1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.11 2004/10/31 08:06:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
20: %%
21: %% The class supports further options.
22: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
23: %%
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25:
26: \documentclass[final]{aipproc}
27: \usepackage{epsfig}
28: \usepackage{amssymb}
29: \layoutstyle{6x9}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: %% FRONTMATTER
33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title[What do we learn from PHENIX results on non-identified jet
38: correlation?]{From mach cone to reappeared jet: What do we learn
39: from PHENIX results on non-identified jet correlation?}
40:
41: \classification{27.75.-q} \keywords{}
42:
43: \author{Jiangyong Jia for the PHENIX Collaboration}{
44: address={Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 and Nevis Laboratories, Irvington, NY 10533, USA}
45: }
46: \begin{abstract}
47: High $p_T$ jets are known to be strongly modified by the dense,
48: strongly interacting medium created in heavy-ion collisions. The
49: jet signal, extracted from two particle $\Delta\phi$ correlation,
50: shows a systematic evolution of these modifications as function of
51: $p_T$ and centrality. At intermediate $p_T$, both near side and
52: away side correlations are modified. But the modifications are
53: much stronger at the away side, resulting in a characteristic cone
54: type of structure in central Au + Au collisions. The robustness of
55: cone structure is strengthened by studying the jet shape as
56: function of angle relative to the reaction plane. As one increase
57: the $p_T$ for BOTH hadrons, the cone structure seems to be filled
58: up, and a peak structure appears on the away side. However, the
59: interpretation of these results require careful separation of
60: medium effect and surface bias.
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \maketitle
64:
65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66: %% MAINMATTER
67: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70: High $p_T$ back-to-back jets are valuable probes for the
71: sQGP~\cite{RHIC} created in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Existing
72: two particle jet correlation results from statistically limited
73: RUN2 Au + Au data set revealed a strong interaction of the jets
74: with the medium. On the one hand, jet correlation at high $p_T$
75: indicates a seemly complete disappearance of the away side jet
76: signal~\cite{Adler:2002tq}. On the other hand, jet correlation at
77: low $p_T$ shows an enhancement of the away side jet
78: yield~\cite{Adams:2005ph} but a broadened jet
79: shape~\cite{Adler:2005ee}. Qualitatively, this is consistent with
80: the energy loss picture, where the high $p_T$ jets are quenched by
81: the medium and their lost energy enhanced the jet multiplicity at
82: low $p_T$.
83:
84: Equipped with excellent statistics from RUN4 Au + Au and RUN5 Cu +
85: Cu data sets, we would like to gain further understanding on the
86: interaction of the jets with the medium. We hope to address
87: important questions such as: How the jet looses it's energy? How
88: the lost energy get redistributed? How the medium responds to the
89: jet? What happens to the higher $p_T$ jets? We attempt to address
90: these questions using the non-identified charged hadron - charged
91: hadron correlation results from RUN4 Au + Au data set.
92:
93:
94: \section{Jet properties at intermediate $p_T$}
95: Our analysis is based on 1 billion minimum bias events from Au +
96: Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. The correlation function
97: $C(\Delta\phi)$ (CF) is defined as the ratio of same event pair
98: distribution, $dN^{\rm{pairs}}/d\Delta\phi$ to the mixed event
99: pair distribution, $dN^{\rm{mix}}/d\Delta\phi$.
100: $dN^{\rm{mix}}/d\Delta\phi$ reflects the level of combinatoric
101: background and the geometrical acceptance~\cite{Jia:2004sw}. In
102: heavy-ion collisions, the CF can be expressed as the sum of jets
103: and elliptic flow,
104: \begin{eqnarray}
105: \label{eq:1} C(\Delta\phi) = J(\Delta\phi) + \xi\left(1+2v_2^{t}
106: v_2^{a} \cos2\Delta \phi\right)
107: \end{eqnarray}
108: The superscript $t$ and $a$ stand for the trigger and associated
109: particles, $\xi$ is a normalization factor.
110: \begin{figure}[ht]
111: \epsfig{file=figs/zyamcf.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}
112: \caption{\label{fig:zyamcf1} a) Correlation function in 0-5\%
113: centrality bin, the lines indicated the level of flow background
114: and it's systematic error band, the insert is CF for higher
115: $p_{T,{\rm{assoc}}}$. b) Correspondingly background subtracted
116: per-trigger yield.}
117: \end{figure}
118:
119: Fig.\ref{fig:zyamcf1}a shows the typical correlation function from
120: central Au + Au collisions. The away side shape is very broad and
121: non-gauss like. It has a plateau that expands to about 2 radians
122: and a possible small dip at $\pi$. The subtraction of the flow
123: contribution (shown by the curves) only makes the dip deeper
124: (Fig\ref{fig:zyamcf1}b). $\xi$ is fixed by scaling the flow term
125: to match the CF, i.e. assuming $J = 0$ at some $\Delta\phi$ (ZYAM
126: assumption)~\cite{Ajitanand:2005jj}. The ZYAM procedure leads to a
127: slight over-subtraction of jet yield, however since $2v_2^tv_2^a
128: \approx$ few $\%$, the over-subtraction mainly results in a
129: vertical shift and does not affect the away side jet shape. The
130: systematic error on $J(\Delta\phi)$ is dominated by the
131: uncertainties on $v_2$.
132:
133: PHENIX performed a systematic study of the jet shape and yield at
134: intermediate $p_T$, as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:zyamcent}. There is a
135: continues evolution of the split and the dip as function of
136: centrality. The away side split is characterized by the split
137: parameter $D$~\cite{nathan}, which is obtained by a double gauss
138: fit on the away side. $D$ seems to turn on rather quickly as a
139: function of centrality, and fall on a uniform curve as function of
140: N$_{\rm{part}}$ for different collision energies and collision
141: systems.
142: \begin{figure}[b]
143: \epsfig{file=figs/zyamcent.ps,width=0.33\linewidth}
144: \epsfig{file=figs/comparitiveD.eps,width=0.33\linewidth}
145: \epsfig{file=figs/nearwidth.eps,width=0.33\linewidth}
146: \caption{\label{fig:zyamcent} a) The correlation function for
147: central, mid-central and peripheral bin in Au + Au. b) The away
148: side ``D'' parameter as function of $N_{\rm{part}}$ for several
149: collision systems and energies. c) the near side width as function
150: of centrality for same charged pairs, opposite charged pairs and
151: all pairs in Au + Au.}
152: \end{figure}
153:
154: What is the nature of the away side dip? Energy loss models that
155: implement the jet broadening in a random walk manner can not
156: describe the dip or the flat jet shape~\cite{Vitev:2005at}. Models
157: with Cherenkov gluons~\cite{Dremin:1979yg,Koch:2005sx} or medium
158: dragging effect from flow~\cite{Armesto:2004vz} predict a cone or
159: a broadening of the away side jet, but the predicted modifications
160: depend strongly on momentum and are expected to disappear at large
161: $p_T$. Casalderrey {\it{et. al.}} \cite{Casalderrey-Solana:2004qm}
162: proposed a `mach cone'/`shock wave' mechanism to explain the away
163: side jet shape. In this model, energetic jets, which travel faster
164: than speed of sound ($c_s$) in the medium, excite shock waves at
165: an angle $\theta = \cos^{-1}\left(c_s/c\right)$. The direction of
166: the cone is independent of the $p_T$, but the width of the cone is
167: predicted to narrow for higher $p_T$.
168:
169: Fig.\ref{fig:zyamcent} also indicates a sizable broadening of the
170: near side jet shape in central collisions. This modification is
171: not as dramatic as that for the away side jet, most likely due to
172: the surface emission bias~\cite{Drees:2003zh} in which the average
173: distance travelled by the near side jet is much smaller than that
174: for the away side jet. However, the relatively small amount of
175: medium that the near side jet has to go through could already lead
176: to some broadening. On the other hand, the baryon yield is
177: enhanced at intermediate $p_T$ in central
178: collisions~\cite{Adler:2003kg}. Since the near side jet structure
179: could be different between baryon trigger and meson
180: trigger~\cite{Adler:2004zd}, the broadening of the near side jet
181: width could be a consequence of the strongly modified particle
182: composition in central collisions.
183:
184: To quantify the modifications of the jet shape, we study the jet
185: yield in three different $\Delta\phi$ regions: near side jet
186: region ($|\Delta\phi|<\pi/3$), the away side dip region
187: ($|\Delta\phi-\pi|<\pi/6$), and the away side shoulder region
188: ($|\Delta\phi-\pi\pm\pi/3|<\pi/6$). The shoulder region is
189: sensitive to the novel medium effects, while the dip region is
190: sensitive to the punch through jet contribution.
191: Fig.\ref{fig:yield} plots the jet yields in the three regions as
192: function of $p_T$ for four centralities. In 0-5\% centrality bin,
193: there is a large separation between the yields for the dip region
194: and near side jet region, persistent to large $p_T$. In more
195: peripheral collisions, the yield of the dip region becomes closer
196: or even exceeds that for the shoulder region, consistent with the
197: returning of the away side jet to a normal gauss shape.
198:
199: \begin{figure}[t]
200: \epsfig{file=figs/yieldsys1.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}
201: \caption{\label{fig:yield} The yield for trigger 2.5-4 GeV/$c$
202: plotted as function of associated hadron $p_T$ for four different
203: centrality bins.}
204: \end{figure}
205: \section{Dependence on the Reaction Plane.}
206:
207: The study of the jet yield as function of angle w.r.p to reaction
208: plane is very important in the sense that it adds another
209: dimension in controlling the path length dependence. It also
210: provide additional constrains on the subtraction of the elliptic
211: flow background. When the trigger particles are selected in a
212: window centered around $\phi_s$ with a width of $\pm c$ with
213: respect to the reaction plane, the pair distribution up to second
214: order harmonics (without jet contribution) is
215: ~\cite{Bielcikova:2003ku}:
216: \[
217: \quad \quad \frac{{dN^{\rm{pairs}} }}{{d\Delta \phi }} =
218: \frac{{2c}}{\pi }B(a + 2v_2^ab\cos 2\Delta \phi )
219: \]
220: \[
221: \begin{array}{l}
222: \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
223: a = 1 + 2v{_2 }^t \cos 2\phi _s \frac{{\sin 2c}}{{2c}}\left\langle {\cos 2\Psi } \right\rangle \\
224: b = v{_2 }^t + \cos 2\phi_s \frac{{\sin 2c}}{{2c}}\left\langle {\cos 2\Psi } \right\rangle + v{_2 }^t \cos 4\phi _s \frac{{\sin 4c}}{{4c}}\left\langle {\cos 4\Psi } \right\rangle \\
225: \end{array} \right. \\
226: \\
227: \end{array}
228: \]
229:
230: $a$ is the combinatoric background level, and it is proportional
231: to the number of trigger particles in the window. The correlation
232: function without jet contribution is:
233: \begin{eqnarray}
234: \label{eq:3}
235: C(\Delta\phi) = \frac{dN^{pairs}/d\Delta \phi
236: }{dN^{mix}/d\Delta \phi} = \xi(1 + 2v{_2 }^ab/a\cos 2\Delta \phi)
237: = \xi(1 + 2v_2^av_{2,eff}^t\cos 2\Delta \phi) \
238: \end{eqnarray}
239: Where $v_{2,eff}^t = b/a$ is the effective $v_2$ of the trigger
240: particle in the window, and $\xi$ is the same normalization factor
241: as in Eq.\ref{eq:1}. $\xi$ does not depend on the trigger
242: direction.
243:
244: We divide the trigger range, [0,$\pi/2$], into 6 bins. Each bin
245: has a different flow background, which can be calculated from
246: Eq.\ref{eq:3}. The measured correlation functions for 30-40\%
247: centrality bin are shown Fig.\ref{fig:rp1}. Several interesting
248: features can be readily identified. The effective
249: $v_{2,\rm{eff}}^t$ changes dramatically from in plane to out of
250: plane direction, but the six CFs cross each other at $\pm\pi/4$
251: and $\pi\pm\pi/4$, where the harmonic contributions are zero. The
252: away side cross points are systematically higher than those at the
253: near side, reflecting directly the amount of jet contribution at
254: $\pi\pm\pi/4$. The extremes of the distributions are not at
255: $\pi/2$ where the flow influence is maximal, instead they are
256: shifted either to the left or the right due to the jet
257: contribution.
258: \begin{figure}[t]
259: \epsfig{file=figs/rp1.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}
260: \caption{\label{fig:rp1} a) Correlation function for 6 trigger
261: direction bins and the trigger integrated bin (the center curve).
262: b) The flow subtracted per-trigger yields, the insert figure shows
263: the 6 trigger bins.}
264: \end{figure}
265:
266: The jet yields in each trigger direction (Fig.\ref{fig:rp1}b ) are
267: obtained by subtracting the flow contribution. The only free
268: parameter, $\xi$, is fixed by the ZYAM procedure from the
269: integrated bin, and the flow terms in all six trigger bin are
270: automatically fixed (Eq.\ref{eq:3}). Fig.\ref{fig:rp2} shows the
271: comparison of the the measured CFs and the calculated flow
272: contributions for 30-40\% centrality bin. The systematic error
273: bands correspond to the error of the RP $v_2$, propagated
274: according to Eq.\ref{eq:3}. The size of the systematic errors is
275: largest for in plane bin and smallest for the out of plane bin. RP
276: dependence study helps to constrain the $v_2$ systematic when it
277: is not dominated by the RP resolution~\footnote{Since $v_2^a =
278: v_{2,\rm{raw}}^a/\left<\cos2\Psi\right>$, the error of $v_2$ from
279: RP resolution is independent of trigger direction.}. In
280: Fig.\ref{fig:rp1}b, jet shapes for different bins show some subtle
281: differences within the systematic error. We believe they are
282: mostly due to the small $v_4$ terms which were not considered in
283: current analysis.
284:
285: \begin{figure}[t]
286: \epsfig{file=figs/rp2.eps,width=1\linewidth}
287: \caption{\label{fig:rp2} (top row) Correlation functions and
288: (bottom row) background subtracted per-trigger yields for the 6
289: trigger direction bins.}
290: \end{figure}
291: In Fig.\ref{fig:rp3}, the difference of the per-trigger yield
292: between in plane direction and out of plane direction:
293: $(1/N_{\rm{trig}} \Delta N/\Delta\phi)_{\rm{in}} -
294: (1/N_{\rm{trig}} \Delta N/\Delta\phi)_{\rm{out}}$ is plotted, and
295: they are fitted with $c_0+c_2\cos2\Delta\phi+c_4\cos4\Delta\phi$
296: term. Indeed most of the variations can be accounted for by this
297: function. There is a small excess on the away side relative the
298: near side in 30-40\% centrality bin. This excess could be the hint
299: for the path length dependence of the away side jet modification.
300: \begin{figure}[ht]
301: \epsfig{file=figs/rp4.eps,width=0.6\linewidth}
302: \caption{\label{fig:rp3} Difference of the in plane and out of
303: plane per-trigger yield for a) 0-5\% and b) 30-40\% centrality
304: bins.}
305: \end{figure}
306:
307: \section{``Reappearance'' of the away side jets at high $p_T$}
308: The importance of high $p_T$ correlation is two fold. On the one
309: hand, high $p_T$ jets are free from complicated intermediate $p_T$
310: physics (for example recombination), thus can serve as a cleaner
311: probe of the medium. On the other hand, Studies of high $p_T$ jets
312: can help to disentangle normal jet fragmentation from cherenkov
313: gluons, shock wave or fragmentation of radiated gluons which
314: become dominating at intermediate or low $p_T$.
315:
316: Fig.\ref{fig:scan1} shows several CFs in successively higher $p_T$
317: ranges in 0-10\% central $\rm{Au + Au}$ collisions. The typical
318: away side cone structure persists to $p_T\approx4$ GeV/$c$, but
319: the edges of the cones become sharper and their magnitude drops.
320: In $4-5 \times 4-5$ GeV/$c$ bin, the relative flat away side shape
321: does not rule out the cone shape, but it's magnitude must be
322: significantly reduced.
323: \begin{figure}[t]
324: \begin{minipage}{0.76\linewidth}
325: \begin{flushright}
326: \epsfig{file=figs/scancent0.eps,width=1\linewidth}
327: \end{flushright}
328: \end{minipage}
329: \begin{minipage}{0.24\linewidth}
330: \begin{flushleft}
331: \epsfig{file=figs/star1.eps,width=1\linewidth}
332: \end{flushleft}
333: \end{minipage}
334: \caption{\label{fig:scan1} (left four panels) : per-trigger yield
335: for different $p_T$ selection in 0-10\% centrality bin. (right
336: panel): per-trigger yield from STAR in 0-10\% centrality
337: bin~\cite{Adler:2002tq}.}
338: \end{figure}
339:
340: As a comparison, in the most right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:scan1},
341: we also show the hadron-hadron correlation from
342: STAR~\cite{Adler:2002tq}. The data are for 0-10\% most central Au
343: + Au with $4<p_{T,\rm{trig}}<6$ GeV/$c$ and
344: $2<p_{T,\rm{assoc}}<p_{T,\rm{trig}}$, and are comparable to the
345: middle panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:scan1}. It is also almost comparable
346: to the highest $p_T$ point in Fig.~\ref{fig:yield}a, with the
347: $p_T$ selection of the trigger and associated hadrons are
348: swapped~\footnote{When the $p_T$ range of trigger and associated
349: particle are swapped, the di-jet modification factor $I_{\rm{AA}}$
350: are connected to each other by, $I^1_{\rm{AA}}R^1_{\rm{AA}} =
351: I^2_{\rm{AA}}R^2_{\rm{AA}}=\frac{\rm{Jet
352: pairs}_{AA}}{N_{\rm{coll}}\rm{Jet pairs}_{pp}}$, where
353: $R^1_{\rm{AA}}$ and $R^2_{\rm{AA}}$ are the nuclear modification
354: factor of the first and second particle,, respectively.
355: JetPairs$_{\rm{AA}}$ and JetPairs$_{\rm{pp}}$ represent the
356: average number of jet pairs in one A + A collision and one p + p
357: collision, respectively, respectively.}. All three are
358: qualitatively similar to each other. Interestingly, STAR's data
359: are consistent with zero around $\pi$, but it seems to have a
360: shoulder at $\pi\pm1$ as suggested by the right panel of
361: Fig.~\ref{fig:scan1}.
362:
363:
364: In the highest $p_T$ bin of Fig.\ref{fig:scan1}, a peak structure
365: seems to reemerge around $\pi$ on top of a flat background. To
366: understand the physics behind the peak structure, we plot in
367: Fig.\ref{fig:scan2} the centrality dependence of the CF for $5-10
368: \times 3-10$ GeV/$c$ selection. The away side peak exists in all
369: centrality bins, although its magnitude is suppressed toward
370: central collisions. At this point, it is hard to say whether the
371: widths of the away peaks are also broadened in central collisions.
372: On the other hand, there seems to be little change in both the
373: shape and magnitude of the near side jet as function of
374: centrality. These can be compared with recent di-jet results
375: measured at much larger $p_T$ ($8<p_{T,\rm{trig}}<15$ GeV/$c$ and
376: $6<p_{T,\rm{assoc}}$ GeV/$c$) from STAR
377: experiment~\cite{magestro}, where the jet width and the shape of
378: the fragmentation function are found to be independent of $p_T$ at
379: fairly large $z$ ($z>0.4-0.5$). In energy loss picture, the large
380: $z$ requirement biases the detected away side jets to smaller
381: energy loss, which biases detected jet towards surface, thus
382: points to the picture where both jets are emitted tangential to
383: the surface. If this scenario is true, we should recover the
384: strong medium modification at low $z$ (by decreasing
385: $p_{T,\rm{assoc}}$). To check this, in Fig.\ref{fig:scan3}a we
386: show the CF for various associated hadron $p_T$ with trigger $p_T$
387: fixed. The $\left<z\right>$ of the associated hadron in the four
388: panels are approximately 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 1. Clearly we see a
389: stronger distortion of the away side jet shape at smaller
390: $p_{T,\rm{assoc}}$, the yields relative to the near side are also
391: larger at smaller $p_{T,\rm{assoc}}$. In fact, the fragmentation
392: functions from STAR also suggest a significant deviation from the
393: uniform scaling shape at $z\lesssim0.4$ as shown in
394: Fig.\ref{fig:scan3}b. It is important to measure the fragmentation
395: function in full $z$ range in order to separate these two
396: competing effects.
397: \begin{figure}[t]
398: \epsfig{file=figs/scansummary.eps,width=0.85\linewidth}
399: \caption{\label{fig:scan2} Centrality dependence of the
400: per-trigger yield at high $p_T$}
401: \end{figure}
402: \begin{figure}[t]
403: \epsfig{file=figs/scanhh.eps,width=0.57\linewidth}
404: \epsfig{file=figs/star.eps,width=0.28\linewidth}
405: \caption{\label{fig:scan3} (left four panels): per-trigger yield
406: for different $p_{T,\rm{assoc}}$ in 20-40\% centrality bin when
407: trigger $p_T$ is fixed. (right panel) Away side jet fragmentation
408: from STAR~\cite{magestro}.}
409: \end{figure}
410:
411: \section{Conclusions}
412: Jet properties from hadron-hadron correlation have been studied as
413: function of $p_T$, centrality and the angle relative to the
414: reaction plane. Precise extraction of jet signal relies on
415: experimental control on the flow backgrounds, which can be
416: constrained by looking their reaction plane dependence. Jet shape
417: and yield are found to be strongly modified at intermediate and
418: low $p_T$. The interpretations of these modification, however, are
419: complicated by various competing mechanisms. By increasing the
420: $p_T$ for both triggering and associated hadrons, away side jet
421: peak reappears but it's yield is suppressed. This might be due to
422: the bias effect where the detected di-jets are emitted tangential
423: to the surface.
424:
425: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
426: \bibitem{RHIC}
427: K.~Adcox {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
428: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 757} (2005) 184;
429: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
430: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 757} (2005) 102;
431: B.~B.~Back {\it et al.} [PHOBOS Collaboration],
432: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 757} (2005) 28;
433: I.~Arsene {\it et al.} [BRAHMS Collaboration],
434: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 757} (2005) 1.
435: \bibitem{Adler:2002tq}
436: C.~Adler {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
437: %``Disappearance of back-to-back high p(T) hadron correlations in central Au +
438: %Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''
439: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 082302 (2003)
440: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0210033;%%
441: \bibitem{Adams:2005ph}
442: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
443: %``Distributions of charged hadrons associated with high transverse momentum
444: %particles in p p and Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''
445: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 95}, 152301 (2005)
446: %arXiv:nucl-ex/0501016.
447: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0501016;%%
448: \bibitem{Adler:2005ee}
449: S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
450: %``Modifications to di-jet hadron pair correlations in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''
451: arXiv:nucl-ex/0507004.
452: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0507004;%%
453: \bibitem{Jia:2004sw}
454: J. Jia, %``Probing jet properties via two particle correlation method,''
455: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 31}, S521 (2005)
456: % [arXiv:nucl-ex/0409024].
457: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0409024;%%
458: \bibitem{Ajitanand:2005jj}
459: N.~N.~Ajitanand {\it et al.},
460: %``Decomposition of harmonic and jet contributions to particle-pair
461: %correlations at ultra-relativistic energies,''
462: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 72}, 011902 (2005)
463: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0501025;%%
464: \bibitem{nathan}
465: Nathan Grau [PHENIX Collaboration], nucl-ex/0511046.
466: \bibitem{Vitev:2005at}
467: I.~Vitev,
468: %``Large angle hadron correlations from medium-induced gluon radiation,''
469: arXiv:hep-ph/0506281.
470: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506281;%%
471: \bibitem{Dremin:1979yg}
472: I.~M.~Dremin,
473: %``Coherent Hadron Radiation At Ultrahigh-Energies,''
474: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 30} (1979) 140
475: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 30} (1979) 152].
476: %%CITATION = JTPLA,30,140;%%
477: \bibitem{Koch:2005sx}
478: V.~Koch, A.~Majumder and X.~N.~Wang,
479: %``Cherenkov radiation from jets in heavy-ion collisions,''
480: arXiv:nucl-th/0507063.
481: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0507063;%%
482: \bibitem{Armesto:2004vz}
483: N.~Armesto, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,
484: %``Low-p(T) collective flow induces high-p(T) jet quenching,''
485: arXiv:hep-ph/0411341.
486: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411341;%%
487: \bibitem{Casalderrey-Solana:2004qm}
488: J.~Casalderrey-Solana, E.~V.~Shuryak and D.~Teaney,
489: %``Conical flow induced by quenched QCD jets,''
490: arXiv:hep-ph/0411315.
491: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411315;%%
492: \bibitem{Bielcikova:2003ku}
493: J.~Bielcikova, S.~Esumi, K.~Filimonov, S.~Voloshin and J.~P.~Wurm,
494: %``Elliptic flow contribution to two-particle correlations at different
495: %orientations to the reaction plane,''
496: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69}, 021901 (2004)
497: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0311007;%%
498:
499: \bibitem{Drees:2003zh}
500: A.~Drees, H.~Feng and J.~Jia,
501: %``Medium induced jet absorption at RHIC,''
502: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71} (2005) 034909
503: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0310044;%%
504:
505: \bibitem{Adler:2003kg}
506: S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
507: %``Scaling properties of proton and anti-proton production in s(NN)**(1/2) =
508: %200-GeV Au + Au collisions,''
509: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91} (2003) 172301
510: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0305036;%%
511: \bibitem{Adler:2004zd}
512: S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
513: %``Jet structure of baryon excess in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) =
514: %200-GeV,''
515: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71} (2005) 051902
516: \bibitem{magestro}
517: Dan magestro [STAR Collaboration], arXiv:nucl-ex/0510002.
518:
519: \end{thebibliography}
520: \end{document}
521:
522: \endinput
523: %%
524: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
525: