1: \chapter{Analysis Methods}

2: 

3: The technique for finding $K_S^0$, $\Lambda$, or

4: $\overline{\Lambda}$ candidates with the STAR detector and

5: calculating their $p_T$ and $y$ distributions is well

6: established~\cite{Lam:Adler:2002pb,huilong}\footnote{The author

7: thanks H. Long for his assistance in making the measurements

8: presented in this thesis. His work with weak-decay-vertex finding

9: has become a cornerstone of the STAR collaborations scientific

10: program.}. Up to now, measurements of identified particle $v_2$

11: have relied on pure particle identification (90\%

12: purity\footnote{Purity is defined as the raw yield of the particle

13: at a given dE/dx value, divided by the sum of all other particle

14: yields with the same dE/dx.}) via dE/dx measurements in the TPC

15: gas~\cite{Adler:2001nb}. We've adapted the $v_2$ analysis method

16: to calculate $v_2$ for particles identified only on a statistical

17: basis. With this method it is possible to calculate $v_2$ for

18: identified particles independent of the particle sample's

19: signal-to-background ratio.

20: 

21: In this chapter, we describe the selection criteria for events,

22: tracks and the $K_S^0$, $\Lambda$, or $\overline{\Lambda}$

23: candidates. Details of the $R_{CP}$ and spectra

24: measurements---including an analysis of systematic errors---are

25: given. Finally, the analysis methods for measuring $v_{2}$ of

26: $K_S^0$, $\Lambda$, and $\overline{\Lambda}$ are presented along

27: with a discussion of the systematic errors associated with the

28: $v_2$ analysis.

29: 

30: \input{event_sample}

31: \input{particle_identification}

32: \input{efficiency}

33: \input{reaction_plane}

34: \input{v2_calculation}

35: