1: \documentclass[aps,prc,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[preprint,superscriptaddress,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
3:
4: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
6: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
7: \usepackage{xspace}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \newcommand{\ox} {$^{16}$O$(p,2p)^{15}$N\xspace}
12: \newcommand{\sk} {Super-Kamiokande\xspace}
13: \newcommand{\nukp} {$p \to \bar{\nu} K^+$\xspace}
14: \newcommand{\tnu} {$n \to \nu \nu \bar{\nu}$\xspace}
15: \newcommand{\resbras} {15.6$\pm$1.3$^{+0.6}_{-1.0}$\%\xspace}
16: \newcommand{\resbra} {15.6$\pm$1.3$^{+0.6}_{-1.0}$\% and 27.9$\pm$1.5$^{+3.4}_{-2.6}$\%\xspace}
17: \newcommand{\respro} {3.1\% and 5.6\%\xspace}
18:
19:
20: \preprint{APS/123-QED}
21:
22: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
23: \title{De-excitation $\gamma$-rays from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N
24: associated with proton decay in $^{16}$O}
25:
26: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
27: \newcommand{\icrr}{\affiliation{Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kamioka, Gifu, 506-1205, Japan}}
28: \newcommand{\kyoto}{\affiliation{Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}}
29: \newcommand{\jasri}{\affiliation{Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan}}
30: \newcommand{\konan}{\affiliation{Department of Physics, Konan University, Kobe 658-8501, Japan}}
31: \newcommand{\rcnp}{\affiliation{Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan}}
32: \newcommand{\kansai}{\affiliation{Kansai Photon Science Institute, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Kizu, Kyoto 619-215, Japan}}
33: \newcommand{\kangaku}{\affiliation{Laboratory of Physics, Kanto Gakuin University, Yokohama 236-0032, Japan}}
34: \newcommand{\jaeri}{\altaffiliation{Advanced Science Research Center, JAERI, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan}}
35:
36: \newcommand{\stonybrooknow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA}}
37: \newcommand{\kyotonow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}}
38: \newcommand{\keknow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan}}
39: \newcommand{\jncnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1194, Japan}}
40: \newcommand{\lnsnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 982-0826, Japan}}
41: \newcommand{\cyricnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}}
42: \newcommand{\nagoyanow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan}}
43: \newcommand{\cnsnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}}
44: \newcommand{\wakayamanow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan}}
45: \newcommand{\rikennow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: RI Beam Science Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}}
46: \newcommand{\titnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8520, Japan}}
47: \newcommand{\kyushunow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Research and Development Center for Higher Education, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan}}
48: \newcommand{\rcnpnow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan}}
49: \newcommand{\michigannow}{\altaffiliation{Present address: National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA}}
50:
51: \author{K.~Kobayashi}\stonybrooknow\icrr
52: \author{H.~Akimune}\konan
53: \author{H.~Ejiri}\jasri\rcnp
54: \author{H.~Fujimura}\kyotonow\rcnp
55: \author{M.~Fujiwara}\rcnp\kansai
56: \author{K.~Hara}\keknow\rcnp
57: \author{K.Y.~Hara}\jncnow\konan
58: \author{T.~Ishikawa}\lnsnow\kyoto
59: \author{M.~Itoh}\cyricnow\rcnp
60: \author{Y.~Itow}\nagoyanow\icrr
61: \author{T.~Kawabata}\cnsnow\kyoto
62: \author{M.~Nakamura}\wakayamanow\kyoto
63: \author{H.~Sakaguchi}\kyoto
64: \author{Y.~Sakemi}\rcnp
65: \author{M.~Shiozawa}\icrr
66: \author{H.~Takeda}\rikennow\kyoto
67: \author{Y.~Totsuka}\keknow\icrr
68: \author{H.~Toyokawa}\jasri
69: \author{M.~Uchida}\titnow\rcnp
70: \author{T.~Yamada}\kangaku
71: \author{Y.~Yasuda}\kyoto
72: \author{H.P.~Yoshida}\kyushunow\rcnp
73: \author{M.~Yosoi}\rcnpnow\kyoto
74: \author{R.G.T.~Zegers}\michigannow\rcnp
75:
76: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
77: \date{\today}
78:
79: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
80: \begin{abstract}
81: We have measured de-excitation $\gamma$-rays from the $s$-hole state
82: in $^{15}$N produced via the \ox reaction in relation to the study of the
83: nucleon decay and the neutrino neutral-current interaction in water
84: Cherenkov detectors.
85: In the excitation-energy region of the $s$-hole state between 16~MeV and
86: 40~MeV in $^{15}$N, the branching ratio of emitting $\gamma$-rays with
87: the energies at more-than-6~MeV are found to be \resbras.
88: Taking into account the spectroscopic factor of the $s$-hole state,
89: the total emission probability is found to be 3.1\%.
90: This is about 1/10 compared with the emission probability of the 6.32~MeV
91: $\gamma$-ray from the 3/2$^-$~$p$-hole state in $^{15}$N.
92: Moreover, we searched for a 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $^{12}$C~$1^+$
93: state which may be populated after the particle-decay of the $s$-hole
94: state in $^{15}$N.
95: Such a high energy $\gamma$-ray from the hole state would provide a new
96: method to search for mode-independent nucleon decay even if the emission
97: probability is small.
98: No significant signal is found within a statistical uncertainty.
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
102: \pacs{13.30.Ce, 23.20.Lv, 27.20.+n, 29.40.Ka}
103: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
104: %display desired
105: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
106: \maketitle
107:
108: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
109: \section{\label{sec:motiv}Introduction}
110: In the recent searches of proton decay and in the studies of neutrino
111: oscillations, water Cherenkov detectors are used, such as \sk~\cite{sk}.
112: Since in such detectors, proton decays or neutrino interactions happen
113: mostly in $^{16}$O, it is important to study the effect of the nuclear
114: de-excitation process on the Cherenkov light detection in more detail.
115:
116: When a proton decays in one of the inner-shell orbits of $^{16}$O,
117: the residual $^{15}$N nucleus remains in an excited state with a proton-hole.
118: This state quickly de-excites by emitting $\gamma$-rays with a certain
119: probability.
120: In the decay search involving the channel \nukp~\cite{nuk}, which is the
121: dominant process in many supersymmetric grand unification
122: models~\cite{susygut1,susygut2,susygut3,susygut4,susygut5}, the
123: de-excitation $\gamma$-rays would be very useful to reduce backgrounds.
124: Since the $K^+$ momentum is below the Cherenkov threshold,
125: the $K^+$ is invisible.
126: Therefore, the $\mu^+$ signal stemming from the $K^+$ decay can be
127: separated from the prompt $\gamma$-ray signal.
128: On the other hand, most backgrounds produced by events such as
129: $\nu N \rightarrow \mu N^{\prime}\gamma$ have no time difference
130: between the $\gamma$-ray and $\mu$ signals and can be eliminated
131: when the $\gamma$-ray energy ($E_{\gamma}$) is in the detectable energy
132: range of the \sk.
133:
134: The de-excitation $\gamma$-ray is also useful for the study of the neutrino
135: neutral-current interaction via the quasi-free knock-out process,
136: e.g. with a 1~kt water Cherenkov detector~\cite{k2k1kt} in the experiment
137: of the long base-line neutrino oscillation from KEK to \sk (K2K).
138: An overall neutrino flux independent of neutrino flavor can be estimated
139: from the measurement of the neutral-current interaction.
140: Because recoil energies of protons are mostly below the Cherenkov threshold,
141: Cherenkov light from the de-excitation $\gamma$-rays can be clearly observed.
142: It is then possible to tag the neutral-current interaction
143: with the $\gamma$-rays.
144:
145: The de-excitation process of hole states in $^{15}$N following proton
146: decay in $^{16}$O was discussed by Ejiri~\cite{ejiri}.
147: He summarized de-excitation modes and their branching ratios, and estimated
148: the emission probabilities of the de-excitation $\gamma$-rays.
149: For a hole state $k$ which de-excites only by $\gamma$~decay,
150: he estimated the $\gamma$-ray emission probability ($P(k)$) by
151: using the spectroscopic factor ($S_p(k)$) as $P(k)$=$S_p(k)$/8,
152: where 8 is the number of protons in $^{16}$O.
153: The 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $3/2^-$ $p$-hole state to the ground
154: state (g.s.) in $^{15}$N, which is in the detectable energy range
155: of the \sk detector, is the most probable one because the state has the
156: largest spectroscopic factor and its excitation energy is below the
157: particle emission threshold.
158: Using the spectroscopic factor from the ($d$,$^{3}$He) data~\cite{sp6mev}
159: (see Table~\ref{tab:comp}), Ejiri predicted that the emission probability
160: of the 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray is 41\%
161: ($P(6.32{\rm \ MeV\ } p_{3/2^-})=S_p(6.32{\rm \ MeV\ }p_{3/2^-})/8=3.3/8$).
162: He also estimated the $\gamma$-ray emission probabilities from other $p$-hole
163: and $s$-hole states to be several percent, respectively.
164: However, the emission probabilities from the $s$-hole state around 25~MeV
165: excitation are uncertain.
166: The $s$-hole state de-excites mostly by particle emissions, because
167: the excitation energy exceeds the particle emission threshold (10.21~MeV for
168: proton decay and 10.83~MeV for neutron decay).
169: If the residual nucleus remains in an excited state, secondary $\gamma$-rays
170: are emitted.
171: Ejiri statistically evaluated the emission probabilities
172: by $P(k)=S_p(s{\rm -state})/8*S_p^{\prime}(k)/N_p*b(N)$, where
173: $S_p^{\prime}(k)$ is the spectroscopic factor of the excited state $k$
174: in the daughter nucleus, $N_p$ (=11) is the number of $p$-shell nucleons in
175: $^{15}$N, and $b(N)$ is the escape ratio of the nucleon.
176: The excited states most likely to be populated were the 7.01~MeV $2^+$ state
177: in $^{14}$C and the 7.03~MeV $2^+$ state in $^{14}$N each with $P(k)=2\%$.
178:
179: However, a recent study~\cite{yosoi} showed that the particle-decay data
180: of deep-hole states in light nuclei cannot be reproduced in a
181: statistical-model calculation.
182: The probability to remain the secondary excited states after particle
183: emissions of the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N was found to be high.
184: The results suggested that the direct two-body decay process from the
185: door-way $s$-hole state predicted by the theoretical calculations based on a
186: SU(3)-model~\cite{yamada} and a shell model~\cite{yamada2} considerably occurred.
187: Thus, from a nuclear-structure point of view, it is also interesting to
188: measure such secondary de-excitation $\gamma$-rays.
189:
190: After the work by Ejiri~\cite{ejiri}, the spectroscopic factors of $p$-hole
191: state have been investigated in an $^{16}$O$(e,e^{\prime}p)^{15}$N
192: experiment~\cite{leus}.
193: The result suggests that the spectroscopic factors in the $p$-shell orbits
194: are substantially lower than the sum-rule limit ($S_p(p_{3/2})=4$) in the
195: independent-particle shell-model; the spectroscopic factor of the 6.32~MeV
196: $p$-state is smaller than that given by Ref.~\cite{ejiri} by 30\% as shown in
197: Table~\ref{tab:comp}.
198: The difference is mainly due to a large theoretical uncertainty associated
199: with the reaction mechanism.
200: The spectroscopic factor derived from transfer reactions strongly
201: depends on the delicate details of the distorted wave Born
202: approximation~\cite{d3here}.
203: This result indicates that the direct measurement of $\gamma$-rays from
204: the $s$-hole state is important.
205: \begin{center}
206: \begin{table}
207: \caption{\label{tab:comp} Comparison of spectroscopic factors of the dominant $p$-hole states in $^{15}$N. The data are taken from Ref.~\cite{ejiri} and \cite{leus}. }
208: \begin{tabular}{cc@{\hspace{0.5cm}}c@{\hspace{0.3cm}}c}
209: \hline
210: \hline
211: Energy (MeV) & J$^{\pi}$ & Ref.~\cite{ejiri} & Ref.~\cite{leus}\\
212: \hline
213: 0 & 1/2$^-$ & 2 & 1.26 \\
214: 5.27 & 5/2$^+$ & --- & 0.11 \\
215: 6.32 & 3/2$^-$ & 3.3 & 2.35 \\
216: 9.93 & 3/2$^-$ & 0.26 & 0.13 \\
217: \hline
218: \hline
219: \end{tabular}
220: \end{table}
221: \end{center}
222:
223: The nucleon-hole state is created via any modes of nucleon decay.
224: The de-excitation $\gamma$-ray is a mode-independent signal of the
225: nucleon decay.
226: If the decay particles do not emit Cherenkov light (for example in \tnu decay),
227: the only detectable signal is Cherenkov light from the $\gamma$-ray.
228: Since in the energy region below 10~MeV the signal in the \sk is
229: contaminated by strong backgrounds from radioactivities, $\gamma$-rays with
230: $E_{\gamma}>$10~MeV are useful to tag the nucleon decay.
231: Though the energies of most $\gamma$-rays from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N
232: are expected to be less than 10~MeV, two different $\gamma$-rays
233: over 10~MeV can be emitted.
234: One is the direct $\gamma$-ray with $E_{\gamma}$=20--30~MeV from the unbound
235: $s$-hole state.
236: However, it was estimated that the emission probability is quite
237: small~\cite{n3nukam}.
238: The other is a unique 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray which can be emitted mainly
239: from the T=1~$1^+$ state in $^{12}$C after $t$~decay, $n$+$d$~decay, or
240: 2$n$+$p$~decay from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N.
241: This $\gamma$-ray is useful to tag the mode-independent nucleon decay
242: with small backgrounds in \sk.
243:
244: In this paper, we present the first measurement of the de-excitation
245: $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma}<$18~MeV from the $s$-hole state in
246: $^{15}$N produced via the \ox reaction.
247: These $\gamma$-rays are useful for the proton decay search and the study
248: of neutrino neutral-current interaction.
249: Especially, in the dominant method of proton decay search via \nukp
250: in \sk, the partial lifetime of proton is estimated to be proportional
251: to the emission probability of the de-excitation $\gamma$-ray.
252: Therefore, this measurement is important to obtain the precise emission
253: probability.
254: It is also important for determining the proton decay sensitivity in future
255: experiments~\cite{uno,hk}.
256: In terms of the 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $^{12}$C~1$^+$ state,
257: even if the emission probability of this $\gamma$-ray is down to
258: 0.01\%, it would provide a new method to search for mode-independent
259: nucleon decay above the current decay limit obtained by SNO~\cite{sno}.
260: Because the proton $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N and neutron $s$-hole state
261: in $^{15}$O are isospin-symmetric, the $^{12}$C~1$^+$ state is expected
262: to be produced similarly.
263: The present measurement is also useful for neutron decay search,
264: such as \tnu mode.
265:
266: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
267: \section{\label{sec:exp}Experiment}
268: The experiment was carried out at the Research Center for
269: Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University using
270: 392~MeV proton beam from the cyclotron facility~\cite{beam}.
271: The proton beam impinged on a H$_2$O ice target~\cite{kawa} in order
272: to generate the \ox reaction.
273: Two protons were detected in coincidence in the dual magnetic spectrometer
274: system, consisting of Grand Raiden (GR)~\cite{gr} and Large Acceptance
275: Spectrometer (LAS)~\cite{las}.
276: Both GR and LAS consisted of magnets, two multi-wire drift chambers (MWDCs),
277: and two plastic scintillators.
278: The laboratory angles of GR (25.5$^{\circ}$) and LAS (51.0$^{\circ}$)
279: relative to the beam and their magnetic fields were chosen to maximize
280: the cross section of the ($p,2p$) reaction leading to the $s$-hole state
281: when the recoil momentum of the residual nucleus is zero.
282: The $\Delta E$ signals of the plastic scintillators were used for particle
283: identification, and were also used as trigger signals.
284: The solid angles of the spectrometers were 4.3~msr for GR and 20.0~msr for
285: LAS, respectively.
286: The momenta and scattering angles of protons were determined by a ray-tracing
287: technique with MWDCs.
288: The experimental details for the production of $s$-hole states in light
289: nuclei via the ($p,2p$) reaction were reported in Refs.~\cite{yosoi,yosoi2}.
290:
291: The de-excitation $\gamma$-rays were measured by three arrays of
292: NaI (Tl) detectors in coincidence with two protons.
293: Each detector array consisted of nine NaI scintillators with sizes of
294: 5.1~cm $\times$ 5.1~cm $\times$ 15.2~cm.
295: Three arrays were mounted at distances of 21.7~cm, 21.7~cm, and 26.8~cm
296: from the target and at scattering angles of 117.4$^{\circ}$, 117.4$^{\circ}$,
297: and 147.5$^{\circ}$ with respect to the beam direction, respectively.
298: The total solid angle covered for the $\gamma$-ray detection was about 1.3~sr.
299: The scintillating light was measured by photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and
300: the pulse height and timing were recorded.
301:
302: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
303: \section{\label{sec:ana}Analysis}
304: To identify the hole state, the excitation energy ($E_x$) is evaluated
305: from the energies of two emerging protons measured by GR and LAS as follows:
306: \begin{equation}
307: {\bf k}_3 = {\bf k}_0 - {\bf k}_1 - {\bf k}_2
308: \label{eq:mom}
309: \end{equation}
310: \begin{equation}
311: E_x - Q = T_0 - (T_1 + T_2 + T_3),
312: \label{eq:ene}
313: \end{equation}
314: where ${\bf k}_i$ and $T_i$ are the momenta and kinetic energies of the
315: incident proton ($i$=0), the emerging protons ($i$=1,2), and the recoiling
316: residual nucleus ($i$=3), respectively.
317: The $Q$-value is given by $Q=M-(m_p+M^{\prime})$, where $M$, $M^{\prime}$, and
318: $m_p$ are the masses of the target $^{16}$O, residual nucleus $^{15}$N, and
319: proton, respectively.
320: \begin{figure*}[tbp]
321: \includegraphics[width=14.cm]{./p2p.eps}
322: \caption{\label{fig:miss} (a) The two-dimensional scatter plot of the kinetic energies of two protons ($E_p$) measured by GR and LAS in the \ox reaction. (b) The excitation energy spectrum of $^{15}$N induced by the \ox reaction. The region shown by an arrow is scaled by 1/10. In the analyses of the $\gamma$-ray from the $s$-hole state, we use the coincident data with two protons in the regions A ($E_x$=16--20~MeV), B ($E_x$=20--30~MeV), and C ($E_x$=30--40~MeV). }
323: \end{figure*}
324: Figure~\ref{fig:miss} shows: (a) the two-dimensional scatter plot of the
325: kinetic energies of two protons measured by GR and LAS, (b) the excitation
326: energy spectrum of $^{15}$N induced by the \ox reaction after the accidental
327: coincidence background is subtracted.
328: The $s$-hole state is strongly excited in the higher excitation energy
329: region ($E_x \ge$ 16~MeV) and splits into a few sub-structures.
330: This structure agrees qualitatively with the result of recent shell-model
331: calculation~\cite{yamada2}.
332: Two peaks at 0.0 and 6.32~MeV correspond to the $p$ $1/2^-$ and $3/2^-$ hole
333: states, respectively.
334: The small amounts of the $p$~$3/2^-$ strength are also fragmented to the
335: states of 9.93~MeV and 10.7~MeV.
336:
337: In the analysis of the $\gamma$-rays from the hole states in $^{15}$N,
338: we use the independent signal of each NaI scintillator to determine the
339: $\gamma$-ray energy.
340: Since we take the timing data of the proton beam and NaI scintillator hit,
341: the accidental coincidence backgrounds are estimated by using the events
342: in the neighboring beam bunches of the true coincident timing.
343: Using the 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $3/2^-$ state, the time variation of
344: each PMT gain is monitored and corrected for. The 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray data
345: is obtained by gating on $E_x$=5.3--7.3~MeV as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:p6mev}.
346: In the following analysis, to estimate the $\gamma$-ray emission probabilities
347: from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N, we generate $\gamma$-ray Monte Carlo
348: (MC) simulations.
349: We use GEANT 3 package~\cite{mc} for simulation of particle tracking.
350: The energy resolutions of the $\gamma$-ray detectors are taken into
351: account from the 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray data.
352:
353: \begin{figure}[tbp]
354: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm]{./result0632.eps}
355: \caption{\label{fig:p6mev} The coincidence $\gamma$-ray spectrum with the NaI scintillators obtained by gating on the peak at $E_x$=5.3--7.3~MeV in the \ox reaction. The open circles and histogram show the data and 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray MC, respectively.}
356: \end{figure}
357:
358: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
359: \subsection{\label{sec:sstate}$\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma}<10$~MeV }
360: Figure~\ref{fig:scheme} shows the decay scheme of the $s$-hole state
361: in $^{15}$N.
362: From the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N, different particles are emitted.
363: In Ref.~\cite{yosoi}, the yields of these emitted particles were measured
364: with their energies.
365: The fraction of the $\alpha$ emission was found to be very small and excited
366: levels fed by proton, neutron, deuteron, and triton emissions were
367: observed.
368: Some of the residual nuclei remained in an excited state below the
369: particle re-emission threshold.
370: This indicates that secondary $\gamma$-rays are emitted.
371: \begin{figure}[tbp]
372: \includegraphics[width=8.cm]{./decayscheme.eps}
373: \caption{\label{fig:scheme} A decay scheme from the $s$-hole state in
374: $^{15}$N~\cite{scheme}. The bold solid lines show ground states.
375: The narrow solid lines show all the possible excited states to emit
376: de-excitation $\gamma$-rays below particle emission thresholds
377: (the break lines), except for the 15.1~MeV state. The states in
378: $^{13}$C are also fed by $p$+$n$~decay, and the states in $^{12}$C are
379: fed by $d$+$n$~decay and $p$+$n$+$n$~decay. We do not show the
380: $^{13}$N+$n$+$n$~decay since the two-neutron emission threshold is high (21.39~MeV).}
381: \end{figure}
382: \begin{table}
383: \begin{center}
384: \caption{\label{tab:fitstate} Candidate states to be generated by a particle emission from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N~\cite{scheme}. The emission probabilities for the $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma}>3$~MeV are shown. $N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$ are obtained from the fitting. The numbers in the parentheses in the $N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$ are the sums of $N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$ at the 7.01~MeV state in $^{14}$C and the 7.03~MeV state in $^{14}$N and at the 6.09, 6.59, and 6.90~MeV states in $^{14}$C, respectively.}
385: \begin{tabular}{cD..{1.2}lD..{1.9}D..{1.2}}
386: \hline
387: \hline
388: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Energy level} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\gamma$-ray energy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{}\\
389: Decay scheme & \multicolumn{2}{c}{MeV (J$^{\pi}$)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{MeV (ratio)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$}\\
390: \hline
391: \hline
392: $^{13}$C+$d$ & 3.09 &(1/2$^+$) & 3.09\ (100\%)& 3.0\%\\
393: \hline
394: $^{13}$C+$d$ & 3.68 &(3/2$^+$) & 3.68\ (99.3\%)& 4.2\%\\
395: \hline
396: $^{13}$C+$d$ & 3.85 &(5/2$^+$) & 3.09\ (1.20\%)& 4.6\%\\
397: & & & 3.68\ (36.3\%)&\\
398: & & & 3.85\ (62.5\%)&\\
399: \hline
400: $^{12}$C+$t$ & 4.44 & (2$^+$) & 4.44\ (100\%)& 5.8\%\\
401: \hline
402: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 4.92 &(0$^-$) & 4.92\ (97\%)& 5.2\%\\
403: \hline
404: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 5.11 &(2$^-$) & 5.11\ (79.9\%)& 0.0\%\\
405: \hline
406: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 5.69 &(1$^-$) & 3.38\ (63.9\%)& 4.5\%\\
407: & & & 5.69\ (36.1\%)& \\
408: \hline
409: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 5.83 &(3$^-$) & 5.11\ (62.9\%)& 0.54\%\\
410: & & & 5.83\ (21.3\%)&\\
411: \hline
412: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 6.20 &(1$^+$) & 3.89\ (76.9\%)& 0.0\%\\
413: & & & 6.20\ (23.1\%)&\\
414: \hline
415: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 6.45 &(3$^+$) & 5.11\ (8.1\%)& 2.8\%\\
416: & & & 6.44\ (70.1\%)&\\
417: \hline
418: $^{14}$N+$n$ & 7.03 &(2$^+$) & 7.03\ (98.6\%)&(6.7\%)\\
419: \hline
420: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 6.09 &(1$^-$) & 6.09\ (100\%)& (0.0\%)\\
421: \hline
422: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 6.59 &(0$^+$) & 6.09\ (98.9\%)& (0.0\%)\\
423: \hline
424: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 6.73 &(3$^-$) & 6.09\ (3.6\%)& 0.43\%\\
425: & & & 6.73\ (96.4\%)&\\
426: \hline
427: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 6.90 &(0$^-$) & 6.09\ (100\%)& (0.0\%)\\
428: \hline
429: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 7.01 &(2$^+$) & 6.09\ (1.4\%)&(6.7\%)\\
430: & & & 7.01\ (98.6\%)&\\
431: \hline
432: $^{14}$C+$p$ & 7.34 &(2$^-$) & 6.09\ (49.0\%)& 5.7\%\\
433: & & & 6.73\ (34.3\%)&\\
434: & & & 7.34\ (16.7\%)&\\
435: \hline
436: \hline
437: \end{tabular}
438: \end{center}
439: \end{table}
440:
441: The $\gamma$-ray data from the $s$-hole state are obtained by gating the
442: two-proton events in the excitation-energy region at $E_x$=16-40~MeV.
443: In the higher excitation-energy region, the signal-to-noise ratio becomes
444: worse, because the detection efficiencies decrease gradually due to the
445: finite momentum acceptance of the spectrometers.
446: Therefore, we do not use the data with $E_x>$40~MeV.
447: The $s$-hole state has sub-structures as mentioned above.
448: To specify $\gamma$-ray emissions from each sub-structure, the data is
449: divided into three regions,
450: $E_x$=16--20~MeV, $E_x$=20--30~MeV, and $E_x$=30--40~MeV,
451: which are indicated as A,B, and C in Fig.~\ref{fig:miss} (b), respectively.
452: Figure~\ref{fig:shole} shows the $\gamma$-ray energy distributions obtained
453: by gating the two-proton events in these three excitation-energy regions.
454: High energy $\gamma$-rays which are within the detectable range in \sk
455: are clearly observed in Fig.~\ref{fig:shole} (b) and (c).
456:
457: In order to obtain accurate values for these $\gamma$-ray emission
458: probabilities, we fit the data with the associated $\gamma$-ray MC simulations.
459: We use the $\gamma$-ray data $E_{\gamma}$=3.0--7.4~MeV.
460: Because many kinds of $\gamma$-ray energy are associated,
461: we do not analyze data at $E_{\gamma}<$3.0~MeV.
462: An upper limit on the $\gamma$-ray gate energy of $E_{\gamma}<$7.4~MeV
463: is chosen because the highest excitation energy of the associated states
464: below the particle emission thresholds is 7.34~MeV, as shown in
465: Fig.~\ref{fig:scheme}.
466:
467: From the excited states in Fig.~\ref{fig:scheme}, we choose
468: candidate excited states that emit the $\gamma$-rays as listed in
469: Table~\ref{tab:fitstate} for fitting.
470: We omit the 3.95~MeV state in $^{14}$N because it
471: mostly de-excites with $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma}<$3.0~MeV.
472: Since the energies of two $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma}$=7.01~MeV
473: and 7.03~MeV are very close, we treat these two $\gamma$-rays as
474: mono-energetic.
475: We generate sixteen $\gamma$-rays in the MC simulations for seventeen
476: states in total.
477: We then estimate the yield of the states by fitting the $\gamma$-ray data
478: with these MC simulations.
479: The result of the best fitted MC simulations are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:shole}
480: (a), (b), and (c) in comparison with the data.
481: The fitted lines reproduce the data well.
482: \begin{figure*}[tbp]
483: \includegraphics[width=5.7cm]{./shole1.eps}
484: \includegraphics[width=5.7cm]{./shole2.eps}
485: \includegraphics[width=5.7cm]{./shole3.eps}
486: \caption{\label{fig:shole} The energy spectrum of $\gamma$-rays from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N after subtracting accidental coincidence background. Each figure is obtained in coincidence by gating two proton events in the excitation-energy regions at (a) $E_x$=16--20~MeV, (b) $E_x$=20--30~MeV, and (c) $E_x$=30--40~MeV via the \ox reaction. The closed circles and lines show the data and the results of the best fitted MC simulations, respectively.}
487: \end{figure*}
488:
489: From the fitting result, the branching ratio to the state $k$
490: ($N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$) is evaluated, where $N(k)$ is the number of events
491: at the state $k$ and $N_{\rm tot}$ (=2.49$\times 10^{6}$) is the number
492: of two-proton events in the excitation-energy region at $E_x$=16--40~MeV
493: in $^{15}$N.
494: These branching ratios are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:fitstate}.
495: Since Cherenkov light is generated from all decay $\gamma$-rays,
496: the total de-excitation energy of $\gamma$~decay ($E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$)
497: determines the amount of Cherenkov light.
498: These states de-excite only by emitting one or more $\gamma$-rays.
499: Therefore, $N(k)/N_{\rm tot}$ corresponds to the $\gamma$-ray emission
500: branching ratio with the total energy of $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$ equivalent to
501: the excitation energy of the state $k$.
502: In \sk, $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV are well within
503: the detectable energy range for the \nukp analysis, and $\gamma$-rays with
504: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV are in the partially detectable range.
505: Therefore, we estimate the summed branching ratios of the $\gamma$-ray
506: emission with $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV and
507: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV, and also estimate the systematic
508: uncertainties of $\sum_k N(k)$ as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:syserr}.
509: We take into account the following systematic uncertainties: imperfect
510: knowledge of $\gamma$-ray energy scale, detector acceptance, and
511: selection of the fitting states.
512: From the 0.2~MeV error of the energy scale, we estimated
513: the uncertainty to be $^{+1.6}_{-5.4}$\% and $^{+9.9}_{-3.4}$\% for
514: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV and $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV,
515: respectively.
516: The uncertainty of the detector acceptance is estimated to be 3.4\%
517: using the 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $3/2^-$ $p$-hole state, because
518: its decay branching ratio is 100\%.
519: To check the effect of the selection of the fitting states, we apply the same
520: fitting method omitting any one of the fourteen states.
521: We take the largest difference from the original result as the uncertainty.
522: The summed emission branching ratios ($\sum_k (N(k)/N_{\rm tot})$)
523: with their systematic uncertainties are estimated to be \resbra for
524: $\gamma$-rays with $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV and
525: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV, respectively.
526: This means that the large amount (about a half) of the $s$-hole state
527: decays to the excited states of daughter nuclei after the particle
528: emissions, which agrees with the results of particle-decay
529: measurement~\cite{yosoi} and supports the theoretical prediction by the
530: SU(3) model~\cite{yamada}.
531:
532: {\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.4}
533: \begin{table}
534: \begin{center}
535: \caption{\label{tab:syserr} Summary of systematic uncertainties (\%) of $\sum_k N(k)$ with $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV and $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV.}
536: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
537: \hline
538: \hline
539: & $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV & $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV\\
540: \hline
541: energy scale & $^{+1.6}_{-5.4}$\% & $^{+9.9}_{-3.4}$\% \\
542: detector acceptance & $\pm$3.4\% & $\pm$3.4\% \\
543: state selection & $^{+0.90}_{-0.72}$\% & $^{+5.8}_{-8.0}$\% \\
544: %background from non $s$-hole states & $\pm$7.5\% & $\pm$7.5\% \\
545: \hline
546: total & $^{+3.9}_{-6.4}$\% & $^{+12.}_{-9.3}$\% \\
547: \hline
548: \hline
549: \end{tabular}
550: \end{center}
551: \end{table}
552: }
553: We evaluate the total $\gamma$-ray emission
554: probabilities from the $s$-hole state associated with proton decay
555: in $^{16}$O.
556: The emission probabilities ($P(k)$) are evaluated using the equation
557: $P(k) = (S_p(s{\rm -state})/8)\times(N(k)/N_{\rm tot})$.
558: The spectroscopic factor of the $s$-hole state in the excitation-energy
559: region at $E_x$=16--40~MeV is estimated to be 1.6 using the
560: distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) calculation~\cite{yosoi,yosoi3}.
561: The uncertainty of the spectroscopic factor is estimated to be about 10\%
562: from the DWIA calculations using different optical potentials.
563: The total $\gamma$-ray emission probabilities with
564: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV and $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV are
565: estimated to be \respro, respectively.
566: Because some extra $s$-hole strengths still exist at $E_x >$ 40~MeV, the total
567: emission probability for the whole $s$-hole state become slightly larger.
568: In addition to the simple direct knockout ($p,2p$) reaction, the multi-step
569: processes or correlated processes like ($p,3p$) and ($p,2pn$) reactions
570: contribute the excitation spectrum.
571: $N_{\rm tot}$ includes such non-quasi-free contributions.
572: The difference between $(N(k)/N_{\rm tot})_{s-hole}$ and $(N(k)/N_{\rm tot})$
573: is estimated to be 15\% for the extreme case that $N(k)$
574: is zero for the non-quasi-free process.
575: The proton decay is a slightly different process from the ($p,2p$) reaction,
576: because the nuclear medium could affect the proton decay and not leave
577: a simple hole state. The fraction of the correlated decay is estimated to be
578: 10\% by Ref.~\cite{yamazaki}. In this paper, we evaluate the emission
579: probabilities without this effect.
580:
581: The $\gamma$-ray emission probabilities estimated for the 7.01 and 7.03~MeV
582: states are less than half of Ejiri's estimate~\cite{ejiri}.
583: However, we found a few excited states to emit $\gamma$-rays
584: with $E_{\gamma}>6$~MeV.
585: Compared to the 4\% $\gamma$-ray emission probability with
586: $E_{\gamma}>6$~MeV estimated by Ejiri,
587: our emission probabilities are estimated to be 3.1\%.
588: On the basis of the $(e,e^{\prime}p)$ result~\cite{leus}, the dominant
589: 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $3/2^-$ $p$-hole state is expected to
590: be emitted with 29\%
591: ($P(6.32{\rm \ MeV\ } p_{3/2^-})=S_p(6.32{\rm \ MeV\ }p_{3/2^-})/8=2.35/8$).
592: The emission probabilities of 3.1\% with $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}>6$~MeV
593: is found to be about 1/10 compared with that of the 6.32~MeV $\gamma$-ray.
594: Moreover, we found that the emission probability with
595: $E_{\gamma,{\rm tot}}$=3--6~MeV is high, though no $\gamma$-rays are quoted
596: in this energy region in Ref.~\cite{ejiri}.
597: Especially, the 4.4~MeV $\gamma$-ray emission mainly from the
598: $^{12}$C+$t$~decay is strong, despite the high $Q$-value.
599: This is consistent with the result of the particle-decay
600: measurement~\cite{yosoi}.
601: The reason why the triton decay probability is higher than that of
602: $\alpha$~decay is theoretically explained by the selection rule
603: obtained from the spatial SU(3) symmetry~\cite{yamada}.
604:
605: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
606: \subsection{\label{sec:15mev}15.1MeV $\gamma$-ray}
607: A 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray is emitted mainly from the T=1,~$1^+$ state in
608: $^{12}$C which might be made from the $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N$^*$.
609: In the $\gamma$-ray data obtained by gating on the $s$-hole events in
610: the excitation-energy region at $E_x$=16--40~MeV,
611: we search for a signal in the energy region at $E_{\gamma}$=10--15.7~MeV,
612: where the peak is expected to be located based on the MC study.
613: Figures~\ref{fig:15mev} (a) and (b) show the 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray MC
614: simulation and data, respectively.
615: We do not find any significant excess within the statistical uncertainty.
616: The limit on the total emission probability including the $s$-hole strength
617: of the 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray is estimated to be 0.38\% at 99\% confidence
618: level.
619:
620: The branching ratio of the door-way $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N to the
621: T=1,~1$^+$ state in $^{12}$C has been recently calculated in the same
622: manner as used in Ref.~\cite{yamada2}.
623: The obtained value is about 0.04\%~\cite{c15theo}.
624: Taking into account the 15.1~MeV emission branching ratio from T=1,~$1^+$
625: state in $^{12}$C and the spectroscopic factor of the $s$-hole state in
626: $^{15}$N, the total emission probability is predicted to be $\sim$0.007\%.
627: Although the statistical decay process from the $s$-hole state might
628: contribute to produce the 15.1~MeV state in $^{12}$C, much more
629: statistics of the data is needed to find out the signal of 15.1~MeV
630: $\gamma$-ray.
631:
632: \begin{figure}[tbp]
633: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm]{./result1511.eps}
634: \caption{\label{fig:15mev} The $\gamma$-ray energy distribution obtained by gating two-proton events in coincidence in the excitation-energy region at $E_x$=16--40~MeV via the \ox reaction. The MC simulations of the 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray (a) and data with statistical errors (b) are shown, respectively.}
635: \end{figure}
636:
637: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
638: \section{\label{sec:concl}Conclusion}
639: We studied the de-excitation $\gamma$-rays from the excitation of the
640: $s$-hole state in $^{15}$N via the \ox reaction.
641: The emission branching ratio of $\gamma$-rays with more-than-6~MeV and
642: 3--6~MeV from the $s$-hole state in the excitation-energy region of 16
643: to 40~MeV are estimated to be \resbra, respectively.
644: If we take into account the spectroscopic factor of the $s$-hole state,
645: the total emission probabilities are found to be \respro, respectively.
646: In water Cherenkov detector experiments, it is important to understand the
647: decay process with $\gamma$-rays from the proton-hole state in $^{15}$N.
648: Especially for the proton decay search via \nukp in \sk, this result is
649: useful to reduce the systematic uncertainty of the detection efficiency.
650: Moreover, we searched for the 15.1~MeV $\gamma$-ray from the $s$-hole state.
651: However, we do not find any signal. We estimate the upper limit on
652: the emission probability to be 0.38\% at 99\% confidence level.
653:
654:
655: \section{\label{sec:ack}Acknowledgments}
656: We are grateful to the RCNP cyclotron staff for preparing a stable and clean
657: beam.
658: This research was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
659: Research Nos.~07404010 and 09440105 from the Japan Ministry of Education,
660: Sports, Culture, Science, and Technology.
661:
662: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
663: \begin{thebibliography}{200}
664: \bibitem{sk}{Y.~Fukuda {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A {\bf 501}, 418 (2003).}
665: \bibitem{nuk}{K.~Kobayashi {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 052007 (2005).}
666: \bibitem{susygut1}{N.~Sakai and T.~Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B197}, 533 (1982).}
667: \bibitem{susygut2}{J.~Ellis, D.V.~Nanopoulos and S.~Rudaz, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B202}, 43. (1982).}
668: \bibitem{susygut3}{P.~Nath, A.H.~Chamseddine and R.~Arnowitt, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 32}, 2348 (1985);
669: P.~Nath and R.~Arnowitt, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 38}, 1479 (1988).}
670: \bibitem{susygut4}{J.~Hisano, H.~Murayama and T.~Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B402}, 46 (1993).}
671: \bibitem{susygut5}{K.~S.Babu, J.C.~Pati and F.~Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 423}, 337 (1998).}
672: \bibitem{k2k1kt}{S.~Nakayama, PhD thesis, Univ. of Tokyo, 2003.}
673: \bibitem{ejiri}{H.~Ejiri, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 48}, 1442 (1993).}
674: \bibitem{sp6mev}{J.C.~Hiebert, E.~Newman and R.H.~Bassel, Phys. Rev. {\bf 154}, 898 (1967).}
675: \bibitem{yosoi}{M.~Yosoi, PhD thesis, Univ. of Kyoto, 2003;
676: M.~Yosoi {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A738}, 451 (2004);
677: M.~Yosoi {\it et al.}, Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 67}, 1810 (2004).}
678: \bibitem{yamada}{T.~Yamada, M.~Takahashi and K.~Ikeda, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 53}, 752 (1996).}
679: \bibitem{yamada2}{T.~Yamada, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A687}, 297 (2001);
680: T.~Yamada, M.~Yosoi and H.~Toyokawa, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A738}, 323 (2004).}
681: \bibitem{leus}{M.~Leuschner {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 49}, 955 (1994).}
682: \bibitem{d3here}{ G.J.~Kramer, H.P.~Blok, and L.~Lapikas, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A679}, 267 (2001).}
683: \bibitem{n3nukam}{ Y.~Suzuki {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 311}, 357 (1993).}
684: \bibitem{uno}{ C.K.~Jung, hep-ex/0005046.}
685: \bibitem{hk}{ K.~Nakamura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A{\bf 18}, 4053 (2003).}
686: \bibitem{sno}{ Yu.G.~Zdesenko and V.I.~Tretyak, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 553}, 135 (2003);
687: S.N.~Ahmed {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 102004 (2004).}
688: \bibitem{beam}{I.~Miura {\it et al.}, in {\it proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Vancouver, 1992}, edited by G.~Dutte and M.K.~Craddock (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993);
689: T.~Wakasa {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A {\bf 482}, 79 (2002).}
690: \bibitem{kawa}{T.~Kawabata {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A {\bf 459}, 171 (2001).}
691: \bibitem{gr}{M.~Fujiwara {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A {\bf 422}, 484 (1999).}
692: \bibitem{las}{M.~Matsuoka {\it et al.}, RCNP annual report, 1991, p.186; 1990, p.235.}
693: \bibitem{yosoi2}{M.~Yosoi {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 551}, 255 (2003).}
694: \bibitem{mc}{R.~Brun and F.~Carminati, CERN Programming Library Report No. W5013, 1993 (unpublished).}
695: \bibitem{scheme}{F.~Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A506}, 1 (1990);
696: F.~Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A523}, 1 (1991).}
697: \bibitem{yosoi3}{M.~Yosoi {\it et al.}, RCNP annual report, 2001, p.43.}
698: \bibitem{yamazaki}{T.~Yamazaki and Y~Akaishi, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 453}, 1 (1999).}
699: \bibitem{c15theo}{T.~Yamada, private communication.}
700: \end{thebibliography}
701:
702: \end{document}
703: