1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentstyle[twocolumn,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
3: %\documentstyle[prd,aps,graphics]{revtex}
4: \def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
5: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
6: %\addtolength{\topmargin}{0.9cm}
7: %
8: \begin{document}
9: %\draft
10: \title{Is the existence of a softest point in the directed flow excitation function\\
11: an unambiguous signal for the creation of a quark-gluon plasma?}
12:
13: \author{Marcus Bleicher and J\"org Aichelin}
14:
15: \address{ SUBATECH,
16: Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et des Technologies Associ\'ees \\
17: University of Nantes - IN2P3/CNRS - Ecole des Mines de Nantes \\
18: 4 rue Alfred Kastler, F-44072 Nantes Cedex 03, France}
19:
20: \maketitle
21:
22: \noindent
23: \begin{abstract}
24: The excitation function of the in-plane directed flow of nucleons is studied
25: within a non-equilibrium transport approach.
26: It is demonstrated that a local minimum in the excitation
27: function of the directed flow develops, which is not related to a transition
28: into a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) phase.
29: It is a consequence of the dynamical softening of the underlying equation
30: of state, due to the onset of resonance matter and particle production.
31: Thus, the interpretation of this minimum as a 'smoking gun' signature for the
32: creation of a QGP is premature.
33: \vspace{.6cm}
34: \end{abstract}
35:
36: The excitation functions of hadron ratios and hadron flow has since long been
37: suggested to search for evidence of exotic states and phase transitions
38: in nuclear collisions~\cite{Rischke:1995pe,qgpreviews}.
39:
40: Especially the in-plane collective flow is
41: the earliest predicted observable to probe heated and
42: compressed nuclear matter~\cite{scheid68a}.
43: Its sensitivity to the equation of state (EoS) might be used to search
44: for abnormal matter states and phase
45: transitions~\cite{hofmann76a,stocker:86,Stocker:1979mj}.
46: Until now, the study of in-plane and azimuthal flow in high
47: energy nuclear collisions is attracting large attention from both
48: experimentalists and theorists~\cite{Csernai:1982ff,H-G,E877,liu97,posk98}.
49:
50: In fluid dynamics, the transverse collective flow is intimately
51: connected to the pressure $P(\rho, S)$ (which in turn depends on
52: the density $\rho$ and the entropy $S$) of the matter in the reaction
53: zone \cite{stoecker81a}:
54: \begin{equation}
55: \label{pxeqn}
56: {\bf p} \,\propto\, \int_t \int_A P(\rho,S) \, {\rm d}{\bf A} \, {\rm d}t\,.
57: \end{equation}
58: Here d{\bf A} represents the surface element between the participant and
59: spectator matters and the total pressure is the sum of the
60: potential pressure and the kinetic pressure, while $t$ denotes the time over which
61: the pressure acts. Thus, the transverse
62: collective flow depends directly on the equation of state, $P(\rho,S)$.
63:
64: The sensitivity of the flow on the equation of
65: state~\cite{Csernai:1982ff,H-G,sorge99,soff,bravina,Kolb:2000sd} which governs
66: the evolution of the system created in violent nucleus-nucleus collisions is conveniently
67: addressed in terms of Fourier coefficients $v_i$ of the azimuthal distribution
68: (given by the angle $\phi$) of the explored hadrons. At fixed rapidity on expands:
69: \begin{equation}
70: \frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}\phi}= 1 + 2\, v_1\, {\rm cos}(\phi) + 2\, v_2 \,{\rm cos}(2\phi) \quad,
71: \end{equation}
72: with
73: \begin{equation}
74: v_1 = \left\langle\frac{p_x}{\sqrt{p_x^2+p_y^2}}\right\rangle\quad,\quad
75: v_2 = \left\langle\frac{p_x^2-p_y^2}{p_x^2+p_y^2}\right\rangle\quad.
76: \end{equation}
77:
78: The first coefficient describes the directed in-plane flow. The directed flow is most
79: pronounced in semi-central interactions around target and projectile rapidities
80: where the spectators are deflected away
81: from the beam axis due to a bounce-off from the compressed and heated matter in the overlap region.
82: The time scales probed by the directed flow are set by the crossing time of the Lorentz-contracted
83: nuclei. Thus, it serves as keyhole to the initial, probably non-equilibrium, stage of the reaction.
84:
85: In contrast, the elliptic flow~\cite{sorge99,olli92,lshur,risc96,sorge97,heisel,csernai,brachmann,zhang99,Bleicher:2000sx}
86: as measured by the $v_2$ coefficient is generated after the overlap of the initial nuclei.
87: This type of flow is strongest around central rapidities in semi-peripheral collisions. It is
88: driven by the anisotropy of the pressure gradients, due to the geometry of the initial overlap region.
89: Therefore, it is a valuable tool to gain insight into the expansion stage of the fire ball
90:
91: Both types of flow can be used to investigate the so-called 'softest point' - i.e. a
92: local minimum of $P/\epsilon$ as a function of the energy density $\epsilon$ - in the EoS \cite{hung}.
93: As pointed out in \cite{hung,test1}, the existence of this 'softest
94: point' leads to a prolonged expansion of matter and consequently to a
95: long lifetime of a mixed phase of QGP and hadron matter.
96: Analogously, it also takes longer to compress matter in the early stage
97: of a heavy--ion collision \cite{test2}. These features result in two key predictions as
98: 'smoking gun' signatures for Quark-Gluon-Plasma formation:
99: \begin{itemize}
100: \item A {\it kinky} centrality dependence of the scaled elliptic flow~\cite{Sorge:1998mk} and
101: \item a {\it minimum} in the excitation function of the directed
102: in-plane collective flow \cite{Rischke:1995pe}.
103: \end{itemize}
104: Especially, the observation of this local minimum in the energy dependence of
105: the in-plane directed flow
106: \begin{equation}
107: p_x^{\rm dir} = \frac{1}{M} \sum_i^M \, p_{x,i} \, {\rm sgn}(y_i)
108: \end{equation}
109: in heavy--ion collisions - here $i$ sums over all considered nucleons,
110: $p_{x,i}$ is the momentum in $x$ direction of nucleon $i$ and $y_i$ denotes the
111: rapidity of nucleon $i$ - has been suggested to be a clear signature
112: for a change of nuclear matter properties
113: as for instance in the transition from hadron to quark and gluon degrees
114: of freedom (see also the pioneering works by~\cite{hofmann76a,csernai2,bravina2}).
115:
116: Recently, a more complex dynamical picture behind the softening of the directed flow
117: had been discovered. In Refs. \cite{brachmann} and \cite{Csernai:1999nf} it
118: was argued that in case of a QGP creation at first strong directed flow develops, which is
119: later compensated by an anti-flow of nucleons at central rapidities.
120:
121: In this letter, we study the excitation function of the
122: directed flow and its connection to the underlying equation of state.
123: We demonstrate that the common interpretation of the softening of the equation of
124: state as a unique signature of a mixed phase near a transition to a QGP
125: is premature.
126:
127: For our investigation, the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular
128: Dynamics model (UrQMD 1.2)~\cite{urqmd} is applied
129: to heavy ion reactions from $E_{\rm beam}= 100$~AMeV to 500~AGeV.
130: This microscopic transport approach is based on the covariant propagation of
131: constituent quarks and diquarks accompanied by mesonic and baryonic
132: degrees of freedom. It simulates multiple interactions of
133: ingoing and newly produced particles, the excitation
134: and fragmentation of color strings and the formation and decay of
135: hadronic resonances.
136: Towards higher energies, the treatment of sub-hadronic degrees of freedom is
137: of major importance.
138: In the present model, these degrees of freedom enter via
139: the introduction of a formation time for hadrons produced in the
140: fragmentation of strings \cite{andersson87a,andersson87b,sjoestrand94a}.
141: The leading hadrons of the fragmenting strings contain the valence-quarks
142: of the original excited hadron. In UrQMD they are allowed to
143: interact even during their formation time, with a reduced cross section
144: defined by the additive quark model,
145: thus accounting for the original valence quarks contained in that
146: hadron \cite{urqmd}. A phase transition to a quark-gluon state is
147: not incorporated explicitly into the model dynamics. However,
148: a detailed analysis of the model in equilibrium, yields an effective equation of state of
149: Hagedorn type \cite{Belkacem:1998gy,Bravina:1999dh}.
150:
151: Note that the present simulations have been performed without
152: potential interactions. Thus the absolute magnitude of the directed flow at the
153: lowest energies is certainly underpredicted~\cite{Cugnon:nk}.
154: Nevertheless, the general statement of a non-monotonic dependence of the
155: directed flow on the collision energy is not blured by this detail.
156:
157: As a measure for particle production, we define an inelasticity:
158: \begin{equation}
159: {\rm Inelasticity}=\frac{\sum\, m_i}{E_{\rm total}}\quad
160: {\rm at\, y_{\rm cm}}\pm 0.5\quad,
161: \end{equation}
162: the sum is taken over all newly produced particles,
163: with $m_i$ being the mass of each produced particle and $E_{\rm total}$
164: being the total available energy, $E_{\rm total}=A\sqrt s$, for a given
165: center-of-mass energy $\sqrt s$.
166:
167: Fig. \ref{exc.pxdir} depicts the excitation functions of the directed flow
168: of protons (full squares) and the inelasticity (open triangles)
169: for central Au+Au (Pb+Pb) reactions with b$\le 3.4$~fm.
170: One clearly observes a non-monotonic behavior of the directed flow
171: excitation function from UrQMD: Up to 1~AGeV beam energy the directed flow
172: of nucleons increases. As particle production sets in, the directed
173: flow starts to decrease and a prominent dip occurs at 8~AGeV beam
174: energy. The development of the dip in $p_x^{\rm dir}$ is directly
175: connected to the onset of particle production, as measured by the inelasticity.
176: At 15~AGeV beam energy, the inelasticity decreases again and the directed flow
177: increases until a beam energy of 40~AGeV. From there on, $p_x^{\rm dir}$
178: stays constant towards the top SPS energy.
179: \begin{figure}
180: \vspace*{-.5cm}
181: \par \centerline{\resizebox*{!}{0.5\textheight}
182: {\includegraphics{exc_pxdir_elab.eps}}} \par{}
183: \caption{Excitation functions for central Au+Au (Pb+Pb) reactions.
184: Top: Directed flow $p_x^{\rm dir}$
185: of nucleons with only isotropic elastic interactions (open squares)
186: and with full elastic and inelastic collision term (full squares).
187: Bottom: Inelasticity (open triangles).
188: \label{exc.pxdir}}
189: \end{figure}
190:
191: For comparison, simulations with an energy independent elastic and isotropic nucleon-nucleon
192: cross section of 40~mb are shown in Fig. \ref{exc.pxdir} (open squares).
193: Here one clearly observes a strong
194: and monotonous increase of the directed flow with energy.
195:
196: While both approaches, hydrodynamics with a phase transition to a QGP or the dynamical
197: softening of the EoS presented here, do yield a minimum in the flow excitation function,
198: the time evolution of the flow pattern is different.
199: In scenarios with QGP phase transition, the development
200: of a nucleonic anti-flow is visible in the time evolution of the directed flow: with QGP,
201: the directed flow at the softest point increases in the early stage
202: of the collision, but then suddenly turns over and decreases as the
203: anti-flow sets in~\cite{brachmann}.
204: In Fig. \ref{time} the time evolution of the directed flow is studied
205: in the transport model. Here, the directed flow increases monotonously with time until its
206: final saturation value. In both studied scenarios,
207: i.e. with the full collision term included (full squares) and
208: in the simulation with only elastic collisions (open squares), no local
209: maximum in the time evolution of $p_x^{\rm dir}$ is present.
210: Investigating the directed flow at midrapidity
211: shows that in the present model, the minimum in the directed flow
212: is {\it not} due to a counter-acting anti-flow of nucleons at central
213: rapidities as discussed in~\cite{brachmann,Csernai:1999nf}.
214: \begin{figure}
215: \vspace*{-.7cm}
216: \par \centerline{\resizebox*{!}{0.37\textheight}
217: {\includegraphics{time_8gev.eps}}} \par{}
218: \caption{Time evolution of the directed flow of nucleons
219: at the softest point ($E_{\rm lab}=8$~AGeV). Open squares: only isotropic elastic
220: interactions. Full squares: full elastic and inelastic collision term.
221: \label{time}}
222: \end{figure}
223: Thus, the observation or non-observation of the anti-flow of nucleons
224: near central rapidities is crucial
225: to distinguish hadronic dynamics from QGP formation.
226: Unfortunately, up to now all flow measurements at relativistic energies cover only
227: the range outside $y/y_{cm}\pm 0.3$ \cite{Csernai:1999nf}. The quantitative
228: value and the sign of the flow near midrapidity remains undetermined.
229: Additional information about the origin of the softening of the EoS might also be obtained
230: by studying the variation of the scaled elliptic flow with centrality at
231: fixed energy~\cite{Sorge:1998mk}.
232: The low energy runs of the NA49 experiment (beam energies of
233: 20~AGeV, 30~AGeV and 40~AGeV) might be able to explore these
234: phenomena in detail \cite{addendum}.
235: The softening of the equation of state, and the minimum of the directed flow will also
236: be accessible by the future GSI accelerator \cite{gsifuture}.
237:
238: In summary, we have demonstrated that a string hadronic model is able to
239: yield a non-monotonic directed flow excitation function.
240: In the present model this is due to a dynamical change (softening) of
241: the equation of state due to a transition to resonance rich matter in line, with
242: the onset of particle production.
243: Irrespective of quantitative uncertainties, we conclude that a {\it minimum}
244: in the $p_x^{\rm dir}$ excitation function is {\it not} a clean signal for a
245: transition from hadron to parton matter in nuclear collisions.
246:
247: The authors would like to thank Horst St\"ocker for fruitful and enlightening
248: discussions.
249: M.B. is supported by the region Pays de la Loire.
250: M.B. thanks L.P. Csernai and D. R\"ohrich for kind hospitality in Bergen,
251: were part of this work had been performed.
252: This project acknowledges
253: support of the Bergen Computational Physics Laboratory in the framework
254: of the European Community - Access to Research Infrastructure action
255: of the Improving Human Potential Programme.
256:
257: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
258: %\cite{Rischke:1995pe}
259: \bibitem{Rischke:1995pe}
260: D.~H.~Rischke, Y.~Pursun, J.~A.~Maruhn, H.~Stocker and W.~Greiner,
261: %``The phase transition to the quark-gluon plasma and its effects on hydrodynamic flow,''
262: Heavy Ion Phys.\ {\bf 1} (1995) 309
263: [arXiv:nucl-th/9505014].
264: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9505014;%%
265:
266: \bibitem{qgpreviews}
267: S.~A.~Bass, M.~Gyulassy, H.~St\"ocker and W.~Greiner,
268: %``Signatures of quark-gluon-plasma formation in high energy heavy-ion
269: % collisions: A critical review,''
270: J.\ Phys.\ {\bf G25}, R1 (1999);
271: H. Satz, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 63}, 1511 (2000).
272: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810281;%%
273:
274:
275: \bibitem{scheid68a}
276: W. Scheid, R. Ligensa, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 21}, 1479 (1968);
277: W. Scheid, R. Ligensa, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 32}, 741 (1974).
278:
279: \bibitem{hofmann76a} J. Hofmann, H. St\"ocker, U. Heinz, W. Scheid,
280: W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 88.
281:
282: \bibitem{stocker:86}
283: H.~St\"ocker and W.~Greiner, Phys. Rep. {\bf 137}, 277 (1986).
284:
285: %\newcommand{\wwwspires}{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www}
286: %\cite{Stocker:1979mj}
287: \bibitem{Stocker:1979mj}
288: H.~Stocker, J.~A.~Maruhn and W.~Greiner,
289: %``Three-Dimensional Calculations On The Formation Of Density Isomers In High-Energy Heavy Ion Collisions,''
290: Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf A290} (1979) 297.
291: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,A290,297;%%
292: %\href{\wwwspires?j=ZEPYA\%2cA290\%2c297}{SPIRES}
293:
294: %\newcommand{\wwwspires}{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www}
295: %\cite{Csernai:1982ff}
296: \bibitem{Csernai:1982ff}
297: L.~P.~Csernai, W.~Greiner, H.~Stocker, I.~Tanihata, S.~Nagamiya and J.~Knoll,
298: %``Macroscopic Nucleon Nucleon Correlations Caused By The Bounceoff Process In Energetic Collisions Of Heavy Nuclei,''
299: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf C25} (1982) 2482.
300: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C25,2482;%%
301: %\href{\wwwspires?j=PHRVA\%2cC25\%2c2482}{SPIRES}
302:
303: \bibitem{H-G}
304: W.~Reisdorf and H.G.~Ritter, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 47}, 663 (1997);
305: J.-Y.~Ollitrault, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A638}, 195c (1998);
306: see also Quark Matter 99 proceedings.
307:
308: \bibitem{E877}
309: E877 Collaboration, J. Barrette {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 2532 (1994).
310:
311: \bibitem{liu97}
312: E895 Collaboration, H. Liu {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A638}, 451c (1998).
313:
314: \bibitem{posk98}
315: NA49 Collaboration, H. Appelsh\"auser {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 4136 (1998).
316:
317: \bibitem{sorge99}
318: H. Sorge, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 2048 (1999).
319:
320: \bibitem{soff}
321: S. Soff {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 51}, 3320 (1995).
322:
323: \bibitem{bravina}
324: L. Bravina {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 344}, 49 (1995).
325:
326:
327: %\cite{Kolb:2000sd}
328: \bibitem{Kolb:2000sd}
329: P.~F.~Kolb, J.~Sollfrank and U.~W.~Heinz,
330: %``Anisotropic transverse flow and the quark-hadron phase transition,''
331: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62} (2000) 054909
332: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006129].
333: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006129;%%
334:
335: \bibitem{olli92}
336: J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 46}, 229 (1992).
337:
338: \bibitem{lshur}
339: C.M. Hung and E.V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 4003 (1995).
340:
341: \bibitem{risc96}
342: D.H. Rischke, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A610}, 88c (1996).
343:
344: \bibitem{sorge97}
345: H.Sorge, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 2309 (1997).
346:
347: \bibitem{heisel}
348: H. Heiselberg, A.-M. Levy, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59}, 2716 (1999).
349:
350:
351: \bibitem{csernai}
352: L.P. Csernai and D. R\"ohrich, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 458}, 454 (1999).
353:
354: \bibitem{brachmann}
355: %\cite{Brachmann:1999xt}
356: %\bibitem{Brachmann:1999xt}
357: J.~Brachmann, S.~Soff, A.~Dumitru, H.~Stocker, J.~A.~Maruhn, W.~Greiner and D.~H.~Rischke,
358: %``Antiflow of nucleons at the softest point of the EoS,''
359: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61} (2000) 024909
360: [arXiv:nucl-th/9908010];
361: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9908010;%%
362: %\cite{Brachmann:1999mp}
363: %\bibitem{Brachmann:1999mp}
364: J.~Brachmann, A.~Dumitru, H.~Stocker and W.~Greiner,
365: %``The directed flow maximum near c(s) = 0,''
366: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 8} (2000) 549
367: [arXiv:nucl-th/9912014].
368: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9912014;%%
369:
370: \bibitem{zhang99}
371: %\cite{Zhang:1999rs}
372: %\bibitem{Zhang:1999rs}
373: B.~Zhang, M.~Gyulassy and C.~M.~Ko,
374: %``Elliptic flow from a parton cascade,''
375: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 455} (1999) 45
376: [arXiv:nucl-th/9902016].
377: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9902016;%%
378:
379: %\cite{Bleicher:2000sx}
380: \bibitem{Bleicher:2000sx}
381: M.~Bleicher and H.~Stocker,
382: %``Anisotropic flow in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions,''
383: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 526} (2002) 309
384: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006147].
385: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006147;%%
386:
387:
388: \bibitem{stoecker81a}
389: H. St\"ocker, B. M\"uller, LBL-preprint~12471
390:
391: \bibitem{hung}
392: %\cite{Hung:1994eq}
393: %\bibitem{Hung:1994eq}
394: C.~M.~Hung and E.~V.~Shuryak,
395: %``Hydrodynamics near the QCD phase transition: Looking for the longest lived fireball,''
396: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75} (1995) 4003
397: [arXiv:hep-ph/9412360].
398: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9412360;%%
399:
400:
401: \bibitem{test1}
402: %\cite{Rischke:1995ir}
403: %\bibitem{Rischke:1995ir}
404: D.~H.~Rischke, S.~Bernard and J.~A.~Maruhn,
405: %``Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions. 1. General aspects and expansion into vacuum,''
406: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 595} (1995) 346
407: [arXiv:nucl-th/9504018].
408: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9504018;%%
409:
410: \bibitem{test2}
411: %\cite{Rischke:1995mt}
412: %\bibitem{Rischke:1995mt}
413: D.~H.~Rischke, Y.~Pursun and J.~A.~Maruhn,
414: %``Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions. 2. Compression of nuclear matter and the phase transition to the quark - gluon plasma,''
415: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 595} (1995) 383
416: [Erratum-ibid.\ A {\bf 596} (1996) 717]
417: [arXiv:nucl-th/9504021].
418: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9504021;%%
419:
420: %\cite{Sorge:1998mk}
421: \bibitem{Sorge:1998mk}
422: H.~Sorge,
423: %``Highly sensitive centrality dependence of elliptic flow: A novel signature of the phase transition in QCD,''
424: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82} (1999) 2048
425: [arXiv:nucl-th/9812057].
426: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9812057;%%
427:
428: \bibitem{csernai2}
429: N.S.\ Amelin, E.F.\ Staubo, L.P.\ Csernai, V.D.\ Toneev, K.K.\ Gudima,
430: D.\ Strottman, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 67 (1991) 1523, Phys.\ Lett.\ B 261
431: (1991) 352;\\
432: N.S.\ Amelin, L.P.\ Csernai, E.F.\ Staubo, D.\ Strottman, Nucl.\ Phys.\ A 544
433: (1992) 463c.
434:
435: \bibitem{bravina2} L.V.\ Bravina, N.S.\ Amelin, L.P.\ Csernai, P.\ Levai, D.\
436: Strottman, Nucl.\ Phys.\ A 566 (1994) 461c.
437:
438:
439: %\cite{Csernai:1999nf}
440: \bibitem{Csernai:1999nf}
441: L.~P.~Csernai and D.~Rohrich,
442: %``Third flow component as QGP signal,''
443: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 458} (1999) 454
444: [arXiv:nucl-th/9908034].
445: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9908034;%%
446:
447:
448: \bibitem{urqmd}
449: %\cite{Bleicher:1999xi}
450: %\bibitem{Bleicher:1999xi}
451: M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles, S.A. Bass, C. Ernst,
452: S. Soff, L. Bravina, M. Belkacem, H. Weber, H. St\"ocker, W. Greiner,
453: %``Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,''
454: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25} (1999) 1859
455: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909407];\\
456: %\cite{Bass:1998ca}
457: %\bibitem{Bass:1998ca}
458: S.A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, M. Brandstetter, L. Bravina,
459: C. Ernst, L. Gerland, M. Hofmann, S. Hofmann, J. Konopka,
460: G. Mao, L. Neise, S. Soff, C. Spieles, H. Weber, L.A. Winckelmann,
461: H. St\"ocker, W. Greiner, C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin, N. Amelin,
462: %``Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,''
463: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41} (1998) 225
464: [arXiv:nucl-th/9803035];\\
465: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9803035;%%
466: A Woods-Saxon initialisation for each nucleus is used (i.e. CTOption 24 = 1).
467:
468: \bibitem{andersson87a}
469: B.~Andersson, G.~Gustavson, B.~Nilsson-Almquist,
470: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B281}, 289 (1987).
471:
472: \bibitem{andersson87b}
473: B.~Andersson {\em et~al.}, Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 43}, 387 (1987).
474:
475: \bibitem{sjoestrand94a}
476: T.~Sjoestrand, Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 82}, 74 (1994).
477:
478: %\cite{Belkacem:1998gy,Bravina:1999dh}
479: \bibitem{Belkacem:1998gy}
480: M.~Belkacem {\it et al.},
481: %``Equation of state, spectra and composition of hot and dense infinite hadronic matter in a microscopic transport model,''
482: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58} (1998) 1727
483: [arXiv:nucl-th/9804058].
484: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9804058;%%
485:
486:
487: %\cite{Bravina:1999dh}
488: \bibitem{Bravina:1999dh}
489: L.~V.~Bravina {\it et al.},
490: %``Local equilibrium in heavy ion collisions: Microscopic model versus statistical model analysis,''
491: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 60} (1999) 024904
492: [arXiv:hep-ph/9906548].
493: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906548;%%
494:
495: %\cite{Cugnon:nk}
496: \bibitem{Cugnon:nk}
497: J.~Cugnon,
498: %``Collective Flow And Intranuclear Cascade Dynamics,''
499: {\it In *Helsinki 1984, Proceedings, Quark Matter '84*, 101-105};
500: %\bibitem{Molitoris:vm}
501: J.~J.~Molitoris, H.~Stocker, H.~A.~Gustafsson, J.~Cugnon and D.~L'Hote,
502: %``Intranuclear Cascade Models Lack Dynamic Flow,''
503: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 33} (1986) 867.
504: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C33,867;%%
505:
506:
507:
508: \bibitem{addendum} NA49 Collaboration, Add. 10 to Proposal CERN/\-SPSC/\-P264.
509:
510: \bibitem{gsifuture}
511: See WWW page of GSI: http://www.gsi.de/\-GSI-Future/\-project/\-eng/\-index.php
512:
513: \end{thebibliography}
514: \end{document}
515: