1: % 07.07.2000
2: \documentstyle[11pt,appb,epsfig]{article}
3: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
4: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
6: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
7: \newcommand{\aein}{\hspace*{.5cm}}
8: \renewcommand{\d}{\partial}
9: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber\\}
10: \newcommand{\BUU}{Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck}
11: %--------------------------------------------------
12: %
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{PERSPECTIVES OF SCALAR- AND VECTOR-MESON PRODUCTION IN
15: HADRON-NUCLEUS REACTIONS\footnote{Supported by BMBF, FZ J\"ulich
16: and the Heisenberg-Landau program }}
17: \author{W. CASSING\thanks{In collaboration with E. L. Bratkovskaya, M. B\"uscher,
18: Ye. S. Golubeva, V. Grishina, V. Hejny, L. A. Kondratyuk, G. I.
19: Lykasov, M. V. Rzjanin, A. Sibirtsev, H. Str\"oher}
20: \\ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Giessen \\
21: D-35392 Giessen, Germany}
22: \date{ }
23: \maketitle
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: The production and decay of vector mesons ($\rho, \omega$) in $pA$
28: reactions at COSY energies is studied with particular emphasis on
29: their in-medium spectral functions. It is explored within
30: transport calculations, if hadronic in-medium decays like
31: $\pi^+\pi^-$ or $\pi^0 \gamma$ might provide complementary
32: information to their dilepton ($e^+e^-$) decays. Whereas the
33: $\pi^+ \pi^-$ signal from the $\rho$-meson is found to be
34: strongly distorted by pion rescattering, the $\omega$-meson Dalitz
35: decay to $\pi^0 \gamma$ appears promising even for more heavy
36: nuclei. The perspectives of scalar meson ($f_0, a_0$) production
37: in $pp$ reactions are investigated within a boson-exchange model
38: indicating that the $f_0$-meson might hardly be detected in these
39: collisions in the $K \bar{K}$ or $\pi \pi$ decay channels whereas
40: the exclusive channel $pp \rightarrow d a_0^+$ looks very
41: promising.
42: \end{abstract}
43: \maketitle
44:
45: PACS numbers: 13.25.-k; 13.60.Le; 13.75.-n
46:
47: \section{Introduction}
48: The modification of the vector meson properties~\cite{Medium} --
49: \cite{Medium6} in nuclear matter has become a challenging subject
50: in dilepton physics from $\pi^- A$, $p A$ and $A A$ collisions.
51: Here the dilepton ($e^+e^-$) radiation from $\rho$'s and
52: $\omega$'s propagating in finite density nuclear matter is
53: directly proportional to their spectral function which becomes
54: distorted in the medium due to the interactions with
55: nucleons~\cite{Propagation} -- \cite{m6}. Apart from the vacuum
56: width $\Gamma^0_V \ (V= \rho, \omega$) these modifications are
57: described by the real and imaginary part of the retarded self
58: energies $\Sigma_V$, where the real part $\Re \Sigma_V$ yields a
59: shift of the meson mass pole and the additional imaginary part
60: $\Im \Sigma_V$ (half) the collisional broadening of the vector
61: meson in the medium. We recall that the meson self energy in the
62: $t-\rho$ approximation is proportional to the complex forward $V
63: N$ scattering amplitude $f_{VN}(P,0)$ and the nuclear density
64: $\rho(X)$, i.e. $ \Sigma_V(P,X) = - 4 \pi \rho(X) f_{V N}(P,0)$.
65: The scattering amplitude itself, furthermore, obeys dispersion
66: relations between the real and imaginary parts
67: \cite{Dispersion,d2,d3} while the imaginary part can be determined
68: from the total $V N$ cross section according to the optical
69: theorem. Thus the vector meson spectral function
70: \begin{eqnarray}
71: A_V(X,\!P){=}\frac{\Gamma_V (X,\!P)}{(P^2{-}
72: M_{V}^{2}{-}\Re\Sigma_V(X,\!P))^{2}{+} \Gamma_V (X,\!P)^{2}/4} ,
73: \label{spectral}
74: \end{eqnarray}
75: where $\Gamma_V(X,P){=}{-}2\Im\Sigma_V(X,P)$, can be constructed
76: once the $V N$ elastic and inelastic cross sections are known.
77: Note that in (\ref{spectral}) all quantities depend on space-time
78: $X$ and four-momentum $P$.
79:
80: \section{Production and decay of vector mesons at finite density}
81:
82: As mentioned before, the in-medium vector meson spectral functions
83: can be measured directly by the leptonic decay $V {\to}e^+e^-$ or
84: the Dalitz decay $\omega{\to}\pi^0\gamma$, respectively. The
85: vector meson production in $pA$ collisions can be considered as a
86: natural way~\cite{Recent} to study the $\rho$- and
87: $\omega$-properties at normal nuclear density under rather well
88: controlled conditions. This also holds for the photo-production of
89: vector mesons on nuclei \cite{Mosel}.
90:
91: The following calculations have been performed for $p{+}A$
92: collisions at 2.4--2.5~GeV by introducing a real and imaginary
93: part of the vector meson self energy as
94: \begin{equation}
95: \label{poten}
96: U_V = \frac{\Re \Sigma_V}{2 M_0} \simeq M_0 \
97: \beta \frac{ \rho(X)}{\rho_0} \end{equation} and width
98: \begin{equation}
99: \label{width} \Gamma^\ast = \frac{\Im \Sigma_V}{2 M_0} \simeq
100: \Gamma_V^0{+}\Gamma_{coll} \frac{\rho(X)}{\rho_0}
101: \end{equation}
102: in the $t{-}\rho$-approximation. Here $M_0$ and $\Gamma_V^0$
103: denote the bare mass and width of the vector meson in vacuum while
104: $\rho(X)$ is the local baryon density and $\rho_0$=0.16~fm$^{-3}$.
105: The parameter $\beta{\simeq}$--0.16 was adopted from the models in
106: Refs.~\cite{Medium} -- \cite{Medium6}. The predictions for the
107: $\omega$-meson collisional width $\Gamma_{coll}$ at density
108: $\rho_0$ range from 20 to 50~MeV~\cite{Medium,Medium1,OmegaN} --
109: depending on the number of $\omega{N}$ final channels taken into
110: account -- while the collisional width of the $\rho$-meson should
111: be about 100 -- 120 MeV at $\rho_0$ due to the strong coupling to
112: baryon resonances (cf. Fig. 6 of Ref. \cite{d3}).
113:
114: \subsection{$\rho^0$-mesons}
115: In Ref. \cite{Model} the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ decays of
116: $\rho^0$-mesons produced in $p A$ reactions has been investigated
117: with the aim of testing the in-medium $\rho^0$-spectral function
118: at normal nuclear matter density.
119:
120: \begin{figure}
121: \psfig{file=cbuu3.ps,width=6cm} \hskip 0.3cm
122: \psfig{file=cbuu6.ps,width=6cm} {\small \caption[]{\label{cbuu3}
123: (l.h.s.) The invariant mass distribution of two pions from
124: $p+{^{12}C}$ collisions at 2.5 GeV using the bare spectral
125: function of the $\rho$-meson for $p_z \leq$ 2 GeV/c and $p_T \leq$
126: 0.8 GeV/c. Displayed are the total $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant mass
127: spectrum (all), the $\rho$ signal after subtraction of the
128: combinatorial background (dashed line) as well as a Breit-Wigner
129: distribution with the bare $\rho$-meson properties normalized to
130: the total $\rho$-production cross section from the transport
131: approach (see text).
132: \\ (r.h.s.) The invariant mass distribution of
133: two pions from $p+{^{12}C}$ at 2.5 GeV ($p_z \leq$ 2 GeV/c and
134: $p_T \leq$ 0.8 GeV/c) employing the in-medium modification of the
135: $\rho$-meson according to Eq. (2) for $\beta$ = - 0.16. In b) the
136: solid histogram shows the $\rho$-meson signal from a); the dashed
137: line is a statistical fit while the hatched histogram is the
138: difference between the $\rho$ signal and the statistical fit,
139: which can be described again by a
140: Breit-Wigner function (solid line) with $M_0^*$ = 708 MeV and
141: $\Gamma$ = 270 MeV (see text).}}
142: \end{figure}
143:
144:
145: Some results of the transport model studies from Ref. \cite{Model}
146: are displayed in Fig. \ref{cbuu3} for the reaction $p + ^{12}C$ at
147: 2.5 GeV. The l.h.s. displays the invariant mass distribution of
148: two pions using the bare spectral function of the $\rho$-meson
149: for $p_z \leq$ 2 GeV/c and $p_T \leq$ 0.8 GeV/c. In a) the solid
150: histogram shows the total $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant mass spectrum
151: while the dashed histogram indicates the $\rho$ signal after
152: subtraction of the combinatorial background. The solid line is a
153: Breit-Wigner distribution with the bare $\rho$-meson properties
154: normalized to the total $\rho$-production cross section from the
155: transport approach as expected in case of no final state
156: interactions. In b) the histogram shows the $\rho$-meson signal
157: from a) while the dotted line is the "statistical spectrum"; the
158: dashed line is a Breit-Wigner function with the $\rho$-meson
159: properties $M_0=766.9$~MeV and ${\Gamma}_0=173$~MeV while the
160: solid line shows the sum. The dashed histogram in the r.h.s. of
161: Fig. \ref{cbuu3}a) represents the $\rho$-signal as obtained by
162: background subtraction from uncorrelated $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs in
163: case of the in-medium modification (2) with $\beta$ = -0.16. It is
164: seen that not only the shape of the mass spectra, but also the
165: absolute normalization are different from the calculations with
166: the bare $\rho$-properties (l.h.s.). The $\rho$-meson signal is
167: shown again in Fig.\ref{cbuu3}b) (r.h.s.) in terms of the solid
168: histogram, which at first glance is quite complicated to analyze
169: in order to extract in-medium properties of the $\rho$-meson. To
170: this aim we have fitted the spectrum with a statistical
171: distribution \cite{Model} as shown in Fig.\ref{cbuu3}b) by the
172: dashed line. The hatched histogram in Fig.\ref{cbuu3}b) then shows
173: the difference between the $\rho$-mass spectrum and the
174: statistical distribution; it can be fitted by a Breit-Wigner
175: distribution with $M_0^*=$708~MeV and ${\Gamma}$=270~MeV.
176:
177: In comparison with the l.h.s. of Fig.\ref{cbuu3}b) a dropping of
178: the $\rho$-meson mass thus might be extracted from the invariant
179: mass distribution of two pions for light nuclei such as $^{12}C$.
180: However, the analysis is partly model dependent and the experiment
181: requires large area detectors.
182:
183:
184:
185: \subsection{$\omega$-mesons}
186: The situation changes for the in-medium $\omega$-meson Dalitz
187: decay since here only a single pion might rescatter whereas the
188: photon escapes practically without reinteraction. Again the
189: calculations are performed within the transport model used before
190: for $\rho^0$ and $K^\pm$ studies~\cite{d2,Model} by taking into
191: account both the direct $pN{\to}{\omega}pN$,
192: $pN{\to}{\omega}pN\pi$ and secondary $pN{\to}{\pi}NN$,
193: ${\pi}N{\to}{\omega}N$ production mechanisms employing the cross
194: sections from Ref.~\cite{Elementary} as well as ${\omega}N$
195: elastic and inelastic interactions in the target nucleus (with
196: cross sections from Ref.~\cite{OmegaN}) and accounting for $\pi^0
197: N$ rescattering. Here the $\omega$ propagation is described by the
198: Hamilton's equation of motion and its Dalitz decay to $\pi^0
199: \gamma$ by Monte Carlo according to the survival probability
200: $P_\omega(t{-}t_0){=} \exp({-}\Gamma_V^0(t{-}t_0))$ in the rest
201: frame of the meson that was created at time $t_0$.
202:
203:
204:
205: \begin{figure}[h]
206: \vspace{-15mm} \psfig{file=ankeom6.ps,width=6.2cm,height=8.cm}
207: \hskip 0.2cm \psfig{file=ankeom14.ps,width=6.cm,height=7.6cm}
208: \vspace{1mm} {\small
209: \caption{(l.h.s.) The $\pi^0\gamma$ invariant
210: mass spectra from $p{+}C$ and $p{+}Cu$ collisions at a beam energy
211: of 2.4~GeV calculated without in-medium modifications of the
212: $\omega$-meson. The different contributions are explained in the
213: text. (r.h.s.) The $\pi^0\gamma$ invariant mass spectra from
214: $p{+}Cu$ collisions at 2.4~GeV calculated for $\Gamma_{coll}$=20
215: and 50~MeV (open histograms) when employing the potential
216: (\ref{poten}) for $\beta$ = -0.16. The hatched histograms indicate
217: the contributions from $\omega$-mesons, that decay at finite
218: density and include $\pi^0$ rescattering, while the solid lines
219: show the $\omega$-spectral function in vacuum for comparison.}}
220: \label{ankeom6}
221: \end{figure}
222:
223: We first present the results without employing any medium
224: modifications for the $\omega$-meson. The l.h.s. of
225: Fig.~\ref{ankeom6} shows the resulting $\pi^0\gamma$ invariant
226: mass spectrum for $p{+}C$ and $p{+}Cu$ collisions at a beam energy
227: of 2.4~GeV. The solid histogram displays the spectral function
228: of $\omega$'s, which decay outside the nucleus at densities
229: $\rho{\le}$0.05~fm$^{-3}$; the distribution from the
230: $\omega{\to}\pi^0\gamma$ decay for $\rho{>}$0.05~fm$^{-3}$ for
231: events without $\pi^0$-rescattering is shown by the light hatched
232: areas while events that involve ${\pi^0}N$ elastic or inelastic
233: scattering are displayed in terms of the dark areas. The solid
234: lines show the Breit-Wigner distribution determined by the pole
235: mass and width for the free $\omega$-meson. As can be seen from
236: Fig.~\ref{ankeom6} (l.h.s.) most of the $\omega$-mesons from the
237: $^{12}C$ target decay in the vacuum (92\%) and consequently
238: $\omega$ decays in the medium as well as $\pi^0$ rescattering are
239: rather scarce. The situation changes for a $Cu$ target where
240: $\pi^0 \gamma$ coincidences from finite density are more frequent
241: (19\% $\omega$'s decay inside the target), however, also $\pi^0$
242: rescattering gives a substantial background which in the invariant
243: mass range of interest can approximately be described by an
244: exponential tail in $\sqrt{s} = M_\omega$. Note, that
245: experimentally the in-medium $\omega$ spectral function can only
246: be observed by the $\pi^0\gamma$ invariant mass distribution from
247: $\omega$-mesons decaying inside the nucleus without
248: $\pi^0$-rescattering.
249:
250: Now we examine the feasibility of a direct detection of an
251: in-medium modification of the $\omega$-spectral function via the
252: $\pi^0\gamma$ invariant mass spectrum. The solid histograms in
253: Fig.~\ref{ankeom6} (r.h.s.) show the calculated $\pi^0\gamma$
254: invariant mass spectra from $p{+}Cu$ collisions at 2.4~GeV
255: calculated with $\Gamma_{coll}$=20~MeV (upper part) and
256: $\Gamma_{coll}$=50~MeV (lower part) while employing the
257: potential~(\ref{poten}) with $\beta$ = -0.16. The results are
258: shown for an 'experimental' mass resolution of 10~MeV. The solid
259: lines indicate the Breit-Wigner distribution given by the mass and
260: width for the vacuum $\omega$-meson for comparison. The results
261: indicate a substantial enhancement of the low mass $\pi^0\gamma$
262: spectra due to the contribution from $\omega$-mesons decaying
263: inside the nucleus while feeling the attractive
264: potential~(\ref{poten}). Apparently, there is no substantial
265: difference between the $\pi^0\gamma$ spectra calculated with
266: $\Gamma_{coll}$=20 and 50~MeV since the shape of the low invariant
267: mass spectrum is dominated by the (density dependent) in-medium
268: shift of the $\omega$-pole. Only above the vacuum $\omega$-pole
269: mass one can see a slightly enhanced yield in case of the higher
270: collisional broadening. Moreover, the contribution from
271: 'distorted' $\omega$-mesons (due to $\pi^0$ rescattering), which
272: is shown in Fig.~\ref{ankeom6} by the dark hatched histograms, is
273: small and represents an approximately exponential background in
274: the available $\pi^0\gamma$ energy.
275:
276: As demonstrated in Ref. \cite{Hejny} $\omega$-meson mass shifts
277: comparable to Fig. 2 (r.h.s.) may also be observed for targets as
278: light as $^{12}C$ or heavy as $^{208}Pb$. Such experiments might
279: be carried out at COSY with neutral particle detectors looking for
280: the $3\gamma$ invariant mass distribution and gating on events
281: where 2 $\gamma$'s yield the invariant mass of a $\pi^0$. This
282: program is complementary to dilepton studies in $pA$ reactions
283: with the HADES detector at GSI Darmstadt~\cite{Hades}.
284:
285: \section{Scalar meson production}
286:
287: The scalar meson sector plays a very important role in the physics
288: of hadrons. Nevertheless, the structure of the lightest scalar
289: mesons a$_0(980)$ and f$_0(980)$ is not yet understood and is one
290: of the most important topics of hadronic physics
291: (\cite{Hadron99a,Hadron99b} and references therein). It has been
292: discussed that they could be either "
293: $\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}}$ states", "Four-quark
294: cryptoexotic states", $\mathrm{K}\overline{\mathrm{K}}$ molecules
295: or vacuum scalars (\cite{Hadron99a}). Nowadays, theory gives some
296: preference to the Unitarized Quark Model (UQM) proposed by
297: Tornqvist \cite{Tornqvist}, however, other options cannot be ruled
298: out experimentally. Moreover, there is a strong mixing between the
299: uncharged $a_0(980)$ and the $f_0(980)$ due to a coupling to
300: $\mathrm{K}\overline{\mathrm{K}}$ intermediate states. It is,
301: therefore, important to study independently the uncharged and
302: charged components of the a$_0(980)$ because the latter are not
303: mixed with the f$_0(980)$ and preserve their original quark
304: content.
305:
306: \subsection{The reaction $NN{\to}f_0NN$}
307: The production of scalar mesons ($f_0, a_0$) in $pp$ reactions is
308: investigated within a meson-exchange approximation. The relevant
309: diagrams for the $NN{\to}f_0NN{\to}K\bar{K}NN$ reaction are those
310: involving pion emission from the nucleons with s-channel
311: production of the $f_0$-meson and its subsequent decay to
312: $K\bar{K}$ or $\pi \pi$ (for details the reader is referred to
313: Ref. \cite{Brat99}). The coupling constant at the $\pi \pi f_0$
314: vertex is determined from a fit to the reaction $\pi^- p
315: \rightarrow f_0 n \rightarrow n K^+ K^-$ \cite{Brat99}. A
316: form factor at the $f_0\pi\pi$ vertex has to be incorporated
317: since both pions
318: are off their mass-shell; we use the form
319: \begin{equation}
320: F_{f_0\pi\pi}(q_1^2,q_2^2)=F_{\pi NN}(q_1^2)F_{\pi NN}(q_2^2) ,
321: \label{form1}
322: \end{equation}
323: where the ${\pi}NN$ form factor is taken as $F(t) = (\Lambda^2 -
324: m_{\pi}^2)/(\Lambda^2-t)$ with a cut-off parameter
325: $\Lambda$=1.05~GeV. The form factor~(\ref{form1}) is normalized to
326: unity at $q_1^2=m_\pi^2$ and $q_2^2=m_\pi^2$, which is consistent
327: with the kinematical conditions for the determination of the
328: $f_0\pi\pi$ coupling constant.
329:
330: \begin{figure}[h]
331: \psfig{file=f0fig5n.eps,width=5.5cm,height=6cm} \hskip 1cm
332: \psfig{file=f0disto.eps,width=5.5cm,height=5.8cm}
333: \vspace{0.55cm}{\small
334: \caption{(l.h.s.) The
335: $pp{\to}f_0pp{\to}K^0\bar{K^0}pp$ cross section calculated with
336: coupling constants from $set \ A$ with (dotted line) and without
337: form factor (solid line) at the $f_0\pi\pi$ vertex. The
338: experimental data for the $pp{\to}K^0\bar{K^0}pp$ reaction are
339: taken from Ref.~\protect\cite{LB}, while the dashed line shows the
340: corresponding calculation within the one-boson exchange model from
341: Ref.~\protect\cite{Sibirtsev1}. (r.h.s.) The $K^+K^-$ invariant
342: mass distribution from $pp$ collisions at 2.85~GeV. The solid line
343: shows the calculated contribution from the $\phi$ decays and
344: $K^+K^-$ background according to Ref. \protect\cite{Sibirtsev1}. The
345: dashed line shows the contribution from the
346: $pp{\to}f_0pp{\to}K^+K^-pp$ reaction calculated with constants
347: from $set \ A$ (lower), while the dotted (upper) line shows the
348: result obtained with $set \ B$ (see text).}}
349: \label{Fig7}
350: \end{figure}
351:
352: The dotted line in Fig.~\ref{Fig7} (l.h.s.) shows the
353: $pp{\to}f_0pp{\to}K^0\bar{K^0}pp$ cross section calculated with
354: the coupling constants $g_{f_0 \pi \pi}$ = 1.49 GeV and g$_{f_0
355: KK}$ = 0.82 GeV ($set \ \ A$) and with the form
356: factor~(\ref{form1}) in comparison to the experimental
357: data~\cite{LB} for the $pp{\to}K^0\bar{K^0}pp$ reaction. The
358: dashed line shows the calculations within the pion and kaon
359: exchange model from Ref.~\cite{Sibirtsev1} for $K\bar{K}$
360: production. To estimate the maximal $f_0$ production cross section
361: we neglect the form factor at the $f_0\pi\pi$ vertex and show the
362: result in terms of the solid line in Fig.~\ref{Fig7} (l.h.s.).
363: Actually, the contribution from $f_0$ production to the total
364: $pp{\to}K^0\bar{K^0}pp$ cross section is almost negligible at high
365: energies. However, a possible way for $f_0$ observation is due to
366: the low energy part of the $K\bar{K}$ invariant mass spectrum.
367:
368: We thus calculate the $K^+K^-$ invariant mass spectrum from the
369: $pp{\to}$ $K^+K^-pp$ reaction at a beam energy of 2.85 GeV, which
370: corresponds to the kinematical conditions for the DISTO experiment
371: at SATURNE \cite{DISTO}. Since at this energy the $\phi$-meson
372: production becomes possible we include its contribution to the
373: $K^+K^-$ spectrum. The $pp{\to}{\phi}pp$ total cross section was
374: taken from Ref.~\cite{Sibirtsev2} and the $K^+K^-$ invariant mass
375: was distributed according to the Breit-Wigner resonance
376: prescription with a full $\phi$-meson width $\Gamma_\phi$ =
377: 4.43~MeV and a branching ratio $Br(\phi\to K^+K^-)=49.1$\%.
378:
379: The solid line in Fig.~\ref{Fig7} (r.h.s.) shows the $K^+K^-$
380: invariant mass spectrum for the $pp{\to}{\phi}pp$ reaction as well
381: as the background spectrum from the $pp{\to}K^+K^-pp$ reaction,
382: which was calculated as in Ref.~\cite{Sibirtsev1} on the basis of
383: pion and kaon exchange diagrams. The dashed line indicates the
384: $K^+K^-$ spectrum calculated with the coupling constants from $set
385: \ \ A$ and without form factor at the $f_0\pi\pi$ vertex. For
386: these coupling constants it is quite obvious that the $f_0$-meson
387: cannot be directly detected in $pp$ collisions by using the
388: $K^+K^-$-mode. Note, that when introducing a form
389: factor~(\ref{form1}) at the $f_0\pi\pi$ vertex the contribution
390: from $pp{\to}f_0pp{\to}K^+K^-pp$ becomes even smaller.
391:
392:
393: To test the sensitivity of the model to the $f_0$ parameters we
394: also performed a calculation with $g_{f_0 \pi \pi}$ = 3.05 GeV and
395: $g_{f_0 KK}$ = 4.3 GeV ($set \ \ B$) \cite{Brat99} and show the
396: result in terms of the dotted line in Fig.~\ref{Fig7} (r.h.s.).
397: Indeed, in this case the $f_0$ contribution is very strong at low
398: $K^+K^-$ invariant mass, however, the experimental data from DISTO
399: \cite{Salabura} exclude this possibility.
400:
401: \subsection{The reaction $pp \rightarrow d a_0^+$}
402: The missing mass spectrum in the reaction $pp \rightarrow d (
403: MM)^+$ for deuterons produced at $0^{\circ}$ in the laboratory and
404: incident momenta of 3.8, 4.5 and 6.3 GeV/c has been measured at
405: LBL (Berkeley) \cite {Abolins}. It is interesting that apart from
406: the peaks corresponding to $\pi$ and $\rho$ production, there is a
407: distinctive structure in the missing mass spectrum at 0.95 GeV$^2$
408: which was identified as a$_0$ production.
409:
410: In order to estimate the cross section of the reaction $pp
411: \rightarrow d a_0^{+}$ at lower momenta -- which are available at
412: COSY -- the two-step model (TSM) described by the triangle
413: diagram is used (\cite{Grishina1,Grishina2}). For the deuteron
414: wave function we take the parameterization from Ref. \cite
415: {Lacomb} and neglect the $D$-wave part which gives only a small
416: contribution compared to the $S$-wave term.
417:
418: The amplitudes taken into account are: i) the a$_0$ coupling to
419: two nucleons through the f$_1$(1285) and $\pi $-meson exchanges;
420: ii) the a$_0$ coupling through $\eta $- and $\pi $-meson
421: exchanges; iii) the production of a$_0 $-mesons through pion
422: exchange with $s$- and $u$%
423: - channel nucleon currents. The coupling constants and cut-off parameters $%
424: \Lambda _i$ for $\pi $- and $\eta $- meson exchanges are taken
425: from the Bonn potential model; for the a$_0$- and
426: f$_1$(1285)-mesons the values from Ref. \cite{Riska} are employed
427: while the cut-off $\Lambda$ at the nucleon exchange vertex was
428: considered as a free parameter within the interval 1.2--1.3 GeV.
429: Within this model the mechanisms i) and ii) are of minor
430: importance and the dominant contribution comes from the nucleon
431: $u$- channel exchange.
432:
433: The results of the calculations for the forward differential
434: cross section at various beam momenta \cite{Grishina2} match with
435: the data from \cite{Abolins} for a cut-off $\Lambda$ = 1.3 GeV and
436: indicate that cross sections of 50 -- 100 nb/sr should be reached
437: at a bombarding energy of 2.6 GeV, which provides very promising
438: perspectives for exploring the $a_0$ properties and dynamics at
439: COSY.
440:
441:
442: \section{Summary}
443: In this contribution the production and decay of vector mesons
444: ($\rho, \omega$) in $pA$ reactions at COSY energies has been
445: studied with particular emphasis on their in-medium spectral
446: functions. It is found within transport calculations, that
447: hadronic in-medium decays like $\pi^+\pi^-$ or $\pi^0 \gamma$
448: might provide complementary information to their dilepton
449: ($e^+e^-$) decays. However, the $\pi^+ \pi^-$ signal from the
450: $\rho$-meson is strongly distorted by pion rescattering on
451: nucleons even for light nuclei like $^{12}C$. On the other hand,
452: the $\omega$-meson Dalitz decay to $\pi^0 \gamma$ appears
453: promising even for more heavy nuclei since only the neutral pion
454: may rescatter and 3-photon events ($\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma
455: \gamma$) have a very small background at high invariant mass.
456:
457: Furthermore, the perspectives of scalar meson ($f_0, a_0$)
458: production in $pp$ reactions have investigated within a
459: boson-exchange model indicating that the $f_0$-meson might hardly
460: be detected in the $K \bar{K}$ or $\pi \pi$ decay channels in
461: these collisions whereas the exclusive channel $pp \rightarrow d
462: a_0^+$ looks very promising when detecting the deuteron and
463: analyzing the missing mass spectrum in the range 0.9 -- 1 GeV$^2$.
464:
465:
466: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
467: \bibitem{Medium}
468: F. Klingl, N. Kaiser, W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 624}, 527 (1997).
469: \bibitem{Medium1}
470: B. Friman, Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B 29}, 3195 (1998).
471: \bibitem{Medium3}
472: K. Saito et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B 433}, 243 (1998);
473: Phys. Rev. {\bf C 59}, 1203 (1999).
474: \bibitem{Hatsuda} T. Hatsuda, S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. {\bf C 46},
475: R34 (1992).
476: \bibitem{Medium4}
477: F. Klingl, T. Waas, W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 650}, 299 (1999).
478: \bibitem{Medium5}
479: W. Cassing, E.L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rep. {\bf 308}, 65 (1999)
480: \bibitem{Medium6}
481: R. Rapp, J. Wambach, hep-ph/9909229.
482: \bibitem{Propagation}
483: G.Q. Li et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 611}, 539 (1996).
484: \bibitem{m2}
485: W. Cassing et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B 363}, 35 (1995);
486: {\bf B 377}, 5 (1996); {\bf B 396}, 26 (1997);
487: Phys. Rev. {\bf C 57}, 916 (1998).
488: \bibitem{m3}
489: Ye. S. Golubeva et al.,
490: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 625}, 832 (1997).
491: \bibitem{m4}
492: C. Ernst et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C 58}, 447 (1998).
493: \bibitem{m5}
494: Th. Weidmann et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C 59}, 919 (1999).
495: \bibitem{m6}
496: M. Effenberger et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C 60}, 027601 (1999);
497: Phys. Rev. {\bf C 60}, 044614 (1999).
498: \bibitem{Dispersion}
499: V. L. Eletsky, B.L. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 1010 (1997).
500: \bibitem{d2}
501: A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 641}, 476 (1998).
502: \bibitem{d3}
503: L. A. Kondratyuk et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C 58}, 1078 (1998).
504: \bibitem{Recent}
505: Ye. S. Golubeva et al., Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A 7}, 271
506: (2000).
507: \bibitem{Mosel} U. Mosel, this volume.
508: \bibitem{OmegaN}
509: G. I. Lykasov et al., Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A 6}, 71 (1999).
510: \bibitem{Model}
511: A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 629}, 717 (1998).
512: \bibitem{Elementary}
513: A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, U. Mosel,
514: Z. Phys. {\bf A 358}, 357 (1997).
515: \bibitem{Hejny} A. Sibirtsev et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B 483}, 405
516: (2000).
517: \bibitem{Hades}
518: J. Friese et al.,
519: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 42}, 235 (1999).
520: \bibitem{Hadron99a} K.~Maltman, "Scalar Meson Decay Constants and the
521: Nature of the a$_0$(980)", Review talk at Hadron-99, Beijing,
522: Aug.\ 24--28, 1999.
523: \bibitem{Hadron99b} S.~Narison,"Gluonic Scalar Mesons Hybrids from QCD
524: Spectral Sum Rules", Review talk at Hadron-99, Beijing, Aug.\
525: 24--28, 1999.
526: \bibitem{Tornqvist} S. Tornqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 49}, 624 (1982).
527: \bibitem{Brat99} E. L. Bratkovskaya et al., Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A
528: 4}, 165 (1999).
529: \bibitem{DISTO}
530: F. Balestra et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 1534 (1999).
531: \bibitem{LB}
532: Landolt-B{\"{o}}rnstein, {\it New Series},
533: ed. H. Schopper, I/12 (1988).
534: \bibitem{Sibirtsev1}
535: A. A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, C. M. Ko,
536: Z. Phys. A {\bf 358}, 101 (1997)
537:
538: \bibitem{Sibirtsev2}
539: A. A. Sibirtsev, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 604}, 455 (1996)
540: \bibitem{Salabura} P. Salabura for the DISTO Collaboration, this
541: volume.
542: \bibitem{Abolins} M. A.~Abolins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 15},
543: 469 (1970).
544:
545: \bibitem{Grishina1} V. Yu.~Grishina et al., KFA Annual Report, 1999.
546:
547: \bibitem{Grishina2} V. Yu.~Grishina et al., this volume and to be published.
548: \bibitem{Lacomb} M. Lacomb et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B 101}, 139 (1981).
549:
550: \bibitem{Riska} M. Kirchbach, D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 176}, 1 (1980).
551:
552:
553: \end{thebibliography}
554:
555:
556:
557: %===============================================================
558: \end{document}
559: #!/bin/csh -f
560: # Uuencoded gz-compressed .tar file created by csh script uufiles
561: # For more info (11/95), see e.g. http://xxx.lanl.gov/faq/uufaq.html
562: # If you are on a unix machine this file will unpack itself: strip
563: # any mail header and call resulting file, e.g., figures.uu
564: # (uudecode ignores these header lines and starts at begin line below)
565: # Then say csh figures.uu
566: # or explicitly execute the commands (generally more secure):
567: # uudecode figures.uu ; gunzip figures.tar.gz ;
568: # tar -xvf figures.tar
569: # On some non-unix (e.g. VAX/VMS), first use editor to change filename
570: # in "begin" line below to figures.tar-gz , then execute
571: # uudecode figures.uu
572: # gzip -d figures.tar-gz
573: # tar -xvf figures.tar
574: #
575: uudecode $0
576: chmod 644 figures.tar.gz
577: gunzip -c figures.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
578: rm $0 figures.tar.gz
579: exit
580:
581: