1: %%%%%
2: %
3: % Xe136 2beta-decay experiment DEVIZ
4: %
5: % Original idea: V.A.Lubimov
6: % Proposal: S.Boris, A.Golutvin, M.Danilov, O.Zeldovich, Yu.Kamushkov,
7: % V.Kirichenko, V.Lubimov, I.Tihomirov
8: % Design: A.Golutvin, M.Ajnutdinov, M.Ivanovsky, O.Zeldovich,
9: % Yu.Kamushkov, V.Kirichenko, V.Artemiev, E.Brakchman
10: % Construction: V.Artemiev, E.Brakchman, A.Karelin, A.Mitin, D.Kovalsky,
11: % A.Karelin, A.Kuchenkov, V.Kirichenko, O.Zeldovich
12: % Processing: V.Kirichenko, T.Tsvetkova, O.Kozodaeva, O.Zeldovich,
13: % V.Belov
14: % Monte-Carlo: V.Belov, T.Tsvetkova
15: % Original text (russian): V.Artemiev, E.Brakchman, O.Zeldovich,
16: % V.Kirichenko, V.Belov
17: % Translation: T.Tsvetkova, O.Zeldovich, V.Belov
18: % Pictures: O.Kozodaeva, V.Belov
19: % Text design: V.Belov
20: %
21: % 31.10.2004 Text freezed
22: % 11.11.2004 Converted to TeX
23: % 17.11.2004 v.1.00 last changes
24: %
25: %%%%%%
26:
27: \documentclass[a4paper]{article}
28: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
29: \usepackage[dvips]{color}
30:
31: \oddsidemargin 0 pt
32: \evensidemargin 0 pt
33: \topmargin -36 pt
34: \textheight 24 cm
35: \textwidth 16 cm
36:
37: \title{Track detector DEVIS for the double beta decay investigation}
38:
39: \author{V.\,Artemiev, V.\,Belov, E.\,Brakhman, A.\,Karelin, V.\,Kirichenko, \\
40: O.\,Kozodaeva, A.\,Kuchenkov, V.\,Lubimov, A.\,Mitin, T.\,Tsvetkova, \\
41: O.\,Zeldovich}
42:
43: \date{23 November 2004}
44:
45: \begin{document}
46: \maketitle
47:
48: \begin{center}
49: Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics
50: \end{center}
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: Detector DEVIS is TPC in the magnetic field. It is dedicated to the
54: investigation of the double-beta decay of Xe. Setup sensitivity was
55: estimated in the series of measurements with Xe with natural isotopes
56: composition. Detector allows measuring two-neutrino double-beta decay
57: of $^{136}$Xe with half-life less than $3 \cdot 10^{20}$ years.
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: Results obtained in the solar, atmospheric and reactor experiments are
63: interpreted as the evidence of the neutrino oscillations and the existence
64: of a small ($m_{\nu} > 0.045$~eV) neutrino mass. But absolute values of neutrino
65: masses and their hierarchy cannot be determined solely from oscillation
66: experiments. Experimental searches for the neutrinoless double beta decay
67: enable to check up the law of lepton charge conservation, to define the
68: neutrino mass nature (Dirac or Majorana) and to investigate the absolute
69: scale of neutrino masses~\cite{1,2}. Evidence of the observation of $^{76}$Ge
70: $2\beta0\nu$-decay~\cite{3} gave rise to a great discussion. Thus appears the
71: necessity to check this result and its interpretation with other isotopes and
72: with higher sensitivity.
73:
74: A lot of new projects of the experiments with few tons isotopes are under
75: consideration and development at present, for example GENIUS~\cite{4} with $^{76}$Ge
76: and EXO~\cite{5} with $^{136}$Xe. The goal of the future experiments is to reach of
77: the sensitivity $T \sim 10^{27-28}$ years and to a neutrino mass of the order
78: $m_{\nu} < 0.05$~eV. However, for unequivocal definition on a neutrino mass (or
79: limit on mass) the knowledge of a nuclear matrix element is necessary.
80: There are many publications, devoted to theoretical calculations of the
81: nuclear matrix elements both for $2\beta2\nu$ and $2\beta0\nu$ decay modes.
82: Results differ
83: more than 2 times. Therefore, experimental observations of $2\beta2\nu$-decay for
84: different isotopes with maximal accuracy are extremely important. Possible
85: test of the theoretical calculations has been proposed in~\cite{6}. Where
86: it was stated that final test of the theoretical calculations can be
87: accomplished if $2\beta0\nu$-decay of three (or more) isotopes will be observed.
88:
89: $^{76}$Ge $2\beta2\nu$-decay was measured in the few experiments~\cite{7,8},
90: though some
91: small disagreement exists. $^{136}$Xe $2\beta2\nu$-decay is not observed up to
92: now, so existing limits for half life time greatly differ,
93: from $T \sim 10^{20}$~y to $T \sim 10^{22}$~y~\cite{9,10,11,12,13}.
94:
95: Large track detector DEVIS (DEtector VISualizing) is the Time Projection
96: Chamber (TPC) in the magnetic field and it is operating at ITEP~\cite{14}.
97: The first goal of the experiment is the investigation of $^{136}$Xe
98: $2\beta2\nu$-decay.
99:
100: \section{Setup description}
101:
102: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
103: \includegraphics{pic_1.2.eps} %[width=\textwidth] [bb=0 0 1890 2200, width=6.3in]
104: \caption{The schematic view of the setup}\label{pic_setup}
105: \end{center}\end{figure}
106:
107: Schematic view of the setup one can see on the Fig.~\ref{pic_setup}. TPC is placed at
108: the magnet with diameter $5.5$ m. Magnetic field can be changed in the
109: range $0.5-1.0$ kilogauss with homogeneity not worse than 2\%.
110:
111: Source of $2\beta$-decay is $^{136}$Xe, located in the central part of TPC,
112: separated by thin mylar films (50~mkm) out of two adjacent parts,
113: filled by methane. Detector is operating at atmospheric pressure.
114: TPC detector has two drift sections, upper and lower (high voltage drift
115: electrodes are located on the upper and lower plates). Uniformly
116: distributed potential from 35~kV to 0~kV is fixed on the all-lateral
117: surfaces (including mylar films) using special electrodes, creating the
118: homogeneous electric drift field. Ionization from passed charge particles
119: in the gas is drifted in direction of an electric field to the proportional
120: chambers, arranged in the center of TPC.
121:
122: Three multiwire chambers (for each gas volume) have two rows of sensitive
123: wires registering the events in the upper and lower drift sections. Signals
124: from two sensitive wires (the upper and the lower) are summarized on the
125: input of preamplifier. Detector has $2\cdot(56+56+17)$ sensitive wires. Additional
126: readout from stripes (cathode wire electrodes formed $45^{\circ}$ related to the
127: sensitive wires) is made for methane volumes~\cite{15}.
128:
129: The coordinate measurements are carried out with TDC (Time Digital Converter)
130: with number of the sensitive wire being coordinate along the magnetic field
131: while the drift time being the coordinate along the electric field. The
132: trajectory of the electron in magnetic field has a spiral form. Therefore
133: in the basic projection (number of sensitive wire -- drift time) track
134: looks like a sinusoid, and in the additional projection (number of cathode
135: strip -- drift time) like a cycloid. The momentum and motion direction are
136: defined by fitting of the trajectory.
137:
138: \section{Electronics}
139:
140: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
141: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{el_eng.eps}
142: \caption{Scheme of the trigger and recording electronics}\label{pic_el}
143: \end{center}\end{figure}
144:
145: Block scheme of the trigger and recording electronics one can see on
146: Fig.~\ref{pic_el}. Signals from preamplifiers of sensitive wires and cathode strips [A]
147: with 13~m cables go to discriminators [D] with threshold 30~mV (15~mV)
148: with standard NIM ($0.7$~V) output. The discriminator can work in three
149: modes: duration above threshold, formation of the duration, start and end
150: of the signal from the wire or strip. We mainly used duration above the
151: threshold mode. Thus duration on an output of the discriminator corresponds
152: to the duration of a signal exceeding the threshold. Dead time of the
153: device was equal to 60~ns. Discriminators have two outputs. Each wire and
154: strip was connected to TDC using twisted pairs and the time of each hit
155: from wires or strips was fixed. Other outputs from discriminators of
156: sensitive wires were used to form trigger. Parameters of TDC (full time
157: of TDC circle -- 80~mks, one bin -- 20~ns) were chosen to minimize the
158: errors in spatial resolution due to electronics, compared to errors by
159: multiple scattering and diffusion. Since it is unknown when an event
160: happens the setup worked in mode ``RUN''. The clock generator was started
161: by computer, and stopped by trigger. Trigger started information recording
162: from TDC to computer. The signal ``Fast Dump'' [FD] cleared the memory of
163: all TDC if trigger did not occurred during 320~mks, 4 cycles of TDC. FD
164: was blocked if it was coincided with trigger, so we had not losses due
165: to FD. On the first stage we used 320 TDC blocks~\cite{16}.
166:
167: The basic part of trigger electronic consists of two trigger processors
168: M$_{L}$ and M$_{R}$ connected to left and right volumes of TPC. The trigger signal
169: from processor arises, when more than 20 sensitive wires from 32 wires
170: on the inputs of M$_{L,R}$, coincide in the 6 mks gate. This time corresponds
171: to the size of the sinusoid track and drift velocity in the CH$_4$ volume.
172: The signals from M$_{L}$ and M$_{R}$ coincide at the scheme [CC1]. At the first
173: stage we used as a trigger coincidences between 4 fixed wires (2 wires
174: from both left and right CH$_4$ volumes). Use of the processors increased the
175: trigger efficiency from large drift distance because the register
176: efficiency of separate sensitive wires is equal to 85--92\% depended
177: on drift pass.
178:
179: A signal from another processor [PAC] arising for events with many tracks
180: in methane volumes included as anti-coincidence to the basic trigger [CC3].
181: Usage of this processor allowed skipping directly in the trigger a part of
182: events with many tracks, thus we reduced the time of data read-out from
183: TDC and increased an alive operating time of setup up to 85\%. Signals
184: of counters of the active protection CCK from charge cosmic radiation
185: were also included in anti-coincidences to basic trigger [CC2]. The
186: description of active protection is resulted in part 5.
187:
188: At an initial stage we selected events with 2 electrons, directed in
189: the different sides. The rate of triggers was 45/s.
190:
191: \section{Gas supply system}
192:
193: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
194: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{gaz_eng.eps}
195: \caption{Gas supply system}\label{pic_gaz}
196: \end{center}\end{figure}
197:
198: As TPC detector consists of three separate not pumped out volumes
199: operating at atmospheric pressure filling with working gases and
200: maintenance of necessary purity of gases appeared difficult enough.
201: Gas supply system consists of 3 separate cycles (see Fig.~\ref{pic_gaz}):
202: \begin{enumerate}
203: \item Methane cycle --- for two large side volumes, in sum about 10 m$^3$,
204: \item Xenon cycle --- for central target volume of 2 m$^3$,
205: \item Subsystem for the proportional counters of active protection from
206: cosmic radiation.
207: \end{enumerate}
208:
209: Two methane volumes were filled by gradual replacing of air with methane,
210: at the first stage by pumping-out with submission of methane, then by
211: flowing up of necessary quantity of volumes.
212:
213: Filling of central target part with mixture Xe\,+\,CH$_4$ was essentially more
214: difficult problem, because Xe (even with the natural composition of
215: isotopes) is a very expensive gas so flowing up becomes impossible. The
216: technique with the chemical reaction described in~\cite{14} was used. First,
217: the central volume was filled by CO$_2$. Then CO$_2$ gas was absorbed in
218: special reactor with alkali (NaOH) with a compensation of the pressure
219: decrease by (Xe\,+\,CH$_4$) mixture. It was necessary to use the admixture
220: of methane to increase the drift velocity as such in pure Xe at our
221: drift field V$_{dr} = 0.233$~kV/cm was too small. The gas composition was
222: controlled in all volumes by chromatograph AXT-002-01 (Russian) with
223: accuracy $\sim$~2\%.
224:
225: After filling the volumes the gas purification is provided in the closed
226: cycles. To have high efficiency for large (L $\sim 1.0-1.5$~m) drift distances
227: deep purification of the working gases from electronegative impurities
228: (O$_2$ and H$_2$O vapor) is necessary up to a level better than 10 ppm.
229: Reactors with Ni/SiO$_2$ adsorbent used at the early stage posses fine
230: purification properties, but should be used at high temperature
231: $\sim 100^{\circ}$C.
232: At such temperature the small part of methane dissociates and hydrogen
233: appears in the detector volumes what could noticeably change the drift
234: velocity. But the main lack of this adsorbent is that it contains the
235: big admixture of $^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th. So the isotopes $^{220}$Rn
236: and $^{222}$Rn
237: appear in the detector due to diffusion from a reactor. The decay of
238: their daughter isotopes $^{214}$Bi and $^{208}$Tl could imitate the events of
239: double beta decay.
240:
241: We investigated various getters from the point of view of their cleaning
242: properties, capacity on O$_2$ (it was necessary to purify large volumes
243: of the gas $10-12$~m$^3$) and the diffusion of Rn isotopes. A getter of the
244: active metals alloy was developed specially for us at the Institute of
245: Chemistry and Technology of Organic Compound. Two reactors for methane
246: and xenon volumes operating at room temperature were prepared. Using of
247: new reactors allowed to reduce Rn concentration more than in 50 times.
248: Calibrating measurements are described below in Section 10.
249:
250: Gas electronegative impurities were controlled using amplitude
251: measurements with the radioactive source $^{55}$Fe located in windows in
252: lateral TPC wall on drift distances of 24 and 129 cm~\cite{14}, and by the
253: trigger rate of setup during measurements.
254:
255: \section{Active protection from charged cosmic particles}
256:
257: TPC is surrounded by the gas proportional counters of active protection
258: from cosmic radiation on all sides. Counters were made of aluminum pipe
259: square cross-section $6\times6$~cm$^2$ with 50 mkm central wire. The length of
260: counters varies from 1.5 up to 3.5 m. Four in fold joins them in groups
261: with one amplifier per fold. Total active surface of 6 panels of counters
262: is $\sim 40$~m$^2$. The counters are pumped and filled by CH$_4$/Ar mixture and
263: works 3 months without purification, then gas changes. The counters
264: efficiency checked with the aid of the radioactive source $^{109}$Cd was not
265: worse than 92\%. All 6 panels are included in the coincedence scheme CCK
266: (see Fig.~\ref{pic_el}). It gives out a veto signal veto on full time of drift in methane
267: in case of signals from any two panels after cosmic particle passage
268: through TPC. In addition, the separate segments of protection register
269: $\mu$-mesons crossed Xe-volume also giving a veto signal in the trigger
270: and registering in TDC. Such including gave the additional suppression
271: of events concerned with cosmic particles. Accidental coincidences are
272: equal 4\% and are controlled regularly.
273:
274: \section{Determination of the drift velocity}
275:
276: To know the drift velocity in methane volume is necessary to calculate
277: the electron kinetic energy using a form of the trajectory. The knowledge
278: of drift velocity in Xe volume is necessary, because the time difference
279: in CH$_4$ and Xe volumes defines the coordinate on drift distance and also
280: for restoration of event vertex.
281:
282: Measurements of the drift velocities and checks of its dependence on
283: drift length are carried out using the cosmic trigger. We look for cosmic
284: particles (for example, coincidence of the counters pointed on Fig.~\ref{pic_setup})
285: crossing the volume of TPC. The delay time of each sensitive wire depends
286: on drift distance at known cosmic trigger. The centers of the delay time
287: distributions for all sensitive wires approximate with a straight line
288: well. The inclination of a straight line gives drift velocity as the
289: distances between wires are fixed. To test this measurement we also use
290: the time distributions for the central wires in CH$_4$, because we know the
291: drift distance at fixed trigger (with not so good accuracy). The drift
292: velocity in CH$_4$ coincides for both cases and equals W$_{CH_4} = 4.0$~cm/sec.
293: It weakly depends on small admixture of nitrogen in volume (accumulated
294: from the atmosphere) and was measured regularly during the runs. Changes
295: were not more than 10\%. The drift velocity in Xe is determined from time
296: distribution for central wire in Xe volume in case of the cosmic trigger
297: and ranges within $1.8-0.9$~cm/sec with Xe concentration.
298:
299: The difference in drift times in CH$_4$ and Xe volumes determines the
300: absolute event coordinate along an electric drift field
301: \begin{displaymath}
302: L[cm] = (T_{Xe} - T_{CH_4})\cdot(w_{CH_4}\cdot{}w_{Xe})/(w_{Xe}-w_{CH_4})
303: \end{displaymath}
304: and is fixed on TDC. At the correct work of the detector the times
305: (coordinates) should be distributed uniformly. Distribution of this
306: difference between drift times in CH$_4$ and Xe volumes is resulted on
307: Fig.~\ref{pic_dmexe}. Such distributions are checked few times in a day and allow
308: watching the TPC condition. One can see that small efficiency fall
309: takes place along the drift.
310:
311: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
312: \includegraphics{dmexe.eps} %[width=10cm]
313: \caption{Example of events distribution along drift}\label{pic_dmexe}
314: \end{center}\end{figure}
315:
316: \section{Expositions with Xe and test measurements}
317:
318: A few measurement series were made using different Xe concentration
319: with the natural isotope composition for the optimal quantity of Xe
320: determination. TPC showed good stability with 50\% concentration of Xe
321: and small (4\%) admixture of iC$_4$H$_{10}$ in order to cancel the ``excitation''
322: of Xe wires. On the other hand Monte-Carlo simulations of the TPC
323: efficiency for $2\beta$-decay showed the weak dependence on Xe concentration.
324: So our measurements were made with the following gas composition:
325: Xe~(50\%), CH$_4$~(46\%), iC$_4$H$_{10}$~(4\%). Such concentration corresponds
326: to 5 kg of Xe in central part TPC. Drift velocity in the central volume
327: decreased up to $0.9$~cm/mks. So to determine the coordinate along the
328: drift pass (measuring of the drift time difference in CH$_4$ and Xe volumes)
329: special block TDC with total time of 160 mks was used.
330:
331: During 1000 hours of the exposition broken into two intervals of 515
332: and 485 hours because of failure with a high-voltage cable (10~kV supply
333: of transformers for the sources of the stabilized current for a magnet)
334: about $10^{10}$ triggers were recorded.
335:
336: Additional expositions with a radioactive source $^{207}$Bi for determination
337: of the energy resolution and checking of the efficiency on-line
338: programs were also made.
339:
340: In other runs with enlarged Rn isotopes concentration in the central
341: volume of the detector (reactors Ni/SiO$_2$ used) we checked up the quality
342: of the new reactors and correctness of work both off-line and modeling
343: programs (see Section 10) simultaneously.
344:
345: Reduction of the Rn concentration by a factor of 50 due to use of reactors
346: on the basis of an alloy of metals resulted in the number of double events
347: reducing only $6-8$ times. At this level it became clear that an additional
348: source of events with two electrons was the cosmic particles crossing the
349: dead zones in Xe volume. Active protection from charged cosmic was
350: reinforced with few new fold cosmic counters. It decreased quantity of
351: double events by $1.5$ times.
352:
353: The large statistics of events from lateral covers without a direction
354: selection has been recorded for the determination of the efficiency of
355: separate sensitive wires in CH$_4$ and Xe volumes depended on drift
356: distances. The efficiency appeared to be high enough, except for nearest
357: to mylar films and to lateral covers wires. These results were used in
358: Monte-Carlo calculations.
359:
360: \section{Selection of \boldmath{$2\beta$}-decay candidate events}
361:
362: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
363: \includegraphics{pic_5_1.eps}\\ %[bb=0 0 4.875in 1.4in]
364: \emph{Number of sensitive wire and drift time coordinates}
365: \includegraphics{pic_5_2.eps}\\ %[bb=0 0 4.875in 0.795in]
366: \emph{Number of cathode strip and drift time coordinates}
367: \caption{Example of $2\beta$-event}\label{pic_2b_ev}
368: \end{center}\end{figure}
369:
370: Events with electrons escaped from Xe in the two different sides in the
371: right and left volumes filled with CH$_4$ are selected. Such selection
372: twice reduces efficiency of the detector to $2\beta$-decay, but considerably
373: simplifies procedure of events distinguishing as it is not required to
374: disentangle electron tracks escaped in one side.
375:
376: Projection of a track in number of a sensitive wire and drift time
377: coordinates is sinusoid, while in number cathodic strip and drift time
378: coordinates is cycloid as cathodic strips are located under $45^{\circ}$ angle
379: to sensitive wires. The loop or narrow part of cycloid is directed in
380: specific direction related to drift depended on a motion direction of
381: the electron. So one can select the electrons escaped from Xe volume
382: or from lateral covers. Events candidates in double-beta decay had two
383: electrons from Xe volumes.
384:
385: The on-line program uses two simple algorithms for events
386: distinguishing. First one for selection of single tracks is restriction
387: on number of hits N in each of methane volumes $30 <$~N~$< 100$ on
388: 56 sensitive wires. Second one is fast algorithm for determination
389: of an electrons direction. In a time window related the trigger it
390: is determined as $T_{av} = (T_{max} + T_{min})/2$, where $T_{av}$ is average time,
391: $T_{max}$, $T_{min}$ -- maximal and minimal drift times for each of methane volumes.
392: Then for each methane volume in this time window the numbers of cathode
393: strip hits above and below this average drift time are calculated. If
394: the number of strip hits above $T_{av}$ exceeds number of strip hits below
395: $T_{av}$ it is considered that the narrow part of cycloid (loop) is directed
396: downwards to drift that corresponds to one electron direction and in the
397: other case to the opposite direction. Such simple algorithms have reduced
398: the detector rate from 45 event/s after the electronic trigger up to 2.2
399: event/s. The factor of background suppression at this stage is equal
400: to 20. The example of $2\beta$-event is presented on Fig.~\ref{pic_2b_ev}.
401:
402: After on-line program's procession the information is stored on a
403: disk and the further off-line analysis of events is proceeded. Further
404: this rate has been additionally reduced by $\sim~30$\% by removal of the events
405: with an additional track in methane volume (3-rd track), by more careful
406: fitting and by removal of events with large energy cosmic particles
407: (straight tracks).
408:
409: Residuary events passes full fit in both number of a sensitive wire and drift
410: time coordinates and in number of cathode strip and drift time additional
411: coordinates. It should be noted that fitting programs used only tracks
412: in methane volumes. In the basic coordinates a projection of electrons
413: tracks in each methane volume is fitted by function
414: \begin{displaymath}
415: z = A + \rho_L \cdot \sin{\theta} \cdot \sin{\big(\frac{x}{\rho_L \cdot \cos{\theta}} +
416: \varphi \big)},
417: \end{displaymath}
418: with four parameters, where x is coordinate along which number of a
419: sensitive wire varies and z is coordinate along drift. In this case $\theta$ is
420: the angle between a momentum of the electron and a magnetic field, $\rho_L$ is
421: Larmor radius, A is the mean line of a sinusoid and $\varphi$ is a phase of a
422: sinusoid. It is supposed that the momentum and corresponding Larmor
423: radius of electron in methane volume changes weakly. Losses in 60~cm of
424: CH$_4$ gas make tens keV, and momentum of electron from the double beta
425: decay is in a range from 100~keV up to 2~MeV. To take into account
426: multiple scattering in methane two breaks on a trajectory are supposed
427: during the fitting with Larmor radius being the same but angles $\theta$ and
428: $\varphi$ changed. This is especially essential for low energies when scattering
429: grows. With one break the number of fitting parameters grows up to 8,
430: with two breaks --- up to 12 for 56 points of the data in each of methane
431: volume. Software package of minimization MINUIT and software package
432: HBOOK from library of programs for processing of physical measurements
433: from CERN~\cite{17} were used in fit.
434:
435: Since cathode strips are directed relative to sensitive wires under $45^{\circ}$
436: the coordinate along which varies number of a cathodic strip is
437: $y_{st}=(x+y)/\sqrt{2}$, where
438: x is earlier coordinate along which number of a sensitive wire varied,
439: and y is coordinate along this wire. Taking into account that projections
440: of a electron trajectory are sinusoids in coordinates z, x and y, x are
441: displaced on an angle $\pm\pi/2$ depending on a direction of electron
442: movement, we obtain within a constant
443: \begin{displaymath}
444: y_{st} = \Big( x + \rho_L \cdot \sin{\theta} \cdot \sin{\big(
445: \frac{x}{\rho_L \cdot \cos{\theta}} +
446: \varphi \pm \frac{\pi}{2}\big)}\Big)\Bigm/ \sqrt{2},
447: \end{displaymath}
448: the equation of two cycloids with loops directed upwards or downwards
449: depending on a sign prior $\pi/2$. A constant responsible for shift of
450: all cycloid along the $y_{st}$ axis is obtained at fitting events in
451: coordinates number of a strip, coordinate along the drift.
452:
453: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
454: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fit.eps}
455: \caption{Experimental points and fit of $2\beta$-event}\label{pic_fit}
456: \end{center}\end{figure}
457:
458: From two hypotheses of a direction of electron the one with the best $\chi^2$
459: is chosen. On Fig.~\ref{pic_fit} experimental points and fit for the candidate
460: of $2\beta$-decay event when two electrons escaped from Xe to the left and
461: right methane volumes are shown. Below is presented only one of the
462: cycloids corresponding to the correct for the candidate in $2\beta$ event
463: electron direction and on the right side the loop of a cycloid is
464: directed upwards while at the left is directed downwards. Projections
465: of a trajectories of the each electron in number of a sensitive wire
466: and drift time coordinates (and number of a cathode strip and drift time
467: coordinates) are fitted separately. Spatial precision along drift at
468: sensitive wires and cathodic strips differs. The signal amplitude from a
469: cathodic strip is 6 times less than that from a sensitive wire and on one
470: cathode strip there can be added signals from several wires, this leaded
471: to shift of the time.
472:
473: As a result of work of the fitting program the quantity of events had
474: decreased from $2.2$~events/s up to $40$~events/hour, i.e. the factor of suppression
475: of a background at this stage (it is mainly electrons from lateral covers)
476: is~$\sim$~200. Then events are reviewed visually analyzing information from
477: both CH$_4$ and Xe volumes.
478:
479: For determination efficiency of the fitting program the additional runs
480: with the increased concentration of $^{222}$Rn in Xe volume were used where
481: events with two electrons with a vertex in Xe arose from decay of
482: $^{214}$Bi --- daughter nucleus from $^{222}$Rn chain. All of the recorded data
483: were viewed without work of fitting programs and after their work.
484: Efficiency of the fitting and direction definitions programs is~$\sim$~70\%
485: for events with two electrons (see Section 10).
486:
487: \section{Calculation of the efficiency by a Monte Carlo simulation}
488:
489: The basic tool of the software for Monte Carlo simulation development
490: is package GEANT (versions 3.21) from CERN library~\cite{17}.
491:
492: On the basis of this package the program model of the detector was
493: built. It includes the exact geometry of the detector, the full trigger
494: and the emulation of the on-line events selection. Simulation results
495: in a file formated completely identically to the data received in real
496: experiment. Then this file is analyzed in the same way as the experimental
497: data.
498:
499: Crossing sensitive wires and strips of the detector forms in
500: perpendicular to drift plane a matrix of virtual cells, such that in
501: each of them there is a part of one wire and one strip. According to
502: the borders of these cells the track of the charged particle breaks
503: into slices. For each of them the drift distance is recalculated to
504: drift time taking in account diffusion, displacement in a magnetic field
505: and efficiency of wires. Received times are written in the corresponding
506: channels of wires and strips. The real hardware restrictions are taken
507: into account when final times are obtained and transferred to the further
508: processing. Direct viewing of the events generated in the simulation has
509: not revealed appreciable differences from real ones.
510:
511: \begin{table}\begin{center}
512: \parbox[t]{0.6\textwidth}{\caption{Efficiency (\%) and product of efficiency and Xe mass (arbitrary units)
513: for $2\beta2\nu$ and $2\beta0\nu$ decay}\label{tab_1}}
514: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline
515: \rule{0pt}{2.5ex}Xe, \% & \hspace{5mm}20\hspace{5mm} & \hspace{5mm}40\hspace{5mm} &
516: \hspace{5mm}50\hspace{5mm} & \hspace{5mm}60\hspace{5mm} \\ \hline
517: \rule{0pt}{2.5ex}$\varepsilon(2\nu)$ & 1.50 & 0.98 & 0.79 & 0.64 \\ \hline
518: \rule{0pt}{2.5ex}$\varepsilon(2\nu)\cdot{}m$ & 0.30 & 0.39 & 0.395 & 0.384 \\ \hline
519: \rule{0pt}{2.5ex}$\varepsilon(0\nu)$ & 12.3 & 10.8 & 9.9 & 9.3 \\ \hline
520: \rule{0pt}{2.5ex}$\varepsilon(0\nu)\cdot{}m$ & 2.46 & 4.32 & 4.95 & 5.58 \\ \hline
521: \end{tabular}
522: \end{center}\end{table}
523:
524: Efficiency of the detector has been determined using simulation depending
525: on Xe concentration. Product of efficiency and number of Xe atoms is the
526: value, which is used to obtain the half-life. It shows weak dependence
527: from Xe concentration. The results of modeling are listed in the Table 1.
528:
529: Efficiency for $2\beta2\nu$-decay at chosen 50\% Xe concentration
530: $\varepsilon=0.79\%$, while for $2\beta0\nu$-decay $\varepsilon=9.9\%$
531: at work with both drift sections. Small
532: efficiency to $2\beta2\nu$-decay is connected with too soft electrons spectrum
533: and small probability for electrons to escape from Xe volume and to
534: give the trigger.
535:
536: \section{Detector calibration}
537:
538: A separate measurements were made to check existing programs modeling
539: correctness and to determine efficiency of on-line programs. We used
540: a radioactive source $^{207}$Bi, which conversion electrons have energy
541: $0.481$ and $0.987$~MeV and lay at energy region of the electrons of $^{136}$Xe
542: double beta decay. The intensity of a radioactive source $^{207}$Bi was
543: calibrated with the aid of NaI(Tl) detector. The only change in selection
544: of events during the work with a radioactive source consisted in changing
545: selection by a direction to search events with electrons moving from a
546: source through the detector. To reduce background it was used the fact
547: that position of a radioactive source is known. Events in the window
548: on the strips corresponding to position of a source with a correct value
549: of the time difference of signals in CH$_4$ and Xe volume (`a methane-xenon
550: difference') were chosen. Measurements with the detector were carried out
551: for two positions of the source: near drift (drift distance of 24~cm) and
552: far drift (distance of 129~cm).
553:
554: Efficiency of registration differed~$\sim$~1\% from the modelling data for near
555: drift and~$\sim$~10\% for far drift. Such discrepancy can be explained by
556: `cancellation' of a source by a background (double tracks) and for far
557: drift the additional contribution is brought with distortions of a drift
558: field at the large drift distances.
559:
560: To calibrate the detector and to check all procedures of event selection
561: and Monte-Carlo simulation of detector work the additional run~$\sim$~17 hours
562: of live time was made. In this run Xe cleaning was carried out by
563: Ni/SiO$_2$ reactor resulting in $^{222}$Rn diffusion from the reactor to TPC
564: that produced two-electron events with a vertex in Xe volume due to
565: $^{214}$Bi decay --- a daughter nucleus of $^{222}$Rn chain.
566:
567: Quantity of Rn atoms in Xe was determined by measurement of the delayed
568: $(\beta-\alpha)$ coincidences from decay of a cascade $^{214}$Bi $\rightarrow$ $^{214}$Po
569: with characteristic time $T_{1/2} = 164$~mks (a half-life of $^{214}$Po).
570: Since sensitive wires worked in a proportional mode, $\alpha$-particle with
571: energy~$\sim$~8~MeV was selected by the amplitude. We used special TDC,
572: operating in the mode ``START'' with full time $1.6$ ms. TDC was started by
573: electron escaped from Xe volume in one side --- $\beta$ and stopped
574: by a signal with the large amplitude in Xe --- $\alpha$. Distribution
575: on the arrival time of a signal $\alpha$ answered to a half-life $^{214}$Po.
576: Measurement of such coincidences after cleaning Xe volume by Ni/SiO$_2$
577: reactor during $1.5$ hours gave number of coincidences
578: $N_{\beta-\alpha} = (527 \pm 32)$/h and when used the reactor on the basis
579: of active alloys $N_{\beta-\alpha} = (10.7 \pm 4.3)$/h. Measurements were
580: carried out during $1.29$ and $9.25$~hours. Reduction of the $N_{\beta-\alpha}$
581: number with time corresponded to a
582: half-life time of $^{222}$Rn $T_{1/2} = 3.8$~days. The similar method was used
583: to determine the Rn concentration in CH$_4$ volume.
584:
585: Efficiency to $\beta-\alpha$ coincidences was calculated by Monte Carlo
586: method using full geometry and imitation of work of programs and was
587: $\varepsilon = 4.0$\%. Taking into account the efficiency concentration
588: of Rn in Xe volume
589: was equal to $N(\mathrm{Rn})/N(\mathrm{Xe+CH_4}) = 3\cdot10^{-20}$ working with getter Ni/SiO$_2$
590: and $0.6\cdot10^{-21}$ using new getter from the active metal alloy.
591:
592: Efficiency for $2\beta$-events from $^{214}$Bi decay has been calculated too,
593: assuming that after decay of daughters Rn ions $^{214}$Bi~\cite{18} was formed
594: and fixed on charged films separating gas volumes. Full enough cascade
595: of decays $^{214}$Bi~\cite{19} has been used to simulate the events with two
596: electrons that can mimicry the $2\beta$-decay. These events appeared as
597: $\beta$-decay of $^{214}$Bi with the subsequent emission of the second electron
598: due to internal conversion or a birth of Compton or M\"{o}ller electron
599: inside Xe-volume. Both electrons escaped to CH$_4$-volumes and gave the
600: trigger.
601:
602: In 17 hours exposition 109 $2\beta$-events were found. Having concentration
603: of $^{222}$Rn determined from the delayed $\beta-\alpha$ coincidences
604: in view of registration efficiency of events from $^{214}$Bi one could
605: expect 119 $2\beta$-events. Observed and expected number of events coincided
606: sufficiently well, that gave some confidence of the correctness of all
607: selection procedures.
608:
609: \section{Visual selection of events}
610:
611: After off-line processing resulted files were viewed visually. Selection
612: was carried out by the following criteria.
613: \begin{enumerate}
614: \item Events with a wrong direction of the electron (from a lateral cover)
615: were thrown out. A great bulk made such events. The fitting program usually
616: made mistakes due to presence of the additional hits (sparks) in wires and
617: in strips, and due to the distortion of the tracks as a result of scattering
618: and distortion of the electric drift field near the mylar films.
619: Strengthening of selection criteria led to the further loss of efficiency.
620: \item Events with additional tracks in any of methane volumes both in top and
621: bottom were thrown out. Events of (1\,+\,2) types were~$\sim$~36/h.
622: \item Events with two or more tracks in Xe-volume and events when the track
623: in Xe was absent (~$\sim$~1/h) were thrown out also.
624: \item Events with a seen track of a cosmic particle in any of volumes were
625: thrown out (~$\sim$~3/h).
626: \end{enumerate}
627:
628: Double viewing of the whole material was made. The efficiency of viewing
629: was close to 100\%. After visual viewing there were 954 events. In addition
630: 45 events have been removed from the two-electron events sample with small
631: quantity of the worked wires. Events with actuated wires in Xe volume
632: N$_{Xe} < 5$ out of total 17 sensitive wires were thrown out. In CH$_4$ volumes
633: actuation of N$_{CH_4} > 14$ wires out of 30 nearest to Xe was required.
634: Efficiency has not decreased practically, but events with severely
635: different number of actuated wires in L and R volumes have been removed,
636: that most likely was connected to accidental coincidence in drift of the
637: left and right tracks.
638:
639: 909 events recorded during 1000 hours remained for the analysis.
640:
641: \begin{figure}[htbp]\begin{center}
642: %\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{pic_7_1.eps}\hfill
643: %\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{pic_7_2.eps}\\
644: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{dmexe_2.eps}\\
645: \caption{Distribution on drift distance for $2\beta$-events}\label{pic_dmexe2}
646: \end{center}\end{figure}
647:
648: \begin{figure}[htbp] \begin{center}
649: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{mc_e.eps}
650: \caption{Distribution on single electron energy and on sum energy of two electrons for
651: Monte-Carlo events}\label{pic_e_mc}
652: \end{center}\end{figure}
653:
654: \section{Results}
655:
656: Distribution along the drift of remaining 909 $2\beta$-events showed substantial
657: growth of the number of the events from small drift distances. This
658: distribution differed from the same distributions after on-line (see Fig.~\ref{pic_dmexe})
659: and off-line processions. Similar concentration of events was observed
660: for the events concerned with $^{214}$Bi decay (see Fig.~\ref{pic_dmexe2}). We assume that these
661: events can be concerned with an interaction of the cosmic particles in
662: multiwire detectors frames and also with possible concentration growth
663: of ions $^{214}$Bi near the detector as a result of diffusion Rn from a
664: frame's material. Events from small drift distances with the corresponding
665: corrections of efficiency have been thrown out. Number of $2\beta$-candidate
666: events was reduced more than twice while efficiency decreased only by 10\%.
667:
668: Energy spectrum of the single electron for $2\beta$-candidate events
669: was more rigid than spectrum of Monte-Carlo events passed full processing.
670: Therefore, energy restrictions were chosen according to Monte Carlo
671: distributions.
672:
673: On Fig.~\ref{pic_e_mc} distributions of energy for each electron and total energy of
674: two electrons for $2\beta0\nu$ and $2\beta0\nu$ Monte-Carlo events are presented.
675:
676: Energy cuts for each electron $E_{L,R} < 1$~MeV for $2\beta2\nu$ decay (see Fig.~\ref{pic_e_mc})
677: were introduced with small efficiency loss. Assuming the same statistics
678: to be obtained during an exposition with $^{136}$Xe and all 254 remaining
679: events to be background we estimate sensitivity of the detector in 1000
680: measurement hours as $T_{1/2}(2\beta2\nu) > 2.7\cdot10^{20}$~years.
681:
682: To estimate sensitivity for $2\beta0\nu$ decay energy cuts
683: $0.4 < E_{L,R} < 1.4$~MeV
684: for every electron energy and for the sum energy $1.4 < E_L+E_R < 2.4$~MeV
685: were used. Such wide interval for the sum energy was used because the
686: electron energy was measured in the methane volumes and losses in Xe
687: were not taken into account. Further measurement of ionization losses
688: in Xe volume and corresponding narrowing of an interval for the two-electron
689: sum energy is planned. With such cuts there were 152 events, that led to
690: limit estimation $T_{1/2}(2\beta0\nu) > 5.3\cdot10^{22}$~years for
691: 1000 measurement hours.
692:
693: \section{Conclusion}
694:
695: In the near future the exposition of TPC detector with $^{136}$Xe will be
696: started. Sensitivity of setup can be increased using both the top and
697: bottom drift sections. The results discussed were obtained with half of
698: detector (only the top drift section). Measurement ionization losses
699: will give additional criteria in suppression of background events.
700: Including the second half of detector, measurement of ionization losses
701: in Xe and increase of measurements time will allow to improve results.
702:
703: Authors are grateful to M.V.Danilov for constant interest, support and
704: discussion of results and possible ways of their improvement. Work is
705: supported by the grant of the Russian Basic Research Fond 02-02-16481.
706:
707: % References
708:
709: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
710: \bibitem{1}
711: S.\,R.\,Elliot, P.\,Vogel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. \textbf{52}, 115~(2002).
712: \bibitem{2}
713: S.\,M.\,Bilenky, hep-ph/0403245.
714: \bibitem{3}
715: H.\,V.\,Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, A.\,Dietz, H.\,L.\,Harley, I.\,V.\,Krivosheina,
716: Mod. Phys. Lett. \textbf{A16}, 2409~(2001).
717: \bibitem{4}
718: H.\,V.\,Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, M.\,Hirsh, Z.\,Phys. \textbf{A359}, 361~(1997).
719: \bibitem{5}
720: M.\,Danilov, R.\,De Voe, A.\,G.\,Dolgolenko \emph{et al.}, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B480},
721: 12~(2000).
722: \bibitem{6}
723: S.\,M.\,Bilenky, S.\,T.\,Petkov, hep-ph/0405237.
724: \bibitem{7}
725: C.\,E.\,Aalseth (IGEX Coll.), Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) \textbf{B87}, 236~(1999).
726: \bibitem{8}
727: M.\,Bakalyarov (Heidelberg-Moscow Coll.), Phys. Rev. \textbf{D55}, 54~(1997).
728: \bibitem{9}
729: V.\,Artemiev, E.\,Brakchman, M.\,Ivanovsky \emph{et al.}, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B280},
730: 159~(1992).
731: \bibitem{10}
732: J.-C.\,Vuilleumier, J.\,Busto, J.\,Farine \emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D48},
733: 1009~(1993).
734: \bibitem{11}
735: R.\,Luescher, J.\,Farine, F.\,Boehm \emph{et al.}, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B434},
736: 407~(1998).
737: \bibitem{12}
738: R.\,Bernabei (DAMA Coll.), Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) \textbf{B110}, 88~(2001).
739: \bibitem{13}
740: Yu.\,Gavriljuk, A.\,Gangapshov, V.\,Kuz'minov \emph{et al.}, Yadernaya Fizika,
741: Intern. Conf. On Non-Accelerator New Physics, (Dubna, 2003).
742: \bibitem{14}
743: V.\,A.\,Artemiev, E.\,V.\,Brachman, M.\,A.\,Ivanovsky \emph{et al.}, Yadernaya Fizika
744: v.63, 1312~(2000).
745: \bibitem{15}
746: V.\,A.\,Artemiev, E.\,V.\,Brachman, M.\,A.\,Ivanovsky \emph{et al.}, NIM A v.477, 414~(2002).
747: \bibitem{16}
748: V.\,A.\,Artemiev, E.\,V.\,Brachman, M.\,A.\,Ivanovsky \emph{et al.}, NIM A v.303, 309~(1991).
749: \bibitem{17}
750: CERN Program Library (http://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib)
751: \bibitem{18}
752: M.\,K.\,Moe and D.\,D.\,Lowenthal, Phys. Rev. \textbf{C22}, 2186~(1980).
753: \bibitem{19}
754: LBNL Isotopes Project (http://ie.lbl.gov/databases/databases.html)
755: \end{thebibliography}
756:
757: \end{document}
758: