nucl-th0108066/ia.tex
1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: %   This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 3.1 distribution.
4: %   Version 3.1 of REVTeX, September 1996.
5: %
6: %   Copyright (c) 1992 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: %   See the REVTeX 3.1 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: %
11: %
12: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,epsf,prc]{revtex}
13: \documentstyle[aps,epsf,prc]{revtex}
14: %\documentstyle[eqsecnum,aps,epsf,twocolumn]{revtex}
15: \def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
16: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
17: \begin{document}
18: \title{Neutron electric form factor at large momentum transfer.}
19: \author{Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson}
20: \address{\it DAPNIA/SPhN, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, 
21: France}
22: 
23: \author{Michail P. Rekalo \footnote{ Permanent address:
24: \it National Science Center KFTI, 310108 Kharkov, Ukraine}}
25: \address{Middle East Technical University, 
26: Physics Department, Ankara 06531, Turkey}
27: 
28: %\date{\today}
29: \maketitle
30: 
31: \def\gms{$G_{Ms}$}
32: \def\gmp{$G_{Mp}$}
33: \def\gmn{$G_{Mn}$}
34: \def\ges{$G_{Es}$}
35: \def\gep{$G_{Ep}$}
36: \def\gen{$G_{En}$}
37: 
38: \begin{abstract}
39: Based on the recent, high precision data for elastic electron scattering from 
40: protons and deuterons, at relatively large momentum transfer $Q^2$, 
41: we determine the neutron electric form factor up to $Q^2=3.5$ GeV$^2$. 
42: The values obtained from the data (in the framework of the nonrelativistic 
43: impulse 
44: approximation) are larger than commonly assumed and 
45: are in good agreement with the 
46: Gari-Kr\"umpelmann parametrization of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors.
47: \end{abstract}
48: 
49: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
50: \vspace*{.2true cm}
51: 
52: pacs numbers: {25.30.-c, 25.30.Bf, 21.45.+v}
53: \vspace*{.2true cm}
54: 
55: 
56: The internal structure of hadrons, their charge and magnetic distributions, can 
57: be 
58: conveniently described in terms of form factors.
59: Elastic electron-hadron scattering  is the traditional way  
60: to experimentally determine the electromagnetic form factors, and it allows a 
61: direct comparison with the theory. 
62: 
63: Direct measurements of the electric neutron form factor have been recently made 
64: possible, at transfer 
65: momenta $Q^2<$1 GeV$^2$, via inelastic electron scattering by deuteron or 
66: $^3\!He$. These 
67: experiments require not only a polarized beam but either a polarized target 
68: or the measurement of the polarization of the outgoing 
69: neutron (for a recent update see \cite{Wa99} and refs. herein).
70: 
71: Having high precision data on the differential cross section for $ed-$ elastic 
72: scattering, and assuming a 
73: reliable model for their description,  one can extract, in principle, the 
74: dependence of the electric neutron form factor \gen\  on the momentum transfer 
75: $Q^2$. Such a procedure  has been carried out in ref. \cite{Pl90}, up to 
76: $Q^2$=0.7 GeV$^2$. The purpose of this paper is to extend such an analysis 
77: at larger $Q^2$. This is motivated by the fact that 
78: the  elastic $ed$-scattering data extend up to $Q^2$=6 GeV$^2$, with high 
79: precision \cite{Al99} and the recent data on the proton electric form factor 
80: \cite{Jo00} (which have been obtain by the recoil proton polarization 
81: measurement following an idea suggested more than 30 
82: years ago \cite{Re68}) extend up to $Q^2$=3.5 
83: GeV$^2$.  A large program is under way at the Jefferson 
84: Laboratory (JLab) to improve the accuracy of the experimental data for the 
85: proton and  deuteron elastic electromagnetic form 
86: factors up to relatively large values of momentum 
87: transfer \cite{Al99,Jo00,Ab99}, to measure 
88: the neutron electric form factor \cite{Madey} and the electromagnetic transition 
89: form 
90: factors of the nucleon resonances 
91: \cite{Bu95}.
92: 
93: Common assumptions, in the previous calculations of deuteron electromagnetic 
94: form factors, 
95: are that the proton electric form factor, \gep , follows a 
96: dipole-like $Q^2$ dependence (resulting from an exponential charge 
97: distribution), 
98: and that \gen\ is negligible (in the 
99: region of space-like momentum transfer).
100: 
101: The large sensitivity to 
102: the nucleon form factors of the models which 
103: describe the light nuclei structure, particularly the deuteron, was carefully 
104: studied in \cite{Ar80}, and 
105: it was pointed out that the disagreement between the relativistic impulse 
106: approximation and the existing data [up to $Q^2$=4 GeV$^2$] could be 
107: significantly reduced if \gen\  were different from zero. 
108: 
109: On the other hand, recent studies focus primarily on other 
110: ingredients of the deuteron structure, such as the choice of the deuteron wave 
111: function or specific corrections like meson exchange currents (MEC), 
112: relativistic effects, and 
113: six-quark components in the deuteron (for a review see, for instance, 
114: \cite{Schiavilla}). 
115: 
116: Here we  take another approach: we look for a consistent explanation of 
117: JLab data about $ed-$ and $ep-$ 
118: scattering in the framework of the impulse approximation (IA) for 
119: $ed$-scattering, and  derive the 
120: neutron electric form factor. A discussion of the role of the corrections to IA, 
121: in particular the MEC, will follow.
122: 
123: In the framework of non relativistic IA,  where the calculation of the  deuteron 
124: electromagnetic form factors is straightforward, only two ingredients are 
125: required: the S- and 
126: D-components of the deuteron wave function and the electromagnetic form factors 
127: of the nucleons, which are considered as free ones, without off-shell mass 
128: effects.
129: 
130: Let us recall here some useful formulas (for a complete derivation, see 
131: \cite{Ja56}). 
132: The  differential cross section for $ed$ elastic scattering 
133: can be expressed in terms of two structure functions, $A(Q^2)$ and 
134: $B(Q^2)$, in one photon approximation\footnote{For a recent discussion of the validity of one-photon exchange in this 
135: momentum range, see ref. \cite{Re99}}:
136: $$\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=
137: \left (\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right )_0 \cdot
138: {\cal S},~~{\cal S}= A(Q^2)+B(Q^2) ~\tan^2(\theta_e/2)
139: $$
140: with
141: $$
142: \left (\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\right)_0=
143: \frac{\alpha^2~cos^2(\theta_e/2)E'}{4sin^4(\theta_e/2)E^3},
144: $$
145: where $E$ ($E'$)  is the electron beam (the scattered electron) energy. 
146: The structure functions $A$ and $B$ can be expressed in terms of the three 
147: deuteron form factors, $G_c$ 
148: (electric), $G_m$ (magnetic) and $G_q$ (electric quadrupole) as:
149: $$
150: A(Q^2) =G_c^2(Q^2)+ \frac{8}{9} \tau^2 G_q^2(Q^2)+\frac{2}{3} \tau 
151: G_m^2(Q^2),
152: $$
153: \begin{equation}
154: B(Q^2) = 
155: \frac{4}{3} (1+\tau) \tau G_m^2(Q^2),~\tau =\frac{Q^2}{4M^2_d}
156: \end{equation}
157: where $M_d$ is the deuteron mass.
158: 
159: In order to disentangle the three form factors it is necessary to measure the 
160: cross section  at least at two different angles for a fixed $Q^2$ (the 
161: Rosenbluth separation), and some polarization observables. In case of an 
162: unpolarized beam and 
163: target, the outgoing deuteron is tensor polarized and the components of the 
164: tensor polarization $t_{2,i}$ ($i=0-2$) give useful combinations of form 
165: factors. In particular $t_{20}$ is sensitive to $G_c$ and $G_q$:
166: \begin{equation}
167: t_{20}=-\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} {\cal S} }
168: \left \{ \displaystyle\frac{8}{3}\tau G_c G_q + 
169: \displaystyle\frac{8}{9} \tau^2 
170: G_q^2+  \frac{1}{3} \tau
171: \left [1+2 (1+\tau )\tan^2 (\theta_e/2 )\right ] G_m^2 \right \}
172: \end{equation}
173: In the non relativistic IA, the deuteron form factors
174: depend only on the deuteron wave function and on nucleon form factors:
175: $$
176: G_c=G_{Es}C_E,~~G_q=G_{Es}C_Q,
177: $$
178: \begin{equation}
179: G_m=\displaystyle\frac{M_d}{M_p}\left 
180: (G_{Ms}C_S+\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}G_{Es}C_L\right ),
181: \end{equation}
182: where $M_p$ is the proton mass, $G_{Es}=G_{Ep}+G_{En}$ and  
183: $G_{Ms}=G_{Mp}+G_{Mn}$ are the charge and 
184: magnetic isoscalar nucleon form factors, respectively. The terms 
185: $C_E$, $C_Q$, 
186: $C_S$, and $C_L$ describe the deuteron structure and can be calculated from the 
187: deuteron $S$ and $D$ 
188: wave functions, $u(r)$ and $w(r)$ \cite{Ja56} :
189: $$C_E={\int }_0^{\infty}dr~j_0\left( 
190: \frac{Qr}2\right) \left[ u^2\left( r\right) +w^2( r)
191: \right], $$
192: $$C_Q=\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}\eta}{\int }_0^{\infty}dr~j_2\left( 
193: \frac{Qr}2\right) \left[ u( r) -\frac{w( r)}{\sqrt{8}}\right] w(r),  $$
194: \begin{equation}
195: C_S={\int }_0^{\infty}dr \left[ u^2( r) -\frac{1}2w^2( r)
196: \right ]j_0\left( \frac{Qr}{2}\right) +
197: \frac{1}{2}\left [\sqrt{2}u( r)w(r)+w^2( r)\right ] j_2\left( 
198: \frac{Qr}{2} \right ),
199: \end{equation}
200: $$C_L=\frac{3}{2} \int_0^{\infty}dr~w^2( r)
201: \left [ j_0 \left ( \frac{Qr}{2} \right )+ j_2 \left ( \frac{Qr}{2}\right ) 
202: \right ]
203: $$
204: where 
205: $$j_0(x) =\frac{\sin x}{x},\ j_2( x) =
206: \sin x\left (\frac {3}{x^3}-\frac {1}{x}\right ) -3\frac{\cos x}{x^2}$$
207: are the spherical Bessel functions.
208: The normalization condition is $$
209: {\int }_0^{\infty}dr~\left[ u^2( r)+w^2( r)\right ]=1.$$
210: 
211: With the help of expressions (3) and (4), the formula for $A(Q)^2$, Eq. (1), 
212: can be inverted into a quadratic equation for \ges. Then \ges\  is calculated 
213: using the experimental values for $A(Q)^2$. We assume, for the magnetic nucleon 
214: form factors $G_{Mp}$ and $G_{Mn}$ 
215: the 
216: following dipole dependence, 
217: $$G_{Mp}(Q^2)/\mu_p=G_{Mn}(Q^2)/\mu_n=G_D,$$
218: with
219: $$\mu_p=2.79,~ 
220: \mu_n=-1.91,\mbox{~and~}
221: G_D =
222: \displaystyle\frac{1}
223: {\left [1+\displaystyle\frac{Q^2}{0.71 ~GeV^2 }\right ]^2},$$
224: which is in agreement with the existing data at a 3\%  level, up to
225: $Q^2\simeq$ 10 GeV$^2$.
226: 
227: In Fig. 1 we illustrate the behavior of the different nucleon 
228: electric form factors: \ges,\  \gep\  and \gen. The nucleon isoscalar 
229: electric form factor, 
230: derived from different sets of deuteron data, decreases when $Q^2$ increases. 
231: The solid line represents the 
232: Gari-Kr\"umpelmann parametrization \cite{G-K} for \ges . The dipole behavior, 
233: which is 
234: generally 
235: assumed for the proton electric form factor is shown as a dotted line. 
236: We have approximated the last \gep\  data by a function of the form:
237: \begin{equation}
238: G_{Ep}=\displaystyle\frac{G_D}{ 1+\displaystyle\frac {Q^2}{m_x^2}}
239: \end{equation} with 
240: $m_x^2$=5.88 GeV$^2$, (thin dashed-dotted line). The 
241: new \gep\  data, which decrease faster than the dipole function, are also well 
242: reproduced by the Gari-Kr\"umpelmann parametrization (thick dashed line). 
243: 
244: The  electric neutron form factor can be calculated 
245: from the isoscalar nucleon form factor, assuming for \gep\  a dipole behavior 
246: (solid stars) or Eq. (5) (open stars). The last option leads to values for 
247: \gen\  which are in  
248: very good agreement with the parametrization 
249: \cite{G-K}. These results shows that the neutron form factor
250: is not going to vanish identically at large momentum transfer, but becomes more 
251: sizeable 
252: than predicted by other parametrizations, often used in the calculations 
253: \cite{Pl90,Galster} (thin dashed line).
254: Starting from $Q^2\simeq 2$ GeV$^2$  the form factor \gen\  becomes even 
255: larger than \gep . Let us mention that a recent 'direct' measurement \cite{Ro99} 
256: at 
257: $Q^2=0.67$ GeV$^2$ finds \gen =$0.052\pm 0.011\pm 0.005$  in agreement with 
258: the present values.
259: 
260: In order to test the coherence of this description, we plot in Fig. 2 the 
261: prediction of the IA model, based on the Paris wave function and 
262: the parametrization \cite{G-K}, together with a sample of the existing data on 
263: the deuteron observables, $A(Q^2)$, $B(Q^2)$ and $t_{20}$.
264: 
265: The agreement is qualitatively good, even at large momentum transfer,
266: for all the observables. Replacing the common dipole approximation with Eq. (5), 
267: based on the new data about \gep,  induces little 
268: effect on the $Q^2$ - dependence of
269: $t_{20}$ and the structure function $B(Q^2)$, but the structure function 
270: $A(Q^2)$ gets much 
271: smaller, up to 40\% at $Q^2=4$ GeV$^2$. This explains the important role 
272: played 
273: by the neutron electric form factor, which is therefore larger than previously 
274: assumed. 
275: Replacing the Paris wave function with other N-N potentials gives qualitatively 
276: similar results.
277: Introducing different corrections to the IA as relativistic effects, MEC, 
278: isobar,
279: six-quark contributions etc.. brings to results which are largely model 
280: dependent \cite{etg}. 
281: Let us mention that the $\gamma^*\pi^{\pm}\rho^{\mp}$-contribution, which is a 
282: good approximation for the isoscalar 
283: transition $\gamma^*\rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ 
284: ($\gamma^*$ is a virtual photon), is typically considered as the main 
285: correction to IA, necessary, in particular, to improve the description of 
286: the SF $A(Q^2)$ \cite{Ar75}. However the relative role of MEC is strongly model 
287: dependent \cite{Bu92} as the coupling constants for meson-NN-vertexes 
288: are not well known and arbitrary form factors are often added \cite{Ad64,VO95}.
289: 
290: It should be pointed out that the $\gamma^*\pi\rho$ vertex is of 
291: magnetic nature and its contribution to $A(Q^2)$ has to be of the same order of 
292: magnitude as the relativistic corrections.
293: The general spin structure of the $\gamma^*\pi\rho-$vertex can be written as: 
294: $\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}e_{\mu}k_{\nu}U_{\rho}q_{\sigma},$ where $e$ and $k$ 
295: ($U$ and $q$) are the 4-vector of the photon ($\rho$-meson) 
296: polarization and corresponding 4-momentum. The equivalent 3-dimensional 
297: expression for the spin structure is: $\vec e\times\vec k\cdot\vec U$ (where 
298: $\vec k$ is the photon 3-momentum), which allows the absorption of real (or  
299: virtual) $M1$ photon, only. A consequence is that the main contribution of 
300: $\gamma^*\pi\rho-$MEC concerns
301: $B(Q^2)$, which is proportional to the square of the deuteron magnetic form 
302: factor,  and not $A(Q^2)$, which mostly depends on the deuteron electric charge 
303: and quadrupole form factors.  
304: 
305: In conclusion, the  description of the deuteron electromagnetic structure in the 
306: framework of IA is now possible up to large momentum transfer ($Q^2\simeq$ 3.5 
307: GeV$^2$ ) and it  predicts a saturation of the isoscalar electric nucleon 
308: form factor by the neutron electric form factor at large $Q^2$. 
309: This result is consistent with the predictions of \cite{G-K}. There is no strong 
310: theoretical background 
311: in the ansatz \gen =0, often used in the literature concerning deuteron, in the 
312: considered region of space-like momentum transfer. The forthcoming data about 
313: \gen, planned at JLab  up to $Q^2$=2 GeV$^2$, \cite{Madey}
314: will be crucial in this respect. The large sensitivity of the 
315: deuteron structure to the nucleon form factors 
316: shows the necessity to reconsider the role of meson exchange currents
317: in the deuteron physics at large momentum transfer.
318: 
319: We  
320: thank  L. Cardman and  C.F. Perdrisat for interesting 
321: discussion on the last JLab results and on the recent \gep\  data, S. Platchkov,  
322: for his remarks on the extraction 
323: of neutron form factors and deuteron physics. We acknowledge the very 
324: positive and encouraging comments from S. Brodsky. Special thanks are due to M. 
325: Mac Cormick, for a careful reading of the manuscript. 
326: 
327: 
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%555555
329: \begin{references}
330: \bibitem{Wa99} T. Walcher, Nucl. Phys. News {\bf 9}, 7 (1999).
331: \bibitem{Pl90} S. Platchkov {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys {\bf A510}, 740 (1990).
332: \bibitem{Al99} L. C. Alexa {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev.  Lett. {\bf 82}, 1374 
333: (1999).
334: \bibitem{Jo00} M. K. Jones {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 1398 (2000).
335: \bibitem{Re68} A. Akhiezer and M. P. Rekalo, Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR, {\bf 180}, 
336: 1081 (1968) and Sov. J. Part. Nucl. {\bf 3}, 277 (1974).		
337: 
338: \bibitem{Ab99} D. Abbott {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 1379 (1999).
339: \bibitem{Madey}	R. Madey, {\it The electric form factor of the neutron 
340: 		from the $d(\vec e,e'\vec n)p$ reaction}, 
341: 		JLAb Proposal PR-93-038. 
342: \bibitem{Bu95}  V. D. Burkert and L. Elouadrhiri, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 
343: 		3614 (1995). 
344: \bibitem{Ar80} R.G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. 
345: 		{\bf C35}, 1426 (1980).
346: \bibitem{Schiavilla} J. Carlson and R. Schiavilla,  Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 70}, 
347: 743 (1998).
348: \bibitem{Ja56} V. Jankus, Phys. Rev. {\bf 102}, 1586 (1956).		
349: \bibitem{Re99} M. P. Rekalo, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, and D. Prout, Phys. Rev.
350: {\bf  C60}, 042202 (1999).
351: \bibitem{Ar75} R.G. Arnold {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 35}, 776 (1975).
352: 
353: \bibitem{G-K}  M. Gari and W. Kr\"umpelmann, Phys. Lett., {\bf B 274}, 159 
354: (1992).
355: \bibitem{Galster} S.~Galster, H.~Klein, J.~Moritz, K.~H.~Schmidt, D.~Wegener and 	
356: 		J.~Bleckwenn, Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf B32}, 221 (1971).
357: \bibitem{Ro99} D. Rohe {\it  et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 4257 (1999).
358: \bibitem{Bo90} P. E. Bosted {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 42}, 38 (1990);\\
359:  S. Auffret {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 54}, 649 (1985). 
360: \bibitem{t20} M. E. Schulze {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 52}, 597 
361: (1984);\\
362:    R. Gilman {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 1733 (1990);\\
363:    I. The {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 67}, 1773 (1991);\\
364:    D. Abbott  {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 5053 (2000).
365: \bibitem{etg} E. Tomasi-Gustafsson, V. Burov and M. Rzjanin, in preparation.
366: \bibitem{Bu92} V. V. Burov, V. N. Dostovalov and S. E. Suskov, Sov. J. Part. 		
367: 		Nucl. {\bf 23}, 317 (1992).
368: 
369: 
370: 
371: \bibitem{Ad64} R. Adler and S. Drell, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 13}, 349 (1964);
372:              \\ M. Chemtob, E. Moniz and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. {\bf C10}, 344 
373: (1974) and refs. herein.
374: \bibitem{VO95} J.W. Van Orden, N. Devine and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 
375: 75}, 4369 (1995).
376: \end{references}
377: \clearpage
378: 
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: %%%Figure 1 %%%%%
381: \begin{figure}
382: \vspace*{-2truecm}
383: \begin{center}
384: \mbox{\epsfxsize=14.cm\leavevmode \epsffile{fig1.ps}}
385: \end{center}
386: \vspace*{-2truecm}
387: \caption{Nucleon  electric form factors as functions of 
388: the momentum transfer $Q^2$. in the framework of IA with Paris potential.
389: Isoscalar electric  form factors are derived from  the deuteron elastic 
390: scattering data: \protect\cite{Pl90} (solid triangles), \protect\cite{Al99} 
391: (solid circles), \protect\cite{Ab99} (solid squares), and \protect\cite{Ar75} 
392: (solid reversed triangles). 
393: The  electric neutron form 
394: factors are shown as solid stars when calculated from the dipole
395: representation of \gep\  (dotted line) and open stars when 
396: Eq. (5) is taken for \gep\  (thin dashed-dotted line).  The parametrization  
397: \protect\cite{G-K} is shown for \ges (solid line), for \gen\  (thick 
398: dashed-dotted 
399: line) and for \gep\  (thick dashed line). The thin dashed line is the 
400: parametrization \protect\cite{Galster} for \gen.}
401: % \label{}
402: \end{figure}
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404: %%%Figure 2 %%%%%
405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
406: 
407: %\newpage
408: \begin{figure}
409: \begin{center}
410: \mbox{\epsfxsize=14.cm\leavevmode \epsffile{fig2.ps}}
411: \end{center}
412: \caption{Impulse approximation prediction for the structure functions $A(Q^2)$, 
413: $B(Q^2)$, and  the 
414: tensor deuteron polarization $t_{20}$. The $A(Q^2)$ data are 
415: from 
416: \protect\cite{Al99,Ab99,Ar75}, the $B(Q^2)$ data are from \protect\cite{Bo90}, 
417: the $t_{20}$ data 
418: are from \protect\cite{t20}. }
419: % \label{}
420: \end{figure}
421: 
422: 
423: 
424: \end{document}
425: 
426: