1: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumber,amsmath,amssymb,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: % \documentclass[prl,preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: % \documentclass[aps,prl,double-spaced,showpacs,preprintnumber,amsmath,amssymb,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
6: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
7:
8: % define
9: \def\L{$\Lambda$}
10: \def\Lam{$\Lambda$}
11: \def\lam{$\Lambda$}
12: \def\LNpi{$\Lambda \to N\pi$}
13: \def\LN{$\Lambda N \to NN$}
14: \def\LNN{$\Lambda NN \to NNN$}
15: \def\Lnn{$\Lambda n\to nn$}
16: \def\Lnp{$\Lambda p\to np$}
17: \def\pik{($\pi^+$,$K^+$)}
18: \def\G{$\Gamma$}
19: \def\Gt{$\Gamma_{tot}$}
20: \def\Gpiz{$\Gamma_{\pi^0}$}
21: \def\Gpim{$\Gamma_{\pi^-}$}
22: \def\Gm{$\Gamma_m$}
23: \def\Gnm{$\Gamma_{nm}$}
24: \def\Gn{$\Gamma_n$}
25: \def\Gp{$\Gamma_p$}
26: \def\Gnp{$\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$}
27: \def\Gnn{$\Gamma_{2N}$}
28: \def\pim{$\pi^-$}
29: \def\pip{$\pi^+$}
30: \def\piz{$\pi^0$}
31: \def\NnNp{$N_{nn}/N_{np}$}
32: \def\Nnpr{$N_{nn}/N_{np}$}
33: \def\Hefive{$^5$He}
34: \def\HefiveL{$^{5}_{\Lambda}$He}
35: \def\He5lam{$^{5}_{\Lambda}$He}
36: \def\Li6lam{$^{6}_{\Lambda}$Li}
37: \def\Clam{$^{12}_{\Lambda}$C}
38: \def\Lisix{$^{6}$Li}
39: \def\Helam{$^4_\Lambda$He}
40: \def\He5lam{$^5_\Lambda$He}
41:
42: \def\ra{$\rightarrow$}
43: \def\c{\cdot}
44: \def\e{\epsilon}
45: \def\t{\times}
46: \def\O{\Omega}
47: \def\et{$\it{et~al.}$}
48: \def\cosbb{$\cos(\theta)\le-0.8$}
49:
50: \begin{document}
51: \preprint{APS/123-QED}
52: \title{Exclusive Measurement of the Nonmesonic Weak Decay of \HefiveL~Hypernucleus}
53:
54: \author{B.~H.~Kang}
55: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
56:
57: \author{S.~Ajimura}
58: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka 560-0043, Japan}
59:
60: \author{K.~Aoki}
61: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
62:
63: \author{A.~Banu}
64: \affiliation{Gesellschaft f\"ur Schwerionenforschung mbH (GSI), Darmstadt 64291, Germany}
65:
66: \author{H.~Bhang}
67: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
68:
69: \author{T.~Fukuda}
70: \affiliation{Laboratory of Physics, Osaka Electro-Communication University, Neyagawa 572-8530, Japan}
71:
72: \author{O.~Hashimoto}
73: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
74:
75: \author{J.~I.~Hwang}
76: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea}
77:
78: \author{S.~Kameoka}
79: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
80:
81: \author{E.~H.~Kim}
82: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
83:
84: \author{J.~H.~Kim}
85: \altaffiliation[Present address: ]{Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon, 305-600, Korea.}
86: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
87:
88: \author{M.~J.~Kim}
89: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
90:
91: \author{T.~Maruta}
92: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 113-0033, Japan}
93:
94: \author{Y.~Miura}
95: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
96:
97: \author{Y.~Miyake}
98: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka 560-0043, Japan}
99:
100: \author{T.~Nagae}
101: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
102:
103: \author{M.~Nakamura}
104: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 113-0033, Japan}
105:
106: \author{S.~N.~Nakamura}
107: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
108:
109: \author{H.~Noumi}
110: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
111:
112: \author{S.~Okada}
113: \altaffiliation[Present address: ]{RIKEN Wako Institute, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan.}
114: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 152-8551, Japan}
115:
116: \author{Y.~Okayasu}
117: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
118:
119: \author{H.~Outa}
120: \altaffiliation[Present address: ]{RIKEN Wako Institute, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan.}
121: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
122:
123: \author{H.~Park}
124: \affiliation{Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon 305-600, Korea}
125:
126: \author{P.~K.~Saha}
127: \altaffiliation[Present address: ]{Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai 319-1195, Japan.}
128: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
129:
130: \author{Y.~Sato}
131: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
132:
133: \author{M.~Sekimoto}
134: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
135:
136: \author{T.~Takahashi}
137: \altaffiliation[Present address: ]{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan.}
138: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
139:
140: \author{H.~Tamura}
141: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
142:
143: \author{K.~Tanida}
144: \affiliation{RIKEN Wako Institute, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan}
145:
146: \author{A.~Toyoda}
147: \affiliation{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan}
148:
149: \author{K.~Tsukada}
150: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
151:
152: \author{T.~Watanabe}
153: \affiliation{Physics Department, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
154:
155: \author{H.~J.~Yim}
156: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}
157: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
158:
159: \date{\today}
160: \begin{abstract}
161: We performed a coincidence measurement of two nucleons emitted
162: from the nonmesonic weak decay (NMWD) of $^{5}_{\Lambda}$He formed
163: via the $^{6}$Li($\pi^+$,$K^+$) reaction.
164: The energies of the two nucleons and
165: the pair number distributions in the opening angle between them were measured.
166: In both $np$ and $nn$ pairs,
167: we observed a clean back-to-back correlation coming from the
168: two-body weak reactions of
169: $\Lambda p \to n p$ and $\Lambda n \to n n$, respectively.
170: The ratio of the nucleon pair numbers was
171: $N_{nn}/N_{np}$=0.45$\pm$0.11(stat)$\pm$0.03(syst)
172: in the kinematic region of $\cos\theta_{NN} < -0.8$.
173: Since each decay mode was exclusively detected,
174: the measured ratio should be close to the ratio of
175: $\Gamma(\Lambda p\to np)$/$\Gamma(\Lambda n\to nn)$.
176: The ratio is consistent with recent theoretical calculations
177: based on the heavy meson/direct quark exchange picture.
178: \end{abstract}
179:
180: \pacs{21.80.+a, 13.30.Eg, 13.75.Ev}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
181:
182: \maketitle
183: A free $\Lambda$ hyperon decays almost totally into a pion and a nucleon, which is a mesonic weak
184: decay process (\LNpi; $\Delta q \sim 100 MeV/c$). However,
185: a $\Lambda$ hyperon bound in a nucleus will eventually
186: decay through either a mesonic or a nonmesonic weak decay process
187: (\LN; $\Delta q \sim 400 MeV/c$).
188: NMWD, in which a $\Lambda$ decays via a weak interaction
189: with neighboring nucleon(s),
190: becomes possible only inside the nucleus.
191: The simplest and long assumed NMWD modes have been
192: the one-nucleon (1$N$) induced ones,
193: namely $\Lambda p\to np$ and
194: $\Lambda n \to nn$, whose partial decay widths are denoted as
195: \Gp~and \Gn, respectively.
196: The study of NMWD is of fundamental importance, since it provides a
197: unique way of exploring the strangeness-changing,
198: baryon-baryon weak interaction.
199: In addition, the two-nucleon (2$N$) induced NMWD ($\Lambda NN \to nNN$; \Gnn)
200: has been predicted in theoretical calculations,
201: although its experimental identification has not yet been achieved.
202:
203: There has been a long standing "puzzle" concerning the \Gnp~ratio of
204: NMWD of $\Lambda$ hypernuclei.
205: Until a few years ago the experimental ratios
206: had been reported to be close to or
207: larger than unity, while the most naive one-pion-exchange
208: (OPE) model with $\Delta I$=1/2 rule predicts very small
209: ratios of 0.05$-$0.20.
210: Other decay mechanisms beyond the OPE model have been considered
211: to explain the large $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratio.
212: The most relevant are:
213: 1) The heavy-meson-exchange (HME) mechanism in which exchanges of
214: mesons heavier than pions
215: (especially kaons) are considered,
216: 2) The direct-quark exchange (DQ) mechanism where the short range
217: $\Lambda N \rightarrow NN$ decay is described
218: using quark degrees of freedom, violating
219: the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule, and in a different context
220: 3) the inclusion of a two-nucleon induced decay ($\Lambda NN \rightarrow nNN$)
221: mechanism.
222: Refer to the recent review article~\cite{ref:Alb02} for the
223: details of various models and their results in terms of NMWD widths.
224: % It was recently found that in all the previous theoretical
225: %work the sign between pion and kaon exchange amplitudes was wrong,
226: It was recently found that in all previous theoretical
227: work there had been an error in the K exchange amplitude
228: and its correction
229: significantly increased theoretical values of
230: the \Gnp~ratio.
231: After the correction was included, the DQ model
232: gave 0.70 for the ratio in \He5lam~\cite{ref:Sas00}.
233: The HME model calculation
234: also predicted an increased value of up to 0.34$-$0.46~\cite{ref:Par01}.
235: These calculations still underestimate the reported values
236: of $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratios for light hypernuclei,
237: although the large experimental errors (e.g. 0.93$\pm$0.55 for
238: $^5_{\Lambda}$He \cite{ref:Szy91}) prevented any definite conclusion being reached.
239: Accurate measurements of the $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$
240: ratio are still awaited.
241:
242: Concerning the $\Gamma_n$/$\Gamma_p$ ratio, most of the previous
243: experiments measured energetic protons only and the ratio
244: was estimated without any experimental information on neutrons and
245: low energy protons
246: \cite{ref:Szy91,ref:Has02,ref:Sat03}.
247: Thus the result might be much affected by missing the low energy
248: protons caused by the re-scattering process of protons
249: inside the nucleus (Final-State Interaction; FSI)
250: and the possible existence of the
251: two-nucleon induced decay modes.
252: Both of these processes may induce the quenching of
253: energetic proton numbers above the detection threshold,
254: thus overestimating the $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratio.
255: Important progress has been made through
256: the accurate measurement of neutron spectra
257: from the NMWD of \Clam~(the KEK-PS E369 experiment)~\cite{ref:Kim03}.
258: A neutron spectrum from the weak decay of \Clam~was measured with
259: an order of magnitude improvement in the
260: statistics and signal-to-background ratio compared to the results of
261: a previous experiment~\cite{ref:Szy91}.
262: This result opened a door to directly comparing the yields of
263: neutrons to protons from the NMWD.
264: Very recently we reported the simultaneously measured
265: spectra of neutrons and protons emitted from NMWD of
266: \He5lam~and \Clam~\cite{ref:Oka04} with much
267: higher statistics than those of the previous
268: experiments~\cite{ref:Szy91,ref:Kim03}.
269: The neutron to proton yield ratios for both hypernuclei
270: obtained with high threshold energy (60 MeV)
271: are approximately equal to two,
272: which suggests a \Gnp~ratio of about 0.5, namely
273: $\Lambda p \rightarrow n p$ channel dominance.
274: However, the results still contained some uncertainties due to
275: residual FSI effects and
276: a possible contribution from 2$N$-induced NMWD.
277:
278: To resolve these experimental difficulties,
279: it is important to clearly identify the two-body decay kinematics
280: of $\Lambda n \to n n$ and $\Lambda p \to n p$.
281: To identify these decay channels unambiguously,
282: we have measured in coincidence two nucleons
283: emitted back-to-back.
284: Here we chose $^5_\Lambda$He hypernuclei because the
285: effect of FSI is expected to be small in such light hypernuclei.
286: The yields of pair coincidences,
287: $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$, can be expressed as
288: \begin{subequations}
289: \begin{eqnarray}
290: \label{eq:NNpair}
291: Y_{nn} (cos \theta)&=& Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ r_n~ \e_{nn}(cos \theta)~
292: f_n^2, \label{eq:Ynn} \\
293: Y_{np} (cos \theta)&=& Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ r_p~ \e_{np}(cos \theta)~
294: f_n~ f_p, \label{eq:Ynp}
295: \end{eqnarray}
296: \end{subequations}
297: %
298: where $Y_{hyp},~b_{nm}$ and $r_{n(p)}$ are the number of \He5lam~produced,
299: the branching ratio for NMWD of \He5lam
300: and $\Gamma_{n(p)}/\Gamma_{nm}$, respectively.
301: The $\e_{np}$ (= $\Omega_{np} \e_n \e_p$) and $\e_{nn}$(= $\Omega_{nn} \e_n^2$) are
302: the overall efficiencies for detecting $np$ and $nn$ pairs
303: including the detector acceptance
304: where $\Omega_{NN}$ and $\e_N$ are the detector solid angle
305: for the nucleon pair $NN$ and the efficiency for each nucleon $N$.
306: The $f_{n(p)}$ is the reduction factor due to FSI on the yield of
307: neutrons or protons in the energy range above 30 MeV.
308: Since the 1$N$-induced NMWD is a two-body interaction
309: and emits nucleons with much higher momentum than
310: the nuclear Fermi momentum,
311: one can expect that the two emitted nucleons are strongly
312: back-to-back correlated in their opening angle,
313: $\theta$, shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:setup},
314: and have their energy-sum $E_{sum}$~close to
315: the Q-value (153 MeV) of the NMWD process,
316: if the $1N$-induced NMWD process occurs without FSI.
317: We were able to reject
318: most of the events due to FSI and 2$N$ processes
319: by requiring strict conditions on the
320: angular and energy-sum correlation.
321: $Y_{nn}$ and $Y_{np}$ are proportional
322: to $r_n$ and $r_p$ as shown in Eqs.~\ref{eq:Ynn} and~\ref{eq:Ynp}.
323:
324: The $r_n/r_p$ ratio, which is identical to the \Gnp~ ratio,
325: is obtained from the ratio $Y_{nn}/Y_{np}$ as
326: \begin{eqnarray}
327: \label{eq:gngp}
328: \frac{r_n}{r_p} \left( = \frac{N_{nn}}{N_{np}} \right)
329: &=&
330: \frac{\{Y_{nn}~/~Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ \epsilon_{nn}\}}
331: {\{Y_{np}~/~Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ \epsilon_{np}\}}
332: \cdot \frac{f_n~f_p}{f_n^2} \nonumber\\
333: &=& \frac{Y_{nn}~ \Omega_{np}~ \epsilon_p}
334: {Y_{np}~ \Omega_{nn}~ \epsilon_n}
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: %
337: since $Y_{hyp}b_{nm}$ is the total number of NMWD,
338: $N_{nn}$ and $N_{np}$ are the normalized pair yields
339: per NMWD for full solid angle and unit efficiency.
340: We can assume that protons and neutrons suffer the same
341: FSI effect in the nucleus, i.e. $f_n = f_p$
342: because of the charge symmetry of the $NN$ interaction.
343: By taking the ratio of the $nn$-to-$np$ pair yields,
344: many systematic error sources, like
345: $Y_{hyp}$, $b_{nm}$, $\epsilon_n$ and $f_n$, cancel
346: and we do not need to know the branching ratio of the 2$N$ contribution
347: to get the \Gnp~ratio from the pair yield ratio.
348: In previous experiments, $b_{nm}$ and $f_n$ were sources
349: of large errors in the \Gnp~ratio.
350: Now we directly obtain the
351: $\Gamma_n / \Gamma_p$ ratio from experimental quantities.
352:
353: The experiment (E462) was carried out at the K6 beam line of KEK-PS using a
354: 1.05 GeV/c $\pi^+$ beam to induce the \Lisix\pik~reaction.
355: Momenta of both the beam pion and the produced kaon
356: were measured with $\sigma_p/p\sim 10^{-3}$ resolution
357: using the K6 beam spectrometer and
358: the Superconducting Kaon Spectrometer (SKS).
359: They were then used to reconstruct the excitation
360: energy spectrum of the hypernucleus produced~\cite{ref:Fuk95}.
361: %
362: \begin{figure}
363: \includegraphics[scale=0.38]{setup.eps}
364: \caption{\label{fig:setup}
365: Detector setup for the coincidence measurement of neutrons
366: and protons emitted from NMWD in KEK-PS E462.}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369: The setup detecting the particles from the weak decay of \HefiveL~is
370: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:setup}. It has three sets of decay-particle counters,
371: two located on the top and bottom of the target
372: for a back-to-back coincidence measurement
373: and one at the side to cover the solid angle for non back-to-back events.
374: Each of the top and bottom coincidence counter sets consists of fast
375: timing counters (T2), a drift chamber (PDC), veto or stop timing counters (T3)
376: and neutron counter arrays (T4).
377: The side counter is similar but without the PDC.
378:
379: Neutral particles, $\gamma$'s and neutrons, were measured in
380: T4 together with T3 as veto counters.
381: The particle identification was done in the TOF spectra,
382: from T1 to T4.
383: The charged decay particles were identified
384: by the three measured variables,
385: $\Delta E$, TOF and $E$ which
386: denote the energy loss per unit length measured by the T2 counter,
387: the time-of-flight between T2 and T3 and
388: the ADC sum of sequentially fired counters, respectively.
389: Protons and pions were clearly identified, and the pion contamination
390: in the proton gate was less than 1\%.
391: The detection thresholds were $\sim$10 MeV for neutrons
392: and $\sim$30 MeV for protons.
393: The neutron detection efficiency of the neutron counter
394: system, $\epsilon_n$, was calculated
395: by a Monte Carlo simulation with a modified version of the {\small DEMONS}
396: \cite{ref:Dem92} code, which is applicable to a multi-element neutron detector
397: and has been tested to reproduce various experimental data~\cite{ref:Kim03}.
398: For charged particle analysis, only the central segments of T2 and T3 were used
399: for more accurate determination of the acceptance and particle identification.
400: Further details of the decay-particle counters are described
401: in Ref.~\cite{ref:Oka04}.
402: \begin{figure}
403: \includegraphics[scale=0.33]{excitation.pair.eps}
404: \caption{\label{fig:inclusive}
405: The hypernuclear excitation energy spectra for $^{6}_{\Lambda}$Li for
406: (a) inclusive, (b) $np$-pair coincidence and (c) $nn$-pair coincidence measurements.}
407: \end{figure}
408:
409: The inclusive $^{6}_\Lambda {\rm Li}$ excitation energy spectrum
410: derived from the pion and kaon momenta is shown
411: in Fig.~\ref{fig:inclusive}(a).
412: Figs.~\ref{fig:inclusive}(b) and~\ref{fig:inclusive}(c)
413: are the spectra in coincidence with nucleon pairs,
414: $np$ and $nn$, respectively.
415: Since the ground state of \Li6lam~is
416: above the $^{5}_\Lambda {\rm He} + p$ threshold,
417: it promptly decays to \HefiveL~by emitting protons of several MeV.
418: The vertical lines show the
419: applied gate for the measurement of the decay of $^{5}_\Lambda {\rm He}$.
420: The enhanced yield in the quasi-free $\Lambda$ region
421: of the $nn$ coincidence excitation spectrum over that of
422: the $np$ pairs is considered to be due to two-neutron emission
423: via the absorption of \pim~from mesonic decay of quasi-free $\Lambda$s.
424:
425: In Figs.~\ref{fig:pair}(a) and \ref{fig:pair}(b),
426: the distributions of the $np$ and $nn$ pair yields
427: are seen in the energy sum of the pair nucleons.
428: In the figure only the pair events in which each of the nucleons has
429: an energy above 30 MeV are counted.
430: The hatched histograms
431: show the contamination due to the absorption of
432: $\pi^-$ emitted from the mesonic decay.
433: The amount of contamination
434: was estimated by referring to the $\pi^-$ absorption
435: from mesonic decay of quasi-free $\Lambda$ formation events.
436: The energy-sum resolution $\sigma_{E_{sum}}$ for $np$ and $nn$~pairs
437: was estimated
438: to be 12 MeV and 16 MeV, respectively, for the typical cases.
439: The energy resolution of neutron deteriorates rapidly
440: in the high energy region, while that of proton is stable with respect to
441: its energy.
442: In the energy-sum spectrum of $np$ pairs, one can see the peak located
443: around expected value.
444: The sharp peak indicates that the effect of FSI is not severe and
445: two-body 1$N$ NMWD is the major process.
446: Note that the back-to-back kinematic condition has not yet been applied
447: to these energy-sum spectra.
448:
449: The upper panels of Figs.~\ref{fig:pair}(c) and~\ref{fig:pair}(d)
450: show the yields of the $np$ and $nn$
451: coincidence events, $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$, as a function of the opening angle
452: between the two nucleons ($\theta_{np}$ and $\theta_{nn}$).
453: They are not yet normalized for acceptance and efficiency.
454: The angular resolutions were estimated
455: to be
456: $\sigma_{\cos(\theta_{np})} = 0.018$ and
457: $\sigma_{\cos(\theta_{nn})} = 0.026$
458: at $\cos\theta = -0.9$.
459: A total of 90 and 30 events were observed in the back-to-back
460: angular region of $\cos\theta < -0.8$ indicated as the vertical
461: dashed lines for the $np$ and $nn$ pair yields, respectively.
462: %
463: \begin{figure}
464: \includegraphics[scale=0.56]{pair.eps}
465: \caption{\label{fig:pair}
466: (a) and (b) : The yields of the $np$ and $nn$ coincidence events,
467: $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$,
468: as a function of the energy-sum $E_{sum}$ for the pair nucleons.
469: The yields are not normalized for efficiency yet.
470: (c) and (d) : The upper panel
471: shows the yields of the $NN$ coincidence
472: events, $Y_{NN}$, plotted as a function of the
473: the opening angle between two nucleons ($\theta_{NN}$).
474: The lower panel depicts the
475: normalized yields of the $np$ and $nn$ coincidence
476: per NMWD.}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: The lower two panels in Figs.~\ref{fig:pair}(c) and~\ref{fig:pair}(d) show
480: the angular correlation of nucleon pairs, where the
481: vertical scale is normalized for full solid angle and unit efficiency
482: ($N_{np}$ and $N_{nn}$ in Eq.~\ref{eq:gngp}).
483: They are normalized with the simulated event-by-event efficiency,
484: $\e_{NN}(cos \theta)$.
485: The $b_{nm}$ value, 0.429$\pm$0.012$\pm$0.005,
486: derived from the $\pi^-$ and $\pi^0$ branching ratios measured
487: in the present experiment~\cite{ref:Oka03,ref:Kam03} and
488: drastically improved from the previous 34\% error~\cite{ref:Szy91}.
489: This accurate $b_{nm}$~value made it possible to normalize the pair yields
490: per NMWD without introducing significant systematic error
491: so that the measured $N_{NN}$ angular correlation of $nn$ and $np$ pairs
492: can be directly compared to those of the FSI
493: model calculation~\cite{ref:Gar03}.
494:
495: Back-to-back peaking at $\cos\theta < -0.8$,
496: which is the signature of a two-body final state, is clearly observed
497: in the angular correlation for both $np$ and $nn$ pairs.
498: This is the first clean observation of
499: \Lnp~and \Lnn~1$N$-induced NMWD processes.
500:
501: Next we discuss the
502: $N_{nn}/N_{np}$ ratio in the back-to-back kinematic region
503: ($\cos\theta < -0.8$), because the acceptance beyond there decrease rapidly.
504: In this kinematic region, the ratio $\Gamma_n /\Gamma_p$ simply becomes
505: the $N_{nn}/N_{np}$ ratio as shown in Eq.~\ref{eq:gngp} assuming
506: the same FSI on neutrons and protons.
507: Possible differences in the FSI on neutrons and protons would not be
508: significant due to the smallness of the FSI itself in the residual
509: nucleus, $^4 \rm{He}$ or $^4 \rm{H}$~\cite{ref:Gar03}.
510: The similar spectral shape of the neutron and
511: proton single spectra observed in the same experiment supports
512: this assumption~\cite{ref:Oka04}.
513: Comparing the yield of $N_{nn}$ and $N_{np}$ in the $cos \theta < -0.8$ region,
514: we obtained
515: \begin{eqnarray}
516: \label{eq:rnrp}
517: \frac{\Gamma_n}{\Gamma_p}
518: \simeq \frac{N_{nn}}{N_{np}}
519: = 0.45\pm0.11 (stat) \pm0.03 (syst).
520: \end{eqnarray}
521: The systematic error of about 7\% is mainly from the
522: ambiguity of neutron detection efficiency, 6\%.
523: The \Gnp~ratio is determined
524: for the first time from exclusive measurement of each NMWD channel
525: by detecting both emitted nucleons in coincidence in order to
526: remove the ambiguities of the FSI and 2$N$ NMWD contributions inherent
527: in all the previous measurements.
528: This ratio agrees well
529: with the recent theoretical ratios of the direct quark interaction
530: and the heavy meson exchange models~\cite{ref:Sas00,ref:Par01}.
531: Although the $\Gamma_n /\Gamma_p$ ratio is found to be smaller
532: than previous values, it is still well
533: above the OPE prediction. It is now clear that one needs
534: additional shorter-range mechanisms, such as DQ and/or HME,
535: to explain this strangeness-changing baryon-baryon weak
536: interaction.
537:
538: In summary,
539: we have measured for the first time the energy-sum and the
540: angular correlation of two nucleon pairs,
541: $nn$ and $np$, emitted in the NMWD of \He5lam.
542: We have clearly observed
543: a distinct $nn$ and $np$ back-to-back correlation
544: coming from a one-nucleon induced decay mode.
545: We have determined the \Gnp~of NMWD of \He5lam
546: accurately and unambiguously
547: from the pair number ratio, $N_{nn}/N_{np}$,
548: in the back-to-back kinematics region,
549: which is almost free from the effects of FSI and 2$N$-induced
550: NMWD contributions.
551:
552: We are grateful to K.Nakamura and KEK-PS staff for their support
553: of our experiment and stable operation of the KEK-PS.
554: Authors, BHK and HB, acknowledge
555: support from grants KOSEF(R01-2005-000-10050-0) and KRF(2003-070-C00015).
556:
557: \begin{references}
558:
559: \bibitem{ref:Alb02} W.~M.~Alberico, G.~Garbarino, Phys. Rep. {\bf 369}, 1-109 (2002), and references therein.
560: \bibitem{ref:Sas00} K.~Sasaki, T.~Inoue, and M.~Oka, Nuc. Phys. A {\bf 669}, 331 (2000); A {\bf 678}, 455 (2000).
561: \bibitem{ref:Par01} A.~Parre\~{n}o and A.~Ramos, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 65}, 015204 (2001).
562: \bibitem{ref:Szy91} J.~J.~Szymanski {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 43}, 849 (1991).
563: \bibitem{ref:Has02} O.~Hashimoto {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 042503 (2002).
564: \bibitem{ref:Sat03} Y.~Sato {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 71}, 025203 (2005).
565: \bibitem{ref:Kim03} J.~H.~Kim {\it et al}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68}, 065201 (2003)
566: \bibitem{ref:Oka04} S.~Okada {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 597}, 249 (2004).
567: \bibitem{ref:Fuk95} T.~Fukuda {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A {\bf 361}, 485 (1995).
568: \bibitem{ref:Dem92} R.~C.~Byrd {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A {\bf 313}, 437(1992).
569: \bibitem{ref:Oka03} S.~Okada {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 752}, 178c (2005).
570: \bibitem{ref:Kam03} S.~Kameoka {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 752}, 173c (2005).
571: \bibitem{ref:Gar03} G.~Garbarino, A.~Parre\~{n}o, and A.~Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 112501 (2003).
572:
573:
574: \end{references}
575:
576: \end{document}
577:
578: