1: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
7: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
8: \def\bd{\begin{displaymath}}
9: \def\ed{\end{displaymath}}
10: \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
11: \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
12: \def\lr{\leftrightarrow}
13: \def\s{\protect{f_0}}
14:
15:
16: \title{Closed-flavor $\pi J/\psi$ and $\pi \Upsilon $ Cross Sections
17: at Low Energies\\ from Dipion Decays}
18: \author{T.Barnes}
19: \email{tbarnes@utk.edu}
20: \affiliation{Physics Division,
21: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA,\\
22: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
23: University of Tennessee,\\
24: Knoxville, TN
25: 37996, USA}
26: \author{N.I.Kochelev}
27: \email{kochelev@thsun1.jinr.ru}
28: \affiliation{
29: Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics,
30: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,\\
31: 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia,
32: Institute of Physics and Technology\\
33: 480082 Almaty, Kazakhstan
34: }
35: \date{\today}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: The scale of low energy
39: $c\bar c$ and $b\bar b$ cross sections on light hadrons is
40: of great importance to searches for the quark gluon
41: plasma using the heavy-quarkonium suppression
42: signature.
43: Unfortunately, little is known about these
44: near-threshold cross sections at present, and
45: recent theoretical estimates span many orders of magnitude.
46: Here we use
47: experimental data on the four observed
48: closed-flavor heavy quarkonium hadronic decays
49: $\psi{\, '}\to \pi \pi J/\psi $,
50: $\Upsilon' \to \pi \pi \Upsilon$,
51: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi \pi \Upsilon $
52: and
53: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi \pi \Upsilon' $,
54: combined with simple models of the transition amplitudes,
55: to estimate the pion scattering cross sections
56: of $c\bar c$ and $b\bar b$ mesons
57: near threshold. Specifically we consider the closed-flavor reactions
58: $\pi J/\psi \to \pi \psi{\, '}$,
59: $\pi \Upsilon \to \pi \Upsilon' $,
60: $\pi \Upsilon \to \pi \Upsilon'' $
61: and
62: $\pi \Upsilon' \to \pi \Upsilon'' $ and their
63: time-reversed analogues.
64: Our results
65: may be useful in constraining theoretical models
66: of the strong interactions of heavy quarkonia,
67: and can be
68: systematically improved through future detailed studies of
69: dipion decays, notably
70: $\psi{\, '}\to \pi\pi J/\psi$ and
71: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi\pi\Upsilon$.
72: \end{abstract}
73:
74: \pacs{12.38.Mh, 13.25.Gv, 13.75.Lb, 25.75.Dw}
75:
76: \maketitle
77:
78: \section{Introduction}
79:
80: One signature proposed for the identification of a
81: quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a suppressed rate of formation
82: of charmonium bound states, due to the screening
83: effect of the plasma on the linear
84: confining potential that normally binds a $c\bar c$ pair
85: \cite{Matsui:1986dk}.
86: In the presence of this screening,
87: $c\bar c$ pairs produced within the plasma presumably
88: separate into open charm mesons, so that the formation of a QGP
89: would be signaled by a decrease in the charmonium production cross section.
90:
91: This attractively simple picture becomes more complicated if the dissociation
92: cross sections of charmonia on light hadrons are not small. In this case
93: the charmonia produced during a heavy-ion collision may rescatter
94: into open-charm final states as the result of interactions with
95: the ``comoving" light hadrons produced in the collision.
96:
97: Due to the importance of these cross sections for QGP searches,
98: many calculations of near-threshold scattering cross sections
99: of light hadrons on charmonia have recently
100: been reported. The methods applied include
101: a high energy color-dipole scattering model \cite{Kharzeev:1994pz},
102: quark models \cite{Martins:1994hd,Wong:1999zb,Barnes:2003dg},
103: meson exchange models \cite{Matinian:1998cb,Haglin:1999xs,Navarra:2001pz},
104: and most recently
105: QCD sum rules \cite{Navarra:2001jy,Duraes:2002ux}.
106:
107: Under certain simplifying assumptions one may relate
108: experimentally known
109: hadron decays
110: to heavy quarkonium scattering cross sections.
111: Here we consider the
112: dipion decays of
113: heavy quarkonia below open-flavor thresholds, which
114: have been observed in four cases,
115: $\psi{\, '} \to \pi \pi J/\psi\, $
116: \cite{Armstrong:pg,Bai:1999mj,Ambrogiani:2000vj},
117: $\Upsilon' \to \pi \pi\Upsilon$
118: \cite{Besson:1984ha,Bowcock:1986um,Brock:pj,Butler:1993rq}
119: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi \pi\Upsilon$
120: \cite{Bowcock:1986um,Brock:pj,Heintz:cv,Wu:qc,Butler:1993rq}
121: and
122: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi \pi\Upsilon'$
123: \cite{Bowcock:1986um,Brock:pj,Heintz:cv,Wu:qc,Butler:1993rq}.
124: These transitions are quite weak, with partial widths of
125: only {\it ca.}
126: 100~keV for $c\bar c$ and 1$-$10~keV for $b\bar b$.
127: They have been observed only because the total widths of the initial
128: heavy quarkonia, which lie below their open-flavor thresholds,
129: are also very small.
130:
131: We can use these three-body partial
132: widths to estimate pion scattering cross sections of the
133: corresponding heavy quarkonia, since these processes
134: are described by
135: the same invariant amplitudes.
136: The
137: pion scattering cross sections are given by
138: \be
139: \sigma_{\pi_1 {\cal M}_a \to \pi_2 {\cal M}_b }
140: =
141: {1\over 64\pi s}\, {1\over p_i^{\, 2}}
142: \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \! dt\; \langle\, |{\cal A}\, |^2 \rangle
143: \ee
144: where as usual
145: $
146: s
147: = m_{\pi_1 {\cal M}_a }^2
148: = m_{\pi_2 {\cal M}_b }^2
149: $,
150: $t = (p_{\pi_1} - p_{\pi_2})^2$,
151: the limits are
152: $t_{2\atop 1} = -2[ E_{\pi_1}E_{\pi_2}\mp p_ip_f - m_{\pi}^2 ]$,
153: and frame-dependent quantities
154: such as $ E_{\pi_1}$ and $p_i = |\vec p_i |$ are understood to be
155: evaluated in the c.m. frame.
156:
157: The corresponding
158: dipion three-body partial width is
159: \be
160: \Gamma_{{\cal M}_b \to \pi_1 \pi_2 {\cal M}_a }
161: =
162: {1\over (2\pi)^3}\,
163: {1\over 32 {M_b}^3}
164: \int \!\!\!
165: \int \!
166: ds\, dt \;
167: \langle\, |{\cal A}\, |^2 \rangle
168: \ee
169: where $s$ and $t$ (after crossing) become
170: $s = m_{\pi_2 {\cal M}_a }^2$ and
171: $t = m_{\pi_1 \pi_2}^2$.
172: Our Eqs.(1,2) correspond to
173: Eqs.(37.30,21)
174: of the 2002 PDG \cite{Hagiwara:fs}.
175:
176:
177: Our convention is that ${\cal M}_b$ is higher in mass
178: than ${\cal M}_a$, so the dipion decay
179: ${\cal M}_b \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_a$
180: is energetically
181: allowed but
182: ${\cal M}_a \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_b$
183: is not.
184: The initial and final mesons
185: in the cross section formula
186: Eq.(1)
187: may be
188: $({\cal M}_a,{\cal M}_b)$
189: as shown, or they may be
190: transposed to
191: $({\cal M}_b,{\cal M}_a)$,
192: since the same invariant amplitude
193: ${\cal A}$ is involved.
194: As an example, the decay
195: $\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi $
196: is related to both
197: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '} $
198: and
199: $\pi^+ \psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ J/\psi$.
200:
201: Since the squared invariant amplitude
202: $\langle\, |{\cal A}\, |^2 \rangle$
203: is sampled in different kinematic regions by
204: the decay and the cross sections
205: (see Fig.1), assumptions regarding the form of
206: $\langle\, |{\cal A}\, |^2 \rangle$ are required to relate
207: these various processes. In the following we shall obtain
208: results for the cross sections given three simple models
209: of the invariant amplitudes.
210:
211: \begin{figure}
212: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth,angle=270]{bk_fig1.eps}
213: \vskip -0.3cm
214: \caption{Dalitz plot of kinematically allowed regions for the
215: decay
216: $\psi{\, '}\to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi $ and the
217: reactions
218: $
219: \pi^+ J/\psi
220: \to
221: \pi^+ \psi{\, '}
222: $
223: and
224: $
225: \pi^+ \psi{\, '}
226: \to
227: \pi^+ J/\psi
228: $
229: .
230: }
231: \label{fig:bk_fig1}
232: \end{figure}
233:
234: \begin{figure}[ht]
235: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\textwidth]{bk_fig2.eps}
236: \vskip -0.5cm
237: \caption{
238: $\sigma_{\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}}$ (lower)
239: and
240: $\sigma_{\pi^+ \psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ J/\psi}$ (upper)
241: estimated from
242: $\Gamma_{\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi\, }$
243: assuming constant amplitudes.
244: }
245: \label{fig:bk_fig2}
246: \end{figure}
247:
248: \vskip -0.5cm
249: \begin{figure}[ht]
250: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\textwidth]{bk_fig3.eps}
251: \vskip -0.5cm
252: \caption{
253: $\sigma_{\pi^+ \Upsilon \to \pi^+ \Upsilon'}$ (lower)
254: and
255: $\sigma_{\pi^+ \Upsilon' \to \pi^+ \Upsilon}$
256: (upper) estimated from
257: $\Gamma_{\Upsilon' \to \pi^+ \pi^- \Upsilon }$
258: assuming constant amplitudes.}
259: \label{fig:bk_fig3}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262: \section{Constant ${\cal A}$ approximation}
263:
264: As a first approximation
265: we neglect any dependence of $\langle\, |{\cal A}\, |^2 \rangle$
266: on kinematics, and simply treat it as a constant. In this case
267: Eqs.(1,2) imply a simple relation between the pion cross
268: section and the dipion partial decay width,
269: \be
270: \sigma_{ \pi {\cal M}_a \to \pi {\cal M}_b }
271: =
272: \Gamma_{ {\cal M}_b \to \pi\pi {\cal M}_a }
273: \cdot
274: {16\pi^2
275: M_b^3\over A_D}
276: \;
277: {p_f\over p_i}
278: \,
279: s^{-1}
280: \equiv
281: c_0
282: \,
283: {p_f\over p_i}
284: \,
285: s^{-1}
286: \ee
287: where $A_D$ is the area of the
288: ${\cal M}_b \to \pi\pi {\cal M}_a$
289: dipion decay
290: Dalitz plot
291: \be
292: A_D
293: =
294: \int \!\!\!
295: \int \!
296: dm_{\pi_2 {\cal M}_a }^2
297: dm_{\pi_1 \pi_2 }^2
298: =
299: \int \!\!\!
300: \int \!
301: ds \, dt
302: \ee
303: and $p_i = p_a $ and $p_f = p_b$
304: are the three-momenta of the initial and final
305: pions (or heavy mesons) in the reaction
306: $\pi {\cal M}_a \to \pi {\cal M}_b$ in the $c.m.$ frame.
307: The
308: Dalitz plot for the
309: decay
310: $\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi $
311: and the related
312: reactions
313: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '} $
314: and
315: $
316: \pi^+ \psi{\, '}
317: \to
318: \pi^+ J/\psi
319: $
320: are shown as examples in Fig.1.
321: The Dalitz plot areas $\{ A_D\} $ and dipion widths used in
322: this work are given in Table~1; the masses assumed are
323: $m_{\pi^+} = 0.1396$~GeV,
324: $M_{J/\psi} = 3.097$~GeV,
325: $M_{\psi{\, '}} = 3.686$~GeV,
326: $M_{\Upsilon} = 9.460$~GeV,
327: $M_{\Upsilon'} = 10.023$~GeV and
328: $M_{\Upsilon''} = 10.355$~GeV.
329:
330: \begin{table}[h]
331: \begin{center}
332: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
333: \hline
334: transition
335: &
336: \
337: $A_D$[GeV$^4$]
338: \
339: &
340: \
341: $\Gamma_{\pi^+\pi^-}$[keV]
342: \
343: &
344: \
345: $c_0$[mb GeV$^2$]
346: \
347: \\ \hline \hline
348: \
349: $\psi{\, '}\to\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi$
350: \
351: & $0.436$ & $91.5\pm 9.0$
352: & $0.65\pm 0.06 $
353: \\ \hline
354: $\Upsilon'\phantom{'}\to\pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon\phantom{'}$
355: & $1.023$ & $8.3\pm 1.3$
356: & $0.50\pm 0.08$
357: \\ \hline
358: $\Upsilon''\to\pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon\phantom{'}$
359: & $6.679$ & $1.2\pm 0.2$
360: & $0.012\pm 0.001$
361: \\ \hline
362: $\Upsilon''\to\pi^+\pi^-\Upsilon'$ & $0.027$ & $0.7\pm 0.2$
363: & $1.9\pm 0.5 $
364: \\ \hline
365: \end{tabular}
366: \caption{Experimental dipion-decay Dalitz plot areas, transition rates
367: and cross section coefficients.}
368: \end{center}
369: \end{table}
370:
371:
372: The cross sections for the reactions
373: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$
374: and
375: $\pi^+ \psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ J/\psi$
376: in the
377: constant amplitude approximation are shown in Fig.2.
378: Evidently the scales of these cross sections
379: a few hundred MeV above threshold are
380: {\it ca.} 20~{$\mu$b}
381: for the endothermic process
382: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$
383: and {\it ca.} 0.1~{mb} for its crossed exothermic
384: partner
385: $\pi^+ \psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ J/\psi$. This method applied to pion
386: cross sections in the upsilon family
387: yields cross sections of
388: {\it ca.} 2~{$\mu$b} for
389: $\pi^+ \Upsilon \to \pi^+ \Upsilon'$
390: and
391: {\it ca.} 10~{$\mu$b} for
392: $\pi^+ \Upsilon' \to \pi^+ \Upsilon$
393: in the analogous kinematic regime (Fig.3).
394:
395: \section{Improved estimates}
396:
397: Although the constant amplitude results of the previous section
398: are of interest as order-of-magnitude
399: estimates, it is known experimentally that the invariant amplitudes for
400: these dipion decays show a strong and rather complicated dependence
401: on the $\pi\pi$ invariant mass.
402: In $\psi{\, '} \to\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi $ a strong
403: suppression of the $\pi\pi$ system at low invariant mass is evident
404: (see for example our Fig.4, or Fig.6 of Bai {\it et al.}\cite{Bai:1999mj}).
405: One might have instead expected a near-threshold
406: enhancement, due to the attractive FSI of an S-wave I=0 $\pi\pi$ system.
407: In contrast, the decay $\Upsilon'' \to \pi\pi \Upsilon$
408: has a complicated double-bump structure,
409: which {\it does} show an enhancement at low $\pi\pi$ invariant mass,
410: as well as a high invariant mass
411: enhancement as seen in
412: $\psi{\, '} \to \pi\pi J/\psi$.
413: This difference between the observed $\pi\pi$ distributions
414: suggests that the
415: $\pi\pi$ production amplitude
416: depends significantly on the heavy-quarkonium
417: source,
418: and is not accurately described by a universal
419: $\pi\pi$ amplitude alone.
420:
421: Various theoretical models
422: of these dipion decay amplitudes have appeared in the
423: literature. They may be divided into three broad
424: categories,
425: according to the mechanism that is assumed to give rise
426: to the strong $m_{\pi\pi}$-dependence;
427: 1) gluon radiation
428: models
429: \cite{Gottfried:1977gp,Yan:1980uh,Chen:1997zz},
430: 2) scalar anomaly models \cite{Voloshin:yb,Voloshin:1980zf,Novikov:fa}, and
431: 3) scalar meson exchange models \cite{Sorge:1997bg,Komada:2000ez,Lahde:2001zd}.
432: The first two categories predict rather similar $m_{\pi\pi}$
433: dependences, so we will consider them together.
434: There is also a suggestion that chiral symmetry, combined
435: with certain simplifying asumptions for amplitudes, can
436: explain the observed $m_{\pi\pi}$ dependence in
437: $\psi{\, '} \to \pi\pi J/\psi$ \cite{Brown:1975dz}; this model
438: suggests an $m_{\pi\pi}$ dependence similar to the
439: first two categories.
440: Finally, we note that several references have considered the
441: decay
442: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi\pi\Upsilon$ as a special case, since it has a
443: ``double-humped" dipion distribution that is not seen in other
444: decays \cite{Moxhay:1988ri,Kiselev:1994ex}.
445:
446: Gluon radiation and scalar anomaly models assume that the
447: important low-energy $m_{\pi\pi}$ dependence is determined by
448: aspects of a purely gluonic intermediate state. In gluon radiation
449: models this strong energy dependence arises from a multipole expansion
450: of the gluon emission amplitude,
451: whereas in the scalar anomaly models it is the momentum dependence
452: encountered in coupling the gluonic state to the $\pi\pi$ final state.
453: Clearly it will be difficult to distinguish these two possibilities,
454: although a detailed comparison of their predictions with experiment
455: appears to favor the scalar anomaly model \cite{Bai:1999mj}.
456:
457: In the scalar anomaly model one can relate the $\pi\pi$
458: production amplitude to the matrix element of the simplest
459: scalar gluon operator between the vacuum and a $\pi\pi$ state,
460: $\langle \pi\pi | G_{\mu\nu}^a G_{\mu\nu}^a | 0 \rangle$.
461: This matrix element can be determined because
462: the operator $G_{\mu\nu}^a G_{\mu\nu}^a$ is proportional to the
463: triangle anomaly in the trace of the energy-momentum tensor, which in
464: a low energy pion effective lagrangian is quadratic in the pion field.
465: The matrix element
466: of this operator gives a near-threshold dependence of
467: ${\cal A} \propto m_{\pi\pi}^2$, which is ${\cal A} \propto t$ in our
468: kinematics.
469:
470: Meson exchange models assume that the $\pi\pi$ system is
471: produced by an intermediate scalar $f_0$ meson
472: (often referred to as the ``$\sigma$"),
473: and the observed
474: $m_{\pi\pi}$-dependence at higher invariant mass
475: is due primarily to this meson.
476: Fits to the dipion decay data
477: (excluding the problematical
478: $\Upsilon'' \to \pi\pi\Upsilon$)
479: typically prefer a light, broad state with a
480: mass near 0.5~GeV;
481: see for example \cite{Komada:2000ez,Lahde:2001zd,Ishida:2001ve}.
482:
483: Ideally we would cross an accurate model of the $\pi\pi$ production
484: amplitudes into the $\pi$ scattering regime to estimate
485: $\pi + (Q\bar Q)$ closed-flavor cross sections,
486: but this is not yet possible
487: because no model gives a good simultaneous description of all the
488: experimentally observed $c\bar c$ and $b\bar b$ dipion mass distributions.
489: For the present we will simply assume the near-threshold $m_{\pi\pi}$
490: dependences suggested by the existing models, and evaluate
491: the cross sections
492: predicted for $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi'$ in each case.
493:
494: For the gluon radiation and scalar anomaly models we assume
495: \be
496: \langle |{\cal A}(s,t)|^2 \rangle = c_2 t^2 \ .
497: \ee
498: For a power-law form $\langle |{\cal A}(s,t)|^2 \rangle = c_n t^n$,
499: the relation between decays and cross sections Eq.(3)
500: generalizes as follows; the decay rate Eq.(2) becomes
501:
502: \be
503: \Gamma_{{\cal M}_b \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_a }
504: =
505: {1\over 256 \pi^3 M_b^3}\; c_n {\cal I}^{(n)}
506: \ee
507: where ${\cal I}^{(n)}$ is the integral of $t^n$ over the
508: ${\cal M}_b \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_a$ Dalitz plot,
509: \be
510: {\cal I}^{(n)}
511: \equiv
512: \int \!\!\!
513: \int \!
514: ds\, dt \; t^n \ .
515: \ee
516: The constant $c_n$ is determined
517: by the measured dipion partial width using Eq.(6), and
518: substitution of $c_n t^n$ into the cross section formula
519: Eq.(1) then gives
520: \bd
521: \hskip -3cm \sigma_{\pi {\cal M}_a \to \pi {\cal M}_b } =
522: \ed
523: \be
524: \Gamma_{{\cal M}_b \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_a }\, \cdot
525: \frac{4\pi^2 M_b^3}{(n+1)\, {\cal I}^{(n)}}\,
526: \frac{1}{s p_i^{\, 2}}
527: \Big(
528: |t_1|^{n+1} - |t_2|^{n+1}
529: \Big) \ .
530: \ee
531:
532: We again specialize to the process
533: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi'$.
534: Setting $n=2$ (scalar anomaly models),
535: for Eq.(7) we find
536: ${\cal I}^{(2)} = 0.01954$~GeV$^8$.
537: The cross section in Eq.(8) may then be evaluated numerically,
538: which gives the result shown in Fig.5.
539: Note that the scalar anomaly model leads to a rapid increase
540: of the cross section relative to the constant amplitude model
541: above $\sqrt{s} \approx 3.9$~GeV. This is due to the
542: $t^2$-weighting combined with the rapid
543: increase in the range of $t$ covered by this reaction
544: with increasing
545: $\sqrt{s}$, which is evident in Fig.1 (lower right region).
546:
547:
548: Finally, for our meson exchange model we assume
549: a generalized Breit-Wigner form which incorporates the scalar anomaly
550: soft-pion factor. For $t>0$ this is
551: \be
552: \langle |{\cal A}(s,t)|^2 \rangle =
553: \frac{\tilde c_2 t^2}{ (\sqrt{t} - M_\s)^2 + \Gamma_{\s}^2/4 }
554: \ee
555: where $M_\s$ and $\Gamma_\s$ are the
556: mass and width of the hypothetical
557: scalar meson source of the $\pi\pi$
558: events. We have incorporated the $t^2$ scalar anomaly soft-pion dependence
559: in Eq.(9) because pure
560: Breit-Wigner forms required
561: an unrealistically narrow $f_0$ ($\Gamma_\s \approx 100$-$150$~MeV) and gave
562: rather poor fits to the data.
563: In contrast the hybrid form Eq.(9) clearly gives
564: an acceptable fit (Fig.4),
565: although we emphasize that
566: {\it this meson exchange model is unphysical}
567: because the fitted parameters
568: $M_\s = 536$~MeV
569: and
570: $\Gamma_\s = 260$~MeV are inconsistent with the experimental I=0
571: $\pi\pi$ S-wave phase shift.
572:
573: We can again use Eqs.(1,2) to determine
574: the
575: cross section for
576: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$
577: implied by this decay model
578: (ignoring the problem of disagreement with
579: phase shifts). The result is
580: \bd
581: \hskip -3cm \sigma_{\pi {\cal M}_a \to \pi {\cal M}_b } =
582: \ed
583: \be
584: \Gamma_{{\cal M}_b \to \pi \pi {\cal M}_a }\, \cdot
585: \frac{4\pi^2 M_b^3}{{\cal I}_{f_0}}\,
586: \frac{1}{s p_i^{\, 2}}
587: \int_{t_1}^{t_2}
588: \frac{t^2 dt}{(\sqrt{-t} + M_\s)^2 + \Gamma_{\s}^2/4} \ .
589: \ee
590: Note that this integration is over negative values of $t$,
591: whereas the decay rate integral is over
592: positive $t$, which leads to different
593: signs in the Breit-Wigner functions.
594: The Dalitz plot decay integral
595: \be
596: {\cal I}_{f_0}
597: \equiv
598: \int \!\!\!
599: \int \!
600: ds\, dt \;
601: \frac{t^2}{(\sqrt{t} - M_\s)^2 + \Gamma_{\s}^2/4}\ .
602: \ee
603: for $\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi\,$
604: equals $0.08069$~GeV$^6$
605: given our external meson masses and fitted
606: $f_0$ parameters.
607: The integral over $t$ in Eq.(10) is
608: \bd
609: I =
610: M_{\s}^4
611: \bigg\{
612: \frac{1}{2} x^4
613: - \frac{10}{3} x^3
614: + (10 - c^2) x^2
615: - (20 -10 c^2) x
616: \ed
617: \bd
618: +( 5 - 10c^2 + c^4)
619: \ln(x^2 + c^2 )
620: \ed
621: \be
622: -(2 - 20c^2 + 10c^4)
623: \frac{\tan^{-1}(x/c)}{c}
624: \bigg\}
625: \Bigg|^{x=1+\sqrt{-t_1}/M_{\s}}_{x=1+\sqrt{-t_2}/M_{\s}}
626: \ee
627: where $c = \Gamma_\s/2M_\s$.
628: Combining Eqs.(10-12) gives the meson exchange model
629: prediction for
630: $\sigma_{\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}}$, which is
631: also shown in Fig.5. Evidently the meson exchange
632: cross section is suppressed near threshold,
633: due to the
634: separation from the $f_0$ pole.
635:
636: \begin{figure}
637: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{bk_fig4.eps}
638: \caption{
639: Fitting a meson exchange model to the $\pi\pi$ distribution observed in
640: $\Gamma_{\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi\, }$.
641: }
642: \label{fig:bk_fig4}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645: \begin{figure}
646: \vskip 1cm
647: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{bk_fig5.eps}
648: \caption{
649: The near-threshold cross section for
650: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$,
651: estimated from
652: $\Gamma_{\psi{\, '} \to \pi^+ \pi^- J/\psi\, }$
653: in constant amplitude, scalar anomaly and meson exchange
654: models.
655: }
656: \label{fig:bk_fig5}
657: \end{figure}
658: \section{Comparison with previous work}
659:
660:
661: Two of the theoretical references on dipion decays
662: cited previously,
663: Sorge, Shuryak and Zahed \cite{Sorge:1997bg} and
664: Chen and Savage \cite{Chen:1997zz},
665: also discussed results for
666: closed-flavor pion scattering cross sections with heavy quarkonia,
667: specifically for
668: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$
669: at low energies.
670: Since these references actually
671: used dipion decay data
672: to normalize their scattering amplitudes, approximate agreement
673: with our results should be anticipated.
674: Fujii and Kharzeev \cite{Fujii:1999xn} have also evaluated
675: closed-flavor charmonium cross sections, using a color-dipole
676: scattering model. They
677: do not use dipion decay data as
678: a direct input, although they do
679: note that their two results for the rate
680: $\Gamma(\psi{\, '}\to\pi \pi J/\psi)$
681: are not far from experiment.
682:
683: In the earliest reference \cite{Sorge:1997bg},
684: Sorge {\it et al.} assume scalar meson exchange
685: with a high-mass $f_0(1400)$ as the
686: $\pi\pi$ source.
687: (They make the important and often neglected
688: observation that assuming a low-mass $f_0$
689: of only moderate width, as in Fig.4,
690: disagrees with
691: the experimental I=0 $\pi\pi$ S-wave phase shift.)
692: Their cross section close to threshold is shown in Fig.6, and is evidently
693: qualitatively similar to our scalar anomaly model result.
694: Chen and Savage \cite{Chen:1997zz} used a gluon radiation model
695: to describe this
696: reaction, and quoted cross sections
697: at tree level and with one-loop chiral
698: corrections. These results are also shown in Fig.6, and are
699: numerically rather similar to Sorge {\it et al}.
700: Finally, Fujii and Kharzeev \cite{Fujii:1999xn}
701: used a color-dipole scattering model, and quote results for this process
702: both with and without a scalar $f_0$ form factor for the $\pi\pi$ system.
703: (Their form factor is inferred from the I=0 $\pi\pi$ S-wave phase shift.)
704: Their results without a form factor are similar to the earlier predictions.
705: With a form factor they find a much smaller cross section, which
706: is rather close to our scalar meson exchange result.
707:
708:
709:
710:
711: \section{Summary and conclusions}
712:
713: The search for the quark gluon plasma has led to great interest
714: in the scale of the cross sections of heavy quarkonia interacting
715: with light hadrons near threshold. Unfortunately, little is
716: known about these cross sections experimentally.
717: In this paper we have used crossing symmetry and several simple
718: amplitude models to estimate the closed-flavor cross sections
719: for heavy quarkonia scattering on pions
720: near threshold, using the experimentally
721: known dipion decays as input. The method is applied both to charmonia
722: and to the $b\bar b$ system. For the simplest cases of
723: $1S \lr 2S$ transitions,
724: {\it assuming constant amplitudes}
725: we estimate the cross sections a few hundred MeV above
726: threshold to be
727: {\it ca.} 20~{$\mu$b}
728: for
729: $\pi J/\psi \to \pi \psi{\, '}$,
730: and
731: {\it ca.} 2~{$\mu$b} for
732: $\pi \Upsilon \to \pi \Upsilon'$.
733: The corresponding time-reversed, exothermic
734: reactions are estimated to be about
735: 0.1~{mb} and 10~{$\mu$b} respectively.
736:
737: \begin{figure}
738: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{bk_fig6.eps}
739: \caption{
740: A comparison of our theoretical cross sections for
741: $\pi^+ J/\psi \to \pi^+ \psi{\, '}$ (from Fig.5)
742: with the results of
743: Sorge, Shuryak and Zahed \cite{Sorge:1997bg},
744: Chen and Savage \cite{Chen:1997zz} and Fujii and Kharzeev \cite{Fujii:1999xn}.
745: Note that of the three forms we have assumed,
746: only the lowest cross section (meson exchange model)
747: gives a good fit to the observed $\pi\pi$ distribution (Fig.4).
748: }
749: \label{fig:bk_fig6}
750: \end{figure}
751: We note that the strong dependence of the decay
752: amplitude on $t=m_{\pi\pi}^2$
753: observed experimentally in the dipion decays
754: near threshold
755: makes analytic continuation to
756: the pion scattering regime rather problematic.
757: The dependence of the cross section
758: for $\pi J/\psi \to \pi \psi{\, '}$
759: (used as our example) on the different
760: model amplitudes is clearly evident even near threshold
761: (Fig.5). For this reaction the various models we considered gave
762: consistent
763: cross sections of $\sim 5$-$15\, \mu$b at E$_{cm} = 3.9$~GeV, but the
764: predictions diverged rapidly with increasing invariant mass.
765:
766: In future, high statistics studies of dipion decays
767: at CLEO might provide additional useful information about the
768: decay amplitude.
769: In particular, it would be useful to accurately
770: determine the $s$ dependence of the decay amplitude in the Dalitz plot of
771: Fig.1 experimentally, in addition to the already well known
772: $t = m_{\pi\pi}^2$ dependence.
773:
774: We note in passing that the cross sections for these
775: near-threshold closed-flavor processes
776: are much smaller than the millibarn scale typically found for
777: open-flavor reactions such as
778: $\pi J/\psi \to {\rm D}^*\bar {\rm D}$
779: \cite{Martins:1994hd,Wong:1999zb,Barnes:2003dg,
780: Matinian:1998cb,Haglin:1999xs,Navarra:2001pz,Navarra:2001jy,Duraes:2002ux}.
781: The possibility that the rather weak closed-flavor reactions
782: are due to open-flavor scattering
783: at second order \cite{Moxhay:1988ri,Lipkin:tg,Lipkin:1989tw}, rather than to
784: exchange of an unphysically light scalar meson,
785: is an interesting suggestion which merits future investigation.
786:
787: \section{Acknowledgements}
788:
789: We are indebted to
790: K.Haglin, M.J.Savage, E.Shuryak, E.S.Swanson and C.Y.Wong
791: and our PHENIX colleagues for useful discussions,
792: and
793: to F.A.Harris for providing the
794: $\psi' \to \pi^+\pi^- J/\psi$ data of Bai
795: {\it et al.}\cite{Bai:1999mj}, which was used
796: to determine the parameters of
797: the meson exchange model.
798: This research was supported in part by
799: the University of Tennessee,
800: the U.S. Department of Energy under contract
801: DE-AC05-00OR22725 at
802: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL),
803: and through
804: European Union grant INTAS-2000-366
805: and Russian Federation grants
806: RFBR-01-02-16431, RFBR-02-02-81023
807: and RFBR-03-02-17291
808: at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR).
809:
810: \vfill\eject
811:
812: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
813:
814: \bibitem{Matsui:1986dk}
815: T.~Matsui and H.~Satz,
816: %``J / Psi Suppression By Quark - Gluon Plasma Formation,''
817: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 178}, 416 (1986).
818: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B178,416;%%
819:
820: \bibitem{Kharzeev:1994pz}
821: D.~Kharzeev and H.~Satz,
822: %``Quarkonium interactions in hadronic matter,''
823: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 334}, 155 (1994)
824: [arXiv:hep-ph/9405414].
825: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405414;%%
826:
827: \bibitem{Martins:1994hd}
828: K.~Martins, D.~Blaschke and E.~Quack,
829: %``Quark exchange model for charmonium dissociation in hot hadronic matter,''
830: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 51}, 2723 (1995)
831: [arXiv:hep-ph/9411302].
832: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411302;%%
833:
834: \bibitem{Wong:1999zb}
835: C.~Y.~Wong, E.~S.~Swanson and T.~Barnes,
836: %``Cross sections for pi and rho induced dissociation of J/psi and psi',''
837: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 045201 (2000)
838: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912431].
839: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912431;%%
840:
841: \bibitem{Barnes:2003dg}
842: T.~Barnes, E.~S.~Swanson, C.~Y.~Wong and X.~M.~Xu,
843: %``Dissociation cross sections of ground-state and excited charmonia with light mesons in the quark model,''
844: arXiv:nucl-th/0302052.
845: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302052;%%
846:
847: \bibitem{Matinian:1998cb}
848: S.~G.~Matinian and B.~M\"uller,
849: %``A model of charmonium absorption by light mesons,''
850: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 2994 (1998)
851: [arXiv:nucl-th/9806027].
852: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9806027;%%
853:
854: \bibitem{Haglin:1999xs}
855: K.~L.~Haglin,
856: %``Charmonium dissociation in hadronic matter,''
857: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61}, 031902 (2000)
858: [arXiv:nucl-th/9907034].
859: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9907034;%%
860:
861: \bibitem{Navarra:2001pz}
862: F.~S.~Navarra, M.~Nielsen and M.~R.~Robilotta,
863: %``Chiral symmetry in charmonium pion cross section,''
864: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 64}, 021901 (2001)
865: [arXiv:nucl-th/0103051].
866: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0103051;%%
867: % this is a pion eff. L model
868:
869: \bibitem{Navarra:2001jy}
870: F.~S.~Navarra, M.~Nielsen, R.~S.~Marques de Carvalho and G.~Krein,
871: %``Charmonium pion cross section from QCD sum rules,''
872: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 529}, 87 (2002)
873: [arXiv:nucl-th/0105058].
874: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0105058;%%
875:
876: \bibitem{Duraes:2002ux}
877: F.~O.~Dur\~aes, H.~c.~Kim, S.~H.~Lee, F.~S.~Navarra and M.~Nielsen,
878: %``Progress in the determination of the J/psi - pi cross section,''
879: arXiv:nucl-th/0211092.
880: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0211092;%%
881:
882: %#########################################
883: % expt
884:
885: %##################
886: % psi system
887:
888: \bibitem{Armstrong:pg}
889: T.~A.~Armstrong {\it et al.} [Fermilab E760 Collaboration],
890: %``Measurement Of The Branching Ratios Psi-Prime $\to$ E+ E-, Psi-Prime $\to$ J / Psi Pion Pion And Psi-Prime $\to$ J / Psi Eta,''
891: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 1153 (1997).
892: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D55,1153;%%
893: % psi' -> J/psi pi+ pi-
894: % psi' -> J/psi pi0 pi0
895:
896: \bibitem{Bai:1999mj}
897: J.~Z.~Bai {\it et al.} [BES Collaboration],
898: %``psi(2S) $\to$ pi+ pi- J/psi decay distributions,''
899: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 032002
900: [arXiv:hep-ex/9909038].
901: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9909038;%%
902: % psi' -> J/psi pi+ pi-
903: % high stats. 3.8M psi' events
904: % some D-wave nr. threshold
905:
906: %\cite{Ambrogiani:2000vj}
907: \bibitem{Ambrogiani:2000vj}
908: M.~Ambrogiani {\it et al.} [E835 Collaboration],
909: %``Measurement of the branching ratios psi' $\to$ e+ e-, psi' $\to$ J/psi pi0 pi0 and psi' $\to$ J/psi eta,''
910: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 032004 (2000).
911: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D62,032004;%%
912: % psi' -> J/psi pi0 pi0
913:
914: %##################
915: % Ups system
916:
917: \bibitem{Besson:1984ha}
918: D.~Besson {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
919: %``A High Statistics Study Of Upsilon (2s) $\to$ Pi+ Pi- Upsilon (1s),''
920: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 1433 (1984).
921: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,1433;%%
922: % A High Statistics Study Of Upsilon (2s) ---> Pi+ Pi- Upsilon (1s)
923: % Ups(2S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
924:
925: \bibitem{Bowcock:1986um}
926: T.~J.~Bowcock {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
927: %``Study Of Pi+ Pi- Transitions From The Upsilon (3s),''
928: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 58}, 307 (1987).
929: %%CITATION = PRLTA,58,307;%%
930: % STUDY OF PI+ PI- TRANSITIONS FROM THE UPSILON (3S).
931: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi+ pi-
932: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
933: % Ups(2S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
934:
935: \bibitem{Brock:pj}
936: I.~C.~Brock {\it et al.},
937: %``Study Of Pi+ Pi- Transitions From The Upsilon (3s) And A Search For The H(B),''
938: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 43}, 1448 (1991).
939: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D43,1448;%%
940: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi+ pi-
941: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
942: % Ups(2S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
943:
944: \bibitem{Butler:1993rq}
945: F.~Butler {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
946: %``Analysis of hadronic transitions in upsilon (3S) decays,''
947: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 40 (1994).
948: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,40;%%
949: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi+ pi-
950: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi0 pi0
951: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
952: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi0 pi0
953: % Ups(2S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
954:
955: \bibitem{Heintz:cv}
956: U.~Heintz {\it et al.},
957: %``B Anti-B Spectroscopy From The Upsilon (3s) State,''
958: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46} (1992) 1928.
959: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,1928;%%
960: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi0 pi0
961: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi0 pi0
962:
963: %\cite{Wu:qc}
964: \bibitem{Wu:qc}
965: Q.~W.~Wu {\it et al.},
966: %``Study Of Pi+ Pi- Transitions From The Upsilon (3s) State,''
967: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 301} (1993) 307.
968: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B301,307;%%
969: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pi+ pi-
970: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pi+ pi-
971:
972: %####################
973: % PDG
974:
975: \bibitem{Hagiwara:fs}
976: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
977: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
978: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 010001 (2002).
979: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
980:
981: %#########################################
982: % theory
983:
984: \bibitem{Gottfried:1977gp}
985: K.~Gottfried,
986: %``Hadronic Transitions Between Quark - Anti-Quark Bound States,''
987: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 40}, 598 (1978).
988: %%CITATION = PRLTA,40,598;%%
989:
990: \bibitem{Yan:1980uh}
991: T.~M.~Yan,
992: %``Hadronic Transitions Between Heavy Quark States In Quantum Chromodynamics,''
993: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 1652 (1980).
994: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,1652;%%
995:
996: %\cite{Chen:1997zz}
997: \bibitem{Chen:1997zz}
998: J.~W.~Chen and M.~J.~Savage,
999: %``Hadronic and electromagnetic interactions of quarkonia,''
1000: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 2837 (1998)
1001: [arXiv:hep-ph/9710338].
1002: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710338;%%
1003: % chiral lagrangian, params from gluon multipole model
1004: % uses crossing on psi' -> psi pipi
1005: % cross sec fig.6 like ours?
1006:
1007: \bibitem{Voloshin:yb}
1008: M.~B.~Voloshin,
1009: %``Adler's Selfconsistency Condition In The Decay Psi-Prime (3700) $\to$ Psi (3100) Pi Pi. (In Russian),''
1010: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 21}, 347 (1975)
1011: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 21}, 733 (1975)].
1012: %%CITATION = JTPLA,21,347;%%
1013: % ADLER'S SELFCONSISTENCY CONDITION IN THE DECAY
1014: % PSI-PRIME (3700) ---> PSI (3100) PI PI. (IN RUSSIAN).
1015:
1016: \bibitem{Voloshin:1980zf}
1017: M.~B.~Voloshin and V.~I.~Zakharov,
1018: %``Measuring QCD Anomalies In Hadronic Transitions Between Onium States,''
1019: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 45} (1980) 688.
1020: %%CITATION = PRLTA,45,688;%%
1021:
1022: %\cite{Novikov:fa}
1023: \bibitem{Novikov:fa}
1024: V.~A.~Novikov and M.~A.~Shifman,
1025: %``Comment On The Psi-Prime $\to$ J / Psi Pi Pi Decay,''
1026: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 8}, 43 (1981).
1027: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C8,43;%%
1028:
1029: %\cite{Sorge:1997bg}
1030: \bibitem{Sorge:1997bg}
1031: H.~Sorge, E.~V.~Shuryak and I.~Zahed,
1032: %``psi'/psi ratio in nucleus nucleus collisions: A measure for the chiral symmetry restoration temperature?,''
1033: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 2775 (1997)
1034: [arXiv:hep-ph/9705329].
1035: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705329;%%
1036: % sigma model, high mass broad f0,
1037: % psi' -> psi pipi and cross sec fig.1
1038:
1039: %\cite{Komada:2000ez}
1040: \bibitem{Komada:2000ez}
1041: T.~Komada, S.~Ishida and M.~Ishida,
1042: %``Light sigma-meson production in excited Upsilon decay processes. I: Analyses,''
1043: arXiv:hep-ph/0012327.
1044: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012327;%%
1045: % light broad sigma model, ccbar and bbbar
1046:
1047: %\cite{Lahde:2001zd}
1048: \bibitem{Lahde:2001zd}
1049: T.~A.~Lahde and D.~O.~Riska,
1050: %``Pion rescattering in two-pion decay of heavy quarkonia,''
1051: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 707}, 425 (2002)
1052: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112131].
1053: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112131;%%
1054:
1055: \bibitem{Brown:1975dz}
1056: L.~S.~Brown and R.~N.~Cahn,
1057: %``Chiral Symmetry And Psi-Prime $\to$ Psi + Pi + Pi Decay,''
1058: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 35}, 1 (1975).
1059: %%CITATION = PRLTA,35,1;%%
1060: % chiral symm, linear sigma-model and psi' -> psi pipi
1061: % their Eq.6 has a (mpipi-2mpi^2)^2 factor
1062: % that gives basically the same dependence
1063: % as Voloshin et al
1064:
1065: %\cite{Moxhay:1988ri}
1066: \bibitem{Moxhay:1988ri}
1067: P.~Moxhay,
1068: %``Coupled Channel Effects In The Decay Upsilon (3s) $\to$ Upsilon (1s) Pi+ Pi-,''
1069: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 39}, 3497 (1989).
1070: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,3497;%%
1071: % Moxhay model, Ups(3S) -> Ups pipi
1072: % has earlier refs
1073:
1074: %\cite{Kiselev:1994ex}
1075: \bibitem{Kiselev:1994ex}
1076: V.~V.~Kiselev and A.~K.~Likhoded,
1077: %``Model for anomalous Upsilon-prime-prime $\to$ Upsilon pi pi transition with account of chiral phase shift in hadron bag of quarkonium,''
1078: arXiv:hep-ph/9406219.
1079: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9406219;%%
1080: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pipi model
1081: % gluon rad and chiral symm
1082:
1083: \bibitem{Ishida:2001ve}
1084: M.~Ishida, S.~Ishida, T.~Komada and S.~I.~Matsumoto,
1085: %``Confirmation of sigma(450-600) meson in Upsilon' $\to$ Upsilon pi pi and other pi pi production processes,''
1086: AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 619}, 735 (2002)
1087: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110358].
1088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110358;%%
1089: % f0 model
1090: % Ups(3S) -> Ups(2S) pipi
1091: % Ups(3S) -> Ups pipi
1092: % Ups(2S) -> Ups pipi
1093: % fits f0 M=580+79-30, Gamma =2*(190+107-49)
1094:
1095: \bibitem{Fujii:1999xn}
1096: H.~Fujii and D.~Kharzeev,
1097: %``Long-range forces of {QCD},''
1098: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114039 (1999)
1099: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903495].
1100: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903495;%%
1101:
1102: \bibitem{Lipkin:tg}
1103: H.~J.~Lipkin and S.~F.~Tuan,
1104: %``Ozi Violating Dipion Decays Of Heavy Quarkonia Via An Intermediate Heavy Meson Pair State,''
1105: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 206}, 349 (1988).
1106: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B206,349;%%
1107: % argue that Ups(3S) -> Ups pipi
1108: % double hump comes from the open-flavor chain
1109: % Ups(3S) -> BB -> BB*pi -> BB pipi -> Ups pipi
1110:
1111: \bibitem{Lipkin:1989tw}
1112: H.~J.~Lipkin and S.~F.~Tuan,
1113: %``Why Is The Upsilon (3s) Different?,''
1114: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 62}, 2910 (1989).
1115: %%CITATION = PRLTA,62,2910;%%
1116:
1117: \end{thebibliography}
1118:
1119:
1120: \end{document}
1121:
1122:
1123: