1:
2:
3: \documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Hyperonic Crystallization in Hadronic Matter}
8:
9: \author{M.A. P\'erez-Garc{\'i}a$^1$}
10:
11: \address{E-mail: aperez{\char64}pinon.ccu.uniovi.es}
12:
13: \author{J. D{\'i}az-Alonso$^{1,2}$, L. Mornas$^{1}$,
14: J.P. Su\'{a}rez$^{1}$}
15:
16: \address{$(^1)$ Dpto. de Fisica, Universidad de Oviedo.
17: Avda. Calvo Sotelo 18, E-33007 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
18: \\$(^2)$ DARC, Observatoire de Paris - Meudon,
19: F-92195 Meudon, France}
20:
21: \maketitle
22:
23: \abstracts{
24: The possible formation of a spatially ordered phase in neutron star
25: matter is investigated in a model where hyperonic impurities are
26: localized on the nodes of a cubic lattice.}
27:
28: We propose a method for analyzing the formation of spatially ordered
29: configurations in hadronic matter, related to the crystallization of the
30: hyperonic sector in a lattice. The method allows the determination of
31: the density ranges where such ordered configurations are energetically
32: favoured with respect to the usual gaseous configurations. This leads
33: to the determination of the parameters of a first order phase transition
34: from the fluid to the crystallized state as well as the equation of
35: state of the plasma in the ordered phase. We show some preliminary
36: results obtained by the application of the method to a very simplified
37: model which shows the efficiency of the mechanism of confinement of
38: the hyperons in an ordered phase proposed here. The eventual existence
39: of such a new phase should induce changes in the structure and cooling
40: of dense stars.
41:
42: At densities about 1.5 times nuclear saturation and beyond, hyperons
43: are present in hadronic matter. The equation of state taking into
44: account the presence of nucleons and hyperons which interact through
45: the exchange of several mesons has been extensively studied using
46: phenomenological lagrangian models \cite{lattimer}.
47: In the mean field approximation, the hyperonic component (as the other
48: hadronic components in the ground state) is supposed to form a
49: spatially uniformly distributed Fermi fluid undergoing the action of
50: the mesonic mean field created by the whole baryonic distribution
51: in the plasma.
52:
53: The hadronic interaction in our model is reduced to the exchange of
54: scalar and vector meson fields. Such a description is the simplest one
55: allowing for an acceptable fit of nuclear saturation \cite{wal}. We
56: consider a unique species of neutral hyperons. The interaction
57: Lagrangian for every baryon species $B$ reads
58: \begin{equation}
59: L_{I}=\sum\limits_{B=p,n,h}g_{\sigma B}\overline{\Psi }\sigma \Psi
60: +g_{\omega B}\overline{\Psi }\gamma ^{\mu }\omega _{\mu }\Psi
61: \end{equation}
62: where the coupling constants to the meson fields are weaker for
63: hyperons than for nucleons.
64: The leptonic sector is reduced for simplicity to the electron.
65:
66: Using relativistic condensed matter techniques, we investigate the
67: possibility of the existence of energetically favourable solid
68: configurations, where pairs of antiparallel spin hyperons are confined
69: on the nodes of a regular lattice in the ground state of the hadronic
70: plasma. In this situation the hyperons should behave as impurities
71: which induce a redistribution of the surrounding nucleons.
72: Nevertheless, as a first approximation to the solution for the dynamics
73: of the nucleon in the medium, we consider the lattice of neutral
74: hyperons as a uniform background, in an analogous way to the ''free
75: electron model'' in a Coulomb lattice \cite{ashcroft}.
76:
77: In evaluating the energetic contribution of a crystal array of hyperons
78: surrounded by the nucleon liquid component in the plasma, the hyperons
79: are assumed to be localized on the nodes of a cubic lattice under the
80: action of their mutual interaction and the mean fields created by the
81: surrounding nucleons. In this way the total potential at every lattice
82: site is approximated by a harmonic potential which is determined
83: selfconsistently as the superposition of the potentials created by
84: the gaussian clouds of two antiparallel spin hyperons on all the other
85: nodes of the lattice, to which the interaction with the mean field of
86: the nucleon sector is added. In a first approximation we neglect the
87: central and spin-spin interaction between the hyperons in the same
88: node. We shall consider such interaction in future work, but we have
89: already verified that their effect improves the confining character
90: of the whole potential and facilitates the crystallization.
91: In calculating the lattice potential we have also introduced monopolar
92: form factors accounting for the composite structure of the hyperon.
93: In this analysis, vanishing temperature is assumed.
94:
95: For the nucleonic background in the crystal, a relativistic Hartree
96: approximation is used to calculate the contribution to the total energy
97: density of the system, as in the case of the liquid ground state to
98: which it is compared.
99:
100: The relative abundances of protons, neutrons and hyperons
101: can be now obtained by establishing the equations of
102: $\beta$-equilibrium between all these particles. The chemical
103: potentials of protons, neutrons and electrons are the Fermi energies
104: of these particles which are in Fermi gaseous phases. The chemical
105: potential of the hyperons are calculated as the energy gained by the
106: system when a new hyperon is added in the $ n = 1 $ level of the
107: harmonic potential in a node.
108: We need also the equations for the mean scalar and vector fields
109: generated by the uniform background of nucleons. The abundance of
110: hyperons resulting from this system is an ingredient in the calculation
111: of the potential created by the lattice on every node.
112:
113: Consequently, for the periodic configuration the self-consistent set of
114: equations for the beta equilibrium of chemical potentials in the plasma
115: coupled to the mean field equations, and the self consistent equations
116: for the confining fields in the nodes are
117: \begin{eqnarray}
118: n_{electrons} &=& n_{protons}\qquad \mbox{\rm (charge neutrality)} \\
119: \mu_{neutrons} &=& \mu_{protons}+\mu _{electrons} \\
120: \mu _{neutrons} &=& \mu _{hyperons} \\
121: n_{baryons} &=& n_{neutrons}+n_{protons}+n_{hyperons} \\
122: m_{\sigma }^{2}<\sigma +\sigma _{ext}> &=&
123: g_{\sigma N}<\overline{\Psi }\Psi >+g_{\sigma H} n_{hyperons} \\
124: m_{\omega }^{2}<\omega ^{0}+\omega _{ext}^{0}>
125: &=& -g_{\omega N}<\overline{\Psi }\gamma ^{0}\Psi >
126: -g_{\omega H} n_{hyperons} \\
127: m_{\sigma }^{2}<\sigma _{ext}> &=& g_{\sigma H} n_{hyperons} \\
128: m_{\omega }^{2}<\omega _{ext}^{0}> &=& -g_{\omega H} n_{hyperons}
129: \end{eqnarray}
130: The crystal size cell $a$ is related to the hyperonic density
131: $n_{hyperons}$ of hyperons paired in a S-state.
132: \begin{equation}
133: n_{hyperons}=\frac{2}{a^{3}}
134: \end{equation}
135: The solution of this system gives the magnitudes characterizing the
136: configuration, such as crystal cell size, characteristic oscillation
137: frequency and width of hyperon wave functions, the energy levels, etc
138: as functions of the total baryonic density \cite{yo}.
139:
140: In Figure 1 we show the confining potential in a node of the hyperonic
141: lattice for a set of values of the parameters of the model
142: ($a$=2.2142 fm, cut-off for the scalar and vector fields,
143: $\Lambda_{\sigma} = 1.4$ GeV, $\Lambda_{\omega}=2.5$ GeV, value of the
144: coupling constants $g_{\sigma H}/g_{\sigma N}=0.6$,
145: $g_{\omega H}/g_{\omega N}=0.65$ taking the Walecka values for the
146: meson-nucleon interaction). This figure has been obtained by the self
147: consistent solution of the equations relating the confining potential
148: to the width of the hyperonic wave function.
149:
150: Figure 2 shows the cell size in the lattice as a function of baryonic
151: density obtained by asuming the solid configuration to be stable at
152: every baryonic density.
153:
154: It is worth mentioning that the screening effects of the
155: nucleonic plasma have to be treated properly in order to consider
156: the modification from the screened HH interaction to the vacuum one,
157: as well as the mixing effects of the hadronic fields. This work is
158: actually in progress.
159:
160: To determine whether the transition from a spatially uniform hyperonic
161: liquid phase to an ordered one takes place inside the plasma, and the
162: range of thermodynamic variables where the crystal phase is
163: energetically favoured, the free energies of both phases have to be
164: compared. The densities of both phases in the transition region is
165: determined by looking for the cross point between the liquid and
166: solid configuration lines in the diagram of partial hyperon pressure
167: versus hyperonic chemical potential.
168:
169: This phase transition is of first order, leading to a change in the
170: equation of state of the plasma with a modification of the mechanical
171: properties which should have consequences on the hydrostatic
172: equilibrium of neutron stars and modify the analysis of the cooling
173: processes.
174:
175: \begin{figure}[t]
176: \begin{minipage}{12cm}
177: \mbox{%
178: \parbox{5.5cm}{%
179: \epsfxsize=13.5pc
180: \epsfbox{confpot.ps}
181: \vskip -1cm
182: \caption{Self consistent confining potential}
183: }
184: \parbox{0.5cm}{\phantom{aaa}}
185: \parbox{5.5cm}{%
186: \epsfxsize=13.5pc
187: \epsfbox{latticecst.ps}
188: \vskip -1cm
189: \caption{Lattice size as a function of density}
190: }
191: }
192: \end{minipage}
193: \end{figure}
194:
195:
196: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
197:
198: \bibitem{lattimer} M. Prakash, I. Bombaci, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer,
199: P. Ellis, R. Knorren, {\it Phys. Rep.} {\bf 280}, 1 (1997).
200: \\ N.Glendenning, {\em Compact Stars} (Springer-Verlag NY, 1997).
201:
202: \bibitem{wal} J.D. Walecka. {\it Ann. Phys.} {\bf 83}, 491 (1974).
203:
204: \bibitem{mach} R. Machleidt, {\em The Meson Theory of Nuclear Forces
205: and Nuclear Structure} Adv. in Nucl. Phys. {\bf 19}, J.W. Negele and
206: E.Vogt eds. (Plenum Press NY, 1989).
207:
208: \bibitem{ashcroft} N.W. Ashcroft, N.D. Mermin, {\em Solid State
209: Physics} (Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, 1976).
210:
211: \bibitem{yo} J. D{\'\i}az Alonso, L. Mornas, M.A. P\'erez-Garc{\'\i}a,
212: J.P. Su\'arez, in preparation.
213:
214: \bibitem{joa} J. D{\'\i}az Alonso, A. P\'{e}rez Canyellas, {\it Nucl.
215: Phys.} A {\bf 526}, 623 (1991).
216:
217:
218: \end{thebibliography}
219:
220: \end{document}
221:
222:
223:
224:
225:
226: