: cluster but are adjacent to sites of different sign, and the
192: diameter $L$ is the side of the smallest square that covers the
193: cluster. The results shown in the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:4}
194: are in a good agreement with the exact results from percolation
195: theory.
196:
197: The two SLEs with $\kappa=6$ and $\kappa_*=8/3$ correspond to CFT
198: with zero central charge which means that the scale invariance
199: remains unbroken even when the system is on a manifold with
200: corners or with a nonzero Euler number (a topological invariant
201: determined by the number of handles and boundaries). Also, SLE$_6$
202: curves are singled out by a ``locality property'' (the curve does
203: not feel the boundary until it touches it), while their dual
204: SLE$_{8/3}$ has the ``restriction property'' (the statistics of
205: the curves conditioned not to visit some region is the same as in
206: the domain without this region)$^{12-16}$. How does all this
207: relate to two-dimensional turbulence?
208:
209: Now we show by a straightforward check that, within statistical
210: accuracy, large-scale zero-vorticity lines are indeed SLE curves,
211: that is they are conformal invariant and possess remarkable
212: properties of a kind that has never been studied in turbulence.
213: Zero-vorticity isolines that are candidate SLE traces are
214: identified as follows. First, a horizontal line representing the
215: real axis in the complex plane is drawn across the vorticity
216: field. Second, an explorer starting from the origin at the real
217: axis walks on the zero-vorticity isoline keeping the positive
218: vorticity sites always on the right. Third, when the explorer hits
219: the real axis it treads on it always leaving the positive region
220: on its right side until it can re-enter the upper half-plane. This
221: eventually leads the explorer to infinity in an unbounded domain.
222: An example of the outcome of this search is shown in
223: Figure~\ref{fig:1}. Strictly speaking, this procedure faithfully
224: reproduces all the details of the statistics only if there is a
225: locality property (meaning that the exploration process does not
226: feel the boundary before it hits it), which holds for SLE$_6$.
227: Since we obtain as a result SLE with $\kappa\approx6$, our
228: procedure is self-consistent; we also checked that shifting and
229: turning the line does not modify the results presented below. To
230: determine which driving function $\xi(t)$ can generate such a
231: curve, one needs to find the sequence of conformal maps $g_t(z)$
232: that map the half-plane $H$ minus the curve into $H$ itself. We
233: approximate $g_t(z)$ by a composition of discrete, conformal slit
234: maps that swallow one segment of the curve at a time (a slight
235: variation of the techniques presented in \cite{MR}). This results
236: in a sequence of ``times'' $t_i$
237: %(equal half the capacity of the hulls)
238: and driving values $\xi_i$
239: that approximate the true driving functions.
240: %A small subset of driving functions is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:2}.
241: If the zero-vorticity isolines in the half-plane are actually SLE
242: traces, then the driving function should behave as an effective
243: diffusion process at sufficiently large times. We have collected
244: 1,607 putative traces. The data presented by blue triangles in
245: Figure~\ref{fig:2} show that the ensemble average $\langle
246: \xi(t)^2 \rangle$ indeed grows linearly in time: the diffusion
247: coefficient $\kappa$ is very close to the value $6$, with an
248: accuracy of 5\% (see inset). The average $\langle\xi(t)\rangle$
249: vanishes by the reflection symmetry of the Navier-Stokes
250: equations. Additionally, the probability distribution functions
251: of $\xi(t)/\sqrt{\kappa t}$ collapse onto a standard Gaussian
252: distribution at all times $t$. Therefore, we expect the driving
253: $\xi(t)$ tend to a true Brownian motion and zero-vorticity lines
254: to become SLE$_\kappa$ traces with $\kappa$ very close to $6$ in
255: the limit of vanishingly small $L_f$. To appreciate how remarkable
256: this property is, pink symbols in the lower insert in
257: Fig~\ref{fig:2} show for comparison the results of the same
258: procedure for the isolines of a Gaussian field having the same
259: Fourier spectrum as vorticity but randomized phases. The slow
260: incomplete recovery to $\kappa=6$ for the random-phase field
261: occurs at the scales where the power-law correlation is already
262: cut-off by friction and the field becomes truly uncorrelated.
263:
264: The identification of isovorticity lines as SLE$_\kappa$ curves
265: allows to apply powerful techniques borrowed from the theory of
266: stochastic differential equations and conformal mapping theory and
267: to obtain analytic predictions for some nontrivial statistical
268: properties of vorticity clusters. The first example is the
269: probability that a point $z=\rho e^{i\theta}$ inside the upper
270: half plane is surrounded by a positive vorticity cluster connected
271: to the positive real axis. In this event, it is not possible to
272: reach infinity with a continuous path starting at $z$ without
273: treading on positive vorticity sites. For this to happen the
274: zero-vorticity line must leave the point $z$ on its right. The
275: probability of such an event depends only on the angle $\theta$
276: between the point and the origin and it assumes a particularly
277: simple form in terms of hypergeometric functions$^{27}$. In the
278: inset of Figure~\ref{fig:3} we show that the analytic solution
279: fits very well the numerical data with $\kappa=5.9$. The second
280: example
281: is the probability that a vorticity cluster spans
282: the rectangle joining two opposite sides. What is the average
283: number of such spanning clusters? What is the probability that a
284: ``four-legged cluster'' joins all four sides? By scale invariance
285: these quantities depend only on the aspect ratio $r$ of the
286: rectangle, and their precise dependence can be found by exploiting
287: conformal invariance. In the context of critical percolation
288: formulae for such probabilities have been derived %by means of CFT
289: by Cardy$^{28}$ and Watts$^{29}$ and later proven by
290: Smirnov$^{30}$ and Dub\'edat$^{31}$. In the main frame of
291: Figure~\ref{fig:3} we show that numerical data for vorticity
292: clusters follow very closely the expectations for SLE$_6$. We have
293: also checked (green symbols in Fig~\ref{fig:4}) that the dimension
294: of the set of narrow necks that enclose large fjords or large
295: peninsulae has dimension$^{32}$ $3/4$ (the set is defined by the
296: pairs of points on the curve that are closer than $L_f$ yet
297: separated by an arclength larger than $1000\,L_f$). All that gives
298: further support to the result that zero-vorticity lines are
299: conformal invariant and belong to the same class of universality
300: as boundaries of percolation clusters.
301:
302: Whether the statistics of the zero-vorticity isolines indeed falls
303: into the simplest universality class of critical phenomena (and
304: the fractal dimensions are exactly $7/4$ and $4/3$) deserves to be
305: a subject of more study. Do our findings signify that universal
306: nature of percolation extends to turbulence as well as to
307: diffusion-limited aggregation$^{33}$ and quantum chaos$^{34}$? At
308: the present level it has the status of a tantalizing conjecture
309: with strong -- though not conclusive -- support from the data. In
310: view of the non-local constraint imposed by the flow
311: incompressibility, it is quite surprising that the statistics of
312: zero-vorticity isolines (within experimental accuracy) enjoys the
313: locality property inherited by its SLE$_6$ nature. Remind that
314: continuous percolation can be constructed as a ``flooded
315: landscape'' determined by some short-correlated random height
316: function. However, vorticity field in the inverse cascade is not
317: short-correlated, it has power-law correlation
318: $\langle\omega(0)\omega({\bf r})\rangle\propto r^{-4/3}$. When the
319: pair correlation function falls slower than $r^{-3/2}$ then the
320: system is not expected generally to belong to the universality
321: class of uncorrelated percolation and even be conformal
322: invariant$^{35}$. Indeed, we have seen that the field having the
323: same pair correlation function as the vorticity yet randomized
324: phases of the Fourier harmonics does not have conformal invariant
325: isolines (pink symbols in the lower inset in Fig~\ref{fig:2}). We
326: thus conclude that there is indeed something special about the
327: vorticity (which has nontrivial phase correlations and higher
328: moments) produced by 2d turbulence. It is also intriguing to
329: notice that conformal field theory of critical percolation
330: possesses a field of scaling dimension 2/3, identical to the one
331: for the vorticity in Kolmogorov-Kraichnan phenomenology. We may
332: also wonder how conformal invariance is broken in statistical
333: properties of non-zero vorticity isolines. Let us stress that we
334: have found conformal invariance for zero-vorticity isolines, not
335: yet for correlation functions as envisaged by Polyakov$^3$; in the
336: related problem of passive scalar in turbulent flow correlation
337: functions are not conformal invariant$^{6,36}$.
338:
339: To conclude, we have developed a numerical tool for testing
340: conformal invariance in physical systems, established this
341: symmetry (within experimental accuracy) for 2d inverse cascade and
342: used it as a powerful new tool in turbulence study which allowed
343: us to make new quantitative predictions confirmed by the
344: experiment. That shows how conformal invariance spans the whole
345: physics, from exalted subjects like string theory and quantum
346: gravity, via statistical mechanics and condensed matter, down to
347: earthly atmospheric turbulence. \vskip 0.3truecm
348: \begin{thebibliography}{90}
349:
350:
351: \bibitem{Kra67} Kraichnan, R.~H., Inertial ranges in two-dimensional
352: turbulence.
353: {\em Phys.\ Fluids} {\bf 10}, 1417--23 (1967).
354:
355: \bibitem{KM80} Kraichnan, R.H. \& Montgomery, D.,
356: Two-dimensional turbulence. {\em Rep. Prog. Phys.} {\bf 43}
357: 547--619 (1980).
358:
359: \bibitem{Pol2} Polyakov, A. M.,
360: The theory of turbulence in two dimensions. {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf
361: B396}, 367--85 (1993).
362:
363: \bibitem{Tab}Tabeling, P., Two-dimensional turbulence: a physicist approach.
364: {\em Phys.\ Rep.} {\bf 362}, 1--62, (2002).
365:
366: \bibitem{KG} Kellay, H. \& I. Goldburg, W.,
367: Two-dimensional turbulence: a review of some recent experiments.
368: {\em Rep. Prog. Phys.} {\bf 65}, 845--894 (2002).
369:
370: \bibitem{FGV} Falkovich, G., Gawedzki K., \& Vergassola, M.
371: Particles and fields in fluid turbulence. {\it Rev. Mod. Phys.}
372: {\bf73}, 913--975 (2001).
373:
374: \bibitem{EREC} Chen, S. et al
375: % R. E. Ecke, G. L. Eyink, M. Rivera, M. Wan, and Z.Xiao,
376: On vortex-merger and vortex -thinning in a 2D inverse energy
377: cascade. {\it 57th APS Meeting of the Division of Fluid
378: Dynamics},
379: abstract MK.009 (Seattle, Washington 2004).
380:
381: \bibitem{BCV} Boffetta, G., Celani, A. \& Vergassola, M.,
382: Inverse energy cascade in two-dimensional turbulence: Deviations
383: from Gaussian behavior. {\em Phys. Rev. E} {\bf 61} R29--R32 (2000)
384: \bibitem{Polyakov} Polyakov, A. M.,
385: Conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations, {\it JETP Lett.} {\bf
386: 12}, 381--3 (1970).
387:
388: \bibitem{BPZ} Belavin, A.A., Polyakov, A.M., \& Zamolodchikov, A.A.,
389: Conformal field theory. {\it Nucl. Phys. B} {\bf 241}, 333--380
390: (1984).
391:
392: %\bibitem{KN} Kager, W. and B. Nienhuis,
393: %A guide to Stochastic L\"owner Evolution and Its Applications,
394: %{\it J. Stat. Phys.} {\bf115}, 1149--1229 (2004).
395:
396: \bibitem{Schramm} Schramm, O.,
397: Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning
398: trees. {\it Israel J. Math.} {\bf 118}, 221--288 (2000).
399:
400:
401: \bibitem{Law1}
402: Lawler, G., Schramm, O. \& Werner, W.,
403: Values of Brownian intersection exponents I: Half-plane exponents,
404: {\it Acta Math.} {\bf187} 237--273 (2001).
405: \bibitem{Law2}
406: Lawler, G., Schramm, O. \& Werner, W.,Values of Brownian intersection exponents II:
407: Plane exponents, {\it Acta Math.} {\bf187} 275--308 (2001).
408: \bibitem{Law3}
409: Lawler, G., Schramm, O. \& Werner, W.,Values
410: of Brownian intersection exponents III: Two-sided exponents, {\it
411: Ann. Inst. H. Poincare} {\bf38} 109--123 (2002).
412: \bibitem{Law4}
413: Lawler, G., Schramm, O. \& Werner, W.,Conformal
414: restriction properties. The chordal case. {\it Journal Amer. Math.
415: Soc.}{\bf 16} 915-955 (2003).
416: % The Dimension of the Planar Brownian Frontier is 4/3
417: %\texttt{arXiv: math.PR/0010165}
418: \bibitem{Lbook} Lawler, G.,
419: %Stochastic L\"owner Evolution. \texttt{http://www.math.cornell.edu/$\sim$lawler}
420: Conformally invariant processes in the plane. {\it Mathematical
421: Surveys and Monographs} {\bf 114}, 1--242 (2005)
422:
423:
424: \bibitem{GK} Gruzberg I. \& Kadanoff, L.,
425: The Loewner equation: maps and shapes. {\it J. Stat. Phys.} {\bf
426: 114} 1183--1198 (2004).
427:
428: \bibitem{Cardy} Cardy, J.,
429: SLE for theoretical physicists. \texttt{arXiv:cond-mat/0503313}.
430:
431: \bibitem{BB1} Bauer, M. \& Bernard, D.,
432: Loewner chains. \texttt{arXiv:cond-mat/0412372}.
433:
434:
435: \bibitem{Loew} L\"owner, K.,
436: Untersuchungen \"uber schlichte konforme Abbildungen des
437: Einheitskreises. {\it Math. Ann.} {\bf 89}, 103--121 (1923).
438:
439: \bibitem{BB} Bauer, M. \& Bernard, D.,
440: Conformal field theories of Stochastic Loewner Evolutions.
441: %\texttt{arXiv: math-ph/0206028};
442: {\it Commun. Math. Phys.} {\bf 239} 493--521 (2003)
443: %CFTs of SLEs
444:
445: \bibitem{SD} Saleur, H. \& Duplantier, B.,
446: Exact determination of the percolation hull exponent in two dimensions,
447: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf58}, 2325--2328 (1987).
448:
449: \bibitem{Beffara} Beffara, V.,
450: The dimension of the SLE curves. \texttt{ arXiv:math.PR/0211322}
451:
452: \bibitem{KH} Kondev, J. \& Henley, C.,
453: Geometrical exponents of contour loops on Random Gaussian
454: surfaces, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf74}, 4580--3 (1995).
455:
456: \bibitem{Dup} Duplantier, B.,
457: Conformally invariant fractals and potential theory. {\it Phys.
458: Rev. Lett.} {\bf 84} 1363--1367 (2000).
459:
460: %\bibitem{BC}A. Celani and G. Boffetta, in preparation
461:
462: \bibitem{MR} Marshall, D. \& Rohde, S.,
463: Convergence of the Zipper algorithm for conformal mapping.
464: \texttt{http://www.math.washington.edu/$\sim$marshall/preprints/zipper.pdf}
465:
466: \bibitem{Schramm2} Schramm, O., A percolation formula.
467: {\it Elect. Comm. Probab.} {\bf 6}, 115--120 (2001).
468: %\texttt{arXiv:math.PR/0107096}
469:
470: \bibitem{Cardy-cross} Cardy, J.,
471: Critical percolation in finite geometries. {\it J. Phys. A} {\bf
472: 25}, L201--L206 (1992)
473:
474: %\bibitem{Cardy-cross-2} J. Cardy,
475: %Linking numbers for self-avoiding loops and percolation:
476: %application to the spin quantum Hall transition
477: %{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 84}, 3507 (2000)
478:
479: \bibitem{Watts} Watts, G.,
480: A crossing probability for percolation in two dimensions. {\it J.
481: Phys. A} {\bf 29}, L363--L368 (1996)
482:
483: \bibitem{Smirnov} Smirnov, S.,
484: Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, Cardy's
485: formula, scaling limits. {\it C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, S\'er. I
486: Math.} {\bf 333(3)}, 239--244 (2001)
487:
488: \bibitem{Dubedat} Dub\'edat, J.,
489: Excursion decompositions for SLE$_6$ and Watts' crossing formula.
490: \texttt{arXiv:math.PR/0405074}.
491:
492: %\bibitem{Beffara2} Beffara, V.,
493: %Hausdorff dimensions for SLE$_6$
494: %{\it Ann. Prob.} {\bf32} (2004) 2606,
495: %\texttt{ arXiv:math.PR/0204208}
496:
497: \bibitem{Nienhuis} Nienhuis, B.,
498: Exact critical point and critical exponents of O(n) models in two
499: dimensions. {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 49} 1062--1065 (1982).
500: \bibitem{MF} Meakin, P. \& Family, F.,
501: Diverging length scales in diffusion-limited aggregation. {\it
502: Phys. Rev. A} {\bf 34} 2558--2560 (1986).
503:
504: \bibitem{BS} Bogomolny, E. \& Schmit, C.,
505: Percolation Model for Nodal Domains of Chaotic Wave Functions.
506: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 88} 114102 (2002).
507: \bibitem{Weinrib} Weinrib A.,
508: Long-correlated percolation, {\em Phys. Rev. B} {\bf 29}, 387--95
509: (1984).
510:
511: \bibitem{FF} Falkovich, G. \& Fouxon, A.,
512: Anomalous scaling of a passive scalar in turbulence and
513: equilibrium. {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 94}, 214502 (2005).
514:
515:
516: \end{thebibliography}
517: {\bf Acknowledgements} This work was supported by the grants from
518: the European network and Israel Science foundation. G.F. thanks A.
519: Zamolodchikov, A. Polyakov, E. Bogomolny and K. Gawedzki for
520: useful discussions.
521:
522: \noindent {\bf Author Information} Reprints and permissions
523: information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions.
524: The authors declare that they have no competing financial
525: interests. Correspondence and requests for materials should be
526: addressed to G.F. (gregory.falkovich@weizmann.ac.il).
527: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
528:
529: \newpage
530:
531: \begin{figure}[!h]
532: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{clusters.eps}}
533: \caption{Vorticity clusters. These are defined as connected
534: regions with the same sign of vorticity (here positive). Colours
535: are arbitrarily attributed to different clusters. Regions of
536: negative vorticity are black. The forcing lengthscale $L_f$ is one
537: hundredth of the box side.} \label{fig:0}
538: \end{figure}
539: \newpage
540:
541: \begin{figure}[!h]
542: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=16cm]{dim+probs.eps}}
543: \caption{Fractal dimensions and probabilities of size and boundary
544: length for vorticity clusters. {\em Left panel}: The fractal
545: dimensions are the slopes of the length-diameter dependencies in
546: log-log coordinates for the boundary of filled clusters (red), for
547: the outer boundary (blue) and for the necks of large
548: fjords/peninsulae (green). The solid lines have slopes with the
549: exact values for SLE$_6$ curves, $7/4$, $4/3$, $3/4$,
550: respectively. Fractal dimensions are obtained by computing the
551: average length for a given diameter of the cluster. {\em Right
552: panel:\/} The fraction of clusters with sizes between $s$ and
553: $1.25 s$ (red symbols) and with boundary lengthes between $b$ and
554: $1.25 b$. The solid lines are the predictions from the percolation
555: theory. Inset shows the same data multiplied by $s^{96/91}$ and
556: $b^{8/7}$, respectively. The vertical scale is linear to
557: appreciate the plateau in the compensated plot.} \label{fig:4}
558: \end{figure}
559: \newpage
560:
561: \begin{figure}[!h]
562: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=16cm]{trace.eps}} \caption{A
563: portion of a candidate SLE trace obtained from the vorticity
564: field. The red curve is a zero-vorticity line in the upper
565: half-plane. The dashed blue line is the "outer boundary" of the
566: red curve, i.e. the boundary of the region that can be reached
567: from infinity without getting closer than $L_f$ to the red curve.
568: The green dots mark the necks of large fjords and peninsulae.}
569: \label{fig:1}
570: \end{figure}
571: \newpage
572:
573: \begin{figure}[!h]
574: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=16cm]{xi_random.eps}}
575: \caption{The driving function is an effective diffusion process
576: with diffusion coefficent $\kappa = 6 \pm 0.3$. The inverse
577: cascade range corresponds to $5\cdot10^{-5} < t < 10^{-2}$. {\em
578: Main frame\/}: the linear behaviour of $\langle \xi(t)^2 \rangle$.
579: {\em Lower-right inset \/}: Diffusivity: blue for vorticity
580: isolines, pink for the field with randomized phases. {\em
581: Upper-left inset\/}: the probability density function of the
582: rescaled driving function $\xi(t)/\sqrt{\kappa t}$ at four
583: different times $t = 0.0012, 0.003, 0.006, 0.009$; the solid line
584: is the Gaussian distribution $g(x)=(2 \pi)^{-1/2} \exp(-x^2/2)$.}
585: \label{fig:2}
586: \end{figure}
587:
588: \newpage
589:
590: \begin{figure}[!h]
591: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=16cm]{cross+right.eps}}
592: \caption{Crossing and surrounding probability for vorticity
593: clusters. {\em Main frame\/}: the probability $\pi_v$ that a
594: cluster crosses from top to bottom a rectangle of aspect ratio $r$
595: (blue), the average number $N_v$ of vertically crossing clusters
596: (green), and the probability $\pi_{hv}$ of a "four-legged" cluster
597: joining all sides of the rectangle (red). The lines are the exact
598: results for $\kappa=6$:
599: $\pi_v=\frac{3\Gamma(\frac{2}{3})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{3})^2}
600: \eta^{1/3} \;{ }_2 F_1 \left(\frac{1}{3},\frac{2}{3};
601: \frac{4}{3};\eta \right) $ with $\eta=[(1-k)/(1+k)]^2$ and
602: $r=K(1-k^2)/[2K(k^2)]$ (Cardy-Smirnov, thick solid line);
603: $N_v=\frac{1}{2}[\pi_v+\pi_{hv}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\pi}\log\eta]$
604: (Cardy, thick dashed line); $\pi_{hv}=\pi_v-
605: \frac{\eta}{\Gamma(\frac{2}{3})\Gamma(\frac{1}{3})} \;{ }_3 F_2
606: \left(1,1,\frac{4}{3};2, \frac{5}{3};\eta \right)$
607: (Watts-Dub\'edat, thin dotted line). {\em Inset\/}: the
608: probability that a zero-vorticity line in the upper half-plane
609: leaves the point $\rho e^{i \theta}$ to its right, for
610: $\rho=0.048,0.064,0.080,0.096$. The prediction for SLE$_\kappa$
611: traces is $P=\frac{1}{2}+
612: \frac{\Gamma(\frac{4}{\kappa})}{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(\frac{8-\kappa}{2\kappa})}
613: \;{ }_2 F_1 \left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{4}{\kappa}; \frac{3}{2};
614: -\cot^2\theta\right) \cot \theta$, shown as a thick solid line for
615: $\kappa=5.9$ (the best fit). The dashed lines are the
616: probabilities for $\kappa=5.7$ and $\kappa=6.1$.} \label{fig:3}
617: \end{figure}
618:
619:
620:
621: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
622: \newpage
623:
624: \begin{table*}[!h]
625: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccc}
626:
627: $N$ & $\mathrm{dx}$ & $\nu$ & $\alpha$ & $u_{rms}$ &
628:
629: $L_{f}$ & $\ell_{d}$ &
630:
631: $\varepsilon_{I}$ & $\varepsilon_{\nu}$ & $\varepsilon_{\alpha}$ &
632:
633: $\eta_{I}$ & $\eta_{\nu}$ & $\eta_{\alpha}$ \\ \hline
634:
635: %%%%%%%%%
636:
637: $2048$ & $4.9 \times 10^{-4}$ & $2\times10^{-5}$ & $0.015$ & $0.26$ &
638:
639: $0.01$ & $2.4\times 10^{-3}$ &
640:
641: $3.9\times10^{-3}$ & $1.8\times10^{-3}$ & $2.1\times10^{-3}$ &
642:
643: $39.3$ & $38.0$ & $1.3$ \\
644:
645: %%%%%%%%%
646:
647: $4096$ & $2.4\times 10^{-4}$ & $5\times10^{-6}$ & $0.024$ & $0.26$ &
648:
649: $0.01$ & $1.2\times 10^{-3}$ &
650:
651: $3.9\times10^{-3}$ & $0.7\times10^{-3}$ & $3.2\times10^{-3}$ &
652:
653: $39.3$ & $36.1$ & $3.2$ \\
654:
655: %%%%%%%%%
656:
657: $8192$ & $1.2 \times 10^{-4}$ & $2\times10^{-6}$ & $0.025$ & $0.27$ &
658:
659: $0.01$ & $7.8 \times 10^{-4}$ &
660:
661: $3.9\times10^{-3}$ & $0.3\times10^{-3}$ & $3.6\times10^{-3}$ &
662:
663: $39.3$ & $35.3$ & $4.0$ \\
664:
665: %%%%%%%%%
666:
667: $16384$ & $0.6 \times 10^{-4}$ & $1\times10^{-6}$ & $0.0$ & $0.24$ &
668:
669: $0.01$ & $5.5 \times 10^{-4}$ &
670:
671: $3.8\times10^{-3}$ & $0.2\times10^{-3}$ & $3.6\times10^{-3}$ &
672:
673: $39.5$ & $37.6$ & $1.9$ \\ \hline
674:
675: \end{tabular}
676:
677: \caption{Parameters of the simulations. $N$ spatial resolution,
678: $\mathrm{dx}$ grid spacing, $\nu$ viscosity, $\alpha$ friction,
679: $L_{f}$ forcing scale, $\ell_{d}=\nu^{1/2}/\eta_{\nu}^{1/6}$
680: enstrophy dissipative scale, $\varepsilon_{I}$ energy injection
681: rate, $\varepsilon_{\nu}$ viscous energy dissipation rate,
682: $\varepsilon_{\alpha}$ energy dissipation by large-scale friction
683: (energy growth rate for $N=16384$), $\eta_{I}$ enstrophy injection
684: rate, $\eta_{\nu}$ viscous enstrophy dissipation rate,
685: $\eta_{\alpha}$ enstrophy dissipation by friction (enstrophy
686: growth rate for $N=16384$).} \label{table}
687:
688: \end{table*}
689:
690: \end{document}
691: