1: \documentclass{ws2}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{$\pi\rho\omega$ vertex in nuclear matter}
6:
7: \author{Anna Baran, Agnieszka Bieniek, and Wojciech Broniowski}
8:
9: \address{The H. Niewodnicza{\'n}ski Institute of Nuclear Physics,
10: ul. Radzikowskiego 152 PL-31342 Cracow, Poland}
11:
12: \maketitle
13:
14: \abstracts{Medium modifications of
15: the $\pi \omega \rho$ vertex are analyzed in context of the
16: $\omega \to \pi^0 \gamma^\ast$ and $\rho \to \pi \gamma^\ast$
17: decays in nuclear matter. A relativistic hadronic model
18: with mesons, nucleons, and $\Delta(1232)$ isobars is applied.
19: A substantial increase of the widths for the decays
20: $\omega \to \pi^0 \gamma^\ast$ and $\rho \to \pi \gamma^\ast$ is found
21: for photon virtualities in the range $0.3-0.6$GeV. This enhancement has
22: a direct importance for the description of dilepton yields obtained
23: in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.}
24:
25: \noindent
26: {\em [To appear in Proceedings of the 2$^{\rm nd}$ International
27: Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries,
28: Cracow, 18-21 July 2001, E. Kapu\'scik and A. Horzela, eds.,
29: World Scientific (Singapore, 2002)]}
30:
31: \bigskip
32:
33: The experience gathered over the past years led to the conviction that
34: the properties of hadrons in medium are substantially
35: modified \cite
36: {brscale,celenza,serot,chin,hatsuda,jean,herrmann1,pirner,rapp,%
37: LeupoldRev,Gao,hatlee,lee2000,Vogl,klingl,Chanfray,BH1,eletsky,%
38: FrimanActa,Lutz99}.
39: This view is supported by numerous studies of hadronic Green functions.
40: Only a few
41: investigations of the in-medium hadronic {\em couplings} exist
42: \cite{Song2,BFH1,BFH2,Urban0,urban,Banerjee96,rhopipi}.
43: For instance, it has been found that the value of the
44: $\rho \pi \pi $ coupling is considerably enhanced.
45: In Ref. \cite{aa}, which is the basis for
46: this talk,
47: we have examined the {\em %
48: in-medium} $\pi \omega \rho $ coupling. This vertex enters the
49: decays $\omega \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }$ and
50: $\rho \rightarrow \pi \gamma^{\ast }$, which
51: are important for description of the dilepton production
52: in relativistic heavy-ion collisions \cite{ceres,helios}. The existing
53: calculations \cite{li,PKoch,rappadv} have always used the unmodified (vacuum)
54: value of the $\pi \omega \rho $ coupling. We have found that the medium
55: effects can significantly alter the input of such calculations, thereby
56: modifying the predicted dilepton production and creating hopes for a resolution
57: of the long-standing problem of the experimental dilepton enhancement in the
58: range $M_{l^+l-}\sim 0.3-0.5$GeV.
59:
60: In our study we use a typical hadronic model with meson, nucleon
61: and $\Delta$ degrees of freedom, and for simplicity
62: work at leading baryon density and at zero
63: temperature. In addition, we constrain
64: ourselves to the case where the decaying
65: particle is at rest with respect to the medium. The effects of the
66: relative motion turn out to be not very large \cite{bbtbp}.
67: In the vacuum the $\pi \omega \rho$ coupling is
68: \begin{equation}
69: -iV_{\pi \omega^\mu \rho^\nu }=i\frac{g_{\pi \omega \rho }}{F_{\pi }}%
70: \epsilon ^{\mu \nu p Q}, \label{vac}
71: \end{equation}
72: where we have used the notation $\epsilon ^{\mu \nu
73: pQ}=\epsilon ^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta }p_{\alpha }Q_{\beta }$, and
74: $F_\pi=93$MeV is the pion decay constant. In our convention
75: $Q$ is the incoming momentum of the pion, $p$ is the outgoing momentum of
76: the $\rho$, and $q = Q-p$ is the outgoing momentum of the $\omega $. The vector
77: mesons are, in general, virtual. For
78: the kinematics where all external momenta
79: vanish, the vector meson dominance models gives $g_{\pi \to \omega \rho
80: }=-\frac{g_{\rho }g_{\omega }}{e^{2}}g_{\pi \gamma \gamma }$, with $g_{\pi
81: \gamma \gamma }=\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi ^{2}F_\pi}$.
82: The nucleon propagator in nuclear matter is decomposed into the {\em %
83: free} and {\em density} parts in the usual way \cite{chin}:
84: \begin{eqnarray}
85: iS(k) &=&iS_{F}(k)+iS_{D}(k)=i(\gamma ^{\mu }k_{\mu }+m_{N})[\frac{1}{%
86: k^{2}-m_{N}^{2}+i\varepsilon }+ \nonumber \\
87: &&\frac{i\pi }{E_{k}}\delta (k_{0}-E_{k})\theta (k_{F}-|k|)]. \label{S}
88: \end{eqnarray}
89: Here $m_{N}$ denotes the nucleon mass, $E_{k}=\sqrt{m_{N}^{2}+k^{2}}$, and $%
90: k_{F}$ is the Fermi momentum. The Rarita-Schwinger propagator \cite
91: {rarita,Ben} for the spin 3/2 $\Delta(1232)$ particle has the form
92: \begin{equation}
93: iS_{\Delta }^{\mu \nu }(k)=i\frac{\gamma ^{\mu }k_{\mu }+M_{\Delta }}{%
94: k^{2}-M_{\Delta }^{2}}(-g^{\mu \nu }+\frac{1}{3}\gamma ^{\mu }\gamma ^{\nu }+%
95: \frac{2k^{\mu }k^{\nu }}{3M_{\Delta }^{2}}+\frac{\gamma ^{\mu }k^{\nu
96: }-\gamma ^{\nu }k^{\mu }}{3M_{\Delta }}). \label{rarita}
97: \end{equation}
98: The effects of the non-zero width of the $%
99: \Delta $ are incorporated by replacing
100: $M_{\Delta }$ by the complex mass $M_{\Delta }-i\Gamma /2$.
101:
102:
103: \begin{figure}[t]
104: \centerline{\psfig
105: {figure=rys.ps,height=4.4cm,bbllx=75bp,bblly=377bp,bburx=541bp,bbury=537bp,clip=}}
106: \label{diag}
107: \caption{Diagrams included in our calculation (crossed ones not shown).
108: Wavy lines denotes the $\rho$ or $\omega$,
109: dashed lines the pions, solid lines
110: the in-medium nucleon, and double lines the $\Delta$ resonance.}
111: \end{figure}
112:
113: The diagrams used in our study are shown in Fig. 1.
114: The density effects are produced when exactly one of the nucleon lines
115: in each of the our diagrams of Fig. 1 involves the nucleon
116: {\em density} propagator, $S_{D}$. The diagrams with more than one
117: $S_{D}$ vanish for kinematic reasons. On the other hand, diagrams with
118: no $S_{D}$ describe the vacuum polarization effects, not considered
119: in the present study devoted to the Fermi sea effect only.
120:
121: The meson-baryon vertices needed in our analysis have the
122: standard form
123: \begin{eqnarray}
124: -iV_{\omega ^{\mu }NN} &=&ig_{\omega }\gamma ^{\mu }, \nonumber \\
125: -iV_{\rho _{b}^{\mu }NN} &=&i\frac{g_{\rho }}{2}(\gamma ^{\mu }-\frac{%
126: i\kappa _{\rho }}{2m_{N}}\sigma ^{\mu \nu }p_{\nu })\tau ^{b}, \\
127: -iV_{\pi ^{a}NN} &=&\frac{g_{A}}{2F_{\pi }}{Q}\!\!\!\!/ \gamma ^{5}\tau ^{a}.
128: \nonumber \end{eqnarray}
129: For the interactions involving the $\Delta$ resonance
130: we use
131: \begin{eqnarray}
132: -iV_{N\Delta ^{\alpha }\pi ^{a}} &=&g_{N\Delta \pi }Q^{\alpha }T^{a},
133: \nonumber \\
134: -iV_{N\Delta ^{\alpha }\rho _{b}^{\mu }} &=&ig_{N\Delta \rho }({p}\!\!\!/%
135: \gamma ^{5}g^{\alpha \mu }-\gamma ^{\mu }\gamma ^{5}p^{\alpha })T^{b}, \\
136: -iV_{\Delta ^{\alpha }\Delta ^{\beta }\omega ^{\mu }} &=&-ig_{\omega
137: }(\gamma ^{\alpha }\gamma ^{\mu }\gamma ^{\beta }-\gamma ^{\beta }g^{\alpha
138: \mu }-\gamma ^{\alpha }g^{\beta \mu }+\gamma ^{\mu }g^{\alpha \beta }).
139: \nonumber
140: \end{eqnarray}
141: Above $T^{a}$ is the standard isospin $\frac{1}{2}\rightarrow
142: \frac{3}{2}$ transition matrix \cite{EW,Ben,Hemmert,Pascal,Haber}.
143: We choose the following values for the physical
144: parameters: $g_{\omega } =10.4$, $g_{\rho }=5.2$, $g_{A}=1.26$,
145: $g_{N\Delta \pi } =2.12/m_{\pi }$,
146: $g_{N\Delta \rho }=2.12 \sqrt{2}/m_{\pi }$, $\kappa _{\rho }=3.7$.
147:
148: The $\pi \omega \rho $ vertex has the following
149: tensor structure in the nuclear medium moving with the four-velocity $u$:
150: \begin{eqnarray}
151: A^{\mu \nu } &=&A_{1}\varepsilon ^{\mu \nu pQ}+A_{2}\varepsilon ^{\mu \nu
152: uQ}+A_{3}\varepsilon ^{\mu \nu pu}+A_{4}\varepsilon ^{\mu upQ}p^{\nu }
153: \label{struct} \\
154: &&+A_{5}\varepsilon ^{\mu upQ}Q^\nu+A_{6}\varepsilon ^{\mu upQ}u^{\nu
155: }+A_{7}\varepsilon ^{\nu upQ}p^{\mu }+A_{8}\varepsilon ^{\nu upQ}Q^{\mu
156: }+A_{9}\varepsilon ^{\nu upQ}u^{\mu }. \nonumber
157: \end{eqnarray}
158: This structure, restricted by the Lorentz invariance and parity, is
159: more involved
160: than in the vacuum case (\ref{vac}) due to the availability of
161: the additional four-vector $u$. The leading-density calculation of diagrams
162: of Fig. 1 is very simple, and follows the steps of Ref. \cite{rhopipi}.
163: First, the trace factors are evaluated, then $k^{\mu}$ is substituted by
164: $m_{N}u^{\mu }$, with $u^{\mu }=(1,0,0,0)$ in the rest frame of
165: the medium, and, finally, the loop integration is replaced by
166: $\int \frac{d^{4}k}{(2\pi )^{4}}\Theta (k_{f}-\left| \vec{k}\right| )\delta
167: (k_{0}-E_{k})\rightarrow \frac{1}{8\pi }\rho _{B}$, where $\rho _{B}$
168: denotes the baryon density \cite{rhopipi}.
169:
170: For the pion is at rest with respect to the medium,
171: the four-vectors $Q$ and $u$ are parallel, and then
172: $A^{\mu \nu }=(A_{1}+A_{3}/m_{\pi})\varepsilon ^{\mu \nu pQ}$.
173: We introduce the notation $A^{\mu \nu }=i\frac{e^{2}}{g_{\rho }g_{\omega }}%
174: \left( \frac{g_{\pi \rho \omega }}{F_{\pi }}+\frac{\rho _{B}}{F_{\pi }}%
175: B\right) \epsilon ^{\nu \mu pQ}$, which puts the medium effects in $B$.
176: Our results below will be presented
177: relative to the vacuum value $g_{{\rm vac}}=g_{\pi \rho \omega}$, hence we
178: define $g_{{\rm eff}} \equiv g_{\pi \rho \omega }+\rho _{0}B$.
179:
180: For the processes $\omega \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }$ and $\rho
181: ^{a}\rightarrow \pi ^{a}\gamma ^{\ast }$, where $\omega $ and $\rho $ are on
182: mass shell, we use the following vacuum values of the
183: coupling constants: $g_{\omega \rightarrow \rho \pi }=-1.13$ and $g_{\rho
184: \rightarrow \omega \pi }=-0.76$, obtained from the experimental partial
185: decay width $\Gamma _{\omega \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma }=717{\rm keV}$ and $%
186: \Gamma _{\rho^a \rightarrow \pi^a \gamma }=79{\rm keV}$. These
187: coupling constants differ from each other, as well as from $g_{\pi
188: \rightarrow \omega \rho }=-\frac{g_{\rho }g_{\omega }}{e^{2}}g_{\pi \gamma
189: \gamma }=-1.36$ inferred from the $\pi ^{0}$ decay.
190: This difference is a manifestation
191: of form-factor effects related to virtuality of vector mesons.
192:
193: The numerical results are shown in Fig. 2.
194: At low values of $M$ the
195: effective coupling constant remains practically unchanged.
196: At higher values of $%
197: M$, above 0.2GeV, the value of $g_{{\rm eff}}$ is much
198: larger than in the vacuum: for the square of $g_{\rm eff}$ we have an
199: enhancement by a factor of $\sim 2$ for the $\omega$, and $\sim 5$
200: for the $\rho$ around $M=0.4$GeV.
201: These values strongly
202: indicate the possibility of large medium
203: effects in the Dalitz decays of vector mesons.
204: %
205: \begin{figure}[tb]
206: \centerline{
207: \vspace{0mm} ~\hspace{-3.5cm}
208: \epsfxsize = 10cm \centerline{\epsfbox{fig6a.eps}} \vspace{0mm}}
209: \label{fig:3}
210: \caption{Top: $|g_{{\rm eff}}/g_{{\rm vac}}|^{2}$ for the decay $%
211: \omega \to \gamma^\ast \pi^0$ at the nuclear saturation
212: density, plotted as a function of the virtuality of the photon, $M$.
213: Bottom: the same for the decay $\rho$.}
214: \end{figure}
215: %
216: The enhancement of Fig. 2 directly affects the calculations of the
217: dilepton yields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
218: The theoretical output
219: from the Dalitz decays of vector mesons becomes enhanced in the region
220: of $0.3-0.6$GeV, which is exactly where the existing calculations have
221: serious problems in supplying enough strength to explain the CERES and HELIOS
222: experiments \cite{ceres,helios}. The dilepton production rate from the Dalitz
223: decays of a vector meson is given by the formula \cite{PKoch}
224: \begin{equation}
225: \frac{dN_{l^{+}l^{-}}}{d^{4}x\,dM^{2}}=\int \frac{d^{3}p_{v}}{(2\pi
226: )^{3}E_{v}}\,f(p_{v })\frac{3m_{v }}{\pi M^{3}}\Gamma
227: _{v \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }}\,\Gamma _{\gamma ^{\ast
228: }\rightarrow l^{+}l^{-}} \label{PK}
229: \end{equation}
230: where $v$ relates to the vector meson, and $f(p_v)$ is the
231: distribution function.
232: The width $\Gamma _{v \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }}$ depends on
233: the baryon density, $\rho _{B}$, which in turn, depends on the space-time
234: point $x$. Clearly, an increased value of
235: $\Gamma _{\omega \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }}$
236: results in an increased dilepton yield.
237: A more exact estimate requires a detailed model of the evolution
238: of the fireball, and is left for a further study \cite{bbtbp}.
239: According to our analysis ({\em cf.} Fig. 3), at $M\approx 400$MeV we have
240: $\Gamma _{\omega \rightarrow \pi ^{0}\gamma ^{\ast }}\approx 900$keV
241: and $\Gamma _{\rho^a \rightarrow \pi^a \gamma ^{\ast }}\approx 250$keV.
242: However,
243: in a thermalized system due to isospin degeneracy the $\rho $ mesons are
244: three times more numerous, hence the effect of the $\rho$
245: is comparable in size to the effect of the $\omega$.
246: The Dalitz yields from the $\pi ^{0}$ decays are not altered by the medium
247: for a double reason: first,
248: virtually all pions decay outside of the
249: fireball due to their long lifetime, second, the width for this decay
250: is practically unaltered by the medium \cite{aa}.
251:
252: \section*{Acknowledgements}
253: Research supported by the Polish State Committee for
254: Scientific Research grant 2P03B09419.
255:
256: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
257:
258: \bibitem{brscale}
259: G.~E. Brown and M.~Rho, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 66:2720, 1991.
260:
261: \bibitem{celenza}
262: L.~S. Celenza, A.~Pantziris, C.~M. Shakin, and W.-D. Sun,
263: {\em Phys. Rev.}, C45:2015, 1992.
264:
265: \bibitem{serot}
266: B.~D. Serot and J.~D. Walecka, {\em Adv. Nucl. Phys.}, 16:1, 1986.
267:
268: \bibitem{chin}
269: S.~A. Chin, {\em Ann. Phys. (NY)}, 108:301, 1977.
270:
271: \bibitem{hatsuda}
272: T.~Hatsuda, H.~Shiomi, and H.~Kuwabara,
273: {\em Prog. Theor. Phys.}, 95:1009, 1996.
274:
275: \bibitem{jean}
276: H.-C. Jean, J.~Piekarewicz, and A.~G. Williams,
277: {\em Phys. Rev.}, C49:1981, 1994.
278:
279: \bibitem{herrmann1}
280: M.~Herrmann, B.~L. Friman, and W.~Noerenberg,
281: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A560:411, 1993.
282:
283: \bibitem{pirner}
284: B.~Friman and H.~J. Pirner,
285: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A617:496, 1997.
286:
287: \bibitem{rapp}
288: R.~Rapp, G.~Chanfray, and J.~Wambach,
289: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A617:472, 1997.
290:
291: \bibitem{LeupoldRev}
292: S.~Leupold and U.~Mosel,
293: {\em Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.}, 42:221, 1999.
294:
295: \bibitem{Gao}
296: {S. Gao, C. Gale, C. Ernst, H. Stocker, and W. Greiner},
297: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A661:518, 1999.
298:
299: \bibitem{hatlee}
300: T.~Hatsuda and S.~H. Lee, {\em Phys. Rev.}, C46:R34, 1993.
301:
302: \bibitem{lee2000}
303: S.-H. Lee,
304: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A670:119, 2000.
305:
306: \bibitem{Vogl}
307: U.~Vogl and W.~Weise,
308: {\em Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.}, 27:195, 1991.
309:
310: \bibitem{klingl}
311: F.~Klingl, N.~Kaiser, and W.~Weise,
312: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A624:527, 1997.
313:
314: \bibitem{Chanfray}
315: G. Chanfray,
316: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A685:328, 2001.
317:
318: \bibitem{BH1}
319: W. Broniowski and B. Hiller,
320: {\em Phys. Lett.}, B392:267, 1997.
321:
322: \bibitem{eletsky}
323: V.~L. Eletsky, B.~L. Ioffe, and J.~I. Kapusta,
324: {\em Eur. J. Phys.}, A3:381, 1998.
325:
326: \bibitem{FrimanActa}
327: B. Friman, {\em Acta Phys. Polon.}, B29:3195, 1998.
328:
329: \bibitem{Lutz99}
330: M.~Lutz, B.~Friman, and G.~Wolf, {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A661:526, 1999.
331:
332: \bibitem{Song2}
333: C. Song and V. Koch, {\em Phys. Rev.}, C54:3218, 1996.
334:
335: \bibitem{BFH1}
336: W. Broniowski, W. Florkowski, and B. Hiller,
337: {\em Acta Phys. Polon.}, B30:1079, 1999.
338:
339: \bibitem{BFH2}
340: W. Broniowski, W. Florkowski, and B. Hiller,
341: {\em Eur. Phys. J.}, A7:287, 2000.
342:
343: \bibitem{Urban0}
344: M.~Urban, M.~Buballa, R.~Rapp, and J.~Wambach,
345: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A641:433, 1998.
346:
347: \bibitem{urban}
348: M.~Urban, M.~Buballa, R.~Rapp, and J.~Wambach,
349: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A673:357, 2000.
350:
351: \bibitem{Banerjee96}
352: M.~K. Banerjee and J.~A. Tjon,
353: {\em Phys. Rev.}, C56:497, 1997.
354:
355: \bibitem{rhopipi}
356: W.~Broniowski, W.~Florkowski, and B.~Hiller,
357: nucl-th/0103027.
358:
359: \bibitem{aa}
360: A.~Bieniek, A.~Baran, and W.~Broniowski, nucl-th/0106053.
361:
362: \bibitem{ceres}
363: {CERES Collab., G. Agakichiev {\it et al.}},
364: {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 75:1272, 1995.
365:
366: \bibitem{helios}
367: {HELIOS/3 Collab., M. Masera {\it et al.}},
368: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A590:93c, 1995.
369:
370: \bibitem{li}
371: G. Q. Li, C.~M. Ko, and G.~E. Brown,
372: {\em Nucl. Phys.}, A606:568, 1996.
373:
374: \bibitem{PKoch}
375: P. Koch, {\em Z. Phys.}, C57:283, 1993.
376:
377: \bibitem{rappadv}
378: R.~Rapp and J.~Wambach,
379: {\em Adv. Nucl. Phys.}, 25:1, 2000.
380:
381: \bibitem{bbtbp}
382: A.~Bieniek and W.~Broniowski, to be published.
383:
384: \bibitem{rarita}
385: W.~Rarita and J.~Schwinger,
386: {\em Phys. Rev.}, 60:61, 1941.
387:
388: \bibitem{Ben}
389: M.~Benmerrouche, R.~M. Davidson, and N.~C. Mukhopadhyay,
390: {\em Phys. Rev.}, C39:2339, 1989.
391:
392: \bibitem{EW}
393: T.~O.~E. Ericson and W.~Weise,
394: {\em Pions and nuclei},
395: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
396:
397: \bibitem{Hemmert}
398: T.~R. Hemmert, B.~R. Holstein, and J. Kambor,
399: {\em J. Phys. G}, G24:1831, 1998.
400:
401: \bibitem{Pascal}
402: V. Pascalutsa and R. Timmermans,
403: {\em Phys. Rev.}, C60:042201, 1999.
404:
405: \bibitem{Haber}
406: H. Haberzettl, nucl-th/9812043.
407:
408: \end{thebibliography}
409:
410:
411: \end{document}
412:
413:
414:
415:
416: