1: \begin{filecontents}{leer.eps}
2: %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0
3: %%CreationDate: Mon Jul 13 16:51:17 1992
4: %%DocumentFonts: (atend)
5: %%Pages: 0 1
6: %%BoundingBox: 72 31 601 342
7: %%EndComments
8:
9: gsave
10: 72 31 moveto
11: 72 342 lineto
12: 601 342 lineto
13: 601 31 lineto
14: 72 31 lineto
15: showpage
16: grestore
17: %%Trailer
18: %%DocumentFonts: Helvetica
19: \end{filecontents}
20: %
21: %\documentclass[epj,referee]{svjour}
22: \documentclass[epj]{svjour}
23: % Remove option referee for final version
24: %
25: % Remove any % below to load the required packages
26: %\usepackage{latexsym}
27: \usepackage{graphics}
28: % etc
29: %
30: \begin{document}
31: %
32: \title{Exclusive and semi-inclusive strangeness and
33: charm production in $\pi N$ and $NN$ reactions \thanks{
34: Supported by DFG, RFFI and Forschugszentrum J\"ulich.}}
35: \author{A.M.~Gasparyan\inst{1,2}, V.Yu.~Grishina\inst{3},
36: L.A.~Kondratyuk\inst{1,2}, W.~Cassing\inst{4}, J.~Speth\inst{1}}
37: %
38: %
39: \institute{IKP, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich, D-52425 J\"ulich, Germany \and
40: Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B.~Cheremushkinskaya 25,
41: 117259 Moscow, Russia\and Institute for Nuclear Research, 60th October
42: Anniversary Prospect 7A, 117312 Moscow, Russia\and Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of
43: Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16, D-35392 Giessen, Germany }
44: %
45: \date{Received: date / Revised version: date}
46: % The correct dates will be entered by Springer
47:
48: \abstract{Using the Quark-Gluon Strings Model (QGSM) combined with
49: Regge phenomenology we consider the reactions $\pi^- p \to K^0
50: \Lambda$ and $\pi^- p \to D^- \Lambda_c^+$ which are dominated by
51: the contributions of the $K^*$ and $D^*$ Regge trajectories,
52: respectively. The spin structure of the amplitudes is described
53: by introducing Reggeized Born terms. It is found that the
54: existing data for the reaction $\pi^- p \to K^0 \Lambda$ are in
55: reasonable agreement with the model predictions. To describe the
56: absolute values of the cross sections it is necessary to introduce
57: also suppression factors which can be related to absorption
58: corrections. Furthermore, assuming the SU(4) symmetry to hold for
59: Regge residues and the universality of absorption corrections we
60: calculate the cross section of the reaction $\pi^- p \to D^-
61: \Lambda_c^+$. Employing the latter results from $\pi^- p$
62: reactions we then estimate the contributions of the pion exchange
63: mechanism to the cross sections of the reactions $NN \to
64: NK\Lambda$ and $NN \to N\bar D \Lambda_c$ and compare them with
65: the contributions of the $K$ and $D$ exchanges. We find that the
66: $NN$ reactions are dominated not by pion exchange but by $K$ and
67: $D$ exchanges, respectively. Moreover, assuming the SU(4) symmetry
68: to hold approximately for the coupling constants $g_{ND
69: \Lambda_c}$ = $g_{NK \Lambda}$ we analyze also the production of
70: leading $\Lambda_c$ hyperons in the reaction $NN \to \Lambda_c X$.
71: It is shown that the non-perturbative mechanism should give an
72: essential contribution to the $\Lambda_c$ yield for $x \geq 0.5$.}
73:
74: \PACS{
75: {13.85.Fb}{Inelastic scattering: two-particle final states} \and
76: {13.85.Hd}{Inelastic scattering: many-particle final states} \and
77: {14.20.Lq}{Charmed baryons} \and
78: {14.40.Lb}{Charmed mesons}
79: }
80: % end of PACS codes
81: %}
82: %end of abstract
83: %
84: \authorrunning{A. M. Gasparyan et al.}
85:
86: \titlerunning{Exclusive and semi-inclusive strangeness and charm production...}
87:
88: \maketitle
89:
90: Recently it has been argued \cite{Cassing2001} that the open
91: charm enhancement observed in nucleus-nucleus collisions
92: \cite{Abreu2000} at the SPS might be due to secondary reaction
93: mechanisms such as $\pi N\to \bar D \Lambda_c$ or $NN \to N\bar D
94: \Lambda_c$. In this work we present estimates of these elementary
95: cross sections using the anology with strangeness production in
96: $\pi N$ and $NN$ collisions. We consider also semi-inclusive $
97: \Lambda$ and $\Lambda_c$ production in the reactions $NN \to N X
98: \Lambda$ and $NN \to N X \Lambda_c$.
99:
100: It is well known that the methods of perturbative QCD can not be
101: applied for a calculation of the cross sections mentioned above
102: especially at invariant energies closer to threshold. For the
103: analysis of binary reactions we instead use the nonperturbative
104: Quark-Gluon String model \cite{Kaidalov82} and for reactions with
105: three particles in the final state we employ the meson-exchange
106: model taking into account the exchanges of the lowest meson states
107: - pseudoscalar and vector.
108:
109: The amplitudes for the reactions $\pi N\to K\Lambda$ and $\pi N\to
110: D\Lambda_c$ are calculated using the Reggeized Born term approach
111: (see e.g. Refs. \cite{Irving,Guidal}) with contributions of $K^*$
112: and $D^*$ Regge trajectories, respectively. The parameters of the
113: trajectories are taken from Ref. \cite{Boreskov}, whereas for the
114: coupling constants we assume SU(4) symmetry as suggested recently
115: by Lin and Ko \cite{Lin}. With these parameters the energy
116: dependence of the total $\pi^-p\to K^+\Lambda$ cross section
117: (solid line in Fig. \ref{piN}) as well as the $t$-dependence of
118: the differential $\pi^- p\to K^+\Lambda$ cross section are
119: described rather well, except for the region close to threshold
120: where the dominant contribution stems from the well established
121: $s$- and $p$-wave resonances \cite{Feuster}. We note that to
122: obtain the absolute value of the cross section one has to
123: introduce a suppression factor of $\sim 0.4$, which can be
124: interpreted as an absorption correction. Assuming its universality
125: we will introduce the same suppression factor for charm
126: production, too. The resulting total cross section of the reaction
127: $\pi^- p\to D^-\Lambda_c^+$ is shown by the dashed line in Fig.
128: \ref{piN}.
129:
130: \begin{figure}
131: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!} {%
132: \includegraphics{klam.eps}
133: } \caption{Total cross section for the reaction $\pi^- p \to K^+
134: \Lambda$ (solid line) and $\pi^- p\to D^-\Lambda_c^+$ (dashed
135: line) as a function of the invariant energy above thresholds in
136: comparison to the data from Ref. \protect\cite{Baldini}.}
137: \label{piN}
138: \end{figure}
139:
140: Our next step is to study $NN$ reactions where we first apply our
141: model to strangeness production. Using the method of Yao
142: \cite{Yao} one can express the $\pi$-exchange cross section for
143: the reaction $pp \to pK^+\Lambda$ in terms of the $g_{NN \pi}$
144: coupling constant and the $\pi^0 p \to K^+ \Lambda$ cross section
145: as
146: \begin{eqnarray}
147: &&\nonumber\sigma =\frac {g^2_{NN \pi}} {8 {\pi}^2 p_i^2 s} \int
148: _{W_{min}}^{W_{max}} k \ W^2 \ \sigma (\pi^0 p \to K^+ \Lambda,
149: W) \ dW \times \nonumber \\ &&\times \int
150: _{t_{min}(W)}^{t^{max}(W)} F^4_\pi(t) \frac{1}{(t-m_\pi^2)^2} \ t
151: \ dt,\label{fyao}
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: where $W$ is the c.m. energy in the $K^+ \Lambda$ subsystem and
154: $t$ is the 4-momentum transfer squared between the initial and
155: final baryons. The form factor was chosen to be of the standard
156: monopole type:
157: $F_\pi(t)=(\Lambda_\pi^2-m_\pi^2)/(\Lambda_\pi^2-t)$ with
158: $\Lambda_\pi=1.3$ GeV. A similar expression -- but with
159: $\sigma(K^+p)$ -- can be written for the $K$-exchange. For the
160: $K^+p$ elastic cross section employed in this case we use the
161: parametrization of Cugnon et al. \cite{Cugnon}.
162:
163:
164: The total cross section of the reaction $p p \to K^+ \Lambda p$ as
165: a function of the laboratory momentum $p_{lab}$ is shown in Fig.
166: \ref{pppkl}. The dashed and solid lines describe the $\pi$- and
167: $K$-exchange contributions, respectively, with the cutoff
168: $\Lambda_{K}$ = 1.0 GeV. An interesting observation is that the
169: pion-exchange contribution is substantially smaller than the
170: $K$-exchange and can be neglected especially at higher energies.
171: The reason for that is a difference in the energy dependence of
172: the elementary cross sections: $\sigma(\pi^-p\to K\Lambda)$ falls
173: off with energy whereas $\sigma(K^+p)$ is almost constant since it
174: is dominated by Pomeron exchange. Moreover, the $K$-exchange alone
175: is able to reproduce the experimental data when choosing the
176: cutoff $\Lambda_K=1.0$ GeV.
177:
178: \begin{figure}
179: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{%
180: \includegraphics{1.eps}
181: } \caption{The total cross section for the reaction $p p \to K^+
182: \Lambda p$ as a function of proton laboratory momentum $p_{lab}$.
183: The dashed line denotes the $\pi$-exchange contribution while the
184: solid line corresponds to the $K$-exchange with the cutoff
185: $\Lambda_{K}$=1.0 GeV} \label{pppkl}
186: \end{figure}
187:
188:
189: We see that using the approach of Yao \cite{Yao} we can express
190: the cross section for the reaction $pp \to K^+ p \Lambda $ through
191: the coupling constant $g_{ K^+ p \Lambda }$ and the elastic $K^+
192: p$ scattering cross section $\sigma_{el} (K^+p)$. Similarly, the
193: cross section for the leading $\Lambda$ production in the reaction
194: $pp \to X \Lambda $ can be expressed through the same coupling
195: constant and the total $K^+ p$ scattering cross section
196: $\sigma_{tot} (K^+p)$.
197:
198: As follows from Fig.~2 the cross section of the reaction $pp \to
199: K^+ p \Lambda$ is about 40--50 $\mu$b for $p_{lab} \geq 5$GeV/c.
200: The ratio of the cross sections $\sigma_{tot} (K^+p)/ \sigma_{el}
201: (K^+p) \simeq 7-8$. Thus we expect that the cross section for
202: semi-inclusive leading $\Lambda$ production in the reaction $pp
203: \to X \Lambda $ via $K$ exchange should be about
204: $\sigma_{K-exch}(pp \to X \Lambda) \simeq 300-400~ \mu$b.
205: Furthermore, the ratio of the coupling constants $g_{ K^{*+} p
206: \Lambda }/ g_{ K^+ p \Lambda } \simeq 2$ \cite{Guidal} which
207: implies that the contribution of the $K^*$ exchange to the cross
208: section of the leading $\Lambda$ production might be $\sim $4
209: times larger. Thus we expect the cross section for the
210: semi-inclusive leading $\Lambda$ production to be about
211: $$\sigma_{K-exch}(pp \to X \Lambda) + \sigma_{K*-exch}(pp \to X
212: \Lambda) \simeq 1.5 \div 2 \rm{mb}.$$ We note that Erhan et al.
213: \cite{Erhan} quote total cross sections for the reaction $pp \to
214: \Lambda+X$ of $4.4 \pm 0.2$ and $4.7 \pm 0.2$ mb at $\sqrt{s}=53$
215: and 62 GeV, respectively. This comparison shows that the
216: mechanism considered above gives a dominant contribution to the
217: semi-inclusive leading $\Lambda$ production in the reaction $pp
218: \to X \Lambda $.
219:
220: Using the analogy of strangeness and charm production we can
221: expect that the main contributions to the cross sections of the
222: reactions $NN \to \bar{D}_c (\bar{D}_c^*) \Lambda_c N$ come from
223: the $D_c$ and $D_c^*$ exchanges, respectively. The coupling
224: constants -- involving a charm quark -- can be related to the
225: strange ones using $SU(4)$ symmetry, i.e. $g_{ K N \Lambda }=g_{
226: D_c N \Lambda _c} $ and $g_{ K^{*+} N \Lambda }=g_{ D_c^{*} N
227: \Lambda_c } $. Within the approach of Yao \cite{Yao} we then can
228: express the cross section of the reaction $pp \to \bar{D}_c^0 p
229: \Lambda_c^{+}$ through the coupling constant $g_{ \bar{D}_c^0 p
230: \Lambda_c^+ }$ and the elastic $\bar{D}_c^0 p$ scattering cross
231: section $\sigma_{el} (\bar{D}_c^0 p)$. Similarly, the cross
232: section for the leading $\Lambda_c$ production in the reaction $pp
233: \to X \Lambda_c $ can be expressed through the same coupling
234: constant and the total $\bar{D}_c^0 p$ scattering cross section
235: $\sigma_{tot} (\bar{D}_c^0 p)$.
236:
237: In our calculations we assume $\sigma_{el} (\bar{D}_c^0 p)$ =
238: $\sigma_{el} (K^+p)$ and $\sigma_{tot}
239: (\bar{D}_c^0 p)$ = $\sigma_{tot} (K^+p)$ while the form factor is taken as
240: \begin{equation}
241: \label{ff1} F_D(t) = \Lambda_D^2/( \Lambda_D^2-t). \end{equation}
242: In Fig. \ref{pppdl} we
243: present the total cross section for the reaction $p p \to
244: \bar{D}_c^0 \Lambda_c^+ p$ as a function of the invariant energy
245: above threshold for $\Lambda_{D_c}$=1.5 GeV (dashed line) and
246: $\Lambda_{D_c}$=1.0 GeV (solid line). The dash-dotted line denotes
247: the contribution from the $\pi$-exchange alone. Note, that for
248: the elementary reaction $\pi^0p\to \bar D^0 \Lambda^+_c$ we use
249: the amplitude calculated in the approach discussed above, while
250: for the $\bar D^0 p$ cross section we adopt a value corresponding
251: to the asymptotic $K^+ p$ cross section, i.e. $\sim 3$ mb, which
252: is consistent with the values used in the literature (see e.g.
253: \cite{Cassing00}).
254:
255: We find that the main contribution to the cross section for the
256: reaction $NN \to \bar D \Lambda_c N$ (a few GeV above threshold)
257: comes from the $D_c$ exchange which is much larger than the pion
258: exchange for cut-off parameters $\Lambda_D \geq $ 1 GeV.
259: \begin{figure}
260: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{%
261: \includegraphics{2_new.eps}
262: } \caption{The predicted total cross section for the reaction $p
263: p \to \bar D^0 \Lambda_c^+ p$ as a function of the invariant
264: energy above threshold. The dash-dotted line denotes the
265: contribution from the $\pi$-exchange while the solid line and the
266: dashed line correspond to the $D_c$-exchange with the cutoff
267: $\Lambda_D=1.0$ GeV and $1.5$ GeV, respectively.}
268: \label{pppdl}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271: To find restrictions on the cutoff parameter $\Lambda_D$ in
272: (\ref{ff1}) we use the data from Ref. \cite{Bari} on
273: semi-inclusive $ \Lambda_c$ production in the reaction $pp \to X
274: \Lambda_c$. We assume now that the same $D$-exchange mechanism
275: also gives a large contribution to the semi-inclusive $ \Lambda_c$
276: production at $x$ close to 1. (In fact, in our calculation the
277: cross section is peaked at $x\sim 0.9$). Of course, in this case
278: one has to insert the total $\bar D^0 p$ cross section in the
279: corresponding analog of Eq. (\ref{fyao}). As shown in Fig.
280: \ref{dsig} the $p_t$ dependence of the differential cross section
281: constrains $\Lambda_D$ to $1-1.5$ GeV.
282:
283: \begin{figure}
284: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{%
285: \includegraphics{dsig.eps}
286: }
287: %\vspace{5cm}
288: \caption{The $p_T$ dependence of the differential cross section
289: for the reaction $pp \to X \Lambda_c $ at $\sqrt{s}=62$ GeV. The
290: theoretical curves correspond to the differential cross section
291: $d^2\sigma/dp_t^2dx$ calculated at $x=0.9$ (where it peaks) for
292: the cutoffs $\Lambda_D=1.0$ GeV (solid line), $\Lambda_D=1.3$ GeV
293: (dashed line), $\Lambda_D=1.5$ GeV (dash-dotted line). The results
294: are normalized to the data from \protect\cite{Bari} at small
295: transverse momentum $p_t$. } \label{dsig}
296: \end{figure}
297:
298: To make a rough estimate of the absolute value of the $D$-exchange
299: contribution to the leading $\Lambda_c$ production in the reaction
300: $pp \to X \Lambda_c $ we assume that the total $\bar D^0 p$ cross
301: section is the same as in case of $K^+ p$ scattering, i.e. $\sim
302: 20$ mb. Then at c.m. energies larger than 10 GeV we obtain a cross
303: section of $\sim10-40~ \mu b$ depending on the choice of the
304: cutoff. As in the case of strangeness production the contribution
305: from $D^*$ exchange might be approximately 4 times larger.
306: Therefore, according to our estimates the cross section of the
307: semi-inclusive leading $\Lambda_c$ production at high energy
308: should be as large as $\sim 50-200~ \mu b$. This estimate agrees
309: with the experimental value of $40-200~ \mu b$ at $\sqrt{s}$=62
310: GeV quoted in Ref. \cite{Bari} which implies that the
311: non-perturbative mechanism considered here gives an essential
312: contribution to the leading $\Lambda_c$ production.
313:
314: We finally note, that the same mechanism with $D$ and $D^*$
315: exchanges should provide a similar contribution to the open charm
316: production in $p \bar p$ collisions.
317:
318: \begin{thebibliography}{}
319: \bibitem{Cassing2001}
320: W.~Cassing, L.~A.~Kondratyuk, G.~I.~Lykasov and M.~V. Rzjanin,
321: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 513}, 1 (2001).
322: \bibitem{Abreu2000}
323: M.~C.~Abreu {\it et al.} [NA50 Collaboration],
324: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 14}, 443 (2000).
325: \bibitem{Kaidalov82}
326: A.~B.~Kaidalov,
327: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 12}, 63 (1982).
328: \bibitem{Irving} A.~C.~Irving and R.~P.~Worden, Phys. Rep. {\bf 34}, 117 (1977).
329: \bibitem{Guidal} M.~Guidal, J.-M.~Laget, and M.~Vanderhaeghen,
330: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 627}, 645 (1997).
331: \bibitem{Boreskov}
332: K.~G.~Boreskov and A.~B.~Kaidalov,
333: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 37}, 174 (1983).
334: \bibitem{Lin}
335: Z.~W.~Lin and C.~M.~Ko,
336: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 27}, 617 (2001).
337: \bibitem{Feuster}
338: T.~Feuster and U.~Mosel,
339: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 457 (1998).
340: \bibitem{Baldini}
341: A.~Baldini, V.~Flaminio, W.~G.~Moorhead, D.~R.~Morrison and
342: H.~Schopper, {\it (LANDOLT-BOERNSTEIN. NEW SERIES, 1/12, BERLIN,
343: SPRINGER (1988), 409 P.)}.
344: \bibitem{Yao}
345: T.~Yao, Phys. Rev. {\bf125}, 1048 (1961).
346: \bibitem{Cugnon}
347: J.~Cugnon, P.~Deneye and J.~Vandermeulen,
348: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 41}, 1701 (1990).
349: \bibitem{Erhan} S.~Erhan {\it et al.}
350: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 85}, 447 (1979).
351: \bibitem{Cassing00}
352: W.~Cassing, Y.~S.~Golubeva and L.~A.~Kondratyuk,
353: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 7}, 279 (2000).
354: \bibitem{Bari}
355: G.~Bari {\it et al.},
356: Nuovo Cim.\ A {\bf 104}, 571 (1991).
357: \end{thebibliography}
358: \end{document}
359:
360: #!/bin/csh -f
361: # Uuencoded gz-compressed .tar file created by csh script uufiles
362: # For more info (11/95), see e.g. http://xxx.lanl.gov/faq/uufaq.html
363: # If you are on a unix machine this file will unpack itself: strip
364: # any mail header and call resulting file, e.g., figures.uu
365: # (uudecode ignores these header lines and starts at begin line below)
366: # Then say csh figures.uu
367: # or explicitly execute the commands (generally more secure):
368: # uudecode figures.uu ; gunzip figures.tar.gz ;
369: # tar -xvf figures.tar
370: # On some non-unix (e.g. VAX/VMS), first use editor to change filename
371: # in "begin" line below to figures.tar-gz , then execute
372: # uudecode figures.uu
373: # gzip -d figures.tar-gz
374: # tar -xvf figures.tar
375: #
376: uudecode $0
377: chmod 644 figures.tar.gz
378: gunzip -c figures.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
379: rm $0 figures.tar.gz
380: exit
381:
382: