1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}

3: 

4: \usepackage{epsfig}

5: 

6: \newcommand{\fpi}{f_\pi}

7: \newcommand{\mpi}{m_\pi}

8: \newcommand{\gev}{\, {\rm GeV}}

9: \newcommand{\mev}{\, {\rm MeV}}

10: \newcommand{\fm}{\, {\rm fm}}

11: 

12: \begin{document}

13: 

14: \title{Quenched Chiral Physics in Baryon Masses}

15: 

16: \author{R.~D. YOUNG, D.~B. LEINWEBER and A.~W. THOMAS}

17: 

18: \address{	Special Research Centre for the

19: 		Subatomic Structure of Matter,

20: 		and Department of Physics and Mathematical Physics,

21: 		University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005,

22: 		Australia\\

23: E-mail: ryoung@physics.adelaide.edu.au; dleinweb@physics.adelaide.edu.au; athomas@physics.adelaide.edu.au}

24: 

25: \author{S.~V. WRIGHT}

26: 

27: \address{	Division of Theoretical Physics,

28: 		Department of Mathematical Sciences,\\

29: 		University of Liverpool,

30: 		Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.\\

31: E-mail: svwright@amtp.liv.ac.uk}

32: 

33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

34:  

35: \maketitle

36: 

37: \abstracts{

38: Recent work has identified that the primary differences between

39: quenched and dynamical spectroscopy can be described by chiral loop

40: effects. Here we highlight the features of this study.

41: }

42: 

43: \vspace{-10cm} \hfill \mbox{\small ADP-02-99/T537, LTH564}

44: \vspace{9cm}

45: 

46: \section{Introduction}

47: Chiral symmetry has long been known to play an important role in the

48: low energy properties of QCD. Theoretical studies of the

49: non-perturbative features of QCD, expressed in terms of the fundamental

50: theory, have proven to be most successful in the field of lattice

51: gauge theory. Lattice studies are typically restricted to relatively

52: large values of the $u$ and $d$ masses, where chiral effects are

53: highly suppressed. As a consequence, direct observation of chiral

54: properties is a challenge in lattice simulations. The study of

55: low-lying baryon spectroscopy in both quenched and full QCD has

56: provided a direct connection between lattice results and chiral

57: physics\cite{Young:2001nc,Young:2002cj}.

58: 

59: The fact that one is restricted to quark masses much larger than the

60: physical values means that, in addition to all the usual

61: extrapolations (e.g. to the infinite volume and continuum limits), if

62: one wants to compare with empirical hadron observables, one must also

63: have a reliable method of extrapolation to the chiral limit. Any such

64: extrapolation must incorporate the appropriate chiral corrections,

65: arising from Goldstone boson loops, which give rise to rapid,

66: non-linear variations as the chiral limit is approached. The

67: importance of incorporating such behaviour has been successfully

68: demonstrated for a number of hadronic observables, see

69: Ref.~[3] for a review and the references

70: contained therein.

71: 

72: The quenched approximation is a widely used tool for studying

73: non-perturbative QCD within numerical simulations of lattice gauge

74: theory. With an appropriate choice of the lattice scale and at

75: moderate to heavy quark masses, this approximation has been shown to

76: give only small, systematic deviations from the results of full QCD

77: with dynamical fermions. Although no formal connection has been

78: established between full and quenched QCD, the similarity of the

79: results has led to the belief that the effects of quenching are small

80: and hence that quenched QCD provides a reasonable approximation to the

81: full theory\cite{Aoki:1999yr}. Under a more reliable choice of lattice

82: scale, where chiral effects are negligible, clear differences are

83: observed between quenched and dynamical results\cite{Bernard:2001av}.

84: 

85: 

86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

87: 

88: \section{Chiral Physics and the Quenched Approximation}

89: 

90: Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the ground state of QCD. As

91: a consequence, the pion is a Goldstone boson characteristic of this

92: broken symmetry. The pion mass then behaves as $\mpi^2 \propto m_q$,

93: the well known Gell-Mann--Oakes--Renner (GOR) relation. In principle,

94: this relation is only guaranteed for quark masses near zero. Explicit

95: lattice calculations show that it holds over an enormous range, as

96: high as $m_\pi \sim 1\gev$. These almost massless Goldstone bosons

97: couple strongly to low-lying baryon states --- particularly the

98: nucleon ($N$) and delta ($\Delta$).

99: 

100: Meson-loop diagrams involving Goldstone bosons coupling to baryons

101: give rise to non-analytic behaviour of baryon properties as a function

102: of quark mass. At light quark masses these corrections are large and

103: rapidly varying. At heavy quark masses these contributions are

104: suppressed and hadron properties are smooth, slowly varying functions

105: of quark mass. The scale of this transition is characterised by the

106: inverse size of the pion-cloud source. Below pion masses of about

107: $400$--$500\mev$ these non-analytic contributions become increasingly

108: important, while they rapidly become negligible above this point.

109: Since lattice simulations are typically restricted to the domain where

110: $\mpi\gtrsim 500\mev$, these rapid-varying chiral effects must be

111: incorporated phenomenologically.

112: 

113: Within the quenched approximation dynamical sea quarks are absent from

114: the simulation. As a consequence the structure of meson-loop

115: contributions is modified. In the physical theory of QCD, meson-loop

116: diagrams can be described by two topologically differing types. A

117: typical meson-loop diagram may be decomposed into those where the loop

118: meson contains a sea quark, such as Fig.~\ref{fig:piQF}(a), and those

119: where the loop meson is comprised of pure valence quarks, see

120: Fig.~\ref{fig:piQF}(b). These diagrams involving the sea quark, type

121: (a), are obviously absent in the quenched approximation and

122: consequently only a subset of the contributions to the physical theory

123: are included.  This type of argument, together with SU(6) symmetry,

124: is precisely that described for the evaluation of non-analytic

125: contributions to baryon magnetic moments by

126: Leinweber\cite{Leinweber:2001jc}.  This quark flow approach is

127: analogous to the original approach to chiral perturbation theory for

128: mesons performed by Sharpe\cite{Sharpe:1990me,Sharpe:1992ft}.

129: %

130: \begin{figure}[!t]

131: \begin{center}

132: {\epsfig{file=quarkflow.eps, width=6cm, angle=0}}

133: \caption{Quark flow diagrams of pion loop contributions

134: appearing in QCD.

135: \label{fig:piQF}}

136: \end{center}

137: \end{figure}

138: %

139: 

140: In addition to the usual pion loop contributions, quenched QCD (QQCD)

141: contains loop diagrams involving the flavour singlet $\eta'$ which

142: also give rise to important non-analytic structure. Within full QCD

143: such loops do not play a role in the chiral expansion because the

144: $\eta'$ remains massive in the chiral limit.  On the other hand, in

145: the quenched approximation the $\eta'$ is also a Goldstone

146: boson\cite{Sharpe:1992ft} and the $\eta'$ propagator has the same

147: kinematic structure as that of the pion.

148: 

149: As a consequence there are two new chiral loop contributions unique to

150: the quenched theory. The first of these corresponds to an axial

151: hairpin diagram such as that indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:etaQF}(a).

152: This diagram gives a contribution to the chiral expansion of baryon

153: masses which is non-analytic at order $\mpi^3$. The second of these new

154: $\eta'$ loop diagrams arises from the double hairpin vertex as

155: pictured in Fig.~\ref{fig:etaQF}(b). This contribution is particularly

156: interesting because it involves two Goldstone boson propagators and is

157: therefore the source of more singular non-analytic behaviour -- linear

158: in $\mpi$. In studying the extrapolation of quenched lattice results

159: it is essential to treat these contributions on an equal footing to

160: the pion-loop diagrams discussed earlier.

161: %

162: \begin{figure}[!t]

163: \begin{center}

164: {\epsfig{file=etaquarkflow.eps, width=6cm, angle=0}}

165: \caption{Quark flow diagrams of chiral $\eta'$ loop contributions

166: appearing in QQCD:  

167: (a) axial hairpin, (b) double hairpin.

168: \label{fig:etaQF}}

169: \end{center}

170: \end{figure}

171: %

172: 

173: 

174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

175: 

176: \section{Chiral Extrapolations}

177: In general, the coefficients of the leading (LNA) and next-to leading

178: non-analytic (NLNA) terms in a chiral expansion of baryon masses are

179: very large. For instance, the LNA term for the nucleon mass is $\delta

180: m_N^{(\rm LNA)} = -5.6\, m_\pi^3$ (with $m_\pi$ and $\delta m_N^{(\rm

181: LNA)}$ in GeV). With $m_\pi = 0.5\gev$, quite a low mass for current

182: simulations, this yields $\delta m_N^{(\rm LNA)} =0.7\gev$ --- a huge

183: contribution. Furthermore, in this region hadron masses in both full

184: and quenched lattice QCD are found to be essentially linear in

185: $m_\pi^2$ or equivalently quark mass, whereas $\delta m_N^{(\rm LNA)}$

186: is highly non-linear. The challenge is therefore to ensure the

187: appropriate LNA and NLNA behaviour, {\it with the correct

188: coefficients}, as $m_\pi \rightarrow 0$, while making a sufficiently

189: rapid transition to the linear behaviour of actual lattice data, where

190: $\mpi$ becomes large.

191: 

192: A reliable method for achieving all this was proposed by

193: Leinweber~{\it et~al.}\cite{Leinweber:1999ig}

194: They fit the full (unquenched) lattice data with the form:

195: %

196: \begin{equation}

197: M_B = \alpha_B + \beta_B \mpi^2 + \Sigma_B (\mpi, \Lambda) ,

198: \label{eq:FullFit}

199: \end{equation}

200: %

201: where $\Sigma_B$ is the total contribution from those pion loops which

202: give rise to the LNA and NLNA terms in the self-energy of the

203: baryon. The extension to the case of quenched QCD is achieved by

204: replacing the self-energies, $\Sigma_B$, of the physical theory by the

205: corresponding contributions of the quenched theory\cite{Young:2002cj},

206: $\tilde\Sigma_B$.

207: 

208: The linear term of Eq.~(\ref{eq:FullFit}), which dominates for $m_\pi

209: \gg \Lambda$, models the quark mass dependence of the pion-cloud

210: source --- the baryon without its pion dressing. This term also serves

211: to account for loop diagrams involving heavier mesons, which have much

212: slower variation with quark mass.

213: 

214: The diagrams for the various meson-loop contributions are evaluated

215: using a phenomenological regulator. This regulator has the effect of

216: suppressing the contributions as soon as the pion mass becomes

217: large. At light quark masses the self-energies, $\Sigma_B$, provide

218: the same non-analytic behaviour as $\chi$PT, independent of the choice

219: of regulator. Therefore the functional form, Eq.~(\ref{eq:FullFit}),

220: naturally encapsulates both the light quark limit of $\chi$PT and the

221: heavy quark behaviour observed on the lattice.

222: 

223: We consider the leading order diagrams containing only the lightest

224: Goldstone degrees of freedom. These are responsible for the most rapid

225: non-linear variation as the quark mass is pushed down toward the

226: chiral limit. In the physical theory we consider only those diagrams

227: containing pions, as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:fullSE}.  In QQCD there

228: exist modified pion loop contributions and the additional structures

229: arising from the $\eta'$ behaving as a Goldstone boson. The diagrams

230: contributing to the nucleon self-energy in the quenched approximation

231: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:quenchSE}, the $\Delta$ can be described by

232: analogous diagrams.

233: 

234: \begin{figure}[!t]

235: \begin{center}

236: \mbox{

237: \vspace*{5mm}$ \Sigma_N = $

238: \hspace{1mm}

239: \centering{\

240:         \epsfig{angle=0,figure=SENfat.eps, width=7cm} }

241: }

242: \mbox{\put(-30,20){\large$\pi$}\put(-140,20){\large$\pi$}}

243: 

244: \vspace*{5mm}

245: 

246: \mbox{

247: \vspace*{5mm}$ \Sigma_\Delta = $

248: \hspace{1mm}

249: \centering{\

250:         \epsfig{angle=0,figure=SEDfat.eps, width=7cm} }

251: }

252: \mbox{\put(-30,20){\large$\pi$}\put(-140,20){\large$\pi$}}

253: \caption{Illustrative view of the meson-loop self-energies,

254: $\Sigma_B$, in full QCD. These diagrams give rise to the LNA and NLNA

255: contributions in the chiral expansion. Single (double) lines denote

256: propagation of a $N$ ($\Delta$).

257: \label{fig:fullSE}}

258: \end{center}

259: \end{figure}

260: 

261: \begin{figure}[!t]

262: \begin{center}

263: \mbox{

264: \put(-30,35){$\tilde\Sigma_N = $}

265: \hspace{1mm}

266: \centering{\

267:         \epsfig{angle=0,figure=SENq.eps, width=7cm} }

268: }

269: \mbox{\put(-140,60){\large$\pi$}}\put(-40,60){\large$\pi$}

270: \mbox{\put(-135,20){\large$\eta'$}}\put(-30,20){\large$\eta'$}

271: \caption{Illustrative view of the meson-loop self-energies,

272: $\Sigma_B$, in quenched QCD. These diagrams give rise to the LNA and

273: NLNA contributions in the chiral expansion. A cross represents a

274: hairpin vertex in the $\eta'$ propagator. Single (double) lines denote

275: propagation of a $N$ ($\Delta$).

276: \label{fig:quenchSE}}

277: \end{center}

278: \end{figure}

279: 

280: For the evaluation of the quenched quantities we assume that the

281: parameters of the chiral Lagrangian exhibit negligible differences

282: between quenched and 3-flavour dynamical simulations. This is a

283: working hypothesis with no better guidance yet available, but the

284: successful results of this work demonstrate the self-consistency of

285: such an assumption\cite{Young:2001nc}.  Only with further accurate

286: lattice simulations at light masses will one be able to determine the

287: extent to which our hypothesis holds.

288: 

289: To highlight the differences in the self-energy contributions we show

290: the net contributions to the $\Delta$ in full ($\Sigma_\Delta$) and

291: quenched ($\tilde\Sigma_\Delta$) QCD in Fig.~\ref{fig:seD}. For

292: details of the breakdown of the individual contributions we refer the

293: reader to our longer article\cite{Young:2002cj}.  The significant point

294: to note is that whereas the meson cloud of the $\Delta$ is attractive

295: in full QCD, it exhibits repulsive behaviour within the quenched

296: approximation.

297: %

298: \begin{figure}[!t]

299: \begin{center}

300: {\epsfig{file=deltasetot.ps, width=7cm, angle=90}}

301: \caption{Net contributions to the $\Delta$ self-energy evaluated with

302: dipole regulator at $\Lambda=0.8\gev$.

303: \label{fig:seD}}

304: \end{center}

305: \end{figure}

306: %

307: 

308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

309: 

310: \section{Fitting Lattice Data}

311: The lattice data considered in this analysis comes from the recent

312: paper of Bernard~{\em et~al.}\cite{Bernard:2001av}  These simulations

313: were performed using an improved Kogut-Susskind quark action, which

314: shows evidence of good scaling\cite{Bernard:1999xx}.  Unlike the

315: standard Wilson fermion action, masses determined at finite lattice

316: spacing are good estimates of the continuum limit results.

317: 

318: We are particularly concerned with the chiral extrapolation of baryon

319: masses and how their behaviour is affected by the quenched

320: approximation. In such a study, it is essential that the method of

321: scale determination is free from chiral contamination. One such method

322: involves the static-quark potential. As low-lying pseudoscalar mesons

323: made of light quarks exhibit negligible coupling to hadrons containing

324: only heavy valence quarks, the low energy effective field theory plays

325: no role in the determination of the scale for these systems. In fixing

326: the scale through such a procedure one constrains all simulations,

327: quenched, 2-flavour, 3-flavour {\em etc.}, to match phenomenological

328: static-quark forces.  Effectively, the short range ($0.35\sim 0.5\fm$)

329: interactions are matched across all simulations.

330: 

331: A commonly adopted method involving the static-quark potential is the

332: Sommer scale\cite{Sommer:1993ce,Edwards:1997xf}.  This procedure

333: defines the force, $F(r)$, between heavy quarks at a particular length

334: scale, namely $r_0\simeq0.5\, {\rm fm}$. Choosing a narrow window to

335: study the potential avoids complications arising in dynamical

336: simulations where screening and ultimately string breaking is

337: encountered at large separations. The lattice data analysed in this

338: report uses a variant of this definition, choosing to define the force\cite{Bernard:2001av}

339: at $r_1=0.35\, {\rm fm}$ via $r_1^2 F(r_1)=1.00$.

340: 

341: The non-analytic chiral behaviour is governed by the infrared regions

342: of the self-energy integrals. Due to the finite volume of lattice

343: simulations much of this structure will not be captured. For this

344: reason we evaluate the self-energy corrections with pion momenta

345: restricted to those available on the particular

346: lattice\cite{Young:2002cj,Leinweber:2001ac}. In this way we get a

347: first estimate of the discretisation errors in the meson-loop

348: corrections. In no way does this account for any artefacts associated

349: with the pion-cloud source.

350: 

351: Current lattice data is insufficient to reliably extract the dipole

352: regulator parameter, $\Lambda$. We fit all data choosing a common

353: value to describe all vertices, $\Lambda=0.8\gev$. This choice has

354: been optimised\cite{Young:2002cj} to highlight the main result of this

355: analysis. We note that the value of $\Lambda$ which we find is

356: indeed consistent with phenomenological estimates which

357: suggest that this should be somewhat less than $1\gev$.

358: 

359: We fit both quenched and dynamical simulation results to the form of

360: Eq.~(\ref{eq:FullFit}) with appropriate discretised self-energies.

361: These fits are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:fqFit}. It is the open squares

362: which should be compared with the lattice data. These points

363: correspond to evaluation of the self-energies on the discretised

364: momentum grid. The lines represent a restoration of the continuum

365: limit in the self-energy evaluation. Discrepancies between the

366: continuum and discrete version only become apparent at light quark

367: masses, this corresponds to the Compton wavelength of the pion

368: becoming comparable to the finite spatial extent of the lattice.

369: %

370: \begin{figure}[!t]

371: \begin{center}

372: \epsfig{file=fqFit.ps, width=7cm, angle=90}

373: \caption{Fit (open squares) to lattice

374: data\protect\cite{Bernard:2001av} (Quenched $\vartriangle$, Dynamical

375: $\blacktriangle$) with adjusted self-energy expressions accounting for

376: finite volume and lattice spacing artifacts.  The infinite-volume,

377: continuum limit of quenched (dashed lines) and dynamical (solid lines)

378: are shown. The lower curves and data points are for the nucleon and

379: the upper ones for the $\Delta$.}

380: \label{fig:fqFit}

381: \end{center}

382: \end{figure}

383: %

384: 

385: The important result of this study is that the behaviour of the

386: pion-cloud source is found to be quite similar in both quenched and

387: dynamical simulations. Once the self-energies corresponding to the

388: given theory are incorporated into the fit, the linear terms are found

389: to be in excellent agreement. Our best fit parameters, for the

390: selected dipole mass $\Lambda=0.8\gev$, are shown in

391: Table~\ref{tab:fitparams}.

392: %

393: \begin{table}[!t]

394: \tbl{Best fit parameters for both full and quenched data sets with

395: dipole regulator, $\Lambda=0.8\gev$. All masses are in 

396: GeV.\vspace*{1pt}}

397: {\begin{tabular}{|lcccc|}

398: \hline

399: Simulation	& $\alpha_N$	& $\beta_N$	& $\alpha_\Delta$	& $\beta_\Delta$     \\

400: \hline

401: Physical	& $1.27(2)$     & $0.90(5)$	& $1.45(3)$		& $0.74(8)$          \\

402: Quenched	& $1.24(2)$     & $0.85(6)$	& $1.45(4)$		& $0.72(11)$         \\

403: \hline 

404: \end{tabular}

405: \label{tab:fitparams}}

406: \end{table}

407: %

408: Here we observe the remarkable agreement between quenched and

409: dynamical data sets for $N$ and $\Delta$ masses over a wide range of

410: pion mass. This leads to the interpretation that the primary effects

411: of quenching can be described by the modified chiral structures which

412: give rise to the LNA and NLNA behaviour of the respective theories.

413: 

414: The success of fitting the $N$ and $\Delta$ data sets with a common

415: regulator lends confidence to an interpretation of the mass splitting

416: between these states. Examination of the self-energy contributions in

417: full QCD suggests that only about $50\mev$ of the observed $300\mev$

418: $N$-$\Delta$ splitting arises from pion loops\cite{Young:2002cj}.  The

419: dominant contribution to the hyperfine splitting would then naturally

420: be described by some short-range quark-gluon interactions.

421: 

422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

423: 

424: \section{Conclusions}

425: We have demonstrated the strength of fitting lattice data with a

426: functional form which naturally interpolates between the domains of

427: heavy and light quarks. The extrapolation formula gives a reliable

428: method for the extraction of baryon masses at realistic quark

429: masses. Although the quenched approximation gives rise to more

430: singular behaviour in the chiral limit, these contributions are

431: quickly suppressed with increasing pion mass. Within the quenched

432: approximation only limited curvature is observed for the $N$ down to

433: low quark masses. In contrast, we find some upward curvature of the

434: $\Delta$ mass in the light quark domain.

435: 

436: The observation that the source of the meson cloud has remarkably

437: similar behaviour within both quenched and physical simulations is of

438: considerable importance. One can describe the primary effects of

439: quenching by the meson-loop contributions which give rise to the most

440: rapid, non-linear variation at light quark masses. This leads one to

441: the possibility of applying this result to obtain more physical

442: results from quenched simulations. The structure of the meson-cloud

443: source can be determined from quenched simulations and then the chiral

444: structures of the physical theory can be incorporated

445: phenomenologically. Natural extension of this work leads to the

446: analysis of further hyperons to investigate the applicability over a

447: range of particles.

448: 

449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

450: 

451: 

452: \begin{thebibliography}{30}

453: 

454: %\cite{Young:2001nc}

455: \bibitem{Young:2001nc}

456: R.~D.~Young, D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~V.~Wright,

457: %``Chiral properties of quenched and full QCD,''

458: hep-lat/0111041.

459: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111041;%%

460: 

461: %\cite{Young:2002cj}

462: \bibitem{Young:2002cj}

463: R.~D.~Young, D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~V.~Wright,

464: %``Chiral Analysis of Quenched Baryon Masses,''

465: hep-lat/0205017.

466: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0205017;%%

467: 

468: %\cite{Detmold:2001hq}

469: \bibitem{Detmold:2001hq}

470: W.~Detmold, D.~B.~Leinweber, W.~Melnitchouk, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~V.~Wright,

471: %``A new slant on hadron structure,''

472: {\it Pramana} {\bf 57}, 251 (2001); nucl-th/0104043.

473: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0104043;%%

474: 

475: %\cite{Aoki:1999yr}

476: \bibitem{Aoki:1999yr}

477: S.~Aoki {\it et al.}, CP-PACS Collaboration,

478: %``Quenched light hadron spectrum,''

479: {\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.}  {\bf 84}, 238 (2000).

480: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9904012;%%

481: 

482: %\cite{Bernard:2001av}

483: \bibitem{Bernard:2001av}

484: C.~W.~Bernard {\it et al.},

485: %``The QCD spectrum with three quark flavors,''

486: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} {\bf D64}, 054506 (2001).

487: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0104002;%%

488: 

489: %\cite{Leinweber:2001jc}

490: \bibitem{Leinweber:2001jc}

491: D.~B.~Leinweber,

492: %``Quenched chiral perturbation theory for baryon form factors,''

493: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.}  {\bf 109}, 45 (2002).

494: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0112021;%%

495: 

496: %\cite{Sharpe:1990me}

497: \bibitem{Sharpe:1990me}

498: S.~R.~Sharpe,

499: %``Chiral Logarithms In Quenched M(Pi) And F(Pi),''

500: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} {\bf D41}, 3233 (1990).

501: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D41,3233;%%

502: 

503: %\cite{Sharpe:1992ft}

504: \bibitem{Sharpe:1992ft}

505: S.~R.~Sharpe,

506: %``Quenched chiral logarithms,''

507: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}  {\bf D46}, 3146 (1992).

508: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9205020;%%

509: 

510: %\cite{Leinweber:1999ig}

511: \bibitem{Leinweber:1999ig}

512: D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~W.~Thomas, K.~Tsushima and S.~V.~Wright,

513: %``Baryon masses from lattice QCD: Beyond the perturbative chiral regime,''

514: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}  {\bf D61}, 074502 (2000).

515: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9906027;%%

516: 

517: %\cite{Bernard:1999xx}

518: \bibitem{Bernard:1999xx}

519: C.~W.~Bernard {\it et al.}, MILC Collaboration,

520: %``Scaling tests of the improved Kogut-Susskind quark action,''

521: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} {\bf D61}, 111502 (2000).

522: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9912018;%%

523: 

524: %\cite{Sommer:1993ce}

525: \bibitem{Sommer:1993ce}

526: R.~Sommer,

527: %``A New way to set the energy scale in lattice gauge theories and its applications to the static force and alpha-s in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory,''

528: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}  {\bf B411}, 839 (1994).

529: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9310022;%%

530: 

531: %\cite{Edwards:1997xf}

532: \bibitem{Edwards:1997xf}

533: R.~G.~Edwards, U.~M.~Heller and T.~R.~Klassen,

534: %``Accurate scale determinations for the Wilson gauge action,''

535: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}  {\bf B517}, 377 (1998).

536: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9711003].

537: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9711003;%%

538: 

539: %\cite{Leinweber:2001ac}

540: \bibitem{Leinweber:2001ac}

541: D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~W.~Thomas, K.~Tsushima and S.~V.~Wright,

542: %``Chiral behaviour of the rho meson in lattice QCD,''

543: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} {\bf D64}, 094502 (2001).

544: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0104013].

545: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0104013;%%

546: 

547: \end{thebibliography}

548: 

549: \end{document}

550: 

551: 

552: