1: \documentclass[aps,prc,preprint,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files

3: 

4: \begin{document}

5: %\draft

6: 

7: \def\dj{\leavevmode\setbox0=\hbox{d}\dimen0=\wd0

8:         \setbox0=\hbox{d}\advance\dimen0 by -\wd0

9:         \rlap{d}\kern\dimen0\hbox to \wd0{\hss\accent'26}}

10: \def\DJ{\leavevmode\setbox0=\hbox{D}\dimen0=\wd0

11:         \setbox0=\hbox{D}\advance\dimen0 by -\wd0

12:         \rlap{D}\kern\dimen0\hbox to \wd0{\raise -0.4ex\hbox{\accent'26}\hss}}

13: 

14: \title{$^{4}$He decay of excited states in $^{14}$C}

15: 

16: \author{N. Soi\'{c}}

17: %\affiliation{

18: %School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham~B15~2TT, U.~K.}

19: \altaffiliation{Permanent address: Ru\dj er Bo\v{s}kovi\'{c} Institute, Bijeni\v{c}ka 54, 

20: HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia}

21: %\email[email:]{soic@lnr.irb.hr}

22: 

23: \author{M.~Freer}

24: %\affiliation{

25: %School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15~2TT, U.~K. }

26: 

27: \author{ L. Donadille}

28: \altaffiliation{Present address: CEA-Saclay, DAPNIA/SPhN, Bt. 703, Pice 162, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette

29:  Cedex, France}

30: %\affiliation{

31: %School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham~B15~2TT, U.~K. }

32: 

33: \author{  N. M. Clarke}

34: %\affiliation{

35: %School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham~B15~2TT, U.~K. }

36: 

37: \author{ P. J. Leask}

38: 

39: \affiliation{

40: School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15~2TT, U. K. }

41: 

42: 

43: \author{  W. N. Catford }

44: \author{  K. L. Jones}

45: \altaffiliation{Present address: GSI, Gesellschaft f\"{u}r Schwerionenforschung mbH, Planckstrasse 1,

46:  D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany}

47: \author{ D. Mahboub }

48: \affiliation{

49: School of Electronics and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 5XH, U. K.}

50: 

51: 

52: \author{ B. R. Fulton }

53: \author{B. J. Greenhalgh}

54: \author{ D. L. Watson}

55: \affiliation{

56: Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, U. K.}

57: 

58: \author{D. C. Weisser}

59: \affiliation{Department of Nuclear Physics,  The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia }

60: 

61: \date{ \today}

62: 

63: 

64: \begin{abstract}

65: A study of the $^7$Li($^{9}$Be,$^4$He$^{10}$Be)$^2$H reaction at $E_{beam}$=70 MeV

66: has been performed using resonant particle spectroscopy techniques and provides

67: the first measurements of $\alpha$-decaying states in $^{14}$C. Excited states

68: are observed at 14.7, 15.5, 16.4, 18.5, 19.8, 20.6, 21.4, 22.4 and 24.0 MeV.

69: The experimental technique was able to resolve decays to the various particle

70: bound states in $^{10}$Be, and provides evidence for the preferential decay of

71: the high energy excited states into states in $^{10}$Be at $\sim$6 MeV. The

72: decay processes are used to indicate the possible cluster structure of the

73: $^{14}$C excited states.

74: \end{abstract}

75: 

76: \pacs{ 25.70.Ef, 21.60.Gx, 27.20.+n}

77: 

78: \maketitle

79: 

80: 

81: \section{Introduction}

82: The study of clustering within nuclei has received renewed interest in the

83: light of the potential impact that the underlying cluster structure has on

84: valence particles, particularly in neutron-rich nuclei. The nucleus $^{8}$Be

85: has a pronounced $\alpha$-$\alpha$ cluster structure, as evidenced by the

86: deformed rotational band built on the ground state and the large

87: $\alpha$-particle decay width \cite{Buc77,Hiu72}. Thus, the wave-functions of

88: neutrons introduced into this system are markedly affected by the two-centre

89: nature of the underlying potential. This situation is reminiscent of the atomic

90: binding of covalent molecules where electrons move in multi-centre orbits

91: characterised by the locations of the nuclei. For example, in the binding of

92: O$_{2}$ the valence electrons reside in orbits with $\sigma$ and

93: $\pi$-character, since such orbits result from the linear combination of

94: $p$-type orbits which the atomic electrons occupy. Similarly, valence

95: neutrons in the neutron-rich Be isotopes could occupy $\sigma$ and $\pi$-type

96: orbits given that when separated the neutrons would reside in orbits in the

97: helium nuclei with $p$-type characteristics.

98: 

99: Indeed, these ideas have been developed considerably in the case of the Be

100: isotopes and there appears to be reasonably good evidence for states with both

101: the $\sigma$ and $\pi$ characteristics in $^{9}$Be and $^{10}$Be

102: \cite{von96,von97,von97a}. There is also tentative evidence for the extension

103: of these ideas to $^{11}$Be \cite{von96,von97,von97a} and $^{12}$Be

104: \cite{Fre99,Fre01}. Somewhat remarkably these characteristics are also found in

105: the calculations using the Antisymmetrised Molecular Dynamics (AMD) framework,

106: a model which in principle contains no explicit cluster, or molecular, content

107: \cite{Dot97,Kan99,Kan02}.

108: 

109: An extension to such ideas is the formation of three-centre molecules,

110: principally formed from three $\alpha$-particles, i.e. $^{12}$C. However, the

111: building block for such linear molecules, the 3$\alpha$ chain state remains to be

112: experimentally observed. There has been a long association between the 7.65 MeV

113: (0$^+$) state and the chain configuration. However, it is now generally

114: accepted, due to the lack of experimental evidence for a rotational 2$^+$

115: state, that this state is probably linked with a triangular arrangement of the

116: three clusters \cite{Fed96}.  The next possible candidate for the chain is the

117: 10.3 MeV state. However, this resonance is broad and lies in a region where the

118: spectroscopy of $^{12}$C is extremely complex. Hence, there is no convincing

119: evidence for the existence of the 3$\alpha$-chain. Indeed, molecular orbit

120: model (MO) calculations, which reproduce well the properties of $^{10}$Be

121: \cite{Ita00}, have found that the 3$\alpha$ state is unstable against the

122: bending mode \cite{Ita01}. The same calculations \cite{Ita01,Ita02} suggest

123: that the introduction of valence neutrons may stabilize the chain structure.

124: 

125: The present paper presents an experimental study of the

126: $^7$Li($^{9}$Be,$^{14}$C$^*$$\rightarrow^{10}$Be+$\alpha$)$^2$H reaction, in which

127: the $\alpha$-decays of $^{14}$C excited states both to the $^{10}$Be ground

128: state and excited states are observed. These $^{10}$Be states have previously

129: been characterised in terms of their molecular structure

130: \cite{von96,von97,von97a}.

131: 

132: 

133: \section{Experimental Details}

134: 

135: The measurements were performed at the Australian National University's 14UD

136: tandem accelerator facility. A 70 MeV $^9$Be beam, of intensity 3 enA, was

137: incident on a 100 $\mu$g cm$^{-2}$ Li$_2$O$_3$ foil. The integrated beam

138: exposure was 0.45 mC.

139: 

140: Reaction products formed in reactions of the $^9$Be beam with the target were

141: detected in an array of four charged particle telescopes. These telescopes

142: contained three elements which allowed the detection of a wide range of

143: particle types, from protons to $Z$=4 to 5 nuclei. The first elements were

144: thin, 70$\mu$m, 5$\times$5 cm$^{2}$ silicon detectors segmented into four

145: smaller squares (quadrants). The second elements were position-sensitive strip

146: detectors with the same active area as the quadrant detectors, but divided into

147: 16 position-sensitive strips. These strips were arranged so that the position

148: axis gave maximum resolution in the measurement of scattering angles. Finally,

149: 2.5 cm thick CsI detectors were used to stop highly penetrating light

150: particles. These detector telescopes provided charge and mass resolution up to

151: Be, allowing the final states of interest to be unambiguously identified. The

152: position and energy resolution of the telescopes was $\sim$1 mm and 300 keV,

153: respectively. Calibration of the detectors was performed using elastic

154: scattering measurements of $^{9}$Be from $^{197}$Au and $^{12}$C targets. The

155: four telescopes were arranged in a cross-like arrangement, separated by

156: azimuthal angles of 90 degrees. Two opposing detectors were located with their

157: centres at 17.3 and 17.8 degrees (detectors 1 and 2) from the beam axis and

158: with the strip detector 130 mm from the target, whilst the remaining pair were

159: at the slightly larger angles of 28.6 and 29.7 degrees (detectors 3 and 4), 136

160: mm from the target.

161: 

162: 

163: \section{Results}

164: The resolution of $^4$He and $^{10}$Be locii in the spectra of the particle

165: identification telescopes, and the measurement of the energies and angles of

166: these detected particles permitted the kinematics of the

167: $^7$Li($^{9}$Be,$^{10}$Be$\alpha$)$^2$H reaction (Q=-1.91 MeV) to be fully

168: reconstructed. Figure \ref{etot} shows the total energy spectrum

169: ($E_{tot}=E_{Be}+E_{\alpha}+E_d$) for the two smaller angle detectors (1 and 2)

170: for one of the two possible coincidence combinations. There are three clear

171: peaks in this spectrum. The two highest energy peaks are separated by 3.4 MeV

172: and the third by a further 2.6 MeV. These would thus correspond to all of the

173: bound states in $^{10}$Be. The highest energy peak ($E_{tot}$ = 68.1 MeV)

174: corresponds to the production of $^{10}$Be in the ground state, the next

175:  lower ($E_{tot}$ = 64.7 MeV) is the 3.4 MeV, 2$^+$ excitation, and the lowest

176:  energy peak  ($E_{tot}$ $\approx$ 62 MeV) in this total energy spectrum

177: corresponds to the population of the 5.958 MeV (2$^+$), 5.960 MeV (1$^-$),

178: 6.179 MeV (0$^+$) and 6.263 MeV(2$^-$) states, which are unresolved in the

179: present spectrum given the energy separation is only $\sim$300 keV. The energy

180: resolution in the total energy spectrum is $\sim$2.0 MeV, i.e. worse than the

181: intrinsic energy resolution of the telescopes. This inferior resolution is due

182: to the very light mass of the recoil particle, since a relative small

183: uncertainty in the measured momenta of the reaction products translates into a

184: large uncertainty in the energy of the unobserved deuteron. Nevertheless, the

185: resolution is sufficient to resolve the $^{10}$Be spectrum into three

186: components; the ground state, the 2$^+$ state and the group of states at

187: $\sim$6 MeV. The spectrum also shows a broad bump at higher total energies,

188: which has been identified as arising from $^{9}$Be+$\alpha$ coincidences

189: from the $^{7}$Li($^{9}$Be,$^{9}$Be$\alpha$)$^{3}$H reaction

190: leaking through the A=10 mass selection windows. This association has been

191: confirmed by the analysis of this latter reaction using the appropriate

192:  particle masses. There is also a broad bump at

193: lower energies which partially extends under the peaks. This contribution is

194: from more complex final states (see later). Reactions from the oxygen and the

195: inevitable carbon components in the targets have very negative Q-values ($<$-19

196: MeV) and are thus not represented in the present spectrum.

197: 

198: Given the measurement of the momenta of the two fragments, potentially from the

199: decay of $^{14}$C, it is possible to reconstruct the excitation energy spectrum

200: of this resonant particle. However, given that there are three particles in the

201: final state it is possible that they can be produced via the decay of either $^6$Li

202: into d+$\alpha$ or $^{12}$B into $^{10}$Be+d. Both of these possibilities were

203: reconstructed and it is clear that there is no, or very little, contribution

204: from either of these decay processes. Figure \ref{exc}a shows the reconstructed

205: $^{14}$C excitation energy spectrum for $\alpha$-decays to the $^{10}$Be ground

206: state, for coincidences between the detectors 1 and 2. The spectrum shows a

207: series of excited states between 14 and 22 MeV. The spectrum for detectors 3

208: and 4 covers the excitation energy range 18 to 32 MeV, and shows little

209: evidence for states beyond 19.8 MeV, indicating that the decay strength is

210: located at the lower excitation energies. The energies of the peaks are listed

211: in Table 1. It is possible that some of the peaks in these spectra correspond

212: to multiple states, however with the present excitation energy resolution

213: ($\sim$300 keV) and statistics it is not possible to be sure if the non-gaussian

214: peak shapes are due to multiple states or statistical fluctuations.

215: 

216: Figure \ref{exc}b corresponds to $\alpha$-decays to the $^{10}$Be$(2^+)$ state as

217: measured by the small angle detector pair. Again, the spectrum for the large

218: angle detectors covers a higher excitation energy region 20 to 34 MeV and

219:  shows no evidence of additional

220: structures beyond those observed in Figure \ref{exc}b. Once again, a series of excited

221: states are observed several of which coincide with those that were observed to

222: decay to the $^{10}$Be ground state. Finally, the $\alpha$-decay spectrum for

223: decays to the peak at $\sim$6 MeV in Figure \ref{etot} is shown in Figure \ref{exc}c.

224:  There is an absolute uncertainty in the excitation energy scale of 300 keV in this

225: instance given that it is not known which of the four $^{10}$Be excited states

226: are observed, indeed a combination may be involved. Thus, an excitation energy

227: of 6 MeV has been assumed for $^{10}$Be in this instance.

228: 

229: 

230: Many of the states observed in the present study have possible counterparts in

231: the present energy level compilation for this nucleus \cite{Ajz91}, as

232: indicated in Table 1. For example, the states at 14.7, 15.5 and 16.4 MeV

233: have all been observed in a study of the $^9$Be($^{6}$Li,p)$^{14}$C reaction

234: \cite{Ajz73}. This reaction is very similar to the present one and is almost

235: certainly compound in nature, with the evaporation of a proton leading to the

236: formation of $^{14}$C. In the present case, there is also evidence for a

237: compound population mechanism as when reconstruction of the $^{14}$C excitation

238: energy spectrum is performed for the background bump at low total energies in

239: Figure \ref{etot}, excited states in $^{14}$C may be observed. This may be explained

240: if the reaction proceeds via the $^{16}$N compound nucleus with the sequential

241: emission of a proton and neutron to form excited states in $^{14}$C which then

242: subsequently $\alpha$-decay. Unfortunately, since it is not possible to identify

243: the excitation energy of the $^{10}$Be for this process it is not possible to

244: determine the excitation energy of the $^{14}$C states populated via

245: the n and p sequential emission process. An analysis of the angular distributions

246: and angular correlations for the states observed in Figure \ref{exc}

247: using the techniques given in \cite{Fre96} was performed,

248: but these were found to be essentially featureless, a consequence of the number

249: of reaction amplitudes contributing to the reaction process due to the presence

250: of non zero spin particles in the entrance and exit channels. Thus it is not

251: possible to infer the spins of these states using this reaction.

252:  The present measurements do however provide the first observation of

253: $\alpha$-decaying states in this nucleus.

254: 

255: An interesting feature of the data is that the $^{14}$C states which decay to

256: the ground state and the $^{10}$Be first 2$^+$ state appear to be the same, with the 18.5

257: and 19.8 MeV states appearing in both spectra. On the other hand, decays to the

258: 6 MeV states in $^{10}$Be appear not to coincide despite there being an overlap

259: in the excitation energy spectra of Figures \ref{exc}b and \ref{exc}c. There, 

260: would thus appear to be a preference for the decay of the lower excitation energy states in

261: $^{14}$C to either the $^{10}$Be ground or first excited state, whilst the

262: higher lying states (22.4 and 24.0 MeV) decay to the excited states at 6 MeV.

263: In the absence of spin measurements, it is possible that the decay systematics

264: reflect changing angular momentum barriers corresponding to decays to states

265: of differing spins. However, the decay systematics do appear to be more complex

266: than can be described by such a picture. As stated above, the decays to the

267: $^{10}$Be ground state and 2$^{+}$ (3.4 MeV) state appear to be similar and thus

268: are largely unaffected by the change in the decay barrier. The decays to the

269: 2$^{+}$,1$^{-}$,0$^{+}$,2$^{-}$ quartet at $\sim$6MeV, which would sample

270: similar differences in the angular momenta barriers, highlights different states.

271: This property, as for example is the case of excited states in $^{20}$Ne

272: \cite{Hin83,Bro84} and $^{24}$Mg \cite{Led84}, may rather be a reflection of

273: changing structural overlap of the states in $^{14}$C with those in $^{10}$Be.

274: This difference may perhaps be understood in terms of the structural content of

275: the various $^{10}$Be states. In a shell model description the $^{10}$Be ground

276: state and first excited state correspond to the occupation of the $p_{3/2}$

277: orbit for the two valence neutrons. On the other hand, the 6 MeV states require

278: the excitation of one or more of the neutrons to the $s-d$ shell

279: \cite{von96,von97,von97a}. In the MO \cite{Ita00} and AMD \cite{Kan99}

280: calculations that have been applied to $^{10}$Be the ground and the first $2^+$ state

281: correspond to neutrons in $\pi$ like orbits, whereas the 6 MeV states require

282: either two $\sigma$ neutrons ($0^+_2$) or combinations of $\sigma$ and $\pi$

283: like neutrons (1$^-$, 2$^-$). Thus, it is possible that the lower energy

284: $^{14}$C excited states (14.7 to 21.4 MeV) are based upon neutrons in

285: $\pi$-type molecular configurations, whereas the higher energy states (22.4 and

286: 24.0 MeV) contain some $\sigma$-orbit parentage.

287: However, it should be noted that there are some states which decay to the 2$^+$

288:  state that are not strongly observed in decays to the ground state (e.g. 21.4 MeV),

289: and vice versa (20.6 MeV). This would indicate that other effects may play

290:  a role in these decay processes, for example angular momentum barriers and

291:  decay phase space. Whether these states

292: correspond to single molecular type configurations related by rotational

293: excitations is unclear, and require measurements of the spins of the states.

294: Nevertheless, there is a possibility that these states are related to molecular

295: chains in $^{14}$C.

296: 

297: \section{Summary}

298: Measurements of the $^7$Li($^{9}$Be,$^4$He$^{10}$Be)$^{2}$H reaction at

299: $E_{beam}$=70 MeV provide evidence for a series of $^{14}$C excited states

300: between 14 and 25 MeV. These studies were able to resolve decays to the various

301: particle bound states in $^{10}$Be. The analysis indicates that decays to the

302: $^{10}$Be ground state and the first $2^+$ state occur from the same states in $^{14}$C,

303: whilst a distinct set of states decay to the excited states at $\sim$6 MeV.

304: Given the proposed molecular content of the states in $^{10}$Be it is speculated

305: that those in $^{14}$C may also contain molecular characteristics. More definitive

306: evidence will be provided by future measurements capable of determining the

307: spins of these excited states.

308: 

309: \begin{acknowledgments}

310: 

311: The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of ANU personnel in

312: running the accelerator. This work was carried out under a formal agreement

313: between the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the

314: Australian National University. PJL, BJG and KLJ would like to acknowledge the

315: EPSRC for financial support.

316: \end{acknowledgments}

317: 

318: 

319: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

320: 

321: \bibitem{Buc77} B. Buck, H. Friedrich, and C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys., {\bf A275} 246 (1977)

322: \bibitem{Hiu72} J. Hiura and R. Tamagaki, Suppl. Prog. Theo. Phys., {\bf 52} 25 (1972)

323: \bibitem{von96} W. von Oertzen, Z. Phys., {\bf A354} 37 (1996)

324: \bibitem{von97} W. von Oertzen, Z. Phys., {\bf A357} 355 (1997)

325: \bibitem{von97a} W. von Oertzen, Nuovo Cimento, {\bf 110} 895 (1997)

326: \bibitem{Fre99} M. Freer {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 82} 1383 (1999)

327: \bibitem{Fre01} M. Freer {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 63} 034301 (2001)

328: \bibitem{Dot97} A. Dot\'{e}, H. Horiuchi and Y. Kanada-En'yo, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 56} 1844 (1997)

329: \bibitem{Kan99} Y. Kanada-En'yo, H. Horiuchi and A. Dot\'{e}, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 60} 064304 (1999)

330: \bibitem{Kan02} Y. Kanada-En'yo and H. Horiuchi, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 66} 024305 (2002)

331: \bibitem{Fed96} D. V. Fedorov and A. S. Jensen, Phys. Lett., {\bf B389} 631 (1996)

332: \bibitem{Ita00} N. Itagaki and S. Okabe, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 61} 044306 (2000)

333: \bibitem{Ita01} N. Itagaki, S. Okabe, K. Ikeda and I. Tanihata, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 64} 014301 (2001)

334: \bibitem{Ita02} N. Itagaki, {\em private communication}

335: \bibitem{Ajz91} F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys., {\bf A523} 1 (1991)

336: \bibitem{Fre96} M. Freer, Nucl. Instr. Meth., {\bf A383} 463 (1996)

337: \bibitem{Ajz73} F. Ajzenberg-Selove, H. G. Bingham and J. D. Garrett, Nucl.Phys., {\bf A202} 152 (1973)

338: \bibitem{Hin83} M. M. Hindi, J. H. Thomas, D. C. Radford and P. D. Parker, Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 27} 2902 (1983)

339: \bibitem{Bro84} D. A. Bromley, Cluster Aspects of Nuclear Structure, (Ed. J. S. Lilley and M. A. Nagarajan),

340:  D. Reidel Pub. Co. 1 (1984)

341: \bibitem{Led84} R. J. Ledoux, C. E. Ordonez, M. J. Bechara, H. A. Al-Juwair, G. Lavelle and E. R. Cosman,

342:  Phys. Rev. C, {\bf 30} 866 (1984)

343: 

344: 

345: 

346: \end{thebibliography}

347: 

348:  \begin{table}

349:  \caption{\label{14cexc} Excitation energies of $^{14}$C states decaying into states in

350: $^{10}$Be. The uncertainties in these energies for decays to the $^{10}$Be

351: ground state and first excited state are 100 keV, and due to the ambiguity in

352: the excitation energy of the 6 MeV peak, the uncertainty here is 300 keV. The

353: previous measurements are from the tabulations of \cite{Ajz91}.}

354: % \begin{ruledtabular}

355: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}\hline

356: $^{10}$Be$_{gs}$ & $^{10}$Be$(2^+)$ & $^{10}$Be(6 MeV) & Previous\\ \hline

357:  14.7(0.1) & & & 14.667 (4$^+$) \\ 15.5(0.1) & & & 15.44 (3$^-$) \\ 16.4(0.1) & & & 16.43\\

358:  18.5(0.1) & 18.5(0.1) & & 18.5\\

359:   & (19.1(0.1)) & &\\ 19.8(0.1) & 19.8(0.1) & &\\ 20.6(0.1) & & &\\

360:   & 21.4(0.1) & &\\ & & 22.4(0.3) &\\ & (23.2(0.1)) & &\\ & & 24.0(0.3) &\\\hline

361: \end{tabular}

362: %\end{ruledtabular}

363: \end{table}

364: 

365: 

366: 

367: \begin{figure}

368: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{14cfig1.eps}

369: \caption{\label{etot} Total energy spectrum for $^{4}$He+$^{10}$Be coincidences,

370: assuming a $^2$H recoil. Only statistical uncertainties are plotted.}

371: \end{figure}

372: 

373: 

374: \begin{figure}

375: \includegraphics[width=0.65\textwidth]{14cfig2.eps}

376: \caption{\label{exc}$^{14}$C excitation energy spectra for decays to (a) $^{10}$Be

377: ground state (b) $^{10}$Be 3.4 MeV, 2$^+$ state and (c) $^{10}$Be excited

378: states at $\sim$6 MeV. Error bars represent statistical errors only.}

379: \end{figure}

380: 

381: \end{document}

382: