1: % **** LaTeX file ***   

2: %********************

3: \documentstyle[11pt,epsf]{article}

4: \textheight=22.5cm

5: \textwidth=16.5cm

6: \oddsidemargin=-0.4cm

7: \evensidemargin=-0.4cm

8: \topmargin -0.4cm 

9: \headheight 0cm

10: %------------------------------------

11: % Gamma matrices:

12: \newcommand{\bd}[1]{ \mbox{\boldmath $#1$}  }

13: \newcommand{\jvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $j$}}

14: \newcommand{\hvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $h$}}

15: \newcommand{\qbar}{\not{\!q}}

16: \newcommand{\kbar}{\not{\!k}}

17: \newcommand{\pbar}{\not{\!p}}

18: \newcommand{\fbar}{\not{\!f}}

19: \newcommand{\hslash}{\not{\!h}}

20: \newcommand{\Qbar}{\not{\!Q}}

21: \newcommand{\Kbar}{\not{\!K}}

22: \newcommand{\Fbar}{\not{\!F}}

23: \newcommand{\Hslash}{\not{\!H}}

24: \newcommand{\Pbar}{\not{\!P}}

25: \newcommand{\pdbar}{\not{\!P}_{\!\Delta}}

26: %------------------------------------

27: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

28: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

29: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}

30: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

31: \newcommand{\uu}{u({\bf p},s)}

32: \newcommand{\ubar}{\overline{u}({\bf p'},s')}

33: \newcommand{\Jvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $J$}}

34: \newcommand{\Xvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $X$}}

35: \newcommand{\qvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $q$}}

36: \newcommand{\kvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

37: \newcommand{\sigvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}

38: \newcommand{\etavec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}

39: \newcommand{\tauvec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}}

40: \newcommand{\kappahat}{\mbox{\boldmath $\hat\kappa$}}

41: \newcommand{\kappavec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\kappa$}}

42: \newcommand{\gammavec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

43: \newcommand{\Gammavec}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Gamma$}}

44: %---------------------------------------------------

45: \newcommand{\nsigma}{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}

46: \newcommand{\ngamma}{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

47: \newcommand{\neta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\eta$}}

48: \newcommand{\ntau}{\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}}

49: \newcommand{\npi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}}

50: \newcommand{\nrho}{\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}

51: \newcommand{\na}{{\bf      a}}  

52: \newcommand{\nb}{{\bf      b}}     

53: \newcommand{\nne}{{\bf     e}}   

54: \newcommand{\nh}{{\bf      h}}

55: \newcommand{\nj}{{\bf      j}}

56: \newcommand{\nk}{{\bf      k}}

57: \newcommand{\np}{{\bf      p}}       

58: \newcommand{\nq}{{\bf      q}}

59: \newcommand{\nr}{{\bf      r}}         

60: \newcommand{\ns}{{\bf      s}}

61: \newcommand{\nv}{{\bf      v}}

62: \newcommand{\nw}{{\bf      w}}

63: \newcommand{\nx}{{\bf      x}}

64: \newcommand{\nA}{{\bf      A}}       

65: \newcommand{\nB}{{\bf      B}}

66: \newcommand{\nC}{{\bf      C}}

67: \newcommand{\nJ}{{\bf      J}}

68: \newcommand{\nL}{{\bf      L}}

69: \newcommand{\nM}{{\bf      M}}       

70: \newcommand{\nP}{{\bf      P}}       

71: \newcommand{\nR}{{\bf      R}}

72: \newcommand{\nS}{{\bf      S}}      

73: \newcommand{\nX}{{\bf      X}}

74: \newcommand{\nY}{{\bf      Y}}          

75: \newcommand{\hp}{{\bf \hat{p}}}

76: \newcommand{\hr}{{\bf \hat{r}}} 

77: \newcommand{\hx}{{\bf \hat{x}}} 

78: %---Column matrix---

79: \newcommand{\columnmatrix}[2]{\left[

80:                                \begin{array}{cc}

81:                                   \displaystyle #1 \\[1ex]

82:                                   \displaystyle #2

83:                                \end{array}

84:                             \right]}

85: %

86: \begin{document}

87: \begin{titlepage}

88: \mbox{} 

89: \vspace*{2.5\fill} 

90: {\Large\bf 

91: \begin{center}

92: %**************************************

93: %

94: Momentum distribution of relativistic nuclei with Hartree-Fock mesonic

95: correlations

96: %

97: %**************************************

98: \end{center}

99: } 

100: \vspace{1\fill} 

101: \begin{center}

102: %**************************************

103: {\large 

104: J.E. Amaro$    ^{1}$, 

105: M.B. Barbaro$  ^{2,3}$, 

106: J.A. Caballero$^{3}$, 

107: T.W. Donnelly$ ^{4}$ and 

108: A. Molinari$   ^{2}$

109: }

110: %**************************************

111: \end{center}

112: \begin{small}

113: \begin{center}

114: $^{1}${\sl 

115: Departamento de F\'\i sica Moderna,

116: Universidad de Granada, 

117: E-18071 Granada, SPAIN 

118: }\\[2mm]

119: $^{2}${\sl 

120: Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica,

121: Universit\`a di Torino and

122: INFN, Sezione di Torino \\

123: Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ITALY 

124: }\\[2mm]

125: $^{3}${\sl 

126: Departamento de F\'\i sica At\'omica, Molecular y Nuclear \\ 

127: Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1065, E-41080 Sevilla, SPAIN 

128: }\\[2mm]

129: $^{4}${\sl 

130: Center for Theoretical Physics, Laboratory for Nuclear Science 

131: and Department of Physics\\

132: Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

133: Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 

134: }

135: \end{center}

136: \end{small}

137: 

138: \kern 1. cm \hrule \kern 3mm 

139: 

140: \begin{small}

141: \noindent

142: %**************************************

143: {\bf Abstract} 

144: %**************************************

145: \vspace{3mm} 

146: 

147: The impact of Hartree-Fock correlations on the nuclear momentum

148: distribution is studied in a fully relativistic one boson exchange

149: model. Hartree-Fock equations are exactly solved to first order

150: in the coupling constants. The renormalization of the Dirac spinors in

151: the medium is shown to affect the momentum distribution, as opposed to

152: what happens in the non-relativistic case. The unitarity of the model 

153: is shown to be preserved by the present renormalization procedure.

154: 

155: 

156: \kern 2mm 

157: 

158: \noindent

159: {\em PACS numbers:}\  21.60.Jz,  21.65.+f, 24.10.Jv, 11.10.Gh

160: 

161: \noindent

162: {\em Keywords:}\ Relativistic Hartree Fock. 

163: Renormalization in nuclear matter.

164: Mesonic correlations.  Relativistic Fermi Gas.

165: 

166: \end{small}

167: \kern 2mm \hrule \kern 1cm

168: \noindent MIT/CTP\#3274 

169: \end{titlepage}

170: 

171: It is well known that in a non-relativistic framework the momentum

172: distribution of nuclear matter is not affected by the Hartree-Fock

173: (HF) field. This arises because, due to general invariance principles

174: \cite{Fet71}, the non-relativistic self-energy cannot depend on spin

175: in an infinite system: hence the single-nucleon wave functions are not

176: modified and only the energy-momentum relation is affected by the

177: medium.  Of course correlations in the nuclear wave function beyond

178: the mean field approximation are very important already at the

179: non-relativistic level~\cite{Mut00,Fan84,Dic92}.  Due to such correlations,

180: the momentum distribution is reduced for momenta below $k_F$ and the

181: states above $k_F$ acquire small but finite occupation probabilities.

182: 

183: Although the momentum distribution is not an observable, it is

184: also true that over the years electron scattering reactions have frequently been expressed in terms of momentum densities. 

185: In recent work~\cite{Ama01,Ama02}

186: we have evaluated the impact of mesonic

187: correlations and meson-exchange currents (MEC) on the electroweak response functions within a fully

188: relativistic, gauge invariant model. We have shown that the

189: consistency of the theory necessarily implies the inclusion in the calculation

190: of Hartree-Fock self-energy insertions. In order to deal properly with the 

191: divergencies associated with these diagrams, not only the

192: energy but also the nucleon wave functions must be renormalized 

193: by the medium. As a consequence, in a relativistic HF framework, 

194: the momentum distribution is also modified for $k<k_F$, since now the

195: Dirac four-spinors describing the nucleons display new features

196: and the self-energy becomes spin-dependent.  The aim of this letter is 

197: to quantify this genuine 

198: relativistic effect in a one boson-exchange model for the NN

199: interaction, while the

200: corresponding observable consequences on the response functions were

201: analyzed in depth in~\cite{Ama01,Ama02}.

202: 

203: An unambiguous treatment of relativistic Hartree-Fock does not exist

204: in the literature, since the presence of the Dirac sea requires (at least) the specification of a prescription to take it into account~\cite{Ser86}. 

205: The approach we use is equivalent to that used in~\cite{Ser86,Cel86}, where

206: the nucleon proper self-energy is calculated in terms of

207: positive-energy spinors only. 

208: This approximation is valid in the

209: first iteration of a fully self-consistent calculation to which we

210: confine ourselves in this work. 

211: This procedure was shown in~\cite{Ser86} to reproduce the

212: non relativistic HF equations in the limit $M \rightarrow \infty$, and

213: it reduces the relativistic Hartree approximation to the

214: Mean Field Theory.

215: 

216: The proton momentum distribution of nuclear matter in the

217: independent particle approximation is

218: \be

219: n(\np) = \sum_{\nk,s} 

220: \psi_{\nk,s}^\dagger(\np)\psi_{\nk,s}(\np) \theta(k_F-k)\, \ ,

221: \label{np}

222: \ee

223: where $k_F$ is the Fermi momentum.

224: Since we are focusing on symmetric nuclear matter the neutron and

225: proton momentum distributions are equal.

226: For a free relativistic Fermi gas, in momentum space 

227: the wave function describing a nucleon with momentum $\nk$ and spin $s$

228: is given by

229: \be

230: \psi_{\nk,s}(\np) = \int_V d\nr\, \psi_{\nk,s}(\nr) e^{-i\np\cdot\nr} 

231: = \sqrt{\frac{m}{V E_\nk}}\, u_s(\nk,m) \int_V d\nr e^{i(\nk-\np)\cdot\nr} 

232: = \sqrt{\frac{V m}{E_\nk}}\, u_s(\np,m) \delta_{\nk,\np}

233: \label{psifree}

234: \ee

235: where  $V$ is the volume enclosing the system, 

236: $u_s(\nk,m)$ is the free Dirac spinor  ($\Kbar u_s =m u_s$) and

237: $E_\nk=\sqrt{\nk^2+m^2}$ is the free energy of the nucleon. 

238: We use the Bjorken and Drell~\cite{Bjo65} conventions for the spinor

239: normalization, $\bar u u=1$. Therefore

240: the wave function in coordinate space is normalized

241: to one: $\int_V d\nr\psi_{\nk,s}^\dagger(\nr)\psi_{\nk,s}(\nr)=1$.

242: 

243: The wave function of Eq.~(\ref{psifree}), inserted in Eq.~(\ref{np}), 

244: yields the well-known result:

245: \be

246: n(\np) 

247: = V \sum_{\nk,s}\frac{m}{E_\nk} 

248: u_{s}^\dagger(\np,m) u_{s}(\np,m)\theta(k_F-p)\delta_{\np,\nk}

249: = 2 V \theta(k_F-p)\ .

250: \label{npfree}

251: \ee

252: 

253: In an interacting system, in the relativistic HF approximation, 

254: the above distribution is modified, since the 

255: single-particle wave functions are renormalized by the interaction

256: with the other nucleons in the medium. 

257: In this case the

258: Dirac equation in the nuclear medium is given by

259: \begin{equation}\label{new_spinors}

260: [\Pbar-m-\Sigma(P)]\widetilde \phi_s(\np)=0\ ,

261: \end{equation}

262: where $\widetilde\phi_s(\np)$ is the renormalized spinor and 

263: $\Sigma(P)$ is the self-energy of a nucleon in nuclear matter.

264: According to general symmetry properties $\Sigma(P)$ can be written in

265: the form~\cite{Cel86,Ana81}:

266: \begin{equation}

267: \label{spin}

268: \Sigma(P) = mA(P)+B(P)\gamma_0 p_0 -C(P)\ngamma\cdot\np \ .

269: \end{equation}

270: 

271: Using the above decomposition the Dirac equation (\ref{new_spinors})

272: can be recast as 

273: \begin{equation}

274: \label{Dirac}

275: \left[1-C(P)\right]

276: \left[ \gamma_0 f_0(P)-\ngamma\cdot\np-

277: \widetilde{m}(P)\right]\widetilde \phi_s(\np)=0\ ,

278: \end{equation}

279: where the functions

280: \begin{eqnarray}

281: \label{f0}

282: f_0(P) &=& \frac{1-B(P)}{1-C(P)}\ p_0 \label{f_0}\\

283: \widetilde{m}(P) &=& \frac{1+A(P)}{1-C(P)}\ m  \label{m-tilde}

284: \end{eqnarray}

285: have been introduced.

286: 

287: Equation~(\ref{Dirac}) has the same structure as the free Dirac equation;

288: hence for the positive-energy eigenvalue one has

289: \begin{equation}

290: f^2_0(P)= \np^2+\widetilde{m}^2(P)\ ,

291: \end{equation}

292: which implicitly yields, using Eq.~(\ref{f0}),

293: the new dispersion relation for the renormalized energy 

294: $p_0=\epsilon(\np)$ of the nucleon in the nuclear medium:

295: \begin{equation}

296: \label{dispersion}

297: p_0 = \frac{1-C(P)}{1-B(P)}\sqrt{\np^2+\widetilde{m}^2(P)}\ .

298: \label{p0eq}

299: \end{equation}

300: 

301: The corresponding positive-energy spinor 

302: reads (see Refs.~\cite{Ama01,Ama02} for details)

303: \begin{equation}

304: \widetilde\phi_s(\np)\equiv\widetilde u_s(\np,\widetilde m(\np)) = 

305: \sqrt{Z_2(\np)}

306: \left(

307: \frac{\widetilde{E}(\np)+\widetilde{m}(\np)}{2\widetilde{m}(\np)}

308: \right)^{1/2}

309: \columnmatrix{\chi_s}{

310: \frac{\nsigma\cdot\np}{\widetilde{E}(\np)+\widetilde{m}(\np)}\chi_s}

311: =

312: \sqrt{Z_2(\np)}u_s(\np,\widetilde{m}(\np))\ ,

313: \label{phispin}

314: \end{equation}

315: where the function $\widetilde{m}(\np)$ of the three-momentum $\np$

316: is obtained from the Dirac mass in 

317: Eq.~(\ref{m-tilde}) by setting $p_0=\epsilon(\np)$:

318: \be

319: \widetilde{m}(\np)

320: \equiv

321: \widetilde{m}(\epsilon(\np),\np) 

322: \label{Dirac-mass}

323: \ee

324: and 

325: \be

326: \widetilde{E}(\np) 

327: \equiv

328: f_0(\epsilon(\np),\np) 

329: = \sqrt{\np^2+\widetilde{m}^2(\np)}

330: \label{Dirac-energy}

331: \ee

332: represents the nucleon's Dirac energy.

333: The field strength

334: renormalization constant, $\sqrt{Z_2(\np)}$, in Eq.~(\ref{phispin}) 

335: is obtained from the renormalized nucleon propagator~\cite{Ama02,Pes95}

336: and reads

337: \begin{eqnarray}

338: Z_2(\np)&=& {\rm Res}

339: \left. \frac{1}{[1-C(P)][f_0(P)-\widetilde{E}(P)]}\right|_{p_0=\epsilon(\np)}

340: \nonumber\\

341: &=& \left[ 1-B

342: -p_0 \frac{\partial B}{\partial p_0}

343: -m\frac{\widetilde{m}}{\widetilde{E}}\frac{\partial A}{\partial p_0} 

344: +\frac{\np^2}{\widetilde{E}}\frac{\partial C}{\partial p_0} 

345: \right]_{p_0=\epsilon(\np)}^{-1}\ .

346: \label{Z2}

347: \end{eqnarray}

348: 

349: In the relativistic Hartree-Fock model the free spinors are used to

350: compute the first approximation to the self-energy. This is then

351: inserted in the Dirac equation to get new spinors, and so on.  This

352: self-consistent procedure has to be dealt with numerically.

353: 

354: The resulting momentum distribution is then obtained with the renormalized wave functions

355: \be

356: \widetilde\psi_{\nk,s}(\np) =  \int_V d\nr\, 

357: \widetilde\psi_{\nk,s}(\nr) e^{-i\np\cdot\nr} 

358: = \sqrt{\frac{V \widetilde m(\np)}{\widetilde E(\np)}}\, 

359: \widetilde u_s(\np,\widetilde m(\np)) \delta_{\nk,\np}

360: \label{psitilde}

361: \ee

362: and reads

363: \be

364: \widetilde n(\np) = \sum_{\nk,s}

365: \widetilde\psi_{\nk,s}^\dagger(\np)\widetilde\psi_{\nk,s}(\np)

366: \theta(\widetilde k_F

367: -p)\ ,

368: \label{nptilde}

369: \ee

370: where $\widetilde k_F$, $\widetilde

371: m(\np)$ and $\widetilde E(\np)$ are the nucleon's renormalized Fermi momentum,

372: mass and energy, respectively.

373: From Eqs.~(\ref{nptilde},\ref{psitilde},\ref{phispin}) 

374: the HF momentum distribution is then found to be

375: \be

376: \widetilde n(\np) = 2 V Z_2(\np) \theta(\widetilde k_F-p)\ ,

377: \label{npHF}

378: \ee

379: which clearly reproduces the free result in 

380: Eq.~(\ref{npfree}) for $Z_2(\np)=1$ and $\widetilde k_F=k_F$.

381: 

382: Note that the HF wave function with the spinor~(\ref{phispin}) is {\em not} normalized to

383: unity. Indeed 

384: \be

385: \int_V d\nr \widetilde \psi_{\nk,s}^\dagger(\nr) \widetilde\psi_{\nk,s}(\nr)

386: = \frac{\widetilde m(\np)}{\widetilde E}\widetilde

387: u_s^\dagger(\nk,\widetilde m(\np)) \widetilde u_s(\nk,\widetilde m(\np))

388: = Z_2(\nk)\ .

389: \label{norm}

390: \ee

391: However the total number of nucleons must be conserved.

392: This implies that the unitarity condition

393: \be  

394: \int \frac{d\np}{(2\pi)^3} \widetilde n(\np)

395: = 2 V \int \frac{d\np}{(2\pi)^3} Z_2(\np) \theta(\widetilde k_F-p) = Z

396: \label{intZ2}

397: \ee

398: must be fulfilled. Equation~(\ref{intZ2}) can be viewed as 

399: the procedure to fix the HF Fermi momentum

400: $\widetilde k_F$, which can in principle be different from the free one.

401: 

402: Here we consider the first-order correction to the

403: momentum distribution arising from the HF series.

404: We shall focus on mesonic correlations, induced by the exchange of

405: $\pi$, $\rho$, $\omega$ and $\sigma$, associated with the following interaction

406: Lagrangian~\cite{Mac87}

407: \be

408: {\cal L}(x) = \bar\psi(x) \left\{ 

409: \frac{g_\pi}{2 m} \gamma^5 \gamma^\mu \ntau \cdot \partial_\mu \npi(x)

410: + g_\rho \left[\gamma^\mu - \frac{a_\rho}{m} \sigma^{\mu\nu}

411: \partial_\nu \right] \ntau \cdot \nrho_\mu (x)

412: + g_\omega \gamma^\mu \omega_\mu(x)

413: + g_\sigma \sigma(x)

414: \right\} \psi(x) \ .

415: \ee

416: 

417: Using this Lagrangian we compute the self-energy in OBE approximation.

418: For each meson $i=\pi,\rho,\omega,\sigma$,

419: the corresponding self-energy functions $A_i(P),B_i(P),C_i(P)$  

420: are given in the Appendix. 

421: The total self-energy is obtained from 

422: Eq.~(\ref{spin}) with $A(P)=\sum_i A_i(P)$, $B(P)=\sum_i B_i(P)$

423: and  $C(P)=\sum_i C_i(P)$.

424: While the pion and rho self-energies correspond to purely exchange (Fock) terms,

425: the sigma and omega also have a direct (Hartree) contribution due to

426: their isoscalar nature.

427: 

428: The HF energy $\epsilon(\np)$, the solution of

429: Eq.~(\ref{dispersion}), can be computed analytically

430: to first order in the squared meson-nucleon coupling 

431: constant $g_i^2$.  

432: For this purpose we note that the functions $A_i(P)$, $B_i(P)$ and 

433: $C_i(P)$ are of order $O(g_i^2)$.  

434: Hence the following expansion of the Dirac mass in Eq.~(\ref{m-tilde}) holds:

435: \begin{equation}\label{m-expansion-1}

436: \widetilde{m}(P)=

437: m\left[1+A(P)+C(P)\right]+O(g_i^4)\ .

438: \end{equation}

439: Inserting this into Eq.~(\ref{dispersion}) 

440: and expanding the righthand side to first order in $g_i^2$, we get the equation

441: \begin{eqnarray}

442: p_0

443: &\simeq& 

444: E_\np+\Delta E(P)\ ,

445: \label{p0}

446: \end{eqnarray}

447: where 

448: \begin{eqnarray}

449: \Delta E(P) = 

450: \frac{1}{E_\np}\left[m^2 A(P)+E_\np^2 B(P)-\np^2 C(P)\right]\ .

451: \label{energycorrection}

452: \end{eqnarray}

453: Next we insert the value of $p_0$ given by Eq.~(\ref{p0}) 

454: inside the functions $A(P)$, $B(P)$, $C(P)$ and

455: expand them around the on-shell value $p_0=E_\np$, 

456: neglecting terms of second order in $g_i^2$. 

457: We get

458: \begin{equation}

459: A(P)\simeq A(E_\np+\Delta E,\np) \simeq

460: A(E_\np,\np)\equiv A_{0}(\np)

461: \end{equation}

462: and likewise $B(P) \simeq  B_{0}(\np)$,  $C(P) \simeq  C_{0}(\np)$.

463: Inserting these on-shell values into Eq.~(\ref{energycorrection}) 

464: we finally obtain the HF energy to first order:

465: \begin{equation}

466: p_0 \simeq E_\np+\frac{1}{E_\np} 

467: \left[m^2 A_{0}(\np) + E_\np^2 B_{0}(\np) 

468: -\np^2 C_{0}(\np) \right] =\epsilon(\np)\ .

469: \label{HFE}

470: \end{equation}

471: 

472: We proceed now by expanding as well

473: the renormalized wave function, see Eqs.~(\ref{psitilde},\ref{phispin}). 

474: For this purpose we expand the Dirac mass in Eq.~(\ref{m-expansion-1}) 

475: around the on-shell energy

476: \begin{equation}

477: \widetilde{m}(\np)

478: \simeq

479: m\left[1+A_{0}(\np)+C_{0}(\np)\right]

480: \label{m-expansion}

481: \end{equation}

482: and likewise the Dirac energy $\widetilde{E}(\np)$ defined in 

483: Eq.~(\ref{Dirac-energy})

484: \begin{eqnarray}

485: \widetilde{E}(\np)

486: &=& \frac{1-B}{1-C}\epsilon(\np)

487: \simeq

488: E_\np+\frac{m^2}{E_\np} 

489: \left[A_{0}(\np) + C_{0}(\np) \right]

490: \ .

491: \label{E-expansion}

492: \end{eqnarray}

493: Moreover for the field-strength renormalization of Eq.~(\ref{Z2})

494: we obtain

495: \begin{equation}

496: Z_2(\np) \simeq 1+\alpha(\np)

497: \end{equation}

498: with

499: \begin{equation} \label{alpha}

500: \alpha(\np) \equiv

501:  B_0(\np)

502: +\left[\frac{m^2}{E_\np}\frac{\partial A}{\partial p_0} 

503: +E_\np\frac{\partial B}{\partial p_0}

504: -\frac{\np^2}{E_\np}\frac{\partial C}{\partial p_0} 

505: \right|_{p_0=E_\np}\ .

506: \end{equation}

507: 

508: After some algebra the following first-order expression for the

509: HF wave function is obtained

510: \begin{equation} \label{A1}

511: \widetilde \psi_{\nk,s}(\np)

512: \simeq

513: \sqrt{\frac{m}{E_\np}}

514: \left[ 1

515:      +m\frac{A_0(\np)+C_0(\np)}{E_\np}

516:       \frac{E_\np\gamma_0-m}{2E_\np}

517:      +\frac12\alpha(\np)

518: \right] u_s(\np,m) \delta_{\nk,\np}\ .

519: \end{equation}

520: 

521: The above expansion transparently displays the effect of the self-energy on 

522: the free wave function.

523: Indeed the second term in the square brackets of Eq.~(\ref{A1}) corresponds 

524: to a negative-energy component with momentum $\np$. 

525: Thus, within the OBE potential approach the renormalized HF spinors in the

526: nuclear medium are characterized by two new elements with respect to

527: the bare $u_s(\np,m)$: the term

528: $(E_\np\gamma_0-m)u_s(\np,m)$, directly connected with the negative-energy

529: components in the wave function, and the term $\alpha(\np)$, arising from

530: the field strength renormalization $\sqrt{Z_2(\np)}$.

531: However, the negative energy component does not contribute

532: to the momentum distribution in first order, where one simply gets

533: \be

534: \widetilde n(\np)\simeq 2 V \left[1+\alpha(\np)\right]\theta(k_F-p) \ .

535: \label{np1}

536: \ee

537: 

538: The explicit expression for the first order expansion of the 

539: function $\alpha(\np)\equiv\alpha(p)=\sum_i\alpha_i(p)$ is

540: given in the Appendix.

541: Note that the Hartree self-energy of the $\omega$ and $\sigma$ 

542: does not contribute to $\alpha$.

543: The unitarity condition of Eq.~(\ref{intZ2}) becomes

544: \ba

545: 2 V \int \frac{d\np}{(2\pi)^3} Z_2(\np) \theta(\widetilde k_F-p) &=&

546: \frac{V\widetilde k_F^3}{3\pi^2}+\frac{V}{\pi^2} 

547: \int_0^{\widetilde k_F} p^2 dp \alpha(p) = Z\ ,

548: \label{intZ2pi}

549: \ea

550: which is certainly satisfied by $\widetilde k_F=k_F$, because

551: the function $\alpha$ exactly satisfies 

552: \begin{equation}

553: \label{unitarity}

554: \int_0^{k_F}{\rm d}p\, p^2 \alpha(p)=0

555: \end{equation}

556: (see Appendix). 

557: We have numerically checked that there is no other value of

558: $\widetilde k_F$ for which the number of particles is $Z$.

559: Therefore {\em to first order in $g_i^2$ the Fermi momentum is not affected 

560: by the Hartree-Fock field}. This means that the present calculation

561: respects not only Lorentz covariance, but also unitarity.

562: 

563: %----------------

564: %    Figure 1

565: %----------------

566: \begin{figure}[th]

567: \begin{center}

568: \leavevmode

569: % scala la figura di  un fattore 0.8:

570: \def\epsfsize#1#2{0.7#1}

571: \epsfbox[160 320 440 720]{fig1.ps}

572: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=fig1.ps,height=1.1\textheight}}

573: \end{center}

574: \caption{The ratio $\widetilde m(\np)/m$ of Eq.~(\protect\ref{m-expansion}) 

575: (upper panel)

576: and the momentum distribution per unit volume of Eq.~(\protect\ref{np1}) 

577: (lower panel) are plotted

578: versus the nucleon momentum divided by the Fermi momentum ($k_F$=250 MeV/c). 

579: The results obtained by taking into account one single meson

580: (pion: dashed; rho: double-dashed, omega: dotted; sigma: dot-dashed)

581: are displayed together with the

582: total result (solid). The mesonic parameters are~\protect{\cite{Mac01}}: 

583: $m_\pi$=139.6 MeV/c,

584: $m_\rho$=770 MeV/c,

585: $m_\omega$=782 MeV/c,

586: $m_\sigma$=550 MeV/c,

587: $g_\pi^2/4\pi^2$=13.6,

588: $g_\rho^2/4\pi^2$=0.84, $a_\rho$=6.1,

589: $g_\omega^2/4\pi^2$=20,

590: $g_\sigma^2/4\pi^2$=7.78,

591: $\Lambda_\pi$=1720 MeV/c,

592: $\Lambda_\rho$=1310 MeV/c,

593: $\Lambda_\omega$=1500 MeV/c,

594: $\Lambda_\sigma$=2500 MeV/c .

595: }

596: \end{figure}

597: 

598: 

599: In Fig.~1 we plot the first order Dirac mass of Eq.~(\ref{m-expansion}) 

600: (top panel) and the first order momentum distribution of

601: Eq.~(\ref{np1}) (bottom panel) as functions of $p/k_F$ for $k_F$=250 MeV/c.

602: The separate contributions of the various mesons

603: are displayed. In the present calculation we empirically account for

604: the short-range physics through the meson-nucleon form factors 

605: $F_i(\nk)=\frac{\Lambda_i^2-m_i^2}{\Lambda_i^2+\nk^2}$ which cut off the

606: nucleon-nucleon interaction in a spatial region of size $\sim 1/\Lambda_i$.

607: Actually, for sake of simplicity, we have

608: approximated their effect by multiplying the self-energy 

609: associated with each meson by a constant factor (1 for the pion, 0.9 for the

610: sigma, 0.5 for the omega and 0.4 for the rho): the form factors are indeed 

611: slowly varying functions of the meson momentum in the integration domain.

612: The figure shows that the most sizable contribution to the

613: Dirac mass arises from the 

614: $\sigma$-meson, which reduces the mass by about 30$\%$, whereas the impact

615: of the other mesons is at most 10$\%$

616: (in particular the pion induces a negligible increase of the mass): the total

617: effect in the present model is a reduction of the mass by about a factor 0.6,

618: in accord with the findings of Refs.~\cite{Ser86,Ana81,Sch01}. It is also

619: remarkable that the $p$-dependence of the Dirac mass is almost negligible.

620: 

621: As far as the momentum distribution is concerned, it appears that the

622: $\sigma$, carrying an attractive interaction,

623: induces a depletion of the baryonic density at low

624: momenta and an enhacement of the latter in the vicinity of the Fermi

625: surface, in contrast with the effect of the other mesons.

626: It is interesting to note that the size of the

627: Fock contribution in the momentum distribution decreases as the meson

628: mass increases. This is in agreement with the fact that, at least for quasielastic inclusive electroweak responses modeled as we do here, the forces carried by the heavier mesons can be reasonably well approximated by four-fermion point interactions.

629: In this case the HF approximation can be expressed as a linear combination of

630: Hartree terms, which, as previously mentioned, do not affect the 

631: momentum distribution. Furthermore, and notably, the contributions arising 

632: from $\rho$, $\sigma$ and $\omega$ cancel almost exactly.

633: Thus the net effect of the full interaction

634: coincides with the one obtained with the pion alone, and it amounts

635: to an

636: increase of the nucleon momentum density by about 1\% for $p\simeq 0$ and to a

637: decrease of it by almost the same amount for $p\simeq k_F$, in such a

638: way that the number of nucleons is conserved, according to the

639: unitarity condition of Eq.~(\ref{intZ2}). 

640: It is worth noticing that the reduction of the

641: momentum distribution near the Fermi surface due to relativistic HF

642: correlations is of the same size as the one arising from 

643: short-range correlations of Jastrow type only,

644: found in Refs.~\cite{Fab01,Maz02} in the spectroscopic

645: factors of quasi-hole valence states.  Note, however, that this

646: effect is very small compared with that expected from 

647: a more sophysticated non-relativistic modeling of short-range 

648: correlations \cite{Mut00}, 

649: although one cannot make this statement with certainty in a relativistic context, since a relativistic version of Brueckner HF is even more challenging 

650: to carry out than relativistic HF and both constitute work for the future.

651: 

652: %----------------

653: %    Figure 2

654: %----------------

655: \begin{figure}[th]

656: \begin{center}

657: \leavevmode

658: % scala la figura di  un fattore 0.8:

659: \def\epsfsize#1#2{0.7#1}

660: \epsfbox[160 320 440 720]{fig2.ps}

661: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=fig2.ps,height=1.1\textheight}}

662: \end{center}

663: \caption{The ratio $\widetilde m(\np)/m$ of Eq.~(\protect\ref{m-expansion}) 

664: (upper panel)

665: and the momentum distribution per unit volume of Eq.~(\protect\ref{np1}) 

666: (lower panel) are plotted

667: versus $p/k_F$ for $k_F$=200 MeV/c (solid), 

668:  $k_F$=250 MeV/c (dashed) and $k_F$=300 MeV/c (dotted). 

669: }

670: \end{figure}

671: 

672: In Fig.~2 the same observables displayed in Fig.~1, 

673: the contributions of all the mesons being included, are shown for three values of the Fermi

674: momentum: $k_F=200$ (solid), 250 (dashed) and 300 (dotted) MeV/c.

675: It appears that the effect of the mesonic HF field on both the Dirac

676: mass and the momentum distribution increases with the density and it is

677: roughly proportional to $k_F^3$.

678: However the origin of this dependence is different in the two cases, due to the

679: different role played by the various mesons.

680: Indeed the Dirac mass essentially stems from the $\sigma$ and $\omega$,

681: whereas the baryonic momentum density is significantly affected by all the four mesons.

682: 

683: A simple analysis of the $k_F$-dependence of the OBE contributions to

684: $\widetilde m(\np)$ and $\widetilde n(\np)$ can be performed

685: through an expansion in the small parameter $\eta_F=k_F/m$,

686: whose typical value is $\sim$ 1/4. 

687: Such an expansion has been successfully applied to the study of inclusive

688: and exclusive electron scattering both for free and correlated nuclear 

689: systems~\cite{Ama96,Jes98,Ama98,Ama99,Alv01}. 

690: Remarkably, the $\eta_F$ expansion has been shown to be very useful for 

691: exploring the role of chiral pion dynamics in nuclear matter~\cite{Kai02_1,Kai02_2}. 

692: 

693: When performing this expansion one should pay attention to the fact that the

694: pion is much lighter than the other mesons: this induces a different 

695: $k_F$-dependence for the pionic contributions, since $k_F/m_\pi$ cannot

696: be treated as a small parameter. In fact it is easy to show

697: that the heavy mesons' contributions to 

698: $\widetilde m(\np)$ go as $k_F^3$ (the

699: pion contribution is negligible). On the other hand in 

700: $\widetilde n$

701: the pionic effect grows as $k_F^3$, while the heavy

702: mesons contribute as $k_F^5$. We recall that the $\sigma$, $\omega$ and $\rho$ 

703: almost cancel in the momentum distribution (see Fig.~1).

704: 

705: It is of importance to notice that the physics of real nuclei roughly corresponds

706: to the range $200\leq k_F\leq 250$ MeV/c: here our prediction for the Dirac mass,

707: $\widetilde{m}$, is close to the one for the effective mass~\cite{Cel86,Mar96}.

708: It is only for larger $k_F$ that the two quantities start to differ substantially.

709: 

710: Finally, it is also interesting to note that the momentum distribution $\widetilde n(p)$

711: coincides with the free one, $n(p)=2$, for a value of $p/k_F$, 

712: which is independent of both the specific meson and the value of $k_F$ 

713: (see Figs.~1 and 2). This finding can

714: again be interpreted on the basis of the above-mentioned expansion,

715: which shows that the function $\alpha$ vanishes for $p\simeq \sqrt{3/5} k_F$.

716: 

717: Before drawing our conclusions we would like to address the issue

718: of the relevance of our findings on physical observables. In this regard

719: we have shown in Refs.~\cite{Ama01,Ama02} that the effect on the

720: electromagnetic response functions including pionic correlations

721: due to the modification of the momentum

722: distribution is negligible (see in particluar Fig.~13 in \cite{Ama02}).

723: One could not say this a priori and so an important conclusion of that work plus the deeper understanding presented in this letter is that at the level where relativity is dealt with in a consistent way such correlations appear under typical circumstances to be perturbatively small.

724: 

725: In summary, in this letter we have presented a relativistic analysis

726: of the single-particle properties of nuclear matter in HF

727: approximation within a meson-exchange model.  In particular, we have

728: focused on the role played by the pion, rho, omega and sigma on the

729: Dirac mass of the nucleon and on the momentum distribution.  Whereas

730: the momentum distribution is not affected by HF field in a

731: non-relativistic framework, in the relativistic case it is slightly

732: modified due to the renormalization of the spinors. In this work we

733: have quantified this effect to first order in the coupling constant

734: where the HF equations can be solved analytically.  Using this

735: solution we have demonstrated that the field strength renormalization

736: function exactly satisfies unitarity at this order.

737:  

738: 

739: Moreover, whereas for the  Dirac mass, as is well known, the effect

740: of HF mesonic correlations amounts to about 30-40\% and mainly arises

741: from the $\sigma$ and

742: $\omega$ mesons, we have shown that in the momentum distribution 

743: a cancellation among

744: the heavier mesons occurs and the total result basically coincides

745: with the pionic contribution, which amounts to a 1-3\% effect,

746: depending upon the density.

747: 

748: \subsection*{Acknowledgments}

749: 

750: This work was partially supported by funds provided by DGICYT (Spain)

751: under Contract Nos. PB/98-1111, PB/98-0676 and PB/98-1367 and the Junta de 

752: Andaluc\'{\i}a (Spain) and by the INFN-CICYT exchange, as well as by

753: the U.S. Department of Energy under cooperative research agreement

754: No. DE-FC02-94ER40818. M.B.B. acknowledges MEC (Spain)

755: for a sabbatical stay at University of Sevilla (Ref. SAB2001-0025).

756: 

757: \appendix

758: 

759: \section{Appendix}

760: 

761: The functions $A,B,C$ of Eq.~(\ref{spin})

762: can be expressed in terms of the integrals

763: \begin{eqnarray}

764: I(P,m_i) &\equiv&

765: \int\frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3}\theta(k_F-k)

766: \frac{1}{2E_\nk}

767: \frac{1}{(P-K)^2-m_i^2} \ ,

768: \label{I}

769: \\

770: L^{\mu}(P,m_i) &\equiv&

771: \int\frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3}\theta(k_F-k)

772: \frac{1}{2E_\nk}

773: \frac{K^{\mu}}{(P-K)^2-m_i^2}\ ,

774: \label{Lmu}

775: \\

776: L^{\mu\nu}(P,m_i) &\equiv&

777: \int\frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3}\theta(k_F-k)

778: \frac{1}{2E_\nk}

779: \frac{K^{\mu} K^{\nu}}{(P-K)^2-m_i^2}\ ,

780: \label{Lmunu}

781: \end{eqnarray}

782: through the following relations

783: \footnote{

784: ${\bf L}$ is parallel to ${\bf p}$ since, choosing ${\bf p}$ along the $z$

785: axis, the azimuthal integration in Eq.~(\ref{Lmu}) yields $L_1=L_2=0$.}:

786: \begin{eqnarray}

787: A_\pi(P) &=&

788: \frac{3 g_\pi^2}{2}

789: \left[I(P,m_\pi)-\frac{P_\mu L^\mu(P,m_\pi)}{m^2}+

790: \frac{P^2-m^2}{2m^2} I(P,m_\pi)

791: \right] \ ,

792: \label{Api-definition}\\ 

793: B_\pi(P) &=&

794: \frac{3 g_\pi^2}{2}

795: \left[I(P,m_\pi)-\frac{P_\mu L^\mu(P,m_\pi)}{m^2}+

796: \frac{P^2-m^2}{2m^2}

797: \frac{L_0(P,m_\pi)}{p_0}

798: \right] \ ,

799: \label{Bpi-definition}\\ 

800: C_\pi (P) &=&

801: \frac{3 g_\pi^2}{2}

802: \left[I(P,m_\pi)-\frac{P_\mu L^\mu(P,m_\pi)}{m^2}+

803: \frac{P^2-m^2}{2m^2}\frac{L_3(P,m_\pi)}{p}

804: \right] 

805: \label{Cpi-definition}

806: \end{eqnarray}

807: for the pion,

808: \begin{eqnarray}

809: A_\rho(P) &=&

810: 6 g_\rho^2

811: \left[(2+3 a_\rho+3a_\rho^2)I(P,m_\rho)

812: -3a_\rho(1+a_\rho)\frac{P_\mu L^\mu(P,m_\rho)}{m^2}

813: \right.

814: \nonumber\\

815: &+&

816: \left.\frac{3a_\rho^2}{2m^2}(P^2-m^2)I(P,m_\rho)

817: \right] \ ,

818: \label{Arho-definition}\\ 

819: B_\rho(P) &=&

820: 6 g_\rho^2

821: \left\{(3 a_\rho+2a_\rho^2)I(P,m_\rho)-

822: \frac{a_\rho^2}{m^2} P_\mu 

823: \left[2 L^\mu(P,m_\rho)-\frac{L^{0\mu}(P,m_\rho)}{p_0}\right]\right.

824: \nonumber\\

825: &-&

826: \left.

827: \left[1+3a_\rho+a_\rho^2-\frac{a_\rho^2}{2m^2}(P^2-m^2)\right]

828: \frac{L_0(P,m_\rho)}{p_0}\right\} \ ,

829: \label{Brho-definition}\\ 

830: C_\rho(P) &=& 6 g_\rho^2 \left\{(3 a_\rho+2a_\rho^2)I(P,m_\rho)-

831: \frac{a_\rho^2}{m^2} P_\mu \left[2

832: L^\mu(P,m_\rho)-\frac{L^{3\mu}(P,m_\rho)}{p} \right] \right.

833: \nonumber\\ &-& \left.

834: \left[1+3a_\rho+a_\rho^2-\frac{a_\rho^2}{2m^2}(P^2-m^2)\right]

835: \frac{L_3(P,m_\rho)}{p}\right\}

836: \label{Crho-definition}

837: \end{eqnarray}

838: for the rho,

839: \begin{eqnarray}

840: A_\omega(P) &=&

841: 4 g_\omega^2 I(P,m_\omega) \ ,

842: \label{Aomega-definition}\\ 

843: B_\omega(P) &=&

844: 2 g_\omega^2

845: \left[\frac{k_F^3}{3 p_0\pi^2

846: m_\omega^2}-\frac{L_0(P,m_\omega)}{p_0}\right]\ ,

847: \label{Bomega-definition}\\ 

848: C_\omega(P) &=&

849: -2 g_\omega^2

850: \frac{L_3(P,m_\omega)}{p}

851: \label{Comega-definition}

852: \end{eqnarray}

853: for the omega and

854: \begin{eqnarray}

855: A_\sigma(P) &=&

856: - g_\sigma^2 \left[I(P,m_\sigma)+\frac{1}{\pi^2 m_\sigma^2}

857: \left(k_F E_F-m^2\ln\frac{k_F+E_F}{m}\right)\right] \ ,

858: \label{Asigma-definition}\\ 

859: B_\sigma(P) &=&

860: - g_\sigma^2 \frac{L_0(P,m_\sigma)}{p_0} \ ,

861: \label{Bsigma-definition}\\ 

862: C_\sigma(P) &=&

863: - g_\sigma^2

864: \frac{L_3(P,m_\sigma)}{p}

865: \label{Csigma-definition}

866: \end{eqnarray}

867: for the sigma.

868: 

869: The corresponding expression for the functions $\alpha_i$

870: (see Eq.~(\ref{alpha})), with

871: $\alpha=\sum_{i=\pi,\rho,\omega,\sigma} \alpha_i$, is

872: \begin{equation}

873: \label{alphai}

874: \alpha_i(p)=

875: \frac{m_i^2 g_i^2}{4\pi^2 E_\np} 

876: \int_0^{k_F} dk \frac{k^2}{E_\nk}

877: \,\frac{E_\nk-E_\np}{\gamma_i^2(p,k)-4 p^2 k^2}

878: \, f_i(p,k) \ ,

879: \end{equation}

880: where

881: \begin{equation}

882: \gamma_i(p,k) \equiv (E_\np-E_\nk)^2-

883: p^2-k^2-m_i^2=2m^2-m_i^2-2E_\np E_\nk

884: \label{gamma}

885: \end{equation}

886: and  the functions $f_i(p,k)$ are defined as 

887: \begin{eqnarray}

888: \label{alphapi}

889: f_\pi(p,k) &=& 3 \ ,

890: \\

891: f_\rho(p,k) &=& 3

892: \left[

893: 2(1+6 a_\rho+4 a_\rho^2)+a_\rho^2\frac{m_\rho^2}{m^2}+4\frac{m^2}{m_\rho^2}

894: \right.

895: \nonumber

896: \\

897: &+& \left. 

898: \left(2+6a_\rho+a_\rho^2\frac{m_\rho^2}{m^2}\right)

899: \frac{\gamma_\rho^2(p,k)-4 p^2 k^2}{4 k p m_\rho^2 }

900: \ln\frac{\gamma_\rho(p,k)+2 k p}{\gamma_\rho(p,k)-2 k p}\right]

901: \ ,

902: \\

903: f_\omega(p,k) &=& 2

904: \left[1+2\frac{m^2}{m_\omega^2}

905: + \frac{\gamma_\omega^2(p,k)-4 p^2 k^2}{2 k p m_\omega^2} 

906: \ln\frac{\gamma_\omega(p,k)+2 k p}{\gamma_\omega(p,k)-2 k p}\right]

907: \ ,

908: \\

909: f_\sigma(p,k) &=& 

910: 1-4\frac{m^2}{m_\sigma^2}

911: +\frac{\gamma_\sigma^2(p,k)-4 p^2 k^2}{4 k p m_\sigma^2} 

912: \ln\frac{\gamma_\sigma(p,k)+2 k p}{\gamma_\sigma(p,k)-2 k p}

913: \ .

914: \end{eqnarray}

915: The meson-nucleon form factors have been neglected for simplicity. Their

916: impact on the results is discussed in the text.  Using the above

917: expressions, the unitarity condition of Eq.~(\ref{unitarity}) follows

918: since the functions $f_i(p,k)$ are all symmetrical under the exchange of

919: $p$ and $k$, hence

920: \begin{equation}

921: \int_0^{k_F} dp p^2 \alpha_i(p) 

922: = 

923: \frac{m_i^2 g_i^2}{4\pi^2}

924: \int_0^{k_F} dp 

925: \int_0^{k_F} dk \,\frac{p^2k^2}{ E_\np E_\nk}

926: \,\frac{E_\nk-E_\np}{\gamma_i^2(p,k)-4 p^2 k^2}

927: \, f_i(p,k) 

928: =0 \ .

929: \end{equation}

930: 

931: 

932: 

933: 

934: %===============================

935: \begin{thebibliography}{Expo92}

936: %===============================

937: 

938: \bibitem{Fet71}  A.L. Fetter, J.D. Walecka,

939:                  Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems,

940:                  McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.

941: 

942: \bibitem{Mut00}  H. M\"uther, A. Polls, 

943:                  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 45} (2000) 243.

944: 

945: \bibitem{Fan84}  S. Fantoni, V. Pandharipande,

946:                 Nucl. Phys. A 427 (1984) 473.

947: 

948: \bibitem{Dic92} W. Dickhoff, H. M\"uther, 

949:                 Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 55} (1992) 1947.

950:  

951: \bibitem{Ama01} J.E. Amaro, M.B. Barbaro, J.A. Caballero, 

952:                 T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

953:                 Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 697} (2002) 388.

954: 

955: \bibitem{Ama02} J.E. Amaro, M.B. Barbaro, J.A. Caballero, 

956:                 T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

957:                 Phys. Rep. {\bf 368} (2002) 317.

958: 

959: \bibitem{Ser86} B.D. Serot, J.D. Walecka,

960:                 Adv. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 16} (1988) 1.

961: 

962: \bibitem{Cel86}  L.S. Celenza, C. M. Shakin,

963:                  Relativistic Nuclear Physics,

964:                  World Scientific, Singapore, 1986.

965: 

966: \bibitem{Bjo65}  J.D. Bjorken, S.D. Drell,

967:                  Relativistic Quantum Mechanics,

968:                  McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.

969: 

970: \bibitem{Ana81}  M.R. Anastasio, L.S. Celenza, C.M. Shakin,

971:                  Phys. Rev. {\bf 23} (1981) 569.

972: 

973: \bibitem{Pes95}  M.E. Peskin, D. V. Schroeder,

974:                  An introduction to quantum field theory,

975:                  Perseus, 1995.

976: 

977: \bibitem{Mac87} R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, Ch. Elster,

978:                 Phys. Rep. {\bf 149}, No. 1 (1987) 1.

979: 

980: \bibitem{Sch01} E. Schiller, H. M\"uther,

981:                 Eur. Phys. Jour. {\bf A11} (2001) 15.

982: 

983: \bibitem{Fab01} A. Fabrocini, G. Co',

984:                 Phys. Rev. {\bf C63}, 044302 (2001). 

985: 

986: \bibitem{Maz02} M. Mazziotta, J.E. Amaro, F. Arias de Saavedra, 

987:                 Phys. Rev. {\bf C65}, 034602 (2002). 

988: 

989: \bibitem{Ama96} J.E. Amaro, J.A. Caballero, T.W. Donnelly,

990:                 A.M. Lallena, E. Moya de Guerra, J.M. Udias,

991:                 Nucl. Phys. {\bf A602} (1996) 263.

992: 

993: \bibitem{Jes98} S. Jeschonnek, T.W. Donnelly, 

994:                 Phys. Rev. {\bf C57} (1998) 2438.

995: 

996: \bibitem{Ama98} J.E. Amaro, M.B. Barbaro, J.A. Caballero, 

997:                 T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

998:                 Nucl. Phys. {\bf A643} (1998) 349.

999: 

1000: \bibitem{Ama99} J.E. Amaro, M.B. Barbaro, J.A. Caballero, 

1001:                 T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

1002:                 Nucl. Phys. {\bf A657} (1999) 161.

1003: 

1004: \bibitem{Alv01} L. \'Alvarez-Ruso, M.B. Barbaro, T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

1005:                 Phys. Lett. {\bf B497} (2001) 214.

1006: 

1007: \bibitem{Kai02_1} N. Kaiser, S. Fritsch, W. Weise, 

1008:                  Nucl.Phys. {\bf A700} (2002) 343.

1009: 

1010: \bibitem{Kai02_2} N. Kaiser, S. Fritsch, W. Weise,

1011:                  Nucl.Phys. {\bf A697} (2002) 255.

1012: 

1013: \bibitem{Mar96} M.B. Barbaro, A. De Pace, T.W. Donnelly, A. Molinari,

1014:                 Nucl. Phys. {\bf A596} (1996) 553.

1015: 

1016: \bibitem{Mac01} R. Machleidt,

1017:                 Phys. Rev. {\bf C63}, 024001 (2001). 

1018: 

1019: \end{thebibliography}

1020: 

1021: \end{document}

1022: 

1023: 

1024: 

1025: 

1026: 

1027: 

1028: 

1029: