1: \documentstyle[preprint,tighten,aps,epsf,floats]{revtex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{First experimental results on creation and decay of
5: $\eta$-mesic nuclei}
6:
7: \author{G.A.\ Sokol%
8: \thanks{ Talk given at the IX Intern. Seminar ``Electromagnetic Interactions
9: of Nuclei at Low and Medium Energies", Sep 20-22, 2000, Moscow.
10: E-mail: gsokol@x4u.lebedev.ru},
11: T.A.\ Aibergenov, A.V.\ Koltsov, A.V.\ Kravtsov, \\
12: Yu.I.\ Krutov, A.I.\ L'vov, L.N.\ Pavlyuchenko, \\
13: V.P.\ Pavlyuchenko, S.S.\ Sidorin}
14:
15: \address{P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute,
16: Leninsky Prospect 53, Moscow 117924, Russia}
17:
18: \maketitle
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: First experimental results on photoproduction of $\eta$-mesic nuclei are
22: analyzed. In an experiment performed at the 1 GeV electron synchrotron of
23: the Lebedev Physical Institute, correlated $\pi^+n$ pairs arising from the
24: reaction
25: $$
26: \gamma + {}^{12}{\rm C} \to N + {}_\eta(A-1)
27: \to N + \pi^+ + n + (A-2)
28: $$
29: and flying transversely to the photon beam have been observed. When the
30: photon energy exceeds the $\eta$-meson production threshold, a distribution
31: of the $\pi^+n$ pairs over their total energy is found to have a peak in
32: the subthreshold region of the internal-conversion process $\eta p \to
33: \pi^+ n$ which signals about formation of $\eta$-mesic nuclei.
34: \end{abstract}
35:
36: \bigskip
37:
38: The idea that a bound state of the $\eta$-meson and a nucleus (the
39: so-called $\eta$-mesic nucleus) can exist in Nature was put forward long
40: ago by Peng \cite{pen85} who relied on the first estimates of the $\eta N$
41: scattering length $a_{\eta N}$ obtained by Bhalerao and Liu \cite{bha85}.
42: Owing to ${\rm Re\,} a_{\eta N} > 0$, an average attractive potential
43: exists between slow $\eta$ and nucleons. This can result in binding $\eta
44: A$ systems, provided the life time of $\eta$ in nuclei is long enough
45: \cite{liu86}.
46:
47: Two attempts to discover $\eta$-nuclei were performed soon after
48: the first theoretical suggestions. They were based on using
49: $\pi^+$-meson beams at BNL \cite{chr88} and LAMPF \cite{lei88} and both
50: failed, thus excluding properties of ${}_\eta A$ assumed in the first
51: works and challenged later \cite{chi88,kul98}. A new interest in
52: studying the hypothetical $\eta$-nuclei arose out of an indirect
53: evidence for a formation of a quasi-bound $\eta$-${^3\rm He}$ state in
54: the reaction $pd \to \eta\, {^3\rm He}$ which would naturally explain
55: \cite{wil93,kon94} an experimentally observed near-threshold
56: enhancement in the total cross section of the reaction \cite{may96}.
57: A similar enhancement was found in the reaction $dd \to \eta \,{^4\rm He}$
58: as well \cite{wil97}. Based on modern determinations of the $T$-matrix
59: of $\eta N$ scattering \cite{bat95,gre97}, theoretical calculations of the
60: $\eta$-nucleus scattering length $a_{\eta A}$ were fulfilled \cite{rak96}
61: which suggested that $\eta$-nuclei ${}_\eta A$ indeed exist
62: for all $A \ge 3$.
63:
64: It should be kept in mind, however, that the above experimental
65: evidences from the reactions with $\eta$ in the final state do not
66: determine the {\em sign} of $a_{\eta A}$ \cite{may96} and thus cannot
67: unambiguously prove that $\eta$-nuclei really exist as bound rather
68: than virtual states. Therefore, a crucial experiment would be in
69: an observation of bound $\eta$'s,
70: and the present work is aimed at doing that.
71:
72: Specifically, in the present work a search for $\eta$-nuclei is
73: performed in the photo-mesonic reaction
74: \begin{equation}
75: \gamma + {}^{12}\mbox{C} \to N + {}_\eta(A-1)
76: \to N + \pi^+ n + (A-2),
77: \end{equation}
78: in which decay products of the $\eta$-nuclei are detected, viz.\
79: correlated pions and nucleons emitted in opposite directions
80: transversely to the beam. The underlying idea is \cite{sok91} that
81: such $\pi N$ pairs cannot be produced in quasi-free photoproduction
82: at energies as high as $E_\gamma \sim 700$ MeV, whereas they naturally
83: appear due to $\eta$'s stopped (captured) in the nucleus.
84: \begin{figure}[ht]
85: \epsfxsize=0.8\textwidth
86: \centerline{\epsfbox[23 656 428 787]{fig1.ps}}
87: \caption{\sl
88: (a) Mechanism of formation and decay of an $\eta$-nucleus.
89: (b) Background production and decay of $\eta$'s in the nucleus.}
90: \end{figure}
91:
92: The process of the $\eta$-nucleus formation in the reaction (1)
93: followed by the decay is shown schematically in Fig.~1a. There, both the
94: first stage of the reaction, i.e.\ production of $\eta$ by a photon,
95: and the second stage, i.e.\ annihilation of $\eta$ and creating a pion,
96: proceeds through single-nucleon interactions (either with a proton or a
97: neutron in the nucleus) mediated by the $S_{11}(1535)$ nucleon
98: resonance. Formation of the bound state of the $\eta$ and the nucleus
99: becomes possible when the momentum of the produced $\eta$ is small
100: (typically less than 150 MeV/c, see below in Fig.~2).
101: This requirement suggests photon
102: energies $E_\gamma = 650{-}850$ MeV as most suitable for creating
103: $\eta$-nuclei. Due to the Fermi motion, $\pi N$ pairs from
104: $\eta$-nuclei decays with characteristic opening angle
105: $\langle\theta_{\pi N}\rangle = 180^\circ$ have the width of $\simeq
106: 25^\circ$. Their kinetic energies are $\langle E_\pi\rangle \simeq 300$
107: MeV and $\langle E_n\rangle \simeq 100$ MeV.
108: In the case when the momentum (or energy) of the
109: produced $\eta$ is high, the attraction between the $\eta$ and the
110: nucleus is not essential, and the $\eta$ propagates freely
111: (up to an absorption), see Fig.~1b.
112: In this case the final $\pi N$ pairs carry a high momentum too and
113: their kinematical characteristics, such as an opening angle, are
114: different from those of pairs produced through the stage of the
115: $\eta$-nucleus formation.
116:
117: \begin{figure}[ht]
118: \epsfxsize=\textwidth
119: \epsfbox[68 568 558 728]{fig2.ps}
120: \caption{\sl
121: Spectral functions $S(E)$ and $S(E,q)$ (in arbitrary units)
122: found with a rectangular-well optical potential
123: simulating the nucleus $^{12}$C.
124: For a comparison, shown also are results obtained with dropping out
125: the attractive (i.e.\ real) part of the $\eta A$ potential.}
126: \end{figure}
127:
128:
129: A systematic way to describe both the resonance (Fig.~1a) and
130: background (Fig.~1b) processes consists in using the Green function
131: $G({\bf r}_1,{\bf r}_2,E)$ which gives an amplitude of $\eta$ having an
132: energy $E$ to propagate between the creation and annihilation points in
133: the nuclear mean-field described by an optical energy-dependent
134: potential $U(r,E)$. In the vicinity of a bound level of a (complex)
135: energy $E_0$, the Green function has a pole $\sim 1/(E-E_0)$, and this
136: pole corresponds to the mechanism shown in Fig.~1a. The
137: background process (Fig.~1b) corresponds to a non-pole part of
138: $G$. A convenient measure of the relative role of the background and
139: resonance processes is given by the spectral function
140: $S(E) = \int \!\!\int \rho(r_1)
141: \,\rho(r_2) \, |G({\bf r}_1,{\bf r}_2,E)|^2
142: \,d{\bf r}_1 \, d{\bf r}_2$,
143: which characterizes a nuclear dependence of pion production through
144: the two-step transition $\gamma \to \eta \to \pi$ in the nucleus.
145: $S(E)$ depends on the binding potential $U$ and is proportional to
146: the number of $\eta N$ collisions which $\eta$ experiences
147: when travels through the nucleus of the density $\rho(r)$
148: between the creation and annihilation points.
149: An attractive potential $U$ makes the produced $\eta$ of a
150: near-resonance energy $E$ to pass several times through the nucleus
151: before it decays or escapes,
152: thus resulting in enhancing the number of collisions and in a resonance
153: increasing the production rate of the correlated $\pi N$ pairs.
154:
155: A comparative role of the resonance and background contributions is
156: illustrated in Fig.~2 \cite{lvo98,sok98}, in which the spectral function
157: $S(E)$ is shown for the case of a rectangular-well optical potential $U$
158: simulating the $^{12}$C nuclear density and proportional to
159: the elementary $\eta N$-scattering amplitude by Green and Wycech
160: \cite{gre97}. The $\eta A$ attraction results in a prominent enhancement in
161: the number of collisions when $\eta$ has a negative energy in between
162: 0 and $-30$ MeV.
163: A related spectral function
164: $S(E,q) = \int \rho(r) \,
165: |G_{r_2<R}({\bf r},{\bf q},E)|^2 \,d{\bf r}$,
166: which is given by Fourier components of the inner part of the Green function
167: (viz.\ a part having an overlap with nucleons in the nucleus),
168: describes a nuclear dependence of the energy-momentum
169: distribution $\partial^2 N / \partial E \partial{\bf q}$ of
170: the produced $\pi N$ pairs over their total energy and momentum
171: (which are $E + m_\eta + m_N$ and $q$, respectively,
172: up to the Fermi smearing).
173: As seen in Fig.~2, the $\eta$-nucleus attraction results
174: in a strong enhancement in the momentum density
175: at the resonance energies $E$ and low $q$.
176: This theoretical finding supports the starting point of the further
177: analysis that the correlated $\pi N$ pairs predominantly appear
178: from decays of bound $\eta$'s.
179:
180:
181:
182: An experimental setup (Fig.~\ref{fig:setup})
183: consisted of a carbon target $\rm \, 4~cm \times 4~cm$ and two
184: time-of-flight scintillator spectrometers having a time resolution of
185: $\delta\tau \simeq 0.1$ ns. A plastic anticounter A of charged particles
186: (of the 90\% efficiency), placed in front of the neutron detectors,
187: and $dE/dx$ layers, placed between start and stop detectors in the pion
188: spectrometer, were used for a better identification of particles.
189:
190: \begin{figure}[ht]
191: \leavevmode
192: \epsfxsize=0.30\textwidth\epsfbox[114 560 305 769]{fig3.ps}
193: \leavevmode
194: \epsfxsize=0.30\textwidth\epsfbox[000 000 184 220]{fig3a.eps}
195: \leavevmode
196: \epsfxsize=0.30\textwidth\epsfbox[000 000 200 210]{fig3b.eps}
197: %\vspace{-2em}
198: \hfill
199: %\epsfig{file=fig3.eps, width=0.28\textwidth, clip=}
200: %\epsfig{file=fig3a.eps, width=0.30\textwidth, clip=}
201: %\epsfig{file=fig3b.eps, width=0.30\textwidth, clip=}
202: \bigskip
203: \caption{Layout of the experimental setup. Shown also
204: time-of-flight spectra in the $\pi$ (left) and $n$ (right) spectrometers.}
205: \label{fig:setup}
206: \end{figure}
207:
208: Strategy of measurements was as follows.
209: There were three runs in the present experiment with different
210: positions of the spectrometers: (a) ``calibration", (b)
211: ``background", and (c) ``effect $+$ background" runs. In the
212: ``calibration" run (a), both spectrometers were placed at
213: $\theta=50^\circ$ with respect to the photon beam, and the end-point
214: energy of the bremsstrahlung spectrum was $E_{\gamma \rm max}=650$ MeV.
215: In this run, mainly $\pi^+n$ pairs from quasi-free production of pions
216: from the carbon, $\gamma + {}^{12}\mbox{C} \to \pi^+ + n + X$, were
217: detected. In the ''background" run (b), the spectrometers were moved
218: at $\theta=90^\circ$ with respect to the photon beam, i.e.\ to the
219: position suitable for measuring the effect. However, the end-point
220: energy still was $E_{\gamma \rm max}=650$ MeV, i.e.\ well below the
221: $\eta$ photoproduction threshold off free nucleons (which is 707 MeV).
222: In the "effect$+$background" run (c), keeping the angle
223: $\theta=90^\circ$, the beam energy was set above the threshold:
224: $E_{\gamma \rm max}=850$ MeV. The observed two-dimensional velocity
225: spectra of the detected pairs are shown in Fig.~4 for all three runs.
226:
227:
228: \begin{figure}[ht]
229: \epsfxsize=\textwidth
230: \epsfbox[23 440 470 800]{fig45.ps}
231: \caption{\sl
232: Left and central panels: Distributions (the number of events
233: $N$) over the pion and neutron velocities for the ``calibration" (a),
234: ``background" (b), and ``effect$+$background" (c) runs. Right panels:
235: Distributions over the time-of-flight $T$ and the energy losses $\Delta
236: E$ in the pion spectrometer for the same runs; only events with a slow
237: particle in the neutron spectrometer were selected for these plots.}
238: \end{figure}
239:
240:
241: In accordance with the velocities of particles in the pion and
242: neutron spectrometer, all events in each run can be assembled into
243: three groups: fast-fast (FF), fast-slow (FS), and slow-slow (SS). The
244: FF events with the extreme velocities close to the speed of the light
245: correspond to a background (mainly $e^+e^-$ pairs produced by $\pi^0$
246: from double-pion production). The FS events mostly correspond to $\pi
247: N$ pairs. In the ``calibration" run ($\theta=50^\circ$, $E_{\gamma \rm
248: max}=650$ MeV), the quasi-free production of the $\pi^+n$ pairs is seen
249: as a prominent peak in the two-dimensional distribution (Fig.~4a). In
250: the ``background" run ($\theta=90^\circ$, $E_{\gamma \rm max}=650$
251: MeV), the largest peak (SS events in Fig.~4b) is caused by $\pi\pi$
252: pairs from double-pion photoproduction off the nucleus. In the
253: ``effect$+$background" run ($\theta=90^\circ$ and $E_{\gamma \rm
254: max}=850$ MeV) (Fig.~4c), apart from the SS events, a clear excess of
255: the FS events, as compared with the ``background" run, is seen. This
256: FS signal is interpreted as a result of production and annihilation of
257: slow $\eta$'s in the nucleus giving the $\pi^+n$ pairs.
258:
259: A further analysis of the events was done using an information from
260: three scintillation detectors which were positioned between the
261: start- and stop-layers of the time-of-flight pion spectrometer.
262: They measured the energy losses $\Delta E$ of particles passed through.
263: A selection of events with a minimal $\Delta E$ in two-dimensional
264: distributions over the time of flight $T$ and the energy losses $\Delta
265: E$ (Fig.~4) allows to discriminate events with a single pion from those
266: with the $e^+e^-$ pairs.
267:
268: \newpage
269: The count rate of the $\pi^+n$ events was evaluated as
270: \begin{equation}
271: N(\pi^+n; 850) = N({\rm FS_{min}}; 850) - N({\rm FS_{min}}; 650)
272: \times K(850/650),
273: \end{equation}
274: where $N({\rm FS_{min}};E_{\gamma \rm max})$ is the number of the
275: observed FS events with the minimal $\Delta E$ and with the specific
276: photon energy $E_{\gamma \rm max}$, and the coefficient K(850/650)
277: gives an increase of the FS-background due to double-pion
278: photoproduction when $E_{\gamma \rm max}$ grows from 650 MeV up to 850
279: MeV. Assuming that the same coefficient describes an increase of the
280: SS count rate as well, it was found from the SS events at 650 and 850
281: MeV that $K=2.15$. Such a procedure gives $N(\pi^+n; 850) = (61 \pm
282: 7)$ events/hour. Assuming an isotropic distribution of the $\pi^+n$
283: pairs, taking into account efficiencies of the pion and neutron
284: spectrometers (80\% and 30\%, respectively) and evaluating a
285: geometrical fraction $f$ of the correlated $\pi^+n$ pairs
286: simultaneously detected by the pion and neutron detectors of a finite
287: size (this fraction, $f=0.18$, was determined by a Monte Carlo
288: simulation of the width of the angular correlation between $\pi^+$ and
289: $n$ caused by the Fermi motion of nucleons and $\eta$ in the nucleus), we
290: obtain the following estimate of the total photoproduction cross
291: section of the correlated pairs from the carbon averaged over the
292: energy interval of 650--850 MeV:
293: \begin{equation}
294: \label{cstot}
295: \langle \sigma(\pi^+n) \rangle = (12.2 \pm 1.3) ~\mu\mbox{b}
296: \end{equation}
297: (a statistical error only).
298:
299: Summarizing, we have observed a clear excess of the correlated $\pi^+n$
300: pairs with the opening angle close to $180^\circ$ arising when the
301: photon beam energy becomes higher than $\eta$-production threshold.
302: That is, we have observed production and decay of slow $\eta$'s inside
303: the nucleus. As was discussed above in relation with Fig.~2,
304: these pairs are expected to be mostly related with a formation
305: and decay of $\eta$-nuclei in the intermediate state.
306: The obtained total cross section of pair production (\ref{cstot})
307: is close to theoretical predictions \cite{try95} for the total
308: cross section of $\eta$-nuclei formation in the photo-reaction,
309: what provides a further support for that expectation.
310:
311:
312: \begin{figure}[htb]
313: \centerline{\epsfxsize=0.8\textwidth
314: \epsfbox[37 260 548 582]{fig6.ps}}
315: \caption{Corrected two-dimensional distributions over the velocities
316: $\beta$ of the $\pi ^+ n$ events
317: with the end-point energy of the bremsstrahlung spectrum
318: $E_{\gamma \rm max} = 850$ and 650 MeV.}
319: \label{fig:betabeta-inverse}
320: \end{figure}
321:
322: In a further analysis of the excess FS events, their
323: energy characteristics have been studied.
324: In order to find kinetic energies of the neutron and pion, the velocities
325: $\beta_i = L_i/ct_i$ of both the particles must be determined. They are
326: subject to fluctuations stemming from errors $\delta t_i$ and $\delta L_i$
327: in the time-of-flight $t_i$ and the flight base $L_i$. Such fluctuations
328: are clearly seen in the case of the ultra-relativistic FF events which have
329: experimentally observed velocities close but not equal to 1 (see Fig.4
330: ). Therefore, an experimental $\beta$-resolution of
331: the setup can be directly inferred from the FF events. Then, using this
332: information and applying an inverse-problem statistical method described in
333: Ref.\ \cite{pav83}, one can unfold the experimental
334: spectrum, obtain a
335: smooth velocity distribution in the physical region $\beta_i < 1$
336: (Fig.~\ref{fig:betabeta-inverse}), and eventually find a distribution of
337: the particle's kinetic energies $E_i = M_i [ (1-\beta_i^2)^{-1/2} - 1 ]$.
338: Finding $E_i$, we introduced corrections related with average energy losses
339: of particles in absorbers and in the detector matter. It is worth to say
340: that the number of the $\pi^+ n$ FS events visibly increases when the
341: photon beam energy becomes sufficient for producing $\eta$ mesons.
342:
343:
344:
345: \begin{figure}[htb]
346: \unitlength=1mm
347: \vspace*{10mm}
348: \begin{picture}(100,55)(0,0)
349: \put(40,55){\small $E_{\gamma \rm max}=850$ MeV}
350: \put(90,55){\small $E_{\gamma \rm max}=650$ MeV}
351: \centerline{\epsfxsize=5.5cm\epsfbox[157 322 443 613]{fig7.ps}
352: \epsfxsize=4.5cm\epsfbox[16 325 304 670]{fig8.ps}}
353: \end{picture}
354: \vspace*{5mm}
355: \caption{Distribution over the total kinetic energy of the $\pi^+n$ pairs
356: for the ``effect$+$background" run (the left panel) and for the
357: ``background" run (the right panel) obtained after
358: unfolding the raw spectra.}
359: \label{fig:Etot-2dim}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362:
363:
364:
365: \begin{figure}[htb]
366: \vspace*{-10mm}
367: \centerline{\epsfxsize=0.45\textwidth
368: \epsfbox[43 18 340 298]{fig9.ps}}
369: \caption{Distribution over the total kinetic energy of the $\pi^+n$ pairs
370: after subtraction of the background. Arrows indicate threshold
371: in the reaction $\eta N \to \pi N$, i.e.\ 408 MeV, and the weighted
372: center of the histogram. For a comparison, a product of free-particle
373: cross sections of $\gamma N \to \eta N$ and $\eta N \to \pi N$
374: \protect\cite{gre97} is shown with the dashed line (in arbitrary units).}
375:
376: \label{fig:Etot-1dim}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379:
380:
381: Of the most interest is the distribution of the $\pi^+ n$ events over their
382: total energy $E_{\rm tot} = E_n + E_\pi$, because creation and decay of
383: $\eta$-mesic nuclei is expected to produce a relatively narrow peak in
384: $E_{\rm tot}$ of the width $\sim 50{-}70$ MeV (see, e.g.,
385: \cite{sok98,lvo98}). Such a peak was indeed observed: see Fig.\
386: \ref{fig:Etot-2dim}, in which an excess of the FS events appears when the
387: photon energy exceeds the $\eta$-production threshold. Subtracting a smooth
388: background, we have found a 1-dimensional energy distribution of the $\pi^+
389: n$ events presumably coming from (bound) $\eta$ decaying in the nucleus,
390: see Fig.\ \ref{fig:Etot-1dim}.
391:
392: The experimental width of this distribution
393: is about 100 MeV, including the apparatus resolution. Its center lies by
394: $\Delta E = 40$ MeV below the energy excess $m_\eta-m_\pi = 408$ MeV in the
395: reaction $\eta N \to \pi N$, and it is well below the position of the
396: $S_{11}(1535)$ resonance too. Up to effects of binding of protons
397: annihilated in the decay subprocess $\eta p \to \pi^+ n$, the value $\Delta
398: E$ characterizes the binding energy of $\eta$ in the nucleus. The width of
399: that peak is determined both by the width of the $\eta$-bound state and by
400: the Fermi motion.\\
401:
402: \begin{figure}[bht]
403: \unitlength=1mm
404: \begin{picture}(100,50)(0,0)
405: \put(030,30){\small $N$}
406: \put(115,01){\small $p_\perp$, MeV}
407: \put(042,45){\small $E_{\gamma \rm max}=850$ MeV}
408: \put(080,45){\small $E_{\gamma \rm max}=650$ MeV}
409: \centerline{\epsfxsize=0.5\textwidth
410: \epsfbox[17 390 542 690]{fig10.eps}}
411: \end{picture}
412: \bigskip
413: \caption{Distribution over the total transverse momentum $p_\perp$ of $\pi^+n$
414: pairs for the ``effect$+$background" run (the left panel)
415: and for the ``calibration" run (the right panel).}
416: \label{fig:momentum}
417: \end{figure}
418:
419: Whereas the fixed opening angle $\theta_{\pi n}=180^\circ$ chosen in the
420: kinematics with $\theta_n=\theta_\pi = 90^\circ$ selects $\pi^+n$ pairs
421: carrying a low total momentum in the direction of the photon beam, an
422: independent check of the transverse momentum $p_\perp = p_\pi - p_n$ is
423: meaningful. The corresponding distribution is shown in Fig.\
424: \ref{fig:momentum}. On the top of a background, there is a narrower peak
425: in $p_\perp$ having a width compatible with the Fermi momentum of nucleons
426: in the nucleus.
427:
428: In conclusion, an excess of correlated $\pi^+ n$ pairs with the opening
429: angle $\langle \theta_{\pi N} \rangle = 180^\circ$ has been experimentally
430: observed when the energy of photons exceeded the $\eta$-production
431: threshold. A distribution of the pairs over their total kinetic energy was
432: found to have a peak lying below threshold of the elementary process $\pi
433: N\to \eta N$. A narrow peak is also found in the pair's distribution over
434: their total transverse momentum. All that suggests that these $\pi^+ n$
435: pairs arise from creation and decay of captured bound $\eta$ in the
436: nucleus, i.e., they arise through the stage of formation of an $\eta$-mesic
437: nucleus.\\
438:
439:
440: \acknowledgments
441: The present research was supported by the Russian Foundation for
442: Basic Research, grants 96-02-17103, 99-02-18224.
443:
444: \begin{references}
445:
446: \bibitem{pen85}
447: J.C. Peng, AIP Conference Proceedings {\bf 133}, 255 (1985).
448: \bibitem{bha85}
449: R.S. Bhalerao and L.C. Liu,
450: {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 54}, 865 (1985).
451: \bibitem{liu86}
452: L.C. Liu and Q. Haider, {\it Phys. Rev. C} {\bf 34} (1986) 1845.
453:
454: \bibitem{chr88}
455: R.E. Chrien et al., {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 60} (1988) 2595.
456: \bibitem{lei88}
457: B.J. Leib and L.C. Liu, LAMPF Progress Report, LA-11670-PR (1988).
458: \bibitem{chi88}
459: H.C. Chiang, E. Oset and L.C. Liu, Phys. Rev. C 44 (1988) 2595.
460: \bibitem{kul98}
461: J. Kulpa, S. Wycech and A.M. Green, nucl-th/9807020.
462:
463: \bibitem{wil93}
464: C. Wilkin, Phys. Rev. C 47 (1993) R938.
465: \bibitem{kon94}
466: L. Kondratyuk et al., In {\it Proc. of Int. Conf.
467: Mesons and Nuclei at Intermediate Energies}, Dubna 1994
468: (World Scientific, Singapore, Eds. M.Kh.~Khanhasayev and
469: Zh.B.~Kurmanov), p.~714.
470: \bibitem{may96}
471: B. Mayer et al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 2068.
472:
473: %\bibitem{ber88} J. Berger et al.,
474: % {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 61} (1988) 919.
475: \bibitem{wil97}
476: N. Willis et al., Phys. Lett. B 406 (1997) 14.
477:
478: \bibitem{bat95}
479: M. Batini\'c et al.,
480: Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 2310; {\it ibid.} 57 (1998) 1004;
481: Physica Scripta 56 (1997) 521; {\it ibid.} 58 (1998) 15.
482: \bibitem{gre97}
483: A.M. Green and S. Wycech, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) R2167.
484: \bibitem{rak96}
485: S.A. Rakityansky et al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) R2043.
486:
487: \bibitem{sok91}
488: G.A. Sokol and V.A. Tryasuchev,
489: Kratkie Soobsh. Fiz. [English transl.: Sov. Phys. --
490: Lebedev Institute Reports] Issue No.\ 4 (1991) 23.
491:
492: \bibitem{lvo98}
493: A.I. L'vov, nucl-th/9810054 and
494: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. ``Mesons and Light Nuclei",
495: Pruhonice, Prague, Czech Republic, 1998
496: (World Scientific, eds. J. Adam et al.), p. ~469.
497:
498: \bibitem{sok98}
499: G.A. Sokol et al., {\it Fizika B} {\bf 8} (1998) 81.
500:
501: \bibitem{try95}
502: A.I. Lebedev and V.A. Tryasuchev, Yad. Fiz. 58 (1995) 642.
503:
504:
505: \bibitem{pav83}
506: V.P. Pavlyuchenko, {\it Vopr. Atom. Nauki i Tekhn, ser. Tekh. Fiz. Eksp.}
507: {\bf 1}/13 (1983) 39.
508:
509:
510: \end{references}
511:
512:
513: \end{document}
514: