1: \documentstyle[12pt,aps,psfig]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,psfig]{article}
3: \textwidth=6.0in
4: \textheight=9in
5: \hoffset=0.35in
6: \voffset=0.5in
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \newcommand{\cd}{\makebox[0.08cm]{$\cdot$}}
11:
12: \preprint{LBNL-52239}
13:
14:
15: \title{Rapidity Asymmetry in High-energy $d+A$ Collisions}
16:
17: \author{Xin-Nian Wang}
18: \address{Nuclear Science Division, Mailstop 70R0319 \\
19: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720}
20:
21: \date{March 1, 2003}
22:
23: \maketitle
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: In contrast to the recent prediction of high $p_T$ hadron suppression
27: within the parton saturation model, it is shown that multiple
28: parton scattering suffered by the projectile will
29: enhance high $p_T$ hadron spectra in $d+A$ collisions
30: relative to a superposition of binary $p+p$ collisions
31: at RHIC. A stronger enhancement in the forward rapidity
32: region of the projectile is also predicted, resulting
33: in a unique rapidity asymmetry of the hadron spectra at high $p_T$.
34: The shape of the rapidity asymmetry should be reversed
35: for low $p_T$ hadrons that are dominated by soft and
36: coherent interactions which suppress hadron spectra in the
37: projectile rapidity region. The phenomenon at the LHC
38: energies is shown to be qualitatively different because
39: of parton shadowing.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \baselineskip=14pt
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: Recent experiments \cite{phenix,star} at the Relativistic Heavy-ion
47: Collider (RHIC) have shown a significant suppression of high $p_T$
48: hadron spectra in central $Au+Au$ collisions that was
49: predicted \cite{gp90,wg92} as a consequence of parton energy
50: loss or jet quenching in dense matter. In addition, the same
51: mechanism is predicted to produce azimuthal anisotropy in high $p_T$
52: hadron spectra \cite{v2} that was also observed in experiments
53: at RHIC \cite{starv2}. This is a dramatic departure from the
54: heavy-ion collisions at the SPS energies where no significant
55: suppression of high $p_T$ spectra is observed \cite{wa98,wangsps}.
56: Since theoretical studies \cite{gw1,bdms,zhak,glv,wied}
57: of parton propagation in a
58: dense medium all show that the parton energy loss induced by
59: multiple scattering is proportional to the gluon density,
60: RHIC data thus indicate an initial gluon density in central $Au+Au$
61: collisions at the RHIC energies that is much higher than that
62: in a large cold nucleus \cite{ww02}.
63:
64: More precise extraction of the parton energy loss from the
65: final hadron suppression in $A+A$ collisions, however, requires
66: the understanding of normal nuclear effects in $p+A$ collisions.
67: As pointed out by many early \cite{Lev,Ochiai,Wang98} and
68: recent \cite{Zhang,Kopel,vg02} studies,
69: the high $p_T$ hadron spectra can also be modified by
70: initial multiple scatterings in $p+A$ and $A+A$ collisions giving
71: rise to the observed Cronin effect. Within
72: a multiple scattering model, the high $p_T$ hadron spectra
73: are normally enhanced relative to $p+p$ collisions, except in the
74: kinematic region where the EMC effect \cite{emc} is important
75: (The EMC effect is the depletion of parton distributions
76: in $x\sim 0.2-0.8$ in nuclei caused by the nuclear binding effect).
77: Such a normal nuclear enhancement will not affect the
78: interpretation of the hadron suppression in central $A+A$
79: collisions as a consequence of jet quenching, though
80: inclusion of it is important for more precise extraction of
81: parton energy loss and the initial gluon density.
82:
83: A very different mechanism was recently proposed for the observed
84: high $p_T$ hadron suppression based on the parton saturation
85: model \cite{klm} which also predicts a similar suppression
86: in $p+A$ collisions at RHIC, in contrast to the predicted
87: enhancement by the multiple parton scattering model. While such a
88: model is not yet checked against the existing $p+A$ collisions
89: for energies up to $\sqrt{s}=40$ GeV where enhancement of hadron
90: spectra for $p_T>2$ GeV/$c$ has been successfully explained by the
91: multiple scattering model, the up-coming data of
92: $d+A$ collisions at RHIC will attest the relevance
93: of parton saturation at the RHIC energies.
94:
95: In this letter, we will point out an additional feature
96: in the rapidity dependence of the Cronin enhancement due
97: to multiple parton scattering in $d+A$ collisions. Such a
98: rapidity dependence was also studied recently by Vitev \cite{Vitev:2003xu}.
99: However, we predict here a unique rapidity asymmetry of
100: high $p_T$ hadron spectra due to stronger Cronin
101: enhancement in the forward (projectile) region as a result
102: of the transverse momentum broadening of the initial partons
103: inside the projectile. The shape of the rapidity asymmetry will
104: also depend on the nuclear modification of the parton
105: distributions inside a nucleus, in particular at small $x$.
106: As one decreases $p_T$, the parton shadowing will reduce
107: the hadron spectra in the forward region, thus changing the
108: rapidity asymmetry. When soft and coherent interactions become
109: dominant at very low $p_T<1$ GeV/$c$, the shape of the rapidity
110: asymmetry will be reversed because of the strong
111: suppression of hadron production in the projectile region
112: relative to a superposition of binary $p+p$ collisions.
113: We will calculate the rapidity asymmetry within a perturbative
114: QCD (pQCD) parton model and study the effect of nuclear
115: modification of parton distributions.
116:
117: \begin{figure}
118: \centerline{\psfig{file=hijing.eps,width=3.5in,height=3.5in}}
119: \caption{Pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged hadrons in
120: minimum-biased $d+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV from
121: the HIJING \protect\cite{hijing} model.}
122: \label{fig:hijing}
123: \end{figure}
124:
125: In a Glauber multiple parton scattering model, large $p_T$
126: spectra are generally enhanced relative to the binary model
127: of hard scattering. It can be shown \cite{ww01}
128: that a combination of absorptive corrections and the
129: power-law behavior of perturbative parton cross section
130: leads to a nuclear enhancement at high $p_T$ that decreases
131: as $1/p_T^2$. The same absorptive processes suppress
132: the spectra relative to the binary model at low $p_T$,
133: where soft processes dominate and the $p_T$ spectra deviate
134: from a power-law behavior. Since the pQCD model cannot be applied
135: to soft processes, one has to resort to phenomenological models
136: like the string model in which coherent particle production is
137: modeled by a string excitation for each participant nucleon.
138: Shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:hijing} is the rapidity distribution
139: (integrated over transverse momentum) of charged hadrons
140: in minimum-biased $d+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV
141: from the HIJING Monte Carlo model \cite{hijing}, which employs
142: the string model for soft and coherent interactions.
143: Because most of the soft particles are produced through
144: string fragmentation, their number should then be proportional
145: to the number of participants. The rapidity distributions of
146: hadrons from the string should also follow their parent nucleons.
147: Since there are more target nucleon participants than projectile
148: nucleons in $d+A$ collisions, the hadron rapidity distribution is thus
149: asymmetrical with respect to $\eta=0$. For high $p_T$ hadrons,
150: the underlying processes are hard parton scatterings. The
151: multiplicity should be approximately proportional to the
152: number of binary scatterings and the rapidity distributions
153: should be approximately symmetric with respect to $\eta=0$.
154: This is roughly the case for high $p_T$ hadrons in HIJING
155: model as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:hijing}.
156: One, however, can notice some asymmetric effect in the
157: rapidity distribution of large $p_T$ hadrons. This is partially
158: due to the coherence between transverse jets and the beam remnants,
159: which is responsible for the asymmetric pedestal effect underlying
160: a jet event in $p+A$ collisions. In addition, energy and quark
161: number conservation will also cause some asymmetric effects.
162: These effects are most important in the large rapidity region.
163: It is expected that they are small in the central rapidity region.
164:
165:
166:
167: Though the HIJING model has incorporated hard processes, it has not
168: included transverse momentum broadening of initial partons. For
169: this purpose, we use the pQCD model as employed in Ref.~\cite{Wang98}.
170: We will use a lowest order (LO) pQCD-inspired parton model in which
171: the inclusive particle production cross section in $pp$ collisions
172: is given by \cite{Owens}
173: \begin{eqnarray}
174: \frac{d\sigma^h_{pp}}{dyd^2p_T}&=&K\sum_{abcd}
175: \int dx_a dx_b d^2k_{aT} d^2k_{bT} g_p(k_{aT},Q^2) g_p(k_{bT},Q^2)
176: \nonumber \\ & & f_{a/p}(x_a,Q^2)f_{b/p}(x_b,Q^2)
177: \frac{D^0_{h/c}(z_c,Q^2)}{\pi z_c}
178: \frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{t}}(ab\rightarrow cd), \label{eq:nch_pp}
179: \end{eqnarray}
180: where $D^0_{h/c}(z_c,Q^2)$ is the fragmentation function of
181: parton $c$ into hadron $h$ as parameterized in Ref.~\cite{bkk}
182: from $e^+e^-$ data, and $z_c$ is the momentum fraction of a parton
183: jet carried by a produced hadron. The $K\approx 1.5$
184: (at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV) factor is used to account for higher
185: order QCD corrections to the jet production cross
186: section. The parton distributions $f_{a/N}(x,Q^2)$
187: in a nucleon are given by the MRS D$-^{\prime}$ parameterization \cite{mrs}.
188: The initial transverse momentum distribution $g_N(k_T,Q^2)$ is
189: assumed to have a Gaussian form,
190: \begin{equation}
191: g_N(k_T,Q^2)=\frac{1}{\pi \langle k^2_T\rangle_N}
192: e^{-k^2_T/\langle k^2_T\rangle_N}.
193: \end{equation}
194: Following \cite{Owens2}, we choose a $Q$-dependent average initial
195: transverse momentum,
196: \begin{equation}
197: \langle k^2_T\rangle_N(Q^2)= 1.2 ({\rm GeV}^2) + 0.2\alpha_s(Q^2) Q^2,
198: \label{kperp}
199: \end{equation}
200: which should include both the intrinsic and pQCD radiation-generated
201: transverse momentum in this LO calculation.
202: The form of the $Q$-dependence and the parameters are chosen
203: to reproduce the experimental data \cite{Wang98}, especially at
204: low energies. Following the same approach as in
205: Refs. \cite{Owens2,Feynman}, we choose $Q^2$ to
206: be $Q^2=2\hat{s}\hat{t}\hat{u}/(\hat{s}^2+\hat{t}^2+\hat{u}^2)$.
207:
208:
209: To take account of multiple initial-state scattering,
210: we assume that the inclusive differential
211: cross section for large $p_T$ particle production is still
212: given by a single hard parton-parton scattering.
213: However, due to multiple parton scattering prior to
214: the hard processes, we consider the initial
215: transverse momentum $k_T$ of the beam partons to be broadened. Assuming
216: that each scattering provide a $k_T$ kick which also has a Gaussian
217: distribution, we can effectively change the width of the initial
218: $k_T$ distribution. Then the single inclusive particle cross section
219: in minimum-biased $p+A$ collisions is,
220: \begin{eqnarray}
221: \frac{d\sigma^h_{pA}}{dyd^2p_T}&=&K\sum_{abcd} \int d^2b t_A(b)
222: \int dx_a dx_b d^2k_{aT} d^2k_{bT} g_A(k_{aT},Q^2,b) g_p(k_{bT},Q^2)
223: \nonumber \\ & &
224: f_{a/p}(x_a,Q^2)f_{b/A}(x_b,Q^2,b)
225: \frac{D^0_{h/c}(z_c,Q^2)}{\pi z_c}
226: \frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{t}}(ab\rightarrow cd), \label{eq:nch_pA}
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: where $t_A(b)$ is the nuclear thickness function normalized
229: to $\int d^2b t_A(b)=A$. We will use the Woods-Saxon form of
230: nuclear distribution for $t_A(b)$ throughout this paper
231: unless specified otherwise. The parton distribution per
232: nucleon inside the nucleus (with atomic mass number
233: $A$ and charge number $Z$) at an impact parameter $b$,
234: \begin{equation}
235: f_{a/A}(x,Q^2,b)=S_{a/A}(x,b)\left[ \frac{Z}{A}f_{a/p}(x,Q^2)
236: +(1-\frac{Z}{A}) f_{a/n}(x,Q^2)\right], \label{eq:shd}
237: \end{equation}
238: is assumed to be factorizable into the parton distribution in a
239: nucleon $f_{a/N}(x,Q^2)$ and the nuclear modification factor
240: $S_{a/A}(x,b)$, for which we take both the new HIJING \cite{LW}
241: and EKS \cite{eks} parameterizations. The initial parton
242: transverse momentum distribution inside a projectile nucleon
243: going through the target nucleus at an impact parameter $b$ is
244: still a Gaussian with a broadened width
245: \begin{equation}
246: \langle k^2_T\rangle_A(Q^2)=\langle k^2_T\rangle_N(Q^2)
247: +\delta^2(Q^2)(\nu_A(b) -1).
248: \end{equation}
249: The broadening is assumed to be proportional to the number of
250: scattering $\nu_A(b)$ the projectile suffers inside the nucleus,
251: which is assumed to given by
252: \begin{equation}
253: \nu_A(b)=\sigma_{NN} t_A(b)=
254: \sigma_{NN} \frac{3 A}{2\pi R_A^2}\sqrt{1-b^2/R_A^2}
255: \end{equation}
256: in a hard sphere nuclear distribution, where $R_A=1.12 A^{1/3}$ fm
257: and $\sigma_{NN}$ is the inelastic nucleon-nucleon cross section.
258: We also assume that $k_T$ broadening during each
259: nucleon-nucleon collision $\delta^2$ also depends
260: on the hard momentum scale $Q=P^{\rm jet}_T$ in the
261: parameterized form,
262: \begin{equation}
263: \delta^2(Q^2)=0.225\frac{\ln^2(Q/{\rm GeV})}{1+\ln(Q/{\rm GeV})}
264: \;\;\;{\rm GeV^2}/c^2,
265: \end{equation}
266: which is chosen to best fit the existing experimental data in $p+A$
267: collisions \cite{Wang98} up to $\sqrt{s}=40$ GeV. The predictive
268: power of this model lies in the energy and flavor dependence of
269: the hadron spectra. It is straightforward to also calculate
270: hadron spectra in $d+A$ collisions, incorporating the
271: initial $k_T$ broadening and parton shadowing. We have tried
272: different forms of nuclear distribution for deuteron and find
273: little difference in the final results. So we will still use the
274: Woods-Saxon distribution for $t_d(b)$. In heavy nuclear $A+A$
275: collisions, one can incorporate parton energy loss induced by the
276: dense medium through modified fragmentation functions \cite{wh}.
277:
278: The pQCD model described above has been compared to
279: experimental data for $pp$, $p\bar{p}$ and $pA$ collisions
280: at various energies \cite{Wang98}. One found that both the
281: intrinsic $k_T$ and the nuclear broadening are very important
282: to describe the existing data in $pp$ and $pA$ collisions,
283: especially at around SPS energies. One can find some more
284: detailed description of this pQCD-inspired model in
285: Ref. \cite{Wang98}. We will restrict ourselves to the study of the
286: rapidity dependence of the nuclear modification in $d+A$
287: collisions at RHIC and LHC energies in this paper.
288:
289: \begin{figure}
290: \centerline{\psfig{file=dy200.eps,width=4.0in,height=4.0in}}
291: \caption{Calculated rapidity distributions of charged hadrons with
292: large transverse momentum in minimum-biased $d+Au$ collisions
293: at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV. The dashed lines correspond to a superposition
294: of binary $N+N$ collisions. The dotted lines have nuclear broadening
295: of initial parton transverse momentum but without parton shadowing. The
296: solid and dot-dashed lines use the EKS \protect\cite{eks} and
297: HIJING \protect\cite{LW} parameterization of parton shadowing,
298: respectively. The spectra have been scaled by the numbers in
299: parentheses.}
300: \label{fig:dy200}
301: \end{figure}
302:
303: Neglecting initial transverse momentum, the initial momentum
304: fractions are related to the transverse momentum and
305: rapidities of the final jets by $x_1=x_T(e^{y_1}+e^{y_2})/2$,
306: $x_2=xT(e^{-y_1}+e^{-y_2})/2$, $x_T=2E_T/\sqrt{s}$, where
307: $E_T$, $y_1$ and $y_2$ are the transverse momentum and
308: rapidities of the produced jets, respectively. Large positive
309: rapidities, therefore, correspond to large parton fractional
310: momentum $x_1$ from the projectile and small momentum fraction
311: $x_2$ from the target. Conversely, negative rapidities correspond
312: to small $x_1$ and large $x_2$. In our parton model calculation,
313: we assume the final hadron rapidity to be the same as that of the
314: fragmenting jets. Shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dy200} are the
315: rapidity distributions of the charged hadron spectra for four
316: different values of $p_T$. Without nuclear modification of the
317: parton distributions (shown as dotted lines), the $k_T$ broadening
318: of the projectile partons enhances the particle spectra. The
319: enhancement is the strongest in the forward (projectile) region,
320: thus giving rise to a rapidity asymmetry.
321: The EKS \cite{eks} parameterization has a strong anti-shadowing
322: at $x_2\sim 0.1-0.2$ for partons from the nuclear target. Such
323: strong anti-shadowing further enhances the rapidity
324: asymmetry (shown as solid lines). However, the HIJING \cite{LW}
325: parameterization has mostly shadowing in this region and thus
326: reduces the rapidity asymmetry in the spectra (dot-dashed line)
327: which is still visible for $p_T>3$ GeV/$c$.
328: At $p_T>10$ GeV/$c$, the target parton distribution
329: at $x_2\sim 0.2 - 0.8$ is suppressed due to the nuclear
330: binding, which is known as the EMC effect \cite{emc}.
331: This reduces the hadron spectra in the backward (target)
332: rapidity region and thus further enhances the rapidity asymmetry.
333:
334:
335: As one decreases the transverse momentum so that parton shadowing
336: in the target becomes significant, the hadron spectra in the
337: forward region are strongly suppressed. It can even overcome the
338: enhancement caused by transverse momentum broadening. In this case
339: the rapidity asymmetry is reversed, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dy200}
340: for $p_T=1.5$ GeV/$c$. This is much like the asymmetric rapidity
341: distribution of soft particles produced via soft and coherent
342: interactions as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:hijing}. The validity of
343: the parton model at $p_T=1.5$ GeV/$c$ may be questionable.
344: However, it clearly shows the trend of the rapidity
345: asymmetry as one changes the value of $p_T$.
346:
347: \begin{figure}
348: \centerline{\psfig{file=dy5500.eps,width=4.0in,height=4.0in}}
349: \caption{Calculated rapidity distributions of charged hadrons with
350: large transverse momentum in minimum-biased $d+Pb$ collisions
351: at $\sqrt{s}=5.5$ TeV.}
352: \label{fig:dy5500}
353: \end{figure}
354:
355: We also show in Fig.~\ref{fig:dy5500} similar rapidity
356: distributions for $d+Pb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.5$ TeV where
357: one has access to much larger values of transverse momentum.
358: At such high energies and transverse momenta,
359: the parton scattering cross is much
360: flatter in $p_T$ than at lower energies. Therefore, the
361: final hadron spectra are less sensitive to the transverse
362: momentum broadening due to initial multiple scatterings.
363: The rapidity asymmetry caused by the $k_T$ broadening is
364: thus very weak, as shown by the dotted lines. The nuclear
365: modification of the parton distributions in the target
366: is causing most of the rapidity asymmetry in the spectra
367: at these energies. Here we used only EKS \cite{eks}
368: parameterization of nuclear modification of the parton
369: distributions. The HIJING \cite{LW} parameterization does not
370: have any scale dependence, which is very important at LHC
371: energies since the shadowing still has significant effects on
372: jet production with large transverse momentum.
373:
374:
375: To demonstrate the $p_T$ dependence of the effect of parton
376: shadowing and $k_T$ broadening, we show in Fig.~\ref{fig:r200}
377: and \ref{fig:r5500} the nuclear modification factors
378: defined as the ratio of charged hadron spectra in $d+A$
379: over that in $p+p$ normalized to the averaged number of
380: binary nucleon collisions,
381: \begin{equation}
382: R_{dA}(p_T,y)\equiv \frac{d\sigma^h_{AB}/dyd^2p_T}
383: {2A d\sigma^h_{pp}/dyd^2p_T}. \label{eq:ratio}
384: \end{equation}
385: At the RHIC energy, the transverse momentum broadening enhances
386: the hadron spectra for $p_T=2-8$ GeV/$c$ in both forward and
387: backward rapidity regions. The exact enhancement in this
388: $p_T$ region depends on the parton shadowing and anti-shadowing.
389: The enhancement in the forward rapidity is larger than in the
390: backward region as demonstrated by the rapidity asymmetry
391: in Fig.~\ref{fig:dy200}. For $p_T>8$ GeV/$c$, the EMC
392: effect of the nuclear modification of parton distribution
393: starts to suppress the hadron spectra. Such a suppression
394: is stronger in the target rapidity region than in the
395: projectile region. We also find that the suppression due to the
396: EMC effect is stronger for kaons than pions.
397: For $p_T<2$ GeV/$c$, parton shadowing
398: suppresses the hadron spectra in the case of HIJING
399: parameterization. However, the pQCD model might not be valid
400: anymore in this small $p_T$ region for a quantitative calculation.
401: The nuclear modification factor
402: for $d+Pb$ collisions at the LHC energy shown
403: in Fig. ~\ref{fig:r5500} has much smaller variation and
404: the Cronin enhancement is also smaller.
405:
406:
407: \begin{figure}
408: \centerline{\psfig{file=r200.eps,width=4.0in,height=5.0in}}
409: \caption{The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}(p_T,y)$ for $d+Au$
410: collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV. $k_T$ broadening and different
411: parameterization of parton shadowing are included.}
412: \label{fig:r200}
413: \end{figure}
414:
415:
416:
417: In summary, we have studied the rapidity distribution of hadron
418: spectra in high-energy $d+A$ collisions, in particular the
419: rapidity asymmetry caused by multiple parton scatterings.
420: The effects of initial multiple parton
421: scatterings are incorporated via an impact-parameter dependent
422: nuclear shadowing of parton distributions and the broadening of
423: the initial $k_T$ carried by partons before they collide and
424: produce high $p_T$ hadrons. At low $p_T$ parton shadowing
425: suppresses the hadron spectra in the projectile rapidity
426: region, giving rise to a rapidity asymmetry much like the
427: soft particle production via soft and coherent interactions
428: in a string model. However, as one increases $p_T$, hadron
429: production is dominated by hard parton scatterings and
430: the rapidity distribution is becoming more symmetric.
431: Within a pQCD model, transverse momentum broadening via
432: initial multiple scattering enhances the hadron spectra in
433: the projectile region at moderate $p_T=3-8$ GeV/$c$, causing
434: a rapidity asymmetry opposite to that of soft hadrons.
435: This is in sharp contrast to the prediction of the parton
436: saturation model \cite{klm}. The coming data of $d+Au$ collisions from RHIC
437: can easily distinguish those two models and will be important
438: to verify whether jet quenching due to parton energy loss
439: is truly the underlying mechanism for the observed hadron
440: suppression in central $A+A$ collisions.
441:
442: \begin{figure}
443: \centerline{\psfig{file=r5500.eps,width=4.0in,height=5.0in}}
444: \caption{The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}(p_T,y)$ for $d+Pb$
445: collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.5$ TeV.}
446: \label{fig:r5500}
447: \end{figure}
448:
449: We should also caution that our pQCD model cannot take into
450: account the non-perturbative effects that can cause some
451: rapidity asymmetry at very large rapidities. Such non-perturbative
452: effect is responsible for the asymmetric pedestal effect underlying
453: a jet event in $p+A$ collisions. Our conclusions are more
454: robust within the central rapidity region where such non-perturbative
455: effect and constraints by total energy conservation are not yet important.
456:
457: This work was supported by the the Director, Office of Energy
458: Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of
459: Nuclear Physics, and by the Office of Basic Energy Science,
460: Division of Nuclear Science, of the U.S. Department of Energy
461: under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.
462:
463:
464: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
465: \bibitem{phenix}
466: K.~Adcox {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
467: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 022301 (2002)
468: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0109003].
469: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0109003;%%
470:
471: \bibitem{star}
472: C.~Adler {\it et al.}, [STAR Collaboration],
473: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 202301 (2002)
474: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0206011].
475: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0206011;%%
476:
477: \bibitem{gp90}
478: M.~Gyulassy and M.~Plumer,
479: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 243}, 432 (1990).
480: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B243,432;%%
481:
482: \bibitem{wg92}
483: X.~N.~Wang and M.~Gyulassy,
484: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 68}, 1480 (1992).
485: %%CITATION = PRLTA,68,1480;%%
486:
487: \bibitem{v2}
488: X.~N.~Wang,
489: %``Jet quenching and azimuthal anisotropy of large p(T)
490: %spectra in non-central high-energy heavy-ion collisions,''
491: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63}, 054902 (2001)
492: [arXiv:nucl-th/0009019];
493: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0009019;%%
494: M.~Gyulassy, I.~Vitev and X.~N.~Wang,
495: %``High p(T) azimuthal asymmetry in noncentral A + A at RHIC,''
496: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 2537 (2001)
497: [arXiv:nucl-th/0012092].
498: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0012092;%%
499:
500: \bibitem{starv2}
501: C.~Adler {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
502: %``Azimuthal anisotropy and correlations in the hard
503: %scattering regime at RHIC,''
504: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 90}, 032301 (2003)
505: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0206006].
506: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0206006;%%
507:
508:
509: \bibitem{wa98}
510: M.~M.~Aggarwal {\it et al.} [WA98 Collaboration],
511: %``Centrality dependence of neutral pion production
512: %in 158-A-GeV Pb-208 + Pb-208 collisions,''
513: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 4087 (1998)
514: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 84}, 578 (1998)]
515: [arXiv:nucl-ex/9806004].
516: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 9806004;%%
517:
518: \bibitem{wangsps}
519: X.-N.~Wang,
520: %``Where is the jet quenching in Pb + Pb collisions at 158-A-GeV?,''
521: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 2655 (1998)
522: [arXiv:hep-ph/9804384].
523: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804384;%%
524:
525: \bibitem{gw1}M. Gyulassy and X.~N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}420, 583 (1994)
526: [arXiv:nucl-th/9306003];
527: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9306003;%%
528: X.~N.~Wang, M.~Gyulassy and M.~Plumer,
529: %``The LPM effect in QCD and radiative energy loss in a quark gluon plasma,''
530: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 3436 (1995)
531: [arXiv:hep-ph/9408344].
532: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408344;%%
533:
534: \bibitem{bdms} R. Baier {\it et al.},
535: %Yu. L. Dokshitzer, A. Mueller, S. Peign\'e and D. Schiff,
536: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B484}, 265 (1997)
537: [arXiv:hep-ph/9608322];
538: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608322;%%
539: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 1706 (1998)
540: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803473].
541: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803473;%%
542:
543: \bibitem{zhak}B. G. Zhakharov, JETP letters {\bf 63}, 952 (1996)
544: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607440].
545: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607440;%%
546:
547: \bibitem{glv} M. Gyulassy, P. L\'evai and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys.
548: {\bf B594}, 371 (2001)
549: [arXiv:nucl-th/0006010];
550: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0006010;%%
551: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 5535 (2000)
552: [arXiv:nucl-th/0005032].
553: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0005032;%%
554:
555: \bibitem{wied}U. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B588}, 303 (2000)
556: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005129].
557: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005129;%%
558:
559: \bibitem{ww02}
560: E.~Wang and X.~N.~Wang,
561: %``Jet tomography of dense and nuclear matter,''
562: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 162301 (2002)
563: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202105].
564: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202105;%%
565:
566: \bibitem{Lev}
567: M.~Lev and B.~Petersson,
568: %``Nuclear Effects At Large Transverse Momentum In A QCD Parton Model,''
569: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 21}, 155 (1983).
570: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C21,155;%%
571:
572: \bibitem{Ochiai}
573: T.~Ochiai, S.~Date and H.~Sumiyoshi,
574: %``EMC Effect And Hadron Production Off Nuclei At Large Transverse Momentum,''
575: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 75}, 288 (1986).
576: %%CITATION = PTPKA,75,288;%%
577:
578:
579: \bibitem{Wang98}
580: X.~N.~Wang,
581: %``Systematic study of high p(T) hadron spectra in p p, p A and A A collisions from SPS to RHIC energies,''
582: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61}, 064910 (2000)
583: [arXiv:nucl-th/9812021].
584: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9812021;%%
585:
586: \bibitem{Zhang}
587: Y.~Zhang, G.~Fai, G.~Papp, G.~G.~Barnafoldi and P.~Levai,
588: %``High-p(T) pion and kaon production in relativistic nuclear collisions,''
589: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 034903 (2002)
590: [arXiv:hep-ph/0109233].
591: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109233;%%
592:
593:
594: \bibitem{Kopel}
595: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Nemchik, A.~Schafer and A.~V.~Tarasov,
596: %``Cronin effect in hadron production off nuclei,''
597: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 232303 (2002)
598: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201010].
599: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201010;%%
600:
601: \bibitem{vg02}
602: I.~Vitev and M.~Gyulassy,
603: %``High-p(T) tomography of d + Au and Au + Au at SPS, RHIC, and LHC,''
604: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 252301 (2002)
605: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209161].
606: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209161;%%
607:
608: \bibitem{emc}
609: J.~Ashman {\it et al.} [European Muon Collaboration],
610: %``Measurement Of The Ratios Of Deep Inelastic Muon - Nucleus
611: %Cross-Sections On Various Nuclei Compared To Deuterium,''
612: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 202}, 603 (1988).
613: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B202,603;%%
614:
615:
616: \bibitem{klm}
617: D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and L.~McLerran,
618: %``Parton saturation and N(part) scaling of semi-hard processes in QCD,''
619: arXiv:hep-ph/0210332.
620: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210332;%%
621:
622: \bibitem{Vitev:2003xu}
623: I.~Vitev,
624: %``Initial state parton broadening and energy loss probed in d + Au at RHIC,''
625: arXiv:nucl-th/0302002.
626: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302002;%%
627:
628: \bibitem{ww01}
629: X.~N.~Wang,
630: %``A pQCD-based approach to parton production and
631: %equilibration in high-energy nuclear collisions,''
632: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 280}, 287 (1997)
633: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605214];
634: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605214;%%
635: E.~Wang and X.~N.~Wang,
636: %``Interplay of soft and hard processes and hadron p(T)
637: %spectra in p A and A A collisions,''
638: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 64}, 034901 (2001)
639: [arXiv:nucl-th/0104031].
640: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0104031;%%
641:
642: \bibitem{hijing}
643: X.~N.~Wang and M.~Gyulassy,
644: %``HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production
645: %in p p, p A and A A collisions,''
646: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 3501 (1991);
647: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,3501;%%
648: M.~Gyulassy and X.~N.~Wang,
649: %``Hijing 1.0: A Monte Carlo Program For Parton And Particle
650: %Production In High-Energy Hadronic And Nuclear Collisions,''
651: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 83}, 307 (1994)
652: [arXiv:nucl-th/9502021].
653: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9502021;%%
654:
655: \bibitem{Owens}
656: J.~F.~Owens,
657: %``Large Momentum Transfer Production Of Direct Photons,
658: %Jets, And Particles,''
659: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 59} (1987) 465.
660: %%CITATION = RMPHA,59,465;%%
661:
662:
663: \bibitem{bkk}
664: J.~Binnewies, B.~A.~Kniehl and G.~Kramer,
665: %``Next-to-leading order fragmentation functions for pions and kaons,''
666: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 65}, 471 (1995)
667: [arXiv:hep-ph/9407347];
668: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9407347;%%
669: J.~Binnewies, B.~A.~Kniehl and G.~Kramer,
670: %``Neutral kaon production in e+ e-, e p and p anti-p collisions at next-to-leading order,''
671: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 3573 (1996)
672: [arXiv:hep-ph/9506437].
673: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9506437;%%
674:
675: \bibitem{mrs}
676: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,
677: %``Parton distributions: A new global analysis,''
678: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 4}, 463 (1998)
679: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803445].
680: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803445;%%
681:
682: \bibitem{Owens2}
683: J.~F.~Owens and J.~D.~Kimel,
684: %``Parton Transverse Momentum Effects And The Quantum Chromodynamic Description Of High P(T) Processes,''
685: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 18}, 3313 (1978).
686: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,3313;%%
687:
688: \bibitem{Feynman}
689: R.~P.~Feynman, R.~D.~Field and G.~C.~Fox,
690: %``Quantum-Chromodynamic Approach For The Large-Transverse-Momentum Production Of Particles And Jets,''
691: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 18}, 3320 (1978).
692: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,3320;%%
693:
694: \bibitem{LW}
695: S.~Y.~Li and X.~N.~Wang,
696: %``Gluon shadowing and hadron production at RHIC,''
697: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 527}, 85 (2002)
698: [arXiv:nucl-th/0110075].
699: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0110075;%%
700:
701: \bibitem{eks}
702: K.~J.~Eskola, V.~J.~Kolhinen and C.~A.~Salgado,
703: %``The scale dependent nuclear effects in parton distributions
704: %for practical applications,''
705: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9}, 61 (1999)
706: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807297].
707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807297;%%
708:
709:
710: \bibitem{wh}
711: X.~N.~Wang, Z.~Huang and I.~Sarcevic,
712: %``Jet quenching in the opposite direction of a tagged photon in
713: %high-energy heavy-ion collisions,''
714: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 231 (1996)
715: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605213];
716: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605213;%%
717: X.~N.~Wang and Z.~Huang,
718: %``Medium-induced parton energy loss in gamma + jet events of
719: %high-energy heavy-ion collisions,''
720: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 55}, 3047 (1997)
721: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701227].
722: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701227;%%
723:
724: \end{thebibliography}
725:
726: \end{document}
727:
728:
729:
730:
731:
732:
733:
734:
735: