1:
2: \documentstyle[preprint,tighten,prc,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
3:
4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
6: \newcommand{\bfeps}{\mbox {\boldmath $\epsilon$}}
7: \newcommand{\bfp}{\mbox {\boldmath $p$}}
8: \newcommand{\bfk}{\mbox {\boldmath $k$}}
9: \newcommand{\bfq}{\mbox {\boldmath $q$}}
10: \newcommand{\bfs}{\mbox {\boldmath $S$}}
11: \newcommand{\bfg}{\mbox {\boldmath $G$}}
12: \newcommand{\bfn}{\mbox {\boldmath $n$}}
13: \newcommand{\bfr}{\mbox {\boldmath $r$}}
14: \newcommand{\bfzeta}{\mbox {\boldmath $\zeta$}}
15: \newcommand{\bfsigma}{\mbox {\boldmath $\sigma$}}
16: \newcommand{\bftau}{\mbox {\boldmath $\tau$}}
17: \newcommand{\bfphi}{\mbox {\boldmath $\varphi$}}
18: \newcommand{\bfdel}{\mbox {\boldmath $\Delta$}}
19: \newcommand{\dsdmok}{\frac {d^2\sigma}{dm\,d\Omega_{\bfk}}}
20: \newcommand{\dsdmoko}{\frac {d^2\sigma_0}{dm\,d\Omega_{\bfk}}}
21: \newcommand{\dsdmokp}{\frac {d^2\sigma_+}{dm\,d\Omega_{\bfk}}}
22: \newcommand{\dsdo}{\frac {d\sigma}{d\Omega}}
23: \newcommand{\dso}{d\sigma /d\Omega}
24: \newcommand{\aofo}{$a^0_0$$\,\leftrightarrow\,$$f_0$}
25: \newcommand{\mix}{$a^0_0\,$$-$$f_0$}
26: \newcommand{\pieta}{$\pi^0$$-$$\eta$}
27: \newcommand{\bfmix}{\mbox {\boldmath $a_0\,$$-$$f_0$}}
28: \newcommand{\pndao}{$pn\to d a^0_0$}
29: \newcommand{\vpndao}{$\vec pn\to d a^0_0$}
30: \newcommand{\bfpnda}{\mbox {\boldmath $pn\to d a_0$}}
31: \newcommand{\bfvpp}{\mbox {\boldmath $\vec p p\to d\pi^+\eta$}}
32: \newcommand{\bfvpn}{\mbox {\boldmath $\vec p n\to d\pi^0\eta$}}
33: \newcommand{\vpp}{$\vec p p\to d\pi^+\eta$}
34: \newcommand{\vpn}{$\vec p n\to d\pi^0\eta$}
35: \newcommand{\ppdkk}{$p p\to d K^+\bar K^0$}
36: \newcommand{\asym}{A(\theta, \varphi )}
37: \newcommand{\asymm}{A(m; \theta, \varphi )}
38: %\newcommand{\dxl}{\overleftarrow{\partial_{\nu}}}
39: %\newcommand{\dxr}{\overrightarrow{\partial_{\nu}}}
40: %\newcommand{\dxb}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}}
41:
42: \begin{document}
43: \preprint{FZJ-IKP-TH-2003-06}
44: \title{
45: Angular asymmetries in the reactions \bfvpp\
46: and \bfvpn\ and \bfmix\ mixing }
47:
48: \author{A.E. Kudryavtsev$^1$, V.E. Tarasov$^1$,
49: J. Haidenbauer$^2$, C. Hanhart$^2$, and J. Speth$^2$}
50: \address{$^1$Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, \\
51: B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, 117259 Moscow, Russia \\
52: $^2$Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum J\"ulich,
53: D-52425 J\"ulich }
54:
55: \date{\today}
56: \maketitle
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: The reactions $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ and
60: $pn\to d\pi^0\eta$ are of special interest for
61: investigating the $a_0(980)$ ($J^P=0^+$) resonance in
62: the process $NN \to da_0 \to d\pi\eta$. We study some
63: aspects of those reactions within a general formalism and also
64: in a concrete phenomenological model. In particular,
65: it is shown that the presence of nonresonant (i.e. without excitation of the
66: $a_0$ resonance) contributions to these reactions
67: yields nonvanishing values for specific polarization observables,
68: i.e. to effects like those generated by \mix\ mixing.
69: An experimental determination of these observables for the
70: reaction $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ would provide concrete information
71: on the magnitude of those nonresonant contributions to $\pi\eta$ production.
72: We discuss also the possibility of extracting information
73: about \mix\ mixing
74: from the reaction \vpn\ with polarized proton beam.
75: \vskip 1cm
76: \noindent
77: {\bf PACS}: 13.60.Le, 13.75.-n, 14.40.Cs
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: \newpage
81:
82: \section{Introduction}
83: The reactions \ppdkk\ and $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ are presently the subject
84: of experimental investigations by the ANKE collaboration at the COSY accelerator
85: in J\"ulich~\cite{1,MB1,VK}. The main issue of this study is to obtain further information
86: about the scalar $a^+_0$(980) resonance, which decays dominantly into the $K^+\bar K^0$
87: and $\pi^+\eta$ channels \cite{PDG}. Also a measurement of the production of the
88: neutral $a^0_0$ meson in the reaction \pndao\ with the
89: ANKE spectrometer is planned~\cite{MB2,2,3}.
90: The $a^0_0$ production is closely related to the problem of \mix\ mixing \cite{Ach1}.
91: A nonzero value for the transition amplitude \aofo\ provides a
92: forward-backward asymmetry for the reaction \pndao. As was shown in
93: ref.~\cite{4}, near the threshold this forward-backward asymmetry is large,
94: of the order of 10\% -- 15\%. Thus, it is evident that the study of this asymmetry
95: can provide useful information on the process of $a_0$$-$$f_0$ mixing.
96:
97: In a recent paper~\cite{KTHHS} some aspects of the reaction \vpndao\ were
98: discussed for the case of a perpendicular polarized proton beam.
99: Specifically, it was shown that for energies close to threshold
100: the angular-asymmetry parameter defined by
101: \be
102: \asym =
103: \frac{\sigma (\theta, \varphi) -\sigma (\pi-\theta, \varphi+\pi)}
104: {\sigma (\theta, \varphi) +\sigma (\pi-\theta, \varphi+\pi)}\, ,
105: \label{1}\ee
106: %
107: with
108: \be
109: \sigma (\theta, \varphi)\equiv \dsdo (\theta, \varphi)\, ,
110: \label{dXS}
111: \ee
112: %
113: ($\theta$ and $\varphi$ are the polar and azimuthal angles of the
114: outgoing $\pi\eta$ system in the CMS of the reaction)
115: is proportional to the \mix\ mixing amplitude. I.e.
116: \be
117: \asym \sim \xi\cdot k\, ,
118: \label{2}
119: \ee
120: where $k$ is the relative momentum of the $a^0_0$ meson with respect
121: to the deuteron and $\xi$ is the \mix\ mixing parameter.
122: %
123: This result is valid in lowest order with respect to the
124: momentum $k$, i.e. keeping only contributions that are at most linear
125: in $k$. It was shown in ref.~\cite{KTHHS}
126: that corrections to $\asym$ from isospin-conserving terms
127: are of order $k^3$ and, therefore, they are of relevance at higher
128: energies only. Thus, the study of the angular asymmetry (Eq.~(\ref{1}))
129: near the $a^0_0$ threshold
130: in the reaction \vpndao\ gives information on various invariant
131: amplitudes for this reaction \cite{KTHHS} but, in particular, on the
132: \mix\ mixing parameter $\xi$.
133:
134: The present paper focusses on the reaction $NN\to d\pi\eta$.
135: We take into consideration that the $\pi\eta$ system can not only
136: be produced via the formation of the $a_0$(980) resonance, i.e.
137: in an $S$-wave state, but also via other reaction mechanisms
138: and then can be in a $P$ wave or in even higher partial waves.
139: For brevity, in the following we will refer to the latter
140: contributions as nonresonant or as background of the $NN\to da_0 \to d\pi\eta$
141: amplitude.
142: %
143: (Note that there can be also a background in the $S$-wave state,
144: as discussed in Refs.~\cite{Mue,Gri} -- but this is not the issue we
145: are concerned with here.)
146: %
147: Consequences of this nonresonant background contribution for
148: polarization observables of the reactions \vpp\ and \vpn\ will be discussed.
149: Specifically, it will be shown that,
150: because of the presence of the nonresonant background,
151: in these reactions the angular-asymmetry
152: parameter $\asym$ becomes nonzero even without isospin-violation.
153: Indeed, like the effect induced by the \mix\ mixing discussed above,
154: the contribution of the nonresonant background is also linear in $k$
155: and therefore is difficult to separate from effects of the
156: \mix\ mixing in the reaction \vpn.
157: However, a measurement of this asymmetry in the
158: reaction \vpp\ can provide us with information on the contribution of
159: the nonresonant background to the reaction
160: $pp\to d a^+_0\to d\pi^+\eta$.
161:
162: Recently the reactions \ppdkk\ and $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ were studied
163: theoretically in a chiral unitary approach taking into account the
164: coupling between the
165: $K^+\bar K^0$ and $\pi^+\eta$ channels~\cite{Oset}.
166: The elementary $\pi\eta$ production amplitude was assumed to be given
167: by the diagram shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1}a where the $\pi$ and
168: $\eta$ mesons emerge from different nucleons and rescatter with
169: each other before being emitted. Since chiral dynamics
170: suppressed the coupling of the $\pi\eta$ system to $P$-waves
171: \cite{Meiss}, it follows within this approach that the $\pi^+\eta$
172: system is preferably produced in $S$-waves and that $P$ waves, i.e. the
173: nonresonant background discussed above, should be practically
174: negligible~\footnote{Note, however, that $P$-waves arise naturally
175: in the effective Lagrangian approach of Achasov et al. \cite{Ach2}
176: based on the anomolous Wess-Zumino action.}.
177: %
178: Their result motivated us to consider in the present paper
179: a different production
180: mechanism that does not involve the $\pi\eta$ amplitude directly
181: and therefore is not constrained by chiral symmetry.
182: We assume that the reaction $pp\to d\pi\eta$ proceeds
183: via pion exchange between the nucleons followed by the exitation
184: of the $\Delta$(1232) and the $N^*$(1535) resonances \cite{Gri} which
185: then produce the $\pi$ and $\eta$ mesons in their respective
186: decay, cf. Fig.~\ref{fig1}b. Such a reaction mechanism is
187: certainly suppressed at energies near the $\pi\eta$
188: threshold where chiral dynamics should be dominating.
189: However, in the region of the $a_0$ resonance the
190: excess energy for the $\pi\eta$ system is already around
191: 300 MeV. Therefore this mechanism could be already of
192: relevance and, specifically, it will introduce $P$-wave contributions.
193: We will present corresponding results for the angular symmetry
194: $\asym$\ and also for differential cross sections.
195: %
196: Clearly, in this context an experimental study of this
197: asymmetry parameter is very interesting because it may shed light on the
198: validity of the chiral unitary approach~\cite{Oset}
199: for the calculation of amplitudes for the reactions \ppdkk\
200: and $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ near the $a_0$ threshold.
201:
202: Finally, we will show that a systematic study
203: of the angular-asymmetry parameters for both reactions, \vpp\ and \vpn,
204: may allow to obtain quantitative information on the \mix\ mixing parameter.
205:
206: The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. II we provide the
207: general form of the reaction amplitude for the process $NN \to d\pi\eta$
208: near threshold where we allow the $\pi\eta$ system to be in an $S$
209: or a $P$ wave. Furthermore we derive expressions for the corresponding
210: differential cross sections. In Sect. III we consider a phenomenological
211: model for the nonresonant ($P$ wave) contributions to the reaction
212: $pp \to d\pi^+\eta$ and present concrete estimations for the angular symmetry
213: $\asym$\ and also for differential cross sections.
214: Implications of a possibly non-zero background contribution to the
215: reaction $NN\to d\pi\eta$ on the issue of \mix\ is discussed in
216: Sect. IV. The paper ends with a short summary.
217:
218: \section{General form of reaction amplitude}
219:
220: Let us consider first the reaction $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$. If the $\pi^+\eta$
221: system is produced by the decay of the $a^+_0$ meson it is in an $S$-wave.
222: However, if we produce the $\pi^+\eta$ state with an invariant mass of
223: $m\approx m_{a_0}\approx 980$~MeV but not via the
224: $a^+_0$ resonance then the orbital angular momentum of the
225: $\pi\eta$ system may be large because, as mentioned, the energy available
226: in the $\pi\eta$ system is already around 300 MeV.
227:
228: We start with the most general form of the amplitude ${\cal M}$
229: for the reaction $NN\to d\pi\eta$. It is given by
230: \be
231: {\cal M} =\phi^T_1\sigma_y\,[F +\bfg\cdot\bfsigma]\,\phi_2 \, ,
232: \label{3}
233: \ee
234: where $\phi^T_1$ and $\phi_2$ are the spinors of the nucleons
235: ($T$ indicates the transposed state vector).
236: The amplitude in Eq.~(\ref{3}) involves two terms, $F$ and
237: $\bfg\cdot\bfsigma$, corresponding to the initial total spin
238: of the nucleons of $S_{NN}=0$ and $S_{NN}=1\,$, respectively.
239:
240: Note, that both functions $F$ and $\bfg$ are to be linear functions
241: of the polarization vector $\bfeps^*$ of the outgoing deuteron.
242: In the following
243: we limit ourselves to the consideration of $S$- and $P$-wave
244: states for the produced $\pi\eta$ system and, accordingly,
245: we write both functions $F$ and $\bfg$ as $F=F_S + F_P$ and
246: $\bfg =\bfg_S +\bfg_P\,$. Taking into account the Pauli principle together
247: with parity and angular momentum conservation
248: and considering only terms that are at most linear in $k$
249: we get
250: %
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: \nonumber
253: F_S & = & 0\, , \\
254: \bfg_S & = & a_S\,\bfp\, (\bfk\cdot\bfeps^*)\, +\,
255: b_S\,\bfeps^*\,(\bfk\cdot\bfp)\, +\, c_S\,\bfk\, (\bfp\cdot\bfeps^*)\,
256: +\, d_S\,\bfp\,(\bfp\cdot\bfeps^*)\,(\bfk\cdot\bfp)\,
257: \label{4}
258: \end{eqnarray}
259: for the case of the $\pi\eta$ system being in an $S$-wave
260: (e.g. production via the $a_0$ resonance) and
261: %
262: \be
263: F_P = a_0\,(\bfeps^*\cdot [\bfk\times\bfq])\, +\,
264: b_0\,(\bfeps^*\cdot[\bfp\times\bfq])\,(\bfp\cdot\bfk )\, +\,
265: c_0\,(\bfeps^*\cdot[\bfp\times\bfk])\,(\bfp\cdot\bfq )\, ,
266: \label{5}
267: \ee
268: \be
269: \bfg_P = a_1\,\bfeps^*\,(\bfp\cdot\bfq )\, +\,
270: b_1\,\bfp\,(\bfeps^*\cdot\bfq )\, +\, c_1\,\bfq\,(\bfeps^*\cdot\bfp)\,
271: +\, d_1\,\bfp\,(\bfeps^*\cdot\bfp)\,(\bfp\cdot\bfq)
272: \label{6}
273: \ee
274: for the case of the $\pi\eta$ system being produced in a $P$-wave.
275: %
276: Here $a_S$, $a_0$, $a_1$, $b_S$, $b_0$, $b_1$, $c_S$, $c_0$, $c_1$,
277: $d_S$, and $d_1\,$ are independent scalar amplitudes, which may be
278: considered as being basically
279: constants for the near-threshold production ($k$ is small) of the
280: $\pi\eta$ system with an invariant mass $m=m_{a_0}$ of the $a_0$ meson.
281: In Eqs.~(\ref{4})-(\ref{6}) we used the following notations:
282:
283: $\bfp$ is the initial relative momentum in the center-of-mass system
284: (CMS) of the reaction;
285:
286: $\bfk$ is the final relative momentum of the deuteron with respect to
287: the $\pi\eta$ system in the CMS of the reaction;
288:
289: $\bfq$ is the relative momentum between the pion and the $\eta$ in the
290: $\pi\eta$ CM frame.
291: \vspace{2mm}
292:
293: The matrix element ${\cal M}$ (Eq.~(\ref{3})) squared and summed over the
294: polarizations of the initial neutron is given by
295: \be
296: \overline {|{\cal M}|^2} =\frac{1}{2} \left[ |F|^2\, +\, 2\,{\rm Re}
297: \left( F^* \bfg\cdot\bfzeta\right)\, +\, (\bfg^* \cdot \bfg)\,
298: +\, i \left(\bfzeta\cdot [\bfg \times \bfg^{\,*} ]\right)\right]\, ,
299: \label{7}
300: \ee
301: where $\bfzeta$ is the polarization vector of the initial proton, i.e.
302: $\bfzeta=\phi^+_1\bfsigma\phi_1\,$. In what follows we shall consider the
303: vector $\bfp$ to be aligned in the direction of the $z$-axis and the vector
304: $\bfzeta$ to be aligned in $x$-direction, so that $\bfzeta\perp\bfp$.
305:
306: Since we are interested in
307: the behaviour of the differential cross section
308: $d^2\sigma/dm d\Omega_{\bfk}$ and in the angular-asymmetry parameter
309: $A(\theta, \varphi)$, we are to integrate the expression~(\ref{7})
310: over the direction of the momentum $\bfq\,$:
311: \be
312: \dsdmok = N \int \frac{d\Omega_{\bfq}}{4\pi}\, \overline {|{\cal M}|^2}\, :=
313: \sigma (m; \theta, \varphi )\, .
314: \label{8}
315: \ee
316: Here $m$ is the invariant mass of the $\pi\eta$ system, $N=kq/(4\pi)^4ps\,$
317: and $s$ is the square of the total energy in the CMS of the reaction.
318: After the integration over $d\Omega_{\bfq}$ the $S-P$ interference term
319: in $\sigma (m; \theta, \varphi)$ disappears. The contribution
320: of the $S$-wave part of ${\cal M}$~(\ref{3}) to $\sigma (m; \theta, \varphi)$
321: can be obtained from Eqs.~(22) and (23) of ref.~\cite{KTHHS} and reads
322: %
323: \begin{eqnarray}
324: \nonumber
325: \left(\dsdmok\right)_S & = & N\,\biggl\{\,p^2 k^2\, \biggl[
326: %\left(\dsdmok\right)_S & = & N\,\,p^2\,k^2\, \left[
327: \frac{1}{2}\,\left(\, |a_S|^2 + |b_S|^2 \,\right)\, \\
328: \nonumber
329: & + & \left[\, |b_S|^2 +\frac{1}{2}\,|b_S + p^2 d_S|^2 +
330: {\rm Re}\,\left( a^*_S c_S + (a_S + c_S)^* (b_S + p^2 \,d_S)\right)
331: \right]\, \cos^2\theta\,\biggr] \\
332: %\nonumber
333: & + & \zeta\,pk\, {\rm Im} (a^*_S b_S + a^*_S c_S + b^*_S c_S
334: + p^2 d^*_S c_S )\,\sin\theta\,\cos\theta\,\sin\varphi \,
335: \biggr\} .
336: \label{81}
337: \end{eqnarray}
338: %
339: The contribution from the $P$-wave part
340: can be deduced from Eqs.~(\ref{5})--(\ref{8}) and amounts to
341: %
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \nonumber
344: \left(\dsdmok\right)_P & = & N\,\biggl\{\,\frac{k^2 q^2}{6}\,\Bigl[\,
345: 2|a_0|^2 + 2|b_0|^2 p^4 \cos^2\theta + |c_0|^2 p^4 \sin^2\theta +
346: 4{\rm Re}\,(a^*_0 b_0)\, p^2 \cos^2\theta \\
347: \nonumber
348: & - & 2{\rm Re}\,(a^*_0 c_0)\,p^2 \sin^2\theta \, \Bigr]\, +\,
349: \frac{q^2}{3}\,{\rm Re}\,(a^*_0 a_1 - a^*_0 c_1 - c^*_0 a_1 p^2\, )
350: \, (\bfzeta\cdot [\bfk\times\bfp ]) \\
351: \nonumber
352: & + & \frac{p^2 q^2}{6}\,\Bigl[\, (3|a_1|^2 + |b_1|^2 + |c_1|^2 )
353: + p^4 |d_1|^2 \\
354: & + & 2{\rm Re}\Bigl(\,(a^*_1\, (b_1 + c_1 + p^2 d_1) +
355: b^*_1 c_1 + (b^*_1 + c^*_1)\, p^2 d_1 \Bigr)\,\Bigr]\, \biggr\} \, .
356: \label{9}
357: \end{eqnarray}
358: %
359: It can be easily seen from Eq.~(\ref{9}) that the only contribution to the
360: angular-asymmetry parameter $\asym$, defined in Eq.~(\ref{1}), comes from the
361: term proportional to
362: $\bfzeta\cdot [\bfk\times\bfp ]=\zeta p k\sin\theta \sin\varphi$,
363: where $\theta$ and $\varphi$ are the polar and azimuthal angles of the
364: outgoing $\pi\eta$ system in the CMS of the reaction. Hence, because of
365: the $P$-wave (nonresonant background) contribution, we get a nonvanishing angular
366: asymmetry and this asymmetry is linear in $k$. Note that
367: $\asym=0$ in the case where the $\pi\eta$ system is produced in an $S$-wave,
368: as follows from Eq.~(\ref{81}).
369:
370: Therefore, it is clear
371: that the angular asymmetry $\asym$ in the reaction
372: \vpp\ can provide information on the magnitude of contributions from
373: partial waves with $l\ge 1$ in the $\pi\eta$ system.
374:
375: \section{Estimation of the angular asymmetry for nonresonant
376: $\pi^+\eta$ production}
377:
378: Let us now come to a concrete estimation for the angular-asymmetry
379: parameter. For that purpose we
380: consider a simple model for the reaction $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ in
381: which the $\pi^+\eta$
382: system can be produced with nonzero internal angular momentum
383: ($l\ge 1$). Specifically, we adopt the one-pion-exchange diagram
384: in Fig.~\ref{fig1}b.
385: %
386: We assume that the dominant contribution arises from the
387: intermediate $\Delta$(1232) state in the subprocess $\pi N\to \pi N$
388: and from the $S$-wave amplitude of the subprocess $\pi N\to \eta N$.
389: The latter is basically given by the contribution of the $N^*$(1535)
390: resonance state.
391: %
392: This diagram with the same subprocesses was already used in
393: ref.~\cite{Gri} in the context of
394: the $a_0$ production process in $pN\to d a_0\to d(\pi\eta)$.
395: However, in that work the authors were primarily interested in the
396: $S$-wave part of the one-pion-exchange $\pi\eta$ production amplitude.
397: Therefore, the
398: angular distribution of the outgoing pion was not calculated in~\cite{Gri}.
399:
400: The evaluation of this diagram, treating the
401: intermediate nucleons and the final deuteron nonrelativistically,
402: leads to the following expression
403: for the corresponding $\pi\eta$ production amplitude ${\cal M}$:
404: \be
405: {\cal M} = {\cal M}_1+{\cal M}_2\, ,
406: \phantom{xxx}
407: {\cal M}_{1,2} =\pm\, A_{1,2}\,\phi^T_{1,2}\sigma_y (\bfeps^*\cdot\bfsigma)\,
408: (2\bfn_{1,2}\cdot\bfn_2 +
409: i\bfsigma\cdot [\bfn_{1,2}\times\bfn_2 ] ) \phi_{2,1}\, ,
410: \label{101}
411: \ee
412: Note that
413: the amplitude ${\cal M}$ is antisymmetric with respect to the initial nucleons,
414: i.e. ${\cal M}_1\leftrightarrow -{\cal M}_2$ when the nucleons are interchanged.
415: The quantities $A_{1,2}$ are given by
416: \be
417: A_{1,2} = T \frac{E+m_N}{2m_N\sqrt{2m_N}}\,
418: M_{\pi^0 N\to\eta N} M_{\pi N\to\pi N}
419: % M(\Delta_{33})
420: \int \frac{d\bfq}{(2\pi)^3} u(q)\, G_{\pi}(t_{1,2})\, .
421: \label{102}
422: \ee
423: Further,
424: $2\bfn'_{1,2}\cdot\bfn_2 +
425: i\bfsigma\cdot [\bfn'_{1,2}\times\bfn_2 ]\,$ is the spin operator of
426: the $\Delta$ state in the $\pi N$ scattering amplitude and
427: $\bfn'_{1,2}=\bfr_{1,2}/r_{1,2}$ and $\bfn_2 = \bfk_2 /k_2$
428: are unit vectors. The corresponding momenta,
429: $\bfr_{1,2}\!=\!\bfk_2\!+\!\bfq_2\!-\!\bfp_{2,1}$ and
430: $\bfk_2$, are the 3-momenta of the intermediate (virtual) and final pion
431: in the CMS of the reaction, in the notation used
432: in Fig.~\ref{fig1}b. $T=4\sqrt{2}/3$ is an isospin factor and
433: $m_N$ and $E$ are the mass and total CMS energy of the initial proton.
434: %
435: The $S$-wave amplitude for $\pi^0 N\to\eta N$ is obtained from the
436: relation (see also ref.~\cite{Gri1})
437: \be
438: |M_{\pi^0 N\to\eta N}(s_1)|^2=8\pi s_1
439: \frac{p^{\pi}_{cm}}{p^{\eta}_{cm}}\, \sigma_{\pi^- p\to\eta N}\,
440: \phantom{xxx}
441: ( s_1=m^2_{\eta N})\, ,
442: \label{1021}
443: \ee
444: where the cross section
445: $\sigma_{\pi^- p\to\eta N}\!=\!(21.2\!\pm\! 1.8)p^{\eta}_{cm}$ [$\mu b$]
446: ($p^{\eta}_{cm}$ in MeV$/c$) is taken from the experiment~\cite{Binnie}.
447: %
448: The scalar amplitude for $\pi N\to\pi N$ resulting from the
449: $\Delta$ resonance reads
450: \be
451: M_{\pi N\to\pi N}(m_{\pi N}) =\frac{g^2_{\pi N\Delta}\,
452: k_{cm}(\pi')\, k_{cm}(\pi)}
453: {m_{\pi N } - M_{\Delta} + i\Gamma_{\Delta}/2}\, ,
454: \phantom{xxx}
455: g^2_{\pi N\Delta}=
456: \frac{4\pi M_{\Delta}\Gamma_{\Delta\!\to\!\pi N}}{k^3_R}\, ,
457: \label{1022}
458: \ee
459: where $k_{cm}(\pi')$, $k_{cm}(\pi)$ are the relative momenta
460: at the $\Delta N\pi$ vertices with the virtual and final pion,
461: respectively. $k_R$ is the relative momentum in the decay
462: $\Delta\to N\pi$ at the nominal mass $m_{\pi N}=M_{\Delta}$.
463:
464: In the following
465: all the values which are taken out of the loop
466: integral~(\ref{102}) are calculated at fixed values
467: $\bfq_1=\bfq_2=\bfp_d/2$ of the intermediate on-mass-shell nucleons,
468: where $\bfp_d$ is the momentum of final deutron in the reaction CM.
469: The loop integral in Eq.~(\ref{102}) contains only the wave function
470: $u(q)$ of the deuteron and the pion propagator $G_{\pi}(t)$.
471: We use the $S$-wave part of the deuteron wave function of the full Bonn
472: potential~\cite{WFD}. The propagator of the virtual pion, including a
473: form factor $F_{\pi}(t)$ of monopole type for each $\Delta N\pi$ vertex,
474: reads
475: \be
476: G_{\pi}(t) =\frac{F^2_{\pi}(t)}{t-\mu^2\!+\!i0},
477: \phantom{xxx}
478: F_{\pi}(t)= \frac{\mu^2-\Lambda^2}{t-\Lambda^2},
479: \label{103}
480: \ee
481: where $\mu$ is the pion mass. For the cutoff parameter $\Lambda$ we
482: consider the values $\Lambda = 1\div 1.3$~GeV~\cite{Gri}. The four-momentum
483: transfer squared $t$ for nonrelativistic intermediate
484: nucleons is given by the relations ($t=t_{1,2}$ for the
485: corresponding part ${\cal M}_{1,2}$ of the total antisymmetric
486: amplitude ${\cal M}$ according to Eq.~(\ref{101}))
487: \be
488: t_{1,2}\!-\!\mu^2\!+i0 =
489: -x\,\left[(\bfq\!-\!\bfdel_{1,2})^2\!-\! a^2_{1,2}\!-\!i0\right]\, ,
490: \phantom{xxx}
491: x=(E-\omega_2)/m\, ,
492: \label{1031}\ee
493: $$
494: a^2_{1,2}=\frac{1}{x}\left[\,(T_N-\omega_2)^2 +(\bfp_{2,1}-\bfk_2)^2
495: \left(\frac{1}{x} -1\right) -\mu^2\,\right]\, ,
496: \phantom{xx}
497: \bfdel_{1,2}=\frac{\bfp_{2,1}-\bfk_2}{x} -\frac{\bfp_d}{2}\, .
498: $$
499: where $T_N=E-m_N$ and $\omega_2$ is the total energy of the final pion
500: in the CMS of the reaction.
501:
502: Let us rewrite the total amplitude ${\cal M}$ (Eq.~(\ref{101})) in the
503: form of Eq.~(\ref{3}). Then we get
504: \be
505: {\cal M} = {\cal M}_1\!+\!{\cal M}_2=
506: \phi^T_1\sigma_y\,[F\!+\!\bfg\cdot\bfsigma]\,\phi_2\, ,
507: \phantom{xx}
508: {\cal M}_{1,2}=\pm\,A_{1,2}\, \phi^T_{1,2}\sigma_y\,[F_{1,2}\!
509: +\!\bfg_{1,2}\cdot\bfsigma]\,\phi_{2,1}\, ,
510: \label{104}
511: \ee
512: where
513: $$
514: F =A_1 F_1 + A_2 F_2\, ,
515: \phantom{xxx}
516: \bfg =A_1 \bfg_1 - A_2 \bfg_2\, ,
517: $$
518: \be
519: F_{1,2} =i(\bfeps\cdot[\bfn'_{1,2}\times\bfn_2])\, ,
520: \phantom{xx}
521: \bfg_1=2(\bfn'_{1,2}\cdot\bfn_2)\bfeps +
522: (\bfn_{1,2}\cdot\bfeps)\bfn_2 -(\bfn_2\cdot\bfeps)\bfn'_{1,2}\, .
523: \label{105}
524: \ee
525:
526: Using Eqs.~(\ref{7}), (\ref{8}) and (\ref{101})-(\ref{105}), we
527: evaluated the angular asymmetry $A(\theta,\varphi)$,
528: defined in Eq.~(\ref{1}), at the angle
529: $\theta=90^0$, where the term $2{\rm Re} ( F^* \bfg\cdot\bfzeta )\sim
530: \bfzeta\cdot [\bfk\times\bfp ]=\zeta p k\sin\theta \sin\varphi$
531: should produce the maximal effect. The calculations were performed at
532: $m=980$~MeV (i.e. in the $a_0$-meson region). It turned out that
533: the resulting angular asymmetry parameter $\asym$ is very small,
534: i.e. $A(90^0, \varphi)\le$~1\%.
535: In order to understand this we need to go back to the equations
536: above. Indeed one can immediately see, that
537: in the case of zero relative phase
538: between the quantities $A_1$ and $A_2$ given by Eq.~(\ref{102}), one
539: should obtain exactly $A(\theta, \varphi) = 0$. This is due to the
540: relative phase of $90^0$ between the functions $F$ and $\bfg$ in the term
541: $2{\rm Re} ( F^* \bfg\cdot\bfzeta )$ of Eq.~(\ref{7}) because of the factor
542: $i$ in $F$ (see Eq.~(\ref{105}) for $F_1$). The latter results from the
543: spin structure of the $\pi N$ scattering amplitude, which in our case
544: is given by the excitation of the $\Delta$ resonance alone,
545: and is connected with the Hermitian form of the interaction
546: (cf. the factor $i$ in front of the ${\bf \sigma}$ matrix in Eq.~(\ref{101})).
547: In fact, the loop integral in Eq.~(\ref{102}) generates an imaginary part from
548: the on-mass-shell contribution of the exchanged pion. Therefore, due to
549: permutation of the initial protons, the quantities $A_1$ and $A_2$ acquire
550: some nonzero relative phase. But still there is only a small effect on the
551: angular asymmetry.
552:
553: In this context let us mention that the interaction in the initial
554: $NN$ system, which is neglected in the simple model calculation presented
555: here, should also introduce a relative phase between those two amplitudes
556: and therefore might lead to an enhancement in the predictions for
557: the angular-asymmetry parameter.
558:
559: In any case,
560: the smallness of this asymmetry effect does not mean that the
561: $P$-wave fraction in the $\pi\eta$ system is also small.
562: To illustrate this, we present here some results for the reaction with
563: unpolarized proton beam, namely the distribution
564: $d^2\sigma/dmdz_1$ at selected values of the invariant mass $m$ of the
565: $\pi\eta$ system around the $a_0$ mass and for two values of the
566: cutoff parameter $\Lambda$ ($\Lambda$ = 1 and 1.3~GeV).
567: Here $z_1=\cos\theta_1$, where $\theta_1$ is the polar angle of the
568: outgoing $\pi^+$ meson with respect to the direction of the
569: proton-beam momentum in the $\pi^+\eta$ rest frame. The calculations
570: were done at the proton beam energy $T_{lab}=2.65$~GeV.
571: The resulting angular spectra are shown in the Figs.~\ref{fig2} and
572: \ref{fig3}.
573: Evidently,
574: they are not isotropic but exhibit a strong angular dependence
575: and, therefore, demonstrate that there are
576: significant contributions from higher partial waves ($l\ge 1$).
577: Thus, a measurement of the angular distribution for the
578: produced $\pi^+\eta$ system would be rather instructive. In
579: particular it should allow to examine the validity of
580: the chiral unitary approach used in ref.~\cite{Oset}, which
581: implies a completely isotropic angular distribution,
582: in the energy region of the $a_0$(980) resonance.
583:
584: \section{The reaction \bfvpn\ and the \bfmix\ mixing amplitude}
585:
586: Let us now consider the reaction $pp\to d\pi^0\eta$. As discussed in
587: ref.~\cite{KTHHS}, if the $\pi^0\eta$ system is produced in an
588: $S$-wave then the only nonzero contribution to the angular-asymmetry
589: parameter comes from the \mix\ mixing amplitude.
590: %
591: Indeed, we have shown there that --
592: in lowest order in $k$ -- the isospin-violating contribution
593: to $\asym$ is proportional to $\xi\cdot k$. Thus, an extraction
594: of the \mix\ mixing parameter $\xi$ would, in principle,
595: be feasible from experimental information on the angular asymmetry.
596:
597: However, as should be clear after the discussion in Sect.~II,
598: there could be also contributions to $\asym$ from isospin-conserving
599: terms, because of the possible presence of $P$ waves in the
600: $\pi\eta$ system.
601: Such contributions arise from the term in the differential cross
602: section proportional to
603: $\bfzeta\cdot [\bfk\times\bfp ]$. This term is maximal at $\theta$ = 90$^0$
604: and vanishes at $\theta=0^0$. As a consequence, a separation of both
605: contributions to $\asym$ is rather complicated.
606:
607: Still, there is a possibility to separate the contribution
608: from the isospin-violating part, namely by carrying out a
609: combined study of the polarized differential cross sections
610: for both reactions \vpp\ and \vpn.
611: In order to illustrate how this can be achieved, let us first remind
612: the reader that the
613: amplitudes of those reactions are related by
614: \be
615: {\cal M}(pn\to d\pi^0\eta) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\,
616: {\cal M}(pp\to d\pi^+\eta)\, ,
617: \label{10}
618: \ee
619: if isospin is conserved. This relation suggests that one
620: should consider a ``subtracted'' differential cross section,
621: \be
622: \sigma_{\Delta} (m; \theta, \varphi) :=
623: \dsdmoko \,-\,\frac{1}{2}\,\dsdmokp \, ,
624: \label{11}
625: \ee
626: where $\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_+$ are the cross sections of the processes
627: \vpn\ and \vpp, respectively. Evidently, the angular asymmetry
628: $\asym$, evaluated according to Eq.~(\ref{1}) for this
629: ``substracted'' differential cross section
630: $\sigma_{\Delta} (m; \theta, \varphi )$
631: does not contain terms induced by isospin-conserving processes and
632: hence provides only information on isospin violating effects.
633: Note that in the simple model considered in Sect.~III the angular
634: asymmetry in the reaction \vpp\ is small in any case and, therefore,
635: one might expect that any effects seen in the experiment
636: should come mainly from isospin-violating \mix\ mixing.
637:
638: \section{Summary}
639:
640: We presented a discussion on effects of background contributions to
641: differential cross sections and the angular asymmetry $\asym$ for the
642: reactions $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ and $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$. Specifically, we pointed
643: out that already in lowest order in the relative momentum between the
644: deuteron and the $\pi\eta$ system
645: the angular asymmetry $\asym$ can be nonzero
646: -- even without isospin mixing effects --
647: because of the presence of higher partial waves in the $\pi\eta$ system.
648: As a consequence, a measurement of the angular asymmetry
649: $\asym$ with polarized proton beams for the reaction \vpp\ should
650: provide useful information on the role of higher partial waves
651: in this reaction. It would also allow to examine the
652: validity of model calculations of the reaction
653: $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$ based on chiral constraints~\cite{Oset}
654: for energies around the the $a_0$ threshold.
655:
656: We also argued that a
657: combined analysis of differential cross sections for both reactions,
658: \vpp\ and \vpn, may facilitate the extraction of isospin-violating effects
659: induced by \mix\ mixing and allow to shed light on the nature of these
660: scalar mesons.
661:
662: \section*{Acknowledgements}
663:
664: The authors are thankful to V.V. Baru and M. B\"uscher for useful
665: discussions.
666: This work was partly supported by the DFG-RFBI Grant
667: No.~02-02-04001 (436 RUS 113/652/1-1) and by the RFBR Grant
668: No.~00-15-96562.
669:
670: %\newpage
671:
672: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
673: %
674: \bibitem{1} Proceedings of the Workshop on $a_0$(980) physics with ANKE,
675: edited by M.~B\"uscher and V.~Kleber,
676: Berichte des
677: Forschungszentrums J\"ulich J\"ul-3801 (2000), pp. 3-34.
678: %
679: \bibitem{MB1} M. B\"uscher, F.P. Sassen, N.N. Achasov, and L. Kondratyuk,
680: hep-ph/0301126.
681: %
682: \bibitem{VK} P. Fedorets and V. Kleber,
683: Proceedings of the Conference on Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP 2002),
684: J\"ulich, Germany, 9-14 June 2002, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A}, in print.
685: %
686: \bibitem{PDG} C. Caso {\it et al.}, {\it Review of Particle Physics},
687: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C 3}, 1 (1998).
688: %
689: \bibitem{MB2} M. B\"uscher et al.,
690: http://www.fz-juelich.de/ikp/anke/doc/anke/proposal/a0-f0.ps.gz
691: %
692: \bibitem{2} V.E.~Tarasov and A.E.~Kudryavtsev,
693: Proceedings of the Workshop on $a_0$(980) physics with ANKE,
694: edited by M.~B\"uscher and V.~Kleber,
695: Berichte des
696: Forschungszentrums J\"ulich J\"ul-3801 (2000), p. 151.
697: %
698: \bibitem{3} Proceedings of the 2nd ANKE
699: Workshop on ``Strangeness Production in $pp$ and
700: $pA$ Interactions at ANKE'',
701: edited by M.~B\"uscher, V.~Kleber, P.~Kulessa and M.~Nekipelov,
702: Berichte des Forschungszentrums
703: J\"ulich J\"ul-3922 (2001), pp. 209-228.
704: %
705: \bibitem{Ach1} N.N. Achasov, S.A. Devyanin, and G.N. Shestakov, Phys. Lett.
706: B {\bf 88}, 367 (1979); Yad. Fiz. {\bf 33}, 1337 (1981)
707: [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 33}, 715 (1981)].
708:
709: \bibitem{4} A.E.~Kudryavtsev and V.E.~Tarasov, JETP Lett. {\bf 72}, 401
710: (2000); nucl-th/0102053.
711: %
712: \bibitem{KTHHS} A.E.~Kudryavtsev, V.E.~Tarasov, J.~Haidenbauer,
713: C.~Hanhart, and J.~Speth,
714: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 66}, 015207 (2002).
715: %
716: \bibitem{Mue} H. M\"uller, Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 11}, 113 (2001).
717: %
718: \bibitem{Gri} L.A.~Kondratyuk, E.L.~Bratkovskaya, and V.Yu.~Grishina,
719: {\tt nucl-th/0207033}, Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 66}, 152
720: (2003).
721: %
722: \bibitem{Oset} E.~Oset, J.~A.~Oller, and Ulf-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
723: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A12}, 435 (2001).
724: %
725: \bibitem{Meiss} V.~Bernard, N. Kaiser, and Ulf-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
726: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 44}, 3698 (1991).
727: %
728: \bibitem{Ach2} N.N. Achasov and G.N. Shestakov, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63},
729: 014017 (2000); Yad. Fiz. {\bf 65}, 579 (2002)
730: [Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 65}, 552 (2002)].
731: \bibitem{Gri1} V.Yu.~Grishina {\it et al.},
732: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 475}, 9 (2000).
733: %
734: \bibitem{Binnie} D.M.~Binnie {\it et al.},
735: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 8}, 2789 (1973).
736: %
737: \bibitem{WFD} R.~Machleidt, K.~Holinde, and Ch.~Elster,
738: Phys. Rep. {\bf 149}, 1 (1987).
739: %
740: %\bibitem{Delta} {\it J.~Hundomalj-Gabitzsch et al.} //
741: %Phys.Rev.C {\bf 18}, 2666 (1978)
742: %
743: \end{thebibliography}
744:
745: \newpage
746:
747: \begin{figure}
748: \caption{Nonresonant mechanisms for the reaction $pp\to d\pi^+\eta$.
749: (a) $\pi\eta$ rescattering.
750: (b) Pion-exchange diagram involving the $\pi N \to \Delta \to \pi N$ and
751: $\pi N \to \eta N$ reaction amplitudes.
752: }
753: \label{fig1}
754: \end{figure}
755:
756: \begin{figure}
757: \caption{
758: Angular distributions of the outgoing $\pi^+$ meson in the $\pi^+\eta$
759: rest frame for several values $m$ of the $\pi^+\eta$ invariant mass
760: in the $a_0$-mass region. The dashed, solid and dotted curves correspond
761: to $m$ = 950, 980 and 1020 MeV$/c^2$, respectively. The calculations are
762: performed at $T_{lab}=2.65$~GeV and for a cutoff parameter~(\ref{103})
763: $\Lambda=1$~GeV$/c$.}
764: \label{fig2}
765: \end{figure}
766:
767: \begin{figure}
768: \caption{
769: The same distributions as in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig2} but
770: for $\Lambda=1.3$~GeV$/c$.
771: }
772: \label{fig3}
773: \end{figure}
774:
775: \newpage
776: \vglue 1cm
777: \begin{figure}%[H!]
778: \begin{center}
779: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=7.0cm}
780: \end{center}
781: \end{figure}
782:
783: \vskip 1cm
784: \center{Fig. 1a}
785:
786: \begin{figure}[tb]
787: \vspace{5cm}
788: \special{psfile=fig1.eps
789: hoffset= 110 voffset =-100 hscale=99 vscale=99}
790: \end{figure}
791:
792: \vskip 5cm
793: \center{Fig. 1b}
794:
795: \newpage
796: \vglue 1cm
797: \begin{figure}[tb]
798: \vspace{5cm}
799: \special{psfile=ap1a.ps
800: hoffset= 20 voffset =-300 hscale=80 vscale=80}
801: \end{figure}
802:
803: \newpage
804:
805: \vglue 1cm
806: \begin{figure}[tb]
807: \vspace{5cm}
808: \special{psfile=ap1b.ps
809: hoffset= 20 voffset =-300 hscale=80 vscale=80}
810: \end{figure}
811:
812: \end{document}
813:
814: