1: % version 08.04.01
2: \documentstyle[prc,aps,preprint,psfig]{revtex}
3: \topmargin -25pt
4: \textwidth 160mm \oddsidemargin 2mm
5: \textheight 240mm \evensidemargin 2mm
6: \draft
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{$e^+e^-$ production in $p A$ reactions at SIS energies
10: \thanks{Work supported by GSI and BMBF} }
11: \author{E. L. Bratkovskaya \\[2mm]
12: {\normalsize Institut f\"{u}r Theoretische Physik, Universit\"{a}t Giessen}\\
13: {\normalsize 35392 Giessen, Germany}}
14: %\date{ }
15: \maketitle
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: Detailed predictions for dilepton production from $p A$ reactions at
19: SIS energies are presented within a semi-classical BUU transport model
20: that includes the off-shell propagation of vector mesons
21: nonperturbatively and calculates the width of the vector mesons dynamically.
22: Different scenarios of in-medium modifications of vector mesons, such
23: as collisional broadening and dropping vector meson masses, are
24: investigated and the possibilities for an experimental observation of
25: in-medium effects in $p A$ reactions at 1--4 GeV are discussed for a
26: variety of nuclear targets.
27: \end{abstract}
28:
29: \vspace{0.5cm}\noindent
30: PACS: \ {25.75.Dw, 13.30.Ce, 12.40.Yx, 12.40.Vv, 25.40.-h}
31:
32: \vspace{0.5cm}\noindent
33: Keywords: particle and resonance production; leptonic and semileptonic
34: decays; hadron models; vector-meson dominance, nucleon-induced
35: reactions
36:
37: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
38: \narrowtext
39: \newpage
40: \section{Introduction}
41: The modification of hadron properties in the nuclear matter are of
42: fundamental interest
43: (cf. Refs. \cite{BrownRho,Shakin94,Klingl96,H&L92,Asakawa93}) as
44: QCD sum rules \cite{H&L92,Asakawa93,Leupold} as well as QCD inspired
45: effective Lagrangian models
46: \cite{BrownRho,Shakin94,Klingl96,Herrmann,asakawa,Chanfray,Rapp,Friman,RappNPA,Peters}
47: predict significant changes of the vector mesons ($\rho$, $\omega$ and
48: $\phi$) with the nuclear density. A more direct evidence for the
49: modification of vector mesons has been provided by the enhanced
50: production of lepton pairs above known sources in nucleus-nucleus
51: collisions at SPS energies \cite{CERES,Ullrich,HELIOS,HELI2}. As
52: proposed by Li, Ko, and Brown \cite{Li} and Ko et al. \cite{Li96}, the
53: observed enhancement in the invariant mass range $0.3 \leq M \leq 0.7$
54: GeV might be due to a shift of the $\rho$-meson mass following
55: Brown/Rho scaling \cite{BrownRho} or the Hatsuda and Lee sum rule
56: prediction~\cite{H&L92}. The microscopic transport studies in Refs.
57: \cite{Cass95C,Cass96H,Brat97,CBRep98,Ernst} for these systems support these
58: results \cite{Li,Li96,Ko93,Ko95}. However, also more conventional approaches
59: that describe a melting of the $\rho$-meson in-medium due to the strong
60: hadronic coupling (along the lines of
61: Refs.~\cite{Herrmann,asakawa,Chanfray,Rapp,Peters}) were found to be
62: compatible with the CERES data~\cite{Rapp,Cass95C,CBRW97}.
63:
64: An alternative way to provide independent information about the hadron
65: properties in the medium is to use more elementary probes such a pions,
66: protons or photons as incoming particles. In such reactions the nuclear
67: matter is close to the ground state, i.e. at normal nuclear density,
68: however, in-medium effects might be still significant to be observed
69: experimentally.
70:
71: In this paper, therefore, the study of dilepton production from
72: heavy-ion, pion-nucleus collisions (cf. \cite{CBRep98,Effe_piA}) and
73: photon-nucleus reactions \cite{Effe99gam} is extended to proton-nucleus
74: reactions. Whereas earlier studies on $p+A$ reactions have involved a
75: perturbative scheme for vector meson production and their dileptonic
76: decay \cite{Wolf90,BCMas96} the latter processes will be evaluated
77: nonperturbatively on the basis of the resonance model
78: \cite{Effe99gam,EffePhD} in this work and the collisional width will be
79: calculated dynamically as a function of nucleon density, mass and
80: momentum of the vector mesons. Furthermore, the off-shell propagation
81: of the vector mesons -- adopted from Refs. \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2}
82: -- will be included consistently.
83:
84: One might argue that $p+A$ reactions should yield similar dilepton
85: spectra than $\pi$ or $\gamma$ induced reactions on nuclear targets.
86: However, it is not clear if the sensitivity to vector meson in-medium
87: effects is the same in $\gamma +A, \pi +A$ or $p+A$ reactions since in
88: $\gamma+A$ reactions the nucleus is illuminated rather uniformly while
89: in $\pi, p$ induced reactions the initial reaction happens close to the
90: surface. Note, that the wavelength of the impinging hadron is short
91: compared to the distance between nucleons in the target such that such
92: classical considerations may be employed. Furthermore, in $\pi+A$
93: reactions initially high mass resonances are excited in the $\pi N$
94: reaction whereas in $p+A$ reactions the excitation of high mass
95: resonances -- which have some $\rho$ meson decay width -- is suppressed
96: since the energy is shared between two nucleons and a substantial
97: longitudinal kinetic energy is left. Thus it is not obvious that all
98: reactions finally result in similar dilepton spectra. On the other
99: hand, it is of importance that all reactions (including $A+A$) are
100: calculated within the same approach.
101:
102: The analysis of dilepton production from $p+A$ reactions is of special
103: interest with respect to the future
104: dilepton experimental program of the HADES Collaboration at GSI. The
105: detailed microscopic calculations on the basis of the resonance
106: Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) model \cite{Effe99gam,EffePhD} will
107: thus be performed for dilepton production in the systems to be measured
108: experimentally, i.e. $p C$, $p Ca$, $p Pb$ at proton energies
109: of $E = 1.0, \ 2.0, \ 3.0$ and 4.0~GeV.
110:
111: In these calculations different scenarios of in-medium modifications of
112: vector mesons such as the 'dropping mass' scenario -- following Brown/Rho
113: scaling \cite{BrownRho} -- or the Hatsuda and Lee sum-rule
114: prediction~\cite{H&L92} as well as the effect of collisional
115: broadening (cf. e.g. \cite{Boresk96}) will be employed
116: including, however, a dynamical width of the vector mesons that is
117: calculated dynamically and consistent with the vector meson
118: production/absorption amplitudes (or probabilities).
119:
120: The paper is organized as follows: In Section~2 the underlying
121: resonance model, that enters the coupled-channel BUU transport approach
122: is presented. In Section~3 detailed predictions for these reactions
123: are given employing a high mass resolution for the dilepton pair
124: of $\Delta M=10$~MeV in view of
125: upcoming experiments with the HADES detector at GSI Darmstadt. Section
126: 4 contains a summary and discussion of open problems.
127:
128:
129: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
130: \section{Description of the model}
131:
132: \subsection{The resonance approach}
133:
134: The analysis of dilepton production from $p C$, $p Ca$
135: and $p Pb$ collisions is performed within the resonance approach of
136: Refs. \cite{Effe99gam,EffePhD}.
137: This model is based on the resonance concept of nucleon-nucleon and
138: meson-nucleon interactions at low invariant energy $\sqrt{s} \ $
139: \cite{TeisZP97} by adopting all resonance parameters from the Manley
140: analysis \cite{Manley};
141: all states with at least 2 stars in Ref.~\cite{Manley}
142: are taken into account:
143: $P_{33}$(1232), $P_{11}$(1440), $D_{13}$(1520), $S_{11}$(1535),
144: $P_{33}$(1600), $S_{31}$(1620), $S_{11}$(1650), $D_{15}$(1675),
145: $F_{15}$(1680), $P_{13}$(1879), $S_{31}$(1900), $F_{35}$(1905),
146: $P_{31}$(1910), $D_{35}$(1930), $F_{37}$(1950), $F_{17}$(1990),
147: $G_{17}$(2190), $D_{35}$(2350). These resonances couple to the following
148: channels: $N \pi$, $N \eta$, $N \omega$, $\Lambda K$, $\Delta(1232)
149: \pi$, $N \rho$, $N \sigma$, $N(1440) \pi$, $\Delta(1232) \rho$
150: with respect to the production and decay.
151:
152: It has been shown in Ref. \cite{TeisZP97} that the resonance model
153: provides a good description of the experimental data on one- and
154: two-pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions at low energy.
155: However, with increasing bombarding energy the resonance contributions
156: underestimate the data; the missing yield is then treated as a
157: background term to the resonance amplitude. This background term
158: 'mimics' $t$-channel particle production mechanism as well as other
159: non-resonance contributions (e.g., direct $NN\to NN\pi$, without
160: creating an intermediate resonance).
161:
162: With increasing energy, furthermore, multiparticle production
163: becomes more and more important.
164: The high energy collisions -- above $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.6~GeV for
165: baryon-baryon collisions and $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.2~GeV for meson-baryon
166: collisions -- are described by the LUND string fragmentation model
167: FRITIOF \cite{FRITIOF}. This aspect is similar to that used in the HSD
168: (Hadron-String-Dynamics) approach \cite{Brat97,CBRep98,Ehehalt} and the UrQMD model
169: \cite{Bass}.
170:
171: This combined resonance-string approach allows to calculate
172: particle production in baryon-baryon and meson-baryon
173: collisions from low to high energies.
174: The collisional dynamics for proton-nucleus reactions, furthermore, is
175: described by the coupled-channel BUU transport approach
176: \cite{Effe99gam,EffePhD} that is based on the same elementary cross
177: sections.
178:
179:
180: \subsection{Dilepton production}
181:
182: The dilepton production within the resonance model can be schematically
183: presented in the following way:
184: \begin{eqnarray}
185: BB &\to&R X \label{chBBR} \\
186: mB &\to&R X \label{chmBR} \\
187: && R \to e^+e^- X, \label{chRd} \\
188: && R \to m X, \ m\to e^+e^- X, \label{chRMd} \\
189: && R \to R^\prime X, \ R^\prime \to e^+e^- X, \label{chRprd}
190: \end{eqnarray}
191: i.e. in a first step a resonance $R$ might be produced
192: in baryon-baryon ($BB$) or meson-baryon ($mB$) collisions -- (\ref{chBBR}),
193: (\ref{chmBR}). Then this resonance can couple to dileptons
194: directly -- (\ref{chRd}) (e.g., Dalitz decay of the $\Delta$ resonance:
195: $\Delta \to e^+e^-N$) or decays to a meson $m$ (+ baryon) -- (\ref{chRMd})
196: which produces dileptons via direct decays ($\rho, \omega$)
197: or Dalitz decays ($\pi^0, \eta, \omega$).
198: The resonance $R$ might also decay into another resonance $R^\prime$ --
199: (\ref{chRprd}) which later produces dileptons via Dalitz decay or again
200: via meson decays (e.g., $D_{35}(1930)\to\Delta\rho,\ \Delta\to
201: e^+e^-N, \ \rho\to e^+e^-$). Note, that in the combined model the
202: final particles -- which couple to dileptons -- can be produced also
203: via non-resonant mechanisms, i.e. 'background' at low and intermediate
204: energies and string decay at high energies.
205:
206: The electromagnetic part of all conventional dilepton sources --
207: $\pi^0, \eta, \omega$ and $\Delta$ Dalitz decay, direct decay of vector
208: mesons $\rho, \omega$ and $pn$ bremsstrahlung -- are treated in the
209: same way as described in detail in Ref.~\cite{BCM00SIS}-- where dilepton
210: production in $pp$ and $pd$ reactions has been studied -- and
211: should not be repeated here again. A description of the elementary
212: dilepton sources can be found also in Ref. \cite{Tuebingen}.
213:
214: \section{In-medium effects on dilepton production.}
215:
216: \subsection{Collisional broadening and in-medium propagation}
217:
218: In line with Refs. \cite{GKC97} the effects of collisional
219: broadening for the vector meson width have been implemented:
220: \begin{eqnarray}
221: \Gamma^*_V(M,|\vec p|,\rho)=\Gamma_V(M)
222: + \Gamma_{coll}(M,|\vec p|,\rho) ,
223: \label{gammas}
224: \end{eqnarray}
225: where the collisional width is given as
226: \begin{eqnarray}
227: \Gamma_{coll}(M,|\vec p|,\rho) = \gamma \ \rho < v \ \sigma_{VN}^{tot} >.
228: \label{dgamma}
229: \end{eqnarray}
230: Here $v=|{\vec p}|/E, \ {\vec p}, \ E$ are the vector
231: meson velocity, 3-momentum and energy with respect to the target at
232: rest, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor for the boost to the rest frame
233: of the vector meson, $\rho$ the
234: nuclear density and $\sigma_{VN}^{tot}$ is the meson-nucleon total
235: cross section calculated within the Manley resonance model
236: \cite{Manley}, while $\Gamma_V(M)$ denotes the vacuum width according
237: to the Manley parametrization \cite{Manley} (for details see
238: Ref. \cite{Effe99gam}). In Eq.~(\ref{dgamma}) the brackets stand
239: for an average over the Fermi distribution of the nucleons.
240:
241: While propagating through the nuclear medium the total width of the
242: vector meson $\Gamma_V^*$ (\ref{gammas}) changes dynamical and its
243: spectral function is modified according to the real part of the vector
244: meson self energy $Re \Sigma^{ret}$, as well as by the imaginary part
245: of the self energy ($\Gamma_V^*\simeq -Im \Sigma^{ret}/M$) following
246: \begin{eqnarray}
247: A_V(M) = {2\over \pi} \ {M^2 \Gamma_V^*
248: \over (M^2-M_0^2- Re \Sigma^{ret})^2 + (M {\Gamma_V^*})^2},
249: \label{spfun}\end{eqnarray}
250: which is the in-medium form for a boson spectral function.
251:
252: Since the vector mesons are produced at finite density in line with the
253: mass-distribution (\ref{spfun}) with $\Gamma_V^* \neq \Gamma_V$ in the
254: kinematical allowed mass regime, their spectral function has to merge
255: the vacuum spectral function when propagating out of the medium. To
256: specify the actual (and general) problem let us consider the decay of
257: the $N(1520)$ to a nucleon and a $\rho$-meson: Only a low mass 'slice'
258: of $\rho$ mesons can be populated due to energy conservation; such low
259: mass $\rho$ test-particles can only change their actual mass by
260: collisions with other hadrons in the approach of \cite{Effe99gam}. In
261: practice, however, such test-particles do not scatter often enough to
262: reconstruct the vacuum spectral function when propagating out of the
263: nucleus. As a consequence such low mass $\rho$'s may propagate to the
264: vacuum without collisions and radiate dileptons for a long time in the
265: vacuum since their lifetime, given by the inverse 2 pion decay width,
266: is very long in the vacuum for low invariant mass. This 'artefact' is
267: enhanced by the dilepton radiation probability which -- due to the
268: virtual photon propagator and a phase-space factor -- is $\sim
269: M^{-3}$. As a consequence the mass differential dilepton spectrum shows
270: a large peak close to $M = 2 m_\pi$ (cf. Fig. 14 of \cite{Effe99gam}.
271: Some 'prescriptions' have been used in \cite{Effe99gam} to cure the
272: problem: either an 'instantaneous' $\rho$ meson decay, a minimum 2 pion
273: width of 10 MeV or a mass- and density-dependent real 'potential' for
274: the $\rho$'s (by Monte Carlo) which reconstructs the vacuum $\rho$
275: spectral function when the test-particles propagate out of the nucleus.
276: The differences between these 'prescriptions' are dramatic for $M \leq
277: 0.4$ GeV but become small for $M \geq$ 0.5 GeV (cf. Fig. 14 of
278: \cite{Effe99gam}).
279:
280:
281: In order to avoid the 'low-mass ambiguities' from such 'numerical
282: prescriptions', which do not appear in perturbative calculational
283: schemes, in this study the general off-shell equations of motion from
284: Refs. \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2} have been employed. Related equations
285: for the nonrelativistic case have been given in Ref. \cite{Leupold_off}.
286: In \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2} the equations of
287: motion for test particles with momentum $\vec P_i$, energy
288: $\varepsilon_i$ at position $\vec X_i$ -- representing a short-lived
289: off-shell particle -- have been extended to
290: \begin{eqnarray}
291: \label{eomr} \frac{d {\vec X}_i}{dt} \! & = &
292: \frac{1}{2 \varepsilon_i} \: \left[ \, 2 \,
293: {\vec P}_i \, + \, {\vec \nabla}_{P_i} \, Re \Sigma^{ret}_{(i)} \,
294: + \, \frac{ \varepsilon_i^2 - {\vec P}_i^2 - M_0^2 - Re
295: \Sigma^{ret}_{(i)}}{\Gamma_{(i)}} \: {\vec \nabla}_{P_i} \,
296: \Gamma_{(i)} \: \right],
297: \\[0.3cm]
298: %
299: \label{eomp} \frac{d {\vec P}_i}{d t} \! & = &
300: \frac{1}{2 \varepsilon_{i}} \: \left[ {\vec
301: \nabla}_{X_i} \, Re \Sigma^{ret}_i \: + \: \frac{\varepsilon_i^2 -
302: {\vec P}_i^2 - M_0^{2} - Re \Sigma^{ret}_{(i)}}{\Gamma_{(i)}} \:
303: {\vec \nabla}_{X_i} \, \Gamma_{(i)} \: \right],
304: \\[0.3cm]
305: %
306: \label{eome} \frac{d \varepsilon_i}{d t}
307: & = & \frac{1}{2 \varepsilon_i} \: \left[ \frac{\partial Re
308: \Sigma^{ret}_{(i)}}{\partial t} \: + \: \frac{\varepsilon_i^2 - {\vec
309: P}_i^2 - M_0^{2} - Re \Sigma^{ret}_{(i)}}{\Gamma_{(i)}} \:
310: \frac{\partial \Gamma_{(i)}}{\partial t} \right],
311: \end{eqnarray}
312: where the notation $F_{(i)}$ implies that the function is taken at
313: the coordinates of the test particle, i.e. $F_{(i)} \equiv
314: F(t,\vec{X}_{i}(t),\vec{P}_{i}(t),\varepsilon_{i}(t))$.
315: In Eqs. (\ref{eomr})-(\ref{eome}) $Re \Sigma^{ret}$ denotes the real
316: part of the retarded self energy while $\Gamma = -1/2 Im \Sigma^{ret}$
317: stands for the imaginary part in short-hand notation. Note, that in
318: (\ref{eomr})-(\ref{eome}) energy derivatives of the self energy
319: $\Sigma^{ret}$ have been discarded (cf. \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2}).
320: This should work out well according to the model studies in \cite{Cass_off2}
321: for the proton-nucleus case.
322:
323:
324: Furthermore, following Ref. \cite{Cass_off1} and using $M^{2} = P^2 -
325: Re \Sigma^{ret}$ as an independent variable instead of the energy
326: $P_0 \equiv \varepsilon$, Eq. (\ref{eome}) turns to
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: \frac{dM_i^2}{dt} \; = \; \frac{M_i^2 -
329: M_0^2}{\Gamma_{(i)}} \; \frac{d \Gamma_{(i)}}{dt}
330: \label{eomm}
331: \end{eqnarray}
332: for the time evolution of the test-particle $i$ in the invariant
333: mass squared \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2}.
334:
335: Apart from the propagation in the real potential
336: $\sim Re \Sigma/2\varepsilon$ the equations (\ref{eomr}) -- (\ref{eomm})
337: include the dynamical changes due to the imaginary part of the
338: self energy $Im \Sigma^{ret} \sim - M \Gamma_{V}^*$ with
339: $\Gamma_V^*$ from (\ref{gammas}). It is worth to mention that the
340: deviation from the pole mass, i.e. $\Delta M^2 = M^2 - M_0^2$, follows
341: the equation
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: {d\over dt}\Delta M^2 = {\Delta M^2\over Im \Sigma^{ret}}
344: \ {d\over dt} Im\Sigma^{ret},
345: \label{dm2}\end{eqnarray}
346: which expresses the fact that the off-shellness in mass is proportional
347: to the total width $\Gamma_V^*$. Note, furthermore, that the
348: equations of motion (\ref{eomr}) -- (\ref{eomm}) conserve the particle
349: energy $\varepsilon$ if the self energy $\Sigma^{ret}$ does not depend
350: on time explicitly (cf. Refs. \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2}), which is
351: approximately the case for $p+A$ reactions.
352:
353: In this study the effects of collisional broadening described by
354: $\Gamma_{coll}$ (\ref{dgamma}) with and without an explicit potential
355: ($Re \Sigma^{ret}$) for the vector mesons will be considered (cf. next
356: Subsection).
357:
358: \subsection{'Dropping' vector meson mass}
359:
360: In order to explore the observable consequences of vector meson mass
361: shifts at finite nuclear density the in-medium vector meson masses are
362: modeled according to the Hatsuda and Lee \cite{H&L92} or Brown/Rho
363: scaling \cite{BrownRho} as
364: \begin{eqnarray}
365: \label{Brown}
366: M^* = M_0 \left(1 - \alpha {\rho ({\vec r}) \over \rho_0}\right),
367: \end{eqnarray}
368: where $\rho ({\vec r})$ is the nuclear density at the resonance decay,
369: $\rho_0 = 0.16 \ {\rm fm}^{-3}$ and $\alpha \simeq 0.18$ for the $\rho$ and
370: $\omega$. The choice (\ref{Brown}) corresponds to
371: \begin{equation}
372: Re \Sigma^{ret} = M_0^2 \left( \left(\alpha \frac{\rho}{\rho_0}\right)^2
373: - 2 \alpha \frac{\rho}{\rho_0}\right)
374: \end{equation}
375: in (\ref{eomr}) -- (\ref{eomm}),
376: which is dominated by the attractive linear term in $\rho/\rho_0$
377: at nuclear matter density $\rho_0$.
378:
379: The in-medium vector meson masses $M^*$ (\ref{Brown}) in principle have
380: to be taken into account in the production part as well as for
381: absorption reactions and for propagation. This is implemented for the
382: low energy reactions with nucleon resonances. Note, however, that the
383: vector mesons produced by the FRITIOF model -- as implemented in the
384: transport approach \cite{Effe99gam} -- have masses according to the
385: free spectral function. This approximation might not be severe since
386: the vector mesons from string decay at high energy have high momenta
387: with respect to the target nucleus where pole-mass shifts are expected
388: to be small \cite{Peters,Kondr_rho}. Furthermore, the $N\rho$-width of
389: the baryonic resonances at finite density \cite{Effe99gam} has not been
390: modified. Such modifications are out of the scope of the present
391: model.
392:
393:
394: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
395: \section{Numerical results}
396:
397: \subsection{spatial distribution of $e^+e^-$ production from
398: vector meson decays}
399:
400: As mentioned in the introduction dilepton studies from $p+A$ reactions
401: allow to investigate the vector meson properties at moderate densities
402: under well controlled conditions and provide complementary information
403: to $\pi$ or $\gamma$ induced reactions on nuclei. To this aim the
404: average density distribution of a $Pb$-nucleus at rest in the
405: laboratory is shown in Fig. \ref{Fig1pA} (upper left part) as well as
406: the spatial distribution in the first $pN$ collisions (upper right
407: part). Here the spatial distribution ${1\over b}{dN\over db dz}$ is
408: displayed in cylindrical coordinates $b=(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}$ and $z$, where
409: $z$ is directed along the beam axis and the proton is impinging on the
410: nucleus from the left side.
411:
412: The lower part of Fig. \ref{Fig1pA} displays the spatial
413: distribution for $\rho$-meson (left part) and $\omega$-meson (right
414: part) decays to dileptons. At low bombarding energy most of the
415: $\rho$'s stem from the decay of baryonic resonances formed in primary
416: $pN$ and secondary $\pi N$ collisions. Thus, $\rho$'s are produced
417: inside the nucleus close to the surface, i.e. at normal nuclear density.
418: Since $\rho$-mesons have a short life time, they decay to dileptons
419: basically inside the nucleus. On the contrary, the $\omega$-mesons are
420: formed dominantly in primary $pN$ collisions and have a longer life
421: time, such that the $\omega$ spatial distribution is more elongated and
422: part of the $\omega$'s decay outside the nucleus.
423:
424: \subsection{$p + A$ collisions from 1--4 GeV}
425:
426: \subsubsection{Invariant mass distributions}
427:
428: In Fig.~\ref{Fig2pA} the calculated dilepton invariant mass spectra
429: $d\sigma/dM$ are presented for $p + C$ collisions from
430: 1.0 -- 4 GeV (including an experimental mass resolution
431: $\Delta M$ = 10 MeV) without in-medium modifications (bare masses) --
432: left part, and applying the collisional broadening + dropping mass
433: scenario -- right part.
434: The thin lines indicate the individual contributions from the different
435: production channels; {\it i.e.}~ starting from low $M$:
436: Dalitz decay $\pi^0 \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ (short dashed line),
437: $\eta \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ (dotted line),
438: $\Delta \to N e^+ e^-$ (dashed line),
439: $\omega \to \pi^0 e^+ e^-$ (dot-dashed line),
440: for $M \approx $ 0.7 GeV: $\omega \to e^+e^-$ (dot-dashed line),
441: $\rho^0 \to e^+e^-$ (short dashed line).
442: The full solid line represents the sum of all sources considered here.
443: The dominant contribution at low $M$ ($> m_{\pi^0}$) is
444: the $\eta$ Dalitz decay, however, for $M > 0.4$ GeV the dileptons stem
445: basically all from direct vector meson decays ($\rho$ and $\omega$).
446: Note, that for the collisional broadening + dropping mass scenario
447: (right panel) only the $\rho$ and $\omega$ contributions as well as the
448: sum of all sources are presented since the other individual
449: contributions are similar to the bare mass case (left panel).
450:
451: It is worth to point out, that already the free $\rho$-contribution is
452: very asymmetric in mass due to the fact that the dilepton decay leads
453: to a multiplication of the $\rho$-spectral function by $1/M^3$ (cf.
454: Ref. \cite{BCM00SIS}). This is in contrast to the assumption made in
455: Ref. \cite{Japen} for the $e^+e^-$ spectra from $p + C$ and $p + Cu$
456: reactions at 12 GeV/c laboratory momentum.
457:
458:
459: In order to see the differences between the results from the left and
460: right panels of Fig. \ref{Fig2pA}, a comparison of the different
461: in-medium modification scenarios is shown in Fig. \ref{Fig3pA}, i.e.
462: collisional broadening (dashed lines) and collisional broadening +
463: dropping vector meson masses (dash-dotted lines), with respect to the
464: bare mass case (solid lines) on a linear scale for $p + C$ from 1--4
465: GeV. At 1.0 GeV some enhancement for $0.4 \leq M \leq 0.5$ GeV in case
466: of collisional broadening (dashed line) is found as well as an
467: additional mass shift (dash-dotted line) which is essentially due to
468: 'subthreshold' $\rho$ production in the $\pi N \rightarrow N^*(1520)
469: \rightarrow \rho N$ or $pN \rightarrow N N^*(1520) \rightarrow NN \rho$
470: reactions, where the $\rho$ is stronger populated from the $N^*(1520)$
471: resonance in case of a broadened (and shifted) $\rho$ spectral
472: function. The modifications of the dilepton spectrum are rather
473: moderate for the light $C$-target at 2, 3 and 4 GeV especially for the
474: collisional broadening scenario since the $\rho$-nucleon-resonance
475: couplings are already included dynamically in the transport model. Only
476: in case of the additional $\rho$ mass shift (dash-dotted lines) one
477: observes a small enhancement for $0.5 \leq M \leq 0.75$ GeV, which is
478: most pronounced at 3 GeV.
479:
480:
481: In Figs. \ref{Fig4pA}--\ref{Fig5pA} the calculational results for the
482: $p + Ca$ reaction from 1--4 GeV are presented in analogy to Figs.
483: \ref{Fig2pA} and \ref{Fig3pA}. Consequently, the assignment of the
484: individual lines is the same as in Figs. \ref{Fig2pA}, \ref{Fig3pA} for
485: the $p + C$ case. Except from an overall scaling in height, these
486: spectra look very much the same as for the light $C$ target. The
487: in-medium modifications again can be much better seen by a direct
488: comparison on a linear scale in Fig. \ref{Fig5pA}. As mentioned before,
489: collisional broadening of the $\rho$ spectral function gives no net
490: signal within the numerical statistics achieved whereas the 'dropping
491: mass' scenario leads to a now more pronounced enhancement in the range
492: $0.5 \leq M \leq 0.75$ GeV, which is up to a factor 1.7 at 3 GeV. Note,
493: that this enhancement correlates with a reduction of the dilepton yield
494: in the pole-mass region of the $\rho$ and $\omega$ mesons.
495:
496: Let's continue with the heavy $Pb$ target. In Figs.
497: \ref{Fig6pA}--\ref{Fig7pA} the calculated results for $p + Pb$ from
498: 1--4 GeV are presented again in analogy to Figs. \ref{Fig2pA} and
499: \ref{Fig3pA} with the same assignment of the individual lines.
500: Apart from an overall scaling in height, these spectra look again very
501: similar as for the $C$ and $Ca$ targets. The in-medium modifications
502: again can be much better seen by a direct comparison on a linear scale
503: in Fig. \ref{Fig7pA}. Now the in-medium effects show up more clearly.
504: Whereas collisional broadening of the $\rho$ spectral function again
505: gives no clear signal within the numerical accuracy achieved the
506: 'dropping mass' scenario leads to a pronounced modification of the
507: spectral shape. A strong reduction of the dilepton yield in the vector
508: meson pole mass region around 0.77 GeV is observed since most of
509: the $\rho$'s and $\omega$'s now decay in the medium approximately at
510: density $\rho_0$. This leads to a pronounced peak around $M \approx
511: 0.65$ GeV, which can be attributed to the in-medium $\omega$ decay
512: since the $\rho$ spectral strength is distributed over a wide low mass
513: regime. The situation is very reminiscent of dilepton spectra from $\pi
514: + A$ and $\gamma + A$ reactions in Refs.
515: \cite{CBRep98,Effe_piA,Effe99gam}. Especially when comparing dilepton
516: spectra from $C$ and $Pb$ targets, it should be experimentally possible
517: to distinguish an in-medium mass shift of the $\omega$ meson by taking
518: the ratio of both spectra.
519:
520:
521: In summarizing the results from Figs. \ref{Fig3pA}, \ref{Fig5pA} and
522: \ref{Fig7pA}, the collisional broadening scenario gives practically the
523: same dilepton spectra (within statistical fluctuations) as the bare
524: mass case, since the coupling of the $\rho$'s to the baryonic
525: resonances are dynamicaly taken into account in the resonance model.
526: The inclusion of 'dropping' vector meson masses leads to an enhancement
527: of the dilepton yield for $M=0.5-0.75$ GeV and to a reduction at
528: the $\omega$-peak which becomes more pronounced with increasing target size
529: and indicates a factor of 2 enhancement from in-medium $\omega$ decays
530: in case of $p + Pb$ at 3--4 GeV.
531:
532: \subsubsection{Transverse momentum distributions}
533:
534: In Fig. \ref{Fig8pA} the transverse momentum distribution of all
535: dileptons for the $p + C$ system at 1.0 , 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV are
536: displayed. Here the sequence of the individual channels is as follows:
537: the contribution from the $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay dominates at all
538: energies and is practically identical to the sum of all sources (solid
539: line). Apart from 1.0 GeV the next strong channel is the $\eta$ Dalitz
540: decay followed by the $\Delta$-Dalitz decays, $pn$ bremsstrahlung and
541: the $\omega$-Dalitz decays, while the direct decays of the $\rho$ and
542: $\omega$ mesons are down by orders of magnitude. Thus global $p_T$
543: spectra do not provide very interesting information.
544:
545: In order to extract the interesting physics one has to apply cuts on
546: the invariant dilepton mass to suppress or exclude the dominant
547: channels. For this purpose a cut on the interval $0.4 \leq M \leq 0.7$
548: GeV has been chosen, which is displayed for the $p + C$ reaction at
549: 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV in Fig. \ref{Fig9pA} (left panel) for the bare
550: mass case. Indeed, now the $\rho$ meson signal is the strongest or at
551: least comparable to the remaining $\eta$ Dalitz decay, whereas the
552: other channels are more suppressed. In the right panel of Fig.
553: \ref{Fig9pA} a comparison of the bare mass case (solid lines) with the
554: collisional broadening and dropping mass scenario (dash-dotted lines)
555: is presented. Since the differences are only very tiny, one can
556: conclude that there is practically no sensitivity to in-medium effects
557: for the $C$ target at all energies.
558:
559: Following the same strategy as in the previous subsection the
560: same analysis for the system $p + Ca$ is shown in Figs. \ref{Fig10pA} and
561: \ref{Fig11pA}. The $p_T$ spectrum of the dileptons is again similar at
562: all energies to that from the $C$ target in Figs. \ref{Fig8pA} and
563: \ref{Fig9pA}, however, the detailed comparison of the bare mass (solid
564: line) and dropping mass + collisional broadening scenario (dash-dotted
565: line) in Fig. \ref{Fig11pA} (right panel) indicates an enhancement of
566: the $p_T$ spectrum in case of the in-medium modifications whereas the
567: shape in $p_T$ is very similar. These observations are practically
568: identical even for the heavy $Pb$ target as demonstrated in Figs.
569: \ref{Fig12pA} and \ref{Fig13pA}. Here the $p_T$ spectrum from the
570: different scenarios (right panel in Fig. \ref{Fig13pA}) show the same
571: enhancement for the dropping mass case as in Fig. \ref{Fig11pA},
572: however, the spectral shape in $p_T$ does not provide new information
573: since it does not differ significantly at any transverse momentum.
574:
575: \subsubsection{Dilepton rapidity distributions}
576:
577: In Fig. \ref{Fig14pA} the rapidity distribution of all dileptons in
578: the laboratory for the $p + C$ system at 1.0 , 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV is
579: displayed. Here the sequence of the individual lines is follows: the
580: contribution from the $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay dominates at all energies
581: and again is almost identical to the sum of all sources (solid
582: line). Apart from 1.0 GeV the next strong channel is the $\eta$ Dalitz
583: decay followed by the $\Delta$-Dalitz decays, $pn$ bremsstrahlung and
584: the $\omega$-Dalitz decays, while the direct decays of the $\rho$ and
585: $\omega$ mesons are again barely visible.
586:
587: In order to extract the interesting information cuts on the invariant
588: dilepton mass are necessary to suppress/exclude the dominant channels.
589: Again a cut on the interval $0.4 \leq M \leq 0.7$ GeV has been chosen,
590: which is displayed for the $p + C$ reaction at 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV in
591: Fig. \ref{Fig15pA} (left panel) for the bare mass case. Indeed, now the
592: $\rho$ meson signal is the strongest or comparable to the remaining
593: $\eta$ Dalitz decay (which will be even more suppressed by gating on
594: the interval $0.55 \leq M \leq 0.75$ GeV). In the right panel of Fig.
595: \ref{Fig15pA} a comparison of the bare mass case (solid lines) with the
596: collisional broadening and dropping mass scenario (dash-dotted lines)
597: is presented. As in case of the $p_T$ spectra the differences are only
598: very tiny; one thus can conclude that there is no sensitivity
599: to in-medium effects for the $C$ target with respect to rapidity
600: spectra, too.
601:
602: For completeness, in Figs. \ref{Fig16pA} to \ref{Fig19pA} the same
603: analysis is shown for the $Ca$ and $Pb$ target at all energies. As
604: seen from the right panels in Figs. \ref{Fig17pA} and \ref{Fig19pA} the
605: shape of the rapidity distribution is not changed very much for the
606: in-medium mass scenario compared to the bare mass case except for a
607: tiny shift to lower laboratory rapidities. As in case of the $p_T$
608: spectra in the previous subsection, an overall enhancement in the
609: dilepton yield for the in-medium mass scenario for the $p + Pb$
610: reaction is the most pronounced effect.
611:
612: \subsubsection{Double differential dilepton spectra}
613:
614: Finally, in Fig.~\ref{Fig20pA} the double differential dilepton
615: spectrum $d\sigma/dMdp_T$ is presented as a function of the invariant
616: mass $M$ and transverse momentum $p_T$ for $p + Pb$ collisions at 4.0
617: GeV calculated within the bare mass scenario. At fixed $p_T$ one can
618: recognize the shape of the invariant mass spectra (cf. left panel of
619: Fig.~\ref{Fig6pA}) with a strong $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay branch at low $M$
620: as well as the contributions from $\eta$ Dalitz decay and the vector
621: meson ($\rho, \omega$) decays. At fixed $M$ the shape looks similar to
622: the one in Fig.~\ref{Fig6pA}. At low $M$ the exponential decrease
623: stems from the $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay, then the spectra become flatter
624: due to the contributions from $\eta$ Dalitz ($M\le 0.4$ GeV) and direct
625: $\rho$ decays. At $M\sim 0.78$ GeV the peak from the direct decay of
626: $\omega$ mesons is visible. Thus, such type of 3-dimensional
627: experimental information (or even 4-dimensional including rapidity)
628: allows to select the contributions from different channels.
629:
630:
631: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
632: \section{Summary}
633:
634: Within the framework of the coupled-channel (resonance) BUU model a
635: detailed nonperturbative study of dilepton production for $p+A$
636: reactions from 1--4 GeV has been performed employing a full off-shell
637: propagation of the vector mesons in line with Refs.
638: \cite{Cass_off1,Cass_off2}. Different scenarios of in-medium
639: modifications of vector mesons, such as collisional broadening and
640: dropping vector meson masses, have been investigated and the
641: possibilities for an experimental observation of in-medium effects in
642: $p+A$ reactions has been discussed.
643:
644: Dilepton spectra from $p+A$ reactions will be measured in future by the
645: HADES Collaboration at GSI Darmshtadt with high mass resolution and
646: good accuracy. In this respect predictions for the dilepton invariant
647: mass spectra, transverse momentum and rapidity distributions for $p +
648: C$, $p + Ca$ and $p + Pb$ collisions from 1 to 4 GeV have been made
649: employing different in-medium scenarios. It has been found that the
650: collisional broadening + 'dropping mass' scenario leads to an
651: enhancement of the dilepton yield in the range $0.5 \leq M \leq 0.75$
652: GeV and to a reduction of the $\omega$-peak, which is more pronounced
653: for heavy systems (up to a factor 2 for $p + Pb$ at 3--4 GeV).
654:
655: It has been indicated that proper cuts in invariant mass for transverse
656: momentum and rapidity spectra allow to select different dilepton
657: sources and to study, for example, the $\rho$ meson channel in more
658: detail. However, an inclusion of in-medium effects predominantly leads
659: to an overall scaling in height of the spectra, but does not change the
660: slope of the $p_T$ and rapidity distributions very much.
661:
662: It has been indicated, furthermore, that it might be very useful to
663: provide experimentally multi-dimensional information, e.g. double
664: differential dilepton spectra $d\sigma/dMdp_T$, in order to investigate
665: the individual contributions.
666:
667:
668: \acknowledgements
669: The author is grateful to U. Mosel, who initiated this work, for useful
670: suggestions and to W. Cassing for valuable discussions on the question
671: of off-shell transport theory.
672:
673: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
674: \begin{references}
675: \bibitem{BrownRho}
676: G.E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2720.
677: \bibitem{Shakin94}
678: C.M. Shakin and W.-D. Sun, Phys. Rev. C 49 (1994) 1185.
679: \bibitem{Klingl96}
680: F. Klingl and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 606 (1996) 329;
681: F. Klingl, N. Kaiser and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 624 (1997) 527.
682: \bibitem{H&L92}
683: T. Hatsuda and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) R34.
684: \bibitem{Asakawa93}
685: M. Asakawa and C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) R526.
686: \bibitem{Leupold}
687: S. Leupold, W. Peters and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A 628 (1998) 311.
688: \bibitem{Herrmann}
689: M. Herrmann, B. Friman, and W. N\"orenberg, Nucl. Phys. A 560
690: (1993) 411.
691: \bibitem{asakawa}
692: M. Asakawa, C. M. Ko, P. L\'evai, and X. J. Qiu, Phys. Rev.
693: C 46 (1992) R1159.
694: \bibitem{Chanfray}
695: G. Chanfray and P. Schuck, Nucl. Phys. A 545 (1992) 271c.
696: \bibitem{Rapp}
697: R. Rapp, G. Chanfray, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76
698: (1996) 368.
699: \bibitem{Friman}
700: B. Friman and H. J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. A 617 (1997) 496.
701: \bibitem{RappNPA}
702: R. Rapp, G. Chanfray and J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. A 617
703: (1997) 472.
704: \bibitem{Peters}
705: W. Peters, M. Post, H. Lenske, S. Leupold, and U. Mosel,
706: Nucl. Phys. A 632 (1998) 109;
707: M. Post, S. Leupold and U. Mosel, nucl-th/0008027.
708: \bibitem{CERES}
709: G. Agakichiev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1272.
710: \bibitem{Ullrich}
711: Th. Ullrich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 610 (1996) 317c;
712: A. Drees, Nucl. Phys. A 610 (1996) 536c.
713: \bibitem{HELIOS}
714: M. A. Mazzoni, Nucl. Phys. A 566 (1994) 95c;
715: M. Masera, Nucl. Phys. A 590 (1995) 93c.
716: \bibitem{HELI2}
717: T. {\AA}kesson et al., Z. Phys. C 68 (1995) 47.
718: \bibitem{Li}
719: G. Q. Li, C. M. Ko, and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75
720: (1995) 4007.
721: \bibitem{Li96}
722: C. M. Ko, G. Q. Li, G. E. Brown, and H. Sorge,
723: Nucl. Phys. A 610 (1996) 342c.
724: \bibitem{Cass95C}
725: W. Cassing, W. Ehehalt, and C. M. Ko, Phys. Lett. B 363
726: (1995) 35.
727: \bibitem{Cass96H}
728: W. Cassing, W. Ehehalt, and I. Kralik, Phys. Lett. B 377
729: (1996) 5.
730: \bibitem{Brat97}
731: E. L. Bratkovskaya and W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 413.
732: \bibitem{CBRep98}
733: W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya,
734: Phys. Rep. 308 (1999) 65.
735: \bibitem{Ernst}
736: C. Ernst, S. A. Bass, M. Belkacem, H. St\"ocker, and W. Greiner,
737: Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 447.
738: \bibitem{Ko93}
739: M. Asakawa and C. M. Ko, Nucl. Phys. A 560 (1993) 399.
740: \bibitem{Ko95}
741: G. Q. Li, C. M. Ko, and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 606 (1996) 568.
742: \bibitem{Effe_piA}
743: M. Effenberger, E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing and U. Mosel,
744: Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 027601.
745: \bibitem{CBRW97}
746: W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, R. Rapp, and J. Wambach,
747: Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 916.
748: \bibitem{Effe99gam}
749: M. Effenberger, E. Bratkovskaya and U. Mosel,
750: Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 044614.
751: \bibitem{Wolf90}
752: Gy. Wolf, G. Batko, W. Cassing, U. Mosel, K. Niita, and M. Sch\"afer,
753: Nucl. Phys. A 517 (1990) 615;
754: Gy. Wolf, W. Cassing and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A 552 (1993) 549.
755: \bibitem{BCMas96}
756: E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing and U. Mosel,
757: Phys. Lett. B 376 (1996) 12.
758: \bibitem{EffePhD}
759: M. Effenberger, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Giessen, 1999;
760: http://theorie.physik.uni-giessen.de/ftp.html.
761: \bibitem{Boresk96}
762: K. G. Boreskov, J. Koch, L. A. Kondratyuk, and M. I. Krivoruchenko,
763: Phys. of Atomic Nuclei 59 (1996) 1908;
764: K. G. Boreskov, L. A. Kondratyuk, M. I. Krivoruchenko, and J. Koch,
765: Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 295.
766: \bibitem{TeisZP97}
767: S. Teis, W. Cassing, M. Effenberger, A. Hombach, U. Mosel,
768: and Gy. Wolf, Z. Phys. A 356 (1997) 421;
769: Z. Phys. A 359 (1997) 297.
770: \bibitem{Manley}
771: D. M. Manley and E. M. Saleski, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4002.
772: \bibitem{FRITIOF}
773: B. Anderson, G. Gustafson and Hong Pi, Z. Phys. C 57
774: (1993) 485.
775: \bibitem{Ehehalt}
776: W. Ehehalt and W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. A 602 (1996) 449.
777: \bibitem{Bass}
778: S. A. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1998) 279;
779: J. Phys. G 25 (1999) 1859.
780: \bibitem{BCM00SIS}
781: E.L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing and U. Mosel,
782: Nucl. Phys. A 686 (2001) 476.
783: \bibitem{Tuebingen}
784: A. Faessler, C. Fuchs and M.I. Krivoruchenko,
785: Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 035206.
786: \bibitem{GKC97}
787: W. Cassing, Ye. S. Golubeva, A. S. Iljinov, and L. A. Kondratyuk,
788: Phys. Lett. B 396 (1997) 26;
789: Ye. S. Golubeva, L. A. Kondratyuk and W. Cassing,
790: Nucl. Phys. A 625 (1997) 832.
791: \bibitem{Cass_off1}
792: W. Cassing and S. Juchem, Nucl. Phys. A 665 (2000) 377.
793: \bibitem{Cass_off2}
794: W. Cassing and S. Juchem, Nucl. Phys. A 672 (2000) 417.
795: \bibitem{Leupold_off}
796: S. Leupold, Nucl. Phys. A 672 (2000) 475.
797: \bibitem{Kondr_rho}
798: L. A. Kondratyuk, A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, Ye. S. Golubeva,
799: and M. Effenberger, Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 1078.
800: \bibitem{Japen}
801: K. Ozawa et al., nucl-ex/0011013.
802: \end{references}
803:
804: %\end{document}
805: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
806: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
807:
808: %------------------ b-z -----------------------------------
809: \begin{figure}[h]
810: \centerline{\psfig{figure=b-z.eps,width=15cm}}
811: \vspace*{-4cm}
812: \caption{
813: Upper left part -- the average density distribution of a $Pb$-nucleus at rest
814: in the laboratory; upper right part -- the spatial distribution
815: in the first $pN$ collisions; lower part -- the spatial distribution
816: for $\rho$-meson (left part) and $\omega$-meson (right part) decays
817: to dileptons. The contour lines correspond to densities of 0.1$\rho_0$,
818: 0.4$\rho_0$, 0.6$\rho_0$ and 0.8$\rho_0$
819: respectively, and the dark shaded area to $\rho \ge 0.8\rho_0$.}
820: \label{Fig1pA}
821: \end{figure}
822:
823: %------------------ M -----------------------------------
824: \begin{figure}[t]
825: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-5mm}
826: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-m-bd.eps,width=12.5cm}}
827: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
828: \caption{
829: The calculated dilepton invariant mass spectra $d\sigma/dM$ for $p + C$
830: collisions from 1 -- 4 GeV (including an experimental mass
831: resolution of 10 MeV) without in-medium modifications (bare masses) --
832: left part, and applying the collisional broadening + dropping mass
833: scenario -- right part.
834: The thin lines indicate the individual contributions from the different
835: production channels; {\it i.e.}~ starting from low $M$:
836: Dalitz decay $\pi^0 \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ (short dashed line),
837: $\eta \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ (dotted line),
838: $\Delta \to N e^+ e^-$ (dashed line),
839: $\omega \to \pi^0 e^+ e^-$ (dot-dashed line),
840: for $M \approx $ 0.7 GeV: $\omega \to e^+e^-$ (dot-dashed line),
841: $\rho^0 \to e^+e^-$ (short dashed line).
842: The full solid line represents the sum of all sources considered here.}
843: \label{Fig2pA}e
844: \end{figure}
845:
846: \begin{figure}[t]
847: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
848: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-m-c.eps,width=15cm}}
849: \vspace*{-8cm}
850: \caption{
851: The comparison of different in-medium modification scenarios, i.e.
852: collisional broadening (dashed lines) and collisional broadening +
853: dropping vector meson masses (dash-dotted lines), with respect to the
854: bare mass case (solid lines) on a linear scale for $p + C$ from 1--4 GeV.}
855: \label{Fig3pA}
856: \end{figure}
857:
858: \begin{figure}[t]
859: %\phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
860: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-m-bd.eps,width=12.5cm}}
861: \vspace*{-5mm}
862: \caption{
863: The calculated dilepton invariant mass spectra $d\sigma/dM$ for $p + Ca$
864: collisions from 1.0 -- 4 GeV (including an experimental mass
865: resolution of 10 MeV)
866: without in-medium modifications (bare masses) -- left part,
867: and applying the collisional broadening + dropping masses scenario
868: -- right part.
869: The assignment of the individual lines is the same as in
870: Fig. \protect\ref{Fig2pA}.}
871: \label{Fig4pA}
872: \end{figure}
873:
874: \begin{figure}[t]
875: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
876: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-m-c.eps,width=15cm}}
877: \vspace*{-8cm}
878: \caption{
879: The comparison of different in-medium modification scenarios, i.e.
880: collisional broadening (dashed lines) and collisional broadening +
881: dropping vector meson masses (dash-dotted lines), with respect to the
882: bare mass case (solid lines) on a linear scale for $p + Ca$ from 1--4 GeV.}
883: \label{Fig5pA}
884: \end{figure}
885:
886: \begin{figure}[t]
887: %\phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
888: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-m-bd.eps,width=12.5cm}}
889: \vspace*{-5mm}
890: \caption{
891: The calculated dilepton invariant mass spectra $d\sigma/dM$ for $p + Pb$
892: collisions from 1.0 -- 4 GeV (including an experimental mass
893: resolution of 10 MeV)
894: without in-medium modifications (bare masses) -- left part,
895: and applying the collisional broadening + dropping masses scenario
896: -- right part.
897: The assignment of the individual lines is the same as in
898: Fig. \protect\ref{Fig2pA}.}
899: \label{Fig6pA}
900: \end{figure}
901:
902: \begin{figure}[t]
903: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
904: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-m-c.eps,width=15cm}}
905: \vspace*{-8cm}
906: \caption{
907: The comparison of different in-medium modification scenarios, i.e.
908: collisional broadening (dashed lines) and collisional broadening +
909: dropping vector meson masses (dash-dotted lines), with respect to the
910: bare mass case (solid lines) on a linear scale for $p + Pb$ from 1--4 GeV.}
911: \label{Fig7pA}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914: %------------------ pt -----------------------------------
915: \begin{figure}[t]
916: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
917: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-pt.eps,width=15cm}}
918: \vspace*{-8cm}
919: \caption{
920: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$
921: for the $p + C$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV.}
922: \label{Fig8pA}
923: \end{figure}
924:
925: \begin{figure}[t]
926: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
927: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-ptcut.eps,width=15cm}}
928: \caption{
929: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$ for the
930: $p + C$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
931: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
932: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
933: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
934: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
935: \label{Fig9pA}
936: \end{figure}
937:
938: \begin{figure}[t]
939: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
940: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-pt.eps,width=15cm}}
941: \vspace*{-8cm}
942: \caption{
943: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$
944: for the $p + Ca$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV.}
945: \label{Fig10pA}
946: \end{figure}
947:
948: \begin{figure}[t]
949: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
950: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-ptcu.eps,width=15cm}}
951: \caption{
952: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$ for the
953: $p + Ca$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
954: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
955: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
956: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
957: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
958: \label{Fig11pA}
959: \end{figure}
960:
961: \begin{figure}[t]
962: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
963: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-pt.eps,width=15cm}}
964: \vspace*{-8cm}
965: \caption{
966: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$
967: for the $p + Pb$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV.}
968: \label{Fig12pA}
969: \end{figure}
970:
971: \begin{figure}[t]
972: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
973: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-ptcu.eps,width=15cm}}
974: \caption{
975: The transverse momentum distribution $d\sigma/dp_T /(2\pi p_T)$ for the
976: $p + Pb$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
977: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
978: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
979: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
980: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
981: \label{Fig13pA}
982: \end{figure}
983:
984: %------------------ y -----------------------------------
985: \begin{figure}[t]
986: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
987: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-y.eps,width=15cm}}
988: \vspace*{-8cm}
989: \caption{
990: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for the $p + C$ system
991: at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV. }
992: \label{Fig14pA}
993: \end{figure}
994:
995: \begin{figure}[t]
996: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
997: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pc-ycut.eps,width=15cm}}
998: \caption{
999: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for
1000: $p + C$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
1001: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
1002: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
1003: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
1004: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
1005: \label{Fig15pA}
1006: \end{figure}
1007:
1008: \begin{figure}[t]
1009: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
1010: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-y.eps,width=15cm}}
1011: \vspace*{-8cm}
1012: \caption{
1013: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for the $p + Ca$ system
1014: at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV. }
1015: \label{Fig16pA}
1016: \end{figure}
1017:
1018: \begin{figure}[t]
1019: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
1020: \centerline{\psfig{figure=pca-ycut.eps,width=15cm}}
1021: \caption{
1022: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for
1023: $p + Ca$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
1024: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
1025: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
1026: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
1027: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
1028: \label{Fig17pA}
1029: \end{figure}
1030:
1031: \begin{figure}[t]
1032: \phantom{a}\vspace*{5mm}
1033: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-y.eps,width=15cm}}
1034: \vspace*{-8cm}
1035: \caption{
1036: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for the $p + Pb$ system
1037: at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV. }
1038: \label{Fig18pA}
1039: \end{figure}
1040:
1041: \begin{figure}[t]
1042: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-20mm}
1043: \centerline{\psfig{figure=ppb-ycut.eps,width=15cm}}
1044: \caption{
1045: The laboratory rapidity distributions $d\sigma/dy$ for
1046: $p + Pb$ system at 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 GeV implying a cut in invariant
1047: mass of $0.4 \le M \le 0.7$ GeV. Left panel -- the individual
1048: contributions for bare mass case, right panel - comparison of the bare
1049: mass spectra (solid line) with the collisional broadening and dropping
1050: mass scenario (dash-dotted lines). }
1051: \label{Fig19pA}
1052: \end{figure}
1053:
1054: \begin{figure}[t]
1055: \phantom{a}\vspace*{-10mm}
1056: \centerline{\psfig{figure=3d_pb40.eps,width=15cm}}
1057: \caption{
1058: The calculated double differential dilepton spectra $d\sigma/dMdp_T$
1059: as a function of invariant mass $M$ and transverse momentum $p_T$
1060: for $p + Pb$ collisions at 4.0 GeV.}
1061: \label{Fig20pA}
1062: \end{figure}
1063:
1064: \end{document}
1065:
1066: #!/bin/csh -f
1067: # Uuencoded gz-compressed .tar file created by csh script uufiles
1068: # For more info (11/95), see e.g. http://xxx.lanl.gov/faq/uufaq.html
1069: # If you are on a unix machine this file will unpack itself: strip
1070: # any mail header and call resulting file, e.g., figures.uu
1071: # (uudecode ignores these header lines and starts at begin line below)
1072: # Then say csh figures.uu
1073: # or explicitly execute the commands (generally more secure):
1074: # uudecode figures.uu ; gunzip figures.tar.gz ;
1075: # tar -xvf figures.tar
1076: # On some non-unix (e.g. VAX/VMS), first use editor to change filename
1077: # in "begin" line below to figures.tar-gz , then execute
1078: # uudecode figures.uu
1079: # gzip -d figures.tar-gz
1080: # tar -xvf figures.tar
1081: #
1082: uudecode $0
1083: chmod 644 figures.tar.gz
1084: gunzip -c figures.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
1085: rm $0 figures.tar.gz
1086: exit
1087:
1088: