1: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \preprint{Nuclear Physics A (2001) in press.}
4: \title{Probing Mechanical and Chemical Instabilities in Neutron-Rich Matter}
5: \bigskip
6: \author{\bf Bao-An Li\footnote{email: Bali@astate.edu}, Andrew T. Sustich, Matt Tilley and Bin Zhang}
7: \address{Department of Chemistry and Physics\\
8: P.O. Box 419, Arkansas State University\\
9: State University, Arkansas 72467-0419, USA}
10: \maketitle
11:
12: \maketitle
13: \begin{abstract}
14: The isospin-dependence of mechanical and chemical instabilities is
15: investigated within a thermal and nuclear transport model using
16: a Skyrme-type phenomenological equation of state for neutron-rich matter.
17: Respective roles of the nuclear mean field and the 2-body stochastic
18: scattering on the evolution of density and isospin fluctuations in either
19: mechanically or chemically unstable regions of neutron-rich matter are investigated.
20: It is found that the mean field dominates overwhelmingly the fast growth of both
21: fluctuations, while the 2-body scattering influences significantly the later growth of the
22: isospin fluctuation only. The magnitude of both fluctuations decreases with the increasing
23: isospin asymmetry because of the larger reduction of the attractive isoscalar mean
24: field by the stronger repuslive neutron symmetry potential in the more neutron-rich matter.
25: Moreover, it is shown that the isospin fractionation happens later, but grows faster
26: in the more neutron-rich matter. Implications of these results to current
27: experiments exploring properties of neutron-rich matter are discussed.\\
28: {\bf PACS} numbers: 25.70.-z, 25.75.Ld., 24.10.Lx\\
29: {\bf Key Words:} {\it Isospin physics, equation of state, neutron-rich matter,
30: fluctuations and instabilities}
31: \end{abstract}
32: \newpage
33: \section{Introduction}
34: Explosion mechanisms of supernova and related properties of neutron stars are
35: among the most interesting topics of modern nuclear astrophysics.
36: Investigations into these questions rely critically on the knowledge about the
37: equation of state of isospin asymmetric nuclear matter.
38: Thus, one of the most important subjects in nuclear physics is the
39: study of the isospin-dependence of the nuclear equation of state
40: using nuclear reactions induced by neutron-rich nuclei or radioactive
41: beams\cite{rib,ria,li01}. In these reactions transient states of nuclear
42: matter with sufficiently high isospin asymmetries as well as large thermal and
43: compressional excitations can be created. The rapid progress in recent
44: experiments with rare isotopes has therefore made the study of novel properties of
45: extremely isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter possible. The planned Rare Isotope
46: Accelerator ({\rm RIA}) will further enhance the exploration of this new frontier
47: dramatically\cite{ria}.
48:
49: Prospects for discovering new physics in neutron-rich matter have generated
50: much interest in the nuclear science
51: community\cite{li01,li97,li98,dasgupta,tsang01,gary,sherry}. In particular,
52: the isospin-dependence of the nuclear equation of state ({\rm EOS}),
53: reflected mainly in the density dependence of the symmetry energy,
54: has recently received much attention. This is because the isospin-dependence
55: of the nuclear {\rm EOS} is among the most
56: important but very poorly known properties of neutron-rich
57: matter\cite{wir88,brown00,hor00,dito01,lom01,bom01}.
58: It is very important to the mechanisms of Type II supernova explosions and
59: neutron-star mergers. It also determines the proton fraction
60: and electron chemical potential in neutron stars at $\beta$ equilibrium. These
61: quantities consequently influence the cooling rate of protoneutron stars and
62: the possibility of kaon condensation in dense stellar
63: matter\cite{lat91,bom94,sum94,lee96,pra97}. Moreover, the isospin-dependence of
64: the nuclear {\rm EOS} also determines the stability boundaries of asymmetric
65: nuclear matter. These boundaries and their isospin-dependence subsequently
66: affects the multifragmentation mechanism in nuclear reactions at intermediate
67: energies. Multifragmentation is thought to occur in symmetric nuclear matter
68: due to the growth of instabilities triggered by density fluctuations, such as
69: the Coulomb, surface and volumetric instabilities\cite{moretto}. While in
70: isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter, it is interesting to study not only the
71: isospin-dependence of the above instabilities, but also new mechanisms for nuclear
72: multifragmentation, such as the chemical instability.
73:
74: In this work we shall explore the isospin-dependence of both mechanical and chemical
75: instabilities using a Skyrme-type phenomenological {\rm EOS}
76: for neutron-rich matter within both a thermal model and a nuclear transport model.
77: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we shall first outline the
78: isospin-dependent nuclear {\rm EOS} that we use in this work, and then investigate
79: relevant thermodynamical properties of neutron-rich matter using a thermal model.
80: In Section 3, we shall establish boundaries of the mechanical and chemical
81: instabilities and their isospin-dependence. Then, in Section 4 we study the
82: dynamical growth of mechanical and chemical instabilities and associated phenomena within a
83: nuclear transport model. Finally, a summary and outlook are given in Section 5.
84:
85: \section{Equation of State and Thermodynamical Properties of Neutron-Rich Matter}
86: To understand the thermodynamic properties of isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter,
87: we must have a good knowledge of its EOS. The isospin-dependent part of the
88: nuclear {\rm EOS} is critical for many unique properties of asymmetric matter.
89: At present, nuclear many-body theories predict vastly different
90: isospin-dependent nuclear {\rm EOS} depending on both the calculation
91: techniques and the bare two-body and/or three-body interactions employed,
92: see e.g., \cite{wir88,brown00,hor00}.
93: Therefore, we use here a Skyrme-type phenomenological {\rm EOS} for asymmetric
94: nuclear matter. With proper parameterizations, it allows us to sample
95: predictions by different many-body theories and to calculate
96: many thermodynamical properties analytically.
97:
98: Various studies (e.g., \cite{bom91,hub93}) have shown that the
99: energy per nucleon $e(\rho,\delta)$ in asymmetric nuclear matter
100: of density $\rho$ and isospin asymmetry parameter
101: \begin{equation}
102: \delta\equiv (\rho_n-\rho_p)/(\rho_n+\rho_p)
103: \end{equation}
104: can be approximated very well by a parabolic function in $\delta$.
105: At zero temperature, the $e(\rho,\delta)$ can be parameterized as
106: \begin{equation}\label{ieos}
107: e(\rho,\delta)= \frac{a}{2}+\frac{b}{1+\sigma}u^{\sigma}+\frac{3}{5}e_F^0u^{2/3}
108: +S(\rho)\cdot\delta^2.
109: \end{equation}
110: In the above $u\equiv \rho/\rho_0$ is the reduced density, $e_F^0$ is the Fermi
111: energy and $a=-123.6$ MeV, $b=70.4$ MeV and $\sigma=2$ corresponding to a stiff
112: nuclear {\rm EOS} of isospin-symmetric nuclear matter. The last term is the
113: symmetry energy whose density dependence is currently rather
114: uncertain\cite{wir88,brown00,hor00,dito01,lom01,bom01}. We adopt
115: here a form of
116: \begin{equation}
117: S(\rho)=S_0(\rho_0)\cdot u^{\gamma},
118: \end{equation}
119: which was used by Heiselberg and Hjorth-Jensen in their recent
120: studies of neutron stars\cite{hei00} with $S_0(\rho_0)=30$ MeV and $\gamma$
121: as a free parameter. We note here that a value of about $\gamma=0.6$ was obtained
122: by fitting to the result of variational many-body calculations\cite{hei00,akm97}.
123: The $\gamma$ parameter is directly related to the $K_{sym}$ parameter of
124: asymmetric nuclear matter via
125: \begin{equation}
126: K_{\rm sym}\equiv 9\rho_0^2\frac{\partial^2 S(\rho)}{\partial \rho^2}|_{\rho
127: =\rho_0}=9S_0(\rho_0)\cdot\gamma(\gamma-1).
128: \end{equation}
129: The values of $K_{sym}$ predicted by many-body theories scatter
130: from about $-400$ {\rm MeV} to $+466$ {\rm MeV}(e.g. \cite{bom91}).
131: Experimental values extracted from studying giant monopole
132: resonances of asymmetric nuclei do not constrain the $K_{\rm sym}$
133: parameter either. The reported experimental values of $K_{sym}$
134: are between $-566\pm 1350$ MeV and $34\pm 159$ MeV\cite{shl93}.
135:
136: Shown in Fig. 1 are the equations of state with $\gamma=$ 0.5 and 1
137: corresponding to $K_{sym}=$ -68 MeV and 0, respectively. The saturation points
138: of asymmetric nuclear matter with different $\delta$ are linked with the dashed lines
139: to guide the eye. These two $\gamma$ parameters lead to rather different
140: saturation points especially for neutron-rich matter. The main features of the
141: equation of state obtained with $\gamma=0.5$ and $\gamma=1$ are surprisingly
142: similarly to those based on the Skyrme Hartree-Fock (SHF) and the Relativistic
143: Mean Field (RMF) models\cite{oya98}, respectively.
144:
145: It is well known that the symmetry energy has a kinetic and a potential
146: contribution
147: \begin{equation} S(\rho)=\frac{3}{5}e_{\rm F}^0u^{\frac{2}{3}}(2^{\frac{2}{3}}-1)
148: +V_2
149: \end{equation}
150: where $V_2$ is the potential contribution. The corresponding symmetry
151: potential energy density is
152: \begin{equation}
153: W_{asy}=V_2\rho\delta^{2},
154: \end{equation}
155: and the single-particle potential
156: $v_{\rm asy}^{q}$ can be obtained from
157: \begin{equation}\label{vasy}
158: v_{\rm asy}^{q}=\frac{\partial W_{asy}}{\partial \rho_{q}}
159: =\pm(S_0u^{\gamma}-12.7u^{2/3})\delta +
160: (S_0(\gamma-1)u^{\gamma}+4.2u^{\frac{2}{3}})\delta^{2}
161: \end{equation}
162: where ``+" and ``-" are for $q=neutron$ and $q=proton$, respectively.
163: Shown in Fig.\ 2 are the symmetry energy and the corresponding symmetry potential
164: with three $\gamma$ parameters. The magnitude of repulsive (attactive) symmetry
165: potentials for neutrons (protons) increases with both the density $\rho$ and
166: isospin asymmetry $\delta$. The most important effect of $v_{asy}^q$ is to
167: cause the migration of neutrons (protons) from relatively high (low) to
168: low (high) density regions leading to the isospin fractionation (distillation)
169: effect, and this effect grows with increasing $\delta$.
170:
171: For asymmetric nuclear matter at a finite temperature $T$,
172: the nucleon chemical potential $\mu_q$ corresponding to the {\rm EOS}
173: of Eq.\ \ref{ieos} is given by\cite{jaqaman1}
174: \begin{equation}\label{muq}
175: \mu_q=au+bu^{\sigma}+v_{\rm asy}^{q}+T\left[{\rm ln}(\frac{\lambda_T^3\rho_q}{2})
176: +\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n+1}{n}b_n(\frac{\lambda_T^{3}\rho_q}{2})^n\right],
177: \end{equation}
178: where $\lambda_T=\left[2\pi\hbar^{2}/(m_q T)\right]^{1/2}$ is the thermal
179: wavelength of a nucleon. The coefficients $b_n$ are obtained from mathematical
180: inversion of the Fermi distribution function\cite{jaqaman1}.
181: From the above chemical potentials for neutrons and protons, the global pressure
182: for asymmetric nuclear matter can be obtained from the
183: Gibbs-Duhem relation
184: \begin{equation}\label{gibbs}
185: \frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho}=\frac{\rho}{2}\left[(1+\delta)
186: \frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \rho}+(1-\delta)
187: \frac{\partial \mu_p}{\partial \rho}\right].
188: \end{equation}
189: We separate the result according to
190: \begin{equation}
191: P=P_0+P_{asy}+P_{kin},
192: \end{equation}
193: where $P_0$ is the isospin-independent nuclear interaction contribution
194: \begin{equation}
195: P_0=\frac{1}{2}a\rho_0u^{2}+b\frac{\sigma\rho_0}{\sigma+1}u^{\sigma+1},
196: \end{equation}
197: $P_{kin}$ is the kinetic contribution
198: \begin{equation}
199: P_{{\rm kin}}=T\rho\{1+\frac{1}{2}
200: \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n(\frac{\lambda_T^{3}\rho}{4})^n\left[(1+\delta)^{n+1}
201: +(1-\delta)^{n+1}\right]\},
202: \end{equation}
203: and $P_{asy}$ is the contribution from the isospin-dependent
204: nuclear interaction $V_2$
205: \begin{equation}
206: P_{asy}=(S_0\gamma\rho_0u^{\gamma+1}-8.5\rho_0u^{\frac{5}{3}})\delta^{2}.
207: \end{equation}
208: The total pressure $P$ depends on the isospin asymmetry $\delta$ through
209: both the kinetic pressure $P_{kin}$ and the asymmetry pressure $P_{asy}$.
210: We compare the relative values of the three partial pressures in Fig.\ 3 for a
211: typical temperature of 5 MeV with $\gamma=0.5$ and $\delta=$0.2, 0.4 and 0.6,
212: respectively. It is seen that the pressure increases with the increasing isospin
213: asymmetry and $P_{asy}$ has an appreciable contribution to the total pressure.
214: The isothermal spinodal (ITS) line moves toward lower densities as the isospin
215: asymmetry increases. Fig.\ 4 shows in more detail the interplay of temperature T,
216: isospin asymmetry $\delta$ and the $\gamma$ parameter. In each window,
217: the isospin asymmetry $\delta$ goes from 0 to 1 (bottom to top) with an increment of 0.2.
218: By increasing the isospin asymmetry the pressure increases as if the temperature
219: is increasing. It is also seen that the $\gamma$ parameter has a small
220: effect on the total pressure especially at high temperature because of the
221: dominating role of the kinetic pressure.
222:
223: \section{Isospin-Dependence of Mechanical and Chemical Instabilities}
224: Based on the {\rm EOS} obtained from various microscopic theories
225: and phenomenological models\cite{lat78,bar80,muller,liko97,baran98,baran00,cat01},
226: it has long been predicted that isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter under certain
227: conditions can be mechanically or chemically unstable, i.e.,
228: \begin{equation}\label{mech}
229: \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho}\right)_{T,\delta}\leq 0~~~({\rm mechanical}),
230: \end{equation}
231: or
232: \begin{equation}
233: \left(\frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \delta}\right)_{P,T}\leq 0~~~({\rm chemical}).
234: \end{equation}
235: In these unstable regions, small fluctuations in $\rho$ or $\delta$ respectively
236: are expected to grow.
237:
238: Mechanical instabilities have been well studied in the past for
239: isospin-symmetric systems, here we concentrate on probing its
240: isospin-dependence. Results presented in Fig. 3 and 4 allow us to explore
241: effects of the temperature, density and $\gamma$ parameter on not only
242: the pressure itself, but also how these factors influence the mechanical
243: instability. The latter happens in the region where
244: the slope of the pressure with respect to density is negative,
245: as defined in Eq. \ref{mech}. From results shown in Fig.\ 3 and 4, it is
246: easy to relate the increase in temperature with a decreasing
247: probability to observe a mechanical instability. It is seen that the
248: mechanical instability region shrinks when either the
249: temperature or the isospin asymmetry increases. Above a critical
250: temperature $T_c$ determined by the condition
251: \begin{equation}
252: \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial\rho}\right)_{T,\delta}=
253: \left(\frac{\partial^{2}P}{\partial\rho^{2}}\right)_{T,\delta}=0,
254: \end{equation}
255: the pressure increases monotonically with density, and the mechanical
256: instability disappears. To be more quantitatively, we show in Fig. 5,
257: the critical temperature as a function of the isospin asymmetry
258: $\delta$ with a $\gamma$ parameter of 0.5. It is interesting to
259: note that the critical temperature decreases with increasing
260: isospin asymmetry. Thus one expects to see a shrinking mechanical instability
261: region for increasingly more neutron-rich systems. It is important to stress here
262: that the critical temperature $T_c$ discussed above is only associated with the
263: disappearance of mechanical instabilities. For isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter,
264: as we shall discuss in detail in the following, the system can still be chemically
265: unstable against density fluctuations and undergo fragmentation above
266: the critical temperature $T_c$.
267:
268: To study the chemical instability and its isospin dependence we show in
269: Fig. 6 the chemical potential isobars $\mu(T,P,\delta)$ as a function of
270: $\delta$ for neutrons and protons with a parameter $\gamma=0.5$ at a typical
271: temperature of 5 MeV and pressure of 0.005, 0.02, 0.06, 0.12, 0.2 and 0.8
272: MeV/fm$^3$, respectively. We note that for corresponding pressures,
273: the isobars for neutrons and protons begin from the same chemical potential
274: at $\delta=0$ as one expects. The most interesting feature in this plot is
275: that there exists an envelope of pressures ($0.005$ MeV/fm$^3$ $<p<$ 0.8
276: MeV/fm$^3$) inside of which chemical instability occurs over a range of
277: $\delta$ where
278: \begin{equation}
279: \left(\frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \delta}\right)\leq 0
280: \end{equation}
281: or
282: \begin{equation}
283: \left(\frac{\partial \mu_p}{\partial \delta}\right)\geq 0.
284: \end{equation}
285: Inside this region, the system is unstable against isospin fluctuations.
286: For instance, if several neutrons have migrated into a region of chemical
287: instability due to some statistical or dynamical fluctuations in a reaction
288: process, the isospin asymmetry parameter $\delta$ in the region will
289: increase and the energy of that region will decrease because of its lower neutron
290: chemical potential. To minimize the total energy of the system,
291: it is then favorable for the system to have even more neutrons move to the
292: chemically unstable region, thus leading to the further growth of the isospin
293: fluctuation. Results at other temperatures show similar features.
294: However, the boundary of the instability region shrinks as the temperatures T
295: increase, i.e., for increasing T, chemical instability occurs for much
296: less isospin asymmetric matter. The temperature dependence and its origin
297: will be more clearly illustrated in the following.
298:
299: Having discussed separately the mechanical and chemical instabilities, we now
300: compare their relative boundaries in the configure space of
301: $(T,\rho,\delta)$. The Gibbs-Duhem relation of Eq.\ \ref{gibbs} can be
302: used to find boundaries of mechanically unstable regions
303: (ITS: isothermal spinodal) in the
304: $\rho-\delta$ plane for given temperatures.
305: Since the chemical instability condition has to be evaluated at constant
306: pressures, the following Maxwellian relation
307: \begin{equation}\label{trans}
308: \left(\frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \delta}\right)_{T,P}
309: =\left(\frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \delta}\right)_{T,\rho}
310: -\left(\frac{\partial \mu_n}{\partial \rho}\right)_{T,\delta}
311: \cdot\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho}\right)^{-1}_{T,\delta}
312: \cdot\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \delta}\right)_{T,\rho}
313: \end{equation}
314: is used to find boundaries of the chemically unstable
315: regions (DS: diffusive spinodal).
316: Shown in Fig.\ 7 are the boundaries of the mechanical (thick lines) and
317: chemical (think lines) instabilities in the $\rho-\delta$ plane with $\gamma=0.5$
318: at $T=5$ (lower window), 10 (middle window) and 15 MeV (upper window),
319: respectively. It is seen that the diffusive spinodal enveloping the region of
320: mechanical instability extends further out into
321: the plane; the two regions of mechanical and chemical
322: instabilities do no overlap. As the temperature increases, both instabilities
323: become less prominent over a more narrow range of densities at smaller isospin
324: asymmetries. It is thus possible to observe phenomena
325: due to the chemical instability even in reactions using stable nuclei at
326: intermediate energies, which can attain local temperatures up to 20 MeV and
327: isospin asymmetries up to about 0.4\cite{li01}.
328: The above features are independent of the parameters of the {\rm EOS}
329: and are in good agreement with those based on more microscopic many-body
330: theories\cite{lat78,bar80,muller}. In particular, we found that the variation of
331: $\gamma$ parameter has very little effect on the instability boundaries.
332: Therefore, in the following a constant of $\gamma=0.5$ is used. The results
333: shown in Fig.\ 7 not only provide the motivations but also serve as a guidance
334: for our following transport model simulations.
335:
336: \section{Evolution of Density and Isospin Fluctuations in Mechanically or Chemically
337: Unstable Neutron-Rich Matter}
338: Density and isospin fluctuations are expected to grow in the mechanically and/or
339: chemically unstable regions of asymmetric nuclear matter. Information about
340: the respective growth rates of these fluctuations and how they depend on the
341: isospin-asymmtry of nuclear matter is currently still rather rare. This
342: information is vitally important for the structure and stability of both neutron
343: stars and radioactive nuclei as well as mechanisms of nuclear multifragmentation
344: in reactions induced by neutron-rich nuclei. In the following, we study the
345: evolution of fluctuations in isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter initialized in
346: the mechanically or chemically unstable regions within an isospin-dependent transport
347: model IBUU\cite{li97,li98}. We note that Baran et al have used a similar approach
348: \cite{baran98} in studying thermodynamical instabilities which can be identified
349: either as a mechanical or chemical instability\cite{baran00}.
350:
351: The IBUU model uses consistently the isospin-dependent
352: {\rm EOS} and the corresponding potentials as in the thermal model outlined
353: in Section 2. Moreover, scatterings among neutrons and protons are fully
354: isospin-dependent in terms of their total and differential cross sections
355: as well as the Pauli blockings. Nucleons are initialized using a Boltzmann
356: distribution function in a cubic box of length $L_{box}$ with periodic
357: boundary conditions. The box is further divided into cells of 1 fm$^3$ volume
358: in which the average density $\rho_{cell}$ and isospin asymmetry $\delta_{cell}$
359: are evaluated. We used $10^{4}$ test particles per nucleon in evaluating the
360: $\rho_{cell}$ and $\delta_{cell}$.
361:
362: Shown in Fig. 8 is an illustration of the evolution of a system initialized
363: in the mechanically unstable region with
364: $T_i=5$ MeV, $\delta_i=0.6$ and $\rho_i=0.05$ fm$^{-3}$. For the purpose of
365: this illustration a small box of $L_{box}=$10 fm is used.
366: The most interesting feature shown here is the gradually increasing isospin
367: fractionation. This is indicated by the spreading of the initial system into
368: regions with $\rho\leq \rho_i$ and $\delta\geq\delta_i$ and where
369: $\rho\geq \rho_i$ but $\delta\leq\delta_i$. The degree of isospin fractionation
370: can be quantified by using the ratio $(N/Z)_{gas}/(N/Z)_{liquid}$,
371: where $(N/Z)_{gas}$ and $(N/Z)_{liquid}$ is the isospin asymmetry of the low
372: $(\rho/\rho_0\leq 1/8)$ and high $(\rho/\rho_0> 1/8)$ density regions,
373: respectively. Shown in Fig.\ 9 are the degree of isospin fractionation as a
374: function of time for a system initialized with $T_i=$5 MeV at a density of
375: $\rho_i=0.05$ $fm^{-3}$. As seen from Fig.\ 7, the system is mechanically
376: unstable with an isospin asymmetry $\delta$ of 0.2 and 0.6, while it is
377: chemically unstable with $\delta=0.9$. As one expects from the $\delta$
378: dependence of the symmetry potential $v_{asy}$, the isospin fractionation
379: grows faster with the increasing $\delta$.
380: It is also interesting to note that the isospin fractionation happens
381: later as the $\delta_i$ increases.
382:
383: The variations of the density $\rho$ and isospin asymmetry $\delta$ with
384: respect to their initial values can be quantified by using, respectively,
385: \begin{equation}
386: \sigma_d(t)\equiv(\bar{\rho^2}-\rho_i^2)^{1/2}
387: \end{equation}
388: and
389: \begin{equation}
390: \sigma_{\delta}(t)\equiv(\bar{\delta^2}-\delta_i^2)^{1/2},
391: \end{equation}
392: where the average is over all cells. Shown in Fig.\ 10 and Fig. 11
393: are the reduced variation in
394: isospin asymmetry $\sigma_{\delta}(t)-\sigma_{\delta}(0)$ and
395: density $\sigma_d(t)/\rho_i$ as a function of time for a system initialized
396: at $T_i=5$ MeV, $\rho_i=$0.05 fm$^{-3}$ and $\delta_i=$0.2, 0.6 and 0.9,
397: respectively. As a reference, results are also shown for a
398: system initialized with $T_i=15$ MeV and $\delta_i=0.9$ with the dash-dot
399: lines (with this initial conditions the system is both mechanically and
400: chemically stable as shown in Fig.\ 7). As one expects, both the isospin
401: and density fluctuations stay almost constant and there is no isospin
402: fractionation at all for this system. While for a system initialized in the
403: mechanically (chemically) unstable region with $\delta_i=$0.2 and 0.6
404: ($\delta_i=$0.9), it is interesting to see that both the isospin and
405: density fluctuations grow {\it faster} with the {\it decreasing}
406: isospin asymmetry $\delta_i$. This finding is consistent with that found by
407: Baran et al in ref. \cite{baran98}. Thus, the more
408: neutron-rich system in either the mechanically or chemically unstable regions
409: is more stable against the growth of both density and isospin fluctuations.
410: This is also responsible for the later start of the isospin fractionation in
411: the more neutron-rich systems as shown in Fig.\ 9.
412:
413: Why is the more neutron-rich matter more stable against both the density and
414: isospin fluctuations? In the following we try to answer not only this question, but
415: also explore seeds of fluctuations and their isospin dependence,
416: and investigate which aspects of nuclear dynamics are important in governing the
417: growth of fluctuations. The evolution dynamics of asymmetric nuclear matter is
418: governed by the isospin-dependent nuclear mean filed and stochastic nuclear scatterings.
419: It is necessary to study their respective roles in generating the fluctuations.
420: We start with investigating the role of nucleon-nucleon scatterings.
421: In our approach, first-order effects of 2-body stochastic scatterings are included
422: through the collision integral of the BUU equation. Second-order effects from the
423: explicitly stochastic correction to the collision integral as in the Boltzmann-Langevin
424: model are negelected. Thus, t here are two main seeds of fluctuations in our approach, i.e.,
425: the initial numerical fluctuations from the random sampling of the initial state and the later
426: 2-body stochastic nuclear scatterings.
427: Both of them may lead to the growth of fluctuations by propagating
428: through the nuclear mean field in the early and later stages of the evolution,
429: respectively. The magnitude of the initial numerical fluctuations in both density
430: and isospin asymmetrty is clearly shown in the upper window of Fig. 8. The seeds of
431: fluctuations due to 2-body stochastic nuclear scatterings are determined by the
432: isospin-dependent collision dynamics in asymmetric nuclear matter.
433: Most importantly, the experimental neutron-neutron cross section,
434: as shown in Fig.\ 12, is only about $1/3$ of that for neutron-proton
435: collisions\cite{nndata}, and also the final state for neutron-neutron
436: scatterings is more strongly Pauli blocked in the more neutron-rich matter.
437: To be more quantitative, we show in Fig.\ 13 the Pauli blocking rate
438: as a function of time. As the $\delta_i$ increases from 0.2 to 0.9 the
439: Pauli blocking rate increases from about 35\% to 50\%. Therefore, there are
440: significantly less nucleon-nucleon collisions in more neutron-rich nuclear
441: matter. Shown in Fig.\ 14 are the average number of
442: possible (before using the Pauli blocking) nucleon-nucleon collisions
443: per nucleon $N_{try}/A$ and the successful ones ($N_{coll}/A$) as a function
444: of time. The value of $N_{try}/A$ reflects directly the isospin-dependent
445: elementary nucleon-nucleon cross sections shown in Fig.\ 12.
446: Before about 40 fm/c, there is essentially no collision
447: because of the strong Pauli blocking when the phase space nonuniformity due to the
448: initial fluctuation is still small. Later, nuclear scatterings become important, moreover,
449: they are more frequent with the decreasing isospin asymmetry. With $\delta_i=0.2$ each nucleon
450: can make about 4 scatterings up to the time of 100 fm/c, while it can only make about 1
451: collision with $\delta_i=0.9$. Because of the combined effects of both the Pauli blocking and
452: the isospin-dependent elementary cross sections, the number of nuclear
453: scatterings in nuclear matter with $\delta_i=0.9$ is consequently only
454: about 1/6 of that with $\delta_i=0.2$, contributing to the smaller isospin
455: and density fluctuations in the more neutron-rich matter.
456: To separate the respective roles of the nuclear mean field and the 2-body scatterings,
457: we have performed studies by turnning off the nucleon-nucleon collisions in the model.
458: As shown in the upper window of Fig.\ 15, the collisional seeds of fluctuations
459: lead to the significant growth of the isospin fluctuation in the later stage of the evolution.
460: However, they have very little effect on the growth of density fluctuations as shown in the lower window.
461: A comparison of the results obtained with and without the collision integral
462: indicates that the growth of fluctuations are overwhelmingly dominated by the nuclear mean field.
463: This is in agreement with the analysis based on the linear response theory by Baran et al\cite{baran98}.
464: The observed isospin-dependence of the fluctuations can be understood from the interplay
465: between the {\it attractive isoscalar} mean field and the {\it repulsive symmetry potential for neutrons}.
466: The symmetry potential, as shown in Eq.\ \ref{vasy}, is repulsive for neutrons and attractive for protons
467: and their magnitudes increase with the increasing isospin asymmetry. Thus, the resultant attractive mean
468: field is weaker in the more neutron-rich matter. Because of the small number of scatterings, particularly
469: in the early stage of the evolution, the growth of fluctuations is thus mainly determined by the strength and
470: sign of the resultant nuclear mean field according to the linear response theory. Based on the latter,
471: the magnitude of both fluctuations can grow larger with the increasing strength of the attractive resultant
472: mean field, and thus also with the decreasing isospin asymmetry $\delta$.
473:
474: \section{Summary and Outlook}
475: In summary, utilizing a phenomenological nuclear equation of state within
476: a thermal model, first we explored the isospin dependence of the
477: chemical and mechanical instabilities in asymmetric nuclear matter. The diffusive
478: spinodal is found to extend further out into the $(\delta-\rho)$ plane
479: than the isothermal spinodal. It is shown that the isospin dependence
480: of the nuclear equation of state plays a key role in determining the
481: thermodynamical properties of asymmetric nuclear matter. We also investigated the
482: evolution of density and isospin fluctuations in mechanically and
483: chemically unstable asymmetric nuclear matter within a nuclear
484: transport model. Both the isospin and density fluctuations are found to
485: decrease with the increasing isospin asymmetry of the system.
486: Respective roles of the nuclear mean field and the 2-body stochastic
487: scattering on the evolution of density and isospin fluctuations in either
488: mechanically or chemically unstable regions of neutron-rich matter are investigated.
489: It is found that the mean field dominates overwhelmingly the fast growth of both
490: fluctuations, while the 2-body scattering influences significantly the later growth of the
491: isospin fluctuation only. We have also shown that the isospin fractionation happens later,
492: but grows much faster in the more neutron-rich matter.
493:
494: It is well known that more neutron-rich systems are less bound and have smaller
495: saturation densities as illustrated by the saturation lines in Fig. 1. However,
496: fluctuations and their growth are also important
497: for determining the final state of a neutron-rich system, such as in the
498: projectile fragmentation in producing exotic beams\cite{fri00}. Our results above
499: indicate that fluctuations actually have a compensating role to the lower
500: binding energy in stabilizing neutron-rich system where fluctuations
501: are smaller and do not grow as fast as in symmetric ones.
502: Moreover, our results on the isospin fractionation accompanying the evolution
503: of fluctuations indicate that the configuration of a more
504: dense, isospin-symmetric region surrounded by a more isospin-asymmetric gas
505: as in halo nuclei is a natural result of the isospin-dependent nuclear dynamics.
506: Furthermore, we expect that the multifragmentation and isospin fractionation
507: in nuclear reactions induced by neutron-rich nuclei to happen on longer time
508: scales compared to symmetric reactions of the same masses. These expectations
509: can be tested by measuring products of multifragmentation. In
510: particular, the measurement of neutron-neutron, proton-proton as well as
511: fragment-fragment correlation functions, in comparative studies of isospin
512: symmetric and asymmetric nuclear reactions will be very
513: useful\cite{robert,bauer}.
514:
515: \section{Acknowledgement}
516: We would like to thank V. Baran, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, A. Evans, J.B. Natowitz, M.B. Tsang
517: and S.J. Yennello for useful discussions.
518: This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation Grant
519: No. 0088934 and Arkansas Science and Technology Authority Grant No. 00-B-14.
520:
521:
522: \newpage \begin{thebibliography}{99}
523:
524: \bibitem{rib}A. Mueller and B. Sherril, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.
525: {\bf 43}, 529 (1993); P.G. Hansen, A.S. Jensen and B. Jonson, Ann. Rev. Nucl.
526: Part. Sci. {\bf 45}, 591 (1995); I. Tanihata, Prog. of Part. and Nucl. Phys.,
527: {\bf 35} (1995) 505; W. Nazarewicz, B. Sherril, I. Tanihata and
528: P. Van Duppen, Nucl. Phys. News {\bf 6}, 17 (1996).
529:
530: \bibitem{ria}RIA Physics White Paper, 2000, Eds. R. Casten, W. Nazarewicz et al..
531:
532: \bibitem{li01}Isospin Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions at Intermediate Energies,
533: Eds. Bao-An Li and W. Udo Schr\"oder, ISBN 1-56072-888-4,
534: Nova Science Publishers, Inc (2001, New York).
535:
536: \bibitem{li97}B.A. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76}, 4492 (1996);
537: {\it ibid}, {\bf 78}, 1644 (1997); B.A. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 4221 (2000); B.A. Li,
538: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A681}, 434c (2001).
539:
540: \bibitem{li98}B.A. Li, C.M. Ko and W. Bauer,
541: topical review, Int. Jou. Mod. Phys. E{\bf 7}, 147 (1998).
542:
543: \bibitem{dasgupta}J. Pan and S. Das Gupta, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 57}, 1839 (1998)
544:
545: \bibitem{tsang01}H.S. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 716 (2000);
546: M.B. Tsang et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5023 (2001).
547:
548: \bibitem{gary}G.D. Westfall, Nucl., Phys. {\bf A681}, 343c (2001).
549:
550: \bibitem{sherry}S.J. Yennello, Nucl., Phys. {\bf A681}, 317c (2001).
551:
552: \bibitem{wir88}R.B. Wiringa, V. Fiks and A. Fabrocini,
553: Phys. Rev. C{\bf 38}, 1010 (1988).
554:
555: \bibitem{brown00}B.A. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 5296 (2000).
556:
557: \bibitem{hor00}C.J. Horowitz et al., Phys.Rev. C{\bf 63}, 025501 (2001).
558:
559: \bibitem{dito01}M. Colonna et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B428}, 1 (1998);
560: M. Di Toro et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A681}, 426c (2001).
561:
562: \bibitem{lom01}U. Lombardo and W. Zuo in ref. \cite{li01}.
563:
564: \bibitem{bom01}I. Bombaci in ref. \cite{li01}.
565:
566: \bibitem{lat91}J.M. Lattimer, C.J. Pethick, M. Prakash and P. Haensel,
567: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 2701 (1991).
568:
569: \bibitem{bom94}I. Bombaci, T.T.S. Kuo and U. Lombardo,
570: Phys. Rep. {\bf 242}, 165 (1994).
571:
572: \bibitem{sum94}K. Sumiyoshi and H. Toki, Astro. Phys. Journal, {\bf 422},
573: 700 (1994); K. Sumiyoshi, H. Suzuki and H. Toki,
574: Astronomy and Astrophysics, {\bf 303}, 475 (1995).
575:
576: \bibitem{lee96}C.-H. Lee, Phys. Rep. {\bf 275}, 255 (1996).
577:
578: \bibitem{pra97}M. Prakash et al., Phys. Rep. {\bf 280}, 1 (1997);
579: J. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Phys. Rep. {\bf 333}, 121 (2000).
580:
581: \bibitem{moretto}L.G. Moretto and G.J. Wozniak,
582: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 43} (1993) 123.
583:
584: \bibitem{bom91}I. Bombaci and U. Lombardo,
585: Phys. Rev. C{\bf 44}, 1892 (1991).
586:
587: \bibitem{hub93}H. Huber, F. Weber and M..K. Weigel,
588: Phys. Lett. {\bf B317}, 485 (1993); Phys. Rev. C{\bf 50}, R1287 (1994).
589:
590: \bibitem{hei00}H. Heiselberg and M. Hjorth-Jensen,
591: Phys. Rep. {\bf 328}, 237 (2000).
592:
593: \bibitem{akm97}A. Akmal and V.R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 56}, 2261 (1997);
594: A. Akmal, V.R. Pandharipande and D.C. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 58}, 1804 (1988).
595:
596: \bibitem{shl93}S. Shlomo and D.H. Youngblood, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 47}, 529 (1993).
597:
598: \bibitem{oya98}K. Oyamatsu, I. Tanihata, Y. Sugahara, K. Sumiyoshi and H. Toki,
599: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A634}, 3 (1998).
600:
601: \bibitem{jaqaman1}H.R. Jaqaman, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 39}, 169 (1988);
602: {\it ibid} C{\bf 40}, 1677 (1989).
603:
604: \bibitem{lat78}J.M. Lattimer and D.G. Ravenhall,
605: Astr. Jour., {\bf 223}, 314 (1978).
606:
607: \bibitem{bar80}M. Barranco and J. R. Buchler, Phys. Rev. C{\bf 22}, 1729 (1980).
608:
609: \bibitem{muller}H. M\"uller and B.D. Serot, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 52}, 2072 (1995).
610:
611: \bibitem{liko97}B.A. Li and C.M. Ko, Nuc. Phys. A {\bf 618}, (1997) 498.
612:
613: \bibitem{baran98}V. Baran, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro and A.B. Larionov, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A632}, 287 (1998).
614:
615: \bibitem{baran00} V. Baran, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro and V. Greco, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 4492 (2001).
616:
617: \bibitem{cat01} D. Catalano, G. Giansiracusa and U. Lombardo,
618: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A681}, 390c (2001).
619:
620: \bibitem{nndata}G. Alkahzov et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A280}, 365 (1977).
621:
622: \bibitem{fri00}W.A. Friedman, M.B. Tsang, D. Bazin and W.G. Lynch,
623: preprint MSUCL-1167, July 2000.
624:
625: \bibitem{robert}R. Ghetti et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A674}, 277 (2000);
626: Phys. Rev. C{\bf 62}, 037603 (2000).
627:
628: \bibitem{bauer}W. Bauer, C.K. Gelbke and S. Pratt,
629: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 42}, 77 (1992).
630:
631:
632: \end{thebibliography}
633:
634: \newpage
635:
636: \begin{figure}[htp]
637: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig1.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
638: \caption{The equation of state of isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter with the
639: isospin asymmetry $\delta$ spans between 0 and 1 with a $\gamma$ parameter
640: of 0.5 (lower window) and 1 (upper window), respectively.}
641: \label{fig1}
642: \end{figure}
643:
644: \begin{figure}[htp]
645: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig2.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
646: \caption{Symmetry energy (upper window) and potential (lower window) as a
647: function of reduced density with a $\gamma$ parameter of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5,
648: respectively. The symmetry potential is plotted for an isospin asymmetry
649: $\delta=0.2$.}
650: \label{fig2}
651: \end{figure}
652:
653: \begin{figure}[htp]
654: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig3.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
655: \caption{Total and partial pressures as a function of density, $\rho$, for
656: isospin asymmetry $\delta=0.2,0.4$ and $0.6$ with a temperature $T=5$ MeV
657: and $\gamma=0.5$. The isothermal spinodal line (ITS) is indicated with arrows.}
658: \label{fig3}
659: \end{figure}
660:
661: \begin{figure}[htp]
662: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig4.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
663: \caption{Total pressure P as a function of density $\rho$ for
664: isospin asymmetry $\delta=0.0,0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8$ and $1.0$ (from bottom to top)
665: with a temperature $T=5, 10$ and $15$ MeV and $\gamma=0.5, 1.0$ and 1.5,
666: respectively.}
667: \label{fig4}
668: \end{figure}
669:
670: \begin{figure}[htp]
671: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig5.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
672: \caption{Critical temperature as a function of isospin asymmetry
673: $\delta$.}
674: \label{fig5}
675: \end{figure}
676:
677: \begin{figure}[htp]
678: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig6.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
679: \caption{Chemical potential isobars, $\mu$ for neutrons and protons as a function
680: of isospin asymmetry, $\delta$ at temperature, T=5 MeV and density parameter,
681: $\gamma=0.5$. The isobars are at pressures of $P=0.005, 0.02, 0.06, 0.12, 0.20$ and $0.80$
682: MeV/fm$^3$, respectively.}
683: \label{fig6}
684: \end{figure}
685:
686: \begin{figure}[htp]
687: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig7.eps,width=15cm,height=13cm,angle=-90}
688: \caption{Boundaries of the mechanical (thick lines) and chemical (thin lines)
689: in the density-isospin asymmetry plane at a temperature of 5, 10 and 15 MeV,
690: respectively. }
691: \label{fig7}
692: \end{figure}
693:
694: \begin{figure}[htp]
695: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig8.eps,width=15cm,height=13cm,angle=-90}
696: \caption{An illustration of the evolution of asymmetric nuclear matter
697: in the density-isospin asymmetry plane. Each point in the scatter plots
698: represent one cell of 1 fm$^3$ volume in a cubic box of side length
699: $L_{box}=10$ fm.}
700: \label{fig8}
701: \end{figure}
702:
703: \begin{figure}[htp]
704: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig9.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
705: \caption{Evolution of the degree of isospin fractionation in a cubic box of side
706: length $L_{box}=30$ fm and density 0.05 fm$^{-3}$, temperature $T_i=5$ MeV
707: and $\delta_i=$0.2, 0.6 and 0.9, respectively.}
708: \label{fig9}
709: \end{figure}
710:
711: \begin{figure}[htp]
712: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig10.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
713: \caption{Evolution of the reduced density fluctuation in a cubic box of side
714: length $L_{box}=30$ fm and density 0.05 fm$^{-3}$. The dash-dot lines
715: are calculated with $T_i=15$ MeV and $\delta_i=0.9$; while the solid
716: lines are calculated with $T_i=5$ MeV and $\delta_i=$0.2, 0.6 and 0.9,
717: respectively.}
718: \label{fig10}
719: \end{figure}
720:
721: \begin{figure}[htp]
722: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig11.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
723: \caption{Evolution of the reduced isospin fluctuation for the same systems
724: as in Fig.\ 10.}
725: \label{fig11}
726: \end{figure}
727:
728: \begin{figure}[htp]
729: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig12.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
730: \caption{Experimental neutron-neutron and neutron-proton cross sections
731: as a faction of beam energy.}
732: \label{fig12}
733: \end{figure}
734:
735: \begin{figure}[htp]
736: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig13.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
737: \caption{The Pauli blocking rate as a function of time in a cubic box of
738: $L_{box}=30$ fm with density 0.05 fm$^{-3}$, temperature $T_i=5$ MeV and
739: $\delta_i=$0.2, 0.6 and 0.9, respectively.}
740: \label{fig13}
741: \end{figure}
742:
743: \begin{figure}[htp]
744: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig14.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
745: \caption{The average number of possible nucleon-nucleon collisions
746: per nucleon (a) and the average number of successful nucleon-nucleon
747: collisions per nucleon (b) as a function of time for the same systems as
748: in Fig. 13.}
749: \label{fig14}
750: \end{figure}
751:
752: \begin{figure}[htp]
753: \centering \epsfig{file=balifig15.eps,width=12cm,height=12cm,angle=-90}
754: \caption{Evolution of isospin (upper window) and density (lower window)
755: fluctuations as a function of time. The solid and long dashed lines are
756: results of full calculations, while the dotted and dash-dot lines are
757: results obtained by turnning off the 2-body scatterings.}
758: \label{fig15}
759: \end{figure}
760:
761: \end{document}
762:
763:
764:
765:
766:
767:
768: