1: \documentclass[12pt,leqno]{article}

2: \usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,caption2}

3: \usepackage{graphicx}

4: \textwidth 163mm \textheight 243mm \topmargin -1cm

5: \begin{document}

6: 

7: \begin{center}

8: \textbf{RELATIVISTIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PHOTON\\

9:        ASYMMETRY IN DEUTERON PHOTODISINTEGRATION}

10: 

11:        \medskip

12: 

13: K.Yu. Kazakov and D.V. Shulga

14: 

15: \medskip \small{ Laboratory of

16: Theoretical Nuclear Physics,\\ Far Eastern State University,\\

17: Sukhanov Str. 8, Vladivostok, 690600, Russia.}

18: \end{center}

19: \bigskip

20: Key-words: deuteron photodisintegration, polarization observables,

21: Bethe-Salpeter.

22: 

23: \begin{abstract}

24: The cross section asymmetry $\Sigma$ in deuteron disintegration with

25: linearly polarized light is considered in the framework of the

26: Bethe-Salpeter formalism. Relativistic contributions to the asymmetry are

27: investigated within the approximation, which takes into account the

28: one-body part of the electromagnetic current operator and the dominant

29: positive-energy partial amplitudes of the Bethe-Salpeter vertex function

30: of the deuteron.

31: \end{abstract}

32: 

33: 

34: 

35: %6 pages, 2 figures, LaTeX2e, caption2.sty, 

36: %Proceedinds of XV International Seminar on High Energy Physics Problems

37: %"Relativistic Nuclear Physics and Quantum Chromodynamics",

38: %Dubna, September 25-29, 2000

39: 

40: 

41: \section{Introduction}

42: 

43: Interest to the study of beam-polarization observables (namely,

44: the polarization-difference cross sections and the cross-section

45: asymmetry) in the exclusive deuteron photodisintegration is

46: twofold. In the energy range from below pion threshold to above

47: the $\Delta$ resonance, it is to find features characterizing

48: sensitivity of these observables to the short-range behavior of

49: the tensor force in models of the nucleon-nucleon (NN)

50: interaction~\cite{legs1}. The study of the polarization

51: observables also offers a testing ground for models of the

52: $N\Delta$ interaction, as the polarization-dependent cross

53: sections are sensitive to interference terms due to the

54: meson-exchange as well as delta-isobar currents

55: (Ref.~\cite{legs2,mami} and references therein). On the other

56: hand, recent experiments on two-body photodisintegration of the

57: deuteron at the TJNAF and the Yerevan Synchrotorn are devoted to

58: measuring both the differential cross section and the asymmetry in

59: the range, when the photon energy is commensurate with the rest

60: mass of the nucleon. Instead of the reaction mechanism related to

61: the conventional mesonic picture of the NN interaction, here one

62: looks for the partonic phenomena such as the scaling of the cross

63: sections and the hadronic helicity

64: conservation~\cite{bochna,adamian}.

65: 

66: Relativistic contributions (RC) are expected to be significant in

67: deuteron photodisintegration, especially when the photon momentum

68: involved in the process, becomes comparable with the rest mass of

69: the nucleon. So far, a through treatment of RC has been based on

70: the Blankenbecler-Sugar reduction of the Bethe-Salpeter (BS)

71: equation with spinor reduction carried out to the order of

72: $\mathcal O(\tfrac{1}{m^2})$ for the charge and current

73: densities~\cite{jaus}. In the nonrelativistic formalism

74: relativistic corrections has been investigated in a number of

75: papers, for example see Ref.~\cite{ying} where it is shown that

76: the inclusion of RC leads to an important reduction of the forward

77: differential cross section. More recently, the strong influence of

78: relativity is found in analysis of the Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn sum

79: rule for the deuteron in the photon energy range up to about 100

80: MeV~\cite{GDH}. Inclusion of leading order RC, this is the

81: spin-orbit term, in the photodisintegration channel results in

82: large positive contribution reducing the value of the sum rule in

83: absolute size by more than 30 percent!

84: 

85: In this talk we present some results concerning the investigation

86: of the RC in the beam-polarization observables in deuteron

87: photodisintegration. This is a continuation of the approach of

88: Ref.~\cite{mypaper} applied to the analysis of the differential

89: cross section. A relativistic formulation is based on the

90: Bethe-Salpeter (BS) equation for the description of the dynamics

91: of 2N system and the gauge invariant procedure for the

92: construction of the electromagnetic (EM) current.

93: 

94: \section{Definition of observables}

95: 

96: The kinematics of the process

97: \begin{eqnarray}

98: \Vec\gamma(q)+D(\mathbb K)\to P(k_p) + N(k_n)

99: \end{eqnarray}

100: for disintegration of the deuteron induced by a linearly polarized

101: photon in the c.m. frame is organized as follows: $\mathbb

102: K=(\sqrt{M_d^2+\mathbf K^2},\mathbf K)$ and

103: $q=(\omega,\boldsymbol{\omega})$ is the four momenta of the

104: deuteron and the real photon, respectively, with $\mathbf K

105: +\boldsymbol{\omega}=\mathbf 0$; $k_p$ and $k_n$ are the four

106: momenta of the proton and neutron, $k_{p,n}^2=m^2$. Further, it is

107: convenient to introduce the total $\mathbb P=k_p+k_n$, $\mathbb

108: P\equiv(\sqrt{s},\mathbf 0)$, and the relative asymptotic

109: $p=\tfrac12(k_p-k_n)$, $p=(0,\mathbf k_p)$, four momenta.

110: 

111: The differential cross section for complete linear polarization of the

112: photon is written in the form

113: \begin{equation}

114: d\sigma(E_\gamma,\Theta,\Phi)=

115: d\sigma_0(E_\gamma,\Theta)[1+\Sigma(E_\gamma,\Theta)\cos(2\Phi)],

116: \end{equation}

117: where $d\sigma_0$ is the differential cross section in the case of the

118: unpolarized initial configuration, $\Sigma$ is the cross section azimuthal

119: asymmetry, $\Theta$ is the angle between the momentum of the photon

120: $\boldsymbol\omega$ and that of the outgoing proton $\mathbf k_p$, and

121: $\Phi$ is the angle between the polarization plane and the reaction plane.

122: If the photon three momentum is taken to be in the $+z$ direction

123: $\boldsymbol\omega=(0,0,\omega)$, the latter is defined by the

124: polarization vector of the photon $\boldsymbol\epsilon_\lambda$ and

125: $\boldsymbol\omega$ and the former --- by vectors $\boldsymbol\omega$ and

126: $\mathbf k_p$. In the transverse gauge for the radiation field, following

127: the property $\boldsymbol\omega\cdot\boldsymbol\epsilon_\lambda=0$, one

128: may write for the photon helicities $\lambda=\pm 1$

129: \begin{equation}

130: \boldsymbol\epsilon_\pm=\mp\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(0,1,\pm\imath,0).

131: \end{equation}

132: 

133: The asymmetry $\Sigma$ is the ratio of the difference to the sum

134: of cross sections obtained with the photon's electric vector

135: parallel and perpendicular to the reaction plane, respectively

136: [$\Sigma=(d\sigma_{||}-d\sigma_\perp)/(d\sigma_{||}+d\sigma_\perp)]$.

137: Both the polarization-independent cross section

138: $d\sigma_0/d\Omega=

139: \tfrac12(d\sigma_{||}/d\Omega+d\sigma_\perp/d\Omega)$ and the

140: polarization-difference cross sections

141: $d\Delta/d\Omega=\tfrac12(d\sigma_{||}/d\Omega-d\sigma_\perp/d\Omega)$

142: are expressed in terms of the invariant reduced amplitude

143: $t_{Sm_s\,\lambda m_d}(\Theta)$, depending on the photon helicity

144: $\lambda$ and projections of the good total angular momentum of

145: the deuteron $m_d=\pm1, 0$ and of the total spin ($S=0,1$) of np

146: pair $m_s$ on to quantization axis

147: \begin{align}

148: \dfrac{d\sigma_0}{d\Omega_p} &=\dfrac{\alpha}{16\pi s}\dfrac{|\mathbf

149: k_p|}{\omega} \sum\limits_{Sm_S\lambda m_d} |t_{Sm_s\,\lambda m_d}|^2,\\

150: \Sigma&=-\frac{\sum\limits_{Sm_S\lambda m_d} t_{Sm_s\,\lambda

151: m_d}t_{Sm_s\,-\lambda m_d}^*} {\sum\limits_{Sm_s\lambda

152: m_d}|t_{Sm_s\,\lambda m_d}|^2}, \label{sigma-T}

153: \end{align}

154: where $\alpha=e^2/(4\pi)$ is the fine-structure constant, and taking the

155: cross section as functions of the laboratory photon energy $E_\gamma$ and

156: the c.m. angle $\Theta$, one relates the variables as

157: \begin{equation}

158: s=M_d(M_d+2E_\gamma),\quad |\mathbf k_p|=\sqrt{\frac{s}{4}-m^2},\quad

159: \omega=\frac{M_d}{\sqrt{s}}E_\gamma. \label{kin-s}

160: \end{equation}

161: 

162: \section{Few theory}

163: 

164: Notwithstanding that the nonrelativistic interpretation of

165: deuteron photodisintegration is successful at low and intermediate

166: energies, a systematic exposition of the covariant formalism at

167: this energy range for the 2N system is still missing. Essential

168: ingredients of the nonrelativistic formulation are the pure

169: one-body EM plus meson-exchange currents as incorporated in the

170: Siegert operators, explicit pair and pionic current, the

171: spin-orbit and further relativistic corrections and delta-isobar

172: configurations~\cite{arenhovel}. At present it is impossible to

173: claim quantitative description of the process in question, using

174: the fully relativistic analysis with the inclusion of the all

175: relevant physics. In order to study RC here we apply the

176: four-dimensional (4D) formalism of the BS equation. The reason for

177: the application of the 4D-formalism is to preserve generality and

178: to avoid some difficulties arising in considering EM process on

179: few nucleon systems. It is known the relativistic effects can take

180: different forms depending upon the organization of the dynamics

181: and its forms~\cite{wallace}. And, if a quasipotential formalism

182: is chosen with the same organization of the 2N interaction,

183: equivalent results should be found in reduction of the exact BS

184: matrix elements. The leading terms of such reduction should

185: correspond to the nonrelativistic approximation, and the next

186: order terms should produce $\mathcal

187: O(\tfrac{1}{m^n})$-corrections.

188: 

189: In the BS formalism the matrix elements associated with the

190: physical observables in Eq.~\eqref{sigma-T} are obtained via the

191: recipe for the EM current operator construction of

192: Refs.~\cite{shebeko,ito}, which is consistent with the form of

193: the NN interaction kernel of the BS equation and gauge

194: invariance. The dynamical model we assume in this work is the

195: one-body plane-wave approximation described in

196: Ref.~\cite{mypaper}. In terms of the BS amplitudes for the

197: deuteron $\psi_{\mathbb K m_d}$ and the np pair $\chi_{\mathbb P

198: p\,Sm_s}$, the c.m. transition amplitude is written in the form

199: \begin{equation}\label{t-amp}

200: T_{Sm_s\,\lambda m_d}(\Theta,\Phi)= \frac{1}{4\pi^3}\int\!\! d^4k

201: d^4l\: \bar{\chi}_{\sqrt{s}{\bf p}\,Sm_s}(l)\,

202: \epsilon_\lambda\cdot\Lambda(l,k;\mathbb P,\mathbb

203: K)\,\psi_{\mathbb K m_d}(k),

204: \end{equation}

205: where $T_{Sm_s\,\lambda

206: m_d}(\Theta,\Phi)=\text{e}^{\imath(\lambda+m_d)\Phi}t_{Sm_s\,\lambda

207: m_d}(\Theta)$, $\Lambda$ denotes the Mandelstam vertex, which

208: determines the EM interaction with 2N system in the framework of

209: the BS formalism. Here all amplitudes are the $4\times4$ matrices

210: in the spinor subspace. The four momentum conservation at the

211: photon-deuteron vertex gives $\mathbb P=\mathbb K+q$. Owing to the

212: fact that the EM interaction does not conserve the total isotopic

213: spin, the invariant amplitude in Eq.~\eqref{t-amp} contains

214: isovector ($\Delta T=1$) and isoscalar ($\Delta T=0$) transitions

215: corresponding to a given spin state $|\mathbb P p\,Sm_s\rangle$ of

216: the np pair. The complete description of our formalism can be

217: found in Ref.~\cite{mypaper}.

218: 

219: \section{Analysis of relativistic effects}

220: 

221: There are two kinds of the relativistic corrections to the

222: nonrelativistic impulse approximation charge and current

223: densities: (i) terms generated from the spinor reduction of the

224: EM current operator, and (ii) terms generated from boosting of

225: the initial deuteron wave function from the rest frame to the

226: c.m. frame of the reaction with the deuteron moving with a

227: velocity $\tfrac{\omega}{M_d}$~\cite{jaus,ying}. In a more

228: complete theoretical description, in addition to the one-body EM

229: current, meson-exchange currents, giving rise to two-body

230: operators, are included. Here the inclusion of energy transfer

231: effects are important~\cite{hwang,schwamb}.

232: 

233: Using the BS formalism one may develop, in principle, systematic

234: studies of the relativistic effects in the EM interactions with

235: 2N systems. Here one distinguishes several classes of the

236: relativistic effects both of the kinematical and dynamical

237: origin. First of all, the relativistic effects in the internal

238: dynamics brought by the generalized relativistic wave function of

239: the deuteron in its rest frame. These are effects of the

240: negative-energy partial-states in the vertex function, the

241: retardation (the relative-energy dependence), and the nonstatic

242: single-particle propagators.

243: 

244: Second, one has to boost the wave function to a moving frame as

245: \begin{equation}

246: \psi_{\mathbb Km_d}(k)=\Lambda^{(1)}(\mathcal

247: L)\Lambda^{(2)}(\mathcal L)\psi_{\mathbb K_{(0)} m_d}({\mathcal

248: L}^{-1}k), \label{boost-vertex}

249: \end{equation}

250: where $\Lambda^{(i)}({\mathcal L})$, $i=1,2$ is the booster to the

251: c.m. frame and $\mathcal L$ is the Lorentz transformation matrix

252: corresponding to $\mathbb K_{(0)}=(M_d,\mathbf 0)$. The correct

253: treatment means that the spin booster $\Lambda^{(i)}({\mathcal

254: L})\neq1$ (the effect of the spin precession) and the effect of

255: boosting on the internal space-time variables $\mathcal L\neq1$

256: (the Lorentz contraction).

257: 

258: \begin{figure}[thp]\label{fig1}

259: \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{0mm} \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{5mm}

260: \captionstyle{centerlast}

261: \renewcommand{\captionlabeldelim}{.~}

262: \renewcommand{\captionfont}{\linespread{1.25}\small\sl}

263: \renewcommand{\captionlabelfont}{\normalsize\sffamily}

264: \setcaptionwidth{0.8\textwidth}% \setcaptionmargin{1cm}

265: \onelinecaptionsfalse \caption{Some relativistic contributions to

266: the cross section asymmetry. Solid line is the exact

267: positive-energy one-body BS calculation, dot-dashed line is the

268: static approximation to the exact result, dotted line is the

269: static approximation with taking into account the booster

270: $\Lambda$, and dashed line is the nonrelativistic impulse

271: approximation. The transverse gauge is used for all the curves.}

272: \centering

273: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{fig1.eps}

274: \end{figure}

275: 

276: Third, the correct treatment of the conserved EM current operator. A

277: method of minimal substitution can be used  for constructing the EM

278: two-body current operator of two-nucleon system within the BS

279: formalism~\cite{ito,shebeko}. The relativistic two-body current operator

280: is derived using the Ward-Takahashi identities for the one-body current

281: operators and the relativistic equation for the bound state. The result

282: depends on the charge-exchange and nonlocal properties of the NN

283: interactions.

284: %\begin{figure}[!hbp]\label{fig1}

285: %\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{0mm} \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{5mm}

286: %\captionstyle{center}

287: %\renewcommand{\captionlabeldelim}{.~}

288: %\renewcommand{\captionfont}{\linespread{1.25}\small\it}

289: %\renewcommand{\captionlabelfont}{\normalsize\sffamily}

290: %\setcaptionwidth{0.75\textwidth}% \setcaptionmargin{1cm}

291: %\onelinecaptionsfalse \caption{Figure} \centering

292: %\includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{fig1.eps}

293: %\includegraphics[width=0.725\textwidth]{fig2.eps}

294: %\hfill\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig1.eps}%

295: %\hfill\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig2.eps} \hspace*{\fill}

296: %\end{figure}

297: \begin{figure}[ht]\label{fig2}

298: \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{0mm} \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{5mm}

299: \captionstyle{centerlast}

300: \renewcommand{\captionlabeldelim}{.~}

301: \renewcommand{\captionfont}{\linespread{1.25}\small\sl}

302: \renewcommand{\captionlabelfont}{\normalsize\sffamily}

303: \setcaptionwidth{0.8\textwidth}% \setcaptionmargin{1cm}

304: \onelinecaptionsfalse \caption{Dependence of the cross-section

305: asymmetry on the interaction kernel of the BS equation. Dashed

306: curve is the positive-energy BS calculation with the

307: one-boson-exchange vertex function, dot line is the same with

308: Graz-II vertex function. Shaded area shows the effects of the

309: retardation in the Graz-II vertex function. } \centering

310: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{fig2.eps}

311: \end{figure}

312: The matrix element in Eq.~\eqref{t-amp} is calculated in the

313: one-body plane wave approximation with the transverse gauge. The

314: vertex function is the solution of the homogeneous BS equation

315: with the Graz-II separable interaction~\cite{tjon}. The dominant

316: positive-energy components of the vertex function of the deuteron

317: are considered. In Fig.~\ref{fig1} we present results of the

318: dependence of the asymmetry at $\Theta=90^\circ$ on the

319: laboratory photon energy $E_\gamma$. Here the curves concerning

320: the number of approximations with respect to the exact

321: positive-energy BS calculation  (solid curve) are depicted. The

322: static approximation (dot-dashed curve) amounts to neglecting the

323: boost on the internal and spin variables of the BS amplitude for

324: the deuteron. Such RC as the Lorentz contraction and spin

325: precession are excluded. The effect due to the booster on the

326: spin variables is shown by dotted line in Fig.~\ref{fig1}.

327: 

328: We find that the asymmetry $\Sigma$ bears rather strong dependence

329: on the interaction kernel used in solving the BS equation for the

330: deuteron. Its is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}. The solid and dash

331: curves are the calculations with the positive-energy vertex

332: functions of the deuteron, which are solutions of the BS equation

333: with the one-boson-exchange and Graz-II interaction (strength of

334: the D-state is equal to 5\%) kernels, respectively. Since a

335: realistic BS amplitude is computed using the Wick

336: rotation~\cite{umnikov}, it can be taken in our analysis only at

337: the relative energy equal to zero. The effect of the retardation

338: (the relative energy dependence of the vertex function) in case of

339: the separable interaction is highlighted in Fig.~\ref{fig2}. The

340: deviations between two curves are explained by, first, that the

341: minima in the S-waves of the two vertex functions are shifted on

342: approximately 100 MeV, and, second, D-wave of the realistic vertex

343: function is much softer than that of the separable one. The latter

344: is rather crucial for the behavior of the asymmetry for the photon

345: energies higher than 600 MeV.

346: 

347: In summary, we conclude that the relativistic effects could make a

348: significant contribution to the polarization-beam observables in

349: deuteron photodisintegration, though for their simple assessment

350: one should encourage us to conduct a more complete analysis.

351: 

352: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

353: \bibitem{legs1}

354: G.S. Blanpied et al. (The LEGS Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 67}, 1206

355: (1991).

356: \bibitem{legs2} G. Blanpied et al. (The LEGS Collab.),

357: Phys. Rev. {\bf C61}, 024604 (2001).

358: \bibitem{mami} S. Wartenberg et al., Few-Body Sys. {\bf 25}, 213 (1999).

359: \bibitem{bochna} C. Bochna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 4576 (1998).

360: \bibitem{adamian} F. Adamian et al., Eur. Phys. J. A. {\bf 8}, 423 (2000).

361: \bibitem{jaus} W. Jaus and W.S. Woolock, Helv. Phys. Acta {\bf 57}, 644 (1984).

362: \bibitem{ying} Shuqian Ying, E.M. Henley, and G.A. Miller, Phys. Rev. {\bf C38}, 1584 (1988).

363: \bibitem{mypaper} K.Yu. Kazakov and S.Eh. Shirmovsky,

364: Phys. Rev. {\bf C63}, 014002 (2001)

365: \bibitem{GDH} H. Arenh\"ovel, G. Kre\ss, R. Shmidt and

366: P.Wilhelm, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A631}, 612c (1998).

367: \bibitem{arenhovel} H. Arenh\"ovel and M. Sanzone, Few-Body Sys. Suppl. {\bf 3}, 1 (1991).

368: \bibitem{wallace} S.J. Wallace, nucl-th/0010090,

369: {\em Invited Talk at XVII Europ. Conf. on Few-Body Problems in Phys.,

370: Sept. 11--16, 2000, Evora, Portugal} (to appear in Nucl. Phys. A).

371: %\bibitem{mandelstam} S. Mandelstam, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)

372: %{\bf A233}, 507 (1955).

373: \bibitem{hwang} W.-Y. Hwang and G.E. Walker, Ann. of Phys. {\bf 159}, 118 (1985).

374: \bibitem{schwamb} M. Schawamb, H. Arenh\"ovel, P. Wilhelm and Th. Wilbois,

375: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A631}, 583c (1998).

376: \bibitem{ito} H. Ito, W.W. Buck, and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. {\bf C43}, 2483 (1991).

377: \bibitem{shebeko} A.V. Shebeko and A.Yu. Korchin, J. Nucl. Phys. (Yadernaya Fizika)

378: {\bf 54}, 357 (1991).

379: \bibitem{tjon} G. Rupp and J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. {\bf C41}, 472 (1990).

380: \bibitem{umnikov} A.Yu. Umnikov, F.C. Khanna, and L.P. Kaptari, Phys.Rev. {\bf C56}, 1700 (1997)

381: \end{thebibliography}

382: 

383: \end{document}

384: