1:
2: %\documentclass[showpacs,aps, prl, preprint]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[showpacs,aps, prl, twocolumn]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{graphics}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{Direct observation of 4$^+$ to 2$^+$ gamma transition in $^8$Be}
10:
11: \author{V.M. Datar$^1$, Suresh Kumar$^1$, D.R. Chakrabarty$^1$, V. Nanal$^2$,
12: E.T. Mirgule$^1$, A. Mitra$^1$, and H.H. Oza$^1$}
13:
14: \affiliation{
15: $^1$Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400 085,
16: India\\$^2$Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai-400 005,
17: India}
18: \date{\today}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21:
22: The low lying states in $^8$Be are believed to have a two-alpha cluster
23: structure and hence a large intrinsic quadrupole deformation. An earlier
24: calculation showed a large collective enhancement in gamma transition
25: probability between the low lying states leading to a 4$^+$ to 2$^+$
26: gamma branch of $\sim$10$^{-7}$ and a resonant radiative cross section
27: of 134~nb for the $\alpha+\alpha$ entrance channel. We report here the
28: first experimental evidence for this transition through a
29: $\gamma-\alpha-\alpha$ coincidence measurement in the
30: reaction $^4$He($\alpha,\alpha \gamma$)$^4$He using a gas target. The
31: measured cross sections on and off the 4$^+$ resonance are
32: 165~$\pm$~41~(stat)~$\pm$35~(sys)~nb and
33: 39~$\pm$~25~(stat)~$\pm$7~(sys)~nb, respectively.
34:
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \pacs{21.10.Ky, 23.20.Lv, 24.30.Gd, 27.20.+n}
38: % PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
39: % Classification Scheme.
40: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}
41: %Use showkeys class option if keyword
42:
43: \maketitle
44:
45: The $^8$Be nucleus is believed to be the simplest composite
46: $\alpha$-cluster system. The ground state is 92~keV above the $\alpha-\alpha$
47: threshold and is a narrow resonance while the first and second excited
48: states are much broader resonances~\cite{ajzenberg} as shown in Fig.~1. These were identified
49: through the phase shift analysis of $\alpha-\alpha$ elastic scattering data and
50: have been assigned as members of the ground state rotational
51: band~\cite{bm2}. This assignment is primarily based on their energies and spins
52: calculated using an $\alpha$-cluster model~\cite{buck, rae}. A crucial
53: observable in support of this assignment is the enhanced E2
54: transition probability between the successive band members arising from
55: the very large intrinsic deformation predicted by the cluster model.
56: To date there does not exist any direct measurement of
57: the electromagnetic transition rate between the low lying states of
58: $^8$Be. Such a measurement, though difficult because of the small
59: gamma branching ratio, would also be of interest in the context of the
60: \begin{figure}
61: \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{Fig-1.eps}
62: %\psfig{figure=fig-1_ppt.eps,scale=0.3,angle=90}
63: \caption{Level scheme of $^8$Be showing the spin and parity~(J$^\pi$),
64: excitation energy~(E$_{\rm X}$) and width~($\Gamma$) of
65: the ground and first two excited states.}
66: \end{figure}
67: study of alpha linear chain configurations~(LCC) in heavier nuclei
68: such as $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, $^{20}$Ne and
69: $^{24}$Mg~\cite{merchant}.
70:
71: There are two measurements in $^8$Be, which is the simplest $\alpha$ LCC,
72: searching for $\alpha-\alpha$ bremsstrahlung at
73: E$_{\alpha}$~=~9.4~MeV~\cite{frois}
74: and at E$_{\alpha}$~=~12~-~19~MeV~\cite{peyer} by
75: only detecting the charged particles. Coincident $\alpha$~particles were
76: measured at fixed angles of $\pm$27.5$^0$ and $\pm$35$^0$, respectively,
77: with respect to the beam. Frois~{\it et al.}~\cite{frois} did not find
78: evidence for gamma emission and placed an upper limit of
79: $\sim$~3~$\mu$b/sr$^2$ at 67\% confidence level while Peyer~{\it et al.}~\cite{peyer}
80: found that the measured cross section is higher than that calculated including
81: only {\it external} bremsstrahlung. The results of Ref.\cite {peyer} suggested
82: the presence of an additional {\it internal} bremsstrahlung amplitude
83: due to the enhanced 4$^+$ to 2$^+$ E2 transition~\cite{green}. It
84: should be mentioned that these measurements were not aimed at measuring,
85: even if only indirectly, the resonant radiative cross section since the beam
86: energies were not optimal for either of the 2$^+$ or 4$^+$ $\alpha-\alpha$
87: resonances. A substantial improvement over these measurements
88: would be to detect the gamma ray in coincidence with the two alpha particles
89: emitted subsequently from the final state. Further, the measurements should be made at
90: beam energies corresponding to on and off resonance.
91:
92: It may be worthwhile at this point to summarize the relevant properties
93: of the low lying states of $^8$Be. The experimental energies
94: and widths of the lowest
95: 0$^+$, 2$^+$ and 4$^+$ states can be reproduced reasonably by the
96: $\alpha$-cluster model~\cite{buck, rae}. The widths arise primarily from the $\alpha$-decay
97: channel since the proton and neutron decay are not energetically possible.
98: Using this model the E2 gamma decay widths
99: for the first two excited states of $^8$Be have been calculated~\cite{langanke1,
100: langanke2} to be 8.3~meV and 0.46~eV corresponding to the
101: B(E2) values of $\sim$~75~W.u. and $\sim$~19~W.u.~\cite{note}, respectively,
102: indicating a substantial collective enhancement. However, the calculated
103: \begin{figure*}
104: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{Fig-2.eps}
105: \caption{A schematic of the experimental setup.}
106: \end{figure*}
107: gamma branching ratios for the two transitions are still very small
108: {\it viz.}~5.9~$\times$~10$^{-9}$ and 1.2~$\times$~10$^{-7}$, respectively.
109: The resonances in the reaction
110: $^4$He($\alpha,\gamma$)$^8$Be are predicted at excitation energies
111: of 2.8 MeV and 10.7 MeV, which are lower than the energies shown
112: in Fig.~1, with the corresponding peak cross sections of 14~nb and 134~nb.
113: Considering the relatively larger cross section we
114: have chosen to measure the gamma decay of the 4$^+$ resonance.
115: In this letter we present the first direct experimental evidence for this
116: electromagnetic decay branch.
117:
118: The $^8$Be nucleus was populated through the $\alpha+\alpha$ channel,
119: using a gas target, at two beam energies of 22.4 MeV and 26.5 MeV.
120: These correspond to on and off the 4$^+$ resonance, respectively, in
121: the reaction zone after accounting for the energy loss in the intervening
122: material. Gamma rays were measured in coincidence with the
123: two $\alpha$~particles from the breakup of the final state.
124: The alpha detectors were placed in the forward direction so as to optimise the
125: detection efficiency for the coincident $\alpha$~particles which emerge from the
126: target region within $\sim$30$^\circ$ of the beam. The 4$^+$ to 2$^+$ radiative
127: transition in $^8$Be has been detected in the present experiment.
128: The measured cross sections are 165~$\pm$~41~(stat)~$\pm$~35~(sys)
129: and 39~$\pm$~25~(stat)~$\pm$~7~(sys)~nb, for on and off resonance,
130: respectively. The measurements agree reasonably with the cluster model
131: calculation of Ref.\cite{langanke2}.
132:
133: The experiment was done using alpha
134: beams from the 14UD Pelletron at Mumbai with a beam current of
135: $\sim$1~pnA. The reaction chamber was designed for
136: use of a gas target and housed a charged particle detector array at forward angle.
137: It allowed the placement of gamma detectors in a compact geometry
138: leading to a high combined detection efficiency. Bi and C foil targets could be inserted
139: in the beam path for calibration of the charged
140: particle detectors by measuring the elastic and inelastic scattering of the alpha beam.
141: A schematic diagram of the set up is shown in Fig.~2. A helium gas
142: target of purity $>$~99.9\% was used at 0.8~bar pressure and the target
143: chamber was isolated from the beam line vacuum by
144: 1.8~mg/cm$^2$
145: thick Kapton foils at the entry and exit. The target
146: chamber was evacuated through a liquid nitrogen trap~(LNT) and flushed with
147: helium passing through another LNT. This cycle of evacuation
148: and flushing was repeated a few times before filling the chamber with helium
149: at the above mentioned pressure. Gamma rays
150: were detected in two arrays, each having seven close packed hexagonal
151: bismuth germanate~(BGO) scintillation detectors
152: placed $\sim$~3~cm above and below the target. The
153: upper BGO detectors had a thickness of 76~mm and a face to face width of
154: 56~mm while the corresponding numbers for the lower set were 64~mm and
155: 56~mm. The two $\alpha$~particles resulting from the decay of the 2$^+$
156: resonance, subsequent to the 4$^+$ to 2$^+$~$\gamma$ transition, were
157: detected in an array of six silicon~(Si) PIN diodes~(9~mm$\times$9~mm$\times$500~$\mu$m).
158: These were placed at forward angles in a close packed configuration (see
159: Fig.~2). A suitably placed 8~mm aperture in the beam path blocked
160: elastically scattered alpha particles from the Kapton window. The downstream
161: snout reduced the coincident elastically scattered $\alpha$~particles. A Monte Carlo
162: simulation was used to optimise the efficiency and decide the aperture
163: and Si detector geometry.
164: The simulations indicated an effective target length
165: of about 12~mm centered around the aperture and the angles covered by the
166: forward Si detectors to be between~$\sim$~15$^{\circ}$
167: to 35$^{\circ}$. A 300~$\mu$m thick Si detector was placed
168: at $\sim$110$^{\circ}$ with respect to the beam and the spectra were recorded
169: separately to monitor the impurities (mainly air) in the helium gas via
170: their corresponding elastic peaks. In order to estimate the contribution of
171: the residual air background, measurements were also
172: made with air at 0.1~bar at both beam energies. This pressure
173: results in a similar energy loss for the incoming and outgoing alpha particles
174: as with the helium gas target.
175:
176: The energy resolution of the Si detectors for 5.5~MeV alpha particles from an
177: $^{241}$Am-$^{239}$Pu source was $\sim$~50 keV. The BGO arrays were
178: calibrated for high energy gamma rays using $^{241}$Am-Be
179: (4.44 MeV) and $^{238}$Pu-$^{13}$C (6.13 MeV) sources.
180: The energy resolution for 4.44~MeV gamma
181: rays in each array was $\sim$~7.5$\%$. The gamma ray response of the
182: arrays was simulated using the code GEANT~\cite{cern}, taking into account
183: the attenuation due to the stainless steel lids of the target chamber. The
184: simulation, after background addition, agrees with the measured
185: source spectrum in shape and magnitude (within $\pm$~15\%).
186: \begin{figure}
187: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{Fig-3.eps}
188: \caption{Summed time spectra between diametrically opposite Si detectors
189: (a),~(b) and Si-BGO (c),~(d) gated by
190: E$_{\alpha1}$~+~E$_{\alpha2}$~+~E$_{\gamma}$ of
191: 19$-$22 and 23$-$26 MeV for on and off resonance beam energies, respectively.}
192: \end{figure}
193:
194: The anode signal from each BGO detector in an array was sent
195: to a two way passive splitter and the two outputs were sent to two separate
196: fast amplifiers. One amplifier was set to a higher gain and
197: was used to generate a fast logic timing signal. The output of the other was
198: summed and sent to a charge sensitive analog to digital
199: converter (with a 1~$\mu$sec wide gate) to generate the total energy signal. The signal from
200: the charge sensitive preamplifier for each Si detector was processed to give an
201: analog energy signal and a fast timing signal. Data were collected in the event
202: by event mode, in a computer based data acquisition system
203: ~\cite{chatterjee}, requiring at least two Si detectors and one of the
204: BGO arrays in fast coincidence. The parameters recorded were 1)~the energies
205: of the Si detectors, 2)~the sum energies of the upper and lower BGO
206: arrays and 3)~the timing between the BGO arrays and each Si detector.
207: The on and off resonance data have been acquired for beam
208: charges of 112~p$\mu$C and 69~p$\mu$C, respectively.
209:
210: The data was sorted by selecting the diagonally opposite (1-6, 2-5 or 3-4, see Fig. 2)
211: Si detectors in coincidence with each other and with one of the BGO
212: arrays. Typical one dimensional projections of the BGO$-$Si time spectra and Si$-$Si
213: time spectra are shown in Fig.~3. Two dimensional~(2D)
214: E$_{\gamma}-($E$_{Si1}$+E$_{Si2}$) spectra, where E$_{\gamma}$ is
215: the energy deposited in one of the gamma detector arrays and 1 and 2 refer to any
216: of the three diagonally opposite pairs, were projected from the data.
217: The gates used during the projection ensured a prompt coincidence
218: between the Si detectors, an energy deposit $\geq$~2~MeV in each Si
219: detector and a prompt Si$-$BGO coincidence with E$_{BGO} \geq$~2~MeV.
220: The random contribution was estimated from the 2D spectra created
221: by putting appropriate prompt and random gates in the Si1$-$Si2 and Si1$-$BGO time
222: parameters. Finally, E$_{\gamma}$ gates of 5.0~$-$~12.5~MeV~(on resonance)
223: and 7.0~$-$~14.5~MeV~(off resonance)
224: were used to generate the sum~(E$_{Si1}$+E$_{Si2}$+E$_{\gamma}$) specra
225: from the above 2D spectra.
226: The background contribution due to the residual air was
227: measured and found to be small. Figure~4 shows the final sum spectra
228: at the two beam energies after subtracting the impurity contributions and
229: random coincidences. A peak can be seen
230: in the E$_{Si1}$+E$_{Si2}$+E$_{\gamma}$ sum energy spectrum at the
231: lower~(on resonance) beam energy. This clearly corresponds to the
232: 4$^+$ to 2$^+$ radiative transition in $^8$Be.
233: The peak energy is lower than the beam energy at the target zone because of
234: the energy loss of $\alpha$~particles, following the radiative transition, in
235: the intervening gas region before they reach the Si detectors.
236: At the higher~(off resonance) beam energy there is a small excess
237: of counts above background but with a
238: larger fractional error. Similar sum spectra have also been generated for non
239: diagonal pairs (1-5, 2-6 and 3-5) of Si detectors in coincidence
240: with the gamma detectors. The on resonance spectra do not show such a
241: peak. This is as expected because the two alpha particles and the beam have to lie in the
242: same plane since the recoil effect due to the radiative transition is negligible.
243: This observation also shows that there is no significant contribution from events
244: corresponding to a sequential $\alpha$ emission from the excitation of the target
245: impurities accompanied by pileup in the BGO array leading to a peak in the
246: energy region of interest.
247: \begin{figure}
248: \includegraphics[scale=0.53]{Fig-4.eps}
249: \caption{Sum energy spectra of E$_{Si1}$+E$_{Si2}$+E$_{\gamma}$ on and
250: off the resonance after random and air background subtraction along with the
251: simulation for the best fit radiative cross section.}
252: \end{figure}
253:
254: In order to extract the cross section for the radiative transition
255: in the present reaction, a Monte Carlo
256: program was used to simulate the experiment and generate
257: $\gamma-\alpha-\alpha$ events. The angular
258: distribution of the alpha particles emitted following E2 gamma decay was included
259: in the simulation.
260: The measured alpha singles spectral shapes
261: were compared with the Monte Carlo simulations to constrain the possible
262: transverse position offsets of the beam. These were found to be
263: $<$~1~mm and result in a change in the triple coincidence efficiency of
264: less than $\pm$~5\%.
265: The gamma ray response for the two BGO arrays were simulated using the code
266: GEANT, taking into account the angular distribution of the
267: E2 gamma rays. Typical values of the photopeak efficiency (defined for a
268: deposited energy of upto 1 MeV lower than the full energy peak) are
269: about 12.5\% and 11.5\% for gamma ray energies of 8 and 10~MeV,
270: respectively for each of the BGO arrays. This response was used in the simulation
271: program to generate a data file from which the
272: E$_{Si1}$+E$_{Si2}$+E$_{\gamma}$ spectra were projected. These were scaled
273: and added to a linear background to fit the data. After
274: accounting for the efficiency loss due to the dead time of the acquisition system and
275: the gates used in the data analysis, this scaling factor was used to obtain the best
276: fit cross section. The best fits to the data, on and off the resonance, are
277: shown in Fig.~4. The extracted gamma cross sections at the two beam energies
278: of 22.4 and 26.5~MeV are 165~$\pm$~41~(stat)~$\pm$~35~(sys) and
279: 39~$\pm$~25(stat)~$\pm$~7~(sys)~nb, respectively. The systematic error
280: includes the error due to the uncertainty in beam position, the choice
281: of the fitting procedure and the subtracted air background. The measured on and off
282: resonance gamma cross sections compare favorably with the 134~nb
283: and $\sim$12~nb calculated in Ref.\cite{langanke2} within experimental
284: errors. This corresponds to a B(E2) of
285: 24~$\pm$~6~(stat)~$\pm$~5~(sys)~e$^2$~fm$^4$ assuming a
286: Breit-Wigner shape for the resonance as in Ref.\cite{langanke2}.
287: This also agrees, within errors, with the B(E2) of 18.2~$\pm$~0.4 e$^2$~fm$^4$
288: calculated by the {\it ab initio} quantum Monte Carlo method~\cite{wiringa}.
289:
290: The natural extension to the present work would be to scan the 4$^+$
291: resonance and to search for the 2$^+$ to 0$^+$ gamma
292: transition in $^8$Be. A more precise measurement than the one
293: described above would require higher segmentation of the
294: alpha detectors in order to handle higher beam currents. This will
295: also give information on the angular correlation of the emitted
296: $\alpha$~particles after the radiative transition.
297:
298: In summary we have made the first direct observation of the 4$^+$ to
299: 2$^+$ gamma transition in $^8$Be through a $\gamma-\alpha-\alpha$
300: triple coincidence measurement. The derived on and off resonance
301: gamma cross sections agree reasonably with an earlier cluster model calculation.
302: The present experiment demonstrates the feasibility of gamma ray measurements
303: to confirm the $\alpha$~LCC in heavier nuclei.
304:
305: We thank the Pelletron crew for delivering the alpha beam, P. Sugathan
306: for providing the Si detectors, S.~Rathi, R.G.~Pillay, A.~Chatterjee
307: and P.V.~Bhagwat for their help during the experiment.
308:
309:
310: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
311:
312: \bibitem{ajzenberg}
313: F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A490}, 1 (1988).
314: \bibitem{bm2}
315: A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol.~2, Benjamin, New
316: York (1975).
317: \bibitem{buck}
318: B. Buck, H. Friedrich, and C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A275}, 246
319: (1977).
320: \bibitem{rae}
321: W.D.M. Rae, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. {\bf 23}, 261 (1997).
322: \bibitem{merchant}
323: A.C. Merchant and W.D.M. Rae, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A549}, 431
324: (1992) and references therein.
325: \bibitem{frois}
326: B. Frois, J. Birchall, R. Roy, and R.J. Slobodrian, Phys. Rev. Lett.
327: {\bf 28}, 633 (1972).
328: \bibitem{peyer}
329: U. Peyer, J. Hall, R. Muller, M. Suter, and W. Wolfli, Phys. Lett. B{\bf
330: 41}, 151 (1972).
331: \bibitem{green}
332: A.M. Green and J. Niskanen, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A240}, 263 (1975).
333: \bibitem{langanke1}
334: K. Langanke and C. Rolfs, Phys. Rev. C~{\bf 33}, 790 (1986).
335: \bibitem{langanke2}
336: K. Langanke and C. Rolfs, Zeit.~Phys.~{\bf A324}, 307 (1986).
337: \bibitem{note}
338: With a radius parameter of 1.2~fm the quoted E2 widths correspond to
339: B(E2) values of 49 and 21 W.u. for the 2$^+$ to 0$^+$ and
340: 4$^+$ to 2$^+ \gamma$ transitions, respectively.
341: \bibitem{cern}
342: GEANT version 3.21, CERN program library.
343: \bibitem{chatterjee}
344: A. Chatterjee, http://www.tifr.res.in/$\sim$pell/lamps
345: \bibitem{wiringa}
346: R.B. Wiringa, S.C. Pieper, J. Carlson and V.R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C~{\bf 62},
347: 014001 (2000).
348: \end{thebibliography}
349: \end{document}
350: