1: \documentclass[onecolumn,showpacs,preprint2,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{bm}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: %\topmargin 0.05in
9:
10: \title{Neutrino-Nucleus Cross Section Measurements using Stopped Pions
11: and Low Energy Beta Beams}
12: \author{G. C. McLaughlin}
13: \email{Gail_McLaughlin@ncsu.edu}
14: \affiliation{Department of Physics, North Carolina State University,
15: Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8202}
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18:
19: Two new facilities have recently been proposed to measure low energy
20: neutrino-nucleus cross sections, the $\nu$-SNS (Spallation Neutron Source)
21: and low energy beta beams. The
22: former produces neutrinos by pion decay at rest, while the latter
23: produces neutrinos from the beta decays of accelerated ions. One of the
24: uses of neutrino-nucleus cross section
25: measurements is for supernova studies, where typical neutrino
26: energies are 10s of MeV. In this energy range there are many different
27: components to the nuclear response and this makes the theoretical
28: interpretation of the results
29: of such an experiment complex. Although even one measurement on a heavy nucleus
30: such as lead is much anticipated, more than one data set would be
31: still better.
32: We suggest that this
33: can be done by breaking the electron spectrum down into the parts
34: produced in coincidence with one or two neutrons, running a beta beam at
35: more than one energy, comparing the spectra produced with pions and
36: a beta beam or any combination of these.
37:
38: \end{abstract}
39: \pacs{25.30Pt}
40:
41: \maketitle
42:
43: \section{introduction}
44:
45: Neutrino-nucleus cross section measurements are desirable
46: from the point of view of understanding nuclear structure, but they
47: are perhaps even more desirable for astrophysical
48: reasons. The supernova is the best studied
49: astrophysical environment where neutrino
50: scattering reactions have significant impact.
51: Proper inclusion of the reverse process,
52: electron capture on nuclei, has recently been shown to factor significantly
53: in the prospects for obtaining a supernova explosion \cite{Hix:2003fg}.
54: Furthermore, neutrino-nucleus
55: interactions figure heavily in determining the nucleosynthesis that
56: is produced during the course of a supernova explosion.
57: Neutrino nucleosynthesis,
58: which occurs when neutrinos spall neutrons and protons off of
59: pre-existing nuclei, is driven entirely
60: by neutrino-nucleus interactions
61: \cite{Woosley:1989bd,Heger:2003mm}. Several papers have
62: suggested that the r-process of nucleosynthesis
63: may be impacted heavily by neutrino-nucleus interactions,
64: e.g. \cite{McLaughlin:1996eq,Haxton:1996ms}. In fact
65: these
66: reactions may have such a detrimental effect that they are an effective
67: tool in constraining the environment \cite{Meyer:1998sn}.
68: Thirdly,
69: neutrino-nucleus measurements are needed to calibrate supernova neutrino
70: detectors. For
71: a description of supernova neutrino detection using lead,
72: see \cite{Boyd:em}. A recent review of different techniques
73: used to calculate neutrino-nucleus cross section measurements
74: is given in \cite{Kolbe:2003ys}.
75:
76: Traditional neutrino beams are created using pions which produce
77: both muon neutrinos and muon antineutrinos, and either electron
78: neutrinos or electron antineutrinos. This is the case for the
79: proposed $\nu$-SNS which will produce neutrinos from pions
80: decaying at rest by way of the Spallation Neutron
81: Source at Oakridge National Laboratory \cite{nuSNS}. This facility will
82: make improvements on existing measurements of nuclei such as carbon and iron
83: \cite{Krakauer:1991rf,Armbruster:vd,Berge:1989hr} and measure cross
84: sections on new nuclei such as lead.
85:
86: Newly proposed beta beam facilities \cite{Zucchelli:sa}
87: produce either electron neutrinos or antineutrinos from beta-plus
88: or beta-minus decays of radioactive ions.
89: Feasibility studies for beta beams
90: are underway and a design is discussed in
91: \cite{Lindroos:2003kp,Bouchez:2003fy}.
92: Beta beams were originally proposed
93: as a way to make high energy neutrinos for use in
94: long-baseline studies to determine the third, and as yet unknown
95: mixing angle in the neutrino mixing matrix,
96: $\theta_{13}$ and to investigate CP-violation in the lepton sector
97: \cite{Mezzetto:2003ub,Bouchez:2003fy}. However, lower energy beta beams have
98: been proposed by Volpe \cite{Volpe:2003fi} and an application for neutrino
99: magnetic moment measurements has been discussed in \cite{McLaughlin:2003yg}.
100:
101: In this paper we consider neutrino-lead measurements using spectra
102: that would be produced by the $\nu$-SNS and
103: from a beta beam facility.
104: We consider a target mass of
105: 10 tons, 20 meters away from the pion source and 10 meters away from the end
106: of a straight section of a beta beam ring.
107: We examine the spectra of the electrons that would be produced
108: from charged current interactions.
109:
110: We explore the signals which can be produced if
111: the electrons can be identified as being created in coincidence with
112: zero, one or two spalled neutrons. We also suggest the possibility that
113: low energy beta beams be operated at more than one energy, therefore
114: producing different neutrino energy spectra.
115:
116: \section{Neutrino Spectra}
117:
118: In order to explore the effect of using
119: different neutrino spectra to probe the
120: nuclear response of $^{208}{\rm Pb}$, we must first compare the various
121: neutrino spectra themselves. We are particularly
122: interested in the charged current interactions of
123: electron neutrinos, since lead is largely Pauli blocked
124: in the electron antineutrino capture direction, and muon neutrinos
125: and antineutrinos are not energetic enough to produce muons for the
126: energy range we consider here.
127:
128: Electron neutrinos coming from stopped pions are produced by the
129: decay of pions into muons which then decay into electrons,
130: $\pi^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu$, $\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e \bar{\nu}_\mu$.
131: Electron neutrinos produced with a low energy beta beam would come from
132: beta-plus decay of a radioactive nucleus such as $^{18}{\rm Ne} \rightarrow
133: ^{18}{\rm F} + e^+ + \nu_e$. Neon-18 decays in its rest frame
134: with a half life $\tau_{1/2} = 1.67$ seconds
135: and has a difference of nuclear masses of $Q_n = 3.93$ MeV, and therefore
136: the maximum energy for the neutrinos is about 3.4 MeV. This
137: energy is lower than that of most neutrinos that are produced in a supernova.
138: These have approximately thermal spectra and average energies between 10 and
139: 25 MeV although the exact values depend on the model, and the subsequent
140: neutrino mixing.
141: However if Neon-18 were boosted to $\gamma \sim 10$ or even $\gamma \sim 5$
142: then the spectrum
143: falls in the same range as that of supernova neutrinos.
144:
145: In Figs. \ref{fig:betaboost} and \ref{fig:pionnuspect} we show three different
146: electron neutrino spectra. One comes
147: from stopped pions, another from a Neon-18 beta beam boosted to
148: $\gamma = 10$ and a third with a lower boost
149: of $\gamma = 5$. Although for a particular
150: target geometry and set up spectra will need to be calculated more precisely,
151: we can obtain a general idea of the relative effects of these different
152: sources using the following rough estimates. In the case of the pions
153: we assume that the ten ton target
154: has a cross sectional area of 4 m$^2$ and is located
155: 20 meters from the source of the neutrinos. For the beta beams we assume
156: that the same target is located 10 meters from the end of a straight section
157: in the ring of 90m in length.
158: The spectrum for the beta beams takes on a different shape and magnitude
159: depending on how large an opening
160: angle the detector subtends. The opening angle for the beam is
161: the about 7 degrees right as the ions reach 10 meters from the
162: detector, although the opening angle, and therefore the flux falls
163: off quickly as the distance from the source increases.
164:
165: \begin{figure}[t]
166: \vspace*{-2cm}
167: %\begin{center}
168: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
169: %\centerline{
170: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig1.ps}
171: %}
172: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{trit-his.ps}
173: \caption{{\sc Beta Beam, $\gamma=5$ and $\gamma=10$:}
174: Figure shows the boosted spectrum of $\nu_e$s
175: produced at a rate of $10^{13} s^{-1}$
176: from $^{18}{\rm Ne}$. Calculated for
177: a target that has a cross sectional area of 4m
178: and is located 10m from one end of the ring, which has a straight
179: side length of more than 90m. These numbers are further reduced by the
180: fraction of time the ions spend on the straight section of the ring.
181: \label{fig:betaboost}}
182: \end{minipage}\hspace*{0.5cm}
183: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
184: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig2.ps}
185: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{reac-his.ps}
186: \hspace*{0.5cm}
187: \caption{{\sc Electron neutrinos from stopped pions}:
188: Figure shows the spectrum of $\nu_e$s from a $10^{15} {\rm s^{-1}}$ neutrino
189: source coming from stopped pions. The target is assumed to be 20 m away
190: with a cross sectional area of 4 m$^2$ \label{fig:pionnuspect}}
191: \end{minipage}
192: %\end{center}
193: \end{figure}
194:
195: For the pions we take
196: a decay rate such that $10^{15} \, {\rm s}^{-1}$ electron
197: neutrinos are produced, which is the order of magnitude
198: discussed in the $\nu$-SNS proposal \cite{nuSNS}.
199: For isotropically emitted neutrinos, the
200: number hitting the target is reduced by
201: $\sim 4 {\rm m}^2 /[ 4 \pi (20 {\rm m})^2] = 0.08\%$ for this
202: geometry.
203: For the beta beams we take a production rate of $10^{13}$ ions per second
204: as discussed in
205: \cite{Lindroos:2003kp}. However, the
206: beam is collimated, since the relativistic boost will shift the
207: neutrinos toward the forward direction. Some estimates can be made
208: by starting with isotropically emitted neutrinos in the rest frame
209: of the ion, boosting the component of neutrino
210: momentum along the beam line, calculating the lab frame angle
211: for the neutrino and determining if it is less than
212: $\theta = \tan^{-1}(R/L)$, where R is the radius of the circular
213: cross section of the detector and L is the distance of the neutrino
214: from the target. For $\gamma=10$, the flux entering
215: the detector falls to 1.5\% when the ions are 100 meters from the target
216: and the integrated fraction of the flux which enters the
217: target that has been emitted
218: between 10 meters and 100 meters is 8\%. Furthermore,
219: for $\gamma=5$, the flux entering the detector falls to 0.3\% when
220: the ions are 100 meters away from the detector and the integrated
221: fraction emitted from
222: between 10m and 100m is 2\%. Even for a larger boost
223: of $\gamma = 15$, the fraction entering the detector is only 3.5\% at 100m
224: away, and the integrated fraction is 14\%. Longer
225: straight sections therefore do not help much to increase the flux. Since
226: all the numbers must be further reduced by the fraction of the entire
227: ring of which these 90 meters consist,
228: smaller rings are advantageous. A more complete discussion
229: of how ring and detector geometry influences fluxes and total event rates
230: is given in \cite{newvolpe}.
231:
232:
233: It can be seen from the figures that although the spectra are of the
234: same order of magnitude in
235: energy, they do not have the same shape or even the same average energy
236: and will therefore produce a different signal from
237: the same target nucleus.
238:
239:
240:
241: \section{Electron Spectra}
242:
243: The next step is to investigate the electron signal produced from the
244: neutrinos interacting with the lead target. In particular we
245: investigate $\nu_e + ^{208}{\rm Pb} \rightarrow ^{208}{\rm Bi} + e^-$.
246: The Bismuth may produce one or more spalled neutrons as a result of
247: this charged current reaction. Some neutrons will also be produced
248: from neutral current interactions as well, but they are not investigated
249: here. Natural lead
250: is a primarily $^{208}{\rm Pb}$ but it contains also a significant
251: amount (almost half) of other isotopes. In this paper we use
252: pre-existing calculations of $^{208}{\rm Pb}$, as no calculations
253: of other isotopes exist to date. Although they are expected
254: to be similar, a complete anaylsis of a neutrino-lead experiment
255: would involve all nuclei present in the target.
256: There are many papers which calculate the
257: cross section of $^{208}{\rm Pb}$
258: \cite{Jachowicz:2003iz,Fuller:1998kb,Kolbe:2000np,Volpe:2001gy,Engel:2002hg}.
259: We use cross sections from
260: \cite{Engel:2002hg} in order to illustrate what
261: can be expected from such experiments.
262: All calculations agree at low energy, although at high energy
263: they begin to diverge. This is because the nuclear response at low
264: energy transfer primarily consists of
265: allowed transitions which are best understood. However, even for the allowed
266: transitions, there are open questions, such as
267: the relative weight of the vector and axial
268: vector couplings in the nucleus.
269: The results of any neutrino-nucleus cross section experiment will be
270: used to calibrate theory and differentiate between different calculations.
271:
272: \begin{figure}[t]
273: \vspace*{-2cm}
274: %\begin{center}
275: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
276: %\centerline{$
277: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig3.ps}
278: %}
279: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{trit-his.ps}
280: \caption{{\sc Electron Spectrum, Pion Source:}
281: Shows the total electron spectrum (solid line) coming from
282: electron neutrino capture on lead. Also shows the allowed
283: contribution (long dashed line), the $0^-$,$1^-$ and $2^-$ contribution
284: (short dashed line) and the $2^+$,$3^+$,$3^-$,$4^+$ and $4^-$ contribution
285: (dotted line).
286: \label{fig:crosspiondecomp}}
287: \end{minipage}\hspace*{0.5cm}
288: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
289: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig4.ps}
290: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{reac-his.ps}
291: \hspace*{0.5cm}
292: \caption{{\sc Electron Spectrum, $\gamma=10$}:
293: Same as Fig. \ref{fig:cross10decomp} except for beta
294: beam ions accelerated to $\gamma =10$. Different parts
295: of the nuclear response contribute at different
296: levels than for the $\nu_e$s from pions. \label{fig:cross10decomp}}
297: \end{minipage}
298: %\end{center}
299: \end{figure}
300:
301: We first plot numbers of electron events as a function of energy for
302: the stopped pion source. This is shown in Fig \ref{fig:crosspiondecomp}.
303: In Fig. \ref{fig:cross10decomp} we show the number of electron events for
304: the $^{18}{\rm Ne}$, $\gamma = 10$ beta beam.
305: As can be see from Table
306: \ref{tab}, the total number of
307: electron events, using 100\% efficiency in each case is
308: 200 per day for the pion source and
309: 26 for the beta beam at $\gamma=10$. For this table, the numbers of
310: electron
311: events for the beta beam can be roughly scaled as
312: \begin{equation}
313: N = \left({N_\nu \over 10^{13} {\rm s}^{-1}}\right)
314: \left( {900 {\rm m} \over L}\right)
315: \left({M \over 10 \, {\rm tons}}\right) N_{\rm table},
316: \end{equation}
317: where $M$ is the mass of the target, $L$ is the total length of
318: the ring and $N_\nu$ is the number of neutrinos emitted per second in
319: the ring. However,
320: changing the cross sectional area of the detector and the distance of the
321: detector from the beam is a nonlinear effect since it alters the spectra
322: through the angular dependence of the Lorentz boost.
323:
324: In both of Figs \ref{fig:crosspiondecomp} and \ref{fig:cross10decomp}
325: we
326: show the contribution from various parts of the nuclear response, allowed
327: ($0^+$ and $1^+$) and different parts of the forbidden. As can be seen,
328: different parts contribute with different
329: weight at different energies to the signal. Understanding which pieces
330: contribute with which weight is an important aspect of the theoretical
331: interpretation of the signal. It is
332: necessary in order to be able to accurately
333: calculate supernova neutrino-nucleus scattering where the spectra are
334: different still and will help to understand such theoretical questions
335: as which underlying force fits the response best.
336:
337: Although any electron spectrum produced from neutrino-lead scattering
338: would be a great improvement on the
339: current experimental situation, to understand which nuclear transitions
340: are producing given electrons would be better still.
341: Although there
342: is no way to determine experimentally whether a particular electron
343: was produced by way of a particular nuclear matrix element,
344: there are several ways to obtain more information in this direction.
345: One way is to
346: separate out the electrons that are emitted in
347: coincidence with zero, one or two neutrons. Another way would be
348: to compare a stopped
349: pion signal to a beta beam signal and fit both simultaneously.
350: Finally, one could run a beta beam at
351: different energies, boosting for example to $\gamma = 10$ and then
352: to $\gamma =15$ or $\gamma =5$.
353:
354:
355: In Fig. \ref{fig:crosspion2ndecomp} we show the electron energy spectrum for
356: only those electrons emitted with two neutrons, for the pion decay
357: at rest source, although the same can be done for the beta beam.
358: There are 66 events per day associated with two neutrons for the pion source
359: and 10 events per day
360: associated with two neutrons for the beta beam with $\gamma = 10$.
361: In Fig. \ref{fig:crosspion2ndecomp}, the majority
362: of the electrons, 80\%, are produced by the $0^-$,$1^-$ and $2^-$
363: part of the signal.
364: In a similar way, the electrons associated
365: with one neutron can be shown to come primarily, 75\%, from the allowed part
366: of the cross section.
367: As can be seen
368: from a comparison with Fig. \ref{fig:crosspiondecomp}, much more
369: information can be obtained if the electrons can be identified as being
370: produced with either one or two neutrons, than from the aggregate spectrum
371: alone. Such a two neutron analysis
372: would also be particularly useful when applied to a lead
373: based supernova neutrino detector \cite{Fuller:1998kb}
374: such as OMNIS or LAND
375: \cite{omnis,land}, since
376: supernovae electron
377: neutrinos will oscillate with the muon and tau type neutrinos, and
378: the two neutron signal will consist primarily of electron neutrinos
379: that were originally prouced as muon neutrinos. If electron neutrinos
380: and muon neutrinos from the supernova are widely separated in energy, then
381: observing the two neutron signal would be an effective
382: way to ``measure'' the original muon or tau spectrum \cite{Engel:2002hg}.
383:
384:
385: \begin{figure}[t]
386: \vspace*{-2cm}
387: %\begin{center}
388: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
389: %\centerline{
390: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig5.ps}
391: %}
392: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{trit-his.ps}
393: \caption{{\sc Electron Spectrum, Pion Source:}
394: The lines are the same as in
395: Fig. \ref{fig:crosspiondecomp}, although only electrons
396: associated with two neutrons are shown. Most of the
397: electrons are produced from the forbidden 0-,1- and 2- transitions.
398: \label{fig:crosspion2ndecomp}}
399: \end{minipage}\hspace*{0.5cm}
400: \begin{minipage}{8cm}
401: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=6cm]{fig6.ps}
402: %\epsfxsize=5in \epsfbox{reac-his.ps}
403: \hspace*{0.5cm}
404: \caption{{\sc Electron Spectrum, $\gamma=5$}:
405: Same as Fig. \ref{fig:cross10decomp} except for ions
406: accelerated to smaller energy. Most of the electrons
407: are produced from allowed nuclear transitions.
408: \label{fig:cross5decomp}}
409: \end{minipage}
410: %\end{center}
411: \end{figure}
412:
413: In Fig. \ref{fig:cross5decomp}
414: we show the electron spectrum associated with a beta beam
415: boosted to $\gamma=5$ instead of $\gamma=10$. For the lower energy
416: spectrum there
417: are 1.1 total electron events per day, and only 0.05
418: electrons associated with two
419: neutrons. The
420: majority of electrons
421: are produced by way of allowed transitions in the nucleus.
422: Some information about these allowed transitions can be inferred
423: from (p,n) reaction data \cite{pn}. However, a beta beam of this energy
424: would provide a first
425: nearly direct measurement of these transitions, without the need to
426: decompose the signal by coincident number of neutrons.
427: It can also provide
428: information about the relative strength of the $0^+$ or Fermi transition
429: (governed by $g_V$) and the $1^+$ or Gamow-Teller transitions
430: (governed by $g_A$).
431: If it were possible to
432: take data at a boost factor of both $\gamma=5$ and $\gamma=10$, then
433: the information obtained by the $\gamma=5$ measurement could be used to
434: calculate the allowed part (long dashed line in
435: Fig. \ref{fig:cross10decomp}) of the $\gamma=10$
436: signal, thereby enabling a better interpretation of the rest of the signal.
437: Higher multipoles
438: continue to
439: contribute more stongly at even larger boost factors. For example, at
440: $\gamma=15$ for these calculations that terminate at the fourth multipole,
441: the $2^+$, $3^+$, $3^-$, $4^+$ and $4^-$
442: multipoles contribute 38\% to the total signal.
443: Therefore such a third measurement would be beneficial in understand
444: this piece, which is
445: the most uncertain part of the response that would
446: contribute to neutrino-nucleus scattering
447: by supernova neutrinos.
448:
449:
450: \section{conclusions}
451:
452: We have discussed the electron spectrum produced from
453: a lead target for two different sources of neutrinos.
454: Any future measurements of neutrino-nucleus cross sections
455: are much anticipated. However, if possible it would be desirable to
456: have more than one electron spectrum with which to calibrate
457: theory. We have illustrated the
458: relative nuclear contribution to the
459: electron energy spectra for various beta beam energies and compared
460: this with the pion source. We have also considered the
461: contributions of the one neutron and two neutron spectrum.
462: One could maximize the infomation with which to compare theory
463: calculations by separating the spectra into parts associated with
464: zero, one and two neutrons, by running the beta beam at more
465: than one energy such as at $\gamma = 5$, $\gamma=10$ and $\gamma=15$,
466: or by using the electron spectra produced by both sources.
467:
468: \acknowledgements
469: Related work has been performed independently by \cite{newvolpe}.
470: G. C. M. thanks B. Flemming, R. Tayloe, and R. Hix for useful discussions.
471: This work was supported by DOE Grant DE-FG02-02ER41216.
472:
473: \begin{references}
474:
475: %\cite{Hix:2003fg}
476: \bibitem{Hix:2003fg}
477: W.~R.~Hix {\it et al.},
478: %``The consequences of nuclear electron capture in core collapse supernovae,''
479: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 201102 (2003)
480: [arXiv:astro-ph/0310883].
481: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310883;%%
482:
483: %\cite{Woosley:1989bd}
484: \bibitem{Woosley:1989bd}
485: S.~E.~Woosley, D.~H.~Hartmann, R.~D.~Hoffman and W.~C.~Haxton,
486: %``The Neutrino Process,''
487: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 356}, 272 (1990).
488: %%CITATION = ASJOA,356,272;%%
489:
490: %\cite{Heger:2003mm}
491: \bibitem{Heger:2003mm}
492: A.~Heger, E.~Kolbe, W.~C.~Haxton, K.~Langanke, G.~Martinez-Pinedo and S.~E.~Woosley,
493: %``Neutrino nucleosynthesis,''
494: arXiv:astro-ph/0307546.
495: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0307546;%%
496:
497: %\cite{McLaughlin:1996eq}
498: \bibitem{McLaughlin:1996eq}
499: G.~C.~McLaughlin and G.~M.~Fuller,
500: %``Evidence for an intense neutrino flux during r process nucleosynthesis?,''
501: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 464}, L143 (1996)
502: [arXiv:astro-ph/9603082].
503: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9603082;%%
504:
505: %\cite{Haxton:1996ms}
506: \bibitem{Haxton:1996ms}
507: W.~C.~Haxton, K.~Langanke, Y.~Z.~Qian and P.~Vogel,
508: %``Neutrino-induced nucleosynthesis and the site of the r-process,''
509: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 78}, 2694 (1997)
510: [arXiv:astro-ph/9612047].
511: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9612047;%%
512:
513: %\cite{Meyer:1998sn}
514: \bibitem{Meyer:1998sn}
515: B.~S.~Meyer, G.~C.~McLaughlin and G.~M.~Fuller,
516: %``Neutrino capture and r-process nucleosynthesis,''
517: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 3696 (1998)
518: [arXiv:astro-ph/9809242].
519: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9809242;%%
520:
521: %\cite{Boyd:em}
522: \bibitem{Boyd:em}
523: R.~N.~Boyd, G.~C.~McLaughlin, A.~S.~J.~Murphy and P.~F.~Smith,
524: %``Science From Detection Of Neutrinos From Supernovae,''
525: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29}, 2543 (2003).
526: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G29,2543;%%
527:
528: %\cite{Kolbe:2003ys}
529: \bibitem{Kolbe:2003ys}
530: E.~Kolbe, K.~Langanke, G.~Martinez-Pinedo and P.~Vogel,
531: %``Neutrino nucleus reactions and nuclear structure,''
532: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29}, 2569 (2003)
533: [arXiv:nucl-th/0311022].
534: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0311022;%%
535:
536: \bibitem{nuSNS}
537: nu-SNS collaboration, ``Neutrino Program at the SNS'', study report, 2004
538:
539: %\cite{Krakauer:1991rf}
540: \bibitem{Krakauer:1991rf}
541: D.~A.~Krakauer {\it et al.},
542: %``Experimental study of neutrino absorption on carbon,''
543: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 45}, 2450 (1992).
544: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C45,2450;%%
545:
546: %\cite{Armbruster:vd}
547: \bibitem{Armbruster:vd}
548: B.~Armbruster {\it et al.} [KARMEN Collaboration],
549: %``Neutrino Interactions With Carbon,''
550: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 38}, 198 (1995).
551: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,38,198;%%
552:
553: %\cite{Berge:1989hr}
554: \bibitem{Berge:1989hr}
555: J.~P.~Berge {\it et al.},
556: %``A Measurement Of Differential Cross-Sections And Nucleon Structure
557: %Functions In Charged Current Neutrino Interactions On Iron,''
558: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 49}, 187 (1991).
559: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C49,187;%%
560:
561: %\cite{Zucchelli:sa}
562: \bibitem{Zucchelli:sa}
563: P.~Zucchelli,
564: %``A Novel Concept For A Anti-Nu/E / Nu/E Neutrino Factory: The Beta Beam,''
565: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 532}, 166 (2002).
566: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B532,166;%%
567:
568: %\cite{Lindroos:2003kp}
569: \bibitem{Lindroos:2003kp}
570: M.~Lindroos and t.~b.~Group,
571: %``The acceleration and storage of radioactive ions for a beta-beam facility,''
572: arXiv:physics/0312042.
573: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 0312042;%%
574:
575: %\cite{Bouchez:2003fy}
576: \bibitem{Bouchez:2003fy}
577: J.~Bouchez, M.~Lindroos and M.~Mezzetto,
578: %``Beta beams: Present design and expected performances,''
579: arXiv:hep-ex/0310059.
580: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0310059;%%
581:
582: %\cite{Mezzetto:2003ub}
583: \bibitem{Mezzetto:2003ub}
584: M.~Mezzetto,
585: %``Physics reach of the beta beam,''
586: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29}, 1771 (2003)
587: [arXiv:hep-ex/0302007].
588: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0302007;%%
589:
590: %\cite{Volpe:2003fi}
591: \bibitem{Volpe:2003fi}
592: C.~Volpe,
593: %``What about a beta beam facility for low energy neutrinos?,''
594: arXiv:hep-ph/0303222.
595: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303222;%%
596:
597: %\cite{McLaughlin:2003yg}
598: \bibitem{McLaughlin:2003yg}
599: G.~C.~McLaughlin and C.~Volpe,
600: %``Prospects for detecting a neutrino magnetic moment with a tritium
601: %source and beta beams,''
602: arXiv:hep-ph/0312156.
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312156;%%
604:
605: \bibitem{newvolpe}
606: J. Serreau and C. Volpe, hep-ph/0403293.
607:
608: %\cite{Fuller:1998kb}
609: \bibitem{Fuller:1998kb}
610: G.~M.~Fuller, W.~C.~Haxton and G.~C.~McLaughlin,
611: %``Prospects for detecting supernova neutrino flavor oscillations,''
612: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 085005 (1999)
613: [arXiv:astro-ph/9809164].
614: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9809164;%%
615:
616: %\cite{Kolbe:2000np}
617: \bibitem{Kolbe:2000np}
618: E.~Kolbe and K.~Langanke,
619: %``The role of nu induced reactions on lead and iron in neutrino detectors,''
620: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63}, 025802 (2001)
621: [arXiv:nucl-th/0003060].
622: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0003060;%%
623:
624: %\cite{Volpe:2001gy}
625: \bibitem{Volpe:2001gy}
626: C.~Volpe, N.~Auerbach, G.~Colo and N.~Van Giai,
627: %``Charged-current neutrino Pb-208 reactions,''
628: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 044603 (2002)
629: [arXiv:nucl-th/0103039].
630: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0103039;%%
631:
632: %\cite{Engel:2002hg}
633: \bibitem{Engel:2002hg}
634: J.~Engel, G.~C.~McLaughlin and C.~Volpe,
635: %``What can be learned with a lead-based supernova-neutrino detector?,''
636: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 013005 (2003)
637: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209267].
638: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209267;%%
639:
640: %\cite{Jachowicz:2003iz}
641: \bibitem{Jachowicz:2003iz}
642: N.~Jachowicz and K.~Heyde,
643: %``Influence of supernova neutrino spectra on the neutrino signal in a
644: %terrestrial detector,''
645: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68}, 055502 (2003).
646: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C68,055502;%%
647:
648: \bibitem{omnis} D.B.\ Cline {\it et al.} Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D50}, 720 (1994);
649: P.F.\ Smith, Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 8}, 27 (1997),
650: J. J. Zach et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A484, 194 (2002).
651:
652: \bibitem{land} C.K.\ Hargrove {\it et al} Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 5}, 183
653: (1996).
654:
655: \bibitem{pn} D. J. Horen {\it et al} Phys.Letl. {\bf 95B}, 27 (1981),
656: C. Gaarde {\it et al} Nucl. Phys. {\bf A369}, 258 (1981)
657:
658: %beta beams,''
659: arXiv:hep-ph/0312156.
660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312156;%%
661:
662: \bibitem{cernweb}
663: http://beta-beam.web.cern.ch/beta-beam/.
664:
665: \end{references}
666:
667: \begin{table}[h]
668: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline
669: & ~~ total ~~ & ~~ one neutron ~~ & ~~ two neutrons ~~ \\
670: \hline
671: pion source & & & \\
672: \hline
673: $\langle \sigma \rangle \, (10^{-40} {\rm cm}^2$) & 41 & 23 & 13 \\
674: $\langle {\rm E} \rangle$ (MeV) & 21 & 21 & 18 \\
675: Events (day$^{-1}$) & 180 & 120 & 66 \\
676: \hline
677: Beta Beam $\gamma=5$ & & &\\
678: \hline
679: $\langle \sigma \rangle \, (10^{-40} {\rm cm}^2$) & 8.5 & 6.7 & 0.4 \\
680: $ \langle E \rangle$ (MeV) & 11 & 10 & 7.1 \\
681: Events (day$^{-1}$) & 1.1 & 0.8 & 0.05 \\
682: \hline
683: Beta Beam $\gamma=10$ & & &\\
684: \hline
685: $\langle \sigma \rangle \, (10^{-40} {\rm cm}^2$) & 52 & 26 & 21 \\
686: $ \langle E \rangle$ (MeV) & 25 & 25 & 23 \\
687: Events (day$^{-1}$) & 26 & 13 & 10 \\
688: \hline
689: Beta Beam $\gamma=15$ & & &\\
690: \hline
691: $\langle \sigma \rangle \, (10^{-40} {\rm cm}^2$) & 110 & 41 & 61 \\
692: $ \langle E \rangle$ (MeV) & 40 & 41 & 38 \\
693: Events (day$^{-1}$) & 95 & 34 & 53\\
694: \hline
695: \end{tabular}
696: \caption{For various electron neutrino sources, this table
697: shows for $^{208}{\rm Pb}$ the flux averaged charged current cross sections,
698: the average energy of the electrons, and compares numbers
699: of events per day in the detector. The event rates are for 100\% efficiency,
700: a detector with a 4m$^2$ cross sectional area, and a straight section of
701: beta beam track of 90m that ends 10m from the detector. Also assumed
702: are that there are $10^{13}$
703: decays per second in the ring, and that 90m takes up 10\% of the track.
704: Some electrons will
705: be produced in coincidence with one or two neutrons and these
706: numbers are also shown.\label{tab}}
707:
708: \end{table}
709:
710: \end{document}
711: