1: \pagestyle{plain}
2: \section{Overview}
3: \pagestyle{plain}
4: %%%%%
5: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
6: \begin{center}
7: \epsfig{file=analysis_e01001.eps,width=4in}
8: \end{center}
9: \caption[E01-001 experiment analysis flow chart.]
10: {E01-001 experiment analysis flow chart.}
11: \label{fig:e01001_flow_chart}
12: \end{figure}
13: %%%%%
14:
15: In this chapter I will present the procedure used to extract the
16: e-p reduced cross section $\sigma_{R}$. Figure \ref{fig:e01001_flow_chart}
17: shows a flow chart of the procedure used. First, ESPACE generates HBOOKs
18: for a list of LH$_2$ and dummy target runs in a particular kinematics which are read by Recon
19: (section \ref{recon}). Recon applies a set of cuts and corrections on an event-by-event basis and
20: generates a new HBOOK file for each run on the list. In addition, Recon generates the $\Delta P$ spectrum
21: for each LH$_2$ and dummy run on the list. For each kinematics the $\Delta P$ spectra from all of the
22: LH$_2$ and dummy runs are added separately after applying a new set of cuts to form the final $\Delta P$
23: spectrum for both LH$_2$ and dummy (section \ref{add_histo}). The final $\Delta P$ spectrum for both the
24: LH$_2$ and the dummy is then normalized to its total $Q_{eff}$ (section \ref{qeff}). The final corrected dummy
25: $\Delta P$ spectrum is subtracted from the final corrected LH$_2$ $\Delta P$ spectrum.
26: Monte Carlo simulations of the $\gamma p \to \pi^{0} p$ and $\gamma p \to \gamma p$ backgrounds are
27: performed (section \ref{pi0}), and then normalized and subtracted from the final corrected LH$_2$ $\Delta P$
28: spectrum to produce the residual elastic e-p spectrum. The net number of the elastic e-p events is then compared
29: to the number of elastic events in the e-p peak as simulated using the Monte Carlo simulation program SIMC
30: (section \ref{ep_simc}) in a window in the $\Delta P$ spectrum. The reduced cross section $\sigma_{R}$ is taken
31: as the value of the input e-p cross section used in the simulation normalized by the ratio of number of elastic
32: events in the data to that in the simulation (section \ref{sigma_R}). Finally, a linear fit of
33: $\sigma_{R}$ to $\varepsilon$ gives $\tau G_{Mp}^2(Q^2)$ as the intercept and $G_{Ep}^2(Q^2)$ as the
34: slope.
35: