1: % version 28.02.2002-final
2: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
3: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
4: \documentclass[epj]{svjour}
5: \usepackage{epsfig} \usepackage{psfig} \usepackage{times}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{Probing the interactions of charmed mesons with nuclei in
9: $\bar p$ induced reactions \footnote{supported by DFG, RFFI and
10: Forschungzentrum J\"{u}lich.}}
11: \author{ Ye.S. Golubeva\inst{1},
12: W. Cassing\inst{2}, L.A. Kondratyuk\inst{3}} \institute{Institute
13: for Nuclear Research, 60th October Anniversary Prospect 7A, \\
14: 117312 Moscow, Russia \and Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
15: Universit\"at Giessen, \\ D-35392 Giessen, Germany \and
16: Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B.\
17: Cheremushkinskaya 25,
18: \\ 117259 Moscow, Russia}
19: \date{Received: date / Revised version: date}
20:
21: \abstract{ We study the perspectives of resonant and nonresonant
22: charmed meson production in $\bar{p} + A$ reactions within the
23: Multiple Scattering Monte Carlo (MSMC) approach. We calculate the
24: production of the resonances $\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$ and
25: $\Psi(4160)$ on various nuclei, their propagation and decay to $D,
26: \bar{D}, D^*, \bar{D}^*, D_s, \bar{D}_s$ in the medium and vacuum,
27: respectively. The modifications of the open charm vector mesons in
28: the nuclear medium are found to be rather moderate or even small
29: such that dilepton spectroscopy will require an invariant mass resolution of a few MeV.
30: Furthermore, the elastic and inelastic interactions
31: of the open charm mesons in the medium are taken into account, which can be related to
32: $(u,d)$-, $s$- or $c$-quark exchange with nucleons. It
33: is found that by studying the $D/\bar{D}$ ratio for low momenta in the laboratory
34: ($\leq 2-2.2$ GeV/c) as a function of target mass $A$ stringent constraints on the
35: $c$-quark exchange cross section can be obtained. On the other hand, the ratios
36: $D^-_s/D^+_s$ as well as $D/D^-_s$
37: and $D/D^+_s$ at low momenta as a function of $A$ will permit to fix independently
38: the strength of the $s$-quark exchange reaction in $D^-_s N$ scattering. }
39:
40:
41: \PACS{ {25.43.+t}{Antiproton-induced reactions} \and
42: {14.40.Lb}{Charmed mesons} \and {14.65.Dw}{Charmed quarks} \and
43: {13.25.Ft}{Decays of charmed mesons} }
44:
45:
46: \authorrunning{Ye. S. Golubeva et al.} \titlerunning{Interactions of
47: charmed mesons with nucleons in the $\bar p A$ reaction}
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52: In the last decade the dynamics of charm quark degrees
53: of freedom have gained sizeable interest especially in the context
54: of a phase transition to the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) where
55: charmed meson states should no longer be formed due to color
56: screening \cite{QM96,QM97,QM99,Satz,Satz2}. However, the
57: suppression of the $c\bar{c}$ vector mesons in the high density
58: phase of nucleus-nucleus collisions might also be attributed to
59: inelastic comover scattering (cf.
60: \cite{Cass95,Cass99,Vogt99,Seattle98} and Refs. therein) if the
61: corresponding charmonium-hadron cross sections are in the order of
62: a few $mb$ \cite{Haglin,Ko}. Also the $J/\Psi N$ cross section is
63: not known sufficiently well \cite{Bernd} since the photoproduction
64: data suggest a value of 3--4 $mb$ \cite{Huefner}, while the
65: charmonium absorption on nucleons (at high relative momentum) in
66: $p+A$ and $A+A$ reactions is conventionally fitted by 6--7~$mb$
67: \cite{Seattle98,Dimo97} which might relate to the cross section of
68: a pre-resonance charmonium state with nucleons before the actual
69: hadronic state is formed. Present estimates for the $J/\Psi$
70: formation times range from 0.3 -- 0.5 fm/c \cite{Huefner}, but
71: additional data from $\bar{p}$ induced reactions on nuclei, where
72: charmonium can be formed on resonance with moderate momenta
73: relative to the target nucleons, should help to pin down the
74: present uncertainties \cite{Seth}. Such studies might be performed
75: experimentally at the HESR, which is presently proposed as a
76: future facility at GSI \cite{GSIfut}.
77:
78: In a previous study we have explored the perspectives of charmed
79: meson - nucleon scattering in the $\bar{p} d$ reaction
80: \cite{Cass00} where the charmonium is produced on resonance with
81: the proton in the deuteron and may scatter with the spectator
82: neutron. Another possibility is also the reaction $\pi^+ d
83: \rightarrow J/\psi p p$ as discussed by Brodsky and Miller in Ref.
84: \cite{Brodsky}. Here we investigate $\bar{p} A$ reactions and
85: study the production of the resonances $\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$
86: and $\Psi(4160)$ in various nuclei, their propagation and decay to
87: $D, \bar{D}, D^*, \bar{D}^*, D_s, \bar{D}_s$ in the medium and
88: vacuum, respectively. Furthermore, the elastic and inelastic
89: interactions of the open charm mesons in the medium are followed
90: up in the Multiple Scattering Monte Carlo (MSMC) approach to study
91: the dominant medium effects as a function of the target mass $A$.
92:
93: Our work is organized as follows: In Section 2 we will briefly
94: describe the MSMC approach and evaluate the formation cross
95: sections for the resonances $\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$ and
96: $\Psi(4160)$ on protons and nuclei. The fractional decay of these
97: resonances to open charm mesons in the medium and vacuum,
98: respectively, is calculated in Section 3 whereas the dynamics of
99: the open charm mesons is described and studied in Section 4.
100: Section 5 concludes this paper with a summary and discussion of
101: open problems.
102:
103: \section{Resonance production and decay in $\bar{p} p$ and $\bar{p} A$ reactions}
104: We here examine the possibility to measure the in-medium life time
105: (or total width) of the resonances $V=(\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$
106: $\Psi(4160)$) produced in $\bar{p} A$ reactions. Before doing so
107: one has to determine first the resonance properties in vacuum,
108: i.e. their production in $\bar{p} p$ reactions. To this aim we
109: describe the vector meson spectral function by a Breit-Wigner
110: distribution
111: \begin{equation}
112: A_V(M^2) = N_V \frac{M
113: \Gamma_{tot}^V(M)}{(M^2-M_V^2-\Re\Pi_V(M))^2 + M^2
114: \Gamma_{tot}^2(M)}, \label{BW}
115: \end{equation}
116: where $M_V$ denotes the vacuum pole mass, $\Re\Pi_V$ is the vector
117: meson self energy in the medium - which vanished in the vacuum -
118: and $N_V \sim 1/\pi$ (for small width $\Gamma_{tot}$) is a
119: normalization factor that ensures $\int dM^2 A(M^2) =1$. The total
120: width $\Gamma_{tot}$ is separated into vacuum and medium
121: contributions as
122: \begin{equation}
123: \Gamma_{tot}(M) = \Gamma_{vac}(M) + \Gamma_{coll}(M),
124: \label{gamma}
125: \end{equation}
126: where \begin{equation} \Gamma_{vac}(M) = \sum_c \Gamma_c(M)
127: \label{vac}
128: \end{equation} with $\Gamma_c(M)$ denoting the partial
129: width to the decay channels $c \equiv D\bar{D}, D\bar{D}^*, D^*
130: \bar{D}, D^* \bar{D}^*, D_s \bar{D}_s, D_s^* \bar{D}_s, D_s
131: \bar{D}^*_s, D_s^* \bar{D}_s^*$, respectively. The in-medium
132: collisional width is determined from the imaginary part of the
133: forward vector-meson nucleon scattering amplitude as
134: \begin{equation}
135: \Gamma_{coll} = \frac{4 \pi}{M} \Im f_V(0) \rho_A, \label{coll}
136: \end{equation}
137: where $\rho_A$ denotes the nuclear density. Furthermore, $\Im
138: f_V(0)$ is determined via the optical theorem by the total
139: vector-meson nucleon cross section $\sigma_{VN}$ that will be
140: specified below. The real part of the vector meson self energy
141: $\Re \Pi_V(M)$ in the medium might be calculated by dispersion
142: relations, however, QCD sum rules for $c \bar{c}$ vector states
143: suggest that the 'mass shift' $\Re \Pi/(2 M_V)$ at normal nuclear
144: matter density is only in the order of a few MeV \cite{Klingl} due
145: to a small coupling of the $c, \bar{c}$ quarks to the nuclear
146: medium. We thus will assume $\Re \Pi_V$ = 0 throughout the
147: following study.
148:
149: \subsection{Vacuum properties}
150: Whereas the pole masses of the vector mesons $M_V$ are
151: approximately known e.g. from $e^+e^-$ annihilation \cite{Bai}
152: this does not hold for the total widths and especially branching
153: ratios. To this end we have to model the vacuum decays, that enter
154: the spectral function (\ref{BW}) via (\ref{vac}), using available
155: information from the PDG \cite{PDG}. In each channel $c$ the
156: relative decay to mesons $m_1$ and $m_2$ is described by a matrix
157: element (squared) and phase space, i.e.
158: \begin{equation}
159: \Gamma_c \sim |{\cal M}_c|^2 p_c^3, \label{channel}
160: \end{equation}
161: where $p_c$ is the meson momentum in the rest frame of the
162: resonance. In case of the $\Psi(3770)$ only the lowest channel to
163: $D \bar{D}$ contributes such that the matrix element in
164: (\ref{channel}) can be fixed by the total width at half maximum
165: which we take as $\Gamma_{FWHM} =$ 25 MeV \cite{PDG}. For the
166: $\Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$ we adopt $\Gamma_{FWHM} =$ 50 MeV
167: and $\Gamma_{FWHM} =$ 80 MeV, respectively \cite{PDG}. The
168: branching ratios for the $\Psi(4040)$ show a strong anomaly
169: favoring the decays to channels with vector mesons $D^*$. The PDG
170: \cite{PDG} quotes $\Gamma(D^0 \bar{D}^0)/\Gamma(D^{*0} \bar{D}^0 +
171: c.c.) = 0.05 \pm 0.03$ and $\Gamma(D^{*0}
172: \bar{D}^{*0})/\Gamma(D^{*0} \bar{D}^0 + c.c.) = 32 \pm 12$, where
173: the phase space factor $\sim p_c^3$ already has been divided out.
174: The origin for such a large variation in the matrix elements is
175: not known so far. We use the actual numbers (within the range of
176: uncertainty) $$\frac{{\cal M}^2_{D\bar{D}}}{{\cal M}^2_{D^*
177: \bar{D}}} = 0.08; \ \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D^*\bar{D}^*}}{{\cal
178: M}^2_{D^* \bar{D}}} = 22; $$
179: \begin{equation}
180: \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D\bar{D}}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}_s}} = 3; \
181: \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}^*_s}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}_s}} =
182: 12.5; \ \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D_s^* \bar{D}^*_s}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s
183: \bar{D}_s^*}} = 22, \label{4040}
184: \end{equation}
185: that provide a reasonable description to the $e^+e^-$ formation
186: data from Ref. \cite{Bai}. The resulting spectral function $S(M)=2
187: M A(M)$ for the $\Psi(4040)$ (with a pole mass of 4.08 GeV) is
188: shown in Fig. 1 (upper part) in terms of the thick solid line as
189: well as the mass dependent branching ratios for the different
190: channels $c$ (including the phase-space factor $\sim p_c^3$). It
191: is clearly seen that for the ratios (\ref{4040}) the $D^*
192: \bar{D}^*$ decay opens up at $M \approx$ 4.03 GeV and dominates
193: the spectral function for higher masses. Furthermore, the decays
194: to $D_s, D_s^*$ are strongly suppressed such that this resonance
195: does not qualify for the production of $(s\bar{c})$ or $(c
196: \bar{s})$ mesons.
197: \begin{figure}[h]
198: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena1.eps,width=8.5cm}}
199: \caption{The spectral functions $S(M)$ for the $\Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$
200: (thick lines, not normalized) and the mass differential branching
201: ratios for both vector mesons within the model described in the
202: text.}
203: \label{bild1}
204: \end{figure}
205:
206: Apart from the total width of 80 $\pm 25$ MeV the properties of
207: the $\Psi(4160)$ are not well known experimentally. For the decay
208: channels we thus adopt a 'counting rule' for high energy open
209: charm production that results from PYTHIA calculations (cf. Fig. 1
210: in Ref. \cite{Cass01}), i.e. $$ \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D\bar{D}}}{{\cal M}^2_{D^*
211: \bar{D}}} = \frac{1}{3}; \ \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D^*\bar{D}^*}}{{\cal M}^2_{D^*
212: \bar{D}}} = 3; \ \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D\bar{D}}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}_s}} = 3;
213: $$
214: \begin{equation}
215: \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D_s\bar{D}^*_s}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}_s}} = 3; \
216: \frac{{\cal M}^2_{D_s^*\bar{D}^*_s}}{{\cal M}^2_{D_s \bar{D}_s^*}} = 3.
217: \label{4160}
218: \end{equation}
219: This is presently nothing but an educated guess (at low energies)
220: and must be controlled by future data. The resulting spectral
221: function $S(M)=2 M A(M)$ for the $\Psi(4160)$ is shown in Fig. 1
222: (lower part) in terms of the thick solid line as well as the mass
223: dependent branching ratios for the different channels $c$. It is
224: clearly seen that for the ratios (\ref{4160}) the $D^* \bar{D}^*$
225: decay still dominates the spectral function, however, the decays
226: to $D_s, D_s^*$ are no longer so strongly suppressed as in case of
227: the $\Psi(4040)$.
228:
229: The production of the vector mesons in $\bar{p} p$ then can be
230: described by Breit-Wigner resonance formation on the basis of
231: the spectral function $A(M^2)$ (\ref{BW}) - employing the proper
232: kinematics - provided that the branching of $\bar{p}p \rightarrow
233: V$ is known,
234: \begin{equation}
235: \sigma_V(M) = \frac{3}{4} Br_{p\bar{p}
236: \rightarrow V} 4 M A_V(M) \Gamma^{tot}_V(M) \frac{\pi^2}{k^2},
237: \label{cross}
238: \end{equation}
239: where the factor 3/4 stems from the ratio of spin factors and $k$
240: denotes the momentum of the $p$ (or $\bar{p}$) in the cms. In
241: fact, the branching ratio is rather uncertain for the cases of
242: interest here. Following our previous work \cite{Cass00} we adopt
243: $Br(p\bar{p} \rightarrow \Psi(3770)) \approx 2 \times 10^{-4}$
244: which is very similar to the branching of the $\Psi(2S)$ state.
245: Due to a lack of detailed knowledge we assume this branching ratio
246: also to hold for the $\Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$. The resulting
247: cross sections for the mesons $V$ in $\bar{p} p$ reactions are
248: displayed in Fig. 2 (upper part) as a function of the antiproton
249: kinetic energy $T_{\bar{p}}$ in the laboratory reflecting the
250: resonance structure (\ref{BW}) and the kinematics from
251: (\ref{cross}).
252:
253: \begin{figure}[h]
254: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena2.eps,width=8.5cm}}
255: \caption{The calculated cross sections for $\Psi(3770)$, $\Psi(4040)$ and
256: $\Psi(4160)$ for $\bar{p}p$ (upper part) and $\bar{p}+^{12}C$
257: reactions (lower part) as a function of the antiproton kinetic
258: energy in the laboratory.}
259: \label{bild2}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262:
263: \subsection{$\bar{p} A$ reactions}
264: In order to simulate events for the reaction $\bar{p}A \rightarrow
265: V $ we use the Multiple Scattering Monte Carlo (MSMC) approach. An
266: earlier version of this approach -- denoted as Intra-Nuclear
267: Cascade (INC) model -- has been applied to the analysis of $\eta$
268: and $\omega$ production in $\bar p A$ and $p A$ interactions in
269: Refs.~\cite{Golub92,Golub93,Golub96,Golub97}. The production of
270: the hidden charm vector resonances on nuclei then can be evaluated
271: within the MSMC by propagating the antiproton in the nucleus and
272: folding the elementary $\bar{p} p \rightarrow V$ production cross
273: section with the local momentum distribution at the annihilation
274: point. We have calculated the latter quantity in the local
275: Thomas-Fermi approximation.
276:
277: The numerical results for the formation cross sections of the
278: resonances $V$ on $^{12}C$ are shown in the lower part of Fig. 2
279: as a function of $T_{\bar{p}}$ indicating that the resonance
280: formation is further smeared out by Fermi motion and the maximum
281: in the cross section becomes reduced inspite of the larger
282: $\bar{p}$ annihilation cross section on $^{12}C$. The suppression
283: factor in the maximum of the cross section - per elementary
284: reaction - is of the order (see Ref. \cite{Farrar})
285: \begin{equation} S.F. \simeq \frac{\pi \Gamma_{R} m_N}{(k_F M_{R})},
286: \end{equation} where
287: $\Gamma_R, M_R$ denote the vacuum width and mass of the produced
288: meson, whereas $k_F$ is the target Fermi momentum. This leads to
289: factors of $\sim$ 0.075, 0.14 and 0.21 for $\Psi(3770),
290: \Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$ per $p\bar{p}$ reaction,
291: respectively. On the other hand, the production on nuclei roughly
292: scales with the target proton number as $Z^{0.6}$ (see below) such
293: that the cross section for $^{12}C$ in the maximum for the
294: $\Psi(4160)$ is roughly the same as in $\bar{p}p$ annihilation,
295: while it is lower for the narrower resonances $\Psi(3770)$ and
296: $\Psi(4040)$.
297:
298:
299:
300:
301: Necessary parameters for a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of
302: rescattering are the elastic and inelastic $V N$ scattering cross
303: sections and slope parameters $b$ for the differential cross
304: sections $d\sigma_{el}/dt$, which are approximated by
305: \begin{equation} \frac{d \sigma_{el}}{dt} \sim \exp(bt), \end{equation}
306: where $t$ is the momentum transfer squared. These parameters as
307: well as the masses of the rescattered particles determine the
308: momentum and angular distributions of the particles in the final
309: state. As in our previous study \cite{Cass00} we use $b$= 1
310: GeV$^{-2}$ for $D,\bar{D}+N$ and $VN$ scattering as an educated
311: guess. Furthermore, the inelastic cross sections of the vector
312: mesons with nucleons have to be specified. Since the relative
313: momenta in the $V-N$ system for rescattering are in the order of a
314: few GeV one might use high energy geometric cross sections for the
315: dissociation to open charm mesons. For all the three resonances
316: studied here we adopt an inelastic cross section of 11 $mb$ as
317: well as $\sigma_{el} = 1\ mb$. The inelastic cross section of 11
318: $mb$ is larger by about a factor of 2 in comparison to the
319: $J/\Psi, \Psi(2S)$ cross sections (see introduction) due to the
320: larger size of the higher lying resonances.
321:
322: As mentioned above, the resonances $V$ are propagated without any
323: mean-field potential. This approximation should be well fulfilled
324: since the expected potentials are only in the order of a few MeV
325: \cite{Klingl} while the energy of vector mesons in the lab. frame
326: is a couple of GeV. Furthermore, due to the high mass of the
327: resonances we neglect any intrinsic formation time $\tau_F$ for
328: the resonances.
329:
330: The resonances are propagated with their actual mass $M$ -
331: selected by MC according to the spectral function (\ref{BW}) -
332: with velocity ${p}_V/E_V$ and decay in time according to the
333: differential equation
334: \begin{equation} \frac{d P_V}{dt} = - \frac{1}{\gamma} \Gamma^V_{tot}(M)
335: P_V(t)
336: \end{equation}
337: with the total width (\ref{gamma}), while $\gamma$ denotes the
338: Lorentz $\gamma$-factor. Their decay to
339: $D\bar{D}, D\bar{D}^*, D^*
340: \bar{D}, D^* \bar{D}^*, D_s \bar{D}_s,$ $ D_s^* \bar{D}_s, $ $
341: D_s \bar{D}^*_s,$ $ D_s^* \bar{D}_s^*$ is, furthermore, selected
342: by Monte-Carlo according to the mass differential branching ratios
343: displayed in Fig. 1.
344:
345: Due to the rather moderate collision rates involved (for
346: $\sigma_{VN}^{tot}$ $ \approx \ 12 mb$) the life time of the
347: vector mesons $\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$ is not
348: reduced sizeably in the nuclear medium relative to the vacuum
349: (assuming the open charm mesons not to change their properties in
350: the medium). This reduction then amounts to about 15\% for the
351: $\Psi(3770),$ to $\sim$ 8\% for the $ \Psi(4040)$ and to $\sim$ 5
352: \% for the $\Psi(4160)$, respectively. On the other hand, the
353: $D,\bar{D}$ mesons might change their effective mass in the
354: nuclear medium as advocated in Refs. \cite{Alex99,Sibirtsev,Haya}.
355: Especially for dropping $D,\bar{D}$ effective masses in the medium
356: the decay width of the vector mesons becomes enhanced at finite
357: density $\rho_A$. This effect is most pronounced for the
358: $\Psi(3770)$ since its pole mass is close to the $D,\bar{D}$
359: threshold of $\sim$ 3.73 GeV. A drop of the $D, \bar{D}$ meson
360: masses both by 50 MeV at density $\rho_0$ would imply an increase
361: of the decay width by about a factor of 2.5 according to phase
362: space. Thus in-medium modifications of the open charm mesons might
363: alter the life time of the $\Psi(3770)$ more effectively than
364: collisional broadening. However, in-\newline medium potentials
365: are most pronounced at low momenta and decrease in size with
366: increasing momentum. Thus it is very questionable if $D, \bar{D}$
367: mesons will have sizeable potentials for relative momenta of 3--5
368: GeV/c with respect to the nucleus at rest. Thus, in the following,
369: we do not speculate any further on such medium mass modifications
370: of $D, \bar{D}$ mesons at high relative momentum and continue our
371: calculations for vacuum properties of the open charm system.
372:
373: The open charm mesons from the decaying vector mesons have a light
374: quark $q=(u,d)$ or strange $s$ quark content apart from the
375: $\bar{c}$ or $c$ quark. In the constituent quark model we get
376: ${D}^+ = (c\bar{d})$, ${D}^- = (\bar{c} {d})$, $\bar{D}^0 =
377: (\bar{c}{u})$, ${D}^0 = (c\bar{u})$, ${D}^+_s = (c\bar{s})$,
378: ${D}^-_s = (\bar{c}{s})$ and the same composition for the related
379: vector states. Now light quark exchanges with nucleons ($(uud)$ or
380: $(udd)$) have different strength as it is well established
381: experimentally from $K^+ p$ and $K^-p$ reactions. Whereas the $K^+
382: (u \bar{s})$ scatters only elastically with nucleons at low
383: momentum - since the $\bar{s}$ cannot be exchanged with a light
384: quark of a nucleon - the $K^- (s\bar{u})$ cross section is
385: dominated by resonant $s$-quark transfer leading to strange
386: baryons such as $\Lambda$ or $\Sigma$ hyperons. Similar relations
387: are expected to hold for the $D, \bar{D}$ mesons, where especially
388: the light quark contribution should give much larger cross section
389: on nucleons than the $c\bar{c}$ vector resonances. This analogy is
390: based on $SU(4)_{flavor}$ symmetry \cite{Lin} which, however,
391: might be broken substantially in view of the different geometrical
392: sizes of $K$- and $D$-mesons. At present this is an open question,
393: which has to be settled by experiment.
394:
395: For our calculations we adopt the following cross sections -
396: taken as constants in the momentum regime of interest - $$
397: \sigma^{el}_{{D} N} = \sigma^{el}_{\bar{D} N} = 10 \
398: mb; \ $$ $$ \sigma^{inel}_{\bar{D} N} \approx 0; \
399: \sigma^{inel}_{{D} N} = 10 \ mb;$$ $$ \sigma^{el}_{{D}_s N} =
400: \sigma^{el}_{{D}_s N} = 3 \ mb; $$
401: \begin{equation}\sigma^{inel}_{{D}^+_s N} \approx 3 \ mb; \ \sigma^{inel}_{{D}^-_s N}
402: = 10 \ mb. \label{parameters}
403: \end{equation}
404: Here the inelastic cross sections of $D$-mesons refer to $c$-quark
405: exchange reactions with nucleons. Furthermore, charge ex\-change
406: reactions like ${D}^+ n \leftrightarrow {D}^0 p$ or ${D}^- p
407: \leftrightarrow \bar{D}^0 n$ are incorporated with a constant
408: cross section $\sigma_{q exc.}$ = 12 $mb$. For our exploratory
409: study we assume the same cross sections for the related open charm
410: vector mesons $D^*, \bar{D}^*$ etc.
411:
412: \section{Resonance production in $\bar{p} A$ reactions}
413: Within the model described in Section 2 we are now in the position
414: to calculate the cross section of the $c \bar{c}$ resonances in
415: $\bar{p} A$ reactions for all targets of interest and can obtain
416: the information about in-medium resonance decays (for densities
417: $\rho_A \geq 0.03 fm^{-3}$) or vacuum decays, respectively. In
418: this respect we show in Fig. 3 the calculated cross section for
419: the $\Psi(3770)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 5.7 GeV for the targets $^{12}C$,
420: $^{64}Cu$, $^{108}Ag$ and $^{207}Pb$ as a function of target mass
421: $A$. The solid line represents the power law
422: \begin{equation}
423: \sigma_\Psi \sim A^\alpha \label{scal}
424: \end{equation}
425: with $\alpha$ = 0.55, which nicely describes the total
426: $\Psi(3770)$ yield. The coefficient $\alpha$ is less than 2/3 - as
427: expected from the total $\bar{p}$ annihilation cross section - due
428: to fact that only reactions with protons can lead to uncharged
429: resonances and the Fermi smearing is more effective in heavy than
430: in light nuclei. The fraction of $\Psi(3770)$, that decay to
431: $D\bar{D}$ inside the nucleus (D ins) is only a few \% in case of
432: the $^{12}C$ target, however, reaches about 50\% for the $Pb$
433: target. Thus for a heavy target the in-medium properties of the
434: $\Psi(3770)$ may well be studied experimentally by dilepton
435: spectroscopy exploiting the dilepton branching of $7 \times
436: 10^{-4}$ of this resonance. However, as mentioned above, a
437: collisional broadening of its spectral function by $\sim$ 15 \% is
438: not expected to provide a clear signal relative to its vacuum
439: decay unless the experimental mass resolution is in the order of
440: 1-2 MeV.
441: \begin{figure}[h]
442: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena8.eps,width=8.5cm}}
443: \caption{The calculated cross sections for $\Psi(3770)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 5.7 GeV
444: as a function of the target mass $A$. The dotted line (D outs) denotes the contribution
445: from 'outside' resonance decays whereas the dash-dotted line (D ins) shows the
446: resonance contribution from 'inside' decays. The solid line reflects the
447: scaling law (\ref{scal}) for $\alpha$ = 0.55 for the total contribution from the resonance decay.
448: The dashed line (D nonr) corresponds to the estimated nonresonant
449: $D, \bar{D}$ cross section.}
450: \label{bild3}
451: \end{figure}
452:
453: Apart from the resonant production of open charm mesons they may
454: also be produced directly as $(c\bar{q})$ and ($\bar{c}q$) pairs
455: in $\bar{p}N$ annihilation. This channel strongly dominates in
456: annihilation reactions on neutrons in the nucleus since the
457: charmonium production is forbidden by charge conservation at low
458: energy above threshold. At higher invariant energies a pion might
459: balance the charge in the $\Psi + \pi$ final channel. For our
460: estimates we have employed the Regge-model analysis of Ref.
461: \cite{Kaidalov} for the elementary $\bar{p} N \rightarrow D,
462: \bar{D}$ cross section as also used by Sibirtsev et al. in Refs.
463: \cite{Alex99,Sibirtsev}. The resulting cross section of
464: nonresonant open charm production is shown in Fig. 3 as a function
465: of the target mass $A$ in terms of the dashed line (D nonr) and
466: demonstrates that the nonresonant cross section is about the same
467: at this energy as the resonant production channel via $\Psi(3770)$
468: production and decay. Thus, in-medium modifications of the
469: $\Psi(3770)$ will be hard to detect experimentally via the $D
470: \bar{D}$ invariant mass spectrum (see below).
471:
472:
473: In analogy to Fig. 3 we show in Figs. 4 and 5 the calculated cross
474: section for the $\Psi(4040)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 6.8 GeV and
475: $\Psi(4160)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 7.7 GeV for the targets $^{12}C$,
476: $^{64}Cu$, $^{108}Ag$ and $^{207}Pb$ as a function of target mass
477: $A$. Due to the shorter life times of these resonances the
478: fraction of in-medium resonance decays increases up to 65 \% and
479: 75\%, respectively, for a $Pb$-target. However, for the
480: rescattering cross sections involved (cf. Section 2) the life
481: times in the medium are shortened only by 8\% and 5\%,
482: respectively. This very moderate change of the spectral functions
483: due to in-medium interactions will be hard to see by dilepton
484: spectroscopy except for setups with excellent invariant mass
485: resolution.
486:
487: \begin{figure}[h]
488: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena9.eps,width=8.5cm}}
489: \caption{The calculated cross sections for $\Psi(4040)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 6.8 GeV
490: as a function of the target mass $A$. The dotted line (D outs) denotes the contribution
491: from 'outside' resonance decays whereas the dash-dotted line (D ins) shows the
492: resonance contribution from 'inside' decays. The solid line reflects the
493: sum of 'outside' and 'inside'
494: resonance decay contributions.
495: The dashed line (D nonr) corresponds to the estimated nonresonant
496: $D, \bar{D}$ cross section. The lower two lines give the 'outside' and 'inside' decay
497: to $D_s,\bar{D}_s$, respectively.}
498: \label{bild4}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501:
502: For the $\Psi(4040)$ the nonresonant $D, \bar{D}$ cross section
503: (upper dashed line; D nonr) becomes larger than the resonant cross
504: section (solid line) due to the higher invariant energy $\sqrt{s}$
505: involved in the elementary reactions at $T_{lab}$ = 6.8 GeV.
506: Furthermore, the resonant decays to $D_s, \bar{D}_s$ are
507: suppressed by almost 3 orders of magnitude in case of the
508: $\Psi(4040)$ which is not favorable for studying $D_s, \bar{D}_s$
509: propagation in the nuclear medium. For the $\Psi(4160)$ an even
510: larger nonresonant contribution is expected which we do not
511: attempt to estimate explicitly since no educated guess for the
512: additional channels $\bar{D} D \pi +X$ is available. However, the
513: perspectives for $D_s, \bar{D}_s$ dynamics become more promising
514: due to larger branching ratios which are a consequence of the
515: higher invariant energy above the threshold and a more favorable
516: matrix element. Especially for the heaviest targets almost 50\% of
517: the $D_s, \bar{D}_s$ mesons from $\Psi(4160)$ decay appear inside
518: the nucleus such that rescattering effects can be explored. Such
519: rescattering phenomena can also be tested for nonresonant $D_s,
520: \bar{D}_s$ production channels; however, their cross section is
521: (at present) hard to estimate as mentioned before.
522:
523: \begin{figure}[h]
524: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena10.eps,width=8.5cm}}
525: \caption{The calculated cross sections for $\Psi(4160)$ at $T_{lab}$ = 7.7 GeV
526: as a function of the target mass $A$. The dotted line (D outs) denotes the contribution
527: from 'outside' resonance decays whereas the dash-dotted line (D ins) shows the
528: resonance contribution from 'inside' decays. The solid line reflects the
529: sum of 'outside' and 'inside' resonance decay contributions.
530: The lower two lines give the 'outside' and 'inside' decay
531: to $D_s,\bar{D}_s$, respectively.}
532: \label{bild5}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535:
536:
537: \section{Open charm propagation and rescattering}
538: The open charm mesons produced by resonance decay or nonresonant
539: channels may rescatter in the nuclear medium either elastically or
540: inelastically. In case of inelastic reaction channels there may be
541: charge exchange reactions such as ${D}^+ n \leftrightarrow {D}^0
542: p$ or $\bar{D}^- p \leftrightarrow \bar{D}^0 n$ or charm flavor
543: exchange reactions $D N \rightarrow \Lambda_c \pi$ or $\Sigma_c
544: \pi$ in analogy to the strangeness exchange reactions $\bar{K} N
545: \rightarrow \Lambda \pi $ or $\Sigma \pi$. Whereas charge exchange
546: reactions - induced by ($u,d$) quark exchange - do not change the
547: ratio ${D}/\bar{D}$ in nuclei, the charm exchange reaction leads
548: to a loss of $c$ quarks in the mesonic sector and thus to a
549: decrease of the ${D}/\bar{D}$ ratio with the target mass number
550: $A$.
551:
552: In order to obtain some idea about the momenta of open charm
553: mesons in the laboratory we display in Fig. 6 the momentum
554: distribution of $D$ and $\bar{D}$ mesons - after full rescattering
555: - for $\bar{p} + Pb$ at $T_{lab}$ = 5.7 GeV. At this energy the
556: resonance contribution stems from the $\Psi(3770)$; its 'outside'
557: decay contribution is shown in Fig. 6 by the hatched area, which
558: extends from 2.2 GeV/c to about 4.2 GeV/c. The 'inside' resonance
559: contribution (denoted by $\bar{{\rm D}}$r and Dr, respectively) is
560: seen to be broadened significantly by elastic scattering and
561: charge exchange reactions showing also a sizeable net absorption
562: of $D$ mesons in case of the $Pb$ target of $\sim$ 30\%. On the
563: other hand, the $D, \bar{D}$ mesons from nonresonant production
564: channels signal larger in-medium rescattering effects which is
565: seen by comparison to the total $D$ (solid line) and $\bar{D}$
566: (dashed line) momentum spectra. The latter phenomenon is due to
567: the fact that rescattering of open charm mesons in case of
568: nonresonant production channels may proceed earlier than in case
569: of the $\Psi(3770) \rightarrow D\bar{D}$ channel since the
570: $\Psi(3770)$ on average is propagating for a couple of fm/c before
571: its decay.
572:
573: \begin{figure}[h]
574: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena3.eps,width=8.5cm}}
575: \caption{The calculated momentum distributions of $D,\bar{D}$
576: mesons for $\bar{p}+Pb$
577: reactions at $T_{lab}$ = 5.7 GeV. The hatched area reflects open
578: charm mesons from $\Psi(3770)$ decays in vacuum, the dotted (Dr)
579: and dash-dotted ($\bar{{\rm D}}$r) lines correspond to resonance
580: decays in the target nucleus, respectively. The solid and dashed
581: lines display the total spectra for $D$ and $\bar{D}$ mesons
582: including the nonresonant production channels (see text). In the
583: calculations elastic and inelastic scatterings of the
584: $\Psi(3770)$ and $D, \bar{D}$ mesons have been taken into
585: account.}
586: \label{bild6}
587: \end{figure}
588:
589:
590: In order to quantify the observable consequences from $D, \bar{D}$
591: rescattering and absorption we have made a cut on the laboratory
592: momenta $P_D, P_{\bar{D}} \leq 2.2$ GeV/c to exclude the vacuum
593: decays of the $\Psi(3770)$ and to reduce the fraction of
594: unscattered $D, \bar{D}$ events. The calculated cross sections for
595: resonant (l.h.s.) and nonresonant (r.h.s.) production channels are
596: shown in Fig. 7 (upper part) for $D$ and $\bar{D}$ mesons,
597: respectively, as a function of the target mass $A$ at $T_{lab}$ =
598: 5.7 GeV. Even for the low momentum cut the cross sections are in
599: the order of 50 -- 100 $nb$ for heavy targets, which should be
600: feasible at the HESR with a $\bar{p}$ luminosity of $\sim$
601: 2$\times$ 10$^{32}$. The resulting ratio ${D}$ to $\bar{D}$ mesons
602: is displayed in the lower part of Fig. 7 for resonant (l.h.s.) and
603: nonresonant (r.h.s.) productions separately. The constant line
604: (=1) results trivially when including charge exchange reactions,
605: however, discarding $c$-quark exchange reactions. As noted above,
606: the ${D}$-meson absorption is larger in the nonresonant case and
607: may reach 40\% for the $Pb$-target within the cross sections
608: specified in Sec. 2. Vice versa, experimental data on this ratio
609: (employing the same low momentum cut) as a function of mass $A$
610: will allow to set stringent bounds on the size of the $c$-quark
611: exchange cross section in the nuclear medium.
612:
613: \begin{figure}[h]
614: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lenanew.eps,width=8.5cm}}
615: \caption{Upper part: The calculated cross sections for $D$ and $\bar{D}$ mesons
616: for $\bar{p}+A$ reactions at $T_{lab}$=5.7 GeV including a low
617: momentum cut $P_D$, $P_{\bar{D}} \leq$
618: 2.2 GeV/c. The l.h.s. shows the contribution from in-medium
619: resonance decays whereas the r.h.s. corresponds to nonresonant
620: production channels. Lower part: The ratio $D/\bar{D}$ versus the
621: target mass $A$ for resonant (l.h.s.) and nonresonant (r.h.s.)
622: production channels. The constant line (=1) results when
623: neglecting $c$-quark exchange channels.}
624: \label{bild7}
625: \end{figure}
626:
627: Without explicit representation we note that the perspectives of
628: measuring $D, \bar{D}$ rescattering in heavy nuclei from the
629: resonance decay of the $\Psi(4040)$ are similar to the previous
630: case discussed above and also close to the results for the
631: $\Psi(4160)$ (see below). Since the chances to measure
632: additionally the re\-scattering effects of $D^+_s, D^-_s$ mesons
633: are very low in view of the small partial decay width for the
634: $\Psi(4040)$ (cf. Fig. 1) we directly continue with a discussion
635: of the $\Psi(4160)$ formation and decay at $T_{lab}$ = 7.7 GeV.
636:
637: \begin{figure}[h]
638: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena11.eps,width=8.5cm}}
639: \caption{The calculated momentum distributions of $D,\bar{D}$
640: (upper lines) and $D_s^+,D_s^-$ (lower lines)
641: mesons for $\bar{p}+Pb$
642: reactions at $T_{lab}$ = 7.7 GeV. The solid lines ($D, \bar{D}$
643: outside, $D^+_s, {D}^-_s$ outside) reflect open charm mesons from
644: $\Psi(4160)$ decays in vacuum, the dotted and dash-dotted
645: ($\bar{D}$) lines correspond to resonance decays in the target
646: nucleus, respectively. In the calculations elastic and inelastic
647: scatterings of the $\Psi(4160)$, $D, \bar{D}$ and $D_s^+,D_s^-$
648: mesons have been taken into account.}
649: \label{bild8}
650: \end{figure}
651:
652: In this case (for $\bar{p} + Pb$) the momentum distribution of the
653: $D, \bar{D}, D^+_s, D^-_s$ mesons becomes very broad and extends
654: from $\sim 0$ to $\sim$ 7 GeV/c (cf. Fig. 8) where the 'outside'
655: $\Psi(4160)$ decays (solid lines; $D,\bar{D}$ outside,
656: $D^+_s,D^-_s$ outside) give open charm mesons essentially above
657: $\sim$ 2 GeV/c. Thus rescattering events of the $D$-mesons are
658: dominantly found for momenta less than 2 GeV/c which,
659: unfortunately, are only a low fraction of the total open charm
660: yield. Furthermore, the number of $D^+_s, D^-_s$ events in this
661: low momentum range is down by more than 2 orders of magnitude
662: relative to the $D, \bar{D}$ mesons. However, apart from the
663: resonant production of charm meson pairs there will be an
664: additional contribution from nonresonant $D, \bar{D}, D^+_s,
665: D^-_s$ mesons which will enhance the cross section also for low
666: momenta, respectively. It is hard to provide reliable estimates
667: for the nonresonant contribution, but in view of Fig. 4 for
668: $T_{lab}$ = 6.8 GeV this contribution might be higher by a factor
669: 2--4 than the resonance contribution.
670:
671: As shown in Fig. 9 the cross sections for $D, \bar{D}$ mesons at
672: $T_{lab}$ = 7.7 GeV are above 50 $nb$ for heavy targets (l.h.s,
673: upper part) -- even when including a low momentum cut of 2 GeV/c
674: -- showing a sizeable difference due to the absorption of $D, D^*$
675: mesons in the nucleus. The perspectives for $D^+_s, D^-_s$ mesons
676: are less promising (r.h.s, upper part). Here only cross sections
677: of $\sim$ 0.1 $nb$ should be expected for a $Pb$ target which
678: might be enhanced due to nonresonant channels by a factor 2--4 (as
679: estimated above). However, the relative absorption of $D,D^*$
680: mesons -- as measured by the ratio to $\bar{D}, \bar{D}^*$ mesons
681: -- increases with target mass by up to 35\% for $A$=207 (l.h.s.,
682: lower part) for the cross sections specified in Sect. 2. This
683: decrease in the $D/\bar{D}$ ratio is roughly the same for the
684: $\Psi(4160)$ decays as for the $\Psi(3770)$ decays (Fig. 7)
685: inspite of the shorter lifetime of the $\Psi(4160)$. This is
686: partly due to the different cut in momentum and the fact, that the
687: average momentum of the produced $\Psi(4160)$ in the laboratory is
688: higher. The ratio of $D^-_s/D^+_s$ versus target mass $A$ (r.h.s.;
689: lower part) also shows a decrease due to the different cross
690: sections for $c$ and $s$ quark exchanges with the nucleons of the
691: target. The vertical lines in Fig. 9 show the statistical error
692: bars in this ratio for the low momentum cut of 2 GeV/c that
693: reflect the low number of $D^-_s, D^+_s$ mesons in this momentum
694: range as obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations. In principle,
695: provided that sufficient statistics are obtained experimentally,
696: it is possible to determine the relative strength of $(u,d)$, $s$
697: and $c$ quark exchanges with nucleons from the mass dependence of
698: the further ratios $D/D^+_s$ and $D/D^-_s$. We only point out this
699: possibility without presenting explicit figures for these ratios
700: since the statistics for $D_s^{\pm}$ is very small and the cross
701: sections employed are rather uncertain so far.
702:
703:
704:
705:
706: \begin{figure}[h]
707: \centerline{\psfig{figure=lena12.eps,width=8.5cm}}
708: \caption{Upper part: The calculated cross sections for $D$ and $\bar{D}$ mesons
709: for $\bar{p}+A$ reactions at $T_{lab}$=7.7 GeV including a low
710: momentum cut $P_D$ and $P_{\bar{D}} \leq$
711: 2.0 GeV/c. The l.h.s. shows the contribution from in-medium
712: resonance decays for $D, \bar{D}$ whereas the r.h.s. corresponds
713: to $D^+_s, {D}^-_s$ resonant production (multiplied by a factor
714: 100). Lower part: The ratio ${D}/\bar{D}$ versus the target mass
715: $A$ (l.h.s.) and the ratio ${D}^-_s/{D}^+_s$ for resonant
716: production. The constant line (=1) results when neglecting $s$ and
717: $c$ quark exchange channels.}
718: \label{bild9}
719: \end{figure}
720:
721: \section{Summary} In this study we have explored the perspectives of
722: measuring the dynamics of hidden charm vector mesons and open
723: charm mesons in nuclei in antiproton induced reactions on nuclei.
724: Such experimental studies will be possible at the high-energy
725: antiproton storage ring HESR proposed for the future GSI facility
726: \cite{GSIfut}. The Multiple Scattering Monte Carlo (MSMC)
727: calculations performed have been based on the resonance production
728: concept with resonance properties from the PDG \cite{PDG} or
729: related estimates from high energy open charm branching ratios. We
730: note, that these resonance properties are in line with
731: $\Psi(3770), \Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$ production from $e^+
732: e^-$ annihilation \cite{Bai}, however, the detailed branching
733: ratios for the $\Psi(4040)$ and $\Psi(4160)$ (cf. Fig. 1) are
734: still quite uncertain. Thus our estimated uncertainty in the cross
735: sections is in the order of a factor 2--3, which should be kept in
736: mind when planning experiments along this line. We stress that the
737: total branching ratios to $\bar{p}p$ should be measured first with
738: high accuracy. Deviations from our calculations for hidden charm
739: vector mesons in $\bar{p}p$ reactions than directly carry over to
740: the cross sections on nuclei (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, even for a
741: light nucleus such as $^{12}C$ cross sections from 70 -- 150 $nb$
742: should be expected at the proper resonance energies (Fig. 2). Our
743: calculations suggest that the total yield of these vector mesons
744: scales as $\sim A^{0.55}$ with target mass $A$ (Fig. 3). For a
745: heavy nucleus like $Pb$ the fraction of 'inside' decays to
746: dileptons or $D, \bar{D}$ reaches $\sim$ 50\% for the
747: $\Psi(3770)$, $\sim$ 65 \% for the $\Psi(4040)$ and $\sim$ 75\%
748: for the $\Psi(3770)$, which is sufficient to address the question
749: of in-medium properties of these resonances. However, for the
750: rescattering cross sections adopted in Sect. 2, the in-medium
751: modifications of their spectral functions is rather moderate, i.e.
752: 15\%, 8\% and 5\% change in width, respectively, such that a mass
753: resolution for dilepton pairs in the order of a few MeV will be
754: necessary. This will be also the case for in-medium mass shifts of
755: these vector mesons which are estimated to be in the order of a
756: few MeV, only \cite{Klingl}.
757:
758: We have, furthermore, explored the perspectives of measuring the
759: interactions of open charm mesons in nuclei that are produced by
760: resonant vector meson decays or nonresonant channels,
761: respectively. For the cross sections specified in (12) the effects
762: of $D,\bar{D}$ rescattering and $D$-meson absorption in heavy
763: nuclei can clearly be identified when imposing a low momentum cut
764: in the laboratory of 2--2.2 GeV/c at $T_{lab}$ = 5.7 or 7.7 GeV,
765: respectively. This low momentum cut excludes events with $D
766: \bar{D}$ decays in vacuum or $D, \bar{D}$ mesons that did not
767: rescatter in the target nucleus. The cross sections for such type
768: of events with $D$ or $\bar{D}$ mesons of low momenta are in the
769: order of 50 $nb$ for a heavy target like $Pb$. Such cross sections
770: are high enough to perform successful experiments with an
771: antiproton luminosity of 2$\times$ 10$^{32}$ as envisaged for the
772: HESR \cite{GSIfut}. Experimentally, the ratio of $D/\bar{D}$ (at
773: low momenta) as a function of target mass $A$ allows to set
774: stringent constraints on the $D$-meson absorption -- or $c$-quark
775: transfer -- cross section at nuclear density $\rho_0$.
776: Furthermore, at $T_{lab} \approx$ 7.7 GeV the production cross
777: section of $D^+_s, D^-_s$ mesons should become appreciable and be
778: in the order of 20 $nb$ for a $Pb$ target when including only the
779: $\Psi(4160)$ decays. Approximately 50\% of these ($c\bar{s}$) and
780: ($\bar{c} s$) mesons should rescatter in a target of mass $A
781: \approx$ 200 such that $c$ and $s$-quark exchange reactions with
782: nucleons can be measured by studying the mass dependence of
783: $D^-_s/D^+_s$ as well as $D/D^-_s$ and $D/D^+_s$ at low momenta.
784: However, to exclude events from $\Psi(4160)$ vacuum decays as
785: well as events with unscattered open charm mesons a severe cut on
786: low momenta ($\leq 2$ GeV) should be performed. In this momentum
787: range the cross section for $D^-_s, D^+_s$ drops to $\sim$ 0.1
788: $nb$ even for a $Pb$ target. It will thus be very hard to measure
789: the various particle ratios as a function of mass $A$ with good
790: statistics.
791:
792:
793:
794:
795:
796: \section*{Acknowledgements} We are grateful to A. B. Kaidalov
797: and A. Sibirtsev for helpful discussions and valuable suggestions.
798: Furthermore, we like to thank E. L. Bratkovskaya and U. Wiedner
799: for critical comments and a careful reading of the manuscript.
800: This work was supported by DFG under grant No. 436 RUS 113/600 and
801: RFFI.
802:
803: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
804:
805: \bibitem{QM96}
806: {\it Quark Matter '96},
807: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 610}, 1 (1996).
808: \bibitem{QM97}
809: {\it Quark Matter '97},
810: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 638}, 1 (1998).
811: \bibitem{QM99}
812: {\it Quark Matter '99},
813: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 661}, 1 (1999).
814:
815: \bibitem{Satz}
816: T. Matsui, H. Satz, {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 178}, 416 (1986).
817: \bibitem{Satz2} H. Satz, {\em Rep. Progr. Phys.} {\bf 63}, 1511
818: (2000).
819: \bibitem{Cass95}
820: W. Cassing, C. M. Ko,
821: {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 396}, 39 (1997).
822: \bibitem{Cass99}
823: W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya,
824: {\em Phys. Rep.} {\bf 308}, 65 (1999).
825: \bibitem{Vogt99}
826: R. Vogt, {\em Phys. Rep.} {\bf 310}, 197 (1999).
827: \bibitem{Seattle98}
828: X.N. Wang, B. Jacak, eds.,
829: {\em Quarkonium Production in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions},
830: World Scientific 1998.
831: \bibitem{Haglin}
832: K. Haglin, {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf C 61}, 031902 (2000).
833: \bibitem{Ko} W. Liu, C. M. Ko, Z. W. Lin, {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf C 65}, 015203 (2002).
834: \bibitem{Bernd}
835: B. M\"uller, {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 661}, 272c (1999).
836: \bibitem{Huefner} J. H\"ufner, B. Z. Kopeliovich, {\em Phys.
837: Lett.} {\bf B 426}, 154 (1998);
838: Y. B. He, J. H\"ufner, B. Z. Kopeliovich, {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 477}, 93 (2000).
839: \bibitem{Dimo97} D. Kharzeev et al., {\em Z. Phys.} {\bf C 74},
840: 307 (1997).
841: \bibitem{Seth} K. Seth, Proceedings of the Int. Workshop {\em
842: Structure of Hadrons}, Hirschegg, Jan. 2001.
843: \bibitem{GSIfut} 'An International Accelerator Facility for Beams
844: of Ions and Antiprotons', http://www.gsi.de/GSI-Future/cdr/.
845: \bibitem{Cass00} W. Cassing, Ye. Golubeva, L.A. Kondratyuk, {\em
846: Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf A 7}, 279 (2000).
847: \bibitem{Brodsky}
848: S. J. Brodsky, G. A. Miller,
849: {\em Phys. Lett. B} {\bf 412}, 125 (1997).
850: \bibitem{Klingl} F. Klingl, S. Kirn, S. H. Lee, P. Morath, W.
851: Weise, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 82}, 3396 (1999).
852:
853: \bibitem{Bai} J. Z. Bai et al., {\em hep-ex/0102003}.
854: \bibitem{PDG} Particle Data Group, {\em
855: Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C 15}, 1 (2000).
856: \bibitem{Cass01} W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, A. Sibirtsev,
857: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 691}, 753 (2001).
858: \bibitem{Golub92}
859: Ye. S. Golubeva, A. S. Iljinov, B. Krippa, I.A. Pshenichnov,
860: {\em Nucl.Phys. A} {\bf 537}, 393 (1992).
861: \bibitem{Golub93}
862: Ye. S. Golubeva, A. S. Iljinov, I. A. Pshenichnov,
863: {\em Nucl.Phys. A} {\bf 562}, 389 (1993).
864: \bibitem{Golub96}
865: W. Cassing, Ye. S. Golubeva, A. S. Iljinov, L. A. Kondratyuk,
866: {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 396}, 26 (1997).
867: \bibitem{Golub97}
868: Ye. S. Golubeva, L. A. Kondratyuk, W. Cassing,
869: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 625}, 832 (1997).
870:
871: \bibitem{Farrar}
872: G. R. Farrar, L. L. Frankfurt, M. I. Strikman, H. Liu,
873: {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B 345}, 125 (1990).
874: \bibitem{Alex99} A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, A. W. Thomas, {\em Eur.
875: Phys. J.} {\bf A 6}, 351 (1999).
876: \bibitem{Sibirtsev} A. Sibirtsev, {\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf A 680}, 274c (2001).
877: \bibitem{Haya} A. Hayashigaki, {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 487}, 96
878: (2000).
879: \bibitem{Lin} Z. Lin, C. M. Ko, {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf C 62}, 034903 (2000);
880: {\em J. Phys.} {\bf G 27}, 617 (2001).
881: \bibitem{Kaidalov}
882: A.B. Kaidalov, P.E. Volkovitsky,
883: {\em Z. Phys.} {\bf C 63}, 517 (1994).
884: \end{thebibliography}
885: \end{document}
886:
887: #!/bin/csh -f
888: # Uuencoded gz-compressed .tar file created by csh script uufiles
889: # For more info (11/95), see e.g. http://xxx.lanl.gov/faq/uufaq.html
890: # If you are on a unix machine this file will unpack itself: strip
891: # any mail header and call resulting file, e.g., figures.uu
892: # (uudecode ignores these header lines and starts at begin line below)
893: # Then say csh figures.uu
894: # or explicitly execute the commands (generally more secure):
895: # uudecode figures.uu ; gunzip figures.tar.gz ;
896: # tar -xvf figures.tar
897: # On some non-unix (e.g. VAX/VMS), first use editor to change filename
898: # in "begin" line below to figures.tar-gz , then execute
899: # uudecode figures.uu
900: # gzip -d figures.tar-gz
901: # tar -xvf figures.tar
902: #
903: uudecode $0
904: chmod 644 figures.tar.gz
905: gunzip -c figures.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
906: rm $0 figures.tar.gz
907: exit
908:
909: